1 1 price and welfare effects of emission quota allocation knut einar rosendahl statistics norway...
TRANSCRIPT
1
1
Price and welfare effects of Price and welfare effects of
emission quota allocationemission quota allocation
Knut Einar Rosendahl
Statistics Norway
Presentation at North American IAEE Conference, Washington DC
October 2011
Based on paper with
Rolf Golombek and Sverre Kittelsen (Frisch Centre)
2
Introduction
• Allocation of free allowances important element of existing
and proposed cap-and-trade (CAT) systems– EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS)
– U.S. CAT: National SO2 and proposed CO2; regional CO2 and NOx
• Different ways of allocating free allowances– Unconditional grandfathering (lump sum) – rarely used
– Conditional grandfathering – much used in EU ETS so far
– Output-based allocation – main rule in EU ETS from 2013
– Capacity-based allocation – used for new entrants in EU ETS
3
• Previous literature on allocation of free allowances:
– Choice of allocation mechanism can affect prices and quantities Welfare/cost effects
– Theoretical studies: Böhringer and Lange (SJE, 2005; EER, 2005); Fischer and Fox (LE,
2007; Ellerman (EJ, 2008); Rosendahl (JEEM, 2008)
– Allocation of free allowances can influence the electricity market –
for a given cap on emissions
– Numerical studies: Neuhoff et al. (CP, 2006); Burtraw et al. (El.J, 2006)
4
Research question
• How may various allocation mechanisms play out in the
electricity market?– Use the European market as our context
– Detailed numerical partial equilibrium model for Western Europe
– More in-depth numerical analysis than previous (European) studies
• Main focus:– Comparing output-based allocation (OBA) with unconditional
grandfathering (GF) (= auctioning in PE model)
5
Analytical part
• Compare OBA with GF, showing:– Emissions price is higher with OBA than with GF
– OBA favors more efficient firms and less emission-intensive firms
• Intuition:– OBA is an implicit subsidy of output
– Hence: OBA tends to increase output and thus emissions
– Price of emissions must increase to comply with the target
– Higher emissions price is bad news for emission-intensive firms
6
Numerical model: LIBEMOD
• Numerical partial equilibrium model of the Western European energy market
– Static model: Do not consider updating of base year for allocation
• The electricity market interacts with the markets of other energy goods
• Electricity production and transmission between countries, including investments in new capacity, are modeled
– A number of different power technologies
• Electricity consumption is determined by the price of electricity and other energy carriers.
7
Policy scenarios
• Emission trading market for the electricity sector
• CO2 taxes for other energy use
• Two main alternatives in the paper1. Identical CO2-price across countries and sectors
– Focus of this presentation
2. Total CO2-emissions in the electricity sector is fixed (see paper)
• Four allocation mechanisms1. Unconditional grandfathering (= auctioning)
2. Conditional grandfathering (require maintenance of capacity)
3. Output-based allocation (proportional to production)
4. Capacity-based allocation (proportional to maintained capacity)
• Relevance: Mix of allocation mechanisms in EU ETS
8
Numerical results: Prices
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Base Case A1 A2 A3 A4
Electricity (€2010/MWh) CO2-price (€2010/tonne)
OBA leads to:
• Substantially higher emissions price
• Much smaller increase in electricity price
9
Numerical results: Output (TWh per year)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Coa
l
Gas O
il
Nuc
lear
Hyd
ro
Oth
erre
new
.
Coa
l
Gas O
il
Nuc
lear
Hyd
ro
Oth
erre
new
.
Existing plants New plants
Base Case A1 A2 A3 A4
Choice of
allocation
mechanism
have
substantial
impacts on
market
shares
• More gas
power with
OBA
10
Numerical results: Capacity (GW)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Coal Gas Oil Nuclear Hydro Other renew.
Scenario
Choice of
allocation
mechanism
have
substantial
impacts on
capacities0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Coa
l
Gas O
il
Nuc
lear
Hyd
ro
Oth
erre
new
.
Coa
l
Gas O
il
Nuc
lear
Hyd
ro
Oth
erre
new
.
Existing plants New plants
Base Case A1 A2 A3 A4
11
Numerical results: Welfare (Billion Euro)
OBA is most
costly, also
for power
producers
jointly
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
A1 A2 A3 A4
Power producers Consumers, government and other producers Total
12
Conclusions
• Choice of allocation mechanism may have substantial
influence on the electricity market– Electricity price and market shares
• Costs of reaching an emissions target may increase
significantly if output-based allocation is chosen– Gas producers will benefit and expand production
– Consumers face lower electricity price but higher CO2-price
– Producers of renewable power stand to lose
13
Thank you for the attention!
Link to paper:http://tinyurl.com/allocation2011