126646127-scm-by-chopra
TRANSCRIPT
1utdallas.edu/~metin
Supply Chain ManagementIntroduction
2utdallas.edu/~metin
Outline
What is supply chain management?
A supply chain strategy framework
Components of a SCM
Major obstacles and common problems
Seven Eleven Japan
3utdallas.edu/~metin
Traditional View: Supply Chains inthe Economy (1990, 1996)
Freight Transportation $352, $455 B– Transportation manager in charge
– Transportation software
Inventory Expense $221, $311 B– Inventory manager in charge
– Inventory software
Administrative Expense $27, $31 B
Logistics related activity 11%, 10.5% of GNP
$898 B spent domestically for SC activities in 1998. $1,160 B of inventory in the US economy in the early 2000s.
Transportation and inventory managers
4utdallas.edu/~metin
Traditional View: Cost breakdown of amanufactured good
Profit 10%
Supply Chain Cost 20%
Marketing Cost 25%
Manufacturing Cost 45%
Profit
Supply ChainCost
MarketingCost
ManufacturingCost
Effort spent for supply chain activities are invisible to the customers.
5utdallas.edu/~metin
What can Supply Chain Management do? Estimated that the grocery industry could save $30 billion (10% of operating
cost) by using effective logistics and supply chain strategies– A typical box of cereal spends 104 days from factory to sale– A typical car spends 15 days from factory to dealership– Faster turnaround of the goods is better?
Laura Ashley (retailer of women and children clothes) turns its inventory 10times a year five times faster than 3 years ago– inventory is emptied 10 times a year, or an item spends about 12/10 months in the
inventory.– To be responsive, it relocated its main warehouse next to FedEx hub in Memphis, TE.
National Semiconductor used air transportation and closed 6 warehouses, 34%increase in sales and 47% decrease in delivery lead time.
6utdallas.edu/~metin
Magnitude of Supply Chain Management
Compaq estimates it lost $0.5 B to $1 B in sales in 1995because laptops were not available when and whereneeded
P&G (Proctor&Gamble) estimates it saved retailcustomers $65 M (in 18 months) by collaborationresulting in a better match of supply and demand
When the 1 gig processor was introduced by AMD(Advanced Micro Devices), the price of the 800 megprocessor dropped by 30%
7utdallas.edu/~metin
Importance of SCM understood by some
AMR Research:– "The biggest issue enterprises face today is intelligent visibility of their
supply chains-both upstream and down"
Forrester Research:– "Companies need to sense and proactively respond to unanticipated variations
in supply and demand by adopting emerging technologies such as intelligentagents. To boost their operational agility, firms need to transform their staticsupply chains into adaptive supply networks”
Gartner Group:– “By 2004, 90% of enterprises that fail to apply supply-chain management
technology and processes to increase their agility will lose their status aspreferred suppliers”
» Open ended statement. Agility can be increased continuously.
8utdallas.edu/~metin
Top 25Supply Chains
AMR research http://www.amrresearch.compublishes reports on supply chainsand other issues.
The Top 25 supply chains report comesout in Novembers.
The table on the right-hand side is fromThe Second Annual Supply ChainTop 25 prepared by Kevin Riley andReleased in November 2005.
9utdallas.edu/~metin
SCM Generated Value
Minimizing supply chain costs
while keeping a reasonable service level
customer satisfaction/quality/on time delivery, etc.
This is how SCM contributes to the bottom line
SCM is not strictly a cost reduction paradigm!
10utdallas.edu/~metin
A picture is better than 1000 words!How many words would be better than 3 pictures?
- A supply chain consists of
- aims to Match Supply and Demand,profitably for products and services
SUPPLY SIDE DEMAND SIDE
The rightProduct
HigherProfits
The rightTime
The rightCustomer
The rightQuantity
The rightStore
The rightPrice =++ ++ +
- achieves
Supplier Manufacturer Distributor Retailer Customer
UpstreamDownstream
11utdallas.edu/~metin
Detergent supply chain:
Customer wantsdetergent
Albertson’sSupermarket
Thirdparty DC
P&G or othermanufacturer
Plastic cupProducer
Chemicalmanufacturer
(e.g. Oil Company)
TennecoPackaging
PaperManufacturer
TimberIndustry
Chemicalmanufacturer
(e.g. Oil Company)
12utdallas.edu/~metin
Flows in a Supply Chain
Customer
Material
Information
Funds
The flows resemble a chain reaction.
Supplier
13utdallas.edu/~metin
SCM in a Supply Network Supply Chain Management (SCM) is concerned with the management and control of
the flows of material, information, and finances in supply chains.
Supply
Demand
Products and ServicesCash
Supply Side OEM Demand Side
THAILAND INDIA MEXICO TEXAS USN-Tier Suppliers Suppliers Logistics Distributors Retailers
Information
The task of SCM is to design, plan, and execute the activities at the different stagesso as to provide the desired levels of service to supply chain customers profitably
14utdallas.edu/~metin
Importance of Supply Chain Management
In 2000, the US companies spent $1 trillion (10% of GNP) on supply-relatedactivities (movement, storage, and control of products across supply chains).Source: State of Logistics Report
Eliminating inefficiencies in supply chains can save millions of $.
Tier 1Supplier
Manufacturer Distributor Retailer Customer
Inefficientlogistics
Highstockouts
Ineffectivepromotions
Frequent Supply shortages
High landed costs tothe shelf
High inventoriesthrough the chain
Low order fillrates
Glitch-Wrong Material,Machine is Down –
effect snowballs
15utdallas.edu/~metin
This image cannot currently be displayed.
Supply
Sources:plantsvendorsports
RegionalWarehouses:stockingpoints
FieldWarehouses:stockingpoints
Customers,demandcenterssinks
Purchase
Inventory
TransportationInventory
A Generic Supply Chain
16utdallas.edu/~metin
Cycle View of Supply Chains
Customer OrderCycle
Replenishment Cycle
Manufacturing Cycle
Procurement Cycle
Customer
Retailer
Distributor
Manufacturer
Supplier
Any cycle0. Customer arrival1. Customer triggers an order2. Supplier fulfils the order3. Customer receives the order
17utdallas.edu/~metin
Push vs Pull System
What instigates the movement of the work in the system?
In Push systems, work release is based on downstream demandforecasts– Keeps inventory to meet actual demand– Acts proactively
» e.g. Making generic job application resumes today (e.g.: exempli gratia)
In Pull systems, work release is based on actual demand or theactual status of the downstream customers– May cause long delivery lead times– Acts reactively
» e.g. Making a specific resume for a company after talking to the recruiter
18utdallas.edu/~metin
Push/Pull View of Supply Chains
Procurement,Manufacturing andReplenishment cycles
Customer OrderCycle
CustomerOrder ArrivesPush-Pull boundary
PUSH PROCESSES PULL PROCESSES
19utdallas.edu/~metin
Examples of Supply Chains
Dell / Compaq– Dell buys some components for a product from its suppliers
after that product is purchased by a customer. Extreme case of apull process
Zara, Spain’s answer to Italy’s Benetton– Sells apparel with a short design-to-sale cycle, avoids markdowns.
Toyota / GM / Volkswagen, in the course notes
McMaster Carr / W.W. Grainger, sell auto parts
Amazon / Barnes and Noble
Frozen food industry/Fast food industry/5 star restaurants
Internet shopping: Webvan / Peapod
20utdallas.edu/~metin
SCM Strategy
21utdallas.edu/~metin
Mission-Strategy-Tactics-Decisions
Mission, Mission statement– The reason for existence of an organization
Strategy– A plan for achieving organizational goals
Tactics– The actions taken to accomplish strategies
Operational decisions– Day to day decisions to support tactics
22utdallas.edu/~metin
Life Strategy for Ted
Ted is an undergrad. He would like to have a career in business, havea good job, and earn enough income to live comfortably
Mission: Live a good life
Goal: Successful career, good income
Strategy: Obtain a master’s degree
Tactics: Select a college and a concentration
Operations: Register, buy books, takecourses, study, graduate, get a job
23utdallas.edu/~metin
Linking SC and Business Strategy
NewProduct
Development
Marketingand
SalesOperations Distribution Service
Finance, Accounting, Information Technology, Human Resources
Competitive (Business) Strategy
Product Development Strategy-Portfolio of products-Timing of product introductions
Marketing Strategy-Frequent discounts-Coupons
Supply Chain Strategy
24utdallas.edu/~metin
Strategies:Product Development
It relates to Technologies for futureoperations (via patents) and Setof products/services
Be the technology leaderIBM workstations
Offer many productsDell computers
Offer products for localsTata’s Nano at $2500=100000 rupeesProduction at Singur, West Bengal, India;l x w x h=3.1 x 1.5 x 1.6 meters;Top speed: 105km/hr;Engine volume 623 cc;Mileage 50 miles/gallon;Annual sales target 200,000.
25utdallas.edu/~metin
Strategies
Marketing and sales strategy relates to positioning, pricing andpromotion of products/services– e.g. Never offer more than 40% discount
– e.g. EDLP = every day low price» At Wal-Mart
– e.g. Demand smoothing via coupons» BestBuy
Supply chain management strategy relates to procurement,transportation, storage and delivery– e.g. Never use more than 1 supplier for every input
– e.g. Never expedite orders just because they are late
– e.g. Always use domestic suppliers within the sales season not in advance.
26utdallas.edu/~metin
Fitting the SC to the customer or vice versa?
Understand the customer Wishes
Understand the Capabilities of your SC
Match the Wishes with the Capabilities
Challenge: How to meet extensive Wishes
with limited Capabilities?
27utdallas.edu/~metin
Achieving Strategic Fit: Consistent SCMand Competitive strategies
Fit SC to the customer
Understanding the Customer– Range of demand, pizza hut stable
– Production lot size, seasonal products
– Response time, organ transplantation
– Service level, product availability
– Product variety
– Innovation
– Accommodating
poor quality
Implied (Demand)Uncertainty for SC
Implied troublefor SC
28utdallas.edu/~metin
Contributors to Implied Demand Uncertainty
Low High
Price ResponsivenessCustomer Need
Implied Demand Uncertainty
CommoditiesDetergentLong lead time steel
Customized productsHigh Fashion ClothingEmergency steel,
for maintenance/replacement
Short lead times, product variety,distribution channel variety, high rate of innovation and
high customer service levels all increasethe Implied Demand Uncertainty
29utdallas.edu/~metin
Understanding the Supply Chain:Cost-Responsiveness Tradeoff
High Low
Low
High
Responsiveness (in time, high service level and product variety)
Cost in $
Efficiency frontier
InefficientFix responsiveness Impossible
Inefficiency Region
Why decreasing slope (concave) for the efficiency frontier?
30utdallas.edu/~metin
Achieving Strategic Fit: Wishes vs. Capabilities
Implieduncertaintyspectrum
Responsive(high cost)
supply chain
Efficient(low cost)
supply chainCertaindemand
Uncertaindemand
Responsivenesspectrum
Lunch buffet<Low margin>
Gourmet dinner<High margin>
31utdallas.edu/~metin
Loosing the strategic fit: Webvan
Webvan started a merger with HomeGrocer in Sept 2000 andcompleted in May 2001.
Declared bankruptcy in July 2001. Why?– “Webvan was so behemoth that could deliver anything to anyone anywhere
that it lost sight of a more mundane task: pleasing grocery customers dayafter day”.
– Short to midterm cash mismanagement. Venture capital of $1.2 B run out.
– Merger costs: duplicated work force, integration of technology, realignmentof facilities.
Peapod has the same business model but more focused in terms ofservice and locations. It actually survives with its parent companyRoyal Ahold’s (Dutch Retailer) cash.– Delivers now at a fee of $6.95 within a day.
32utdallas.edu/~metin
Top 10 Retailers Reported in 2008 – First 4
Source www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/dtt_2008globalpowersofretailing.pdf
33utdallas.edu/~metin
Top 10 Retailers Reported in 2008 – First 5-10
34utdallas.edu/~metin
Big retailers’ StrategyWal-Mart: Efficiency Target: More quality and service Carrefour: International, ambiance
K-Mart: Confused.– Squeezed between Target and Wal-Mart– Reliance on coupon sales– Do coupons stabilize or destabilize a Supply chain?
K-Mart and Sears merged in November 2004.Now called Sears Holdings.
» K-Mart gets cash» Sears gets presence outside malls
35utdallas.edu/~metin
Other Factors Multiple products in a SC. Multiple customers for a given product
– Separate supply chains or Tailored supply chains» e.g. Barnes and Noble: Retailing and/or e-tailing
– Product and/or customer classes» e.g. UTD library loans books for 6 months (2 weeks) to faculty (students)» Customer segmentation by pricing
Competitors: more, faster and global» UTD online programs compete globally
Product life cycle (shortening)– SCM strategy moves toward efficiency and low implied uncertainty as products age
» e.g. Air travel is becoming more efficient e.g. Southwest airlines lead the drive for efficiency e.g. Airbus announced A380 accommodating 555-800 people on Jan 17, 2005.
» e.g. Flat screen TV producer of AU Optronics of Taiwan was looking for ways to make itsSC more efficient in June 2004.
– Replacement sales» Selling to replace broken units.
e.g. AC replacement is about 50% of the market.– Macroeconomic factors for visibility
» Forecasting Home Depot sales from S&P 500 price index. Positive correlation is detected.
36utdallas.edu/~metin
Achieving Strategic Fit over a Lifecycle
Responsive(high cost)
supply chain
Efficient(low cost)
supply chainCertaindemand
Uncertaindemand
37utdallas.edu/~metin
Integration
Integration is the central theme in SCM
Building synergies by integrating business functions,departments and companies
38utdallas.edu/~metin
Strategic Scope
Suppliers Manufacturer Distributor Retailer Customer
CompetitiveStrategy
Product Dev.Strategy
Supply ChainStrategy
MarketingStrategy
39utdallas.edu/~metin
Supply Chain Drivers and Obstacles
40utdallas.edu/~metin
Drivers of Supply Chain Performance
Efficiency Responsiveness
Inventory Transportation Facilities
Information
Supply chain structure
LogisticalDrivers
How to achieve
Sourcing PricingCross-FunctionalDrivers
41utdallas.edu/~metin
1. Inventory
Convenience: Cycle inventory– No customer buys eggs one by one
Unstable demand: Seasonal inventory– Bathing suits
– Xmas toys and computer sales
Randomness: Safety inventory– 20% more syllabi than the class size were available in the
first class
– Compaq’s loss in 95 Pipeline inventory
– Work in process or transit
42utdallas.edu/~metin
Little’s lawLong run averages = Expected values
I = R . T
I=Pipeline inventory;
R=output per time=throughput;
T=delay time=flow time
Flow time? Thruput? Pipeline (work in process) Inventory?
10/minuteSpend 1 minute
43utdallas.edu/~metin
2. Transportation
Air
Truck
Rail
Ship
Pipeline
Electronic
44utdallas.edu/~metin
3. Facilities
Production– Flexible vs. Dedicated
– Flexibility costs» Production: Remember BMW: “a sports car disguised as a sedan”» Service: Can your instructor teach music as well as SCM?
» Sports: A playmaker who shoots well is rare.
Inventory-like operations: Receiving, Prepackaging,Storing, Picking, Packaging, Sorting, Accumulating,Shipping– Job Lot Storage: Need more space. Reticle storage in fabs.
– Crossdocking: Wal-Mart
45utdallas.edu/~metin
4. Information
Role in the supply chain– The connection between the various stages in the supply chain
– Crucial to daily operation of each stage in a supply chain» E.g., production scheduling, inventory levels
Role in the competitive strategy– Allows supply chain to become more efficient and more
responsive at the same time (reduces the need for a trade-off)
– Information technology» Andersen Windows
Wood window manufacturer, whose customers can choose from a library of50,000 designs or create their own. Customer orders automatically sent tothe factory.
46utdallas.edu/~metin
Characteristics of the Good Information
Information Global Scope
CoordinatedDecisions
Supply ChainSuccess
Strategy Analytical Models $$$
Information
Accurate?
Accessible?
Up-to-date?
In the Correct form?» If not, database restricted ability. How difficult is it to import data into SAP?
47utdallas.edu/~metin
Quality of Information
Information drives the decisions:– Good information means good decisions
IT helps: MRP, ERP, SAP, EDI
Relevant information?
How to use information?
48utdallas.edu/~metin
Information Technology in a SupplyChain: Legacy Systems
Supplier CustomerRetailerDistributorManufacturer
Strategic
Planning
Operational
49utdallas.edu/~metin
Information Technology in a Supply Chain:ERP Systems
Supplier CustomerRetailerDistributorManufacturer
Strategic
Planning
OperationalERPPotential
ERPPotential
ERP
50utdallas.edu/~metin
Information Technology in a Supply Chain:Analytical Applications
Supplier CustomerRetailerDistributorManufacturer
Strategic
Planning
Operational
SupplierApps
SCM
MES
Dem Plan
Transport execution &WMS
APS Transport & InventoryPlanning
CRM/SFA
51utdallas.edu/~metin
ERP Systems
Wider focus
Push (MRP) versus Pull (demand information transmittedquickly throughout the supply chain)
Real-time information
Coordination and Information sharing
Transactional IT
Expensive and difficult to implement– About 25% of ERP installations are cancelled within a year
– About 70% of ERP installations go over the budget
52utdallas.edu/~metin
IT Push
0
100
200
300
400
500
1965 1973 1981 1989 1997
IT investment($B)
53utdallas.edu/~metin
Supply Chain Software PushSee Top 100 under /articles.html
Source Kanakamedala,Ramsdell, Srivatsan (2003).McKinsey Quarterly, No 1.
54utdallas.edu/~metin
5. Sourcing
Role in the supply chain– Set of processes required to purchase goods and services in a supply chain
– Supplier selection, single vs. multiple suppliers, contract negotiation
Role in the competitive strategy– Sourcing is crucial. It affects efficiency and responsiveness in a supply chain
– In-house vs. outsource decisions- improving efficiency and responsiveness» TI: More than half of the revenue spent for sourcing.
» Cisco sources: Low-end products (e.g. home routers) from China.
Components of sourcing decisions– In-house versus outsource decisions
– Supplier evaluation and selection
– Procurement process:» Every department of a firm buy from suppliers independently, or all together.
EDS to reduce the number of officers with purchasing authorization.
55utdallas.edu/~metin
6. Pricing
Role in the supply chain– Pricing determines the amount to charge customers in a supply chain
– Pricing strategies can be used to match demand and supply» Price elasticity: Do you know yours?
Role in the competitive strategy– Use pricing strategies to improve efficiency and responsiveness
– Low price and low product availability; vary prices by response times» Amazon: Faster delivery is more expensive
Components of pricing decisions– Pricing and economies of scale
– Everyday low pricing versus high-low pricing
– Fixed price versus menu pricing, depending on the product and services» Packaging, delivery location, time, customer pick up
» Bundling products; products and services
56utdallas.edu/~metin
Considerations for Supply Chain Drivers
Driver Efficiency Responsiveness
Inventory Cost of holding Availability
Transportation Consolidation Speed
Facilities Consolidation /Dedicated
Proximity /Flexibility
Information Low cost/slow/noduplication
High cost/streamlined/reliable
Sourcing Low cost sources Responsive sources
Pricing Constant price Low-high price
57utdallas.edu/~metin
Major Obstacles to Achieving Fit
SC is big:– Variety of products/services
– Spoiled customer
– Multiple owners (Procurement, Production, Inventory,Marketing) / multiple objectives
– Globalization
Local optimization and lack of global fit
58utdallas.edu/~metin
Dealing with Multiple Owners / Local Optimization– Information Coordination
» Information sharing / Shyness / Legal and ethical issues
– Contractual Coordination» Mechanisms to align local objectives with global ones
– Coordination with (real) options» Rare in the practice
– Without coordination, misleading reliance on metrics:» Average safety inventory, Average incoming shipment size, Average
purchase price of raw materials, Revenue
Major Obstacles to Achieving Fit
59utdallas.edu/~metin
Major obstacles to achieving fit
Instability and Randomness:– Increasing product variety
– Shrinking product life cycles
– Customer fragmentation: Push for customization, segmentation
– Fragmentation of Supply Chain ownership: Globalization
Increasing implied uncertainty
60utdallas.edu/~metin
Common problems
Lack of relevant SCM metrics: How to measureresponsiveness?
» How to measure efficiency, costs, worker performance, etc?
Poor inventory status information» Theft: Major problem for furniture retailers.» Transaction errors: Retailers with inaccurate inventory records
for 65% of SKUs» Information delays, dated information, incompatible info. systems» Misplaced inventory: 16% of items cannot be found at a major retailer» Spoilage: active ingredients in the products are losing their properties» Product quality and yield» Lack of visibility in SCs
Do you know the inventory your distribution centers hold? Do you know the inventory your fellow retailer holds?
61utdallas.edu/~metin
Common problems
Poor delivery status information» Not knowing the order status
Poor IT design» Unreliable, duplicate data» Security problems: too much or too little
Ignoring uncertainties– “The flight from uncertainty and ambiguity is so motivated that we often
create pseudocertainty.”– Nitin Nohra, HBR February 2006 issue, p.40.
Internal customer discrimination» Giving lower priority to internal customers than external customers
Poor integration Elusive inventory costs
» Accounting systems do not capture opportunity costs
SC-insensitive product design
62utdallas.edu/~metin
Summary
Supply Chain Introduction
Competitiveness / Business strategy / SCM strategy
Components» Inventory, Transportation, Facilities, Information, Sourcing, Pricing
Challenges
63utdallas.edu/~metin
Seven Eleven Japan (SEJ)
A Case Study
64utdallas.edu/~metin
Factual Information on Seven Eleven Japan (SEJ)
Largest convenience store in Japan with market value of $95 B. The third largestretail company in the world after Wal-Mart and Home Depot.
Established in 1974. In 2000, total sales $18,000 M, profit $620 M. Average inventory turnover time 7-8.5 days. Stock value increased by 3000 times from 1974 to 2000. In 1985, there were 2000 stores in Japan, increasing by 400-500 per year. Return on equity 14% over 2000-2004. A SEJ store is about the half the size of a US 7-eleven store,
that is about 110 m2. Sales:
– Products» 32.9% Processed food: drinks, noodles, bread and snacks» 31.6% Fast food: rice ball, box lunch and hamburgers» 12.0% Fresh food: diary products» 25.3% Non-food: magazines, ladies stockings and batteries.
– Services: Utility bill paying, installment payments for credit companies, ATMs, photocopying
65utdallas.edu/~metin
More on SEJ
More factual info: Average sales about twice of an average US store SKU’s offered in store: Over 3,000 (change by time of day, day of week, season) Virtually no storage space No food cooking at the stores
Japanese Images of Seven Eleven: Convenient Cheerful and lively stores Many ready made dinner items I buy Famous for its great boxed lunch and dinner - On weekends, when I was single, I went to buy lunch and dinner
SC strategy:Micro matching of supply and demand (by location, time of day, day of week, season)
66utdallas.edu/~metin
Seven Eleven - Number of Stores
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94
Number of Stores
1999: 8,0272004: 10,356
67utdallas.edu/~metin
Seven Eleven - Net Sales (B Yen)Sales 1,963 B Yen in 2000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94
Net Sales
68utdallas.edu/~metin
Seven Eleven - Pre tax Profit (B Yen)
0102030405060708090
100
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94
Profit
69utdallas.edu/~metin
Seven Eleven - Inventory turnover (days)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94
Inventory
70utdallas.edu/~metin
Information StrategyQuick access to up to date information (as opposed to data): In 1991, SEJ implemented Integrated Service Digital Network to link stores, headquarter,
DCs and suppliers
Customer checkout process– Clerk records the customer’s gender, (estimated) age and purchased items. These Point of Sales
(POS) data are transmitted to database at the headquarters.» Store hardware: Store computer, POS registers linked to store computer, Graphic Order
Terminals, Scanner terminals for receiving
Daily use of the data– Headquarters aggregate the data by region, products and time and pass to suppliers and stores by
next morning. Store managers deduce trend information. Weekly use of the data
– Monday morning, the CEO chairs a weekly strategy formulation meeting attended by 100corporate managers.
– Tuesday morning, strategies are communicated to Operation Field Counselors who arrive inTokyo on Monday night.
– Tuesday afternoon, regional elements (e.g. weather, sport events) are factored into the strategy.Tuesday nights, field counselors return back to their regions.
71utdallas.edu/~metin
72utdallas.edu/~metin
Information Analysis of POS Data Analysis of
– Sales for product categories over time– SKU (stock keeping unit)– Waste or disposal– 10 day (or week) sales trend by SKU
Sales trends for new product– In the early 1990s, half-prepared fresh noodle sales were going up,
new fresh noodle products were quickly developed
Sales trend by time and day– Different sales patterns for different sizes of milk at different times of the day results in
rearrangement of the milks in the fridge. Extreme store micromanagement.» Let us speculate: Flavored milks are put in front of the pure milks in the evening (or the morning?).
List of slow moving items– About half of 3000 SKUs are replaced by new ones every year
73utdallas.edu/~metin
Facilities Strategy Limited storage space at stores which have only 125-150 m2 space
– Frequent and small deliveries to stores Deliveries arrive from over 200 plants. Products are grouped by the cooling needs
– Combined delivery system: frozen foods, chilled foods, room temperature and hot foods.
– Such product groups are cross-docked at distribution centers (DC). Food DCs store noinventory.
– A single truck brings a group of products and visits several stores within a geographical region– Aggregation: No supplier (not even coke!) delivers direct
The number of truck deliveries per day is reduced by a factor of 7 from 1974 to 2000.Still, at least 3 fresh food deliveries per day. Goods are received faster with the use ofscanners.
Have many outlets, at convenient locations, close to where customers can walk Focus on some territories, not all: When they locate in a place they blanket (a.k.a.
clustering) the area with stores; stores open in clusters with corresponding DC’s.– 844 stores in the Tokyo region; Seven Eleven had stores in 32 out of 47 prefectures in 2004. No
stores in Kobe.– Success rate of franchise application <= 1/100
74utdallas.edu/~metin
The Present and the Future Is food preparation a good idea at 7-eleven locations?
– e.g. Compare microwave heating vs. salad preparation. Why SEJ does not allow direct delivery from suppliers to retailers? Point out which of the following strategies can also be used in US (or Taiwan)
– Information strategy– Facilities strategy
Discuss the differences between the Japanese and US (or Taiwanese) consumers withregard to
– Frequency and amount of grocery purchase– Use of credit cards vs. cash for purchase– 7-eleven inventory turnover rate is 50 in Japan and 19 in the USA.
7-eleven growing rapidly in the US so it aims to be a web depot in both the US and Japan.Does this make sense from a supply chain perspective?– Cost vs. Responsiveness– Business strategy
What is the risk of micro-matching strategy? No direct deliveries to SEJ, what is the potential risk of this strategy if used in the USA?
75utdallas.edu/~metin
Deloitte 2008 Global Retailers Survey
Excerpts fromwww.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/dtt_2008globalpowersofretailing.pdf
Downloaded on Jan 30, 2008.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-1
Chapter 8AggregatePlanning
in the SupplyChain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-2
Outline
Role of aggregate planning in a supply chain
The aggregate planning problem
Aggregate planning strategies
Implementing aggregate planning in practice
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-3
Role of Aggregate Planningin a Supply Chain
Capacity has a cost, lead times are greater than zero
Aggregate planning:– process by which a company determines levels of capacity,
production, subcontracting, inventory, stockouts, and pricingover a specified time horizon
– goal is to maximize profit
– decisions made at a product family (not SKU) level
– time frame of 3 to 18 months
– how can a firm best use the facilities it has?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-4
Role of Aggregate Planningin a Supply Chain
Specify operational parameters over the time horizon:– production rate
– workforce
– overtime
– machine capacity level
– subcontracting
– backlog
– inventory on hand
All supply chain stages should work together on anaggregate plan that will optimize supply chainperformance
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-5
The Aggregate Planning Problem
Given the demand forecast for each period in theplanning horizon, determine the production level,inventory level, and the capacity level for each periodthat maximizes the firm’s (supply chain’s) profit overthe planning horizon
Specify the planning horizon (typically 3-18 months)
Specify the duration of each period
Specify key information required to develop anaggregate plan
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-6
Information Needed foran Aggregate Plan
Demand forecast in each period
Production costs– labor costs, regular time ($/hr) and overtime ($/hr)
– subcontracting costs ($/hr or $/unit)
– cost of changing capacity: hiring or layoff ($/worker) andcost of adding or reducing machine capacity ($/machine)
Labor/machine hours required per unit
Inventory holding cost ($/unit/period)
Stockout or backlog cost ($/unit/period)
Constraints: limits on overtime, layoffs, capitalavailable, stockouts and backlogs
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-7
Outputs of Aggregate PlanProduction quantity from regular time, overtime, and
subcontracted time: used to determine number ofworkers and supplier purchase levels
Inventory held: used to determine how much warehousespace and working capital is needed
Backlog/stockout quantity: used to determine whatcustomer service levels will be
Machine capacity increase/decrease: used to determineif new production equipment needs to be purchased
A poor aggregate plan can result in lost sales, lostprofits, excess inventory, or excess capacity
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-8
Aggregate Planning Strategies
Trade-off between capacity, inventory,backlog/lost sales
Chase strategy – using capacity as the lever
Time flexibility from workforce or capacitystrategy – using utilization as the lever
Level strategy – using inventory as the lever
Mixed strategy – a combination of one or more ofthe first three strategies
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-9
Chase StrategyProduction rate is synchronized with demand by
varying machine capacity or hiring and laying offworkers as the demand rate varies
However, in practice, it is often difficult to varycapacity and workforce on short notice
Expensive if cost of varying capacity is high
Negative effect on workforce morale
Results in low levels of inventory
Should be used when inventory holding costs are highand costs of changing capacity are low
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-10
Time Flexibility StrategyCan be used if there is excess machine capacity
Workforce is kept stable, but the number of hoursworked is varied over time to synchronize productionand demand
Can use overtime or a flexible work schedule
Requires flexible workforce, but avoids moraleproblems of the chase strategy
Low levels of inventory, lower utilization
Should be used when inventory holding costs arehigh and capacity is relatively inexpensive
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-11
Level StrategyMaintain stable machine capacity and workforce
levels with a constant output rate
Shortages and surpluses result in fluctuations ininventory levels over time
Inventories that are built up in anticipation of futuredemand or backlogs are carried over from high to lowdemand periods
Better for worker morale
Large inventories and backlogs may accumulate
Should be used when inventory holding and backlogcosts are relatively low
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-12
Fundamental Tradeoffs inAggregate Planning
Capacity (regular time, overtime, subcontract)
Inventory
Backlog / lost sales
Basic Strategies
Chase strategy
Time flexibility from workforce or capacity
Level strategy
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-13
Aggregate Planning atRed Tomato Tools
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 1,600February 3,000
March 3,200April 3,800May 2,200June 2,200
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-14
Aggregate Planning at RedTomato Tools
Item CostMaterials $10/unitInventory holding cost $2/unit/monthMarginal cost of a stockout $5/unit/monthHiring and training costs $300/workerLayoff cost $500/workerLabor hours required 4/unitRegular time cost $4/hourOver time cost $6/hourCost of subcontracting $30/unit
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-15
Aggregate Planning at Red Tomato Tools(Define Decision Variables)
Wt = Workforce size for month t, t = 1, ..., 6
Ht = Number of employees hired at the beginning of month t,t = 1, ..., 6
Lt = Number of employees laid off at the beginning of month t,t = 1, ..., 6
Pt = Production in month t, t = 1, ..., 6
It = Inventory at the end of month t, t = 1, ..., 6
St = Number of units stocked out at the end of month t,t = 1, ..., 6
Ct = Number of units subcontracted for month t, t = 1, ..., 6
Ot = Number of overtime hours worked in month t, t = 1, ..., 6
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-16
Aggregate Planning at Red Tomato Tools(Define Objective Function)
6
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
30105
26500
300640
tt
tt
tt
tt
tt
tt
tt
tt
CPS
IOL
HWMin
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-17
Aggregate Planning at Red Tomato tools(Define Constraints Linking Variables)
Workforce size for each month is based on hiringand layoffs
.80,6,...,1
0
,
0
1
1
WwheretforLHWW
orLHWW
tttt
tttt
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-18
Aggregate Planning at Red Tomato Tools(Constraints)
Production for each month cannot exceed capacity
.6,...,1
,0440
,440
tforPOW
OWP
ttt
ttt
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-19
Aggregate Planning at Red Tomato Tools(Constraints)
Inventory balance for each month
.500,0
,000,1,6,...,1
,0
,
60
0
11
11
IandS
IwheretforSISDCPI
SISDCPI
ttttttt
ttttttt
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-20
Aggregate Planning at Red Tomato Tools(Constraints)
Over time for each month
.6,...,1
,010
,10
tfor
OW
WO
tt
tt
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-21
Scenarios
Increase in holding cost (from $2 to $6)
Overtime cost drops to $4.1 per hour
Increased demand fluctuation
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-22
Increased Demand Fluctuation
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 1,000February 3,000March 3,800April 4,800May 2,000June 1,400
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-23
Aggregate Planning in Practice
Think beyond the enterprise to the entire supply chain
Make plans flexible because forecasts are alwayswrong
Rerun the aggregate plan as new information emerges
Use aggregate planning as capacity utilizationincreases
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Aggregate Planning in Excel
Construct a table with the decision variables
Construct a table for constraints
Create a cell containing the objective function
Use Data Analysis Solver
8-24
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
INVENTORY PLANNING AND ECONOMICTHEORY -ABERRATIONS
Available evidence indicates that Indian industries,by and large do not show any serious concern forinventory ordering and carrying costs. What are themain reasons for their indifference to scientificinventory management techniques?What adaptations of Just In Time (JIT) practices do
you visualize emerging in the Indian environment inthe near future?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 8-26
Summary of Learning ObjectivesWhat types of decisions are best solved by aggregate
planning?
What is the importance of aggregate planning as asupply chain activity?
What kinds of information are needed to produce anaggregate plan?
What are the basic trade-offs a manager makes toproduce an aggregate plan?
How are aggregate planning problems formulated andsolved using Microsoft Excel?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter 7Demand
Forecastingin a Supply
Chain
7-1
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-2
Outline
The role of forecasting in a supply chain
Characteristics of forecasts
Components of forecasts and forecasting methods
Basic approach to demand forecasting
Time series forecasting methods
Measures of forecast error
Forecasting demand at Tahoe Salt
Forecasting in practice
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-3
Role of Forecastingin a Supply Chain
The basis for all strategic and planning decisionsin a supply chain
Used for both push and pull processes
Examples:– Production: scheduling, inventory, aggregate planning
– Marketing: sales force allocation, promotions, newproduction introduction
– Finance: plant/equipment investment, budgetaryplanning
– Personnel: workforce planning, hiring, layoffs
All of these decisions are interrelated
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-4
Characteristics of Forecasts
Forecasts are always wrong. Should includeexpected value and measure of error.
