1 navigating the award kim hayes michael lenetsky

29
1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

Upload: louise-fowler

Post on 18-Jan-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

3 Types of Awards Gift, Grant or Contract –Issue is whether assistance, procurement or type of donation –Can lead you to SPS or to Development –Questions on categorizations Restricted or Unrestricted Above the Line or Below the Line

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

1

Navigating the Award

Kim Hayes

Michael Lenetsky

Page 2: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

2

Navigating the Award - Overview

• Types of Awards

• Above / Below the Line– Foundation Relations

• Non-Monetary Agreements– Non Disclosure Agreements– Material Transfer Agreements– Restricted Data Set Access Agreements

Page 3: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

3

Types of Awards

• Gift, Grant or Contract– Issue is whether assistance, procurement or type of donation– Can lead you to SPS or to Development– Questions on categorizations

• Restricted or Unrestricted• Above the Line or Below the Line

Page 4: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

4

Gifts

• In general the following criteria identifies a gift:– No contractual requirements– Award is irrevocable– No defined period of performance– No formal financial accounting required– Not from a government entity

Page 5: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

5

Gifts (continued)

• Gifts may

– Be restricted to specific person or purpose

– Request report describing use, utilization or impact of gift

Page 6: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

6

Grants and Contracts

• Important to note

– Contract is both term of art and a legal document

– Grants, Cooperative Agreements and “Contracts” are all legally binding documents that fit under the umbrella of contracts

Page 7: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

7

Grant (Assistance Action)

• Used in a relationship when:

– Accomplish a public purpose of support

– Little involvement between sponsor and recipient is anticipated

– Deliverables are minimal

Page 8: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

8

Grants (continued)

• In general the following criteria identify a grant:– Specific budget w/restrictions– Specific goals/objectives (Scope of Work)– PI responsible for completion of effort– Period of performance– Authority to withhold funds– Return of unused funds

Page 9: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

9

Grants (continued)

• Criteria of Grants (continued)– Formal financial accounting– Formal reporting on efforts, effects of work, etc.– Copies of published materials– Acknowledge of Support– Unilateral Agreements– FDP agreements are grants

Page 10: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

10

Cooperative Agreement

• Used in a relationship between the Sponsor and Recipient when:

– Need to support public purpose

– Substantial interaction between Sponsor and Recipient is anticipated

Page 11: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

11

Contracts (Procurement Action)

• Used in relationship between the Sponsor and Recipient when:

– Goal of relationship is to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the Sponsor

Page 12: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

12

Contracts (continued)

• In general the criteria for identifying a contract (procurement action are):– Formal conditions for performance and outcomes– Not unilateral agreement– Publication restrictions– Intellectual Property– Conveyance of tangible property

Page 13: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

13

Contracts (continued)

• General criteria (continued):– Conveyance of intangible property rights– Strict restrictions on financial spending– Frequent reports– Ability to stop work on short notice

Page 14: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

14

Payment Terms

• Payment terms further define Awards:– Cost Reimbursement

– Most common

Or

– Fixed Price – Needs to be closely monitored– Seldom used– Could be costly

Page 15: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

17

Above the Line/Below the Line

• Gifts and restricted grants that are accepted without indirect cost recovery factored into the budget, have an impact on the financial condition of the University overall

• Carry 10% rate instead of typical F&A rate

• Rate cannot be waived on below the line– Impacts Department/PI when Sponsor does not allow

charges

Page 16: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

18

Above/Below the Line (continued)

• To be considered Above the Line –– Award document must contain one or more of the following

requirements:• Specified deliverable (report, hardware, software, data, etc.) • Sponsor receives rights to intellectual property• Sponsor is main beneficiary of work• Sponsor has input on performance of effort

Note – Government awards are always Above the Line

Page 17: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

19

Above/Below the Line (continued)

• When Above the Line– Full F&A applied unless Sponsor policy applies.– F&A can be waived if prohibited by Sponsor in written

policy

• SPS makes determination Above or Below the Line.

• If sponsor states in Guidelines or Agreement that no overhead can be charged to this grant then the 10% will need to come from other sources

Page 18: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

20

Working with Foundation Relations

• http://www.alumni.cornell.edu/foundations/

• Priority Foundations – 1st Tier (always Foundation Relations)– 2nd Tier (SPS or Foundation Relations)– 3rd and 4th Tier (SPS with cc to Foundation Relations)

Page 19: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

21

Non-Monetary Agreements

• MTA (Material Transfer Agreements)

• NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreements)

• RDS (Restricted Data Sets)

• Referred to as non-monetary agreement because no funding is associated with it.

Page 20: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

22

Material Transfer Agreement

• The transfer of material coming into Cornell

• Some types of material are:– animals, cells, vector, plants, roots, seeds and trees

• MTA’s are contracts that cover the transfer of the property (material) from the owner of the property to the user (the researcher)

Page 21: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

23

Material Transfer Agreement

• Can be complicated Agreements to negotiate

• Can be very restrictive– In use– Who can work with the material– Ownership– Transferring– Patents– Publications– Location

Page 22: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

24

Material Transfer Agreements

• Can negotiate with same sponsor several times. A sponsor can have different agreements because of restriction on the material

• AUTM (Association of University Transfer Managers) – – UBMTA (Uniform Biological Material Transfer Agreement)

– A FREEBIE !

Page 23: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

25

Material Transfer Agreement

• Material leaving Cornell is handled through CCTEC (Cornell Center for Technology, Enterprise and Commercialization) – was CRF– Caution when transferring material that comes into Cornell

through SPS and is transferred out through CCTEC

Page 24: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

26

Material Transfer Agreement

• A MTA statement is required from the researcher

• An electronic copy of a sponsor’s MTA is very helpful

• Documentation when destroying or returning the material

Page 25: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

27

Non-Disclosure Agreement

• Contracts that covers the transfer of some intellectual property information (tangible and non-tangible) from the discloser of the information to the recipient of the information

• Also called “Confidentiality Agreement” or “Secrecy Agreement”

• Frequently complicated documents to negotiate

Page 26: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

28

Non-Disclosure Agreement

• Areas of negotiations that can be problematic -– Intellectual Property– Who can have access to the information– Publications– Length of time information needs to remaining confidential

Page 27: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

29

Non-Disclosure Agreement

• A NDA is sometimes necessary before a researcher can have a meeting with a sponsor

• SPS encourages faculty to try and use our own NDA. – No negotiation necessary

Page 28: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

30

Non-Disclosure Agreement

• A Form 10 is required

• An electronic copy of the sponsor’s DNA is very helpful

Page 29: 1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky

31

Restricted Data Sets

• Information that is coming into the University that must be strictly maintained.

• Often seen in agreements with Dept of Ed and Dept of Census.

• Protecting information usually about individuals

• CISER is approved facility for maintaining information.