1920911
TRANSCRIPT
8/12/2019 1920911
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1920911 1/12
International Review of Psychiatry (1998), 10, 9±19
Social skills training in psychiatric rehabilitation: recent ®ndings
CHARLES J. WALLACE
Clinical Research Center for Schizophrenia and Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Department of Psychiatry, University
California at Los Angeles, USA
Summary
This article is a detailed critique of six recent evaluations of the effects of social skills training on the functioning and quality of li
of individuals with schizophrenia. Given the many factors that affect individuals’ social and role functioning, the results of the s
evaluations are complex and interpretable only after careful consideration of their many methodological and procedural differenc
The general pattern of their results indicates, however, that when skills training is conducted with speci®city and highly structur
instructional techniques, signi®cant and durable increases in targeted behaviors and knowledge ensue. Social functioning a
objective quality of life improve if (1) the knowledge and skills improved by training are actually relevant to the variables assess
by the outcome me asures (e.g. workplace knowledge and skills contribute to the outcome of improved employment, not just lo
economic conditions); (2) the de®ciencies in individuals’ functioning re¯ect de®cits in the relevant behaviors and knowledge (e.
de®cits in an individual’s interpersonal skills are observable in the workplace and these skills are needed for improved employmen
and (3) the environment provides prompts and reinforcers for the use of these new behaviors and knowledge (e.g. improved workpla
interpersonal skills are rewarded by praise and increased social acceptance by peers and supervisors). Thus, unlike the rap
improvements in symptoms effected by psychotropic medication, the bene®ts of social skills training occur slowly, and only w
suf®cient, carefully conducted, training. Hence, the expectations for the bene®ts of training must re¯ect the complexity of the, man
fac tors th at affec t fu nctio ning , an d the pai nst aki ng, ca ref ul an d de tail ed na tur e of eff ect iv e tra in in g. Th e re vie w en ds wi th seve
recommendations for improving the ef®ciency and generality of training, including developing more precise assessments of individu
and roles, standardizing training and presenting it in self-directed formats, and increasing environmental supports.
Introduction
Despite the well documented effectivenessÐand
ubiquityÐof antipsychotic m edication in the treat-
ment of individuals with schizophrenia, it is no
p a na c ea. Co m plia nce with its c on tinu ou s a nd
inde®nite regimen is a challenge; its side-effects are
often unpleasant and may grow worse over time,
although less so with the newer, unconventional
neuroleptics; and it does little if anything to improve
individuals’ social and instrumental role function-
ing. This lack of imp roved functioning is particularly
problematic since numerous g overnment and `stake-holder’ organizations have stated that better role
functioning should be a principal aim of treatment.
The NIMH plan for Caring for People with Severe
Mental Illness (1991), for example, notes that four
domains:
¼ encompass the important areas ¼ [of treat-
ment outcome] ¼ (1) clinical, reduction or elim-
in ation of sym pto ms; (2 ) r eh ab ilita tiv e,
im pr ov em en t o r re sto ra tion of so cial a nd
vocational functioning; (3) humanitarian, increase
in a sense of wellbeing and personal ful®llment;
and (4) public welfare, prevention of harm.
most constructive and satisfying lives possible in t
least restrictive available settings’ (Welfare anInstitutions Code, Section 5600.1). Minneso
charges the Comm issioner of Mental Health wi
the responsibility to provide accountable servic
that `increase the level of functioning of adults wi
mental illness or restore them to a previously he
higher level of functioning’ (Comprehensive Adu
Mental Health Act, 1991).
To achieve the aim of improved functioning,
number of treatments have been developed bas
on the rationale that functioning is limited by skil
hence, improve skills and improve functionin
These treatments, despite their different labels su
as social skills training, psychosocial s kills trainin
skills training, psychosocial rehabilitation and ps
chiatric rehabilitation, have a common focus
teaching skills and a similar methodology for doi
s o: i nstr uc ti on s, m od el in g a nd p ra ct ice . T
remainder of this article will review the empiric
evidence about the effectiveness of these treatmen
and note possible directions for future research. T
review will be selective; it will not include resu
from studies in which these treatments have on
been one of several services, or the primary foc
8/12/2019 1920911
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1920911 2/12
Environment
Opportunities
for role
functioning
Rewards for
role
functioning
Supports ± social,
financial, housing,
medical, psychiatric
Number and
mix of tasks
Sequence and
timing of tasks
Contextual factors
and task difficulty
Role
complexities
SOCIAL and ROLE
FUNCTIONING
Negative symptoms, anhedonia,
motivation to perform role
Positive symptom s, medication effects
Cognitive
impairments
Expertise in performing
role
Practice
Role skills
Quality of instruction
Quality of curriculum
Skills training
Individual
10 Charles J. Wallace
Figure 1. Factors that in¯uence social and role functioning .
Social and instrumental role functioning
Adopting the axiom that behavior is a product of
the individual and the environment, Figure 1 indi-
cates that an individual’s social and instrumental
role functioning is in¯uenced by several classes of
variables including the skills that de®ne the role,the s kills a nd m otiv es o f the ind iv idu al a nd the
support offered by the environment.
Ro le comp lexit ies
The few and simple questions that typically mea-
sure role functioning (e.g. How many hours were
y ou e mp loy ed in a c om p etitive job for the p as t
week?) belie the often complex sequence of tasks
tha t m u st b e e n ac ted to fu n ction s uc ce ss fu lly.B ei ng a w age ea rne r, for e xam ple, re qu ir es
adequate performance of myriad speci®c and gen-
eric tasks that de®ne a particular job at a particular
work s ite a t a p a rtic ular p oint in tim e . Not o nly
m ay th e m ix o f sp ec i® c a nd g en er ic ta sks v ary
considerably from site to site for the same job title,
b ut it m a y v ary c on sidera bly fro m tim e to tim e
within the same site. Furthermore, even if the mix
of tasks is relatively constant, their dif®culty level
may vary considerably depending upon such con-
textual factors as the clarity of the performancestandards, the number and preferred interactional
s ty les o f c o- wo rk ers a nd s up erv is ors , a nd e ve n
Individual
E ric sson a nd C h arn es s’ s (1 99 4) r evi ew o f t
development of `expert’ performance convincing
con®rms the adage that `practice makes perfec
Understanding and demonstrating skills duri
limited training sessions is apparently not enouto gu arantee a d eq u ate p e rform a nce in a re as
diverse as playing a musical instrument, program
ming a computer and solving mathematical pro
lems. PracticeÐdone early and oftenÐdevelo
expertise whose hallmarks are cognitive structur
and processes that allow the expert to rapidly sol
problems and use long-term memory to circumve
the limitations of short-term memory (Chase
Ericsson, 1982; Ericsson & Kintsch, 1994; Er
sson & Staszewski, 1989).
