1 of ecn wol - unt digital library/67531/metadc678607/... · (1) document number record of revision...

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE Of 2

2 . ECN Category (mark one)

Supplemental I1 Di rec t Revision [ X I Change ECN [I Temporary [I Standby [I Supersedure [I Cancellvoid [I

lECN 638912 ECN WOl

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

123. Mod i f i ca t i on Uork

[ ] Yes ( f i l l out Blk.

[ X I NO (NA Blks. 12b. 12b)

12c. 12d)

?. Docunent Numbers Changed by t h i s ECN ( inc ludes sheet no. and rev.)

and Telephone No.

K . E . Smith, SNF P r o j e c t , R3-86, 376-0273 5 . Project Title/No./Uork Order No. 7. Bldg.lSys./Fac. NO.

10. Related ECN No($).

12b. Uork Package NO.

5. Date

12c. Modi f icat ion Work Complete 12d. Restored t o Or ig ina l Condi- t i o n (Temp. o r Standby ECN only)

N /A N / A

02/27/97

8. Approval Designator

s> 9 11. Related PO No.

I Design AuthoritylCog. Engineer I Design AuthorityICog. Ensineer I Signature E Date I s ignature E Date

13a. Descr ip t ion of Change 13b. Design Baseline Document? [ ] Yes [XI No

F u l l s c a l e r e v i s i o n

14a. J u s t i f i c a t i o n (mark one)

C r i t e r i a Change [ X I Design Improvement [ ] Envi romenta l [ ] F a c i l i t y Deact ivat ion [ ] As-Found [ ] F a c i l i t a t e Const [ ] Const. ErrorlOmission [ ] Design Error lomiss ion [ ] 14b. J u s t i f i c a t i o n De ta i l s

Schedule da tes r e v i s e d t o r e f l e c t a d d i t i o n a l d u r a t i o n o f Phase 2 des ign a c t i v i t i e s

15. D i s t r i b u t i o n ( inc lude name, MSIN, and no. of copies) . 'RELEACr3A7AIMb ---- -7 (?- See D i s t r i b u t i o n Sheet

I. ~ . A-7900-013-2 (05/96) GEF095

a-7900.01 3-1

1. ECN (use no. from pg. 1 ) ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE

of 2 638912 16. Design 17. Cost Impact 18. Schedule Impact (days)

ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION V e r i f i c a t i o n R equ i red

[ I [ I

Improvement

Delay [ I $ [ I $

Add i t iona l [ I $ Add i t iona l

Savings [I yes

[ X I No savings

19. Change Impact Revieu: Ind icate the re la ted documents (other than the engineering documents i d e n t i f i e d on Side 1 ) [ I $

that w i l l be a f fec ted bv the chanqe described i n Block 13. Enter the a f fec ted document number i n Block 20. SDDIDD

Functional Design Criteria

Operating Specification

Criticality Specification

Conceptual Design Report

Equipment Spec

const spec

Procurement Spec

Vendor Information

OM Manual

FSARISAR

Safety Equipment List

Radiation Work Permit

Environmental Impact Statement

Environmental Repont

Environmental Permit

SeiamiciStress Analysis

StressiDesign Repolf

Interface Control Drawing

Calibration Procedure

Installation Procedure

Maintenance Procedure

Engineering Procedure

Operating Instruction

Operating Procedure

Operational Safety Requirement

IEFD Drawing

Cell Arrangement Drawing

Essential Material Specification

Fac Prac Samp Schedule

Inspectlo" Plan

Inventory Adjustment Request

Tank Calibration Manual

Health Physics Procedure

Spares Multiple Unit Listing

Test Piocedura.iSpecific,t,~"

Component Index

ASME Coded Rem

Human Factor Consideration

Computer S o h a r e

Electric Circuit Schedule

ICRS Procedure

Process Control ManuallPlan

Process Flow Chart

Purchase Requiemon

Tickler File

[ I [I 20. Other A f fec ted Documents: (NOTE: Documents L is ted below w i l l not be revised by t h i s ECN.) Signatures below

ind icate that the s ign ing organization has been n o t i f i e d of other a f fec ted documents L is ted belou. Docment Number/Revision Docunent NunberIRevision Document Nuber Revision

21. Approvals

Signatur Design Author i ty LH Galdmann?=&-

Cog. Eng. KE Smith gk& Cog. Mgr. RW Rasmussen

OA J I D ieh l 'w +& Safety DW Mc&ly &&wHcy& Envi ron.

Other

R3-86

R3-86

~ 3 - a 6

X3-80

GI - I2

Signature Design Agent

PE

QA

Safety

Design

Envi ron.

Other

Date

DEPARTMENT DF ENERGY

Signature or a Control Nmber that tracks the Approval Signature

ADDITIONAL

A-7900-013-3 (05/96) GEF096

3 HNF-SD-SNF-SOW-001, Rev. 2

Statement of Work for System Design and Engineering of the Spent Nuclear Fuel Multi- Canister Overpack

K. E . Smith DE&S Hanford, I n c . , Richland, WA 99352 U.S. Department o f Energy Cont rac t DE-AC06-96RL13200

EDT/ECN: 638912 UC: UC-510 Org Code: 2T400 Charge Code: LE008 B&R Code: EW7040000 T o t a l Pages:& .LA

Key Words: Spent Nuclear Fue l , M u l t i - C a n i s t e r Overpack, Packaging

A b s t r a c t : T h i s document descr ibes t h e workscope f o r f i n a l des ign o f t h e M u l t i - C a n i s t e r Overpack t o be used f o r long-term s to rage o f N Reactor f u e l .

