1 risk-based information sharing approaches to supply chain security and visibility department of...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Risk-based Information Sharing Approaches to Supply Chain Security and Visibility
Department of Investigation,
Directorate General of Customs,
Ministry of Finance, Taiwan
Outlines
• Forward• Customs Risk Management Mechanism• Cross-border Container Information
Sharing Platform• Case Study• Conclusions
2
Forward
• Variety types of codes for cargo transportation information according to individual management systems.
• The information become invisible when the cargoes depart from control area.
• Invisibility raises potential risk to border security and additional cost to stakeholders
3
The invisibility and its influence
4
The developing trend• In 2005, WCO released SAFE framework defined two
pillars of relationship, Customs to Customs and Customs to Business.
• In 2009, APEC regional economic integration (REI) defined three areas (at the border, behind the border and across the border) of key work priorities for supporting and accelerating the regional economic integration.
• In 2010, APEC initiated Supply Chain Connectivity Initiative (SCI) to the development of Eight Action Plans for eight logistics chokepoints. SCI also encourage cooperation between public and private sectors to develop efficient supply chain model.
Forward
Customs Risk Management Mechanism
• To achieve the balance between the trade security and trade facilitation, it is crucial to build the cross-border platforms and share the high-risk and low-risk container movement information instantly.
5
Customs Risk Management Mechanism
• High-risk containers– In general, the export container has shorter
inspection time. The inspection ratio for export containers is much lower than import containers.
– In consideration of logistic flow efficiency, the export containers are considered as potential-risked, but has no evidence to violate the relevant laws of export economics, or has no enough time for detail inspection, could be affixed with RFID e-Seal and notice next Customs through the information sharing platform. The local Customs can analyze the pre-interchange information for the purpose of further inspection.
6
Customs Risk Management Mechanism
• Low-risk containers– The AEO containers are affixed with RFID e-Seal at
the factories. When they arrive at the border, the Customs scan the e-Seals, verify the relevant information, and release the containers.
– When they arrive the destination country, the local Customs could release the container after scanning the e-Seal and verify the relevant information over the cross-border platform.
– Develop a safe and green path for cross-border movement of cargo to enhance the customs clearance efficiency.
7
Cross-border Container Information Sharing Platform
• Unity code to identify cargo– In consideration of conformity, a unanimous,
standardized number as a key to retrieve relevant data is necessary to seamless connect every links in the end-to-end supply chain.
• Information and communication technologies (ICTs) for container identification, transportation tracking and information sharing.
8
Two things we needs to build the platform
B
E
A
D
F
C
Active e-Seal
Passive e-Seal
Semi-active e-Seal
Discovery &Authentication
Data Repository
Information Capture
Information Query
ISO 18000
ISO 18185
ISO 18186
ISO 17712
EPC C1G2Middleware Middleware Middleware
Information Carrier
EPCIS
Not Specified (draft)
Cross-border Container Information Sharing Platform
10
Item Item
Pallet, crate, vessel
Consignment
Pallet, crate, vessel
Item
Item Item
Item GTIN
SSCC
GSIN
UCR
Last digit of calendar
Country or territory of export
Company (Supplier) ID
Internally applied
++ +
Consignment Level
Cross-border Container Information Sharing Platform
Cross-border Container Information Sharing Platform
Mapping table for different coding over internet
11
Code A
Transform/Mapping over
Secured Networks
Code C
CodeB
Code D
XML Self-definition
Autonomy
Encrytion/Authentication
Standardization
– Starts From 2009 to 2012.– Implementation scope including import, export,
transit and transshipment containers.– Uses information and communication
technologies.– Provides a feasible solution to balance
facilitation and security. – Proposes cross-border cooperation plan for
supply chain connectivity.