Ericsson and Charness (1994) do note that
period of highly focused instruction can be usefu
it `aims’ practice toward expert performance, and
may impart some elements of an expert’s cogniti
structure and processes. However, instruction is n
substitute for practice, and there is evidence (D
& Mayer, 1987; Ericsson et al ., 1993; Hulin et a
1990) that expertise is limited to the speci®c are
p rac tice d with m in im a l ge ne ra liza tion to oth
areas.
Unfortunately, several factors may restrict t
opportunities of individuals with schizophrenia
practice and become experts in such basic tasks
i f d d i l l
8/12/2019 1920911
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1920911 3/12
Social skills training in psychiatric rehabilitation
tailed by the symptoms, the treatment, or both.
Furthermore, individuals’ anhedonia and negative
symptoms may reduce their willingness to engage in
sustained practice which is likely to have minimal
rewards in its early stages. There may also be disad-
vantages to adopting greater independence and los-
ing th e e con om ic s up p ort p rov id ed b y v a rious
public agencies. Finally, the medication generallyused to counteract the side-effects of antipsychotic
medication may impede the development of the
more ef®cient use of long-term memory that charac-
terizes experts (Spohn & Strauss, 1989).
Environment
Individuals’ opportunities to practice and develop
expertise may also be limited by the environment.
The importance of environmental support has been
freq ue n tly m en tion ed in the c linical l iterature
(Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, 1992;
Liberman, 1992; NIMH, 1992), but there are few
studies demonstrating its relative contribution to
functioning and even fewer speci®c suggestions
about how an environment (other than the family)
can be altered to provide the requisite opportunities
and support. However, studies of training in a very
different contextÐbusinessÐprovide clear examples
of the importance of environmental opportunities
and support. Carnevale et a l . (1990), for example,
noted that the $30 billion spent annually on corpo-
rate training programs yields only an estimated $3
billion of improvements because the workplace does
not provide the equipment and support that trainees
need to adapt and hone their newly learned skills.
Pre- and post-training support by a supervisor is
critical for successfully transferring learning to the
workplace, and is most effective when the supervisor
provides clearly de®ned opportunities to practice
and explicit accountability for doing so (Baumgartel
et al ., 1984; Ford et al ., 1991; Huczynski & Lewis,
1980; Pentland, 1989). Additionally, workplace
cues such as reminders to use the skills and speci®c
monetary and/or interpersonal consequences con-
tribute independently of each other to the transfer of
training (Rouillier & Goldstein, 1991).
Evaluation of studies of social and instrumen-
tal role skills training
Given this admittedly simplistic model of the factors
that in¯uence social and instrumental role function-ing, several criteria may be used to evaluate the
empirical evidence about the effectiveness of skills
designed to improve? Were there opportunities f
trainees to practice their skills so that they cou
develop suf®cient expertise to function adequate
in the role(s)? Was the practice accompanied
suf®cient feedback that the repetition would lead
expertise and not just fatigue? Were there opport
nities to continue the role(s) beyond the traini
and the practice? W as there suf®cient environmensupport to sustain the trainees during the period
practice and beyond? Were the economic and `ps
chological’ costs of adopting the new role(s) b
anced by the rewards? Were the rewards deliver
consistently in the expected amount?
These criteria re¯ect the hypothesized role
skills training as one link in the causal chain th
leads to social and instrumental functioning. Th
will be considered in the review of the empiric
literature which, as noted above, is selective. It w
exclude studies in w hich skills training has beenminor element in a range of services, or in which t
primary focus has been on training vocational ski
in the speci®c context of vocational rehabilitati
programs. The review will include relatively rece
studies that have used experimental research desig
to evaluate the effects of skills training, and w
adopt a broad de®nition of `social skills rehabi
tation’.
Manchester, England
In research supported by the North West Region
Health Authority in the UK, Tarrier and his co
leagues (1993a) trained participants to reduce the
persisting symptoms, based on the rationale th
these symptoms are not only `extremely distressi
in themselves and a frequent source of anxiety an
depression, ¼ [they] also contribute signi®cantly
general disabilities and handicaps’ (p. 524). T
authors developed a ten-session program, Copi
Strategy Enhancement (CSE), that taught partipants to use one or more of four `strategies’ to cop
with persisting symptoms. These strategies direct
attention away from the symptoms by either narrow
ing or switching attention (cognitive strategies), i
creasing motor activity or momentarily disengagin
from social activity (behavioral strategies), m odif
ing sensory input (sensory strategies), or changi
physiological states (physiological strategies). T
strategies were taught in individual training sessio
and were tailored to each participant’s preferenc
and previous efforts to reduce the symptoms. Btween session homework, primarily practicing t
components of a strategy, was assigned and its ou
8/12/2019 1920911
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1920911 4/12
12 Charles J. Wallace
simple games such as tick-tack-toe (noughts and
crosses), progressed through standardized situations
such as `getting a job’ and ended with individualized
scenarios that each participant identi®ed as being
personally nettlesome. The training sessions con-
sisted of discussing alternative s olutions; there w as
n o p ra ctice o f the ir imp lem e ntatio n, a ltho u gh
behavioral objectives were established for the inter-val between sessions with progress monitored at the
succeeding session. The effects of CSE and PS were
evaluated with several interview-based measures
administered by a non-blind assessor at pr e-training,
post-training and six-month follow-up. The mea-
s u re s inc lu de d the P re se nt S ta te E xam ina tion
(PSE), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS),
the Psychiatric Assessment Scale (PAS) and the
Social Functioning Scale (SFS). All of the partici-
pants (39 enrolled; 27 completed the training; 23
were available for the six-month follow-up) wereselected based on h aving symptoms of schizophrenia
that had persisted for at least six months despite
regular ad ministration of antipsychotic medication.
