1086_ftp
TRANSCRIPT
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
1/17
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSESHydrol. Process.16, 30193035 (2002)Published online 17 September 2002 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1086
Groundwater recharge through an alluvial fan in theAtacama Desert, northern Chile: mechanisms,
magnitudes and causes
John Houston*Av. Las Condes, 10373, Of. 60, Santiago, Chile
Abstract:The Chacarilla fan in the Atacama Desert is one of several formed in the Late Miocene at the foot of the Pre-AndeanCordillera overlying the large, complex, Pampa Tamarugal aquifer contained in the continental clastic sediments of thefore-arc basin. The Pampa Tamarugal aquifer is a strategic source of water for northern Chile but there is continuingdoubt over the resource magnitude and recharge. During January 2000 a 1 in 4 year storm in the Andes delivered a34 million m3 flash flood to the fan apex where c . 70% percolated to the underlying aquifers. Groundwater rechargethrough the fan is calculated to be a minimum of 200 l/s or 6% of the long-term catchment rainfall. These figures aresupported by hydrochemical data that suggest that recharge may be 9% of long-term rainfall. Isotopic data suggestgroundwater less than 50 years old is transmitted westward through the permeable sheetflood sediments of the fanoverlying the main aquifer. Analysis of this and other events shows that the hydrological system is non-linear withpositive feedback. The magnitude of groundwater recharge is dependent on climatic variations, antecedent soil moisturestorage and changes in channel characteristics. Long-term declines in groundwater level may partly result from climaticfluctuations and the causes of such fluctuations are discussed. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
KEY WORDS recharge; runoff; precipitation; water resources; alluvial fans; Atacama Desert; Chile
INTRODUCTION
The Atacama Desert of northern Chile is one of the most arid zones in the world, but groundwater resources
exist. However, there is continuing controversy over the size of these resources and whether any recharge
takes place under current climatic conditions. Houston et al. (2001) have suggested that the resource in
the Pampa Tamarugal could be large, but its development is partly constrained by the lack of any reliable
quantification of its recharge. There is general consensus that recharge is currently taking place (DGA, 1987;
JICA, 1995) but the magnitude and mechanism(s) have largely been the subject of conjecture rather than
proof and calculation. It has been suggested, for example, that fresh, apparently recent, groundwater in the
center of the Pampa Tamarugal may originate through a system of faults and deep fissures connected with
Altiplano aquifers (Galli and Dingman, 1962; Margaritz et al., 1990). On the other hand, Grilli et al. (1999)provide convincing hydrochemical and isotopic evidence that recharge takes place at relatively shallow levels
as a result of infiltrating runoff from the Pre-Cordillera.
Mountain-front recharge through alluvial fans is well documented (e.g. Simmers, 1997) but rarely quantified,
and is a function of fan geology and morphology, as well as channel and flow characteristics (Issar and
Passchier, 1990; Sorman and Abdulrazzak, 1997):
1. infiltration rates are highest at the fan apex, where coarsest sediment is deposited, and are proportional to
the saturated vertical hydraulic conductivity;
* Correspondence to: John Houston, Av. Las Condes, 10373, Of. 60, Santiago, Chile. E-mail: [email protected]
Received 16 May 2001
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Accepted 15 October 2001
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
2/17
3020 J. HOUSTON
2. infiltration rates increase with increasing depth to water table and hence increasing groundwater gradient;
3. infiltration rates increase with stream-flow velocity (probably as a result of scour), volume (owing to
increased cross-sectional area) and duration;
4. infiltration is greatest in active channels and least in overbank flooded areas.
This paper examines a specific mountain-front recharge event, which proves the mechanism and provides a
first-order quantification of the processes. It is shown that such events are intermittent and therefore average
values become meaningless; evaluations must take place over many years and take into account many factors,
including possible variations in geology (channel characteristics) and climate within the evaluation horizon.
THE FORE-ARC BASIN OF NORTHERN CHILE
The Pampa Tamarugal of northern Chile (Figure 1) is part of a continental fore-arc basin, which extends
from 18 to 24 S between the Coastal Cordillera in the west and the Pre-Andean Cordillera in the east.
It is nearly 600 km long and varies between 20 and 60 km wide at an average elevation of 1000 m. The
Tertiary sedimentary infill of the fore-arc basin represents a very large, complex aquifer system of strategic
significance to northern Chile. The provincial capital of Iquique depends entirely on groundwater supplies,
and several smaller towns, many mines and agriculture are also heavily dependent on groundwater resources
from the Pampa Tamarugal.
The basin started to form in the early Oligocene, when plate convergence rates slowed creating a
transtensionalextensional environment after the Eocene Incaic phase of compressional deformation (Pardo-
Casas and Molnar, 1987; Mpodozis and Ramos, 1989). The fore-arc basin is a complex asymmetric graben
bounded by two major NS fault zones, to the west the Coastal Range Fault Zone (CRFZ) and to the east
the Pre-Cordillera Fault Zone (PCFZ). Both show evidence of normal faulting as well as lateral displacement,
which, on the PCFZ started as dextral strike-slip in the Eocene and reversed in the late Oligocene (Reutter
et al., 1996). On the northern CRFZ, anticlockwise block rotations may be the cause of lateral displacement(Taylor et al., 1998; Taylor, personal communication 2001). Conjugate oblique NESW and NWSE faults
70W
20S
22S
CHILE
70W
20S
22S
Rio Loa
Rio
Loa
QUILLAGUA
J8
UJINA
COLLACAGUA
CERRO GORDO
3000m
IQUIQUE
FOREARC
BASIN
PRE-CORDILLERA
FAULT ZON E
Figure 1. Location map of the Pampa Tamarugal fore-arc basin between fault lines and the Chacarilla catchment and fan (outlined), showingplaces mentioned in the text
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
3/17
GROUNDWATER RECHARGE 3021
cut the fore-arc creating a series of rhomb-shaped pull-apart basins (Jensen et al., 1995). At least four major
basins have been identified, infilled with up to 1000 m of continental deposits (Houston et al., 2001).
