1 running title: slnap2 regulates leaf senescence in tomato 2 … · 2018-05-14 · 178 in the...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Running title: SlNAP2 regulates leaf senescence in tomato 1 2
Correspondence to: 3
Salma Balazadeh; email: [email protected] 4
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam-5
Golm, Germany 6
7
Research Area: Signaling and Response 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on May 14, 2018, as DOI:10.1104/pp.18.00292
Copyright 2018 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
The NAC Transcription Factor SlNAP2 Regulates Leaf Senescence and Fruit Yield in 33 Tomato 34
35
Xuemin Ma1,2, Youjun Zhang1, Veronika Turečková3, Gang-Ping Xue4, Alisdair R. Fernie1,5, 36
Bernd Mueller-Roeber1,2,5, Salma Balazadeh1.* 37
38 1Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam-39
Golm, Germany; 2University of Potsdam, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Karl-40
Liebknecht-Straße 24-25, Haus 20, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany; 3Laboratory of Growth 41
Regulators, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, 42
Palacký University & Institute of Experimental Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, 78371 43
Olomouc, Czech Republic; 4CSIRO Plant Industry, St. Lucia QLD 4067, Australia. 5Center 44
of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology, Ruski Blvd. 139, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria. 45
46
47
ORCID IDs: 0000-0002-1410-464X (B.M.-R.); 0000-0002-5789-4071 (S.B.). 48
49
One-sentence summary: 50
The abscisic acid-activated NAC transcription factor SlNAP2 controls leaf senescence and 51
fruit yield in tomato. 52
53
Author Contributions: 54
S.B. and B.M.-R. conceived this study. S.B. designed the research and supervised the work. 55
X.M. conducted the experiments. V.T. performed the ABA measurements. G.-P.X. 56
performed the binding site selection assays. Y.Z. and A.R.F. performed primary metabolite 57
profiling. S.B. wrote the manuscript with contributions from X.M. and B.M.-R. All authors 58
read and commented on the manuscript. 59
60
Keywords: 61
Senescence, transcription factor, NAC, SlNAP, tomato, ABA 62
63
Email addresses: 64
XM: [email protected] 65
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
YZ: [email protected] 66
VT: [email protected] 67
GPX: [email protected] 68
ARF: [email protected] 69
BMR: [email protected] 70
SB: [email protected] 71
72
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
Financial sources: 73
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR 948; BA4769/1-2) 74
and the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology. X.M. received a fellowship from 75
the China Scholarship Council (CSC). 76
77 *Corresponding author: 78
Salma Balazadeh; email: [email protected]
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
ABSTRACT 80
Leaf senescence is an essential physiological process in plants that supports the recycling of 81
nitrogen and other nutrients to support the growth of developing organs, including young 82
leaves, seeds and fruits. Thus, the regulation of senescence is crucial for evolutionary success 83
in wild populations and for increasing yield in crops. Here we describe the influence of a 84
NAC transcription factor, SlNAP2 (Solanum lycopersicum NAC-like, activated by 85
apetala3/pistillata) , that controls both leaf senescence and fruit yield in tomato (Solanum 86
lycopersicum). SlNAP2 expression increases during age-dependent and dark-induced leaf 87
senescence. We demonstrate that SlNAP2 activates SlSAG113 (Solanum lycopersicum 88
SENESCENCE-ASSOCIATED GENE 113), a homolog of Arabidopsis thaliana SAG113, 89
chlorophyll degradation genes such as SlSGR1 (Solanum lycopersicum senescence-inducible 90
chloroplast stay-green protein 1) and SlPAO (Solanum lycopersicum pheide a oxygenase), 91
and other downstream targets by directly binding to their promoters, thereby promoting leaf 92
senescence. Furthermore, SlNAP2 directly controls the expression of genes important for 93
abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis Solanum lycopersicum 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 94
1 (SlNCED1), transport Solanum lycopersicum ABC transporter G family member 40 95
(SlABCG40) and degradation Solanum lycopersicum ABA 8′-hydroxylase (SlCYP707A2), 96
indicating that SlNAP2 has a complex role in establishing ABA homeostasis during leaf 97
senescence. Inhibiting SlNAP2 expression in transgenic tomato plants impedes leaf 98
senescence but enhances fruit yield and sugar content likely due to prolonged leaf 99
photosynthesis in aging tomato plants. Our data indicate that SlNAP2 has a central role in 100
controlling leaf senescence and fruit yield in tomato. 101
102
103
INTRODUCTION 104
105
Leaf senescence represents the final stage of leaf development, which is an important part of 106
a deciduous plant’s life cycle. The process is genetically programmed and involves a series of 107
orderly changes that lead to degradation of macromolecules (e.g., proteins) and the 108
mobilization of nutrients to actively growing organs such as young leaves, developing seeds 109
and fruits. The timing of leaf senescence is a major determinant of crop yield and quality. If 110
senescence occurs early (i.e., premature senescence), the plant’s overall capacity to assimilate 111
CO2 can be reduced (Wingler et al., 2006). Conversely, if senescence is late, then 112
senescence-dependent nutrient recycling is inhibited (Himelblau and Amasino, 2001), which 113
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
is important for reproductive success. Thus, plasticity in the timing of leaf senescence and the 114
delicate balance between the onset and extent of leaf senescence are essential for ecological 115
success and crop yield. 116
Leaves undergo massive changes in gene expression throughout senescence (Buchanan-117
Wollaston et al., 2005; Balazadeh et al., 2008; Breeze et al., 2011). These expression changes 118
are precisely altered to produce a genomic expression program that is customized for the 119
timing, progression and/or magnitude of leaf senescence in response to different 120
environmental conditions. Therefore, fine-tuning the expression of senescence-related 121
transcriptional regulators is a powerful strategy to manipulate senescence for agronomic 122
purposes, including increased biomass and improved crop yield and production traits. 123
In the last decade, senescence regulatory transcription factors, particularly those from the 124
NAC family, have been identified. NAC proteins (NAM, ATAF1/2 and CUC2) represent one 125
of the largest plant-specific transcription factor (TF) families with 117 members in 126
Arabidopsis thaliana, 151 in rice (Oryza sativa), and 101 in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) 127
(Nuruzzaman et al., 2010; Ooka et al., 2003; Tweneboah and Oh, 2017). NAC proteins 128
harbor a highly conserved N-terminal domain that serves as a DNA binding domain (DBD) 129
and a variable C-terminal domain which is essential for transcriptional regulation. Several 130
members of the NAC TF family have been reported to be functionally involved in the 131
regulation of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis and other plant species including wheat (Uauy et 132
al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2015), cotton (Fan et al., 2015), and rice (Zhou et al., 2013; Mao et al., 133
2017). For example, Arabidopsis AtNAP (ANAC029) (Guo and Gan, 2006) and ORE1 134
(ANAC092) (Kim et al., 2009; Balazadeh et al., 2010) have been identified as central positive 135
regulators of leaf senescence. The micro-RNA miR164 suppresses accumulation of ORE1 136
transcripts in young leaves, whereas the transcription factor ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3 137
(EIN3) negatively regulates miR164 expression in an age-dependent manner resulting in 138
decreased expression of miR164 and an increased expression of ORE1 in aging leaves (Kim 139
et al., 2009). It has been demonstrated that ORE1 controls a complex regulatory circuitry 140
which involves direct transcriptional activation of several genes involved in chlorophyll 141
catabolism, ethylene biosynthesis, and senescence activation. Additionally, the ORE1 protein 142
physically interacts with the chloroplast maintenance G2-like transcription factors GLK1 and 143
GLK2, which hinders their transcriptional activity and contributes to the progression of leaf 144
senescence (Rauf et al., 2013; Lira et al., 2017). 145
The NAC factor AtNAP has been reported to integrate abscisic acid (ABA) signaling and leaf 146
senescence in different plant species (Guo and Gan, 2006; Zhang and Gan, 2012; Liang et al., 147
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
2014; Fan et al., 2015). Leaf and silique senescence are delayed in atnap null mutants, but 148
promoted in AtNAP inducible overexpression lines of Arabidopsis (Guo and Gan, 2006; Kou 149
et al., 2012). AtNAP binds to the promoter of a Golgi-localized protein phosphatase 2C 150
(PP2C) family gene, SAG113, and activates its expression. Induction of SAG113 inhibits 151
stomatal closure and thereby promotes water loss and accelerates leaf senescence, whereas 152
knocking-out the gene delays developmental senescence (Zhang and Gan, 2012). Similarly in 153
rice, OsNAP/PS1 (a functional ortholog of AtNAP) mediates ABA-induced leaf senescence 154
by direct transcriptional activation of several chlorophyll degradation and senescence-155
associated genes (SAGs) including SGR, NYC1, NYC3, RCCR1, Osh36, OsI57, and Osh69. 156
Overexpression of OsNAP promotes leaf senescence, but knocking down this gene causes a 157
marked delay in senescence. Impeded leaf senescence in OsNAP RNAi lines occurs 158
concomitantly with a slower decrease in the rate of photosynthesis, and ultimately an 159
increased grain yield compared to wild-type plants (Liang et al., 2014). Recently, the cotton 160
(Gossypium hirsutum) putative ortholog of AtNAP, GhNAP, was identified as a positive 161
regulator of ABA-mediated leaf senescence. Reduction in GhNAP expression resulted in 162
delayed senescence and improved cotton yield and fiber quality (Fan et al., 2015). 163
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is one of the most popular fleshy fruit-bearing crops 164
worldwide. The tomato genome has been sequenced (Tomato Genome Consortium, 2012) 165
and tomato has been used extensively as a model crop for studies of fruit development and 166
physiology. By contrast, very few studies have been conducted on the regulation of leaf 167
senescence and its possible impact on tomato fruit yield and quality. Recently, the closest 168
tomato putative orthologs of Arabidopsis ORE1 (i.e., SlORE1S02 SlORE1S03 and 169
SlORE1S06) were identified and functionally characterized for their roles in regulating 170
tomato leaf senescence (Lira et al., 2017). Like Arabidopsis ORE1, SlORE1s expression is 171
regulated by miR164 in an age-dependent manner, and at the protein level SlORE1s interact 172
with SlGLKs (Lira et al., 2017). Reduced expression of SlORE1s in RNAi lines led to 173
delayed leaf senescence, extended carbon assimilation, and reduced expression of senescence 174
marker genes. Prolonged photosynthetic activity in SlORE1s RNAi lines, compared with 175
wild-type plants, resulted in a significant increase in the supply of photoassimilates to fruits 176
and enhanced fruit yield. 177
In the current study, we report that an ABA-activated NAC transcription factor named 178
SlNAP2 (the tomato putative ortholog of AtNAP from Arabidopsis and OsNAP from rice) 179
plays a central role in regulating leaf senescence. Furthermore, we characterize the influence 180
of SlNAP2 on fruit quality and yield. SlNAP2 is revealed to be a positive regulator of leaf 181
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
senescence and the senescence regulatory module controlled by SlNAP2 is shown to be 182
highly conserved between tomato and other plant species whose NAP-control mechanisms 183
have been elaborated. SlNAP2 directly controls the expression of the senescence-associated 184
gene SlSAG113 (a homologue of Arabidopsis SAG113) and chlorophyll degradation-related 185
genes SlSGR1 and SlPAO. Intriguingly, we also observed that SlNAP2 directly regulates the 186
expression of both ABA biosynthesis (SlNCED1) and ABA degradation (SlCYP707A2) 187
genes, suggesting the existence of a ´self-regulation´ mechanism by which SlNAP2 tunes its 188
dynamic expression in leaves. Transgenic lines with reduced expression of SlNAP2 exhibit a 189
significant delay in leaf senescence, along with an increase in fruit yield and fruit sugar 190
content. Our research further emphasizes the importance of the regulation of leaf senescence 191
for achieving increased fleshy fruit yield and sugar content. 192
193
194
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
RESULTS 195
196
SlNAP2 is Induced During Senescence 197 SlNAP2 (Solyc04g005610.2.1) and SlNAP1 (Solyc05g007770.2.1) are closely related 198
(~72.7% identity at the amino acid level) NAC transcription factors (TFs) in Solanum 199
lycopersicum (Fig. 1A). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 are 200
homologous to ANAC029/AtNAP (Arabidopsis thaliana NAC-like, activated by 201
Apetala3/Pistillata, At1g69490), which is a well-known senescence regulatory NAC TF (Guo 202
and Gan, 2006) (Fig. 1B). 203
To examine the expression patterns of SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 in S. lycopersicum, we harvested 204
various organs including roots, stem, flowers, leaves at different developmental stages (young 205