The immediate effects of each treatment were
assessed by measuring participants’ changes on
i nte rv ie w-b as ed m eas ur es o f th e n um b er a nd
ef®cacy of strategies used to cope with symptoms
and the number and ef®cacy of solutions generated
to solve standardized problems (Tarrier et al .,
1993b ). Inform a tion fro m the s ym p to m c op in g
measure was also used to develop the individualizedstrategies that were taught to the CSE participants.
The results indicated that both the CSE and PS
procedures achieved their intended effects; each
group improved signi®cantly on the m easure speci®c
to its training and not on the other measure.
Unfortunately, the results for the symptom and
functioning measures were dif®cult to interpret
since the CSE participants were considerably more
symptomatic at the pre-treatment assessment than
the PS participants despite their random assignment
to conditions. T he C SE participants didsigni®cantly reduce the number and severity of their
symptoms as measured by the PSE and BPRS, with
somewhat less of a reduction on the PAS. These
red u ctio ns gen e ra lly p la ced th em a t the p os t-
training and follow-up levels of the PS participants,
who also reduced to some extent the number and
severity of their symptoms. Neither group changed
on the SFS.
Tarrier and his colleagues (1993a) concluded that
their results con®rmed the effectiveness of CSE
compared to PS despite the lack of ` ªripple outºimprovements in ¼ social functioning, as had been
predicted’ (p. 530). Although they suggested that
CSE participants’ in-session practice of the comp
nent skills of the individualized coping strategie
the functional skills addressed by the PS proc
duresÐeven the skills needed to solve individua
relevant problemsÐwere discussed and not pra
ticed. Third, the analysis of functioning was bas
on the total SFS score which may have been inse
sitive to the subtle changes in individually relevafunctioning that did occur. In contrast, the measu
of symptom change was focused speci®cally on t
individually relevant targets of the CSE procedure
Fourth, treatment was discontinued after ten se
s io ns , an d the s u pp o rt n ee de d to m a in ta in a n
expand the changes particularly in functioning m
have been prematurely withdrawn. Indeed, Tarr
et a l . (1993a) c om m e nt tha t the `u se o f b o os t
s es sions o r the e xten sion o f tre a tm en t o ve r
extended time period ¼ may be advisable’ (p. 530
San Diego, California
Similar to Tarrier and his colleagues, Bradsha
(1993) compared Coping Skills Training (CST
with Problem Solving Training (PST). CST w
based on the rationale that coping `with stress
essential to ¼ prevent relapse and improve fun
tional ability’ (p. 1102). CST consisted of four se
of instructional exercises that taught participan
how to identify and reduce physiological stressodevelop recreational activities and other plann
activities to manage time, restructure distorted
negative cognitions associated with stressful even
and interact in a manner that reduces interperson
stressors. The exercises were practiced during t
sessions by all participants, and inter-session activ
ties were assigned and completed by each parti
pant in `partnership’ with another. In contrast, PS
consisted of discussions of four generic stages
problem solving (brainstorm solutions, choose on
implement it, monitor its effects) applied to prolems generated by the participants. Neither i
session practice nor extra-session assignments we
required, and their optional use was restricted
those participants who had generated the problem
for that session’s discussion.
Both CST and PST were conducted in weekly 1
hour sessions for six months with seven participan
e ach, a ll of w hom h ad b een di agn osed w i
schizophrenia based on DSM-III-R criteria, an
we re e nrolle d in a d ay h o sp ita l p ro gram in S
Diego and living independently. The effects of ttreatments were evaluated with Goal Attainme
Scaling (GAS), a method of standardizing acro
8/12/2019 1920911
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1920911 5/12
Social skills training in psychiatric rehabilitation
both groups made progress in achieving their goals,
th e G A S s cor es o f t he C S T p ar ti cip an ts w ere
signi®cantly higher immediately after treatment than
those of the PST participants. Both CST and PST
participants maintained their progress at the six-
month follow-up, as well as the signi®cant difference
b etwe en the m tha t c on tinu ed to fav or the P ST
participants. Bradshaw concluded that both treat-ments were effective, but he noted that `it was not
clear ¼ [why the two groups had] ¼ a difference in
outcomes ¼ [given that] ¼ both are cognitively and
behaviorally oriented’ (pg. 1103).
However, Bradshaw’s descriptions of CST and
PST indicate that there were important procedural
differences between them that likely account for
their different outcomes. PST’s content was sponta-
neously generated by the participants, and may have
had little, if any, relationship to the information and
skills needed for major role functioning. In contrast,CST’s content was systematic and, as described, far
more closely related to major role functioning. Prac-
tice sessions and homework assignments were irreg-
ularly scheduled, if at all, for CST participants;
PST’s practice sessions and homework sessions
were frequent and regular, with the added feature of
a supportive `buddy’ arrangement for completion of
the homework assignments.
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic (University of Pittsburgh)
Hogarty and his colleagues examined the effects of
two treatments speci®cally designed to forestall
symptomatic relapse by modifying the `demands of
the environment or the underlying de®cits’ (Hogarty
et al ., 1986, p. 634; italics supplied by authors).
