1 the central team ryan sawasaki holger keitel joanna lennartsson lan yu ben thompson kevin nadolny...

39
1 The Central Team Ryan Sawasaki Holger Keitel Joanna Lennartsson Lan Yu Ben Thompson Kevin Nadolny Linda Strömgren 1

Post on 21-Dec-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

The Central Team

Ryan Sawasaki

Holger Keitel

Joanna Lennartsson

Lan Yu

Ben Thompson

Kevin Nadolny

Linda Strömgren

1

22

34

4

Flying Box

6

5

Flying Box

7

6

Flying Box

8

7

Flying Box

9

8

Flying Box

10

9

Flying Box

11

1012

11

Flying Box – 1st structural system - Floorplan

- steel construction with pile foundation

- concrete slab, use of composite beams

N

13

12

Flying Box – 1st structural system – Section A-A

- perimeter MRF for lateral loads

- use of base isolation to decrease lateral loads

14

13

Flying Box – 2nd structural system - Floorplan

- Cast in Place Concrete Construction

15

1417

15

Boxes in Forest

19

16

Boxes in Forest

20

17

Boxes in Forest

21

18

Boxes in Forest

22

19

Boxes in Forest

23

20

Boxes in Forest

24

21

Boxes in Forest

26

22

Boxes in Forest – 1st Structural Concept

- Reinforced concrete

29

23

Boxes in Forest – 1st Structural Concept

- Reinforced concrete

30

24

Boxes in Forests – 2nd structural design – Second Floor Plan

- Cloumns and beams layout

- “Forests“ location need to be adjusted

33

25

Foundation TypeFootingsSlab-On-GroundfoundationMat-type footingsStepped FoundationsCountinuousfoundationsGrillage FootingsBleacher Footings

Boxes in Forests – 2nd structural design – Third Floor Plan

- Customize the elements

- Eccentric center of stiffness

34

26

Boxes in Forest – Auditorium

- candilevered auditorium

- truss construction, pile foundation

N

W 14x34W 16x57

W 14x34

W 14x74

36

27

Boxes in Forest – Auditorium - Roof

- cable construction to reduce the steel amount

- bay size is 50 ft

W 14x26

W 16x57

cable

37

28

Dry material storage

Material storage

Site offices

Cranes

Recycling area

Access for workers – before morning transit

Access for materials – least disturbing for on campus activities

38

29

Structural System Cost Comparison – Concept 1 “Flying Box”

Structural System Option

Foundation Cost Floor 1 Cost Floor 2 Cost

Floor 3 Cost

Total Cost per

C.I.P Beams $27,883 $147,593 $147,593 $125,851v $448,922

Precast Beams $27,883 $229,920 $202,036 $180,294 $640,135

Steel $118,583 $253,850 $253,850 $233,897 $860,182

39

Construction permit fee Total permit fee is $ 108 000Fees included in the estimate: fire hydrant fee, sewer fee, arts development fees, LAUSD developer fees, dwelling unit tax and utility connection.

30

31

Cooling Load Estimate

• “Rule of Thumb”: 1 Ton/400 SF

• Required Airflow:

• Main Duct Run: 40” f for low pressure

– Equivalent to 76”x19”, 60”x24”, 37”x37”

• Horizontal Duct Run each floor: 28” f for low pressure

– Equivalent to 29”x23”, 56”x14”

CFMCFM 500,18)55100(*08.1

000,900

41

32

Mechanical shaft sizing

Mechanical room sizing

37”

37”

18”min 6’-9”

5’-3”

Say 2’ for access

Plumbing

AHU: 9.6’ x 28’ x 6.01’ high

Hot Water heater

Electrical Equipment

22’

32’

Mech Room

32’x22’ = 704 SF

Minimum area for mechanical shaft

6.75’x5.25’ = 35.5 SF

42

33

HVAC System

• Conventional System Option

• Under-floor Passive Distribution System Option

– Energy savings

– Less ductwork

– Easier maintenance

43

34

Elevator Gen2™ with Remote Elevator Monitoring (REM ®)

Excavation depth: 47” (1,2 m) below finished slabTop height: 138” (3,5 m) above top slab– space for mechanical and emergency operationsDimensions: Door opening = 38” (900 mm ) 66” x 99” (1670 x 2520 mm) including construction tolerance

Costs: $50 000 (installation not included)

44

Low energy consumption Low speed Reduce need for maintenance by no switches, no gear-weel, no oil use. Only reusable components.Encourage usage of the stairs– fewer users –less mechanical wear

35

Energy demand

45

• Energy Demand– 145 kBtu/SF for University Bldgs

(1995 DOE Data)1,300,000 kWh/year

• Peak Energy Demand– 9.33 W/SF (75th percentile 1995

DOE data) – With 4% annual growth: Total 2015

Peak Energy Demand = 500kW

Reduce energy consumption

• Few large Air Handling Units

• Low speed

• Conformity regarding components

36

Solar Energy

• Solar Supply = 12 W/SF

– For 50% of roof area, max available solar energy = 180 kW, or 36% of estimated peak energy demand.

• @ $6/W, 500 kW of solar energy installed = $3,000,000, 42,000 SF!!

• @ $6/W, 180 kW of solar energy installed = $1,080,000

• $3/W Rebate (CA Energy Commission)

• Total installed cost = $540,000

• Energy savings as high as $25,000/year

46

Geothermal Energy

Our site is not very suitable for geothermal energy

Source: California Energy Commission “Preliminary Renewable Resource Assessment,” July 2003

3747

Other Green Concepts – LEED requirements

• Green Roof

– Cut cooling costs 20-30%

– Stormwater, aesthetics, acoustics

• Waste heat recovery

• Thermal storage in building mass

• Climate façade

• IR reflective coatings/paint

• Hybrid Solar Lighting

• Low-flow plumbing fixtures

• Grey-water recycling

• Storm water control – native plant landscaping

•Reusable materials•Recycling• Prefered use of bio-mass materials•Low VOC•Low contamination

3849

39

Green funding

48

• Public Interest Energy Research Program (PIER) California Energy Commission (solar energy)

• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (green roofs)

• Renewable Resources Trust Fund Emerging Renewables Program (solar energy)