The lowermost sediments of these basins are coarse conglomerates and gravels of the Sichal and Altos
de Pica Formation (Table I), eroded from the adjacent uplifting Coastal Range and Pre-Cordillera. At an
early stage, endorreic lacustrine and evaporitic sediments began to be deposited in the south. Coarse clastic
sediments continued to be deposited over wide areas throughout the Miocene. Episodes of volcanic activity
took place at several times throughout the Miocene, producing andesitic tuffs and ignimbrites from eruptive
centres in the Pre-Cordillera and Cordillera to the north and east of the Pampa Tamarugal (Galli and Dingman,
1962).
Towards the end of the Miocene, as the basins began to fill up, a series of large alluvial fans developed
along the east of the fore-arc basin as discrete architectural elements (Miall, 1996; Kiefer et al., 1997). These
were associated with a final lacustrine phase, which produced fine-grained and evaporitic lake sediments of
the Soledad Formation. Since the Pliocene only minor alluvial and evaporitic sediments have been deposited
at various locations throughout the fore-arc basin.
THE CHACARILLA CATCHMENT
The Quebrada Chacarilla is located on the east side of the Pampa Tamarugal (Figure 1). It is a perennial
river in its descent from the Cordillera, but elsewhere it is ephemeral. It has a catchment area of 1235 km2,
largely above 3000 m and discharges at the foot of the Cordillera to an alluvial fan, which extends into the
Pampa Tamarugal over an area of 684 km2. A hypsometric curve for the basin (Figure 2a) demonstrates that
nearly 90% of the basin is at elevations greater than 3000 m, extending up to 4520 m. The drainage basin is
sixth-order (based on 1 : 50 000 topographic maps) with a mixed trellis and dendritic pattern and a drainage
density varying from 01 to 37 km/km2, averaging 16 km/km2 (Figure 3).
The geology of the catchment (Figure 4 and Table I) is comprised of impermeable Palaeozoic and Mesozoic
bedrock overlain by the Huasco Ignimbrite and permeable, clastic, continental sediments of the Altos de Pica
Formation. To the east of the catchment, Quaternary strato-volcanoes have punched through the underlying
strata to form the highest peaks of the Western Cordillera. The Huasco Ignimbrite occupies large areas of
the central and northern part of the basin and has a relatively low drainage density compared with the clastic
sediments in the southern part of the catchment.
The river profile (Figure 2b) shows a steep descent in a canyon, in places over 500 m deep, down the
Pre-Cordillera to the fan system on the Pampa at elevations of around 1000 m. There are two major terraces
within the canyon. The upper terrace is 2040 m above the canyon floor. It is debris covered and clearly
ancient and inactive and may correlate with the presumed fan-base unconformity. At a height of 25 m is a
more recent terrace, which is contiguous with the downstream fan surface and represents the current floodplain
for extreme events. The currently active channel is cut into this terrace/floodplain.
THE CHACARILLA FAN
The alluvial fan is similar to the Arcas fan located to the south (Kiefer et al., 1997), although with a
smaller volume and different sedimentology, presumably owing to the lower permeability (more erosive)
Arcas catchment area (Blair, 1999). The Chacarilla fan cone has a maximum radius of nearly 40 km and
a flow expansion angle of only 60. Both the main fan and the recent, active channel are asymmetrically
displaced towards the north, as indeed are almost all the major fan systems exposed along the Cordillera.
Houston (2001) has suggested that this is a result of the sinistral movement on the PCFZ during the Miocene.
This model of fan formation explains why the flow expansion angle for the Chacarilla is small compared with
the Arcas fan and why the latter is apparently so much larger with a fan to catchment ratio of 1 03 (compared
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
4/17
3022 J. HOUSTON
Table I. Stratigraphy of the Chacarilla area, based largely on Dingman and Galli (1965), Vergara and Thomas
(1984), Mpodozis and Ramos (1989) and Jensen (1992)
Epoch/
Period
Map
symbol
Formation/
description
Lithology Thickness
(m)
QS
QF
Salar deposits Saline alluvial deposits 0100
Alluvium Clay, sand and gravel 0100Pleistocene
StratovolcanoesAndesitic to basaltic
lavas and tephra01500
Late Pliocene Diaguita uplift and drainage incision
Alluvial fan Gravel, sand and clay 01000+
Late MioceneQuecha phase of compressional deformation
Member 5Sandstone and
conglomerate
QV
QAL
QTA5
QTA1
QTA2
QTA3
QTA4Member 4
Huasco Ignimbrite
Andesitic to dacitic
ignimbrite
Member 3Sandstone with
conglomerates
Member 2Andesitic ignimbrites and
tuffs
EarlyMiddle
Miocene
Altos
de
Pica
Member 1
735
TOM3 Sichal Massive gravels 1000+
Oligocene
Transtension/extensional formation of major basins
Eocene +Intrusive granodiorite and
quartz monzonite
Empexa
ChacarillaJ/K
Longacho
Marine sandstones,
shales, and volcanics12753470
Cretaceous
Jurassic
Gondwana Cycle of magmatic intrusion along Coastal Range andformation of back-arc basins
Permian + Intrusive granite
Permian
CarboniferousPZC Collahuasi
Rhyolitic to dacitic
volcanics >3200
Carboniferous
OrdovicianFamatinian Cycle of accretionary tectonics
Conglomerates and
sandstones
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
5/17
GROUNDWATER RECHARGE 3023
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Area (km2)
Elevation(masl)
fan apex
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
0 50 100 150
Distance from fan toe (km)
Elevation(masl)
Quebrada Caya(S tributary)
Quebrada Chara(N tributary)
watershed profile
fan apex
PCFZ
a
b
PCFZ
Figure 2. Hypsometric curve of the Chacarilla catchment (a) showing the control exerted by the Pre-Cordillera Fault Zone (PCFZ), and(b) profile of the watershed, quebradas and fan
with 055 for the Chacarilla), as there is no major fan to the south of Arcas to cover its southern part, whereas
all the fans to the north are partly covered by the adjacent fan to the south.
