No 16272010-PA (N) 1240 - 76 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION PROJECT APPRAISAL ORGANIZATION

407 SEWA BHAWAN R K PURAM NEW DELHI-110 066

Datef ~ 2010

Sub 10Sth meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of technoshyeconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multipurpose Project proposals held on 25062010

Enclosed please find herewith a copy of the summary record of discussions of the

above meeting held at Ilew Delhi on 25 th June 2010 at Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New

Delhi for information and necessary action

Enc As above ] fYVvv R

(S K~ sriva~~ Chief Engineer (PAG) cum f 0

Member Secretary of the Advisory Committee

To Members of Committee

1 Chairman CWC Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi I

2 Secretary (Expenditure) Ministry of Finance (lst Floor) North BlockNew Delhi 3 Secretary Department of Power 55 Bhawan IInd Floor New Delhi 4 Secretary Ministry of Environment amp Forests 4th Floor Room No- 40405

Paryavaran Bhawan CGO Complex New Delhi 5 Secretary Ministry of Tribal Affairs Room No 73S A-Wing Shastri Bhawan

New Delhi 6 Secretary Department of Agriculture amp Cooperation Room No 126 Krishi

Bhawan New Delhi 7 Director General ICAR Room No-lOS Krishi Bhawan New Delhi S Chairman CEA Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 9 Chairman Central Ground Water Board Jam Nagar House Man

Singh Road New Delhi 10 Principal Adviser (WR) Planning Commission Room 110-255 Yojana Bhawan

New Delhi 11 Principal Adviser (Power) Planning Commission Room No-107 Yojana Bhawan

New Delhi 12 Financial Adviser Ministry of Water Resources Room 110-401 SS Bhawan New

Delhi Special Invitees

13 Member (WPampP) CWC New Delhi 14 Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi 15 Member (RM) CWC New Delhi 16 Chairman GFCC Sinchai Bhawan Patna - SOO 015 Bihar 17 Commissioner (Projects) Room No-411 55 Bhawan MoWR New Delhi

~ 18 Commissioner (Ganga) Ministry of Water Resources CGO Complex New Delhi 19 Secretary Water Resources Department Government of Bihar Sinchai Bhawan

20

2l

22

23

24

25

26

27 28 29 30

31 32

33

Patna-800 015 Principal Secretary Water Resources Department Government of Madhya Pradesh Sachivalaya Arera Hills Bhopal Secretary (Water Resources) Government of Chhattisgarh DK Bhawan Sachivalaya Raipur-492 010 Chhattisgarh Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Uttar Pradesh Sachivalay Annexe Lucknow-226 001 (UP) Secretary (Irrigation amp Power) Government of Uttaranchal Sachivalaya Dehradun-248 001 (Uttarakhand) Secretary (Water Resources) Government of Orissa Secretariat Bhubaneshwarshy751 001 (Orissa) Secretary Irrigation amp Waterways Directorate Government of West Bengal Writers Building Kolkata-700 00 Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Maharashtra Mantralaya Mumbai-400 032 Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi Chief Engineer (FMO) CWC New Delhi Chief Engineer Monitoring- Central CWC CGO complex Seminary Hills Nagpur Chief Engineer (NBO)CWC Paryawas Bhawan Mother Teresa Marg Arera Hills Bhopal-4620 11

Chief Engineer Lower Ganga Basin WC 177 - B Srikrishnapuri Patna-800 001 (Bihar) Chief Engineer (VIER) Mahanadi amp Eastern Rivers CWC Plot No 655 Sahid Nagar Bhubneshwar - 751007 (Orissa) Chief Engineer (UGB) Upper Ganga Basin CWC Janhavi Bhawan 212496 Indira Nagar Lucknow- 226024 (Uttar Pradesh)

Copy for information to 34 Sr PPS to Secretary Ministry of Water Resources Room No-407 Ilew Delhi

1051hSUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOOD CONTROL AND MULTI

25thPURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON JUNE 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNO-ECONOMIC VIABILlT OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 105111 meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposa ls was held on 25062010 at 1000 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting It was observed that the representatives trom the Ministry of Agriculture Tribal Affairs and Environment amp Forest were not present in the meeting This was viewed seriously by the Chairman and accordingly it was advised to issue necessary directives to these Ministries to depute their representatives in the meetings of the Advisory Committee ill future

Thereafter the Chairman requested the Member-Secretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 104TH MEETING

104th The Summary Record of Discussions of the Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter No16272010-PA (N)960-993 dated 21052010 Member-Secretary informed the Committee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee confirmed the Summarv Record of discussions of the 104th Advisory Committee meeting J

il) PROJECT PROPOSALS PUT UP FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

1 Restoration Works of Eastern Gandak Canal (Revised-Major) Bihar

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Restoration works of Eastern Gandak Canal an ERM scheme was accorded investment clearance by the Planning Commission in May 2004 for Rs 294 Cr at 2001 PL to restore CCA of 48 lakh ha and annual irrigation of 662 lakh ha This will provide irrigation facilities to East Champaran West Champaran Vaishali and Muzaffarpur districts

The present proposal envisages restoration and replacement of 10 components

a) Restoration of designed section of canal by desilting (Eastern Tirhut Main canal having length of 240 78 km 11 branchsub-~ranch canals having length 421 08 km 24 distributaries of 131 km length 132 sub distributaries of 1052 km length 424 minors and 1342 sub-minors)

b) Repairs to Gandak brarrage and its appurtenances c) Replacement of all the damaged structures with new ones

d) Renovation of all the pucca works like lining etc and structures to increase their longevity

e) Construction of few additional structures as per present site condition in line with approval of the Govt of Bihar

f) LOPE lining in selected reaches in high filling zones to avoid possibility of seepage

g) Brick tile lining in the selected canal reaches where earthwork has already been completed

hbull bull J Repar of damaged hydraulic gates in canal structures i) Constructionrepair of outlets at suitable locations j) Installations of telecommunication system for operation of canal

procurementdocumentation of technical records Preparation of manual for canal operation and water management PIM implementation for ascertaining assured irrigation to the beneficiaries and maintenance and operation of the canal through the beneficiaries

Apart from aboveworks following emergent works are also included in the present p(oposal

a) Restoration of mechanical work of barrage appurtenants as suggested by CWC

b) Restoration and strengthening of Cross-Drainage (CD) work at RD 29300 of Triveni Branch canal across Koraina river which includes construction of all bank connections construction of damaged canal trough and river training works for diversion of river streams

The present revised cost estimate without change in scope has been finalized for Rs 68478 cr at 2009-PL with BC ratio as 296 State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-II)

The project was discussed in length Member (WPampP) informed that the project is not included under AIBP It was informed by Principal Secretary Govt of Bihar that the construction work has already been started and it will be completed by March 2013 It was further informed by Govt of Bihar that during construction the closure of the existing canal would be done during rabi season only

Planning Commission informed that CGWB has been carrying out studies of conjunctive use for addressing the problem of water logging in the Gandak canal command area falling between Gandak and Burhi Gandak rivers

Chairman desired that the submission of CGWB report may be expedited by the Govt of Bihar and suggested to take remedial measures for water logged area based on recommendations of CGWB It was also advised to explore the possibility of increasing CCA through conjunctive use of ground and surface water in the command

After discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

2

Kharung Project (Major ERM-New) Chhattisgarh

CE (PAO) CWC gave a brief account of project Kharung Tank is an old completed med tank constructed during year 1 1930

across Kharung river a tributary of Sheonath river in Mahanadi system in Bilaspur district of Chhattisgarh state

Kharung k project is very old project and canal has been providing since the last years During period

only minor maintenance has As a result conditions of project components been over time reby causing gradual in seepage

present proposal envisages only the provIsion of concrete lining in its distribution system remodeling of structures in order and provide irrigation for additional 15 from water thus saved

project proposal envisages construction the following main works

i)

ji)

mm cement concrete lining along with low density poly film of 1 micron thickness the bed as well as on

for a total length 110 km of main canal and respective distribution system Re-modellingrepairing of District Road

iii) IV)

v) vi)

Re-modellingrepairing Head Regulators regulators etc Re-modellingrepairing of falls (16 Nos) in Main canals and its distributaries and Minors Nos) Re-modellingrepairing of in Main (4 Nos) Re-modellingrepairing of DrainageDrainage SyphonsAcqueduct Nos in Main canals amp 21 in distributaries and Minors)

price cost of with BC ratio as

been finalized 309

Rs 10104 crore2008-09 Concurrence been

obtained (copy as Annexure-III)

After brief discussion the Committee proposal

Maniyari Tank Project (Major ERM-New) Chhattisgarh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the proposal The iyari Tank project is an old completed tank constructed during the 1 1930 across Maniyari river a tributary of Sheonath river in Mahanadi system in Bilaspur district Chhattisgarh

present proposal is only for provIsion cement concrete lining in canal and its distribution and remodeling of existing structures to

3

save seepage water and thus to provide irrigation for additional 11000 ha in 32 villages without affecting any parameter of the reservoir

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 15995 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 181

The Chairman enquired that while computing BC ratio of the project why the old project cost has not been taken into consideration The Project Authorities replied that being an old project the depreciation of the project is too high to consider As a result the impact on BC ratio would be negligible The Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of suriace and ground water in the command area so as to reduce the impact of water logging

Since the State Finance Concurrence has not been obtained it was decided that the project may be deferred for reconsideration in the next meeting

4 Halon Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC gave a brief account of the project proposal The Halon Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam near village Karanjiya in the district of Mandia of Madhya Pradesh across river Halon a tributary of river Burne in Narmada basin The Halon Irrigation Project contemplates to provide annual irrigation facilities to an area of 16782 ha (CCA - 13040 ha) in Mandla district a tribal district of Madhya Pradesh The project will irrigate land on the left bank through gravity flow canal

84thThe project was earlier considered in the meeting of Advisory Committee held on 12052005 and was deferred for want of final environmental clearance clearance of RampR plan clearance from CGWB and in the absence of site specific discharge data to review the yield

The Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) and clearance from CGWB have now been obtained As regards forest clearance it was informed by the Project officials that stage-1 clearance has been obtained and the work will be started after stage-2 clearance

The representative from CEA enquired regarding the provision of Hydroshypower generation in the project The Project Authorities mentioned that provision of Hydro-power generation was not found viable as per the site conditions The Chairman enquired about why the BC ratio of the project is very marginal ie 155 The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls in Mandla district a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well within the permissible limits The State Finance Concurrence has been received

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

4

5 Man Irrigation Project (Revised Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The original proposal was approved by the Planning Commission in June 1992 for Rs 44 10 cr at 1983 price level The present proposal is a revised cost estimate without any change in its scope and the cost has been finalized for Rs 24603 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 179 The expenditure incurred till March 2010 is 196 crore The State Finance Concurrence has already been received

Chairman enquired about the construction status of the project The Project Authorities replied that the dam and head works of the project had already been completed in 2006 and the canal system is already in operation since the last two years Only some residual works are to be completed by March 2012

Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of surface and ground water in the command area to reduce the impact of water logging in consultation with CGWB

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further cost time revision will be considered by the Committee

6 Upper Narmada Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Upper Narmada Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam of maximum height of 3380 m and total length of 212 km near village Shobhapur (Rinatola) of Dindori district of Madhya Pradesh The project contemplates to provide irrigation benefits to an area of 26622 ha annually in Annupur and Dindori districts of Madhya Pradesh Most of the beneficiaries from the project belong to Schedule Caste (SC) and Schedule Tribe (ST) categories

The project was considered in the 84 th meeting of Advisory Committee held on 1205 2005 and was deferred for want of environmental clearance and RampR clearance

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 68393 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 157 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IV)

Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (lVIoTA) and Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) have now been obtained On query regarding the physical programme of the project the Project Authorities replied that the project works would be awarded on turn-key basis and would be completed by March 2015 The Chairman asked why the BC ratio of the project is marginal (153)

5

f The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls

in Annupur amp Dindori districts a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well with in the permissible limits (1)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

7 Shelgaon Barrage Project (New-Medium) Maharashtra

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Shelgaon Barrage a medium irrigation project envisages construction of 41965 m long barrage across river Tapi in Tapi basin The project is located near village Shelgaon in the Jalgaon district of Maharashtra The project is planned to irrigate annually an area of 11318 ha (CCA-9589 ha) benefiting 19 villages of Jalgaon district

The project envisages construction of the following main components

i) A 419 65 m long barrage with 18 Nos of radial gates of size 1830 m x 1676m

ii) A 465 m long left side earthen embankment and 165 m long saddle earthen embankment with a top width of 75 m

iii) An intake well of size 3 m x 11 m and jack well of size 9 m x 24 m along with 5 Nos of VT pumps of 1400 HP

The estimated cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 44649 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 186 State Finance Concurrence has already been obtained

Chairman asked why the irrigation cost per hectare is so high The representative from the Govt of Maharashtra replied that the project is basically a lift irrigation scheme As such the irrigation cost per hectare is high

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should be completed by March 2014 and no further timecost overrun would be considered by the Committee

8 Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II (Revised-Major) Orissa

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II Orissa was earlier considered and accepted by the Advisory Committee in its 65th meeting held on 14696 for Rs 70515 at 1995 price level Planning Commission subsequently accorded investment clearance to this project in July 1997 for providing irrigation to CCA of 93501 ha with 90 intensity of irrigation

The proposal envisages completion of all works of Left Bank Canal from 30 km to 141 km with head discharge of 13222 cumec to irrigate the CCA of 93501 ha

()

The present proposal is a revised cost estimate and there is no change in the scope of the project The revised cost has been finalized in CWC for Rs 195834 crore at 2009-10 price level with BC ratio as 1986 State Finance concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-V)

Secretary (WR) obseNed that work programme is too lengthy As such he desired that the work schedule should be revised in such a way that the project should be completed by March 2015 It was also decided that no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject to the aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

9 Kachnoda Dam project (Revised-Major) Uttar Pradesh

CE (PLlO) cwe briefly introduced the project proposal Kachnoda dam project was considered and accepted in the 87th TAC meeting held on 17112006 Planning Commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal in Jan 2007 for Rs 8867 crore at 2004 price level for providing irrigation to 11 699 ha of CCA and annual irrigation to the tune of 10850 ha

The project envisages construction of following main components

a) 41 km long and 16 m high earthen dam with a live storage of 5464 Million Cubic Metre

b) An ogee shaped masonry spillway of 127 m length with 9 nos vertical gates of size 12 x 71 m each to pass maximum flood discharge of 6038 cumec

c) Left main canal of length 154 km with head discharge of 3 cumec and Right main canal of length 84 km with head discharge of 275 cumec with their distribution systems to provide irrigation to an area of 5173 ha of CCA

d) Apart from above irrigation facilities to 6096 ha under existing Lalitpur canal system and 430 ha under existing Dilwara distributory of Jamni canal are also proposed to be brought under command of Kachnoda dam project

The present revised cost estimate is without change in scope and the revised cost has been finalized for Rs 42345 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 109 State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-VI) Chairman observed that BC ratio of the project proposal is very marginal but keeping the chronic drought prone area of command the proposal may be accepted subject to the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject tothe aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

7

10 Flood protection works to Brahmani-Kelua-Birupa Doab of Brahmani system (Flood Control) Orissa

(PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood protection to provide protection to 17100 area in Jaipur district of Orissa The proposal

a) Raising and strengthening of existing embankments -8649km

b) Construction of new embankment at - 1583 km

c) Construction of spurs - 24 Nos

d) Renovation of drains - 3750 km

e) Construction of sluices 10 Nos

f) Construction of launching aprons - 2000 m

g) Construction service roads 56 km

The cost of the scheme has been finalized by CWC for Rs 6232 crore at price level with BC ratio as 1 The State Finance Concurrence has

been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VII) On query related to provision of launching aprons it was clarified by Project officials that there would provision of the aprons where are considered essential It was further informed by the project authority that project was formulated on the of model study carried out by 11 Chennai

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should completed by March 2013 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

11 Revised Project Estimate for construction of Right Marginal Bund on river Ganga from Bhogpur to Balawali (Flood Control) Dist Haridwar Uttarakhand

CE (PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 40460 persons and provide protection to 9000 ha land in 10 villages of Uttarakhand from the fury of flood

scheme was originally sanctioned for Rs 11 crore for providing protection along river Ganga in a length of 205 km Due to cost escalation only 105 m of embankment is being constructed by the Gov with 11 crore as earlier approved The scheme is an ongoing under Management Programme MoWR The Empowered Committee in July 2009 decided that the cost of the scheme may allowed to revise the price level of March 2008

The present proposal envisages Construction of embankment of remaining 10 km length in a stretch of the river from 105 km 205

8

The present revised estimate of flood control scheme has been examined in GFCC and finalized for Rs 2069 crore with BC ratio as 509 The State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VIII) Commissioner (Ganga) advised the Govt of Uttarakhand to send scheme-wise budget allocation for project in question

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

12 Scheme for Desilting of river Ichamati along the common Border portion for better drainage and flood management (Flood Control) West Bengal

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 984 lakhs and to provide protection of 225 sq km area The proposal envisages

a) Desilting of river Ichamati by means of suitable floating type excavator mounted on pontoon (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 15 28000 cum)

b) Desilting of river Ichamati by manual labour within clmr land and depositing the excavated earth at suitable distance (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 139000 cum)

c) Total length of excavationdesilting is 20415 km

GFCC has finalized the cost of the project for Rs 3823 crore with BC ratio as 637 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IX)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with Vote of thanks to the Chair

9

Annexure-l 10sth Meeting of Advisory Committee

bull LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

fVembers of the Committee

SI ShriMrs 1 UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair 2 Allanya Ray Financial Advisor Ministry of Water Resources Member 3 Avinash Misbra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Planning Member

Commission) 4 Saidul Haq Hydrologist ( Representing Chairh1an CGWB) Member 5 JSBawa Director (HPampI) CEA (Representing Centra Electricity Member

Authority) () S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO cwe New D~lhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees a Ministry of water Resources

7 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MoWR b) Central vVater Commission

~ R C lha Member (RM) CWC New Delhi lty Jndra Raj Member (WPampP) 10 ~ K lYOlhi Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi II S K Chaudhary Chief Engineer (FM) ewc New Delhi 12 T S Patil Chid Engineer (MCO) CWC Nagpur

deg1 3 M K Sinha Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi 14 BG Kaushik Chief Engineer (PPO) CWC New Delhi 15 V K Chawla Chief Engineer (lMO) CWC New Delhi 10 Y K Sharma Chief Engineer (IBO) cwe Chandigarh 17 KN Keslui Chief Engineer (LGBO) CWC Patna 1~ G S Tyagi Director UTampSS CWC New Delhi 19 Gorakh Thakur Director CA-l CWC New Delhi 20 Ajay KumarDirector PA (N) cwe New Delhi 2L D M Raipure Dixector Appraisal CWC Nagpur -

22 P C ]ha Director PA-C CWC New Delhi middot -lt

4-middotM middot ~ 23 R K Kanodia Director PA-S CWC New Delhi

24 M W Paunikar DD PA-N CWC New Delhi 25 B Rai DD PA-C CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC 26 AK GanjuChairman GFCC Patna 27 S Masood Husain Member (Planning) GFCC Patna

d) State Governmenofficers Bihar

28 Ajay Nayak PriRcipal Secretary WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 29 SiJsil Kumar Singh SE WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 30 P K lha Resident Engineer Govt of Bihar

Chattisgarh 31 B K Rai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur 32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

middot33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur 34 BK Pndey AE Bilaspur

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

~ 18 Commissioner (Ganga) Ministry of Water Resources CGO Complex New Delhi 19 Secretary Water Resources Department Government of Bihar Sinchai Bhawan

20

2l

22

23

24

25

26

27 28 29 30

31 32

33

Patna-800 015 Principal Secretary Water Resources Department Government of Madhya Pradesh Sachivalaya Arera Hills Bhopal Secretary (Water Resources) Government of Chhattisgarh DK Bhawan Sachivalaya Raipur-492 010 Chhattisgarh Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Uttar Pradesh Sachivalay Annexe Lucknow-226 001 (UP) Secretary (Irrigation amp Power) Government of Uttaranchal Sachivalaya Dehradun-248 001 (Uttarakhand) Secretary (Water Resources) Government of Orissa Secretariat Bhubaneshwarshy751 001 (Orissa) Secretary Irrigation amp Waterways Directorate Government of West Bengal Writers Building Kolkata-700 00 Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Maharashtra Mantralaya Mumbai-400 032 Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi Chief Engineer (FMO) CWC New Delhi Chief Engineer Monitoring- Central CWC CGO complex Seminary Hills Nagpur Chief Engineer (NBO)CWC Paryawas Bhawan Mother Teresa Marg Arera Hills Bhopal-4620 11

Chief Engineer Lower Ganga Basin WC 177 - B Srikrishnapuri Patna-800 001 (Bihar) Chief Engineer (VIER) Mahanadi amp Eastern Rivers CWC Plot No 655 Sahid Nagar Bhubneshwar - 751007 (Orissa) Chief Engineer (UGB) Upper Ganga Basin CWC Janhavi Bhawan 212496 Indira Nagar Lucknow- 226024 (Uttar Pradesh)

Copy for information to 34 Sr PPS to Secretary Ministry of Water Resources Room No-407 Ilew Delhi

1051hSUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOOD CONTROL AND MULTI

25thPURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON JUNE 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNO-ECONOMIC VIABILlT OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 105111 meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposa ls was held on 25062010 at 1000 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting It was observed that the representatives trom the Ministry of Agriculture Tribal Affairs and Environment amp Forest were not present in the meeting This was viewed seriously by the Chairman and accordingly it was advised to issue necessary directives to these Ministries to depute their representatives in the meetings of the Advisory Committee ill future

Thereafter the Chairman requested the Member-Secretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 104TH MEETING

104th The Summary Record of Discussions of the Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter No16272010-PA (N)960-993 dated 21052010 Member-Secretary informed the Committee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee confirmed the Summarv Record of discussions of the 104th Advisory Committee meeting J

il) PROJECT PROPOSALS PUT UP FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

1 Restoration Works of Eastern Gandak Canal (Revised-Major) Bihar

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Restoration works of Eastern Gandak Canal an ERM scheme was accorded investment clearance by the Planning Commission in May 2004 for Rs 294 Cr at 2001 PL to restore CCA of 48 lakh ha and annual irrigation of 662 lakh ha This will provide irrigation facilities to East Champaran West Champaran Vaishali and Muzaffarpur districts

The present proposal envisages restoration and replacement of 10 components

a) Restoration of designed section of canal by desilting (Eastern Tirhut Main canal having length of 240 78 km 11 branchsub-~ranch canals having length 421 08 km 24 distributaries of 131 km length 132 sub distributaries of 1052 km length 424 minors and 1342 sub-minors)

b) Repairs to Gandak brarrage and its appurtenances c) Replacement of all the damaged structures with new ones

d) Renovation of all the pucca works like lining etc and structures to increase their longevity

e) Construction of few additional structures as per present site condition in line with approval of the Govt of Bihar

f) LOPE lining in selected reaches in high filling zones to avoid possibility of seepage

g) Brick tile lining in the selected canal reaches where earthwork has already been completed

hbull bull J Repar of damaged hydraulic gates in canal structures i) Constructionrepair of outlets at suitable locations j) Installations of telecommunication system for operation of canal

procurementdocumentation of technical records Preparation of manual for canal operation and water management PIM implementation for ascertaining assured irrigation to the beneficiaries and maintenance and operation of the canal through the beneficiaries

Apart from aboveworks following emergent works are also included in the present p(oposal

a) Restoration of mechanical work of barrage appurtenants as suggested by CWC

b) Restoration and strengthening of Cross-Drainage (CD) work at RD 29300 of Triveni Branch canal across Koraina river which includes construction of all bank connections construction of damaged canal trough and river training works for diversion of river streams

The present revised cost estimate without change in scope has been finalized for Rs 68478 cr at 2009-PL with BC ratio as 296 State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-II)

The project was discussed in length Member (WPampP) informed that the project is not included under AIBP It was informed by Principal Secretary Govt of Bihar that the construction work has already been started and it will be completed by March 2013 It was further informed by Govt of Bihar that during construction the closure of the existing canal would be done during rabi season only

Planning Commission informed that CGWB has been carrying out studies of conjunctive use for addressing the problem of water logging in the Gandak canal command area falling between Gandak and Burhi Gandak rivers

Chairman desired that the submission of CGWB report may be expedited by the Govt of Bihar and suggested to take remedial measures for water logged area based on recommendations of CGWB It was also advised to explore the possibility of increasing CCA through conjunctive use of ground and surface water in the command

After discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

2

Kharung Project (Major ERM-New) Chhattisgarh

CE (PAO) CWC gave a brief account of project Kharung Tank is an old completed med tank constructed during year 1 1930

across Kharung river a tributary of Sheonath river in Mahanadi system in Bilaspur district of Chhattisgarh state

Kharung k project is very old project and canal has been providing since the last years During period

only minor maintenance has As a result conditions of project components been over time reby causing gradual in seepage

present proposal envisages only the provIsion of concrete lining in its distribution system remodeling of structures in order and provide irrigation for additional 15 from water thus saved

project proposal envisages construction the following main works

i)

ji)

mm cement concrete lining along with low density poly film of 1 micron thickness the bed as well as on

for a total length 110 km of main canal and respective distribution system Re-modellingrepairing of District Road

iii) IV)

v) vi)

Re-modellingrepairing Head Regulators regulators etc Re-modellingrepairing of falls (16 Nos) in Main canals and its distributaries and Minors Nos) Re-modellingrepairing of in Main (4 Nos) Re-modellingrepairing of DrainageDrainage SyphonsAcqueduct Nos in Main canals amp 21 in distributaries and Minors)

price cost of with BC ratio as

been finalized 309

Rs 10104 crore2008-09 Concurrence been

obtained (copy as Annexure-III)

After brief discussion the Committee proposal

Maniyari Tank Project (Major ERM-New) Chhattisgarh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the proposal The iyari Tank project is an old completed tank constructed during the 1 1930 across Maniyari river a tributary of Sheonath river in Mahanadi system in Bilaspur district Chhattisgarh

present proposal is only for provIsion cement concrete lining in canal and its distribution and remodeling of existing structures to

3

save seepage water and thus to provide irrigation for additional 11000 ha in 32 villages without affecting any parameter of the reservoir

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 15995 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 181

The Chairman enquired that while computing BC ratio of the project why the old project cost has not been taken into consideration The Project Authorities replied that being an old project the depreciation of the project is too high to consider As a result the impact on BC ratio would be negligible The Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of suriace and ground water in the command area so as to reduce the impact of water logging

Since the State Finance Concurrence has not been obtained it was decided that the project may be deferred for reconsideration in the next meeting

4 Halon Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC gave a brief account of the project proposal The Halon Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam near village Karanjiya in the district of Mandia of Madhya Pradesh across river Halon a tributary of river Burne in Narmada basin The Halon Irrigation Project contemplates to provide annual irrigation facilities to an area of 16782 ha (CCA - 13040 ha) in Mandla district a tribal district of Madhya Pradesh The project will irrigate land on the left bank through gravity flow canal

84thThe project was earlier considered in the meeting of Advisory Committee held on 12052005 and was deferred for want of final environmental clearance clearance of RampR plan clearance from CGWB and in the absence of site specific discharge data to review the yield

The Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) and clearance from CGWB have now been obtained As regards forest clearance it was informed by the Project officials that stage-1 clearance has been obtained and the work will be started after stage-2 clearance

The representative from CEA enquired regarding the provision of Hydroshypower generation in the project The Project Authorities mentioned that provision of Hydro-power generation was not found viable as per the site conditions The Chairman enquired about why the BC ratio of the project is very marginal ie 155 The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls in Mandla district a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well within the permissible limits The State Finance Concurrence has been received

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

4

5 Man Irrigation Project (Revised Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The original proposal was approved by the Planning Commission in June 1992 for Rs 44 10 cr at 1983 price level The present proposal is a revised cost estimate without any change in its scope and the cost has been finalized for Rs 24603 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 179 The expenditure incurred till March 2010 is 196 crore The State Finance Concurrence has already been received

Chairman enquired about the construction status of the project The Project Authorities replied that the dam and head works of the project had already been completed in 2006 and the canal system is already in operation since the last two years Only some residual works are to be completed by March 2012

Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of surface and ground water in the command area to reduce the impact of water logging in consultation with CGWB

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further cost time revision will be considered by the Committee

6 Upper Narmada Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Upper Narmada Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam of maximum height of 3380 m and total length of 212 km near village Shobhapur (Rinatola) of Dindori district of Madhya Pradesh The project contemplates to provide irrigation benefits to an area of 26622 ha annually in Annupur and Dindori districts of Madhya Pradesh Most of the beneficiaries from the project belong to Schedule Caste (SC) and Schedule Tribe (ST) categories

The project was considered in the 84 th meeting of Advisory Committee held on 1205 2005 and was deferred for want of environmental clearance and RampR clearance

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 68393 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 157 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IV)

Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (lVIoTA) and Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) have now been obtained On query regarding the physical programme of the project the Project Authorities replied that the project works would be awarded on turn-key basis and would be completed by March 2015 The Chairman asked why the BC ratio of the project is marginal (153)

5

f The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls

in Annupur amp Dindori districts a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well with in the permissible limits (1)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

7 Shelgaon Barrage Project (New-Medium) Maharashtra

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Shelgaon Barrage a medium irrigation project envisages construction of 41965 m long barrage across river Tapi in Tapi basin The project is located near village Shelgaon in the Jalgaon district of Maharashtra The project is planned to irrigate annually an area of 11318 ha (CCA-9589 ha) benefiting 19 villages of Jalgaon district

The project envisages construction of the following main components

i) A 419 65 m long barrage with 18 Nos of radial gates of size 1830 m x 1676m

ii) A 465 m long left side earthen embankment and 165 m long saddle earthen embankment with a top width of 75 m

iii) An intake well of size 3 m x 11 m and jack well of size 9 m x 24 m along with 5 Nos of VT pumps of 1400 HP

The estimated cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 44649 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 186 State Finance Concurrence has already been obtained

Chairman asked why the irrigation cost per hectare is so high The representative from the Govt of Maharashtra replied that the project is basically a lift irrigation scheme As such the irrigation cost per hectare is high

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should be completed by March 2014 and no further timecost overrun would be considered by the Committee

8 Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II (Revised-Major) Orissa

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II Orissa was earlier considered and accepted by the Advisory Committee in its 65th meeting held on 14696 for Rs 70515 at 1995 price level Planning Commission subsequently accorded investment clearance to this project in July 1997 for providing irrigation to CCA of 93501 ha with 90 intensity of irrigation

The proposal envisages completion of all works of Left Bank Canal from 30 km to 141 km with head discharge of 13222 cumec to irrigate the CCA of 93501 ha

()

The present proposal is a revised cost estimate and there is no change in the scope of the project The revised cost has been finalized in CWC for Rs 195834 crore at 2009-10 price level with BC ratio as 1986 State Finance concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-V)

Secretary (WR) obseNed that work programme is too lengthy As such he desired that the work schedule should be revised in such a way that the project should be completed by March 2015 It was also decided that no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject to the aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

9 Kachnoda Dam project (Revised-Major) Uttar Pradesh

CE (PLlO) cwe briefly introduced the project proposal Kachnoda dam project was considered and accepted in the 87th TAC meeting held on 17112006 Planning Commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal in Jan 2007 for Rs 8867 crore at 2004 price level for providing irrigation to 11 699 ha of CCA and annual irrigation to the tune of 10850 ha

The project envisages construction of following main components

a) 41 km long and 16 m high earthen dam with a live storage of 5464 Million Cubic Metre

b) An ogee shaped masonry spillway of 127 m length with 9 nos vertical gates of size 12 x 71 m each to pass maximum flood discharge of 6038 cumec

c) Left main canal of length 154 km with head discharge of 3 cumec and Right main canal of length 84 km with head discharge of 275 cumec with their distribution systems to provide irrigation to an area of 5173 ha of CCA

d) Apart from above irrigation facilities to 6096 ha under existing Lalitpur canal system and 430 ha under existing Dilwara distributory of Jamni canal are also proposed to be brought under command of Kachnoda dam project

The present revised cost estimate is without change in scope and the revised cost has been finalized for Rs 42345 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 109 State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-VI) Chairman observed that BC ratio of the project proposal is very marginal but keeping the chronic drought prone area of command the proposal may be accepted subject to the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject tothe aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

7

10 Flood protection works to Brahmani-Kelua-Birupa Doab of Brahmani system (Flood Control) Orissa

(PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood protection to provide protection to 17100 area in Jaipur district of Orissa The proposal

a) Raising and strengthening of existing embankments -8649km

b) Construction of new embankment at - 1583 km

c) Construction of spurs - 24 Nos

d) Renovation of drains - 3750 km

e) Construction of sluices 10 Nos

f) Construction of launching aprons - 2000 m

g) Construction service roads 56 km

The cost of the scheme has been finalized by CWC for Rs 6232 crore at price level with BC ratio as 1 The State Finance Concurrence has

been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VII) On query related to provision of launching aprons it was clarified by Project officials that there would provision of the aprons where are considered essential It was further informed by the project authority that project was formulated on the of model study carried out by 11 Chennai

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should completed by March 2013 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

11 Revised Project Estimate for construction of Right Marginal Bund on river Ganga from Bhogpur to Balawali (Flood Control) Dist Haridwar Uttarakhand

CE (PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 40460 persons and provide protection to 9000 ha land in 10 villages of Uttarakhand from the fury of flood

scheme was originally sanctioned for Rs 11 crore for providing protection along river Ganga in a length of 205 km Due to cost escalation only 105 m of embankment is being constructed by the Gov with 11 crore as earlier approved The scheme is an ongoing under Management Programme MoWR The Empowered Committee in July 2009 decided that the cost of the scheme may allowed to revise the price level of March 2008

The present proposal envisages Construction of embankment of remaining 10 km length in a stretch of the river from 105 km 205

8

The present revised estimate of flood control scheme has been examined in GFCC and finalized for Rs 2069 crore with BC ratio as 509 The State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VIII) Commissioner (Ganga) advised the Govt of Uttarakhand to send scheme-wise budget allocation for project in question

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

12 Scheme for Desilting of river Ichamati along the common Border portion for better drainage and flood management (Flood Control) West Bengal

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 984 lakhs and to provide protection of 225 sq km area The proposal envisages

a) Desilting of river Ichamati by means of suitable floating type excavator mounted on pontoon (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 15 28000 cum)

b) Desilting of river Ichamati by manual labour within clmr land and depositing the excavated earth at suitable distance (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 139000 cum)

c) Total length of excavationdesilting is 20415 km

GFCC has finalized the cost of the project for Rs 3823 crore with BC ratio as 637 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IX)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with Vote of thanks to the Chair

9

Annexure-l 10sth Meeting of Advisory Committee

bull LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

fVembers of the Committee

SI ShriMrs 1 UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair 2 Allanya Ray Financial Advisor Ministry of Water Resources Member 3 Avinash Misbra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Planning Member

Commission) 4 Saidul Haq Hydrologist ( Representing Chairh1an CGWB) Member 5 JSBawa Director (HPampI) CEA (Representing Centra Electricity Member

Authority) () S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO cwe New D~lhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees a Ministry of water Resources

7 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MoWR b) Central vVater Commission

~ R C lha Member (RM) CWC New Delhi lty Jndra Raj Member (WPampP) 10 ~ K lYOlhi Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi II S K Chaudhary Chief Engineer (FM) ewc New Delhi 12 T S Patil Chid Engineer (MCO) CWC Nagpur

deg1 3 M K Sinha Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi 14 BG Kaushik Chief Engineer (PPO) CWC New Delhi 15 V K Chawla Chief Engineer (lMO) CWC New Delhi 10 Y K Sharma Chief Engineer (IBO) cwe Chandigarh 17 KN Keslui Chief Engineer (LGBO) CWC Patna 1~ G S Tyagi Director UTampSS CWC New Delhi 19 Gorakh Thakur Director CA-l CWC New Delhi 20 Ajay KumarDirector PA (N) cwe New Delhi 2L D M Raipure Dixector Appraisal CWC Nagpur -

22 P C ]ha Director PA-C CWC New Delhi middot -lt

4-middotM middot ~ 23 R K Kanodia Director PA-S CWC New Delhi

24 M W Paunikar DD PA-N CWC New Delhi 25 B Rai DD PA-C CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC 26 AK GanjuChairman GFCC Patna 27 S Masood Husain Member (Planning) GFCC Patna

d) State Governmenofficers Bihar

28 Ajay Nayak PriRcipal Secretary WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 29 SiJsil Kumar Singh SE WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 30 P K lha Resident Engineer Govt of Bihar

Chattisgarh 31 B K Rai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur 32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

middot33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur 34 BK Pndey AE Bilaspur

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

1051hSUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOOD CONTROL AND MULTI

25thPURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON JUNE 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNO-ECONOMIC VIABILlT OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 105111 meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposa ls was held on 25062010 at 1000 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting It was observed that the representatives trom the Ministry of Agriculture Tribal Affairs and Environment amp Forest were not present in the meeting This was viewed seriously by the Chairman and accordingly it was advised to issue necessary directives to these Ministries to depute their representatives in the meetings of the Advisory Committee ill future

Thereafter the Chairman requested the Member-Secretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 104TH MEETING

104th The Summary Record of Discussions of the Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter No16272010-PA (N)960-993 dated 21052010 Member-Secretary informed the Committee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee confirmed the Summarv Record of discussions of the 104th Advisory Committee meeting J

il) PROJECT PROPOSALS PUT UP FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

1 Restoration Works of Eastern Gandak Canal (Revised-Major) Bihar

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Restoration works of Eastern Gandak Canal an ERM scheme was accorded investment clearance by the Planning Commission in May 2004 for Rs 294 Cr at 2001 PL to restore CCA of 48 lakh ha and annual irrigation of 662 lakh ha This will provide irrigation facilities to East Champaran West Champaran Vaishali and Muzaffarpur districts

The present proposal envisages restoration and replacement of 10 components

a) Restoration of designed section of canal by desilting (Eastern Tirhut Main canal having length of 240 78 km 11 branchsub-~ranch canals having length 421 08 km 24 distributaries of 131 km length 132 sub distributaries of 1052 km length 424 minors and 1342 sub-minors)

b) Repairs to Gandak brarrage and its appurtenances c) Replacement of all the damaged structures with new ones

d) Renovation of all the pucca works like lining etc and structures to increase their longevity

e) Construction of few additional structures as per present site condition in line with approval of the Govt of Bihar

f) LOPE lining in selected reaches in high filling zones to avoid possibility of seepage

g) Brick tile lining in the selected canal reaches where earthwork has already been completed

hbull bull J Repar of damaged hydraulic gates in canal structures i) Constructionrepair of outlets at suitable locations j) Installations of telecommunication system for operation of canal

procurementdocumentation of technical records Preparation of manual for canal operation and water management PIM implementation for ascertaining assured irrigation to the beneficiaries and maintenance and operation of the canal through the beneficiaries

Apart from aboveworks following emergent works are also included in the present p(oposal

a) Restoration of mechanical work of barrage appurtenants as suggested by CWC

b) Restoration and strengthening of Cross-Drainage (CD) work at RD 29300 of Triveni Branch canal across Koraina river which includes construction of all bank connections construction of damaged canal trough and river training works for diversion of river streams

The present revised cost estimate without change in scope has been finalized for Rs 68478 cr at 2009-PL with BC ratio as 296 State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-II)

The project was discussed in length Member (WPampP) informed that the project is not included under AIBP It was informed by Principal Secretary Govt of Bihar that the construction work has already been started and it will be completed by March 2013 It was further informed by Govt of Bihar that during construction the closure of the existing canal would be done during rabi season only

Planning Commission informed that CGWB has been carrying out studies of conjunctive use for addressing the problem of water logging in the Gandak canal command area falling between Gandak and Burhi Gandak rivers

Chairman desired that the submission of CGWB report may be expedited by the Govt of Bihar and suggested to take remedial measures for water logged area based on recommendations of CGWB It was also advised to explore the possibility of increasing CCA through conjunctive use of ground and surface water in the command

After discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

2

Kharung Project (Major ERM-New) Chhattisgarh

CE (PAO) CWC gave a brief account of project Kharung Tank is an old completed med tank constructed during year 1 1930

across Kharung river a tributary of Sheonath river in Mahanadi system in Bilaspur district of Chhattisgarh state

Kharung k project is very old project and canal has been providing since the last years During period

only minor maintenance has As a result conditions of project components been over time reby causing gradual in seepage

present proposal envisages only the provIsion of concrete lining in its distribution system remodeling of structures in order and provide irrigation for additional 15 from water thus saved

project proposal envisages construction the following main works

i)

ji)

mm cement concrete lining along with low density poly film of 1 micron thickness the bed as well as on

for a total length 110 km of main canal and respective distribution system Re-modellingrepairing of District Road

iii) IV)

v) vi)

Re-modellingrepairing Head Regulators regulators etc Re-modellingrepairing of falls (16 Nos) in Main canals and its distributaries and Minors Nos) Re-modellingrepairing of in Main (4 Nos) Re-modellingrepairing of DrainageDrainage SyphonsAcqueduct Nos in Main canals amp 21 in distributaries and Minors)

price cost of with BC ratio as

been finalized 309

Rs 10104 crore2008-09 Concurrence been

obtained (copy as Annexure-III)

After brief discussion the Committee proposal

Maniyari Tank Project (Major ERM-New) Chhattisgarh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the proposal The iyari Tank project is an old completed tank constructed during the 1 1930 across Maniyari river a tributary of Sheonath river in Mahanadi system in Bilaspur district Chhattisgarh

present proposal is only for provIsion cement concrete lining in canal and its distribution and remodeling of existing structures to

3

save seepage water and thus to provide irrigation for additional 11000 ha in 32 villages without affecting any parameter of the reservoir

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 15995 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 181

The Chairman enquired that while computing BC ratio of the project why the old project cost has not been taken into consideration The Project Authorities replied that being an old project the depreciation of the project is too high to consider As a result the impact on BC ratio would be negligible The Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of suriace and ground water in the command area so as to reduce the impact of water logging

Since the State Finance Concurrence has not been obtained it was decided that the project may be deferred for reconsideration in the next meeting

4 Halon Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC gave a brief account of the project proposal The Halon Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam near village Karanjiya in the district of Mandia of Madhya Pradesh across river Halon a tributary of river Burne in Narmada basin The Halon Irrigation Project contemplates to provide annual irrigation facilities to an area of 16782 ha (CCA - 13040 ha) in Mandla district a tribal district of Madhya Pradesh The project will irrigate land on the left bank through gravity flow canal

84thThe project was earlier considered in the meeting of Advisory Committee held on 12052005 and was deferred for want of final environmental clearance clearance of RampR plan clearance from CGWB and in the absence of site specific discharge data to review the yield

The Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) and clearance from CGWB have now been obtained As regards forest clearance it was informed by the Project officials that stage-1 clearance has been obtained and the work will be started after stage-2 clearance

The representative from CEA enquired regarding the provision of Hydroshypower generation in the project The Project Authorities mentioned that provision of Hydro-power generation was not found viable as per the site conditions The Chairman enquired about why the BC ratio of the project is very marginal ie 155 The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls in Mandla district a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well within the permissible limits The State Finance Concurrence has been received

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

4

5 Man Irrigation Project (Revised Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The original proposal was approved by the Planning Commission in June 1992 for Rs 44 10 cr at 1983 price level The present proposal is a revised cost estimate without any change in its scope and the cost has been finalized for Rs 24603 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 179 The expenditure incurred till March 2010 is 196 crore The State Finance Concurrence has already been received

Chairman enquired about the construction status of the project The Project Authorities replied that the dam and head works of the project had already been completed in 2006 and the canal system is already in operation since the last two years Only some residual works are to be completed by March 2012

Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of surface and ground water in the command area to reduce the impact of water logging in consultation with CGWB

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further cost time revision will be considered by the Committee

6 Upper Narmada Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Upper Narmada Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam of maximum height of 3380 m and total length of 212 km near village Shobhapur (Rinatola) of Dindori district of Madhya Pradesh The project contemplates to provide irrigation benefits to an area of 26622 ha annually in Annupur and Dindori districts of Madhya Pradesh Most of the beneficiaries from the project belong to Schedule Caste (SC) and Schedule Tribe (ST) categories

The project was considered in the 84 th meeting of Advisory Committee held on 1205 2005 and was deferred for want of environmental clearance and RampR clearance

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 68393 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 157 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IV)

Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (lVIoTA) and Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) have now been obtained On query regarding the physical programme of the project the Project Authorities replied that the project works would be awarded on turn-key basis and would be completed by March 2015 The Chairman asked why the BC ratio of the project is marginal (153)

5

f The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls

in Annupur amp Dindori districts a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well with in the permissible limits (1)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

7 Shelgaon Barrage Project (New-Medium) Maharashtra

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Shelgaon Barrage a medium irrigation project envisages construction of 41965 m long barrage across river Tapi in Tapi basin The project is located near village Shelgaon in the Jalgaon district of Maharashtra The project is planned to irrigate annually an area of 11318 ha (CCA-9589 ha) benefiting 19 villages of Jalgaon district

The project envisages construction of the following main components

i) A 419 65 m long barrage with 18 Nos of radial gates of size 1830 m x 1676m

ii) A 465 m long left side earthen embankment and 165 m long saddle earthen embankment with a top width of 75 m

iii) An intake well of size 3 m x 11 m and jack well of size 9 m x 24 m along with 5 Nos of VT pumps of 1400 HP

The estimated cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 44649 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 186 State Finance Concurrence has already been obtained

Chairman asked why the irrigation cost per hectare is so high The representative from the Govt of Maharashtra replied that the project is basically a lift irrigation scheme As such the irrigation cost per hectare is high

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should be completed by March 2014 and no further timecost overrun would be considered by the Committee

8 Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II (Revised-Major) Orissa

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II Orissa was earlier considered and accepted by the Advisory Committee in its 65th meeting held on 14696 for Rs 70515 at 1995 price level Planning Commission subsequently accorded investment clearance to this project in July 1997 for providing irrigation to CCA of 93501 ha with 90 intensity of irrigation

The proposal envisages completion of all works of Left Bank Canal from 30 km to 141 km with head discharge of 13222 cumec to irrigate the CCA of 93501 ha

()

The present proposal is a revised cost estimate and there is no change in the scope of the project The revised cost has been finalized in CWC for Rs 195834 crore at 2009-10 price level with BC ratio as 1986 State Finance concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-V)

Secretary (WR) obseNed that work programme is too lengthy As such he desired that the work schedule should be revised in such a way that the project should be completed by March 2015 It was also decided that no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject to the aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

9 Kachnoda Dam project (Revised-Major) Uttar Pradesh

CE (PLlO) cwe briefly introduced the project proposal Kachnoda dam project was considered and accepted in the 87th TAC meeting held on 17112006 Planning Commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal in Jan 2007 for Rs 8867 crore at 2004 price level for providing irrigation to 11 699 ha of CCA and annual irrigation to the tune of 10850 ha

The project envisages construction of following main components

a) 41 km long and 16 m high earthen dam with a live storage of 5464 Million Cubic Metre

b) An ogee shaped masonry spillway of 127 m length with 9 nos vertical gates of size 12 x 71 m each to pass maximum flood discharge of 6038 cumec

c) Left main canal of length 154 km with head discharge of 3 cumec and Right main canal of length 84 km with head discharge of 275 cumec with their distribution systems to provide irrigation to an area of 5173 ha of CCA

d) Apart from above irrigation facilities to 6096 ha under existing Lalitpur canal system and 430 ha under existing Dilwara distributory of Jamni canal are also proposed to be brought under command of Kachnoda dam project

The present revised cost estimate is without change in scope and the revised cost has been finalized for Rs 42345 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 109 State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-VI) Chairman observed that BC ratio of the project proposal is very marginal but keeping the chronic drought prone area of command the proposal may be accepted subject to the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject tothe aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

7

10 Flood protection works to Brahmani-Kelua-Birupa Doab of Brahmani system (Flood Control) Orissa

(PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood protection to provide protection to 17100 area in Jaipur district of Orissa The proposal

a) Raising and strengthening of existing embankments -8649km

b) Construction of new embankment at - 1583 km

c) Construction of spurs - 24 Nos

d) Renovation of drains - 3750 km

e) Construction of sluices 10 Nos

f) Construction of launching aprons - 2000 m

g) Construction service roads 56 km

The cost of the scheme has been finalized by CWC for Rs 6232 crore at price level with BC ratio as 1 The State Finance Concurrence has

been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VII) On query related to provision of launching aprons it was clarified by Project officials that there would provision of the aprons where are considered essential It was further informed by the project authority that project was formulated on the of model study carried out by 11 Chennai

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should completed by March 2013 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

11 Revised Project Estimate for construction of Right Marginal Bund on river Ganga from Bhogpur to Balawali (Flood Control) Dist Haridwar Uttarakhand

CE (PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 40460 persons and provide protection to 9000 ha land in 10 villages of Uttarakhand from the fury of flood

scheme was originally sanctioned for Rs 11 crore for providing protection along river Ganga in a length of 205 km Due to cost escalation only 105 m of embankment is being constructed by the Gov with 11 crore as earlier approved The scheme is an ongoing under Management Programme MoWR The Empowered Committee in July 2009 decided that the cost of the scheme may allowed to revise the price level of March 2008

The present proposal envisages Construction of embankment of remaining 10 km length in a stretch of the river from 105 km 205

8

The present revised estimate of flood control scheme has been examined in GFCC and finalized for Rs 2069 crore with BC ratio as 509 The State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VIII) Commissioner (Ganga) advised the Govt of Uttarakhand to send scheme-wise budget allocation for project in question

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

12 Scheme for Desilting of river Ichamati along the common Border portion for better drainage and flood management (Flood Control) West Bengal

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 984 lakhs and to provide protection of 225 sq km area The proposal envisages

a) Desilting of river Ichamati by means of suitable floating type excavator mounted on pontoon (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 15 28000 cum)

b) Desilting of river Ichamati by manual labour within clmr land and depositing the excavated earth at suitable distance (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 139000 cum)

c) Total length of excavationdesilting is 20415 km

GFCC has finalized the cost of the project for Rs 3823 crore with BC ratio as 637 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IX)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with Vote of thanks to the Chair

9

Annexure-l 10sth Meeting of Advisory Committee

bull LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

fVembers of the Committee

SI ShriMrs 1 UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair 2 Allanya Ray Financial Advisor Ministry of Water Resources Member 3 Avinash Misbra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Planning Member

Commission) 4 Saidul Haq Hydrologist ( Representing Chairh1an CGWB) Member 5 JSBawa Director (HPampI) CEA (Representing Centra Electricity Member

Authority) () S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO cwe New D~lhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees a Ministry of water Resources

7 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MoWR b) Central vVater Commission

~ R C lha Member (RM) CWC New Delhi lty Jndra Raj Member (WPampP) 10 ~ K lYOlhi Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi II S K Chaudhary Chief Engineer (FM) ewc New Delhi 12 T S Patil Chid Engineer (MCO) CWC Nagpur

deg1 3 M K Sinha Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi 14 BG Kaushik Chief Engineer (PPO) CWC New Delhi 15 V K Chawla Chief Engineer (lMO) CWC New Delhi 10 Y K Sharma Chief Engineer (IBO) cwe Chandigarh 17 KN Keslui Chief Engineer (LGBO) CWC Patna 1~ G S Tyagi Director UTampSS CWC New Delhi 19 Gorakh Thakur Director CA-l CWC New Delhi 20 Ajay KumarDirector PA (N) cwe New Delhi 2L D M Raipure Dixector Appraisal CWC Nagpur -

22 P C ]ha Director PA-C CWC New Delhi middot -lt

4-middotM middot ~ 23 R K Kanodia Director PA-S CWC New Delhi

24 M W Paunikar DD PA-N CWC New Delhi 25 B Rai DD PA-C CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC 26 AK GanjuChairman GFCC Patna 27 S Masood Husain Member (Planning) GFCC Patna

d) State Governmenofficers Bihar

28 Ajay Nayak PriRcipal Secretary WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 29 SiJsil Kumar Singh SE WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 30 P K lha Resident Engineer Govt of Bihar

Chattisgarh 31 B K Rai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur 32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

middot33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur 34 BK Pndey AE Bilaspur