leaves, YL; mature leaves, ML; early senescent leaves, SL; and late senescent leaves, LS), 206
and fruits (immature green, IMG; mature green, MG; breaker and ripe red), and then 207
analyzed transcriptional changes using reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-208
qPCR). SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 transcripts were detected in all organs examined (Figure 1C and 209
Supplemental Figure S1A). However, both genes were significantly induced during leaf 210
senescence and fruit ripening. 211
Accordingly, histochemical analysis of transgenic SlNAP2pro:GUS tomato plants, expressing 212
the β-GLUCURONIDASE (GUS) reporter under the control of the 1.5-kb SlNAP2 promoter, 213
revealed elevated GUS activity (indicating enhanced promoter activity) in older parts of the 214
leaves. This was consistent with the results of the RT-qPCR-based expression analyses 215
(Supplemental Fig. S1B). Furthermore, expression analysis by RT-qPCR indicated that both 216
SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 transcript levels increased in leaves during dark-induced senescence 217
(Supplemental Fig. S1C). 218
219
SlNAP2 Promotes Leaf Senescence 220
To elucidate the possible involvement of SlNAP2 in the regulation of leaf senescence, we 221
first generated transgenic tomato lines (cv. Moneymaker) constitutively expressing SlNAP2 222
under the control of the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. Two lines 223
(hereafter called OX-L2 and OX-L10) were selected for further analysis (Supplemental Fig. 224
S2A). Overexpression of SlNAP2 in tomato plants triggered accelerated leaf senescence (Fig. 225
2A). The two OX lines exhibited a significantly higher number of yellow leaves compared to 226
the wild type (WT) 12 weeks after sowing (Fig. 2B). Consequently, the chlorophyll content 227
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
of the third true leaf decreased faster in OX lines than in WT during a period of 6 weeks (Fig. 228
2C). 229
To further analyze the early senescence phenotype of SlNAP2-OX lines at the molecular 230
level, we checked the expression of senescence-associated genes (SAGs). To this end, we 231
selected the following three SAGs: SlSAG12 (Solyc02g076910), a homolog of Arabidopsis 232
SAG12; SlSAG113 (Solyc05G052980), a homolog of Arabidopsis SAG113 and a direct 233
downstream target gene of AtNAP (Zhang and Gan, 2012); and SlSGR1 (Solyc08g080090), 234
which encodes a stay-green protein involved in the degradation of chlorophyll during leaf 235
senescence. We observed that all three genes were transcriptionally induced during natural 236
and dark-induced senescence as well as upon treatment with ABA in wild-type plants 237
(Supplemental Fig. S3A-C). In accordance with an early senescence phenotype of SlNAP2-238
OX plants, expression of all three SAGs was significantly higher in the third true leaf of 12-239
week-old SlNAP2-OX lines compared to wild type (Fig. 2D). 240
Next, we generated estradiol-inducible SlNAP2 overexpression lines (SlNAP2-IOE) 241
(Supplemental Fig. S2B) and checked the expression by RT-qPCR of SlSAG12, SlSAG113 242
and SlSGR1 after a 6 hour estradiol (ESTR) induction of SlNAP2 expression. The expression 243
of all three SAGs was up-regulated in SlNAP2-IOE plants following ESTR treatment 244
compared to the mock treatment (Fig. 2E). These observations support a role for SlNAP2 in 245
the regulation of developmental leaf senescence by direct or indirect regulation of 246
senescence-associated genes. 247
248
Knock-down of SlNAP2 Delays Developmental Leaf Senescence 249
To further investigate the function of SlNAP2 in controlling senescence, transgenic knock-250
down lines with reduced expression of SlNAP2 were generated using RNA interference 251
(RNAi) (Supplemental Fig. S2C). Two lines with reduced expression of SlNAP2 were 252
selected for further analysis (KD-L2 exhibiting a ~4-fold reduction and KD-L14 with a ~32-253
fold reduction). Expression of SlNAP1, the putative ortholog of SlNAP2, was unaltered in 254
these lines, indicating target gene specificity with RNAi (Supplemental Fig. S2D). 255
Considering the high sequence similarity between SlNAP1 and SlNAP2, and the possibility 256
of functional redundancy, we also created SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 double knock-down lines 257
(dKD) using artificial microRNA (amiRNA) technology. Specifically, a 21-bp sequence 258
identical in SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 was selected for generating the amiRNA construct 259
(Supplemental Fig. S2C and S2E). In general, the analysis of senescence phenotypes 260
revealed that knocking down SlNAP2 alone (KD) or in combination with SlNAP1 (dKD) 261
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
resulted in a significant delay of leaf senescence as measured by the number of yellow leaves, 262
the rate of chlorophyll loss, and the expression of senescence marker genes (Fig. 3 and see 263
next chapters). However, the observed delay in senescence was slightly more pronounced in 264
dKD plants indicating a partial functional redundancy of the two proteins. 265
We also analysed the levels of primary metabolites in fully expanded fifth leaves of 8-week-266
old SlNAP2 transgenic and wild-type plants. Overall, more significant changes among the 267
genotypes were observed with amino acids (Fig. 3D; Supplemental Table S1). The levels of 268
aromatic amino acids (AAAs: Trp, Tyr and Phe) were greater in mature leaves of SlNAP2-OX 269
plants, but lower in leaves of SlNAP2-KD and dKD plants. An increase in AAA levels was 270
reported previously for dark-induced and nitrate limitation-induced senescence as well as 271
natural senescence (Gibon et al., 2006; Fahnenstich et al., 2007; Araújo et al., 2010; Araújo et 272
al., 2011; Watanabe et al., 2013). By contrast, the levels of branched chain amino acids 273
(BCAAs; Ile and Val) were significantly lower in mature leaves of SlNAP2-OX plants. The 274
level of proline, a stress-induced osmoprotectant, was higher in SlNAP2-KD, but significantly 275
lower in SlNAP2-OX compared with wild-type plants. Glu and Asp were lower in mature 276
leaves of SlNAP2-OX plants, and greater in SlNAP2-KD and dKD lines. Conversely, the level 277
of Gln (the major amino acid translocated in the phloem sap during developmental 278
senescence; Guo et al., 2004; Diaz et al., 2005) was higher in SlNAP2-OX but significantly 279
lower in SlNAP2-KD plants. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) was significantly higher in 280
SlNAP2-OX and lower in SlNAP2-dKD than in WT. Accumulation of GABA is known to be 281
associated with senescence (Ansari et al., 2005; Ansari et al., 2014). 282
Among tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates, malic acid and fumaric acid 283
accumulated in SlNAP2 mutants. Accumulation of these metabolites was reported to be 284
associated with older parts of the leaves (Watanabe et al., 2013). These results reveal that 285
SlNAP2-OK and KD plants have varying mature leaf metabolite profiles that reflect their 286
altered senescence phenotypes. Thus, SlNAP2 plays an important role as a positive regulator 287
of leaf senescence in tomato. 288
289
SlNAP2 Is Involved in Dark-Induced Senescence 290
Darkness is widely used as a tool to induce senescence. Several reports indicate that 291
darkening of leaves share many physiological and molecular alterations with developmental 292
senescence, including a decline in photosynthesis and chlorophyll content, leaf yellowing, 293
and enhanced expression of SAGs (Weaver et al., 1998; Buchanan-Wollaston et al., 2005; 294
Van der Graaff et al., 2006; Parlitz et al., 2011). To test the involvement of SlNAP2 in dark-295
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
induced senescence, young leaves (collected from the upper part of tomato stems) from 10-296
week-old WT and SlNAP2 transgenic lines were subjected to darkness for a period of up to 297
14 days. SlNAP2-OX plants displayed an early leaf yellowing phenotype under darkness, 298
while the leaves of KD-L2 and dKD-L4 remained greener compared to the WT under the 299
same condition (Fig. 4A). Dark-induced early leaf yellowing of OX-L2 was accompanied by 300
a dramatic reduction in chlorophyll content (~70%), while chlorophyll loss was significantly 301
less in WT (~45%), KD-L2 (~20%) and dKD-L4 (~14%) leaves (Fig. 4B). Accordingly, the 302
expression of senescence marker genes such as SlSAG12, SlSAG113 and SlAGT1 303
(Solyc10G076250), as well as of genes involved in chlorophyll degradation such as SlSGR1, 304
SlPPH (Solyc01g088090), SlPAO (Solyc11g066440) and SlNYC1 (Solyc07g024000), was 305
significantly elevated in OX-L2, but reduced in KD-L2 and dKD-L4 lines compared with WT 306
under dark incubation (Fig. 4C). These data suggest that SlNAP2 acts as a positive regulator 307
of both natural and dark-induced leaf senescence by directly or indirectly controlling 308
senescence-associated chlorophyll degradation. 309
310
Involvement of SlNAP2 in ABA-mediated Leaf Senescence 311
Abscisic acid (ABA) is an important hormone involved in the regulation of plant growth and 312
development, including leaf senescence. An increase in endogenous ABA levels during 313
senescence has been reported in several plant species, including Avena sativa (oat; Gepstein 314
and Thimann, 1980), rice (Philosoph-Hadas et al., 1993), Zea mays (maize; He et al., 2005), 315
and Arabidopsis (Yang et al., 2014; Balazadeh et al., 2014). Furthermore, it is known that 316
ABA promotes leaf senescence (Gepstein and Thimann, 1980; Quiles et al., 1995; Yang et 317
al., 2003; Lee et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2016), the exogenous application of ABA can 318
accelerate chlorophyll degradation (Quiles et al., 1995; Gao et al., 2016), and ABA-deficient 319
mutants display delayed senescence in both rice (Mao et al., 2017) and Arabidopsis (Pourtau 320
et al., 2004). 321
Transcript levels of SlNAP2 began to increase (~3-fold change) 2 hours after ABA treatment 322
of wild-type seedlings, with additional increases at later time points (e.g., ~6-fold changes 323
at 8 hours) (Fig. 5A). Conversely, SlNAP2 expression was significantly reduced in tomato 324
mutants deficient in ABA biosynthesis, such as sitiens (sit) and notabilis (not), further 325
confirming that SlNAP2 is an ABA-activated transcription factor (Fig. 5B). To examine the 326
possible role of SlNAP2 in regulating ABA-induced leaf senescence, we analysed the 327
phenotype of SlNAP2 transgenic plants upon application of exogenous ABA. Specifically, 328
detached leaves from WT and SlNAP2 transgenic plants were exposed to ABA (40 µM), and 329
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
compared to control (mock) treatments that lacked ABA. When wild-type leaves were treated 330
with ABA, senescence symptoms were induced such as leaf yellowing, chlorophyll loss and 331
enhanced expression of senescence marker genes (Fig. 5C-E). Interestingly, ABA-induced 332
early senescence was more pronounced in leaves of SlNAP2 overexpressors than WT, while 333
SlNAP2 knock-down lines (KD-L2 and dKD-L4) exhibited stay-green phenotypes upon ABA 334
treatment (Fig. 5C-E). Activation of SlNAP2 by ABA and the altered senescence phenotype 335
of SlNAP2 transgenic lines upon treatment with ABA implicate SlNAP2 as a regulator of 336
ABA-dependent leaf senescence. 337
338
Identification of the Consensus Target Sequence of SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 339
TFs bind to cis-regulatory elements in promoters of target genes to control their expression. 340
Knowledge of the binding sites favours the identification of TF target genes and helps gain 341
insight into its regulatory functions. Previous work has identified high-affinity binding 342
sequences of TaNAC69 from wheat using an in vitro binding site selection assay employing 343
the CELD-fusion method (Xue et al., 2006). SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 are homologs of 344
TaNAC69, suggesting they have overlapping DNA-binding specificities. To identify the 345
target sequences of SlNAP1 and SlNAP2, we analysed the binding activity of both TFs on 12 346
randomly selected oligonucleotides with TaNAC69 binding motifs, including SO1 which is 347
considered a high-affinity binding sequence of TaNAC69 (Xue et al., 2006). SlNAP1 and 348
SlNAP2 are capable of binding to TaNAC69-selected motifs containing the YACG (or 349
CGTR) core sequence and share similar binding sequence specificities to that of TaNAC69, 350
with SO1 as the highest-affinity binding motif (Supplemental Fig. S4A). 351
To assess the specificity of binding, nucleotide mutation (substitution, insertion or deletion) 352
experiments were performed on the basis of SO1 (SO1m1–SO1m18) and SO48 (SO48m1 353
and SO48m2) motifs. Our analysis revealed that mutation of nucleotides in the core motifs 354
(oligonucleotides SO1m3, 4, 8, 9 and SO48m1) led to a dramatic reduction or abolishment of 355
SlNAP1 binding. A significant drop in the binding affinity was noticed upon reducing the 356
distance between the two core motifs from 5 to 4 bp (oligonucleotide SO1m1), or increasing 357
it to 7 bp (oligonucleotide SO1m2) (Supplemental Fig. S4A, B). Based on these results, we 358
conclude that CGT[AG](5N)NACG[ACT][AC][AT][ACG][ACT] and 359
CACG[ACT][AC][AT][AGT][CT] are high-affinity binding sites of SlNAP1. SlNAP2 360
appears to be more tolerant to the nucleotide mutations of SO1 (which contains two core 361
motifs) than SlNAP1 (Supplemental Fig. S4B). However, the mutation in the single core 362
motif of SO48 (SO48m1) led to almost complete abolishment of its binding activity. To 363
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