The Chacarilla fan is a Type II of Blair and McPherson (1994), being dominated by planar sheetflood
couplets of gravelsand or gravelclay (Figure 5). Couplets range from cm to m scales. The gravel beds
consist of subrounded clasts with a typical maximum diameter of c. 20 cm at fan apex, decreasing down
fan. The gravel beds are clast- or matrix-supported with some crude, thick cross-stratification and occasional
grading. The overlying finer grained, waning member of the couplet usually represents less than 20% of thepaired couplet thickness and is composed of finely stratified sand, silt or clay. These sheetflood deposits have
wide, belt-like geometries that can be traced over many hundreds of metres and are cut by occasional shallow,
erosive based, gravel filled, avulsion channels. Rare, overbank mudflows may be observed, and there are
occasional weakly developed palaeosols suggesting subaerial exposure and erosion during fan formation. Distal
fan areas are dominated by a sand skirt that probably interfingers with the uppermost sediments of the Altos de
Pica Formation or the Soledad Formation. The whole area is overlain by the feather edge of later palaeolake
sediments. The Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite imagery reveals the presence of a palaeospring line along the
toe of the Chacarilla fan, suggesting that this once represented the eastern shoreline of Palaeolake Soledad.
The fan has a slope that decreases from 2 at the apex to 05 in the distal sections. The currently active
channel has been incised by as much as 80 m at the fan apex and so has considerably lower gradients
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
6/17
3024 J. HOUSTON
7740
7.700
1000
4
60
5
00
7740
4000
7.700
460
500
3000
4000
4000
2000
Figure 3. Drainage density of the Chacarilla catchment (UTM grid, 20 km squares, light grey 3 km/km2)
(002 D 11 at the fan apex). This channel is c. 100 m wide at the fan apex and becomes braided in the distal
fan sections. Recent mudflows are largely constrained to this channel, although crevasse splays are common,
and are dominated by silt and clay fractions with very little sand fraction.The age of the Chacarilla fan has not been determined directly but it is stratigraphically equivalent to the
Arcas fan that was formed between 73 (02) Ma and 68 (0.2) Ma (Kiefer et al., 1997).
REGIONAL PRECIPITATION AND THE STORM EVENT OF JANUARY 2000
Despite the general lack of precipitation in the Atacama Desert, the flanking Andes receive significant
precipitation during the austral summer (DecemberMarch) as a result of intense convection over Amazonia
coupled with strong low-level easterly winds, which generate significant precipitation on the eastern slope of
the Andes and over the Altiplano (Fuenzalida and Rutllant, 1986; Garreaud, 1999).
The Atacama Desert, on the western slope of the Andes, lies in a well-developed rainshadow, and as
a result there is a rapid decline in rainfall as air masses move west and descend. Recent reanalysis of 35
precipitation gauges maintained by the Direccion General de Aguas (DGA) between 18 and 24 S for theperiod 19751991 provides the following precipitation model for elevations between 20005000 m
MAR D e00012A
where MAR is the mean annual (OctoberSeptember) rainfall, and A is the altitude in metres.
Above average precipitation occurred during the wet seasons in 1999 and 2000. In particular the storm
events of January 2000 as recorded by the rain gauges at Ujina and Collacagua produced peak daily intensities
of 196 and 268 mm with a return period of c. 4 years (Figure 6). Ujina and Collacagua are two DGA
stations located at 4220 m a.s.l., 25 km south of the Chacarilla catchment and at 3990 m a.s.l., 40 km north,
respectively.
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
7/17
GROUNDWATER RECHARGE 3025
Q L
QTA5
QTA5
QF
QTTA5
QTA4
QS QV
QV
QV
QS
PZC
J K
PCFZCFZPCFZCFZ
7.7407.740
7.7007.700
5
00
5
4
60
460
Figure 4. Geology of the Chacarilla catchment and adjacent areas superimposed on the Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite image. Modifiedfrom Dingman and Galli (1965) and Vergara and Thomas (1984)
Figure 5. Section through the fan apex sediments dominated by laterally extensive sheetflood facies with vertical permeabilities much lessthan horizontal at fan scales. Palaeosols arrowed. Vertical scale bar equals 1 m
Using these two stations, event models can be generated that are applicable to the Chacarilla catchment.