AutoCAD i s a Reg is te red Trademark o f AutoDesk, I n c .

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. t rade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessar i ly cons t i t u te o r imply i t s endorsement, recommendation, or favor ing by the United States Goverment o r any agency thereof o r i t s cont ractors o r subcontractors.

P r in ted i n the Uni ted States of America. To obta in copies of t h i s docment. contact: Document Control Services, P.O. Box 950, Mai ls top H6-08, Richland WA 99352, Phone (509) 372-2420: F ~ X (509) 376-4989,

Reference here in t o any speci f ic comnercial product, process, o r serv ice by

. , . ,-, ., ,",. .l.iy-~ .. .....I'

1

1

Date' 2 77

Approved for Public Release

A-6400-073 (01/97) GEF321

( 1 ) Document Number

RECORD OF REVISION HNF-SD-SNF-SOW- Page 1 001

I &t'z:int o f Work f o r System Desiqn and Enqineer inq o f t h e Soent Nuclear Fuel M u l t i - I ( 3 ) Revision

Authorized for Release

(5) Cog. Engr. I ( 6 ) Cog. Hgr. Date ( 4 ) Description of Change - Replace, Add, and Delete Pages

1 I F u l l y r e v i s e d p e r ECN 634996 2 RS F u l l y r e v i s e d p e r ECN 638912 KE Smith RWJasmussen

A-7320.005 (08/91) WEF168

HNF-SD-SNF-SOW-001 Rev. 2

STATEMENT OF WORK FOR SYSTEM DESIGN AND ENGINEERING OF THE SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL

MULTI-CANISTER OVERPACK

HNF-SD-SNF-SOW-001 R e v i s i o n 2

FEBRUARY 1997

Prepared f o r t h e U.S. Department o f Energy O f f i c e o f Environmental Res to ra t i on and Waste Management

HNF-SD-SNF-SOW-001 Rev . 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 REQUESTED SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2.0 WORKSCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.1 GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2 DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.3 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.4 SCHEDULE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.5 PRELIMINARY INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

3.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.1 MANAGEMENT APPROACH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.2 TECHNICAL DIRECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.3 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

3.3.1 IssuesKoncerns and A c t i o n Track ina Svstem . . . . . . 5 . r ”

3.3.2 Monthly Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.4 MEETINGS AND REVIEWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

3.4.1 K ick-Of f Meet inq . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.4.2 S ta tus Meet ings- . . . . . . . . . . 3.4.3 Design Reviews . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4.4 Coord ina t ion Meetings . . . . . . .

3 .5 DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5.1 General Data . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5.2 Document Cont ro l . . . . . . . . . . 3.5.3 Document I d e n t i f i c a t i o n and Format . 3.5.4 Document Approval . . . . . . . . . 3.5.5 Document T r a n s m i t t a l . . . . . . . .

3 .6 RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES . . . . . . . 3.6.1 Record F i l e s and O b j e c t i v e Evidence

3 .7 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . 3.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.8.1 Q u a l i t y Assurance Plan (QAP) . . . . 3.8.2 Q u a l i t y Assurance A c c e s s i b i l i t y . . 3.8.3 C o r r e c t i v e A c t i o n . . . . . . . . . 3.8.4 Q u a l i t y Assurance M a t r i x . . . . . . 3.8.5 Q u a l i t y Assurance Repor t ing . . . .

3.9 INDEPENDENT SAFETY PROGRAM . . . . . . . . 3.10 CHANGE CONTROL . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . 6

. . . . . . . . . 6

. . . . . . . . . 6

. . . . . . . . . 6

. . . . . . . . . 7

. . . . . . . . . 7

. . . . . . . . . 7

. . . . . . . . . 8

. . . . . . . . . 8

. . . . . . . . . 9

. . . . . . . . . 9

. . . . . . . . . 9

. . . . . . . . . 9

. . . . . . . . . 9

. . . . . . . . . 10

. . . . . . . . . 10

. . . . . . . . . 10

. . . . . . . . . 10

. . . . . . . . . 10

. . . . . . . . . 11

4.0 DESCRIPTION OF REQUIRED SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.1 Phase 2 Design Ob jec t ives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.2 DESIGN WORK ITEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

4.2.1 Design End I tems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

5.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

6.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

7.0 ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

ii

HNF-SD-SNF-SOW-001 Rev . 2

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1 MCO Subpro jec t Mi les tones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Table 2-1 M i l e s t o n e Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 4-1 Design End Items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

iii


STATEMENT OF WORK FOR PHASE 2 DESIGN OF THE MULTIPLE CANISTER OVERPACK SUBPROJECT

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1 . 1 REQUESTED SERVICES

T h i s Statement o f Work (SOW) descr ibes t h e work scope f o r t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f t h e Phase 2 ( f i n a l ) des ign f o r t h e M u l t i p l e C a n i s t e r Overpack (MCO) equipment. The MCO i s t o be used as t h e r a d i o l o g i c a l containment dev ice f o r t h e Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) assemblies, c u r r e n t l y i n wet s to rage i n K East and West Basins, t o be t r a n s p o r t e d and s t o r e d i n t h e C a n i s t e r Storage B u i l d i n g (CSB) u n t i l f i n a l d isposa l f a c i l i t i e s are made a v a i l a b l e . The eng ineer ing s e r v i c e s c o n t r a c t o r w i l l be requested t o p r o v i d e r e p o r t s , s t u d i e s , analyses, eng ineer ing , drawings, s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , es t imates and schedules.