Long-term forecasts are less accurate than short-term forecasts (forecast horizon is important)
Aggregate forecasts are more accurate thandisaggregate forecasts
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-5
Forecasting Methods
Qualitative: primarily subjective; rely onjudgment and opinion
Time Series: use historical demand only– Static
– Adaptive
Causal: use the relationship between demand andsome other factor to develop forecast
Simulation– Imitate consumer choices that give rise to demand
– Can combine time series and causal methods
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-6
Components of an ObservationObserved demand (O) =
Systematic component (S) + Random component (R)
Level (current deseasonalized demand)
Trend (growth or decline in demand)
Seasonality (predictable seasonal fluctuation)
• Systematic component: Expected value of demand• Random component: The part of the forecast that deviates
from the systematic component• Forecast error: difference between forecast and actual demand
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-7
Time Series ForecastingQuarter Demand Dt
II, 2006 8000III, 2006 13000IV, 2006 23000I, 2007 34000II, 2007 10000III, 2007 18000IV, 2007 23000I, 2008 38000II, 2008 12000III, 2008 13000IV, 2008 32000I, 2009 41000
Forecast demand for thenext four quarters.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-8
Time Series Forecasting
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-9
Forecasting Methods
Static
Adaptive– Moving average
– Simple exponential smoothing
– Holt’s model (with trend)
– Winter’s model (with trend and seasonality)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-10
Basic Approach toDemand Forecasting
Understand the objectives of forecasting
Integrate demand planning and forecasting
Identify major factors that influence the demandforecast
Understand and identify customer segments
Determine the appropriate forecasting technique
Establish performance and error measures for theforecast
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-11
Time SeriesForecasting Methods
Goal is to predict systematic component of demand– Multiplicative: (level)(trend)(seasonal factor)
– Additive: level + trend + seasonal factor
– Mixed: (level + trend)(seasonal factor)
Static methods
Adaptive forecasting
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-12
Static MethodsAssume a mixed model:
Systematic component = (level + trend)(seasonal factor)
Ft+l = [L + (t + l)T]St+l
= forecast in period t for demand in period t + l
L = estimate of level for period 0
T = estimate of trend
St = estimate of seasonal factor for period t
Dt = actual demand in period t
Ft = forecast of demand in period t
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-13
Static Methods
Estimating level and trend
Estimating seasonal factors
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-14
Estimating Level and Trend
Before estimating level and trend, demand datamust be deseasonalized
Deseasonalized demand = demand that wouldhave been observed in the absence of seasonalfluctuations
Periodicity (p)– the number of periods after which the seasonal cycle
repeats itself
– for demand at Tahoe Salt (Table 7.1, Figure 7.1) p = 4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-15
Time Series Forecasting(Table 7.1)
Quarter, Year Demand Dt
II, 1 8000III, 1 13000IV, 1 23000I, 2 34000II, 2 10000III, 2 18000IV, 2 23000I, 3 38000II, 3 12000III, 3 13000IV, 3 32000I, 4 41000
Forecast demand for thenext four quarters.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-16
Time Series Forecasting(Figure 7.1)
010,00020,00030,00040,00050,000
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-17
Estimating Level and Trend
Before estimating level and trend, demand datamust be deseasonalized
Deseasonalized demand = demand that wouldhave been observed in the absence of seasonalfluctuations
Periodicity (p)– the number of periods after which the seasonal cycle
repeats itself
– for demand at Tahoe Salt (Table 7.1, Figure 7.1) p = 4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-18
Deseasonalizing Demand
[Dt-(p/2) + Dt+(p/2) + Σ 2Di] / 2p for p even
Dt = (sum is from i = t+1-(p/2) to t+1+(p/2))
Σ Di / p for p odd
(sum is from i = t-(p/2) to t+(p/2)), p/2 truncated to lower integer
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-19
Deseasonalizing DemandFor the example, p = 4 is even
For t = 3:
D3 = D1 + D5 + Sum(i=2 to 4) [2Di]/8
= 8000+10000+[(2)(13000)+(2)(23000)+(2)(34000)]/8
= 19750
D4 = D2 + D6 + Sum(i=3 to 5) [2Di]/8
= 13000+18000+[(2)(23000)+(2)(34000)+(2)(10000)]/8
= 20625
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-20
Deseasonalizing DemandThen include trend
Dt = L + tT
where Dt = deseasonalized demand in period t
L = level (deseasonalized demand at period 0)
T = trend (rate of growth of deseasonalized demand)
Trend is determined by linear regression usingdeseasonalized demand as the dependent variable andperiod as the independent variable (can be done inExcel)
In the example, L = 18,439 and T = 524
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-21
Time Series of Demand(Figure 7.3)
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Period
Dem
and
Dt
Dt-bar
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-22
Estimating Seasonal Factors
Use the previous equation to calculate deseasonalizeddemand for each period
St = Dt / Dt = seasonal factor for period t
In the example,
D2 = 18439 + (524)(2) = 19487 D2 = 13000
S2 = 13000/19487 = 0.67
The seasonal factors for the other periods arecalculated in the same manner
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-23
Estimating Seasonal Factors(Fig. 7.4)
t Dt Dt-bar S-bar1 8000 18963 0.42 = 8000/189632 13000 19487 0.67 = 13000/194873 23000 20011 1.15 = 23000/200114 34000 20535 1.66 = 34000/205355 10000 21059 0.47 = 10000/210596 18000 21583 0.83 = 18000/215837 23000 22107 1.04 = 23000/221078 38000 22631 1.68 = 38000/226319 12000 23155 0.52 = 12000/23155
10 13000 23679 0.55 = 13000/2367911 32000 24203 1.32 = 32000/2420312 41000 24727 1.66 = 41000/24727
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-24
Estimating Seasonal FactorsThe overall seasonal factor for a “season” is then obtained
by averaging all of the factors for a “season”If there are r seasonal cycles, for all periods of the form
pt+i, 1<i<p, the seasonal factor for season i is
Si = [Sum(j=0 to r-1) Sjp+i]/r
In the example, there are 3 seasonal cycles in the data andp=4, so
S1 = (0.42+0.47+0.52)/3 = 0.47
S2 = (0.67+0.83+0.55)/3 = 0.68
S3 = (1.15+1.04+1.32)/3 = 1.17
S4 = (1.66+1.68+1.66)/3 = 1.67
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-25
Estimating the Forecast
Using the original equation, we can forecast the nextfour periods of demand:
F13 = (L+13T)S1 = [18439+(13)(524)](0.47) = 11,868
F14 = (L+14T)S2 = [18439+(14)(524)](0.68) = 17,527
F15 = (L+15T)S3 = [18439+(15)(524)](1.17) = 30,770
F16 = (L+16T)S4 = [18439+(16)(524)](1.67) = 44,794
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-26
Adaptive Forecasting
The estimates of level, trend, and seasonality areadjusted after each demand observation
General steps in adaptive forecasting
Moving average
Simple exponential smoothing
Trend-corrected exponential smoothing (Holt’smodel)
Trend- and seasonality-corrected exponentialsmoothing (Winter’s model)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-27
Basic Formula forAdaptive Forecasting
Ft+1 = (Lt + lT)St+1 = forecast for period t+l in period t
Lt = Estimate of level at the end of period t
Tt = Estimate of trend at the end of period t
St = Estimate of seasonal factor for period t
Ft = Forecast of demand for period t (made period t-1 orearlier)
Dt = Actual demand observed in period t
Et = Forecast error in period t
At = Absolute deviation for period t = |Et|
MAD = Mean Absolute Deviation = average value of At
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-28
General Steps inAdaptive Forecasting
Initialize: Compute initial estimates of level (L0), trend(T0), and seasonal factors (S1,…,Sp). This is done asin static forecasting.
Forecast: Forecast demand for period t+1 using thegeneral equation
Estimate error: Compute error Et+1 = Ft+1- Dt+1
Modify estimates: Modify the estimates of level (Lt+1),trend (Tt+1), and seasonal factor (St+p+1), given theerror Et+1 in the forecast
Repeat steps 2, 3, and 4 for each subsequent period
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-29
Moving AverageUsed when demand has no observable trend or seasonality
Systematic component of demand = level
The level in period t is the average demand over the last Nperiods (the N-period moving average)
Current forecast for all future periods is the same and is basedon the current estimate of the level
Lt = (Dt + Dt-1 + … + Dt-N+1) / N
Ft+1 = Lt and Ft+n = Lt
After observing the demand for period t+1, revise theestimates as follows:
Lt+1 = (Dt+1 + Dt + … + Dt-N+2) / N
Ft+2 = Lt+1
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-30
Moving Average ExampleFrom Tahoe Salt example (Table 7.1)
At the end of period 4, what is the forecast demand for periods 5through 8 using a 4-period moving average?
L4 = (D4+D3+D2+D1)/4 = (34000+23000+13000+8000)/4 = 19500
F5 = 19500 = F6 = F7 = F8
Observe demand in period 5 to be D5 = 10000
Forecast error in period 5, E5 = F5 - D5 = 19500 - 10000 = 9500
Revise estimate of level in period 5:
L5 = (D5+D4+D3+D2)/4 = (10000+34000+23000+13000)/4 =20000
F6 = L5 = 20000
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-31
Simple Exponential SmoothingUsed when demand has no observable trend or seasonality
Systematic component of demand = level
Initial estimate of level, L0, assumed to be the average of allhistorical data
L0 = [Sum(i=1 to n)Di]/n
Current forecast for all future periods is equal to the currentestimate of the level and is given as follows:
Ft+1 = Lt and Ft+n = Lt
After observing demand Dt+1, revise the estimate of the level:
Lt+1 = αDt+1 + (1-α)Lt
Lt+1 = Sum(n=0 to t+1)[α(1-α)nDt+1-n ]
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-32
Simple Exponential SmoothingExample
From Tahoe Salt data, forecast demand for period 1 usingexponential smoothing
L0 = average of all 12 periods of data
= Sum(i=1 to 12)[Di]/12 = 22083
F1 = L0 = 22083
Observed demand for period 1 = D1 = 8000
Forecast error for period 1, E1, is as follows:
E1 = F1 - D1 = 22083 - 8000 = 14083
Assuming α = 0.1, revised estimate of level for period 1:
L1 = αD1 + (1-α)L0 = (0.1)(8000) + (0.9)(22083) = 20675
F2 = L1 = 20675
Note that the estimate of level for period 1 is lower than in period 0
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-33
Trend-Corrected ExponentialSmoothing (Holt’s Model)
Appropriate when the demand is assumed to have a level andtrend in the systematic component of demand but no seasonality
Obtain initial estimate of level and trend by running a linearregression of the following form:
Dt = at + b
T0 = a
L0 = b
In period t, the forecast for future periods is expressed as follows:
Ft+1 = Lt + Tt
Ft+n = Lt + nTt
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-34
Trend-Corrected ExponentialSmoothing (Holt’s Model)
After observing demand for period t, revise the estimates for leveland trend as follows:
Lt+1 = αDt+1 + (1-α)(Lt + Tt)
Tt+1 = β(Lt+1 - Lt) + (1-β)Tt
α = smoothing constant for level
β = smoothing constant for trend
Example: Tahoe Salt demand data. Forecast demand for period 1using Holt’s model (trend corrected exponential smoothing)
Using linear regression,
L0 = 12015 (linear intercept)
T0 = 1549 (linear slope)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-35
Holt’s Model Example (continued)Forecast for period 1:F1 = L0 + T0 = 12015 + 1549 = 13564Observed demand for period 1 = D1 = 8000E1 = F1 - D1 = 13564 - 8000 = 5564Assume α = 0.1, β = 0.2L1 = αD1 + (1-α)(L0+T0) = (0.1)(8000) + (0.9)(13564) = 13008T1 = β(L1 - L0) + (1-β)T0 = (0.2)(13008 - 12015) + (0.8)(1549)
= 1438F2 = L1 + T1 = 13008 + 1438 = 14446F5 = L1 + 4T1 = 13008 + (4)(1438) = 18760
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-36
Trend- and Seasonality-CorrectedExponential Smoothing
Appropriate when the systematic component ofdemand is assumed to have a level, trend, and seasonalfactor
Systematic component = (level+trend)(seasonal factor)
Assume periodicity p
Obtain initial estimates of level (L0), trend (T0),seasonal factors (S1,…,Sp) using procedure for staticforecasting
In period t, the forecast for future periods is given by:
Ft+1 = (Lt+Tt)(St+1) and Ft+n = (Lt + nTt)St+n
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-37
Trend- and Seasonality-CorrectedExponential Smoothing (continued)After observing demand for period t+1, revise estimates for level,
trend, and seasonal factors as follows:
Lt+1 = α(Dt+1/St+1) + (1-α)(Lt+Tt)
Tt+1 = β(Lt+1 - Lt) + (1-β)Tt
St+p+1 = γ(Dt+1/Lt+1) + (1-γ)St+1
α = smoothing constant for level
β = smoothing constant for trend
γ = smoothing constant for seasonal factor
Example: Tahoe Salt data. Forecast demand for period 1 usingWinter’s model.
Initial estimates of level, trend, and seasonal factors are obtainedas in the static forecasting case
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-38
Trend- and Seasonality-CorrectedExponential Smoothing Example (continued)
L0 = 18439 T0 = 524 S1=0.47, S2=0.68, S3=1.17, S4=1.67
F1 = (L0 + T0)S1 = (18439+524)(0.47) = 8913
The observed demand for period 1 = D1 = 8000
Forecast error for period 1 = E1 = F1-D1 = 8913 - 8000 = 913
Assume α = 0.1, β=0.2, γ=0.1; revise estimates for level and trendfor period 1 and for seasonal factor for period 5
L1 = α(D1/S1)+(1-α)(L0+T0) = (0.1)(8000/0.47)+(0.9)(18439+524)=18769
T1 = β(L1-L0)+(1-β)T0 = (0.2)(18769-18439)+(0.8)(524) = 485
S5 = γ(D1/L1)+(1-γ)S1 = (0.1)(8000/18769)+(0.9)(0.47) = 0.47
F2 = (L1+T1)S2 = (18769 + 485)(0.68) = 13093
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-39
Measures of Forecast Error
Forecast error = Et = Ft - Dt
Mean squared error (MSE)
MSEn = (Sum(t=1 to n)[Et2])/n
Absolute deviation = At = |Et|
Mean absolute deviation (MAD)
MADn = (Sum(t=1 to n)[At])/n
σ = 1.25MAD
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-40
Measures of Forecast ErrorMean absolute percentage error (MAPE)
MAPEn = (Sum(t=1 to n)[|Et/ Dt|100])/n
Bias shows whether the forecast consistently under- oroverestimates demand; should fluctuate around 0
biasn = Sum(t=1 to n)[Et]
Tracking signal should be within the range of +6,otherwise, possibly use a new forecasting method
TSt = bias / MADt
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-41
Forecasting Demand at Tahoe Salt
Moving average
Simple exponential smoothing
Trend-corrected exponential smoothing
Trend- and seasonality-corrected exponentialsmoothing
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-42
Forecasting in Practice
Collaborate in building forecasts
The value of data depends on where you are in thesupply chain
Be sure to distinguish between demand and sales
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 7-43
Summary of Learning Objectives
What are the roles of forecasting for an enterprise anda supply chain?
What are the components of a demand forecast?
How is demand forecast given historical data usingtime series methodologies?
How is a demand forecast analyzed to estimateforecast error?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter 5Network
Design in theSupply Chain
5-1
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Outline
The Role of Network Design in the Supply Chain
Factors Influencing Network Design Decisions
Framework for Network Design Decisions
Models for Facility Location and CapacityAllocation
The Role of IT in Network Design
Making Network Design Decisions in Practice
5-2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Network Design Decisions
Facility role
Facility location
Capacity allocation
Market and supply allocation
5-3
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Factors InfluencingNetwork Design Decisions
Strategic
Technological
Macroeconomic
Political
Infrastructure
Competitive
Logistics and facility costs
5-4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
The Cost-Response Time Frontier
Local FG
Mix
Regional FG
Local WIP
Central FG
Central WIP
Central Raw Material and Custom production
Custom production with raw material at suppliers
Cost
Response Time HiLow
Low
Hi
5-5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Service and Number of Facilities
Number of Facilities
ResponseTime
5-6
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Costs and Number of Facilities
Costs
Number of facilities
Inventory
Transportation
Facility costs
5-7
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Percent ServiceLevel Within
Promised Time
Transportation
Cost Buildup as a Function of FacilitiesC
ost
of O
pera
tion
s
Number of Facilities
Inventory
Facilities
Total Costs
Labor
5-8
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Framework for Network DesignDecisions
Phase I – Supply Chain Strategy
Phase II – Regional Facility Configuration
Phase III – Desirable Sites
Phase IV – Location Choices
5-9
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
A Framework forNetwork Design Decisions
PHASE ISupply Chain
Strategy
PHASE IIRegional Facility
Configuration
PHASE IIIDesirable Sites
PHASE IVLocation Choices
Competitive STRATEGY
INTERNAL CONSTRAINTSCapital, growth strategy,existing network
PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIESCost, Scale/Scope impact, supportrequired, flexibility
COMPETITIVEENVIRONMENT
PRODUCTION METHODSSkill needs, response time
FACTOR COSTSLabor, materials, site specific
GLOBAL COMPETITION
TARIFFS AND TAXINCENTIVES
REGIONAL DEMANDSize, growth, homogeneity,local specifications
POLITICAL, EXCHANGERATE AND DEMAND RISK
AVAILABLEINFRASTRUCTURE
LOGISTICS COSTSTransport, inventory, coordination
5-10
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Conventional Network
CustomerStore
MaterialsDC
ComponentManufacturing
VendorDC
FinalAssembly
FinishedGoods DC
ComponentsDC
VendorDC Plant
Warehouse
FinishedGoods DC
CustomerDC
CustomerDC
CustomerDC
CustomerStore
CustomerStore
CustomerStore
CustomerStore
VendorDC
5-11
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Tailored Network: Multi-EchelonFinished Goods Network
RegionalFinished
Goods DC
RegionalFinished
Goods DC
Customer 1DC
Store 1
NationalFinished
Goods DC
Local DCCross-Dock
Local DCCross-Dock
Local DCCross-Dock
Customer 2DC
Store 1
Store 2
Store 2
Store 3
Store 3
5-12
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Gravity Methods for Location
Ton Mile-Center Solution– x,y: Warehouse Coordinates
– xn, yn : Coordinates of deliverylocation n
– dn : Distance to deliverylocation n
– Fn : Annual tonnage to deliverylocation n
k
n n
n
k
n n
nn
k
n n
n
k
n n
nn
n
dFD
dFyDd
FDd
FxD
yyxxd
n
n
y
n
n
x
nn
1
1
1
1
22 )()(
Min FDd nn n
5-13
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Models for Facility Location andCapacity Allocation
Phase II– Capacitated Plant location model
Phase III– Gravity location models
5-14
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Network Optimization Models
Allocating demand to production facilities
Locating facilities and allocating capacity
Which plants to establish? How to configure the network?
Key Costs:
• Fixed facility cost• Transportation cost• Production cost• Inventory cost• Coordination cost
5-15
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Demand Allocation Model
Which market is servedby which plant?
Which supply sourcesare used by a plant?
xij = Quantity shipped fromplant site i to customer j
0
,...,1,
,...,1,
..
1
1
1 1
x
Kx
Dx
xc
ij
i
m
jij
j
n
iij
n
i
m
jijij
ni
mj
ts
Min
5-16
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Plant Location with Multiple Sourcing
yi = 1 if plant is locatedat site i, 0 otherwise
xij = Quantity shippedfrom plant site i tocustomer j
1,0;
,...,1,
,...,1,
..
1
1
1
1 11
yy
yKx
Dx
xcyf
i
m
ii
ii
n
jij
j
n
iij
n
i
m
jijiji
n
ii
k
ni
mj
ts
Min
5-17
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Plant Location with Single Sourcing
yi = 1 if plant is locatedat site i, 0 otherwise
xij = 1 if market j issupplied by factory i, 0otherwise
1,0
,...,1,
,...,1,1
..
,1
1
1 11
yx
yKxD
x
xcDyf
ij
nij
mj
ts
jMin
i
ii
n
jij
n
iij
n
i
m
jijiji
n
ii
5-18
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
The Role of IT in Network Design
IT systems help with network design by:1. Making the modeling of the network design
problems easier
2. Containing high-performance optimizationtechnologies
3. Allowing for “what-if” scenarios4. Interfacing with planning and operational
software
5-19
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Making Network Design Decisions InPractice
Do not underestimate the life span of facilities
Do not gloss over the cultural implications
Do not ignore quality of life issues
Focus on tariffs and tax incentives whenlocating facilities
5-20
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
SOCIO ECONOMIC FACTORS IN CHOICE OFFACILITY LOCATION
What role do socio-economic factors play inthe selection of the facility location?
How do state policies aimed at promotingbalanced regional development, shape thesupply chain network designs?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
JAIPUR RUGS
How has Jaipur Rugs knitted together thetraditional skills of widely dispersed ruralworkforce, through innovative adaptation ofsupply chain practices that best fit the Indiansocio economic conditions to bring qualityproducts to the international market and ensurefair returns to the artisans?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Summary of Learning ObjectivesWhat is the role of network design decisions in
the supply chain?What are the factors influencing supply chain
network design decisions?Describe a strategic framework for facility
location.How are the following optimization methods used
for facility location and capacity allocationdecisions?– Gravity methods for location– Network optimization models
5-23
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-1
Chapter 6Designing
Global SupplyChain Networks
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-2
OutlineThe Impact of Globalization on Supply Chain Networks
The Offshoring Decision: Total Cost
Risk Management in Global Supply Chains
The Basic Aspects of Evaluating Global Supply ChainDesign
Evaluating Network Design Decisions Using DecisionTrees
AM Tires: Evaluation of Global Supply Chain DecisionsUnder Uncertainty in Practice
Summary of Learning Objectives
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-3
The Impact of Globalization onSupply Chain Networks
Globalization offers companies opportunities tosimultaneously grow revenues and decrease costsThe opportunities from globalization are often
accompanied by significant additional riskThere will be a good deal of uncertainty in demand,
prices, exchange rates, and the competitive marketover the lifetime of a supply chain networkTherefore, building flexibility into supply chain
operations allows the supply chain to deal withuncertainty in a manner that will maximize profits
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-4
The Offshoring Decision: Total Cost
Total cost can be identified by focusing on thecomplete sourcing process
Offshoring to low-cost countries is likely to be mostattractive for products with:– High labor content
– Large production volumes
– Relatively low variety
– Low transportation costs
Perform a careful review of the production process
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Risk Management in GlobalSupply Chains
Disruptions
Delays
Systems risk
Forecast risk
Intellectual property risk
Procurement risk
Inventory risk
Capacity risk
6-5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Tailored Risk Mitigation StrategiesIncrease capacity
Get redundant suppliers
Increase responsiveness
Increase inventory
Increase flexibility
Pool or aggregate demand
Increase source capability
6-6
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-7
Discounted Cash Flow AnalysisSupply chain decisions are in place for a long time, so
they should be evaluated as a sequence of cash flowsover that period
Discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis evaluates thepresent value of any stream of future cash flows andallows managers to compare different cash flowstreams in terms of their financial value
Based on the time value of money – a dollar today isworth more than a dollar tomorrow
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-8
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
returnofrate
flowscashofstream thisofluepresent vanetthe
periodsToverflowscashofstreamais,...,,
where
1
1
1
1factorDiscount
10
10
k
NPV
CCC
Ck
CNPV
k
T
T
tt
t
• Compare NPV of different supply chain design options
• The option with the highest NPV will provide the greatestfinancial return
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-9
NPV Example: Trips LogisticsHow much space to lease in the next three yearsDemand = 100,000 unitsRequires 1,000 sq. ft. of space for every 1,000 units of
demandRevenue = $1.22 per unit of demandDecision is whether to sign a three-year lease or
obtain warehousing space on the spot marketThree-year lease: cost = $1 per sq. ft.Spot market: cost = $1.20 per sq. ft.k = 0.1
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-10
NPV Example: Trips Logistics
For leasing warehouse space on the spot market:
Expected annual profit = 100,000 x $1.22 – 100,000 x$1.20 = $2,000
Cash flow = $2,000 in each of the next three years
471,5$1.1
2000
1.1
20002000
11lease)(no
2
221
0
k
C
k
CCNPV
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-11
NPV Example: Trips LogisticsFor leasing warehouse space with a three-year lease:
Expected annual profit = 100,000 x $1.22 – 100,000 x $1.00 = $22,000
Cash flow = $22,000 in each of the next three years
182,60$1.1
22000
1.1
2200022000
11lease)(no
2
221
0
k
C
k
CCNPV
The NPV of signing the lease is $54,711 higher; therefore, the managerdecides to sign the lease
However, uncertainty in demand and costs may cause the manager torethink his decision
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-12
Representations of UncertaintyBinomial Representation of Uncertainty
Other Representations of Uncertainty
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-13
Binomial Representationsof Uncertainty
When moving from one period to the next, the value of theunderlying factor (e.g., demand or price) has only twopossible outcomes – up or down
The underlying factor moves up by a factor or u > 1 withprobability p, or down by a factor d < 1 with probability 1-p
Assuming a price P in period 0, for the multiplicativebinomial, the possible outcomes for the next four periods:
– Period 1: Pu, Pd
– Period 2: Pu2, Pud, Pd2
– Period 3: Pu3, Pu2d, Pud2, Pd3
– Period 4: Pu4, Pu3d, Pu2d2, Pud3, Pd4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-14
Binomial Representationsof Uncertainty
In general, for multiplicative binomial, period T hasall possible outcomes Putd(T-t), for t = 0,1,…,TFrom state Puad(T-a) in period t, the price may move in
period t+1 to either– Pua+1d(T-a) with probability p, or
– Puad(T-a)+1 with probability (1-p)
Represented as the binomial tree shown in Figure 6.1(p. 140)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-15
Binomial Representationsof Uncertainty
For the additive binomial, the states in the followingperiods are:– Period 1: P+u, P-d
– Period 2: P+2u, P+u-d, P-2d
– Period 3: P+3u, P+2u-d, P+u-2d, P-3d
– Period 4: P+4u, P+3u-d, P+2u-2d, P+u-3d, P-4d
In general, for the additive binomial, period T has allpossible outcomes P+tu-(T-t)d, for t=0, 1, …, T
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-16
Evaluating Network DesignDecisions Using Decision Trees
A manager must make many different decisions whendesigning a supply chain network
Many of them involve a choice between a long-term (or lessflexible) option and a short-term (or more flexible) option
If uncertainty is ignored, the long-term option will almostalways be selected because it is typically cheaper
Such a decision can eventually hurt the firm, however,because actual future prices or demand may be differentfrom what was forecasted at the time of the decision
A decision tree is a graphic device that can be used toevaluate decisions under uncertainty
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-17
Decision Tree Methodology1. Identify the duration of each period (month, quarter, etc.) and
the number of periods T over the which the decision is to beevaluated.
2. Identify factors such as demand, price, and exchange rate,whose fluctuation will be considered over the next T periods.
3. Identify representations of uncertainty for each factor; that is,determine what distribution to use to model the uncertainty.
4. Identify the periodic discount rate k for each period.5. Represent the decision tree with defined states in each period,
as well as the transition probabilities between states insuccessive periods.
6. Starting at period T, work back to period 0, identifying theoptimal decision and the expected cash flows at each step.Expected cash flows at each state in a given period should bediscounted back when included in the previous period.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-18
Decision Tree Methodology:Trips Logistics
Decide whether to lease warehouse space for the comingthree years and the quantity to lease
Long-term lease is currently cheaper than the spot marketrate
The manager anticipates uncertainty in demand and spotprices over the next three years
Long-term lease is cheaper but could go unused if demandis lower than forecast; future spot market rates could alsodecrease
Spot market rates are currently high, and the spot marketwould cost a lot if future demand is higher than expected
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-19
Trips Logistics: Three OptionsGet all warehousing space from the spot market as
needed
Sign a three-year lease for a fixed amount ofwarehouse space and get additional requirements fromthe spot market
Sign a flexible lease with a minimum change thatallows variable usage of warehouse space up to a limitwith additional requirement from the spot market
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-20
Trips Logistics1000 sq. ft. of warehouse space needed for 1000 units of
demand
Current demand = 100,000 units per year
Binomial uncertainty: Demand can go up by 20% withp = 0.5 or down by 20% with 1-p = 0.5
Lease price = $1.00 per sq. ft. per year
Spot market price = $1.20 per sq. ft. per year
Spot prices can go up by 10% with p = 0.5 or down by10% with 1-p = 0.5
Revenue = $1.22 per unit of demand
k = 0.1
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-21
Trips Logistics Decision Tree(Fig. 6.2)
D=144
p=$1.45
D=144
p=$1.19
D=96
p=$1.45
D=144
p=$0.97
D=96
p=$1.19
D=96
p=$0.97
D=64
p=$1.45
D=64
p=$1.19
D=64
p=$0.97
D=120
p=$1.32
D=120
p=$1. 08
D=80
p=$1.32
D=80
p=$1.32
D=100
p=$1.20
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.250.25
0.25
0.25
Period 0
Period 1
Period 2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-22
Trips Logistics ExampleAnalyze the option of not signing a lease and
obtaining all warehouse space from the spot market
Start with Period 2 and calculate the profit at eachnode
For D=144, p=$1.45, in Period 2:
C(D=144, p=1.45,2) = 144,000x1.45 = $208,800
P(D=144, p =1.45,2) = 144,000x1.22 –C(D=144,p=1.45,2) = 175,680-208,800 = -$33,120
Profit at other nodes is shown in Table 6.1
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-23
Trips Logistics ExampleExpected profit at each node in Period 1 is the profit
during Period 1 plus the present value of the expectedprofit in Period 2
Expected profit EP(D=, p=,1) at a node is theexpected profit over all four nodes in Period 2 thatmay result from this node
PVEP(D=,p=,1) is the present value of this expectedprofit and P(D=,p=,1), and the total expected profit, isthe sum of the profit in Period 1 and the present valueof the expected profit in Period 2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-24
Trips Logistics ExampleFrom node D=120, p=$1.32 in Period 1, there are four
possible states in Period 2
Evaluate the expected profit in Period 2 over all four statespossible from node D=120, p=$1.32 in Period 1 to be
EP(D=120,p=1.32,1) = 0.25xP(D=144,p=1.45,2) +
0.25xP(D=144,p=1.19,2) +
0.25xP(D=96,p=1.45,2) +
0.25xP(D=96,p=1.19,2)
= 0.25x(-33,120)+0.25x4,320+0.25x(-22,080)+0.25x2,880
= -$12,000
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-25
Trips Logistics ExampleThe present value of this expected value in Period 1 is
PVEP(D=12, p=1.32,1) = EP(D=120,p=1.32,1) / (1+k)= -$12,000 / (1+0.1)= -$10,909
The total expected profit P(D=120,p=1.32,1) at nodeD=120,p=1.32 in Period 1 is the sum of the profit in Period 1 atthis node, plus the present value of future expected profitspossible from this nodeP(D=120,p=1.32,1) = [(120,000x1.22)-(120,000x1.32)] +
PVEP(D=120,p=1.32,1)= -$12,000 + (-$10,909) = -$22,909
The total expected profit for the other nodes in Period 1 is shownin Table 6.2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-26
Trips Logistics ExampleFor Period 0, the total profit P(D=100,p=120,0) is the sum of
the profit in Period 0 and the present value of the expectedprofit over the four nodes in Period 1
EP(D=100,p=1.20,0) = 0.25xP(D=120,p=1.32,1) +
= 0.25xP(D=120,p=1.08,1) +
= 0.25xP(D=96,p=1.32,1) +
= 0.25xP(D=96,p=1.08,1)
= 0.25x(-22,909)+0.25x32,073+0.25x(-15,273)+0.25x21,382
= $3,818
PVEP(D=100,p=1.20,0) = EP(D=100,p=1.20,0) / (1+k)
= $3,818 / (1 + 0.1) = $3,471
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-27
Trips Logistics ExampleP(D=100,p=1.20,0) = 100,000x1.22-100,000x1.20 +
PVEP(D=100,p=1.20,0)
= $2,000 + $3,471 = $5,471
Therefore, the expected NPV of not signing the leaseand obtaining all warehouse space from the spot marketis given by NPV(Spot Market) = $5,471
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-28
Trips Logistics ExampleUsing the same approach for the lease option,
NPV(Lease) = $38,364
Recall that when uncertainty was ignored, the NPVfor the lease option was $60,182
However, the manager would probably still prefer tosign the three-year lease for 100,000 sq. ft. becausethis option has the higher expected profit
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-29
Evaluating FlexibilityUsing Decision Trees
Decision tree methodology can be used to evaluate flexibility within thesupply chain
Suppose the manager at Trips Logistics has been offered a contractwhere, for an upfront payment of $10,000, the company will have theflexibility of using between 60,000 sq. ft. and 100,000 sq. ft. ofwarehouse space at $1 per sq. ft. per year. Trips must pay $60,000 forthe first 60,000 sq. ft. and can then use up to 40,000 sq. ft. on demand at$1 per sq. ft. as needed.
Using the same approach as before, the expected profit of this option is$56,725
The value of flexibility is the difference between the expected presentvalue of the flexible option and the expected present value of theinflexible options
The three options are listed in Table 6.7, where the flexible option hasan expected present value $8,361 greater than the inflexible lease option(including the upfront $10,000 payment)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-30
AM Tires: Evaluation of Supply ChainDesign Decisions Under UncertaintyDedicated Capacity of 100,000 in the United States
and 50,000 in Mexico– Period 2 Evaluation
– Period 1 Evaluation
– Period 0 Evaluation
Flexible Capacity of 100,000 in the United States and50,000 in Mexico– Period 2 Evaluation
– Period 1 Evaluation
– Period 0 Evaluation
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-31
Evaluating Facility Investments:AM Tires
Dedicated Plant Flexible PlantPlantFixed Cost Variable Cost Fixed Cost Variable Cost
US 100,000 $1 million/yr. $15 / tire $1.1 million/ year
$15 / tire
Mexico50,000
4 millionpesos / year
110 pesos /tire
4.4 millionpesos / year
110 pesos /tire
U.S. Expected Demand = 100,000;Mexico Expected Demand = 50,0001US$ = 9 pesos
Demand goes up or down by 20 percent with probability 0.5 andexchange rate goes up or down by 25 per cent with probability 0.5.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-32
RU=100RM=50
E=9
Period 0 Period 1 Period 2
RU=120RM = 60E=11.25
RU=120RM = 60E=6.75
RU=120RM = 40E=11.25
RU=120RM = 40E=6.75
RU=80RM = 60E=11.25
RU=80RM = 60E=6.75
RU=80RM = 40E=11.25
RU=80RM = 40E=6.75
RU=144RM = 72E=14.06
RU=144RM = 72E=8.44
RU=144RM = 48E=14.06
RU=144RM = 48E=8.44
RU=96RM = 72E=14.06
RU=96RM = 72E=8.44
RU=96RM = 48E=14.06
RU=96RM = 48E=8.44
AM Tires
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-33
AM TiresFour possible capacity scenarios:• Both dedicated• Both flexible• U.S. flexible, Mexico dedicated• U.S. dedicated, Mexico flexible
For each node, solve the demand allocation model:
Plants Markets
U.S.
Mexico
U.S.
Mexico
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-34
AM Tires: Demand Allocation forRU = 144; RM = 72, E = 14.06
Source Destination Variablecost
Shippingcost
E Sale price Margin($)
U.S. U.S. $15 0 14.06 $30 $15U.S. Mexico $15 $1 14.06 240 pesos $1.1
Mexico U.S. 110 pesos $1 14.06 $30 $21.2Mexico Mexico 110 pesos 0 14.06 240 pesos $9.2
Plants Markets
U.S.
Mexico
U.S.
Mexico
100,000
6,000
Profit (flexible) =$1,075,055Profit (dedicated) =$649,360
100,000
50,000
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-35
Facility Decision at AM Tires
Plant ConfigurationUnited States Mexico
NPV
Dedicated Dedicated $1,629,319Flexible Dedicated $1,514,322
Dedicated Flexible $1,722,447Flexible Flexible $1,529,758
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-36
Making Global Supply Chain DesignDecisions Under Uncertainty in Practice
Combine strategic planning and financial planningduring global network design
Use multiple metrics to evaluate global supply chainnetworks
Use financial analysis as an input to decision making,not as the decision-making process
Use estimates along with sensitivity analysis
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 6-37
Summary of Learning ObjectivesWhat are the factors that need to be included in total
landed cost when making global sourcing decisions?
What are the uncertainties that influence global supplychain performance and global network design?
What are the different strategies used to mitigate riskin global supply chains?
What are the methodologies that are used to evaluatesupply chain decisions under uncertainty?
