1. 2 antibiotic resistance occurs when an antibiotic has lost its ability to effectively control or...
TRANSCRIPT
2
Antibiotic resistance occurs when an antibiotic has lost its ability to effectively control or kill bacterial growth; in other words, the bacteria are "resistant" and continue to multiply in the presence of therapeutic levels of an antibiotic.
3
When antibiotics are used to kill the bacterial microorganisms, a few microorganisms are able to still survive, because microbes are always mutating, eventually leading to a mutation protecting itself against the antibiotic
4
Antibiotics that are used correctly overwhelm the harmful bacteria
Overuse of antibiotics or unnecessary use creates a selective environment
Resistant bacteria has better fitness in this context
Resistant strains survive and multiply. After reproducing, the resistant bacteria move to
another host.
5
Bacteria do exchange genes forming new combinations
Bacteria exchange genes is by conjugation This involves the transfer of genetic material via
a cytoplasmic bridge between the two organisms This can be done between unrelated species of
bacteria Recent studies on bacteria in the wild show that
it definitely occurs in the soil, in freshwater and oceans and inside living organisms
6
Antibiotics revolutionised medicine The first antibiotic, penicillin, was discovered by
Alexander Fleming in 1929 It was later isolated by Florey and Chain It was not extensively used until the 2nd World
War when it was used to treat war wounds After 2nd World War many more antibiotics were
developed Today about 150 types are used Most are inhibitors of the protein synthesis,
blocking the 70S ribosome, which is characteristic of prokaryotes
7
It took less than 20 years for, bacteria to show signs of resistance
Staphylococcus aureus, which causes blood poisoning and pneumonia, started to show resistance in the 1950s
Today there are different strains of S. aureus resistant to every form of antibiotic in use
8
It seems that some resistance was already naturally present in bacterial populations
The presence of antibiotics in their environment in higher concentrations increased the pressure by natural selection
Resistant bacteria that survived, rapidly multiplied
They passed their resistant genes on to other bacteria (both disease causing pathogens and non-pathogens)
9
Resistance genes are often associated with transposons, genes that easily move from one bacterium to another
Many bacteria also possess integrons, pieces of DNA that accumulate new genes
Gradually a strain of a bacterium can build up a whole range of resistance genes
This is multiple resistance These may then be passed on in a group
to other strains or other species
10
If a patient taking a course of antibiotic treatment does not complete it
Or forgets to take the doses regularly, Then resistant strains get a chance to build up The antibiotics also kill innocent bystanders
bacteria which are non-pathogens This reduces the competition for the resistant
pathogens The use of antibiotics also promotes antibiotic
resistance in non-pathogens too These non-pathogens may later pass their
resistance genes on to pathogens
12
MRSA MBL
VISA
VRSA
PRP
ESBL
VRE
1961 1967 1983 1986 1988 1996 2002
All -lactams
Penicillin
3rd gen cephalosporin
Carbapenem
Vancomycin Vancomycin
and teicoplanin Vancomycin
and teicoplanin
Emergence → Spread
13
Bacteria can gain resistance over time through:
•Acquired resistance
•Vertical gene transfer
•Horizontal gene transfer
14
Spontaneous mutations in endogenous genes Structural genes: expanded spectrum of enzymatic
activity, target-site modification, transport defect Regulatory genes: increased expression
Acquisition of exogenous genes Usually genes that encode inactivating enzymes or
modified targets, regulatory genes Mechanisms of DNA transfer: conjugation (cell–cell
contact); transformation (uptake of DNA in solution); transduction (transfer of DNA in bacteriophages)
Expression of resistance genes Reversible induction/repression systems can affect
