1st adamas workshop, gsi, 2012r.pleskac18/12/2012 mosaic detector: experiments for therapy and space...
TRANSCRIPT
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Mosaic Detector:Experiments for Therapy and Space Research
R.Pleskac
GSI / Biophysics
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
OverviewOverview
Hadrontherapy & Space ResearchSignificance of nuclear fragmentationCave A measurements(Bragg curves, nuclear fragmentation, microdosimetry, beam widening)FIRST experiment(double-differential cross-section for Z particles)
Mosaic DetectorRequirementsDesignTime Line
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Significance of nuclear fragmentation Significance of nuclear fragmentation in RT with light ionsin RT with light ions
Carbon ion therapy
100-400 MeV/u
I. Pshenichnov
High-energy carbon beam stopping in water
Nuclear fragmentation Loss of primary ions depth-dose, RBE
Total reaction cross section 1-2 b
Buildup of secondary fragments dose-tail, lateral dose
Exp. Investigations (physical characterization)– LBL Berkeley Ne 670 MeV/u 1970’s W. Schimmerling – NIRS/HIMAC Chiba C, light ions 1990’s T. Kanai – GSI Biophysics C, light ions 1990’s
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Before treatmentBefore treatment
Definition and delineation of target volume (CT,MRI,PET)
transform patient CT-data to water-equivalent path length of ions
Treatment planning: - find best entrance ports - optimization (absorbed dose [Gy]) physical model - biological optim. (RBE (LET(Z,E),dose …) [GyE])
Verify dose distribution in water phantom (tolerable deviation < 5%)
Patient positioning
Patient treatment Bragg curves + Bragg curves +
fragmentation datafragmentation data
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Mechanical accuracy:1 μm for relative thickness
0.1 mm absolute
Precision Bragg curve measurementsPrecision Bragg curve measurements
Comparison of absolute B.P. positions measured at GSI and HIT synchrotrons at the same nominal beam energies:
→ agreement within < 2 ‰ rel. deviation
The present data base includesprecise B.P. position data forp, 3He, 7Li, 12C, 16O
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Bragg curves of Bragg curves of 12C waterC water
peak-width and height are affected by– straggling – fragmentation
increasing tail dose
© D.Schardt
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Microdosimetry Microdosimetry in-phantomin-phantom measurements measurements
Tissue-equivalent proportional chamber (TEPC)
Sensitive volume
120 mb TE-gas
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Beam Widening –Beam Widening –- Film Stack in Water Acquarium- Film Stack in Water Acquarium
Photo© G.Martino
Irradiated GaF Chromic filmsStack of films placed in the water-phantom aligned with the beam axis
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Fragmentation studies
- Fragment buildup in thick targets
- Neutrons
- Microdosimetry
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Fragmentation SetupFragmentation Setup
Angular distribution setup → Beam energy of 120 MeV/u→ Cylindrical water target (diameter of 150 mm)→ Telescope positionned at 0°, 20°, 30°, 60°, 90° and 120°
The ΔE–E telescope detector
Loss of primary ions setup→ beam energy of 300 MeV/u→ Target: 0, 1, …, 7 large water flasks→ Telescope positionned at 0°
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Signal processing & Data Acquisition (DAQ) systemSignal processing & Data Acquisition (DAQ) system
Number of primary ions N0→ big ionization chamber
Number of fragments N→ ΔE-E telescope
Trigger→ START and/or BaF2 detector
DAQ→ GSI Multi Branch System (MBS)→ Aug 2007 – CAMAC CVC based DAQ→ Feb 2009 – CAMAC GTBC based DAQ→ Aug 2012 – VME based DAQ
RAW DATA→ List Mode Data (LMD) files
DATA ANALYSIS→ on event-by-event basis→ ROOT program (online / offline)→ ΔE-E scatter plot → "banana" cuts → identification of fragments
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Identification of FragmentsIdentification of Fragments
7Li at 120 MeV/u: ΔE-E scatter plot
p
d
t3He
4He
γ+n
ΔE (plastic)
E (
BaF
2)
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Loss of primary ions and fragment buildupLoss of primary ions and fragment buildup
Loss of carbon Ions by
nuclear reactions
E. Haettner et al., GSI 2005
Buildup of secondary fragments
Surviving fraction
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Spectral dataSpectral data
E. Haettner et al., GSI 2005
Buildup of secondary
fragments
Fragment energy spectra 4mm behind B.P.
E0 12C
He energy spectra at angles 0° - 6°
E0 12C
Comparison with
PHITS-code
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
FIRST – experimental setup in cave CFIRST – experimental setup in cave C
IR – START scintillatorIR – Beam MonitorIR – TargetIR – Si Pixel Vertex DetectorIR- KENTROSALADIN MagnetTP-MUSIC IVTOF wallLAND
→ Beam diagnostics→ New detectors in interaction region (IR) → ALADIN dipole→ MUSIC + ToF Wall→ LAND
Measurable→ Double-differential cross-section for Z particles
Experiment in August 2011(carbon beam fragmented on thick targets)
→ C + C (5 mm) at 400 MeV/u→ C + Au (0.5 mm) at 400 MeV/u
→ coincidence measurement→ on event-by-event basis
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Future Experiments at GSI: Irradiation facilitiesFuture Experiments at GSI: Irradiation facilities
Cave B (rear part)Preparation of FIRST
E = 0.1 – 2 GeV/u
Medical cave
Cave AFragmentation ExperimentsSpace research
E < 15 MeV/uCave CFIRST experiment
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Mosaic DetectorMosaic Detector
new GSI mosaic detector
(based on n_ToF design)n_ToF mosaic detector
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Requirements / GeometryRequirements / Geometry
Purpose:Beam monitor (counter) + START/STOP for ToF + Energy lossParticles: protons – carbon – iron - HIIntensities: 1e0 – 1e8/sec(replacing existing START plastic scintillator)
sCVD:4,5 x 4,5 mm2 x 300 μmactive area 4,0 x 4,0 mm2 (~ 80 % of total area)
Mosaic detector:3 x 3 sCVDtotal area 13,5 x 13,5 mm2 (beam spot 5 – 10 mm FWHM)9 x C2 + 1 x C6 preamplifiers
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
CharacteristicsCharacteristics
Signalsprotons - oxygen at 500 MeV: → 3.2 – 350 fC3.2 fC / 4 ns = 0.8 μA → 0.8 μA * 50 Ω = 40 μV40 dB current amplifier (f = 100) → 40 μV * 100 = 4 mVprotons: S/B = 4 mV / 2.5 mV = 1.6oxygen: S/B = 200 mV / 3.2 mV = 62.5
protons: using quick charge amplifier (4 mV/fC) → 3.2 fC * 4 mV/fC = 12.8 mV → S/B = 12.8 mV / 0.6 mV (noice) = 21.3
Time Resolutioncase of 16O: 1 ns / 100 ps = 10 pscase of protons: 3.5 ns / 21.3 ns = 150 ps
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Proton / Carbon InteractionProton / Carbon Interaction
Ionization for protons at 200 – 500 MeV
Ionization for carbon at 1 – 10 GeV →
150 – 600 fC (150 – 600 MIP)
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
n_ToF PCB Design (1)n_ToF PCB Design (1)
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
n_ToF PCB Design (2)n_ToF PCB Design (2)
Top layer Bottom layer
Readout lines
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
Time lineTime line
January 2013 – assembling February 2013 – final testing End of February 2013 - delivering
1st ADAMAS Workshop, GSI, 2012R.Pleskac 18/12/2012
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION !THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION !