15-sept faculty report card estratman annual meeting/2… · median faculty performance 50.5 22.54%...

TEACHING CREDITS

FACULTYCONTACT

DAYS SINGLE

LEARNER

Percent Single

Learner days

(assume 224

CPD/yr)

CONTACT

DAYS

MULTIPLE

LEARNERS

Dr. Carley 29.5 13% 24.5

Dr. Cutlan 23 10% 0

Dr. Gordon 50.5 23% 2

Dr. Green 61.5 27% 48.75

Dr. Kim 35 16% 0

Dr. McIntee 118.5 53% 11

Dr. Melski 54 24% 119.5

Dr. Miech 18.5 8% 5.5

Dr. Patten 53 24% 18.5

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Percent CPD working with learners past y

PerceAttend

Participated in Department QualityImprovement Activity

Clinical Role Model Score

Professional Mentor Score

Clinical Supervisor Score

Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

Dr. Smith 53 24% 14.25

Dr. Stratman 45.75 20% 68.5

MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM

MARGINAL PERFORMANCE SUBSPECIALTY DERM

MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 50.5 22.54% 14.25

For RADAR PLOT:

FACULTY

Percent CPD

working with

learners past

year

Completed

Program

Evaluation

Percent of

"At or

Above"

requested

Didactics/L

ectures/Lab

s/Worksho

ps

Dr. Carley 24% 0 50.00%

MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75.00%

MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100.00%

FACULTY

Percent CPD

working with

learners past

year

Completed

Program

Evaluation

Percent of

"At or

Above"

requested

Didactics/L

ectures/Lab

s/Worksho

ps

Dr. Cutlan 10% 100% 100%

MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75%

MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100%

FACULTY

Percent CPD

working with

learners past

year

Completed

Program

Evaluation

Percent of

"At or

Above"

requested

Didactics/L

ectures/Lab

s/Worksho

ps

Dr. Gordon 23% 100% 100%



FACULTY

Percent CPD

working with

learners past

year

Completed

Program

Evaluation

Percent of

"At or

Above"

requested

Didactics/L

ectures/Lab

s/Worksho

ps

Dr. Stratman 51% 100% 100%



FACULTY

Percent CPD

working with

learners past

year

Completed

Program

Evaluation

Percent of

"At or

Above"

requested

Didactics/L

ectures/Lab

s/Worksho

ps

Dr. Green 49% 100% 50%



FACULTY

Percent CPD

working with

learners past

year

Completed

Program

Evaluation

Percent of

"At or

Above"

requested

Didactics/L

ectures/Lab

s/Worksho

ps

Dr. Kim 16% 100% 100%



FACULTY

Percent CPD

working with

learners past

year

Completed

Program

Evaluation

Percent of

"At or

Above"

requested

Didactics/L

ectures/Lab

s/Worksho

ps

Dr. McIntee 58% 100% 100%



FACULTY

Percent CPD

working with

learners past

year

Completed

Program

Evaluation

Percent of

"At or

Above"

requested

Didactics/L

ectures/Lab

s/Worksho

ps

Dr. Melski 77% 100% 100%



FACULTY

Percent CPD

working with

learners past

year

Completed

Program

Evaluation

Percent of

"At or

Above"

requested

Didactics/L

ectures/Lab

s/Worksho

ps

Dr. Miech 11% 0% 100%



FACULTY

Percent CPD

working with

learners past

year

Completed

Program

Evaluation

Percent of

"At or

Above"

requested

Didactics/L

ectures/Lab

s/Worksho

ps

Dr. Patten 32% 100% 100%



FACULTY

Percent CPD

working with

learners past

year

Completed

Program

Evaluation

Percent of

"At or

Above"

requested

Didactics/L

ectures/Lab

s/Worksho

ps

Dr. Smith 30% 100% 100%



CONFERENCE CREDITS

Percent Multiple

Learner days

(assume 224

CPD/yr)

Percent CPD

working with

learners past

year

Completed

Program

Evaluation

Didactics/Lectures/La

bs/Workshops (Hrs)

Percent of "At or

Above" requested

Didactics/Lectures/La

bs/Workshops

11% 24% 0% 2 50.00%

0% 10% 100% 25 100.00%

1% 23% 100% 16.25 100.00%

22% 49% 100% 2 50.00%

0% 16% 100% 26 100.00%

5% 58% 100% 6 100.00%

53% 77% 100% 6.25 100.00%

2% 11% 0% 79.5 100.00%

8% 32% 100% 6.5 100.00%

year

Completed Program Evaluation

Percent of "At or Above" requestedDidactics/Lectures/Labs/Workshops

Percent of Assigned Resident EvaluationsCompleted

Percent of Direct Observation AssessmentsCompleted

Percent Max Scholarly Activity Points

ent Max Faculty Developmentdance (Max determined by PD)