resistance phenotypes
18
Antibiotics exert selective pressure that favours emergence of resistant organisms
Bacteria employ several biochemical strategies to become resistant
19
AntibioticAntibiotic Mechanism of actionMechanism of actionMajor resistance mechanismsMajor resistance mechanisms
ββ-Lactams-Lactams Inactivate PBPs Inactivate PBPs (peptidoglycan synthesis)(peptidoglycan synthesis)
• ββ-lactamases-lactamases• Low affinity PBPsLow affinity PBPs• Efflux pumpsEfflux pumps
GlycopeptidesGlycopeptides Bind to precursor of Bind to precursor of peptidoglycanpeptidoglycan
• Modification of precursorModification of precursor
AminoglycosidesAminoglycosides Inhibit protein synthesis Inhibit protein synthesis (bind to 30S subunit)(bind to 30S subunit)
• Modifying enzymes (add Modifying enzymes (add adenyl or Phosphate)adenyl or Phosphate)
MacrolidesMacrolides Inhibit protein synthesis Inhibit protein synthesis (bind to 50S subunit)(bind to 50S subunit)
• Methylation of rRNAMethylation of rRNA• Efflux pumpsEfflux pumps
(Fluoro)Quinolones(Fluoro)Quinolones Inhibit topoisomerases Inhibit topoisomerases (DNA synthesis)(DNA synthesis)
• Altered target enzymeAltered target enzyme• Efflux pumpsEfflux pumps
PBPs penicillin-binding proteins
20
Penicillins Narrow-spectrum penicillins Broad-spectrum penicillins β-lactamase inhibitor combinations Oxacillin derivatives
Cephalosporins (ATC/WHO 2005 classification) 1st generation: Gram-positive cocci
(GPCs), some Gram-negative bacilli (GNBs) 2nd generation: some GNBs, anaerobes 3rd generation: many GNBs, GPCs 4th generation: many GNBs resistant to
3rd generation, GPCs
22
Structure of peptidoglycan
|L-Ala |D-Glu |L-diA |D-Ala |D-Ala
NAG-NAM-NAG-NAM
-(AA)n-NH2
|L-Ala |D-Glu |L-diA |D-Ala |D-Ala
NAG-NAM-NAG-NAM
-(AA)n-NH2
Cytoplasm
Transpeptidation reaction
23
Penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) Membrane-bound enzymes Catalyse final steps of peptidoglycan
synthesis (transglycosylation and transpeptidation)
-lactams Act on PBPs, inhibit transpeptidation Substrate analogues of D-Ala-D-Ala
25
Gram-negative -lactamases Major resistance mechanism in nosocomial GNB
pathogens >470 -lactamases known to date Classified into 4 groups based on sequence similarity
▪ Ambler Class A (TEM, SHV, CTX), C and D (OXA) are serine -lactamases
▪ Ambler Class B are metallo--lactamases Their spread has been greatly exacerbated by their
integration within mobile genetic elements Integron-borne -lactamase genes are part of multi drug
resistance gene cassettes
Multidrug-resistant nosocomial pathogens with complex resistance patterns
Selection of potent -lactamases through use of non--lactam agents
26
Active site
Nucleotide sequence
Four evolutionarily distinct molecular classes
A C D
Serine-enzymes
B
Zinc-enzymes
β-lactamases
27
Functional Substrate profile Group
Molecular Class
Inhibitor
Example
1 Cephalosporinase C Oxa AmpC, MIR-1
2a Penicillinase A Clav. S.aureus
2b Broad spectrum A Clav. TEM-1/2, SHV-1
2be Extended spectrum A Clav. TEM 3-29, TEM46-104 SHV2-28, CTX-M types
2br Inhibition resistant A - TEM 30-41 (IRT1-12)
2c Carbenicillinase A Clav. PSE-1
2d Oxacillinase D (Clav.) OXA-1 (OXA-2 &-10 derived ESBL)
2e Cephalosporinase A Clav. FPM-1 P. vulgaris, CepA B. fragilis.
2f Carbapenemase A Clav. IMI-1, NmcA, Sme 1-3
3 Metallo-enzyme B - S.maltophilia
4 Penicillinase - - B.cepacia
28
Serine enzymes Metallo (Zn) enzymes
Group C Group A Group D Group B
AmpC TEM/SHV OXA IMP/VIM
Cephs Pens, Cephs Pens, esp Oxa CarbapenemsInhib-R Inhib-S Inhib-R/S Inhib-R
Bush. Rev Inf Dis 1987;10:681; Bush et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:12; Bush. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2002;3:1284
29
Inducible: Enterobacter spp.Citrobacter spp.Morganella spp.Providencia spp.Serratia spp.P. aeruginosa
Basal : E. coliShigella spp.
-lactam concentration
Amountenzymeper cell
Absent : Salmonella spp.Klebsiella spp.
30
Population of inducible organisms
Derepressed cell due to ampD mutation (Enterobacter : 1 of 105 !)