Double mass analysis of daily rainfall for the two stations between 1995 and 2000 shows that the difference
between the two stations is much less during heavy, intense storms than during lighter events, and reduces over
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
8/17
3026 J. HOUSTON
0
10
20
30
Dailyrainfall(mm)
Event 224Jan :26.8 mm
Event 1
13Jan :19.6 mm
JanJul 1999 2000 Jun
1
10
100
1000
Annualmaxmonthlyrainfall(m
m)
Jan 2000
4areturn period
0.99 0.95 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.05 0.01
Exceedence probability
b
a
Figure 6. Mean daily rainfall for 19992000 (a) and the frequency of annual maximum monthly rainfall for 19702000 (b) at Ujina (4200m a.s.l.) and Collacagua (3900 m a.s.l.)
Table II. Event and long-term rainfall calculated for the Chacarilla catchment above 1400 m
Event 1 Event 2 1999 2000 Mean annualrainfall
Weighted mean depth (mm) 21 38 110 91Time span (days) 5 10 43
Volume (million m3) 26 47 136 112
the duration of the storm event. Daily amounts differ by an average of 03 mm and a maximum of 11 mm.
The difference is reduced for 10-day amounts, to an average of 02 mm and a maximum of only 3 mm.
This indicates strong spatial and temporal coherence at the catchment scale for significant storm events, and
therefore the two-station average provides a reliable record for the Chacarilla catchment between 3900 and
4200 m a.s.l. Despite the strong spatial coherence at this elevation, the rainshadow described above requires
that a storm event model takes elevation effects into account. Factoring the mean daily rainfall data at Ujina
and Collacagua according to the precipitationelevation model above and based on the hypsometric curve
gives total catchment rainfall (see Table II).
THE JANUARY 2000 FLOOD HYDROGRAPH
The lower part of the Chacarilla canyon was visited in the low flow season of October 1999 in order to obtain
water samples for a regional study being undertaken by Nazca S.A. A follow-up visit in March 2000 revealed
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
9/17
GROUNDWATER RECHARGE 3027
Figure 7. Rio Chacarilla channel at the fan apex on 8 March 2000, showing (a) the incised bankfull channel (c. 4 m deep, c. 20 m wide)resulting from flash floods, with gravel bar bedforms, overbank mudflows (two episodes) and point bars, (b) detail of the offlappingoverbank mudflows, with the waning deposits of both floods showing differential raindrop intensities, and (c) bank scars resulting from
antidune standing wave scour (c. 4 m high and c . 10 m wavelength)
that a significant flood event had taken place in the interim (see Figure 7). Major changes had taken place to
the active channel morphology, a new mudflow had been deposited throughout the canyon and at least 20 km
out on to the fan along the course of the active channel. Considerable scour had taken place in some reaches
of the canyon, leaving behind the outline of antidune standing waves, and at the fan apex rearrangement of
the gravel bed of the channel had taken place prior to deposition of the mudflow. The overbank mudflow
shows two episodes, which are most likely correlated with differential timing of the flood surge from each
major tributary. The mudflows both display rain pitting, so that rainfall was still occurring at 1400 m a.s.l.
soon after peak flow, an indication that the response time of the catchment must be short because the rainfall
event lasted only a few days (see below).
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
10/17
3028 J. HOUSTON
Based on the slope area method (Benson, 1968), it is possible to estimate the peak discharge. Cross-
and longitudinal profiles were surveyed of a uniform reach of the channel, to the topmost level of the fresh
overbank deposits. The cross-profile was split into six sections varying from 2 to 7 m wide and up to 4 17 m
deep with resistance coefficients estimated for the bed of each section using both the Chezy equation and
Manningsn (Chow, 1959). Using this information, the peak flow is calculated as 450 (50) m3/s.
The dominant process in transferring intense storm precipitation to the Rio Chacarilla, an arid catchment
with steep slopes and sparse vegetation, is likely to be Horton overland flow (Dingman, 1994). Some losses
are to be expected, however, largely owing to infiltration in permeable soils. Such infiltration is subsequently
either evaporated, passed to the river as interflow or percolates to aquifers as recharge. As the Chacarilla
catchment area is separated from the discharge area by the impermeable canyon, the flood peak at the
fan apex will result solely from Horton overland flow plus any baseflow discharge from permeable areas
in the catchment. Baseflow measured at the end of the dry season (October 1999) accounted for 15 l/s,
less than the error in the estimate of the flood peak and can be safely ignored for the purposes of this
calculation.The hydrograph generated by Horton overland flow from the storm event can be estimated using the
US Soil Conservation Service (1972) method to determine the unit hydrograph. This approach has been
widely used and is appropriate for the level of information available. The SCS method allows estimation
of the time to peak discharge from the centroid of the rainfall event (Tpk) based on soil characteristics
and catchment morphology. A value of 121 h has been calculated for Tpk, which is in agreement with
observations for similar catchments in the Calama basin during the 2001 flood events. As Qpk is known,
a degree of calibration is given to the computed unit hydrograph. By integrating the area under the
resulting hydrograph it is possible to obtain a reliable estimate of the total flood volume for each event
(Table III).
The computed flood volumes are high but not unrealistic for flash floods. Runoff coefficients are
consequently also high owing to the intense nature of the storm, but decline as the duration of the storm
event decreases in intensity and duration. This decrease in runoff coefficient in relation to the time spaninvolved indicates a non-linear catchment response, which is common in arid environments. Comparable
runoff coefficients with non-linear behaviour were found by Evenari et al. (1971) in the Negev Desert
of Israel, where long-term rates were around 15 20%, whereas during major floods this increased to
5070%.
THE GROUNDWATER RESPONSE TO THE STORM RUNOFF
The alluvial fan of the Chacarilla constitutes a discrete element in the Pampa Tamarugal aquifer system
(differentiated by its geometry, stratigraphical position, porosity and permeability characteristics) despite
being in overall hydraulic connection with the rest of the basin. The active channel close to the fan apex
represents the main recharge area, with the horizontal sheetflood sediments facilitating transmission down
gradient.