further demonstrate binding of SlNAP2 to the TaNAC69 motif, an electrophoretic mobility 364
shift assay (EMSA) was performed. This experiment revealed that SlNAP2 strongly binds to 365
SO1 (Supplemental Fig. S4C). 366
367
Direct Transcriptional Regulation of SAGs and ABA-related Genes by SlNAP2 368
To further elucidate the senescence control function of SlNAP2 at the molecular level, we 369
conducted an RT-qPCR analysis to evaluate the expression of 22 senescence-related genes in 370
SlNAP2-IOE plants, including known SAGs, genes involved in chlorophyll degradation, and 371
ABA-associated genes (Supplemental Fig. S2B). Our data revealed that the majority of 372
genes (15 out of 22; SlSAG12, SlSAG15, SlSAG113, SlSGR1, SlAGT1, SlSGR1, SlNYC1, 373
SlPAO, SlNCED1, SlABA3, SITIENS, SlAAO3, SlCYP707A2, SlCYP707A4, SlABCG40) were 374
induced (log2 fold change > 1) 6 hours after estradiol treatment in SlNAP2-IOE plants 375
compared to mock-treated controls (Fig. 6A), suggesting their early and positive regulation 376
by SlNAP2. Expression of all genes examined except one (SlPPH) was down-regulated in 377
KD-L2 and dKD-L4. We then searched for the presence of SlNAP2 binding sites (perfect 378
match) within 1-kb promoters of SlNAP2 early responsive genes to identify potential direct 379
target genes of the NAC TF. Twelve genes (SlSAG12, SlSAG15, SlSAG113, SlSGR1, SlPAO, 380
SlNCED1, SlABA3, SITIENS, SlAAO3, SlCYP707A2, SlCYP707A4, SlABCG40) harbor 381
SlNAP2 binding sites (perfect match) within their promoters. To test if SlNAP2 interacts with 382
the promoters of early responsive genes in vivo, we generated transgenic lines expressing 383
SlNAP2-GFP fusion protein under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter. As expected for a 384
transcription factor, SlNAP2-GFP fusion protein was located in nuclei, as visualized by 385
fluorescence microscopy of epidermal cells of transgenic tomato leaves (Fig. 6B). Using 386
SlNAP2-GFP lines, we performed chromatin immuno-precipitation coupled with RT-qPCR 387
(ChIP-qPCR) and confirmed direct binding of SlNAP2 to the promoters of SlSAG113, 388
SlSGR1, SlPAO, SlNCED1, SlCYP707A2 and SlABCG40 in vivo (Fig. 6C, E). Furthermore, 389
employing EMSAs, direct physical interaction of SlNAP2 with the promoters of all six genes 390
was confirmed (Fig. 6D, F). SlNCED1 encodes 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, a key 391
enzyme in ABA biosynthesis, and SlCYP707A2 encodes ABA 8′-hydroxylase, a key enzyme 392
in the oxidative catabolism of ABA in tomato (Ji et al., 2014). Positive regulation of both 393
genes by SlNAP2 reveals a complex role for this TF for the regulation of ABA homeostasis. 394
Next, we determined ABA levels in SlNAP2 transgenic lines and WT plants. Suppression of 395
SlNAP2 results in higher ABA accumulation in 3-week-old plants, suggesting its role as an 396
inhibitor of ABA accumulation and subsequently its own accumulation at this stage (Fig. 397
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
6G). No change in ABA levels was detected in 8-week-old SlNAP2 KD lines and WT plants 398
(Supplemental Fig. S5). 399
400
SlNAP2 Knock-down Enhances Fruit Yield and Sugar Content 401
To test the influence of altered leaf senescence (triggered by manipulating SlNAP2 402
expression) on fruit yield, we measured various yield-associated parameters. SlNAP2-OX 403
plants started producing flowers around one week earlier than WT plants (Supplemental Fig. 404
S6A). The number of fruits per plant significantly increased in SlNAP2-KD plants compared 405
to WT, while fruit number decreased in SlNAP2 overexpressors (Supplemental Fig. S6B). 406
Notably, we did not observe a significant difference between genotypes for the 407
mean time span between anthesis and the fruit breaker stage (Supplemental Fig. S6D). 408
Furthermore, fruit size was almost indistinguishable between SlNAP2-KD and WT plants, but 409
was significantly reduced in SlNAP2 overexpressors (Supplemental Fig. S6C). 410
Sweetness, which results from enhanced soluble sugar content, is one of the most important 411
traits of tomato fruits. During senescence, sugars are translocated from older leaves (source) 412
to developing fruits (sinks). To test the effect of altered senescence in SlNAP2 transgenics on 413
fruit sweetness, we measured Brix values and soluble sugar content in fruits of different 414
developmental stages. SlNAP2 KD and dKD plants synthesized higher contents of soluble 415
solids in ripe fruits as demonstrated by Brix units (Fig. 7A). The levels of sugars (fructose, 416
sucrose and glucose) were also significantly higher in SlNAP2 KD and dKD lines, particularly 417
at the breaker stage (Fig. 7B-D). Collectively, our data clearly indicate an association of 418
SlNAP2 deficiency with delayed aging and improved fruit yield and metabolism. 419
420
421
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
DISCUSSION 422
The main biological role of senescence is nutrient recycling, which is essential for plant 423
survival, crop yield and the shelf life of leafy vegetables. Although several studies have 424
demonstrated a connection between leaf senescence and productivity with regard to biomass 425
production and seed/grain yield (reviewed in Gregersen, 2013), research that has examined the 426
effects of leaf senescence on fleshy fruit production and its nutritional quality is limited. 427
Recently, Lira et al. (2017) demonstrated that a simultaneous suppression of all three homologs 428
of ORE1 in tomato (SlORE1S02, SlORE1S03, and SlORE1S06) resulted in a remarkable delay 429
of leaf senescence, increased fruit yield, and enhanced levels of sugars in the ripe fruits. 430
Furthermore, in apple (Malus sp.), overexpression of the YTH-domain-containing RNA-431
binding proteins MhYTP1 and MhYTP2 promoted leaf senescence and accelerated fruit 432
ripening (Wang et al., 2017). 433
In the current study, we demonstrate the senescence-regulatory function of SlNAP2, a member 434
of the NAC family of transcription factors (TFs) in tomato, and show that the manipulation of 435
leaf senescence by this TF is effective for improving fleshy fruit yield. SlNAP2 is expressed at 436
all stages of leaf and fruit development; however, its expression is significantly induced in 437
senescing leaves and ripe fruits. Similar to its homologs in Arabidopsis, rice and cotton, 438
expression of SlNAP2 is rapidly induced by ABA (one of the main hormones that initiates 439
leaf senescence), indicating conservation of the upstream regulatory pathways that control the 440
ABA-mediated induction of NAP genes across monocot and eudicot plant species (Zhang and 441
Gan, 2012; Liang et al., 2014; Fan et al., 2015). 442
Transgenic plants with enhanced expression of SlNAP2 exhibit early leaf senescence during 443
typical age-dependent senescence as well as during senescence induced by darkness (Fig. 2 444
and 4), as measured by reduced chlorophyll content and enhanced expression of senescence 445
marker genes. In contrast, reduced expression of SlNAP2 in knock-down plants results in a 446
substantial delay of natural and dark-induced senescence. The delayed senescence was more 447
pronounced in transgenic lines with reduced expression of both SlNAP2 and its closely related 448
homolog SlNAP1, revealing partially redundant and additive functions of the two genes in the 449
regulation of leaf senescence in tomato. 450
During senescence, a drastic change occurs in leaf metabolism, which is mainly due to the 451
degradation of metabolites and the subsequent mobilization of nutrients toward developing 452
organs. Metabolomic profiles of fully expanded fifth leaves (from 8-week-old plants) revealed 453
a clear metabolic shift between SlNAP2 overexpression and knock-down lines corresponding 454
to the contrasting senescence phenotypes (Fig. 3). Among amino acids, the levels of aromatic 455
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
amino acids (particularly Trp and Phe) and Gln were greater in SlNAP2-OX plants, but 456
significantly lower in leaves of SlNAP2-KD and dKD plants. Induction of AAAs, and more 457
specifically tryptophan, during senescence has been shown in several species such as rice 458
(Kang et al., 2009), Arabidopsis (Watanabe et al., 2013; Chrobok et al., 2016), tomato (Araújo 459
et al., 2012), and tobacco (Li et al., 2016). Gln is a major source of remobilizable N during 460
senescence and its synthesis is induced by glutamine synthetase 1 (GS1) activity in senescent 461
leaves (Tabushi et al., 2007; Park et al., 2010). Indeed, the transcript level of SlGS1 462
significantly decreased in SlNAP2 KD and dKD plants in accordance with the dramatic 463
reduction in the level of Gln in those lines (Supplemental Fig. S7). The majority of other 464
amino acids, including branched chain amino acids (Ile and Val), Gly, Ser, Lys, Asp and Glu, 465
were downregulated in SlNAP2-OX, but upregulated in KD plants. In fact, such a metabolic 466
pattern can be explained in part by enhanced expression of SlGDH (encoding glutamate 467
dehydrogenase) in SlNAP2-OX plants and its significant reduction in the KD lines 468
(Supplemental Fig. S7). It has been shown that SlGDH activity increases during senescence 469
which is essential for deamination of glutamate and subsequent catabolism of several amino 470
acids (Masclaux et al., 2000; Masclaux-Daubresse et al., 2006; Miyashita and Good, 2008). 471
In addition to age- and dark-induced senescence, ABA-induced senescence was also 472
significantly impeded in SlNAP2-suppressed plants suggesting an important role of SlNAP2 in 473
ABA-induced leaf senescence. Previous reports demonstrated a functionally conserved role for 474
NAP in the regulation of age- and ABA-induced leaf senescence in different eudicot and 475
monocot species such as Arabidopsis (AtNAP), rice (OsNAP), and cotton (GhNAP) (Guo and 476
Gan, 2006; Zhang and Gan, 2012; Zhou et al., 2013, Liang et al., 2014; Fan et al., 2015). 477
Reports on downstream regulatory pathways indicate that AtNAP and OsNAP negatively 478
regulate ABA signalling and biosynthesis pathways in Arabidopsis and rice, respectively. In 479
Arabidopsis, AtNAP directly and positively regulates expression of SAG113, a Golgi-localized 480
protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C). Hence, it negatively regulates the ABA-induced promotion of 481
stomatal closure, consequently leading to water loss and triggering leaf senescence (Zhang and 482
Gan, 2012). In rice, OsNAP suppresses ABA biosynthesis genes including OsNCED1, 483
OsNCED3 and OsNCED4, thereby controlling ABA synthesis via a feedback mechanism 484
(Liang et al., 2014). 485
To unravel the molecular mechanism through which SlNAP2 regulates leaf senescence and 486
gain insight into the level of conservation of regulatory networks controlled by SlNAP2 in 487
tomato and its homologs in other species, we performed RT-qPCR-based expression profiling 488
of senescence-associated genes, chlorophyll degradation genes, and ABA biosynthesis and 489
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
signaling genes in wild-type plants, SlNAP2 inducible overexpression lines (shortly after 490
SlNAP2 induction by estradiol) and SlNAP2 knock-down lines. Our data revealed that most 491
genes were transcriptionally enhanced after induction of SlNAP2 in estradiol-inducible 492
overexpression plants but reduced in KD and dKD lines. Of the differentially expressed genes 493
(Fig. 6), SlSAG113, SlSGR1, SlPAO, SlNCED1, SlCYP707A2 and SlABCG40 contained 494
bipartite SlNAP2 binding sites within their 1-kb 5´ upstream regulatory regions (promoters), 495
revealing potential direct targets of SlNAP2. The direct interaction between SlNAP2 and the 496
promoters of all six genes was confirmed in vivo by ChIP-qPCR, and in vitro by EMSA (Fig. 497
6). SlSAG113 is a homolog of Arabidopsis SAG113, a direct downstream target gene of 498
AtNAP. SlSGR1 and SlPAO are crucial to chlorophyll degradation in tomato leaves and 499
fruits, and the sgr mutation in tomato results in a stay-green phenotype (Akhtar et al., 1999: 500
Hu et al., 2011; Guyer et al., 2014). Interestingly in rice, OsNAP directly targets the 501
promoters of genes involved in chlorophyll degradation such as SGR, NYC1, NYC3 (PPH) 502
and RCCR, besides other senescence-associated genes (SAGs), and enhances their expression 503
(Liang et al., 2014). SlNAP2 shares high amino acid sequence similarity in the NAC domain 504
with AtNAP (~92, 2%) and OsNAP (~79, 2%) explaining the similar target gene profiles. 505
Intriguingly, SlNAP2 directly promotes the expression of both SlNCED1 and SlCYP707A2, 506
key tomato genes involved in ABA synthesis and catabolism, respectively. It has been shown 507
that the level of ABA in fruits is mainly regulated by SlNCED1 and SlCYP707A2 at the 508
transcriptional levels (Ji et al., 2014). However, functional properties of the enzymes in 509
leaves with respect to regulation of ABA levels and the consequent impact on leaf senescence 510
remain to be investigated. A positive regulation of both genes by SlNAP2 reflects a more 511
complex regulation of ABA homeostasis in tomato leaves. ABA levels were significantly 512
higher in SlNAP2 KD and dKD plants at the early stages of development, while ABA levels 513
were not altered by SlNAP2 at the later stages. This result suggests the existence of a ´self-514
regulation´ mechanism by which SlNAP2 tunes its dynamic expression during leaf 515
development (Fig. 6G). Similarly, a feedback mechanism in ABA-OsNAP1 regulation was 516
previously reported in rice, where ABA amounts were greater in non-senescent leaves of 517
OsNAP RNAi plants than in those of the wild type (Liang et al., 2014). Together, the direct 518