How can global supply chain network designdecisions in an uncertain environment be analyzed?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-1
Chapter 3Supply ChainDrivers and
Metrics
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-2
Outline Impellers of Supply Chain
Supply Chain Concepts
Drivers of supply chain performance
A framework for structuring drivers
Facilities
Inventory
Transportation
Information
Sourcing
Pricing
Obstacles to achieving fit
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
IMPELLERS OF SUPPLY CHAIN
Empowered Customer
Developments in Information Technology Tools
Globalisation
3-3
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
SUPPLY CHAIN CONCEPTS
Systems Concept
Total Cost Concept
Trade off Concept
3-4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-5
Drivers of Supply Chain Performance Facilities
– places where inventory is stored, assembled, or fabricated– production sites and storage sites
Inventory– raw materials, WIP, finished goods within a supply chain– inventory policies
Transportation– moving inventory from point to point in a supply chain– combinations of transportation modes and routes
Information– data and analysis regarding inventory, transportation, facilities throughout the
supply chain– potentially the biggest driver of supply chain performance
Sourcing– functions a firm performs and functions that are outsourced
Pricing– Price associated with goods and services provided by a firm to the supply chain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-6
A Framework forStructuring Drivers
Competitive Strategy
Supply ChainStrategy
Efficiency Responsiveness
Facilities Inventory Transportation
Information
Supply chain structure
Cross Functional Drivers
Sourcing Pricing
Logistical Drivers
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-7
FacilitiesRole in the supply chain
– the “where” of the supply chain– manufacturing or storage (warehouses)
Role in the competitive strategy– economies of scale (efficiency priority)
– larger number of smaller facilities (responsiveness priority)
Example 3.1: Toyota and Honda
Components of facilities decisions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-8
Components of Facilities DecisionsLocation
– centralization (efficiency) vs. decentralization (responsiveness)
– other factors to consider (e.g., proximity to customers)
Capacity (flexibility versus efficiency)
Manufacturing methodology (product focused versusprocess focused)
Warehousing methodology (SKU storage, job lotstorage, cross-docking)
Overall trade-off: Responsiveness versus efficiency
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-9
InventoryRole in the supply chain
Role in the competitive strategy
Components of inventory decisions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-10
Inventory: Role in the Supply ChainInventory exists because of a mismatch between
supply and demand
Source of cost and influence on responsiveness
Impact on– material flow time: time elapsed between when material
enters the supply chain to when it exits the supply chain
– throughput» rate at which sales to end consumers occur
» I = DT (Little’s Law)» I = inventory; D = throughput; T = flow time
» Example
» Inventory and throughput are “synonymous” in a supply chain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-11
Inventory: Role in CompetitiveStrategy
If responsiveness is a strategic competitive priority, afirm can locate larger amounts of inventory closer tocustomers
If cost is more important, inventory can be reduced tomake the firm more efficient
Trade-off
Example 3.2 – Nordstrom
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-12
Components of InventoryDecisions
Cycle inventory– Average amount of inventory used to satisfy demand between shipments
– Depends on lot size
Safety inventory– inventory held in case demand exceeds expectations
– costs of carrying too much inventory versus cost of losing sales
Seasonal inventory– inventory built up to counter predictable variability in demand
– cost of carrying additional inventory versus cost of flexible production
Overall trade-off: Responsiveness versus efficiency– more inventory: greater responsiveness but greater cost
– less inventory: lower cost but lower responsiveness
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-13
TransportationRole in the supply chain
Role in the competitive strategy
Components of transportation decisions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-14
Transportation: Role inthe Supply Chain
Moves the product between stages in the supply chain
Impact on responsiveness and efficiency
Faster transportation allows greater responsivenessbut lower efficiency
Also affects inventory and facilities
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-15
Transportation:Role in the Competitive StrategyIf responsiveness is a strategic competitive priority,
then faster transportation modes can provide greaterresponsiveness to customers who are willing to payfor it
Can also use slower transportation modes forcustomers whose priority is price (cost)
Can also consider both inventory and transportation tofind the right balance
Example 3.3: Blue Nile
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-16
Components ofTransportation Decisions
Mode of transportation:– air, truck, rail, ship, pipeline, electronic transportation
– vary in cost, speed, size of shipment, flexibility
Route and network selection– route: path along which a product is shipped
– network: collection of locations and routes
In-house or outsource
Overall trade-off: Responsiveness versus efficiency
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-17
InformationRole in the supply chain
Role in the competitive strategy
Components of information decisions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-18
Information: Role inthe Supply Chain
The connection between the various stages in thesupply chain – allows coordination between stages
Crucial to daily operation of each stage in a supplychain – e.g., production scheduling, inventory levels
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-19
Information:Role in the Competitive StrategyAllows supply chain to become more efficient and
more responsive at the same time (reduces the needfor a trade-off)
Information technology
What information is most valuable?
Example 3.4: Andersen Windows
Example 3.5: Sunsweet Growers
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-20
Components of InformationDecisions
Push (MRP) versus pull (demand informationtransmitted quickly throughout the supply chain)
Coordination and information sharing
Forecasting and aggregate planning
Enabling technologies– EDI
– Internet
– ERP systems
– Supply Chain Management software
Overall trade-off: Responsiveness versus efficiency
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-21
SourcingRole in the supply chain
Role in the competitive strategy
Components of sourcing decisions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-22
Sourcing: Role inthe Supply Chain
Set of business processes required to purchase goodsand services in a supply chain
Supplier selection, single vs. multiple suppliers,contract negotiation
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-23
Sourcing:Role in the Competitive StrategySourcing decisions are crucial because they affect the
level of efficiency and responsiveness in a supplychain
In-house vs. outsource decisions- improvingefficiency and responsiveness
Example 3.6: Cisco
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-24
Components of SourcingDecisions
In-house versus outsource decisions
Supplier evaluation and selection
Procurement process
Overall trade-off: Increase the supply chain profits
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-25
PricingRole in the supply chain
Role in the competitive strategy
Components of pricing decisions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-26
Pricing: Role inthe Supply Chain
Pricing determines the amount to charge customers ina supply chain
Pricing strategies can be used to match demand andsupply
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-27
Sourcing:Role in the Competitive StrategyFirms can utilize optimal pricing strategies to improve
efficiency and responsiveness
Low price and low product availability; vary prices byresponse times
Example 3.7: Amazon.com
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-28
Components of Pricing DecisionsPricing and economies of scale
Everyday low pricing versus high-low pricing
Fixed price versus menu pricing
Overall trade-off: Increase the firm profits
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-29
Obstacles to AchievingStrategic Fit
Increasing variety of products
Decreasing product life cycles
Increasingly demanding customers
Fragmentation of supply chain ownership
Globalization
Difficulty executing new strategies
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 3-30
SummaryWhat are the major drivers of supply chain
performance?
What is the role of each driver in creating strategic fitbetween supply chain strategy and competitive strategy(or between implied demand uncertainty and supplychain responsiveness)?
What are the major obstacles to achieving strategic fit?
In the remainder of the course, we will learn how tomake decisions with respect to these drivers in order toachieve strategic fit and surmount these obstacles
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-1
Chapter 4Designing
DistributionNetworks and
Applications toE-Business
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-2
OutlineThe Role of Distribution in the Supply Chain
Factors Influencing Distribution Network Design
Design Options for a Distribution Network
E-Business and the Distribution Network
Distribution Networks in Practice
Summary of Learning Objectives
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-3
The Role of Distributionin the Supply Chain
Distribution: the steps taken to move and store aproduct from the supplier stage to the customer stagein a supply chain
Distribution directly affects cost and the customerexperience and therefore drives profitability
Choice of distribution network can achieve supplychain objectives from low cost to high responsiveness
Examples: Wal-Mart, Dell, Proctor & Gamble,Grainger
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4
Factors InfluencingDistribution Network Design
Distribution network performance evaluated alongtwo dimensions at the highest level:– Customer needs that are met
– Cost of meeting customer needs
Distribution network design options must therefore becompared according to their impact on customerservice and the cost to provide this level of service
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-5
Factors InfluencingDistribution Network Design
Elements of customer service influenced by network structure:– Response time
– Product variety
– Product availability
– Customer experience
– Order visibility
– Returnability
Supply chain costs affected by network structure:– Inventories
– Transportation
– Facilities and handling
– Information
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-6
Service and Number of Facilities(Fig. 4.1)
Number ofFacilities
Response Time
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-7
Inventory Costs and Numberof Facilities (Fig. 4.2)
InventoryCosts
Number of facilities
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-8
Transportation Costs andNumber of Facilities (Fig. 4.3)
TransportationCosts
Number of facilities
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-9
Facility Costs and Numberof Facilities (Fig. 4.4)
FacilityCosts
Number of facilities
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-10
Response Time
Variation in Logistics Costs and ResponseTime with Number of Facilities (Fig. 4.5)
Number of Facilities
Total Logistics Costs
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-11
Design Options for aDistribution Network
Manufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping
Manufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping and In-Transit Merge
Distributor Storage with Carrier Delivery
Distributor Storage with Last Mile Delivery
Manufacturer or Distributor Storage with CustomerPickup
Retail Storage with Customer Pickup
Selecting a Distribution Network Design
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-12
Manufacturer Storage withDirect Shipping (Fig. 4.6)
Manufacturer
Retailer
Customers
Product Flow
Information Flow
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-13
In-Transit Merge Network (Fig. 4.7)Factories
Retailer
Product Flow
Information Flow
In-Transit Merge byCarrier
Customers
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-14
Distributor Storage withCarrier Delivery (Fig. 4.8)
Factories
Customers
Product FlowInformation Flow
Warehouse Storage byDistributor/Retailer
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-15
Distributor Storage withLast Mile Delivery (Fig. 4.9)
Factories
Customers
Product Flow
Information Flow
Distributor/RetailerWarehouse
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-16
Manufacturer or Distributor Storagewith Customer Pickup (Fig. 4.10)
Factories
Retailer
Pickup Sites
Product FlowInformation Flow
Cross Dock DC
Customer Flow
Customers
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-17
Comparative Performance of DeliveryNetwork Designs (Table 4.7)
Information
Facility & Handling
Transportation
Inventory
Returnability
Order Visibility
Customer Experience
Product Availability
Product Variety
Response Time
Manufacturerstorage with pickup
Distributorstorage with last
mile delivery
Distributor Storagewith Package
Carrier Delivery
ManufacturerStorage with In-Transit Merge
ManufacturerStorage with Direct
Shipping
Retail Storagewith Customer
Pickup
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
55
5
6
6
5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-18
Performance of Delivery Networks for DifferentProduct/Customer Characteristics (Table 4-8)
Low customer effort
High product variety
Quick desired response
High product value
Many product sources
Very low demand product
Low demand product
Medium demand product
High demand product
Manufacturerstorage with
pickup
Distributor storagewith last mile delivery
Distributor Storagewith Package Carrier
Delivery
ManufacturerStorage with In-Transit Merge
ManufacturerStorage with
Direct Shipping
Retail Storagewith
CustomerPickup
+2
+2
+2
+2
+2
+2
+2 +2 +2
+2
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1 -1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-2 -2
-2
-2
-2
-2 -2
-2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
TRADITIONAL INDIANDISTRIBUTION CHANNELS
What characteristics of the traditional Indian agriculturalproduce distribution channels militate against deliveringsimultaneous benefits to the farmer and the consumer?
What Supply Chain Best Practices do you see as being relevantto the Indian agricultural produce distribution system?
Organised retailing underway in India is likely to impact thetraditional distribution channels and transform the sameradically. What major changes do you visualize taking placein the Agricultural Produce Distribution System in India andhow do you see the existing channels responding to the same?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-20
E-Business and the DistributionNetwork
Impact of E-Business on Customer Service
Impact of E-Business on Cost
Using E-Business: Dell, Amazon, Peapod, Grainger
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Impact of E-Business onCustomer Service
Response time
Product variety
Product Availability
Customer experience
Time to market
Order Visibility
Returnability
Direct Sales to Customers
Flexible Pricing, Product Portfolio, and Promotions
Efficient Funds Transfer4-21
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Impact of E-Business on CostInventory
Facilities
Transportation
Information
4-22
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-23
Distribution Networks in PracticeThe ownership structure of the distribution network
can have as big as an impact as the type of distributionnetwork
The choice of a distribution network has very long-term consequences
Consider whether an exclusive distribution strategy isadvantageous
Product, price, commoditization, and criticality havean impact on the type of distribution system preferredby customers
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-24
Summary of Learning ObjectivesWhat are the key factors to be considered when
designing the distribution network?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of variousdistribution options?
How has E-Business affected the design ofdistribution networks in different industries?
What roles do distributors play in the supply chain?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-1
Chapter 2Supply ChainPerformance:
Achieving StrategicFit and Scope
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-2
OutlineCompetitive and supply chain strategies
Achieving strategic fit
Expanding strategic scope
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-3
What is Supply Chain Management?
Managing supply chain flows and assets, to maximizesupply chain surplus
What is supply chain surplus?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-4
Competitive and SupplyChain Strategies
Competitive strategy: defines the set of customer needs a firmseeks to satisfy through its products and services
Product development strategy: specifies the portfolio of newproducts that the company will try to develop
Marketing and sales strategy: specifies how the market will besegmented and product positioned, priced, and promoted
Supply chain strategy:– determines the nature of material procurement, transportation of
materials, manufacture of product or creation of service, distribution ofproduct
– Consistency and support between supply chain strategy, competitivestrategy, and other functional strategies is important
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-5
NewProduct
Development
Marketingand
SalesOperations Distribution Service
Finance, Accounting, Information Technology, Human Resources
The Value Chain: Linking SupplyChain and Business Strategy
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-6
Achieving Strategic FitIntroduction
How is strategic fit achieved?
Other issues affecting strategic fit
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-7
Achieving Strategic Fit
Strategic fit:– Consistency between customer priorities of competitive
strategy and supply chain capabilities specified by thesupply chain strategy
– Competitive and supply chain strategies have the samegoals
A company may fail because of a lack of strategic fitor because its processes and resources do not providethe capabilities to execute the desired strategy
Example of strategic fit -- Dell
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-8
How is Strategic Fit Achieved?Step 1: Understanding the customer and supply chain
uncertainty
Step 2: Understanding the supply chain
Step 3: Achieving strategic fit
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-9
Step 1: Understanding the Customerand Supply Chain Uncertainty
Identify the needs of the customer segment beingserved
Quantity of product needed in each lot
Response time customers will tolerate
Variety of products needed
Service level required
Price of the product
Desired rate of innovation in the product
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-10
Step 1: Understanding the Customerand Supply Chain Uncertainty
Overall attribute of customer demand
Demand uncertainty: uncertainty of customer demandfor a product
Implied demand uncertainty: resulting uncertainty forthe supply chain given the portion of the demand thesupply chain must handle and attributes the customerdesires
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-11
Step 1: Understanding the Customerand Supply Chain Uncertainty
Implied demand uncertainty also related to customerneeds and product attributes
Table 2.1
Figure 2.2
Table 2.2
First step to strategic fit is to understand customers bymapping their demand on the implied uncertaintyspectrum
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-12
Achieving Strategic FitUnderstanding the Customer
– Lot size
– Response time
– Service level
– Product variety
– Price
– Innovation
ImpliedDemand
Uncertainty
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-13
Impact of Customer Needs on ImpliedDemand Uncertainty (Table 2.1)
Customer Need Causes implied demanduncertainty to increase because …
Range of quantity required increases Wider range of quantity requiredimplies greater variance in demand
Lead time decreases Less time to react to orders
Variety of products required increases Demand per product becomes moredisaggregated
Number of channels through whichproduct may be acquired increases
Total customer demand is nowdisaggregated over more channels
Rate of innovation increases New products tend to have moreuncertain demand
Required service level increases Firm now has to handle unusualsurges in demand
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-14
Levels of Implied DemandUncertainty
Predictablesupply and
demand
Salt at asupermarket
A newcommunication
device
Highly uncertainsupply and demand
Figure 2.2: The Implied Uncertainty (Demand and Supply)Spectrum
Predictable supply and uncertaindemand or uncertain supply andpredictable demand or somewhat
uncertain supply and demand
An existingautomobile
model
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-15
Correlation Between Implied DemandUncertainty and Other Attributes (Table 2.2)
Attribute Low ImpliedUncertainty
High ImpliedUncertainty
Product margin Low High
Avg. forecast error 10% 40%-100%
Avg. stockout rate 1%-2% 10%-40%
Avg. forced season-end markdown
0% 10%-25%
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-16
Step 2: Understanding theSupply Chain
How does the firm best meet demand?
Dimension describing the supply chain is supply chainresponsiveness
Supply chain responsiveness -- ability to– respond to wide ranges of quantities demanded
– meet short lead times
– handle a large variety of products
– build highly innovative products
– meet a very high service level
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-17
Step 2: Understanding theSupply Chain
There is a cost to achieving responsiveness
Supply chain efficiency: cost of making anddelivering the product to the customer
Increasing responsiveness results in higher costs thatlower efficiency
Figure 2.3: cost-responsiveness efficient frontier
Figure 2.4: supply chain responsiveness spectrum
Second step to achieving strategic fit is to map thesupply chain on the responsiveness spectrum
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-18
Understanding the Supply Chain: Cost-Responsiveness Efficient Frontier
High Low
Low
High
Responsiveness
Cost
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-19
Responsiveness Spectrum(Figure 2.4)
Integratedsteel mill
Dell
Highlyefficient
Highlyresponsive
Somewhatefficient
Somewhatresponsive
Hanesapparel
Mostautomotiveproduction
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-20
Step 3: Achieving Strategic FitStep is to ensure that what the supply chain does well
is consistent with target customer’s needsFig. 2.5: Zone of strategic fit
Fig. 2.6: Uncertainty/Responsiveness map
Examples: Dell, Barilla
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-21
Achieving Strategic Fit Shown on theUncertainty/Responsiveness Map (Fig. 2.5)
Implieduncertaintyspectrum
Responsivesupply chain
Efficientsupply chain
Certaindemand
Uncertaindemand
Responsivenessspectrum
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-22
Step 3: Achieving Strategic FitAll functions in the value chain must support the
competitive strategy to achieve strategic fit – Fig. 2.7
Two extremes: Efficient supply chains (Barilla) andresponsive supply chains (Dell) – Table 2.4
Two key points– there is no right supply chain strategy independent of
competitive strategy
– there is a right supply chain strategy for a given competitivestrategy
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-23
Comparison of Efficient andResponsive Supply Chains (Table 2.4)
Efficient Responsive
Primary goal Lowest cost Quick response
Product design strategy Min product cost Modularity to allowpostponement
Pricing strategy Lower margins Higher margins
Mfg strategy High utilization Capacity flexibility
Inventory strategy Minimize inventory Buffer inventory
Lead time strategy Reduce but not at expenseof greater cost
Aggressively reduce even ifcosts are significant
Supplier selection strategy Cost and low quality Speed, flexibility, quality
Transportation strategy Greater reliance on low costmodes
Greater reliance onresponsive (fast) modes
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-24
Other Issues Affecting Strategic FitMultiple products and customer segments
Product life cycle
Competitive changes over time
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-25
Multiple Products andCustomer Segments
Firms sell different products to different customersegments (with different implied demand uncertainty)
The supply chain has to be able to balance efficiencyand responsiveness given its portfolio of products andcustomer segments
Two approaches:
– Different supply chains
– Tailor supply chain to best meet the needs of eachproduct’s demand
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-26
Product Life CycleThe demand characteristics of a product and the needs
of a customer segment change as a product goesthrough its life cycle
Supply chain strategy must evolve throughout the lifecycle
Early: uncertain demand, high margins (time isimportant), product availability is most important, costis secondary
Late: predictable demand, lower margins, price isimportant
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-27
Product Life CycleExamples: pharmaceutical firms, Intel
As the product goes through the life cycle, the supplychain changes from one emphasizing responsivenessto one emphasizing efficiency
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-28
Competitive Changes Over TimeCompetitive pressures can change over time
More competitors may result in an increased emphasison variety at a reasonable price
The Internet makes it easier to offer a wide variety ofproducts
The supply chain must change to meet these changingcompetitive conditions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-29
Expanding Strategic ScopeScope of strategic fit
– The functions and stages within a supply chain that devise anintegrated strategy with a shared objective
– One extreme: each function at each stage develops its ownstrategy
– Other extreme: all functions in all stages devise a strategy jointly
Five categories:– Intracompany intraoperation scope– Intracompany intrafunctional scope– Intracompany interfunctional scope– Intercompany interfunctional scope– Flexible interfunctional scope
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-30
Different Scopes of Strategic FitAcross a Supply Chain
Suppliers M anufacturer D istributor R etailer C ustom er
C om petitiveStrategy
ProductD evelopm ent
Strategy
Supply C hainStrategy
M arketingStrategy
Intracom panyIntraoperationat D istributor
Intracom panyIntrafunctionalat D istributor
Intracom panyInterfunctional
at D istributor
Intercom panyInterfunctional
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
INDIAN RETAIL SECTORWhat different models of supply chains do you
visualize emerging in the transforming Indian retailsector?What trends do you see in in the emerging Indian
supply chain models that suggest conscious attemptsat achieving proper strategic fit between businessstrategies and supply chain strategies?How do you see the Indian retail supply chains
becoming role models for supply chains in othersectors?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 2-32
Summary of Learning ObjectivesWhy is achieving strategic fit critical to a company’s
overall success?
How does a company achieve strategic fit between itssupply chain strategy and its competitive strategy?
What is the importance of expanding the scope ofstrategic fit across the supply chain?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-1
Chapter 17Coordination ina Supply Chain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-2
OutlineLack of Supply Chain Coordination and the
Bullwhip EffectEffect on Performance of Lack of CoordinationObstacles to Coordination in a Supply ChainManagerial Levers to Achieve CoordinationBuilding Strategic Partnerships and Trust Within
a Supply ChainContinuous Replenishment and Vendor-Managed
InventoriesCollaborative Planning, Forecasting, and Replenishment
(CPFR)The Role of IT in CoordinationAchieving Coordination in Practice
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-3
Objectives
Describe supply chain coordination, the bullwhipeffect, and their impact on performanceIdentify obstacles to coordination in a supply chainDiscuss managerial levers that help achieve
coordination in a supply chainDescribe actions that facilitate the building of strategic
partnerships and trust within a supply chainUnderstand the different forms of CPFR possible in a
supply chain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-4
Lack of Supply Chain Coordinationand the Bullwhip Effect
Supply chain coordination – all stages in the supplychain take actions together (usually results in greatertotal supply chain profits)SC coordination requires that each stage take into
account the effects of its actions on the other stagesLack of coordination results when:
– Objectives of different stages conflict or– Information moving between stages is distorted
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-5
Bullwhip Effect
Fluctuations in orders increase as they move upthe supply chain from retailers to wholesalers tomanufacturers to suppliers (shown in Figure 16.1)Distorts demand information within the supply
chain, where different stages have very differentestimates of what demand looks likeResults in a loss of supply chain coordinationExamples: Proctor & Gamble (Pampers); HP
(printers); Barilla (pasta)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-6
The Effect on Performance of Lack ofCoordination
Manufacturing cost (increases)Inventory cost (increases)Replenishment lead time (increases)Transportation cost (increases)Labor cost for shipping and receiving (increases)Level of product availability (decreases)Relationships across the supply chain (worsens)Profitability (decreases)The bullwhip effect reduces supply chain profitability
by making it more expensive to provide a given levelof product availability
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-7
Obstacles to Coordinationin a Supply Chain
Incentive Obstacles
Information Processing Obstacles
Operational Obstacles
Pricing Obstacles
Behavioral Obstacles
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-8
Incentive Obstacles
When incentives offered to different stages orparticipants in a supply chain lead to actions thatincrease variability and reduce total supply chainprofits – misalignment of total supply chainobjectives and individual objectives
Local optimization within functions or stages of asupply chain
Sales force incentives
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-9
Information Processing Obstacles
When demand information is distorted as it movesbetween different stages of the supply chain,leading to increased variability in orders withinthe supply chainForecasting based on orders, not customer
demand– Forecasting demand based on orders magnifies demand
fluctuations moving up the supply chain from retailerto manufacturer
Lack of information sharing
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-10
Operational Obstacles
Actions taken in the course of placing and fillingorders that lead to an increase in variability
Ordering in large lots (much larger than dictatedby demand) – Figure 17.2
Large replenishment lead times
Rationing and shortage gaming (common in thecomputer industry because of periodic cycles ofcomponent shortages and surpluses)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-11
Pricing Obstacles
When pricing policies for a product lead to anincrease in variability of orders placed
Lot-size based quantity decisions
Price fluctuations (resulting in forward buying) –Figure 17.3
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-12
Behavioral ObstaclesProblems in learning, often related to communication in the
supply chain and how the supply chain is structuredEach stage of the supply chain views its actions locally and is
unable to see the impact of its actions on other stagesDifferent stages react to the current local situation rather than
trying to identify the root causesBased on local analysis, different stages blame each other for
the fluctuations, with successive stages becoming enemiesrather than partners
No stage learns from its actions over time because the mostsignificant consequences of the actions of any one stage occurelsewhere, resulting in a vicious cycle of actions and blame
Lack of trust results in opportunism, duplication of effort, andlack of information sharing
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-13
Managerial Levers toAchieve Coordination
Aligning Goals and Incentives
Improving Information Accuracy
Improving Operational Performance
Designing Pricing Strategies to Stabilize Orders
Building Strategic Partnerships and Trust
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-14
Aligning Goals and Incentives
Align incentives so that each participant has anincentive to do the things that will maximize totalsupply chain profits
Align incentives across functions
Pricing for coordination
Alter sales force incentives from sell-in (to theretailer) to sell-through (by the retailer)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-15
Improving Information Accuracy
Sharing point of sale data
Collaborative forecasting and planning
Single stage control of replenishment– Continuous replenishment programs (CRP)
– Vendor managed inventory (VMI)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-16
Improving Operational PerformanceReducing replenishment lead time
– Reduces uncertainty in demand– EDI is useful
Reducing lot sizes– Computer-assisted ordering, B2B exchanges– Shipping in LTL sizes by combining shipments– Technology and other methods to simplify receiving– Changing customer ordering behavior
Rationing based on past sales and sharing information tolimit gaming– “Turn-and-earn”– Information sharing
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-17
Designing Pricing Strategiesto Stabilize Orders
Encouraging retailers to order in smaller lots and reduceforward buyingMoving from lot size-based to volume-based quantity
discounts (consider total purchases over a specified timeperiod)Stabilizing pricing
– Eliminate promotions (everyday low pricing, EDLP)– Limit quantity purchased during a promotion– Tie promotion payments to sell-through rather than amount
purchased
Building strategic partnerships and trust – easier toimplement these approaches if there is trust
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-18
Building Strategic Partnershipsand Trust in a Supply Chain
Background
Designing a Relationship with Cooperation andTrust
Managing Supply Chain Relationships forCooperation and Trust
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-19
Building Strategic Partnershipsand Trust in a Supply Chain
Trust-based relationship– Dependability– Leap of faith
Cooperation and trust work because:– Alignment of incentives and goals– Actions to achieve coordination are easier to implement– Supply chain productivity improves by reducing
duplication or allocation of effort to appropriate stage– Greater information sharing results
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-20
Trust in the Supply Chain
Table 17.2 shows benefits
Historically, supply chain relationships are basedon power or trust
Disadvantages of power-based relationship:– Results in one stage maximizing profits, often at the
expense of other stages
– Can hurt a company when balance of power changes
– Less powerful stages have sought ways to resist
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-21
Building Trust into aSupply Chain Relationship
Deterrence-based view– Use formal contracts
– Parties behave in trusting manner out of self-interest
Process-based view– Trust and cooperation are built up over time as a result
of a series of interactions
– Positive interactions strengthen the belief incooperation of other party
Neither view holds exclusively in all situations
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-22
Building Trust into aSupply Chain Relationship
Initially more reliance on deterrence-based view,then evolves to a process-based view
Co-identification: ideal goal
Two phases to a supply chain relationship– Design phase
– Management phase
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-23
Designing a Relationshipwith Cooperation and Trust
Assessing the value of the relationship and itscontributions
Identifying operational roles and decision rightsfor each party
Creating effective contracts
Designing effective conflict resolutionmechanisms
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-24
Assessing the Value of theRelationship and its Contributions
Identify the mutual benefit provided
Identify the criteria used to evaluate therelationship (equity is important)
Important to share benefits equitably
Clarify contribution of each party and the benefitseach party will receive
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-25
Identifying Operational Roles andDecision Rights for Each Party
Recognize interdependence between parties– Sequential interdependence: activities of one partner
precede the other– Reciprocal interdependence: the parties come together,
exchange information and inputs in both directions
Sequential interdependence is the traditionalsupply chain formReciprocal interdependence is more difficult but
can result in more benefitsFigure 17.4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-26
Effects of Interdependence on SupplyChain Relationships (Figure 17.4)
Org
aniz
atio
n’s D
epen
denc
e
High
Low
Partner’s Dependence
Low High
PartnerRelativelyPowerful
OrganizationRelativelyPowerful
High Level ofInterdependence
Effective Relationship
Low Level ofInterdependence
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-27
Creating Effective Contracts
Create contracts that encourage negotiation whenunplanned contingencies arise
It is impossible to define and plan for everypossible occurrence
Informal relationships and agreements can fill inthe “gaps” in contractsInformal arrangements may eventually be
formalized in later contracts
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-28
Designing Effective ConflictResolution Mechanisms
Initial formal specification of rules and guidelinesfor procedures and transactions
Regular, frequent meetings to promotecommunication
Courts or other intermediaries
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-29
Managing Supply Chain Relationshipsfor Cooperation and Trust
Effective management of a relationship isimportant for its success
Top management is often involved in the designbut not management of a relationship
Figure 17.5 -- process of alliance evolution
Perceptions of reduced benefits or opportunisticactions can significantly impair a supply chainpartnership
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Continuous Replenishment andVendor-Managed Inventories
A single point of replenishment
CRP – wholesaler or manufacturer replenishes basedon POS data
VMI – manufacturer or supplier is responsible for alldecisions regarding inventory
Substitutes
17-30
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Collaborative Planning, Forecasting,and Replenishment (CPFR)
Sellers and buyers in a supply chain may collaboratealong any or all of the following:– Strategy and planning
– Demand and supply management
– Execution
– Analysis
Organizational and Technology requirements
Risks and Hurdles for a CPFR implementation
17-31
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
The Role of IT in CoordinationEnablement of coordination the ultimate goal
Information availability
Use of information available to make decisions
ERP and best-of-breed vendors
17-32
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-33
Achieving Coordination in Practice
Quantify the bullwhip effectGet top management commitment for coordinationDevote resources to coordinationFocus on communication with other stagesTry to achieve coordination in the entire supply chain
networkUse technology to improve connectivity in the supply
chainShare the benefits of coordination equitably
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 17-34
Summary of Learning Objectives
What are supply chain coordination and the bullwhipeffect, and what are their effects on supply chainperformance?What are obstacles to coordination in the supply
chain?What are the managerial levers that help achieve
coordination in the supply chain?What are actions that facilitate the building of
strategic partnerships and trust in the supply chain?What are the different forms of CPFR available in a
supply chain?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-1
Chapter 16InformationTechnologyin a Supply
Chain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-2
Outline
The Role of IT in a Supply ChainThe Supply Chain IT FrameworkCustomer Relationship ManagementInternal Supply Chain ManagementSupplier Relationship ManagementThe Transaction Management FoundationThe Future of IT in the Supply ChainRisk Management in ITSupply Chain IT in Practice
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-3
Role of ITin a Supply Chain
Information is the driver that serves as the “glue” to create acoordinated supply chain
Information must have the following characteristics to beuseful:
– Accurate
– Accessible in a timely manner
– Information must be of the right kind
Information provides the basis for supply chain managementdecisions
– Inventory
– Transportation
– Facility
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-4
Characteristics of UsefulSupply Chain Information
Accurate
Accessible in a timely manner
The right kind
Shared
Provides supply chain visibility
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-5
Use of Informationin a Supply Chain
Information used at all phases of decision making:strategic, planning, operational
Examples:– Strategic: location decisions
– Operational: what products will be produced duringtoday’s production run
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-6
Use of Informationin a Supply Chain
Inventory: demand patterns, carrying costs,stockout costs, ordering costs
Transportation: costs, customer locations,shipment sizes
Facility: location, capacity, schedules of a facility;need information about trade-offs betweenflexibility and efficiency, demand, exchange rates,taxes, etc.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-7
Role of Information Technologyin a Supply Chain
Information technology (IT)– Hardware and software used throughout the supply
chain to gather and analyze information
– Captures and delivers information needed to makegood decisions
Effective use of IT in the supply chain can have asignificant impact on supply chain performance
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-8
The Importance of Informationin a Supply Chain
Relevant information available throughout thesupply chain allows managers to make decisionsthat take into account all stages of the supplychain
Allows performance to be optimized for the entiresupply chain, not just for one stage – leads tohigher performance for each individual firm in thesupply chain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-9
The Supply Chain IT Framework
The Supply Chain Macro Processes– Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
– Internal Supply Chain Management (ISCM)
– Supplier Relationship Management (SRM)
– Plus: Transaction Management Foundation
– Figure 16.1
Why Focus on the Macro Processes?
Macro Processes Applied to the Evolution of Software
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-10
Macro Processes in a Supply Chain(Figure 16.1)
SupplierRelationshipManagement
(SRM)
InternalSupply ChainManagement
(ISCM)
CustomerRelationshipManagement
(CRM)
Transaction Management Foundation (TFM)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-11
Customer Relationship Management
The processes that take place between an enterpriseand its customers downstream in the supply chain
Key processes:– Marketing
– Selling
– Order management
– Call/Service center
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-12
Internal Supply Chain Management
Includes all processes involved in planning for andfulfilling a customer order
ISCM processes:– Strategic Planning
– Demand Planning
– Supply Planning
– Fulfillment
– Field Service
There must be strong integration between the ISCMand CRM macro processes
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-13
Supplier Relationship Management
Those processes focused on the interaction betweenthe enterprise and suppliers that are upstream in thesupply chainKey processes:
– Design Collaboration– Source– Negotiate– Buy– Supply Collaboration
There is a natural fit between ISCM and SRMprocesses
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-14
The Transaction ManagementFoundation
Enterprise software systems (ERP)
Earlier systems focused on automation of simpletransactions and the creation of an integrated methodof storing and viewing data across the enterprise
Real value of the TMF exists only if decision makingis improved
The extent to which the TMF enables integrationacross the three macro processes determines its value
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-15
The Future of IT in the Supply Chain
At the highest level, the three SCM macro processeswill continue to drive the evolution of enterprisesoftwareSoftware focused on the macro processes will become
a larger share of the total enterprise software marketand the firms producing this software will becomemore successfulFunctionality, the ability to integrate across macro
processes, and the strength of their ecosystems, willbe keys to success
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Risk Management in ITInstalling new systems
Revised business processes
Integration
Software glitches
Power outages
Viruses
16-16
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-17
Supply Chain InformationTechnology in Practice
Select an IT system that addresses the company’s keysuccess factors
Take incremental steps and measure value
Align the level of sophistication with the need forsophistication
Use IT systems to support decision making, not tomake decisions
Think about the future
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 16-18
Summary of Learning Objectives
What is the importance of information and IT in thesupply chain?
How does each supply chain driver use information?