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

d) Renovation of all the pucca works like lining etc and structures to increase their longevity

e) Construction of few additional structures as per present site condition in line with approval of the Govt of Bihar

f) LOPE lining in selected reaches in high filling zones to avoid possibility of seepage

g) Brick tile lining in the selected canal reaches where earthwork has already been completed

hbull bull J Repar of damaged hydraulic gates in canal structures i) Constructionrepair of outlets at suitable locations j) Installations of telecommunication system for operation of canal

procurementdocumentation of technical records Preparation of manual for canal operation and water management PIM implementation for ascertaining assured irrigation to the beneficiaries and maintenance and operation of the canal through the beneficiaries

Apart from aboveworks following emergent works are also included in the present p(oposal

a) Restoration of mechanical work of barrage appurtenants as suggested by CWC

b) Restoration and strengthening of Cross-Drainage (CD) work at RD 29300 of Triveni Branch canal across Koraina river which includes construction of all bank connections construction of damaged canal trough and river training works for diversion of river streams

The present revised cost estimate without change in scope has been finalized for Rs 68478 cr at 2009-PL with BC ratio as 296 State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-II)

The project was discussed in length Member (WPampP) informed that the project is not included under AIBP It was informed by Principal Secretary Govt of Bihar that the construction work has already been started and it will be completed by March 2013 It was further informed by Govt of Bihar that during construction the closure of the existing canal would be done during rabi season only

Planning Commission informed that CGWB has been carrying out studies of conjunctive use for addressing the problem of water logging in the Gandak canal command area falling between Gandak and Burhi Gandak rivers

Chairman desired that the submission of CGWB report may be expedited by the Govt of Bihar and suggested to take remedial measures for water logged area based on recommendations of CGWB It was also advised to explore the possibility of increasing CCA through conjunctive use of ground and surface water in the command

After discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

2

Kharung Project (Major ERM-New) Chhattisgarh

CE (PAO) CWC gave a brief account of project Kharung Tank is an old completed med tank constructed during year 1 1930

across Kharung river a tributary of Sheonath river in Mahanadi system in Bilaspur district of Chhattisgarh state

Kharung k project is very old project and canal has been providing since the last years During period

only minor maintenance has As a result conditions of project components been over time reby causing gradual in seepage

present proposal envisages only the provIsion of concrete lining in its distribution system remodeling of structures in order and provide irrigation for additional 15 from water thus saved

project proposal envisages construction the following main works

i)

ji)

mm cement concrete lining along with low density poly film of 1 micron thickness the bed as well as on

for a total length 110 km of main canal and respective distribution system Re-modellingrepairing of District Road

iii) IV)

v) vi)

Re-modellingrepairing Head Regulators regulators etc Re-modellingrepairing of falls (16 Nos) in Main canals and its distributaries and Minors Nos) Re-modellingrepairing of in Main (4 Nos) Re-modellingrepairing of DrainageDrainage SyphonsAcqueduct Nos in Main canals amp 21 in distributaries and Minors)

price cost of with BC ratio as

been finalized 309

Rs 10104 crore2008-09 Concurrence been

obtained (copy as Annexure-III)

After brief discussion the Committee proposal

Maniyari Tank Project (Major ERM-New) Chhattisgarh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the proposal The iyari Tank project is an old completed tank constructed during the 1 1930 across Maniyari river a tributary of Sheonath river in Mahanadi system in Bilaspur district Chhattisgarh

present proposal is only for provIsion cement concrete lining in canal and its distribution and remodeling of existing structures to

3

save seepage water and thus to provide irrigation for additional 11000 ha in 32 villages without affecting any parameter of the reservoir

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 15995 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 181

The Chairman enquired that while computing BC ratio of the project why the old project cost has not been taken into consideration The Project Authorities replied that being an old project the depreciation of the project is too high to consider As a result the impact on BC ratio would be negligible The Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of suriace and ground water in the command area so as to reduce the impact of water logging

Since the State Finance Concurrence has not been obtained it was decided that the project may be deferred for reconsideration in the next meeting

4 Halon Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC gave a brief account of the project proposal The Halon Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam near village Karanjiya in the district of Mandia of Madhya Pradesh across river Halon a tributary of river Burne in Narmada basin The Halon Irrigation Project contemplates to provide annual irrigation facilities to an area of 16782 ha (CCA - 13040 ha) in Mandla district a tribal district of Madhya Pradesh The project will irrigate land on the left bank through gravity flow canal

84thThe project was earlier considered in the meeting of Advisory Committee held on 12052005 and was deferred for want of final environmental clearance clearance of RampR plan clearance from CGWB and in the absence of site specific discharge data to review the yield

The Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) and clearance from CGWB have now been obtained As regards forest clearance it was informed by the Project officials that stage-1 clearance has been obtained and the work will be started after stage-2 clearance

The representative from CEA enquired regarding the provision of Hydroshypower generation in the project The Project Authorities mentioned that provision of Hydro-power generation was not found viable as per the site conditions The Chairman enquired about why the BC ratio of the project is very marginal ie 155 The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls in Mandla district a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well within the permissible limits The State Finance Concurrence has been received

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

4

5 Man Irrigation Project (Revised Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The original proposal was approved by the Planning Commission in June 1992 for Rs 44 10 cr at 1983 price level The present proposal is a revised cost estimate without any change in its scope and the cost has been finalized for Rs 24603 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 179 The expenditure incurred till March 2010 is 196 crore The State Finance Concurrence has already been received

Chairman enquired about the construction status of the project The Project Authorities replied that the dam and head works of the project had already been completed in 2006 and the canal system is already in operation since the last two years Only some residual works are to be completed by March 2012

Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of surface and ground water in the command area to reduce the impact of water logging in consultation with CGWB

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further cost time revision will be considered by the Committee

6 Upper Narmada Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Upper Narmada Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam of maximum height of 3380 m and total length of 212 km near village Shobhapur (Rinatola) of Dindori district of Madhya Pradesh The project contemplates to provide irrigation benefits to an area of 26622 ha annually in Annupur and Dindori districts of Madhya Pradesh Most of the beneficiaries from the project belong to Schedule Caste (SC) and Schedule Tribe (ST) categories

The project was considered in the 84 th meeting of Advisory Committee held on 1205 2005 and was deferred for want of environmental clearance and RampR clearance

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 68393 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 157 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IV)

Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (lVIoTA) and Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) have now been obtained On query regarding the physical programme of the project the Project Authorities replied that the project works would be awarded on turn-key basis and would be completed by March 2015 The Chairman asked why the BC ratio of the project is marginal (153)

5

f The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls

in Annupur amp Dindori districts a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well with in the permissible limits (1)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

7 Shelgaon Barrage Project (New-Medium) Maharashtra

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Shelgaon Barrage a medium irrigation project envisages construction of 41965 m long barrage across river Tapi in Tapi basin The project is located near village Shelgaon in the Jalgaon district of Maharashtra The project is planned to irrigate annually an area of 11318 ha (CCA-9589 ha) benefiting 19 villages of Jalgaon district

The project envisages construction of the following main components

i) A 419 65 m long barrage with 18 Nos of radial gates of size 1830 m x 1676m

ii) A 465 m long left side earthen embankment and 165 m long saddle earthen embankment with a top width of 75 m

iii) An intake well of size 3 m x 11 m and jack well of size 9 m x 24 m along with 5 Nos of VT pumps of 1400 HP

The estimated cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 44649 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 186 State Finance Concurrence has already been obtained

Chairman asked why the irrigation cost per hectare is so high The representative from the Govt of Maharashtra replied that the project is basically a lift irrigation scheme As such the irrigation cost per hectare is high

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should be completed by March 2014 and no further timecost overrun would be considered by the Committee

8 Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II (Revised-Major) Orissa

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II Orissa was earlier considered and accepted by the Advisory Committee in its 65th meeting held on 14696 for Rs 70515 at 1995 price level Planning Commission subsequently accorded investment clearance to this project in July 1997 for providing irrigation to CCA of 93501 ha with 90 intensity of irrigation

The proposal envisages completion of all works of Left Bank Canal from 30 km to 141 km with head discharge of 13222 cumec to irrigate the CCA of 93501 ha

()

The present proposal is a revised cost estimate and there is no change in the scope of the project The revised cost has been finalized in CWC for Rs 195834 crore at 2009-10 price level with BC ratio as 1986 State Finance concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-V)

Secretary (WR) obseNed that work programme is too lengthy As such he desired that the work schedule should be revised in such a way that the project should be completed by March 2015 It was also decided that no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject to the aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

9 Kachnoda Dam project (Revised-Major) Uttar Pradesh

CE (PLlO) cwe briefly introduced the project proposal Kachnoda dam project was considered and accepted in the 87th TAC meeting held on 17112006 Planning Commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal in Jan 2007 for Rs 8867 crore at 2004 price level for providing irrigation to 11 699 ha of CCA and annual irrigation to the tune of 10850 ha

The project envisages construction of following main components

a) 41 km long and 16 m high earthen dam with a live storage of 5464 Million Cubic Metre

b) An ogee shaped masonry spillway of 127 m length with 9 nos vertical gates of size 12 x 71 m each to pass maximum flood discharge of 6038 cumec

c) Left main canal of length 154 km with head discharge of 3 cumec and Right main canal of length 84 km with head discharge of 275 cumec with their distribution systems to provide irrigation to an area of 5173 ha of CCA

d) Apart from above irrigation facilities to 6096 ha under existing Lalitpur canal system and 430 ha under existing Dilwara distributory of Jamni canal are also proposed to be brought under command of Kachnoda dam project

The present revised cost estimate is without change in scope and the revised cost has been finalized for Rs 42345 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 109 State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-VI) Chairman observed that BC ratio of the project proposal is very marginal but keeping the chronic drought prone area of command the proposal may be accepted subject to the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject tothe aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

7

10 Flood protection works to Brahmani-Kelua-Birupa Doab of Brahmani system (Flood Control) Orissa

(PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood protection to provide protection to 17100 area in Jaipur district of Orissa The proposal

a) Raising and strengthening of existing embankments -8649km

b) Construction of new embankment at - 1583 km

c) Construction of spurs - 24 Nos

d) Renovation of drains - 3750 km

e) Construction of sluices 10 Nos

f) Construction of launching aprons - 2000 m

g) Construction service roads 56 km

The cost of the scheme has been finalized by CWC for Rs 6232 crore at price level with BC ratio as 1 The State Finance Concurrence has

been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VII) On query related to provision of launching aprons it was clarified by Project officials that there would provision of the aprons where are considered essential It was further informed by the project authority that project was formulated on the of model study carried out by 11 Chennai

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should completed by March 2013 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

11 Revised Project Estimate for construction of Right Marginal Bund on river Ganga from Bhogpur to Balawali (Flood Control) Dist Haridwar Uttarakhand

CE (PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 40460 persons and provide protection to 9000 ha land in 10 villages of Uttarakhand from the fury of flood

scheme was originally sanctioned for Rs 11 crore for providing protection along river Ganga in a length of 205 km Due to cost escalation only 105 m of embankment is being constructed by the Gov with 11 crore as earlier approved The scheme is an ongoing under Management Programme MoWR The Empowered Committee in July 2009 decided that the cost of the scheme may allowed to revise the price level of March 2008

The present proposal envisages Construction of embankment of remaining 10 km length in a stretch of the river from 105 km 205

8

The present revised estimate of flood control scheme has been examined in GFCC and finalized for Rs 2069 crore with BC ratio as 509 The State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VIII) Commissioner (Ganga) advised the Govt of Uttarakhand to send scheme-wise budget allocation for project in question

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

12 Scheme for Desilting of river Ichamati along the common Border portion for better drainage and flood management (Flood Control) West Bengal

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 984 lakhs and to provide protection of 225 sq km area The proposal envisages

a) Desilting of river Ichamati by means of suitable floating type excavator mounted on pontoon (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 15 28000 cum)

b) Desilting of river Ichamati by manual labour within clmr land and depositing the excavated earth at suitable distance (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 139000 cum)

c) Total length of excavationdesilting is 20415 km

GFCC has finalized the cost of the project for Rs 3823 crore with BC ratio as 637 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IX)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with Vote of thanks to the Chair

9

Annexure-l 10sth Meeting of Advisory Committee

bull LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

fVembers of the Committee

SI ShriMrs 1 UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair 2 Allanya Ray Financial Advisor Ministry of Water Resources Member 3 Avinash Misbra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Planning Member

Commission) 4 Saidul Haq Hydrologist ( Representing Chairh1an CGWB) Member 5 JSBawa Director (HPampI) CEA (Representing Centra Electricity Member

Authority) () S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO cwe New D~lhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees a Ministry of water Resources

7 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MoWR b) Central vVater Commission

~ R C lha Member (RM) CWC New Delhi lty Jndra Raj Member (WPampP) 10 ~ K lYOlhi Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi II S K Chaudhary Chief Engineer (FM) ewc New Delhi 12 T S Patil Chid Engineer (MCO) CWC Nagpur

deg1 3 M K Sinha Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi 14 BG Kaushik Chief Engineer (PPO) CWC New Delhi 15 V K Chawla Chief Engineer (lMO) CWC New Delhi 10 Y K Sharma Chief Engineer (IBO) cwe Chandigarh 17 KN Keslui Chief Engineer (LGBO) CWC Patna 1~ G S Tyagi Director UTampSS CWC New Delhi 19 Gorakh Thakur Director CA-l CWC New Delhi 20 Ajay KumarDirector PA (N) cwe New Delhi 2L D M Raipure Dixector Appraisal CWC Nagpur -

22 P C ]ha Director PA-C CWC New Delhi middot -lt

4-middotM middot ~ 23 R K Kanodia Director PA-S CWC New Delhi

24 M W Paunikar DD PA-N CWC New Delhi 25 B Rai DD PA-C CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC 26 AK GanjuChairman GFCC Patna 27 S Masood Husain Member (Planning) GFCC Patna

d) State Governmenofficers Bihar

28 Ajay Nayak PriRcipal Secretary WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 29 SiJsil Kumar Singh SE WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 30 P K lha Resident Engineer Govt of Bihar

Chattisgarh 31 B K Rai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur 32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

middot33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur 34 BK Pndey AE Bilaspur

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

Kharung Project (Major ERM-New) Chhattisgarh

CE (PAO) CWC gave a brief account of project Kharung Tank is an old completed med tank constructed during year 1 1930

across Kharung river a tributary of Sheonath river in Mahanadi system in Bilaspur district of Chhattisgarh state

Kharung k project is very old project and canal has been providing since the last years During period

only minor maintenance has As a result conditions of project components been over time reby causing gradual in seepage

present proposal envisages only the provIsion of concrete lining in its distribution system remodeling of structures in order and provide irrigation for additional 15 from water thus saved

project proposal envisages construction the following main works

i)

ji)

mm cement concrete lining along with low density poly film of 1 micron thickness the bed as well as on

for a total length 110 km of main canal and respective distribution system Re-modellingrepairing of District Road

iii) IV)

v) vi)

Re-modellingrepairing Head Regulators regulators etc Re-modellingrepairing of falls (16 Nos) in Main canals and its distributaries and Minors Nos) Re-modellingrepairing of in Main (4 Nos) Re-modellingrepairing of DrainageDrainage SyphonsAcqueduct Nos in Main canals amp 21 in distributaries and Minors)

price cost of with BC ratio as

been finalized 309

Rs 10104 crore2008-09 Concurrence been

obtained (copy as Annexure-III)

After brief discussion the Committee proposal

Maniyari Tank Project (Major ERM-New) Chhattisgarh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the proposal The iyari Tank project is an old completed tank constructed during the 1 1930 across Maniyari river a tributary of Sheonath river in Mahanadi system in Bilaspur district Chhattisgarh

present proposal is only for provIsion cement concrete lining in canal and its distribution and remodeling of existing structures to

3

save seepage water and thus to provide irrigation for additional 11000 ha in 32 villages without affecting any parameter of the reservoir

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 15995 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 181

The Chairman enquired that while computing BC ratio of the project why the old project cost has not been taken into consideration The Project Authorities replied that being an old project the depreciation of the project is too high to consider As a result the impact on BC ratio would be negligible The Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of suriace and ground water in the command area so as to reduce the impact of water logging

Since the State Finance Concurrence has not been obtained it was decided that the project may be deferred for reconsideration in the next meeting

4 Halon Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC gave a brief account of the project proposal The Halon Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam near village Karanjiya in the district of Mandia of Madhya Pradesh across river Halon a tributary of river Burne in Narmada basin The Halon Irrigation Project contemplates to provide annual irrigation facilities to an area of 16782 ha (CCA - 13040 ha) in Mandla district a tribal district of Madhya Pradesh The project will irrigate land on the left bank through gravity flow canal

84thThe project was earlier considered in the meeting of Advisory Committee held on 12052005 and was deferred for want of final environmental clearance clearance of RampR plan clearance from CGWB and in the absence of site specific discharge data to review the yield

The Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) and clearance from CGWB have now been obtained As regards forest clearance it was informed by the Project officials that stage-1 clearance has been obtained and the work will be started after stage-2 clearance

The representative from CEA enquired regarding the provision of Hydroshypower generation in the project The Project Authorities mentioned that provision of Hydro-power generation was not found viable as per the site conditions The Chairman enquired about why the BC ratio of the project is very marginal ie 155 The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls in Mandla district a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well within the permissible limits The State Finance Concurrence has been received

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

4

5 Man Irrigation Project (Revised Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The original proposal was approved by the Planning Commission in June 1992 for Rs 44 10 cr at 1983 price level The present proposal is a revised cost estimate without any change in its scope and the cost has been finalized for Rs 24603 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 179 The expenditure incurred till March 2010 is 196 crore The State Finance Concurrence has already been received

Chairman enquired about the construction status of the project The Project Authorities replied that the dam and head works of the project had already been completed in 2006 and the canal system is already in operation since the last two years Only some residual works are to be completed by March 2012

Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of surface and ground water in the command area to reduce the impact of water logging in consultation with CGWB

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further cost time revision will be considered by the Committee

6 Upper Narmada Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Upper Narmada Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam of maximum height of 3380 m and total length of 212 km near village Shobhapur (Rinatola) of Dindori district of Madhya Pradesh The project contemplates to provide irrigation benefits to an area of 26622 ha annually in Annupur and Dindori districts of Madhya Pradesh Most of the beneficiaries from the project belong to Schedule Caste (SC) and Schedule Tribe (ST) categories

The project was considered in the 84 th meeting of Advisory Committee held on 1205 2005 and was deferred for want of environmental clearance and RampR clearance

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 68393 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 157 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IV)

Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (lVIoTA) and Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) have now been obtained On query regarding the physical programme of the project the Project Authorities replied that the project works would be awarded on turn-key basis and would be completed by March 2015 The Chairman asked why the BC ratio of the project is marginal (153)

5

f The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls

in Annupur amp Dindori districts a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well with in the permissible limits (1)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

7 Shelgaon Barrage Project (New-Medium) Maharashtra

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Shelgaon Barrage a medium irrigation project envisages construction of 41965 m long barrage across river Tapi in Tapi basin The project is located near village Shelgaon in the Jalgaon district of Maharashtra The project is planned to irrigate annually an area of 11318 ha (CCA-9589 ha) benefiting 19 villages of Jalgaon district

The project envisages construction of the following main components

i) A 419 65 m long barrage with 18 Nos of radial gates of size 1830 m x 1676m

ii) A 465 m long left side earthen embankment and 165 m long saddle earthen embankment with a top width of 75 m

iii) An intake well of size 3 m x 11 m and jack well of size 9 m x 24 m along with 5 Nos of VT pumps of 1400 HP

The estimated cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 44649 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 186 State Finance Concurrence has already been obtained

Chairman asked why the irrigation cost per hectare is so high The representative from the Govt of Maharashtra replied that the project is basically a lift irrigation scheme As such the irrigation cost per hectare is high

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should be completed by March 2014 and no further timecost overrun would be considered by the Committee

8 Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II (Revised-Major) Orissa

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II Orissa was earlier considered and accepted by the Advisory Committee in its 65th meeting held on 14696 for Rs 70515 at 1995 price level Planning Commission subsequently accorded investment clearance to this project in July 1997 for providing irrigation to CCA of 93501 ha with 90 intensity of irrigation

The proposal envisages completion of all works of Left Bank Canal from 30 km to 141 km with head discharge of 13222 cumec to irrigate the CCA of 93501 ha

()

The present proposal is a revised cost estimate and there is no change in the scope of the project The revised cost has been finalized in CWC for Rs 195834 crore at 2009-10 price level with BC ratio as 1986 State Finance concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-V)

Secretary (WR) obseNed that work programme is too lengthy As such he desired that the work schedule should be revised in such a way that the project should be completed by March 2015 It was also decided that no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject to the aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

9 Kachnoda Dam project (Revised-Major) Uttar Pradesh

CE (PLlO) cwe briefly introduced the project proposal Kachnoda dam project was considered and accepted in the 87th TAC meeting held on 17112006 Planning Commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal in Jan 2007 for Rs 8867 crore at 2004 price level for providing irrigation to 11 699 ha of CCA and annual irrigation to the tune of 10850 ha

The project envisages construction of following main components

a) 41 km long and 16 m high earthen dam with a live storage of 5464 Million Cubic Metre

b) An ogee shaped masonry spillway of 127 m length with 9 nos vertical gates of size 12 x 71 m each to pass maximum flood discharge of 6038 cumec

c) Left main canal of length 154 km with head discharge of 3 cumec and Right main canal of length 84 km with head discharge of 275 cumec with their distribution systems to provide irrigation to an area of 5173 ha of CCA

d) Apart from above irrigation facilities to 6096 ha under existing Lalitpur canal system and 430 ha under existing Dilwara distributory of Jamni canal are also proposed to be brought under command of Kachnoda dam project

The present revised cost estimate is without change in scope and the revised cost has been finalized for Rs 42345 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 109 State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-VI) Chairman observed that BC ratio of the project proposal is very marginal but keeping the chronic drought prone area of command the proposal may be accepted subject to the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject tothe aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

7

10 Flood protection works to Brahmani-Kelua-Birupa Doab of Brahmani system (Flood Control) Orissa

(PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood protection to provide protection to 17100 area in Jaipur district of Orissa The proposal

a) Raising and strengthening of existing embankments -8649km

b) Construction of new embankment at - 1583 km

c) Construction of spurs - 24 Nos

d) Renovation of drains - 3750 km

e) Construction of sluices 10 Nos

f) Construction of launching aprons - 2000 m

g) Construction service roads 56 km

The cost of the scheme has been finalized by CWC for Rs 6232 crore at price level with BC ratio as 1 The State Finance Concurrence has

been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VII) On query related to provision of launching aprons it was clarified by Project officials that there would provision of the aprons where are considered essential It was further informed by the project authority that project was formulated on the of model study carried out by 11 Chennai

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should completed by March 2013 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

11 Revised Project Estimate for construction of Right Marginal Bund on river Ganga from Bhogpur to Balawali (Flood Control) Dist Haridwar Uttarakhand

CE (PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 40460 persons and provide protection to 9000 ha land in 10 villages of Uttarakhand from the fury of flood

scheme was originally sanctioned for Rs 11 crore for providing protection along river Ganga in a length of 205 km Due to cost escalation only 105 m of embankment is being constructed by the Gov with 11 crore as earlier approved The scheme is an ongoing under Management Programme MoWR The Empowered Committee in July 2009 decided that the cost of the scheme may allowed to revise the price level of March 2008

The present proposal envisages Construction of embankment of remaining 10 km length in a stretch of the river from 105 km 205

8

The present revised estimate of flood control scheme has been examined in GFCC and finalized for Rs 2069 crore with BC ratio as 509 The State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VIII) Commissioner (Ganga) advised the Govt of Uttarakhand to send scheme-wise budget allocation for project in question

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

12 Scheme for Desilting of river Ichamati along the common Border portion for better drainage and flood management (Flood Control) West Bengal

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 984 lakhs and to provide protection of 225 sq km area The proposal envisages

a) Desilting of river Ichamati by means of suitable floating type excavator mounted on pontoon (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 15 28000 cum)

b) Desilting of river Ichamati by manual labour within clmr land and depositing the excavated earth at suitable distance (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 139000 cum)

c) Total length of excavationdesilting is 20415 km

GFCC has finalized the cost of the project for Rs 3823 crore with BC ratio as 637 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IX)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with Vote of thanks to the Chair

9

Annexure-l 10sth Meeting of Advisory Committee

bull LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

fVembers of the Committee

SI ShriMrs 1 UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair 2 Allanya Ray Financial Advisor Ministry of Water Resources Member 3 Avinash Misbra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Planning Member

Commission) 4 Saidul Haq Hydrologist ( Representing Chairh1an CGWB) Member 5 JSBawa Director (HPampI) CEA (Representing Centra Electricity Member

Authority) () S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO cwe New D~lhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees a Ministry of water Resources

7 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MoWR b) Central vVater Commission

~ R C lha Member (RM) CWC New Delhi lty Jndra Raj Member (WPampP) 10 ~ K lYOlhi Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi II S K Chaudhary Chief Engineer (FM) ewc New Delhi 12 T S Patil Chid Engineer (MCO) CWC Nagpur

deg1 3 M K Sinha Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi 14 BG Kaushik Chief Engineer (PPO) CWC New Delhi 15 V K Chawla Chief Engineer (lMO) CWC New Delhi 10 Y K Sharma Chief Engineer (IBO) cwe Chandigarh 17 KN Keslui Chief Engineer (LGBO) CWC Patna 1~ G S Tyagi Director UTampSS CWC New Delhi 19 Gorakh Thakur Director CA-l CWC New Delhi 20 Ajay KumarDirector PA (N) cwe New Delhi 2L D M Raipure Dixector Appraisal CWC Nagpur -

22 P C ]ha Director PA-C CWC New Delhi middot -lt

4-middotM middot ~ 23 R K Kanodia Director PA-S CWC New Delhi

24 M W Paunikar DD PA-N CWC New Delhi 25 B Rai DD PA-C CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC 26 AK GanjuChairman GFCC Patna 27 S Masood Husain Member (Planning) GFCC Patna

d) State Governmenofficers Bihar

28 Ajay Nayak PriRcipal Secretary WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 29 SiJsil Kumar Singh SE WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 30 P K lha Resident Engineer Govt of Bihar

Chattisgarh 31 B K Rai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur 32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

middot33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur 34 BK Pndey AE Bilaspur

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

save seepage water and thus to provide irrigation for additional 11000 ha in 32 villages without affecting any parameter of the reservoir

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 15995 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 181

The Chairman enquired that while computing BC ratio of the project why the old project cost has not been taken into consideration The Project Authorities replied that being an old project the depreciation of the project is too high to consider As a result the impact on BC ratio would be negligible The Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of suriace and ground water in the command area so as to reduce the impact of water logging

Since the State Finance Concurrence has not been obtained it was decided that the project may be deferred for reconsideration in the next meeting

4 Halon Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC gave a brief account of the project proposal The Halon Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam near village Karanjiya in the district of Mandia of Madhya Pradesh across river Halon a tributary of river Burne in Narmada basin The Halon Irrigation Project contemplates to provide annual irrigation facilities to an area of 16782 ha (CCA - 13040 ha) in Mandla district a tribal district of Madhya Pradesh The project will irrigate land on the left bank through gravity flow canal

84thThe project was earlier considered in the meeting of Advisory Committee held on 12052005 and was deferred for want of final environmental clearance clearance of RampR plan clearance from CGWB and in the absence of site specific discharge data to review the yield

The Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) and clearance from CGWB have now been obtained As regards forest clearance it was informed by the Project officials that stage-1 clearance has been obtained and the work will be started after stage-2 clearance

The representative from CEA enquired regarding the provision of Hydroshypower generation in the project The Project Authorities mentioned that provision of Hydro-power generation was not found viable as per the site conditions The Chairman enquired about why the BC ratio of the project is very marginal ie 155 The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls in Mandla district a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well within the permissible limits The State Finance Concurrence has been received

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

4

5 Man Irrigation Project (Revised Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The original proposal was approved by the Planning Commission in June 1992 for Rs 44 10 cr at 1983 price level The present proposal is a revised cost estimate without any change in its scope and the cost has been finalized for Rs 24603 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 179 The expenditure incurred till March 2010 is 196 crore The State Finance Concurrence has already been received

Chairman enquired about the construction status of the project The Project Authorities replied that the dam and head works of the project had already been completed in 2006 and the canal system is already in operation since the last two years Only some residual works are to be completed by March 2012

Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of surface and ground water in the command area to reduce the impact of water logging in consultation with CGWB

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further cost time revision will be considered by the Committee

6 Upper Narmada Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Upper Narmada Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam of maximum height of 3380 m and total length of 212 km near village Shobhapur (Rinatola) of Dindori district of Madhya Pradesh The project contemplates to provide irrigation benefits to an area of 26622 ha annually in Annupur and Dindori districts of Madhya Pradesh Most of the beneficiaries from the project belong to Schedule Caste (SC) and Schedule Tribe (ST) categories

The project was considered in the 84 th meeting of Advisory Committee held on 1205 2005 and was deferred for want of environmental clearance and RampR clearance

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 68393 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 157 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IV)

Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (lVIoTA) and Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) have now been obtained On query regarding the physical programme of the project the Project Authorities replied that the project works would be awarded on turn-key basis and would be completed by March 2015 The Chairman asked why the BC ratio of the project is marginal (153)

5

f The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls

in Annupur amp Dindori districts a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well with in the permissible limits (1)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

7 Shelgaon Barrage Project (New-Medium) Maharashtra

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Shelgaon Barrage a medium irrigation project envisages construction of 41965 m long barrage across river Tapi in Tapi basin The project is located near village Shelgaon in the Jalgaon district of Maharashtra The project is planned to irrigate annually an area of 11318 ha (CCA-9589 ha) benefiting 19 villages of Jalgaon district

The project envisages construction of the following main components

i) A 419 65 m long barrage with 18 Nos of radial gates of size 1830 m x 1676m

ii) A 465 m long left side earthen embankment and 165 m long saddle earthen embankment with a top width of 75 m

iii) An intake well of size 3 m x 11 m and jack well of size 9 m x 24 m along with 5 Nos of VT pumps of 1400 HP

The estimated cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 44649 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 186 State Finance Concurrence has already been obtained

Chairman asked why the irrigation cost per hectare is so high The representative from the Govt of Maharashtra replied that the project is basically a lift irrigation scheme As such the irrigation cost per hectare is high

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should be completed by March 2014 and no further timecost overrun would be considered by the Committee

8 Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II (Revised-Major) Orissa

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II Orissa was earlier considered and accepted by the Advisory Committee in its 65th meeting held on 14696 for Rs 70515 at 1995 price level Planning Commission subsequently accorded investment clearance to this project in July 1997 for providing irrigation to CCA of 93501 ha with 90 intensity of irrigation

The proposal envisages completion of all works of Left Bank Canal from 30 km to 141 km with head discharge of 13222 cumec to irrigate the CCA of 93501 ha

()

The present proposal is a revised cost estimate and there is no change in the scope of the project The revised cost has been finalized in CWC for Rs 195834 crore at 2009-10 price level with BC ratio as 1986 State Finance concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-V)

Secretary (WR) obseNed that work programme is too lengthy As such he desired that the work schedule should be revised in such a way that the project should be completed by March 2015 It was also decided that no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject to the aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

9 Kachnoda Dam project (Revised-Major) Uttar Pradesh

CE (PLlO) cwe briefly introduced the project proposal Kachnoda dam project was considered and accepted in the 87th TAC meeting held on 17112006 Planning Commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal in Jan 2007 for Rs 8867 crore at 2004 price level for providing irrigation to 11 699 ha of CCA and annual irrigation to the tune of 10850 ha

The project envisages construction of following main components

a) 41 km long and 16 m high earthen dam with a live storage of 5464 Million Cubic Metre

b) An ogee shaped masonry spillway of 127 m length with 9 nos vertical gates of size 12 x 71 m each to pass maximum flood discharge of 6038 cumec

c) Left main canal of length 154 km with head discharge of 3 cumec and Right main canal of length 84 km with head discharge of 275 cumec with their distribution systems to provide irrigation to an area of 5173 ha of CCA

d) Apart from above irrigation facilities to 6096 ha under existing Lalitpur canal system and 430 ha under existing Dilwara distributory of Jamni canal are also proposed to be brought under command of Kachnoda dam project

The present revised cost estimate is without change in scope and the revised cost has been finalized for Rs 42345 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 109 State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-VI) Chairman observed that BC ratio of the project proposal is very marginal but keeping the chronic drought prone area of command the proposal may be accepted subject to the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject tothe aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

7

10 Flood protection works to Brahmani-Kelua-Birupa Doab of Brahmani system (Flood Control) Orissa

(PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood protection to provide protection to 17100 area in Jaipur district of Orissa The proposal

a) Raising and strengthening of existing embankments -8649km

b) Construction of new embankment at - 1583 km

c) Construction of spurs - 24 Nos

d) Renovation of drains - 3750 km

e) Construction of sluices 10 Nos

f) Construction of launching aprons - 2000 m

g) Construction service roads 56 km

The cost of the scheme has been finalized by CWC for Rs 6232 crore at price level with BC ratio as 1 The State Finance Concurrence has

been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VII) On query related to provision of launching aprons it was clarified by Project officials that there would provision of the aprons where are considered essential It was further informed by the project authority that project was formulated on the of model study carried out by 11 Chennai

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should completed by March 2013 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

11 Revised Project Estimate for construction of Right Marginal Bund on river Ganga from Bhogpur to Balawali (Flood Control) Dist Haridwar Uttarakhand

CE (PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 40460 persons and provide protection to 9000 ha land in 10 villages of Uttarakhand from the fury of flood

scheme was originally sanctioned for Rs 11 crore for providing protection along river Ganga in a length of 205 km Due to cost escalation only 105 m of embankment is being constructed by the Gov with 11 crore as earlier approved The scheme is an ongoing under Management Programme MoWR The Empowered Committee in July 2009 decided that the cost of the scheme may allowed to revise the price level of March 2008

The present proposal envisages Construction of embankment of remaining 10 km length in a stretch of the river from 105 km 205

8

The present revised estimate of flood control scheme has been examined in GFCC and finalized for Rs 2069 crore with BC ratio as 509 The State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VIII) Commissioner (Ganga) advised the Govt of Uttarakhand to send scheme-wise budget allocation for project in question

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

12 Scheme for Desilting of river Ichamati along the common Border portion for better drainage and flood management (Flood Control) West Bengal

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 984 lakhs and to provide protection of 225 sq km area The proposal envisages

a) Desilting of river Ichamati by means of suitable floating type excavator mounted on pontoon (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 15 28000 cum)

b) Desilting of river Ichamati by manual labour within clmr land and depositing the excavated earth at suitable distance (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 139000 cum)

c) Total length of excavationdesilting is 20415 km

GFCC has finalized the cost of the project for Rs 3823 crore with BC ratio as 637 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IX)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with Vote of thanks to the Chair

9

Annexure-l 10sth Meeting of Advisory Committee

bull LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

fVembers of the Committee

SI ShriMrs 1 UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair 2 Allanya Ray Financial Advisor Ministry of Water Resources Member 3 Avinash Misbra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Planning Member

Commission) 4 Saidul Haq Hydrologist ( Representing Chairh1an CGWB) Member 5 JSBawa Director (HPampI) CEA (Representing Centra Electricity Member

Authority) () S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO cwe New D~lhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees a Ministry of water Resources

7 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MoWR b) Central vVater Commission

~ R C lha Member (RM) CWC New Delhi lty Jndra Raj Member (WPampP) 10 ~ K lYOlhi Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi II S K Chaudhary Chief Engineer (FM) ewc New Delhi 12 T S Patil Chid Engineer (MCO) CWC Nagpur

deg1 3 M K Sinha Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi 14 BG Kaushik Chief Engineer (PPO) CWC New Delhi 15 V K Chawla Chief Engineer (lMO) CWC New Delhi 10 Y K Sharma Chief Engineer (IBO) cwe Chandigarh 17 KN Keslui Chief Engineer (LGBO) CWC Patna 1~ G S Tyagi Director UTampSS CWC New Delhi 19 Gorakh Thakur Director CA-l CWC New Delhi 20 Ajay KumarDirector PA (N) cwe New Delhi 2L D M Raipure Dixector Appraisal CWC Nagpur -

22 P C ]ha Director PA-C CWC New Delhi middot -lt

4-middotM middot ~ 23 R K Kanodia Director PA-S CWC New Delhi

24 M W Paunikar DD PA-N CWC New Delhi 25 B Rai DD PA-C CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC 26 AK GanjuChairman GFCC Patna 27 S Masood Husain Member (Planning) GFCC Patna

d) State Governmenofficers Bihar

28 Ajay Nayak PriRcipal Secretary WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 29 SiJsil Kumar Singh SE WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 30 P K lha Resident Engineer Govt of Bihar

Chattisgarh 31 B K Rai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur 32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

middot33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur 34 BK Pndey AE Bilaspur

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

5 Man Irrigation Project (Revised Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The original proposal was approved by the Planning Commission in June 1992 for Rs 44 10 cr at 1983 price level The present proposal is a revised cost estimate without any change in its scope and the cost has been finalized for Rs 24603 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 179 The expenditure incurred till March 2010 is 196 crore The State Finance Concurrence has already been received

Chairman enquired about the construction status of the project The Project Authorities replied that the dam and head works of the project had already been completed in 2006 and the canal system is already in operation since the last two years Only some residual works are to be completed by March 2012

Chairman suggested for conjunctive utilization of surface and ground water in the command area to reduce the impact of water logging in consultation with CGWB

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further cost time revision will be considered by the Committee

6 Upper Narmada Irrigation Project (New Major) Madhya Pradesh

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Upper Narmada Irrigation Project envisages construction of a composite dam of maximum height of 3380 m and total length of 212 km near village Shobhapur (Rinatola) of Dindori district of Madhya Pradesh The project contemplates to provide irrigation benefits to an area of 26622 ha annually in Annupur and Dindori districts of Madhya Pradesh Most of the beneficiaries from the project belong to Schedule Caste (SC) and Schedule Tribe (ST) categories

The project was considered in the 84 th meeting of Advisory Committee held on 1205 2005 and was deferred for want of environmental clearance and RampR clearance

The cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 68393 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 157 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IV)

Chairman enquired about the status of statutory clearances of the project The Project Authorities replied that all the requisite statutory clearances from Ministry of Tribal Affairs (lVIoTA) and Ministry of Environment amp Forest (MoEF) have now been obtained On query regarding the physical programme of the project the Project Authorities replied that the project works would be awarded on turn-key basis and would be completed by March 2015 The Chairman asked why the BC ratio of the project is marginal (153)

5

f The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls

in Annupur amp Dindori districts a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well with in the permissible limits (1)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

7 Shelgaon Barrage Project (New-Medium) Maharashtra

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Shelgaon Barrage a medium irrigation project envisages construction of 41965 m long barrage across river Tapi in Tapi basin The project is located near village Shelgaon in the Jalgaon district of Maharashtra The project is planned to irrigate annually an area of 11318 ha (CCA-9589 ha) benefiting 19 villages of Jalgaon district

The project envisages construction of the following main components

i) A 419 65 m long barrage with 18 Nos of radial gates of size 1830 m x 1676m

ii) A 465 m long left side earthen embankment and 165 m long saddle earthen embankment with a top width of 75 m

iii) An intake well of size 3 m x 11 m and jack well of size 9 m x 24 m along with 5 Nos of VT pumps of 1400 HP

The estimated cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 44649 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 186 State Finance Concurrence has already been obtained

Chairman asked why the irrigation cost per hectare is so high The representative from the Govt of Maharashtra replied that the project is basically a lift irrigation scheme As such the irrigation cost per hectare is high

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should be completed by March 2014 and no further timecost overrun would be considered by the Committee

8 Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II (Revised-Major) Orissa

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II Orissa was earlier considered and accepted by the Advisory Committee in its 65th meeting held on 14696 for Rs 70515 at 1995 price level Planning Commission subsequently accorded investment clearance to this project in July 1997 for providing irrigation to CCA of 93501 ha with 90 intensity of irrigation

The proposal envisages completion of all works of Left Bank Canal from 30 km to 141 km with head discharge of 13222 cumec to irrigate the CCA of 93501 ha

()

The present proposal is a revised cost estimate and there is no change in the scope of the project The revised cost has been finalized in CWC for Rs 195834 crore at 2009-10 price level with BC ratio as 1986 State Finance concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-V)

Secretary (WR) obseNed that work programme is too lengthy As such he desired that the work schedule should be revised in such a way that the project should be completed by March 2015 It was also decided that no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject to the aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

9 Kachnoda Dam project (Revised-Major) Uttar Pradesh

CE (PLlO) cwe briefly introduced the project proposal Kachnoda dam project was considered and accepted in the 87th TAC meeting held on 17112006 Planning Commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal in Jan 2007 for Rs 8867 crore at 2004 price level for providing irrigation to 11 699 ha of CCA and annual irrigation to the tune of 10850 ha

The project envisages construction of following main components

a) 41 km long and 16 m high earthen dam with a live storage of 5464 Million Cubic Metre

b) An ogee shaped masonry spillway of 127 m length with 9 nos vertical gates of size 12 x 71 m each to pass maximum flood discharge of 6038 cumec

c) Left main canal of length 154 km with head discharge of 3 cumec and Right main canal of length 84 km with head discharge of 275 cumec with their distribution systems to provide irrigation to an area of 5173 ha of CCA

d) Apart from above irrigation facilities to 6096 ha under existing Lalitpur canal system and 430 ha under existing Dilwara distributory of Jamni canal are also proposed to be brought under command of Kachnoda dam project

The present revised cost estimate is without change in scope and the revised cost has been finalized for Rs 42345 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 109 State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-VI) Chairman observed that BC ratio of the project proposal is very marginal but keeping the chronic drought prone area of command the proposal may be accepted subject to the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject tothe aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

7

10 Flood protection works to Brahmani-Kelua-Birupa Doab of Brahmani system (Flood Control) Orissa

(PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood protection to provide protection to 17100 area in Jaipur district of Orissa The proposal

a) Raising and strengthening of existing embankments -8649km

b) Construction of new embankment at - 1583 km

c) Construction of spurs - 24 Nos

d) Renovation of drains - 3750 km

e) Construction of sluices 10 Nos

f) Construction of launching aprons - 2000 m

g) Construction service roads 56 km

The cost of the scheme has been finalized by CWC for Rs 6232 crore at price level with BC ratio as 1 The State Finance Concurrence has

been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VII) On query related to provision of launching aprons it was clarified by Project officials that there would provision of the aprons where are considered essential It was further informed by the project authority that project was formulated on the of model study carried out by 11 Chennai

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should completed by March 2013 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

11 Revised Project Estimate for construction of Right Marginal Bund on river Ganga from Bhogpur to Balawali (Flood Control) Dist Haridwar Uttarakhand

CE (PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 40460 persons and provide protection to 9000 ha land in 10 villages of Uttarakhand from the fury of flood

scheme was originally sanctioned for Rs 11 crore for providing protection along river Ganga in a length of 205 km Due to cost escalation only 105 m of embankment is being constructed by the Gov with 11 crore as earlier approved The scheme is an ongoing under Management Programme MoWR The Empowered Committee in July 2009 decided that the cost of the scheme may allowed to revise the price level of March 2008

The present proposal envisages Construction of embankment of remaining 10 km length in a stretch of the river from 105 km 205

8

The present revised estimate of flood control scheme has been examined in GFCC and finalized for Rs 2069 crore with BC ratio as 509 The State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VIII) Commissioner (Ganga) advised the Govt of Uttarakhand to send scheme-wise budget allocation for project in question

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

12 Scheme for Desilting of river Ichamati along the common Border portion for better drainage and flood management (Flood Control) West Bengal

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 984 lakhs and to provide protection of 225 sq km area The proposal envisages

a) Desilting of river Ichamati by means of suitable floating type excavator mounted on pontoon (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 15 28000 cum)

b) Desilting of river Ichamati by manual labour within clmr land and depositing the excavated earth at suitable distance (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 139000 cum)

c) Total length of excavationdesilting is 20415 km

GFCC has finalized the cost of the project for Rs 3823 crore with BC ratio as 637 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IX)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with Vote of thanks to the Chair

9

Annexure-l 10sth Meeting of Advisory Committee

bull LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

fVembers of the Committee

SI ShriMrs 1 UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair 2 Allanya Ray Financial Advisor Ministry of Water Resources Member 3 Avinash Misbra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Planning Member

Commission) 4 Saidul Haq Hydrologist ( Representing Chairh1an CGWB) Member 5 JSBawa Director (HPampI) CEA (Representing Centra Electricity Member

Authority) () S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO cwe New D~lhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees a Ministry of water Resources

7 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MoWR b) Central vVater Commission

~ R C lha Member (RM) CWC New Delhi lty Jndra Raj Member (WPampP) 10 ~ K lYOlhi Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi II S K Chaudhary Chief Engineer (FM) ewc New Delhi 12 T S Patil Chid Engineer (MCO) CWC Nagpur

deg1 3 M K Sinha Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi 14 BG Kaushik Chief Engineer (PPO) CWC New Delhi 15 V K Chawla Chief Engineer (lMO) CWC New Delhi 10 Y K Sharma Chief Engineer (IBO) cwe Chandigarh 17 KN Keslui Chief Engineer (LGBO) CWC Patna 1~ G S Tyagi Director UTampSS CWC New Delhi 19 Gorakh Thakur Director CA-l CWC New Delhi 20 Ajay KumarDirector PA (N) cwe New Delhi 2L D M Raipure Dixector Appraisal CWC Nagpur -

22 P C ]ha Director PA-C CWC New Delhi middot -lt

4-middotM middot ~ 23 R K Kanodia Director PA-S CWC New Delhi

24 M W Paunikar DD PA-N CWC New Delhi 25 B Rai DD PA-C CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC 26 AK GanjuChairman GFCC Patna 27 S Masood Husain Member (Planning) GFCC Patna

d) State Governmenofficers Bihar

28 Ajay Nayak PriRcipal Secretary WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 29 SiJsil Kumar Singh SE WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 30 P K lha Resident Engineer Govt of Bihar

Chattisgarh 31 B K Rai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur 32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

middot33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur 34 BK Pndey AE Bilaspur

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

f The Project Authorities replied that the command area of the project falls

in Annupur amp Dindori districts a tribal area in Madhya Pradesh As such the BC ratio is well with in the permissible limits (1)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

7 Shelgaon Barrage Project (New-Medium) Maharashtra

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Shelgaon Barrage a medium irrigation project envisages construction of 41965 m long barrage across river Tapi in Tapi basin The project is located near village Shelgaon in the Jalgaon district of Maharashtra The project is planned to irrigate annually an area of 11318 ha (CCA-9589 ha) benefiting 19 villages of Jalgaon district

The project envisages construction of the following main components

i) A 419 65 m long barrage with 18 Nos of radial gates of size 1830 m x 1676m

ii) A 465 m long left side earthen embankment and 165 m long saddle earthen embankment with a top width of 75 m

iii) An intake well of size 3 m x 11 m and jack well of size 9 m x 24 m along with 5 Nos of VT pumps of 1400 HP

The estimated cost of the project has been finalized for Rs 44649 crore at 2008-09 price level with BC ratio as 186 State Finance Concurrence has already been obtained

Chairman asked why the irrigation cost per hectare is so high The representative from the Govt of Maharashtra replied that the project is basically a lift irrigation scheme As such the irrigation cost per hectare is high

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should be completed by March 2014 and no further timecost overrun would be considered by the Committee

8 Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II (Revised-Major) Orissa

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The Rengali Irrigation Sub-project LBC-II Orissa was earlier considered and accepted by the Advisory Committee in its 65th meeting held on 14696 for Rs 70515 at 1995 price level Planning Commission subsequently accorded investment clearance to this project in July 1997 for providing irrigation to CCA of 93501 ha with 90 intensity of irrigation

The proposal envisages completion of all works of Left Bank Canal from 30 km to 141 km with head discharge of 13222 cumec to irrigate the CCA of 93501 ha

()

The present proposal is a revised cost estimate and there is no change in the scope of the project The revised cost has been finalized in CWC for Rs 195834 crore at 2009-10 price level with BC ratio as 1986 State Finance concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-V)

Secretary (WR) obseNed that work programme is too lengthy As such he desired that the work schedule should be revised in such a way that the project should be completed by March 2015 It was also decided that no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject to the aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

9 Kachnoda Dam project (Revised-Major) Uttar Pradesh

CE (PLlO) cwe briefly introduced the project proposal Kachnoda dam project was considered and accepted in the 87th TAC meeting held on 17112006 Planning Commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal in Jan 2007 for Rs 8867 crore at 2004 price level for providing irrigation to 11 699 ha of CCA and annual irrigation to the tune of 10850 ha

The project envisages construction of following main components

a) 41 km long and 16 m high earthen dam with a live storage of 5464 Million Cubic Metre

b) An ogee shaped masonry spillway of 127 m length with 9 nos vertical gates of size 12 x 71 m each to pass maximum flood discharge of 6038 cumec

c) Left main canal of length 154 km with head discharge of 3 cumec and Right main canal of length 84 km with head discharge of 275 cumec with their distribution systems to provide irrigation to an area of 5173 ha of CCA

d) Apart from above irrigation facilities to 6096 ha under existing Lalitpur canal system and 430 ha under existing Dilwara distributory of Jamni canal are also proposed to be brought under command of Kachnoda dam project

The present revised cost estimate is without change in scope and the revised cost has been finalized for Rs 42345 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 109 State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-VI) Chairman observed that BC ratio of the project proposal is very marginal but keeping the chronic drought prone area of command the proposal may be accepted subject to the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject tothe aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

7

10 Flood protection works to Brahmani-Kelua-Birupa Doab of Brahmani system (Flood Control) Orissa

(PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood protection to provide protection to 17100 area in Jaipur district of Orissa The proposal

a) Raising and strengthening of existing embankments -8649km

b) Construction of new embankment at - 1583 km

c) Construction of spurs - 24 Nos

d) Renovation of drains - 3750 km

e) Construction of sluices 10 Nos

f) Construction of launching aprons - 2000 m

g) Construction service roads 56 km

The cost of the scheme has been finalized by CWC for Rs 6232 crore at price level with BC ratio as 1 The State Finance Concurrence has

been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VII) On query related to provision of launching aprons it was clarified by Project officials that there would provision of the aprons where are considered essential It was further informed by the project authority that project was formulated on the of model study carried out by 11 Chennai

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should completed by March 2013 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

11 Revised Project Estimate for construction of Right Marginal Bund on river Ganga from Bhogpur to Balawali (Flood Control) Dist Haridwar Uttarakhand

CE (PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 40460 persons and provide protection to 9000 ha land in 10 villages of Uttarakhand from the fury of flood

scheme was originally sanctioned for Rs 11 crore for providing protection along river Ganga in a length of 205 km Due to cost escalation only 105 m of embankment is being constructed by the Gov with 11 crore as earlier approved The scheme is an ongoing under Management Programme MoWR The Empowered Committee in July 2009 decided that the cost of the scheme may allowed to revise the price level of March 2008

The present proposal envisages Construction of embankment of remaining 10 km length in a stretch of the river from 105 km 205

8

The present revised estimate of flood control scheme has been examined in GFCC and finalized for Rs 2069 crore with BC ratio as 509 The State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VIII) Commissioner (Ganga) advised the Govt of Uttarakhand to send scheme-wise budget allocation for project in question

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

12 Scheme for Desilting of river Ichamati along the common Border portion for better drainage and flood management (Flood Control) West Bengal

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 984 lakhs and to provide protection of 225 sq km area The proposal envisages

a) Desilting of river Ichamati by means of suitable floating type excavator mounted on pontoon (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 15 28000 cum)

b) Desilting of river Ichamati by manual labour within clmr land and depositing the excavated earth at suitable distance (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 139000 cum)

c) Total length of excavationdesilting is 20415 km

GFCC has finalized the cost of the project for Rs 3823 crore with BC ratio as 637 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IX)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with Vote of thanks to the Chair

9

Annexure-l 10sth Meeting of Advisory Committee

bull LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

fVembers of the Committee

SI ShriMrs 1 UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair 2 Allanya Ray Financial Advisor Ministry of Water Resources Member 3 Avinash Misbra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Planning Member

Commission) 4 Saidul Haq Hydrologist ( Representing Chairh1an CGWB) Member 5 JSBawa Director (HPampI) CEA (Representing Centra Electricity Member

Authority) () S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO cwe New D~lhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees a Ministry of water Resources