regulation of SlSAG113 and chlorophyll degradation genes (such as SlSGR1 and SlPAO) by 519
SINAP2, as well as SINAP2’s tight link to ABA signaling demonstrate that the regulation of 520
leaf senescence by SlNAP2 is an evolutionarily conserved pathway for senescence control in 521
eudicots and monocots. 522
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
Leaf senescence can significantly impact crop production by remobilization of 523
photoassimilates from older vegetative tissues to sink organs. To examine the influence of 524
altered leaf senescence mediated by a modification of SlNAP2 on tomato productivity, we 525
analysed different yield-related traits, such as the number and quality of fruits, and the timing 526
of ripening. Importantly, delayed senescence in SlNAP2 knock-down plants was concomitant 527
with an increased number of fruits per plant, while fruit size and speed of fruit ripening were 528
not affected (Supplemental Fig. S6). Furthermore, SlNAP2 KD and dKD plants accumulated 529
higher levels of soluble sugars such as fructose, glucose and sucrose at breaker and ripe fruit 530
stages, and brix units were significantly higher in dKD than wild-type plants (Fig. 7). 531
Delayed senescence in OsNAP and GhNAP RNAi lines was also reported to be associated 532
with increased yield in rice and cotton, respectively (Liang et al., 2014; Fan et al., 2015). 533
However, it cannot be excluded that the enhanced fruit number and nutritional quality 534
observed in SlNAP2 KD lines may result from a combinatorial effect of SlNAP2 in altering 535
senescence in leaves and modifying the physiology in fruits. 536
We conclude that SlNAP2 regulates leaf senescence and subsequently fruit yield through a 537
gene regulatory network that combines several target genes including senescence-associated 538
marker genes, chlorophyll degradation genes and ABA homeostasis-related genes (Fig. 8). 539
The regulation of leaf senescence by SlNAP2 and its positive effect on yield are considerably 540
conserved across species. Manipulation of leaf senescence through a modification of 541
regulatory factors that initiate and control senescence is a powerful strategy to improve 542
agricultural plant productivity, including the production of fleshy fruits. 543
544
545
MATERIALS AND METHODS 546
547
General 548
Tomato putative orthologs of Arabidopsis genes were identified using the PLAZA 3.0 549
database (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/plaza/; Proost et al., 2015). Genes were 550
annotated using the PLAZA 3.0 and Sol Genomics (https://solgenomics.net/) databases, and 551
using information extracted from the literature. Oligonucleotide sequences are listed in 552
Supplemental Table S2. RT-qPCR primers were designed using QuantPrime 553
(www.quantprime.de; Arvidsson et al., 2008) and some primers were designed based on 554
literature data, as indicated. Chemicals and reagents were obtained from Invitrogen, Sigma-555
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
Aldrich and Fluka. Molecular biological kits were obtained from Qiagen and Macherey-556
Nagel. 557
558
Plant Material and Growth Conditions 559
Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Moneymaker wild type (WT) was used as control in this study. 560
Seeds were germinated on full-strength Murashige–Skoog (MS) medium containing 2% 561
(w/v) sucrose, and 3-week-old seedlings were transferred to a mixture of potting soil and 562
quartz sand (2:1, v/v). Plants were grown in a growth chamber at 500 μmol photons m-2 s-1 563
and 25°C under a 14/10-h light/dark regime in individual pots (18 cm diameter). 564
565
DNA Constructs 566
Primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table S2. Amplified fragments generated by 567
PCR were sequenced by Eurofins MWG Operon (Ebersberg, Germany). Constructs were 568
transformed into tomato cv. Moneymaker via Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV2260-mediated 569
transformation. For SlNAP2pro:GUS lines, the 1.5-kb SlNAP2 promoter was amplified from 570
WT genomic DNA and introduced upstream of the GUS coding sequence in plasmid 571
pKGWFS7,0 (Karimi et al., 2002). For the generation of SlNAP2-KD plants, an 88-bp 572
fragment from the 3´ end of the SlNAP2 coding sequence was amplified from WT cDNA and 573
cloned into the GATEWAY-compatible entry vector pDONR221 (Invitrogen). The fragment 574
was then cloned into the pK7GWIWG2 RNAi vector (Karimi et al., 2002) in sense and 575
antisense orientations, flanking an intervening intron, by GATEWAY cloning (Invitrogen). 576
To generate SlNAP1/SlNAP2 double knock-down (dKD) plants, an amiRNA construct was 577
engineered by replacing the original miR319a/miR319a* sequence in plasmid pRS300 578
(Schwab et al., 2006) with a 21-bp sequence (TAATTCCCAGGGATCGAACTT) identical in 579
SlNAP1 and SlNAP2. The amiRNA was designed using Web MicroRNA Designer 3 580
(http://wmd3.weigelworld.org/cgi-bin/webapp.cgi), and subsequently inserted downstream of 581
the CaMV 35S promoter in the pK7WG2 binary vector (Karimi et al., 2002) via GATEWAY 582
cloning. For 35S:SlNAP2-GFP, the full-length SlNAP2 open reading frame was amplified 583
without its stop codon. The PCR product was cloned into the pENTR/D-TOPO vector using 584
the pENTR Directional TOPO Cloning kit (Invitrogen). The sequence-verified entry clone 585
was then transferred to the pK7FWG2 vector (Karimi et al., 2002) by LR recombination 586
(Invitrogen). For SlNAP2-IOE, the SlNAP2 coding sequence was cloned into the pER10-587
GATEWAY-compatible vector (Zuo et al., 2000). For SlNAP1- and SlNAP2-CELD, the 588
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
DBP-CELD fusion vector pTacLCELD6XHis was used (Xue, 2005). SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 589
full coding sequences (without stop codons) were amplified by PCR with a sense primer 590
(including an NheI restriction site) and an antisense primer (including a BamHI restriction 591
site) (Supplemental Table S2). The amplified DNA fragments were first inserted into 592
pCR2.1 (ThermoFischer Scientific) and then inserted N-terminal of CELD using the NheI 593
and BamHI cloning sites of pTacLCELD6XHis to create an in-frame fusion. 594
595
Treatments 596
For estradiol induction, 3-week-old SlNAP2-IOE seedlings were incubated in sterile water 597
containing 15 μM estradiol (control treatment: 0.15% [v/v] ethanol). The seedlings were kept 598
on a rotary shaker for 6 hours and then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. For ABA 599
treatment, 3-week-old tomato seedlings were incubated in sterile water containing 40 μM 600
ABA. The seedlings were kept on a rotary shaker for 2, 4, 8 or 16 hours and then harvested in 601
liquid nitrogen. For dark-induced leaf senescence experiments, detached young leaves from 602
10-week-old WT and SlNAP2 transgenic plants were placed on moist filter papers in Petri 603
dishes with the adaxial side facing upwards. The plates were kept in darkness at 22°C for two 604
weeks. Filter papers were changed every five days. Gene expression levels were determined 605
by RT-qPCR. 606
607
Gene Expression Analysis 608
Total RNA extraction was done using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies). Synthesis of 609
complementary DNA and RT-qPCR using SYBR Green were performed as described 610
(Balazadeh et al., 2008). PCR was performed using an ABI PRISM 7900HT sequence 611
detection system (Applied Biosystems). GAPDH (Solyc04g009030) served as reference gene 612
for data analysis. Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-test. 613
614
DNA-Binding Site Selection 615
In vitro binding site selection was performed using the CELD-fusion method with the 616
pTacSlNAP1-LCELD6XHis and pTacSlNAP2-LCELD6XHis constructs, employing biotin-617
labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides (Xue, 2005). The DNA binding activity of SlNAP1-618
CELD and SlNAP2-CELD was measured using methylumbelliferyl β-D-cellobioside as a 619
substrate (Xue, 2002). DNA binding assays with a biotin-labeled single-stranded 620
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
oligonucleotide or a biotin-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotide without a target binding 621
site were used as controls. 622
623
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay 624
SlNAP2-CELD fusion protein was extracted from Escherichia coli Rosetta (DE3) competent 625
cells. 5´-DY682-labelled 40-bp oligonucleotides representing fragments of the SlSAG113 (5’-626
TCTTCTCATTGGCCCACGTAAATTCAAATCAATAAAATCT-3’), SlSGR1 (5’-627
ATCGATCGAGCTCCAATACGAATATCGGAATAAGAAAAAA-3’), SlPAO (5’-628
CATTGTTCATAACTTGCACGCAAATCCTTCTTCTTCTTCT-3’), SlNCED1 (5’-629
CAATTTCTTTTATATGTCTACGTAATTATTTAAAAAGAAT-3’), SlCYP707A2 (5’-630
TTGTTGTTTTTTCATTACGTATTTGAAATTCGCGTTAGAG-3’) and SlABCG40 (5’- 631
TTTTTGTGTGTTTGATACGTAATTAAATATAAATAAAAAA-3’) promoters were 632
purchased from Eurofins MWG Operon and annealed with their sequence-complementary 633
oligonucleotides to form DNA probes. Annealing was performed by heating the primers to 634
99°C, followed by slow cooling to room temperature. The binding reaction was performed at 635
room temperature for 20 min. EMSA reactions were performed using the Odyssey Infrared 636
EMSA kit (LI-COR Biosciences, Bad Homburg, Germany) as described in the manual. 637
DNA-protein complexes were separated on 6% agarose retardation gels, while DY682 signal 638
was detected using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences). 639
640
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) 641
ChIP-qPCR was performed from leaves of mature 35S:SlNAP2-GFP plants, and wild type 642
(WT) served as control. ChIP was performed as described (Kaufmann et al., 2010) using anti-643
GFP antibody to immunoprecipitate protein-DNA complexes. qPCR primers were designed 644
to flank the SlNAP2-binding sites within the promoter regions of SlSAG12, SlSAG113, 645
SlSGR1, SlPAO, SlNCED1, SlCYP707A2 and SlABCG40. Primers annealing to a promoter 646
region of Solyc04g009030 lacking a SlNAP2 binding site were used as a negative control. 647
Primers used for qPCR are listed in Supplemental Table S2. 648
649
Chlorophyll Measurements 650
Chlorophyll content was determined using a SPAD analyser (N-tester; Hydro Agri). 651
652
Metabolite Measurements 653
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
Metabolite profiling of tomato mature green leaves and fruits at three developmental stages 654
was carried out by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (ChromaTOF software, Pegasus 655
driver 1.61; LECO) as described previously (Lisec et al., 2006). The chromatograms and 656
mass spectra were evaluated using TagFinder software (Luedemann et al., 2012). Metabolite 657
identification was manually checked by the mass spectral and retention index collection of 658
the Golm Metabolome Database (Kopka et al., 2004). Peak heights of the mass fragments 659
were normalized on the basis of the fresh weight of the sample and the added amount of an 660
internal standard (ribitol). Statistical differences between groups were analyzed by Student’s 661
t-tests on the raw data. Results were determined to be statistically different at a probability 662
level of P < 0.05. Relative metabolite levels were obtained as the ratio between the lines and 663
the mean value of the respective wild type. 664
665
ABA Measurement 666
Plant tissue (approximately 20 mg fresh weight of each sample) was ground using 3-mm 667
tungsten carbide beads (Retsch, Haan, Germany) with a MM 301 vibration mill at a 668
frequency of 27.0 Hz for 3 min (Retsch). Internal standard containing deuterium-labelled 669
standard (20 pmol of (+)-3´,5´,5´,7´,7´,7´-2H6-ABA) and 1 mL ice-cold methanol/water/acetic 670
acid (10/89/1, v/v) were added to each of the samples. After 1 h of shaking in the dark at 4°C, 671
the homogenates were centrifuged (20,000 x g, 10 min, 4°C) after extraction, and the pellets 672
were then re-extracted in 0.5 mL extraction solvent for 30 min. The combined extracts were 673
purified by solid-phase extraction on Oasis HLB cartridges (60 mg, 3 mL, Waters, Milford, 674
MA, USA), evaporated to dryness in a Speed-Vac (UniEquip), and analysed by UPLC-ESI (-675
/+)-MS/MS (Turečková et al., 2009). 676
677
Brix Determination 678
Brix was determined as the concentration of total soluble solids (TSS), using a digital 679
refractometer (Krüss Optronic, Germany), on six ripe red fruit samples per genotype. 680
681
Accession Numbers 682
Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under 683
accession numbers SlNAP1 (NP_001316452.1); SlNAP2 (XM_004236996.2); SlSAG12 684
(XP_004233054); SlSAG113 (XP_004239911.1); SlSGR1 (NP_001234723.1); SlPAO 685
(NP_001234535.2); SlNCED1 (NP_001234455); SlCYP707A2 (XP_004244436.1); 686
SlABCG40 (XP_004247842.1); SlGDH1 (NP_001292722); SlGS1 (XP_004248690). 687
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
24
XXX. 688
689
Supplemental Data 690
Supplemental Figure 1. Expression of SlNAP1 and SlNAP2. 691
Supplemental Figure 2. Expression of SlNAP2 in overexpression and knock-down lines. 692
Supplemental Figure 3. Expression of senescence marker genes. 693
Supplemental Figure 4. Identification of the binding sequences of SlNAP1 and SlNAP2. 694
Supplemental Figure 5. ABA content. 695
Supplemental Figure 6. Effect of SlNAP2 on fruit yield. 696
Supplemental Figure 7. Expression of SlGDH1 and SlGS1. 697
698
699
Supplemental Table 1. 700
Supplemental Table 1. Relative metabolite content of fully expanded leaves of 8-week-old 701
SlNAP2 transgenic and WT pants. 702
Supplemental Table 2. Oligonucleotide sequences. 703
704
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 705