What are the major applications of supply chain ITand what processes do they enable?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-1
Chapter 15Pricing and
RevenueManagement in
the Supply Chain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-2
OutlineThe Role of Pricing and Revenue Management in a Supply
Chain
Pricing and Revenue Management for Multiple CustomerSegments
Pricing and Revenue Management for Perishable Assets
Pricing and Revenue Management for Seasonable Demand
Pricing and Revenue Management for Bulk and SpotCustomers
The Role of IT in Pricing and Revenue Management
Using Pricing and Revenue Management in Practice
Summary of Learning Objectives
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-3
The Role of Pricing and RevenueManagement in the Supply ChainRevenue management is the use of pricing to increase
the profit generated from a limited supply of supplychain assets
Supply assets exist in two forms: capacity andinventory
Revenue management may also be defined as the useof differential pricing based on customer segment,time of use, and product or capacity availability toincrease supply chain profits
Most common example is probably in airline pricing
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-4
Conditions Under Which RevenueManagement Has the Greatest Effect
The value of the product varies in different marketsegments (Example: airline seats)The product is highly perishable or product waste
occurs (Example: fashion and seasonal apparel)Demand has seasonal and other peaks (Example:
products ordered at Amazon.com)The product is sold both in bulk and on the spot
market (Example: owner of warehouse who candecide whether to lease the entire warehouse throughlong-term contracts or save a portion of thewarehouse for use in the spot market)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-5
Pricing and Revenue Management forMultiple Customer Segments
If a supplier serves multiple customer segments witha fixed asset, the supplier can improve revenues bysetting different prices for each segment
Prices must be set with barriers such that the segmentwilling to pay more is not able to pay the lower price
The amount of the asset reserved for the higher pricesegment is such that the expected marginal revenuefrom the higher priced segment equals the price of thelower price segment
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-6
Pricing and Revenue Management forMultiple Customer Segments
pL = the price charged to the lower price segment
pH = the price charged to the higher price segment
DH = mean demand for the higher price segment
σH = standard deviation of demand for the higher price segment
CH = capacity reserved for the higher price segment
RH(CH) = expected marginal revenue from reserving morecapacity
= Probability(demand from higher price segment > CH) x pH
RH(CH) = pL
Probability(demand from higher price segment > CH) = pL / pH
CH = F-1(1- pL/pH, DH,σH) = NORMINV(1- pL/pH, DH,σH)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-7
Example 15.2: ToFrom TruckingRevenue from segment A = pA = $3.50 per cubic ftRevenue from segment B = pB = $3.50 per cubic ftMean demand for segment A = DA = 3,000 cubic ftStd dev of segment A demand = σA = 1,000 cubic ftCA = NORMINV(1- pB/pA, DA,σA)
= NORMINV(1- (2.00/3.50), 3000, 1000)= 2,820 cubic ft
If pA increases to $5.00 per cubic foot, thenCA = NORMINV(1- pB/pA, DA,σA)
= NORMINV(1- (2.00/5.00), 3000, 1000)= 3,253 cubic ft
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-8
Pricing and Revenue Managementfor Perishable Assets
Any asset that loses value over time is perishable
Examples: high-tech products such as computers andcell phones, high fashion apparel, underutilizedcapacity, fruits and vegetables
Two basic approaches:– Vary price over time to maximize expected revenue
– Overbook sales of the asset to account for cancellations
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-9
Pricing and Revenue Managementfor Perishable Assets
Overbooking or overselling of a supply chain asset isvaluable if order cancellations occur and the asset isperishable
The level of overbooking is based on the trade-offbetween the cost of wasting the asset if too manycancellations lead to unused assets and the cost ofarranging a backup if too few cancellations lead tocommitted orders being larger than the availablecapacity
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-10
Pricing and Revenue Managementfor Perishable Assets
p = price at which each unit of the asset is sold
c = cost of using or producing each unit of the asset
b = cost per unit at which a backup can be used in thecase of asset shortage
Cw = p – c = marginal cost of wasted capacity
Cs = b – c = marginal cost of a capacity shortage
O* = optimal overbooking level
s* = Probability(cancellations < O*) = Cw / (Cw + Cs)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-11
Pricing and Revenue Managementfor Perishable Assets
If the distribution of cancellations is known to be normalwith mean µc and standard deviation σc then
O* = F-1(s*, µc, σc) = NORMINV(s*, µc, σc)If the distribution of cancellations is known only as a
function of the booking level (capacity L +overbooking O) to have a mean of µ(L+O) and stddeviation of σ(L+O), the optimal overbooking level isthe solution to the following equation:
O = F-1(s*,µ (L+O),σ(L+O))= NORMINV(s*,µ (L+O),σ(L+O))
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-12
Example 15.5 - OverbookingCost of wasted capacity = Cw = $10 per dress
Cost of capacity shortage = Cs = $5 per dress
s* = Cw / (Cw + Cs) = 10/(10+5) = 0.667
µc = 800; σc = 400
O* = NORMINV(s*, µc,σc)
= NORMINV(0.667,800,400) = 973
If the mean is 15% of the booking level and the coefficient ofvariation is 0.5, then the optimal overbooking level is thesolution of the following equation:
O = NORMINV(0.667,0.15(5000+O),0.075(5000+O))
Using Excel Solver, O* = 1,115
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-13
Pricing and Revenue Managementfor Seasonal Demand
Seasonal peaks of demand are common in many supplychains
Examples: Most retailers achieve a large portion oftotal annual demand in December (Amazon.com)
Off-peak discounting can shift demand from peak tonon-peak periods
Charge higher price during peak periods and a lowerprice during off-peak periods
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-14
Pricing and Revenue Management forBulk and Spot Customers
Most consumers of production, warehousing, andtransportation assets in a supply chain face the problem ofconstructing a portfolio of long-term bulk contracts andshort-term spot market contracts
The basic decision is the size of the bulk contract
The fundamental trade-off is between wasting a portion ofthe low-cost bulk contract and paying more for the asset onthe spot market
Given that both the spot market price and the purchaser’sneed for the asset are uncertain, a decision tree approach asdiscussed in Chapter 6 should be used to evaluate theamount of long-term bulk contract to sign
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-15
Pricing and Revenue Management forBulk and Spot Customers
For the simple case where the spot market price is knownbut demand is uncertain, a formula can be used
cB = bulk ratecS = spot market priceQ* = optimal amount of the asset to be purchased in bulkp* = probability that the demand for the asset does not
exceed Q*Marginal cost of purchasing another unit in bulk is cB.
The expected marginal cost of not purchasing anotherunit in bulk and then purchasing it in the spot market is(1-p*)cS.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-16
Pricing and Revenue Management forBulk and Spot Customers
If the optimal amount of the asset is purchased in bulk,the marginal cost of the bulk purchase should equal theexpected marginal cost of the spot market purchase, orcB = (1-p*)cS
Solving for p* yields p* = (cS – cB) / cS
If demand is normal with mean µ and std deviation σ, theoptimal amount Q* to be purchased in bulk is
Q* = F-1(p*,µ,σ) = NORMINV(p*,µ,σ)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-17
Example 15.6 – Long-term BulkContracts versus the Spot Market
Bulk contract cost = cB = $10,000 per million units
Spot market cost = cS = $12,500 per million units
µ = 10 million units
σ = 4 million units
p* = (cS – cB) / cS = (12,500 – 10,000) / 12,500 = 0.2
Q* = NORMINV(p*,µ,σ) = NORMINV(0.2,10,4) = 6.63
The manufacturer should sign a long-term bulk contractfor 6.63 million units per month and purchase anytransportation capacity beyond that on the spot market
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
The Role of IT in Pricing andRevenue Management
Pricing of perishable assets
Pricing of retail goods in the consumer packaged-goods category
Mark downs of goods as the styles and seasonschange
Linking with other areas and applications
15-18
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-19
Using Pricing and RevenueManagement in Practice
Evaluate your market carefully
Quantify the benefits of revenue management
Implement a forecasting process
Apply optimization to obtain the revenuemanagement decision
Involve both sales and operations
Understand and inform the customer
Integrate supply planning with revenuemanagement
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15-20
Summary of Learning Objectives
What is the role of revenue management in asupply chain?
Under what conditions are revenue managementtactics effective?
What are the trade-offs that must be consideredwhen making revenue management decisions?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-1
Chapter 14Sourcing
Decisions in aSupply Chain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-2
Outline The Role of Sourcing in a Supply Chain
In-House or Outsource
Third- and Fourth-Party Logistics Providers
Supplier Scoring and Assessment
Supplier Selection – Auctions and Negotiations
Contracts, risk Sharing, and Supply Chain Performance
Design Collaboration
The Procurement Process
Sourcing Planning and Analysis
The Role of IT in Sourcing
Risk Management in sourcing
Making Sourcing Decisions in Practice
Summary of Learning Objectives
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-3
The Role of Sourcingin a Supply Chain
Sourcing is the set of business processes requiredto purchase goods and services
Sourcing processes include:– Supplier scoring and assessment
– Supplier selection and contract negotiation
– Design collaboration
– Procurement
– Sourcing planning and analysis
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-4
Benefits of EffectiveSourcing Decisions
Better economies of scale can be achieved if ordersare aggregated
More efficient procurement transactions cansignificantly reduce the overall cost of purchasing
Design collaboration can result in products that areeasier to manufacture and distribute, resulting inlower overall costs
Good procurement processes can facilitatecoordination with suppliers
Appropriate supplier contracts can allow for thesharing of risk
Firms can achieve a lower purchase price byincreasing competition through the use of auctions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Supplier Scoring and AssessmentSupplier performance should be compared on the
basis of the supplier’s impact on total costThere are several other factors besides purchase price
that influence total cost
14-5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-6
Supplier Assessment FactorsReplenishment Lead Time
On-Time Performance
Supply Flexibility
Delivery Frequency /Minimum Lot Size
Supply Quality
Inbound Transportation Cost
Pricing Terms
Information CoordinationCapability
Design CollaborationCapability
Exchange Rates, Taxes,Duties
Supplier Viability
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-7
Supplier Selection- Auctions andNegotiations
Supplier selection can be performed through competitivebids, reverse auctions, and direct negotiations
Supplier evaluation is based on total cost of using asupplier
Auctions:– Sealed-bid first-price auctions
– English auctions
– Dutch auctions
– Second-price (Vickery) auctions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-8
Contracts and Supply ChainPerformance
Contracts for Product Availability and SupplyChain Profits– Buyback Contracts
– Revenue-Sharing Contracts
– Quantity Flexibility Contracts
Contracts to Coordinate Supply Chain Costs
Contracts to Increase Agent Effort
Contracts to Induce Performance Improvement
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-9
Contracts for Product Availabilityand Supply Chain Profits
Many shortcomings in supply chain performance occurbecause the buyer and supplier are separate organizationsand each tries to optimize its own profit
Total supply chain profits might therefore be lower than ifthe supply chain coordinated actions to have a commonobjective of maximizing total supply chain profits
Recall Chapter 10: double marginalization results insuboptimal order quantity
An approach to dealing with this problem is to design acontract that encourages a buyer to purchase more andincrease the level of product availability
The supplier must share in some of the buyer’s demanduncertainty, however
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-10
Contracts for Product Availability andSupply Chain Profits: Buyback ContractsAllows a retailer to return unsold inventory up to a
specified amount at an agreed upon priceIncreases the optimal order quantity for the retailer,
resulting in higher product availability and higher profitsfor both the retailer and the supplier
Most effective for products with low variable cost, such asmusic, software, books, magazines, and newspapers
Downside is that buyback contract results in surplusinventory that must be disposed of, which increases supplychain costs
Can also increase information distortion through thesupply chain because the supply chain reacts to retailorders, not actual customer demand
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-11
Contracts for Product Availability and SupplyChain Profits: Revenue Sharing Contracts
The buyer pays a minimal amount for each unitpurchased from the supplier but shares a fraction ofthe revenue for each unit sold
Decreases the cost per unit charged to the retailer,which effectively decreases the cost of overstocking
Can result in supply chain information distortion,however, just as in the case of buyback contracts
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-12
Contracts for Product Availability and SupplyChain Profits: Quantity Flexibility Contracts
Allows the buyer to modify the order (within limits)as demand visibility increases closer to the point ofsale
Better matching of supply and demand
Increased overall supply chain profits if the supplierhas flexible capacity
Lower levels of information distortion than eitherbuyback contracts or revenue sharing contracts
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-13
Contracts to CoordinateSupply Chain Costs
Differences in costs at the buyer and supplier can leadto decisions that increase total supply chain costsExample: Replenishment order size placed by the
buyer. The buyer’s EOQ does not take into accountthe supplier’s costs.A quantity discount contract may encourage the buyer
to purchase a larger quantity (which would be lowercosts for the supplier), which would result in lowertotal supply chain costsQuantity discounts lead to information distortion
because of order batching
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-14
Contracts to Increase Agent Effort
There are many instances in a supply chain where anagent acts on the behalf of a principal and the agent’sactions affect the reward for the principal
Example: A car dealer who sells the cars of amanufacturer, as well as those of other manufacturers
Examples of contracts to increase agent effort includetwo-part tariffs and threshold contracts
Threshold contracts increase information distortion,however
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-15
Contracts to InducePerformance Improvement
A buyer may want performance improvement from asupplier who otherwise would have little incentive todo so
A shared savings contract provides the supplier witha fraction of the savings that result from theperformance improvement
Particularly effective where the benefit fromimprovement accrues primarily to the buyer, butwhere the effort for the improvement comes primarilyfrom the supplier
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-16
Design Collaboration50-70 percent of spending at a manufacturer is
through procurement80 percent of the cost of a purchased part is fixed in
the design phaseDesign collaboration with suppliers can result in
reduced cost, improved quality, and decreased time tomarketImportant to employ design for logistics, design for
manufacturabilityManufacturers must become effective design
coordinators throughout the supply chain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-17
The Procurement ProcessThe process in which the supplier sends product in response to
orders placed by the buyerGoal is to enable orders to be placed and delivered on schedule
at the lowest possible overall costTwo main categories of purchased goods:
– Direct materials: components used to make finished goods– Indirect materials: goods used to support the operations of a firm– Differences between direct and indirect materials listed in Table 13.2
Focus for direct materials should be on improving coordinationand visibility with supplier
Focus for indirect materials should be on decreasing thetransaction cost for each order
Procurement for both should consolidate orders where possibleto take advantage of economies of scale and quantity discounts
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-18
Product Categorization by Valueand Criticality (Figure 14.2)
Critical Items Strategic Items
General Items Bulk PurchaseItems
Low
Low
High
HighValue/Cost
Cri
tical
ity
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-19
Sourcing Planning and AnalysisA firm should periodically analyze its procurement
spending and supplier performance and use thisanalysis as an input for future sourcing decisionsProcurement spending should be analyzed by part and
supplier to ensure appropriate economies of scaleSupplier performance analysis should be used to build
a portfolio of suppliers with complementary strengths– Cheaper but lower performing suppliers should be used to
supply base demand– Higher performing but more expensive suppliers should be
used to buffer against variation in demand and supply fromthe other source
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
The Role of IT in SourcingDesign collaboration
Negotiate
Buy
Supply collaboration
14-20
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Risk Management in SourcingSupply disruption
Increased procurement costs
Intellectual property
14-21
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-22
Making SourcingDecisions in Practice
Use multifunction teams
Ensure appropriate coordination across regionsand business units
Always evaluate the total cost of ownership
Build long-term relationships with key suppliers
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 14-23
Summary of Learning ObjectivesWhat is the role of sourcing in a supply chain?
What factors affect the decision to outsource a supplychain function?
What dimensions of supplier performance affect totalcost?
How do you structure successful auctions andnegotiations?
What is the impact of risk sharing on supplier performanceand information distortion?
What are different categories of purchased products andservices? What is the desired focus for procurement foreach of these categories?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-1
Chapter 12Determining theOptimal Level of
ProductAvailability
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-2
OutlineThe importance of the level of product availabilityFactors affecting the optimal level of product
availabilityManagerial levers to improve supply chain
profitabilitySetting product availability for multiple products
under capacity constraintsSetting optimal levels of product availability in
practice
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-3
Importance of the Levelof Product Availability
Product availability measured by cycle service level or fill rateAlso referred to as the customer service levelProduct availability affects supply chain responsivenessTrade-off:
– High levels of product availability increased responsiveness andhigher revenues
– High levels of product availability increased inventory levels andhigher costs
Product availability is related to profit objectives, and strategicand competitive issues (e.g., Nordstrom, power plants,supermarkets, e-commerce retailers)
What is the level of fill rate or cycle service level that willresult in maximum supply chain profits?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-4
Factors Affecting the OptimalLevel of Product Availability
Cost of overstocking
Cost of under stocking
Possible scenarios– Seasonal items with a single order in a season
– One-time orders in the presence of quantity discounts
– Continuously stocked items
– Demand during stock out is backlogged
– Demand during stock out is lost
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-5
Managerial Levers to ImproveSupply Chain Profitability
“Obvious” actions– Increase salvage value of each unit
– Decrease the margin lost from a stockout
Improved forecasting
Quick response
Postponement
Tailored sourcing
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-6
Improved Forecasts
Improved forecasts result in reduced uncertainty
Less uncertainty (lower σR) results in either:– Lower levels of safety inventory (and costs) for the same
level of product availability, or
– Higher product availability for the same level of safetyinventory, or
– Both lower levels of safety inventory and higher levels ofproduct availability
An increase in forecast accuracy decreases both the overstocked andunderstocked quantity and increases a firm’s profits.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-7
Impact of Improving Forecasts(Example)
Demand: Normally distributed with a mean of R =350 and standard deviation of R = 100
Purchase price = $100
Retail price = $250
Disposal value = $85
Holding cost for season = $5
How many units should be ordered as R changes?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-8
Impact of Improving ForecastsR O* Expected
OverstockExpected
UnderstockExpected
Profit150 526 186.7 8.6 $47,469
120 491 149.3 6.9 $48,476
90 456 112.0 5.2 $49,482
60 420 74.7 3.5 $50,488
30 385 37.3 1.7 $51,494
0 350 0 0 $52,500
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-9
Quick Response Set of actions taken by managers to reduce lead time Reduced lead time results in improved forecasts
– Typical example of quick response is multiple orders in one season for retailitems (such as fashion clothing)
– For example, a buyer can usually make very accurate forecasts after the firstweek or two in a season
– Multiple orders are only possible if the lead time is reduced – otherwisethere wouldn’t be enough time to get the later orders before the season ends
Benefits:– Lower order quantities less inventory, same product availability– Less overstock– Higher profits
If quick response allows multiple orders in the season, profitsincrease and the overstock quantity decreases.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-10
Quick Response: MultipleOrders Per Season
Ordering shawls at a department store– Selling season = 14 weeks
– Cost per handbag = $40
– Sale price = $150
– Disposal price = $30
– Holding cost = $2 per week
Expected weekly demand = 20
SD of weekly demand = 15
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-11
Impact of Quick ResponseSingle Order Two Orders in Season
ServiceLevel
OrderSize
EndingInvent.
Expect.Profit
InitialOrder
OULfor 2nd
Order
AverageTotalOrder
EndingInvent.
Expect.Profit
0.96 378 97 $23,624 209 209 349 69 $26,590
0.94 367 86 $24,034 201 201 342 60 $27,085
0.91 355 73 $24,617 193 193 332 52 $27,154
0.87 343 66 $24,386 184 184 319 43 $26,944
0.81 329 55 $24,609 174 174 313 36 $27,413
0.75 317 41 $25,205 166 166 302 32 $26,916
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-12
Forecast Improves for SecondOrder (SD=3 Instead of 15)
Single Order Two Orders in SeasonServiceLevel
OrderSize
EndingInvent.
Expect.Profit
InitialOrder
OULfor 2nd
Order
AverageTotalOrder
EndingInvent.
Expect.Profit
0.96 378 96 $23,707 209 153 292 19 $27,007
0.94 367 84 $24,303 201 152 293 18 $27,371
0.91 355 76 $24,154 193 150 288 17 $26,946
0.87 343 63 $24,807 184 148 288 14 $27,583
0.81 329 52 $24,998 174 146 283 14 $27,162
0.75 317 44 $24,887 166 145 282 14 $27,268
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-13
Postponement Delay of product differentiation until closer to the time of the sale of the
product All activities prior to product differentiation require aggregate forecasts
more accurate than individual product forecasts Individual product forecasts are needed close to the time of sale –
demand is known with better accuracy (lower uncertainty) Results in a better match of supply and demand Valuable in e-commerce – time lag between when an order is placed and
when customer receives the order (this delay is expected by thecustomer and can be used for postponement)
Higher profits, better match of supply and demand
Postponement allows a firm to increase profits and better match supply and demandif the firm produces a large variety of products whose demand is not positivelycorrelated and is of about the same size.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-14
Value of Postponement: Benetton
For each color– Mean demand = 1,000; SD = 500
For each garment– Sale price = $50– Salvage value = $10– Production cost using Option 1 (long lead time) = $20– Production cost using Option 2 (uncolored thread) = $22
What is the value of postponement?– Expected profit increases from $94,576 to $98,092
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-15
Value of Postponementwith Dominant Product
Color with dominant demand: Mean = 3,100, SD = 800
Other three colors: Mean = 300, SD = 200
Expected profit without postponement = $102,205
Expected profit with postponement = $99,872
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-16
Tailored Postponement: BenettonProduce Q1 units for each color using Option 1 and QA
units (aggregate) using Option 2
Results:
– Q1 = 800
– QA = 1,550
– Profit = $104,603
Tailored postponement allows a firm to increaseprofits by postponing differentiation only for productswith the most uncertain demand; products with morepredictable demand are produced at lower cost withoutpostponement
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-17
Tailored Sourcing
A firm uses a combination of two supply sourcesOne is lower cost but is unable to deal with
uncertainty wellThe other is more flexible, and can therefore deal
with uncertainty, but is higher costThe two sources must focus on different capabilitiesDepends on being able to have one source that faces
very low uncertainty and can therefore reduce costsIncrease profits, better match supply and demand
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-18
Tailored Sourcing
Sourcing alternatives– Low cost, long lead time supplier
» Cost = $245, Lead time = 9 weeks
– High cost, short lead time supplier» Cost = $250, Lead time = 1 week
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-19
Tailored Sourcing StrategiesFraction of demand fromoverseas supplier
Annual Profit
0% $37,250
50% $51,613
60% $53,027
100% $48,875
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-20
Tailored Sourcing: MultipleSourcing Sites
Characteristic Primary Site Secondary Site
ManufacturingCost
High Low
Flexibility(Volume/Mix)
High Low
Responsiveness High Low
EngineeringSupport
High Low
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-21
Dual Sourcing Strategies
Strategy Primary Site Secondary Site
Volume baseddual sourcing
Fluctuation Stable demand
Product baseddual sourcing
Unpredictableproducts,Small batch
Predictable,large batchproducts
Model baseddual sourcing
Newerproducts
Older stableproducts
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-22
Setting Product Availability for MultipleProducts under Capacity Constraints
Single product order
Multiple product order
Decrease the order size
Allocating the products
When ordering multiple products under a limited supply capacity,the allocation of capacity to products should be based on theirexpected marginal contribution to profits. This approach allocates arelatively higher fraction of capacity to products that have a highmargin relative to their cost of overstocking.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-23
Setting Optimal Levels ofProduct Availability in Practice
Use an analytical framework to increase profits
Beware of preset levels of availability
Use approximate costs because profit-maximizingsolutions are very robust
Estimate a range for the cost of stocking out
Ensure levels of product availability fit with thestrategy
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Strategic Capital AssetsMaintenance Support
MRO inventory policies in support of StrategicCapital Assets are governed by stochastic, economicand sourcing considerations. How can companies andorganisations holding such assets ensure minimaldowntimes while keeping inventory carrying andobsolescence costs under control?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 12-25
Summary of Learning Objectives
What are the factors affecting the optimal level ofproduct availability?How is the optimal cycle service level estimated?What are the managerial levers that can be used to
improve supply chain profitability throughoptimal service levels?How can contracts be structured to increase
supply chain profitability?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-1
Chapter 13Transportation
in a SupplyChain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-2
OutlineThe role of transportation in the supply chain
Factors affecting transportation decisions
Modes of transportation and their performancecharacteristics
Transportation infrastructure and policies
Design options for a transportation network
Trade-offs in transportation design
Tailored transportation
The role of IT in transportation
Risk management in transportation
Making transportation decisions in practice
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-3
Factors AffectingTransportation Decisions
Carrier (party that moves or transports the product)– Vehicle-related cost
– Fixed operating cost
– Trip-related cost
Shipper (party that requires the movement of theproduct between two points in the supply chain)– Transportation cost
– Inventory cost
– Facility cost
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-4
Transportation ModesTrucks
– TL
– LTL
Rail
Air
Package Carriers
Water
Pipeline
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-5
Truckload (TL)
Average revenue per ton mile (1996) = 9.13 cents
Average haul = 274 miles
Average Capacity = 42,000 - 50,000 lb.
Low fixed and variable costs
Major Issues– Utilization
– Consistent service
– Backhauls
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-6
Less Than Truckload (LTL)Average revenue per ton-mile (1996) = 25.08
cents
Average haul = 646 miles
Higher fixed costs (terminals) and low variablecosts
Major issues:– Location of consolidation facilities
– Utilization
– Vehicle routing
– Customer service
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-7
Rail
Average revenue / ton-mile (1996) = 2.5 cents
Average haul = 720 miles
Average load = 80 tons
Key issues:– Scheduling to minimize delays / improve service
– Off-track delays (at pickup and delivery end)
– Yard operations
– Variability of delivery times
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-8
Air
Key issues:– Location/number of hubs
– Location of fleet bases/crew bases
– Schedule optimization
– Fleet assignment
– Crew scheduling
– Yield management
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-9
Package CarriersCompanies like FedEx, UPS, USPS, that carry small
packages ranging from letters to shipments of about 150pounds
Expensive
Rapid and reliable delivery
Small and time-sensitive shipments
Preferred mode for e-businesses (e.g., Amazon, Dell,McMaster-Carr)
Consolidation of shipments (especially important forpackage carriers that use air as a primary method oftransport)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-10
Water
Limited to certain geographic areas
Ocean, inland waterway system, coastal waters
Very large loads at very low cost
Slowest
Dominant in global trade (autos, grain, apparel, etc.)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-11
Pipeline
High fixed cost
Primarily for crude petroleum, refined petroleumproducts, natural gas
Best for large and predictable demand
Would be used for getting crude oil to a port orrefinery, but not for getting refined gasoline to agasoline station (why?)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-12
IntermodalUse of more than one mode of transportation to move a
shipment to its destinationMost common example: rail/truckAlso water/rail/truck or water/truckGrown considerably with increased use of containersIncreased global trade has also increased use of
intermodal transportationMore convenient for shippers (one entity provides the
complete service)Key issue involves the exchange of information to
facilitate transfer between different transport modes
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-13
Design Options for aTransportation Network
What are the transportation options? Which one toselect? On what basis?
Direct shipping network
Direct shipping with milk runs
All shipments via central DC
Shipping via DC using milk runs
Tailored network
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-14
Trade-offs in Transportation Design
Transportation and inventory cost trade-off– Choice of transportation mode
– Inventory aggregation
Transportation cost and responsiveness trade-off
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-15
Choice of Transportation Mode
A manager must account for inventory costs whenselecting a mode of transportation
A mode with higher transportation costs can bejustified if it results in significantly lower inventories
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-16
Inventory Aggregation: Inventoryvs. Transportation Cost
As a result of physical aggregation– Inventory costs decrease
– Inbound transportation cost decreases
– Outbound transportation cost increases
Inventory aggregation decreases supply chain costs ifthe product has a high value to weight ratio, highdemand uncertainty, or customer orders are large
Inventory aggregation may increase supply chaincosts if the product has a low value to weight ratio,low demand uncertainty, or customer orders are small
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-17
Trade-offs Between TransportationCost and Customer Responsiveness
Temporal aggregation is the process of combiningorders across time
Temporal aggregation reduces transportation costbecause it results in larger shipments and reducesvariation in shipment sizes
However, temporal aggregation reduces customerresponsiveness
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-18
Tailored Transportation
The use of different transportation networks andmodes based on customer and product characteristics
Factors affecting tailoring:– Customer distance and density
– Customer size
– Product demand and value
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-19
Role of IT in Transportation
The complexity of transportation decisions demandsuse of IT systems
IT software can assist in:– Identification of optimal routes by minimizing costs subject
to delivery constraints
– Optimal fleet utilization
– GPS applications
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-20
Risk Management in Transportation
Three main risks to be considered in transportation are:– Risk that the shipment is delayed– Risk of disruptions– Risk of hazardous material
Risk mitigation strategies:– Decrease the probability of disruptions– Alternative routings– In case of hazardous materials the use of modified
containers, low-risk transportation models, modification ofphysical and chemical properties can prove to be effective
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-21
Making TransportationDecisions in Practice
Align transportation strategy with competitivestrategy
Consider both in-house and outsourced transportation
Design a transportation network that can handlee-commerce
Use technology to improve transportationperformance
Design flexibility into the transportation network
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
INDIAN ROAD TRANSPORT
Nature of fleet ownership and scale of operations
Impact of poor infrastructure on sector performance
Physical, organisational, infrastructural, regulatoryand human resource constraints
Dominance of road transport as preferred mode offreight transportation
Features of Indian Road Transport Sector
OM Logistics-Succeeding against Odds
13-22
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 13-23
Summary of Learning Objectives
What is the role of transportation in a supply chain?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of differentmodes of transportation?
What is role of infrastructure and policies intransportation?
What are the different network design options andwhat are their strengths and weaknesses?
What are the trade-offs in transportation networkdesign?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-1
Chapter 11Managing
Uncertainty in theSupply Chain:
Safety Inventory
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-2
Role of Inventory in the Supply ChainImprove Matching of Supply
and Demand
Improved Forecasting
Reduce Material Flow Time
Reduce Waiting Time
Reduce Buffer Inventory
Economies of ScaleSupply / Demand
VariabilitySeasonal
Variability
Cycle Inventory Safety InventoryFigure Error! No text of
Seasonal Inventory
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-3
Outline
The role of safety inventory in a supply chain
Determining the appropriate level of safety inventory
Impact of supply uncertainty on safety inventory
Impact of aggregation on safety inventory
Impact of replenishment policies on safety inventory
Managing safety inventory in a multi-echelon supplychain
Estimating and managing safety inventory in practice
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-4
The Role of Safety Inventoryin a Supply Chain
Forecasts are rarely completely accurate
If average demand is 1000 units per week, then half thetime actual demand will be greater than 1000, and half thetime actual demand will be less than 1000; what happenswhen actual demand is greater than 1000?
If you kept only enough inventory in stock to satisfyaverage demand, half the time you would run out
Safety inventory: Inventory carried for the purpose ofsatisfying demand that exceeds the amount forecasted in agiven period
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-5
Role of Safety Inventory
Average inventory is therefore cycle inventory plussafety inventory
There is a fundamental tradeoff:– Raising the level of safety inventory provides higher levels
of product availability and customer service
– Raising the level of safety inventory also raises the level ofaverage inventory and therefore increases holding costs
» Very important in high-tech or other industries where obsolescenceis a significant risk (where the value of inventory, such as PCs, candrop in value)
» Compaq and Dell in PCs
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-6
Two Questions to Answer inPlanning Safety Inventory
What is the appropriate level of safety inventoryto carry?
What actions can be taken to improve productavailability while reducing safety inventory?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-7
Determining the AppropriateLevel of Safety Inventory
Measuring demand uncertainty
Measuring product availability
Replenishment policies
Evaluating cycle service level and fill rate
Evaluating safety level given desired cycle servicelevel or fill rate
Impact of required product availability and uncertaintyon safety inventory
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-8
Determining the AppropriateLevel of Demand Uncertainty
Appropriate level of safety inventory determined by:– supply or demand uncertainty
– desired level of product availability
Higher levels of uncertainty require higher levels ofsafety inventory given a particular desired level ofproduct availability
Higher levels of desired product availability requirehigher levels of safety inventory given a particularlevel of uncertainty
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-9
Measuring Demand UncertaintyDemand has a systematic component and a random component
The estimate of the random component is the measure ofdemand uncertainty
Random component is usually estimated by the standarddeviation of demand
Notation:
D = Average demand per period
σD = standard deviation of demand per period
L = lead time = time between when an order is placed andwhen it is received
Uncertainty of demand during lead time is what is important
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-10
Measuring Demand Uncertainty
P = demand during k periods = kD
Ω = std dev of demand during k periods = σRSqrt(k)
Coefficient of variation = cv = µ /σ= mean/(std dev)= size of uncertainty relative to demand
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-11
Measuring Product AvailabilityProduct availability: a firm’s ability to fill a
customer’s order out of available inventoryStockout: a customer order arrives when product is not
available
Product fill rate (fr): fraction of demand that issatisfied from product in inventory
Order fill rate: fraction of orders that are filled fromavailable inventory
Cycle service level: fraction of replenishment cyclesthat end with all customer demand met
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-12
Replenishment Policies
Replenishment policy: decisions regarding when toreorder and how much to reorder
Continuous review: inventory is continuouslymonitored and an order of size Q is placed when theinventory level reaches the reorder point ROP
Periodic review: inventory is checked at regular(periodic) intervals and an order is placed to raise theinventory to a specified threshold (the “order-up-to”level)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-13
Continuous Review Policy: SafetyInventory and Cycle Service Level
L: Lead time for replenishment
D: Average demand per unittime
D:Standard deviation ofdemand per period
DL: Mean demand during leadtime
L: Standard deviation ofdemand during lead time
CSL: Cycle service level
ss: Safety inventory
ROP: Reorder point
),,(
)(1
LL
L
LS
DL
L
DD
F
D
ROPFCSL
ssROP
CSLss
L
DL
Average Inventory = Q/2 + ss
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-14
Example 11.1: Estimating SafetyInventory (Continuous Review Policy)
D = 2,500/week; D = 500
L = 2 weeks; Q = 10,000; ROP = 6,000
DL = DL = (2500)(2) = 5000
ss = ROP - RL = 6000 - 5000 = 1000
Cycle inventory = Q/2 = 10000/2 = 5000
Average Inventory = cycle inventory + ss = 5000 + 1000 = 6000
Average Flow Time = Avg inventory / throughput = 6000/2500 =2.4 weeks
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-15
Example 11.2: Estimating Cycle ServiceLevel (Continuous Review Policy)
D = 2,500/week; D = 500
L = 2 weeks; Q = 10,000; ROP = 6,000
Cycle service level, CSL = F(DL + ss, DL, L) =
= NORMDIST (DL + ss, DL, L) = NORMDIST(6000,5000,707,1)
= 0.92 (This value can also be determined from a Normal probability distribution table)
7072)500( LRL
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-16
Fill RateProportion of customer demand
satisfied from stock
Stockout occurs when thedemand during lead time exceedsthe reorder point
ESC is the expected shortage percycle (average demand in excessof reorder point in eachreplenishment cycle)
ss is the safety inventory
Q is the order quantity
LSL
LS
ssf
ssFssESC
Q
ESCfr
1
1
ESC = -ss1-NORMDIST(ss/L, 0, 1, 1) + L NORMDIST(ss/L, 0, 1, 0)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-17
Example 11.3: Evaluating Fill Ratess = 1,000, Q = 10,000, σL = 707, Fill Rate (fr) = ?
ESC = -ss1-NORMDIST(ss/L, 0, 1, 1) +
L NORMDIST(ss/L, 0, 1, 0)
= -1,0001-NORMDIST(1,000/707, 0, 1, 1) +
707 NORMDIST(1,000/707, 0, 1, 0)
= 25.13
fr = (Q - ESC)/Q = (10,000 - 25.13)/10,000 =0.9975
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-18
Factors Affecting Fill Rate
Safety inventory: Fill rate increases if safetyinventory is increased. This also increases thecycle service level.
Lot size: Fill rate increases on increasing the lotsize even though cycle service level does notchange.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-19
Example 11.4: EvaluatingSafety Inventory Given CSL
D = 2,500/week; D = 500
L = 2 weeks; Q = 10,000; CSL = 0.90
DL = 5000, L = 707 (from earlier example)
ss = FS-1(CSL)L = [NORMSINV(0.90)](707) = 906
(this value can also be determined from a Normal probability distribution table)
ROP = DL + ss = 5000 + 906 = 5906
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-20
Evaluating Safety InventoryGiven Desired Fill Rate
D = 2500, σD = 500, Q = 10000
If desired fill rate is fr = 0.975, how much safetyinventory should be held?
