1 human resource management recruitment & selection lecture tessa owens module leader

23
1 Human Resource Management Recruitment & Selection Lecture Tessa Owens Module Leader

Upload: gary-iley

Post on 15-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Human Resource Management

Recruitment & Selection Lecture

Tessa Owens

Module Leader

2

HRMLearning Outcomes1. To be able to produce job descriptions and

specifications and distinguish between them. Understand the importance of effective

Recruitment and Selection Analyse some of the methods used in this field in

the UK and elsewhere Identify the requirements of an interview, typical

interviewer errors and how to avoid them Examine the need for feedback and evaluation of

this process

3

Job Description

This is a written description of the job containing the title, reporting relationships,

purpose and main tasks and duties

4

Purposes of Job Descriptions

1. to assist in the evaluation of the job

2. to illustrate the job and its many duties as a training tool for new incumbents

3. to be used to determine appraisal criteria

4. to be the basis of the contract of employment

5. to provide the information required to produce person specifications

5

Job Specifications

A job (or person, or personnel) specification sets out the education, qualifications, training,

experience, personal attributes and competences a job holder requires to perform

the job satisfactorily.

Within this some requirements may be described as essential/desirable/ or ‘contra’

6

Models of Job Specifications See Rodger (1952) Seven Point Plan

Physical make-up Attainments General intelligence Special aptitudes Interests Disposition Circumstances

Munro-Fraser (1954) Five fold grading system. Impact on others Acquired qualifications Innate abilities Motivation Adjustment

7

Shortlisting An assessment matrix Categorise candidates as probable,

possible or unsuitable, by comparing c.v against pre determined criteria. An assessment matrix can aid objectivity.

Qualifications Experience Evidence of leadership ability

Evidence of reliability

Candidate 1

8/10 2/10 0/10 4/10

Candidate 2

4/10 9/10 7/10 7/10

Candidate 3

8/10 8/10 7/10 10/10

8

Subjective?

Watson (1994) believed that the use of person specification frameworks may provide a

“cloak for improper discrimination” (p.189)

Why might this be true?

9

Selection Methods

Many methods of selection exist: Application forms / C.Vs Initial telephone interviews (CIPD 2001, cited

Beardwell et al 2004) One-to-one interviews Panel interviews Psychometric tests Assessment Centres Testing ‘In tray’ exercise Presentation Trial Project

10

Activity

What are the strengths and weaknesses of the selection methods used?

11

Making the ‘right’ choice

The cost of the selection process itself, including the use of various selection instruments

The future cost of inducting and training staff The cost of turnover if the selected staff are

not retained.

12

Reliable &Valid Selection?

Reliability and Validity are 2 statistical concepts which are important in selection

Reliability – refers to the extent to which a selection technique achieves consistency in what it is measuring over repeated use, e.g. what matters is how an individual is being measured not by who.

Validity – refers to the extent to which a selection technique actually measures what it sets out to measure. For example where the selection methods adopted have been used before, did the organisation get ‘the right’ employees?

13

The trouble with interviews

Research suggests that traditional interviews don’t appear to be reliable or valid!

‘Pre-selection’ can take place where implicit discrimination is formed (on the grounds of gender, race, educational qualifications etc)

First impressions – and early decisions, which the interviewer may then look to support with their questioning.

Stereotyping – interviewers with little skill can quickly label individuals

14

Trouble with interviews 2

‘The contrast effect’ – interviewers are influenced by the order in which applicants are interviewed. An ‘average’ candidate following a ‘poor’ candidate can appear to be better than they are. Interviewers may compare applicants against each other rather than objective criteria.

Attraction – interviewers may be biased towards applicants they ‘like’.

15

International Selection Methods

% use of popular selection methods1. Interviews still most popular – from 97%

(France) to 84% (Israel)2. References and Recommendations – from

74% (UK) to 23% (Germany)

Others include: Graphology (France 52%, Netherlands 24%) Astrology (France 6%, Israel 1%)

16

Activity – Common interviewer errors

What do you think are the common interviewer errors which occur?

What would you do to overcome them?

17

Poor Interviewer Skills

Not having a structure Welcome, introductions, description of process,

questions, follow-up questions, discussion, summary, what happens next……………..etc!

Asking multiple, leading, embarrassing, provocative questions

Poor listening skills – this is as important as questioning skill!

Interviewer may have poor recall of information discussed, or may have difficulty interpreting what they were told and what that means for whether the applicant can do the job on offer. So make notes!

and/or use a Scoring System to help make more objective evaluations.

18

Training for interviewers

Will typically include

1. Questioning techniques

2. Understanding of Equal Opportunities legislation. You should research (see Learnwise for resources): Sex and Race discrimination Disability discrimination Age discrimination Employment of people with criminal records Human Rights Act 1998, e.g. questioning someone

on what they do in their leisure time could infringe their right to privacy.

19

Questioning Techniques

Closed Questions Leading Questions Open Questions Probing questions Two types of questions have been shown to

improve the validity and reliability of interviews: Situational questions Patterned behaviour description questions

20

Reliable & Valid Questions

Arvey and Champion (1982) found that panel interviews were more reliable and valid when conducted by a panel and based on job analysis and information.

Latham et al (1980) found situational interviews reliable and valid where interview questions are derived from systematic job analysis based on a critical incident technique, i.e. what an applicant would do in a variety of situations.

21

Reliable &Valid Questions 2

Pulakos and Schmitt (1995) compared situational questioning against experience-based or behavioural questions.

They found behavioural questions to be more predicatively valid as the behavioural question is asking

“What have you done in a similar situation?” compared to

“What would you do in the situation?”

22

Evaluation

Once the recruitment and selection event is complete an evaluation should be conducted.

Unless this evaluation occurs then the organisation will not fully understand whether the methods they are currently using to select someone for employment are worthwhile and whether these methods are getting them the sort of people they need for their organisation’s long term health and sustainability.

23

BibliographyArmstrong, M (1999) A handbook of Human Resource Management Practice 7th edition, Kogan

PageArvey, R D & Champion, J E (1982) The employment interview: a summary of recent research.

Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.Beardwell, I & Holden, L, Clayton, T (2004) Human Resource Management 4th edition, Pitman

PublishingBratton, J & Gold, J (2003) Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice 3rd Edition,

Palgrave.Carling, C (1995) How to run a Voluntary Group How to books, PlymouthCarter, S & Jones, D (2000) Enterprise and Small Business Principles Practice and Policy

Financial Times , Prentice HallFoot, M & Hook, C (1999) Introducing Human Resource Management 2nd edition, LongmanHerriot, P Manning, W E G & Kidd, J M (1997) The content of the psychological contract. British

Journal of Management, 8(2):151-62Legge, K (1995) Human Resource Management. Rhetorics and Realities Macmillan BusinessPulakos, E D & Schmitt, N (1995) Experience- based and situational questions: studies of validity.

Personnel Psychology, 48, 289-309.Scott, M et al (1989) Management and Industrial Relations in small firms Research Paper No. 70,

London: Dept of EmploymentSparrow, P & Hiltrop, J M (1994) European Human Resource Management in Transition. New

York: Prentice HallTorrington, D & Hall, L (1998) Human Resource Management 4th Edition, Prentice HallWatson, T (1994) Recruitment and selection. In Sisson, K (ed.), Personnel Management. Oxford:

Blackwell.