We thank Dr. Karin Koehl and her team (Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology) 706
for plant care. We thank the University of Potsdam and the Max Planck Institute of Molecular 707
Plant Physiology for supporting our research. 708
709
Figure legends 710
711
Figure 1. SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 are up-regulated during leaf senescence. 712
A, Protein sequence alignment of AtNAP, SlNAP1, and SlNAP2. Amino acids identical in all 713
three proteins are highlighted with a black background, while conservative substitutions are 714
shown with a grey background. Asterisks indicate the stop codons. B, Phylogenetic analysis 715
of NAC proteins. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA 5.05 software using the 716
Neighbor–Joining method with the following parameters: bootstrap analysis of 1,000 717
replicates, Poisson model and pairwise deletion. SlNAP1, SlNAP2, NAC-NOR and SlNAC3 718
are senescence-induced tomato TFs of the NAP family, while all other TFs are from 719
Arabidopsis. Gene codes are: ATAF1, At1g01720; ATAF2, At5g08790; AtNAC2, 720
At5g39610; AtNAM, At1g52880; AtNAP, At1g69490; CUC2, At5g53950; NAC-NOR, 721
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
25
Solyc10g006880; SlNAP1, Solyc05g007770; SlNAP2, Solyc04g005610; SlNAC3, 722
Solyc07g063420. The numbers at the nodes indicate the bootstrap values. The bar at the 723
bottom indicates the relative divergence of the sequences examined. C, The left panel shows 724
representative images of Solanum lycopersicum cv. Moneymaker leaves at different 725
developmental stages; young leaves (YL), mature leaves (ML), senescent leaves (SL), and 726
late senescent leaves (LS). The right panel denotes the expression levels of SlNAP1 and 727
SlNAP2 in such leaves, determined by RT-qPCR. The Y axis indicates expression level (40 - 728
dCt). Values are expressed as the difference between an arbitrary value of 40 and dCt, so that 729
high 40 - dCt values indicate high gene expression levels. Data are means of three biological 730
replicates ± SD. Asterisks indicate significant difference from young leaves (Student’s t-test; 731
**: P ≤ 0.01). 732
733
Figure 2. Overexpression of SlNAP2 leads to early developmental leaf senescence. 734
A, Phenotype of WT, OX-L2, and OX-L10 plants. Upper panel: 12-week-old plants; lower 735
panel: phenotypes of the third true leaf of 10-week-old plants (leaves were individually 736
photographed and compiled for comparison). B, Ratio of yellow to all leaves in 12-week-old 737
WT, OX-L2, and OX-L10 plants. Leaves were counted as yellow if chlorophyll content had 738
declined by more than 50% compared to those leaves in 8-week-old plants. Data are means ± 739
SD (n = 5). C, Chlorophyll loss of the third true leaf (counted from the bottom of the stem) of 740
WT, OX-L2, OX-L10 plants 8, 10, 12 and 14 weeks after sowing (8W - 14W). Chlorophyll 741
content was measured using a SPAD analyser and compared to the content in each genotype 742
at time point 8W (set to 1). Data are means ± SD of three biological replicates. Significant 743
difference from the wild type is denoted by one asterisk (Student’s t-test; P ≤ 0.05) or two 744
asterisks (P ≤ 0.01). Red asterisks indicate a significant difference between OX-L2 and WT, 745
and blue asterisks indicate a significant difference between OX-L10 and WT. D, Expression 746
of senescence marker genes (SlSAG12, SlSAG113 and SlSGR1) in lower positioned leaves of 747
12-week-old WT, OX-L2, and OX-L10 plants, analysed by RT-qPCR. Data are means ± SD 748
of three biological replicates. E, Expression of senescence marker genes in SlNAP2-IOE 749
plants after 6 h estradiol (ESTR) induction of SlNAP2 expression, compared to expression in 750
mock-treated plants. Data are means ± SD of three biological replicates. Values at the Y axes 751
in (D) and (E) represent the difference between an arbitrary value of 40 and dCt, so that high 752
40 - dCt values indicate high gene expression level. Asterisks in panels B, D and E indicate 753
significant difference from WT (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05, **: P ≤ 0.01). 754
755
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
26
Figure 3. Knocking down SlNAP2 delays developmental leaf senescence. 756
A, Phenotype of SlNAP2 knock-down (KD-L2) and SlNAP2/SlNAP1 double knock-down 757
(dKD-L4) plants. Upper panel: 12-week-old plants; lower panel: phenotypes of the third true 758
leaf of 10-week-old plants. The WT plant shown is the same as in Figure 2A (as 759
overexpressor and knock-down lines, together with WT plants, were grown side by side in 760
the same experiment; plants and leaves were individually photographed and compiled for 761
comparison). B, Ratio of yellow to all leaves in 12-week-old plants. Leaves were counted as 762
yellow if chlorophyll content had declined by more than 50% compared to those leaves in 8-763
week-old plants. Asterisks indicate significant difference from wild-type plants (Student’s t-764
test; **: P ≤ 0.01) (n = 5). C, Chlorophyll loss of the third true leaf (counted from the bottom 765
of the stem) of WT, KD-L2, and dKD-L4 plants 8, 10, 12 and 14 weeks after sowing (8W – 766
14W). Chlorophyll content was measured using a SPAD analyser and compared to the 767
content in each genotype at time point 8W (set to 1). Data are means ± SD of three biological 768
replicates. Significant difference from wild type is denoted by one asterisk (Student’s t-test; P 769
≤ 0.05) or two asterisks (P ≤0.01). Red asterisks indicate a significant difference between 770
dKD-L4 and WT, and blue asterisks indicate a significant difference between KD-L2 and 771
WT. D, Metabolite contents of SlNAP2 transgenic lines compared to wild-type plants. The 772
fifth fully expanded leaves were harvested from 8-week-old WT, OX-L2, KD-L2 and dKD-L4 773
plants. Metabolite content was analyzed using GC-MS (n = 4). Log2 fold change (FCh) 774
values of the relative metabolite contents are presented here. Asterisks indicate significant 775
difference from wild type (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05, **: P ≤ 0.01). 776
777
Figure 4. SlNAP2 accelerates dark-induced senescence. 778
A, Young detached leaves of 10-week-old WT and SlNAP2-transgenic lines before (day 0) 779
and after 14 days of dark treatment. Leaves were detached from the top part of the stem. 780
Leaves in each panel were individually photographed and compiled for presentation. B, 781
Chlorophyll content of control and dark-treated leaves, determined using a SPAD analyser. 782
Data are means of leaves from three plants ± SD. Asterisks indicate significant differences 783
from wild-type plants (Student’s t test; **: P ≤ 0.01). C, Expression of SAGs (SlSAG12, 784
SlSAG113, SlAGT1 and SlSAG15), chlorophyll degradation genes (SlSGR1, SlPPH, SlPAO 785
and SlNYC1) in control and dark-treated leaves of WT and SlNAP2 transgenic lines. The Y 786
axis indicates expression level (40-dCt). Data are means ± SD of three biological replicates. 787
Asterisks indicate significant difference from wild-type plant (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05, 788
**: P ≤ 0.01). 789
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
27
790
Figure 5. SlNAP2 regulates ABA-induced leaf senescence. 791
A, Elevated expression of SlNAP2 after ABA treatment. Three-week-old wild-type seedlings 792
were treated with ABA (40 µM) for 2, 4, 8 and 16 h. Data are means ± SD of three biological 793
replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences from mock-treated plants (Student’s t-794
test; *: P ≤ 0.05). B, Reduced expression of SlNAP2 in ABA-deficient mutants, sitiens (sit) 795
and notabilis (not). Data are means ± SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate 796
significant difference from WT (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05; **: P ≤ 0.01). C, Phenotype of 797
detached leaves from 10-week-old WT and SlNAP2-transgenic plants before (0 d) and after 798
treatment with 40 µM ABA for 9 days (9 d). Young leaves from the top of the stem were used 799
and individually photographed. D, Chlorophyll content of control and ABA-treated leaves, 800
determined using a SPAD analyser. Data are means ± SD from six leaves of three different 801
plants. Asterisks indicate significant difference from respective mock-treated leaves 802
(Student’s t-test; **: P ≤ 0.01). E, RT-qPCR analysis of SlSAG12, SlSAG113 and SlSGR1 803
expression in control and ABA-treated leaves. The Y axis indicates expression level (40 - 804
dCt). Asterisks indicate significant difference from wild type (Student’s t-test; **: P ≤ 0.01). 805
806
Figure 6. Direct regulation of SAGs and ABA-related genes by SlNAP2. 807
A, Heat map showing the fold change (FCh; log2 basis) of the expression ratio of SAGs, 808
chlorophyll degradation as well as ABA biosynthesis and signalling genes in the following 809
samples: 3-week-old SlNAP2-IOE seedlings (line IOE-L5) treated with estradiol (15 µM) for 810
6 h compared to ethanol (0.15%, v/v) treated seedlings (mock); KD-L2 and dKD-L4 lines, 811
compared to WT. Blue, downregulated; red, upregulated (as indicated by the color bar). Data 812
represent means of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference from 813
mock-treated and/or WT plants (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05, **: P ≤ 0.01). Genes shown in 814
bold are direct targets of SlNAP2 (see panels C – F). B, Subcellular localization of SlNAP2-815
GFP fusion protein in epidermal cells of transgenic tomato leaves, visualized by fluorescence 816
microscopy. Top, bright field; bottom, GFP fluorescence (green) under bright field. Scale bar, 817
10 µm. C, ChIP-qPCR shows enrichment of SlSAG113, SlSGR1 and SlPAO (but not 818
SlSAG12) promoter regions containing the SlNAP2 binding site. Mature leaves (no. 3 - 5) 819
harvested from 8-week-old SlNAP2-GPF plants were used for the ChIP experiment. Values 820
were normalized to the values for Solyc04g009030 (promoter lacking a SlNAP2 binding site). 821
Data are means ± SD of two independent biological replicates, each performed with three 822
technical replicates. D, EMSA showing binding of purified SlNAP2-CELD protein to the 5´-823
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
28
DY682-labelled 40-bp-long promoter fragments of SlSAG113, SlSGR1 and SlPAO, containing 824
the SlNAP2 binding sites. Lane 1, labelled promoter fragment only; lane 2, labelled promoter 825
fragment plus SlNAP2-CELD protein, showing the retardation band (´bound probe´); lane 3, 826
labelled promoter fragment, SlNAP2-CELD protein plus 100-fold molar access of non-827
labelled promoter (competitor). E, ChIP-qPCR. Mature leaves of 8-week-old SlNAP2-GPF 828
plants were harvested for the ChIP experiment. qPCR was performed to quantify the 829
enrichment of SlNCED1, SlCYP70A2 and SlABCG40 promoter regions. Values were 830
normalized to the values for Solyc04g009030 (promoter lacking a SlNAP2 binding site). 831
Data are means ± SD of two biological replicates, each performed in two technical replicates. 832
F, EMSA showing binding of purified SlNAP2-CELD protein to 5´-DY682-labelled 40-bp-833
long promoter fragments of SlNCED1, SlCYP707A2 and SlABCG40, containing the SlNAP2 834
binding sites. For description of lanes, see legend to panel D. G, ABA content. Three-week-835
old WT, KD-L2 and dKD-L4 plants were harvested and ABA content was determined using 836
UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. ABA content is shown as means ± SD of three biological replicates. 837
Asterisks indicate significant difference from the wild type (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05). FW, 838
fresh weight. 839
840
Figure 7. Fruit Brix value and soluble sugar content. 841
A, The content of total soluble solids (TSS) of ripe red fruits was determined using a digital 842
refractometer. Values represent the means ± SD of six biological replicates (Student’s t-test; 843
*: P ≤ 0.05). The contents of fructose (B), sucrose (C) and glucose (D) in the pericarps of 844
SlNAP2 transgenic and WT fruits at different developmental stages, analyzed by GC-MS (n = 845
4). Relative metabolite levels were obtained by normalizing the intensity value of each 846
metabolite to the ribitol internal standard. Asterisks indicate significant difference from the 847
wild type (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05, **: P ≤ 0.01). MG: mature green fruits. 848
849
Figure 8. Model of SlNAP2 action in tomato. 850
During age-dependent and dark-induced senescence, ABA accumulates in leaves which leads 851
to an activation of SlNAP2 expression; enhanced expression of SlNAP2 during leaf aging may 852
also be triggered without the involvement of ABA. SlNAP2 activates SlSAG113, chlorophyll 853
degradation genes such as SlSGR1 and SlPAO, and other downstream targets by directly 854
binding to their promoters, thereby promoting leaf senescence. SlNAP2 also directly 855
regulates the expression of ABA biosynthesis (SlNCED1), transport (SlABCG40) and 856
degradation (SlCYP707A2) genes, indicating a complex role in establishing ABA 857
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
29
homeostasis. Inhibition of SlNAP2 leads to delayed leaf senescence and enhanced fruit yield 858
and sugar content, likely due to prolonged leaf photosynthesis, although a direct effect of 859
SlNAP2 on fruit development is possible. Arrow-ending lines, positive regulation; T-ending 860
lines, negative regulation. The dashed line indicates a possible, but not yet experimentally 861
confirmed interaction between senescing leaves and developing fruits. 862
863
864
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
C
Figure 1.