7 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MoWR b) Central vVater Commission

~ R C lha Member (RM) CWC New Delhi lty Jndra Raj Member (WPampP) 10 ~ K lYOlhi Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi II S K Chaudhary Chief Engineer (FM) ewc New Delhi 12 T S Patil Chid Engineer (MCO) CWC Nagpur

deg1 3 M K Sinha Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi 14 BG Kaushik Chief Engineer (PPO) CWC New Delhi 15 V K Chawla Chief Engineer (lMO) CWC New Delhi 10 Y K Sharma Chief Engineer (IBO) cwe Chandigarh 17 KN Keslui Chief Engineer (LGBO) CWC Patna 1~ G S Tyagi Director UTampSS CWC New Delhi 19 Gorakh Thakur Director CA-l CWC New Delhi 20 Ajay KumarDirector PA (N) cwe New Delhi 2L D M Raipure Dixector Appraisal CWC Nagpur -

22 P C ]ha Director PA-C CWC New Delhi middot -lt

4-middotM middot ~ 23 R K Kanodia Director PA-S CWC New Delhi

24 M W Paunikar DD PA-N CWC New Delhi 25 B Rai DD PA-C CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC 26 AK GanjuChairman GFCC Patna 27 S Masood Husain Member (Planning) GFCC Patna

d) State Governmenofficers Bihar

28 Ajay Nayak PriRcipal Secretary WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 29 SiJsil Kumar Singh SE WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 30 P K lha Resident Engineer Govt of Bihar

Chattisgarh 31 B K Rai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur 32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

middot33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur 34 BK Pndey AE Bilaspur

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

The present proposal is a revised cost estimate and there is no change in the scope of the project The revised cost has been finalized in CWC for Rs 195834 crore at 2009-10 price level with BC ratio as 1986 State Finance concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-V)

Secretary (WR) obseNed that work programme is too lengthy As such he desired that the work schedule should be revised in such a way that the project should be completed by March 2015 It was also decided that no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject to the aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

9 Kachnoda Dam project (Revised-Major) Uttar Pradesh

CE (PLlO) cwe briefly introduced the project proposal Kachnoda dam project was considered and accepted in the 87th TAC meeting held on 17112006 Planning Commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal in Jan 2007 for Rs 8867 crore at 2004 price level for providing irrigation to 11 699 ha of CCA and annual irrigation to the tune of 10850 ha

The project envisages construction of following main components

a) 41 km long and 16 m high earthen dam with a live storage of 5464 Million Cubic Metre

b) An ogee shaped masonry spillway of 127 m length with 9 nos vertical gates of size 12 x 71 m each to pass maximum flood discharge of 6038 cumec

c) Left main canal of length 154 km with head discharge of 3 cumec and Right main canal of length 84 km with head discharge of 275 cumec with their distribution systems to provide irrigation to an area of 5173 ha of CCA

d) Apart from above irrigation facilities to 6096 ha under existing Lalitpur canal system and 430 ha under existing Dilwara distributory of Jamni canal are also proposed to be brought under command of Kachnoda dam project

The present revised cost estimate is without change in scope and the revised cost has been finalized for Rs 42345 crore at 2009 price level with BC ratio as 109 State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-VI) Chairman observed that BC ratio of the project proposal is very marginal but keeping the chronic drought prone area of command the proposal may be accepted subject to the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further costtime overrun shall be considered by the Committee

Subject tothe aforesaid condition the Committee accepted the proposal

7

10 Flood protection works to Brahmani-Kelua-Birupa Doab of Brahmani system (Flood Control) Orissa

(PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood protection to provide protection to 17100 area in Jaipur district of Orissa The proposal

a) Raising and strengthening of existing embankments -8649km

b) Construction of new embankment at - 1583 km

c) Construction of spurs - 24 Nos

d) Renovation of drains - 3750 km

e) Construction of sluices 10 Nos

f) Construction of launching aprons - 2000 m

g) Construction service roads 56 km

The cost of the scheme has been finalized by CWC for Rs 6232 crore at price level with BC ratio as 1 The State Finance Concurrence has

been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VII) On query related to provision of launching aprons it was clarified by Project officials that there would provision of the aprons where are considered essential It was further informed by the project authority that project was formulated on the of model study carried out by 11 Chennai

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should completed by March 2013 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

11 Revised Project Estimate for construction of Right Marginal Bund on river Ganga from Bhogpur to Balawali (Flood Control) Dist Haridwar Uttarakhand

CE (PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 40460 persons and provide protection to 9000 ha land in 10 villages of Uttarakhand from the fury of flood

scheme was originally sanctioned for Rs 11 crore for providing protection along river Ganga in a length of 205 km Due to cost escalation only 105 m of embankment is being constructed by the Gov with 11 crore as earlier approved The scheme is an ongoing under Management Programme MoWR The Empowered Committee in July 2009 decided that the cost of the scheme may allowed to revise the price level of March 2008

The present proposal envisages Construction of embankment of remaining 10 km length in a stretch of the river from 105 km 205

8

The present revised estimate of flood control scheme has been examined in GFCC and finalized for Rs 2069 crore with BC ratio as 509 The State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VIII) Commissioner (Ganga) advised the Govt of Uttarakhand to send scheme-wise budget allocation for project in question

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

12 Scheme for Desilting of river Ichamati along the common Border portion for better drainage and flood management (Flood Control) West Bengal

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 984 lakhs and to provide protection of 225 sq km area The proposal envisages

a) Desilting of river Ichamati by means of suitable floating type excavator mounted on pontoon (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 15 28000 cum)

b) Desilting of river Ichamati by manual labour within clmr land and depositing the excavated earth at suitable distance (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 139000 cum)

c) Total length of excavationdesilting is 20415 km

GFCC has finalized the cost of the project for Rs 3823 crore with BC ratio as 637 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IX)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with Vote of thanks to the Chair

9

Annexure-l 10sth Meeting of Advisory Committee

bull LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

fVembers of the Committee

SI ShriMrs 1 UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair 2 Allanya Ray Financial Advisor Ministry of Water Resources Member 3 Avinash Misbra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Planning Member

Commission) 4 Saidul Haq Hydrologist ( Representing Chairh1an CGWB) Member 5 JSBawa Director (HPampI) CEA (Representing Centra Electricity Member

Authority) () S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO cwe New D~lhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees a Ministry of water Resources

7 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MoWR b) Central vVater Commission

~ R C lha Member (RM) CWC New Delhi lty Jndra Raj Member (WPampP) 10 ~ K lYOlhi Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi II S K Chaudhary Chief Engineer (FM) ewc New Delhi 12 T S Patil Chid Engineer (MCO) CWC Nagpur

deg1 3 M K Sinha Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi 14 BG Kaushik Chief Engineer (PPO) CWC New Delhi 15 V K Chawla Chief Engineer (lMO) CWC New Delhi 10 Y K Sharma Chief Engineer (IBO) cwe Chandigarh 17 KN Keslui Chief Engineer (LGBO) CWC Patna 1~ G S Tyagi Director UTampSS CWC New Delhi 19 Gorakh Thakur Director CA-l CWC New Delhi 20 Ajay KumarDirector PA (N) cwe New Delhi 2L D M Raipure Dixector Appraisal CWC Nagpur -

22 P C ]ha Director PA-C CWC New Delhi middot -lt

4-middotM middot ~ 23 R K Kanodia Director PA-S CWC New Delhi

24 M W Paunikar DD PA-N CWC New Delhi 25 B Rai DD PA-C CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC 26 AK GanjuChairman GFCC Patna 27 S Masood Husain Member (Planning) GFCC Patna

d) State Governmenofficers Bihar

28 Ajay Nayak PriRcipal Secretary WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 29 SiJsil Kumar Singh SE WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 30 P K lha Resident Engineer Govt of Bihar

Chattisgarh 31 B K Rai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur 32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

middot33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur 34 BK Pndey AE Bilaspur

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

10 Flood protection works to Brahmani-Kelua-Birupa Doab of Brahmani system (Flood Control) Orissa

(PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood protection to provide protection to 17100 area in Jaipur district of Orissa The proposal

a) Raising and strengthening of existing embankments -8649km

b) Construction of new embankment at - 1583 km

c) Construction of spurs - 24 Nos

d) Renovation of drains - 3750 km

e) Construction of sluices 10 Nos

f) Construction of launching aprons - 2000 m

g) Construction service roads 56 km

The cost of the scheme has been finalized by CWC for Rs 6232 crore at price level with BC ratio as 1 The State Finance Concurrence has

been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VII) On query related to provision of launching aprons it was clarified by Project officials that there would provision of the aprons where are considered essential It was further informed by the project authority that project was formulated on the of model study carried out by 11 Chennai

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that project should completed by March 2013 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

11 Revised Project Estimate for construction of Right Marginal Bund on river Ganga from Bhogpur to Balawali (Flood Control) Dist Haridwar Uttarakhand

CE (PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 40460 persons and provide protection to 9000 ha land in 10 villages of Uttarakhand from the fury of flood

scheme was originally sanctioned for Rs 11 crore for providing protection along river Ganga in a length of 205 km Due to cost escalation only 105 m of embankment is being constructed by the Gov with 11 crore as earlier approved The scheme is an ongoing under Management Programme MoWR The Empowered Committee in July 2009 decided that the cost of the scheme may allowed to revise the price level of March 2008

The present proposal envisages Construction of embankment of remaining 10 km length in a stretch of the river from 105 km 205

8

The present revised estimate of flood control scheme has been examined in GFCC and finalized for Rs 2069 crore with BC ratio as 509 The State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VIII) Commissioner (Ganga) advised the Govt of Uttarakhand to send scheme-wise budget allocation for project in question

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

12 Scheme for Desilting of river Ichamati along the common Border portion for better drainage and flood management (Flood Control) West Bengal

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 984 lakhs and to provide protection of 225 sq km area The proposal envisages

a) Desilting of river Ichamati by means of suitable floating type excavator mounted on pontoon (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 15 28000 cum)

b) Desilting of river Ichamati by manual labour within clmr land and depositing the excavated earth at suitable distance (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 139000 cum)

c) Total length of excavationdesilting is 20415 km

GFCC has finalized the cost of the project for Rs 3823 crore with BC ratio as 637 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IX)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with Vote of thanks to the Chair

9

Annexure-l 10sth Meeting of Advisory Committee

bull LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

fVembers of the Committee

SI ShriMrs 1 UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair 2 Allanya Ray Financial Advisor Ministry of Water Resources Member 3 Avinash Misbra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Planning Member

Commission) 4 Saidul Haq Hydrologist ( Representing Chairh1an CGWB) Member 5 JSBawa Director (HPampI) CEA (Representing Centra Electricity Member

Authority) () S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO cwe New D~lhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees a Ministry of water Resources

7 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MoWR b) Central vVater Commission

~ R C lha Member (RM) CWC New Delhi lty Jndra Raj Member (WPampP) 10 ~ K lYOlhi Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi II S K Chaudhary Chief Engineer (FM) ewc New Delhi 12 T S Patil Chid Engineer (MCO) CWC Nagpur

deg1 3 M K Sinha Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi 14 BG Kaushik Chief Engineer (PPO) CWC New Delhi 15 V K Chawla Chief Engineer (lMO) CWC New Delhi 10 Y K Sharma Chief Engineer (IBO) cwe Chandigarh 17 KN Keslui Chief Engineer (LGBO) CWC Patna 1~ G S Tyagi Director UTampSS CWC New Delhi 19 Gorakh Thakur Director CA-l CWC New Delhi 20 Ajay KumarDirector PA (N) cwe New Delhi 2L D M Raipure Dixector Appraisal CWC Nagpur -

22 P C ]ha Director PA-C CWC New Delhi middot -lt

4-middotM middot ~ 23 R K Kanodia Director PA-S CWC New Delhi

24 M W Paunikar DD PA-N CWC New Delhi 25 B Rai DD PA-C CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC 26 AK GanjuChairman GFCC Patna 27 S Masood Husain Member (Planning) GFCC Patna

d) State Governmenofficers Bihar

28 Ajay Nayak PriRcipal Secretary WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 29 SiJsil Kumar Singh SE WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 30 P K lha Resident Engineer Govt of Bihar

Chattisgarh 31 B K Rai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur 32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

middot33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur 34 BK Pndey AE Bilaspur

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

The present revised estimate of flood control scheme has been examined in GFCC and finalized for Rs 2069 crore with BC ratio as 509 The State Finance Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-VIII) Commissioner (Ganga) advised the Govt of Uttarakhand to send scheme-wise budget allocation for project in question

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that the project should be completed by March 2012 positively and no further costtime revision would be considered by the Committee

12 Scheme for Desilting of river Ichamati along the common Border portion for better drainage and flood management (Flood Control) West Bengal

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposal The proposal is a flood control scheme to benefit population of 984 lakhs and to provide protection of 225 sq km area The proposal envisages

a) Desilting of river Ichamati by means of suitable floating type excavator mounted on pontoon (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 15 28000 cum)

b) Desilting of river Ichamati by manual labour within clmr land and depositing the excavated earth at suitable distance (Total quantity of excavated material is estimated to be 139000 cum)

c) Total length of excavationdesilting is 20415 km

GFCC has finalized the cost of the project for Rs 3823 crore with BC ratio as 637 The State Finance Concurrence has been received (copy enclosed as Annexure-IX)

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with Vote of thanks to the Chair

9

Annexure-l 10sth Meeting of Advisory Committee

bull LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

fVembers of the Committee

SI ShriMrs 1 UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair 2 Allanya Ray Financial Advisor Ministry of Water Resources Member 3 Avinash Misbra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Planning Member

Commission) 4 Saidul Haq Hydrologist ( Representing Chairh1an CGWB) Member 5 JSBawa Director (HPampI) CEA (Representing Centra Electricity Member

Authority) () S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO cwe New D~lhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees a Ministry of water Resources

7 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MoWR b) Central vVater Commission

~ R C lha Member (RM) CWC New Delhi lty Jndra Raj Member (WPampP) 10 ~ K lYOlhi Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi II S K Chaudhary Chief Engineer (FM) ewc New Delhi 12 T S Patil Chid Engineer (MCO) CWC Nagpur

deg1 3 M K Sinha Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi 14 BG Kaushik Chief Engineer (PPO) CWC New Delhi 15 V K Chawla Chief Engineer (lMO) CWC New Delhi 10 Y K Sharma Chief Engineer (IBO) cwe Chandigarh 17 KN Keslui Chief Engineer (LGBO) CWC Patna 1~ G S Tyagi Director UTampSS CWC New Delhi 19 Gorakh Thakur Director CA-l CWC New Delhi 20 Ajay KumarDirector PA (N) cwe New Delhi 2L D M Raipure Dixector Appraisal CWC Nagpur -

22 P C ]ha Director PA-C CWC New Delhi middot -lt

4-middotM middot ~ 23 R K Kanodia Director PA-S CWC New Delhi

24 M W Paunikar DD PA-N CWC New Delhi 25 B Rai DD PA-C CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC 26 AK GanjuChairman GFCC Patna 27 S Masood Husain Member (Planning) GFCC Patna

d) State Governmenofficers Bihar

28 Ajay Nayak PriRcipal Secretary WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 29 SiJsil Kumar Singh SE WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 30 P K lha Resident Engineer Govt of Bihar

Chattisgarh 31 B K Rai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur 32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

middot33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur 34 BK Pndey AE Bilaspur

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

Annexure-l 10sth Meeting of Advisory Committee

bull LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

fVembers of the Committee

SI ShriMrs 1 UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair 2 Allanya Ray Financial Advisor Ministry of Water Resources Member 3 Avinash Misbra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Planning Member

Commission) 4 Saidul Haq Hydrologist ( Representing Chairh1an CGWB) Member 5 JSBawa Director (HPampI) CEA (Representing Centra Electricity Member

Authority) () S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO cwe New D~lhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees a Ministry of water Resources

7 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MoWR b) Central vVater Commission

~ R C lha Member (RM) CWC New Delhi lty Jndra Raj Member (WPampP) 10 ~ K lYOlhi Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi II S K Chaudhary Chief Engineer (FM) ewc New Delhi 12 T S Patil Chid Engineer (MCO) CWC Nagpur

deg1 3 M K Sinha Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New Delhi 14 BG Kaushik Chief Engineer (PPO) CWC New Delhi 15 V K Chawla Chief Engineer (lMO) CWC New Delhi 10 Y K Sharma Chief Engineer (IBO) cwe Chandigarh 17 KN Keslui Chief Engineer (LGBO) CWC Patna 1~ G S Tyagi Director UTampSS CWC New Delhi 19 Gorakh Thakur Director CA-l CWC New Delhi 20 Ajay KumarDirector PA (N) cwe New Delhi 2L D M Raipure Dixector Appraisal CWC Nagpur -

22 P C ]ha Director PA-C CWC New Delhi middot -lt

4-middotM middot ~ 23 R K Kanodia Director PA-S CWC New Delhi

24 M W Paunikar DD PA-N CWC New Delhi 25 B Rai DD PA-C CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC 26 AK GanjuChairman GFCC Patna 27 S Masood Husain Member (Planning) GFCC Patna

d) State Governmenofficers Bihar

28 Ajay Nayak PriRcipal Secretary WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 29 SiJsil Kumar Singh SE WRD Govt of Bihar Patna 30 P K lha Resident Engineer Govt of Bihar

Chattisgarh 31 B K Rai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur 32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

middot33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur 34 BK Pndey AE Bilaspur

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

Chattisgarh

3~~~ BKRai Chief Engineer Hasdeo Basin Bilaspur

32 Alok Agarwal EE Kharung W R Divn Bilaspur

33 SK Saraf SDO Kh WR Divn Bilaspur

34 B K Pndey A E Bilaspur

Madhya Pradesh F

35 KN Agarwal Member Engineering NVDA Bhopal ~ KC Chauhan Chief Engineer Lower Narmada Projects Indore 37 OPJadhau Chief Engineer Rani Awauli Baisugar Project Bayi Hills

Jabalpur 38 PN Sharma Executive Engineer Man Project Division

Maharashtra

39 HK Tonpe Chief Engineer Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 40 VR Bhure SE Jalgaon Irrigation Project Jalgaon 41 CS Modak ED Tapi Irrigation Dev Corporation Jalgaon 42 SN Patil Executive Engineer Jalgaon

Orissa

43 DK Das Additional Secretary WRD Govt of Orissa Bhubaneswar

M Harish ChBehera Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Bhubaneswar

45 Chakradhar Mohnta CEampBM Brahmani Lfet Basin Angul

~ Basudev Mohapatra SE Eastern Circle Cuttak

47 Gopal Krishna Behera EE OECF Divn VIBhuban

~ Subrat Das EE Jaraka Irrigation Divn Jaraka

Uttar Pradesh

49 S Ahmad Engineer-in- Chief Irrigation Deptt

50 SP Singh SE Irrigation Deptt

51 Avinash Misra AE ICD-ILalipur

52 AKNiranjan AE ICD-IIILalipur

Uattarkhand

53 Rajeev Gupta Principal Secretary Govt of Uttarakhand Dehradun

~ AK Dinker SE Irrigation Works Circle Dehradun

55 DD Dalal EE Dehradun

West Bengal

~ TK Ghosh Chief Engineer IampW Deptt Kolkata West Bengal

57 S Konar Se Greater Kolkata Drainage Circle West Bengal

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

~ltcl (bullbull M2~Vlimikillgal~(hi~middot7 20 j 0shy

G~t cf CihOl WjlCr tsrmiddottlrCcs j)cplitmellt

Fron Fr Aji~ i(UlH-l Sarnjya

~---

loinl S-rtlilf (ngiwcril)~)

ro Sri 0 Thkw [iii ~Itp A-~1

Centrill ~atcr ( onunissm W7 (~-rl )tli BhltlwaJl l~ K -la1f1 New D~thi

lt ~r

Prtn1 diil0d r 6 q20 10

S~Lgt S~te f jlli[tCf CQnCUlTc je for rc3lotat ion work (If Elll (t~rn G)JldHJlaquo_~ltid Systcm (MltiurKRcvi~-d) fsihar

1 Ref- Yo~~r leu no n p2TOI )middotPA(lli 14~lti) dilW tj-(c2(JO

~

Dcnr Sir I ino (11 uin(te~l (I) coves tL tiliwial CIiC1rCnc~ r~ ll 1stumt1olt ()r

q)rk of Ea5lcr~Gmi~ Caxal S)MI~nt Cv1~iol l(evis~d) Dihur coHting H3 6)4 n (W(~

~Hx Hundr()(J Eil~htyF(hl Omiddotm amp Se~mly J~i~~illakh) under rUJ Il1tkr CClltrall)~Ji

~dlHn~ ( 00 Cclrl~ A ~~str~

Co)Pf )f prxc~(~3 Jf FlHpoc~rd Ccrlfllj~e (iS1 Srbcme) OOVrtlJI1(J)( or 13 Uli1 i~ Cl1(ued for rjity rcI~ltlle $

Th~a ~ [0] )0) ~ llG ironnniol1 ar l nm ~~fll ~ctir)1

En()IIr A alxmiddotyc

i

~ rr

j L0-shy

XOW3 failltfui ly te~ ~~~ --P A---i-~r- --( shyV V ~ ~TI ~

(Ajit Kur1gtr Silhniyar) I

Joilt Se(fct~i nlbii-~e(e)

I

J i ~ middot kl If middot shy~ ~ I

( ~ 4- bull bull

~

~ ~ ( J

~~ 1 1

I

middotr ti bull~ 0 middot [

~~~~~

~ ~ tmiddot

amp

) t i

rI

i k ~~ ~

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

r ~_ r~ It- ~ -r ~ --~oolt_ _ bull _ ll 1 -- ~ ~- a U -nT

n)~~ ~ ~ lmiddot bull ( I 1 it toO l i 1

I bullbullbullfy ( -1 ~- A1J ~ 1 ) ~ ~~ If ~ A I J ~

~ ~~ i j ~ t ] ~ t -+J

Jro)lllt ti tTl bull - 4 li 1 ~ J

lICT cf~InN l1nlf1r ~imp~

~Jl ir)~llr ft1P_~ T~r~

ifgtLJi ltP If 3) V Tr-(J_I) 1 ~1--21 oon ~rt1~~rr11rltLI 00 2010 )In

~Q ~f1lQm

r14l middot~I ~rz MI ~mu~~ lnf[lf middot)~Q~IttJ~ (poundPc)

[q7~- t~QTm11 Itl~ f ftllmr~r~I~(i3q)cr~qt tPl tlt~~r i6fnIlT I$~~i lrmfl ~ Rlf~lr ~ji~ill~~II (iIll q~l ~l~~m u~IW61~ ~4li~hJ I

~~t- ~~ ~r~r qjq~ w~5li 1 ~t-O21J0(l ~cI~[lF $liqj 1fUl02010 --0(J--gt bull

~Vlaquo mmf 1~~r31Jgt f~) til 1~irHlU~ ~il~rltillli~~fr qiT lifiiTJ J1lt1~ ltt tV3( W1rltlr W RfF~~fT ti iffit~r Qi11l ~ ~ 1fJ1 V (fj~)~ (i 1ifl ~ ~~ r

~l 71Rt T1T~) tt WTWj(f) $1 ~~ltr~tITtra J~II~(l ~netT ftT ~r H wrr ~m f1 fir ~16-rr r ~ -rRfgt -i~it r~ ~1 Ii1~jii 11 middotR1~rtr mn Glom ltmr~1 lt~ T~rl ~~ -xi) 2252

iil~ r~ -ltltir-- qrlt em i11tft1 qtllr 3Ii I1~r -iI middot~tmx 1tVn tj~r AlfJP l~ 3i~h1 r

~~ r-~ KI ~rFl qA ~lImiddoti-eltl r~1 in0- iv~ III i gt

t~

2 1iWf-n ~t 0300 (~h$rlt Ulfit1 ~q 7500 ~IH1r T~l i~il 15eOJ t-qtm ~rl 14 ~nf1Hltm ftjqr~ ~HlTfltlTI t I ~ middotf

ltflit tmlrT f~llllqQ j1 m~~l ~~ODI) 10 ~~ ~i P)~ ojlt ~(li) ~ 3(~) tfJ

Jfjlaquor tllWiI ltP) n~~~T tlIltpfn ~ WIf ~q ~irif ~r-~~(~ J~~IO~Qjil1011 ifil ~l ~1 tll) q(rn flTljlif ilipf ~rr~lT filj([ 3Jri IfltH mr4 lfll~ middotltlVImiddot l rt1j~1 TllJfll u)jlJOrm WfTUf-tl-f ~nt1q q~ ftrrr ~Jll~1 I - ~~i~

It ~rJnun- rlgt~ll IIE-IT Illllr - - (~ Ff - lorTI r 1lll-r lIT lt1-tT l IIIt)f II ~il~ IQC1(middot tli iYJ ctmiddot 11~ -- OJ J ~~~ middot~ I1 r )i

4Tfucq -t r~ trqri ~H ~~(i~lr xd (ll r 7iicjllf(oJl cltH 3rtii~ ~mur ri ~~ frml-r 111ci~1IRtji ~iTn ~UTfj~~~~ flq~i lUr 1IM-T6 I rr

u rhmiddot~rirr qj[ r-lt~iyenil~ 11( 1 -Wu-v ~~~1Jtmiddot~OO lr(~ Qf~~F~rll (Gn~IJFH) cii bullbulltI bull

bull rt- f1 n-~ ~ I i n -]

G f4-m fltMFT um ~lil lt~r if~U41 1~J-- i4~))if i-~ flfW-lIO ftjrltfgt 24GfliJ 0 IrJ ~~ ~~f( l1GI1 ltJi tnl ~ I

7 ~IfT ltliT fniJittTIU -(Hi if r11U 61 lLlJ f)nH ii1~1J JI~~rn -~~j~ I -g1 ltojflF[ ur -Jh 1 1it ~ h I ~

ol-t fl( q Ir ~ middot 0 ~

J~)() tmfuPTI ~ IlJ1Ill1U 6- ll middot(l

~ll ~t~IrIffi~~---- -gt --0 ~ ~~ - ~- ~~~-lt-~ -~ ~

n middot -r-~- i--

- ~ (-ill~ 1~~r gt-) (~ ~ ~

middotlfli~ iI~

fd mfllHmiddotlipli11 ~ n~ 1S1ml ~Gl1Jmiddot 4

l-fImiddottvHrd L ) t ~ gt11 I ~I ~i ~~ltirfl 1iOf-~ ampwr -~I I ~ ~ lo-~ r yC- ~

1( ~ ~ ~

~~ a~ r

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

bull ~

I tJltt-J Iic ~ l~~J 12L13 12 ~Lk Lmiddot I+i Iii 6 ~bt( ~LI

lt ~~h 1middot~middot_b~ - y~

~

I lJ~lt IncPJtl ltJ~ ill ~(~~) R-c2f-rJVr I ~1~1J~ ~Ih l-lLI1hll middotb~)llJC~1pound2 cl~~~ CD ~middotlgtJl) ~till (pound)

I ~~-ltd~~JLllLUC ~tt~poundQ(tl8bullil)JJl1-l812 tamplt (Z) 1~middotJJLlJthJ~~tmiddotJtllt~~~f-I=CII~ lJ~JitBh~ (~)

- ~t(JI(jK

JLlttlD ~ll~I~~1 ~~ln i2~u

middotL~~llci middot J~(JiILlt

~1~Hc ll0

(12 ~~Lt lSb ~I)_ middot 1

I (

I ~ h)Jdl~ JlllIg Ilyen~~t lj ~ Jc~19-h ~ ltlpll~ ~

tlJJ~ltQ ~~J ~~ ~S pound6S89 tD~f2 ~Q-tilliP~l5-JJ) ~cQ JJJf-iJll ~Li llii2

I ~0~l~tillt ~-hl kPJL lltJli)Jll~ ~ ~ 7-l1 l-~

Hg~ Qhlh

RJ~t1t ~jJJlil ~l0

C~U~~~) ~~~ LJ K ~

toozm J-wJvt1-~hlt~ii~-middotihb)ik~

LtlJt~t HJ~ lJ-lh l2t-th 1~JjlrTl~li mh

-----_- q -=- bull-~- -

-)l~i ~~ middotf bull bull bull ~ J ~_ _ _ __ bull bull

2010 1159 FROM TO 01126105 18J

shy

BY F4middot ~1sectIJLrampErI

GOVERNMENT OF OUSSA TJFPARTMENT OF WAfltn t1F~(JJRCFS

No IUrlOlO 9l1 IWR Ol1foo -~ 0

From Shri DK Das Additionnl Seer~tary to Ooverrmcnt

To Tht DIrector EA

GOVemmanl of ndia Cenlr W~p Commission Extemal ASlIisUmce Dte Room No 803(S) SeWQ BhQwtm lKuraffi New Dclhimiddot(i6 I~

G i~~

~~Sub- Rtn1 Left Bn11( CHonl of Jlaquooampall lrri~utcp Pr~~ctt Oricsa ~

(Estimated cos~ amp130409 Crore) ~ ~~ Sir

I 11m directcd to invite reference to your letter No G199-EA I 04

011 lle Wove lIubjcc l1nU lilly lhl1t Fimmco D rpl1rtmcrll OOVCrrlll1Cmt of Ori~ hn~] I~llurrcd in

the lt051 estimnte of RengaliLefi Bank Canal (RD 29117 Km tgt IlD 1470 m) al ~~145U~ Crorc A$ per 2009 Cprice vide their UOR No 3409 PSF dJeltJ 2162 Io

This is for kind informlltion auJ necesSAry ~ction I I

J

BYFo~ Memiddotrna N~o ~~7 ~ WR Dated 2 bull b I 0

Copy ((Warded to the Director CA(l) voveruner1t or ~ Co~m~sson Cos~Apprn~snl(~rrigatio~) Directornte Room No 406 A(Sgt S Poram New Delhl-l1 0066 for mformatlon and necessary action

~

c q 1 ~ A~Jltionai Sla1 ct GmiddotprtMmoNo J IIWR Doted l ) middot middoth I () CoJY forwordcd to the Finance Department for infonnAtioll

C) AlaquocHti)n ill Slaquo1 Memo No ~ 9 ~ IIWR Dated l- G I cJ

Copy forwarded to the EfC bullbull Watr Res(ur~s for infoFJn1ior ~

AlditiOlaql secretn ~f~~lllmgntgt -~ r~

- -J~r-rv-r~middotf

--_

I

j~

I 6 I ~I 1 ~ I I

I bull bull t I bull

I L I I I ~ I I

OiOf lLllttj ftt~~J

middot(HI(Ut4 ~)~~~i4Jb) tpitIU1t ~

4

I ~bll~fl Ryli-trl~ 1JVt4~ HP[~J iL~ t~~~ ~~llh~W -t

I ublJf i~lh JlJtl~ pb4~ ll~tJl~ lnllI1K ~--e

JL~middot CliOt hhgt~ ~(llii-~~-lbJJ)J~Jh) lll~~~ riyenft ~I~J~ -~

~ l~~~~ tf1 WHpct ~ti~wtpoundmiddot p1t~uh~ tQ Jl~l~blt ~l~i ~ - bull- middotmiddotmiddot middot7-- shy

01~O~~OliOii itJtl1 middotw

bull

~

~q MO~)OlZ L-hJt~ ~- 1$ ~lli ~~l ~du ~t~ 9trpoundi~V O~ lUtl~ Il~ffi~h

~~ )~Jflipoundhlb tJrt l~j3~ ~~ 21ID l~ ~I~ bJU(~t~ 1Q LbJJ l-Jllfhl

miH td~~ ~ fr1~Sti-b~-p-Iif) middotD~~-ti1Jlmiddot -l~middotmiddotUililJhlh--n~~Th-u1iili -~

O~i)( hl~ ~lgt1Fmiddot gtL~bj m~JDUt~OlpoundOlil -~J1 (

~~ Fl J~c~ J1Jlt JJWpound ~~ ltiJ~B~ bOllOl1

~li~

~~1i 0l10~ lJl~lJ Jp--~J

middotOl)~t~ ~~) lliliP~p1) H~~l1tf15 )iilitl

I 6 I ~I 1 ~ I I

I bull bull t I bull

I L I I I ~ I I

OiOf lLllttj ftt~~J

middot(HI(Ut4 ~)~~~i4Jb) tpitIU1t ~

4

I ~bll~fl Ryli-trl~ 1JVt4~ HP[~J iL~ t~~~ ~~llh~W -t

I ublJf i~lh JlJtl~ pb4~ ll~tJl~ lnllI1K ~--e

JL~middot CliOt hhgt~ ~(llii-~~-lbJJ)J~Jh) lll~~~ riyenft ~I~J~ -~

~ l~~~~ tf1 WHpct ~ti~wtpoundmiddot p1t~uh~ tQ Jl~l~blt ~l~i ~ - bull- middotmiddotmiddot middot7-- shy

01~O~~OliOii itJtl1 middotw

bull

~

~q MO~)OlZ L-hJt~ ~- 1$ ~lli ~~l ~du ~t~ 9trpoundi~V O~ lUtl~ Il~ffi~h

~~ )~Jflipoundhlb tJrt l~j3~ ~~ 21ID l~ ~I~ bJU(~t~ 1Q LbJJ l-Jllfhl

miH td~~ ~ fr1~Sti-b~-p-Iif) middotD~~-ti1Jlmiddot -l~middotmiddotUililJhlh--n~~Th-u1iili -~

O~i)( hl~ ~lgt1Fmiddot gtL~bj m~JDUt~OlpoundOlil -~J1 (

~~ Fl J~c~ J1Jlt JJWpound ~~ ltiJ~B~ bOllOl1

~li~

~~1i 0l10~ lJl~lJ Jp--~J

middotOl)~t~ ~~) lliliP~p1) H~~l1tf15 )iilitl

- ~L-- 1 _ N _ _ _ 1 )lt ~ rA_~ I 1 ~ - _ rLmiddotJ j ~ ~ ~yen ~ 4 I ~ I bull 11lf $ Ijbullbullll1 rt bull gt p bullh~Ul Imiddot ~ II V -- 4 ~ r ~ 1 ~~ l1 1bull ~~~ 1 --- ~~ ( )~~lt~~ -~

tmiddot YI middotbull1f- ( I f I ~ 1J If A- J ~ i-- bull t~ (~middot ~

C- ~ bull~ ~ jl gt1 ~ tt~11 ~ ~iI~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~

FXLURGtNT --~

GOVERNrv1ENT OF ORISSA

DEPARTMEIlT OF iVATER RESOURCES gtI~

NO~ t C~middot-U ~r_jWR Dated BhubaneswiJr tHe ~ l () c FC-J -4510

From Shri Dhiren Kumar Oas Additional Secretary lo Governm(r~

To ~ Director (LJT amp 55)

Central Water Comrllission 803 (N) Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi - 110 606

Subject Regarding State Finaf1ce Concurrence of Fio0d Pmiddototection work of Brahmani-Keurolua-Birupa Doab of Brahmdni Sys(em

Sir

I am directed Lo invite a reference to the LettEr NO8307 dated 19062010 of the Engineer-in-Chief P~annin~ u Design on the abovesubject and to say that Finance Departrrent have concurred in the cost EstirYlate of Rs62 32 aores in respect of Finance Depnrtmcnt vide lmiddottleir UOR IJOl3410rrJ SF duted

21062010

Yours t3itllfJIIY

tmiddot

-i ( Ic f

k olo~ p ~J o oJ Add~~s~cretarycil~p~r~ltr GA- Memo No - ~~vi__-JWR middot Dated L 2 0J--rJ ~

~ ~ ~~ t) COPYl forNarded to the Director Region~ lEntrcJl Water l ~ J I

j ~ Commission MahenadiBhawn Bhoi Nagar Bhubaneswar or irfqmetion and 1 ~

~necessary action I bull L

~ ~

I ~

(

-- ~ ~

~

Ii v ~

b Addl Secretory yiltje)lttn[l1ltf( C

Memo No f c ~ WR Dated L 2 - ( F-i r)) (I

Copy forwarded to the Enqinee-il-Chicf wder1 R i ~

JI Engineer-in-Chief ~ ~Dfor irFOimqtioon ~nd re~essary action ~ i

I

~dcgt-~~ ~~1-l) ~ltt ~~Y G lo I

1Ai) s sJ)~ c-w ~ )~~ I ~Cgt--f~~ ~-D C-IC C ~Pr~) 7 ~N -=-- ~ t

~~---~~~~ogt~~ Add 5rCI etary to ~eJ~~~1i II ~~ ~ -r lr-c ~ ~~~ 1(l ~ - l

- -s ~~ )-= -~--=- ~

- 1 -_Ob~ __b

~~ l 0fL _L 1J-=~1O-o~fM)~iiQi ~

~ 3ffiO~O cr~ ~ ~ ~

3ffiI~ mffi I ~

f1~~ICfgt (~~- II) -- shy

~mcnR

1R1 ~ riampj=jnI=61T1~

Tflnmiddot~ ft~ijdegl ~fftimf ~ cfRr-it ~ ~-3000151

fmt 3fTWT~~ fcrCl) 24 ~ 2010

~ VR1tG ~ -q ~ ~ ffr~i1 Jjlrtfmiddoth~ ~ fr~lfur Qgt~ T~1ffif mur-=rr $ ~ -q I

lTlgt1Gll middot 34X1Cffi fqtt~co Ugtll it31rPTd ~ t f$ ~ 25(162010 em ~ JR1

~ it ~ tH116Cfgt1lt tlfllfcr (Acvisory Cornmjtt~e on Inieation) $t ~4J centl~lti ~ if ~ 1000 EIk fItrffuJ ~dq) if J~TO~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~Ifmiddot~ ~ EiIampIClIRI GJltfi 11~ir r-~ ~T ((gt1 S~ti ~ qx fcr~ fctm 1iAT gtI laquo11 fq lt1 t I

34(1 ltl1vr-=rr mT ~ ffi1rti cpr ~T~ xO 2370euroO ~ ~TTfR qj -rrq=j=tlITmiddotamplr-TTT1 4213 11-2009-04 (04)04 ~ 2101 2010 GHT Tf1jl fffiP ~1Tf 3ITllPT ~ cnT ~ cBT VT ~ t I fct+IflT ampm 3ftFlil ClRTltn 7f1JT t f$ lt-I1wlT ~ TRhamshy~~ fcnlt) vrA ~ ~ 3ctHI~o-s WffR ~ fctr ~lfTl ~ ~~ t I

~ W1l it ~ y6 ~ cpr ~~ E3fi t f$ f4-XcK ~ l1~ ~fffii ~cfi ~q-q fcmr 1~f cBT ~~Rf iFlt t Tflt1[ tl ~ -g-~ ~ (l~~ f$lt) vrA cfi ~ it ~P Cf711t(iTifi ~ Clgt1 CfflC em I

1 l~ CC

--3 --~---

~ ii (~lxO~O ~) I _ 1~~l~

~ lcO~ L 11-201ltgt-04(04)2004 5fi1~q) ( lARlRlFil Pidif(jRsld ClgtT ~~ 3iTcfffcf) Cflrltlcntl g tlftm-

1

~ Gql~oe m~x -I 11ffiT mqJR ref ~llf~m -rfrn fiM ampgtlIen

f0-11 ~qt mf ~ovfi03lTO qgtI~ ~ ~~ I

2 3lT tl61It5centlx (~3fIX) ~ 3lWllT ~f PtA ~ 1Wf ~~ I 3 -s1~~CfClt (~)~ffi1 7f1n ~ PI llij 01 ~firr~ ~q ~I

middot4middot ~~~fcrrrnurlff fu~ ~ 3ffiI~U-s I

J11lfT ~

1 ~----(31RO~O ~T~)

gill)) -ffpm mr4

IlllIMroc jtWFAH 2WI()IIE~ ~ectioo WOfLJ lOlOmiddotIICSS Flood ScherntC )$ F1uod ir0leclia1 rmiddot~~ocb

I I H i

f I

~~ l 0fL _L 1J-=~1O-o~fM)~iiQi ~

~ 3ffiO~O cr~ ~ ~ ~

3ffiI~ mffi I ~

f1~~ICfgt (~~- II) -- shy

~mcnR

1R1 ~ riampj=jnI=61T1~

Tflnmiddot~ ft~ijdegl ~fftimf ~ cfRr-it ~ ~-3000151

fmt 3fTWT~~ fcrCl) 24 ~ 2010

~ VR1tG ~ -q ~ ~ ffr~i1 Jjlrtfmiddoth~ ~ fr~lfur Qgt~ T~1ffif mur-=rr $ ~ -q I

lTlgt1Gll middot 34X1Cffi fqtt~co Ugtll it31rPTd ~ t f$ ~ 25(162010 em ~ JR1

~ it ~ tH116Cfgt1lt tlfllfcr (Acvisory Cornmjtt~e on Inieation) $t ~4J centl~lti ~ if ~ 1000 EIk fItrffuJ ~dq) if J~TO~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~Ifmiddot~ ~ EiIampIClIRI GJltfi 11~ir r-~ ~T ((gt1 S~ti ~ qx fcr~ fctm 1iAT gtI laquo11 fq lt1 t I

34(1 ltl1vr-=rr mT ~ ffi1rti cpr ~T~ xO 2370euroO ~ ~TTfR qj -rrq=j=tlITmiddotamplr-TTT1 4213 11-2009-04 (04)04 ~ 2101 2010 GHT Tf1jl fffiP ~1Tf 3ITllPT ~ cnT ~ cBT VT ~ t I fct+IflT ampm 3ftFlil ClRTltn 7f1JT t f$ lt-I1wlT ~ TRhamshy~~ fcnlt) vrA ~ ~ 3ctHI~o-s WffR ~ fctr ~lfTl ~ ~~ t I

~ W1l it ~ y6 ~ cpr ~~ E3fi t f$ f4-XcK ~ l1~ ~fffii ~cfi ~q-q fcmr 1~f cBT ~~Rf iFlt t Tflt1[ tl ~ -g-~ ~ (l~~ f$lt) vrA cfi ~ it ~P Cf711t(iTifi ~ Clgt1 CfflC em I

1 l~ CC

--3 --~---

~ ii (~lxO~O ~) I _ 1~~l~

~ lcO~ L 11-201ltgt-04(04)2004 5fi1~q) ( lARlRlFil Pidif(jRsld ClgtT ~~ 3iTcfffcf) Cflrltlcntl g tlftm-

1

~ Gql~oe m~x -I 11ffiT mqJR ref ~llf~m -rfrn fiM ampgtlIen

f0-11 ~qt mf ~ovfi03lTO qgtI~ ~ ~~ I

2 3lT tl61It5centlx (~3fIX) ~ 3lWllT ~f PtA ~ 1Wf ~~ I 3 -s1~~CfClt (~)~ffi1 7f1n ~ PI llij 01 ~firr~ ~q ~I

middot4middot ~~~fcrrrnurlff fu~ ~ 3ffiI~U-s I

J11lfT ~

1 ~----(31RO~O ~T~)

gill)) -ffpm mr4

IlllIMroc jtWFAH 2WI()IIE~ ~ectioo WOfLJ lOlOmiddotIICSS Flood ScherntC )$ F1uod ir0leclia1 rmiddot~~ocb

I I H i

f I

~~~ P ~j~ q _ ~ ~ Jf ~ _ _~ _ _____~_ ~ _ ~ - ~vmiddot~~4i~ I ltf lU gt

__ - - 1( IAmiddottltJjIl~~ ~ 1 pbull lhxmiddot shy- r L I bull Jao- _ _~_ ~ __ _ ~ _~ abullbull ~ ~~ Ji~~middotrdJ - _

lIf~ middot _ f)~ -e _ D)( f~

~Ir J

~ ~ J middot i~~ t ~middotJi J ~ ( ) ~ ~J ~ bull

f~ f 4~~ t~ ~lt 4 ~ iH~( ~ t j ~

~(~~_dmiddott~ Irrgation amp Vaferway~ Departmeilt Government of West Beng~l

Jalasampau Bhovan Western Block(0 r ltl Flool1 Bidhannagar lolkata~-OO 091

N ) 13 -lfl IW I PI l-r~C~8D~-120 10 D~cd ihc 17h illltl gt010

From Shri D Sengupta Ii

Deputy Secretary to the Government of WC6t Bengal

I The Chairman Ganga Flood Control Commission Government of India Ministry of Water Resources Sinchal Bhavan 1st Floor Patna - 80CO 15

J -) I i

Sub Concurrence oj the State Finnnce I)cpariment tOUiards execution oj the Scheme Desilting oj liver IcharllCiti alonf] the coTtliwn border portion Jor better drainage and flood managemelLt ill the ~ench froln Humogtcria P S Guighata at 12000 KM (Kulkhali PS 3arsa Dist J~SS()t Bal1g[uuesfl) to the BSF bridge at Kalanchi PS Gaighatu at 1404 15 km (Challclvria

P S Sarsa Dist Jessore Bangladesh) - approximate length 20 OU c1Il (Estimated Cost Rs 3821 crare)

Sir Inviting a reference to thesubject referred Rhove IaJH dire(tcd tost8tf thafthe

Stat~ Finance Department has since concurred to the pxecutilt11 of the aJove lllellliolled scheme on consideration of incl1lsion of the SClrw under Ccp trll Sector Scheme ltu be executed under 100 Central Assistance) by way of making bUGgetalY provisions under Plan Budget in Demand No 32 as shown belamiddot

Ruclgetcu) prevision Head of Account Year nade for thE SChellle

4711-01-1Q3-CN-001-53-V 2010-11 2400 ClUre

4711-0 1-103-CN-OO 1-53-V 2011-12 1423 core Total 3823 crore

This is for favour )[ your kind infonn8lion

YOurR faithfullyy PrCN) ~

0r-1lshy ~ y O~qt) ( D Sengupta l

Deputy Secretary

No 13 -IBl(l) DRteu lhe 17 th June 2010 Copy forwarded tor informaion to

The Director amp EO Chief Engineer IampW Directorate Gbvt of West Bengal

I

( ~bull R~ p gt 1~ i ) p ~ middotclmiddot

-No 16272010-PA (N) i 935 - ~ y

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION

PROJECT APPRAISAL ORGANIZATION 407 SEWA BHAWAN R K PURAM NEW DELHI-110 066

Date 04102010

Sub 106th meeting middotof the Advis~ry Committee for consideration of technoshyeconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multipurpose Project proposals held on 16092010

Enclosed please find herewith a copy of the summary record of discussions of the I

above meeting held at New Delhi on 16th September 2010 at Sew a Bhawan R K Puram I

New-Belhi for information and necessary action

Encl As above ~~

(SK Srivastava) 0- Chief Engineer (PAO) cum

Member Secretary of the Advisory Committee

To 1

f C bull ~ Members 0 ommleett ~ cAf ~ 1 Chairman CWC Sewa Bhawan R ~jl~iram New Delhi 2 Secretary (Expenditure) Ministry of Fihance nS~~FI6or) North BlockNew Delhi 3 Secretary Departmeht of Power 55 Bhawan-tlhd FlgorNew Delhi 4 Secretary Ministrymiddot of Environment amp Forftsts 4th FlooJ~ R6om No- 40405

Paryavaran BhawanCGQ Complex New Delhi 5 Secretary Ministry of Tribal Affairs Room No 738 A-Wing Shastri Bhawan

New Delhi 6 Secretary Department of Agriculture amp Cooperation Room No 126 Krishi

Bhawan New Delhi 7 Director General ICAR Room No-lOS Krishi Bhawan New Delhi

S Chairman CEA Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 9 Chairman Central Ground Water Board Jam Nagar House Man

Singh Road New Delhi 10 Principal Adviser (WR) Planning Commission Room No-255 Yojana Bhawan

New belhi 11 Principal Adviser (Power) Planning CommisSion Room No-107 Yojana Bhawan

New Delhi 12 Financial Adviser Ministry of Water Resources Room No-401 55 Bhawan New

Delhi Special Invitees

13 Member (WPampP) CWC New Delhi 14 Member (DampR) cwe New Delhi 15 Member (RM)CWC New Delhi 16 Cbairman GFCC Sinchai Bhawan Patna - SOO 015 Bihar 17 Commissioner (Projects) Room No-411 55 Bhawan MoWR New Delhi

18 lCommissioner ) Ministry Resources CGO Complex New Delhi 19 Chief Advisor (Cost) Department of Expenditu Ministry Finance Lok

Bhawan j Delhi 20 Prinei I Secretary Irrigation Department ment of Punjab Secretariat

Chandigarh-160 001 2l Principal ry Irrigation rtment Government of Uttar Pradesh

lay Lueknow-226 001 (UP) Secretary Irrigation Department of Maharashtra Mantralaya Mumbai-400 032

23 Princi I ry Irrigation rtment Government of Rajasthan Secretariat Jaipur-302 005

24 Principal Irrigation amp CAD Government of Andhra Pradesh Room No7 floor J-Block Secretariat Building Hyderabad-SOO 022 Secretary Water Resources amp Energy rtment Governm of Jharkhand Nepal H Ranchi834 001 (Jharkhand)

ment of Bihar Sinchai Bhawan Patna-800 015

29 Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New DeihL 30 Chief Engineer (FMO)eWcr New Delhi 31 Chief Engi Low~f Ganga Basinj WC 1 napuri Patna-800 001

(Bihar) Engineer

Basin Or neer Gan

Nagar Lucknow- (Uttar

CWC Chandigprh

33 Chief Engineer CWC Hyderqbad (Andhra Pradesh) Ch Engi ipn ewe Kalindr Bhawan New Delhi

CWCI Janhavi Bhawan 212496 Indira35 Chief

28

ry Irrigation amp Public Health Government of Himachal Pradesh la-171 002

ry Departm of Irrigation amp Flood Control Government of Assam Guwahati-781 006

Secretary Water PC)VU

Copy information to to SecretarYI MioistrYof Water Room tJo-407 New Delhi 36

j

)

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE 10sth MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOODmiddot CONTROL AND MULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON 1sth SEPTEMBER 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNOshyECONOMIC VIABILITY OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 106th meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposals vyas held on 16092010 at 1000 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting Thereafter the Chairman requested the MembershySecretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 10STH MEETING

The Summary Record of Discussions of the 105ih Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter No16272010-PA(N)1240-i6 dated 21052010 MembershySecretary informed the Cornrpittee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee coJ1firmed the Summary Record of discussions of the 105th

Advisory Committee meeting ~~i~i II) PROJECT PROPOSAlS PUT tjP ~F6R CONSIDERATION OF THE ADVISORY

COMMITTEE

1 J CHOKKA RAO GODAVARI LIS ANDHRA PRADESH (REVISED- MAJOR)

CE (PAO) cwe briefly introduced the project The project proposal was middot earlier

considered by the Advisory committee in its 88th meeting held on 02032007 and was

accepted for Rs 6016 Crore Planning Commission subsequently accorded investment

clearance to the proposal on 23032007 The State Govt has now submitted Revised

Cost Estimate at price level 2009-10 without change in scope The cost estimate for the

project has been finalized as Rs 942773 crore (PL-2009-10) with BC Ratio as 137 An

expenditure of Rs 378302 crore has been incurred up to March 2010 State Finance

Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-II)

Advisor (Cost) enquired about the original time frame for completion of the project

and reasons for delay Secretary Irrigation Govt of Andhra Pradesh intimated that

1

originally the project was to be completed by 2008-09 but due to land acquisition problem

and want of forest clearance the project could not be completed as per original schedule )

11e also informed that now land acquisition has completed the project for

execution purpose has been divided into 3 phases out of which most of the works under

phase-I amp II has been completed while the works under Phase-III is yet to started

However contract has already been awarded As such the project would be completed

as per revised time schedule Chairman of the committee Secretary (WR) suggested to

optimize use of water by using micro irrigation system in the command to tlie

maximum possible extent as the project is basically lift irrigation scheme Project

Authority informed that there is already a provision of drip irrigation in some of

command

On a query raised by (WR) Secretary (Irrigation) Govt of Andhra

Pradesh stated that State Govt would adequate provision for the maintenance of

the project

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that

project should be completed by March 2013 and no further costtime overrun will be

considered by this Committee~

2 DURGAWATI RESERVOIR P bull ~t- (REVISEDMAJOR) BIHAR

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Durgawati Project

envisages construction of an earthen dam of length 1830 hl with spillway across the rivet