MARGINAL PERFORMANCE G

MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMA

6% 30% 100% 6 100.00%

31% 51% 100% 86.5 100.00%

31% 99% 4 75.00%

15% 99% 4 75.00%

6.36% 30.02% 1 6.5 100.00%

Percent of

Assigned

Resident

Evaluations

Completed

Percent of Direct

Observation

Assessments

Completed

Percent Max

Scholarly

Activity Points

Percent Max Faculty

Development

Attendance (Max

determined by PD)

Participated in

Department Quality

Improvement Activity

78% 86% 83% 40% 100%

99% 75% 33% 20% 100%

100% 50% 17% 20% 100%

Percent of

Assigned

Resident

Evaluations

Completed

Percent of Direct

Observation

Assessments

Completed

Percent Max

Scholarly

Activity Points

Percent Max Faculty

Development

Attendance (Max

determined by PD)

Participated in

Department Quality


90% 40% 17% 20% 100%

99% 75% 33% 20% 100%

100% 50% 17% 20% 100%

Percent of

Assigned

Resident

Evaluations

Completed

Percent of Direct

Observation

Assessments

Completed

Percent Max

Scholarly

Activity Points

Percent Max Faculty

Development

Attendance (Max

determined by PD)

Participated in

Department Quality


100% 0% 0% 20% 100%

99% 75% 33% 20% 100%

100% 50% 17% 20% 100%

Percent of

Assigned

Resident

Evaluations

Completed

Percent of Direct

Observation

Assessments

Completed

Percent Max

Scholarly

Activity Points

Percent Max Faculty

Development

Attendance (Max

determined by PD)

Participated in

Department Quality


100% 27% 100% 60% 100%

99% 75% 33% 20% 100%

100% 50% 17% 20% 100%

Percent of

Assigned

Resident

Evaluations

Completed

Percent of Direct

Observation

Assessments

Completed

Percent Max

Scholarly

Activity Points

Percent Max Faculty

Development

Attendance (Max

determined by PD)

Participated in

Department Quality


100% 94% 33% 20% 100%

99% 75% 33% 20% 100%

100% 50% 17% 20% 100%

Percent of

Assigned

Resident

Evaluations

Completed

Percent of Direct

Observation

Assessments

Completed

Percent Max

Scholarly

Activity Points

Percent Max Faculty

Development

Attendance (Max

determined by PD)

Participated in

Department Quality


100% 100% 33% 20% 100%

99% 75% 33% 20% 100%

100% 50% 17% 20% 100%

Percent of

Assigned

Resident

Evaluations

Completed

Percent of Direct

Observation

Assessments

Completed

Percent Max

Scholarly

Activity Points

Percent Max Faculty

Development

Attendance (Max

determined by PD)

Participated in

Department Quality


100% 100% 17% 20% 100%

99% 75% 33% 20% 100%

100% 50% 17% 20% 100%

Percent of

Assigned

Resident

Evaluations

Completed

Percent of Direct

Observation

Assessments

Completed

Percent Max

Scholarly

Activity Points

Percent Max Faculty

Development

Attendance (Max

determined by PD)

Participated in

Department Quality


100% 19% 17% 20% 100%

99% 75% 33% 20% 100%

100% 50% 17% 20% 100%

Percent of

Assigned

Resident

Evaluations

Completed

Percent of Direct

Observation

Assessments

Completed

Percent Max

Scholarly

Activity Points

Percent Max Faculty

Development

Attendance (Max

determined by PD)

Participated in

Department Quality


50% 100% 17% 40% 100%

99% 75% 33% 20% 100%

100% 50% 17% 20% 100%

Percent of

Assigned

Resident

Evaluations

Completed

Percent of Direct

Observation

Assessments

Completed

Percent Max

Scholarly

Activity Points

Percent Max Faculty

Development

Attendance (Max

determined by PD)

Participated in

Department Quality


100% 29% 17% 40% 100%

99% 75% 33% 20% 100%

100% 50% 17% 20% 100%

Percent of

Assigned

Resident

Evaluations

Completed

Percent of Direct

Observation

Assessments

Completed

Percent Max

Scholarly

Activity Points

Percent Max Faculty

Development

Attendance (Max

determined by PD)