The o v e r a l l goal o f t h i s t a s k o r d e r i s t o do t h e f o l l o w i n g :

1. Prepare a f a b r i c a t i o n s p e c i f i c a t i o n , ASME Code except ion r e p o r t , a packaging, sh ipp ing and warehouse plan, and d e t a i l e d f a b r i c a t i o n drawings o f t h e MCO i n accordance w i t h t h e MCO Performance S p e c i f i c a t i o n (HNF-S-0426, Rev. 3 ) f o r procurement a c t i v i t i e s by t h e SNF MCO Subpro jec t .

E s t a b l i s h and m a i n t a i n a comment da ta base on t h e comments, r e s o l u t i o n s , changes t o t h e design o f t h e MCO.

Support f a b r i c a t i o n a c t i v i t i e s through t h e rev iew o f vendor f a b r i c a t i o n drawings and shop t e s t r e p o r t s .

2.

3 .

1 . 2 BACKGROUND

The Hanford Spent Nuclear Fuel P r o j e c t has committed t o an acce le ra ted schedule f o r removing spent n u c l e a r f u e l f rom t h e K Basins t o a new s to rage f a c i l i t y i n t h e 200 Areas. A key p a r t o f t h i s a c t i o n i n v o l v e s r e t r i e v a l o f t h e SNF m a t e r i a l s f rom t h e bas in water storage poo ls and t r a n s f e r i n t o t h e MCOs t h a t w i l l be used f o r s to rage o f f u e l p r i o r t o and a f t e r c o n d i t i o n i n g . The MCO i s one o f t h e most c r i t i c a l components o f t h e o v e r a l l system because o f i t s m u l t i p l e f u n c t i o n s and i n t e r f a c e s . The MCO i n t e r f a c e s w i t h severa l p o r t i o n s o f t h e SNF P r o j e c t d u r i n g i t s l i f e c y c l e .

The general MCO i n t e r f a c e s are l i s t e d below:

The MCO i s used i n t h e b a s i n as a c o n t a i n e r f o r t h e SNF be ing removed from t h e K West and East Basins. The f u e l i s t o be re racked i n t o a f u e l basket and t h e basket i s then loaded i n t o t h e MCO i n t h e bas in poo l . A f t e r sea l ing , t h e MCO i s then d r a i n e d o f f r e e water and vacuum d r i e d a t t h e Cold Vacuum D r y i n g (CVD) F a c i l i t y b e f o r e be ing s t o r e d a t t h e CSB.

1


T i t l e M i 1 estone Number

The MCO i s used i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e s h i p p i n g cask t o c o n t a i n and t r a n s p o r t t h e SNF t o t h e CSB.

Date

The MCO i s used a t t h e Hot C o n d i t i o n i n g System (HCS) F a c i l i t y as a c o n d i t i o n i n g vessel whereby some o f t h e hydra tes and hydr ides on t h e SNF and i n t h e MCO a re broken down t o r e l e a s e some o f t h e i r compounded hydrogen.

The MCO i s used a t t h e CSB t o h o l d and c o n t a i n t h e SNF d u r i n g an i n t e r i m s to rage p e r i o d o f up t o 75 years . w i t h i n t h e 200 East Area o f t h e Hanford S i t e , approx imate ly 48 km (30 m i ) nor thwest o f Richland, Washington.

The CSB l o c a t i o n i s

1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVE

The SNF MCO Subproject o b j e c t i v e i s t o design, f a b r i c a t e , t e s t , and procure t h e containment vessel and i n t e r n a l components f o r t h e f u e l assemblies t o suppor t i n i t i a t i o n o f f u e l removal a c t i v i t i e s by December 1997.

The h i g h l e v e l subpro jec t mi les tones are d e p i c t e d i n Table 1-1.

I ] B e g i n Phase 2 ( f i n a l ) design. I 10/01/96 I I IPhase 2 design 100% complete I 04/18/97 I I I Award F a b r i c a t i o n Cont rac t I 05/01/97 I I I D e l i v e r f i r s t shipment o f MCOs I 03/02/98 I I I B e g i n I n i t i a l shipment o f Fuel I 05/31/98 I

2.0 WORK SCOPE

T h i s SOW i s in tended t o address t h e Phase 2 des ign th rough A p r i l 1997. Support d u r i n g l a t t e r phases o f t h i s p r o j e c t may be admin is te red th rough r e v i s i o n s t o t h i s SOW. f o r t h e work performed under t h i s SOW. accountable f o r t h e p r o f e s s i o n a l q u a l i t y , t e c h n i c a l accuracy, c o s t - e f f e c t i v e n e s s , t i m e l i n e s s , c o o r d i n a t i o n , and development o f a l l end i t e m d e l i v e r a b l e s performed under t h i s SOW. A l l t e c h n i c a l work s h a l l comply w i t h t h e MCO.Performance S p e c i f i c a t i o n (HNF-S-0426, Rev. 3 ) .

The S e l l e r s h a l l be f u l l y r e s p o n s i b l e and accountable The S e l l e r s h a l l be r e s p o n s i b l e and

2


2 .1 GENERAL

The S e l l e r s h a l l per fo rm Phase 2 design i n s u f f i c i e n t d e t a i l t o p e r m i t procurement o f MCOs under a f i r m f i x e d p r i c e c o n t r a c t .

I n a d d i t i o n t o a l l bas ic design support analyses (such as s t r u c t u r a l , se ismic , thermal , e t c . ) , t h e S e l l e r s h a l l a l s o per fo rm a l l r e q u i r e d s p e c i a l des ign suppor t analyses, i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , s h i e l d i n g ; r e l i a b i l i t y , a v a i l a b i l i t y , and m a i n t a i n a b i l i t y ; l i f e - c y c l e c o s t ; human f a c t o r s eng ineer ing assessment; operabilitylmaintainability assessments; e t c . The f i n a l des ign work s h a l l be documented and summarized i n a Design Report . A l l des ign media prepared under t h i s c o n t r a c t s h a l l become t h e p r o p e r t y o f t h e DOE.