Durgawati in Bihar The Dam is located near village Karamchat in KaimurDistrict of Bihar

to irrigate an area of 42900 ha annually in drought prone districts of Bhabhua and Rohtas

in Bihar

The Scheme was originally approved by the Planning Commission in May 1975 for

2530 crore State Govt subsequently modifled the cost estimate which was

) examined in CWC and cost of the project was finalized for Rs 2344 crore at 1998

price level same was accepted by Advisory Committee of MOWR in its 72nd

meeting on 18012000 subject to theforest clearance from MoEF As such the project

) was not accorded investment clearance from Planning Commission

Now the State Govt has submitted the forest clearance of MoEF along with the

at 2009-10 Price Level same has been finalized as Rs98310 Cr

(2009 -10 PL) with BC Ratio as 113 The State Concurrence has also been

obtained for the finalized cost

2

18 lCommissioner ) Ministry Resources CGO Complex New Delhi 19 Chief Advisor (Cost) Department of Expenditu Ministry Finance Lok

Bhawan j Delhi 20 Prinei I Secretary Irrigation Department ment of Punjab Secretariat

Chandigarh-160 001 2l Principal ry Irrigation rtment Government of Uttar Pradesh

lay Lueknow-226 001 (UP) Secretary Irrigation Department of Maharashtra Mantralaya Mumbai-400 032

23 Princi I ry Irrigation rtment Government of Rajasthan Secretariat Jaipur-302 005

24 Principal Irrigation amp CAD Government of Andhra Pradesh Room No7 floor J-Block Secretariat Building Hyderabad-SOO 022 Secretary Water Resources amp Energy rtment Governm of Jharkhand Nepal H Ranchi834 001 (Jharkhand)

ment of Bihar Sinchai Bhawan Patna-800 015

29 Chief Engineer (PMO) CWC New DeihL 30 Chief Engineer (FMO)eWcr New Delhi 31 Chief Engi Low~f Ganga Basinj WC 1 napuri Patna-800 001

(Bihar) Engineer

Basin Or neer Gan

Nagar Lucknow- (Uttar

CWC Chandigprh

33 Chief Engineer CWC Hyderqbad (Andhra Pradesh) Ch Engi ipn ewe Kalindr Bhawan New Delhi

CWCI Janhavi Bhawan 212496 Indira35 Chief

28

ry Irrigation amp Public Health Government of Himachal Pradesh la-171 002

ry Departm of Irrigation amp Flood Control Government of Assam Guwahati-781 006

Secretary Water PC)VU

Copy information to to SecretarYI MioistrYof Water Room tJo-407 New Delhi 36

j

)

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE 10sth MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOODmiddot CONTROL AND MULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON 1sth SEPTEMBER 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNOshyECONOMIC VIABILITY OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 106th meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposals vyas held on 16092010 at 1000 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting Thereafter the Chairman requested the MembershySecretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 10STH MEETING

The Summary Record of Discussions of the 105ih Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter No16272010-PA(N)1240-i6 dated 21052010 MembershySecretary informed the Cornrpittee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee coJ1firmed the Summary Record of discussions of the 105th

Advisory Committee meeting ~~i~i II) PROJECT PROPOSAlS PUT tjP ~F6R CONSIDERATION OF THE ADVISORY

COMMITTEE

1 J CHOKKA RAO GODAVARI LIS ANDHRA PRADESH (REVISED- MAJOR)

CE (PAO) cwe briefly introduced the project The project proposal was middot earlier

considered by the Advisory committee in its 88th meeting held on 02032007 and was

accepted for Rs 6016 Crore Planning Commission subsequently accorded investment

clearance to the proposal on 23032007 The State Govt has now submitted Revised

Cost Estimate at price level 2009-10 without change in scope The cost estimate for the

project has been finalized as Rs 942773 crore (PL-2009-10) with BC Ratio as 137 An

expenditure of Rs 378302 crore has been incurred up to March 2010 State Finance

Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-II)

Advisor (Cost) enquired about the original time frame for completion of the project

and reasons for delay Secretary Irrigation Govt of Andhra Pradesh intimated that

1

originally the project was to be completed by 2008-09 but due to land acquisition problem

and want of forest clearance the project could not be completed as per original schedule )

11e also informed that now land acquisition has completed the project for

execution purpose has been divided into 3 phases out of which most of the works under

phase-I amp II has been completed while the works under Phase-III is yet to started

However contract has already been awarded As such the project would be completed

as per revised time schedule Chairman of the committee Secretary (WR) suggested to

optimize use of water by using micro irrigation system in the command to tlie

maximum possible extent as the project is basically lift irrigation scheme Project

Authority informed that there is already a provision of drip irrigation in some of

command

On a query raised by (WR) Secretary (Irrigation) Govt of Andhra

Pradesh stated that State Govt would adequate provision for the maintenance of

the project

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that

project should be completed by March 2013 and no further costtime overrun will be

considered by this Committee~

2 DURGAWATI RESERVOIR P bull ~t- (REVISEDMAJOR) BIHAR

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Durgawati Project

envisages construction of an earthen dam of length 1830 hl with spillway across the rivet

Durgawati in Bihar The Dam is located near village Karamchat in KaimurDistrict of Bihar

to irrigate an area of 42900 ha annually in drought prone districts of Bhabhua and Rohtas

in Bihar

The Scheme was originally approved by the Planning Commission in May 1975 for

2530 crore State Govt subsequently modifled the cost estimate which was

) examined in CWC and cost of the project was finalized for Rs 2344 crore at 1998

price level same was accepted by Advisory Committee of MOWR in its 72nd

meeting on 18012000 subject to theforest clearance from MoEF As such the project

) was not accorded investment clearance from Planning Commission

Now the State Govt has submitted the forest clearance of MoEF along with the

at 2009-10 Price Level same has been finalized as Rs98310 Cr

(2009 -10 PL) with BC Ratio as 113 The State Concurrence has also been

obtained for the finalized cost

2

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE 10sth MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOODmiddot CONTROL AND MULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON 1sth SEPTEMBER 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNOshyECONOMIC VIABILITY OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 106th meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposals vyas held on 16092010 at 1000 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting Thereafter the Chairman requested the MembershySecretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 10STH MEETING

The Summary Record of Discussions of the 105ih Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter No16272010-PA(N)1240-i6 dated 21052010 MembershySecretary informed the Cornrpittee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee coJ1firmed the Summary Record of discussions of the 105th

Advisory Committee meeting ~~i~i II) PROJECT PROPOSAlS PUT tjP ~F6R CONSIDERATION OF THE ADVISORY

COMMITTEE

1 J CHOKKA RAO GODAVARI LIS ANDHRA PRADESH (REVISED- MAJOR)

CE (PAO) cwe briefly introduced the project The project proposal was middot earlier

considered by the Advisory committee in its 88th meeting held on 02032007 and was

accepted for Rs 6016 Crore Planning Commission subsequently accorded investment

clearance to the proposal on 23032007 The State Govt has now submitted Revised

Cost Estimate at price level 2009-10 without change in scope The cost estimate for the

project has been finalized as Rs 942773 crore (PL-2009-10) with BC Ratio as 137 An

expenditure of Rs 378302 crore has been incurred up to March 2010 State Finance

Concurrence has been obtained (copy enclosed as Annexure-II)

Advisor (Cost) enquired about the original time frame for completion of the project

and reasons for delay Secretary Irrigation Govt of Andhra Pradesh intimated that

1

originally the project was to be completed by 2008-09 but due to land acquisition problem

and want of forest clearance the project could not be completed as per original schedule )

11e also informed that now land acquisition has completed the project for

execution purpose has been divided into 3 phases out of which most of the works under

phase-I amp II has been completed while the works under Phase-III is yet to started

However contract has already been awarded As such the project would be completed

as per revised time schedule Chairman of the committee Secretary (WR) suggested to

optimize use of water by using micro irrigation system in the command to tlie

maximum possible extent as the project is basically lift irrigation scheme Project

Authority informed that there is already a provision of drip irrigation in some of

command

On a query raised by (WR) Secretary (Irrigation) Govt of Andhra

Pradesh stated that State Govt would adequate provision for the maintenance of

the project

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that

project should be completed by March 2013 and no further costtime overrun will be

considered by this Committee~

2 DURGAWATI RESERVOIR P bull ~t- (REVISEDMAJOR) BIHAR

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Durgawati Project

envisages construction of an earthen dam of length 1830 hl with spillway across the rivet

Durgawati in Bihar The Dam is located near village Karamchat in KaimurDistrict of Bihar

to irrigate an area of 42900 ha annually in drought prone districts of Bhabhua and Rohtas

in Bihar

The Scheme was originally approved by the Planning Commission in May 1975 for

2530 crore State Govt subsequently modifled the cost estimate which was

) examined in CWC and cost of the project was finalized for Rs 2344 crore at 1998

price level same was accepted by Advisory Committee of MOWR in its 72nd

meeting on 18012000 subject to theforest clearance from MoEF As such the project

) was not accorded investment clearance from Planning Commission

Now the State Govt has submitted the forest clearance of MoEF along with the

at 2009-10 Price Level same has been finalized as Rs98310 Cr

(2009 -10 PL) with BC Ratio as 113 The State Concurrence has also been

obtained for the finalized cost

2

11e also informed that now land acquisition has completed the project for

execution purpose has been divided into 3 phases out of which most of the works under

phase-I amp II has been completed while the works under Phase-III is yet to started

However contract has already been awarded As such the project would be completed

as per revised time schedule Chairman of the committee Secretary (WR) suggested to

optimize use of water by using micro irrigation system in the command to tlie

maximum possible extent as the project is basically lift irrigation scheme Project

Authority informed that there is already a provision of drip irrigation in some of

command

On a query raised by (WR) Secretary (Irrigation) Govt of Andhra

Pradesh stated that State Govt would adequate provision for the maintenance of

the project

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the condition that

project should be completed by March 2013 and no further costtime overrun will be

considered by this Committee~

2 DURGAWATI RESERVOIR P bull ~t- (REVISEDMAJOR) BIHAR

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Durgawati Project

envisages construction of an earthen dam of length 1830 hl with spillway across the rivet

Durgawati in Bihar The Dam is located near village Karamchat in KaimurDistrict of Bihar

to irrigate an area of 42900 ha annually in drought prone districts of Bhabhua and Rohtas

in Bihar

The Scheme was originally approved by the Planning Commission in May 1975 for

2530 crore State Govt subsequently modifled the cost estimate which was

) examined in CWC and cost of the project was finalized for Rs 2344 crore at 1998

price level same was accepted by Advisory Committee of MOWR in its 72nd

meeting on 18012000 subject to theforest clearance from MoEF As such the project

) was not accorded investment clearance from Planning Commission

Now the State Govt has submitted the forest clearance of MoEF along with the

at 2009-10 Price Level same has been finalized as Rs98310 Cr

(2009 -10 PL) with BC Ratio as 113 The State Concurrence has also been

obtained for the finalized cost

2

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Advisor (Cost) enquired about reason for ovron iture of 15 cr against

the approved cost of 2530 cr State representative replied that State Govt has

incurred such expenditure due advance deposit to Forest Department for undertaking

compensatory afforestation

Dy Advisor Planning Commission advised State Govt to provide sprinkler

irrigation system in some of its command for efficient use of water instead of Flood

irrigation

After brief discussion the committee accepted proposal with the condition that

the project should be completed by March 2012 and no further costtime overrun will be

considered by the Committee

3 BALH VALLEY (LEFT BANK) IRRIGATION PROJECT (REVISED MEDIUM) HIMACHALPRADESH

(PAO) CWC introduced the project The Balh Valley Medium IrrIgation

Project envisagesmiddot of irrigation facilities to villages located in the valley

covering a culturablecommand area hectare The irrigation is to be provided by

tapping water from BBMS Hydel 1middotmiddot Suketi Khad

project was earlier approved by Planning CommissIon in June for Rs

4164 Cr L 1999~2000) Later on cost estimate the project was

accepted by Technical AdviSOry Committee of MqWR in its 8ih Meeting held on

17112006 for Rs6225 Gr Planning Commission subsequently accorded investmentmiddot

clearance to the proposal in March 2007

The State Govt now submitted 2nd Revised Cost Estimate without change in

The cost estimate for project has been finalized as 10378 (2010 PL)

with BC ratio of 1 Finance Concurrence also been obtained for the finalized

cost Advisor (Cost) enquired about reason for delay in execution and substantial

of the cost due to change in design Project authorities informed that distribution

system had changed from open channel to H pressurizedmiddot pipes in a stretch of

1848 km in order to reduce conveyance loss thus resulting in increase in cost apart from

price escalation On a query from Secretary (WR) Project Authorities further informed that

100 irrigation would be provided through sprinkler system and project would

completed by March 2012

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal

3

I I

GUMANI

- MAJOR) JHARKHAND

(PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project The Gumani Barrage project

construction of a across Gumani River tributary of Ganga in

Jharkhand The Barrage is located near the village Petkhasa in Sahibganj District of

Jharkhand Main canal of 3360 km length with a network of distribution system provides

annual irrigation of 16194 ha to benefit drought prone districts of Sahibganj and Pakur

The Project was originally approved by the Planning Commission in January 1976

for Rs 384 crore Subsequently the Advisory Committee of MoWR accepted the project

for revised cost amounting Rs croreat 1996 price level in in its 70th meeting held

on 27011999 subject to certain observations However the project was not accorded

investment clearance by Planning Commission for want of forest clearance from MoEF

Now the State Govt has submitted Forest qf the project along with the Revised

Cost Estimate at 2008-09 price level without change in cost estimate for the

project has finalized 18576 crore (PL-2008-Q9) with ratio of 169

Advisor (Cost) enquired about 9Jiginal and schedule of the project

Project Authorities r~plied that as original schedule the project was to be

completed in 2001 but for want of the forest clearance the project could not be completed

As per the revised schedu the project is to be completed by March 201

Secretary (WR) asked about non-submission of St~te Finance Concurrence The

project authority informed that Govt of Jharkhand has already accorded its administrative

approval to this project for Rs -16259 cr at 2004 price level Now the project has

finalized for Rs 18576 cr at 2008-09 price level Since the increase in cost is less than

20 fresh administrative approvalState Finance Concurrence is not required as per the

Govt of Jharkhand Gazette notification dated 18122001 a copy enclosed at Annex- III

(A) amp (B)

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal

SUBERNAREKHA MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT (REVISED-MAJOR) JHARKHAND

(PAD) CWC briefly introduced the project Subernarekha Multipurpose project

envisages construction of two dams namely Chandil and Ichha and two Barrages namely

Galudih and Kharkai across Subernarekha and Kharkai respectively with an

4

~

I

extensive network of canal system off taking from the headworks of Ichha Chandil I I

Galudih and Kharakai The project will provide irrigation to 1 54802 ha (CCA) with annLtal I

irrigation of 2 36846 ha This will provide irrigation facilitates to East Singhbhum West I Singhbhum and Sarai Kela- Khansawa Districts of Jharkahnd

T~e scheme was originally accepted by TAC during 1982 for an estimated cost of

Rs 48090 Cr which has also been accorded investment clearance from the Planning

Commission Its 1st revised estimate was also accepted by the Advisory committee in its

53rd meeting held on 08121992 for Rs142882 crore subject to certain observations

However the project was not accorded investment clearance by Planning Commission for

want of forest clearance from MoEF and clearance from Ministry of Welfare

2ndThe Govt of Jharkahnd has now submitted revised cost estimate without

change in scope along with Forest clearance for 165555 ha against requirement of

180081 ha and the Ministry of Welfare clearance It has been stated in the letter of the

Forest Department of Jharkhand that the diversion of 145 26 ha of forest land falling in

Dalma wildlife sanctuary wflJbe consid~red after receipt of compliance of various

conditions stipulated by the Standing G~Qirriiltee of Natio~al Board of Wildlife (NBWL) and bull lt ~1tt1

as directed by the Honble Supremecotfft~ The cost estimate for the project has been

finalized as Rs 661374 Cr at 2010 price level with BC ratio of 176 State Finance

Concurrence is also yet to be submitted by the project Authorities

Secretary (WR) observed that out of total forest land of 180082 ha clearance for

diversion of 14526 ha of reserve forest land falling under Dalma Wildlife Sanctuary is

essential for consideration of the project by the Advisory Committee Accordingly he

directed the Principal Secretary (WR) Govt of Jharkhand to expedite the clearance of

NBWL and concurrence of the State Finance Department

After brief discussion Committee deferred the proposal on account of nonshy

submission of following documents

(i) Clearance for diversion of 14526 ha of reserve forest land falling under

Dalma Wildlife Sanctuary and

(ii) State Finance Concurrence

oj

The representatives of the State Government were asked to submit the same

within a month so that the proposal can be considered in the next meeting

5

~

I

extensive network of canal system off taking from the headworks of Ichha Chandil I I

Galudih and Kharakai The project will provide irrigation to 1 54802 ha (CCA) with annLtal I

irrigation of 2 36846 ha This will provide irrigation facilitates to East Singhbhum West I Singhbhum and Sarai Kela- Khansawa Districts of Jharkahnd

T~e scheme was originally accepted by TAC during 1982 for an estimated cost of

Rs 48090 Cr which has also been accorded investment clearance from the Planning

Commission Its 1st revised estimate was also accepted by the Advisory committee in its

53rd meeting held on 08121992 for Rs142882 crore subject to certain observations

However the project was not accorded investment clearance by Planning Commission for

want of forest clearance from MoEF and clearance from Ministry of Welfare

2ndThe Govt of Jharkahnd has now submitted revised cost estimate without

change in scope along with Forest clearance for 165555 ha against requirement of

180081 ha and the Ministry of Welfare clearance It has been stated in the letter of the

Forest Department of Jharkhand that the diversion of 145 26 ha of forest land falling in

Dalma wildlife sanctuary wflJbe consid~red after receipt of compliance of various

conditions stipulated by the Standing G~Qirriiltee of Natio~al Board of Wildlife (NBWL) and bull lt ~1tt1

as directed by the Honble Supremecotfft~ The cost estimate for the project has been

finalized as Rs 661374 Cr at 2010 price level with BC ratio of 176 State Finance

Concurrence is also yet to be submitted by the project Authorities

Secretary (WR) observed that out of total forest land of 180082 ha clearance for

diversion of 14526 ha of reserve forest land falling under Dalma Wildlife Sanctuary is

essential for consideration of the project by the Advisory Committee Accordingly he

directed the Principal Secretary (WR) Govt of Jharkhand to expedite the clearance of

NBWL and concurrence of the State Finance Department

After brief discussion Committee deferred the proposal on account of nonshy

submission of following documents

(i) Clearance for diversion of 14526 ha of reserve forest land falling under

Dalma Wildlife Sanctuary and

(ii) State Finance Concurrence

oj

The representatives of the State Government were asked to submit the same

within a month so that the proposal can be considered in the next meeting

5

6 LOWER WARDHA IRRIGATION PROJECT MAHARASHTRA (REVISED shy

MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Lower Wardha Irrigation

Project envisages construction of a 9464 m long earthen dam across River Wardha a

tributary of Pranhita river in Godavari basin The proposed project is located near Village

Dhanodi Taluka Arvi in district Wardha of Maharashtra is planned to irrigate annually an

area of 63333 ha in Wardha district The project is included in the Honble Prime

Minister Package for agrarian distressed district of Maharashtra

The project was earlier considered by the Advisory committee in its 88th meeting

held on 02032007 and was accepted for Rs 85770 Crore at PL2005-2006 and

accordingly Planning Commi~sr6n accorded investment clearance to the proposal in

February 2008

Now the project aut~rWes have submitted revised proposal by including lift

irrigation components upstream of the ~1t~~JQg reservoir and two barrages downstream of ~ ~~~ ~~-lt ) ~ ~

the existing reservoir namely Pulgaon ~m~Kharda to irrigate additional annual irrigation of I

11678 ha

The Revised project proposal has been examined in CWCother Central Agencies

and the cost of the project has been finalized forRs 2Z324middot1crore at 2008-09 price level

with BC ratio as 155 State Finange Conc~r~enceha~ also been obtained

The Chairman enquiredthat why the revised cost of the project (Rs 223241 Cr) is

so high with respect to its originally approved cost (85770 Cr) in February 2008 The

Project Authorities replied that the main reasons for increase in cost are due to new

provision of Lift component and other two barrages namely Pulgaon and Kharda in

downstream of the dam In addition price escalation of certain items has also resulted in

higher cost of the project Representative from Ministry of Finance enquired that why lift

component and other barrages have been proposed in the revised project The project

authorities replied that by provision of lift and other barrages an additional area of 11678

ha would be brought under irrigation In addition 1080 MCM of drinking water has also

been contemplated for supply from Kharda Barrage Secretary (WR) questioned that

instead of proposing for other additional components in the original Lower Wardha

Project why not the originally approved project could be completed first and separate

6

middotmiddot middot middotmiddot1 t I bull

)

)

)

proJect would framed up for the proposed additional irrigation components The project

authorities replied that the present revised Lower Wardha Project is meant for

augmentation of the original project to provide irrigation benefits to adjacent command

area and to supply water for drinking purpose and Lanco Power Plant The project

authorities also mentioned that the integrated Lower Wardha Project is under Honble

PMs package for distressed districts of Maharashtra The Ratio for the revised

Lower Wardha Project has been worked out to 1 considering the above additional

components Secretary (WR) asked project authorities to submit proper justification

regarding the benefits accrued by the present revised proposal of Lower Wardha Project

against the originally approved project

After detailed discussions the committee deferred the proposal and the project authorities were advised to submit proper justification of increasing the scope of the proJectmiddot

7 KANDI CANAL STAGE-II (REViSED-MAJOR)PUNJAB

(PAO) cwe briefly introduced the project original proposal of Kandi

Canal I was earlier considered Advisory in its 71 51 Meeting held

on 03081999 and was accepted for 12 crore Accorcentingly Planning Commission

accorded investment cl~arance to the proposal on 050420Q2

Subsequently 151 revised Cost Estimate of the project was accepted by the Advisory

Committee in its 95th meeting held in January 2009 for Rs 34662 crore and Investment

Clearance was accorded by the Planning Commission to the revised project on

12042010

The Govt has now submitted Revised Cost Estimate at November 2009

price level without change in SCCtoe The same been examined in CWC Revision in

cost has been necessary mainly due to price escalation and inadequate provision in

the earlier estimate

The cost estimate for the project has been finalized as Rs 54024 crore at

November 2009 price level with BC ratio of 1 State Finance Concurrence has been

submitted by the project authorities

The committee enquired about the reasons behind so much increase in the cost in

a of just 2 years The project authority informed that the cost has been increased

due modifications in thickness of lining in distributaries from 4 to for its safety point

7

j ~

of view in accordance with the decision of Govt of Punjab at a later date and also due to

price escalation

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal subject to the condition

that the project would be completed by March 2012 and no further time and cost overrun

would be accepted by the committee

8 MODERNISATION OF GANG CANAL SYSTEM RAJASTHAN (REVISED MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The original proposal bf

modernization of Gang Canal System was earlier considered by the Advisory committee

73rdin its meeting held on 31052000 and was accepted for Rs 44573 Crore

Accordingly Planning Comrnissionaccorded investment clearance to the proposal on

23092000

The State Goyt n-as now submitted Revised Cost Estimate at price level 2008shy

2009 without change in scoPr The cost of the project has peen finalized for Rs 62142

Crore at 2008-09 PL with BC ratio a~ t1~ Q State Finance Concurrence has also been middot middot r bull

submitted by the projeCt authorities

Secretary (WR) asked why the provision for land co~t in the original estimate was

kept as middot1104 crore wher~as in the present revised estimafe the cos aginst this item has

been shown as 1336 middotIakh The project authorities replied that in the earlier estimate the

higher provision was kept with the anticipation of additional land acquisition for canals

whereas during the execution the additional land was not required

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the conditi9n that

the project should be completed by March 2013 and no further cost and time overrun

would be considered by the Committee )

9 BADAUN IRRIGATION PROJECT (NEW- MAJOR) UTTAR PRADESH

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Badaun Irrigation Project envisages

construction of a 490 m long barrage across river Ramganga (a tributary of Ganga river)

to utilize monsoon discharge by diverting 56 cumec through canal on right side of the

barrage The project is located on Bareilly-Mathura state highway and about 10 km south

of Bareilly city The project would provide irrigation benefits to an area of 37453 ha

annually (CCA-53504 ha) in Badaun and Bareilly districts of Uttar Pradesh

8

09

The Cost Estimate for the project has been finalized as Rs33212 Crore 2008shy

Level with BC ratio of 169 Finance Concurrence has been submitted by

the Project Authorities (Annexure- IV)

It was stated by the Member Secretary that Ganga Wing MoWR has suggested for

monitoring of barrage operation for ensuring no withdrawal during the lean period from 1 st

January to 31 st May in view of the Indo Bangia Desh agreement The projet Authorites

rplied that due to storage in existing Kalagarh reservoir in upstream of the proposed

barrage there would not be sufficient water in the pondage of the barrage

After discussion committee accepted the proposal

10 BANSAGAR CANAL PROJECT UTTAR PRADESH (MAJOR-REVISED)

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Bansagar Canal Project envisages

construction of a lined cClhaltaking off from common feeder which in turn takes off from

Bansagar Dam Bansagar is situated in Madhya Pradesh across river Sone in

Shahdol District and is a joint of Madhya Pradesh Uttar Pradesh and

Bihar under the inter-state agreement aJjjiQI1I~t

1stThe revised estimate of Bansagar Canal Project was considered and

accepted by the Advisory Committee in its 90th meeting held on 26092007 for Rs

205335 crore (including share cost of the dam) at 2006 level and investment

clearance to the same was accOrded by the Planning Commission in April 2008

The Government of Uttar Pradesh has noW submitted 2nd Revised Cost

without change in scope The same been examined in CWC and the cost has been

finalized for Rs 314891 crore at 2008-09 price level including share cost of Rs 45803

crore to be borne by the Govt of Uttar Pradesh towards construction of common

components of Bansagar Dam Project

ratio of the proposal has been worked out to be 111 State Finance

Concurrence has been submitted by the Project Authorities

The committee observed that the cost has been finalized at 2008-09 PL and how

the project will be completed on this finalized cost The project authority informed that

most of the work has been awarded So the project will be completed at this finalized

and no further cost escalation would be allowed

9

)

)

)

proJect would framed up for the proposed additional irrigation components The project

authorities replied that the present revised Lower Wardha Project is meant for

augmentation of the original project to provide irrigation benefits to adjacent command

area and to supply water for drinking purpose and Lanco Power Plant The project

authorities also mentioned that the integrated Lower Wardha Project is under Honble

PMs package for distressed districts of Maharashtra The Ratio for the revised

Lower Wardha Project has been worked out to 1 considering the above additional

components Secretary (WR) asked project authorities to submit proper justification

regarding the benefits accrued by the present revised proposal of Lower Wardha Project

against the originally approved project

After detailed discussions the committee deferred the proposal and the project authorities were advised to submit proper justification of increasing the scope of the proJectmiddot

7 KANDI CANAL STAGE-II (REViSED-MAJOR)PUNJAB

(PAO) cwe briefly introduced the project original proposal of Kandi

Canal I was earlier considered Advisory in its 71 51 Meeting held

on 03081999 and was accepted for 12 crore Accorcentingly Planning Commission

accorded investment cl~arance to the proposal on 050420Q2

Subsequently 151 revised Cost Estimate of the project was accepted by the Advisory

Committee in its 95th meeting held in January 2009 for Rs 34662 crore and Investment

Clearance was accorded by the Planning Commission to the revised project on

12042010

The Govt has now submitted Revised Cost Estimate at November 2009

price level without change in SCCtoe The same been examined in CWC Revision in

cost has been necessary mainly due to price escalation and inadequate provision in

the earlier estimate

The cost estimate for the project has been finalized as Rs 54024 crore at

November 2009 price level with BC ratio of 1 State Finance Concurrence has been

submitted by the project authorities

The committee enquired about the reasons behind so much increase in the cost in

a of just 2 years The project authority informed that the cost has been increased

due modifications in thickness of lining in distributaries from 4 to for its safety point

7

j ~

of view in accordance with the decision of Govt of Punjab at a later date and also due to

price escalation

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal subject to the condition

that the project would be completed by March 2012 and no further time and cost overrun

would be accepted by the committee

8 MODERNISATION OF GANG CANAL SYSTEM RAJASTHAN (REVISED MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The original proposal bf

modernization of Gang Canal System was earlier considered by the Advisory committee

73rdin its meeting held on 31052000 and was accepted for Rs 44573 Crore

Accordingly Planning Comrnissionaccorded investment clearance to the proposal on

23092000

The State Goyt n-as now submitted Revised Cost Estimate at price level 2008shy

2009 without change in scoPr The cost of the project has peen finalized for Rs 62142

Crore at 2008-09 PL with BC ratio a~ t1~ Q State Finance Concurrence has also been middot middot r bull

submitted by the projeCt authorities

Secretary (WR) asked why the provision for land co~t in the original estimate was

kept as middot1104 crore wher~as in the present revised estimafe the cos aginst this item has

been shown as 1336 middotIakh The project authorities replied that in the earlier estimate the

higher provision was kept with the anticipation of additional land acquisition for canals

whereas during the execution the additional land was not required

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the conditi9n that

the project should be completed by March 2013 and no further cost and time overrun

would be considered by the Committee )

9 BADAUN IRRIGATION PROJECT (NEW- MAJOR) UTTAR PRADESH

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Badaun Irrigation Project envisages

construction of a 490 m long barrage across river Ramganga (a tributary of Ganga river)

to utilize monsoon discharge by diverting 56 cumec through canal on right side of the

barrage The project is located on Bareilly-Mathura state highway and about 10 km south

of Bareilly city The project would provide irrigation benefits to an area of 37453 ha

annually (CCA-53504 ha) in Badaun and Bareilly districts of Uttar Pradesh

8

09

The Cost Estimate for the project has been finalized as Rs33212 Crore 2008shy

Level with BC ratio of 169 Finance Concurrence has been submitted by

the Project Authorities (Annexure- IV)

It was stated by the Member Secretary that Ganga Wing MoWR has suggested for

monitoring of barrage operation for ensuring no withdrawal during the lean period from 1 st

January to 31 st May in view of the Indo Bangia Desh agreement The projet Authorites

rplied that due to storage in existing Kalagarh reservoir in upstream of the proposed

barrage there would not be sufficient water in the pondage of the barrage

After discussion committee accepted the proposal

10 BANSAGAR CANAL PROJECT UTTAR PRADESH (MAJOR-REVISED)

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Bansagar Canal Project envisages

construction of a lined cClhaltaking off from common feeder which in turn takes off from

Bansagar Dam Bansagar is situated in Madhya Pradesh across river Sone in

Shahdol District and is a joint of Madhya Pradesh Uttar Pradesh and

Bihar under the inter-state agreement aJjjiQI1I~t

1stThe revised estimate of Bansagar Canal Project was considered and

accepted by the Advisory Committee in its 90th meeting held on 26092007 for Rs

205335 crore (including share cost of the dam) at 2006 level and investment

clearance to the same was accOrded by the Planning Commission in April 2008

The Government of Uttar Pradesh has noW submitted 2nd Revised Cost

without change in scope The same been examined in CWC and the cost has been

finalized for Rs 314891 crore at 2008-09 price level including share cost of Rs 45803

crore to be borne by the Govt of Uttar Pradesh towards construction of common

components of Bansagar Dam Project

ratio of the proposal has been worked out to be 111 State Finance

Concurrence has been submitted by the Project Authorities

The committee observed that the cost has been finalized at 2008-09 PL and how

the project will be completed on this finalized cost The project authority informed that

most of the work has been awarded So the project will be completed at this finalized

and no further cost escalation would be allowed

9

j ~

of view in accordance with the decision of Govt of Punjab at a later date and also due to

price escalation

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal subject to the condition

that the project would be completed by March 2012 and no further time and cost overrun

would be accepted by the committee

8 MODERNISATION OF GANG CANAL SYSTEM RAJASTHAN (REVISED MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The original proposal bf

modernization of Gang Canal System was earlier considered by the Advisory committee

73rdin its meeting held on 31052000 and was accepted for Rs 44573 Crore

Accordingly Planning Comrnissionaccorded investment clearance to the proposal on

23092000

The State Goyt n-as now submitted Revised Cost Estimate at price level 2008shy

2009 without change in scoPr The cost of the project has peen finalized for Rs 62142

Crore at 2008-09 PL with BC ratio a~ t1~ Q State Finance Concurrence has also been middot middot r bull

submitted by the projeCt authorities

Secretary (WR) asked why the provision for land co~t in the original estimate was

kept as middot1104 crore wher~as in the present revised estimafe the cos aginst this item has

been shown as 1336 middotIakh The project authorities replied that in the earlier estimate the

higher provision was kept with the anticipation of additional land acquisition for canals

whereas during the execution the additional land was not required

After brief discussion the Committee accepted the proposal with the conditi9n that

the project should be completed by March 2013 and no further cost and time overrun

would be considered by the Committee )

9 BADAUN IRRIGATION PROJECT (NEW- MAJOR) UTTAR PRADESH

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Badaun Irrigation Project envisages

construction of a 490 m long barrage across river Ramganga (a tributary of Ganga river)

to utilize monsoon discharge by diverting 56 cumec through canal on right side of the

barrage The project is located on Bareilly-Mathura state highway and about 10 km south

of Bareilly city The project would provide irrigation benefits to an area of 37453 ha

annually (CCA-53504 ha) in Badaun and Bareilly districts of Uttar Pradesh

8

09

The Cost Estimate for the project has been finalized as Rs33212 Crore 2008shy

Level with BC ratio of 169 Finance Concurrence has been submitted by

the Project Authorities (Annexure- IV)

It was stated by the Member Secretary that Ganga Wing MoWR has suggested for

monitoring of barrage operation for ensuring no withdrawal during the lean period from 1 st

January to 31 st May in view of the Indo Bangia Desh agreement The projet Authorites

rplied that due to storage in existing Kalagarh reservoir in upstream of the proposed

barrage there would not be sufficient water in the pondage of the barrage

After discussion committee accepted the proposal

10 BANSAGAR CANAL PROJECT UTTAR PRADESH (MAJOR-REVISED)

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Bansagar Canal Project envisages

construction of a lined cClhaltaking off from common feeder which in turn takes off from

Bansagar Dam Bansagar is situated in Madhya Pradesh across river Sone in

Shahdol District and is a joint of Madhya Pradesh Uttar Pradesh and

Bihar under the inter-state agreement aJjjiQI1I~t

1stThe revised estimate of Bansagar Canal Project was considered and

accepted by the Advisory Committee in its 90th meeting held on 26092007 for Rs

205335 crore (including share cost of the dam) at 2006 level and investment

clearance to the same was accOrded by the Planning Commission in April 2008

The Government of Uttar Pradesh has noW submitted 2nd Revised Cost

without change in scope The same been examined in CWC and the cost has been

finalized for Rs 314891 crore at 2008-09 price level including share cost of Rs 45803

crore to be borne by the Govt of Uttar Pradesh towards construction of common

components of Bansagar Dam Project

ratio of the proposal has been worked out to be 111 State Finance

Concurrence has been submitted by the Project Authorities

The committee observed that the cost has been finalized at 2008-09 PL and how

the project will be completed on this finalized cost The project authority informed that

most of the work has been awarded So the project will be completed at this finalized

and no further cost escalation would be allowed

9

09

The Cost Estimate for the project has been finalized as Rs33212 Crore 2008shy

Level with BC ratio of 169 Finance Concurrence has been submitted by

the Project Authorities (Annexure- IV)

It was stated by the Member Secretary that Ganga Wing MoWR has suggested for

monitoring of barrage operation for ensuring no withdrawal during the lean period from 1 st

January to 31 st May in view of the Indo Bangia Desh agreement The projet Authorites

rplied that due to storage in existing Kalagarh reservoir in upstream of the proposed

barrage there would not be sufficient water in the pondage of the barrage

After discussion committee accepted the proposal

10 BANSAGAR CANAL PROJECT UTTAR PRADESH (MAJOR-REVISED)

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Bansagar Canal Project envisages

construction of a lined cClhaltaking off from common feeder which in turn takes off from

Bansagar Dam Bansagar is situated in Madhya Pradesh across river Sone in

Shahdol District and is a joint of Madhya Pradesh Uttar Pradesh and

Bihar under the inter-state agreement aJjjiQI1I~t

1stThe revised estimate of Bansagar Canal Project was considered and

accepted by the Advisory Committee in its 90th meeting held on 26092007 for Rs

205335 crore (including share cost of the dam) at 2006 level and investment

clearance to the same was accOrded by the Planning Commission in April 2008

The Government of Uttar Pradesh has noW submitted 2nd Revised Cost

without change in scope The same been examined in CWC and the cost has been

finalized for Rs 314891 crore at 2008-09 price level including share cost of Rs 45803

crore to be borne by the Govt of Uttar Pradesh towards construction of common

components of Bansagar Dam Project

ratio of the proposal has been worked out to be 111 State Finance

Concurrence has been submitted by the Project Authorities

The committee observed that the cost has been finalized at 2008-09 PL and how

the project will be completed on this finalized cost The project authority informed that

most of the work has been awarded So the project will be completed at this finalized

and no further cost escalation would be allowed

9

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal subject to the condition

that the project would be completed by March 2013 at the finalized cost and further time

and cost overrun would not be considered by the committee

11 KANHAR IRRIGATION PROJECT (NEW -MAJOR) UTTAR PRADESH

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Kanhar Irrigation Project

envisages construction of a 3003 km long earthen dam across river Kanhar a tributary of

river Sone The project is proposed to provide irrigation benefits to an area of 27898 ha

(CCA-26075 ha) annualiy to the Dudhi and Robertsganj Tehsils bf Sonebhadra District

which falls in the drought prone area ()fUJt~r Pradesh

The Cost Estimate for the project has been finalized as Rs 65259 crore at 2008shy

09Price Level with BC ratio of 117 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by

the Project Authorities (AnnexureV)

Ganga Wing MoWR h~sinformed vide their letter No 7J17J2008-GangaJ 5511-13

dated 15th September 2010 that TAC ~ 9f Kanhar Irrigation Project does not have any J ~) ~~ t middot

information about international aspecr~ ~middot prbject The prqJect authorities informed that

Kanhar Project ha~ been taken up for utilizing 015 MAFof Kanhar water out of total

16thallocation of 025 MAF to Uttar Pradesh as per Bansag~r Agreement (reached on

September 1973 prior to Ineto-Bangladesh treatyon sharing of Gaga water)

After brief discussion thecoO)rnittee accepted the proposal ~~

12 RESTORING CAPACITY OF WESTERN GANDAK CANAL SYSTEM UTTAR PRADESH (NEW-ERM -MAJOR-)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Western Gandak Canal project

(UP portion) was originally approved by Planning Commission in the year 1960 for an

estimated cost of Rs 5039 crore The work on this project was started in the year 1961

and completed in the year 1994 Later on the revised estimate of the project was

considered in the 5yth meeting of TAC held on 27011994 for Rs 15438 crore However

Planning Commission did not accord investment clearance to revised cost of the project

The Govt of Uttar Pradesh has now submitted the ERM proposal of the existing

project to restore the designed discharge of the main canal branch canal as well as I I distributaries which is reduced substantially due to accumulation of silt The present

10

proposal will restore the irrigation potential of 178 lakh ha in order to utilize full designed

irrigation potential of lakh ha which would nefit Gorakhpur Maharajganj

Kushinagar and Deoria Districts of Uttar Pradesh

The cost estimate for the project has been finalized as 21712 Cr at 2009 -10 price

with BC ratio of 404 Finance Concurrence has also been submitted by the

state government

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal

13 RAISING AND STRENGTHENING OF TRIBUTARY DYKE ALONG BOTH BANKS OF KOPILLI RIVER FROM CHARAIHAGI TO TUKLAIUP (LIB) BASUNDHARI TO KILLING KOPILLI JUNCTION (LIB) AND CHAPARMUKH TO AHOTGURI AMSOI PWD ROAD (RiB) INCLUDING ANTI EROSION MEASURES AT DIFFERENT REACHES

(PAO) CWC bri~fly introduced the project proposed scheme envisages

raising and strengthening of embankments dyke and cohptruction of launching apron to

prevent floods and erosiohboth Nagaon and Morigaoh districts of Assam wiIJ

benefit around 26000 ha of homesteaq land including thickly populated

villages other public and private a population 350000

The project been examined in eWCother Central Agencies and the cost

estimate for the Scheme has been finalized Rs 11 at 2009-10 price level

with BC ratio of 218 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the project

authorities (Annexure-VI)

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal

14 ASSAM INTEGRATED FLOOD RIVER BANK EROSION RISK MANAGEMENTmiddot PROJECT - DIBRUGARH SUB PROJECT

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposed sub project

envisages raising and strengthening of Dibrugarh Town Protection (DTP) dyke and

construction of launching apron to prevent floods and erosion in affected the

Dibrugarh District will benefit around 4 ha of cultivated homestead land

) including thickly populated villages other public and private properties and a population of

150000

The project has been examined in CWCother Central and the

11

estimate for the Scheme has been finalized at 6133 Crore at 2009-10 with BC

ratio of 227 Finance Concurrence has submitted by the project authorities

(Annexure-VII)

After brief discussion the committee accepted proposal

15 ASSAM INTEGRATED FLOOD RIVERBANK EROSION RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT - PALASBARI SUB PROJECT

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposed project envisages

construction of revetment at Paiasbari Gumi and Raising and Strengthening of

embankment at Palasbari The main objective of this scheme is to protect 621 ha area

of land comprising cultivable homestead fallow land schools and institutes market

complexes and road communication with benefits to a population of 500000

The project has examined in CWCother Central Agencies and the cost

estimate for Scheme has been finalized Rs 1 at 2009-1 degprice level

with BC ratio of 335 Concurrence has submitted by the project

authorities (Annexure-VII)

After brief discussion the accepted the proRosal

16 SCHEME FOR ~LOOD PROTECTION WORKS ALONG AND RIGHT BANK OF RIVER RAPTI IN DISTRICT SIDDHARTHNAGAR SANT KABIR NAGARGORAKHPUR amp DEORIA UP

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposed flood protection

scheme envisages anti-erosion works Bunds along left and right banks of river Rapt

10 locations to protect important cities villages and culturable land in Siddharthnagar

SanLKabir Nagar Gorakhpur and Deoria districts of UP severe erosion and water

logging had been taken place

The project hasmiddot been examined in CWCother Central Agencies and the cost

estimate for Scheme has been finalized at Rs Crore 2009-10 Price Level

with BC ratio of 364 State Finance Concurrence has not been submitted by the project

authorities

Since State Finance Concurrence not furnished after brief discussion the

committee the proposal

12

17) Maniyari Tank Project (Major ERMqNew) Chhattisgarh

Chief PAO briefly introd the project and intimated that the proposal

at an estimated cost of Rs 15995 was considered in the 105th TAC Meeting held on

25062010 and deferred due to non-submission of Finance Concurrence State

Finance Concurrence now been submitted by the project authorities for Rs 15995

vide letter No 3AIBP12004-Bilaspur dated 2172010 (Annexure-VIII)

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal

III) It was brought to the notice of all members that the Guidelines for Submission

Appraisal and Clearance of Irrigation and MultipurposeProjects has been revised withthe

approval of the Secretary (WR) Chairmaoof the Advisory Committee and issued to all the

State Governments on 31 st August O

IV) Chairman observe~that current average cost of on farm development of command

area is Rs20OOOr heqtare which should be considered (if not already taken in

estimate) while computing the BC project This should be revised from time

to time as cost per hectare Command Area Development and Water

Management Programme is revised

Meeting ended with vote of thanks to the chair

)

)

)

13

proposal will restore the irrigation potential of 178 lakh ha in order to utilize full designed

irrigation potential of lakh ha which would nefit Gorakhpur Maharajganj

Kushinagar and Deoria Districts of Uttar Pradesh

The cost estimate for the project has been finalized as 21712 Cr at 2009 -10 price

with BC ratio of 404 Finance Concurrence has also been submitted by the

state government

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal

13 RAISING AND STRENGTHENING OF TRIBUTARY DYKE ALONG BOTH BANKS OF KOPILLI RIVER FROM CHARAIHAGI TO TUKLAIUP (LIB) BASUNDHARI TO KILLING KOPILLI JUNCTION (LIB) AND CHAPARMUKH TO AHOTGURI AMSOI PWD ROAD (RiB) INCLUDING ANTI EROSION MEASURES AT DIFFERENT REACHES

(PAO) CWC bri~fly introduced the project proposed scheme envisages

raising and strengthening of embankments dyke and cohptruction of launching apron to

prevent floods and erosiohboth Nagaon and Morigaoh districts of Assam wiIJ

benefit around 26000 ha of homesteaq land including thickly populated

villages other public and private a population 350000

The project been examined in eWCother Central Agencies and the cost

estimate for the Scheme has been finalized Rs 11 at 2009-10 price level

with BC ratio of 218 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the project

authorities (Annexure-VI)

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal

14 ASSAM INTEGRATED FLOOD RIVER BANK EROSION RISK MANAGEMENTmiddot PROJECT - DIBRUGARH SUB PROJECT

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project proposed sub project

envisages raising and strengthening of Dibrugarh Town Protection (DTP) dyke and

construction of launching apron to prevent floods and erosion in affected the

Dibrugarh District will benefit around 4 ha of cultivated homestead land

) including thickly populated villages other public and private properties and a population of

150000

The project has been examined in CWCother Central and the

11

estimate for the Scheme has been finalized at 6133 Crore at 2009-10 with BC

ratio of 227 Finance Concurrence has submitted by the project authorities

(Annexure-VII)

After brief discussion the committee accepted proposal

15 ASSAM INTEGRATED FLOOD RIVERBANK EROSION RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT - PALASBARI SUB PROJECT

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposed project envisages

construction of revetment at Paiasbari Gumi and Raising and Strengthening of

embankment at Palasbari The main objective of this scheme is to protect 621 ha area

of land comprising cultivable homestead fallow land schools and institutes market

complexes and road communication with benefits to a population of 500000

The project has examined in CWCother Central Agencies and the cost

estimate for Scheme has been finalized Rs 1 at 2009-1 degprice level

with BC ratio of 335 Concurrence has submitted by the project

authorities (Annexure-VII)

After brief discussion the accepted the proRosal

16 SCHEME FOR ~LOOD PROTECTION WORKS ALONG AND RIGHT BANK OF RIVER RAPTI IN DISTRICT SIDDHARTHNAGAR SANT KABIR NAGARGORAKHPUR amp DEORIA UP

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposed flood protection

scheme envisages anti-erosion works Bunds along left and right banks of river Rapt

10 locations to protect important cities villages and culturable land in Siddharthnagar

SanLKabir Nagar Gorakhpur and Deoria districts of UP severe erosion and water

logging had been taken place

The project hasmiddot been examined in CWCother Central Agencies and the cost

estimate for Scheme has been finalized at Rs Crore 2009-10 Price Level

with BC ratio of 364 State Finance Concurrence has not been submitted by the project

authorities

Since State Finance Concurrence not furnished after brief discussion the

committee the proposal

12

17) Maniyari Tank Project (Major ERMqNew) Chhattisgarh

Chief PAO briefly introd the project and intimated that the proposal

at an estimated cost of Rs 15995 was considered in the 105th TAC Meeting held on

25062010 and deferred due to non-submission of Finance Concurrence State

Finance Concurrence now been submitted by the project authorities for Rs 15995

vide letter No 3AIBP12004-Bilaspur dated 2172010 (Annexure-VIII)

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal

III) It was brought to the notice of all members that the Guidelines for Submission

Appraisal and Clearance of Irrigation and MultipurposeProjects has been revised withthe

approval of the Secretary (WR) Chairmaoof the Advisory Committee and issued to all the

State Governments on 31 st August O

IV) Chairman observe~that current average cost of on farm development of command

area is Rs20OOOr heqtare which should be considered (if not already taken in

estimate) while computing the BC project This should be revised from time

to time as cost per hectare Command Area Development and Water

Management Programme is revised

Meeting ended with vote of thanks to the chair

)

)

)

13

estimate for the Scheme has been finalized at 6133 Crore at 2009-10 with BC

ratio of 227 Finance Concurrence has submitted by the project authorities

(Annexure-VII)

After brief discussion the committee accepted proposal

15 ASSAM INTEGRATED FLOOD RIVERBANK EROSION RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT - PALASBARI SUB PROJECT

(PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposed project envisages

construction of revetment at Paiasbari Gumi and Raising and Strengthening of

embankment at Palasbari The main objective of this scheme is to protect 621 ha area

of land comprising cultivable homestead fallow land schools and institutes market

complexes and road communication with benefits to a population of 500000

The project has examined in CWCother Central Agencies and the cost

estimate for Scheme has been finalized Rs 1 at 2009-1 degprice level

with BC ratio of 335 Concurrence has submitted by the project

authorities (Annexure-VII)

After brief discussion the accepted the proRosal

16 SCHEME FOR ~LOOD PROTECTION WORKS ALONG AND RIGHT BANK OF RIVER RAPTI IN DISTRICT SIDDHARTHNAGAR SANT KABIR NAGARGORAKHPUR amp DEORIA UP

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposed flood protection

scheme envisages anti-erosion works Bunds along left and right banks of river Rapt

10 locations to protect important cities villages and culturable land in Siddharthnagar

SanLKabir Nagar Gorakhpur and Deoria districts of UP severe erosion and water

logging had been taken place

The project hasmiddot been examined in CWCother Central Agencies and the cost

estimate for Scheme has been finalized at Rs Crore 2009-10 Price Level

with BC ratio of 364 State Finance Concurrence has not been submitted by the project

authorities

Since State Finance Concurrence not furnished after brief discussion the

committee the proposal

12

17) Maniyari Tank Project (Major ERMqNew) Chhattisgarh

Chief PAO briefly introd the project and intimated that the proposal

at an estimated cost of Rs 15995 was considered in the 105th TAC Meeting held on

25062010 and deferred due to non-submission of Finance Concurrence State

Finance Concurrence now been submitted by the project authorities for Rs 15995

vide letter No 3AIBP12004-Bilaspur dated 2172010 (Annexure-VIII)

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal

III) It was brought to the notice of all members that the Guidelines for Submission

Appraisal and Clearance of Irrigation and MultipurposeProjects has been revised withthe

approval of the Secretary (WR) Chairmaoof the Advisory Committee and issued to all the

State Governments on 31 st August O

IV) Chairman observe~that current average cost of on farm development of command

area is Rs20OOOr heqtare which should be considered (if not already taken in

estimate) while computing the BC project This should be revised from time

to time as cost per hectare Command Area Development and Water

Management Programme is revised

Meeting ended with vote of thanks to the chair

)

)

)

13

17) Maniyari Tank Project (Major ERMqNew) Chhattisgarh

Chief PAO briefly introd the project and intimated that the proposal

at an estimated cost of Rs 15995 was considered in the 105th TAC Meeting held on

25062010 and deferred due to non-submission of Finance Concurrence State

Finance Concurrence now been submitted by the project authorities for Rs 15995

vide letter No 3AIBP12004-Bilaspur dated 2172010 (Annexure-VIII)

After brief discussion the committee accepted the proposal

III) It was brought to the notice of all members that the Guidelines for Submission

Appraisal and Clearance of Irrigation and MultipurposeProjects has been revised withthe

approval of the Secretary (WR) Chairmaoof the Advisory Committee and issued to all the

State Governments on 31 st August O

IV) Chairman observe~that current average cost of on farm development of command

area is Rs20OOOr heqtare which should be considered (if not already taken in

estimate) while computing the BC project This should be revised from time

to time as cost per hectare Command Area Development and Water

Management Programme is revised

Meeting ended with vote of thanks to the chair

)

)

)

13

Annexure-I

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Members of the Committee

SI Shri 1 U N Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair

2 A K Bajaj Chairman CWC New Delhi Member

3 P K Aggarwal Advisor (Cost) (Representing Secretary Member (Expenditure) Ministry of Finance)

4 S KThakur Director (Finance) (Representing Financial Advisor Member Ministry of Water Resources)

5 Avinash Mishra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Member Planning Commission)

6 S Das Deputy Secretary (Representing Ministry of Tribal Affairs) Member

7 C M Pandey Additional Commissioner (Representing Ministry of Member Agriculture)

8 J S Bawa DirectorCEA (Representing Ministry of Power and Member Central ElectriCity Authority)

9 S K Srivastava Chief Engineer PAO CWC New-Delhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees

a) Ministry of water Resources SShri - 10 S P Kakran Commissioner (Ganga) MaWR

11 V K Nagpure Sr Joint Commissioner MOWR )

b) Central Water Gommission

J SI Shri

0) 12 R C Jha Member (WPampP)amp Member (RM) ewc New Delhi

13 A K Ganju Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi and Chairman GFCC Patna ) 14 OP Khanda Chief Engineer YBO CWC New Delhi