Participated in

Department Quality


100% 50% 33% 20% 100%

99% 75% 33% 20% 100%

100% 50% 17% 20% 100%

July 1, 2014‐June 30, 2015

RESIDENT

EVALUATION

COMPLETION

Percent of

Assigned

Resident

Evaluations

Completed

Number of

Direct

Observation

Assessments

Expected

Number of

Direct

Observation

Assessments

Percent of

Direct

Observation

Assessments

Completed

SCHOLARLY

ACTIVITIES

Points (6 points

max)

7 78% 6 7 85.71% 5

7 90% 2 5 40.00% 1

4 100% 0 6 0.00% 0

13 100% 32 34 94.12% 2

10 100% 7 7 100.00% 2

15 100% 13 13 100.00% 1

13 100% 10 52 19.23% 1

7 50% 3 3 100.00% 1

7 100% 2 7 28.57% 1

GEN DERM

ANCE

11 100% 3 6 50.00% 2

13 100% 14 52 26.92% 6

99% 14 75.00% 2

99% 7 75.00% 2

10 1 6 50.00% 1

Clinical Role

Model Score

Professional

Mentor Score

Clinical

Supervisor

Score

Instructor

Score

Evaluator

Score

79% 81% 78% 79% 79%

75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

89% 89% 86% 87% 86%

Clinical Role

Model Score

Professional

Mentor Score

Clinical

Supervisor

Score

Instructor

Score

Evaluator

Score

87% 86% 88% 86% 86%

75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

89% 89% 86% 87% 86%

Clinical Role

Model Score

Professional

Mentor Score

Clinical

Supervisor

Score

Instructor

Score

Evaluator

Score

90% 73% 85% 73% 75%

75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

89% 89% 86% 87% 86%

Clinical Role

Model Score

Professional

Mentor Score

Clinical

Supervisor

Score

Instructor

Score

Evaluator

Score

96% 95% 96% 95% 95%

75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

89% 89% 86% 87% 86%

Clinical Role

Model Score

Professional

Mentor Score

Clinical

Supervisor

Score

Instructor

Score

Evaluator

Score

87% 89% 89% 89% 91%

75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

89% 89% 86% 87% 86%

Clinical Role

Model Score

Professional

Mentor Score

Clinical

Supervisor

Score

Instructor

Score

Evaluator

Score

90% 89% 86% 87% 85%

75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

89% 89% 86% 87% 86%

Clinical Role

Model Score

Professional

Mentor Score

Clinical

Supervisor

Score

Instructor

Score

Evaluator

Score

97% 96% 95% 96% 95%

75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

89% 89% 86% 87% 86%

Clinical Role

Model Score

Professional

Mentor Score

Clinical

Supervisor

Score

Instructor

Score

Evaluator

Score

99% 96% 98% 98% 95%

75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

89% 89% 86% 87% 86%

Clinical Role

Model Score

Professional

Mentor Score

Clinical

Supervisor

Score

Instructor

Score

Evaluator

Score

89% 92% 86% 94% 90%

75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

89% 89% 86% 87% 86%

Clinical Role

Model Score

Professional

Mentor Score

Clinical

Supervisor

Score

Instructor

Score

Evaluator

Score

79% 75% 75% 75% 76%

75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

89% 89% 86% 87% 86%

Clinical Role

Model Score

Professional

Mentor Score

Clinical

Supervisor

Score

Instructor

Score

Evaluator

Score

83% 82% 83% 83% 83%

75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

89% 89% 86% 87% 86%

AVERAGE RESIDENT EVALUATION SCORES

Percent Max

Scholarly

Activity Points

FACULTY

DEVELOPMENT

ATTENDANCE

Percent Max

Faculty

Development

Attendance

(Max

determined by

PD)

Participated in

Department

Quality

Improvement

Activity

CLINICAL ROLE

MODEL

Clinical Role

Model Score

83% 2 40% 100% 4.75 79%

17% 1 20% 100% 5.24 87%

0% 1 20% 100% 5.38 90%

33% 1 20% 100% 5.23 87%

33% 1 20% 100% 5.39 90%

17% 1 20% 100% 5.81 97%

17% 1 20% 100% 5.92 99%

17% 2 40% 100% 5.33 89%

17% 2 40% 100% 4.75 79%

33% 1 20% 100% 5 83%

100% 3 60% 100% 5.77 96%

33% 1 20% 100% 4.5 75%

33% 1 20% 100% 4.5 75%

16.67% 1 20.00% 100.00% 5.33 88.83%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Percent CPD working with learnerspast year