Selection of derepressed cell
Multiplication and spread of derepressed clone
Ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, piperacillin, etc.:
31
Produced constitutively in tiny concentrations by certain GNB
Induction of production: Can occur by the exposure to certain antibiotics (eg,
carbapenems) Only in vitro phenomenon; not clinically relevant (stops
when antibiotic use is discontinued; carbapenems not affected by these enzymes)
Selection of production: Can occur by the use of certain antibiotics (eg,
ceftazidime) Also in vivo phenomenon; highly clinically relevant (does
not stop when antibiotic use is discontinued; leads to selection and spread of ABR clones)
Therapeutic options: 4th generation cephalosporins (but resistance may occur
with minor AA changes) Carbapenems
32
Chromosomal AmpC -lactamases Several Enterobacteriaceae, including Enterobacter,
Citrobacter, and Serratia contain an inducible, chromosomal gene coding for a -lactamase
Resistant to cephalosporins and monobactams; not inhibited by clavulanate; Class C -lactamases
Plasmid-mediated AmpC -lactamases Arose through transfer of AmpC chromosomal genes into
plasmids Not inducible, with substrate profile (usually) same as
parental enzyme Highly prevalent in the naturally AmpC-deficient K.
pneumoniae Emergence predominantly in community-acquired infections
(Salmonella spp., E. coli) Co-resistance to aminoglycosides, SXT, quinolones Wide dissemination worldwide (SE Asia, N Africa, South
Europe, USA)
33
Enzyme Host Country Year isolatedMIR-1 K. pneumoniae US 1988ACT-1 K. pneumoniae US 1994
E. coliBIL-1 E. coli UK 1989CMY-2 K. pneumoniae Greece 1990
S. senftenberg France 1994Salmonella US 1996E. coli Libya 1996Salmonella Spain 1999Salmonella Romania 2000
LAT-1 K. pneumoniae Greece 1993LAT-2 K. pneumoniae, Greece 1994
E. coli, E. aerogenesCMY-3 P. mirabilis France 1998CMY-4 P. mirabilis Tunisia 1996
E. coli UK 1999K. pneumoniae Sweden 1998
CMY-5 K. oxytoca Sweden 1988CMY-7 E. coli India
34
Enzyme Host Country Year isolatedDHA-1 Salm. enteritidis Saudi Arabia 1992
K. pneumoniae Taiwan 1999 US 1996-2000
DHA-2 K. pneumoniae France 1992ACC-1 K. pneumoniae Germany 1997
K. pneumoniae France 1998P. mirabilis Tunisia 1997K. pneumoniae Tunisia 1999Salm. livingstone Tunisia 2000
35
Enzyme Host Country Year isolatedFOX-1 K. pneumoniae Argentina 1989FOX-2 E. coli Germany 1993FOX-3 K. oxytoca, Italy 1994
K. pneumoniaeFOX-4 E. coli Canaries 1998FOX-5 K. pneumoniae US 1999CMY-1 K. pneumoniae Korea 1989CMY-8 K. pneumoniae Taiwan 1998CMY-9 E. coli Japan 1995CMY-10 E. aerogenes Korea 1999CMY-11 E. coli Korea 1998MOX-1 K. pneumoniae Japan 1991MOX-2 K. pneumoniae France 1999
36
Extended-spectrum -lactamases (ESBL) No consensus of the precise definition of ESBLs In general: β-lactamases conferring resistance
to the penicillins, 1st , 2nd, 3rd, and even 4th generation cephalosporins, and monobactams, not to carbapenems and cephamycins
Inhibited by -lactamase inhibitor clavulanic acid Derived from Class A -lactamases (exceptions
are Class D, OXA): TEM, SHV, CTX-M, OXA, VEB, PER,...
Differ from their progenitors by 1–5 amino acids Marked and unexplained predilection for
Klebsiella pneumoniae Therapeutic options: carbapenems
37
June 1964: ampicillin released in Europe
December 1964; the first case of ampicillin- resistant E. coli detected
Mrs Temoneira (Athens, Greece): Urinary isolate of E. coli Produced -lactamase (TEM-1) Genes encoding the -lactamase found
on a plasmid
38
SHV-1 enzyme: -lactamase with a narrow spectrum of activity (ampicillin)
Chromosomally encoded If produced in high amounts:
May result in resistance to cefazolin and piperacillin
May even overcome β-lactamase inhibitors (clavulanic acid or tazobactam)
39
Third generation cephalosporins: Developed in response to proliferation of K.
pneumoniae and E. coli producing -lactamases active against ampicillin and first generation cephalosporins
Introduced in Europe in the early 1980s Emergence of extended-spectrum -lactamases:
Cefotaxime marketed in Germany in September 1981 Cefotaxime-resistant Klebsiella isolate detected in
Frankfurt in March 1982 (mutant of the gene encoding SHV-1)
40
MIC (g/mL) ceftazidime
102 162TEM-1 0.25
glutamine arginine
TEM-122.0
glutamine serineTEM-26
128lysine serine
41
Emergence of transferable ESBL enzymes (Class A, B or D) in non-fermenters (P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp.)