J 15 Rajesh KumarChief Engineer FMOCWC New Delhi

16 KN Keshri Chief Engineer LGBOCWC Patna

) - 17 VN Wakpanjar Chief Engineer KGBO CWC Hyderabad

18 MK Sinha Chief Engineer PMO CWC New Delhi ) 19 YK Sharma Chief Engineer lBO CWC Chandigarh

J 20 GThakur Director CA(I) CWC New Delhi

J 21 Ajay Kumar Director PA (N) CWC New Delhi

) 22 PC Jha Director PA (C) CWC New Delhi

23 RK Kanodia Director PA (S) CWC New Delhi J

14

J

Deepak Kumar DirectorFM-II CWC New Delhi

25 M W Paunikar DD PA(N) CWC New Delhi

26 Sudhir Kumar DD PA(S) CWC NewDelhi

27 Bashishtha Rai DD PA(C) CWC New Delhi

28 Sureshwar Singh Bonal DD CA(I) CWC New Delhi

Piyush Kumar DD FM-II CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC

30 SMasood Husain Member (Planning) Patna

d) State Government officers

Sf Shri

Andhra Pradesh

31 Aditya Nath Das Secretary Irrigation Govtof AnqhraPradesh Hyderabad

32 N Reddy (lrr i ) Govtof Andhra Hyderabad

33 KRamakrishna Govtof Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad

34 Y Mahadev Warangal

Assam

Jnhin Chakaraborthy Chief Engineer WR Deptt Govt of Assam Guwahati

Bihar

36 Devi Rajak Engineer-in-Chief WRD Govtof Bihar Pafna

37 OPAmbarker Chief WRD Govtof Bihar Patna

38 MK Das WRD Govtof Bihar

Himachal Pradesh )

39 RKSharma IPH Deptt Govt of Himachal rnco

Jharkhand

40 Poddar Principal WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

41 RM RavidasEngineer-in-Chief WRD Govt of Iharkhand Ranchi

42 BMKumar Chief WRD Govt of Jharkhand Jamshedpur )

43 GRam Chief Engineer WRD Govt of Jharkhand Jamshedpur

44 RSTigga Chief Engineer WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi ) 45 BKSingh WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

) 46 BC Mandai WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

)

15

Maharashtra 47 Pati SecretaryWR Govt of Maharashtra Mumbai

48 SNHuddar Advisor Govt Maharashtra Pune

49 H Y Kolawale Director VIDC Nagpur

50 NBGhuge Chief Engineer Gosikhurd Nagpur

Punjab

51 Hussan Lal of Punjab Chandigarh

52 Varinder Kumar Kandi Canal Govt of Punjab Hoshiarpur

Rajasthan

SCMaharshi WRD Govtof Rajasthan Jaipur

MR Dood Ganganagar

Uttar Pradesh

Suresh Tiwari C (DampP) Irrigation Department Lucknow

A K Ojha CE IampP UP lrrigation Luoknow

57 SV Singh Irrigation Department Lucknow

58 AP Aggarwal Irrigation Department LUcknow

59 Sandeep KumarSEIrrigation Department Lucknow

LR Adlakha

61 Irrigation

SNKanntia Irrigation Depadhlent Mirzapur

63 Ram SE Irrigation Department Gorakhpur

64 Vishwanath Shukla EE Irrigation Kusllinagar

)

)

)

j

16

middot i 1hmiddotpmiddot bull (-middot A ~N ~XUFZ~- IT J Cl1o~kJ RoO Devadula lin IrrigCltioh Scheme Grounding of works with 5tltlte Funds Re-vISed

ctpprovClI - PJrtlal Modification - Orders Issued

IRRIGATION amp CAD (PWMAJIRRIVl) DEPARTMENT

Patedjlij-Q9-ZQlQ ~

CO RtNo599 Irrigutionamp CAl) (PWMajIrTNl) DepClrtment dt 14middot092010

In portial modification of the orders Issued in the GO read abo~ the following

wn~truction programme for execution of GLIS Is approved for the revised project cost of [h94273 Crates The works shall be executed with funds of State Government initinlly and by

(Jbt1ining Cmtrul Assistanceexternal funds after obtaining necessary clearances

- _-- shyYx~)~i~rf~lPto fJJ1amlal Year 2qO~-10 rxpenditure for nnancial Year 201(-1l Expenditure for FinallcialYear 2011-12

[xpetlditure for FlnJIKial Year 2012-13 --_shy1T_olill_ - - - - -

378302 Crores 317993 emres --1 i92405 Crores -

54013 C~o~es 94n73 Crote~

The order issues With the concurrtJceof Finance (WampR) Depi)ftment vida thelt IJONo1G30r4(1)lOmiddotOl dt 16-09-201O -

~

J nle Chief EnglneerGLlSiha take further necessary action a-tcordlrigJy - ~ 1- bull

BY ORDER ANQll NTAE NAME OF rHE -G(jVERNOR OF ANDH~PRADESH

ADm~ tiAlrH DAS SEtittrARY tcfGOVERNMe-NT

1u tf~

Ihe Chief Lngincer t~

Godavari ( ift Irrlgatlon Scheme ~

yenCroluny Chlnlagattu W(1(lngal

)

Copy to ) [he finance (WampP) Department

f~jC

IFORWARDED BY ORDERI)

)

)

j

) l d 88pound28Lpound2 Ql lLI72Sbpound201716

)

Deepak Kumar DirectorFM-II CWC New Delhi

25 M W Paunikar DD PA(N) CWC New Delhi

26 Sudhir Kumar DD PA(S) CWC NewDelhi

27 Bashishtha Rai DD PA(C) CWC New Delhi

28 Sureshwar Singh Bonal DD CA(I) CWC New Delhi

Piyush Kumar DD FM-II CWC New Delhi

c) GFCC

30 SMasood Husain Member (Planning) Patna

d) State Government officers

Sf Shri

Andhra Pradesh

31 Aditya Nath Das Secretary Irrigation Govtof AnqhraPradesh Hyderabad

32 N Reddy (lrr i ) Govtof Andhra Hyderabad

33 KRamakrishna Govtof Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad

34 Y Mahadev Warangal

Assam

Jnhin Chakaraborthy Chief Engineer WR Deptt Govt of Assam Guwahati

Bihar

36 Devi Rajak Engineer-in-Chief WRD Govtof Bihar Pafna

37 OPAmbarker Chief WRD Govtof Bihar Patna

38 MK Das WRD Govtof Bihar

Himachal Pradesh )

39 RKSharma IPH Deptt Govt of Himachal rnco

Jharkhand

40 Poddar Principal WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

41 RM RavidasEngineer-in-Chief WRD Govt of Iharkhand Ranchi

42 BMKumar Chief WRD Govt of Jharkhand Jamshedpur )

43 GRam Chief Engineer WRD Govt of Jharkhand Jamshedpur

44 RSTigga Chief Engineer WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi ) 45 BKSingh WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

) 46 BC Mandai WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

)

15

Maharashtra 47 Pati SecretaryWR Govt of Maharashtra Mumbai

48 SNHuddar Advisor Govt Maharashtra Pune

49 H Y Kolawale Director VIDC Nagpur

50 NBGhuge Chief Engineer Gosikhurd Nagpur

Punjab

51 Hussan Lal of Punjab Chandigarh

52 Varinder Kumar Kandi Canal Govt of Punjab Hoshiarpur

Rajasthan

SCMaharshi WRD Govtof Rajasthan Jaipur

MR Dood Ganganagar

Uttar Pradesh

Suresh Tiwari C (DampP) Irrigation Department Lucknow

A K Ojha CE IampP UP lrrigation Luoknow

57 SV Singh Irrigation Department Lucknow

58 AP Aggarwal Irrigation Department LUcknow

59 Sandeep KumarSEIrrigation Department Lucknow

LR Adlakha

61 Irrigation

SNKanntia Irrigation Depadhlent Mirzapur

63 Ram SE Irrigation Department Gorakhpur

64 Vishwanath Shukla EE Irrigation Kusllinagar

)

)

)

j

16

middot i 1hmiddotpmiddot bull (-middot A ~N ~XUFZ~- IT J Cl1o~kJ RoO Devadula lin IrrigCltioh Scheme Grounding of works with 5tltlte Funds Re-vISed

ctpprovClI - PJrtlal Modification - Orders Issued

IRRIGATION amp CAD (PWMAJIRRIVl) DEPARTMENT

Patedjlij-Q9-ZQlQ ~

CO RtNo599 Irrigutionamp CAl) (PWMajIrTNl) DepClrtment dt 14middot092010

In portial modification of the orders Issued in the GO read abo~ the following

wn~truction programme for execution of GLIS Is approved for the revised project cost of [h94273 Crates The works shall be executed with funds of State Government initinlly and by

(Jbt1ining Cmtrul Assistanceexternal funds after obtaining necessary clearances

- _-- shyYx~)~i~rf~lPto fJJ1amlal Year 2qO~-10 rxpenditure for nnancial Year 201(-1l Expenditure for FinallcialYear 2011-12

[xpetlditure for FlnJIKial Year 2012-13 --_shy1T_olill_ - - - - -

378302 Crores 317993 emres --1 i92405 Crores -

54013 C~o~es 94n73 Crote~

The order issues With the concurrtJceof Finance (WampR) Depi)ftment vida thelt IJONo1G30r4(1)lOmiddotOl dt 16-09-201O -

~

J nle Chief EnglneerGLlSiha take further necessary action a-tcordlrigJy - ~ 1- bull

BY ORDER ANQll NTAE NAME OF rHE -G(jVERNOR OF ANDH~PRADESH

ADm~ tiAlrH DAS SEtittrARY tcfGOVERNMe-NT

1u tf~

Ihe Chief Lngincer t~

Godavari ( ift Irrlgatlon Scheme ~

yenCroluny Chlnlagattu W(1(lngal

)

Copy to ) [he finance (WampP) Department

f~jC

IFORWARDED BY ORDERI)

)

)

j

) l d 88pound28Lpound2 Ql lLI72Sbpound201716

)

Maharashtra 47 Pati SecretaryWR Govt of Maharashtra Mumbai

48 SNHuddar Advisor Govt Maharashtra Pune

49 H Y Kolawale Director VIDC Nagpur

50 NBGhuge Chief Engineer Gosikhurd Nagpur

Punjab

51 Hussan Lal of Punjab Chandigarh

52 Varinder Kumar Kandi Canal Govt of Punjab Hoshiarpur

Rajasthan

SCMaharshi WRD Govtof Rajasthan Jaipur

MR Dood Ganganagar

Uttar Pradesh

Suresh Tiwari C (DampP) Irrigation Department Lucknow

A K Ojha CE IampP UP lrrigation Luoknow

57 SV Singh Irrigation Department Lucknow

58 AP Aggarwal Irrigation Department LUcknow

59 Sandeep KumarSEIrrigation Department Lucknow

LR Adlakha

61 Irrigation

SNKanntia Irrigation Depadhlent Mirzapur

63 Ram SE Irrigation Department Gorakhpur

64 Vishwanath Shukla EE Irrigation Kusllinagar

)

)

)

j

16

middot i 1hmiddotpmiddot bull (-middot A ~N ~XUFZ~- IT J Cl1o~kJ RoO Devadula lin IrrigCltioh Scheme Grounding of works with 5tltlte Funds Re-vISed

ctpprovClI - PJrtlal Modification - Orders Issued

IRRIGATION amp CAD (PWMAJIRRIVl) DEPARTMENT

Patedjlij-Q9-ZQlQ ~

CO RtNo599 Irrigutionamp CAl) (PWMajIrTNl) DepClrtment dt 14middot092010

In portial modification of the orders Issued in the GO read abo~ the following

wn~truction programme for execution of GLIS Is approved for the revised project cost of [h94273 Crates The works shall be executed with funds of State Government initinlly and by

(Jbt1ining Cmtrul Assistanceexternal funds after obtaining necessary clearances

- _-- shyYx~)~i~rf~lPto fJJ1amlal Year 2qO~-10 rxpenditure for nnancial Year 201(-1l Expenditure for FinallcialYear 2011-12

[xpetlditure for FlnJIKial Year 2012-13 --_shy1T_olill_ - - - - -

378302 Crores 317993 emres --1 i92405 Crores -

54013 C~o~es 94n73 Crote~

The order issues With the concurrtJceof Finance (WampR) Depi)ftment vida thelt IJONo1G30r4(1)lOmiddotOl dt 16-09-201O -

~

J nle Chief EnglneerGLlSiha take further necessary action a-tcordlrigJy - ~ 1- bull

BY ORDER ANQll NTAE NAME OF rHE -G(jVERNOR OF ANDH~PRADESH

ADm~ tiAlrH DAS SEtittrARY tcfGOVERNMe-NT

1u tf~

Ihe Chief Lngincer t~

Godavari ( ift Irrlgatlon Scheme ~

yenCroluny Chlnlagattu W(1(lngal

)

Copy to ) [he finance (WampP) Department

f~jC

IFORWARDED BY ORDERI)

)

)

j

) l d 88pound28Lpound2 Ql lLI72Sbpound201716

)

middot i 1hmiddotpmiddot bull (-middot A ~N ~XUFZ~- IT J Cl1o~kJ RoO Devadula lin IrrigCltioh Scheme Grounding of works with 5tltlte Funds Re-vISed

ctpprovClI - PJrtlal Modification - Orders Issued

IRRIGATION amp CAD (PWMAJIRRIVl) DEPARTMENT

Patedjlij-Q9-ZQlQ ~

CO RtNo599 Irrigutionamp CAl) (PWMajIrTNl) DepClrtment dt 14middot092010

In portial modification of the orders Issued in the GO read abo~ the following

wn~truction programme for execution of GLIS Is approved for the revised project cost of [h94273 Crates The works shall be executed with funds of State Government initinlly and by

(Jbt1ining Cmtrul Assistanceexternal funds after obtaining necessary clearances

- _-- shyYx~)~i~rf~lPto fJJ1amlal Year 2qO~-10 rxpenditure for nnancial Year 201(-1l Expenditure for FinallcialYear 2011-12

[xpetlditure for FlnJIKial Year 2012-13 --_shy1T_olill_ - - - - -

378302 Crores 317993 emres --1 i92405 Crores -

54013 C~o~es 94n73 Crote~

The order issues With the concurrtJceof Finance (WampR) Depi)ftment vida thelt IJONo1G30r4(1)lOmiddotOl dt 16-09-201O -

~

J nle Chief EnglneerGLlSiha take further necessary action a-tcordlrigJy - ~ 1- bull

BY ORDER ANQll NTAE NAME OF rHE -G(jVERNOR OF ANDH~PRADESH

ADm~ tiAlrH DAS SEtittrARY tcfGOVERNMe-NT

1u tf~

Ihe Chief Lngincer t~

Godavari ( ift Irrlgatlon Scheme ~

yenCroluny Chlnlagattu W(1(lngal

)

Copy to ) [he finance (WampP) Department

f~jC

IFORWARDED BY ORDERI)

)

)

j

) l d 88pound28Lpound2 Ql lLI72Sbpound201716

)

Letter No ]PMClVividhl15404- IRanchi Dated

From

To Shri UN Panjiyar

to Govt of India Ministry of Water Resources Shram Shakti New Delhi -110001

Sub State Finance Concurrence for Gumani Barrage Project (Major-Revised) lharkhand

Ref Letter no I (N) I 1504-05 dated 130820 I 0 of Central Water Commission New

With reference to the above mentioned subject this is to inform that with the concurrence of state finance Approv1 of has been accorded for Rs16259 cr vide Govt Order no~ Ranchildated the CWChas cr which is

The cost of the project on 2008-09 of the amount of Administrative Qval 1 R -1022000-4151 1 Cabinet Secretariat of lharkhand concurrence required( copy of the said notification is en

The cost of Department Govt of before Technical

arrived at by hence it is requested that

of MoWR Gol for appmval

CWC is well within 20 as per Notification no CS

Department Govt of cabinet is not

to the Water Resources project proposal may be placed

An early action is Yours faithfully

En as above Poddar)

lAS Principal p(rpr-

Letter No - IPMClVividhII 5404- 7~ Ranchi Dated I

Copy forwarded to SriAjay Kumar Director PA Appraisal Central Water Commission 407 (S)

Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi in reference to~ for infonnation amp necessary action )

flJ L

~J~ ) i ~- ~

(RS Poddar)) Principal

)

J

--

rmiddot

I ~

~~

~1fQon

-TR0 3Rlgt I ~~ c$ 3i~~i66 ~ ~ (3)

~ ~IRffim ~ ~ ~ sectlJ ~~~~ltliejqlcl Cfif5iCHO$C1

-~ TICf centtfI~l~ fcrmur r$T ~iFiT m~f~middot07 ~4iCf) 16 (JJ(JktloJ1t~~ I

J ampT~ ~ ~ ~I~~os cpi4QIWGi5r ~iT -7ft 20_00 it fatk1~Ra(1bull bull t

R~iT-~

bull J

~-J5 middot1514Q 1k1Et5I ~~Jnqclt 2000 ctl ~ 31~iampJl ~ ~ ~ bull~I4~

31 cf 3fcmr 3lcJ5 1ci ~~ 1500000 ~~~~ aror) ~ crr +

fcllaquoIRw com SQ ~~ q~ 100000001- (lTcP ~) ~

~ltrrf(rn ~ ~ ~ I

fGj amiddotn den -$ C[(ft~ 31 ~Fi-eft $ ~ ~ 35 ot3tmKr UTCftJTGfT ciT

rn2llfq(j ~ St ~~ lR ~tijfc1R~k1 middot eQRTmcr ~~

~ OOffi ~ shy

I )

12 )

19

141002 9 2010 1~ 13 FAX 06512491158

~ ~ 31TCTffi ~

im daft -a eT ~

~Tef cwrr Gi la~ II I ~r (pal qft ~=-rri

fR fu~ ampRT qft

~

g-~TRft NffITJi cf ~ qft 2rcrrrDrTT CJl ~bull ~rr C5Z facu r~ ~r-rl ~ Pcrarrar

~CKr ~IT

n1--rrT 861all fGF8 $1

~~y

N

20 ~~Rf 36 (J ill I ltif

3Plffi 6TJft I

~ 50Rmf it

~J ct ~c1 ~ em 3rrq~ICfjC11 ctt iIvft 3ITtr20 ~T ~ ~fT -rJ1-tt ~-r-J

13

D

09 2llO 13 13 06512491158

--shyq5y GTIc1cEDfl ~ fftr

( 1 ) FampHWlti

3fR-~ ~

~ am ~cnT ~3fR

~ -

ri1 jj Cj I lci ~ it ~~r-=r ~ 1IMd iclt ~

crcift i3lRt

14

09

-

61 (fGIT ~ aqajq crmt ~ eft

3nltr~mo fdCl~UI ~ ~ ~ it 3fR

CTTlt4T =816l1ltil ~ em rn~cp~ ~ ~ ctt (f ml ~ gW- ~ itml

lID 004

2010 13 14 FAX 06512491158

- ~

~~ l1616i I 801 em qft fcRr fltr~ 1ltRT yen middot~_ ~_~~_ctr

3ITQ~G[Cfiffi artt i1m ar~fcf PcB ~ cwrc iT ~nftra fcvw ~ ~ ~

bull t

)

-

Pcra- ftmmmiddot em- ~m ~ reg am iit ~

ilr ~ 20 -~~~ a

- ---iZ shy =

1It

oc - - n=- ~ ~

I~ ~- I

Uta5 m0QRl3fR-1022000 41$4middot I Jrm middot -i 18 ml1JdRr bull --- - - I ~~~~ ~I I

~middot~ttJ

) )lfuff1fQ - ~IWlQIC1 $ UElTQf ~ ~ ~IltomOSI ~ampJa1$f1 ~

2 OJ~-os Jfcmi

a~ctJli c$ ~ - ~~ P~

i r f41A

shy

2001

~

~

Jri cB ltrt-ft ~ tFi ~QI ~Ht ~I zra-fi fumprrfu~ ciT ~cl QCf

)~~ Cl5ha rt g ~ I

) Iir 11 ~ I

) ~os wmI

) lt4 lCl5I~ m~

)

)

) 15

)

J

)

)

J )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1 2550436C

ampffi- ~=~

~- ~IPG1 ~ ~o 1625667 ~ ~o ~m itffiO

nllflPtib ~lttt~ 5 ~ if I

iI1if ~ ~ 3l~ lIgifliJl

ft1 ii11iPa rwTI ~ ~ Ii ~o 1625867 ~

~ iITflO

2 ff ~ ~

3 ~

4

5

6

7

8 ~

23

141002 9 2010 1~ 13 FAX 06512491158

~ ~ 31TCTffi ~

im daft -a eT ~

~Tef cwrr Gi la~ II I ~r (pal qft ~=-rri

fR fu~ ampRT qft

~

g-~TRft NffITJi cf ~ qft 2rcrrrDrTT CJl ~bull ~rr C5Z facu r~ ~r-rl ~ Pcrarrar

~CKr ~IT

n1--rrT 861all fGF8 $1

~~y

N

20 ~~Rf 36 (J ill I ltif

3Plffi 6TJft I

~ 50Rmf it

~J ct ~c1 ~ em 3rrq~ICfjC11 ctt iIvft 3ITtr20 ~T ~ ~fT -rJ1-tt ~-r-J

13

D

09 2llO 13 13 06512491158

--shyq5y GTIc1cEDfl ~ fftr

( 1 ) FampHWlti

3fR-~ ~

~ am ~cnT ~3fR

~ -

ri1 jj Cj I lci ~ it ~~r-=r ~ 1IMd iclt ~

crcift i3lRt

14

09

-

61 (fGIT ~ aqajq crmt ~ eft

3nltr~mo fdCl~UI ~ ~ ~ it 3fR

CTTlt4T =816l1ltil ~ em rn~cp~ ~ ~ ctt (f ml ~ gW- ~ itml

lID 004

2010 13 14 FAX 06512491158

- ~

~~ l1616i I 801 em qft fcRr fltr~ 1ltRT yen middot~_ ~_~~_ctr

3ITQ~G[Cfiffi artt i1m ar~fcf PcB ~ cwrc iT ~nftra fcvw ~ ~ ~

bull t

)

-

Pcra- ftmmmiddot em- ~m ~ reg am iit ~

ilr ~ 20 -~~~ a

- ---iZ shy =

1It

oc - - n=- ~ ~

I~ ~- I

Uta5 m0QRl3fR-1022000 41$4middot I Jrm middot -i 18 ml1JdRr bull --- - - I ~~~~ ~I I

~middot~ttJ

) )lfuff1fQ - ~IWlQIC1 $ UElTQf ~ ~ ~IltomOSI ~ampJa1$f1 ~

2 OJ~-os Jfcmi

a~ctJli c$ ~ - ~~ P~

i r f41A

shy

2001

~

~

Jri cB ltrt-ft ~ tFi ~QI ~Ht ~I zra-fi fumprrfu~ ciT ~cl QCf

)~~ Cl5ha rt g ~ I

) Iir 11 ~ I

) ~os wmI

) lt4 lCl5I~ m~

)

)

) 15

)

J

)

)

J )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1 2550436C

ampffi- ~=~

~- ~IPG1 ~ ~o 1625667 ~ ~o ~m itffiO

nllflPtib ~lttt~ 5 ~ if I

iI1if ~ ~ 3l~ lIgifliJl

ft1 ii11iPa rwTI ~ ~ Ii ~o 1625867 ~

~ iITflO

2 ff ~ ~

3 ~

4

5

6

7

8 ~

23

09 2llO 13 13 06512491158

--shyq5y GTIc1cEDfl ~ fftr

( 1 ) FampHWlti

3fR-~ ~

~ am ~cnT ~3fR

~ -

ri1 jj Cj I lci ~ it ~~r-=r ~ 1IMd iclt ~

crcift i3lRt

14

09

-

61 (fGIT ~ aqajq crmt ~ eft

3nltr~mo fdCl~UI ~ ~ ~ it 3fR

CTTlt4T =816l1ltil ~ em rn~cp~ ~ ~ ctt (f ml ~ gW- ~ itml

lID 004

2010 13 14 FAX 06512491158

- ~

~~ l1616i I 801 em qft fcRr fltr~ 1ltRT yen middot~_ ~_~~_ctr

3ITQ~G[Cfiffi artt i1m ar~fcf PcB ~ cwrc iT ~nftra fcvw ~ ~ ~

bull t

)

-

Pcra- ftmmmiddot em- ~m ~ reg am iit ~

ilr ~ 20 -~~~ a

- ---iZ shy =

1It

oc - - n=- ~ ~

I~ ~- I

Uta5 m0QRl3fR-1022000 41$4middot I Jrm middot -i 18 ml1JdRr bull --- - - I ~~~~ ~I I

~middot~ttJ

) )lfuff1fQ - ~IWlQIC1 $ UElTQf ~ ~ ~IltomOSI ~ampJa1$f1 ~

2 OJ~-os Jfcmi

a~ctJli c$ ~ - ~~ P~

i r f41A

shy

2001

~

~

Jri cB ltrt-ft ~ tFi ~QI ~Ht ~I zra-fi fumprrfu~ ciT ~cl QCf

)~~ Cl5ha rt g ~ I

) Iir 11 ~ I

) ~os wmI

) lt4 lCl5I~ m~

)

)

) 15

)

J

)

)

J )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1 2550436C

ampffi- ~=~

~- ~IPG1 ~ ~o 1625667 ~ ~o ~m itffiO

nllflPtib ~lttt~ 5 ~ if I

iI1if ~ ~ 3l~ lIgifliJl

ft1 ii11iPa rwTI ~ ~ Ii ~o 1625867 ~

~ iITflO

2 ff ~ ~

3 ~

4

5

6

7

8 ~

23

09

-

61 (fGIT ~ aqajq crmt ~ eft

3nltr~mo fdCl~UI ~ ~ ~ it 3fR

CTTlt4T =816l1ltil ~ em rn~cp~ ~ ~ ctt (f ml ~ gW- ~ itml

lID 004

2010 13 14 FAX 06512491158

- ~

~~ l1616i I 801 em qft fcRr fltr~ 1ltRT yen middot~_ ~_~~_ctr

3ITQ~G[Cfiffi artt i1m ar~fcf PcB ~ cwrc iT ~nftra fcvw ~ ~ ~

bull t

)

-

Pcra- ftmmmiddot em- ~m ~ reg am iit ~

ilr ~ 20 -~~~ a

- ---iZ shy =

1It

oc - - n=- ~ ~

I~ ~- I

Uta5 m0QRl3fR-1022000 41$4middot I Jrm middot -i 18 ml1JdRr bull --- - - I ~~~~ ~I I

~middot~ttJ

) )lfuff1fQ - ~IWlQIC1 $ UElTQf ~ ~ ~IltomOSI ~ampJa1$f1 ~

2 OJ~-os Jfcmi

a~ctJli c$ ~ - ~~ P~

i r f41A

shy

2001

~

~

Jri cB ltrt-ft ~ tFi ~QI ~Ht ~I zra-fi fumprrfu~ ciT ~cl QCf

)~~ Cl5ha rt g ~ I

) Iir 11 ~ I

) ~os wmI

) lt4 lCl5I~ m~

)

)

) 15

)

J

)

)

J )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1 2550436C

ampffi- ~=~

~- ~IPG1 ~ ~o 1625667 ~ ~o ~m itffiO

nllflPtib ~lttt~ 5 ~ if I

iI1if ~ ~ 3l~ lIgifliJl

ft1 ii11iPa rwTI ~ ~ Ii ~o 1625867 ~

~ iITflO

2 ff ~ ~

3 ~

4

5

6

7

8 ~

23

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1 2550436C

ampffi- ~=~

~- ~IPG1 ~ ~o 1625667 ~ ~o ~m itffiO

nllflPtib ~lttt~ 5 ~ if I

iI1if ~ ~ 3l~ lIgifliJl

ft1 ii11iPa rwTI ~ ~ Ii ~o 1625867 ~

~ iITflO

2 ff ~ ~

3 ~

4

5

6

7

8 ~

23

~-

- 1 ~o -To 01 Rl ffI rq Iffr

)

)

)

)

J )

)

)

IZE

rs- 2010

~ ~

0SU2 7 8200 6-mOTIO

q 11 lt~il 31 C I lt$I 33212

~I

1527-29 1 7 - 0 8 shy 1 O qr

2

( ~ )

j J

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Badaun Irrigation Scheme has been submitted to Central Water

Commission New Delhi Central Water Commission has evaluated this Scheme

for Rs 33212 Crore Financial Concurrence for Badaun Irrigation Scheme IS

hereby accorded

N~~J~~ Engineer-in-lihief (Eastern Ganga) (Design amp Planning)

Irrigation Departm~nt uP Irrigation Department UP Moradabad~ Lucknow

~

Principal Secr~tary Principal Secr~tary (Irrigation) (Finance)

GovernmenimiddotofUP Government ofUP Luckriow Lucknow

IZE

rs- 2010

~ ~

0SU2 7 8200 6-mOTIO

q 11 lt~il 31 C I lt$I 33212

~I

1527-29 1 7 - 0 8 shy 1 O qr

2

( ~ )

j J

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Badaun Irrigation Scheme has been submitted to Central Water

Commission New Delhi Central Water Commission has evaluated this Scheme

for Rs 33212 Crore Financial Concurrence for Badaun Irrigation Scheme IS

hereby accorded

N~~J~~ Engineer-in-lihief (Eastern Ganga) (Design amp Planning)

Irrigation Departm~nt uP Irrigation Department UP Moradabad~ Lucknow

~

Principal Secr~tary Principal Secr~tary (Irrigation) (Finance)

GovernmenimiddotofUP Government ofUP Luckriow Lucknow

j J

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Badaun Irrigation Scheme has been submitted to Central Water

Commission New Delhi Central Water Commission has evaluated this Scheme

for Rs 33212 Crore Financial Concurrence for Badaun Irrigation Scheme IS

hereby accorded

N~~J~~ Engineer-in-lihief (Eastern Ganga) (Design amp Planning)

Irrigation Departm~nt uP Irrigation Department UP Moradabad~ Lucknow

~

Principal Secr~tary Principal Secr~tary (Irrigation) (Finance)