ESC = (1 - fr)Q = 250
Solve
σ1250
LSL
LS
ssf
ssFssESC σσ
0,1,1,
σσ
σ1250
LL
L
ssNORMDIST
ssNORMSDISTss
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-21
Evaluating Safety Inventory GivenFill Rate (try different values of ss)
Fill R ate Safety Inventory
97.5% 67
98.0% 183
98.5% 321
99.0% 499
99.5% 767
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-22
Impact of Required Product Availabilityand Uncertainty on Safety Inventory
Desired product availability (cycle service level or fillrate) increases, required safety inventory increases
Demand uncertainty (σL) increases, required safetyinventory increases
Managerial levers to reduce safety inventory withoutreducing product availability– reduce supplier lead time, L (better relationships with
suppliers)
– reduce uncertainty in demand, σL (better forecasts, betterinformation collection and use)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-23
Impact of Supply Uncertainty
D: Average demand per period
D: Standard deviation of demand per period
L: Average lead time
sL: Standard deviation of lead time
sD
D
LDL
L
L
DL
222
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-24
Impact of Supply UncertaintyD = 2,500/day; D = 500
L = 7 days; Q = 10,000; CSL = 0.90; sL = 7 days
DL = DL = (2500)(7) = 17500
ss = F-1s(CSL)σL = NORMSINV(0.90) x 17550
= 22,491
17500)7()2500(500)7( 222
222
sDL LDL
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-25
Impact of Supply Uncertainty
Safety inventory when sL = 0 is 1,695
Safety inventory when sL = 1 is 3,625
Safety inventory when sL = 2 is 6,628
Safety inventory when sL = 3 is 9,760
Safety inventory when sL = 4 is 12,927
Safety inventory when sL = 5 is 16,109
Safety inventory when sL = 6 is 19,298
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-26
Impact of Aggregationon Safety Inventory
Models of aggregation
Information centralization
Specialization
Product substitution
Component commonality
Postponement
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-27
Impact of Aggregation
C
Ls
C
D
C
L
n
ii
C
D
n
ii
C
CSLss
L
F
DD
)(1
1
2
1
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-28
Impact of Aggregation(Example 11.7)
Car Dealer : 4 dealership locations (disaggregated)
D = 25 cars; σD = 5 cars; L = 2 weeks; desired CSL=0.90
What would the effect be on safety stock if the 4 outletsare consolidated into 1 large outlet (aggregated)?
At each disaggregated outlet:
For L = 2 weeks, σL = 7.07 cars
ss = Fs-1(CSL) x σL = Fs
-1(0.9) x 7.07 = 9.06
Each outlet must carry 9 cars as safety stock inventory,so safety inventory for the 4 outlets in total is (4)(9) =36 cars
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-29
Impact of Aggregation(Example 11.7)
One outlet (aggregated option):
RC = D1 + D2 + D3 + D4 = 25+25+25+25 = 100 cars/wk
σRC = Sqrt(52 + 52 + 52 + 52) = 10
σLC = σD
C Sqrt(L) = (10)Sqrt(2) = (10)(1.414) = 14.14
ss = Fs-1(CSL) x σL
C = Fs-1(0.9) x 14.14 =18.12
or about 18 cars
If ρ does not equal 0 (demand is not completelyindependent), the impact of aggregation is not as great(Table 11.3)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-30
Impact of AggregationIf number of independent stocking locations
decreases by n, the expected level of safety inventorywill be reduced by square root of n (square root law)
Many e-commerce retailers attempt to take advantageof aggregation (Amazon) compared to bricks andmortar retailers (Borders)
Aggregation has two major disadvantages:– Increase in response time to customer order
– Increase in transportation cost to customer
– Some e-commerce firms (such as Amazon) have reducedaggregation to mitigate these disadvantages
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-31
Information CentralizationVirtual aggregation
Information system that allows access to currentinventory records in all warehouses from eachwarehouse
Most orders are filled from closest warehouse
In case of a stockout, another warehouse can fill theorder
Better responsiveness, lower transportation cost,higher product availability, but reduced safetyinventory
Examples: McMaster-Carr, Gap, Wal-Mart
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-32
SpecializationStock all items in each location or stock different
items at different locations?– Different products may have different demands in different
locations (e.g., snow shovels)
– There can be benefits from aggregation
Benefits of aggregation can be affected by:– coefficient of variation of demand (higher cv yields greater
reduction in safety inventory from centralization)
– value of item (high value items provide more benefits fromcentralization)
– Table 11.4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-33
Product Substitution
Substitution: use of one product to satisfy the demandfor another product
Manufacturer-driven one-way substitution
Customer-driven two-way substitution
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-34
Component Commonality
Using common components in a variety ofdifferent products
Can be an effective approach to exploitaggregation and reduce component inventories
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-35
Example 11.9: Value ofComponent Commonality
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
SS
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-36
Postponement
The ability of a supply chain to delay productdifferentiation or customization until closer to thetime the product is sold
Goal is to have common components in thesupply chain for most of the push phase and moveproduct differentiation as close to the pull phaseas possible
Examples: Dell, Benetton
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
POSTPONEMENT PRACTICESINDIAN PAINT INDUSTRY
Nature of Product
Demand Pattern
Variety
Perishability
Finished Product Inventory Costs
Postponement
Dealer Tinting System
11-37
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-38
Impact of ReplenishmentPolicies on Safety Inventory
Continuous review policies
Periodic review policies
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-39
Estimating and ManagingSafety Inventory in Practice
Account for the fact that supply chain demand islumpy
Adjust inventory policies if demand is seasonal
Use simulation to test inventory policies
Start with a pilot
Monitor service levels
Focus on reducing safety inventories
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 11-40
Summary of Learning Objectives
What is the role of safety inventory in a supply chain?
What are the factors that influence the required levelof safety inventory?
What are the different measures of productavailability?
What managerial levers are available to lower safetyinventory and improve product availability?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-1
Chapter 9Sales and
OperationsPlanning
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-2
Outline
Responding to predictable variability in a supply chain
Managing supply
Managing demand
Implementing solutions – Sales and OperationsPlanning - to predictable variability in practice
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-3
Responding to PredictableVariability in a Supply Chain
Predictable variability is change in demand that can beforecasted
Can cause increased costs and decreased responsivenessin the supply chain
A firm can handle predictable variability using twobroad approaches:– Manage supply using capacity, inventory, subcontracting, and
backlogs
– Manage demand using short-term price discounts and tradepromotions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-4
Managing Supply
Managing capacity– Time flexibility from workforce
– Use of seasonal workforce
– Use of subcontracting
– Use of dual facilities – dedicated and flexible
– Designing product flexibility into production processes
Managing inventory– Using common components across multiple products
– Building inventory of high demand or predictable demandproducts
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-5
Inventory/Capacity Trade-off
Leveling capacity forces inventory to build up inanticipation of seasonal variation in demand
Carrying low levels of inventory requires capacityto vary with seasonal variation in demand orenough capacity to cover peak demand duringseason
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-6
Managing Demand
Promotion
Pricing
Timing of promotion and pricing changes isimportant
Demand increases can result from a combinationof three factors:– Market growth (increased sales, increased market size)
– Stealing share (increased sales, same market size)
– Forward buying (same sales, same market size)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-7
Demand Management
Pricing and aggregate planning must be donejointly
Factors affecting discount timing– Product margin: Impact of higher margin ($40 instead
of $31)
– Consumption: Changing fraction of increase comingfrom forward buy (100% increase in consumptioninstead of 10% increase)
– Forward buy
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-8
Factors AffectingPromotion Timing
Factor Favored timingHigh forward buying Low demand periodHigh stealing share High demand periodHigh growth of market High demand periodHigh margin High demand periodLow margin Low demand periodHigh holding cost Low demand periodLow flexibility Low demand period
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Red Tomato ToolsPlanning example
9-9
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-10
Off-Peak (January) Discountfrom $40 to $39
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 3,000February 2,400March 2,560April 3,800May 2,200June 2,200
Cost = $421,915, Revenue = $643,400, Profit = $221,485
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-11
Peak (April) Discountfrom $40 to $39
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 1,600February 3,000March 3,200April 5,060May 1,760June 1,760
Cost = $438,857, Revenue = $650,140, Profit = $211,283
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-12
January Discount: 100% Increase inConsumption, Sale Price = $40 ($39)
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 4,440February 2,400March 2,560April 3,800May 2,200June 2,200
Off-peak discount: Cost = $456,750, Revenue = $699,560
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-13
Peak (April) Discount: 100% Increasein Consumption, Sale Price = $40 ($39)
Month Demand ForecastJanuary 1,600February 3,000March 3,200April 8,480May 1,760June 1,760
Peak discount: Cost = $536,200, Revenue = $783,520
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-14
Performance UnderDifferent Scenarios
Regular
Price
Promotion
Price
Promotion
Period
Percent
increase in
demand
Percent
forward
buy
Profit Average
Inventory
$40 $40 NA NA NA $217,725 895
$40 $39 January 10% 20% $221,485 523
$40 $39 April 10% 20% $211,283 938
$40 $39 January 100% 20% $242,810 208
$40 $39 April 100% 20% $247,320 1,492
$31 $31 NA NA NA $73,725 895
$31 $30 January 100% 20% $84,410 208
$31 $30 April 100% 20% $69,120 1,492
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-15
Implementing Solutions toPredictable Variability in Practice
Coordinate planning across enterprises in the supplychain
Take predictable variability into account whenmaking strategic decisions
Preempt, do not just react to, predictable variability
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
SEASONALITY OF INPUT PRODUCT ANDCAPACITY UTILISATION OF PLANT
Seasonal agricultural produce such as sugarcane, hasto reach sugar mills for crushing soon after harvestingto avoid sugar yield and quality losses. What stepshave been taken by Simbhaoli Sugars to ensure evenflow of this crop into the mill in line with theinstalled crushing capacity to minimise losses?
Identify the innovative practices adopted bySimbhaoli Sugars Limited and link the same withsupply chain best practices used in process industries.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 9-17
Summary of Learning Objectives
How can supply be managed to improvesynchronization in the supply chain in the face ofpredictable variability?
How can demand be managed to improvesynchronization in the supply chain in the face ofpredictable variability?
How can sales and operations planning be used tomaximize profitability when faced with predictablevariability in the supply chain?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.1-1
Chapter 1Understanding
the SupplyChain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-2
Traditional View: Logistics in theUS Economy (2006, 2007)
Freight Transportation $809, $856 Billion
Inventory Expense $446, $487 Billion
Administrative Expense $50, $54 Billion
Total Logistics Costs $1.31, $1.4 Trillion
Logistics Related Activity 10%, 10.1% of GNP
Source: 18th and 19th Annual State of Logistics Report – Logistics Magazine
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-3
Traditional View: Logistics in theManufacturing Firm
Profit 4%
Logistics Cost 21%
Marketing Cost 27%
Manufacturing Cost 48%
Profit
LogisticsCost
MarketingCost
ManufacturingCost
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-4
Supply Chain Management: TheMagnitude in the Traditional ViewEstimated that the grocery industry could save $30
billion (10% of operating cost) by using effectivelogistics and supply chain strategies– A typical box of cereal spends 104 days from factory to sale
– A typical car spends 15 days from factory to dealership
Laura Ashley turns its inventory 10 times a year, fivetimes faster than 3 years ago
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-5
Supply Chain Management:The True Magnitude
Compaq estimates it lost $.5 billion to $1 billion insales in 1995 because laptops were not available whenand where needed
When the 1 gig processor was introduced by AMD,the price of the 800 mb processor dropped by 30%
P&G estimates it saved retail customers $65 millionby collaboration resulting in a better match of supplyand demand
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-6
OutlineWhat is a Supply Chain?
Decision Phases in a Supply Chain
Process View of a Supply Chain
The Importance of Supply Chain Flows
Examples of Supply Chains
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-7
What is a Supply Chain?Introduction
The objective of a supply chain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-8
What is a Supply Chain?All stages involved, directly or indirectly, in fulfilling
a customer request
Includes manufacturers, suppliers, transporters,warehouses, retailers, and customers
Within each company, the supply chain includes allfunctions involved in fulfilling a customer request(product development, marketing, operations,distribution, finance, customer service)
Examples: Fig. 1.1 Detergent supply chain (Wal-Mart), Dell
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-9
What is a Supply Chain?Customer is an integral part of the supply chainIncludes movement of products from suppliers to
manufacturers to distributors, but also includesmovement of information, funds, and products in bothdirectionsProbably more accurate to use the term “supply
network” or “supply web”Typical supply chain stages: customers, retailers,
distributors, manufacturers, suppliers (Fig. 1.2)All stages may not be present in all supply chains
(e.g., no retailer or distributor for Dell)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-10
What is a Supply Chain?Customer wants
detergent and goesto Jewel
JewelSupermarket
Jewel or thirdparty DC
P&G or othermanufacturer
PlasticProducer
Chemicalmanufacturer
(e.g. Oil Company)
TennecoPackaging
PaperManufacturer
TimberIndustry
Chemicalmanufacturer
(e.g. Oil Company)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-11
Flows in a Supply Chain
Customer
Information
Product
Funds
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-12
The Objective of a Supply ChainMaximize overall value created
Supply chain value: difference between what the finalproduct is worth to the customer and the effort thesupply chain expends in filling the customer’s requestValue is correlated to supply chain profitability
(difference between revenue generated from thecustomer and the overall cost across the supply chain)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-13
The Objective of a Supply ChainExample: Dell receives $2000 from a customer for a
computer (revenue)Supply chain incurs costs (information, storage,
transportation, components, assembly, etc.)Difference between $2000 and the sum of all of these
costs is the supply chain profitSupply chain profitability is total profit to be shared
across all stages of the supply chainSupply chain success should be measured by total
supply chain profitability, not profits at an individualstage
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-14
The Objective of a Supply ChainSources of supply chain revenue: the customer
Sources of supply chain cost: flows of information,products, or funds between stages of the supply chain
Supply chain management is the management offlows between and among supply chain stages tomaximize total supply chain profitability
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-15
Decision Phases of a Supply ChainSupply chain strategy or design
Supply chain planning
Supply chain operation
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-16
Supply Chain Strategy or Design
Decisions about the structure of the supply chain andwhat processes each stage will performStrategic supply chain decisions
– Locations and capacities of facilities– Products to be made or stored at various locations– Modes of transportation– Information systems
Supply chain design must support strategic objectivesSupply chain design decisions are long-term and
expensive to reverse – must take into account marketuncertainty
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-17
Supply Chain PlanningDefinition of a set of policies that govern short-term
operations
Fixed by the supply configuration from previousphase
Starts with a forecast of demand in the coming year
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-18
Supply Chain PlanningPlanning decisions:
– Which markets will be supplied from which locations
– Planned buildup of inventories
– Subcontracting, backup locations
– Inventory policies
– Timing and size of market promotions
Must consider in planning decisions demanduncertainty, exchange rates, competition over the timehorizon
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-19
Supply Chain OperationTime horizon is weekly or dailyDecisions regarding individual customer ordersSupply chain configuration is fixed and operating
policies are determinedGoal is to implement the operating policies as
effectively as possibleAllocate orders to inventory or production, set order
due dates, generate pick lists at a warehouse, allocatean order to a particular shipment, set deliveryschedules, place replenishment ordersMuch less uncertainty (short time horizon)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-20
Process View of a Supply ChainCycle view: processes in a supply chain are divided
into a series of cycles, each performed at theinterfaces between two successive supply chain stages
Push/pull view: processes in a supply chain aredivided into two categories depending on whetherthey are executed in response to a customer order(pull) or in anticipation of a customer order (push)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-21
Cycle View of Supply Chains
Customer Order Cycle
Replenishment Cycle
Manufacturing Cycle
Procurement Cycle
Customer
Retailer
Distributor
Manufacturer
Supplier
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-22
Cycle View of a Supply ChainEach cycle occurs at the interface between two successive
stages
Customer order cycle (customer-retailer)
Replenishment cycle (retailer-distributor)
Manufacturing cycle (distributor-manufacturer)
Procurement cycle (manufacturer-supplier)
Cycle view clearly defines processes involved and theowners of each process. Specifies the roles andresponsibilities of each member and the desired outcomeof each process.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-23
Push/Pull View of Supply ChainsProcurement,Manufacturing andReplenishment cycles
Customer OrderCycle
CustomerOrder Arrives
PUSH PROCESSES PULL PROCESSES
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-24
Push/Pull View ofSupply Chain Processes
Supply chain processes fall into one of two categoriesdepending on the timing of their execution relative tocustomer demand
Pull: execution is initiated in response to a customerorder (reactive)
Push: execution is initiated in anticipation of customerorders (speculative)
Push/pull boundary separates push processes frompull processes
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-25
Push/Pull View ofSupply Chain Processes
Useful in considering strategic decisions relating tosupply chain design – more global view of howsupply chain processes relate to customer orders
Can combine the push/pull and cycle views– L.L. Bean (Figure 1.6)
– Dell (Figure 1.7)
The relative proportion of push and pull processes canhave an impact on supply chain performance
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-26
Supply Chain Macro Processes ina Firm
Supply chain processes discussed in the two views canbe classified into (Figure 1.8):– Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
– Internal Supply Chain Management (ISCM)
– Supplier Relationship Management (SRM)
Integration among the above three macro processes iscritical for effective and successful supply chainmanagement
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-27
Examples of Supply ChainsGateway
Zara
McMaster Carr / W.W. Grainger
Toyota
Amazon / Borders / Barnes and Noble
Webvan / Peapod / Jewel
What are some key issues in these supply chains?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-28
Gateway: A Direct Sales ManufacturerWhy did Gateway have multiple production facilities in the
US? What advantages or disadvantages does this strategy offerrelative to Dell, which has one facility?
What factors did Gateway consider when deciding which plantsto close?
Why does Gateway not carry any finished goods inventory atits retail stores?
Should a firm with an investment in retail stores carry anyfinished goods inventory?
Is the Dell model of selling directly without any retail storesalways less expensive than a supply chain with retail stores?
What are the supply chain implications of Gateway’s decisionto offer fewer configurations?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-29
7-ElevenWhat factors influence decisions of opening and closing stores?
Location of stores?
Why has 7-Eleven chosen off-site preparation of fresh food?
Why does 7-Eleven discourage direct store delivery from vendors?
Where are distribution centers located and how many stores doeseach center serve? How are stores assigned to distribution centers?
Why does 7-Eleven combine fresh food shipments by temperature?
What point of sale data does 7-Eleven gather and what informationis made available to store managers? How should informationsystems be structured?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-30
W.W. Grainger and McMaster CarrHow many DCs should there be and where should they be
located?How should product stocking be managed at the DCs? Should
all DCs carry all products?What products should be carried in inventory and what
products should be left at the supplier?What products should Grainger carry at a store?How should markets be allocated to DCs?How should replenishment of inventory be managed at various
stocking locations?How should Web orders be handled?What transportation modes should be used?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-31
ToyotaWhere should plants be located, what degree of
flexibility should each have, and what capacity shouldeach have?Should plants be able to produce for all markets?How should markets be allocated to plants?What kind of flexibility should be built into the
distribution system?How should this flexible investment be valued?What actions may be taken during product design to
facilitate this flexibility?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-32
Amazon.comWhy is Amazon building more warehouses as it grows? How
many warehouses should it have and where should they belocated?
What advantages does selling books via the Internet provide? Arethere disadvantages?
Why does Amazon stock bestsellers while buying other titlesfrom distributors?
Does an Internet channel provide greater value to a bookseller likeBorders or to an Internet-only company like Amazon?
Should traditional booksellers like Borders integrate e-commerceinto their current supply?
For what products does the e-commerce channel offer the greatestbenefits? What characterizes these products?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
GOPALJEE How can Gopaljee Supply and Distribution Model be
extended to other business lines in the Indian and SouthAsian context?
Which all socio-economic features of South Asian societiescan be identified as the foundations for building sustainablesupply chains?
How can the existing distribution channels in the SouthAsian region be transformed to maximize the value deliveredto the customer?
How can such indigenously developed SCM Modelsintegrate with and expand into global supply chains?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
JAIPUR RUGSHow can small and medium scale industries in the
developing world, leverage the power of supplychains to deliver value to the customers andsimultaneously improve the standard of living ofthe artisans?
How can the involvement of middlemen beminimised, freeing the artisans from exploitationand under payment?
1-34
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1-35
Summary of Learning ObjectivesWhat are the cycle and push/pull views of a supply
chain?
How can supply chain macro processes be classified?
What are the three key supply chain decision phasesand what is the significance of each?
What is the goal of a supply chain and what is theimpact of supply chain decisions on the success of thefirm?
8-1
Outline Chapter 8: Aggregate
Planning in the Supply Chain
Role of aggregate planning in a supply chain
The aggregate planning problem
Aggregate planning strategies
Implementing aggregate planning in practice
8-2
Role of Aggregate Planning
in a Supply Chain
Basic Assumptions:
– Capacity has a cost
– Lead times are greater than zero
Aggregate planning:
– Is the process by which a company determines levels of capacity,
production, subcontracting, inventory, stockouts, and pricing over a
specified time horizon
– goal is to maximize profit Or, if demand is effectively fixed for all the
decision we can make, we can just minimize costs
– decisions made at a product family (not SKU) level
– time frame of 3 to 18 months (What decision phase are we in?)
» Too late to build another plant
» Too early to get into daily/weekly production issues, SKU level detail
– We need to answer: how can a firm best use the facilities it has?
8-3
The Aggregate Planning Problem
(and role in the Supply Chain)
The Problem: Given the demand forecast for each period in the
planning horizon, determine the production level, inventory level,
and the capacity level for each period that maximizes the firm’s
(supply chain’s) profit over the planning horizon
– Specify the planning horizon (typically 3 to 18 months)
– Specify the duration of each period (typically 1 month for longer horizons)
– Specify key information required to develop an aggregate plan
All supply chain stages should work together on an aggregate plan
that will optimize supply chain performance
– For now we ignore transportation issues and costs and have single facility
– Avoid sub-optimization by silo. We may need to incur more costs (ex.
outsourcing production) in a function to maximize overall profit
– Supply chains usually involve multiple firms. If these firms have close ties,
it may be possible to optimize the efficiency of the entire chain
8-4
Information Needed for
an Aggregate Plan Demand forecast in each period
Production costs
– Machine costs
– labor costs, regular time ($/hr) and overtime ($/hr)
– subcontracting costs ($/hr or $/unit)
– cost of changing capacity: hiring or layoff ($/worker) and cost of adding
or reducing machine capacity ($/machine)
Labor/machine hours required per unit
Material requirements per unit, material cost and availability
Inventory holding cost ($/unit/period)
Stock-out / backlog cost ($/unit/period)
Constraints: physical or policy limits on overtime, layoffs,
capital available, warehousing, stock-outs and backlogs
8-5
Outputs of Aggregate Plan Production quantity from regular time, overtime, and
subcontracted time: used to determine number of workers and
supplier purchase levels
Inventory held: used to determine how much warehouse space
and working capital is needed
Backlog/stock-out quantity: used to determine what customer
service levels can be
– (i.e. do we short customers for a certain time- and how much/how long?)
Machine capacity increase/decrease: used to determine if new
production equipment needs to be purchased
A poor aggregate plan can result in lost sales, lost profits, excess
inventory, or excess capacity
8-6
Aggregate Planning Strategies
There is typically a trade-off between optimizing for
capacity (machine+labor), inventory, and backlog/lost sales
– Chase strategy: sync production with demand, hiring and firing as
needed.
– Time flexibility from workforce or capacity strategy: assumes labor
pool can work variable hours (incl. overtime), has lower inventory&
utilization,
– Level strategy – keep capacity & labor usage constant, either
stockpile inventory or short orders as needed
– Mixed strategy – a combination of one or more of the first three
strategies
…
8-7
Tools for Creating Aggregate Plans
Some companies have not created explicit aggregate plans, and rely only on orders from warehouses or DCs to drive production schedules (pure pull system).
– This is acceptable only if products are not capacity intensive, or if maintaining a plant with low utilization is inexpensive.
– It also assumes material and labor inputs are flexible / available when needed
For simple problems, it may be possible to produce a feasible plan by guessing. (No guarantee of optimality)
What tool is commonly used to produce an optimal aggregate plan?
8-8
Linear Programming
Inherently assumes costs are linear
– Pure unit costs are the easiest
– Increasing marginal costs (e.g. regular labor $20/hour, overtime $30/hour)
– Economies of scale harder to model, but possible (ignored for this class)
Difficulty of solving increases with degree of detail
– Take a 1-year plan for a plant that monitors weekly production of 100 different SKUs. How many variables?
» have 100*52 = over 5000 production decision variables Pi,t
– If we could aggregate SKUs into 5 different product families, with monthly time buckets, how many variables do we have now?
» only have 5*12= 60 decision variables for Pi,t
– Industry aggregate plans often have 10,000 to 100,000 decision variables
» In this class will keep our problem scales well below that of industry (under 200 decision variables, the limit of the built in Excel solver)
8-9
Aggregate Planning Example: Red
Tomato Tools, Inc.
Red Tomato makes a single product, a garden tool that sells for $40
Red Tomato starts with 1000 of these tools in inventory and is expected to end
with at least 500 in stock
Red Tomato can temporarily backlog demand for a cost, but at the end of the time
horizon, they require their backlog to be zero
– This is an important constraint to remember- if we forget it, we will get strange results
Production costs are based on parts and labor with no machine capacity issues
– They start with 80 employees can hire or fire workers for a cost.
– Workers get regular pay whether they are producing or not. There are 20 days of
production per month, each month.
– We can have workers work overtime (no more than 10 hrs/mo per worker) for extra $
– We can also subcontract production out and pay a flat fee (in lieu of labor + materials)
Red Tomato would like to generate a 6 month plan that maximizes profits
(revenue net of costs) – For now we can just minimizing costs, if we have no influence over demand
8-10
Aggregate Planning at
Red Tomato Tools
Month Demand Forecast
January 1,600
February 3,000
March 3,200
April 3,800
May 2,200
June 2,200
Here’s the demand that the book gives us- see the seasonality?
8-11
Aggregate Planning- Costs
Item Cost
Materials $10/unit
Inventory holding cost $2/unit/month
Marginal cost of a stockout $5/unit/month
Hiring and training costs $300/worker
Layoff cost $500/worker
Labor hours required 4/unit
Regular time cost $4/hour
Over time cost $6/hour
Cost of subcontracting $30/unit
Note: subcontracting costs includes all materials and labor
Time to bring up Excel….
8-12
Aggregate Planning
(Define the Decision Variables)
Wt = Workforce size for month t, t = 1, ..., 6
Ht = Number of employees hired at start of month t, t = 1, ..., 6
Lt = Number of employees laid off at start of month t, t = 1, ..., 6
Pt = Production in month t, t = 1, ..., 6
It = Inventory at the end of month t, t = 1, ..., 6
St = Number of units stocked out (backlogged) at end of month t, t = 1, ..., 6
Ct = Number of units subcontracted for month t, t = 1, ..., 6
Ot = Number of overtime hours worked in month t, t = 1, ..., 6
8-13
Aggregate Planning
(Define Objective Function)
6
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
30105
26500
300640
tt
tt
tt
tt
tt
tt
tt
tt
CPS
IOL
HWMin
Apologies to any Finance gurus but we do not consider NPV here
8-14
Aggregate Planning (Constraints)
Aside from the conditions for the ending level of
inventory and the ending backlog being = 0, we
will have 4 other types of constraints to consider:
1. Balance of workers
2. Production limit
3. Balance of inventory
4. Overtime limit
8-15
Aggregate Planning (Define
Constraints Linking Variables)
Workforce size for each month is based on hiring and layoffs
(# workers employed end of Month 1 = # workers employed
at the start of Month 2) – May end up with fractional # workers, e.g. 73.4, which could be
acceptable if we allow for part-time (Also, even if not with larger
numbers like this, we can get away with approximating for integer)
– Is a Balance constraint. No spontaneous creation or destruction of
workers outside of the hiring and layoff processes
.80,6,...,1
0
,
0
1
1
Wwheretfor
LHWW
orLHWW
tttt
tttt
8-16
Links Between Periods?
Why not create 6 different LPs, each with 1 period of a month?
It would be easier* for the computer to solve, after all!
Why not solve several 1-month problems sequentially? At end
points, such as #workers left at the end of the month 1 and
then use that as the starting #workers for month 2?
* A computer trivial aside from this class: as N increases, the inherent complexity and
required solution time goes up by order of N3 or more)
8-17
Aggregate Planning (Constraints)
Production for each month cannot exceed capacity
(hence, have a limit rather than balance constraint)
.6,...,1
,0440
,440
tfor
POW
OWP
ttt
ttt or
8-18
Aggregate Planning (Constraints)
Inventory balance for each month.
Inventory levels change if we a) produce (P) or sub-contract (C)
more units than we have demand for, either from this period (t) or
the prior one (t-1). It may help to think about what is a “debit”
and a “credit” to the level of inventory….
We can then rearrange the terms to reflect standard form (all
variables on one side). What happens at t=0?
011
11
SISDCPI
SISDCPI
ttttttt
tttttttFor t =1 to 6
8-19
Aggregate Planning (Constraints)
Over-time limit for each month, reflecting policy
that no one worker can put in more than 10 hours
of overtime for the month.
.6,...,1
,010
,10
tfor
OW
WO
tt
tt or
8-20
Further Conditions…
All of the variables are inherently non-negative
We have a starting balance of
– 80 workers
– 1000 tools
– 0 backlog
Thus, the variables associated with these are going to need to be
initialized (put in a value for time period 0)
Reminder: have been told that we are not allowed to have
any backlog and must have at least 500 tools in stock at
the end of the planning horizon
8-21
LP Formulation
We now take a brief digression and look at the formulation in
Excel, including the LP Solver configuration and the reports
Some things to think about:
1. How many variables will we have?
2. Which variables have “memory”- and why do we care?
3. How many different types of constraints (aside from non-
negativity and certain beginning/end conditions)? How
many total constraint equations?
4. What is our overall goal? Why can we take a “shortcut”
8-22
LP Formulation
8-23
LP Formulation: Solver
Decision variables are indexed to 1 thru 6, tp0 exists only for initialization
We have 4 types of constraints, plus 2 ending conditions
Technically we should require variables to be integers (no laying off .2
people or making .3 tools) but for now will leave as linear.
– Real industry LPs have numbers like 300K and 3M, so this is less of an issue
Assume linear model and non-negativity both checked in Options
8-24
What-if Scenarios
Planners often run re-run their models to see how the plan
might change if parameter values are different than expected
Here are some potentially realistic changes that would result
in changes our previously optimal plan at Red Tomato:
1. Increase the seasonal swings in demand (Example 8-1)
2. Raise holding costs (from $2 to $6) (Example 8-2)
8-25
Increased Demand Fluctuation
Month Demand Forecast
January 1,000
February 3,000
March 3,800
April 4,800
May 2,000
June 1,400
For chapter 8, we are assuming that demand
is beyond our control to influence.
Demand is still 16000 within the total planning period
8-26
Solution: Comparison of What-If
Scenario 1 –vs.- Base Case
Major changes
– Increases total Costs by $10,583
» Changes come from Inventory and Stock-out
» Base Case costs: $10,233 $1,333
» Larger seasonal fluctuations: $12,400 $9,750
Caveat: The book treats beginning and end periods differently when calculating
the average inventory position (see p. 218, p.220). This is overkill: we can just
use a simple average if we are interested in the inventory position. – Should I ask you to calculate this on a test, either method is correct, but my
method is easier!
– I will focus on minimizing the total inventory COST over the planning
horizon rather than inventory LEVELS at any point in time- ultimately,
inventory levels are measured because of their associated costs
8-27
What-If Scenario #2: Increase
Inventory Costs from $2 to $6
Major changes- costs increase over base case…. In what way?
Reduce inventory carried by….
– engaging in more ”workforce reductions” as pre-building inventory for
peak periods is no longer as cost effective
– subcontracting some demand out in peak periods
We switch from what type of strategy to what?
8-28
More Thoughts on Red
Tomato’s Planning Problem
1. What if our aggregate demand forecasts are incorrect?
– Review/ Reminder: How often are real forecasts 100% accurate?
2. What if demand is greater than anticipated?
– What are some ways we can prepare for extra (either in terms of Safety
Stock or Safety Capacity?)
3. What if demand is less than anticipated- what will happen?
– What is one way to keep costs lower if demand is greatly reduced and
expected to stay low for awhile?
9-30
Managing Supply: Some Possible
Tools to Consider
Managing capacity
– Time flexibility from workforce
– Use of a seasonal workforce
– Use of subcontracting
– Use of dual facilities – dedicated and flexible
– Designing product flexibility into production processes
Managing inventory
– Using common components across multiple products
– Building up inventory of high demand or predictable demand
products
– Inventory strategies are discussed in detail in Chapters10-12
8-31
Aggregate Planning in Practice
If possible, think beyond your enterprise to the entire supply
chain*
Make plans flexible because forecasts are always wrong
– Sensitivity Analysis can be used to show where bottlenecks and potential
improvements may be
Rerun the aggregate plan as new information emerges
– Usually every time period, with revisions and future predictions
Importance of aggregate planning grows as a firm’s capacity
utilization increases
– Less room for mistakes in this era of low margins
8-32
Summary of Chapter 8’s Learning
Objectives
1. What types of decisions are best solved by aggregate
planning?
2. What is the importance of aggregate planning as a supply
chain activity?
3. What kinds of information are needed to produce an aggregate
plan?
4. What are the basic trade-offs a manager makes to produce an
aggregate plan?
5. How are aggregate planning problems formulated and solved
using Microsoft Excel?
9-33
Chapter 9 Outline:
Sales and Operations Planning
In Chapter 8 we focused on managing supply, but now
we are going to consider: Managing demand
Implementing solutions – Sales and Operations
Planning (S&OP) – to manage predictable variability
in practice
9-34
Responding to Predictable
Variability in a Supply Chain
Predictable variability - demand changes that can be forecasted
Can increase costs and decrease responsiveness in the supply
chain (as discussed in Chapter 17- Supply Chain coordination)
A firm can handle predictable variability using two broad
approaches:
1. Manage supply using capacity, inventory, subcontracting,
and backlogs (This is what we did in Chapter 8)
2. Manage demand using short-term price discounts and trade
promotions
9-35
Demand Management
Promotion- increased marketing, product placements, discounts to wholesalers/retailers, etc.
Pricing discounts to consumers
Demand Management and aggregate planning must be jointly coordinated
Factors that should influence timing of promotion/ price discount
1. Product margins: Impact of change in margins
2. Demand changes
3. Cost of holding inventory
4. Cost of changing capacity
Some companies with software or services in this arena: DemandTec, Rapt, KHI
9-36
Effect of Promotions and Discounts
Demand increases can result from a combination of three
factors:
1. Market growth (increased sales, increased market size)
2. Stealing market share (increased sales, same market size)
3. Forward buying (same sales, same market size)
Have you ever “stocked up” on an item that was on a great sale?
Higher demand now offset by demand decrease in later periods
It is crucial to be able to estimate the effect of all these factors,
as their effects will determine what is the best pricing and
promotion strategy
9-37
Example: Effect of
Promotions and Discounts
Red Tomato Example: a $1 discount offered to the consumer
for a month is expected to increase demand that period by
10% because of market growth or stealing share, and also with
20% of demand for the next two months being pulled forward
to the current month
How do we compute the new demand?
How do we modify the aggregate planning problem?
Do we need to revisit our objective function?
– Hint: we are now considering actions that will modify demand between
scenarios, whereas in our prior work demand was assumed to be fixed
9-38
Off-Peak (January) if Discount
Sales Price from $40 to $39
Month Demand Forecast
January 3,000
February 2,400
March 2,560
April 3,800
May 2,200
June 2,200
• 10% increase in January
• but forward buying decreases Feb and Mar’s demands each by 20%
• Cost = $421,915, Revenue = $643,400, ->Profit = $221,485
• Profit is better than base case (no discount) profit of $217,725
The next few slides show scenarios from the textbook example
9-39
Peak (April) if Discount
price from $40 to $39
Month Demand Forecast
January 1,600
February 3,000
March 3,200
April 5,060
May 1,760
June 1,760
• 10% increase in April
• but forward buying decreases May and June’s demands each by 20%
• Cost = $438,857, Revenue = $650,140, Profit = $211,283
• Profit is worse than either base case or off-peak discount
9-40
January Discount (Sales price $39):
if 100% Increase in Consumption
Month Demand Forecast
January 4,440
February 2,400
March 2,560
April 3,800
May 2,200
June 2,200
• Assumes 100% rather than 10% consumption increase • either from overall market growth for product or stealing share from others
• still assume 20% forward buying from Feb and March
• Off-peak discount: Cost = $456,750, Revenue = $699,560, Profit $242,810
9-41
Peak (April) Discount:
if 100% Increase in Consumption
Month Demand Forecast
January 1,600
February 3,000
March 3,200
April 8,480
May 1,760
June 1,760
• We still assume we have 20% forward buying from May and June
• Peak discount: Cost = $536,200, Revenue = $783,520
• PROFIT $247,320 better than no promotion or off peak promo
9-42
Performance Under
Different Scenarios Regular
Price
Promotion
Price
Promotion
Period
Percent
increase in
demand
Percent
forward
buy
Profit
$40 none NA NA NA $217,725
$40 $39 January 10 % 20 % $221,485
$40 $39 April 10% 20% $211,283
$40 $39 January 100% 20% $242,810
$40 $39 April 100% 20% $247,320
$31 none NA NA NA $73,725
$31 $30 January 100% 20% $84,410
$31 $30 April 100% 20% $69,120
• Summary of different results (includes a low-margin variation,
where product only retails for a $31 regular price.)