Table III. Storm and flood volumes calculated by the US Soils ConservationService method for the Chacarilla catchment
Event 1 Event 2 1999 2000total (dailyequivalent)
Storm volume (million m3) 26 47 136 (33)
Flow volume (million m3) 74 268 344 (08)Runoff coefficient 029 057 023
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
11/17
GROUNDWATER RECHARGE 3029
long term recession
17.7cm/a
39.0
39.5
40.0
40.5
41.01995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Depthtowater(m)
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.5
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Detrendedwaterlevel
fluctuations(m)
Meandailyrainfall(mm
)
recessioncurves
a
b
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Figure 8. Monthly groundwater levels at J8 during the period 1995 2000, (a) showing the superimposed linear regression and (b) detrended
water level fluctuations compared with mean daily rainfall at Ujina and Collacagua and the estimated recession curves
It is fortunate that the DGA monitoring well J8 penetrates the distal part of the Chacarilla fan, at a radialdistance of 33 km from the apex. Data for this well is continuous from 1995 to date with the exception of
a six-month gap in 199798. Since 1995, water levels in this well show an overall decline (see Figure 8a)
in common with many other monitoring wells in the Pampa Tamarugal, which generally is attributed to
overexploitation. Nevertheless, short-term fluctuations are visible and are most pronounced in 1999 and
2000. Such fluctuations are the result of recharge to the aquifer through the alluvial fan. If it assumed that
the long-term decline is the result of overexploitation, and this trend removed, then the residuals represent
groundwater recharge (water level rises) and subsequent recession (water level declines). When compared with
annual rainfall (Figure 8b) confirmation is obtained that recharge is associated with high intensity rainfall,
which causes flash floods and flood water infiltration.
Groundwater rises owing to recharge took place between February and November 1999 and between January
and June 2000. The rise started immediately after the rainfallrunoff peak owing to infiltration from flood
water, which reached the distal parts of the fan and continued for 59 months owing to the lag time in thepassage of groundwater through the fan, which was infiltrated near the fan apex.
In order to calculate the volume of recharge, several assumptions and calculations must be made. Firstly,
the total rise resulting from groundwater recharge is calculated by extending the prior recession. Secondly, it
is assumed that the rise of water level in J8 can be applied to the whole of the fan area. This is a conservative
assumption because J8 is in the distal fan area and any rise here will be a minimum. Furthermore, the exposed
fan area is a minimum because it is overlain by separate fan sediments from the south. Finally, the specific
yield (effective porosity) of the sediments must be known.
A pumping test was carried out on J8 and several other wells in alluvial fan sediments of the Pampa
Tamarugal by JICA (1995). Reanalysis of their data shows that these wells (and in particular J8) exhibit a
typical dual porosity response (Gringarten, 1982). This is typical for such alluvial fan sediments (Beard and
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
12/17
3030 J. HOUSTON
Weyl, 1973; Galloway and Sharp, 1998a,b). The reanalysis provided the following parameter values
fissure permeabilityKf D 5 m/day
fissure storativitySf D 0005
matrix storativitySm D 008
In these layered sediments, where horizontal permeability is greater than vertical permeability, specific yield
is equivalent to matrix porosity and a value of 008 is considered conservative for such sediments (Johnson,
1967).
Then recharge is given by
RECH D WL CRAfan Sy
where, RECH is the volume of groundwater recharge, WL is the rise in groundwater level, R is the extrap-
olated prior groundwater recession, Afan is the area of the fan and Sy is the specific yield or effective porosity.
The results of the recharge volume calculations are given in Table IV. Note that it is possible to consider the
groundwater recharge event as either the result of storm-runoff events 1 and 2 or the water year 19992000.
The results are also provided for 19981999 for comparison.
The recharge volume is very significant. An examination of the recharge coefficients is instructive; recharge
coefficients are higher than normally might be expected, with event ratios being higher than annual values
confirming the non-linear catchment response. Furthermore, the higher recharge coefficient for 19981999
compared with 19992000, despite a lower total recharge volume, probably is related to antecedent moisture
in the catchment, because the years prior to 19981999 received relatively little rainfall-runoff-recharge and
hence soil moisture storage was depleted allowing a greater percentage infiltration.
The balance of the flood volume is evaporated over a period of days from temporary surface water ponds
created within the active channels of the fan and overbank flooded areas. As a check on the validity of
the recharge component it is possible to estimate the number of days required to evaporate the standing
water. For events 1 and 2, the flood volume amounts to 342 million m3
and recharge has been calculatedas 246 million m3, requiring the evaporation of 96 million m3. The area of the active channels and over-
bank flood zones has been measured as 65 km2 and summertime open water evaporation rates in the Pampa
Tamarugal are c. 14 mm/day (DGA, 1987). Thus, a period of 105 days would be required to evaporate the
standing water, which is consistent with observations carried out in the field.
HYDROCHEMICAL AND ISOTOPIC EVIDENCE AND THE RECHARGE MECHANISM
Two additional, independent lines of evidence support the recharge mechanism and magnitude determined
from hydrological data. Firstly, the chloride mass balance technique (Allison and Hughes, 1978; Houston,
Table IV. Water level rise in well J8 and calculation of recharge to the Chacarillafan
19981999 19992000
Events 1C2 Total
WL (m) 032 030 030R (m) 010 015 015
Afan (km2) 684 684 684
Sy 008 008 008Volume of groundwater
recharge (million m3)175 246 246
Recharge/runoff Not known 072 070Recharge/rainfall 025 034 018
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
13/17
GROUNDWATER RECHARGE 3031
1990; Kruseman, 1997) has been shown to provide reliable quantification of long-term average recharge rates.