GovernmenimiddotofUP Government ofUP Luckriow Lucknow

~7

itcn

~TGf ~ 31 GlRilI 9 ~gt~~ ~-ifu (~ ~

3090 ~TR-iG1 I

cB ~~TCP

~I~cFC L9ltJiC1 (c=rrcl) cfgtccentlil~Cf 3ncirltYr crf T( m=iT_ IT -

m7H $ ~anltJT-4

lt4lCJQ I-A 2751 1 0 -27 -fuo -4-1 72 (6CltGIJ-qfi-Ol (I IS

~~~ ltHRlt1 dCf)

~3I)-gO ~ CfgtCigt6l QUdk1C11

(ff~

3 qCfd fa~ ltQfh Cflq lt= ~ ~ ~~(ltzl O1 3 ltgt1 200 IS -lfTo 120 (L0J)t

574-76 Y8Ci0middotmiddot 24-08-1 0 ~Pil ~icentH ~ cb-~ CflT ~ ~ R1~ic8) ~W~

ampRT cpG16l qR~IIi1G1 cBT 3llcbf=~0~ regIltgtCi ~o 6 5~ 58 ~ ~ ~ qft i

fa CC1f1 Gl ~6~ 3 q C1 CU ~ ~ qft Wr-~) CJf ~ ~

2- ~ ~ -a Cf)~e R4tlllt$ q~C~1G1 q r- ~ c51Rlrrflil 2le-Cf1k1

-i C1 () Cj Cf5lt ~ ~ ~ 3-1T47r 2-l ~~ if ~ fcp CQ q P q Rcj Ii1 C1 cBT

65258

)

)

gtl~ ~q f

-9t2ooCl ~~Gc-I Q1gt4 fu~7 309) ~~C =5 ) 3fTaiGlcltIT (tTRO Qc1 fumo) R~ill$ mamp-ffltJT 3090 C1~~

3-ffjOj Gl Ci(j f (cnur 2~ I () 12) R~ TJ I fuyenltYf 3 (1 -g ( $C1 euro J I )

)

)

~

Cf5f0qr6i 66 9Tq-(1 gt

27- ( ~ rClC1 ~~ )

ci 9gtlttt1 Rfuq I

i

I

lrrigation ProJen co

Commission New Delhi Water Commision ha evaluated this Project

Rs 65258 crore for Kanhar lmject is hereby

Chief

(Bansagar Canal Project) c Engi~~~f

(Design amp Planning) l)P uP

Principal Principal Secretary (Irrigation) (Finance)

UP Lucknow

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ln~ ttwt(l middotnan nilll ~NHl Crniml

GD cru fil f [i I UF NNEXVR n~-ANCK ( IUPARTJ1KNT

~r( frrUlTt- -~middotpoundl~v r~~l~~

Pgt( N( 011-26 i OJ 6 [

r(r S~eme3 nndtt F-

for the

(ioernttQnt of

Ulnrh (lr

(~ 11 H11rkr Ihi

Illltuii)llia ll](gt

IlllonmirllL[( Rteos to

)

)

)

for

)

)

)

ENT OF ASAM OF 1HE AND FINANCE DEPT1

DISPUR

No CampSFin10971 Dated alspuf

from

tnth~

FInance Depi31rtment

lO The Engineer (FM-II) Project Approval Organisation

Centr-ill Water Commission Seva Bhavan ItKPuram New Delhi

~ub Finance provisions flrnmdinijJ=MP works in Oibrugarh and in

Assam under NFRERMIP

2010

letter NoCfJSflnlf1970 datid

accord~Q

the that

(iovernmen of tci(arancefor Oibrugarh Palasb~ri

ubprojects forRs cror(~s respe~lvelVI under the afores1d

inv~stment program Necessary blldget~lry the effect has been provid~d

) ill State blldget to mdet the expenditure abo~e 2 projects

)

)

)

) Memo No C8SFjn10~l7tAf Digtpur the 20th 2010

COP to L Addltion~1 ~~(etary to the Government of Assam Water Department for ~ind irlformatkmiddotr and action

)

) Water Department for information l11d

G()vernrrl(~nt of

J

)

)

) 3D

Govt of Chhattisgarh Wa Resources Deptt

Ma laya KS Bhawan Raipur

2010IF-9-JO-31 22009 purMemo I IAbc Dwuty Advisor (WR) I

PI~nning Commission na Bhavan

Sub - Sta Rinance Concurrencc to Maniya project tank of BUaspur Distridt

inform you that the Department Govt

Cbhattisgarh accorded to Maniyari

Tank crores (Rs one hundred nine crare amp

five additional area of 1 15

I be irrigated )

blocks of Bilaspur district

The provision of a of 2010-11 has m

the )

It therefore to accord investment to )

proposal so that this may be included under AIBP

Encl- NiL M) ~ Igt~~~ (CK Khaitan~

Secretary Water Rcsoprces Department

) Mantralaya Raipur

)

) IBMmiddotEmiddotDRNEmiddotHKY 143EL REDDY SIR

)

J

IF-9-1 18-22009 Raipu- 1092010

forwarded to

Bilaspur with reference to memo

nO20AIBP2010307)

20082010 information and necessary

action

The Chief

Nil Officer on Special Duty

Water Re~ourccs Department Mantralaya Raipur

IBMmiddotEmiddotDRIVEmiddotHKY 143middotEL REDDY SIR

3

No 16272010-PA (N)YJ-~ ~t GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION PROJECT APPRAISAL ORGANIZATION

407 SEWA BHAWAN R K PURAM NEW DELHI-110 066

Date 04112010Dg

Sub 107th meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of technoshyeconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multipurpose Project proposals held on 27102010

Enclosed please find herewith a copy of the summary record of discussions of the

above meeting held at New Delhi on 27th October 2010 at Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New

Delhi for information and necessary action

Encl As above ~ ()rvvvc_ (SK SriVastava) 6 y 111)

Chief Engineer (PAO) amp Member Secretary of the

Advisory Committee

To Members of Committee

1 Chairman CWC Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 2 Secretary (Expenditure) Ministry of Finance (lst Floor) North BlockNew Delhi 3 Secretary Department of Power 55 Bhawan IInd Floor New Delhi 4 Secretary Ministry of Environment amp Forests 4th Floor Room No- 40405

Paryavaran Bhawan CGO Complex New Delhi 5 Secretary Ministry of Tribal Affairs Room No 73S A-Wing Shastri Bhawan

New Delhi 6 Secretary Department of Agriculture amp Cooperation Room No 126 Krishi

Bhawan New Delhi 7 Director General ICAR Room No-lOS Krishi Bhawan New Delhi S Chairman CEA Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 9 Chairman Central Ground Water Board Jam Nagar House Man

Singh Road New Delhi 10 Principal Adviser (WR) Planning Commission Room No-255 Yojana Bhawan

Ilew Delh i 11 Principal Adviser (Power) Planning Commission Room No-107 Yojana Bhawan

New Delhi 12 Financial Adviser Ministry of Water Resources Room No-401 55 Bhawan Ilew

Delhi

Special Invitees

13 Member (WPampP) CWC New Delhi 14 Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi 15 Member (RM) CWC New Delhi 16 Chairman GFCC Sinchai Bhawan Patna - 800 015 Bihar 17 Commissioner (Projects) Room No-411 55 Bhawan MoWR New Delhi 18 Commissioner (Ganga) l1inistry of Water Resources CGO Complex New Delhi 19 Chief Advisor (Cost) Department of Expenditure Ministry of Finance Lok Nayak

Bhawan New Delhi 20 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Uttar Pradesh

Sachivalay Annexe Lucknow-226 001 (UP) 21 Principal Secretary Water Resources Govt of Madhya Pradesh Sachivalaya

Arera Hills Bhopal 22 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Rajasthan Secretariat

Jaipur-302 005 23 Principal Secretary Irrigation amp CAD Department Government of Andhra Pradesh

Room No 716 7th floor J-Block Secretariat Building Hyderabad-SOO 022 24 Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Maharashtra Mantralaya

Mumbai-400 032 25 Secretary Water Resources amp Energy Department Government of Jharkhand

Nepal House Ranchi-834 001 (Jharkhand) 6th26 Secretary Irrigation Department Govt of Karnataka MS Building floor

Karnataka Government Secretariat Dr Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore-S60 001 27 Chief Engineer (PI10) CWC New Delhi 28 ChiEf Engineer (FMO) CWC New Delhi 29 Chief Engineer Lower Ganga Basin WC 177-B Srikrishnapuri Patna-800 001 30 Chief Engineer Monitoring Central CWC Nagpur 31 Chief Engineer Monitoring South CWC Bangalore 32 Chief Engineer KGBO CWC Hyderabad 33 Chief Engineer NBO CWC Bhopal 34 Chief Enginbeer Yamuna Basin Orgainsation CWC Kalindi Bhawan New Delhi

Copy for information to 35 Sr PPS to Secretary Ministry of Water Resources New Delhi

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE 10ih MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOOD CONTROL AND MULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON 27th OCTOBER 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNOshyECONOMIC VIABILITY OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 107h meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposals was held on 27102010 at 1500 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Shri UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting Thereafter the Chairman requesteg the MembershySecretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 10STH MEETING

The Summary Record of Discussions of the 106th Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter NO16272010-PA (N)1939-64 dated 4102010 MembershySecretary informed the Committee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee confirmed the Summary Record of discussions of the 106th

Advisory Committee meeting

II) PROJECT PROPOSALS CONSIDERED BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

10 INDIRA SAGAR (POLAVARAM) PROJECT AP (REVISED-MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Sagar (Polavaram)

Project envisages construction of a dam across the river Godavari at a village near

Polavaram in West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh The project is contemplated as a

Multipurpose Project conferring annual irrigation to an extent of 436 lakh ha in upland

areas of four districts of Andhra Pradesh namely East Godavari Vishakapatnam West

Godavari and Krishna water supply to Vishakhapatnam Steel Plant and industries in and

around Vishakhapatnam besides domestic water supply to enroute towns and villages

diversion of 80 TMC of water to Krishna basin and generation of hydropower with installed

capacity of 960 MW

The said proposal was earlier considered by the advisory committee in its 95th

meeting held on 2001 2009 and was accepted for Rs1 015104 crore at 2005-06 Price

Level Planning commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal on

25022009 for Rs 1015104 crore The State Govt has now submitted the Revised Cost

Estimate at 2010-11 price level without change in scope Revision was necessary due to

lrrigation ProJen co

Commission New Delhi Water Commision ha evaluated this Project

Rs 65258 crore for Kanhar lmject is hereby

Chief

(Bansagar Canal Project) c Engi~~~f

(Design amp Planning) l)P uP

Principal Principal Secretary (Irrigation) (Finance)

UP Lucknow

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ln~ ttwt(l middotnan nilll ~NHl Crniml

GD cru fil f [i I UF NNEXVR n~-ANCK ( IUPARTJ1KNT

~r( frrUlTt- -~middotpoundl~v r~~l~~

Pgt( N( 011-26 i OJ 6 [

r(r S~eme3 nndtt F-

for the

(ioernttQnt of

Ulnrh (lr

(~ 11 H11rkr Ihi

Illltuii)llia ll](gt

IlllonmirllL[( Rteos to

)

)

)

for

)

)

)

ENT OF ASAM OF 1HE AND FINANCE DEPT1

DISPUR

No CampSFin10971 Dated alspuf

from

tnth~

FInance Depi31rtment

lO The Engineer (FM-II) Project Approval Organisation

Centr-ill Water Commission Seva Bhavan ItKPuram New Delhi

~ub Finance provisions flrnmdinijJ=MP works in Oibrugarh and in

Assam under NFRERMIP

2010

letter NoCfJSflnlf1970 datid

accord~Q

the that

(iovernmen of tci(arancefor Oibrugarh Palasb~ri

ubprojects forRs cror(~s respe~lvelVI under the afores1d

inv~stment program Necessary blldget~lry the effect has been provid~d

) ill State blldget to mdet the expenditure abo~e 2 projects

)

)

)

) Memo No C8SFjn10~l7tAf Digtpur the 20th 2010

COP to L Addltion~1 ~~(etary to the Government of Assam Water Department for ~ind irlformatkmiddotr and action

)

) Water Department for information l11d

G()vernrrl(~nt of

J

)

)

) 3D

Govt of Chhattisgarh Wa Resources Deptt

Ma laya KS Bhawan Raipur

2010IF-9-JO-31 22009 purMemo I IAbc Dwuty Advisor (WR) I

PI~nning Commission na Bhavan

Sub - Sta Rinance Concurrencc to Maniya project tank of BUaspur Distridt

inform you that the Department Govt

Cbhattisgarh accorded to Maniyari

Tank crores (Rs one hundred nine crare amp

five additional area of 1 15

I be irrigated )

blocks of Bilaspur district

The provision of a of 2010-11 has m

the )

It therefore to accord investment to )

proposal so that this may be included under AIBP

Encl- NiL M) ~ Igt~~~ (CK Khaitan~

Secretary Water Rcsoprces Department

) Mantralaya Raipur

)

) IBMmiddotEmiddotDRNEmiddotHKY 143EL REDDY SIR

)

J

IF-9-1 18-22009 Raipu- 1092010

forwarded to

Bilaspur with reference to memo

nO20AIBP2010307)

20082010 information and necessary

action

The Chief

Nil Officer on Special Duty

Water Re~ourccs Department Mantralaya Raipur

IBMmiddotEmiddotDRIVEmiddotHKY 143middotEL REDDY SIR

3

No 16272010-PA (N)YJ-~ ~t GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION PROJECT APPRAISAL ORGANIZATION

407 SEWA BHAWAN R K PURAM NEW DELHI-110 066

Date 04112010Dg

Sub 107th meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of technoshyeconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multipurpose Project proposals held on 27102010

Enclosed please find herewith a copy of the summary record of discussions of the

above meeting held at New Delhi on 27th October 2010 at Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New

Delhi for information and necessary action

Encl As above ~ ()rvvvc_ (SK SriVastava) 6 y 111)

Chief Engineer (PAO) amp Member Secretary of the

Advisory Committee

To Members of Committee

1 Chairman CWC Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 2 Secretary (Expenditure) Ministry of Finance (lst Floor) North BlockNew Delhi 3 Secretary Department of Power 55 Bhawan IInd Floor New Delhi 4 Secretary Ministry of Environment amp Forests 4th Floor Room No- 40405

Paryavaran Bhawan CGO Complex New Delhi 5 Secretary Ministry of Tribal Affairs Room No 73S A-Wing Shastri Bhawan

New Delhi 6 Secretary Department of Agriculture amp Cooperation Room No 126 Krishi

Bhawan New Delhi 7 Director General ICAR Room No-lOS Krishi Bhawan New Delhi S Chairman CEA Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 9 Chairman Central Ground Water Board Jam Nagar House Man

Singh Road New Delhi 10 Principal Adviser (WR) Planning Commission Room No-255 Yojana Bhawan

Ilew Delh i 11 Principal Adviser (Power) Planning Commission Room No-107 Yojana Bhawan

New Delhi 12 Financial Adviser Ministry of Water Resources Room No-401 55 Bhawan Ilew

Delhi

Special Invitees

13 Member (WPampP) CWC New Delhi 14 Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi 15 Member (RM) CWC New Delhi 16 Chairman GFCC Sinchai Bhawan Patna - 800 015 Bihar 17 Commissioner (Projects) Room No-411 55 Bhawan MoWR New Delhi 18 Commissioner (Ganga) l1inistry of Water Resources CGO Complex New Delhi 19 Chief Advisor (Cost) Department of Expenditure Ministry of Finance Lok Nayak

Bhawan New Delhi 20 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Uttar Pradesh

Sachivalay Annexe Lucknow-226 001 (UP) 21 Principal Secretary Water Resources Govt of Madhya Pradesh Sachivalaya

Arera Hills Bhopal 22 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Rajasthan Secretariat

Jaipur-302 005 23 Principal Secretary Irrigation amp CAD Department Government of Andhra Pradesh

Room No 716 7th floor J-Block Secretariat Building Hyderabad-SOO 022 24 Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Maharashtra Mantralaya

Mumbai-400 032 25 Secretary Water Resources amp Energy Department Government of Jharkhand

Nepal House Ranchi-834 001 (Jharkhand) 6th26 Secretary Irrigation Department Govt of Karnataka MS Building floor

Karnataka Government Secretariat Dr Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore-S60 001 27 Chief Engineer (PI10) CWC New Delhi 28 ChiEf Engineer (FMO) CWC New Delhi 29 Chief Engineer Lower Ganga Basin WC 177-B Srikrishnapuri Patna-800 001 30 Chief Engineer Monitoring Central CWC Nagpur 31 Chief Engineer Monitoring South CWC Bangalore 32 Chief Engineer KGBO CWC Hyderabad 33 Chief Engineer NBO CWC Bhopal 34 Chief Enginbeer Yamuna Basin Orgainsation CWC Kalindi Bhawan New Delhi

Copy for information to 35 Sr PPS to Secretary Ministry of Water Resources New Delhi

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE 10ih MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOOD CONTROL AND MULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON 27th OCTOBER 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNOshyECONOMIC VIABILITY OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 107h meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposals was held on 27102010 at 1500 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Shri UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting Thereafter the Chairman requesteg the MembershySecretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 10STH MEETING

The Summary Record of Discussions of the 106th Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter NO16272010-PA (N)1939-64 dated 4102010 MembershySecretary informed the Committee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee confirmed the Summary Record of discussions of the 106th

Advisory Committee meeting

II) PROJECT PROPOSALS CONSIDERED BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

10 INDIRA SAGAR (POLAVARAM) PROJECT AP (REVISED-MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Sagar (Polavaram)

Project envisages construction of a dam across the river Godavari at a village near

Polavaram in West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh The project is contemplated as a

Multipurpose Project conferring annual irrigation to an extent of 436 lakh ha in upland

areas of four districts of Andhra Pradesh namely East Godavari Vishakapatnam West

Godavari and Krishna water supply to Vishakhapatnam Steel Plant and industries in and

around Vishakhapatnam besides domestic water supply to enroute towns and villages

diversion of 80 TMC of water to Krishna basin and generation of hydropower with installed

capacity of 960 MW

The said proposal was earlier considered by the advisory committee in its 95th

meeting held on 2001 2009 and was accepted for Rs1 015104 crore at 2005-06 Price

Level Planning commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal on

25022009 for Rs 1015104 crore The State Govt has now submitted the Revised Cost

Estimate at 2010-11 price level without change in scope Revision was necessary due to

ln~ ttwt(l middotnan nilll ~NHl Crniml

GD cru fil f [i I UF NNEXVR n~-ANCK ( IUPARTJ1KNT

~r( frrUlTt- -~middotpoundl~v r~~l~~

Pgt( N( 011-26 i OJ 6 [

r(r S~eme3 nndtt F-

for the

(ioernttQnt of

Ulnrh (lr

(~ 11 H11rkr Ihi

Illltuii)llia ll](gt

IlllonmirllL[( Rteos to

)

)

)

for

)

)

)

ENT OF ASAM OF 1HE AND FINANCE DEPT1

DISPUR

No CampSFin10971 Dated alspuf

from

tnth~

FInance Depi31rtment

lO The Engineer (FM-II) Project Approval Organisation

Centr-ill Water Commission Seva Bhavan ItKPuram New Delhi

~ub Finance provisions flrnmdinijJ=MP works in Oibrugarh and in

Assam under NFRERMIP

2010

letter NoCfJSflnlf1970 datid

accord~Q

the that

(iovernmen of tci(arancefor Oibrugarh Palasb~ri

ubprojects forRs cror(~s respe~lvelVI under the afores1d

inv~stment program Necessary blldget~lry the effect has been provid~d

) ill State blldget to mdet the expenditure abo~e 2 projects

)

)

)

) Memo No C8SFjn10~l7tAf Digtpur the 20th 2010

COP to L Addltion~1 ~~(etary to the Government of Assam Water Department for ~ind irlformatkmiddotr and action

)

) Water Department for information l11d

G()vernrrl(~nt of

J

)

)

) 3D

Govt of Chhattisgarh Wa Resources Deptt

Ma laya KS Bhawan Raipur

2010IF-9-JO-31 22009 purMemo I IAbc Dwuty Advisor (WR) I

PI~nning Commission na Bhavan

Sub - Sta Rinance Concurrencc to Maniya project tank of BUaspur Distridt

inform you that the Department Govt

Cbhattisgarh accorded to Maniyari

Tank crores (Rs one hundred nine crare amp

five additional area of 1 15

I be irrigated )

blocks of Bilaspur district

The provision of a of 2010-11 has m

the )

It therefore to accord investment to )

proposal so that this may be included under AIBP

Encl- NiL M) ~ Igt~~~ (CK Khaitan~

Secretary Water Rcsoprces Department

) Mantralaya Raipur

)

) IBMmiddotEmiddotDRNEmiddotHKY 143EL REDDY SIR

)

J

IF-9-1 18-22009 Raipu- 1092010

forwarded to

Bilaspur with reference to memo

nO20AIBP2010307)

20082010 information and necessary

action

The Chief

Nil Officer on Special Duty

Water Re~ourccs Department Mantralaya Raipur

IBMmiddotEmiddotDRIVEmiddotHKY 143middotEL REDDY SIR

3

No 16272010-PA (N)YJ-~ ~t GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION PROJECT APPRAISAL ORGANIZATION

407 SEWA BHAWAN R K PURAM NEW DELHI-110 066

Date 04112010Dg

Sub 107th meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of technoshyeconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multipurpose Project proposals held on 27102010

Enclosed please find herewith a copy of the summary record of discussions of the

above meeting held at New Delhi on 27th October 2010 at Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New

Delhi for information and necessary action

Encl As above ~ ()rvvvc_ (SK SriVastava) 6 y 111)

Chief Engineer (PAO) amp Member Secretary of the

Advisory Committee

To Members of Committee

1 Chairman CWC Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 2 Secretary (Expenditure) Ministry of Finance (lst Floor) North BlockNew Delhi 3 Secretary Department of Power 55 Bhawan IInd Floor New Delhi 4 Secretary Ministry of Environment amp Forests 4th Floor Room No- 40405

Paryavaran Bhawan CGO Complex New Delhi 5 Secretary Ministry of Tribal Affairs Room No 73S A-Wing Shastri Bhawan

New Delhi 6 Secretary Department of Agriculture amp Cooperation Room No 126 Krishi

Bhawan New Delhi 7 Director General ICAR Room No-lOS Krishi Bhawan New Delhi S Chairman CEA Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 9 Chairman Central Ground Water Board Jam Nagar House Man

Singh Road New Delhi 10 Principal Adviser (WR) Planning Commission Room No-255 Yojana Bhawan

Ilew Delh i 11 Principal Adviser (Power) Planning Commission Room No-107 Yojana Bhawan

New Delhi 12 Financial Adviser Ministry of Water Resources Room No-401 55 Bhawan Ilew

Delhi

Special Invitees

13 Member (WPampP) CWC New Delhi 14 Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi 15 Member (RM) CWC New Delhi 16 Chairman GFCC Sinchai Bhawan Patna - 800 015 Bihar 17 Commissioner (Projects) Room No-411 55 Bhawan MoWR New Delhi 18 Commissioner (Ganga) l1inistry of Water Resources CGO Complex New Delhi 19 Chief Advisor (Cost) Department of Expenditure Ministry of Finance Lok Nayak

Bhawan New Delhi 20 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Uttar Pradesh

Sachivalay Annexe Lucknow-226 001 (UP) 21 Principal Secretary Water Resources Govt of Madhya Pradesh Sachivalaya

Arera Hills Bhopal 22 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Rajasthan Secretariat

Jaipur-302 005 23 Principal Secretary Irrigation amp CAD Department Government of Andhra Pradesh

Room No 716 7th floor J-Block Secretariat Building Hyderabad-SOO 022 24 Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Maharashtra Mantralaya

Mumbai-400 032 25 Secretary Water Resources amp Energy Department Government of Jharkhand

Nepal House Ranchi-834 001 (Jharkhand) 6th26 Secretary Irrigation Department Govt of Karnataka MS Building floor

Karnataka Government Secretariat Dr Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore-S60 001 27 Chief Engineer (PI10) CWC New Delhi 28 ChiEf Engineer (FMO) CWC New Delhi 29 Chief Engineer Lower Ganga Basin WC 177-B Srikrishnapuri Patna-800 001 30 Chief Engineer Monitoring Central CWC Nagpur 31 Chief Engineer Monitoring South CWC Bangalore 32 Chief Engineer KGBO CWC Hyderabad 33 Chief Engineer NBO CWC Bhopal 34 Chief Enginbeer Yamuna Basin Orgainsation CWC Kalindi Bhawan New Delhi

Copy for information to 35 Sr PPS to Secretary Ministry of Water Resources New Delhi

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE 10ih MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOOD CONTROL AND MULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON 27th OCTOBER 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNOshyECONOMIC VIABILITY OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 107h meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposals was held on 27102010 at 1500 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Shri UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting Thereafter the Chairman requesteg the MembershySecretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 10STH MEETING

The Summary Record of Discussions of the 106th Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter NO16272010-PA (N)1939-64 dated 4102010 MembershySecretary informed the Committee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee confirmed the Summary Record of discussions of the 106th

Advisory Committee meeting

II) PROJECT PROPOSALS CONSIDERED BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

10 INDIRA SAGAR (POLAVARAM) PROJECT AP (REVISED-MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Sagar (Polavaram)

Project envisages construction of a dam across the river Godavari at a village near

Polavaram in West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh The project is contemplated as a

Multipurpose Project conferring annual irrigation to an extent of 436 lakh ha in upland

areas of four districts of Andhra Pradesh namely East Godavari Vishakapatnam West

Godavari and Krishna water supply to Vishakhapatnam Steel Plant and industries in and

around Vishakhapatnam besides domestic water supply to enroute towns and villages

diversion of 80 TMC of water to Krishna basin and generation of hydropower with installed

capacity of 960 MW

The said proposal was earlier considered by the advisory committee in its 95th

meeting held on 2001 2009 and was accepted for Rs1 015104 crore at 2005-06 Price

Level Planning commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal on

25022009 for Rs 1015104 crore The State Govt has now submitted the Revised Cost

Estimate at 2010-11 price level without change in scope Revision was necessary due to

ENT OF ASAM OF 1HE AND FINANCE DEPT1

DISPUR

No CampSFin10971 Dated alspuf

from

tnth~

FInance Depi31rtment

lO The Engineer (FM-II) Project Approval Organisation

Centr-ill Water Commission Seva Bhavan ItKPuram New Delhi

~ub Finance provisions flrnmdinijJ=MP works in Oibrugarh and in

Assam under NFRERMIP

2010

letter NoCfJSflnlf1970 datid

accord~Q

the that

(iovernmen of tci(arancefor Oibrugarh Palasb~ri

ubprojects forRs cror(~s respe~lvelVI under the afores1d

inv~stment program Necessary blldget~lry the effect has been provid~d

) ill State blldget to mdet the expenditure abo~e 2 projects

)

)

)

) Memo No C8SFjn10~l7tAf Digtpur the 20th 2010

COP to L Addltion~1 ~~(etary to the Government of Assam Water Department for ~ind irlformatkmiddotr and action

)

) Water Department for information l11d

G()vernrrl(~nt of

J

)

)

) 3D

Govt of Chhattisgarh Wa Resources Deptt

Ma laya KS Bhawan Raipur

2010IF-9-JO-31 22009 purMemo I IAbc Dwuty Advisor (WR) I

PI~nning Commission na Bhavan

Sub - Sta Rinance Concurrencc to Maniya project tank of BUaspur Distridt

inform you that the Department Govt

Cbhattisgarh accorded to Maniyari

Tank crores (Rs one hundred nine crare amp

five additional area of 1 15

I be irrigated )

blocks of Bilaspur district

The provision of a of 2010-11 has m

the )

It therefore to accord investment to )

proposal so that this may be included under AIBP

Encl- NiL M) ~ Igt~~~ (CK Khaitan~

Secretary Water Rcsoprces Department

) Mantralaya Raipur

)

) IBMmiddotEmiddotDRNEmiddotHKY 143EL REDDY SIR

)

J

IF-9-1 18-22009 Raipu- 1092010

forwarded to

Bilaspur with reference to memo

nO20AIBP2010307)

20082010 information and necessary

action

The Chief

Nil Officer on Special Duty

Water Re~ourccs Department Mantralaya Raipur

IBMmiddotEmiddotDRIVEmiddotHKY 143middotEL REDDY SIR

3

No 16272010-PA (N)YJ-~ ~t GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION PROJECT APPRAISAL ORGANIZATION

407 SEWA BHAWAN R K PURAM NEW DELHI-110 066

Date 04112010Dg

Sub 107th meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of technoshyeconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multipurpose Project proposals held on 27102010

Enclosed please find herewith a copy of the summary record of discussions of the

above meeting held at New Delhi on 27th October 2010 at Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New

Delhi for information and necessary action

Encl As above ~ ()rvvvc_ (SK SriVastava) 6 y 111)

Chief Engineer (PAO) amp Member Secretary of the

Advisory Committee

To Members of Committee

1 Chairman CWC Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 2 Secretary (Expenditure) Ministry of Finance (lst Floor) North BlockNew Delhi 3 Secretary Department of Power 55 Bhawan IInd Floor New Delhi 4 Secretary Ministry of Environment amp Forests 4th Floor Room No- 40405

Paryavaran Bhawan CGO Complex New Delhi 5 Secretary Ministry of Tribal Affairs Room No 73S A-Wing Shastri Bhawan

New Delhi 6 Secretary Department of Agriculture amp Cooperation Room No 126 Krishi

Bhawan New Delhi 7 Director General ICAR Room No-lOS Krishi Bhawan New Delhi S Chairman CEA Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 9 Chairman Central Ground Water Board Jam Nagar House Man

Singh Road New Delhi 10 Principal Adviser (WR) Planning Commission Room No-255 Yojana Bhawan

Ilew Delh i 11 Principal Adviser (Power) Planning Commission Room No-107 Yojana Bhawan

New Delhi 12 Financial Adviser Ministry of Water Resources Room No-401 55 Bhawan Ilew

Delhi

Special Invitees

13 Member (WPampP) CWC New Delhi 14 Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi 15 Member (RM) CWC New Delhi 16 Chairman GFCC Sinchai Bhawan Patna - 800 015 Bihar 17 Commissioner (Projects) Room No-411 55 Bhawan MoWR New Delhi 18 Commissioner (Ganga) l1inistry of Water Resources CGO Complex New Delhi 19 Chief Advisor (Cost) Department of Expenditure Ministry of Finance Lok Nayak

Bhawan New Delhi 20 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Uttar Pradesh

Sachivalay Annexe Lucknow-226 001 (UP) 21 Principal Secretary Water Resources Govt of Madhya Pradesh Sachivalaya

Arera Hills Bhopal 22 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Rajasthan Secretariat

Jaipur-302 005 23 Principal Secretary Irrigation amp CAD Department Government of Andhra Pradesh

Room No 716 7th floor J-Block Secretariat Building Hyderabad-SOO 022 24 Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Maharashtra Mantralaya

Mumbai-400 032 25 Secretary Water Resources amp Energy Department Government of Jharkhand

Nepal House Ranchi-834 001 (Jharkhand) 6th26 Secretary Irrigation Department Govt of Karnataka MS Building floor

Karnataka Government Secretariat Dr Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore-S60 001 27 Chief Engineer (PI10) CWC New Delhi 28 ChiEf Engineer (FMO) CWC New Delhi 29 Chief Engineer Lower Ganga Basin WC 177-B Srikrishnapuri Patna-800 001 30 Chief Engineer Monitoring Central CWC Nagpur 31 Chief Engineer Monitoring South CWC Bangalore 32 Chief Engineer KGBO CWC Hyderabad 33 Chief Engineer NBO CWC Bhopal 34 Chief Enginbeer Yamuna Basin Orgainsation CWC Kalindi Bhawan New Delhi

Copy for information to 35 Sr PPS to Secretary Ministry of Water Resources New Delhi

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE 10ih MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOOD CONTROL AND MULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON 27th OCTOBER 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNOshyECONOMIC VIABILITY OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 107h meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposals was held on 27102010 at 1500 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Shri UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting Thereafter the Chairman requesteg the MembershySecretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 10STH MEETING

The Summary Record of Discussions of the 106th Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter NO16272010-PA (N)1939-64 dated 4102010 MembershySecretary informed the Committee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee confirmed the Summary Record of discussions of the 106th

Advisory Committee meeting

II) PROJECT PROPOSALS CONSIDERED BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

10 INDIRA SAGAR (POLAVARAM) PROJECT AP (REVISED-MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Sagar (Polavaram)

Project envisages construction of a dam across the river Godavari at a village near

Polavaram in West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh The project is contemplated as a

Multipurpose Project conferring annual irrigation to an extent of 436 lakh ha in upland

areas of four districts of Andhra Pradesh namely East Godavari Vishakapatnam West

Godavari and Krishna water supply to Vishakhapatnam Steel Plant and industries in and

around Vishakhapatnam besides domestic water supply to enroute towns and villages

diversion of 80 TMC of water to Krishna basin and generation of hydropower with installed

capacity of 960 MW

The said proposal was earlier considered by the advisory committee in its 95th

meeting held on 2001 2009 and was accepted for Rs1 015104 crore at 2005-06 Price

Level Planning commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal on

25022009 for Rs 1015104 crore The State Govt has now submitted the Revised Cost

Estimate at 2010-11 price level without change in scope Revision was necessary due to

Govt of Chhattisgarh Wa Resources Deptt

Ma laya KS Bhawan Raipur

2010IF-9-JO-31 22009 purMemo I IAbc Dwuty Advisor (WR) I

PI~nning Commission na Bhavan

Sub - Sta Rinance Concurrencc to Maniya project tank of BUaspur Distridt

inform you that the Department Govt

Cbhattisgarh accorded to Maniyari

Tank crores (Rs one hundred nine crare amp

five additional area of 1 15

I be irrigated )

blocks of Bilaspur district

The provision of a of 2010-11 has m

the )

It therefore to accord investment to )

proposal so that this may be included under AIBP

Encl- NiL M) ~ Igt~~~ (CK Khaitan~

Secretary Water Rcsoprces Department

) Mantralaya Raipur

)

) IBMmiddotEmiddotDRNEmiddotHKY 143EL REDDY SIR

)

J

IF-9-1 18-22009 Raipu- 1092010

forwarded to

Bilaspur with reference to memo

nO20AIBP2010307)

20082010 information and necessary

action

The Chief

Nil Officer on Special Duty

Water Re~ourccs Department Mantralaya Raipur

IBMmiddotEmiddotDRIVEmiddotHKY 143middotEL REDDY SIR

3

No 16272010-PA (N)YJ-~ ~t GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION PROJECT APPRAISAL ORGANIZATION

407 SEWA BHAWAN R K PURAM NEW DELHI-110 066

Date 04112010Dg

Sub 107th meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of technoshyeconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multipurpose Project proposals held on 27102010

Enclosed please find herewith a copy of the summary record of discussions of the

above meeting held at New Delhi on 27th October 2010 at Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New

Delhi for information and necessary action

Encl As above ~ ()rvvvc_ (SK SriVastava) 6 y 111)

Chief Engineer (PAO) amp Member Secretary of the

Advisory Committee

To Members of Committee

1 Chairman CWC Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 2 Secretary (Expenditure) Ministry of Finance (lst Floor) North BlockNew Delhi 3 Secretary Department of Power 55 Bhawan IInd Floor New Delhi 4 Secretary Ministry of Environment amp Forests 4th Floor Room No- 40405

Paryavaran Bhawan CGO Complex New Delhi 5 Secretary Ministry of Tribal Affairs Room No 73S A-Wing Shastri Bhawan

New Delhi 6 Secretary Department of Agriculture amp Cooperation Room No 126 Krishi

Bhawan New Delhi 7 Director General ICAR Room No-lOS Krishi Bhawan New Delhi S Chairman CEA Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 9 Chairman Central Ground Water Board Jam Nagar House Man

Singh Road New Delhi 10 Principal Adviser (WR) Planning Commission Room No-255 Yojana Bhawan

Ilew Delh i 11 Principal Adviser (Power) Planning Commission Room No-107 Yojana Bhawan

New Delhi 12 Financial Adviser Ministry of Water Resources Room No-401 55 Bhawan Ilew

Delhi

Special Invitees

13 Member (WPampP) CWC New Delhi 14 Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi 15 Member (RM) CWC New Delhi 16 Chairman GFCC Sinchai Bhawan Patna - 800 015 Bihar 17 Commissioner (Projects) Room No-411 55 Bhawan MoWR New Delhi 18 Commissioner (Ganga) l1inistry of Water Resources CGO Complex New Delhi 19 Chief Advisor (Cost) Department of Expenditure Ministry of Finance Lok Nayak

Bhawan New Delhi 20 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Uttar Pradesh

Sachivalay Annexe Lucknow-226 001 (UP) 21 Principal Secretary Water Resources Govt of Madhya Pradesh Sachivalaya

Arera Hills Bhopal 22 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Rajasthan Secretariat

Jaipur-302 005 23 Principal Secretary Irrigation amp CAD Department Government of Andhra Pradesh

Room No 716 7th floor J-Block Secretariat Building Hyderabad-SOO 022 24 Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Maharashtra Mantralaya

Mumbai-400 032 25 Secretary Water Resources amp Energy Department Government of Jharkhand

Nepal House Ranchi-834 001 (Jharkhand) 6th26 Secretary Irrigation Department Govt of Karnataka MS Building floor

Karnataka Government Secretariat Dr Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore-S60 001 27 Chief Engineer (PI10) CWC New Delhi 28 ChiEf Engineer (FMO) CWC New Delhi 29 Chief Engineer Lower Ganga Basin WC 177-B Srikrishnapuri Patna-800 001 30 Chief Engineer Monitoring Central CWC Nagpur 31 Chief Engineer Monitoring South CWC Bangalore 32 Chief Engineer KGBO CWC Hyderabad 33 Chief Engineer NBO CWC Bhopal 34 Chief Enginbeer Yamuna Basin Orgainsation CWC Kalindi Bhawan New Delhi

Copy for information to 35 Sr PPS to Secretary Ministry of Water Resources New Delhi

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE 10ih MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOOD CONTROL AND MULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON 27th OCTOBER 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNOshyECONOMIC VIABILITY OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 107h meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposals was held on 27102010 at 1500 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Shri UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting Thereafter the Chairman requesteg the MembershySecretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 10STH MEETING

The Summary Record of Discussions of the 106th Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter NO16272010-PA (N)1939-64 dated 4102010 MembershySecretary informed the Committee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee confirmed the Summary Record of discussions of the 106th

Advisory Committee meeting

II) PROJECT PROPOSALS CONSIDERED BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

10 INDIRA SAGAR (POLAVARAM) PROJECT AP (REVISED-MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Sagar (Polavaram)

Project envisages construction of a dam across the river Godavari at a village near

Polavaram in West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh The project is contemplated as a

Multipurpose Project conferring annual irrigation to an extent of 436 lakh ha in upland

areas of four districts of Andhra Pradesh namely East Godavari Vishakapatnam West

Godavari and Krishna water supply to Vishakhapatnam Steel Plant and industries in and

around Vishakhapatnam besides domestic water supply to enroute towns and villages

diversion of 80 TMC of water to Krishna basin and generation of hydropower with installed

capacity of 960 MW

The said proposal was earlier considered by the advisory committee in its 95th

meeting held on 2001 2009 and was accepted for Rs1 015104 crore at 2005-06 Price

Level Planning commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal on

25022009 for Rs 1015104 crore The State Govt has now submitted the Revised Cost

Estimate at 2010-11 price level without change in scope Revision was necessary due to

J

IF-9-1 18-22009 Raipu- 1092010

forwarded to

Bilaspur with reference to memo

nO20AIBP2010307)

20082010 information and necessary

action

The Chief

Nil Officer on Special Duty

Water Re~ourccs Department Mantralaya Raipur

IBMmiddotEmiddotDRIVEmiddotHKY 143middotEL REDDY SIR

3

No 16272010-PA (N)YJ-~ ~t GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION PROJECT APPRAISAL ORGANIZATION

407 SEWA BHAWAN R K PURAM NEW DELHI-110 066

Date 04112010Dg

Sub 107th meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of technoshyeconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multipurpose Project proposals held on 27102010

Enclosed please find herewith a copy of the summary record of discussions of the

above meeting held at New Delhi on 27th October 2010 at Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New

Delhi for information and necessary action

Encl As above ~ ()rvvvc_ (SK SriVastava) 6 y 111)

Chief Engineer (PAO) amp Member Secretary of the

Advisory Committee

To Members of Committee

1 Chairman CWC Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 2 Secretary (Expenditure) Ministry of Finance (lst Floor) North BlockNew Delhi 3 Secretary Department of Power 55 Bhawan IInd Floor New Delhi 4 Secretary Ministry of Environment amp Forests 4th Floor Room No- 40405

Paryavaran Bhawan CGO Complex New Delhi 5 Secretary Ministry of Tribal Affairs Room No 73S A-Wing Shastri Bhawan

New Delhi 6 Secretary Department of Agriculture amp Cooperation Room No 126 Krishi

Bhawan New Delhi 7 Director General ICAR Room No-lOS Krishi Bhawan New Delhi S Chairman CEA Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 9 Chairman Central Ground Water Board Jam Nagar House Man

Singh Road New Delhi 10 Principal Adviser (WR) Planning Commission Room No-255 Yojana Bhawan

Ilew Delh i 11 Principal Adviser (Power) Planning Commission Room No-107 Yojana Bhawan

New Delhi 12 Financial Adviser Ministry of Water Resources Room No-401 55 Bhawan Ilew

Delhi

Special Invitees

13 Member (WPampP) CWC New Delhi 14 Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi 15 Member (RM) CWC New Delhi 16 Chairman GFCC Sinchai Bhawan Patna - 800 015 Bihar 17 Commissioner (Projects) Room No-411 55 Bhawan MoWR New Delhi 18 Commissioner (Ganga) l1inistry of Water Resources CGO Complex New Delhi 19 Chief Advisor (Cost) Department of Expenditure Ministry of Finance Lok Nayak

Bhawan New Delhi 20 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Uttar Pradesh

Sachivalay Annexe Lucknow-226 001 (UP) 21 Principal Secretary Water Resources Govt of Madhya Pradesh Sachivalaya

Arera Hills Bhopal 22 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Rajasthan Secretariat

Jaipur-302 005 23 Principal Secretary Irrigation amp CAD Department Government of Andhra Pradesh

Room No 716 7th floor J-Block Secretariat Building Hyderabad-SOO 022 24 Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Maharashtra Mantralaya

Mumbai-400 032 25 Secretary Water Resources amp Energy Department Government of Jharkhand

Nepal House Ranchi-834 001 (Jharkhand) 6th26 Secretary Irrigation Department Govt of Karnataka MS Building floor

Karnataka Government Secretariat Dr Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore-S60 001 27 Chief Engineer (PI10) CWC New Delhi 28 ChiEf Engineer (FMO) CWC New Delhi 29 Chief Engineer Lower Ganga Basin WC 177-B Srikrishnapuri Patna-800 001 30 Chief Engineer Monitoring Central CWC Nagpur 31 Chief Engineer Monitoring South CWC Bangalore 32 Chief Engineer KGBO CWC Hyderabad 33 Chief Engineer NBO CWC Bhopal 34 Chief Enginbeer Yamuna Basin Orgainsation CWC Kalindi Bhawan New Delhi

Copy for information to 35 Sr PPS to Secretary Ministry of Water Resources New Delhi

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE 10ih MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOOD CONTROL AND MULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON 27th OCTOBER 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNOshyECONOMIC VIABILITY OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 107h meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposals was held on 27102010 at 1500 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Shri UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting Thereafter the Chairman requesteg the MembershySecretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 10STH MEETING

The Summary Record of Discussions of the 106th Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter NO16272010-PA (N)1939-64 dated 4102010 MembershySecretary informed the Committee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee confirmed the Summary Record of discussions of the 106th

Advisory Committee meeting

II) PROJECT PROPOSALS CONSIDERED BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

10 INDIRA SAGAR (POLAVARAM) PROJECT AP (REVISED-MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Sagar (Polavaram)

Project envisages construction of a dam across the river Godavari at a village near

Polavaram in West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh The project is contemplated as a

Multipurpose Project conferring annual irrigation to an extent of 436 lakh ha in upland

areas of four districts of Andhra Pradesh namely East Godavari Vishakapatnam West

Godavari and Krishna water supply to Vishakhapatnam Steel Plant and industries in and

around Vishakhapatnam besides domestic water supply to enroute towns and villages

diversion of 80 TMC of water to Krishna basin and generation of hydropower with installed

capacity of 960 MW

The said proposal was earlier considered by the advisory committee in its 95th

meeting held on 2001 2009 and was accepted for Rs1 015104 crore at 2005-06 Price

Level Planning commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal on

25022009 for Rs 1015104 crore The State Govt has now submitted the Revised Cost

Estimate at 2010-11 price level without change in scope Revision was necessary due to

No 16272010-PA (N)YJ-~ ~t GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION PROJECT APPRAISAL ORGANIZATION

407 SEWA BHAWAN R K PURAM NEW DELHI-110 066

Date 04112010Dg

Sub 107th meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of technoshyeconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multipurpose Project proposals held on 27102010

Enclosed please find herewith a copy of the summary record of discussions of the

above meeting held at New Delhi on 27th October 2010 at Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New

Delhi for information and necessary action

Encl As above ~ ()rvvvc_ (SK SriVastava) 6 y 111)

Chief Engineer (PAO) amp Member Secretary of the

Advisory Committee

To Members of Committee

1 Chairman CWC Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 2 Secretary (Expenditure) Ministry of Finance (lst Floor) North BlockNew Delhi 3 Secretary Department of Power 55 Bhawan IInd Floor New Delhi 4 Secretary Ministry of Environment amp Forests 4th Floor Room No- 40405

Paryavaran Bhawan CGO Complex New Delhi 5 Secretary Ministry of Tribal Affairs Room No 73S A-Wing Shastri Bhawan

New Delhi 6 Secretary Department of Agriculture amp Cooperation Room No 126 Krishi

Bhawan New Delhi 7 Director General ICAR Room No-lOS Krishi Bhawan New Delhi S Chairman CEA Sewa Bhawan R K Puram New Delhi 9 Chairman Central Ground Water Board Jam Nagar House Man

Singh Road New Delhi 10 Principal Adviser (WR) Planning Commission Room No-255 Yojana Bhawan

Ilew Delh i 11 Principal Adviser (Power) Planning Commission Room No-107 Yojana Bhawan

New Delhi 12 Financial Adviser Ministry of Water Resources Room No-401 55 Bhawan Ilew

Delhi

Special Invitees

13 Member (WPampP) CWC New Delhi 14 Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi 15 Member (RM) CWC New Delhi 16 Chairman GFCC Sinchai Bhawan Patna - 800 015 Bihar 17 Commissioner (Projects) Room No-411 55 Bhawan MoWR New Delhi 18 Commissioner (Ganga) l1inistry of Water Resources CGO Complex New Delhi 19 Chief Advisor (Cost) Department of Expenditure Ministry of Finance Lok Nayak

Bhawan New Delhi 20 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Uttar Pradesh

Sachivalay Annexe Lucknow-226 001 (UP) 21 Principal Secretary Water Resources Govt of Madhya Pradesh Sachivalaya

Arera Hills Bhopal 22 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Rajasthan Secretariat

Jaipur-302 005 23 Principal Secretary Irrigation amp CAD Department Government of Andhra Pradesh

Room No 716 7th floor J-Block Secretariat Building Hyderabad-SOO 022 24 Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Maharashtra Mantralaya

Mumbai-400 032 25 Secretary Water Resources amp Energy Department Government of Jharkhand

Nepal House Ranchi-834 001 (Jharkhand) 6th26 Secretary Irrigation Department Govt of Karnataka MS Building floor

Karnataka Government Secretariat Dr Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore-S60 001 27 Chief Engineer (PI10) CWC New Delhi 28 ChiEf Engineer (FMO) CWC New Delhi 29 Chief Engineer Lower Ganga Basin WC 177-B Srikrishnapuri Patna-800 001 30 Chief Engineer Monitoring Central CWC Nagpur 31 Chief Engineer Monitoring South CWC Bangalore 32 Chief Engineer KGBO CWC Hyderabad 33 Chief Engineer NBO CWC Bhopal 34 Chief Enginbeer Yamuna Basin Orgainsation CWC Kalindi Bhawan New Delhi

Copy for information to 35 Sr PPS to Secretary Ministry of Water Resources New Delhi

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE 10ih MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOOD CONTROL AND MULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON 27th OCTOBER 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNOshyECONOMIC VIABILITY OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 107h meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposals was held on 27102010 at 1500 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Shri UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting Thereafter the Chairman requesteg the MembershySecretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 10STH MEETING

The Summary Record of Discussions of the 106th Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter NO16272010-PA (N)1939-64 dated 4102010 MembershySecretary informed the Committee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee confirmed the Summary Record of discussions of the 106th

Advisory Committee meeting

II) PROJECT PROPOSALS CONSIDERED BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

10 INDIRA SAGAR (POLAVARAM) PROJECT AP (REVISED-MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Sagar (Polavaram)

Project envisages construction of a dam across the river Godavari at a village near

Polavaram in West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh The project is contemplated as a

Multipurpose Project conferring annual irrigation to an extent of 436 lakh ha in upland

areas of four districts of Andhra Pradesh namely East Godavari Vishakapatnam West

Godavari and Krishna water supply to Vishakhapatnam Steel Plant and industries in and

around Vishakhapatnam besides domestic water supply to enroute towns and villages

diversion of 80 TMC of water to Krishna basin and generation of hydropower with installed

capacity of 960 MW

The said proposal was earlier considered by the advisory committee in its 95th

meeting held on 2001 2009 and was accepted for Rs1 015104 crore at 2005-06 Price

Level Planning commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal on

25022009 for Rs 1015104 crore The State Govt has now submitted the Revised Cost

Estimate at 2010-11 price level without change in scope Revision was necessary due to

Special Invitees

13 Member (WPampP) CWC New Delhi 14 Member (DampR) CWC New Delhi 15 Member (RM) CWC New Delhi 16 Chairman GFCC Sinchai Bhawan Patna - 800 015 Bihar 17 Commissioner (Projects) Room No-411 55 Bhawan MoWR New Delhi 18 Commissioner (Ganga) l1inistry of Water Resources CGO Complex New Delhi 19 Chief Advisor (Cost) Department of Expenditure Ministry of Finance Lok Nayak

Bhawan New Delhi 20 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Uttar Pradesh

Sachivalay Annexe Lucknow-226 001 (UP) 21 Principal Secretary Water Resources Govt of Madhya Pradesh Sachivalaya

Arera Hills Bhopal 22 Principal Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Rajasthan Secretariat

Jaipur-302 005 23 Principal Secretary Irrigation amp CAD Department Government of Andhra Pradesh

Room No 716 7th floor J-Block Secretariat Building Hyderabad-SOO 022 24 Secretary Irrigation Department Government of Maharashtra Mantralaya

Mumbai-400 032 25 Secretary Water Resources amp Energy Department Government of Jharkhand

Nepal House Ranchi-834 001 (Jharkhand) 6th26 Secretary Irrigation Department Govt of Karnataka MS Building floor

Karnataka Government Secretariat Dr Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore-S60 001 27 Chief Engineer (PI10) CWC New Delhi 28 ChiEf Engineer (FMO) CWC New Delhi 29 Chief Engineer Lower Ganga Basin WC 177-B Srikrishnapuri Patna-800 001 30 Chief Engineer Monitoring Central CWC Nagpur 31 Chief Engineer Monitoring South CWC Bangalore 32 Chief Engineer KGBO CWC Hyderabad 33 Chief Engineer NBO CWC Bhopal 34 Chief Enginbeer Yamuna Basin Orgainsation CWC Kalindi Bhawan New Delhi

Copy for information to 35 Sr PPS to Secretary Ministry of Water Resources New Delhi

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE 10ih MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOOD CONTROL AND MULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON 27th OCTOBER 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNOshyECONOMIC VIABILITY OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 107h meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposals was held on 27102010 at 1500 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Shri UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting Thereafter the Chairman requesteg the MembershySecretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 10STH MEETING

The Summary Record of Discussions of the 106th Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter NO16272010-PA (N)1939-64 dated 4102010 MembershySecretary informed the Committee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee confirmed the Summary Record of discussions of the 106th

Advisory Committee meeting

II) PROJECT PROPOSALS CONSIDERED BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

10 INDIRA SAGAR (POLAVARAM) PROJECT AP (REVISED-MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Sagar (Polavaram)

Project envisages construction of a dam across the river Godavari at a village near

Polavaram in West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh The project is contemplated as a

Multipurpose Project conferring annual irrigation to an extent of 436 lakh ha in upland

areas of four districts of Andhra Pradesh namely East Godavari Vishakapatnam West

Godavari and Krishna water supply to Vishakhapatnam Steel Plant and industries in and

around Vishakhapatnam besides domestic water supply to enroute towns and villages

diversion of 80 TMC of water to Krishna basin and generation of hydropower with installed

capacity of 960 MW

The said proposal was earlier considered by the advisory committee in its 95th

meeting held on 2001 2009 and was accepted for Rs1 015104 crore at 2005-06 Price

Level Planning commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal on

25022009 for Rs 1015104 crore The State Govt has now submitted the Revised Cost

Estimate at 2010-11 price level without change in scope Revision was necessary due to

SUMMARY RECORD OF DISCUSSIONS OF THE 10ih MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IRRIGATION FLOOD CONTROL AND MULTI PURPOSE PROJECTS HELD ON 27th OCTOBER 2010 FOR CONSIDERATION OF TECHNOshyECONOMIC VIABILITY OF PROJECT PROPOSALS

The 107h meeting of the Advisory Committee for consideration of TechnoshyEconomic viability of Irrigation Flood Control and Multi-purpose Project proposals was held on 27102010 at 1500 Hrs in the Conference Room of Central Water Commission Sewa Bhawan RK Puram New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Shri UN Panjiar Secretary (WR) List of participants is enclosed at Annexure-I

At the outset Chairman welcomed the Members of the Committee and other Officers present in the meeting Thereafter the Chairman requesteg the MembershySecretary to take up the agenda for discussion Proceedings of the meeting followed as under

I) CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 10STH MEETING

The Summary Record of Discussions of the 106th Advisory Committee meeting was circulated vide Letter NO16272010-PA (N)1939-64 dated 4102010 MembershySecretary informed the Committee that no comments on the same have since been received The Committee confirmed the Summary Record of discussions of the 106th

Advisory Committee meeting

II) PROJECT PROPOSALS CONSIDERED BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

10 INDIRA SAGAR (POLAVARAM) PROJECT AP (REVISED-MAJOR)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Sagar (Polavaram)

Project envisages construction of a dam across the river Godavari at a village near

Polavaram in West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh The project is contemplated as a

Multipurpose Project conferring annual irrigation to an extent of 436 lakh ha in upland

areas of four districts of Andhra Pradesh namely East Godavari Vishakapatnam West

Godavari and Krishna water supply to Vishakhapatnam Steel Plant and industries in and

around Vishakhapatnam besides domestic water supply to enroute towns and villages

diversion of 80 TMC of water to Krishna basin and generation of hydropower with installed

capacity of 960 MW

The said proposal was earlier considered by the advisory committee in its 95th

meeting held on 2001 2009 and was accepted for Rs1 015104 crore at 2005-06 Price

Level Planning commission accorded investment clearance to the proposal on

25022009 for Rs 1015104 crore The State Govt has now submitted the Revised Cost

Estimate at 2010-11 price level without change in scope Revision was necessary due to

price escalation and change in the design of the Spillway and Earth amp Rockfill Dam The

Revised Estimate has been appraised in CWC and the cost has been finalized for Rs

1601045 crore at 2010-11 price level The BC ratio of the project is 170 State Finance

Concurrence has been obtained from the State Government

Advisor (Cost) raised query whether the phasing of expenditure as proposed by the

State Govt is feasible The Principal Secretary Govt of Andhra Pradesh replied that

the pace of work of the project was slow during the initial stage due to delay in obtaining

requisite statutory clearances from MoEF and MoTA He further informed that now all the

requisite statutory clearances have already been obtained and confirmed that the project

would be completed as per the proposed phasing

Joint Secretary (Exp) Deptt Of Expenditure suggested that in view of the letter

dated 26102010 of JS ampFA (MoWR) copies of DPR of the project should be sent to the

Office of Chief Advisor (Cost) Department of Expenditure and IFD MoWR for their

observations before considering the proposal Further she also stated that the subject is

sub-judice in the Honble Supreme Court Member (WPampP) explained that there is no stay

on implementation of the project and the Advisory Committee is considering only the

techno-economic viability of the project in respect of the revised cost However on the

suggestion of Joint Secretary (Exp) the committee decided to defer the project proposal

for next meeting and directed the Member Secretary to send copies of DPR to IFD and

Chief Advisor (Cost) for their reference

20 RAISA RESERVOIR SCHEME JHARKHAND (NEW MEDIUM)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The project envisages

construction of a dam near village Gitimeretoli under Bundu Block of Khunti Sub-division

in Ranchi district across River Raisa which is a left bank tributary of Kanchi river in

Subarnrekha basin The project will provide annual irrigation of 3145 ha (1887 ha Kharif

and 1258 ha Rabi) spread over in a CCA of 3145 ha lying on the both banks of the river

in Bundu Block of Ranchi district The project would benefit the tribal people of Ranchi

district

The project has been appraised in CWC and the cost of the project has been

finalized for Rs 7768 crore (at PL 2009-10) The BC ratio of the project is 127 The

project authority informed that Govt of Jharkhand has already accorded its administrative

approval to this project for Rs 6778 crore(at PL 2008-09) Now the project has been

finalized for Rs 7768 crore(at PL 2009-10) Since the increase in cost is less than 20

2

fresh administrative approvalState Finance Concurrence is not required as per the Govt

of Jharkhand Gazette notification dated 18122001

Advisor (Cost) informed that the provisions under Establishment Tools amp Plants

and Audit amp Accounts were kept nil in the estimate and therefore the cost estimate does

not appear to be realistic It was informed by project authorities that the provisions under

Establishment etc were kept nil keeping in view very small size of the project to be

executed departmentally The salary etc would be booked under non-plan head

Secretary 0NR) observed that the provisions under Establishment Tools ampPlants

and Audit amp Accounts etc ought to be kept so as to reflect the actual cost estimate of the

project for establishing its econornic viability Member (WPampP) asked projsct authorities to

submit the revised cost abstract incorporating provisions under aforesaid subheads and

the BC ratio be worked out accordingly

The Project Authorities submitted the Revised Cost amounting to Rs 8111 crore

incorporating provisions under aforesaid subheads and the revised BC ratio as 117

Since the project would benefit the tribal area the project proposal was accepted

30 TAJNA RESERVOIR SCHEME JHARKHAND (NEW-MEDIUM)

CE (PAD) CWC gave a brief introduction of the project The project envisages

construction of an earthen dam near village Gutjora under Khunti Block in Khunti district

across river Tajna which is a left bank tributary of Subarnrekha river in Subarnrekha