• Based on the effects of different factors, the optimal promotion
time (high verses low demand months) will change
9-43
Factors Affecting Optimal
Promotion Timing
Factor Favored timing
High forward buying Low demand period
High stealing of market share High demand period
High growth of market High demand period
High margin High demand period
High holding cost Low demand period
High flexibility High demand period
• Reverse timing for opposite (Low Margin -> Low demand period best)
• For a combination of factors (i.e. high margin product, but with a high
holding cost) still need to analyze to see which factor dominates
9-44
Implementing Solutions to
Predictable Variability in Practice
Coordinate* planning across enterprises in the supply chain
Take predictable variability into account when making strategic
decisions
Pre-empt (do not just react to) predictable variability
Be proactive, not reactive
Perform a lot of “What-if” analysis BEFORE going live with a
strategy!
9-45
Summary of Chapter 9’s Learning
Objectives
1. What factors may comprise an increase in Demand?
2. How can supply be managed to improve synchronization in
the supply chain in the face of predictable variability?
3. How can aggregate planning be used to maximize
profitability when faced with predictable variability in the
supply chain?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-1
Chapter 10Managing
Economies ofScale in the
Supply Chain:Cycle Inventory
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-2
Outline
Role of Cycle Inventory in a Supply Chain
Economies of Scale to Exploit Fixed Costs
Economies of Scale to Exploit Quantity Discounts
Short-Term Discounting: Trade Promotions
Managing Multi-Echelon Cycle Inventory
Estimating Cycle Inventory-Related Costs inPractice
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-3
Role of Inventory in the Supply ChainImprove Matching of Supply
and Demand
Improved Forecasting
Reduce Material Flow Time
Reduce Waiting Time
Reduce Buffer Inventory
Economies of ScaleSupply / Demand
VariabilitySeasonal
Variability
Cycle Inventory Safety InventoryFigure Error! No text of
Seasonal Inventory
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-4
Role of Cycle Inventoryin a Supply Chain
Lot, or batch size: quantity that a supply chain stage eitherproduces or orders at a given time
Cycle inventory: average inventory that builds up in thesupply chain because a supply chain stage either producesor purchases in lots that are larger than those demanded bythe customer– Q = lot or batch size of an order– D = demand per unit time
Inventory profile: plot of the inventory level over time(Fig. 10.1)
Cycle inventory = Q/2 (depends directly on lot size)Average flow time = Avg inventory / Avg flow rateAverage flow time from cycle inventory = Q/(2D)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-5
Role of Cycle Inventoryin a Supply Chain
Q = 1000 unitsD = 100 units/dayCycle inventory = Q/2 = 1000/2 = 500 = Avg inventory level from
cycle inventoryAvg flow time = Q/2D = 1000/(2)(100) = 5 daysCycle inventory adds 5 days to the time a unit spends in the
supply chainLower cycle inventory is better because:
– Average flow time is lower– Working capital requirements are lower– Lower inventory holding costs
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-6
Role of Cycle Inventoryin a Supply Chain
Cycle inventory is held primarily to take advantage ofeconomies of scale in the supply chain
Supply chain costs influenced by lot size:– Material cost = C– Fixed ordering cost = S– Holding cost = H = hC (h = cost of holding $1 in inventory for one year)
Primary role of cycle inventory is to allow different stages topurchase product in lot sizes that minimize the sum of material,ordering, and holding costs
Ideally, cycle inventory decisions should consider costs acrossthe entire supply chain, but in practice, each stage generallymakes its own supply chain decisions – increases total cycleinventory and total costs in the supply chain
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Estimating Cycle InventoryRelated Costs in Practice
Inventory Holding Cost– Obsolescence
– Handling costs
– Occupancy costs
– Theft, security, damage, tax, insurance
Ordering Cost– Buyer time
– Transportation costs
– Receiving costs
– Unique other costs
10-7
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-8
Economies of Scaleto Exploit Fixed Costs
How do you decide whether to go shopping at aconvenience store or at Sam’s Club?Lot sizing for a single product (EOQ)
Aggregating multiple products in a single order
Lot sizing with multiple products or customers– Lots are ordered and delivered independently for each
product
– Lots are ordered and delivered jointly for all products
– Lots are ordered and delivered jointly for a subset ofproducts
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-9
Economies of Scaleto Exploit Fixed Costs
Annual demand = D
Number of orders per year = D/Q
Annual material cost = CR
Annual order cost = (D/Q)S
Annual holding cost = (Q/2)H = (Q/2)hC
Total annual cost = TC = CD + (D/Q)S + (Q/2)hC
Figure 10.2 shows variation in different costs fordifferent lot sizes at Best Buy
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-10
Fixed Costs: Optimal Lot Sizeand Reorder Interval (EOQ)
D: Annual demandS: Setup or Order CostC: Cost per unith: Holding cost per year as a
fraction of product costH: Holding cost per unit per yearQ: Lot Size, Q*: Optimal Lot Sizen*: Optimal order frequencyMaterial cost is constant and
therefore is not considered inthis model
S
DhCn
H
DSQ
hCH
2*
2*
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-11
Example 10.1Demand, D = 12,000 computers per year
Unit cost, C = $500
Holding cost fraction, h = 0.2
Fixed cost, S = $4,000/order
Q* = Sqrt[(2)(12000)(4000)/(0.2)(500)] = 980 computers
Cycle inventory = Q*/2 = 490
Average Flow time = Q*/2D = 980/(2)(12000) = 0.041year = 0.49 month
n* = Sqrt[(12000)(0.2)(500)/(2)(4000)] = 12.24 orders
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-12
Example 10.1 (continued)
Annual ordering and holding cost == (12000/980)(4000) + (980/2)(0.2)(500) = $97,980Suppose lot size is reduced to Q=200, which would
reduce flow time:Annual ordering and holding cost == (12000/200)(4000) + (200/2)(0.2)(500) = $250,000To make it economically feasible to reduce lot size, the
fixed cost associated with each lot would have to bereduced
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-13
Example 10.2If desired lot size = Q* = 200 units, what would S have
to be?
D = 12000 units
C = $500
h = 0.2
Use EOQ equation and solve for S:
S = [hC(Q*)2]/2D = [(0.2)(500)(200)2]/(2)(12000) =$166.67
To reduce optimal lot size by a factor of k, the fixed ordercost must be reduced by a factor of k2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-14
Key Points from EOQ Model
In deciding the optimal lot size, the tradeoff is betweensetup (order) cost and holding cost.
If demand increases by a factor of 4, it is optimal toincrease batch size by a factor of 2 and produce (order)twice as often. Cycle inventory (in days of demand)should decrease as demand increases.
If lot size is to be reduced, one has to reduce fixed ordercost. To reduce lot size by a factor of 2, order cost hasto be reduced by a factor of 4.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-15
Aggregating Multiple Productsin a Single Order
Transportation is a significant contributor to the fixed cost per order
Can possibly combine shipments of different products from thesame supplier– same overall fixed cost
– shared over more than one product
– effective fixed cost is reduced for each product
– lot size for each product can be reduced
Can also have a single delivery coming from multiple suppliers or asingle truck delivering to multiple retailers
Aggregating across products, retailers, or suppliers in a single orderallows for a reduction in lot size for individual products becausefixed ordering and transportation costs are now spread acrossmultiple products, retailers, or suppliers
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-16
Example: Aggregating MultipleProducts in a Single Order
Suppose there are 4 computer products in the previousexample: Deskpro, Litepro, Medpro, and Heavpro
Assume demand for each is 1000 units per month
If each product is ordered separately:– Q* = 980 units for each product
– Total cycle inventory = 4(Q/2) = (4)(980)/2 = 1960 units
Aggregate orders of all four products:– Combined Q* = 1960 units
– For each product: Q* = 1960/4 = 490
– Cycle inventory for each product is reduced to 490/2 = 245
– Total cycle inventory = 1960/2 = 980 units
– Average flow time, inventory holding costs will be reduced
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-17
Lot Sizing with MultipleProducts or Customers
In practice, the fixed ordering cost is dependent at least in parton the variety associated with an order of multiple models
– A portion of the cost is related to transportation(independent of variety)
– A portion of the cost is related to loading and receiving(not independent of variety)
Three scenarios:
– Lots are ordered and delivered independently for eachproduct
– Lots are ordered and delivered jointly for all three models
– Lots are ordered and delivered jointly for a selected subset ofmodels
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-18
Lot Sizing with Multiple Products
Demand per year– DL = 12,000; DM = 1,200; DH = 120
Common transportation cost, S = $4,000
Product specific order cost– sL = $1,000; sM = $1,000; sH = $1,000
Holding cost, h = 0.2
Unit cost– CL = $500; CM = $500; CH = $500
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-19
Delivery OptionsNo Aggregation: Each product ordered separately
Complete Aggregation: All products delivered on
each truck
Tailored Aggregation: Selected subsets of products
on each truck
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-20
No Aggregation: Order EachProduct Independently
Litepro Medpro Heavypro
Demand peryear
12,000 1,200 120
Fixed cost /order
$5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Optimalorder size
1,095 346 110
Orderfrequency
11.0 / year 3.5 / year 1.1 / year
Annual cost $109,544 $34,642 $10,954
Total cost = $155,140
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-21
Aggregation: Order AllProducts Jointly
S* = S + sL + sM + sH = 4000+1000+1000+1000 = $7000
n* = Sqrt[(DLhCL+ DMhCM+ DHhCH)/2S*]
= 9.75
QL = DL/n* = 12000/9.75 = 1230
QM = DM/n* = 1200/9.75 = 123
QH = DH/n* = 120/9.75 = 12.3
Cycle inventory = Q/2
Average flow time = (Q/2)/(weekly demand)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-22
Complete Aggregation:Order All Products Jointly
Litepro Medpro Heavypro
Demand peryear
12,000 1,200 120
Orderfrequency
9.75/year 9.75/year 9.75/year
Optimalorder size
1,230 123 12.3
Annualholding cost
$61,512 $6,151 $615
Annual order cost = 9.75 × $7,000 = $68,250Annual total cost = $136,528
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-23
Lessons from Aggregation
Aggregation allows firms to lower lot size withoutincreasing cost
Complete aggregation is effective if productspecific fixed cost is a small fraction of joint fixedcost
Tailored aggregation is effective if productspecific fixed cost is a large fraction of joint fixedcost
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-24
Economies of Scale toExploit Quantity Discounts
All-unit quantity discounts
Marginal unit quantity discounts
Why quantity discounts?– Coordination in the supply chain
– Price discrimination to maximize supplier profits
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-25
Quantity Discounts
Lot size based– All units
– Marginal unit
Volume based
How should buyer react?
What are appropriate discounting schemes?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-26
All-Unit Quantity DiscountsPricing schedule has specified quantity break points
q0, q1, …, qr, where q0 = 0
If an order is placed that is at least as large as qi butsmaller than qi+1, then each unit has an average unitcost of Ci
The unit cost generally decreases as the quantityincreases, i.e., C0>C1>…>Cr
The objective for the company (a retailer in ourexample) is to decide on a lot size that will minimizethe sum of material, order, and holding costs
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-27
All-Unit Quantity Discount Procedure(different from what is in the textbook)Step 1: Calculate the EOQ for the lowest price. If it is feasible
(i.e., this order quantity is in the range for that price), then stop.This is the optimal lot size. Calculate total cost (TC ) for thislot size.
Step 2: If the EOQ is not feasible, calculate the TC for this priceand the smallest quantity for that price.
Step 3: Calculate the EOQ for the next lowest price. If it isfeasible, stop and calculate the TC for that quantity and price.
Step 4: Compare the TC for Steps 2 and 3. Choose the quantitycorresponding to the lowest TC.
Step 5: If the EOQ in Step 3 is not feasible, repeat Steps 2, 3, and4 until a feasible EOQ is found.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-28
All-Unit Quantity Discount:Example
Order quantity Unit Price
0-5000 $3.00
5001-10000 $2.96
Over 10000 $2.92
q0 = 0, q1 = 5000, q2 = 10000
C0 = $3.00, C1 = $2.96, C2 = $2.92
D = 120000 units/year, S = $100/lot, h = 0.2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-29
All-Unit Quantity Discount:Example
Step 1: Calculate Q2* = Sqrt[(2DS)/hC2]= Sqrt[(2)(120000)(100)/(0.2)(2.92)] = 6410Not feasible (6410 < 10001)Calculate TC2 using C2 = $2.92 and q2 = 10001TC2 = (120000/10001)(100)+(10001/2)(0.2)(2.92)+(120000)(2.92)= $354,520Step 2: Calculate Q1* = Sqrt[(2DS)/hC1]=Sqrt[(2)(120000)(100)/(0.2)(2.96)] = 6367Feasible (5000<6367<10000) StopTC1 = (120000/6367)(100)+(6367/2)(0.2)(2.96)+(120000)(2.96)= $358,969TC2 < TC1 The optimal order quantity Q* is q2 = 10001
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-30
All-Unit Quantity Discounts
Suppose fixed order cost were reduced to $4– Without discount, Q* would be reduced to 1265 units– With discount, optimal lot size would still be 10001 units
What is the effect of such a discount schedule?– Retailers are encouraged to increase the size of their orders– Average inventory (cycle inventory) in the supply chain is
increased– Average flow time is increased– Is an all-unit quantity discount an advantage in the supply
chain?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-31
Why Quantity Discounts?
Coordination in the supply chain– Commodity products
– Products with demand curve» 2-part tariffs
» Volume discounts
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-32
Coordination forCommodity Products
D = 120,000 bottles/year
SR = $100, hR = 0.2, CR = $3
SS = $250, hS = 0.2, CS = $2
Retailer’s optimal lot size = 6,324 bottlesRetailer cost = $3,795; Supplier cost = $6,009
Supply chain cost = $9,804
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-33
Coordination forCommodity Products
What can the supplier do to decrease supply chaincosts?– Coordinated lot size: 9,165; Retailer cost = $4,059;
Supplier cost = $5,106; Supply chain cost = $9,165
Effective pricing schemes– All-unit quantity discount
» $3 for lots below 9,165
» $2.9978 for lots of 9,165 or more
– Pass some fixed cost to retailer (enough that he raisesorder size from 6,324 to 9,165)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-34
Quantity Discounts WhenFirm Has Market Power
No inventory related costs
Demand curve
360,000 - 60,000p
What are the optimal prices and profits in thefollowing situations?– The two stages coordinate the pricing decision
» Price = $4, Profit = $240,000, Demand = 120,000
– The two stages make the pricing decisionindependently
» Price = $5, Profit = $180,000, Demand = 60,000
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-35
Two-Part Tariffs andVolume Discounts
Design a two-part tariff that achieves thecoordinated solution
Design a volume discount scheme that achievesthe coordinated solution
Impact of inventory costs– Pass on some fixed costs with above pricing
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-36
Lessons from Discounting Schemes
Lot size based discounts increase lot size andcycle inventory in the supply chain
Lot size based discounts are justified to achievecoordination for commodity products
Volume based discounts with some fixed costpassed on to retailer are more effective in general– Volume based discounts are better over rolling horizon
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-37
Short-Term Discounting:Trade Promotions
Trade promotions are price discounts for a limited period of time(also may require specific actions from retailers, such as displays,advertising, etc.)
Key goals for promotions from a manufacturer’s perspective:– Induce retailers to use price discounts, displays, advertising to increase sales– Shift inventory from the manufacturer to the retailer and customer– Defend a brand against competition– Goals are not always achieved by a trade promotion
What is the impact on the behavior of the retailer and on theperformance of the supply chain?
Retailer has two primary options in response to a promotion:– Pass through some or all of the promotion to customers to spur sales– Purchase in greater quantity during promotion period to take advantage of
temporary price reduction, but pass through very little of savings tocustomers
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-38
Short Term DiscountingQ*: Normal order quantity
C: Normal unit cost
d: Short term discount
D: Annual demand
h: Cost of holding $1 per year
Qd: Short term order quantity dC
C
hdC
dD QQ
d
-+
)-(=
*
Forward buy = Qd - Q*
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-39
Short Term Discounts:Forward Buying
Normal order size, Q* = 6,324 bottles
Normal cost, C = $3 per bottle
Discount per tube, d = $0.15
Annual demand, D = 120,000
Holding cost, h = 0.2
Qd = [(0.15)(120000)/(3.00-0.15)(0.2)] + [(3)(6324)/(3.00-0.15)] = 38,236 bottles
Forward buy = Qd – Q* = 38,236 – 6,324 = 31,912 bottles
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-40
Promotion Pass Throughto Consumers
Demand curve at retailer: 300,000 - 60,000p
Normal supplier price, CR = $3.00– Optimal retail price = $4.00
– Customer demand = 60,000
Promotion discount = $0.15– Optimal retail price = $3.925
– Customer demand = 64,500
Retailer only passes through half the promotiondiscount and demand increases by only 7.5%
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-41
Trade Promotions
When a manufacturer offers a promotion, the goalfor the manufacturer is to take actions(countermeasures) to discourage forward buyingin the supply chain
Counter measures– EDLP (every day low pricing)
– Scan based promotions
– Customer coupons
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-42
Managing Multi-EchelonCycle Inventory
Multi-echelon supply chains have multiple stages, withpossibly many players at each stage and one stage supplyinganother stage
The goal is to synchronize lot sizes at different stages in away that no unnecessary cycle inventory is carried at anystage
Figure 10.6: Inventory profile at retailer and manufacturerwith no synchronization
Figure 10.7: Illustration of integer replenishment policyFigure 10.8: An example of a multi-echelon distribution
supply chainIn general, each stage should attempt to coordinate orders
from customers who order less frequently and cross-dock allsuch orders. Some of the orders from customers that ordermore frequently should also be cross-docked.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-43
Levers to Reduce Lot SizesWithout Hurting Costs
Cycle Inventory Reduction– Reduce transfer and production lot sizes
» Aggregate fixed costs across multiple products, supply points,or delivery points
– Are quantity discounts consistent with manufacturingand logistics operations?
» Volume discounts on rolling horizon
» Two-part tariff
– Are trade promotions essential?» EDLP
» Based on sell-thru rather than sell-in
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 10-44
Summary of Learning ObjectivesHow are the appropriate costs balanced to choose the
optimal amount of cycle inventory in the supplychain?What are the effects of quantity discounts on lot size
and cycle inventory?What are appropriate discounting schemes for the
supply chain, taking into account cycle inventory?What are the effects of trade promotions on lot size
and cycle inventory?What are managerial levers that can reduce lot size
and cycle inventory without increasing costs?
1
Facility Decisions
Network Design in a Supply Chain
2
Outline
The Role of Distribution in the Supply Chain
Factors Influencing Distribution Network Design
Design Options for a Distribution Network
The Value of Distributors in the Supply Chain
Distribution Networks in Practice
Summary of Learning Objectives
3
The Role of Distributionin the Supply Chain
Distribution: the steps taken to move and store aproduct from the supplier stage to the customerstage in a supply chain
Distribution directly affects cost and the customerexperience and therefore drives profitability
Choice of distribution network can achieve supplychain objectives from low cost to highresponsiveness
Examples: Wal-Mart, Dell, Proctor & Gamble,Grainger
4
Factors InfluencingDistribution Network Design
Distribution network performance evaluated alongtwo dimensions at the highest level:– Customer needs that are met
– Cost of meeting customer needs
Distribution network design options musttherefore be compared according to their impacton customer service and the cost to provide thislevel of service
5
Factors InfluencingDistribution Network Design
Elements of customer service influenced by networkstructure:– Response time– Product variety– Product availability– Customer experience– Order visibility– Returnability
Supply chain costs affected by network structure:– Inventories– Transportation– Facilities and handling– Information
6
Service and Number of Facilities(Fig. 4.1)
Number ofFacilities
Response Time
7
The Cost-Response Time Frontier
Local FG
Mix
Regional FG
Local WIP
Central FG
Central WIP
Central Raw Material and Custom production
Custom production with raw material at suppliers
Cost
Response Time HighLow
Low
High
8
Inventory Costs and Numberof Facilities (Fig. 4.2)
InventoryCosts
Number of facilities
9
Transportation Costs andNumber of Facilities (Fig. 4.3)
TransportationCosts
Number of facilities
10
Facility Costs and Numberof Facilities (Fig. 4.4)
FacilityCosts
Number of facilities
11
Transportation
Total Costs Related toNumber of Facilities
Tota
l Cos
ts
Number of Facilities
Inventory
Facilities
Total Costs
12
Response Time
Variation in Logistics Costs and ResponseTime with Number of Facilities (Fig. 4.5)
Number of Facilities
Total Logistics Costs
13
Design Options for aDistribution Network
Manufacturer Storage with Direct ShippingManufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping and
In-Transit Merge Distributor Storage with Carrier Delivery Distributor Storage with Last Mile DeliveryManufacturer or Distributor Storage with
Consumer Pickup Retail Storage with Consumer Pickup Selecting a Distribution Network Design
14
Manufacturer Storage withDirect Shipping (Fig. 4.6)
Manufacturer
Retailer
Customers
Product Flow
Information Flow
15
In-Transit Merge Network (Fig. 4.7)Factories
Retailer
Product Flow
Information Flow
In-Transit Merge byCarrier
Customers
16
Distributor Storage withCarrier Delivery (Fig. 4.8)
Factories
Customers
Product FlowInformation Flow
Warehouse Storage byDistributor/Retailer
17
Distributor Storage withLast Mile Delivery (Fig. 4.9)
Factories
Customers
Product Flow
Information Flow
Distributor/RetailerWarehouse
18
Manufacturer or Distributor Storage withCustomer Pickup (Fig. 4.10)
Factories
Retailer
Pickup Sites
Product FlowInformation Flow
Cross Dock DC
Customer Flow
Customers
19
Comparative Performance of DeliveryNetwork Designs (Table 4.7)
Information
Facility & Handling
Transportation
Inventory
Returnability
Order Visibility
CustomerExperience
Product Availability
Product Variety
Response Time
Manufacturerstorage with
pickup
Distributorstorage with
last miledelivery
DistributorStorage with
Package CarrierDelivery
ManufacturerStorage with In-Transit Merge
ManufacturerStorage with
Direct Shipping
Retail Storagewith
CustomerPickup
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
55
5
6
6
5
20
Linking Product Characteristics and CustomerPreferences to Network Design
Low customer effort
High product variety
Quick desired response
High product value
Many product sources
Very low demand product
Low demand product
Medium demand product
High demand product
Manufacturerstorage with
pickup
Distributor storagewith last mile
delivery
Distributor Storagewith Package
Carrier Delivery
ManufacturerStorage with
In-TransitMerge
ManufacturerStorage with
Direct Shipping
RetailStorage with
CustomerPickup
+2
+2
+2
+2
+2
+2
+2 +2 +2
+2
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1 -1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-2 -2
-2
-2
-2
-2 -2
-2
21
The Value of Distributorsin the Supply Chain
Distributing Consumer Goods in India
Distributing MRO Products
Distributing Electronic Components
22
Distribution Networks in Practice
The ownership structure of the distributionnetwork can have as big as an impact as the typeof distribution network
The choice of a distribution network has verylong-term consequences
Consider whether an exclusive distributionstrategy is advantageous
Product, price, commoditization, and criticalityhave an impact on the type of distribution systempreferred by customers
23
Summary of Learning Objectives
What are the key factors to be consideredwhen designing the distribution network?
What are the strengths and weaknesses ofvarious distribution options?
What roles do distributors play in thesupply chain?
24
Outline
A strategic framework for facility location
Multi-echelon networks
Gravity methods for location
Plant location models
25
Network Design Decisions
Facility role- flexibility of Toyota since 1997
Facility location- Amazon.com : a single warehouse in Seattle
Capacity allocation- Allocating too much poor utilization
- Allocating too little poor responsiveness, high cost
Market and supply allocation- Amazon.com : built new warehouses due to grown markets
26
Factors Influencing Network DesignDecisions
Strategic – Cost vs. Responsiveness
ex) Apparel producers, Convenience stores, Discount stores
Technological– Economies of scale few high-capacity locations
ex) Manufacturer of computer chips
– Lower fixed costs many local facilities
ex) Bottling plants for Coca-Cola
Macroeconomic– Tariffs, Tax incentives, Exchange rate and Demand risk
Political
27
Factors Influencing Network DesignDecisions (continued)
Infrastructure– availability of sites & labor
– proximity to transportation terminals, rail service, airportsand seaports
– highway access, congestion, local utilities
Competitive – Close vs. Far
ex) Retail stores in a mall, Supermarkets
Logistics and facility costs
28
The Cost-Response Time Frontier
Local FG
Mix
Regional FG
Local WIP
Central FG
Central WIP
Central Raw Material and Custom production
Custom production with raw material at suppliers
Cost
Response Time HiLow
Low
Hi
29
Service and Number of Facilities
Number of Facilities
ResponseTime
30
Where inventory needs to be…
…for a 1 week order response time [1 DC]…for a 5 day order response time [2 DCs]…for a 3 day order response time [5 DCs]…etc
31
Costs and Number of Facilities
Costs
Number of facilities
Inventory
Transportation
Facility costs
32
Percent ServiceLevel Within
Promised Time
Transportation
Cost Build-up as a function of facilitiesC
ost
of O
pera
tion
s
Number of Facilities
Inventory
Facilities
Total Costs
Labor
33
A Framework for Global Site Location
PHASE ISupply Chain
Strategy
PHASE IIRegional Facility
Configuration
PHASE IIIDesirable Sites
PHASE IVLocation Choices
Competitive STRATEGY
INTERNAL CONSTRAINTSCapital, growth strategy,existing network
PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIESCost, Scale/Scope impact, supportrequired, flexibility
COMPETITIVEENVIRONMENT
PRODUCTION METHODSSkill needs, response time
FACTOR COSTSLabor, materials, site specific
GLOBAL COMPETITION
TARIFFS AND TAXINCENTIVES
REGIONAL DEMANDSize, growth, homogeneity,local specifications
POLITICAL, EXCHANGERATE AND DEMAND RISK
AVAILABLEINFRASTRUCTURE
LOGISTICS COSTSTransport, inventory, coordination
34
Conventional Network
CustomerStore
MaterialsDC
ComponentManufacturing
VendorDC
FinalAssembly
FinishedGoods DC
ComponentsDC
VendorDC Plant
Warehouse
FinishedGoods DC
CustomerDC
CustomerDC
CustomerDC
CustomerStore
CustomerStore
CustomerStore
CustomerStore
VendorDC
5-34
35
Tailored Network: Multi - EchelonFinished Goods Network
RegionalFinished
Goods DC
RegionalFinished
Goods DC
Customer 1DC
Store 1
NationalFinished
Goods DC
Local DCCross-Dock
Local DCCross-Dock
Local DCCross-Dock
Customer 2DC
Store 1
Store 2
Store 2
Store 3
Store 3
36
Network Optimization Models
Allocating demand to production facilities
Locating facilities and allocating capacity
Which plants to establish? How to configure the network?
Key Costs:
•Fixed facility cost•Transportation cost•Production cost•Inventory cost•Coordination cost
37
Demand Allocation Model
Which market isserved by whichplant?
Which supply sourcesare used by a plant?
xij = Quantity shippedfrom plant site i tocustomer j
0
..
1
1
1 1
x
Kx
Dx
ts
xcMin
ij
i
m
jij
j
n
iij
n
i
m
jijij
38
Plant Location with Multiple Sourcing
yi = 1 if plant islocated at site i, 0otherwise
xij = Quantity shippedfrom plant site i tocustomer j
1,0;
..
1
1
1
1 11
yky
yKx
Dx
ts
xcyfMin
i
m
ii
ii
n
jij
j
n
iij
n
i
m
jijiji
n
ii
39
Capacity Investment Strategies
Speculative Strategy– Single sourcing
Hedging Strategy– Match revenue and cost exposure
Flexible Strategy– Excess total capacity in multiple plants
– Flexible technologies
40
Summary
Factors influencing facility decisions
A strategic framework for facility location
Gravity methods for location
Network optimization models
Value capacity as a real option
41
Summary of Learning Objectives
What is the role of network design decisions inthe supply chain?
What are the factors influencing supply chainnetwork design decisions?
Describe a strategic framework for facilitylocation.
How are the following optimization methods usedfor facility location and capacity allocationdecisions?– Gravity methods for location– Network optimization models
5-41
42
Location Allocation Decisions
Plants Warehouses
1
2
Which plants to establish? Which warehouses to establish?How to configure the network?
Markets
43
Plant Location with Single Sourcing
yi = 1 if plant islocated at site i, 0otherwise
xij = 1 if market j issupplied from plantsite i, 0 otherwise
1,0,;
1
..
1
1
1
1 11
yxky
yKDx
x
ts
xcyfMin
iij
n
ii
iij
n
jij
n
iij
n
i
m
jijiji
n
ii
44
Conventional Network
CustomerStore
MaterialsDC
ComponentManufacturing
VendorDC
FinalAssembly
FinishedGoods DC
ComponentsDC
VendorDC Plant
Warehouse
FinishedGoods DC
CustomerDC
CustomerDC
CustomerDC
CustomerStore
CustomerStore
CustomerStore
CustomerStore
VendorDC
45
Gravity Methods for Location
Ton-Center Solution– x,y: Warehouse
Coordinates
– xn, yn : Coordinates ofdelivery location n
– Fn : Annual tonnage todelivery location n
xx F
F
y
y F
F
i ii
n
ii
n
i ii
n
ii
n
1
1
1
1
Min ])()([ 22 yyxxF iii
Supply Chain Management
Lecture 2
Announcements
• Summer Intern Program at Ball Aerospace– 10 week summer program that provides candidates with
• Practical experience on relevant projects while working withdesignated mentors
• A competitive salary• Access to state-of-the-art equipment• Possible future employment• Housing assistance• Relocation reimbursement• In-house training• Group activities
– For more information visit• http://www.recruitingsite.com/csbsites/ball_aerospace/JobDescription.
asp?JobNumber=617603• http://www.ballaerospace.com/
Outline
• Last Tuesday– Chapter 1
• Sections 1, 2
• Today– Chapter 1
• Sections 3, 4, 5
• Next week– Chapters 2 and 3
What is a Supply Chain?
• Flow of products and services from– Suppliers– Raw materials manufacturers– Intermediate goods manufacturers– Finished goods manufacturers– Distributors and wholesalers– Retailers– Customers
• Connected through transportation, information, andexchanges of funds
Manufacturer Distributor Retailer CustomerSupplier
Key Observations
• In order to maximize supply chain surplus– Every facility that impacts costs needs to be considered
• Suppliers’ suppliers• Customers’ customers
– Efficiency throughout the supply chain network isrequired using a network level approach
What is Supply Chain Management?
Supply chain management involves themanagement of supply chain assets andproducts, information, and fund flows to
maximize total supply chain surplus
What is Supply Chain Management?
Getting the right thingsto the right placesat the right times
for profit
What is Supply Chain Management?
• “Managing supply and demand, sourcing rawmaterials and parts, manufacturing and assembly,warehousing and inventory tracking, order entryand order management, distribution across allchannels, and delivery to the customer”– The Supply Chain Council
• “The design and management of seamless,value-added process across organizationalboundaries to meet the real needs of the endcustomer”– Institute for Supply Management
What is Supply Chain Management?
• “Supply chain management is a set ofapproaches utilized to efficiently integratesuppliers, manufacturers, warehouses, andstores, so that merchandise is produced anddistributed at the right quantities, to the rightlocations, and at the right time, in order tominimize system wide costs while satisfyingservice level requirements”– Simchi-Levi et al, 2003
• Video– Ford Manufacturing Supply Chain
What is Supply Chain Management?
• Supply chain management is all aboutrelationships– Management of relationships in order to enhance value
and reduce cost– Collaboration is an important part of effective supply
chain management
Evolution of Supply Chain Management
1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s Beyond
Traditional Mass Manufacturing
Inventory Management/CostOptimization
JIT, TQM, BPR,Alliances
SCMFormation/Extensions
FurtherRefinement of
SCM Capabilities
Evolution of Supply Chain Management
• Mass production era (1900s – 1970s)– In the early 1900s, Henry Ford created the first moving assembly
line reducing the time to build a Model T from 728 hours to 1.5hours
• Lean manufacturing era (1970s –1995)– In the early 1970s, Japanese manufacturers like Toyota changed
the rules of production from mass to lean. Lean manufacturingfocuses on flexibility and quality more than on efficiency andquantity.
• Mass customization era (1995 – 2010?)– Beginning around 1995 and coinciding with the commercial
application of the Internet, manufacturers started to mass-producecustomized products. Henry Ford’s famous statement “You canhave any color Model T as long as it’s black” no longer applies.
Managing a Supply Chain is Not Easy
• Geographically dispersed complex network• Conflicting objectives across the supply chain• Uncertainty and risk factors• Information distortion
Managing a Supply Chain is Not Easy
• Geographically dispersed complex network
Managing a Supply Chain is Not Easy
• Convenience• Short lead time• Large variety ofproducts
• Few stores• Low inventory• Little variety• Close to DCs
• Low inventory• Few DCs
• Large shipments
• Large productionbatches
• Conflicting objectives across the supply chain
Manufacturer Distributor Retailer Customer
Managing a Supply Chain is Not Easy
• Uncertainty and risk factors– 2005 Hurricane Katrina
• P&G coffee supplies from sites around New Orleans• Six month impact
– 2002 West Coast port strike• Losses of $1B/day• Store stock-outs, factory shutdowns
– 2001 India earthquake• Supply interruptions for apparel manufacturers
– 1999 Taiwan earthquake• Supply interruptions for HP and Dell
Managing a Supply Chain is Not Easy
• Information distortionManufacturer Distributor Retailer CustomerSupplier
Bullwhip effect
Why Study Supply Chain Management?
The Magnitude
• In 1998, American companies spent $898 billionin supply chain related activities (or 10.6% ofGross Domestic Product)
• Third party logistics services grew in 1998 by 15%to nearly $40 billion
• It is estimated that the grocery industry couldsave $30 billion (10% of operating cost) by usingmore effective logistics strategies– A typical box of cereal spends more than three months
getting from factory to supermarket
The Potential
• In 10 years, Wal-Mart transformed itself bychanging its logistics system. It has the highestsales per square foot, inventory turnover andoperating profit of any discount retailer
• Laura Ashley turns its inventory 10 times a year,five times faster than three years ago– New information system– Centralized warehouse
The Impact
In 1996, Dell held 31 days of inventory. Itnow holds only 4 days of inventory.