A
B
YL ML SL LS
AtNAPSlNAP1SlNAP2
AtNAPSlNAP1SlNAP2
AtNAPSlNAP1SlNAP2
AtNAPSlNAP1SlNAP2
20
25
30
35
40
45
SlNAP1 SlNAP2
Expr
essi
on le
vel (
40-d
Ct) YL ML SL LS
**
****
**
797980
159159160
238233236
269283276
NAC-NOR
0.10100
100
100
100100
99
79
SlNAP1SlNAP2AtNAP
AtNAM
SlNAC3ATAF1
ATAF2AtNAC2
CUC2
Figure 1. SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 are up-regulated during leaf senescence.A, Protein sequence alignment of AtNAP, SlNAP1, and SlNAP2. Amino acids identical in all three proteins are highlighted with ablack background, while conservative substitutions are shown with a grey background. Asterisks indicate the stop codons. B,Phylogenetic analysis of NAC proteins. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA 5.05 software using the Neighbor–Joining method with the following parameters: bootstrap analysis of 1,000 replicates, Poisson model and pairwise deletion.SlNAP1, SlNAP2, NAC-NOR and SlNAC3 are senescence-induced tomato TFs of the NAP family, while all other TFs are fromArabidopsis. Gene codes are: ATAF1, At1g01720; ATAF2, At5g08790; AtNAC2, At5g39610; AtNAM, At1g52880; AtNAP,At1g69490; CUC2, At5g53950; NAC-NOR, Solyc10g006880; SlNAP1, Solyc05g007770; SlNAP2, Solyc04g005610; SlNAC3,Solyc07g063420 . The numbers at the nodes indicate the bootstrap values. The bar at the bottom indicates the relativedivergence of the sequences examined. C , The left panel shows representative images of Solanum lycopersicumcv. Moneymaker leaves at different developmental stages; young leaves (YL), mature leaves (ML), senescent leaves (SL), andlate senescent leaves (LS). The right panel denotes the expression levels of SlNAP1 and SlNAP2 in such leaves, determined byRT-qPCR. The Y axis indicates expression level (40 - dCt). Values are expressed as the difference between an arbitrary value of40 and dCt, so that high 40 - dCt values indicate high gene expression levels. Data are means of three biological replicates±SD. Asterisks indicate significant difference from young leaves (Student’s t-test; **: P ≤ 0.01).
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 2
A
C
WT OX-L2 OX-L10
D
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
8W 10W 12W 14W
WTOX-L2OX-L10
25
30
35
40
45
50
SlSAG12 SlSAG113 SlSGR1
Expr
essi
on le
vel (
40-d
Ct)
WT OX-L2 OX-L10
** ** ****
WT
WT
B
05
10152025303540
WT OX-L2 OX-L10
**
WT
Yello
w le
af ra
tio (%
)(y
ello
w le
aves
/tota
l lea
fno.
)
*
Chl
orop
hyll
cont
ent
(com
pare
dto
8W)
15
20
25
30
35
40
SlSAG12 SlSAG113 SlSGR1
Expr
essi
on le
vel (
40-d
Ct)
Mock
Est
*
** **E
*
**
****
*
ESTR
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.2
Figure 2. Overexpression of SlNAP2 leads to early developmental leaf senescence.A, Phenotype of WT, OX-L2, and OX-L10 plants. Upper panel: 12-week-old plants; lower panel: phenotypes of the third trueleaf of 10-week-old plants (leaves were individually photographed and compiled for comparison). B , Ratio of yellow to allleaves in 12-week-old WT, OX-L2, and OX-L10 plants. Leaves were counted as yellow if chlorophyll content had declined bymore than 50% compared to those leaves in 8-week-old plants. Data are means± SD (n = 5). C, Chlorophyll loss of the thirdtrue leaf (counted from the bottom of the stem) of WT, OX-L2, OX-L10 plants 8, 10, 12 and 14 weeks after sowing (8W -14W). Chlorophyll content was measured using a SPAD analyser and compared to the content in each genotype at timepoint 8W (set to 1). Data are means± SD of three biological replicates. Significant difference from the wild type is denotedby one asterisk (Student’s t-test; P ≤ 0.05) or two asterisks (P ≤ 0.01). Red asterisks indicate a significant difference betweenOX-L2 and WT, and blue asterisks indicate a significant difference between OX-L10 and WT. D, Expression of senescencemarker genes (SlSAG12, SlSAG113 and SlSGR1) in lower positioned leaves of 12-week-old WT, OX-L2, and OX-L10 plants,analysed by RT-qPCR. Data are means ± SD of three biological replicates. E, Expression of senescence marker genes inSlNAP2-IOE plants after 6 h estradiol (ESTR) induction of SlNAP2 expression, compared to expression in mock-treated plants.Data are means± SD of three biological replicates. Values at the Y axes in (D) and (E) represent the difference between anarbitrary value of 40 and dCt, so that high 40 - dCt values indicate high gene expression level. Asterisks in panels B, D and Eindicate significant difference fromWT (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05, **: P ≤ 0.01).
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 3
A
C
BWT KD-L2 dKD-L4
5th
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
WT KD-L2 dKD-L4Ye
llow
leaf
ratio
(%)
(yel
low
leav
es /
tota
l lea
fno.
)
** **
WT
D
TrpPheTyrIleValThrGlySerLysProAspGluGlnAla
*
***
**
* **
** *
**
OX-L2 KD-L2 dKD-L4
GABACitric acidMalic acidSuccinic acidFumaric acidAconitic acidPhosphoric acidSaccharic acidGlyceric acid
OX-L2 KD-L2 dKD-L4
RhamnoseXyloseFructoseSucroseGlucoseMannoseSorboseRiboseXylose
OX-L2 KD-L2 dKD-L4
* *
** *
*
Log2 FCh-0.6 0 0.6
* *
*
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
8W 10W 12W 14W
Chl
orop
hyll
cont
ent
(com
pare
dto
8W)
WTKD-L2dKD-L4
WT
**
*
***
**
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Figure 3. Knocking down SlNAP2 delays developmental leaf senescence.A, Phenotype of SlNAP2 knock-down (KD-L2) and SlNAP2/SlNAP1 double knock-down (dKD-L4) plants. Upper panel: 12-week-oldplants; lower panel: phenotypes of the third true leaf of 10-week-old plants. The WT plant shown is the same as in Figure 2A (asoverexpressor and knock-down lines, together with WT plants, were grown side by side in the same experiment; plants andleaves were individually photographed and compiled for comparison). B, Ratio of yellow to all leaves in 12-week-old plants.Leaves were counted as yellow if chlorophyll content had declined by more than 50% compared to those leaves in 8-week-oldplants. Asterisks indicate significant difference from wild-type plants (Student’s t-test; **: P ≤ 0.01) (n = 5). C, Chlorophyll loss ofthe third true leaf (counted from the bottom of the stem) of WT, KD-L2, and dKD-L4 plants 8, 10, 12 and 14 weeks after sowing(8W – 14W). Chlorophyll content was measured using a SPAD analyser and compared to the content in each genotype at timepoint 8W (set to 1). Data are means± SD of three biological replicates. Significant difference from wild type is denoted by oneasterisk (Student’s t-test; P ≤ 0.05) or two asterisks (P ≤0.01). Red asterisks indicate a significant difference between dKD-L4 andWT, and blue asterisks indicate a significant difference between KD-L2 and WT. D, Metabolite contents of SlNAP2 transgeniclines compared to wild-type plants. The fifth fully expanded leaves were harvested from 8-week-old WT, OX-L2, KD-L2 and dKD-L4 plants. Metabolite content was analyzed using GC-MS (n = 4). Log2 fold change (FCh) values of the relative metabolitecontents are presented here. Asterisks indicate significant difference from wild type (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05, **: P ≤ 0.01).
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 4
15
25
35
45
55
Control Dark
SlPPH
AB
14
0
KD-L2 dKD-L4OX-L2 WT
WT
01020304050607080
Control Dark
Chl
orop
hyll
cont
ent
(SPA
D v
alue
)
OX-L2 WTKD-L2 dKD-L4
**
** **
WT
Day
s in
dar
knes
s
15
25
35
45
55
Control Dark
SlSAG113 ***
15
25
35
45
55
Control Dark
SlAGT1
****SlSAG113
Day 0 Day 14
Day 0 Day 14Day 0 Day 14
15
25
35
45
55
Control Dark
**
SlSAG15
Day 0 Day 14
*****
Day 0 Day 1415
25
35
45
55
Control Dark
****
SlSGR1
Day 0 Day 14
Expr
essi
on le
vel
(40-
dCt)
SIPPH
15
25
35
45
55
Control Dark
**
Day 0 Day 14
SIPAO
15
25
35
45
55
Control Dark
** *
SlNYC1
Day 0 Day 14
SINYC1
C
15
25
35
45
55
Control Dark
*
* *
SlSAG12
Day 0 Day 14
Expr
essi
on le
vel
(40-
dCt)
OX-L2WTKD-L2dKD-L4
Figure 4 . SlNAP2 accelerates dark-induced senescence.A, Young detached leaves of 10-week-old WT and SlNAP2-transgenic lines before (day 0) and after 14 days of dark treatment.Leaves were detached from the top part of the stem. Leaves in each panel were individually photographed and compiled forpresentation. B, Chlorophyll content of control and dark-treated leaves, determined using a SPAD analyser. Data are means ofleaves from three plants± SD. Asterisks indicate significant differences from wild-type plants (Student’s t test; **: P ≤ 0.01). C,Expression of SAGs (SlSAG12, SlSAG113, SlAGT1 and SlSAG15), chlorophyll degradation genes (SlSGR1, SlPPH, SlPAO and SlNYC1)in control and dark-treated leaves of WT and SlNAP2 transgenic lines. The Y axis indicates expression level (40-dCt). Data aremeans± SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference from wild-type plant (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤0.05, **: P ≤ 0.01). https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by
Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 5
E
20
25
30
35
40
0 DAT 9 DAT
OX-L2WTKD-L2DKD-L4
**
SlSAG12
25
30
35
40
45
0 DAT 9 DAT
**
25
30
35
40
0 DAT 9 DAT
**SlSAG113 SlSGR1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Chl
orop
hyll
cont
ent
(SPA
D v
alue
)
Mock 0DATMock 9DATABA 9DAT
****
OX-L2 WT KD-L2 dKD-L4
0d9d,Mock9d,ABA
D
9d, ABA
0d
9d, Mock
OX-L2 WT KD-L2 dKD-L4C
Expr
essi
on le
vel
(40-
dCt)
A B
25
30
35
40
45
2h 4h 8h 16h
Mock ABA
* * *
Expr
essi
on le
vel
(40-
dCt)
WT sitiens notabilis25
30
35 ***
Expr
essi
on le
vel (
40-d
Ct)
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 5. SlNAP2 regulates ABA-induced leaf senescence.A, Elevated expression of SlNAP2 after ABA treatment. Three-week-old wild-type seedlings were treated with ABA (40 µM)for 2, 4, 8 and 16 h. Data are means± SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences from mock-treated plants (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05). B, Reduced expression of SlNAP2 in ABA-deficient mutants, sitiens (sit) andnotabilis (not). Data are means ± SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference from WT(Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05; **: P ≤ 0.01). C , Phenotype of detached leaves from 10-week-old WT and SlNAP2-transgenicplants before (0 d) and after treatment with 40 µM ABA for 9 days (9 d). Young leaves from the top of the stem were usedand individually photographed. D, Chlorophyll content of control and ABA-treated leaves, determined using a SPAD analyser.Data are means± SD from six leaves of three different plants. Asterisks indicate significant difference from respective mock-treated leaves (Student’s t-test; **: P ≤ 0.01). E, RT-qPCR analysis of SlSAG12, SlSAG113 and SlSGR1 expression in control andABA-treated leaves. The Y axis indicates expression level (40 - dCt). Asterisks indicate significant difference from wild type(Student’s t-test; **: P ≤ 0.01).