ESBL types often different (PER-1, VEB-1, OXA,…) from Enterobacteriaceae
Multiple resistance mechanisms co-expressed (chromosomal AmpC -lactamase, impermeability, efflux)
Non-fermenters should not be tested routinely for ESBLs P. aeruginosa: «False-negative» (most ESBLs not inhibited by
clavulanate) Acinetobacter spp.: «False-positive» DD with clavulanate
(intrinsic activity of -lactam inhibitors) S. maltophilia: «False-positive» DD with clavulanate (inhibition
of L2 chromosomal enzyme)
43
Routine tests are not designed for ESBL detection
Low level ESBL expression will not be detected by current tests using low inoculum
MIC values and zone sizes of ESBL producers overlap those of susceptible non-ESBL producers
ESBL double disk test may be inaccurate if positioning is suboptimal
ESBL breakpoint methods are limited since MICs for different strains can range over 7 dilutions
44
Carbapenemases Defined as -lactamases, hydrolyzing at
least imipenem or/and meropenem or/and ertapenem
Belong to Ambler Class A, B, and D, of which Class B are the most clinically significant:▪ Class A: KPC, SME & NMC/IMI ▪ Class B: IMP, VIM & SPM metallo -lactamases ▪ Class D: OXA-23, -40 & -58 related
45
Hydrolyzing virtually all -lactamsMediate broad spectrum -lactam
resistanceNo clinical inhibitor availablePresent on large plasmids and
integronsGenes are continuously spreadingAssociated (80%) with
aminoglycoside resistance Still rare but increasing, especially in non-fermenters
46
ORF1 aacC4 aacC1
blaIMP
blaVIM
Class I integron
5'cs 3'cs
Nosocomial outbreak of carbapenem-resistant P.aeruginosa and A. baumanii reported in Canada and France, respectively
Cross-resistance to other beta-lactams and to other AB classes
Link with aminoglycoside use, not necessarily carbapenems!
47
Enzyme Host Country (Year)IMP-1 S. marcescens Japan (>91)
P. aeruginosa Japan A. xylosoxydans JapanP. putida JapanC. freundii JapanK. pneumoniae Japan,
Singapore (99)A. baumannii JapanP. stutzeri, TaiwanP. putida A. junii UK (00)
IMP-2 A. baumannii ItalyItaly (97)IMP-3 S. flexneri Japan (96)IMP-4 Acinetobacter Hong Kong (>94)
C. youngae China (98)IMP-5 A. baumannii Portugal (98)IMP-6 S. marcescens Japan (96)IMP-7 P. aeruginosa Canada (95)
Malaysia (99)IMP-8 K. pneumoniae Taiwan (98)IMP-9 P. aeruginosa China (?)IMP-10 A. xylosoxydans Japan (00)
P. aeruginosa Japan (97)
Enzyme Host Country (Year)VIM-1 P.aeruginosa Italy (1997)
A. baumannii Italy (1997)P.aeruginosa Greece (1996)E. coli Greece (2001)A. xylosoxydans Italy (1997)
VIM-2 P. aeruginosa FranceFrance (1996)P. aeruginosa Greece (1996)P. aeruginosa Italy (1998)S. marcescens Korea (2000)A. baumannii Korea (1998)P. aeruginosa Belgium (2004/5)P.putida stutzeri Taiwan (>1997)
VIM-3 P. aeruginosa Taiwan (>1997)VIM-4 P. aeruginosa Greece (2001)
SPM-1 P. aeruginosa Brazil (1997)
GIM-1 P. aeruginosa Germany (2003)
48
Class D enzymes OXA-23, -24, -25, -26, -27, -28, -40, -49,
-58, …. Highly mobile (integron, plasmid) Found in South America, South-East
Asia, Europe (Greece, Spain, Portugal, France, Belgium)
Multi-drug resistance (penicillins and 3rd & 4th generation cephalosporins, BL/BL-inhibitors, aminoglycosides, SXT,…)
Variable resistance levels to imipenem and meropenem (4–>256 g/mL)