They compared the outcomes of Family Therapy
(FT) and SST with 103 participants, all of whom
met Research Diagnostic Criteria for a diagnosis of
schizophrenia (n5 67) or schizoaffective disorder (n5 36). The participants were relatively young,
Caucasian, male, never married, and had been ill for
approximately six years. They were all recruited
during their inpatient treatment (23% ®rst episode),
and all were at risk for symptomatic relapse based
o n h av ing r es id ed f or a t l ea st o ne o f th e th ree
months prior to the inpatient episode with a relative
who was high in Expressed Emotion (EE). All par-
ticipants were maintained on antipsychotic medi-
c ation, a dm in is te red a s m uc h a s p os sib le in
injectable form to reduce the effects of medicationnoncompliance.
Participants were randomly assigned to one of
on a day-to-day basis’ (Hogarty et al ., 1986, p. 634
FT was scheduled for bi-weekly sessions, with refe
ral a t th e two -y ea r te rm ina tion o f the s tu dy
clinicians w ho were staff members of the institu
that conducted the study and could continue FT
In contrast, SST sought to `indirectly ªcoolº t
emotional climate of the household ¼ by improvi
the patient’s social skills in dealing with fammembers ¼ [including] ¼ enhancing the patien
verbal and nonverbal behaviors as well as developi
more accurate social perception and judgmen
(Hogarty et a l ., 1986, p. 635). During the secon
year of training, the focus expanded to include soc
skills in interactions with nonfamilial partners. SS
was scheduled for weekly sessions for approximate
21 months, followed by three months of bi-week
sessions that prepared participants for the two-ye
termination and referral to clinicians and agenci
who could not continue SST.Although no evaluation was reported of the exte
to which participants i mproved their social skills, t
effects of both treatments on EE were evaluate
T h e res ults ind ic ate d tha t F T h ad its inten d
effects, with approximately 40% of the househol
changing from high to low EE. In contrast, 30%
th e S ST g ro up a nd 2 5% o f th e con tr ol gr ou
changed from high to low EE, suggesting that t
indirect reduction of EE via improved social ski
was not achieved.
The primary focus of the evaluation was symtomatic relapse, de®ned as either a Type I relapse
a c ha nge fro m n on p sy ch o tic a t d is ch a rge fro
inp atie nt trea tm e nt to e ithe r s ch izoph ren ia
schizoaffective disorder according to R DC criteria
or a Type II relapseÐa substantial exacerbation
persisting symptoms. A ll categorizations of relap
inc lu din g the c on clus io n th a t a relap se h ad n
occurred, was a consensus judgement of all mem
bers of the treatment team. The results at the end
®rst year of treatment indicated that both FT an
SST had signi®cant and substantially lower rates relapse (19% and 20%, respectively) than the co
trol group (41%), with no relapses in the FT 1 SS
g rou p (0 % ). B y th e en d of th e s ec on d y ea r
treatment, all groups’ relapse rates increased (FT
29%; F T 1 S ST to 25%; S S T to 50%), with t
SST group’s approaching that of the control grou
(62%; Hogarty et al ., 1991). Inspection of a surviv
curve presented in Hogarty et al . (1991), howeve
indicates that the relapse rate of the SST group w
almost identical to those of the FT and FT 1 SS
groups until the 21st month of treatment, at whipoint the additional SST relapses occurred. G iv
the change in the SST’s schedule of training se
8/12/2019 1920911
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1920911 6/12
14 Charles J. Wallace
d ucte d t he tr eatm ent s. T h e r esu lts f or t ho se
participants who did not relapse one year into the
study were relatively few, and occurred in the con-
text of m ultiple measures and comparisons. How-
ever, as Hogarty et al . (1991) note, `if there is any
pattern of effects observed, it favors the SST-alone
condition at both the symptom and the performance
level’ (p. 342). The results for those who did notrelapse for the entire study (24 month survivors)
were even less clear, but, as Hogarty et al . note, they
`favored the FT condition and combined FT 1 SST
treatment groups’ (p. 343). T hese few effects and
their ambiguous patterns may perhaps re¯ect the
narrow focus of SST on the interpersonal skills
needed to cope with familial interactions; only for
part of the second years of training did the focus
expand to include nonfamilial interactions and
situations.
West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Medical
Center and UCLA
Marder et al . (1996) compared the effects of SST
and Supportive Group Therapy (SGT) on symp-
tomatic relapse and role functioning. The compari-
son was conducted as part of a study of the effects
of supplementing an ongoing regimen of low-dose
injectable medication (5 to 10mg of ¯uphenazine
decanoate every seven to 14 days) with time-limitedoral medication at the appearance of idiosyncratic
prodromes. Participants were 80 individuals diag-
nosed with schizophrenia according to DSM-III-R
criteria con®rmed by symptom pro®les assessed
with the Present State Examination. All had been
stabilized for a minimum of two months on the low
dose injectable medication, and all were receiving
care at a Veteran’s Administration Medical Center.
After the stabilization period, participants were
ra nd om ly a ss igned to e ither S ST o r S GT . S ST
consisted of six months of bi-weekly sessions usingthe M edication M anagement and Symptom Man-
agement Modules of the UCLA Social & Indepen-
dent Living Skills Modules (Liberman et al ., 1993);
followed by six months of weekly sessions using the
Training in Interpersonal Problem Solving Module;
and concluded with 12 months of weekly `Success-
ful Living’ sessions focused on the skills required for
participants to achieve their own personal goals
(Hierholzer & Liberman, 1986). The modules are
highly structured and thoroughly speci®ed curricula
that each use seven `learning activities’ (introduc-tion, videotaped demonstration, role-play, solving
resource management problems, solving outcome
tioning (Training in Interpersonal Problem Solvi
Mo du le ), s elect a nd e va lu a te leisu re a nd re
reational activities (Recreation for L eisure Module
and engage in friendly conversations (Basic Conve
sation Skills Module). The SGT sessions, whi
followed the same schedule as SST, were design
to assist participants to set personal goals and sol
problems that might impede their achievement. Tsessions used expressive and supportive group the
apy techniques (open-ended questions, re¯ectio
empathy, etc.) and ex plicitly avoided the use of ski
training techniques.