The Phase 2 des ign s h a l l i n c o r p o r a t e t h e design f e a t u r e s r e s u l t i n g f rom t h e p r o t o t y p e development and t e s t i n g program. Pro to type f a b r i c a t i o n drawings and analyses w i l l be p rov ided t o t h e S e l l e r f o r i n c o r p o r a t i o n i n t o Phase 2 design. The S e l l e r should n o t i f y t h e Technical Representa t ive (MCO Subpro jec t Design A u t h o r i t y ) o f any d e v i a t i o n s f rom these design f e a t u r e s deemed necessary t o comply w i t h t h e Performance S p e c i f i c a t i o n , and i n c l u d e j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r t h e change. The S e l l e r s h a l l o b t a i n Technical Representa t ive concurrence f o r each d e v i a t i o n .

2 . 2 DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY

The S e l l e r s h a l l be considered t h e r e s p o n s i b l e des ign agent ensur ing t h a t t h e o v e r a l l MCO design, i n c l u d i n g designs f u r n i s h e d by subcont rac tors , meets a l l t h e s p e c i f i c a t i o n c r i t e r i a .

2 . 3 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

The des ign s h a l l be i n accordance w i t h t h e MCO Performance S p e c i f i c a t i o n (HNF-S-0426, Rev. 3 ) .

2.4 SCHEDULE

The MCO Phase 2 Design mi les tones are presented i n Table 2-1. The S e l l e r should propose i n work p l a n a schedule f o r t h e d e l i v e r a b l e s t o be prov ided a t t h e 60% and 90% design reviews.

except f o r i n c o r p o r a t i n g rev iewer comments, which represents t h e f i n a l 10% o f t h e des ign e f f o r t .

D e l i v e r a b l e s a t t h e 90% complete mi les tone should be f u l l y developed,

3


Phase 2 Design 60% rev iew completed

Phase 2 Design 90% rev iew i n i t i a t e d

Tab le 2-1 M i l e s t o n e Schedule

12 123196

03/05/97

I M i 1 estone* I Date I

Phase 2 Design 100% complete

I Phase 2 Design Task Award I 10/04/96 I

04/18/97

2.5 PRELIMINARY INFORMATION

A l l p r o t o t y p i c design media (drawings, analyses, s tud ies , e t c . ) w i l l be p r o v i d e d under separate cover.

3.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

T h i s s e c t i o n descr ibes t h e p r o j e c t management approach and t h e r e q u i r e - ments f o r t h e S e l l e r p r o j e c t management system f o r t h e MCO Subpro jec t Design phase.

3 . 1 MANAGEMENT APPROACH

O v e r a l l p r o j e c t management w i l l be p rov ided by t h e SNF MCO Subpro jec t Manager. A d m i n i s t r a t i o n o f t h e S e l l e r c o n t r a c t w i l l be p rov ided by t h e des ignated procurement s p e c i a l i s t . Techn ica l Representa t ive f o r a l l scope inc luded i n t h i s Statement o f Work.

The SNF MCO Design A u t h o r i t y i s t h e

3.2 TECHNICAL DIRECTION

The SNF MCO Technical Representa t ive has t h e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y and a u t h o r i t y t o p r o v i d e t e c h n i c a l d i r e c t i o n t o t h e S e l l e r f o r a c t i v i t i e s w i t h i n t h e scope o f t h i s SOW. Any changes t o t h e requirements o f t h i s SOW, o r d i r e c t i o n t h a t impacts any o f t h e c o n t r a c t cos t fschedu le p r o v i s i o n s o r i t s terms o r c o n d i t i o n s , must come o n l y f rom t h e procurement s p e c i a l i s t . S e l l e r s h a l l n o t i f y t h e procurement s p e c i a l i s t o f any d i r e c t i o n i t has r e c e i v e d from t h e SNF MCO Technical Representa t ive o r Subpro jec t Manager t h a t impacts t h e c o n t r a c t p r o v i s i o n s and request a u t h o r i z a t i o n .

The

4


3 . 3 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT

3.3.1 Issues/Concerns and Act ion Track ing System

The S e l l e r s h a l l develop and m a i n t a i n an issues and concerns t r a c k i n g system. T h i s system s h a l l r e c o r d and t r a c k s i g n i f i c a n t d e s i g n - r e l a t e d issues t h a t a re r a i s e d by any SNF subpro jec t p a r t i c i p a n t o r o u t s i d e o v e r s i g h t e n t i t y , b u t a re n o t immediately r e s o l v a b l e . The system s h a l l c l e a r l y i d e n t i f y t h e issue, t h e p a r t y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r r e s o l u t i o n , and a planned i s s u e c l o s u r e da te . The system s h a l l i n c l u d e i s s u e s / a c t i o n s r a i s e d v i a correspondence and d u r i n g meet ings.

c o n t a i n i n g t h e ques t ions , comments, concerns and t h e r e s o l u t i o n o f t h e issues, a c t i o n s and concerns.