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 6
Fold
enric
hmen
t(lo
g2)
C
boundprobes
freeprobes
B D
-2.0 0.0 +2.0
AFo
lden
richm
ent(
log2
)
E
-1-0,5
00,5
11,5
22,5
3
SlSAG12 SISAG113 SISGR1 SIPAO
SlSAG12SlSAG15SlSAG113
SlSGR1SlAGT1
SlNYC1SlPPHSlPAOSlNCED1
SlABA1SlABA3SlTIENSSlAAO3SlCYP707A1SlCYP707A2
SlCYP707A4SlABCG40SlABI3
SlNCED2SlNCED3SlNCED4
SlCYP707A3
IOE-L5 KD-L2 dKD-L4
*
******** *
* ** **
********
* ***
*
SAGs
Chlorophylldegradation
ABA-associated genes
00,5
11,5
22,5
3
SlNCED1 SICYP707A2 SIABCG40
SlSAG113 SlSGR1 SlPAO
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
Brig
ht fi
eld
Mer
ged
(GFP
fluo
resc
ence
/br
ight
field
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
WT KD-L2 dKD-L4
**
G
** Log2 FCh
F 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
SlNCED1 SlCYP707A2 SlABCG40
boundprobes
freeprobes
WT
ABA
(pm
ol/g
FW)
2.5
-1-0.5
0.51
1.52
0
3
2.5
0.51
1.52
3
0
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure6.DirectregulationofSAGs andABA-relatedgenesbySlNAP2.A, Heat map showing the fold change (FCh; log2 basis) of the expression ratio of SAGs, chlorophyll degradation as well as ABAbiosynthesis and signalling genes in the following samples: 3-week-old SlNAP2-IOE seedlings (line IOE-L5) treated withestradiol (15 µM) for 6 h compared to ethanol (0.15%, v/v)-treated seedlings (mock); KD-L2 and dKD-L4 lines, compared toWT. Blue, downregulated; red, upregulated (as indicated by the colour bar). Data represent means of three biologicalreplicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference from mock-treated and/or WT plants (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05, **: P ≤0.01). Genes shown in bold are direct targets of SlNAP2 (see panels C – F). B, Subcellular localization of SlNAP2-GFP fusionprotein in epidermal cells of transgenic tomato leaves, visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Top, bright field; bottom, GFPfluorescence (green) under bright field. Scale bar, 10 µm. C, ChIP-qPCR shows enrichment of SlSAG113, SlSGR1 and SlPAO (butnot SlSAG12) promoter regions containing the SlNAP2 binding site. Mature leaves (no. 3 - 5) harvested from 8-week-oldSlNAP2-GPF plants were used for the ChIP experiment. Values were normalized to the values for Solyc04g009030 (promoterlacking a SlNAP2 binding site). Data are means ± SD of two independent biological replicates, each performed with threetechnical replicates. D, EMSA showing binding of purified SlNAP2-CELD protein to the 5´-DY682-labelled 40-bp-long promoterfragments of SlSAG113, SlSGR1 and SlPAO, containing the SlNAP2 binding sites. Lane 1, labelled promoter fragment only; lane2, labelled promoter fragment plus SlNAP2-CELD protein, showing the retardation band (´bound probe´); lane 3, labelledpromoter fragment, SlNAP2-CELD protein plus 100-fold molar access of non-labelled promoter (competitor). E, ChIP-qPCR.Mature leaves of 8-week-old SlNAP2-GPF plants were harvested for the ChIP experiment. qPCR was performed to quantifythe enrichment of SlNCED1, SlCYP70A2 and SlABCG40 promoter regions. Values were normalized to the values forSolyc04g009030 (promoter lacking a SlNAP2 binding site). Data are means ± SD of two biological replicates, each performedin two technical replicates. F, EMSA showing binding of purified SlNAP2-CELD protein to 5´-DY682-labelled 40-bp-longpromoter fragments of SlNCED1, SlCYP707A2 and SlABCG40, containing the SlNAP2 binding sites. For description of lanes, seelegend to panel D. G, ABA content. Three-week-old WT, KD-L2 and dKD-L4 plants were harvested and ABA content wasdetermined using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. ABA content is shown as means ± SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicatesignificant difference from the wild type (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05). FW, fresh weight.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Met
abol
ite/ri
bito
l
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
4
Met
abol
ite/ri
bito
l
MG Breaker Ripe red
*
OX-L2 WT KD-L2 dKD-L4
Total soluble solidsA
C
B
DGlucose
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
Met
abol
ite/ri
bito
l OX-L2WTKD-L2dKD-L4
******
Sucrose
****
*
** **
Fructose
MG Breaker Ripe red MG Breaker Ripe red
OX-L2 WT KD-L2 dKD-L4
00,5
11,5
22,5
33,5
44,5
Brix
inde
x
**
**
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0.5
1.5
2.53
4
1
2
3.5
4.5
Figure 7. Fruit Brix value and soluble sugar content.A, The content of total soluble solids (TSS) of ripe red fruits was determined using a digital refractometer. Values representthe means ± SD of six biological replicates (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05). The contents of fructose (B), sucrose (C) and glucose(D) in the pericarps of SlNAP2 transgenic and WT fruits at different developmental stages, analyzed by GC-MS (n = 4). Relativemetabolite levels were obtained by normalizing the intensity value of each metabolite to the ribitol internal standard.Asterisks indicate significant difference from the wild type (Student’s t-test; *: P ≤ 0.05, **: P ≤ 0.01). MG: mature greenfruits.
1
0.5
1.5
2.53
4
2
3.5
1
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 19, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 8
SlNAP2
SlSGR1SlPAO
Leafsenescence
ABASlNCED1SlABCG40
SlSAG113
Developmentalleafaging/darkness
Chlorophylldegradation
SlCYP707A2
Othertargets
Yield/sugars
?
Fruits
Leaves
SlNAP2
Figure 8. Model of SlNAP2 action in tomato.During age-dependent and dark-induced senescence, ABA accumulates in leaves which leads to an activation of SlNAP2expression; enhanced expression of SlNAP2 during leaf aging may also be triggered without the involvement of ABA. SlNAP2activates SlSAG113, chlorophyll degradation genes such as SlSGR1 and SlPAO, and other downstream targets by directly bindingto their promoters, thereby promoting leaf senescence. SlNAP2 also directly regulates the expression of ABA biosynthesis(SlNCED1), transport (SlABCG40) and degradation (SlCYP707A2) genes, indicating a complex role in establishing ABA homeostasis.Inhibition of SlNAP2 leads to delayed leaf senescence and enhanced fruit yield and sugar content, likely due to prolonged leafphotosynthesis, although a direct effect of SlNAP2 on fruit development is possible. Arrow-ending lines, positive regulation; T-ending lines, negative regulation . The dashed line indicates a possible, but not yet experimentally confirmed interaction betweensenescing leaves and developing fruits.
Parsed CitationsAkhtar MS, Goldschmidt EE, John I, Rodoni S, Matile P, Grierson D (1999) Altered patterns of senescence and ripening in gf, a stay-green mutant of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J Exp Bot 50: 1115-1122
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ansari MI, Hasan S, Jalil SU (2014) Leaf senescence and GABA shunt. Bioinformation 10: 734-736Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ansari MI, Lee RH, Chen SCG (2005) A novel senescence-associated gene encoding gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA): pyruvatetransaminase is upregulated during rice leaf senescence. Physiol Plantarum 123: 1-8
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Araujo WL, Ishizaki K, Nunes-Nesi A, Larson TR, Tohge T, Krahnert I, Witt S, Obata T, Schauer N, Graham IA, Leaver CJ, Fernie AR(2010) Identification of the 2-hydroxyglutarate and isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenases as alternative electron donors linking lysinecatabolism to the electron transport chain of Arabidopsis mitochondria. Plant Cell 22: 1549-1563
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Araujo WL, Tohge T, Ishizaki K, Leaver CJ, Fernie AR (2011) Protein degradation - an alternative respiratory substrate for stressedplants. Trends Plant Sci 16: 489-498
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Araujo WL, Tohge T, Osorio S, Lohse M, Balbo I, Krahnert I, Sienkiewicz-Porzucek A, Usadel B, Nunes-Nesi A, Fernie AR (2012)Antisense inhibition of the 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex in tomato demonstrates its importance for plant respiration andduring leaf senescence and fruit maturation. Plant Cell 24: 2328-2351
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Balazadeh S, Riano-Pachon DM, Mueller-Roeber B (2008) Transcription factors regulating leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant Biology 10: 63-75
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Balazadeh S, Schildhauer J, Araujo WL, Munne-Bosch S, Fernie AR, Proost S, Humbeck K, Mueller-Roeber B (2014) Reversal ofsenescence by N resupply to N-starved Arabidopsis thaliana: transcriptomic and metabolomic consequences. J Exp Bot 65: 3975-3992
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Balazadeh S, Siddiqui H, Allu AD, Matallana-Ramirez LP, Caldana C, Mehrnia M, Zanor MI, Kohler B, Mueller-Roeber B (2010) A generegulatory network controlled by the NAC transcription factor ANAC092/AtNAC2/ORE1 during salt-promoted senescence. Plant J 62:250-264
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Breeze E, Harrison E, McHattie S, Hughes L, Hickman R, Hill C, Kiddle S, Kim YS, Penfold CA, Jenkins D, Zhang CJ, Morris K, JennerC, Jackson S, Thomas B, Tabrett A, Legaie R, Moore JD, Wild DL, Ott S, Rand D, Beynon J, Denby K, Mead A, Buchanan-Wollaston V(2011) High-resolution temporal profiling of transcripts during Arabidopsis leaf senescence reveals a distinct chronology of processesand regulation. Plant Cell 23: 873-894
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Buchanan-Wollaston V, Page T, Harrison E, Breeze E, Lim PO, Nam HG, Lin JF, Wu SH, Swidzinski J, Ishizaki K, Leaver CJ (2005)Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals significant differences in gene expression and signalling pathways betweendevelopmental and dark/starvation-induced senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant J 42: 567-585
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Chrobok D, Law SR, Brouwer B, Linden P, Ziolkowska A, Liebsch D, Narsai R, Szal B, Moritz T, Rouhier N, Whelan J, Gardestrom P,
Keech O (2016) Dissecting the metabolic role of mitochondria during developmental leaf senescence. Plant Physiol 172: 2132-2153Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Diaz C, Purdy S, Christ A, Morot-Gaudry JF, Wingler A, Masclaux-Daubresse CL (2005) Characterization of markers to determine theextent and variability of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. A metabolic profiling approach. Plant Physiol 138: 898-908
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fahnenstich H, Saigo M, Niessen M, Zanor MI, Andreo CS, Fernie AR, Drincovich MF, Flugge UI, Maurino VG (2007) Alteration oforganic acid metabolism in Arabidopsis overexpressing the maize C(4)NADP-malic enzyme causes accelerated senescence duringextended darkness. Plant Physiol 145: 640-652
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fan K, Bibi N, Gan SS, Li F, Yuan SN, Ni M, Wang M, Shen H, Wang XD (2015) A novel NAP member GhNAP is involved in leafsenescence in Gossypium hirsutum. J Exp Bot 66: 4669-4682
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gao S, Gao J, Zhu XY, Song Y, Li ZP, Ren GD, Zhou X, Kuai BK (2016) ABF2, ABF3, and ABF4 promote ABA-Mediated chlorophylldegradation and leaf senescence by transcriptional activation of chlorophyll catabolic genes and senescence-associated genes inArabidopsis. Mol Plant 9: 1272-1285
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gepstein S, Thimann KV (1980) Changes in the abscisic-acid content of oat leaves during senescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:2050-2053
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gibon Y, Usadel B, Blaesing OE, Kamlage B, Hoehne M, Trethewey R, Stitt M (2006) Integration of metabolite with transcript andenzyme activity profiling during diurnal cycles in Arabidopsis rosettes. Genome Biol 7: R76
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gregersen PL, Culetic A, Boschian L, Krupinska K (2013) Plant senescence and crop productivity. Plant Mol Biol 82: 603-622Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Guo Y, Gan S-S (2006) AtNAP, a NAC family transcription factor, has an important role in leaf senescence. Plant J 46: 601-612Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Guyer L, Hofstetter SS, Christ B, Lira BS, Rossi M, Hortensteiner S (2014) Different mechanisms are responsible for chlorophylldephytylation during fruit ripening and leaf senescence in tomato. Plant Physiol 166: 44-56