Comp

Percent Max FAttendance (M





Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Completed Program Eva

Percent Didactics

P

PercA

Percent Max Sc

Percent Max Faculty DevelopmeAttendance (Max determined by P





Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Percent Didactics

PeClinical Supervisor Score

Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

PercA

Percent Max Sc

Percent Max Faculty DevelopmenAttendance (Max determined by P




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Percent Didactics

Pe

PercA

Percent Max Sc






Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Percent oDidactics

Pe

PercA

Percent Max Sch






Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Comp


Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

Percent Max FAttendance (M




PROFESSIONAL

MENTOR

Professional

Mentor Score

CLINICAL

SUPERVISOR

Clinical

Supervisor

Score INSTRUCTOR

Instructor

Score EVALUATOR

4.83 81% 4.67 78% 4.75 79% 4.75

5.18 86% 5.27 88% 5.18 86% 5.14

4.38 73% 5.07 85% 4.38 73% 4.5

5.31 89% 5.31 89% 5.31 89% 5.46

5.32 89% 5.17 86% 5.23 87% 5.09

5.78 96% 5.7 95% 5.78 96% 5.7

5.77 96% 5.85 98% 5.85 98% 5.69

5.54 92% 5.17 86% 5.62 94% 5.42

4.5 75% 4.5 75% 4.5 75% 4.58

4.92 82% 5 83% 5 83% 5

5.69 95% 5.77 96% 5.69 95% 5.69

4.5 75% 4.5 75% 4.5 75% 4.5

4.5 75% 4.5 75% 4.5 75% 4.5

5.31 88.50% 5.17 86.17% 5.23 87.17% 5.14

pleted Program Evaluation


Percent of Assigned ResidentEvaluations Completed

Percent of Direct ObservationAssessments Completed


Faculty DevelopmentMax determined by PD)

MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE


Dr. Carley

aluation

of "At or Above" requesteds/Lectures/Labs/Workshops


cent of Direct ObservationAssessments Completed

cholarly Activity Points

entPD)



Dr. Gordon

Prof

Clini

aluation


Percent of Assigned ResidentEvaluations Completed MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE


Clinic



ntPD)

Dr. Stratman

Profe

aluation





ntPD)



Dr. Kim

Profe

Clinic

aluation


ercent of Assigned ResidentEvaluations Completed


holarly Activity Points

ntPD)



Dr. Melski

Profes

Clinica

pleted Program Evaluation


Percent of Assigned ResidentEvaluations Completed MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE


D P tt

Percent of Direct ObservationAssessments Completed


Faculty Developmentax determined by PD)

Dr. Patten

Evaluator

Score

79%

86%

75%

91%

85%

95%

95%

90%

76%

83%

95%

75%

75%

85.67%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Percent CPD working withlearners past year

Completed Program Evaluati

Percent of "requ

Didactics/Lectur

Percent oEvalua

Percent of DAssessme

Percent Max ScholarlyPoints

Percent Max Faculty DevelopmentAttendance (Max determined by

PD)

Participated in DepartmentQuality Improvement Activity




Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Percent of "At or Aboverequested

Didactics/Lectures/Labs/Wops

Percent of Assigned ReEvaluations Comple

Percent of Direct ObservAssessments Complet

Percent Max Scholarly ActivityPoints


PD)



fessional Mentor Score

ical Supervisor Score

Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Percent of "At or Above"requested

Didactics/Lectures/Labs/Worps

Percent of Assigned ReEvaluations Complet

cal Supervisor Score

Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

Percent of Direct ObservaAssessments Complete



PD)



essional Mentor Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




Didactics/Lectures/Labs/Worps

Percent of Assigned ReEvaluations Complet




PD)



essional Mentor Score

cal Supervisor Score

Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




Didactics/Lectures/Labs/Workps

Percent of Assigned ResEvaluations Complet




PD)



ssional Mentor Score

al Supervisor Score

Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Completed Program Evaluatio

Percent of "requ

Didactics/Lecturp

Percent ofEvaluat


Instructor Score

Evaluator Score

Percent of DAssessme

Percent Max ScholarlyPoints


PD)




ion

"At or Above"uestedres/Labs/Workshops

of Assigned Residentations Completed

Direct Observationents Completed

y Activity



Dr. Cutlan

e"

orksho

esidenteted

vationted



Dr. Cutlan

"

rksho

esidentted



ationed

Dr. Green

"

rksho

esidentted

ationed



Dr. McIntee

ksho

sidentted

ationed



Dr. Miech

on

"At or Above"uestedres/Labs/Workshops

f Assigned Residenttions Completed



D S ith

Direct Observationents Completed

y Activity

Dr. Smith

15-sept faculty report card estratman annual meeting/2… · median faculty performance 50.5 22.54%...

Documents