The Impact
The Impact
• The Turning Point (The Economist, 9/20/07)– “For such a tiny part of GDP, the contents of warehouses has had a
surprisingly big effect on its volatility. When industries cut or add stocksaccording to demand, that adjustment magnifies the effect of the initialchange in sales. Stock levels were once much larger relative to the size ofthe economy, so a small slip in demand could easily blow up into arecession. But thanks to improvements in technology, firms now havetimelier and better information about buyers. Speedier market intelligenceand production in smaller batches allows firms to match supply tochanging conditions. This makes huge stocks unnecessary and minimizesthe lurches in inventories that were once so destabilizing. The entireinventory of some lean-running companies now consists of whateverFedEx or UPS is shipping on their account.Mr Cecchetti and his colleagues calculate that, on average, more than halfthe improvement in the stability of economic growth in the countries theystudied is accounted for by diminished inventory cycles. That somethingso workaday as supply-chain management could have so marked aneffect might seem a dull conclusion. But dullness is a virtue,because technological improvement is irreversible”
The Impact
Study of Supply Chain Management
• Successful supply chain management requiresdecisions on the flow of information, product, andfunds that fall into three decision phases– Supply chain strategy or design– Supply chain planning– Supply chain operation
Decision Phases in a Supply Chain
TYPICAL DECISIONS
Strategic
Tactical
TYPETIME FRAME
•Supply chain network design (How many plants?Location and capacities of plants and warehouses?)•Supply chain strategies (Sell direct or throughretailers? Outsource or in-house? Focus on cost orcustomer service?)•Product mix at each plant
years
•Workforce & Production planning•Inventory policies (safety stock level)•Which locations supply which markets•Transportation strategies
3 mo.- 1year
Operational•Production scheduling•Decisions regarding individual orders•Place replenishment orders
daily
Study of Supply Chain Management
• A supply chain is a sequence of processes andflows that take place within and between differentstages– Cycle view
• The processes in a supply chain are divided into a series ofcycles, each performed at the interface between twosuccessive stages of a supply chain
– Push/pull view• The processes in a supply chain are divided into two
categories depending on whether they are executed inresponse or in anticipation of a customer order
Cycle View of Supply Chain Processes
Customer Order Cycle
Replenishment Cycle
Manufacturing Cycle
Procurement Cycle
Customer
Retailer
Distributor
Manufacturer
Supplier
Cycle viewdefines theprocesses
involved andthe owner ofeach process
Subprocesses in Each Cycle
Supplier marketsthe product
Buyer
Supplier
Buyer placesan order
Supplier receivesthe order
Supplier suppliesthe order
Buyer receivesthe order
Buyer may returnthe product
Cycle View of Supply Chain Processes
Customer Order Cycle
Replenishment Cycle
Manufacturing Cycle
Procurement Cycle
Customer Order Process1. Customer Arrival2. Customer Order Entry3. Customer Order Fullfillment4. Customer Order Receiving
Procurement Process1. Component Order Arrival2. Production Scheduling3. Manufacturing/Shipping4. Receiving
Manufacturing Process1. Order Arrival2. Production Scheduling3. Manufacturing/Shipping4. Receiving
Replenishment Process1. Retail Order Trigger2. Retail Order Entry3. Retail Order Fullfillment4. Retail Order Receiving
Push/Pull View of Supply Chain Processes
Customer order arrives
PULLPROCESSES
PUSHPROCESSES
Execution is initiated inresponse to customer orders
(reactive)
Execution is initiated inanticipation of customer orders
(speculative)
Processes are divided based on the timing oftheir execution relative to a customer order
Push/Pull Processes for the Supply chainof Dell
PUSH
PULL
Customer Order Cycle andManufacturing Cycle
Procurement Cycle
Customer
Manufacturer
Supplier
Push/Pull Processes for the Supply chainof Detergent
PULL
PUSH
Customer Order Cycle
Replenishment Cycle
Manufacturing Cycle
Procurement Cycle
Customer
Retailer
Distributor
Manufacturer
Supplier
Are the following systems push or pull?
Soda vending machines
Amazon.com
Emergency care
Paint industry
Runway capacity at an Airport
Cycle View Versus Push/Pull View
Which view is more useful whenconsidering operational decisions and
which view is more useful whenconsidering strategic decisions?
Examples of Supply Chains
Celestial Seasonings
• The herbs were originally harvested by hand in the RockyMountains
• Currently, herbs and leafs come from growers around theworld– “We’ve been working to establish sustainable harvests
and fair wages for more than 30 years”
What advantages does selling tea over the Internetprovide?
What are advantages of having one production facility?
What are disadvantages of having one production facility?
17-1
Outline Chapter 17:
Supply Chain Coordination
Supply Chain Coordination and the Bullwhip Effect
Effect on Performance from Lack of Coordination
The Problem: Obstacles to Coordination in a Supply Chain
The Potential Solutions: Managerial Levers to Achieve Coordination
Achieving Coordination in Practice
– Continuous Replenishment (CRP) and Vendor-Managed Inventories (VMI)
– Collaborative Planning, Forecasting, and Replenishment (CPFR)
16-2
Supply Chain Coordination
and the Bullwhip Effect
Supply chain coordination: all stages in the supply chain take actions together (usually results in greater total supply chain profits)
– requires that each stage take into account the effects of its actions on the other stages
Lack of coordination results when:
– The objectives of different stages are conflicting
and / or
– Information moving between stages is distorted
Bullwhip Effect: The distortion of demand information as it is transmitted up the demand chain
16-3
The Beer Game: a B-school Tradition
A Team consists of 4 positions: Retailer, Wholesaler, Distributor and Factory
– Every position can see its inventory now, and expected deliveries for the next 2 periods.
Everyone is trying to minimize their costs, both as a player and as a team
– Inventory costs ($1 holding cost per period)
– Stock-out costs ($2 fee per period shorted)
Obstacles – No advance knowledge of orders
– No knowledge of what the other positions see for demand
– No communication between team positions allowed!
– You can’t cancel backorders
– There is a 2 period lead-time between each stage
See the “getting started” document
16-4
16-5
The Beer Game: Details
You have two decisions each period –1) How much to ship? 2) How much to order (or make if you are the factory) ?
– You will be prevented from shipping more than is demanded (current demand plus backordered demand) - No pushing of product is allowed!
– Game will not allow to ship more than you have in inventory
– You cannot cancel an order once placed. (Also, there is no visibility to your past orders. If you wish to record this, you must do so on paper)
You must click on “Submit Button” to enter decision
One everyone has entered all information, the game master (professor) will then advance the clock to the next period
Once that happens, you must ask for a status update
– Refresh your web browser to make sure you are in the right period
16-6
The Beer Game: Interface
Sample of Retailer screen- left part is for decision,
right part provides information:
16-7
Interface Intricacies
Once you enter these and click on the button, if you refresh, you will then see
them reflected, with your on-hand updated.
At the start of a new period the “Current Order” and “Current Shipment” are at 0.
You can re-enter decisions (until the clock is advanced)
See the Before and After screens (just below)
16-8
Final Points to Remember
You can see what your supplier will ship to you, but unless
you are the factory (where you can make as much beer as
you want), you may not get shipped what you want!
» If your supplier shorts you, then it appears as their back-order
(and costs them!)
The “back-order” displayed is from your direct customers.
It never goes away until you satisfy that demand.
– You should try to get rid of it, as it costs you money!
16-9
Beer Game Debrief
Did the system perform as you wished?
– Did you ever have too much or too little inventory?
– Were you ever surprised by the amount ordered by your client or by the
amount delivered from your supplier? Was it ever too high? Strangly
low?
What is realistic and what is unrealistic about the game?
What are ways we might improve the performance of this
supply chain?
16-10
Bullwhip Effect
Fluctuations in orders increase as they move up the supply chain from retailers to wholesalers to manufacturers to suppliers
Distorts demand information within the supply chain – different stages have different estimates of what demand looks like
Results in a loss of supply chain coordination
Manufacturer Warehouses
Retailers Consumers Wholesalers Suppliers Plants
Forecast of
Consumer demand
Forecast of
store demand
Forecast of
DC demand
Forecast of
Regional demand
Forecast of
Plant demand
Variability of demand
16-11
The Effect of Lack of
Coordination on Performance
The bullwhip effect reduces supply chain profitability by making it more expensive to provide to a given level of product availability
– Manufacturing cost (increases)
– Inventory cost (increases)
– Replenishment lead time (increases)
– Transportation cost (increases)
– Labor cost for shipping and receiving (increases)
– Level of product availability (decreases)
– Waste within the supply chain (increases)
– Relationships across the supply chain (worsens)
– Profitability (decreases)
16-12
The Problem: Obstacles to
Coordination in a Supply Chain
1. Incentive Obstacles
2. Information Processing Obstacles
3. Operational Obstacles
4. Pricing Obstacles
5. Behavioral Obstacles
16-13
1. Incentive Obstacles
When incentives offered to different stages or
participants in a supply chain lead to actions that
increase variability and reduce total supply chain
profits – misalignment of total supply chain
objectives and individual objectives
Local optimization within functions or stages of a
supply chain
Sales force incentives (e.g. Pharmaceutical sales)
16-14
2. Information Processing Obstacles
When demand information is distorted as it moves
between different stages of the supply chain, leading to
increased variability in orders within the supply chain
Forecasting based on orders, not customer demand
– As we have seen, forecasting demand based on orders magnifies
demand fluctuations moving up the supply chain from retailer to
manufacturer
Lack of information sharing
16-15
3. Operational Obstacles
Actions taken in the course of placing and filling orders that lead to an increase in variability
Ordering in large lots (much larger than dictated by demand)
Large replenishment lead times
Rationing and shortage gaming (common in the computer industry because of periodic cycles of component shortages and surpluses)
16-16
4. Pricing Obstacles
When pricing policies for a product lead to an increase in
variability of orders placed
Lot-size based quantity decisions
Price fluctuations (resulting in forward buying)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Shipments
Consumption
17-17
5. Behavioral Obstacles Problems in learning, often related to communication in the
supply chain and how the supply chain is structured
Each supply chain stage views its actions locally and is unable to see its impact on other stages
Different stages react to the current local situation rather than trying to identify the root causes
Based on local analysis, different stages blame each other for the fluctuations, with successive stages becoming enemies rather than partners
No stage learns from its actions over time because the most significant consequences of the actions of any one stage occur elsewhere, resulting in a vicious cycle of actions and blame
Lack of trust results in opportunism, duplication of effort, and lack of information sharing
17-18
Potential Solutions: Managerial
Levers to Achieve Coordination
1. Aligning Goals and Incentives
2. Improving Information Accuracy
3. Improving Operational Performance
4. Designing Pricing Strategies to Stabilize Orders
5. Building Strategic Partnerships and Trust
17-19
Aligning Goals and Incentives
Align incentives so that each participant has an
incentive to do the things that will maximize total
supply chain profits
Align incentives across functions
Pricing for coordination
Alter sales force incentives from sell-in (to the
retailer) to sell-through (by the retailer)
17-20
Improving Information Accuracy
Sharing point of sale (POS) data
Collaborative forecasting and planning
Single stage control of replenishment
We will discuss this later in:
– Continuous replenishment programs (CRP)
– Vendor managed inventory (VMI)
17-21
Improving Operational Performance
Reducing replenishment lead time
– Reduces uncertainty in demand
– EDI is useful
Reducing lot sizes
– Computer-assisted ordering, B2B exchanges
– Shipping in LTL sizes by combining shipments
– Technology and other methods to simplify receiving
– Changing customer ordering behavior
Rationing based on past sales and sharing information to limit gaming
– “Turn-and-earn”
– Information sharing
17-22
Designing Pricing Strategies
to Stabilize Orders
Encouraging retailers to order in smaller lots and reduce forward buying
Moving from lot size-based to volume-based quantity discounts (consider total purchases over a specified time period)
Stabilizing pricing
– Eliminate promotions (everyday low pricing, EDLP)
– Limit quantity purchased during a promotion
– Tie promotion payments to sell-through rather than amount purchased
Building strategic partnerships and trust – easier to implement these approaches if there is trust
17-23
Building Strategic Partnerships
and Trust in a Supply Chain
Designing a Relationship with Cooperation and Trust
Managing Supply Chain Relationships for Cooperation and Trust
Move to a trust-based relationship
– Supply chain relationships are based on power or trust
– Ultimately, trust-based relationships better than power-based
Cooperation and trust work because:
– Alignment of incentives and goals
– Actions to achieve coordination are easier to implement
– Supply chain productivity improves by reducing duplication or allocation of effort to appropriate stage
– Greater information sharing results
17-24
Achieving Coordination in Practice
Quantify the bullwhip effect
Get top management commitment
– And then devote resources to coordination
Focus on communication with other stages
– Use information technology wisely
Try to achieve coordination in the entire supply chain network
– However, before attempting to change the world, may help to start simple (DC vs. Retail CPFR, pilot studies, etc)
Share the benefits of coordination equitably
Some examples follow….
Continuous Replenishment and
Vendor-Managed Inventories
Over-arching idea: Remove inventory distortions by having a
single point of replenishment
Continuous RePlenishment, CRP – wholesaler, manufacturer
or 3rd party replenishes based on POS data
A type of CRP is VMI – where the manufacturer/supplier is
responsible for all decisions regarding inventory
– Positives: less stockpiling of intermediate inventories, manufacturer
may know more about the product and consumer demand patterns than
retailer, e.g. MGM DVDs at Wal-Mart
– Cons: Requires the manufacturer to have sophisticated IT and/or
logistical support, as manufacturers will ignore other brands that may be
near perfect substitutes, overall inventory levels may be higher
17-25
Collaborative Planning, Forecasting,
and Replenishment (CPFR)
While they may still act individually (unlike CRP/VMI)…
Sellers and buyers in a supply chain can still collaborate along
any or all of the following:
– Strategy and planning
– Demand and supply management
– Execution
– Analysis
Example: Henkel (German detergent) supplied into Grupo
Eroski (supermarkets in Spain)
Common scenarios: Retail event collaboration, assortment
planning (especially for fashion/seasonal goods) DC and/or
store replenishment
Risks and Hurdles for a CPFR implementation 17-26
17-27
Summary of Learning Objectives
What is supply chain coordination and the bullwhip effect, and how does the bullwhip effect hurt supply chain performance?
What are obstacles to coordination in the supply chain?
What are the potential solutions to addressing these obstacles?
What are some ways companies can do this in practice?
13-1
(Shortened) Outline Chapter 13:
Transportation in a Supply Chain
Some of this material is covered in the Sustainable Supply
Chain overview, and we will skip much of the chapter
The role of Transportation in the Supply Chain
Factors affecting transportation decisions
Modes of transportation and their performance characteristics
Trade-offs in transportation design
Tailored transportation
The role of IT in transportation
Risk management in transportation
Making transportation decisions in practice
The Role of Transportation in the
Supply Chain
To move the product through the chain to the end consumer
Some fun facts
– US: freight transport activities account for 10% of GDP
» It is estimated that JIT inventory policies and other efficiencies have been
able to reduce this from historical rates of around ~15%
– Germany: per www.bmvbs.de
» The German freight logistics sector is currently the largest in Europe.
» (In) 2005 …estimated to be around 170 billion euros. …7%of German GDP
» the freight logistics sector comes third after retail trade and the automotive
industry, with an estimated 2.5 million employees, (and is)… growing at a
disproportionately high rate
» “Interconnection of infrastructure, information and organization is a pre-
condition for Germany to master the challenges ….At the same time
Germany must face the challenges of making freight transport more
environmentally-, climate- and resource- friendly”
13-2
13-3
Factors (and Parties) Affecting
Transportation Decisions
From earlier, we know that there may be three separate parties
involved. All of them have factors to consider:
1. Carrier (party that moves or transports the product)
– Vehicle-related costs, Fixed operating costs, Trip-related costs
– Often incurs huge investments (new fleets, etc…)
2. Shipper (party that requires the movement of the product
between two points in the supply chain)
– May need to balance Transportation costs with Inventory and Facility costs
3. Consignee (party that receives the shipment)
– May have certain responsiveness needs
We should also consider:
4. The owners of the infrastructure (Ports, highways, railroads)
5. Government and/or bodies that set worldwide transportation policy
13-4
Transportation Modes
Trucks
– TL
– LTL
Rail
Air
Water
Pipeline (highly limited by geography and product)
Package Carriers (still using trucks, but the focus is on
delivery of a few packages)
13-5
Truckload (TL) vs. Less than
Truckload (LTL)
TL
Cheaper than LTL for large
shipments
Average haul = 274 miles
Great for large loads
Low fixed and variable costs
Major Issues (especially when
economies of scale are missing)
Utilization
Consistent service
Backhauls
LTL
Typically used for smaller
shipments
Average haul = 646 miles
Higher fixed costs
(terminals/consolidation
centers) but low variable costs
Major issues: Location of consolidation
facilities
Utilization can still be an issue
Vehicle routing, other IT
complexities
Customer service
13-6
Rail
Cheapest of the land-based modes
– Uses less fuel, so also greener
Average US haul, load= 720 miles, 80 tons
Key issues:
– Scheduling to minimize delays / improve service
– Off-track delays (at pickup and delivery end)
– Yard operations
– Variability of delivery times
– Ownership of rail network in the US is highly fragmented
– Rail does not and cannot reach everywhere
13-7
Air
Fastest mode, often used for global transit of expensive items
– Use is growing (14% per year in US, see usage in Europe in graph below)
Key issues:
– Complex: Location/number of hubs, Location of fleet bases/crew bases,
Schedule optimization, Fleet + Crew assignment, yield management….
– Expensive, EXPENSIVE, EXPENSIVE
– Most energy/emissions intensive
13-8
Package Carriers
Companies like DHL, FedEx, UPS, USPS, that carry small
packages ranging from letters to shipments of about 150 pounds
Expensive
Rapid and reliable delivery
Small and time-sensitive shipments
Preferred mode for e-businesses (e.g., Amazon)
Consolidation of shipments (especially important for package
carriers that use air as a primary method of transport)
– Interestingly, a lot of package carriers have, through their own need for
such networks, expanded into being full service 3PLs (DHL is world’s
largest)
13-9
Water
Ocean, inland waterway system, coastal waters
– Limited to certain geographic areas
Very large loads at very low cost
– Lowest energy/emission intensity per tonne-km, though some concern
about port pollution
Slowest
– Also subject to bottlenecks at Ports
Dominant in overseas trade (autos, grain, apparel, etc.)
Book example of successful usage: IKEA
» As per 2008: 250 stores in 24 countries, sales: 21+ billion euro
» Internationally sourced goods
» IKEA makes very strong use of water and other low cost transport
13-10
Pipeline
High fixed cost
Primarily for crude petroleum, refined petroleum products,
natural gas
Best for large and predictable demand
Would be used for getting crude oil to a port or refinery,
but not for getting refined gasoline to a gasoline station
13-11
Intermodal
Use of more than one mode of transportation to move a shipment to its destination
– rail/truck, water/rail/truck or water/truck
Grown considerably with increased use of containers
Increased global trade has also increased use of intermodal transportation
More convenient for shippers (one entity can provide the complete service)
Key issue involves the exchange of information to facilitate transfer between different transport modes
13-12
Design Options for a
Transportation Network
What are the transportation options? On what basis do we design
our network?
Consider the tradeoffs:
– Transportation cost vs. inventory cost
» Choice of transportation mode: A mode with higher transportation costs
may be justifiable if it results in significantly lower inventories or is
necessary to maintain strategic level of responsiveness
» Physical inventory aggregation
– Transportation cost vs. responsiveness: temporal aggregation
We won’t cover all the networks in the book, i.e. “milk runs” etc.
– Instead we will look at a transportation LP (SRH students- we don’t even do
this!)
13-13
Tailored Transportation
The use of different transportation networks and/or modes based
on customer and product characteristics
Factors affecting tailoring:
– Customer distance and density
– Customer size
– Product demand and value
Some examples:
– GAP primarily imports from its contract manufacturers worldwide by
cargo ship. However, for some high-margin or otherwise key products,
they may use some air freight for mid-season replenishment
– Keeco, LLC supplies home furnishings. They primarily use trucking to
deliver goods from their warehouse to retail stores, but occasionally they
will use parcel delivery for small replenishment orders instead of sending
out a mostly empty truck.
13-14
Role of IT in Transportation
The complexity of transportation decisions demands
use of IT systems
– Especially crucial with intermodal transportation, need for
cross-enterprise collaboration
Information Technology can assist in many ways:
– Identification of optimal routes by minimizing costs subject
to delivery constraints (such as LPs)
– Optimal fleet utilization
– GPS applications
– Finding backhaul opportunities www.coyotelogistics.com
13-15
Risk Management in Transportation
Three main risks to be considered in transportation are:
– Risk that the shipment is delayed
– Risk of disruptions
» When the International Longshore & Warehouse Union strike/lockout closed 29 West Coast ports for 10 days in 2003, one study estimated it cost the U.S.economy $19.4 billion (that’s almost $2 billion per day!)
» 2011 Tsunami: not only impacting auto manufacturers on the Island, but so are the dealers/repair shops
– Risk of hazardous material issues, theft, terrorism (the dirty secret about dirty bombs….)
Risk mitigation strategies:
– Decrease the probability of disruptions
– Alternative routings
– In case of hazardous materials the use of modified containers, low-risk transportation models, modification of physical and chemical properties can prove to be effective
13-16
Making Transportation
Decisions in Practice
Align transportation strategy with competitive strategy
– Does your transportation strategy balance responsiveness vs.
efficiency?
– Does it consider sustainability?
Evaluate both in-house and outsourced transportation
options
Design a transportation network that can handle
e-commerce, if that is part of your business plan
Use technology to improve transportation performance
Design flexibility into the transportation network
13-17
Summary of Chapter 13’s Learning
Objectives
1. What is the role of transportation in a supply chain?
2. What are some of the factors and parties that need to
be considered?
3. What are the strengths and weaknesses of different
modes of transportation?
4. What are the trade-offs in transportation network
design?
Supply/Demand Chain Introduction, Overview and Strategy
These slides address chapters 1 through 3 of the
textbook, with some information already found in the
earlier “Sustainable Demand Chain Management: an
Introduction” de-emphasized
While the slide decks are based on the textbook, they
have been customized for this class
– Additional materials are often included
– Professorial commentary that expresses a different
viewpoint than in the text will be noted in a different color
1-1
1-2
Overview of Course
1. Chapters 1-3 + additional slide deck: Introduction, Overview
and Strategy
2. Chapters 4-6: Network Planning and Distribution
3. Chapters 8-9: Aggregate Planning
4. Chapters 10-11, 13+ additional slide deck: Inventory and
Transportation
5. Chapter 17: Supply Chain Coordination
1-3
Who Needs to Know About this
Topic?
Anyone involved in a manufacturing or service
industry where capacities and raw materials cannot be
obtained or expanded without a time or cost penalty
– Executives and Entrepreneurs must understand the strategic
importance of the Supply Chain
– Managers, Consultants and Software Designers need to be
able to analyze, design, and implement Supply Chain
solutions
1-4
Supply Chain Management is not
Learned just Through a Textbook
The “best” solution to a Supply Chain problem may not win
– An elegant, mathematically complex LP presented such that only Ph.D.s
understand may not be the best practical solution to the problem at hand.
And even if it is, it is not the one that will be awarded the contract!
Supply Chain Practitioners need soft skills
– Work effectively with clients and team members, including being
responsive to questions and requests
– You must package and sell your proposed solution
Supply Chain Practitioners need hard skills
– Lots of data, need to understand processes and interactions with IT
– Work usually involves creating or adapting large-scale computer models
The class is designed for you to practice both hard and soft skills
1-5
Traditional View: Logistics in the
US Economy (2006, 2007)
Freight Transportation $809, $856 Billion
Inventory Expense $446, $487 Billion
Administrative Expense $50, $54 Billion
Total Logistics Costs $1.31, $1.4 Trillion
Logistics Related Activity 10%, 10.1% of GNP
– About 21% of total costs for a manufacturing firm
– Logistical costs percentages are higher in the EU
But supply chain is more than logistics….
Source: 18th and 19th Annual State of Logistics Report – Logistics Magazine
1-6
Supply Chain Management:
Mishaps and Opportunities
Estimated that the grocery industry could save $30 billion (10%
of operating cost) by using effective logistics and supply chain
strategies
– A typical box of cereal spends 104 days from factory to sale
– A typical car spends 15 days from factory to dealership
Compaq estimates it lost $.5 billion to $1 billion in sales in
1995 because laptops were not available when and where
needed
When the 1 gig processor was introduced by AMD, the price of
its previous version, the 800 megabyte processor, dropped by
30%
– What happened to firms who had stockpiled those?
1-7
Chapter 1 Outline
What is a Supply Chain? (We covered this earlier)
Decision Phases in a Supply Chain
Process View of a Supply Chain
The Importance of Supply Chain Flows
A Brief Review of Material to Date
Typical stages: (from a demand chain perspective)
customers<retailers<distributors<manufacturers<suppliers
– All stages may not be present- Can you think of some well
known companies that are missing a stage?
– What stage is always present?
The obvious flow is the movement of products from
suppliers to the customer, but also includes movement
of information, funds, and products in both directions
– Reverse logistics is an important facet of both sustainability
and CRM initiatives, will be discussed later.
1-8
1-9
The Objective of a Supply Chain
Sources of supply chain revenue: the customer
Sources of supply chain cost: flows of information,
products, or funds between stages of the supply chain
Supply chain management is ….
– Book: …the management of flows between and among
supply chain stages to maximize total supply chain
profitability
– Professor commentary: …is the coordination of business
functions within an organization and its channel partners in
order to provide goods and services to fulfill customer
demand responsively, efficiently and sustainably
1-10
Dell Computer: Illustration of
Supply Chain Success
Example: Dell receives $1000 from a customer for a computer (revenue)
Supply chain incurs costs (information, storage, transportation, components, assembly, etc.)
Difference between $1000 and the sum of all of these costs is the supply chain profit
– Time value of money often plays a role
Supply chain profitability is the total profit to be shared across all stages of the supply chain
Supply chain success should be measured by total supply chain profitability, not profits at an individual stage
– In practice this may be difficult when stages are separate firms
1-11
Decision Phases of a Supply Chain
1. Supply chain strategy (also called chain design)
2. Supply chain planning
3. Supply chain operation
1-12
Supply Chain Strategy (or Design)
Decisions about the structure of the supply chain and what processes each stage will perform
Strategic supply chain decisions
– Locations and capacities of facilities
– Products to be made or stored at various locations
– Modes of transportation
– Information systems
Supply chain design must support strategic objectives
Supply chain design decisions are long-term and expensive to reverse – must take into account market uncertainty
Decisions often analyzed first through models and simulations
1-13
Supply Chain Planning
Definition of a set of policies that govern short-term
operations - typically a quarter to a couple years
Fixed by the supply configuration from previous phase
– Typically starts with a forecast of demand in the coming year
Planning decisions:
– Which markets will be supplied from which locations
– Planned buildup of inventories, inventory policies
– Subcontracting, backup locations
– Timing and size of market promotions
Must consider demand uncertainty, exchange rates,
competition over the time horizon
1-14
Supply Chain Operations
Time horizon is weekly or daily
Decisions regarding individual customer orders
Supply chain configuration is fixed and operating policies are determined
Goal is to implement the operating policies as effectively as possible
Allocate orders to inventory or production, set order due dates, generate pick lists at a warehouse, allocate an order to a particular shipment, set delivery schedules, place replenishment orders
Much less uncertainty (due to short time horizon)
1-15
Process View of a Supply Chain
Cycle view: processes in a supply chain are divided
into a series of cycles, each performed at the
interfaces between two successive supply chain stages
– We will not be emphasizing the cycle view in class, as not
all chains have all stages present
Push/pull view: processes in a supply chain are
divided into two categories depending on whether
they are executed in response to a customer order
(pull) or in anticipation of a customer order (push)
1-16
Push/Pull View of Supply Chains
Actions initiated from Suppliers Retail/Customer
Initiated Action
The barrier between push
And pull may vary for different
companies and industries
PUSH PROCESSES PULL PROCESSES
1-17
Push/Pull View of
Supply Chain Processes
Supply chain processes fall into one of two categories
depending on the timing of their execution relative to
customer demand
– Pull: execution is initiated in response to a customer order
(reactive)
– Push: execution is initiated in anticipation of customer
orders (speculative)
Push/pull boundary separates push processes from
pull processes
– The relative proportion of push and pull processes can have
an impact on supply chain performance
2-18
Outline: Chapter 2 - Chain Performance:
Achieving Strategic Fit and Scope
Competitive and supply chain strategies
Achieving strategic fit
Expanding strategic scope
2-19
Competitive and Supply
Chain Strategies
Competitive strategy: defines the set of customer needs a firm
seeks to satisfy through its products and services
Product development strategy: specifies the portfolio of new
products that the company will try to develop
Marketing and sales strategy: specifies how the market will be
segmented and product positioned, priced, and promoted
Supply chain strategy:
– determines the nature of material procurement, transportation of
materials, manufacture of product or creation of service, distribution of
product
– Consistency and support between supply chain strategy, competitive
strategy, and other functional strategies is important
2-20
The Value Chain: Linking Supply
Chain and Business Strategy
New
Product
Development
Marketing
and
Sales
Operations Distribution Service
Overall Competitive Strategy
Product Dev.
Strategy Marketing
Strategy Supply Chain Strategy
2-21
Achieving Strategic Fit
Strategic fit:
– Consistency between customer priorities of competitive
strategy and supply chain capabilities specified by the
supply chain strategy
– Competitive and supply chain strategies have the same
goals
A company may fail because of a lack of strategic fit
or because its processes and resources do not provide
the capabilities to execute the desired strategy
Example of strategic fit – Dell’s varied sales channels
2-22
How is Strategic Fit Achieved?
Step 1: Understanding the customer and the supply
chain uncertainty
Step 2: Understanding the supply chain capabilities
Step 3: Achieving strategic fit
2-23
Step 1: Understanding the Customer
and Supply Chain Uncertainty
Identify the needs of the customer segment being served
– Quantity of product needed in each lot
– Response time customers will tolerate
– Variety of products needed
– Service level required
– Price of the product
– Desired rate of innovation in the product
– Demand uncertainty: How much does customer demand for a
product vary?
– Are there particular needs related to Sustainability?
2-24
Step 1: Understanding the Customer
and Supply Chain Uncertainty
Key Point: Implied Demand Uncertainty is more than
just Demand Uncertainty
Demand uncertainty: uncertainty of customer demand for a
product
Implied demand uncertainty: resulting uncertainty for the
supply chain given the portion of the demand the supply chain
must handle and the attributes the customer desires from the
product and the experience of purchasing it:
– For example: if customers require very fast service or if they are many
varieties of the product (and customers are picky about what they get)
implied demand uncertainty is higher.
2-25
Impact of Customer Needs on Implied
Demand Uncertainty
Customer Need Causes implied demand
uncertainty to increase because …
Range of quantity required increases Wider range of quantity required
implies greater variance in demand
Lead time required to decrease Less time to react to orders
Variety of products required increases Demand per product becomes more
disaggregated
Number of channels through which
product may be acquired increases
Total customer demand is now
disaggregated over more channels
Rate of innovation must increase New products tend to have more
uncertain demand
Required service level must increase Firm now has to handle unusual
surges in demand
Supply Uncertainty
Now turn away from demand briefly to look at other side of the
coin: Supply
Supply Uncertainty – variability associated with getting the
right amount of the product at the right time
Will increase with….
– Unpredictable/low yields problematic issue from high tech
(semiconductor) to low tech- traditional agriculture)
– Limited/inflexible supply capacity
– Evolving production process
First step to achieving strategic fit is to understand customers
and their inherent implied demand uncertainty, and also
consider effects from Supply Uncertainty, mapping both onto
the implied uncertainty spectrum
1-26
2-27
Implied Uncertainty Spectrum
Predictable
supply and
demand
Salt at a
supermarket
A new communication
device
Highly uncertain
supply and demand
Figure 2.2: The Implied Uncertainty (Demand and Supply)
Spectrum
Predictable supply and uncertain demand or uncertain supply and
predictable demand or somewhat
uncertain supply and demand
An existing
automobile
model
There are exceptions- for example, with salt, think of Fleur de Sel or pink Himalayan salt!
Many firms have attempted to move their products upstream, eg. Fresh Choice: bagged salads
2-28
Step 2: Understanding the
Supply Chain Capabilities
How does the firm best meet demand?
One dimension describing the chain is supply chain responsiveness
– respond to wide ranges of quantities demanded
– meet short lead times
– handle a large variety of products
– build highly innovative products
– meet a very high service level
There is a cost to achieving responsiveness
Supply chain efficiency: cost of making and delivering the product
to the customer
– Increasing responsiveness usually results in higher costs, lowing efficiency
Second step to achieving strategic fit is to map the supply chain on
the responsiveness spectrum
2-29
High Low
Low
High
Responsiveness
Cost
Understanding the Supply Chain: Cost-
Responsiveness Efficient Frontier
2-30
Responsiveness Spectrum
Integrated
steel mill-
Production
scheduled
months in
advance
7-11 Japan,
Changes
merchandise
Mix by location
and time of day
Highly
efficient
Highly
responsive
Somewhat
efficient
Somewhat
responsive
Hanes
Apparel,
Traditional
Make-to-stock
Manufacturer
With lead-times
of several weeks
Most
automotive
Production, large
Variety of products
in a few weeks,
Some customization
So now we have two spectrums (lines)- what do you think is next?
2-31
Step 3: Achieving Strategic Fit
Third Step is to ensure that what the supply chain does well is
consistent with target customer’s needs
All functions in the value chain must support the competitive
strategy to achieve strategic fit
Barilla Pasta and Apple Computer are examples of companies
that are “in the Zone”
– Do you think their supply chain strategies are similar?
Key points
– There is no one right supply chain for all companies
– there is a right supply chain strategy for a given competitive strategy
– In balancing efficiency and responsiveness, it is still critical to
remember sustainability
2-32
Achieving Strategic Fit Shown on the
Uncertainty/Responsiveness Map
Implied
uncertainty
spectrum
Responsive
supply chain
Efficient
supply chain
More
Certain
Highly
Uncertain
Responsiveness
spectrum
2-33
Comparison of Efficient and
Responsive Supply Chains
Efficient Responsive
Primary goal Lowest cost Quick response
Product design strategy Min product cost Modularity to allow
postponement
Pricing strategy Lower margins Higher margins
Mfg strategy High utilization Capacity flexibility
Inventory strategy Minimize inventory Buffer inventory
Lead time strategy Reduce but not at expense
of greater cost
Aggressively reduce even if
costs are significant
Supplier selection strategy Cost and, typically lower
quality
Speed, flexibility, quality
Transportation strategy Greater reliance on low cost
modes
Greater reliance on
responsive (fast) modes
2-34
Other Issues Affecting Strategic Fit
1. Multiple products and customer segments
2. Product life cycle
3. Competitive changes over time
4. Sustainability
2-35
Multiple Products and
Customer Segments
Firms sell different products to different customer
segments (with different implied demand uncertainty)
The supply chain has to be able to balance efficiency
and responsiveness given its portfolio of products and
customer segments
Two approaches:
1. Different supply chains for different products/customers
or
2. Tailor supply chain to best meet the needs of each product’s
demand. Example: W.W. Grainger, MRO
2-36
Product Life Cycle
The demand characteristics of a product and the needs
of a customer segment change as a product goes
through its life cycle
– Examples: pharmaceutical firms, Intel
As the product goes through the life cycle, the supply
chain changes from one emphasizing responsiveness to
one emphasizing efficiency
Supply chain strategy must evolve throughout life cycle
– Early: uncertain demand, high margins (time is important),
product availability is most important, cost is secondary
– Late: predictable demand, lower margins, price is important
2-37
Competitive Changes Over Time
Competitive pressures can change over time
More competitors may result in an increased emphasis
on variety at a reasonable price
The Internet makes it easier to offer a wide variety of
products
The supply chain must change to meet these changing
competitive conditions
– Example Dell used to sell PCs and laptops only via internet,
but now also sells at Wal-Mart
Sustainability
Consider both Ethical as well as Environmental issues
Sustainability policies may be driven by either
regulation or risk factors
– WEEE- EU regulation forced electronics providers to
rethink SCs
– Supplier risk
– Demand risk, consumer expectations
May be complex relationships between
responsiveness, efficiency and sustainability issues
– Sometimes, but not always, involving tradeoffs
2-38
2-39
Expanding Strategic Scope
Scope of strategic fit : The functions and stages within a supply chain that devise an integrated strategy with a shared objective
– One extreme: each function at each stage develops its own strategy
– Other extreme: all functions in all stages devise a strategy jointly
From least to most evolved/expanded….