Case Study
The cargo movement security subproject
12
Case Study
• RFID e-Seal • Information processing• Information sharing platform
Technologies we used
13
Two Operational Scenarios of RFID e-SealOpen Loop Applicatio
ns
Close Loop Applicatio
ns
PASSIVE E-SEALSYSTEM
ACTIVE E-SEALSYSTEM
Case Study
14
RFID Handset
Real Time Warning
CCD Camera
Barcode Scanner
Active e-Seal
Passive e-Seal
3G/WiFi Wireless Communication
Case Study
15
RFID Lane in Container Yard
DVR
OCR: Car plate No.Recognition
OCR:Container No.Recognition
ICR: Image CharacteristicRecognition
PassiveRFID e-Seal Reader & Antenna
LED Signal
Barcode Scanner
Infrared Triggers
Case Study
16
Nonstop Fast Lane in Harbor Gateway
Fixed RFID Reader
(for driver identification)
OCR Cameras(for car plate number
identification)
OCR Cameras(for container
number identification)
Infrared Triggers
Fixed RFID Reader(for passive e-Seal)
LED Display Board
DVR & ICR Camera: (Image
CharacteristicRecognition)
Case Study
17
Surveillance TV Real Time Warning and Alarm Devices Monitoring
Synchronized Display of Comparison Results of RFID
Lanes
Container Status from Customs Clearance
Systems
Instant Log of Container Notes
Monitoring Center in Taichung Customs Office
Case Study
18
Active e-Seal
• In-transit real-time tracking and warning– GPS function– 3.5G communication
modules• AES 128 bits encryption• Quick and easy to install
and unlock
Case Study
19
Green Channel 1
Keelung Harbor
Taipei Harbor
Distance : 51.6 km
Case Study
Airport Security Area
Ever Terminal
Distance : 4.7 km
Green Channel 2
Case Study
Kaohsiung harbor (2012)
Taichung harbor(2010)
Taoyuan internal airport (2011)
Taipei Harbor (2011)
Keelung harbor(2011)
286 RFID handsets deployed in 118 monitor
areas
110 RFID lanes (for passive e-Seal)
2 green channels (for active e-Seal)
1 control center in headquarters and 4
control offices in local Customs
Passive e-Seal System
Cargo Risk Control System(2012)
Active e-Seal System
Case Study
Cross-border Control
• A cross-border information exchange platform is essential to the Customs.
• The platform can provide critical or important information for Customs to
• ascertain the lowest risk containers such as AEOs’ and provide speedy clearance environment, and
• target the highest risk containers.
Case Study
23
The Cross-border Pilot Project
• Chinese Taipei Customs initiated the cross-border pilot project in January 2010.
• The 7th Kuala Lumpur-Taipei Trade and Investment meeting held in April recognized Chinese Taipei’s proposal for bilateral cooperation in the use of RFID e-Seal between Malaysia and Chinese Taipei.
• The meeting of the Cooperation and Cross-Border Pilot Project on RFID E-Seal between Malaysia and Chinese Taipei for further discussion on the cooperation issues, was held in May 2010.
Case Study
24
Two-Stage Test Plan
Stage 1: CY to CY test•The end-to-end test is limited to the
container yards that Customs can commence.
•The containers affixed with e-Seals are verified at the check points.
•The information exchanged between two sides is limited.
Stage 2: Trader-to-trader test•The container movement along the entire
supply chain is logged and traceable.•Enterprises with good reputation are
encouraged to join the trader-to-trader test.
•The containers movement along the end-to-end supply chain are traced and tracked by the above-mentioned platform.
Case Study
25
Case Study
Chinese Taipei side:
Kaohsiung harbor
Malaysia side: Penang harbor
Case 1: 5 containers
Vessel name: WANHAI 313 VOY 060N
Departure date: 2010/9/18
Arrival date: 2010/9/25
Case 2: 4 containers
Vessel name: WANHAI 316 3F
Departure date: 2010/9/26
Arrival date: 2010/10/1
Chinese Taipei side: Taichung harbor
Malaysia side: Penang harbor
Case 3: 3 containers
Vessel name: EVER PEARL
Departure date: 2010/12/26
Arrival date: 2011/1/3
The container movement were logged and tracked in the cross-border platform
26
Achievements
1Validation and justification of the RFID e-Seal in container movement security of end-to-end supply chain.
2The speedy clearance and transnational green lane concepts raised in this project are workable and feasible.
3By way of promotion of transnational cooperation, AEOs could enjoy the privilege of facilitated clearance at the import countries.
Case Study
27
• Cross-border platform is essential for risk-management.
• Cross-border cooperation should be conducted by the agencies that in charge of border security, such as Customs.
• The cross-border platform should be conducted and implemented under APEC multilateral cooperation model.
Conclusions
28
THANK YOU
29