A simplified version of this method is given by
ClRF MAR D ClGW RECH
where ClRF is the chloride concentration in rainfall and Cl GWis the chloride concentration in groundwater, and
MAR and RECH are as defined previously. This formula is readily rearranged to make the recharge coefficient
(RECH/MAR) equal to the ratio between the chloride content of rainfall and groundwater. A recent study of
the chloride concentration in rainfall in the Altiplano has been conducted by Nazca SA and it can be shown
that mean values are around 12 mg/l. The chloride content of groundwater in J8 is around 128 mg/l (JICA,
1995), leading to an average long-term recharge coefficient of 009. This may be compared with a long-term
recharge coefficient of 006 determined from the year 2000 recharge, based on a 4 year return period and
mean annual rainfall for the Chacarilla catchment.
Secondly, as part of the same programme, a series of rainfall, baseflow and groundwater samples have beenanalysed for tritium concentration. The results of these studies will be reported elsewhere, but values within
or adjacent to the Chacarilla catchment are shown in Table V (note that Cerro Gordo is another well located
in fan sediments in the west of the Pampa Tamarugal).
There is a progressive decline in tritium content from rainfall, through baseflow in Quebrada Caya and the
Rio Chacarilla, to groundwater from wells on the west side of the Pampa Tamarugal. Using the radioactive
decay equation and adjusting precipitation values for known prior levels in the Altiplano (International Atomic
Table V. Tritium content and calculated mean residence time (MRT)for samples within and adjacent to the Chacarilla catchment
Tritium (TU) MRT (years)
Rainfall 367 021 0Quebrada Caya 134 019 39Rio Chacarilla 113 02 42Cerro Gordo well 073 016 50
WESTERN CORDILLERA
Rainfall
Runoff
Fan
rechangeFresh, recentfast moving water
Evaporation
COAST
RANGE
SALAR DE
BELLAVISTA
PAMPA TAMARUGAL
Stratified, oldslow moving water
PCFZ
CRFZ
69.5 W 69.0 W
SL
1000
3000
4000
5000
2000
0 10 20
Km
Early-Middle Mioceneclastic+volcanic sediments
Late Miocenefan sediment
Mesozoic basement++ +
++
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ +
+
+++
++
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
++
Saline, residualstagnant water
Figure 9. Section through the Pampa Tamarugal and Chacarilla fan showing the inferred groundwater system and recharge pathway
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
14/17
3032 J. HOUSTON
Energy Agency, Global Network for Isotopes in Precipitation (GNIP) database) it is possible to calculate mean
residence times (MRT) for the baseflow and groundwater. The MRT increase from a minimum of 39 years for
groundwater at high elevations within the Chacarilla catchment to 50 years for groundwater on the western
side of the Pampa Tamarugal. Such relatively low MRT confirm that recharge is taking place under current
climatic conditions and suggest that recharge entering the fan near its apex may be transmitted across the
Pampa Tamarugal through the near-surface fan sediments to reach the far western side relatively rapidly
(Figure 9). Hydraulic calculations based on data from the pumping test (see above), confirm that groundwater
may be transmitted from the fan apex to distal areas in 2030 years.
DISCUSSION
Rainfall in the Atacama Desert of northern Chile is highly variable and the non-linear response of the
hydrological system indicates a positive feedback, such that the causal mechanisms of rainfall variation willhave a correspondingly greater impact on groundwater recharge. It is interesting to assess possible causal
mechanisms for these variations. Rainfall in the Altiplano is linked with the El Nino Southern Oscillation
(ENSO) phenomena (e.g. Vuille, 1999) with La Nina years tending to produce higher rainfall. Rainfall also has
been linked to solar activity (e.g. Herman and Goldberg, 1978), with years of low solar activity being associated
with increased rainfall in the middle latitudes of western South America (Clayton, 1923) and a possible reason
for this has been proposed by Svensmark and Friis-Christensen (1997). Low solar activity allows increased
cosmic radiation to reach the atmosphere, which tends to increase cloudiness and precipitation. Data from
Ujina and Collacagua (Figure 10) provide support for the concept that either or both ENSO or solar activity
may have an impact on rainfall in the Altiplano region. Further investigation of rainfall variation and its
causes are clearly warranted.
Over the long term it can be anticipated that clusters of wet years will enhance runoff and recharge, whereas
conversely periods of drought will lead to reduced flow in rivers and groundwater recession. The cumulativerainfall departure shown in Figure 11 indicates that the late 1970s and mid-1980s were periods of above
average rainfall, whereas the late 1980s and 1990s have been a period of relative drought. It is interesting
to speculate whether all or part of the groundwater level decline in the Pampa Tamarugal reported by JICA
(1995) throughout the late 1980s and 1990s and monitored by the DGA in well J8 during the late 1990s is
the result of climate fluctuations on decadal to century scales as opposed to overexploitation. Further research
on these aspects are urgently required.