basin The project will provide Annual Irrigation of 5670 ha (4050 ha Kharif and 1620 ha

Rabi) spread over in a CCA of 6370 ha lying on the both bank of the river in Khunti

block

The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 8776 crore at 2009-10

price level with BC ratio of 234 The project authority informed that Govt of Jharkhand

has already accorded its administrative approval to this project for Rs 7442 crore at 2008

price level Now the project has been finalized for Rs 8776 crore(at PL 2009-10) Since

the increase in cost is less than 20 fresh administrative approvalState Finance

Concurrence is not required as per the Govt of Jharkhand Gazette notification dated

18122001

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

3

40 SUBERNAREKHA MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT JHARKHAND (REVISEDshyMAJOR)

CE (PAO) stated that the Subernarekha Multi-purpose Project Jharkhand was

discussed in the 106TH TAC Meeting of MoWR held on 16092010 In the said meeting

after discussions Committee deferred the proposal on account of non-submission of the

following documents

(i) Clearance for diversion of 14526 ha of reserve forest land falling under Dalma Wildlife Sanctuary and

(ii) State Finance Concurrence

Accordingly the representatives of the State Government were asked to submit the

same within a month so that the proposal can be considered in the next meeting

In regard to condition (i) MoEF in his letter dated 2382006 communicating 1s1

stage forest clearance has given forest clearance for 165555 ha against requirement of

180081 ha It has been stated in the said letter that the diversion of 14526 ha of forest

land falling in Dalma wildlife sanctuary will be considered after receipt of compliance of

various conditions stipulated by the Standing Committee of National Board of Wildlife

(NBWL) as directed by the Honble Supreme Court

Accordingly the Government of Jharkhand complied the conditions of the Standing

Committee and recommended the proposal to MoEF for clearance vide letter dated

4102010 Further the State Wild Life Board under the chairmanship of Honble Chief

Minister also recommended the case for clearance of the said forest land in the meeting

held on 7102010 and State Govt sent the case to MoEF vide their letter dated

20102010 State Finance Concurrence has been obtained from the state Government of

Iharkhand

After brief discussion the committee considered that the project proposal is sound

and fit to be accepted techno-economically once the wild life clearance is obtained

Therefore the Committee decided that the project proposal may be considered for

acceptance after receipt of MOEF clearance in respect of 14526 ha of forest land falling

in the Dalma Wild life sanctuary The project was deferred only on the ground of nonshy

availability of wild life clearance and the Project Authorities were asked to expedite the

said clearance

4

50 KACHHAL MEDIUM)

MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT MADHYA PRADESH (NEW -

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposed Kachhal Medium

Irrigation project envisages construction of 3150 m long earthen dam across river

Kachhal a tributary of Choti Kalisindh river in Chambal Basin The proposed project is

located in Shajapur district of MP and is planned to irrigate annually an area of 3470 ha

benefiting 18 villages of Badod block of Shajapur district in DPAP area

The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 624789 crore (at 2009

Price Level) and BC ratio is 102 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the

Project Authorities (Annexure- II)

The committee observed that since BC ratio of the project is marginally more than

one as applicable for DPAP area detailed scrutiny of the project is required Chief

Engineer (NBO) CWC informed that BC ratio has been revised based on the latest

approved rate of soyabean obtained from the State Agriculture Department recently

Based on the latest rate the BC ratio stands revised to 145 which is considerably more

than 1 He also mentioned that since the project benefits DPAP area of Badod block the

project can therefore be accepted The revised calculations were placed before the

Committee which was accepted after discussion The representative of Mlo Finance

enquired to know about the steps proposed to be taken by the project authorities for

resettlement and rehabilitation of Project Affected People (PAP) The Principal

Secretary Govt of Madhya Pradesh explained thatin the instant case only one village will

be affected Accordingly resettlement of PAP of this village would be done as per

guidelines of Madhya Pradesh State Rehabilitation Policy (Revised) 2007

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

60 UPPER KAKETO IRRIGATION PROJECT MADHYA PRADESH (NEWshyMEDIUM)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposed Upper Kaketo

Medium Irrigation project envisages construction of 3672 m long earthen dam across river

Parwati a tributary of Sindh in Yamuna river Basin in Sheopur and Shivpuri districts of

Madhya Pradesh The project is proposed as augmentation storage scheme to provide

storage augmentation to existing Tigra reservoir so that 3046 MCM drinking water

requirements of Gwalior city are adequately met The annual irrigation proposed from the

5

project is 3423 hectare in 600 ha of independent command of Upper Kaketo and 2823 ha

in existing command area of Tigra canal system

The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 196266 crore (at 2009

Price Level) and BC ratio is 154 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the

Project Authorities (Annexure- III)

The committee observed that the project provides drinking water benefits as a

major benefit while irrigation is proposed through existing canal system of the Tigra dam

Joint Secretary (Exp) raised query on the issue of tribal families being affected by the

project Principal Secretary (WRD) Govt of Madhya Pradesh explained that only 115

families belonging to scheduled tribe category are being affected due to project As per

Mlo Tribal Affairs guidelines since the number of scheduled tribe families are less than

200 the clearance from Mlo Tribal Affairs is not required Further that the resettlement of

PAPs of eight villages being affected by the project will be done as per guidelines of

Madhya Pradesh State Rehabilitation Policy (Revised) 2007

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

70 LOWER WARDHA IRRIGATION PROJECT (REVISED-MAJOR) MAHARASHTRA

CE (PAO) cwe briefly introduced the project The Revised Lower Wardha

Project Maharashtra was discussed in the 106TH TAC Meeting of MoWR held on

16092010 In this meeting the Committee decided that the project will be reconsidered

after submission of proper justification note by the project authoritieslState Govt for

increasing the scope of the project

Acq()rdingly the Government of Maharashtra vide letter dated 2092010 have

submitted the justiflcation note (Annexure-IV) which inter-alia contains the componentshy

wise justification as under

1 Inclusion of Lift irrigation scheme in the project to provide irrigation benefits to an additional area of 8330 ha annually for the Project Affected People (PAP) resettled near the reservoir

2 Inclusion of Pulgaon Barrage for supply of drinking water to Pulgaon City along with 13 villages Damangaon City and Central Ammunition Depot located at Pulgaon

3 Inclusion of Kharda Barrage to provide irrigation benefits to the farmers belonging to the distressed farmers suicide prone district

6

In addition the project authorities also mentioned in the above letter that tenders

for the above works have been invited and the maximum works have been awarded and

the project would be completed within time and with minimum cost over-run Further they

have mentioned that the project is under Honble PMs package for agrarian distressed

districts of Maharashtra

-Subsequent upon discussion on the justification note and on the advice of JS

(Exp) the project proposal was deferred by the Committee and the project authorities

were asked to submit additional justification in respect of cost and timepver- run based

on internal audit of accounts for the project

80 RELINING OF INDIRA GANDHI MAIN CANAL (STAGE-I) RAJASTHAN (NEWshyERM)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Gandhi Nahar Project

(Stage-I) is an old completed project constructed during the year 1958-1962 The canal

system of the project was originally constructed to irrigate an area of 553 lakh ha The

project provides irrigation facility and drinking water to the areas located in the districts of

Sri Ganga Nagar Hanumangarh and a part of Bikaner

The present proposal envisages relining of Indira Gandhi Feeder (traversing

through Haryana and Rajasthan) for a length of 5354 km and main canal in a reach of 61

km About 15106 Million Cubic feet (479 cusec) of water being saved due to Relining of

5334 km long Indira Gandhi Feeder Canal (between RD 496 to 671) including Haryana

Portion (Le RD496 to 555) and 61 km long Indira Gandhi Main Canal (between RD 000

to 20000) would provide additional irrigation to 71892 ha in the eXisting command area

of Rajasthan The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 40163 crore (at

March 2010 Price Level) and BC ratio is 236

Chairman inquired about the quantity of water being saved due to lining of canals

The project authorities replied that 6 cusecmillion sqft would be saved due to lining The

representative from CGWB suggested for installation of observation wellspiezometers so

as to monitor ground water table in the command area in the post project stage The

project authorities informed that a committee would be constituted by the State

Government for the purpose

7

The representative from Ministry of Finance inquired about the average plant

protection cost adopted while calculating the BC ratio and also queried about the

cropping pattern adopted for the project After a brief discussion the project authorities

were suggested to recalculate the BC ratio considering modified cropping pattern and

crop wise plant protection cost

The project authorities submitted the revised BC ratio calculation incorporating the

crop wise plant protection cost in line with the modified cropping pattern The revised

BCratio worked out as 225 was found acceptable

Since the State Finance Concurrence has not been obtained it was decided that

the proposal may be differed for re-consideration in the next meeting

90 INDIRA GANDHI NAHAR PROJECT (STAGE-II) RAJASTHAN (RevisedshyMajor)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Indira Gandhi Nahar Project stageshy

II envisages construction of 256 km long main canal starting from km 189 (downstream

end of Stage I ) to tail end of the Main Canal at km 445 and its distribution system which

includes construction of about 3835 km long branch canals distributaries and minors to

irrigate CCA of 802 lakh ha by gravity flow on the right side and about 1985 Km long

branch canals distributaries and minors to irrigate CCA of 442 lakh ha through six lift

systems (maximum lift 60 m) on the left side to provide annual irrigation of 901 lakh ha in

drought prone districts of Sriganganagar part of Bikaner Churu Jodhpur and Jaisalmer

of Rajasthan

The Revised cost estimate of Indira Gandhi Nahar Project Stage II for RS339891

cr (at 1992 price level) was earlier accepted by the Technical Advisory committee in its

65th meeting held on 14061996 Planning Commission has also accorded investment

clearance to the proposal in March 1998 for 339891 Crore (1992 price level)

The State Govt has now submitted Revised Cost Estimate at 2010 price level

without change in scope The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for

RS692132 crore (at 2010 price level) with BC ratio of 185 State Finance Concurrence

has been submitted by the Project Authorities

The expenditure incurred up to March 2010 is RS3990 cr Advisor (Cost) obseNed

that 84 of potential has already been created and queried why additional amount of Rs

8

40 SUBERNAREKHA MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT JHARKHAND (REVISEDshyMAJOR)

CE (PAO) stated that the Subernarekha Multi-purpose Project Jharkhand was

discussed in the 106TH TAC Meeting of MoWR held on 16092010 In the said meeting

after discussions Committee deferred the proposal on account of non-submission of the

following documents

(i) Clearance for diversion of 14526 ha of reserve forest land falling under Dalma Wildlife Sanctuary and

(ii) State Finance Concurrence

Accordingly the representatives of the State Government were asked to submit the

same within a month so that the proposal can be considered in the next meeting

In regard to condition (i) MoEF in his letter dated 2382006 communicating 1s1

stage forest clearance has given forest clearance for 165555 ha against requirement of

180081 ha It has been stated in the said letter that the diversion of 14526 ha of forest

land falling in Dalma wildlife sanctuary will be considered after receipt of compliance of

various conditions stipulated by the Standing Committee of National Board of Wildlife

(NBWL) as directed by the Honble Supreme Court

Accordingly the Government of Jharkhand complied the conditions of the Standing

Committee and recommended the proposal to MoEF for clearance vide letter dated

4102010 Further the State Wild Life Board under the chairmanship of Honble Chief

Minister also recommended the case for clearance of the said forest land in the meeting

held on 7102010 and State Govt sent the case to MoEF vide their letter dated

20102010 State Finance Concurrence has been obtained from the state Government of

Iharkhand

After brief discussion the committee considered that the project proposal is sound

and fit to be accepted techno-economically once the wild life clearance is obtained

Therefore the Committee decided that the project proposal may be considered for

acceptance after receipt of MOEF clearance in respect of 14526 ha of forest land falling

in the Dalma Wild life sanctuary The project was deferred only on the ground of nonshy

availability of wild life clearance and the Project Authorities were asked to expedite the

said clearance

4

50 KACHHAL MEDIUM)

MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT MADHYA PRADESH (NEW -

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposed Kachhal Medium

Irrigation project envisages construction of 3150 m long earthen dam across river

Kachhal a tributary of Choti Kalisindh river in Chambal Basin The proposed project is

located in Shajapur district of MP and is planned to irrigate annually an area of 3470 ha

benefiting 18 villages of Badod block of Shajapur district in DPAP area

The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 624789 crore (at 2009

Price Level) and BC ratio is 102 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the

Project Authorities (Annexure- II)

The committee observed that since BC ratio of the project is marginally more than

one as applicable for DPAP area detailed scrutiny of the project is required Chief

Engineer (NBO) CWC informed that BC ratio has been revised based on the latest

approved rate of soyabean obtained from the State Agriculture Department recently

Based on the latest rate the BC ratio stands revised to 145 which is considerably more

than 1 He also mentioned that since the project benefits DPAP area of Badod block the

project can therefore be accepted The revised calculations were placed before the

Committee which was accepted after discussion The representative of Mlo Finance

enquired to know about the steps proposed to be taken by the project authorities for

resettlement and rehabilitation of Project Affected People (PAP) The Principal

Secretary Govt of Madhya Pradesh explained thatin the instant case only one village will

be affected Accordingly resettlement of PAP of this village would be done as per

guidelines of Madhya Pradesh State Rehabilitation Policy (Revised) 2007

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

60 UPPER KAKETO IRRIGATION PROJECT MADHYA PRADESH (NEWshyMEDIUM)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposed Upper Kaketo

Medium Irrigation project envisages construction of 3672 m long earthen dam across river

Parwati a tributary of Sindh in Yamuna river Basin in Sheopur and Shivpuri districts of

Madhya Pradesh The project is proposed as augmentation storage scheme to provide

storage augmentation to existing Tigra reservoir so that 3046 MCM drinking water

requirements of Gwalior city are adequately met The annual irrigation proposed from the

5

project is 3423 hectare in 600 ha of independent command of Upper Kaketo and 2823 ha

in existing command area of Tigra canal system

The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 196266 crore (at 2009

Price Level) and BC ratio is 154 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the

Project Authorities (Annexure- III)

The committee observed that the project provides drinking water benefits as a

major benefit while irrigation is proposed through existing canal system of the Tigra dam

Joint Secretary (Exp) raised query on the issue of tribal families being affected by the

project Principal Secretary (WRD) Govt of Madhya Pradesh explained that only 115

families belonging to scheduled tribe category are being affected due to project As per

Mlo Tribal Affairs guidelines since the number of scheduled tribe families are less than

200 the clearance from Mlo Tribal Affairs is not required Further that the resettlement of

PAPs of eight villages being affected by the project will be done as per guidelines of

Madhya Pradesh State Rehabilitation Policy (Revised) 2007

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

70 LOWER WARDHA IRRIGATION PROJECT (REVISED-MAJOR) MAHARASHTRA

CE (PAO) cwe briefly introduced the project The Revised Lower Wardha

Project Maharashtra was discussed in the 106TH TAC Meeting of MoWR held on

16092010 In this meeting the Committee decided that the project will be reconsidered

after submission of proper justification note by the project authoritieslState Govt for

increasing the scope of the project

Acq()rdingly the Government of Maharashtra vide letter dated 2092010 have

submitted the justiflcation note (Annexure-IV) which inter-alia contains the componentshy

wise justification as under

1 Inclusion of Lift irrigation scheme in the project to provide irrigation benefits to an additional area of 8330 ha annually for the Project Affected People (PAP) resettled near the reservoir

2 Inclusion of Pulgaon Barrage for supply of drinking water to Pulgaon City along with 13 villages Damangaon City and Central Ammunition Depot located at Pulgaon

3 Inclusion of Kharda Barrage to provide irrigation benefits to the farmers belonging to the distressed farmers suicide prone district

6

In addition the project authorities also mentioned in the above letter that tenders

for the above works have been invited and the maximum works have been awarded and

the project would be completed within time and with minimum cost over-run Further they

have mentioned that the project is under Honble PMs package for agrarian distressed

districts of Maharashtra

-Subsequent upon discussion on the justification note and on the advice of JS

(Exp) the project proposal was deferred by the Committee and the project authorities

were asked to submit additional justification in respect of cost and timepver- run based

on internal audit of accounts for the project

80 RELINING OF INDIRA GANDHI MAIN CANAL (STAGE-I) RAJASTHAN (NEWshyERM)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Gandhi Nahar Project

(Stage-I) is an old completed project constructed during the year 1958-1962 The canal

system of the project was originally constructed to irrigate an area of 553 lakh ha The

project provides irrigation facility and drinking water to the areas located in the districts of

Sri Ganga Nagar Hanumangarh and a part of Bikaner

The present proposal envisages relining of Indira Gandhi Feeder (traversing

through Haryana and Rajasthan) for a length of 5354 km and main canal in a reach of 61

km About 15106 Million Cubic feet (479 cusec) of water being saved due to Relining of

5334 km long Indira Gandhi Feeder Canal (between RD 496 to 671) including Haryana

Portion (Le RD496 to 555) and 61 km long Indira Gandhi Main Canal (between RD 000

to 20000) would provide additional irrigation to 71892 ha in the eXisting command area

of Rajasthan The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 40163 crore (at

March 2010 Price Level) and BC ratio is 236

Chairman inquired about the quantity of water being saved due to lining of canals

The project authorities replied that 6 cusecmillion sqft would be saved due to lining The

representative from CGWB suggested for installation of observation wellspiezometers so

as to monitor ground water table in the command area in the post project stage The

project authorities informed that a committee would be constituted by the State

Government for the purpose

7

The representative from Ministry of Finance inquired about the average plant

protection cost adopted while calculating the BC ratio and also queried about the

cropping pattern adopted for the project After a brief discussion the project authorities

were suggested to recalculate the BC ratio considering modified cropping pattern and

crop wise plant protection cost

The project authorities submitted the revised BC ratio calculation incorporating the

crop wise plant protection cost in line with the modified cropping pattern The revised

BCratio worked out as 225 was found acceptable

Since the State Finance Concurrence has not been obtained it was decided that

the proposal may be differed for re-consideration in the next meeting

90 INDIRA GANDHI NAHAR PROJECT (STAGE-II) RAJASTHAN (RevisedshyMajor)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Indira Gandhi Nahar Project stageshy

II envisages construction of 256 km long main canal starting from km 189 (downstream

end of Stage I ) to tail end of the Main Canal at km 445 and its distribution system which

includes construction of about 3835 km long branch canals distributaries and minors to

irrigate CCA of 802 lakh ha by gravity flow on the right side and about 1985 Km long

branch canals distributaries and minors to irrigate CCA of 442 lakh ha through six lift

systems (maximum lift 60 m) on the left side to provide annual irrigation of 901 lakh ha in

drought prone districts of Sriganganagar part of Bikaner Churu Jodhpur and Jaisalmer

of Rajasthan

The Revised cost estimate of Indira Gandhi Nahar Project Stage II for RS339891

cr (at 1992 price level) was earlier accepted by the Technical Advisory committee in its

65th meeting held on 14061996 Planning Commission has also accorded investment

clearance to the proposal in March 1998 for 339891 Crore (1992 price level)

The State Govt has now submitted Revised Cost Estimate at 2010 price level

without change in scope The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for

RS692132 crore (at 2010 price level) with BC ratio of 185 State Finance Concurrence

has been submitted by the Project Authorities

The expenditure incurred up to March 2010 is RS3990 cr Advisor (Cost) obseNed

that 84 of potential has already been created and queried why additional amount of Rs

8

50 KACHHAL MEDIUM)

MEDIUM IRRIGATION PROJECT MADHYA PRADESH (NEW -

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposed Kachhal Medium

Irrigation project envisages construction of 3150 m long earthen dam across river

Kachhal a tributary of Choti Kalisindh river in Chambal Basin The proposed project is

located in Shajapur district of MP and is planned to irrigate annually an area of 3470 ha

benefiting 18 villages of Badod block of Shajapur district in DPAP area

The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 624789 crore (at 2009

Price Level) and BC ratio is 102 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the

Project Authorities (Annexure- II)

The committee observed that since BC ratio of the project is marginally more than

one as applicable for DPAP area detailed scrutiny of the project is required Chief

Engineer (NBO) CWC informed that BC ratio has been revised based on the latest

approved rate of soyabean obtained from the State Agriculture Department recently

Based on the latest rate the BC ratio stands revised to 145 which is considerably more

than 1 He also mentioned that since the project benefits DPAP area of Badod block the

project can therefore be accepted The revised calculations were placed before the

Committee which was accepted after discussion The representative of Mlo Finance

enquired to know about the steps proposed to be taken by the project authorities for

resettlement and rehabilitation of Project Affected People (PAP) The Principal

Secretary Govt of Madhya Pradesh explained thatin the instant case only one village will

be affected Accordingly resettlement of PAP of this village would be done as per

guidelines of Madhya Pradesh State Rehabilitation Policy (Revised) 2007

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

60 UPPER KAKETO IRRIGATION PROJECT MADHYA PRADESH (NEWshyMEDIUM)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposed Upper Kaketo

Medium Irrigation project envisages construction of 3672 m long earthen dam across river

Parwati a tributary of Sindh in Yamuna river Basin in Sheopur and Shivpuri districts of

Madhya Pradesh The project is proposed as augmentation storage scheme to provide

storage augmentation to existing Tigra reservoir so that 3046 MCM drinking water

requirements of Gwalior city are adequately met The annual irrigation proposed from the

5

project is 3423 hectare in 600 ha of independent command of Upper Kaketo and 2823 ha

in existing command area of Tigra canal system

The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 196266 crore (at 2009

Price Level) and BC ratio is 154 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the

Project Authorities (Annexure- III)

The committee observed that the project provides drinking water benefits as a

major benefit while irrigation is proposed through existing canal system of the Tigra dam

Joint Secretary (Exp) raised query on the issue of tribal families being affected by the

project Principal Secretary (WRD) Govt of Madhya Pradesh explained that only 115

families belonging to scheduled tribe category are being affected due to project As per

Mlo Tribal Affairs guidelines since the number of scheduled tribe families are less than

200 the clearance from Mlo Tribal Affairs is not required Further that the resettlement of

PAPs of eight villages being affected by the project will be done as per guidelines of

Madhya Pradesh State Rehabilitation Policy (Revised) 2007

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

70 LOWER WARDHA IRRIGATION PROJECT (REVISED-MAJOR) MAHARASHTRA

CE (PAO) cwe briefly introduced the project The Revised Lower Wardha

Project Maharashtra was discussed in the 106TH TAC Meeting of MoWR held on

16092010 In this meeting the Committee decided that the project will be reconsidered

after submission of proper justification note by the project authoritieslState Govt for

increasing the scope of the project

Acq()rdingly the Government of Maharashtra vide letter dated 2092010 have

submitted the justiflcation note (Annexure-IV) which inter-alia contains the componentshy

wise justification as under

1 Inclusion of Lift irrigation scheme in the project to provide irrigation benefits to an additional area of 8330 ha annually for the Project Affected People (PAP) resettled near the reservoir

2 Inclusion of Pulgaon Barrage for supply of drinking water to Pulgaon City along with 13 villages Damangaon City and Central Ammunition Depot located at Pulgaon

3 Inclusion of Kharda Barrage to provide irrigation benefits to the farmers belonging to the distressed farmers suicide prone district

6

In addition the project authorities also mentioned in the above letter that tenders

for the above works have been invited and the maximum works have been awarded and

the project would be completed within time and with minimum cost over-run Further they

have mentioned that the project is under Honble PMs package for agrarian distressed

districts of Maharashtra

-Subsequent upon discussion on the justification note and on the advice of JS

(Exp) the project proposal was deferred by the Committee and the project authorities

were asked to submit additional justification in respect of cost and timepver- run based

on internal audit of accounts for the project

80 RELINING OF INDIRA GANDHI MAIN CANAL (STAGE-I) RAJASTHAN (NEWshyERM)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Gandhi Nahar Project

(Stage-I) is an old completed project constructed during the year 1958-1962 The canal

system of the project was originally constructed to irrigate an area of 553 lakh ha The

project provides irrigation facility and drinking water to the areas located in the districts of

Sri Ganga Nagar Hanumangarh and a part of Bikaner

The present proposal envisages relining of Indira Gandhi Feeder (traversing

through Haryana and Rajasthan) for a length of 5354 km and main canal in a reach of 61

km About 15106 Million Cubic feet (479 cusec) of water being saved due to Relining of

5334 km long Indira Gandhi Feeder Canal (between RD 496 to 671) including Haryana

Portion (Le RD496 to 555) and 61 km long Indira Gandhi Main Canal (between RD 000

to 20000) would provide additional irrigation to 71892 ha in the eXisting command area

of Rajasthan The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 40163 crore (at

March 2010 Price Level) and BC ratio is 236

Chairman inquired about the quantity of water being saved due to lining of canals

The project authorities replied that 6 cusecmillion sqft would be saved due to lining The

representative from CGWB suggested for installation of observation wellspiezometers so

as to monitor ground water table in the command area in the post project stage The

project authorities informed that a committee would be constituted by the State

Government for the purpose

7

The representative from Ministry of Finance inquired about the average plant

protection cost adopted while calculating the BC ratio and also queried about the

cropping pattern adopted for the project After a brief discussion the project authorities

were suggested to recalculate the BC ratio considering modified cropping pattern and

crop wise plant protection cost

The project authorities submitted the revised BC ratio calculation incorporating the

crop wise plant protection cost in line with the modified cropping pattern The revised

BCratio worked out as 225 was found acceptable

Since the State Finance Concurrence has not been obtained it was decided that

the proposal may be differed for re-consideration in the next meeting

90 INDIRA GANDHI NAHAR PROJECT (STAGE-II) RAJASTHAN (RevisedshyMajor)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Indira Gandhi Nahar Project stageshy

II envisages construction of 256 km long main canal starting from km 189 (downstream

end of Stage I ) to tail end of the Main Canal at km 445 and its distribution system which

includes construction of about 3835 km long branch canals distributaries and minors to

irrigate CCA of 802 lakh ha by gravity flow on the right side and about 1985 Km long

branch canals distributaries and minors to irrigate CCA of 442 lakh ha through six lift

systems (maximum lift 60 m) on the left side to provide annual irrigation of 901 lakh ha in

drought prone districts of Sriganganagar part of Bikaner Churu Jodhpur and Jaisalmer

of Rajasthan

The Revised cost estimate of Indira Gandhi Nahar Project Stage II for RS339891

cr (at 1992 price level) was earlier accepted by the Technical Advisory committee in its

65th meeting held on 14061996 Planning Commission has also accorded investment

clearance to the proposal in March 1998 for 339891 Crore (1992 price level)

The State Govt has now submitted Revised Cost Estimate at 2010 price level

without change in scope The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for

RS692132 crore (at 2010 price level) with BC ratio of 185 State Finance Concurrence

has been submitted by the Project Authorities

The expenditure incurred up to March 2010 is RS3990 cr Advisor (Cost) obseNed

that 84 of potential has already been created and queried why additional amount of Rs

8

project is 3423 hectare in 600 ha of independent command of Upper Kaketo and 2823 ha

in existing command area of Tigra canal system

The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 196266 crore (at 2009

Price Level) and BC ratio is 154 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the

Project Authorities (Annexure- III)

The committee observed that the project provides drinking water benefits as a

major benefit while irrigation is proposed through existing canal system of the Tigra dam

Joint Secretary (Exp) raised query on the issue of tribal families being affected by the

project Principal Secretary (WRD) Govt of Madhya Pradesh explained that only 115

families belonging to scheduled tribe category are being affected due to project As per

Mlo Tribal Affairs guidelines since the number of scheduled tribe families are less than

200 the clearance from Mlo Tribal Affairs is not required Further that the resettlement of

PAPs of eight villages being affected by the project will be done as per guidelines of

Madhya Pradesh State Rehabilitation Policy (Revised) 2007

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

70 LOWER WARDHA IRRIGATION PROJECT (REVISED-MAJOR) MAHARASHTRA

CE (PAO) cwe briefly introduced the project The Revised Lower Wardha

Project Maharashtra was discussed in the 106TH TAC Meeting of MoWR held on

16092010 In this meeting the Committee decided that the project will be reconsidered

after submission of proper justification note by the project authoritieslState Govt for

increasing the scope of the project

Acq()rdingly the Government of Maharashtra vide letter dated 2092010 have

submitted the justiflcation note (Annexure-IV) which inter-alia contains the componentshy

wise justification as under

1 Inclusion of Lift irrigation scheme in the project to provide irrigation benefits to an additional area of 8330 ha annually for the Project Affected People (PAP) resettled near the reservoir

2 Inclusion of Pulgaon Barrage for supply of drinking water to Pulgaon City along with 13 villages Damangaon City and Central Ammunition Depot located at Pulgaon

3 Inclusion of Kharda Barrage to provide irrigation benefits to the farmers belonging to the distressed farmers suicide prone district

6

In addition the project authorities also mentioned in the above letter that tenders

for the above works have been invited and the maximum works have been awarded and

the project would be completed within time and with minimum cost over-run Further they

have mentioned that the project is under Honble PMs package for agrarian distressed

districts of Maharashtra

-Subsequent upon discussion on the justification note and on the advice of JS

(Exp) the project proposal was deferred by the Committee and the project authorities

were asked to submit additional justification in respect of cost and timepver- run based

on internal audit of accounts for the project

80 RELINING OF INDIRA GANDHI MAIN CANAL (STAGE-I) RAJASTHAN (NEWshyERM)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Gandhi Nahar Project

(Stage-I) is an old completed project constructed during the year 1958-1962 The canal

system of the project was originally constructed to irrigate an area of 553 lakh ha The

project provides irrigation facility and drinking water to the areas located in the districts of

Sri Ganga Nagar Hanumangarh and a part of Bikaner

The present proposal envisages relining of Indira Gandhi Feeder (traversing

through Haryana and Rajasthan) for a length of 5354 km and main canal in a reach of 61

km About 15106 Million Cubic feet (479 cusec) of water being saved due to Relining of

5334 km long Indira Gandhi Feeder Canal (between RD 496 to 671) including Haryana

Portion (Le RD496 to 555) and 61 km long Indira Gandhi Main Canal (between RD 000

to 20000) would provide additional irrigation to 71892 ha in the eXisting command area

of Rajasthan The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 40163 crore (at

March 2010 Price Level) and BC ratio is 236

Chairman inquired about the quantity of water being saved due to lining of canals

The project authorities replied that 6 cusecmillion sqft would be saved due to lining The

representative from CGWB suggested for installation of observation wellspiezometers so

as to monitor ground water table in the command area in the post project stage The

project authorities informed that a committee would be constituted by the State

Government for the purpose

7

The representative from Ministry of Finance inquired about the average plant

protection cost adopted while calculating the BC ratio and also queried about the

cropping pattern adopted for the project After a brief discussion the project authorities

were suggested to recalculate the BC ratio considering modified cropping pattern and

crop wise plant protection cost

The project authorities submitted the revised BC ratio calculation incorporating the

crop wise plant protection cost in line with the modified cropping pattern The revised

BCratio worked out as 225 was found acceptable

Since the State Finance Concurrence has not been obtained it was decided that

the proposal may be differed for re-consideration in the next meeting

90 INDIRA GANDHI NAHAR PROJECT (STAGE-II) RAJASTHAN (RevisedshyMajor)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Indira Gandhi Nahar Project stageshy

II envisages construction of 256 km long main canal starting from km 189 (downstream

end of Stage I ) to tail end of the Main Canal at km 445 and its distribution system which

includes construction of about 3835 km long branch canals distributaries and minors to

irrigate CCA of 802 lakh ha by gravity flow on the right side and about 1985 Km long

branch canals distributaries and minors to irrigate CCA of 442 lakh ha through six lift

systems (maximum lift 60 m) on the left side to provide annual irrigation of 901 lakh ha in

drought prone districts of Sriganganagar part of Bikaner Churu Jodhpur and Jaisalmer

of Rajasthan

The Revised cost estimate of Indira Gandhi Nahar Project Stage II for RS339891

cr (at 1992 price level) was earlier accepted by the Technical Advisory committee in its

65th meeting held on 14061996 Planning Commission has also accorded investment

clearance to the proposal in March 1998 for 339891 Crore (1992 price level)

The State Govt has now submitted Revised Cost Estimate at 2010 price level

without change in scope The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for

RS692132 crore (at 2010 price level) with BC ratio of 185 State Finance Concurrence

has been submitted by the Project Authorities

The expenditure incurred up to March 2010 is RS3990 cr Advisor (Cost) obseNed

that 84 of potential has already been created and queried why additional amount of Rs

8

In addition the project authorities also mentioned in the above letter that tenders

for the above works have been invited and the maximum works have been awarded and

the project would be completed within time and with minimum cost over-run Further they

have mentioned that the project is under Honble PMs package for agrarian distressed

districts of Maharashtra

-Subsequent upon discussion on the justification note and on the advice of JS

(Exp) the project proposal was deferred by the Committee and the project authorities

were asked to submit additional justification in respect of cost and timepver- run based

on internal audit of accounts for the project

80 RELINING OF INDIRA GANDHI MAIN CANAL (STAGE-I) RAJASTHAN (NEWshyERM)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The Indira Gandhi Nahar Project

(Stage-I) is an old completed project constructed during the year 1958-1962 The canal

system of the project was originally constructed to irrigate an area of 553 lakh ha The

project provides irrigation facility and drinking water to the areas located in the districts of

Sri Ganga Nagar Hanumangarh and a part of Bikaner

The present proposal envisages relining of Indira Gandhi Feeder (traversing

through Haryana and Rajasthan) for a length of 5354 km and main canal in a reach of 61

km About 15106 Million Cubic feet (479 cusec) of water being saved due to Relining of

5334 km long Indira Gandhi Feeder Canal (between RD 496 to 671) including Haryana

Portion (Le RD496 to 555) and 61 km long Indira Gandhi Main Canal (between RD 000

to 20000) would provide additional irrigation to 71892 ha in the eXisting command area

of Rajasthan The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 40163 crore (at

March 2010 Price Level) and BC ratio is 236

Chairman inquired about the quantity of water being saved due to lining of canals

The project authorities replied that 6 cusecmillion sqft would be saved due to lining The

representative from CGWB suggested for installation of observation wellspiezometers so

as to monitor ground water table in the command area in the post project stage The

project authorities informed that a committee would be constituted by the State

Government for the purpose

7

The representative from Ministry of Finance inquired about the average plant

protection cost adopted while calculating the BC ratio and also queried about the

cropping pattern adopted for the project After a brief discussion the project authorities

were suggested to recalculate the BC ratio considering modified cropping pattern and

crop wise plant protection cost

The project authorities submitted the revised BC ratio calculation incorporating the

crop wise plant protection cost in line with the modified cropping pattern The revised

BCratio worked out as 225 was found acceptable

Since the State Finance Concurrence has not been obtained it was decided that

the proposal may be differed for re-consideration in the next meeting

90 INDIRA GANDHI NAHAR PROJECT (STAGE-II) RAJASTHAN (RevisedshyMajor)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Indira Gandhi Nahar Project stageshy

II envisages construction of 256 km long main canal starting from km 189 (downstream

end of Stage I ) to tail end of the Main Canal at km 445 and its distribution system which

includes construction of about 3835 km long branch canals distributaries and minors to

irrigate CCA of 802 lakh ha by gravity flow on the right side and about 1985 Km long

branch canals distributaries and minors to irrigate CCA of 442 lakh ha through six lift

systems (maximum lift 60 m) on the left side to provide annual irrigation of 901 lakh ha in

drought prone districts of Sriganganagar part of Bikaner Churu Jodhpur and Jaisalmer

of Rajasthan

The Revised cost estimate of Indira Gandhi Nahar Project Stage II for RS339891

cr (at 1992 price level) was earlier accepted by the Technical Advisory committee in its

65th meeting held on 14061996 Planning Commission has also accorded investment

clearance to the proposal in March 1998 for 339891 Crore (1992 price level)

The State Govt has now submitted Revised Cost Estimate at 2010 price level

without change in scope The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for

RS692132 crore (at 2010 price level) with BC ratio of 185 State Finance Concurrence

has been submitted by the Project Authorities

The expenditure incurred up to March 2010 is RS3990 cr Advisor (Cost) obseNed

that 84 of potential has already been created and queried why additional amount of Rs

8

The representative from Ministry of Finance inquired about the average plant

protection cost adopted while calculating the BC ratio and also queried about the

cropping pattern adopted for the project After a brief discussion the project authorities

were suggested to recalculate the BC ratio considering modified cropping pattern and

crop wise plant protection cost

The project authorities submitted the revised BC ratio calculation incorporating the

crop wise plant protection cost in line with the modified cropping pattern The revised

BCratio worked out as 225 was found acceptable

Since the State Finance Concurrence has not been obtained it was decided that

the proposal may be differed for re-consideration in the next meeting

90 INDIRA GANDHI NAHAR PROJECT (STAGE-II) RAJASTHAN (RevisedshyMajor)

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project Indira Gandhi Nahar Project stageshy

II envisages construction of 256 km long main canal starting from km 189 (downstream

end of Stage I ) to tail end of the Main Canal at km 445 and its distribution system which

includes construction of about 3835 km long branch canals distributaries and minors to

irrigate CCA of 802 lakh ha by gravity flow on the right side and about 1985 Km long

branch canals distributaries and minors to irrigate CCA of 442 lakh ha through six lift

systems (maximum lift 60 m) on the left side to provide annual irrigation of 901 lakh ha in

drought prone districts of Sriganganagar part of Bikaner Churu Jodhpur and Jaisalmer

of Rajasthan

The Revised cost estimate of Indira Gandhi Nahar Project Stage II for RS339891

cr (at 1992 price level) was earlier accepted by the Technical Advisory committee in its

65th meeting held on 14061996 Planning Commission has also accorded investment

clearance to the proposal in March 1998 for 339891 Crore (1992 price level)

The State Govt has now submitted Revised Cost Estimate at 2010 price level

without change in scope The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for

RS692132 crore (at 2010 price level) with BC ratio of 185 State Finance Concurrence

has been submitted by the Project Authorities

The expenditure incurred up to March 2010 is RS3990 cr Advisor (Cost) obseNed

that 84 of potential has already been created and queried why additional amount of Rs

8

293155 cr is required to create balance potential of only 16 The project authorities

informed that 84 of the potential created as indicated in the DPR is the area for which

irrigation facilities have been created due to construction of mainbranch canals etc but

whole of this area cannot be irrigated unless minorswater courses are complete The

actual area under irrigation up to end of 2010 is 454 lakh ha which is about 50 of the

proposed annual irrigation

Secretary (WR) suggested that the cost of pressure pipes etc be kept under the

sub-head V-water courses He further suggested that the cost of the sprinkler system etc

to be installed by the farmers should also be taken into consideration while working out

BC ratio of the project proposal

He further enquired about the electricity charges considered for lifting of water

The project authorities informed that Rs120per unit was considered for electricity

charges after deducting subsidy by the Government of Rajasthan Secretary (WR)

suggested that BC ratio be worked out considering the market rate for electricity charges

levied fo(lift system excluding the subsidy by the Government of Rajasthan

The project authorities submitted modified abstract of the cost estimate along with

computations for BC ratio taking into consideration above observations of Secretary

(WR) The BC ratio now worked out is 169 Since this requires to be examined again

after brief discussions the committee deferred this proposal for consideration in the next

meeting

10 FLOOD PROTECTION WORKS ALONG BANKS OF RIVER TUNGA AT SHIMOGA TOWN FROM CH 11754 KM TO CH 14410 KM AND MATTUR VILLAGE FROM CH 6006KM TO CH 7036 KM IN SHIMOGA DISTRICT OF KARNATAKA STATE

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposal envisages

construction of counterfort retaining wall in River Tunga on right bank at Mattur Village for

a length of 103 km and on left bank at Shimoga Town for a length of 2646 km The

proposed works would minimize inundation of village of Mattur (an old Vedic village) and

town of Shimoga and would result in saving of annual damage to the infrastructures to the

extent of Rs 1321 Crore and provide protection to the life and properties of 40000

people of Mattur Village and Shimoga Town The proposed scheme would benefit an

area of 11 ha of residential and commercial land in Mattur and Shimoga

9

The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 5518 crore (at 2010-11

Price Level) and BC ratio is 150 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the

Project Authorities (Annexure-V)

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

11 FLOOD PROTECTION WORKS FOR HEMAVATHI RIVER (CH km 2950 - km 3150) AT HOLENRASIPUR IN HASSAN DISTRICT OF KARNATAKA STATE

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposal envisages

construction of a counter fort retaining walls in river Hemavathi middot on right bank at cO

Holenarsipur town for a length of 20 km in Hassan district of Karnataka State The

proposed works would minimize inundation of town of Holenarsipur and would result in

saving of annual damage to the infrastructures to the extent of RS6991 crore and would

provide protection to the life and properties of the people of Holenarsipur town The

propos~d scheme would benefit an area of 7 ha residential and commercial land and

population of about 20000

The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 2548 crore (at 2010-11

Price Level) and BC ratio is 171 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the

Project Authorities (Annexure- VI)

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

120 FLOOD PROTECTION WORKS ALONG LEFT AND RIGHT BANK OF RIVER RAPTI IN DISTRICT SIDDHARTHNAGAR SANT KABIR NAGAR GORAKHPUR amp DEORIA UP

CE (PAO) CWC mentioned that the Scheme was earlier discussed in the 106TH

TAC Meeting of MoWR held on 16092010 and was deferred for want of State Finance

Concurrence for the finalized cost of Rs 5229 Crore (PL 2009-10)

Now the project authorities have submitted State Finance Concurrence (SFC) for

the finalized cost of the project from Govt of Uttar Pradesh (Annexure- VII)

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with vote of thanks to the Chair

10

8

Annexure-I

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Members of the Committee

Sf Shri 1 U N Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair

2 Smt AC Duggal Joint Secretary (Expenditure) (Representing Member Secretary (Expenditure) Ministry of Finance)

3 Avinash Mishra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Member Planning Commission)

4 Tanmoy Das Chief engineer CEA (Representing Ministry of Member Power and Central Electricity Authority)

5 Dr Poonam Sharma Scientist - 0 (Representing Central Ground Member Water Board)

6 Dr Maan Singh DAC (Representing Ministry ofAgriculture) Member

7 S K Shrivastava Chief Engineer PAO ewc New Delhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees

a) Ministry of Finance

Shri P K Aggarwal Advisor (Cost) (Representing Chief Advisor Cost Ministry of Finance)

b) Ministry ofwater Resources

9 Shri A 8 Pandya Commissioner (Projects) MoWR New Delhi

c) Central Water Commission

Sf Shri

10 R C Jha Member (WPampP)amp Member (RM) CWC New Delhi

11 OP Khanda Chief Engineer YBO CWC New Delhi

12 KN Keshri Chief Engineer LGBOCWC Patna

13 VN Wakpanjar Chief Engineer KGBO CWC Hyderabad

14 MK Sinha Chief Engineer PMO CWC New Delhi

15 YK Sharma Chief Engineer lBO CWC Chandigarh

16 SKG Panclit Chief Engineer NBO CWC Bhopal

17 SK Haldar Director (Mon) CWC Bhopal

18 DP Mathuria Director (MampA) CWC Bhopal

19 GThakur Director CA(I) CWC New Delhi

20 Ajay Kumar Director PA (N) CWC New Delhi

21 PC Jha Director PA (C) CWC New Delhi

11

22 RK Kanodia Director PA (S) CWC New Delhi

23 C Lal Director FMP CWC New Delhi

24 GS Tyagi Director (UT amp SS) CWC New Delhi

25 SS Bakshi Director (FEamp SA) CWC New Delhi

26 M W Paunikar DO PA(N) CWC New Delhi

27 Sudhir Kumar DO PA(S) CWC New Delhi

28 Bashishtha Rai DO PA(C) CWC New Delhi

29 OP Gupta DO (FEamp SA) CWC New Delhi

d) State Government officers

SI Shri

Andhra Pradesh

30 SK Joshi Principal Secretary I ampCAD Dptt Govtof Andhra Pradesh Hyoerabad

31 M Venkateswara Rao Chief Engineer Indira Sagar Polavaram Project Dowlaiswarm AP

32 KRamakrishna Chief Engineer Govtof Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad

Jharkhand

33 RS Poddar Principal Secretary WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

34 BC Nigam Spl Secretary WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

35 RMRabidas Engineer-in-Chief WRD Govt of ~Iharkhand Ranchi

36 BMKumar Chief Engineer WRD Govt of Jharkhand Jamshedpur

37 BKSingh SE WRD Govt of Jharkhand~ Ranchi

38 Amaresh Kumar Sinha Resident Engineer cum OSD WRD Govt of Jharkhand New Delhi

Karnataka

39 B Guru Prasad Chief Engineer Minor Irrigation Govt of Karnataka Bangalore

Madhya Pradesh

40 R S Julaniya Principal Secretary WRD Govt of Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

41 EB Pati SecretaryWRD Govt of Maharashtra Mumbai

42 SNHuddar Advisor WRD Govt of Maharashtra Pune

43 CS Modak Executive Director VIDC Nagpur

NBGhuge Chief Engineer Gosikhurd Project Nagpur

44 Rajasthan

45 Damodar Sharma Chairman IGNP Govtof Rajasthan Jaipur

46 TK Parmar Chief Engineer WR (North) Govt of Rajasthan Hanumangarh

47 Virdhi Chand Chief Engineer IGNP Govtof Rajasthan Bikaner

48 Rajni kant SE Suratgarh WRCircie Hanumangarh

Uttar Pradesh

49 Suresh Tiwari Engineer-in-Chief (DampP) Irrigation Department Govtof UP Lucknow

50 A K Ojha CE UP Irrigation Govtof UP Lucknow

12

T tzrnit IT fiTTH1

~~ ~I1P1 ~

1fII1tCh gj-11 13441173 105 1gtI Jl ll n Fcr Iii 131 0 r)- ( ~ ftrrfli 2 G 11012010

gtlA 1fCltnJntrziffi ~ -mwfif1 J~~T1 ~T1 ~ J117lTrT ~~I

Iqqq- ~ 11UT1 ~ qf~~ f~ ~Wif[f (1f~i) ~ ~ 1]clrl ~ ~1 P1

ltfl~ Ofl~ I

ltnrnZ1middotlftlrIl fn-~ qf4111 11 ~ ~n~ (mzrn~1) ~ ~fitf~B rITTfl ~ 6247 4lt- CHrdl ~ h~ ~ ~ ~~I ~mr-I ~ ~ I f

yen ~lO )10

C(1)~tw=I ~Rltn) ~tIfIq

ql~~1 ~ITB1 iiftf mn~ ~

~ ~3441173 05 Q -31f n fltUt31IQLI] Wrr~r ~ ~amp lO~OlO ~-

1 BfI ~ n-mtFf ffiwl 1TITrf (-Tiff ~ ~ 1ltf~ rn lilll 1 ~1-110028 2 ~~P-l ~( Vf1 3wW1 qtt)qm ~fcA 1tG ~ ~

wv5--~

~~ Tjlt~~l ~TTfR Jfff Hmlfil frqrl

V - h H A t l l ~ I oKt lr rT( It ~o IO rln~

A -liN f5 X L 10 ~- TIl

P~ 31f7-1589081131 Jo-y f

l1~lm~lT ~ I

iJ1~ mwR ~PT ~ffi11

~ R1lcn 261012010

11Yl ~r~ ~ -Jj)TlfJf7 -3rrirm~~A

~ vwr 3W1l1

~~I

fm- Jffi ~ 11-ltr1

(~fc1 ~ I

ffiql~ 11~R-A1 fvrrn TCnIfltf (11~~I) qjl ~I ~ 1i r~ffit ~

middot3m WI l[tzr f~ qf~ ~ ~ (qvrW~l) ~ TfMm illll1

~ 19626 ltf19 3ffift ~ ltfit ~ ~ q~~T Qll1R ~ rft9fltf f I~~~ i)

j bull (lq~ltfl11 TTT11ltn)

~ BfircI

tj unR~1 ~1TIf1 ~ Gm18 if1Pl

~ ~ Jffi-15S9 08Q311 Io-43 ~~ ~C 102010 ~M- 1 -rifT iff ~~ 1111 ~ ~fl1 ~1flt)~ ~ tl Qri ~ Wi-ll0028

2 W~T9i ~-i)l ~ middotjwnrr 7nITB ljqf m ~ ~

~-~ 1fuCl

1iurnt~T ~ ~ mntr1 fcr+wl

~VJ nR~r

I I~

i Leuro (~i~L- co ----- - ---~ pt ~ -

16loUO

~t c0-kt5)

birmiddot (gt k((Jl)-1 ~ -shy

I Lf

ld 5pound029L2SSL0 01 WOJj 2S2t 0102-92-1)0

ANIV E XUI F - rv ---~- - - -

JUSTIFICATION

FOR

INCREASING THE SCOPE OF THE

LOWER WARDHA IRRIGATION PROJECT MAHARASHIRA

(REVISED-MAJOR)

Imiddot

i

(

J S

The F1evised Lower Wardha Project Maharashtra wa~ discussed in the 106lh TAC Meeting of

MoWR held on 16092010 In the said meeting after discussions regarding the benefits

accrued by the present proposal against the originally approved project proposal the

Committee dpcidecl that the project will be reconsidered after submission of proper justification

note for chan~Jing the scope of the project by project authorities

In thi s regard the Government of Maharashtra vide letter dated 20 92010 addre ssed to

Secretary (MoWR) with a copy endorsed to Chairman CWC have submitted justification which

13 enclosed at Annex-I

The component-wise justification as stated by the project authorities are given as here under

1 Lift Component The Lift irrigation scheme in the project has been proposed to provide

irrigation benefits to an additional area of 8330 ha annually for which sufficjent water is

available With the provision of Lift irrigation benefits can be given to some extent to the

Project Affected People At present the work of Head works is under completion it is

feasible at this stage to construct the lift component as a part of Lower Wardha Project rather

than taking the scheme separately

2 Pulgaon Barrage In earlier proposal supply of water for drinking purpose to Pulgaon City

had been proposed from the Lower Wardha Reservoir Now in the revised proposal it has

been proposed to supply drinking water to Pulgaon City with 13 villages Damangaoll

City and Central Ammunition Depot located at Pulgaon from the Pulgaon Barrage

located at 27 Kl DIS of the Lower Wardha Project With such proposal the water losses

due to transmission from Lower Wardha Dam and Cost of the water carriage system would

be reduceej significantly Also the water from free catchment downstream of Lower Wardha

Project would also be utilized The water thus saved would be supplied to Lanco Power

project which adds net revenue to the Government and reduces the Power scarcity in

the state

3 Kharda Barrage The barrage has been proposed at 62 Km DIS of the Lower Wardha

Project to provide additional irrigation benefits to an area of 2464 ha annually Though this

area comes in culturable command of the project topographicqlly it is located at higher

elevation due to which the irrigation benefits cannot be provi~e through the distribution

network of the originally conceived Lower Wardha Project The propos~d fltharda Barrage is

located near by the above command area Therefore this area would tiJe brought under

irrigation by the proposed Kharda barrage The benefited area belongs to the distressed

farmers suicide prone district Further water from free catchment below is also utilized

thus increasing the utilization of water

---

Apart from the above the project authorities have mentioned that framing the above project

propo~)al fer the said components separately would consume much time for the preparation

ot detailed project reports At the same tii-le the actual intended benefits from the original

Lower Wai-dha project would not be affected due to inclusion of Lift Irrigation Scheme and

other two 13arrages However the original components of the project will be given priority to

complete first and to give irrigation benefits accordingly The additional components

proposed will be planned in such a way that the completion of original components should

not be affected The detailed programme of the various components of the project is as given

below - --_

-S~ParticuI8-r Progress

-~~------shy 1001 I Head works I

I

i i

_---shy -~---- lal tg7 - shy

_1-_rain ca 1001~~1JD~~3Jttries 20

------- - -shy0t S~-t-w-orkS of LIS

0l (i~ IBarage~ --~---

As per the schedule bull proposed earlier

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be completed by 2010

Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Comf2leted Proposed to be completed by 2014 Proposed to be completed by 2015 Proposed to be completed by 2014

As per the schedule revised now - ~j

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be comf2leted by 2010 ___ _ Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Completed Proposed to be completed by 2012 Proposed to be completed by 201 5 Proposed to be completed by 2014 --

The project authorities have also mentioned that tenders for the above works have been invited

and the maximum works have been awarded so that the project would be completed within

time and minimum cost over-run

(ov1 of Mahmashtra has _also given concurrence of Finance Oeptt for the finalized cost of the

revised Lower Wardha project

Iurther they have mentioned that the project IS under Honble PMs package for agrarian

distressed districts of iVlaharashtra

In view of the above justification furnished -by Government of Maharashtra the revised proi(~ct

proposal is put up for consideration of the Ijvisory Committee please

~

j( 11 ill 1 11

(

he I 11

i1~)1 n

1 1

1)11 III I) i ]IIW)1 dtle1

II

middot

1 i

--shy

1011]

T

IITI lUll

C0I11101ICI11 1OP( the silPldd llut

maxinllllll wi lhi 11 Ii me minim lIllJ cost

nance DcptLmiddot Ihe t1 cost

Lower Varclha a~

W

(tl Y Kobnyulc) (K U HatH)

bull llthc Dircdol ~cuda Iy (Wl) v rhha Irriglltion J)ccllJpnl~t Water lcsomcdDqlarhW211 t

rporation Nagplll G(ycrtimcnt hI Mahra~htra MI~ntralHya l1lhlbai

lu C c lK Pmam Nevv Delhimiddot

A

102010

is hereby

by the of Kamataka and

will for the project

r Resources) (Minor trrigation) Department

Bangalore

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 5518 crore (at 2010-11

Price Level) and BC ratio is 150 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the

Project Authorities (Annexure-V)

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

11 FLOOD PROTECTION WORKS FOR HEMAVATHI RIVER (CH km 2950 - km 3150) AT HOLENRASIPUR IN HASSAN DISTRICT OF KARNATAKA STATE

CE (PAO) CWC briefly introduced the project The proposal envisages

construction of a counter fort retaining walls in river Hemavathi middot on right bank at cO

