10 march 2015 barbora bukovska, article 19 freedom of expression: jurisprudential trends focus on...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 10 March 2015 Barbora Bukovska, ARTICLE 19 Freedom of Expression: Jurisprudential trends Focus on surveillance](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081821/56649e3f5503460f94b2f23f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
10 March 2015Barbora Bukovska, ARTICLE 19
Freedom of Expression: Jurisprudential trends
Focus on surveillance
![Page 2: 10 March 2015 Barbora Bukovska, ARTICLE 19 Freedom of Expression: Jurisprudential trends Focus on surveillance](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081821/56649e3f5503460f94b2f23f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
BackgroundVarious forms of surveillance addressed in case
law (e.g. electronic communication, surveillance of public spaces, data retention);
Infringement of variety of human rights, in particularThe right to freedom of expression;The right to privacy (private life);The right to effective remedy;
Lack of large scale judicial challenges – no class action, cases brought For the review of the constitutionality/lawfulness of
the legislation; orBy human rights activists; or Within specific issue in criminal cases.
![Page 3: 10 March 2015 Barbora Bukovska, ARTICLE 19 Freedom of Expression: Jurisprudential trends Focus on surveillance](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081821/56649e3f5503460f94b2f23f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Developments at regional courts
European Court of Human Rights (Council of Europe)Riina vs Italy (App. No. 43575/09, 11 March
2014) – video surveillance;Dragojevic vs Croatia (App. No. 68955/11, 15
January 2015) - lawfulness of surveillance;Pending cases
Zakharov vs Russia (App. No. 47143/06, hearing in 2014);
Big Brother Watch & Others vs the UK(App. no. 58170/13, communicated to the UK in 2014);
European Court of Justice (the EU)Digital Rights Ireland vs Ireland (Joint Cases C-
293/12 & C-594/12, 8 April 2014) – Data Retention Direction unlawful.
![Page 4: 10 March 2015 Barbora Bukovska, ARTICLE 19 Freedom of Expression: Jurisprudential trends Focus on surveillance](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081821/56649e3f5503460f94b2f23f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Developments in national courtsAustria – The Constitutional Court - Case
47/2012 of 27 June 2014 - on statutory provisions on data retention;
South Korea: The South Korean National Human Rights Commission - decision of 8April 2014 - on the lack of prior judicial authorization for access to the collected data;
The United Kingdom: The Investigatory Powers Tribunal – decision from 6 February 2015 in the case of Liberty vs GCHQ – on regulations covering access by the UK intelligence agency to emails and phone records intercepted by the NSA
![Page 5: 10 March 2015 Barbora Bukovska, ARTICLE 19 Freedom of Expression: Jurisprudential trends Focus on surveillance](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081821/56649e3f5503460f94b2f23f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Cases to watchPakistan: Bytes for All vs the Federation
of Pakistan and others – against the use of FinFisher Command and Control Server on the network of Pakistan Telecommunications Company Ltd and suspected digital surveillance targeting human rights defenders, NGOs and population at large;
Ethiopia: Kidane vs Ethiopia, launched in February 2014, in Federal Court in Washington, DC – challenging the Ethiopian government use of secret spyware (FinSpy);
Venezuela: Omar Silva vs Public Prosecutor of San Cristobal – launched in October 2014, challenge by human rights attorney for being target by the intelligence agencies for his human rights work.