0
50
100
150
200
1970 1980 1990 2000
Meanmonthlyrainfall(mm)
4
3
2
1
0
1
2
3
4
Solaractivit
y
(standardisedsunspotnumber)El Nino
La Nina
solar activity
rainfall
Figure 10. Mean monthly rainfall at Ujina and Collacagua over the period 1970 2000 compared with solar and ENSO activity. Solar activitydata from World Data center-A, Boulder, CO and ENSO data from Climate Prediction Center, NOAA
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
15/17
GROUNDWATER RECHARGE 3033
200
0
200
400
600
800
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000Cu
mulativedeparturefromm
eanrainfall(mm)
39.0
39.5
40.0
40.5
41.0
DepthtowaterinwellJ8(m)
rainfall
water level in J8
Figure 11. Cumulative departure from the mean rainfall at Ujina and Collacagua compared with groundwater levels in the Pampa Tamarugal.All data provided by the Direccion General de Aguas, Santiago, Chile. Data J8 plotted at same scale but adjusted for elevation
Not only are temporal variations in recharge important, but spatial variations also. Runoff from high-level
catchments clearly concentrates recharge through alluvial fans. As it is known that alluvial fans tend to be
dominated either by relatively impermeable debris flow sediments or more permeable sheetflood sediments
(Blair and McPherson, 1994) it can be expected that these different fan types will also display different
recharge characteristics. Further research is urgently required on the many different fans and their infiltration
characteristics throughout the Pampa Tamarugal and elsewhere in northern Chile.
CONCLUSIONS
A major flash flood took place in the Chacarilla catchment in January 2000 that can be quantified and followed
in its path from storm through runoff to recharge allowing a valuable insight into the associated hydrological
processes.
The Chacarilla hydrological system is composed of a high-altitude catchment area on both permeable and
impermeable rocks, a transfer channel through a deeply incised bedrock canyon, and a lower discharge zone
into the permeable alluvial fan. The fan is comprised of two main elements: a recharge zone close to the apex
extending along the active channel, and a transfer zone through the mid-sections of the fan.
Recharge takes place through this system, with water being transferred rapidly to the west through the
aquifer. Recharge is intermittent, related to significant flash floods draining the high-level catchment during
intense storm events.
The catchment response is non-linear with positive feedback, so that higher intensity, shorter duration eventslead to increased runoff and recharge coefficients. The 19992000 events are calculated to have generated
around 25 million m3 recharge. As this event has a return period of only c . 4 years, minimum average annual
recharge amounts to the equivalent of around 200 l/s.
Recharge mechanisms that are intermittent and non-linear are not readily quantifiable for groundwater
resource evaluation. They require an analysis of many factors, including possible variations in physical and
climatic parameters, over many years. Calculations based on average conditions are bound to be suspect,
although hydrochemical and isotopic methods do offer some hope of providing instantaneous answers.
The analysis of the January 2000 flood in the Quebrada Chacarilla allows a better understanding of the
recharge mechanisms and magnitudes, with a consequential increase in the reliability of groundwater resource
evaluation.
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
16/17
3034 J. HOUSTON
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Funding for this study was provided by Nazca SA. The Direccion General de Aguas and DSM Minera S.A.
supplied data. Ultra-low-level tritium analyses were carried out by the Environmental Isotope Laboratory of
the University of Waterloo in Canada.
REFERENCES
Allison GB, Hughes MW. 1978. The use of environmental chloride and tritium to estimate total recharge to an unconfined aquifer. AustralianJournal of Soil Research 16: 181195.
Beard DC, Weyl PK. 1973. Influence of texture on porosity and permeability. Bulletin American Association Petroleum of Geologists 57:349369.
Benson MA. 1968. Measurement of Peak Discharge by Indirect Methods. WMO Publication 225, Technical Note 90, World MeteorologicalOrganization: Geneva.
Blair TC. 1999. Cause of dominance by sheetflood vs. debris-flow processes on two adjoining alluvial fans, Death Valley, California.Sedimentology 46: 10151028.
Blair TC, McPherson JG. 1994. Alluvial fans and their natural distinction from rivers based on morphology, hydraulic processes, sedimentaryprocesses, and facies assemblages. Journal of Sedimentary Research 64: 450489.
Chow VT. 1959. Open Channel Hydraulics . McGraw Hill: New York.Clayton HH. 1923. World Weather. MacMillan: New York.DGA. 1987. Balance Hidrico Nacional. Direccion General de Aguas: Santiago.Dingman RJ, Galli C. 1965. Geology and groundwater resources of the Pica area, Tarapaca Province, Chile. Bulletin of the United States
Geological Survey 1189.Dingman SL. 1994. Physical Hydrology. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Evenari M, Shanan L, Tadmore N. 1971. The Negev, the Challenge of a Desert. Harvard University Press.Fuenzalida H, Rutllant J. 1986. Estudio sobre el origen del vapor de agua que precipita en el invierno altiplanico . Informe Final, Convenio
de Cooperacion Direccion General de Aguas y Universidad de Chile: Santiago, Chile.Galli C, Dingman RJ. 1962. Cuadrangulos Pica, Alca, Matilla y Chacarilla. Carta Geologica de Chile No 710, Instituto de Investigaciones
Geologicas: Santiago, Chile.Galloway WE, Sharp JM. 1998a. Characterizing aquifer heterogeneity within terriginous clastic depositional systems. In Hydrogeologic
Models of Sedimentary Aquifers, Fraser GS, Dowis JM (eds). Society of Sedimentary Geology: Tulsa, OK; 8590.Galloway WE, Sharp JM. 1998b. Hydrogeology and characterization of fluvial aquifer systems. In Hydrogeologic Models of Sedimentary
Aquifers, Fraser GS, Dowis JM (eds). Society of Sedimentary Geology: Tulsa, OK; 91105.Garreaud RD. 1999. Multi-scale analysis of summertime precipitation over the Central Andes. Monthly Weather Review 127: 901921.Grilli A, Aguirre E, Duran M, Townsend F, Gonzalez A. 1999. Origen de las agues subterraneas del sector Pica-Salar del Huasco, Provincia
de Iquique, 1 Region de Tarapaca. XII Congreso de Ingenieria Sanitaria y Ambiental, Antofagasta, Chile.Gringarten AC. 1982. Flow test evaluation in fractured aquifers. In Recent Trends in Hydrogeology. Geological Society of America Special
Paper, Fraser GS, Dowis JM (eds). 189: 237263.Herman JR, Goldberg RA. 1978.Sun, Weather and Climate. NASA Special Publication 426 National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
Washington, DC.Houston J. 1990. Rainfallrunoff recharge relationships in the basement rocks of Zimbabwe. In Groundwater Recharge: a Guide to
Understanding and Estimating Natural Recharge. Publication 8, International Association of Hydrogeologists Verlag Heinz Heise GmbH& Co KG, Hannover; 271283.