Participants’ prodromes were assessed in a week
interview, and an idiosyncratically determin
increase triggered a decision that supplemental or
medication, 5mg ¯uphenazine administered twice
day, was needed. However, to evaluate the effects
th e s up plem en t, p ar ti ci pan ts w er e r an dom
assigned to receive either the oral medication orplacebo. Both the participants and the assesso
were blind to the speci®c assignment. In the event
continued deterioration, open label medication w
provided.
The effects of the procedures were evaluated wi
monthly administrations of the BPRS and sem
annual administrations of the Social Adjustme
Scale II (SAS-II). In addition, the speci®c effects
the SST procedures were evaluated with an inte
view and role-play test of participant’s knowled
and performance of the speci®c material taught the M edication Management and Symptom Ma
agement modules. T he results of the module tes
indicated that participants signi®cantly and substa
tially increased their knowledge and performance
the skills, and retained these improvements over
one-year follow-up (Eckman et al ., 1992).
The results for the BPRS and SAS-II indicat
tha t the o utco m es we re a c om p le x intera cti
between medication and training. For the BPR
the risk o f s ym p to m atic relap se, d e ®n e d a s
increase of four points or more on the sum of thThought Disturbance and Hostility factors or
increase of three or more on either, was signi®cant
higher for participants who received placebo an
SGT compared to those who received placebo an
SST. The difference between SST and SGT w
not signi®cant for participants who received the or
supplement, and Marder et al . conclude that `SS
may affect exacerbation risk most in high-risk ind
v id u als wh os e m e dica tion m a na gem e nt is s u
optimal’ (p. 14). Indeed, for those individuals, t
risk of relapse with SST was equivalent to that findividuals who receive supplemental oral med
cation.
8/12/2019 1920911
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1920911 7/12
Social skills training in psychiatric rehabilitation
pants who either received placebo supplementation
or remained stable for the two years of treatment
and did not have an increase in prodromes, there
wa s n o s igni® c ant d iffe re nc e b e twee n S S T a nd
SGT. Additionally, the effects of SST on adjust-
ment were largest for participants with an early
onset of their illnesses (before 24 years old). Marder
et al . conclude that `skills training may be mostbene®cial to those patients with a relatively early
onset that has left them with fundamental de®cits in
social and interpersonal skills. Furthermore, SST
appears optimally effective ¼ [for improved adjust-
ment] ¼ for those patients who either remain clini-
cally stable, or, if unstable, receive effective early
drug intervention’ (p. 16). H owever, considering the
results for relapse, SST may have bene®ts in differ-
ent areas of functioning for all but relatively skilled
and stable individuals.
University of Calgary
Dobson et al . (1995) compared the effects of SST
with those of social milieu treatment (SMT). Both
were conducted for nine weeks on a four day per
week schedule. SST was divided into three three-
w ee k se gm e nts ; b as ic c om m un ica tio n sk ill s,
assertiveness training, individual communication
and goal setting. Training techniques included
instruction, communication games, role-plays, mod-eling, and daily homework. A manual was developed
to guide the trainers who were continually moni-
tored to ensure that they accurately conducted the
training. SMT gave participants a choice of struc-
tured activities including supportive discussion,
exercise, horticulture, and art and crafts. Partici-
p ants we re 3 3 individu als d ia gnosed w ith
schizophrenia according to DSM-III-R criteria,
s elec te d o n the b a sis o f a Ge ne ra l P os itive a nd
Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS; Kay et al ., 1987)
score below the 50th percentile. The 33 were ran-domly assigned to the conditions.
T h e e ffec ts o f the c on d itio ns were e va lu ate d
exclusively on improvements in symptomatology,
measured by the PANSS and the Symptom Check-
list-90 (SCL-90). Both were administered before,
twice during (three week and six week), and imme-
diately after treatment, with a follow-up assessment
at three months for both groups and six months for
the SST group. The results indicated that, despite
the limitation in the range of potential improvement
introduced by the selection criterion, `there wasgenerally more change for the SST group than the
SMT group, notably on the ¼ PANSS’ (p. 22). The
Rehospitalization rates during the year after tre
ment were the same for both groups, although th
SST participants were hospitalized for fewer da
(m ean o f 3.47 v ersu s 15.42, p, 0.08). Unfort
nately, these results are dif®cult to interpret sin
Dobson et al . did not measure functioning, partic
larly interpersonal functioning which was the p
m a ry ta rget o f S ST , a nd th e re wa s a s igni® careduction in medication for both groups coincide
with the administration of their treatment.
University of Brisbane
Hayes et a l . (1995) compared the effects of SS
with those of discussions groups (DG) conduct
w ith a r el at iv el y l ar ge sa mp le of p ar tic ip an
( N 5 63). Like the Dobson et al . study, participan
were chosen based on a DSM-III-R diagnosis schizophrenia and relatively low to moderate sym
tomatology (ratings of not more than three on BPR
items assessing hallucinations, delusions, and loos
ness of associations). SST consisted of 36 sessio
c on d uc te d o ve r 18 we ek s, with n in e a d dition
booster sessions conducted over the following s
months. The curriculum `emphasized p ositive tim
use skills, interpersonal skills, and social proble
solving skills’ (p. 10). The curriculum also includ
a segment that taught participants how to commun
cate concerns about their illness and their medictio n s. S k ills we re tau gh t with d e mon stra tion
role-played practice, and written homework assig
ments that were reviewed at the beginning of ea
session. Th e discussion groups focused on the iden
ical topics, and used `open ended questions, par
phrasing, re¯ecting, and summarizing’ (p. 10)
lieu of demonstrations and in-session role-play
Manuals were written that detailed the speci®c pr
c ed u re s for e ach c on dition a nd p e rs on ne l we
trained to implement them. The sessions were co
tinually monitored to ensure that they were conduted as speci®ed.