I n a d d i t i o n t h e S e l l e r w i l l e s t a b l i s h and m a i n t a i n a comment database

3 .3 .2 Monthly Reports

submi t ted on o r b e f o r e t h e t e n t h day o f each month ( f o r t h e p r e v i o u s month) and s h a l l i n c l u d e , b u t n o t be l i m i t e d t o , t h e f o l l o w i n g i n f o r m a t i o n :

The S e l l e r s h a l l p r o v i d e monthly s t a t u s r e p o r t s . These r e p o r t s s h a l l be

P r o j e c t manager's n a r r a t i v e high1 i g h t s and s t a t u s assessment f o r each CWBS element i n c l u d i n g a c t i v i t i e s planned f o r t h e n e x t month

and progress toward r e s o l u t i o n

DOE "Cost Performance Report" formats 1 and 3 and Var iance A n a l y s i s (see DOE Order 1332.1A, Uniform R e p o r t i n g System [DOE 196'51) completed a t t h e CWBS l e v e l . The monthly Cost Performance Reports should p r o v i d e i n t e g r a t e d CWBS cos t /schedu le da ta f o r measuring performance. t h e l a t e s t r e v i s e d es t imate s h a l l be inc luded i n t h e Cost Performance Report . The Var iance A n a l y s i s s h a l l be on t h e c u r r e n t month and cumula t ive- to -da te and i n c l u d e cause, e f f e c t , and c o r r e c t i v e a c t i o n . The var iance a n a l y s i s s h a l l be prepared a t t h e CWBS l e v e l w i t h e x p l a n a t i o n lower r e q u i r e d t o adequately address problems ( o f f s e t t i n g var iance, e t c . ) . Cost and schedule var iance a n a l y s i s t h r e s h o l d s ( c u r r e n t month and cumula t ive da te) s h a l l be $10k and 10%.

Issues/concerns ( c o s t , schedule, t e c h n i c a l ) , recommended s o l u t i o n ,

Earned va lue progress and any changes i n

Statused c r i t i c a l pa th l o g i c network schedules and a f o r e c a s t o f schedule impacts, i n c l u d i n g a s ta tused l o g o f c o n t r o l m i les tones

5


3.4 MEETINGS AND REVIEWS

3.4.1 Kick-Off Meeting

A design kick-off meeting will be held at the Seller's office after the task is awarded. approved documents to accomplish the required activities. focus on a discussion of the SOW and Seller's work plan.

The purpose of the meeting is to provide the Seller with This meeting will

3.4.2 Status Meetings

Bi-weekly meetings shall be held at the Seller's offices to review progress of the work. During these meetings, the Seller shall present subproject technical progress. During the presentation, the Seller shall identify existing or anticipated problem areas for each activity (including impacts), and report on progress toward problem resolution. prepare and distribute the meeting minutes within 10 working days after the meeting for approval by the SNF MCO Subproject Manager. emphasize issues, concerns and planned actions.

The Seller shall

Minutes shall

3.4.3 Design Reviews

objectives are being achieved. A formal review will be conducted at the 90% complete milestone. The Seller should allow for a ten working day review by the Buyer's design review team, after which comments will be forwarded to the Seller for disposition, incorporation, and tracking. If necessary, meetings shall be held to ensure that the design objectives are being achieved and to resolve significant comments in a timely manner to allow for the completion o f the design task. The 60% and 90% Design reviews shall be identified in the work plan.

Design review meetings shall be held to ensure that the design

3.4.4 Coordination Meetings

required, between the Technical Representative and the Seller to discuss various subproject issues as they arise. the Seller and issued to the meeting participants within 5 working days of the meeting for review and comments. Any oral communications (including telephone conferences) having an impact on the work shall be issued with a controlled record number and maintained as subproject records.

Coordination meetings, including telephone conferences, will be held as

Meeting minutes will be prepared by

3.5 DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS

Record documents and contract documents will be generated during the course of the design. by this SOW. Contract documents are those documents identified in the task order agreement and this SOW.

Record documents are those end-item documents required

6


3.5.1 General Data

aided design and drafting (CADD) process compatible with the AutoCAD.dwg drawing format. Any exceptions shall be identified and submitted for approval. It is the intent of the Project to produce all final engineering drawings in compliance with the requirements defined in ICF KH Hanford A/E Standard, General Manual GG-DWG-01. During the Design phase, the Seller shall implement cost-effective compliance t o the requirements of GG-DWG-01. Seller proprietary software is used, the Buyer shall have free access to it after the design is completed. All commercial software user rights will be transferred to the Buyer on or before the project is completed.

Full-size drawings shall be 71 by 102 cm (28 by 40 in.). Reduced drawings can be 36 by 50 cm (14 by 20 in.) if mutually agreed upon by the Technical Representative and the Seller. Drawings or sketches included in topical reports can be 28 by 43 cm (11 by 17 in.). Drawing sizes other than those listed may be accepted on a mutually agreed upon basis. Reproducibles for drawings shall be furnished by the Seller pending approval by the Technical Representative.

All drawings from detailed design shall be prepared using the computer-

If

3.5.2 Document Control

Preparation, identification, approval, transmittal, and final disposition o f new and revised record documents shall conform to the Seller's established procedures or special instructions. Use o f contract documents shall be controlled in accordance with the Seller's established procedures or special instructions. The Seller shall identify in their work plan the document control procedures intended for use.

3.5.3 Document Identification and Format

The Seller is required to use a numbering system for all documents, including correspondence, technical reports, drawings and specifications, etc. The numbering system will be developed by the Seller and concurred with by the Technical Representative. Numbering sequences for sketches and drawings shall be provided by the Technical Representative.

Each record document shall have the following format:

Project and contract identification

- SNF - Project number, if assigned - Contract number

Originating firm's name

Document title

Document identification number (on each page)

7


* devision or addendum number or letter (on each page with revised portion of page indicated)

Issue or revision date (released documents only)

Authorized use stamp (e.g., draft, for approval, approved for

Total number of pages and number of each page (e.g., page 1 of 4)

Table of contents or attachments (as needed)

Approval signature and title o f responsible person in originating

construction, proprietary information, secret)

firm (released documents only).