1. Intracompany intraoperation scope – silos!
2. Intracompany intrafunctional scope
3. Intracompany interfunctional scope
4. Intercompany interfunctional scope - CPFR…
5. Agile Intercompany, interfunctional scope - 3+ companies
Obstacles to Achieving Strategic Fit
In short: today’s business environment is more
challenging for companies
1. Increasing variety of products
2. Shorter product life cycles (technology development, trend)
3. Increasingly picky customers
4. Fragmentation of chain ownership
5. Globalization, on supply-side and also the demand side*
6. Rapidly changing business environment
7. Difficulties with executing new strategies
8. Especially for 2007-2011 timeframe- economic cycle
2-40 *see the P&G Swiffer in Italy story
3-41
Outline: Chapter 3- Supply Chain
Drivers and Metrics
Drivers of supply chain performance
A framework for structuring drivers
Detailed view for each driver and appropriate metrics
3-42
Drivers of Supply Chain Performance
1. Facilities
– places where inventory is stored, assembled, or fabricated
– production sites and storage sites
2. Inventory
– raw materials, WIP, finished goods within a supply chain
– inventory policies
3. Transportation
– moving inventory from point to point in a supply chain
– combinations of transportation modes and routes
4. Information
– data & analysis regarding inventory, transportation, facilities throughout the chain
– potentially the biggest driver of chain performance
5. Sourcing
– functions a firm performs and functions that are outsourced
6. Pricing
– Price associated with goods and services provided by a firm to the supply chain
3-43
A Framework for
Structuring Drivers
Competitive Strategy
Supply Chain
Strategy
Efficiency Responsiveness
Facilities Inventory Transportation
Information
Supply chain structure
Cross Functional Drivers
Sourcing Pricing
Logistical Drivers
** also includes Sustainability
**
3-44
Facilities
Role in the supply chain- the “where”
– manufacturing or storage (warehouses)
Role in the competitive strategy
– economies of scale (efficiency priority)
– larger number of smaller facilities (responsiveness priority)
Components of facilities decisions
– Location
» centralization (efficiency) vs. decentralization (responsiveness)
» other factors to consider (e.g., proximity to customers)
– Capacity (flexibility versus efficiency)
– Manufacturing methodology (product focused versus process focused)
– Warehousing methodology (SKU storage, job lot storage, cross-docking)
Overall trade-off: Responsiveness versus efficiency
3-45
Inventory
Role in the supply chain
– Exists because of a mismatch between supply and demand
– Source of cost and influence on responsiveness
– Given Little’s Law, if throughput=demand, then inventory synonymous
with material flow time
Role in the competitive strategy
– If responsiveness is a strategic competitive priority, a firm can locate
larger amounts of inventory closer to customers
– If cost is more important, inventory can be reduced (or consolidated
further away) to make the firm more efficient
– Example: High-service department store: Nordstrom’s
We will spend 2 chapters in this class on inventory policies!
3-46
Components of Inventory
Decisions
Cycle inventory
– Average amount of inventory used to satisfy demand between shipments
– Depends on lot size
Safety inventory
– inventory held in case demand exceeds expectations
– costs of carrying too much inventory versus cost of losing sales
Seasonal inventory
– inventory built up to counter predictable variability in demand
– cost of carrying additional inventory versus cost of flexible production
Overall trade-off: Responsiveness versus efficiency
– more inventory: greater responsiveness but greater cost
– less inventory: lower cost but lower responsiveness
3-47
Transportation
Role in the supply chain
– Moves the product between stages in the supply chain
– Impact on responsiveness and efficiency
– Faster transportation allows greater responsiveness but lower efficiency
– Also affects inventory and facilities
Role in the competitive strategy
– If responsiveness is a strategic competitive priority, then faster
transportation modes can provide greater responsiveness to customers
who are willing to pay for it
– Can also use slower transportation modes for customers whose priority
is price (cost)
– Can also consider both inventory and transportation to find the right
balance
3-48
Components of
Transportation Decisions
Mode of transportation:
– air, truck, rail, ship, pipeline, electronic transportation
– Utilization and backhaul rates should be considered
– vary in cost, speed, size of shipment, flexibility, carbon footprint
Route and network selection
– route: path along which a product is shipped
– network: collection of locations and routes
In-house or outsource (see driver #5)
Overall trade-off: Responsiveness versus efficiency
3-49
Information
Role in the supply chain
– The connection between the various stages in the supply chain – allows
coordination between stages
– Crucial to daily operation of each stage in a supply chain – e.g.,
production scheduling, inventory levels
Role in the competitive strategy
– Allows supply chain to become more efficient and more responsive at
the same time (reduces the need for a trade-off)
– Need to ask: what information is most valuable?
3-50
Components of Information
Decisions
Components of information decisions
– Push (MRP) versus pull (need demand information across
all stages)
– Coordination and information sharing
– Forecasting and aggregate planning
– Enabling technologies include the following:
» EDI
» Internet
» ERP systems
» Supply Chain Management software
» RFID
– Still some tradeoff exists: Responsiveness versus efficiency
3-51
Sourcing
Role in the supply chain
– Set of business processes required to purchase goods and services in a chain
» Examples: contract manufacturers, Transportation/Inventory services- 3PL
– Supplier selection, single vs. multiple suppliers, contract negotiation
Role in the competitive strategy
– Sourcing decisions are crucial because they affect the level of efficiency and
responsiveness in a supply chain
– In-house vs. outsource decisions- improving efficiency and responsiveness
» Example: Expedited delivery usually requires Parcel Delivery
Components of sourcing decisions
– Perform a task in-house versus outsource?
– Supplier evaluation and selection
– Procurement process
– Overall trade-off: balance profitability (Risk? Ethical issues?)
3-52
Pricing
Role in the supply chain
– Pricing determines the amount to charge customers
– Pricing strategies can be used to match demand and supply
Role in the competitive strategy
– Firms can utilize optimal pricing strategies to improve efficiency and
responsiveness
– Low price and low product availability; vary prices by response times
Components of pricing decisions
– Pricing and economies of scale
– Everyday low pricing versus high-low pricing
– Fixed price versus menu pricing
– Overall trade-off: Increase the firm profits
We will explore effects from some of these pricing decisions later
Metrics
The performance for these supply chain drivers can be quantified
with metrics. Here’s some examples we will work with during
this term:
1. Facilities: Capacity, Utilization rate, per unit production cost
2. Inventory: Days-OnHand (Dollars-OnHand), Safety Stock, Stockout %
3. Transportation: Fraction transported by mode, inbound/outbound
shipment size, inbound/outbound transportation cost per unit
4. Information: Forecast error, ratio of demand variability to order variability
5. Sourcing: supplier lead time, average purchase price, supplier reliability
6. Pricing: profit margin, fixed cost per order, variable cost per unit
Certain metrics will be more important than others for different
firms with different supply chain strategies
Information Overload: SCOR has over 150+ KPIs
3-53
1-54
Summary of Learning Objectives-
Chapter 1
What are supply chain stages?
What are the three flows within a supply chain?
What are the three key supply chain decision phases
and what is the significance of each?
What is the push/pull view of a supply chain?
What is the goal of a supply chain and what is the
impact of supply chain decisions on the success of the
firm?
2-55
Summary of Learning Objectives
for Chapter 2
Why is achieving strategic fit critical to a company’s
overall success?
How does implied demand uncertainty differ from
demand uncertainty?
How does a company achieve strategic fit between its
supply chain strategy and its competitive strategy?
What are some complications to achieving this fit?
3-56
Summary of Learning Objectives
for Chapter 3
What are the major drivers of supply chain
performance?
What is the role of each driver in creating strategic fit
between supply chain strategy and competitive strategy
(or between implied demand uncertainty and supply
chain responsiveness)?
What are some relevant metrics?
In the remainder of the course, we will learn how to make
decisions with respect to these drivers in order to achieve
strategic fit and surmount these obstacles
4-1
Chapter 4 Outline: Designing Distribution
Networks and Applications to e-Business
The Role of Distribution in the Supply Chain
Factors Influencing Distribution Network Design
Design Options for a Distribution Network
E-Business and the Distribution Network
4-2
The Role of Distribution
in the Supply Chain
Distribution: the steps taken to move and store a product from
the supplier stage to the customer stage in a supply chain
– Distribution directly affects cost and the customer experience and
therefore drives profitability
Factors Influencing Distribution Network Design: As choice of
distribution network can achieve supply chain objectives from
low cost to high responsiveness:
– Distribution network performance evaluated along two dimensions at the
highest level (and when sustainability is explicitly considered, three):
» Customer needs that are met
» Cost of meeting customer needs
» Affect on sustainability
– Distribution network design options must therefore be compared
according to their impact on customer service and the cost to provide this
level of service as well as any significant sustainability impacts
4-3
Distribution Networks in Practice
DC = Distribution Center (effectively synonymous w/ Wholesaler)
– DCs can be operated by a manufacturer, retailer or completely separate player
– Types of DCs 1. Break-bulk
2. Transport optimizers, especially Cross-Dock
3. Fast response -aggregate inventory (risk-pooling) yet still quick delivery to customer, e.g. MRO
Product, price, commoditization, and criticality (item’s importance) have an impact on the type of distribution system
The choice of a distribution network has very long-term consequences
– Consider whether an exclusive distribution strategy is advantageous
– The ownership structure of the distribution network can have as big as an impact as the type of distribution network (ex. Naya water/CCE distribution)
4-4
A Professorial Aside: Value of
Distributors in the Supply Chain
Are distributors an unnecessary link?
Consolidate small or varied replenishment orders (breaking bulk
orders and centralizing safety stocks)
– Consumer Packaged Goods in India
– Pharmaceuticals: 5-6 distributors in U.S. handle thousands of retailers who
order from hundreds of manufacturers
Sometimes mandated by regulation: For alcohol sales in the US,
the 2nd tier is mandated in 48 states, serves as a tax collection point
Distributors typically have low margins (1%-2%), so are
motivated to be efficient
4-5
Factors Influencing
Distribution Network Design
Elements of customer service (responsiveness) that are
influenced by network structure:
– Response time
– Product variety & availability
– Customer experience
– Order visibility
– Returnability (for both customer service and sustainability reasons)
Supply chain costs affected by network structure (4 of 6 drivers
from Chapter 3):
– Facilities and handling (At the moment, focus is on warehousing facilities )
– Inventories
– Transportation
– Information
» Let’s graph the interactions of these with costs
4-6
Facility Costs and Number
of Facilities
Facility
Costs
Number of facilities
4-7
Transportation Costs and
Number of Facilities
Transportation
Costs
Number of facilities
4-8
Inventory Costs and Number
of Facilities
Inventory
Costs
Number of facilities
4-9
Transportation
Total Costs Related to
Number of Facilities
Tota
l C
ost
s
Number of Facilities
Inventory
Facilities
Total Costs
4-10
Service and Number of Facilities
Number of
Facilities
Response Time
4-11
Response Time
Variation in Logistics Costs and Response
Time with Number of Facilities
Number of Facilities
Total Logistics Costs
4-12
Design Options for a
Distribution Network
We consider some various network options that move beyond
the traditional model. (Many of these non-traditional networks
have been made more viable by the internet revolution)
Shown in graphic format in next few slides:
– Manufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping
– Manufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping and In-Transit Merge
– Distributor Storage with Carrier Delivery
– Distributor Storage with Last Mile Delivery
Also not explicitly graphed:
– Retail Storage with Customer Pickup- often integrated with traditional
model (Bevmo.com, for example. REI.com and Gap.com also allow
used this model in the US).
– Not discussed: Manufacturing/Distributor storage w/Customer Pickup
4-13
Manufacturer Storage with
Direct Shipping via Parcel Delivery (Fig. 4.6)
Manufacturer
Retailer
Customers
Product Flow
Information Flow
This is also called drop shipping
4-14
In-Transit Merge Network (Fig. 4.7)
Factories
Retailer
Product Flow
Information Flow
In-Transit Merge by
Carrier
Customers
4-15
Distributor Storage with
Parcel Delivery (fig 4.8)
Factories
Customers
Product Flow
Information Flow
Warehouse Storage by
Distributor/Retailer
4-16
Distributor Storage with
Last Mile Delivery (Fig. 4.9)
Factories
Customers
Product Flow
Information Flow
Distributor/Retailer
Warehouse
4-17
Competitive Performance of the
Distribution Network
Table 4-7 in the text shows that each of these distribution
networks has different characteristics with respect to:
– Costs - facilities, inventory, transport, information
– Service/Responsiveness:
» Response time
» Product variety
» Product availability
» Customer experience
» Order visibility
» Return-ability
Performance will change depending on attributes of
– Products: demand level, variety, multiple sources? high value
– Customers: do they desire quick response times? Effort level?
4-18
E-Business and the Distribution
Network
Depending on the firm, the product and core customer base, e-
Business will have different impacts on:
Customer Service (i.e. Responsiveness of Supply Chain):
Response time (non downloadable products), Product variety, Product
availability, Customer experience, Time to market, Order visibility,
Returnability, Direct Sales to Customers, Efficient Funds Transfer,
Costs Facilities , Inventory, Transportation, Information
In general, E-Business provides an easier way to adjust Pricing: Flexible
Pricing, Product Portfolio, and Promotions
Example: Table 4-10 in the text summarizes Dell’s online
business with respect to two different products:
– customized, high-value PCs verses standardized, commodity PCs
Chapter 5 Outline: Network
Design in the Supply Chain
The Role of Network Design in the Supply Chain
Factors Influencing Network Design Decisions
Framework for Network Design Decisions
Models for Facility Location and Capacity
Allocation
5-19
Network Design Decisions
Facility role
– What role should each facility play?
Facility number and location
– How many facilities do we need?
– Where should facilities be located?
Capacity allocation
– How much capacity should be allocated to each facility?
Market and supply allocation
– What supply sources should feed each facility?
– What markets should each facility serve?
5-20
Facility Role-
Classifications of Facilities
In order from lowest cost to highest value, and their strategic roles:
1. Offshore (Low cost facility for export production)
2. Source (Low-cost facility for global production)
3. Server (Regional production facility)
4. Contributor (Regional production facility with development skills)
5. Outpost (Regional production facility used by the firm to gain expertise from the locals)
6. Lead (Model facility that leads the firm in development of new products or technologies)
Factors Influencing
Network Design Decisions
Strategic – Evaluate tradeoffs: place manufacturing close to market -vs.- low cost?
– Should we co-locate facilities with vendors/suppliers?
Technological: Do production technologies have significant economies of scale?
Macroeconomic – Tariffs and tax incentives (i.e. free trade zones), Exchange rate and demand risk
Political: Stability, clear legal system and regulations important for corporations
Infrastructure – Will local infrastructure support a facility? Labor (especially skilled) available?
Competitive: Locate near or far from rivals?
Customer Response time / Local Presence – How important is convenience –vs.- lower cost centralized facilities
– Is “local knowledge” crucial to the business model?
Logistics & facility COSTS – Crucial to consider in setting up or redesigning the supply chain
Sustainability: Are local environmental and ethical practices consistent with corporate need?
5-22
The Cost-Response Time Frontier
Local FG
Mix
Regional FG
Local WIP
Central FG
Central WIP
Central Raw Material and Custom production
Custom production with raw material at suppliers
Cost
Response Time Slooooow Quick
Low
High
5-23
Infeasible (without
innovation)
Inefficient-
can either
reduce cost or
lead-time
FG- finished goods.
WIP- Work in Progress
How Many Facilities?
Service given Number of Facilities
Number of Facilities
Response
Time
5-24
Costs and Number of Facilities
Costs
Number of facilities
Inventory
Transportation
Facility costs
5-25
Percent Service
Level Within
Promised Time
Transportation
Cost Buildup as a Function of Facilities
Lev
el o
f S
ervic
e
Number of Facilities
Inventory
Facilities
Total Costs
5-26
Cost
of
Op
erati
on
s
Low
High
A Framework for
Global Site Location
PHASE I
Supply Chain
Strategy
PHASE II
Regional
Facility
Configuration
PHASE III
Desirable Sites
PHASE IV
Location
Choices
Competitive STRATEGY
INTERNAL CONSTRAINTS
Capital, growth strategy,
existing network
PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES
Cost, Scale/Scope impact, support
required, flexibility
COMPETITIVE
ENVIRONMENT
PRODUCTION METHODS
Skill needs, response time
FACTOR COSTS
Labor, materials, site specific
GLOBAL COMPETITION
TARIFFS AND TAX
INCENTIVES
REGIONAL DEMAND
Size, growth, homogeneity,
local specifications
POLITICAL, EXCHANGE
RATE AND DEMAND RISK
AVAILABLE
INFRASTRUCTURE
LOGISTICS COSTS Transport,
inventory, coordination
5-27
Network Optimization Models
Useful tools for both Phase II and Phase IV
Question for Phase II: “In what regions should we source demand in and how do we configure our network?” given:
– Regional demand, tariffs, economics of scale, aggregate factor costs
– Not necessary to go to detail of specific plant locations as we do in later phases
– Need to also consider less quantifiable factors such as political and regulatory climate, competition
Phase IV involves selecting specific existing facilities and allocating capacity within those selected given:
– Fixed facility cost, Transportation cost, Production cost, Inventory cost, Coordination cost
5-28
Example: Using Network Models
for Phase II Decisions
SunOil, a global energy company, needs to determine 1. where to locate facilities to service their demand
2. what size to build in the region (small or large), should they locate a facility there
– They divide the world into 5 different regions: N.America, S.America, Europe, Asia, Africa
– SunOil knows regional demands, transport costs, and facility costs and capacities for each size (and region)
– We will ignore tariffs and exchange rate fluctuations for now, and assume all demand must be met (so we can focus on minimizing costs)
What analytic tool are we likely to use?
What is the “twist” that we need to consider?
5-29
Excel Example: SUNOIL
I’ll email the following document: network-MIP.xls
Turn to the SunOil sheet
The data is shown below
INPUTS
Supply Region N. America S. America Europe Asia Africa fixed cost cap. M fixed cost cap. M
N. America 81$ 92$ 101$ 130$ 115$ 6,000$ 10 9,000$ 20
S. America 117$ 77$ 108$ 98$ 100$ 4,500$ 10 6,750$ 20
Europe 102$ 105$ 95$ 119$ 111$ 6,500$ 10 9,750$ 20
Asia 115$ 125$ 90$ 59$ 74$ 4,100$ 10 6,150$ 20
Africa 142$ 100$ 103$ 105$ 71$ 4,000$ 10 6,000$ 20
Demand total 12 8 14 16 7
production,tax, and transit costs per 1M units from
Supply Region to Demand Region SMALL facility LARGE facility
Capacitated Plant Location Model
n the number of potential sites – As we are considering two different type plants
(small, large) for each region, n = 10
m regions with demand
Dj demand in region j
Ki capacity at plant I
fi fixed cost of keeping plant i open
cij variable cost of sourcing region j from plant i
yi = 1 if plant is located at site i,
= 0 otherwise
xij Quantity shipped from site i to region j
1,0
..
1
1
1 11
y
yKx
Dx
xcyf
i
ii
n
jij
j
n
iij
n
i
m
jijiji
n
ii
ts
Min
5-31
• Can we do this with a pure LP?
• When would a simple LP be acceptable?
While the equations may
look complex, go to the
spreadsheet and look at the
underlying relationships
Excel Example: SUNOIL
Before solving, we can experiment with some configurations.
What are the tradeoffs?
– Often a good idea to experiment to help understand the network model
and the solution
Consider the optimal solution- what are some characteristics?
Food for Thought: what happens if we want to change the
model?
– Force a plant to be located in Europe?
– Avoid locating more than one facility in the same region?
– Force worldwide capacity to be able to accommodate more than current
demand by 5 M…
What the book has for Phase III:
Gravity Methods for Location
Ton Mile-Center Solution
– x,y: Warehouse Coordinates
– xn, yn : Coordinates of delivery
location n
– dn : Distance to delivery
location n
– Fn : Annual tonnage to delivery
location n
k
n n
n
k
n n
nn
k
n n
n
k
n n
nn
n
dFD
dFyD
dFD
dFxD
yyxxd
n
n
y
n
n
x
nn
1
1
1
1
22
)()(
Min FDd nn n
5-33
Before you pull out your calculator….
Gravity Location Models: Limitations
Professor Opinion, not in Textbook
Assumes that all distances have identical per-mile costs – Assumes homogenous topography
– Ignores limitations of existing ground/water transport network, inter-state/country transit taxes and regulations
Costs of setting up a new facility is often prohibitive compared to revamping an existing facility (even if in a less desirable location) – Especially pertinent given economic and less-quantifiable costs of
shutting down facilities
– The problems I have encountered personally have been to consolidate or revamp facilities, never to set up a completely new installation
For this class, you can assume that you will be provided with a finite number of site locations, and that you will be given all cost parameters ci,j for transit between location i and j
Phase IV: Network Optimization
Models- Allocating Demand
Allocating demand to production facilities
Locating facilities and allocating capacity
Which plants to establish/keep? How to configure the network?
Key Costs:
• Fixed facility cost
• Transportation cost
• Production cost
• Inventory cost
• Coordination cost
5-35
Example- Modeling a Phase IV
Decision
TelecomOne has merged with High Optic. They have plants in different cities and service several regions. They would like to figure out how to service all demand while keeping costs low:
– The supply cities are Baltimore (capacity 18K), Cheyenne (24K), Salt Lake City (27K), Memphis (22K) and Wichita (31K)
– They have the following monthly regional demands: » 10K in Atlanta
» 6K in Boston
» 14K* in Chicago * per table 5.3 , Book uses 12 K, not 14K for Chicago,
» 6K in Denver although their spreadsheet inserts are okay
» 7K in Omaha
– They will consider consolidating facilities
What sort of tool are we likely to use?
5-36
Demand Allocation Model
Answers the questions of…
Which market is served by which plant?
Which supply sources are used by a plant?
Decision variables:
xij = Quantity shipped from plant site i to customer j
Can solve as a simple LP, see sheet “Telecom-all-plants” under network-MIP.xls
But what if we also have the option of not using all facilities…. 0
..
1
1
1 1
x
Kx
Dx
ts
xcMin
ij
i
m
jij
j
n
iij
n
i
m
jijij
5-37
Allocating Demand to
Production Facilities
Decision variables
yi = 1 if plant is located/left
open at site i, 0 otherwise
xij = Quantity shipped from
plant site i to customer j
See Sheet “Telecom-close-
plants” of network-MIP.xls
Look familiar? 1,0
..
1
1
1 11
y
yKx
Dx
xcyf
i
ii
n
jij
j
n
iij
n
i
m
jijiji
n
ii
ts
Min
5-38
Demand Allocation Model
Example Results
Before we solve the problem, what can we say about TelecomOptic’s situation?
What does the Excel model indicate should happen with plant configuration? Demand allocation?
What are the ramifications from this solution?
What are some what-if scenarios we might consider?
5-39
Considering Additional Layers: Simultaneously Locating Plants and DCs
Now add cost to transport from suppliers, as well as the
plant and DC/Warehouse costs
yKx
Dx
xcxcxcyfyf
ii
n
jij
j
n
iij
t
e
m
jejej
n
i
t
eieie
l
h
n
ihihie
t
eei
n
ii
ts
Min
1
1
1 11 11 111
..
5-40
suppliers plants DCs
customer1
customer2
customer3
Etc… (Don’t worry- that’s beyond the scope of this class)
Making Network Design Decisions
In Practice
Do not underestimate the life span of facilities
– Production facilities harder to retool than storage facilities
– Consider ethical issues with respect to closing plants
Do not gloss over the cultural implications
– Should Eichbaum (who has a single brewery in Mannheim)
produce beer for the growing Chinese in Shanghai?
Do not ignore quality of life issues
Consider tariffs and tax incentives when locating
facilities
5-41
6-42
Outline- subset of Chapter 6 Designing Global Supply Chain Networks
Due to time limitations, we do not delve into Decision Tree
theory and other analytical models in this chapter, and we
consider only the introductory material in this chapter
The Impact of Globalization on Supply Chain Networks
The Offshoring Decision: Total Cost
Risk Management in Global Supply Chains
6-43
The Impact of Globalization on
Supply Chain Networks
Globalization offers companies opportunities to simultaneously grow revenues and decrease costs
The opportunities from globalization are often accompanied by significant additional risk
There will be a good deal of uncertainty in demand, prices, exchange rates, and the competitive market over the lifetime of a supply chain network
Therefore, building flexibility into supply chain operations allows the supply chain to deal with uncertainty in a manner that will maximize profits
6-44
The Offshoring Decision: Total Cost
Total cost can be identified by focusing on the
complete sourcing process, not just per-unit cost
Offshoring to low-cost countries is likely to be most
attractive for products with:
– High labor content
– Large production volumes
– Relatively low variety
– Low transportation costs
Perform a careful review of the production process
– Consider use of auditors (verifying workplace conditions)
and quality testing services
Risk Management in Global
Supply Chains
Disruptions
– Topical Example: Honda, Nissan and Toyota have
effectively shut down factories for weeks following the
2011 Tsunami
» Nissan estimates lost profits of over $25 million/day
Delays
Systems risk
Forecast risk
Intellectual property risk
Procurement risk
Inventory risk
Capacity risk 6-45
Tailored Risk Mitigation Strategies
Increase capacity
Get redundant suppliers
Increase responsiveness
Increase inventory
Increase flexibility
Pool or aggregate demand
Increase source capability
6-46
4-47
Summary of Chapter 4’s Learning
Objectives
What roles do distributors play in the supply chain?
What are the key factors to be considered when
designing the distribution network?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of various
distribution options, including e-Business enabled
ones?
Summary of Chapter 5’s Learning
Objectives
What is the role of network design decisions in the supply chain?
What are the factors influencing supply chain network design decisions?
Describe a strategic framework for facility location
How can network optimization methods be used for facility location and capacity allocation decisions?
5-48
7-1
Outline:
Demand Forecasting
Given the limited background from the surveys
and that Chapter 7 in the book is complex, we will
cover less material.
– The role of forecasting in the chain
– Characteristics of forecasts
– Basic approach to demand forecasting
– Measures of forecast error
– We will skip seasonality and Holt’s and Winter’s
methods. We do not spend any time on static forecasts
7-2
Role of Forecasting
in a Supply Chain
The basis for all strategic and planning decisions
in a supply chain
Used for both push and pull processes
Examples:
– Production: scheduling, inventory, aggregate planning
– Marketing: sales force allocation, promotions, new
production introduction
– Finance: plant/equipment investment, budgetary
planning
– Personnel: workforce planning, hiring, layoffs
All of these decisions are interrelated
7-3
Characteristics of Forecasts
A FORECAST is a statement about the future
– Absatzprognose, Vorhersage
Forecasts are always wrong. Report both the expected
value of the forecast and the measure of error
Long-term forecasts are less accurate than short-term
forecasts (forecast horizon is important)
Aggregate forecasts are more accurate than disaggregate
forecasts
In order to forecast, the past has to have some relevance to
the future
7-4
Forecasting Methods
Qualitative: primarily subjective; use judgment/opinion
Time Series: use historical demand only
– Static
– Adaptive We will only consider adaptive
Causal (or associative): use the relationship between demand and a
factor other than pure time to develop forecast
Simulation
– Imitate consumer choices that give rise to demand
– Can combine time series and causal methods
7-5
Basic Approach to
Demand Forecasting
Understand the objectives of forecasting
Integrate demand planning and forecasting
Identify major factors that influence the demand
forecast
Understand and identify customer segments
Determine the appropriate forecasting technique
Establish performance and error measures for the
forecast
7-6
Components of an Observation
Observed demand (O) =
Systematic component (S) + Random component (R)
Level (current deseasonalized demand)
Trend (growth or decline in demand)
Seasonality (predictable seasonal fluctuation)
• Systematic component: Expected value of demand
• Random component: The part of the forecast that deviates
from the systematic component
• Forecast error: difference between forecast and actual demand
7
Steps in the Forecasting Process
Step 1 Determine the purpose of forecast
Step 2 Pick an appropriate time horizon
Step 3 Select a forecasting technique - Plotting data may reveal patterns
Step 4 Gather and analyze data in detail – State assumptions
– Validate Data: May need to cleanse or filter for past events
Step 5 Calculate forecast
Step 6 Analyze/Monitor the forecast- Measure Accuracy
Are results acceptable?
No: Return to Step 3, revising forecast technique
Yes: Publish forecast
For ongoing forecasting: repeat Steps 4 through 6
Time Series Forecasts Trend - long-term movement in data
– Linear: steady increase (or decrease) over time
– Not all trends are linear. Demand may be exponential, may both increase and decrease over product life cycle: VHS players
Seasonality - short-term regular variations in data – Example: Walgreen’s sales of cold medications over the year
– Not just limited to Fall/Winter/Spring/Summer variations » Weekly demand for reservations at expensive restaurants
» Daily cycle of coffee sales at Starbucks
Irregular variations - caused by unusual circumstances – Infrequent spikes
– i.e. a stock market crash, 9/11 catastrophe
Random variations - caused by chance
Time Series Forecasting Techniques Covered in this Class
Averaging (or Smoothing)
– Moving Average
– Weighted Moving Average
– Exponential Smoothing
- Trend-Adjusted Exponential Smoothing (Holt’s) is not
covered, nor is Winters (trend + seasonality)
Linear Trend Analysis
10
Moving Average
The average of the N most recent observations:
Example: a 4-period MA for time period 7 would be
F7= (A6+A5+A4+A3)/4
The larger N, the smoother the forecast, but the greater the Lag (ability to respond to “real” changes)
n
A
tMA
t
nti
i
n
1
)(
11
General Note: To Write Formula
with Respect to t or t+1
Which is correct?
1. Ft+1 = (blah)At + blah…
2. Ft = (blah)At-1 + blah…
Both are! As long as it’s clear just what t (or t+1) represents,
these can be usable interchangeably
– If you need to calculate the forecast for period 5, be clear whether t=5 or t+1=5
But most important, don’t write:
Ft = (blah)At + blah
12
Weighted Moving Average Premise:The most recent observations might have the best
predictive value. Yet for simple moving averages older data
points have same importance as most recent
We modify to give greater weight to more recent observations.
(Remember: S Wi = 1 or you get bias!)
Advantages: Avoids “oversmoothing” and lag time is
decreased
Weights are arbitrary, often found through trial and error!
1
)(t
nti
iin AWtWMA
13
Exponential Smoothing
Exponential Smoothing is a type of Weighted Moving
Average:
Ft = aAt-1 + a (1-a) At-2 + a (1-a)2At-3 + a (1-a)3At-4+ ...
However, it is much more easily written, computed and
understood as:
Where a is between 0 and 1
11 )1( ttt FAF aa
More Exponential Smoothing
Rearranging the terms shows this method can be viewed as the
previous period’s forecast adjusted by a percentage of the
previous period’s error (Et-1 = At-1– Ft-1)
The quickness of forecast adjustment is determined by the
smoothing constant, a
– The closer a to zero, the greater the smoothing
– How do we pick a? Trial and error or can even optimize for it!
– How to initialize the forecast? Many ways!
» Book: average all the data we have so far
» More practical and repeatable? Start it with F2 = A1
)( 111 tttt FAFF a
15
How to Select a Forecast
To forecast data without trends, we could use a simple naïve
forecast, a MA (still need to pick the window), a WMA (need
to pick both the window and the weights) or an exponential
smoother (need to pick a)
We will get many different answers- how do we pick the one
we feel will have the best chance of being close to what will
happen?
We calculate past forecast accuracy, and we then pick the one
that is most accurate.
Measuring Forecast Accuracy
•Error: difference between actual value and predicted value.
Many different measures exist (we use MAD only)
•Mean Absolute Deviation
(MAD)
• Mean Squared Error
(MSE)
• Standard Error (Standard Deviation)
t
FA
MAD
t
i
ii
t
1
1
1
2
t
FA
MSE
t
i
ii
t
tt
tt
MAD
MSE
*25.1 thumbof rule
Linear Trend Analysis
If there is a trend, the smoothing filters we have covered will
LAG, resulting in bad forecasts.
Plot the data first- in this example, do you see a trend?
If the trend is linear, we will use Linear Trend Analysis
– Caveat: Not all trends are linear! (We do not cover curvilinear regression in
this class)
sales by week
145
150
155
160
165
170
175
180
0 2 4 6week
sa
les
Linear Trend Equation
Where
a = intercept
b = slope
Looks like a simple line equation, but a and b are determined to minimize Mean Squared Error (MSE)
Yt = a + b*t
140
145
150
155
160
165
170
175
180
185
1 2 3 4 5 6
Graphing the Results
Regressing Sales Against Week
145
150
155
160
165
170
175
180
185
1 2 3 4 5 6
week
sale
s Actual
Forecast
Example:
Linear Trend Analysis
An intern at Netflix has been tracking weekly rentals of the direct-to-DVD movie “Barney Meets Vin_Diesel: Fossilized!” and, after noticing a pattern, has modeled them with a linear trend analysis. The Excel model gives a= 400, b= -10, where t = 0 was the DVD release week. It is currently week 12
– What is the linear trend equation?
– What are sales predicted to be this week?
– What does the model predict sales will be a half year (26 weeks) after the release?
– When does the model predict sales to stop? Do you believe this model is likely to be accurate for making long term predictions?
Associative Forecasting
What if we think there is a better indicator of future behavior than time?
Use explanatory or predictor variables to predict the future
– E.g. Using interest rates to predict home purchases
The associative technique used in this class is Simple Linear Regression
– Linear Trend Analysis was an example where time t was used at the dependent variable. But now we can use factors other than time
Yt = a + bt Linear Trend Analysis
Yt = a + bXt Associative Forecast
( Xt is used instead of t)
– Again, we use Excel to determine a and b
22
Associative Forecasting:
Linear Regression D
epen
den
t vari
ab
le
Independent variable
X
Y
Actual
value
of Y
Estimate of
Y from
regression
equation
Value of X used
to estimate Y
Regression
equation:
Y = a + bX
23
Associative Forecasting:
Linear Regression
Dep
end
ent
vari
ab
le
Independent variable
X
Y
Actual
value
of Y
Estimate of
Y from
regression
equation
Value of X used
to estimate Y
Deviation,
or error
Regression
equation:
Y = a + bX
24
Example:
Associative Forecast
Sales Advertising
Month (000 units) (000 $)
1 264 2.5
2 116 1.3
3 165 1.4
4 101 1.0
5 209 2.0
a = Y - bX b =
A rotor manufacturer has recorded these sales figures over the past 5
months. They also know the budget spent promoting these parts
1) Is there wide variation in sales?
2) Does this appear to be a good candidate for linear trend analysis?
25
Now Consider Sales
verses Advertising Spend
26
How Strong is the Relationship?
Correlation ( r ), measures strength and direction of the forecast of Y with respect to X (or t for linear trend analysis) – 0 < r <1 Positive correlation (sales of ice cream cones –vs- temperature)
– -1 < r < 0 Negative correlation (sales of sweatshirts –vs- temperature)
You are not expected to compute r by hand! Instead use Regression Analysis in Excel (the “multiple R entry”)
R-Squared ( r2) measures the percentage of variation in y that is “explained” by x – If .8 < r2 < 1, X is a very good predictor
– For r2 < .25, X is a poor predictor- look for something else!
Even if you have a good predictor, remember correlation is not causation
27
Example: Excel Solution
to Linear Regression
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.979565
R Square 0.959547
Adjusted R Square 0.946063
Standard Error 15.60274
Observations 5
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 17323.66 17323.66 71.1604 0.0035
Residual 3 730.3361 243.4454
Total 4 18054
CoefficientsStandard Error t Stat P-valueLower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%
Intercept -8.13 22.35 -0.36 0.74 -79.27 63.00 -79.27 63.00
X Variable 1 109.23 12.95 8.44 0.00 68.02 150.44 68.02 150.44
Correlation is not Causation:
An Example The following scatter-plot shows that the average life
expectancy for a country is related to the number of doctors per
person in that country. We could come up with all sorts of
reasonable explanations justifying this, but…
Lurking Variables and Causation:
Another Example
This new scatter-plot shows that the average life expectancy for is
also related to the number of televisions per person in that country.
– And the relationship is even stronger: R2 of 72% instead of 62%
Since TVs are cheaper than doctors, Why don’t we send TVs to
countries with low life expectancies in order to extend lifetimes.
Right?
Lurking Variables and Causation:
An Example
How about considering a lurking variable? That
makes more sense… – Countries with higher standards of living have both longer life
expectancies and more doctors (and TVs!).
– If higher living standards cause changes in these other variables,
improving living standards might be expected to prolong lives and,
incidentally, also increase the numbers of doctors and TVs.