Several measures of social skills, symptomatolog
relapse, social adjustment, quality of functionin
use of time, and satisfaction with treatment we
administered at pre-treatment, post-treatment, an
follow-up (six months after the post-treatmen
Un fo rtun ately, the rate o f m is se d s es sion s a n
dropouts was relatively high and equal for bo
groups; at the post-treatment assessment, only 37
the initial 63 participants had attended half or mo
of the scheduled sessions, and at follow-up, only 3of them were available for assessment. The resu
for the study `completers’ indicated that the inte
8/12/2019 1920911
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1920911 8/12
16 Charles J. Wallace
for all participants or for the completers only. Par-
ticipants’ satisfaction with treatment was equally
high for both groups.
S ev eral fac to rs m a ke the se res ults s om e wha t
dif®cult to interpret. It is possible that the high rate
of dropout and poor attendance may have resulted
in losing those participants most likely to bene®t
from SST. Restricting the analyses to completersstill included participants who attended as few as
50% of the scheduled sessions, perhaps too few for
SST to have an effect. Although DG did not include
speci®c in-session demonstrations and role-plays, it
did include the same topics, and the group mem-
bers’ discussions may have provided the support,
advice and prompts needed for their performance of
s kil ls th at m a y h av e b een a lr ea dy t ho ro ug hl y
instatedÐif not performedÐin their behavioral
repertoires. Interestingly, the average age of onset
for the 63 wh o b e ga n the s tu d y wa s 25, s ligh tlygreater than the `dividing line’ of 24 that Marder et
al . (1996) reported as separating those who bene®t
from skills training and those who do not. Thus, an
unreported number of participants may not have
needed the speci®c training provided in the SST
group, and their lack of performance of the skills
may have been caused by the factors suggested in
Figure 1. Indeed, Hayes et al . conducted a post-hoc
hierarchical multiple regression analysis that indi-
cated the importance of social skills in community
functioning. Th ey found that post-test interpersonalskills were signi®cantly and positively correlated
with post-test social adjustment and symptoms over
and above pre-test adjustment and symptoms.
Conclusions
The results of these six sets of studies offer ®ndings
to please everyone from adherents of social skills
rehabilitation (e.g. Liberman, 1992) to s keptics (e.g.
Hogarty et al ., 1991). The studies that measured the
immediate effects of training (Tarrier et al ., Marder
et al ., Hayes et al .) demonstrated that training does
achieve increases in the targeted skills w hen conduc-
ted with reasonable speci®city using simple instruc-
tional techniques including demonstration and
practice. When these skills are relevant to the com-
plexities of the roles and functioning assessed by the
outcome measures, when trainees can bene®t from
training because they lack the skills, and when the
environment provides prompts and reinforcers for
use of the skills, improved functioning ensues, as
clearly indicated by the West Los Angeles±UCLA/
VA study of Marder and his colleagues.
adjustment, particularly on instrumental role pe
formance, can be explained by psychosocial trea
ment or medication. Globally, patients get `bett
but not well’ ¼ relatively few patients appear
a ch ieve i nd ep en de nt li vi ng an d c on ti nu
employment that is uninterrupted by intermitte
relap se d urin g the y ea rs wh en the y rem a in
greatest risk (p. 345).
This pessimistic assessment of the usefulness
skills training is perhaps better interpreted as
commentary on the multitude of intertwined facto
that affect functioning, the limited role of training
imp ro ving it, th e d if®c u lty o f c on d uc ting we
focused training accompanied by suf®cient practic
and the need to adapt clinical services to this com
plex reality.
The wide range of results reported by the six se
o f s tu d ies re¯ ec ts the c on sidera ble d iffe re nc
among their content, training techniques, and sens
tivity of outcome measures. For example, Tarrier
al . based their C SE procedures on the assumpti
that improved coping with persistent symptom
would result in improved role functioning. As ind
c ate d p rev iou sly, the y c on c lu de d tha t the CS
group’s unimproved functioning re¯ected a relati
independence of symptoms and functioning an
consequent irrelevance of CSE’s content. The P
grou p’ s u n im p rov ed fun c tion in g m a y h a ve a l
re¯ected irrelevant content that focused only
global skills and not speci®c complexities, as well
a lack o f p ra c tice tha t m ay h a ve b ee n a c ritic
omission given Ericsson and Charness’s (1994) co
clusions. Both CSE and PS were brief, and suppo
was apparently not available after it ended.
Hogarty et al .’s SST focused for the ®rst year o
the interpersonal skills needed to improve relatio
ships with familial members, and only shifted duri
months 12 to 21 to focus on interaction skills wi
nonfamilial individuals. There is no indication th
SST focused on nonrelationship skills that may habeen important for improved functioning. In co
trast, FT explicitly augmented its focus on interpe
s on al s kills with tec h niq ue s to e nlis t a fam ily
assistance to `reintegrate ¼ [their relative] ¼ in
normal roles in community systems (work/schoo
(Hogarty et a l ., 1986, p. 634). Furthermore, SS
was faded beginning with month 21, and terminat
three months later with referral to clinicians an
agencies who were unable to continue treatmen
FT was not faded, and it ended at 24 months wi
referral to `in-house’ clinicians who were able continue it. Additionally, the measures of adju
ment (e.g. Katz Adjustment Scales, Relatives) we
8/12/2019 1920911
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1920911 9/12
Social skills training in psychiatric rehabilitation
¼ by means of graduated internal coping strate-
gies, attempts to provide a growing awareness of
personal vulnerability. Goals are to increase fore-
sight through the accurate appraisal of emotional
states, their appropriate expression, and assess-
ment of the reciprocal response of others. Strate-
g ies are supp lem ented b y p hase-s peci® c
psychoeducation and behavior therapy (Hogartyet al .,1995, p. 379).
PT is highly individualized, maximizing the likeli-
hood of clinical success at the cost of requiring well
trained and experienced clinicians to do the individ-
ualization and the increased dif®culty of conducting
a systematic evaluation.