3.5.4 Document Approval

All design drawings and technical documents submitted for review shall first be appropriately reviewed by the Seller's responsible technical staff including, but not limited to, QA, safety, and drafting checker personnel. Reports and documents shall be checked for technical and editorial accuracy before they are submitted for any review. Final design drawings, reports, and documents submitted for acceptance shall be approved by the Seller. Seller shall have written procedures in place that delineate the requirements for reviewing, checking, technical editing, and approval of documents before issuance. These procedures shall be issued for review and concurrence with the document control plan.

Acceptance by the Technical Representative is the act of reviewing an activity or document and acknowledging that it may be used for the purpose intended at that time. Acceptance by the Technical Representative does not ensure that future changes will not be required, and does not convey or imply approval, or assumption of responsibility for the activity or document. The originator remains fully responsible for all aspects of the activity or document; for fulfilling all specifications; and for any other obligation or liability otherwise arising under a specification, agreement, or contract.

The

3.5.5 Document Transmittal

Unless otherwise agreed upon, transmittal of record documents shall include one reproducible and 10 copies. For documents larger than 21.6 by 27.9 cm (8 1/2 by 11 in.), full-size, photo-quality reproducibles shall be included. Transmittal of record documents produced electronically shall include indices that identify directory and data set file names. Transmittals shall be documented on a suitable, sequentially numbered form that contains a standard document identification number, distribution, and space for reviewers to note the disposition of listed attachments in accordance with DOE Order 1324.2A, Records D i s p o s i t i o n (DOE 1988b) and the Seller Project document transmittal procedure. All final deliverables shall also be provided on an electronic file (e.g., CADD, ANSYS, WP5.1, etc.).

8


3.6 RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES

Records shall be managed in accordance with the procedures submitted in the Seller's work plan. Records management shall include receipt, transmittal, processing, disposition, and storage requirements.

3.6.1 Record Files and Objective Evidence

record documents in accordance with the Seller's approved QA plan. At the conclusion of the design and fabrication phase, the Seller will be advised of the files' disposition. The Seller shall keep duplicate copies of data to meet code or legal requirements.

record documents. Objective evidence includes, but is not limited to, material samples used in examinations and tests, instrument records, radiographs, and photographs. Unless needed for evaluation of a nonconformance or other special use, objective evidence will not be distributed. A "record only" transmittal should be issued with the objective evidence listed in the document index and retained with the record files.

Record files with current and previous revisions shall be maintained for

Objective evidence is test material and unreduced data that support

3.7 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT

The Seller shall identify the configuration management process for control and status of the Phase 2 Design. This process shall be identified in an update (as-needed) to the CMP that was prepared for Phase 1 Design and shall be submitted for review and approval. The CMP shall be developed in accordance with the guidelines contained in DOE Order 4700.1 and WHC-SD-SNF- CM-001.

3.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE

All work under this task order shall be performed in accordance with the Seller's ICF KH approved Quality Assurance Plan. The QA Program shall also comply with those sections of 10 CFR 71, subpart H, "Quality Assurance," that affect the particular tasks being performed. Initially, the program shall encompass those QA elements applicable only to design tasks. elements applicable to follow-on services, such as fabrication support and inspection, will be added when options for these services are exercised.

Other QA

3.8.1 Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)

The Seller shall submit for approval an update (as-needed) to the project-specific QAP that was prepared for Phase 1 Design which provides a description of the QA Program and how the QA requirements in Section 3.8 will be applied to the design work.

9


3.8.2 Quality Assurance Accessibility

The Seller shall provide access to all documents, files, and workstations for purposes of audit or surveillance of ongoing activities by the SNF Project and its designated agents. as requested, for audits or surveillances conducted by the Buyer, or the Buyer in conjunction with other project participants and specialists.

The Seller shall provide support,

3.8.3 Corrective Action

The Seller shall be responsive to deficiencies identified by the DOE or SNF Project, via QA reports, corrective action reports, nonconformance reports, audit/surveillance/management assessment reports, stop work orders, or reviews/evaluations. The Seller shall provide input data (i.e., nonconformance report, corrective action report, audit findings, unsatisfactory surveillance) and develop a project quality trend program that identifies conditions adverse to quality.

3.8.4 Quality Assurance Matrix

matrix shall be developed to demonstrate that each of the applicable requirements of ANSI/ASME NQA-1-1989 (ANSI/ASME 1989) and 10 CFR 71, subpart H, "Quality Assurance," have been addressed in the Seller's QAP and subsequent implementing procedures. annually updated to address requirements that have been changed, added, or deleted. the QAP.

The Seller shall develop a matrix of implementing procedures. This

This matrix is a controlled document and shall be

The QA matrix shall be submitted to the Buyer for concurrence with

3.8.5 Quality Assurance Reporting

The Seller shall provide to the MCO Subproject Manager a monthly QA report. This report shall contain a status of the QA Program and include summaries of deficiencies that require corrective action, updates of corrective actions, audits performed and results, trend information, and key QA personnel changes. This report shall be submitted with the monthly activity report. Trend information will not initially be required to be addressed until the Seller's project quality trend program has had time to fully mature.

3.9 INDEPENDENT SAFETY PROGRAM

The Seller shall be responsible for satisfying all safety requirements imposed on the design by the criteria documents. with safety and health protection requirements (i . e . , nuclear safety, fire protection, industrial safety and hygiene, health physics, radiation protection engineering, etc.). Features of the MCO which provide fuel containment and criticality control are considered Safety Class items per WHC- CM-4-46, Rev. 2. The specific listing of Safety Class and Safety Significant components is included in the MCO Performance Specification.