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
He P, Osaki M, Takebe M, Shinano T, Wasaki J (2005) Endogenous hormones and expression of senescence-related genes in differentsenescent types of maize. J Exp Bot 56: 1117-1128
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Himelblau E, Amasino RM (2001) Nutrients mobilized from leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana during leaf senescence. J Plant Physiol 158:1317-1323
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hu ZL, Deng L, Yan B, Pan Y, Luo M, Chen XQ, Hu TZ, Chen GP (2011) Silencing of the LeSGR1 gene in tomato inhibits chlorophylldegradation and exhibits a stay-green phenotype. Biol Plantarum 55: 27-34
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and Title
Google Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ji K, Kai W, Zhao B, Sun Y, Yuan B, Dai S, Li Q, Chen P, Wang Y, Pei Y, Wang H, Guo Y, Leng P (2014) SlNCED1 and SlCYP707A2: keygenes involved in ABA metabolism during tomato fruit ripening. J Exp Bot 65: 5243-5255
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kang K, Kim YS, Park S, Back K (2009) Senescence-induced serotonin biosynthesis and its role in delaying senescence in rice leaves.Plant Physiol 150: 1380-1393
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Karimi M, Inzé D, Depicker A (2002) GATEWAY vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci 7: 193-195Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kaufmann K, Muiño JM, Østerås M, Farinelli L, Krajewski P, Angenent GC (2010) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) of planttranscription factors followed by sequencing (ChIP-SEQ) or hybridization to whole genome arrays (ChIP-CHIP). Nat Protoc 5: 457-472
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kim JH, Woo HR, Kim J, Lim PO, Lee IC, Choi SH, Hwang D, Nam HG (2009) Trifurcate feed-forward regulation of age-dependent celldeath involving miR164 in Arabidopsis. Science 323: 1053-1057
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kopka J, Schauer N, Krueger S, Birkemeyer C, Usadel B, Bergmuller E, Dormann P, Weckwerth W, Gibon Y, Stitt M, Willmitzer L,Fernie AR, Steinhauser D (2005) [email protected]: the Golm Metabolome Database. Bioinformatics 21: 1635-1638
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kou XH, Watkins CB, Gan SS (2012) Arabidopsis AtNAP regulates fruit senescence. J Exp Bot 63: 6139-6147Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lee IC, Hong SW, Whang SS, Lim PO, Nam HG, Koo JC (2011) Age-dependent action of an ABA-inducible receptor kinase, RPK1, as apositive regulator of senescence in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell Physiol 52: 651-662
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li L, Zhao J, Zhao Y, Lu X, Zhou Z, Zhao C, Xu G (2016) Comprehensive investigation of tobacco leaves during natural earlysenescence via multi-platform metabolomics analyses. Sci Rep 6: 37976
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang CZ, Wang YQ, Zhu YN, Tang JY, Hu B, Liu LC, Ou SJ, Wu HK, Sun XH, Chu JF, Chu CC (2014) OsNAP connects abscisic acid andleaf senescence by fine-tuning abscisic acid biosynthesis and directly targeting senescence-associated genes in rice. Proc Natl AcadSci USA 111: 10013-10018
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lira BS, Gramegna G, Trench BA, Alves FRR, Silva EM, Silva GFF, Thirumalaikumar VP, Lupi ACD, Demarco D, Purgatto E, NogueiraFTS, Balazadeh S, Freschi L, Rossi M (2017) Manipulation of a senescence-associated gene improves fleshy fruit yield. Plant Physiol175: 77-91
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lisec J, Schauer N, Kopka J, Willmitzer L, Fernie AR (2006) Gas chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling inplants. Nat Protoc 1: 387-396
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Luedemann A, von Malotky L, Erban A, Kopka J (2012) TagFinder: preprocessing software for the fingerprinting and the profiling of gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry based metabolome analyses. Methods Mol Biol 860: 255-286Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mao CJ, Lu SC, Lv B, Zhang B, Shen JB, He JM, Luo LQ, Xi DD, Chen X, Ming F (2017) A rice NAC transcription factor promotes leafsenescence via ABA biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 174: 1747-1763
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Masclaux C, Valadier MH, Brugiere N, Morot-Gaudry JF, Hirel B (2000) Characterization of the sink/source transition in tobacco(Nicotiana tabacum L.) shoots in relation to nitrogen management and leaf senescence. Planta 211: 510-518
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Masclaux-Daubresse C, Reisdorf-Cren M, Pageau K, Lelandais M, Grandjean O, Kronenberger J, Valadier MH, Feraud M, Jouglet T,Suzuki A (2006) Glutamine synthetase-glutamate synthase pathway and glutamate dehydrogenase play distinct roles in the sink-sourcenitrogen cycle in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Plant Physiol 140: 444-456
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Miyashita Y, Good AG (2008) NAD(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase is essential for the survival of Arabidopsis thaliana duringdark-induced carbon starvation. J Exp Bot 59: 667-680
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nuruzzaman M, Manimekalai R, Sharoni AM, Satoh K, Kondoh H, Ooka H, Kikuchi S (2010) Genome-wide analysis of NAC transcriptionfactor family in rice. Gene 465: 30-44
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ooka H, Satoh K, Doi K, Nagata T, Otomo Y, Murakami K, Matsubara K, Osato N, Kawai J, Carninci P, Hayashizaki Y, Suzuki K, KojimaK, Takahara Y, Yamamoto K, Kikuchi S (2003) Comprehensive analysis of NAC family genes in Oryza sativa and Arabidopsis thaliana.DNA Res 10: 239-247
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Park S, Lee K, Kang K, Kim YS, Lee S, Kweon SJ, Back K (2010) Tryptophan boost caused by senescence occurred independently ofcytoplasmic glutamine synthetase. Biosci Biotech Bioch 74: 2352-2354
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Parlitz S, Kunze R, Mueller-Roeber B, Balazadeh S (2011) Regulation of photosynthesis and transcription factor expression by leafshading and re-illumination in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. J Plant Physiol 168: 1311-1319
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Philosoph-Hadas S, Hadas E, Aharoni N (1993) Characterization and use in ELISA of a new monoclonal-antibody for quantitation ofabscisic acid in senescing rice leaves. Plant Growth Reg12: 71-78
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pourtau N, Mares M, Purdy S, Quentin N, Ruel A, Wingler A (2004) Interactions of abscisic acid and sugar signalling in the regulation ofleaf senescence. Planta 219: 765-772
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Proost S, Van Bel M, Vaneechoutte D, Van de Peer Y, Inzé D, Mueller-Roeber B, Vandepoele K (2015) PLAZA 3.0: an access point forplant comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 43: D974-D981
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Quiles MJ, Garcia C, Cuello J (1995) Differential effects of abscisic acid and methyl jasmonate on endoproteinases in senescing barleyleaves. Plant Growth Reg 16: 197-204
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Rauf M, Arif M, Dortay H, Matallana-Ramirez LP, Waters MT, Nam HG, Lim PO, Mueller-Roeber B, Balazadeh S (2013) ORE1 balancesleaf senescence against maintenance by antagonizing G2-like-mediated transcription. EMBO Rep 14: 382-388
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Schwab R, Ossowski S, Riester M, Warthmann N, Weigel D (2006) Highly specific gene silencing by artificial microRNAs in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell 18: 1121-1133
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tabuchi M, Abiko T, Yamaya T (2007) Assimilation of ammonium ions and reutilization of nitrogen in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot 58:2319-2327
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tureckova V, Novak O, Strnad M (2009) Profiling ABA metabolites in Nicotiana tabacum L. leaves by ultra-performance liquidchromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta 80: 390-399
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Uauy C, Distelfeld A, Fahima T, Blechl A, Dubcovsky J (2006) A NAC gene regulating senescence improves grain protein, zinc, and ironcontent in wheat. Science 314: 1298-1301
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Van der Graaff E, Schwacke R, Schneider A, Desimone M, Flugge UI, Kunze R (2006) Transcription analysis of Arabidopsis membranetransporters and hormone pathways during developmental and induced leaf senescence. Plant Physiol 141: 776-792
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang N, Guo TL, Wang P, Sun X, Shao Y, Liang BW, Jia X, Gong XQ, Ma FW (2017) Functional analysis of apple MhYTP1 and MhYTP2genes in leaf senescence and fruit ripening. Sci Hortic 221: 23-32
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Watanabe M, Balazadeh S, Tohge T, Erban A, Giavalisco P, Kopka J, Mueller-Roeber B, Fernie AR, Hoefgen R (2013) Comprehensivedissection of spatiotemporal metabolic shifts in primary, secondary, and lipid metabolism during developmental senescence inArabidopsis. Plant Physiol 162: 1290-1310
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weaver LM, Gan SS, Quirino B, Amasino RM (1998) A comparison of the expression patterns of several senescence-associated genesin response to stress and hormone treatment. Plant Mol Biol 37: 455-469
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wingler A, Purdy S, MacLean JA, Pourtau N (2006) The role of sugars in integrating environmental signals during the regulation of leafsenescence. J Exp Bot 57: 391-399
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xue GP (2002) Characterisation of the DNA-binding profile of barley HvCBF1 using an enzymatic method for rapid, quantitative andhigh-throughput analysis of the DNA-binding activity. Nucleic Acids Res 30: e77
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xue GP, Bower NI, McIntyre CL, Riding GA, Kazan K, Shorter R (2006) TaNAC69 from the NAC superfamily of transcription factors isup-regulated by abiotic stresses in wheat and recognises two consensus DNA-binding sequences. Funct Plant Biol 33: 43-57
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Google Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yang JC, Zhang JH, Wang ZQ, Zhu QS, Liu LJ (2003) Involvement of abscisic acid and cytokinins in the senescence and remobilizationof carbon reserves in wheat subjected to water stress during grain filling. Plant Cell Environ 26: 1621-1631
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yang JD, Worley E, Udvardi M (2014) A NAP-AAO3 regulatory module promotes chlorophyll degradation via ABA biosynthesis inArabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell 26: 4862-4874
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang KW, Gan SS (2012) An abscisic acid-AtNAP transcription factor-SAG113 protein phosphatase 2C regulatory chain for controllingdehydration in senescing Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol 158: 961-969
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhao D, Derkx AP, Liu DC, Buchner P, Hawkesford MJ (2015) Overexpression of a NAC transcription factor delays leaf senescence andincreases grain nitrogen concentration in wheat. Plant Biol 17: 904-913
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhao Y, Chan ZL, Gao JH, Xing L, Cao MJ, Yu CM, Hu YL, You J, Shi HT, Zhu YF, Gong YH, Mu ZX, Wang HQ, Deng X, Wang PC,Bressan RA, Zhu JK (2016) ABA receptor PYL9 promotes drought resistance and leaf senescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113: 1949-1954
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhou Y, Huang WF, Liu L, Chen TY, Zhou F, Lin YJ (2013) Identification and functional characterization of a rice NAC gene involved inthe regulation of leaf senescence. BMC Plant Biol 13
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zuo J, Niu QW, Chua NH (2000) Technical advance: An estrogen receptor-based transactivator XVE mediates highly inducible geneexpression in transgenic plants. Plant J 24: 265-273
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title