Bradshaw’s results may represent the fortuitous
use of an outcome measure that assessed attainment
of individual goals rather than independent living
and instrumental role skills, and the Dobson et a l .study evaluated their training procedures solely in
terms of symptom reduction, an outcome that was
at best only obliquely related to the content and
methods of the training. Furthermore, Dobson et al .
confounded their results with decreases in medi-
cation that were instituted during training. In con-
trast, Hayes et a l . a dm inistered a ran ge o f we ll
chosen outcome measures to evaluate two treat-
m e nts tha t c on sisted o f the s am e we ll s pe ci®e d
content; their results did indicate that both had
desirable effects, but the differences between themwere slight. Unfortunately, the high rate of dropouts
a nd the v a riable ra te s o f a tten d an ce m a y h a ve
reduced the effectiveness of both treatments, partic-
ularly SST since it relied on demonstration and
p ra ctice to a ch ie ve e ffec ts o ve r a nd a b ove d is-
cussion.
Hogarty et al . d irec tly a dd re sse d the iss ue o f
dropouts and variable attendance by dividing their
participants into treatment `takers’ and `partial tak-
ers’, basing most of the analyses on data collected
from the takers. FT takers were de®ned as thosewho attended a family education workshop and
`attempted to implement a management procedure
at home, or, in a rare case, attended six or m ore
family sessions’ (p. 636). In contrast, SST takers
were de®ned as those who `completed the baseline
assessments of social skills de®cits plus at least one
session in skills rehearsal’, and control takers were
de®ned as those who attended at least `two individ-
ual sessions of supportive therapy provided by the
nurse clinician’ (p. 636). Hogarty et al . do not pro-
v ide inform atio n a bo ut th e n u mb er of s es sion sattended by their participants, and a possible `dose-
response’ relationship between the amount of train-
cial `real world’ obstacles, and the differences in th
effectiveness of different instructional technologi
(e.g. `reciprocal teaching’; Palincsar & Brow
1984). Unfortunately, the bene®ts of skills traini
are neither as immediate nor as widespread as tho
of psychotropic medication; they accrue slowly an
only with suf®cient teaching resources applied wi
care. Hogarty et al .’s expectation that skills traininshould result in many individuals’ achieving `ind
pendent living and continued employment that
uninterrupted by intermittent relapse during t
years when they remain at greatest risk’ may exce
what is possible given even a generous allocation
resources.
Focusing on the details, however, risks bei
absorbed by them and losing sight of the `forest f
the trees’. Figure 1 suggests that training is just o
of the variables that affect functioning, and there a
certainly several that account for large proportioof the variance of outcomes. Noncompliance wi
m e dica tion , a ge o f o n se t, a d dictio n to d ru gs
alcohol, performance of intolerable behaviors su
as assault, and the environment’s tolerance for dev
ance and expectations for performance are but a fe
o f t he m. T re atm en t a nd p rev enti on p ro gr am
directed to each may achieve large improvements
outcomes, particularly symptoms and rehospitaliz
tion rates. However, even with medication comp
a n ce a nd e nv iro nm e nts wh ose to le ra n ce is n
exceeded by individuals’ behaviors, their role funtioning is typically far less than adequate, and ski
training becomes an effective component in indivi
uals’ treatment.
Recommendations for further research
Given the factors that in¯uence social and instr
mental role functioning, there are several areas f
future research. First, b etter methods of assessi
roles, individuals and environments would be mohelpful. Clinicians could allocate scarce treatme
resources based on information about the complex
ties of the speci®c role(s) to which an individu
aspires, the skills in the individual’s current beha
ioral repertoire, and the degree and predictability
environmental supports and rewards. This alloc
tion could be the result of an algorithm that pr
s cr ib es the balan ce of sk ills training an
environmental manipulations that maximizes t
probability of improving the individual’s functio
ing. The algorithm could itself be developed bason research investigating the process of `expe
clinician’s decision-making, yielding a system th
8/12/2019 1920911
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1920911 10/12
18 Charles J. Wallace
achieve better outcomes by focusing their efforts on
delivering training rather than producing it. Current
technology such as computer-based interactive
training may provide an ef®ciently delivered format
that allows a relatively high degree of individuation.
Furthermore, the current efforts to improve individ-
uals’ persistent cognitive de®cits with `cognitive
rehabilitation’ techniques may also help them toparticipate more ef®ciently in skills training.
T hi rd, d ev el opi ng tec hn iq ues t o ex pl icitl y
increase environmental support could be helpful. In
keeping with the Americans with Disability Act,
these techniques could be used to accommodate
individuals with varying levels of skills, or to provide
v ar ia tion s i n s up po rt a s a n i nd iv idu al’s sk ills
increased with training.
F ou rth, d is sem in a tion o f s kills tra in ing m a y
require changes in the philosophies and practices of
the service delivery system. Such treatments gener-a lly d o n ot ® t the typ ic al p sy ch oth e ra py a nd /o r
medication models, and how best to accomplish
these changes and then disseminate these tech-
niques is yet to be determined.
References
A MERICAN PSYCHIATRIC A SSOCIATION (1992). Beyond
symptom suppression: improving the long-term outcomes of
schizophrenia . R ep ort N o . 1 34. W a sh in gt on , D C:
American Psychiatric Press.BAUMGARTEL , H. , R EYNOLDS, M . & PATHAN , R. (1984).
How personality and organizational-climate variables
moderate the effectiveness of management develop-
ment programmes. Management and Labour Studies , 9 ,
1±16.
BRADSHAW , W.H. (1993). Coping-skills training versus a
problem-solving approach with schizophrenic patients.
Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 44 , 1102±1104.
C ARNVEVALE , A .P ., G AINER , L .J . & V ILLET , J . ( 19 9 0) .
Training in America: the organization and strategic role of
training . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
C HASE , W . G . & E RICSSON , K.A. (1982). Skill and work-
ing memory. In: G. H. BOWER (Ed.), The psychologyof learning and motivation , volume 16 (pp. 1±58). New
York: Academic Press.