This shall ensure compliance

10


3.10 CHANGE CONTROL

Change control shall be managed in accordance with the MCO Project Management Plan (PMP), WHC-SD-W442-PMP-001, Rev. 0. The Seller shall track changes less than $50,000 and will be requested to maintain a log of all changes until the cumulative exceeds $50,000. Once the cumulative total of Seller changes exceeds the $50,000 threshold, the Seller shall submit a change request for approval.

4.0 DESCRIPTION OF REQUIRED SERVICES

The Seller is the fully responsible design agent for translating the MCO Subproject performance specification into a cost-effective final design. The tasks described in this section are those that the SNF MCO Subproject has specifically identified for the development of Phase 2 Design. The Seller may supplement this task list by adding new work items or upgrading definitions of identified tasks, as necessary, to satisfy its assessment of the tasks required to produce an acceptable Design that meets all technical and quality requirements.

4.1 Phase 2 Design Objectives

procurement activities. The overall objective is to produce final design media suitable for MCO

The principal objectives of the Phase 2 Design are as follows:

Provide a fabrication specification and fabrication drawings in compliance with the Performance Specification that can be used for fixed price competitive procurement of the MCOs.

Document compliance with the Performance Specification requirements.

Provide input to the MCO Topical Design Report

4 . 2 DESIGN WORK ITEMS

The Seller is required to perform the following SNF MCO Subproject activities, at a minimum.

1. Review the Performance Specification and preliminary information provided for the SNF MCO Subproject, and identify those items or areas that require further clarification.

2. Develop the prototype design into a final design and document compliance with Performance Specification requirements.

11


a. Provide an update to the Fabrication Specification (WHC-S- 0453, Rev. 0) to reflect compliance with the Performance Specification and consistency with the Phase 2 Design drawings.

Provide a Phase 2 Design Report describing the MCO features, materials, components, quality characteristics, safety features, etc. Include a detailed matrix listing the specific design requirements included in the Performance Specification and indicating how the design has complied with each requirement.

c. Prepare, review, and approve an ASME code exception report to the Performance Specification where the levels of compliance are described, exceptions described, and levels of the exceptions justified against the Performance Specification MCO life cycle paths. Suitability o f the lesser compliance levels will be compared to the active service interval in the MCO life cycle path.

b.

3. A s part of the development of the Phase 2 Design of the MCO, the Seller may perform additional (not routine design) special studiespasks as required or directed by the Technical Representative to evaluate alternatives and document design recommendations. Such studies shall be documented in topical reports that contain technical findings, tradeoffs, developments, analysis performed, recommendations, etc. The reports shall be prepared in accordance with applicable QA requirements such that content may be used as design input. A standard format shall be developed by the Seller with concurrence from the Technical Representative for use in preparing study reports. outline, including alternatives to be evaluated, work statements, decision hold points, and cost and schedule of each study, in the standard format, shall be submitted for approval.

Perform required shielding analyses and issue a report that documents the design's compliance with specification requirements. To ensure that standardized, validated methods are followed for shielding calculations, the Technical Representative will review and concur with the Seller's shielding design code(s). In addition, the Technical Representative will review and concur with source terms, bases for assumptions, and modeling done in support of shielding design to ensure that codes and the principles of "as low as reasonably achievable" have been properly applied. Shielding calculations may be reviewed by the Technical Representative before the Seller uses the calculated values in the design.

5. A s requested, consult with and advise the Technical Representative concerning any questions that may arise in connection with the Seller services described within the contract. Participate in special study tasks, technical services, discussions, and meetings required on an "as-needed'' basis to support the SNF MCO design and development.

A detailed

4.

Provide assistance with briefings and formal

12


6 .

7 .

8.

9.

11

presentations, as requested. The estimated frequency of presentations is one per month. Assistance shall include generation of briefing material (narratives, cost data, and graphics), participation in portions of the briefing, and responding to actions (via agreement/commitment documentation and meeting minutes) for which the Seller is made responsible.

Provide support in the development of a Topical Design Report with a description of safety systems and components, human factors, and design criteria.

Provide support for other special need items, such as independent engineering reviews, audits and surveillances, and independent cost estimate reviews, as required.

Supervise preparation of design, analyses, specifications, reports, and other items such that the fabrication drawings, fabrication specification, and exception report are approved per Section 3.5.4 of this SOW.

Prepare a packaging, shipping, and warehouse plan for MCOs and components as fabricated and shipped to the Hanford site for use. The plan shall address the following, at a minimum:

a. Identify potential locations for warehousing of MCOs and

b. Define package sizing

c.

components on site.

Identify required coverings/packaging suitable for warehouse environments.

d. Establish a numbering control methodology

e . Specify standard packaging identification

f. Identify cleaniness control requirements

Coordination and input from the WHC Material Control and Warehouse personnel on site will be required in order to prepare this plan. Packaging and shipping requirements developed in preparation of this plan shall be reflected in the fabrication specification.

Identify and provide design drawings for any special tools and/or handling devices for closing the MCO or movement of the MCOs and components during storage. This includes a means of lifting an empty MCO into the transportation cask at the CSB, but excludes aramles for handlina the loaded MCO. loadina baskets into the k0:'and placing the-shield plug into the MC6.