Houston J. 2001. Caudal maximo 2000 en la quebrada Chacarilla, Primera Region, Norte de Chile, una evidencia de recarga de aguessubterraneas.Revista Chilena de Geologia 28: 163177.
Houston J, Jensen A, Arevalo G. 2001. Constitucion de derechos de aprovechamiento sobre agues almacenadas. Revista Chilena de Derecho3: 117127.
Issar A, Passchier R. 1990. Regional hydrogeological concepts. In Groundwater a Guide to understanding and Estimating Natural Recharge.Publication 8, Recharge: International Association of Hydrogeologists; 21 37.
Jensen A. 1992. Las Cuencas aluvio-lacustres Oligoceno-Neogenas de la region ante-arco de Chile septentrionial, entre 19 y 23 Sur.Unpublished PhD thesis, Universidad de Barcelona.
Jensen A, Dorr MJ, Gotze HJ, Kieffer E, Ibbeken H, Wilke H. 1995. Subsidence and sedimentation of a fore-arc hosted continental pull-apart basin: the Quillagua trough between 2130 and 2145 S, northern Chile. In Recent and Ancient Lacustrine Systems in Convergent
Margins, GLOPALSIAS Meeting, Antofagasta.JICA. 1995. The Study on the Development of Water Resources in Northern Chile. JICADGAPCI, Direction General de Aguas: Santiago.Johnson AJ. 1967. Specific Yield; compilation of specific yields for various materials. United States Geological Survey, Water Supply Paper
1662-D: 74 pp.Kiefer E, Dorr MJ, Ibbeken H, Gotze HJ. 1997. Gravity-based mass balance of an alluvial fan giant: the Arcas Fan, Pampa del Tamarugal,
northern Chile. Revista Geologia de Chile 24: 165186.Kruseman GP. 1997. Recharge from intermittent flow. In Recharge of Phreatic Aquifers in (Semi-) Arid Areas , Simmers I (ed.). Publication
19, International Association of Hydrogeologists, Balkema: Rotherdam. 145 186.Margaritz M, Arevena R, Pena H, Suzuki O, Grilli A. 1990. Source of groundwater in the deserts of northern Chile: evidence for deep
circulation of groundwater from the Andes. Ground Water 28: 513517.
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)
-
5/22/2018 1086_ftp
17/17
GROUNDWATER RECHARGE 3035
Miall AD. 1996. The Geology of Fluvial deposits: Sedimentary Facies, Basin Analysis and Petroleum Geology . Springer-Verlag: New York.
Mpodozis C, Ramos V. 1989. The Andes of Chile and Argentina. In Geology of the Andes and its Relation to Hydrocarbon and MineralResources. Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral resources, Earth Science Series 11: 5990.
Pardo-Casas F, Molnar P. 1987. Relative motion of the Nazca (Farallon) and South American plates since Late Cretaceous time. Tectonics6: 233248.
Reutter KJ, Scheuber E, Chong G. 1996. The Pre-Cordilleran fault system of Chuquicamata, northern Chile: evidence for reversals alongarc-parallel strike-slip faults. Tectonophysics 259: 213228.
Simmers I (ed.). 1997. Recharge of Phreatic Aquifers in (Semi-) Arid Areas . Publication 19, International Association of Hydrogeologists,Balkema: Rotherdam.
Sorman AU, Abdulrazzak MJ. 1997. Estimation of wadi recharge from channel losses in Tabalah Basin, Saudi Arabia. In Recharge of PhreaticAquifers in (Semi-) Arid Areas, Simmers I (ed.). Publication 19, International Association of Hydrogeologists, Balkema: Rotherdam.
Svensmark H, Friis-Christensen E. 1997. Variation of cosmic ray flux and global cloud coverage, a missing link in solarclimate relationships.Journal of Atmospheric Solar and Terrestrial Physics 59: 1225.
Taylor GK, Grocott J, Pope A, Randall DE. 1998. Mesozoic fault systems, deformation and fault block rotation in the Andean Fore-arc: acrustal scale strike-slip duplex in the Coastal Cordillera of northern Chile. Tectonophysics 299: 103149.
US Soils Conservation Service. 1972. Hydrology. Section 4 , SCS National Engineering Handbook: Washington, DC.Vergara H, Thomas A. 1984.Hoja Collacagua, Region de Tarapaca. Carta geologica de Chile, No 59, Instituto de Investigaciones Geologicas:
Santiago, Chile.Vuille M. 1999. Atmospheric circulation over the Bolivian Altiplano during dry and wet periods and extreme phases of the SouthernOscillation.International Journal of Climatology 19: 15791600.
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 16, 30193035 (2002)