Holenarsipur town for a length of 20 km in Hassan district of Karnataka State The

proposed works would minimize inundation of town of Holenarsipur and would result in

saving of annual damage to the infrastructures to the extent of RS6991 crore and would

provide protection to the life and properties of the people of Holenarsipur town The

propos~d scheme would benefit an area of 7 ha residential and commercial land and

population of about 20000

The Cost Estimate of the project has been finalized for Rs 2548 crore (at 2010-11

Price Level) and BC ratio is 171 State Finance Concurrence has been submitted by the

Project Authorities (Annexure- VI)

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

120 FLOOD PROTECTION WORKS ALONG LEFT AND RIGHT BANK OF RIVER RAPTI IN DISTRICT SIDDHARTHNAGAR SANT KABIR NAGAR GORAKHPUR amp DEORIA UP

CE (PAO) CWC mentioned that the Scheme was earlier discussed in the 106TH

TAC Meeting of MoWR held on 16092010 and was deferred for want of State Finance

Concurrence for the finalized cost of Rs 5229 Crore (PL 2009-10)

Now the project authorities have submitted State Finance Concurrence (SFC) for

the finalized cost of the project from Govt of Uttar Pradesh (Annexure- VII)

After brief discussions the committee accepted the proposal

The meeting ended with vote of thanks to the Chair

10

8

Annexure-I

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Members of the Committee

Sf Shri 1 U N Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair

2 Smt AC Duggal Joint Secretary (Expenditure) (Representing Member Secretary (Expenditure) Ministry of Finance)

3 Avinash Mishra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Member Planning Commission)

4 Tanmoy Das Chief engineer CEA (Representing Ministry of Member Power and Central Electricity Authority)

5 Dr Poonam Sharma Scientist - 0 (Representing Central Ground Member Water Board)

6 Dr Maan Singh DAC (Representing Ministry ofAgriculture) Member

7 S K Shrivastava Chief Engineer PAO ewc New Delhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees

a) Ministry of Finance

Shri P K Aggarwal Advisor (Cost) (Representing Chief Advisor Cost Ministry of Finance)

b) Ministry ofwater Resources

9 Shri A 8 Pandya Commissioner (Projects) MoWR New Delhi

c) Central Water Commission

Sf Shri

10 R C Jha Member (WPampP)amp Member (RM) CWC New Delhi

11 OP Khanda Chief Engineer YBO CWC New Delhi

12 KN Keshri Chief Engineer LGBOCWC Patna

13 VN Wakpanjar Chief Engineer KGBO CWC Hyderabad

14 MK Sinha Chief Engineer PMO CWC New Delhi

15 YK Sharma Chief Engineer lBO CWC Chandigarh

16 SKG Panclit Chief Engineer NBO CWC Bhopal

17 SK Haldar Director (Mon) CWC Bhopal

18 DP Mathuria Director (MampA) CWC Bhopal

19 GThakur Director CA(I) CWC New Delhi

20 Ajay Kumar Director PA (N) CWC New Delhi

21 PC Jha Director PA (C) CWC New Delhi

11

22 RK Kanodia Director PA (S) CWC New Delhi

23 C Lal Director FMP CWC New Delhi

24 GS Tyagi Director (UT amp SS) CWC New Delhi

25 SS Bakshi Director (FEamp SA) CWC New Delhi

26 M W Paunikar DO PA(N) CWC New Delhi

27 Sudhir Kumar DO PA(S) CWC New Delhi

28 Bashishtha Rai DO PA(C) CWC New Delhi

29 OP Gupta DO (FEamp SA) CWC New Delhi

d) State Government officers

SI Shri

Andhra Pradesh

30 SK Joshi Principal Secretary I ampCAD Dptt Govtof Andhra Pradesh Hyoerabad

31 M Venkateswara Rao Chief Engineer Indira Sagar Polavaram Project Dowlaiswarm AP

32 KRamakrishna Chief Engineer Govtof Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad

Jharkhand

33 RS Poddar Principal Secretary WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

34 BC Nigam Spl Secretary WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

35 RMRabidas Engineer-in-Chief WRD Govt of ~Iharkhand Ranchi

36 BMKumar Chief Engineer WRD Govt of Jharkhand Jamshedpur

37 BKSingh SE WRD Govt of Jharkhand~ Ranchi

38 Amaresh Kumar Sinha Resident Engineer cum OSD WRD Govt of Jharkhand New Delhi

Karnataka

39 B Guru Prasad Chief Engineer Minor Irrigation Govt of Karnataka Bangalore

Madhya Pradesh

40 R S Julaniya Principal Secretary WRD Govt of Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

41 EB Pati SecretaryWRD Govt of Maharashtra Mumbai

42 SNHuddar Advisor WRD Govt of Maharashtra Pune

43 CS Modak Executive Director VIDC Nagpur

NBGhuge Chief Engineer Gosikhurd Project Nagpur

44 Rajasthan

45 Damodar Sharma Chairman IGNP Govtof Rajasthan Jaipur

46 TK Parmar Chief Engineer WR (North) Govt of Rajasthan Hanumangarh

47 Virdhi Chand Chief Engineer IGNP Govtof Rajasthan Bikaner

48 Rajni kant SE Suratgarh WRCircie Hanumangarh

Uttar Pradesh

49 Suresh Tiwari Engineer-in-Chief (DampP) Irrigation Department Govtof UP Lucknow

50 A K Ojha CE UP Irrigation Govtof UP Lucknow

12

T tzrnit IT fiTTH1

~~ ~I1P1 ~

1fII1tCh gj-11 13441173 105 1gtI Jl ll n Fcr Iii 131 0 r)- ( ~ ftrrfli 2 G 11012010

gtlA 1fCltnJntrziffi ~ -mwfif1 J~~T1 ~T1 ~ J117lTrT ~~I

Iqqq- ~ 11UT1 ~ qf~~ f~ ~Wif[f (1f~i) ~ ~ 1]clrl ~ ~1 P1

ltfl~ Ofl~ I

ltnrnZ1middotlftlrIl fn-~ qf4111 11 ~ ~n~ (mzrn~1) ~ ~fitf~B rITTfl ~ 6247 4lt- CHrdl ~ h~ ~ ~ ~~I ~mr-I ~ ~ I f

yen ~lO )10

C(1)~tw=I ~Rltn) ~tIfIq

ql~~1 ~ITB1 iiftf mn~ ~

~ ~3441173 05 Q -31f n fltUt31IQLI] Wrr~r ~ ~amp lO~OlO ~-

1 BfI ~ n-mtFf ffiwl 1TITrf (-Tiff ~ ~ 1ltf~ rn lilll 1 ~1-110028 2 ~~P-l ~( Vf1 3wW1 qtt)qm ~fcA 1tG ~ ~

wv5--~

~~ Tjlt~~l ~TTfR Jfff Hmlfil frqrl

V - h H A t l l ~ I oKt lr rT( It ~o IO rln~

A -liN f5 X L 10 ~- TIl

P~ 31f7-1589081131 Jo-y f

l1~lm~lT ~ I

iJ1~ mwR ~PT ~ffi11

~ R1lcn 261012010

11Yl ~r~ ~ -Jj)TlfJf7 -3rrirm~~A

~ vwr 3W1l1

~~I

fm- Jffi ~ 11-ltr1

(~fc1 ~ I

ffiql~ 11~R-A1 fvrrn TCnIfltf (11~~I) qjl ~I ~ 1i r~ffit ~

middot3m WI l[tzr f~ qf~ ~ ~ (qvrW~l) ~ TfMm illll1

~ 19626 ltf19 3ffift ~ ltfit ~ ~ q~~T Qll1R ~ rft9fltf f I~~~ i)

j bull (lq~ltfl11 TTT11ltn)

~ BfircI

tj unR~1 ~1TIf1 ~ Gm18 if1Pl

~ ~ Jffi-15S9 08Q311 Io-43 ~~ ~C 102010 ~M- 1 -rifT iff ~~ 1111 ~ ~fl1 ~1flt)~ ~ tl Qri ~ Wi-ll0028

2 W~T9i ~-i)l ~ middotjwnrr 7nITB ljqf m ~ ~

~-~ 1fuCl

1iurnt~T ~ ~ mntr1 fcr+wl

~VJ nR~r

I I~

i Leuro (~i~L- co ----- - ---~ pt ~ -

16loUO

~t c0-kt5)

birmiddot (gt k((Jl)-1 ~ -shy

I Lf

ld 5pound029L2SSL0 01 WOJj 2S2t 0102-92-1)0

ANIV E XUI F - rv ---~- - - -

JUSTIFICATION

FOR

INCREASING THE SCOPE OF THE

LOWER WARDHA IRRIGATION PROJECT MAHARASHIRA

(REVISED-MAJOR)

Imiddot

i

(

J S

The F1evised Lower Wardha Project Maharashtra wa~ discussed in the 106lh TAC Meeting of

MoWR held on 16092010 In the said meeting after discussions regarding the benefits

accrued by the present proposal against the originally approved project proposal the

Committee dpcidecl that the project will be reconsidered after submission of proper justification

note for chan~Jing the scope of the project by project authorities

In thi s regard the Government of Maharashtra vide letter dated 20 92010 addre ssed to

Secretary (MoWR) with a copy endorsed to Chairman CWC have submitted justification which

13 enclosed at Annex-I

The component-wise justification as stated by the project authorities are given as here under

1 Lift Component The Lift irrigation scheme in the project has been proposed to provide

irrigation benefits to an additional area of 8330 ha annually for which sufficjent water is

available With the provision of Lift irrigation benefits can be given to some extent to the

Project Affected People At present the work of Head works is under completion it is

feasible at this stage to construct the lift component as a part of Lower Wardha Project rather

than taking the scheme separately

2 Pulgaon Barrage In earlier proposal supply of water for drinking purpose to Pulgaon City

had been proposed from the Lower Wardha Reservoir Now in the revised proposal it has

been proposed to supply drinking water to Pulgaon City with 13 villages Damangaoll

City and Central Ammunition Depot located at Pulgaon from the Pulgaon Barrage

located at 27 Kl DIS of the Lower Wardha Project With such proposal the water losses

due to transmission from Lower Wardha Dam and Cost of the water carriage system would

be reduceej significantly Also the water from free catchment downstream of Lower Wardha

Project would also be utilized The water thus saved would be supplied to Lanco Power

project which adds net revenue to the Government and reduces the Power scarcity in

the state

3 Kharda Barrage The barrage has been proposed at 62 Km DIS of the Lower Wardha

Project to provide additional irrigation benefits to an area of 2464 ha annually Though this

area comes in culturable command of the project topographicqlly it is located at higher

elevation due to which the irrigation benefits cannot be provi~e through the distribution

network of the originally conceived Lower Wardha Project The propos~d fltharda Barrage is

located near by the above command area Therefore this area would tiJe brought under

irrigation by the proposed Kharda barrage The benefited area belongs to the distressed

farmers suicide prone district Further water from free catchment below is also utilized

thus increasing the utilization of water

---

Apart from the above the project authorities have mentioned that framing the above project

propo~)al fer the said components separately would consume much time for the preparation

ot detailed project reports At the same tii-le the actual intended benefits from the original

Lower Wai-dha project would not be affected due to inclusion of Lift Irrigation Scheme and

other two 13arrages However the original components of the project will be given priority to

complete first and to give irrigation benefits accordingly The additional components

proposed will be planned in such a way that the completion of original components should

not be affected The detailed programme of the various components of the project is as given

below - --_

-S~ParticuI8-r Progress

-~~------shy 1001 I Head works I

I

i i

_---shy -~---- lal tg7 - shy

_1-_rain ca 1001~~1JD~~3Jttries 20

------- - -shy0t S~-t-w-orkS of LIS

0l (i~ IBarage~ --~---

As per the schedule bull proposed earlier

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be completed by 2010

Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Comf2leted Proposed to be completed by 2014 Proposed to be completed by 2015 Proposed to be completed by 2014

As per the schedule revised now - ~j

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be comf2leted by 2010 ___ _ Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Completed Proposed to be completed by 2012 Proposed to be completed by 201 5 Proposed to be completed by 2014 --

The project authorities have also mentioned that tenders for the above works have been invited

and the maximum works have been awarded so that the project would be completed within

time and minimum cost over-run

(ov1 of Mahmashtra has _also given concurrence of Finance Oeptt for the finalized cost of the

revised Lower Wardha project

Iurther they have mentioned that the project IS under Honble PMs package for agrarian

distressed districts of iVlaharashtra

In view of the above justification furnished -by Government of Maharashtra the revised proi(~ct

proposal is put up for consideration of the Ijvisory Committee please

~

j( 11 ill 1 11

(

he I 11

i1~)1 n

1 1

1)11 III I) i ]IIW)1 dtle1

II

middot

1 i

--shy

1011]

T

IITI lUll

C0I11101ICI11 1OP( the silPldd llut

maxinllllll wi lhi 11 Ii me minim lIllJ cost

nance DcptLmiddot Ihe t1 cost

Lower Varclha a~

W

(tl Y Kobnyulc) (K U HatH)

bull llthc Dircdol ~cuda Iy (Wl) v rhha Irriglltion J)ccllJpnl~t Water lcsomcdDqlarhW211 t

rporation Nagplll G(ycrtimcnt hI Mahra~htra MI~ntralHya l1lhlbai

lu C c lK Pmam Nevv Delhimiddot

A

102010

is hereby

by the of Kamataka and

will for the project

r Resources) (Minor trrigation) Department

Bangalore

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

8

Annexure-I

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Members of the Committee

Sf Shri 1 U N Panjiar Secretary (WR) Ministry of Water Resources In the Chair

2 Smt AC Duggal Joint Secretary (Expenditure) (Representing Member Secretary (Expenditure) Ministry of Finance)

3 Avinash Mishra Dy Advisor (WR) (Representing Advisor Member Planning Commission)

4 Tanmoy Das Chief engineer CEA (Representing Ministry of Member Power and Central Electricity Authority)

5 Dr Poonam Sharma Scientist - 0 (Representing Central Ground Member Water Board)

6 Dr Maan Singh DAC (Representing Ministry ofAgriculture) Member

7 S K Shrivastava Chief Engineer PAO ewc New Delhi Member- Secretary

Special Invitees

a) Ministry of Finance

Shri P K Aggarwal Advisor (Cost) (Representing Chief Advisor Cost Ministry of Finance)

b) Ministry ofwater Resources

9 Shri A 8 Pandya Commissioner (Projects) MoWR New Delhi

c) Central Water Commission

Sf Shri

10 R C Jha Member (WPampP)amp Member (RM) CWC New Delhi

11 OP Khanda Chief Engineer YBO CWC New Delhi

12 KN Keshri Chief Engineer LGBOCWC Patna

13 VN Wakpanjar Chief Engineer KGBO CWC Hyderabad

14 MK Sinha Chief Engineer PMO CWC New Delhi

15 YK Sharma Chief Engineer lBO CWC Chandigarh

16 SKG Panclit Chief Engineer NBO CWC Bhopal

17 SK Haldar Director (Mon) CWC Bhopal

18 DP Mathuria Director (MampA) CWC Bhopal

19 GThakur Director CA(I) CWC New Delhi

20 Ajay Kumar Director PA (N) CWC New Delhi

21 PC Jha Director PA (C) CWC New Delhi

11

22 RK Kanodia Director PA (S) CWC New Delhi

23 C Lal Director FMP CWC New Delhi

24 GS Tyagi Director (UT amp SS) CWC New Delhi

25 SS Bakshi Director (FEamp SA) CWC New Delhi

26 M W Paunikar DO PA(N) CWC New Delhi

27 Sudhir Kumar DO PA(S) CWC New Delhi

28 Bashishtha Rai DO PA(C) CWC New Delhi

29 OP Gupta DO (FEamp SA) CWC New Delhi

d) State Government officers

SI Shri

Andhra Pradesh

30 SK Joshi Principal Secretary I ampCAD Dptt Govtof Andhra Pradesh Hyoerabad

31 M Venkateswara Rao Chief Engineer Indira Sagar Polavaram Project Dowlaiswarm AP

32 KRamakrishna Chief Engineer Govtof Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad

Jharkhand

33 RS Poddar Principal Secretary WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

34 BC Nigam Spl Secretary WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

35 RMRabidas Engineer-in-Chief WRD Govt of ~Iharkhand Ranchi

36 BMKumar Chief Engineer WRD Govt of Jharkhand Jamshedpur

37 BKSingh SE WRD Govt of Jharkhand~ Ranchi

38 Amaresh Kumar Sinha Resident Engineer cum OSD WRD Govt of Jharkhand New Delhi

Karnataka

39 B Guru Prasad Chief Engineer Minor Irrigation Govt of Karnataka Bangalore

Madhya Pradesh

40 R S Julaniya Principal Secretary WRD Govt of Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

41 EB Pati SecretaryWRD Govt of Maharashtra Mumbai

42 SNHuddar Advisor WRD Govt of Maharashtra Pune

43 CS Modak Executive Director VIDC Nagpur

NBGhuge Chief Engineer Gosikhurd Project Nagpur

44 Rajasthan

45 Damodar Sharma Chairman IGNP Govtof Rajasthan Jaipur

46 TK Parmar Chief Engineer WR (North) Govt of Rajasthan Hanumangarh

47 Virdhi Chand Chief Engineer IGNP Govtof Rajasthan Bikaner

48 Rajni kant SE Suratgarh WRCircie Hanumangarh

Uttar Pradesh

49 Suresh Tiwari Engineer-in-Chief (DampP) Irrigation Department Govtof UP Lucknow

50 A K Ojha CE UP Irrigation Govtof UP Lucknow

12

T tzrnit IT fiTTH1

~~ ~I1P1 ~

1fII1tCh gj-11 13441173 105 1gtI Jl ll n Fcr Iii 131 0 r)- ( ~ ftrrfli 2 G 11012010

gtlA 1fCltnJntrziffi ~ -mwfif1 J~~T1 ~T1 ~ J117lTrT ~~I

Iqqq- ~ 11UT1 ~ qf~~ f~ ~Wif[f (1f~i) ~ ~ 1]clrl ~ ~1 P1

ltfl~ Ofl~ I

ltnrnZ1middotlftlrIl fn-~ qf4111 11 ~ ~n~ (mzrn~1) ~ ~fitf~B rITTfl ~ 6247 4lt- CHrdl ~ h~ ~ ~ ~~I ~mr-I ~ ~ I f

yen ~lO )10

C(1)~tw=I ~Rltn) ~tIfIq

ql~~1 ~ITB1 iiftf mn~ ~

~ ~3441173 05 Q -31f n fltUt31IQLI] Wrr~r ~ ~amp lO~OlO ~-

1 BfI ~ n-mtFf ffiwl 1TITrf (-Tiff ~ ~ 1ltf~ rn lilll 1 ~1-110028 2 ~~P-l ~( Vf1 3wW1 qtt)qm ~fcA 1tG ~ ~

wv5--~

~~ Tjlt~~l ~TTfR Jfff Hmlfil frqrl

V - h H A t l l ~ I oKt lr rT( It ~o IO rln~

A -liN f5 X L 10 ~- TIl

P~ 31f7-1589081131 Jo-y f

l1~lm~lT ~ I

iJ1~ mwR ~PT ~ffi11

~ R1lcn 261012010

11Yl ~r~ ~ -Jj)TlfJf7 -3rrirm~~A

~ vwr 3W1l1

~~I

fm- Jffi ~ 11-ltr1

(~fc1 ~ I

ffiql~ 11~R-A1 fvrrn TCnIfltf (11~~I) qjl ~I ~ 1i r~ffit ~

middot3m WI l[tzr f~ qf~ ~ ~ (qvrW~l) ~ TfMm illll1

~ 19626 ltf19 3ffift ~ ltfit ~ ~ q~~T Qll1R ~ rft9fltf f I~~~ i)

j bull (lq~ltfl11 TTT11ltn)

~ BfircI

tj unR~1 ~1TIf1 ~ Gm18 if1Pl

~ ~ Jffi-15S9 08Q311 Io-43 ~~ ~C 102010 ~M- 1 -rifT iff ~~ 1111 ~ ~fl1 ~1flt)~ ~ tl Qri ~ Wi-ll0028

2 W~T9i ~-i)l ~ middotjwnrr 7nITB ljqf m ~ ~

~-~ 1fuCl

1iurnt~T ~ ~ mntr1 fcr+wl

~VJ nR~r

I I~

i Leuro (~i~L- co ----- - ---~ pt ~ -

16loUO

~t c0-kt5)

birmiddot (gt k((Jl)-1 ~ -shy

I Lf

ld 5pound029L2SSL0 01 WOJj 2S2t 0102-92-1)0

ANIV E XUI F - rv ---~- - - -

JUSTIFICATION

FOR

INCREASING THE SCOPE OF THE

LOWER WARDHA IRRIGATION PROJECT MAHARASHIRA

(REVISED-MAJOR)

Imiddot

i

(

J S

The F1evised Lower Wardha Project Maharashtra wa~ discussed in the 106lh TAC Meeting of

MoWR held on 16092010 In the said meeting after discussions regarding the benefits

accrued by the present proposal against the originally approved project proposal the

Committee dpcidecl that the project will be reconsidered after submission of proper justification

note for chan~Jing the scope of the project by project authorities

In thi s regard the Government of Maharashtra vide letter dated 20 92010 addre ssed to

Secretary (MoWR) with a copy endorsed to Chairman CWC have submitted justification which

13 enclosed at Annex-I

The component-wise justification as stated by the project authorities are given as here under

1 Lift Component The Lift irrigation scheme in the project has been proposed to provide

irrigation benefits to an additional area of 8330 ha annually for which sufficjent water is

available With the provision of Lift irrigation benefits can be given to some extent to the

Project Affected People At present the work of Head works is under completion it is

feasible at this stage to construct the lift component as a part of Lower Wardha Project rather

than taking the scheme separately

2 Pulgaon Barrage In earlier proposal supply of water for drinking purpose to Pulgaon City

had been proposed from the Lower Wardha Reservoir Now in the revised proposal it has

been proposed to supply drinking water to Pulgaon City with 13 villages Damangaoll

City and Central Ammunition Depot located at Pulgaon from the Pulgaon Barrage

located at 27 Kl DIS of the Lower Wardha Project With such proposal the water losses

due to transmission from Lower Wardha Dam and Cost of the water carriage system would

be reduceej significantly Also the water from free catchment downstream of Lower Wardha

Project would also be utilized The water thus saved would be supplied to Lanco Power

project which adds net revenue to the Government and reduces the Power scarcity in

the state

3 Kharda Barrage The barrage has been proposed at 62 Km DIS of the Lower Wardha

Project to provide additional irrigation benefits to an area of 2464 ha annually Though this

area comes in culturable command of the project topographicqlly it is located at higher

elevation due to which the irrigation benefits cannot be provi~e through the distribution

network of the originally conceived Lower Wardha Project The propos~d fltharda Barrage is

located near by the above command area Therefore this area would tiJe brought under

irrigation by the proposed Kharda barrage The benefited area belongs to the distressed

farmers suicide prone district Further water from free catchment below is also utilized

thus increasing the utilization of water

---

Apart from the above the project authorities have mentioned that framing the above project

propo~)al fer the said components separately would consume much time for the preparation

ot detailed project reports At the same tii-le the actual intended benefits from the original

Lower Wai-dha project would not be affected due to inclusion of Lift Irrigation Scheme and

other two 13arrages However the original components of the project will be given priority to

complete first and to give irrigation benefits accordingly The additional components

proposed will be planned in such a way that the completion of original components should

not be affected The detailed programme of the various components of the project is as given

below - --_

-S~ParticuI8-r Progress

-~~------shy 1001 I Head works I

I

i i

_---shy -~---- lal tg7 - shy

_1-_rain ca 1001~~1JD~~3Jttries 20

------- - -shy0t S~-t-w-orkS of LIS

0l (i~ IBarage~ --~---

As per the schedule bull proposed earlier

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be completed by 2010

Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Comf2leted Proposed to be completed by 2014 Proposed to be completed by 2015 Proposed to be completed by 2014

As per the schedule revised now - ~j

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be comf2leted by 2010 ___ _ Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Completed Proposed to be completed by 2012 Proposed to be completed by 201 5 Proposed to be completed by 2014 --

The project authorities have also mentioned that tenders for the above works have been invited

and the maximum works have been awarded so that the project would be completed within

time and minimum cost over-run

(ov1 of Mahmashtra has _also given concurrence of Finance Oeptt for the finalized cost of the

revised Lower Wardha project

Iurther they have mentioned that the project IS under Honble PMs package for agrarian

distressed districts of iVlaharashtra

In view of the above justification furnished -by Government of Maharashtra the revised proi(~ct

proposal is put up for consideration of the Ijvisory Committee please

~

j( 11 ill 1 11

(

he I 11

i1~)1 n

1 1

1)11 III I) i ]IIW)1 dtle1

II

middot

1 i

--shy

1011]

T

IITI lUll

C0I11101ICI11 1OP( the silPldd llut

maxinllllll wi lhi 11 Ii me minim lIllJ cost

nance DcptLmiddot Ihe t1 cost

Lower Varclha a~

W

(tl Y Kobnyulc) (K U HatH)

bull llthc Dircdol ~cuda Iy (Wl) v rhha Irriglltion J)ccllJpnl~t Water lcsomcdDqlarhW211 t

rporation Nagplll G(ycrtimcnt hI Mahra~htra MI~ntralHya l1lhlbai

lu C c lK Pmam Nevv Delhimiddot

A

102010

is hereby

by the of Kamataka and

will for the project

r Resources) (Minor trrigation) Department

Bangalore

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

22 RK Kanodia Director PA (S) CWC New Delhi

23 C Lal Director FMP CWC New Delhi

24 GS Tyagi Director (UT amp SS) CWC New Delhi

25 SS Bakshi Director (FEamp SA) CWC New Delhi

26 M W Paunikar DO PA(N) CWC New Delhi

27 Sudhir Kumar DO PA(S) CWC New Delhi

28 Bashishtha Rai DO PA(C) CWC New Delhi

29 OP Gupta DO (FEamp SA) CWC New Delhi

d) State Government officers

SI Shri

Andhra Pradesh

30 SK Joshi Principal Secretary I ampCAD Dptt Govtof Andhra Pradesh Hyoerabad

31 M Venkateswara Rao Chief Engineer Indira Sagar Polavaram Project Dowlaiswarm AP

32 KRamakrishna Chief Engineer Govtof Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad

Jharkhand

33 RS Poddar Principal Secretary WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

34 BC Nigam Spl Secretary WRD Govt of Jharkhand Ranchi

35 RMRabidas Engineer-in-Chief WRD Govt of ~Iharkhand Ranchi

36 BMKumar Chief Engineer WRD Govt of Jharkhand Jamshedpur

37 BKSingh SE WRD Govt of Jharkhand~ Ranchi

38 Amaresh Kumar Sinha Resident Engineer cum OSD WRD Govt of Jharkhand New Delhi

Karnataka

39 B Guru Prasad Chief Engineer Minor Irrigation Govt of Karnataka Bangalore

Madhya Pradesh

40 R S Julaniya Principal Secretary WRD Govt of Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

41 EB Pati SecretaryWRD Govt of Maharashtra Mumbai

42 SNHuddar Advisor WRD Govt of Maharashtra Pune

43 CS Modak Executive Director VIDC Nagpur

NBGhuge Chief Engineer Gosikhurd Project Nagpur

44 Rajasthan

45 Damodar Sharma Chairman IGNP Govtof Rajasthan Jaipur

46 TK Parmar Chief Engineer WR (North) Govt of Rajasthan Hanumangarh

47 Virdhi Chand Chief Engineer IGNP Govtof Rajasthan Bikaner

48 Rajni kant SE Suratgarh WRCircie Hanumangarh

Uttar Pradesh

49 Suresh Tiwari Engineer-in-Chief (DampP) Irrigation Department Govtof UP Lucknow

50 A K Ojha CE UP Irrigation Govtof UP Lucknow

12

T tzrnit IT fiTTH1

~~ ~I1P1 ~

1fII1tCh gj-11 13441173 105 1gtI Jl ll n Fcr Iii 131 0 r)- ( ~ ftrrfli 2 G 11012010

gtlA 1fCltnJntrziffi ~ -mwfif1 J~~T1 ~T1 ~ J117lTrT ~~I

Iqqq- ~ 11UT1 ~ qf~~ f~ ~Wif[f (1f~i) ~ ~ 1]clrl ~ ~1 P1

ltfl~ Ofl~ I

ltnrnZ1middotlftlrIl fn-~ qf4111 11 ~ ~n~ (mzrn~1) ~ ~fitf~B rITTfl ~ 6247 4lt- CHrdl ~ h~ ~ ~ ~~I ~mr-I ~ ~ I f

yen ~lO )10

C(1)~tw=I ~Rltn) ~tIfIq

ql~~1 ~ITB1 iiftf mn~ ~

~ ~3441173 05 Q -31f n fltUt31IQLI] Wrr~r ~ ~amp lO~OlO ~-

1 BfI ~ n-mtFf ffiwl 1TITrf (-Tiff ~ ~ 1ltf~ rn lilll 1 ~1-110028 2 ~~P-l ~( Vf1 3wW1 qtt)qm ~fcA 1tG ~ ~

wv5--~

~~ Tjlt~~l ~TTfR Jfff Hmlfil frqrl

V - h H A t l l ~ I oKt lr rT( It ~o IO rln~

A -liN f5 X L 10 ~- TIl

P~ 31f7-1589081131 Jo-y f

l1~lm~lT ~ I

iJ1~ mwR ~PT ~ffi11

~ R1lcn 261012010

11Yl ~r~ ~ -Jj)TlfJf7 -3rrirm~~A

~ vwr 3W1l1

~~I

fm- Jffi ~ 11-ltr1

(~fc1 ~ I

ffiql~ 11~R-A1 fvrrn TCnIfltf (11~~I) qjl ~I ~ 1i r~ffit ~

middot3m WI l[tzr f~ qf~ ~ ~ (qvrW~l) ~ TfMm illll1

~ 19626 ltf19 3ffift ~ ltfit ~ ~ q~~T Qll1R ~ rft9fltf f I~~~ i)

j bull (lq~ltfl11 TTT11ltn)

~ BfircI

tj unR~1 ~1TIf1 ~ Gm18 if1Pl

~ ~ Jffi-15S9 08Q311 Io-43 ~~ ~C 102010 ~M- 1 -rifT iff ~~ 1111 ~ ~fl1 ~1flt)~ ~ tl Qri ~ Wi-ll0028

2 W~T9i ~-i)l ~ middotjwnrr 7nITB ljqf m ~ ~

~-~ 1fuCl

1iurnt~T ~ ~ mntr1 fcr+wl

~VJ nR~r

I I~

i Leuro (~i~L- co ----- - ---~ pt ~ -

16loUO

~t c0-kt5)

birmiddot (gt k((Jl)-1 ~ -shy

I Lf

ld 5pound029L2SSL0 01 WOJj 2S2t 0102-92-1)0

ANIV E XUI F - rv ---~- - - -

JUSTIFICATION

FOR

INCREASING THE SCOPE OF THE

LOWER WARDHA IRRIGATION PROJECT MAHARASHIRA

(REVISED-MAJOR)

Imiddot

i

(

J S

The F1evised Lower Wardha Project Maharashtra wa~ discussed in the 106lh TAC Meeting of

MoWR held on 16092010 In the said meeting after discussions regarding the benefits

accrued by the present proposal against the originally approved project proposal the

Committee dpcidecl that the project will be reconsidered after submission of proper justification

note for chan~Jing the scope of the project by project authorities

In thi s regard the Government of Maharashtra vide letter dated 20 92010 addre ssed to

Secretary (MoWR) with a copy endorsed to Chairman CWC have submitted justification which

13 enclosed at Annex-I

The component-wise justification as stated by the project authorities are given as here under

1 Lift Component The Lift irrigation scheme in the project has been proposed to provide

irrigation benefits to an additional area of 8330 ha annually for which sufficjent water is

available With the provision of Lift irrigation benefits can be given to some extent to the

Project Affected People At present the work of Head works is under completion it is

feasible at this stage to construct the lift component as a part of Lower Wardha Project rather

than taking the scheme separately

2 Pulgaon Barrage In earlier proposal supply of water for drinking purpose to Pulgaon City

had been proposed from the Lower Wardha Reservoir Now in the revised proposal it has

been proposed to supply drinking water to Pulgaon City with 13 villages Damangaoll

City and Central Ammunition Depot located at Pulgaon from the Pulgaon Barrage

located at 27 Kl DIS of the Lower Wardha Project With such proposal the water losses

due to transmission from Lower Wardha Dam and Cost of the water carriage system would

be reduceej significantly Also the water from free catchment downstream of Lower Wardha

Project would also be utilized The water thus saved would be supplied to Lanco Power

project which adds net revenue to the Government and reduces the Power scarcity in

the state

3 Kharda Barrage The barrage has been proposed at 62 Km DIS of the Lower Wardha

Project to provide additional irrigation benefits to an area of 2464 ha annually Though this

area comes in culturable command of the project topographicqlly it is located at higher

elevation due to which the irrigation benefits cannot be provi~e through the distribution

network of the originally conceived Lower Wardha Project The propos~d fltharda Barrage is

located near by the above command area Therefore this area would tiJe brought under

irrigation by the proposed Kharda barrage The benefited area belongs to the distressed

farmers suicide prone district Further water from free catchment below is also utilized

thus increasing the utilization of water

---

Apart from the above the project authorities have mentioned that framing the above project

propo~)al fer the said components separately would consume much time for the preparation

ot detailed project reports At the same tii-le the actual intended benefits from the original

Lower Wai-dha project would not be affected due to inclusion of Lift Irrigation Scheme and

other two 13arrages However the original components of the project will be given priority to

complete first and to give irrigation benefits accordingly The additional components

proposed will be planned in such a way that the completion of original components should

not be affected The detailed programme of the various components of the project is as given

below - --_

-S~ParticuI8-r Progress

-~~------shy 1001 I Head works I

I

i i

_---shy -~---- lal tg7 - shy

_1-_rain ca 1001~~1JD~~3Jttries 20

------- - -shy0t S~-t-w-orkS of LIS

0l (i~ IBarage~ --~---

As per the schedule bull proposed earlier

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be completed by 2010

Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Comf2leted Proposed to be completed by 2014 Proposed to be completed by 2015 Proposed to be completed by 2014

As per the schedule revised now - ~j

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be comf2leted by 2010 ___ _ Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Completed Proposed to be completed by 2012 Proposed to be completed by 201 5 Proposed to be completed by 2014 --

The project authorities have also mentioned that tenders for the above works have been invited

and the maximum works have been awarded so that the project would be completed within

time and minimum cost over-run

(ov1 of Mahmashtra has _also given concurrence of Finance Oeptt for the finalized cost of the

revised Lower Wardha project

Iurther they have mentioned that the project IS under Honble PMs package for agrarian

distressed districts of iVlaharashtra

In view of the above justification furnished -by Government of Maharashtra the revised proi(~ct

proposal is put up for consideration of the Ijvisory Committee please

~

j( 11 ill 1 11

(

he I 11

i1~)1 n

1 1

1)11 III I) i ]IIW)1 dtle1

II

middot

1 i

--shy

1011]

T

IITI lUll

C0I11101ICI11 1OP( the silPldd llut

maxinllllll wi lhi 11 Ii me minim lIllJ cost

nance DcptLmiddot Ihe t1 cost

Lower Varclha a~

W

(tl Y Kobnyulc) (K U HatH)

bull llthc Dircdol ~cuda Iy (Wl) v rhha Irriglltion J)ccllJpnl~t Water lcsomcdDqlarhW211 t

rporation Nagplll G(ycrtimcnt hI Mahra~htra MI~ntralHya l1lhlbai

lu C c lK Pmam Nevv Delhimiddot

A

102010

is hereby

by the of Kamataka and

will for the project

r Resources) (Minor trrigation) Department

Bangalore

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

T tzrnit IT fiTTH1

~~ ~I1P1 ~

1fII1tCh gj-11 13441173 105 1gtI Jl ll n Fcr Iii 131 0 r)- ( ~ ftrrfli 2 G 11012010

gtlA 1fCltnJntrziffi ~ -mwfif1 J~~T1 ~T1 ~ J117lTrT ~~I

Iqqq- ~ 11UT1 ~ qf~~ f~ ~Wif[f (1f~i) ~ ~ 1]clrl ~ ~1 P1

ltfl~ Ofl~ I

ltnrnZ1middotlftlrIl fn-~ qf4111 11 ~ ~n~ (mzrn~1) ~ ~fitf~B rITTfl ~ 6247 4lt- CHrdl ~ h~ ~ ~ ~~I ~mr-I ~ ~ I f

yen ~lO )10

C(1)~tw=I ~Rltn) ~tIfIq

ql~~1 ~ITB1 iiftf mn~ ~

~ ~3441173 05 Q -31f n fltUt31IQLI] Wrr~r ~ ~amp lO~OlO ~-

1 BfI ~ n-mtFf ffiwl 1TITrf (-Tiff ~ ~ 1ltf~ rn lilll 1 ~1-110028 2 ~~P-l ~( Vf1 3wW1 qtt)qm ~fcA 1tG ~ ~

wv5--~

~~ Tjlt~~l ~TTfR Jfff Hmlfil frqrl

V - h H A t l l ~ I oKt lr rT( It ~o IO rln~

A -liN f5 X L 10 ~- TIl

P~ 31f7-1589081131 Jo-y f

l1~lm~lT ~ I

iJ1~ mwR ~PT ~ffi11

~ R1lcn 261012010

11Yl ~r~ ~ -Jj)TlfJf7 -3rrirm~~A

~ vwr 3W1l1

~~I

fm- Jffi ~ 11-ltr1

(~fc1 ~ I

ffiql~ 11~R-A1 fvrrn TCnIfltf (11~~I) qjl ~I ~ 1i r~ffit ~

middot3m WI l[tzr f~ qf~ ~ ~ (qvrW~l) ~ TfMm illll1

~ 19626 ltf19 3ffift ~ ltfit ~ ~ q~~T Qll1R ~ rft9fltf f I~~~ i)

j bull (lq~ltfl11 TTT11ltn)

~ BfircI

tj unR~1 ~1TIf1 ~ Gm18 if1Pl

~ ~ Jffi-15S9 08Q311 Io-43 ~~ ~C 102010 ~M- 1 -rifT iff ~~ 1111 ~ ~fl1 ~1flt)~ ~ tl Qri ~ Wi-ll0028

2 W~T9i ~-i)l ~ middotjwnrr 7nITB ljqf m ~ ~

~-~ 1fuCl

1iurnt~T ~ ~ mntr1 fcr+wl

~VJ nR~r

I I~

i Leuro (~i~L- co ----- - ---~ pt ~ -

16loUO

~t c0-kt5)

birmiddot (gt k((Jl)-1 ~ -shy

I Lf

ld 5pound029L2SSL0 01 WOJj 2S2t 0102-92-1)0

ANIV E XUI F - rv ---~- - - -

JUSTIFICATION

FOR

INCREASING THE SCOPE OF THE

LOWER WARDHA IRRIGATION PROJECT MAHARASHIRA

(REVISED-MAJOR)

Imiddot

i

(

J S

The F1evised Lower Wardha Project Maharashtra wa~ discussed in the 106lh TAC Meeting of

MoWR held on 16092010 In the said meeting after discussions regarding the benefits

accrued by the present proposal against the originally approved project proposal the

Committee dpcidecl that the project will be reconsidered after submission of proper justification

note for chan~Jing the scope of the project by project authorities

In thi s regard the Government of Maharashtra vide letter dated 20 92010 addre ssed to

Secretary (MoWR) with a copy endorsed to Chairman CWC have submitted justification which

13 enclosed at Annex-I

The component-wise justification as stated by the project authorities are given as here under

1 Lift Component The Lift irrigation scheme in the project has been proposed to provide

irrigation benefits to an additional area of 8330 ha annually for which sufficjent water is

available With the provision of Lift irrigation benefits can be given to some extent to the

Project Affected People At present the work of Head works is under completion it is

feasible at this stage to construct the lift component as a part of Lower Wardha Project rather

than taking the scheme separately

2 Pulgaon Barrage In earlier proposal supply of water for drinking purpose to Pulgaon City

had been proposed from the Lower Wardha Reservoir Now in the revised proposal it has

been proposed to supply drinking water to Pulgaon City with 13 villages Damangaoll

City and Central Ammunition Depot located at Pulgaon from the Pulgaon Barrage

located at 27 Kl DIS of the Lower Wardha Project With such proposal the water losses

due to transmission from Lower Wardha Dam and Cost of the water carriage system would

be reduceej significantly Also the water from free catchment downstream of Lower Wardha

Project would also be utilized The water thus saved would be supplied to Lanco Power

project which adds net revenue to the Government and reduces the Power scarcity in

the state

3 Kharda Barrage The barrage has been proposed at 62 Km DIS of the Lower Wardha

Project to provide additional irrigation benefits to an area of 2464 ha annually Though this

area comes in culturable command of the project topographicqlly it is located at higher

elevation due to which the irrigation benefits cannot be provi~e through the distribution

network of the originally conceived Lower Wardha Project The propos~d fltharda Barrage is

located near by the above command area Therefore this area would tiJe brought under

irrigation by the proposed Kharda barrage The benefited area belongs to the distressed

farmers suicide prone district Further water from free catchment below is also utilized

thus increasing the utilization of water

---

Apart from the above the project authorities have mentioned that framing the above project

propo~)al fer the said components separately would consume much time for the preparation

ot detailed project reports At the same tii-le the actual intended benefits from the original

Lower Wai-dha project would not be affected due to inclusion of Lift Irrigation Scheme and

other two 13arrages However the original components of the project will be given priority to

complete first and to give irrigation benefits accordingly The additional components

proposed will be planned in such a way that the completion of original components should

not be affected The detailed programme of the various components of the project is as given

below - --_

-S~ParticuI8-r Progress

-~~------shy 1001 I Head works I

I

i i

_---shy -~---- lal tg7 - shy

_1-_rain ca 1001~~1JD~~3Jttries 20

------- - -shy0t S~-t-w-orkS of LIS

0l (i~ IBarage~ --~---

As per the schedule bull proposed earlier

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be completed by 2010

Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Comf2leted Proposed to be completed by 2014 Proposed to be completed by 2015 Proposed to be completed by 2014

As per the schedule revised now - ~j

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be comf2leted by 2010 ___ _ Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Completed Proposed to be completed by 2012 Proposed to be completed by 201 5 Proposed to be completed by 2014 --

The project authorities have also mentioned that tenders for the above works have been invited

and the maximum works have been awarded so that the project would be completed within

time and minimum cost over-run

(ov1 of Mahmashtra has _also given concurrence of Finance Oeptt for the finalized cost of the

revised Lower Wardha project

Iurther they have mentioned that the project IS under Honble PMs package for agrarian

distressed districts of iVlaharashtra

In view of the above justification furnished -by Government of Maharashtra the revised proi(~ct

proposal is put up for consideration of the Ijvisory Committee please

~

j( 11 ill 1 11

(

he I 11

i1~)1 n

1 1

1)11 III I) i ]IIW)1 dtle1

II

middot

1 i

--shy

1011]

T

IITI lUll

C0I11101ICI11 1OP( the silPldd llut

maxinllllll wi lhi 11 Ii me minim lIllJ cost

nance DcptLmiddot Ihe t1 cost

Lower Varclha a~

W

(tl Y Kobnyulc) (K U HatH)

bull llthc Dircdol ~cuda Iy (Wl) v rhha Irriglltion J)ccllJpnl~t Water lcsomcdDqlarhW211 t

rporation Nagplll G(ycrtimcnt hI Mahra~htra MI~ntralHya l1lhlbai

lu C c lK Pmam Nevv Delhimiddot

A

102010

is hereby

by the of Kamataka and

will for the project

r Resources) (Minor trrigation) Department

Bangalore

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

A -liN f5 X L 10 ~- TIl

P~ 31f7-1589081131 Jo-y f

l1~lm~lT ~ I

iJ1~ mwR ~PT ~ffi11

~ R1lcn 261012010

11Yl ~r~ ~ -Jj)TlfJf7 -3rrirm~~A

~ vwr 3W1l1

~~I

fm- Jffi ~ 11-ltr1

(~fc1 ~ I

ffiql~ 11~R-A1 fvrrn TCnIfltf (11~~I) qjl ~I ~ 1i r~ffit ~

middot3m WI l[tzr f~ qf~ ~ ~ (qvrW~l) ~ TfMm illll1

~ 19626 ltf19 3ffift ~ ltfit ~ ~ q~~T Qll1R ~ rft9fltf f I~~~ i)

j bull (lq~ltfl11 TTT11ltn)

~ BfircI

tj unR~1 ~1TIf1 ~ Gm18 if1Pl

~ ~ Jffi-15S9 08Q311 Io-43 ~~ ~C 102010 ~M- 1 -rifT iff ~~ 1111 ~ ~fl1 ~1flt)~ ~ tl Qri ~ Wi-ll0028

2 W~T9i ~-i)l ~ middotjwnrr 7nITB ljqf m ~ ~

~-~ 1fuCl

1iurnt~T ~ ~ mntr1 fcr+wl

~VJ nR~r

I I~

i Leuro (~i~L- co ----- - ---~ pt ~ -

16loUO

~t c0-kt5)

birmiddot (gt k((Jl)-1 ~ -shy

I Lf

ld 5pound029L2SSL0 01 WOJj 2S2t 0102-92-1)0

ANIV E XUI F - rv ---~- - - -

JUSTIFICATION

FOR

INCREASING THE SCOPE OF THE

LOWER WARDHA IRRIGATION PROJECT MAHARASHIRA

(REVISED-MAJOR)

Imiddot

i

(

J S

The F1evised Lower Wardha Project Maharashtra wa~ discussed in the 106lh TAC Meeting of

MoWR held on 16092010 In the said meeting after discussions regarding the benefits

accrued by the present proposal against the originally approved project proposal the

Committee dpcidecl that the project will be reconsidered after submission of proper justification

note for chan~Jing the scope of the project by project authorities

In thi s regard the Government of Maharashtra vide letter dated 20 92010 addre ssed to

Secretary (MoWR) with a copy endorsed to Chairman CWC have submitted justification which

13 enclosed at Annex-I

The component-wise justification as stated by the project authorities are given as here under

1 Lift Component The Lift irrigation scheme in the project has been proposed to provide

irrigation benefits to an additional area of 8330 ha annually for which sufficjent water is

available With the provision of Lift irrigation benefits can be given to some extent to the

Project Affected People At present the work of Head works is under completion it is

feasible at this stage to construct the lift component as a part of Lower Wardha Project rather

than taking the scheme separately

2 Pulgaon Barrage In earlier proposal supply of water for drinking purpose to Pulgaon City

had been proposed from the Lower Wardha Reservoir Now in the revised proposal it has

been proposed to supply drinking water to Pulgaon City with 13 villages Damangaoll

City and Central Ammunition Depot located at Pulgaon from the Pulgaon Barrage

located at 27 Kl DIS of the Lower Wardha Project With such proposal the water losses

due to transmission from Lower Wardha Dam and Cost of the water carriage system would

be reduceej significantly Also the water from free catchment downstream of Lower Wardha

Project would also be utilized The water thus saved would be supplied to Lanco Power

project which adds net revenue to the Government and reduces the Power scarcity in

the state

3 Kharda Barrage The barrage has been proposed at 62 Km DIS of the Lower Wardha

Project to provide additional irrigation benefits to an area of 2464 ha annually Though this

area comes in culturable command of the project topographicqlly it is located at higher

elevation due to which the irrigation benefits cannot be provi~e through the distribution

network of the originally conceived Lower Wardha Project The propos~d fltharda Barrage is

located near by the above command area Therefore this area would tiJe brought under

irrigation by the proposed Kharda barrage The benefited area belongs to the distressed

farmers suicide prone district Further water from free catchment below is also utilized

thus increasing the utilization of water

---

Apart from the above the project authorities have mentioned that framing the above project

propo~)al fer the said components separately would consume much time for the preparation

ot detailed project reports At the same tii-le the actual intended benefits from the original

Lower Wai-dha project would not be affected due to inclusion of Lift Irrigation Scheme and

other two 13arrages However the original components of the project will be given priority to

complete first and to give irrigation benefits accordingly The additional components

proposed will be planned in such a way that the completion of original components should

not be affected The detailed programme of the various components of the project is as given

below - --_

-S~ParticuI8-r Progress

-~~------shy 1001 I Head works I

I

i i

_---shy -~---- lal tg7 - shy

_1-_rain ca 1001~~1JD~~3Jttries 20

------- - -shy0t S~-t-w-orkS of LIS

0l (i~ IBarage~ --~---

As per the schedule bull proposed earlier

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be completed by 2010

Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Comf2leted Proposed to be completed by 2014 Proposed to be completed by 2015 Proposed to be completed by 2014

As per the schedule revised now - ~j

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be comf2leted by 2010 ___ _ Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Completed Proposed to be completed by 2012 Proposed to be completed by 201 5 Proposed to be completed by 2014 --

The project authorities have also mentioned that tenders for the above works have been invited

and the maximum works have been awarded so that the project would be completed within

time and minimum cost over-run

(ov1 of Mahmashtra has _also given concurrence of Finance Oeptt for the finalized cost of the

revised Lower Wardha project

Iurther they have mentioned that the project IS under Honble PMs package for agrarian

distressed districts of iVlaharashtra

In view of the above justification furnished -by Government of Maharashtra the revised proi(~ct

proposal is put up for consideration of the Ijvisory Committee please

~

j( 11 ill 1 11

(

he I 11

i1~)1 n

1 1

1)11 III I) i ]IIW)1 dtle1

II

middot

1 i

--shy

1011]

T

IITI lUll

C0I11101ICI11 1OP( the silPldd llut

maxinllllll wi lhi 11 Ii me minim lIllJ cost

nance DcptLmiddot Ihe t1 cost

Lower Varclha a~

W

(tl Y Kobnyulc) (K U HatH)

bull llthc Dircdol ~cuda Iy (Wl) v rhha Irriglltion J)ccllJpnl~t Water lcsomcdDqlarhW211 t

rporation Nagplll G(ycrtimcnt hI Mahra~htra MI~ntralHya l1lhlbai

lu C c lK Pmam Nevv Delhimiddot

A

102010

is hereby

by the of Kamataka and

will for the project

r Resources) (Minor trrigation) Department

Bangalore

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

ANIV E XUI F - rv ---~- - - -

JUSTIFICATION

FOR

INCREASING THE SCOPE OF THE

LOWER WARDHA IRRIGATION PROJECT MAHARASHIRA

(REVISED-MAJOR)

Imiddot

i

(

J S

The F1evised Lower Wardha Project Maharashtra wa~ discussed in the 106lh TAC Meeting of

MoWR held on 16092010 In the said meeting after discussions regarding the benefits

accrued by the present proposal against the originally approved project proposal the

Committee dpcidecl that the project will be reconsidered after submission of proper justification

note for chan~Jing the scope of the project by project authorities

In thi s regard the Government of Maharashtra vide letter dated 20 92010 addre ssed to

Secretary (MoWR) with a copy endorsed to Chairman CWC have submitted justification which

13 enclosed at Annex-I

The component-wise justification as stated by the project authorities are given as here under

1 Lift Component The Lift irrigation scheme in the project has been proposed to provide

irrigation benefits to an additional area of 8330 ha annually for which sufficjent water is

available With the provision of Lift irrigation benefits can be given to some extent to the

Project Affected People At present the work of Head works is under completion it is

feasible at this stage to construct the lift component as a part of Lower Wardha Project rather

than taking the scheme separately

2 Pulgaon Barrage In earlier proposal supply of water for drinking purpose to Pulgaon City

had been proposed from the Lower Wardha Reservoir Now in the revised proposal it has

been proposed to supply drinking water to Pulgaon City with 13 villages Damangaoll

City and Central Ammunition Depot located at Pulgaon from the Pulgaon Barrage

located at 27 Kl DIS of the Lower Wardha Project With such proposal the water losses

due to transmission from Lower Wardha Dam and Cost of the water carriage system would

be reduceej significantly Also the water from free catchment downstream of Lower Wardha

Project would also be utilized The water thus saved would be supplied to Lanco Power

project which adds net revenue to the Government and reduces the Power scarcity in

the state

3 Kharda Barrage The barrage has been proposed at 62 Km DIS of the Lower Wardha

Project to provide additional irrigation benefits to an area of 2464 ha annually Though this

area comes in culturable command of the project topographicqlly it is located at higher

elevation due to which the irrigation benefits cannot be provi~e through the distribution

network of the originally conceived Lower Wardha Project The propos~d fltharda Barrage is

located near by the above command area Therefore this area would tiJe brought under

irrigation by the proposed Kharda barrage The benefited area belongs to the distressed

farmers suicide prone district Further water from free catchment below is also utilized

thus increasing the utilization of water

---

Apart from the above the project authorities have mentioned that framing the above project

propo~)al fer the said components separately would consume much time for the preparation

ot detailed project reports At the same tii-le the actual intended benefits from the original

Lower Wai-dha project would not be affected due to inclusion of Lift Irrigation Scheme and

other two 13arrages However the original components of the project will be given priority to

complete first and to give irrigation benefits accordingly The additional components

proposed will be planned in such a way that the completion of original components should

not be affected The detailed programme of the various components of the project is as given

below - --_

-S~ParticuI8-r Progress

-~~------shy 1001 I Head works I

I

i i

_---shy -~---- lal tg7 - shy

_1-_rain ca 1001~~1JD~~3Jttries 20

------- - -shy0t S~-t-w-orkS of LIS

0l (i~ IBarage~ --~---

As per the schedule bull proposed earlier

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be completed by 2010

Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Comf2leted Proposed to be completed by 2014 Proposed to be completed by 2015 Proposed to be completed by 2014

As per the schedule revised now - ~j

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be comf2leted by 2010 ___ _ Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Completed Proposed to be completed by 2012 Proposed to be completed by 201 5 Proposed to be completed by 2014 --

The project authorities have also mentioned that tenders for the above works have been invited

and the maximum works have been awarded so that the project would be completed within

time and minimum cost over-run

(ov1 of Mahmashtra has _also given concurrence of Finance Oeptt for the finalized cost of the

revised Lower Wardha project

Iurther they have mentioned that the project IS under Honble PMs package for agrarian

distressed districts of iVlaharashtra

In view of the above justification furnished -by Government of Maharashtra the revised proi(~ct

proposal is put up for consideration of the Ijvisory Committee please

~

j( 11 ill 1 11

(

he I 11

i1~)1 n

1 1

1)11 III I) i ]IIW)1 dtle1

II

middot

1 i

--shy

1011]

T

IITI lUll

C0I11101ICI11 1OP( the silPldd llut

maxinllllll wi lhi 11 Ii me minim lIllJ cost

nance DcptLmiddot Ihe t1 cost

Lower Varclha a~

W

(tl Y Kobnyulc) (K U HatH)

bull llthc Dircdol ~cuda Iy (Wl) v rhha Irriglltion J)ccllJpnl~t Water lcsomcdDqlarhW211 t

rporation Nagplll G(ycrtimcnt hI Mahra~htra MI~ntralHya l1lhlbai

lu C c lK Pmam Nevv Delhimiddot

A

102010

is hereby

by the of Kamataka and

will for the project

r Resources) (Minor trrigation) Department

Bangalore

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

The F1evised Lower Wardha Project Maharashtra wa~ discussed in the 106lh TAC Meeting of

MoWR held on 16092010 In the said meeting after discussions regarding the benefits

accrued by the present proposal against the originally approved project proposal the

Committee dpcidecl that the project will be reconsidered after submission of proper justification

note for chan~Jing the scope of the project by project authorities

In thi s regard the Government of Maharashtra vide letter dated 20 92010 addre ssed to

Secretary (MoWR) with a copy endorsed to Chairman CWC have submitted justification which

13 enclosed at Annex-I

The component-wise justification as stated by the project authorities are given as here under

1 Lift Component The Lift irrigation scheme in the project has been proposed to provide

irrigation benefits to an additional area of 8330 ha annually for which sufficjent water is

available With the provision of Lift irrigation benefits can be given to some extent to the

Project Affected People At present the work of Head works is under completion it is

feasible at this stage to construct the lift component as a part of Lower Wardha Project rather

than taking the scheme separately

2 Pulgaon Barrage In earlier proposal supply of water for drinking purpose to Pulgaon City

had been proposed from the Lower Wardha Reservoir Now in the revised proposal it has

been proposed to supply drinking water to Pulgaon City with 13 villages Damangaoll

City and Central Ammunition Depot located at Pulgaon from the Pulgaon Barrage

located at 27 Kl DIS of the Lower Wardha Project With such proposal the water losses

due to transmission from Lower Wardha Dam and Cost of the water carriage system would

be reduceej significantly Also the water from free catchment downstream of Lower Wardha

Project would also be utilized The water thus saved would be supplied to Lanco Power

project which adds net revenue to the Government and reduces the Power scarcity in

the state

3 Kharda Barrage The barrage has been proposed at 62 Km DIS of the Lower Wardha

Project to provide additional irrigation benefits to an area of 2464 ha annually Though this

area comes in culturable command of the project topographicqlly it is located at higher

elevation due to which the irrigation benefits cannot be provi~e through the distribution

network of the originally conceived Lower Wardha Project The propos~d fltharda Barrage is

located near by the above command area Therefore this area would tiJe brought under

irrigation by the proposed Kharda barrage The benefited area belongs to the distressed

farmers suicide prone district Further water from free catchment below is also utilized

thus increasing the utilization of water

---

Apart from the above the project authorities have mentioned that framing the above project

propo~)al fer the said components separately would consume much time for the preparation

ot detailed project reports At the same tii-le the actual intended benefits from the original

Lower Wai-dha project would not be affected due to inclusion of Lift Irrigation Scheme and

other two 13arrages However the original components of the project will be given priority to

complete first and to give irrigation benefits accordingly The additional components

proposed will be planned in such a way that the completion of original components should

not be affected The detailed programme of the various components of the project is as given

below - --_

-S~ParticuI8-r Progress

-~~------shy 1001 I Head works I

I

i i

_---shy -~---- lal tg7 - shy

_1-_rain ca 1001~~1JD~~3Jttries 20

------- - -shy0t S~-t-w-orkS of LIS

0l (i~ IBarage~ --~---

As per the schedule bull proposed earlier

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be completed by 2010

Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Comf2leted Proposed to be completed by 2014 Proposed to be completed by 2015 Proposed to be completed by 2014

As per the schedule revised now - ~j

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be comf2leted by 2010 ___ _ Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Completed Proposed to be completed by 2012 Proposed to be completed by 201 5 Proposed to be completed by 2014 --

The project authorities have also mentioned that tenders for the above works have been invited

and the maximum works have been awarded so that the project would be completed within

time and minimum cost over-run

(ov1 of Mahmashtra has _also given concurrence of Finance Oeptt for the finalized cost of the

revised Lower Wardha project

Iurther they have mentioned that the project IS under Honble PMs package for agrarian

distressed districts of iVlaharashtra

In view of the above justification furnished -by Government of Maharashtra the revised proi(~ct

proposal is put up for consideration of the Ijvisory Committee please

~

j( 11 ill 1 11

(

he I 11

i1~)1 n

1 1

1)11 III I) i ]IIW)1 dtle1

II

middot

1 i

--shy

1011]

T

IITI lUll

C0I11101ICI11 1OP( the silPldd llut

maxinllllll wi lhi 11 Ii me minim lIllJ cost

nance DcptLmiddot Ihe t1 cost

Lower Varclha a~

W

(tl Y Kobnyulc) (K U HatH)

bull llthc Dircdol ~cuda Iy (Wl) v rhha Irriglltion J)ccllJpnl~t Water lcsomcdDqlarhW211 t

rporation Nagplll G(ycrtimcnt hI Mahra~htra MI~ntralHya l1lhlbai

lu C c lK Pmam Nevv Delhimiddot

A

102010

is hereby

by the of Kamataka and

will for the project

r Resources) (Minor trrigation) Department

Bangalore

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

---

Apart from the above the project authorities have mentioned that framing the above project

propo~)al fer the said components separately would consume much time for the preparation

ot detailed project reports At the same tii-le the actual intended benefits from the original

Lower Wai-dha project would not be affected due to inclusion of Lift Irrigation Scheme and

other two 13arrages However the original components of the project will be given priority to

complete first and to give irrigation benefits accordingly The additional components

proposed will be planned in such a way that the completion of original components should

not be affected The detailed programme of the various components of the project is as given

below - --_

-S~ParticuI8-r Progress

-~~------shy 1001 I Head works I

I

i i

_---shy -~---- lal tg7 - shy

_1-_rain ca 1001~~1JD~~3Jttries 20

------- - -shy0t S~-t-w-orkS of LIS

0l (i~ IBarage~ --~---

As per the schedule bull proposed earlier

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be completed by 2010

Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Comf2leted Proposed to be completed by 2014 Proposed to be completed by 2015 Proposed to be completed by 2014

As per the schedule revised now - ~j

All the civil work is completed and Miscellaneous work of gate erection balance is in progress to be comf2leted by 2010 ___ _ Main canal works are proposed to be completed by 2011 Completed Proposed to be completed by 2012 Proposed to be completed by 201 5 Proposed to be completed by 2014 --

The project authorities have also mentioned that tenders for the above works have been invited

and the maximum works have been awarded so that the project would be completed within

time and minimum cost over-run

(ov1 of Mahmashtra has _also given concurrence of Finance Oeptt for the finalized cost of the

revised Lower Wardha project

Iurther they have mentioned that the project IS under Honble PMs package for agrarian

distressed districts of iVlaharashtra

In view of the above justification furnished -by Government of Maharashtra the revised proi(~ct

proposal is put up for consideration of the Ijvisory Committee please

~

j( 11 ill 1 11

(

he I 11

i1~)1 n

1 1

1)11 III I) i ]IIW)1 dtle1

II

middot

1 i

--shy

1011]

T

IITI lUll

C0I11101ICI11 1OP( the silPldd llut

maxinllllll wi lhi 11 Ii me minim lIllJ cost

nance DcptLmiddot Ihe t1 cost

Lower Varclha a~

W

(tl Y Kobnyulc) (K U HatH)

bull llthc Dircdol ~cuda Iy (Wl) v rhha Irriglltion J)ccllJpnl~t Water lcsomcdDqlarhW211 t

rporation Nagplll G(ycrtimcnt hI Mahra~htra MI~ntralHya l1lhlbai

lu C c lK Pmam Nevv Delhimiddot

A

102010

is hereby

by the of Kamataka and

will for the project

r Resources) (Minor trrigation) Department

Bangalore

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

~

j( 11 ill 1 11

(

he I 11

i1~)1 n

1 1

1)11 III I) i ]IIW)1 dtle1

II

middot

1 i

--shy

1011]

T

IITI lUll

C0I11101ICI11 1OP( the silPldd llut

maxinllllll wi lhi 11 Ii me minim lIllJ cost

nance DcptLmiddot Ihe t1 cost

Lower Varclha a~

W

(tl Y Kobnyulc) (K U HatH)

bull llthc Dircdol ~cuda Iy (Wl) v rhha Irriglltion J)ccllJpnl~t Water lcsomcdDqlarhW211 t

rporation Nagplll G(ycrtimcnt hI Mahra~htra MI~ntralHya l1lhlbai

lu C c lK Pmam Nevv Delhimiddot

A

102010

is hereby

by the of Kamataka and

will for the project

r Resources) (Minor trrigation) Department

Bangalore

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

IITI lUll

C0I11101ICI11 1OP( the silPldd llut

maxinllllll wi lhi 11 Ii me minim lIllJ cost

nance DcptLmiddot Ihe t1 cost

Lower Varclha a~

W

(tl Y Kobnyulc) (K U HatH)

bull llthc Dircdol ~cuda Iy (Wl) v rhha Irriglltion J)ccllJpnl~t Water lcsomcdDqlarhW211 t

rporation Nagplll G(ycrtimcnt hI Mahra~htra MI~ntralHya l1lhlbai

lu C c lK Pmam Nevv Delhimiddot

A

102010

is hereby

by the of Kamataka and

will for the project

r Resources) (Minor trrigation) Department

Bangalore

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

A

102010

is hereby

by the of Kamataka and

will for the project

r Resources) (Minor trrigation) Department

Bangalore

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

10 10

Concurrence of Finance

-1~ tp Government Water ResQunes Department

Minor irrigation) Finance Department ngalore ngalOre

(Budget and gtIOJ

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

fTr~ ~

3oJ0 fSI 1 3

~~m YfW -J7TJTrTT

YfW ~ lRT ~o pound~ ~~ qft qrf ~oo~-90 Gfl 9~o~~o90 cit i2J7-rr

=-ftamp HfltPbl ( ~=r

rT-r=T it ~Plff flrf)l r-fliiFrrfir

~~~~ ~~ ampc~~ ===~= e=ftrr =~~

3fTCr~z(ifi

~-lt3rJ1flr) i3oJl0 ~lTfFf ~ (middotrosqJ ~

JfTi(lZT itfiiKr ~ fcli ~=~ ~ Cfj( rT-r=T -r7+=

Cfir qrsc

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting

STATE FINANCE CONCURRENCE

Combined proect Estimate if 10 ns Flood Protection

Schemer Basin under Flood Management Programme in Districts

Siddharthnt~ar Jant Kabir Nagar Gorakhpur Deoria in UP

costing 5229 crore Submitted to Central Water Commission

New Delhi which has been evaluated ~ them for Rs 52~29 crore

State Concurrence Rs 5229 crore is heretJ accoreded for

the same

Engineer-in-Chief Design amp Planning

Lucknow

~ w~~ Principal Secretary Principal Secretary

Irrigation Govt ofuP Finanace ofuP Lucknow Lucknow

[-mail einc_dp(iliidurgovin CE-Galldak-ISAl80

• 105 th meeting
• 106 th meeting
• 107th meeting