13


I t e m

Update t o Phase 1 C o n f i g u r a t i o n Manaqement P1 an

4 . 2 . 1 Design End I tems

S e l l e r DESH Schedule

P R I A w i t h i n 10 working days ANTP

Table 4-1 shows d e l i v e r a b l e design end i tems f o r t h e Phase 2 des ign . The t a b l e a l s o i d e n t i f i e s r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s , approval l e v e l s , and schedule i n f o r m a t i o n . P=Prepare, A=Approve, R=Review

Table 4-1 Design End I tems

Phase 1 Design A c t i v i t i e s

F a b r i c a t i o n S p e c i f i c a t i o n

Phase 2 F a b r i c a t i o n Drawings

S h i e l d i n g Analyses Report

S t r u c t u r a l Design C a l c u l a t i o n s

P R I A A t i d e n t i f i e d rev iews

i d e n t i f i e d rev iews

rev iew package

rev iew oackaqe

P R I A A t

P R I A w i t h 90%

P R I A w i t h 90%

P 10 th o f each I I R I month ANTP Monthly Reports, a c t i o n t r a c k i n g , weekly meet inqs

ASME Code Except ion Report

Spec ia l s t u d i e s

R I A W i t h i n 10 I p I I days ANTP ca lendar

Update t o Phase 1 Qua l i t y Assurance P1 an

P R I A A t i d e n t i f i e d rev iews

P R I A as scheduled

P i d e n t i f i e d I I I At rev iews

Phase 2 Design Report

R I A w i t h 90% rev iew I p / I package

Packaging, Shipping, and Warehouse Plan

14


5.0 REFERENCES

10 CFR 71, Subpart H, " Q u a l i t y Assurance," Code o f Federa l Regu la t ions , as

ANSI/ASME, 1989, Q u a l i t y Assurance Program Requirements f o r N u c l e a r F a c i l i t i e s , ANSI /ASME NQA-1-1989, American N a t i o n a l Standards I n s t i t u t e / American S o c i e t y o f Mechanical Engineers, New York, New York.

DOE, 1985, Un i fo rm R e p o r t i n g System, DOE Order 1332.1A, U.S. Department o f Energy, Washington, D.C.

DOE, 1987, P r o j e c t Management System, DOE Order 4700.1, U . S . Department o f Energy, Washington, D.C.

DOE, 1988b, Records D i s p o s i t i o n , DOE Order 1324.2A, U.S. Department o f Energy, Washington, D.C.

DOE-RL, 1990, "Prepara t ion and Cont ro l o f Engineer ing and F a b r i c a t i o n Drawings," HPS-SDC-1.3, Rev. 6, Hanford P l a n t Standards, U.S. Department o f Energy-Richland Operat ions O f f i c e , Richland, Washington.

0426, Rev. 3, Duke Engineer ing & Services Hanford, Richland, Washington

WHC-SD-W442-PMP-001, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington

amended.

HNF, 1996, "Performance S p e c i f i c a t i o n f o r M u l t i - C a n i s t e r Overpack," HNF-S-

WHC, 1996, " P r o j e c t W-442 M u l t i - C a n i s t e r Overpack P r o j e c t Management P lan , "

15


6.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Clean A i r Ac t o f 1977, 42 USC 7401, e t seq.

DOE, 1993, Ex tens ion o f DOE N 4700.5, DOE N 4700.6, U.S. Department o f Energy, Washington, D.C.

N a t i o n a l Environmental P o l i c y Act o f 1969, 42 USC 4321, e t seq

Resource Conserva t ion and Recovery Act o f 1976, 42 USC 6901, e t seq.

RL, 1994, P r o j e c t Cost Es t imat ing , Ana lys is , and Cost S t a n d a r d i z a t i o n , DOE RLID 5700.3, U.S. Department o f Energy, R ich land Operat ions O f f i c e , R ich land, Washington.

16


7.0 ACRONYMS

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

ANTP AWP CADD CMP CSB DESH DOE F&R LLW MCO NRC PMB PMP PSEMP QAP RL ROM SNF sow

a f t e r N o t i c e t o Proceed i n accordance w i t h approved work p l a n computer-aided design and d r a f t i n g C o n f i g u r a t i o n Management Plan C a n i s t e r Storage B u i l d i n g DE&S Hanford, I n c . U.S. Department o f Energy Func t ion and Requirements low- leve l waste m u l t i - c a n i s t e r overpack U.S. Nuclear Regu la to ry Commission performance measurement b a s e l i n e P r o j e c t Management Plan P r o j e c t Systems Engineer ing Management Plan Qua l i t y Assurance P1 an U.S. Department o f Energy, R ich land Operat ions O f f i c e rough-order-of-magni tude spent n u c l e a r f u e l Statement o f Work

17

DISTRIBUTION SHEET To D i s t r i b u t i o n

From Page 1 of 1 MCO Subproject Date 02/27/97

Name

Project Ti t le iwork Order Statement o f Work f o r System Design and Engineer ing o f t h e Spent Nuclear Fuel M u l t i - C a n i s t e r Overpack

Text Only Attach./ EDT/ECN I MSlN I W l , l I I Ap;Etix I Only

EDTNo. N / A ECN NO. 6 0 8 9 1 2

flcr 1bh7

W . C . A l a c o n i s P. D. Braun J . I . D i e h l J . R. F reder ickson L. J. Garv in L. H. Goldmann C . 8. L o f t i s 8. D . Lorenz D . W . McNal ly R. W . Rasmussen E . S . R u f f K . E . Smith SNF P r o j e c t F i l e s MCO P r o j e c t F i l e 2. , l o

R3-85 61-25 X3-80 R3-86 R3-15 R3-86 S7-41 R3-11 61-12 R3-86 H5-70 R3-86 R3-11 R3-86

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

A-6000-135 (01/93) WEF067