D OBSON , D .J.G ., M CDOUGALL , G., BUSHEIKIN , J. &
A LDOUS, J. (1995). Social skills t raining a nd symp -
tomatology in schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services, 46,
376±380.
D OL L , J . & M AYR , U. (1987). Intelligence and achieve-
ment in chess: a study of chess masters. Psychologische
Beitrage, 29 , 270±289.
E CKMAN , T . A . , W IRSHING , W . C. , M ARDER , S.R., L IBER-
MAN , R.P., J OHNSTON -C RONK , K . , ZIMMERMAN , K . &
M INTZ, J. (1992). Techn ology fo r training
schizophrenics in illness self-management: a controlledtrial. American Journal of Psychiatry, 14 9 , 1549±1555.
E RICSSON , K.A. & C HARNESS, N. (1994). Expert perform-
i d i i i A i P h l
m at ion p ro ce ssin g: th e i mpa ct o f H e rb er t A . S im
(pp. 235±267). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
E RICSSON , K .A ., K RAMPE , R.T. & T ESCH-R OMER ,
(1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acq
sition of skilled performance. Psychological Review, 10
363±406.
FOR D, J.K., Q UINONES, M., SEGO , D . & SPEER , J. (199
Factors affecting the opportunity to use trained sk
on the job. Paper presented at the 6th annual conf
ence of the Society of Organizational and IndustrPsychologists. St. Louis.
H AYES, R.L., H ALFORD, W.K., & V ARGHESE , F.T. (1995
S o ci al s k il ls t ra in in g w i th c hr on ic s ch iz oph ren
patients: effects on community functioning. Behav
Therapy, 26 , 433±449.
H IERHOLZER , R.W. & L IBERMAN , R.P. (1986). Success
living: a social skills and problem-solving group for t
chronic mentally ill. Ho s pital a nd Co mm u n ity P
chiatry, 37, 913±918.
H OGARTY , G . E . , A NDERSON , C .M ., R EISS, D .J ., K OR
BLITH, S.J., G REENWALD, D . P . , J AVNA , C . S . & M AD
NIA , M.J. (1986). Family psychoeducation, social ski
training, and maintenance chemotherapy in the aftcare treatment of schizophrenia. I: One year effects
a controlled study on relapse and expressed emotio
Archi ves of Gen era l Ps ychi atry, 43 , 633±642.
H OGARTY , G . E . , A NDERSON , C .M ., R EISS, D .J ., K OR
BLITH, S.J., G REENWALD, D .P., U LRICH, R.F.
CARTER , M. (1991). Family psychoeducation, soc
skills training, and maintenance chemotherapy in t
a ft ercare t rea tment of schiz oph renia. II: T wo y
effects of a cont rolled st udy on rela p se a nd a dju
ment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48 , 340±347.
H OGARTY , G .E ., K ORNBLITH, S .J ., G REENWALD, D .
DIBARRY , A. L. (1995). Personal therapy: a disord
relevant psychotherapy for schizophrenia. Schizophren
Bulletin, 21, 379±393.
H UCZYNSKI, A . A . & L EWIS, J.W . (1980). A n emp iri
study into the learning transfer process in manageme
training. Journal of Management Studies, 17 , 227±240
H ULIN , C.L., H ENRY , R.A. & N OO N , S.L. (1990). Addi
a dimension: time as a factor in the generalizability
predictive relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 10
328±340.
K AY , S.R., FISZBEIN , A. & O PLER , L. (1987). The positi
and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophr
nia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13 , 261±276.
L IBERMAN , R.P. (1992). Handbook of psychiatric rehab
tation. New York: MacMillan.
L IBERMAN , R.P., W ALLACE , C.J., BLACKWELL , G.A., E CMA N , T.A., V ACARRO, J . V . & K UEHNEL , T.G. (199
Innovations in skills training for the seriously menta
i ll: t he U C LA S o ci al & Independent Living Sk
Modules. Innovation Research, 2 , 43±60.
M ARDER , S.R., W IRSHING , W . C. , M INTZ, J. , M CK ENZ
J., J OHNSTON -C RONK , K . , E CKMAN , T.A., L EBELL , M
ZIMMERMAN , K . & L IBERMAN , R.P. (1996). Two ye
outcome of social skills training and group psychothe
apy for outpatients w ith chronic schizophrenia. Ame
can Journal of Psychiatry, 15 3 , 1585±1592.
N ATIONAL INSTITUTE OF M ENTAL H EALTH (1991). Cari
for pe ople wi th severe me nta l di sor de rs: a na tio nal pla n
research to improve services. D HH S Pu b N o. (A DM91±1762. Washington, DC: Supt of Docs., US Go
Printing Of®ce.
S & ( ) i
8/12/2019 1920911
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1920911 11/12
Social skills training in psychiatric rehabilitation
R OUILLIER , J.Z. & G OLDSTEIN , I.L. (1991). Determinants
of the climate for transfer of training. Paper presented
at the 6th Annual Conference of the Society of Organi-
zational and Industrial Psychologists, St. Louis.
SPOHN , H.E. & STRAUSS, M.E. (1989). Relation of neu-
roleptic and anticholinergic medication to cognitive
functions in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psy-
chology, 98, 367±380.
T ARRIER , N . , BECKETT , R . , H ARWOOD, S . , BAKER , A .,
Y USUPOFF, L. & U GARTEBURU , I. (1993a). A trial of two
cognitive-behavioural methods of treating drug-resista
residual psychotic symptoms in schizophrenic patien
I. Outcome. British Journal of Psychiatry, 16 2 , 524±53
T ARRIER , N . , SHARPE , R . , BECKETT , R . , H ARWOOD, S
BAKER , A . & Y USUPOFF, L. ( 19 93 b). A t ri al o f t
cognitive-behavioural methods of treating drug-resista
residual psychotic symptoms in schizophrenic patien
II. Treatment speci®c changes in coping and proble
solving skills. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemi
og y, 28, 5±10.
8/12/2019 1920911
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/1920911 12/12