2005. why is it necessary when person lacks capacity physicians have power and influence over them...
TRANSCRIPT
2005
Why is it necessary
When person lacks capacity physicians have power and influence over them which could be abused
30% pts on acute medical wards may lack capacity
2 million people in UK lack capacity Until this act no statutory law
covered this area
Lack of capacity
• Causes– Mental illness– Acute physical illness– Learning difficulties– Dementia
• Just because a person has a condition that might mean they lack capacity does not mean that they are incapable of making all decisions
The new Act
Codifies previous common law Introduces a code of practice A criminal offence for wilful neglect
or ill treatment of people without capacity
A new role of independent mental capacity advocate service - IMCA
Advanced decisions
Key Principles
• Capacity should always be assumed• Persons ability to make decisions should be
optimised before concluding capacity is absent
• Patients are entitled to make unwise decisions• Decisions and actions made for people lacking
capacity must be in their best interests• Such decisions must always be the least
restrictive options for their basic rights and freedoms
The code of practice
Designed to guide those responsible for interpreting the act
Clinicians are legally required to “have regard to” its guidance and if later asked prove they did
Any departures form it will be hard to justify
Is available online
Independent mental capacity advocate A person who is assigned to support
and represent “unbefriended” people who lack capacity
Clinicians do not have to adhere to their decisions but must take them into account as part of the decision making process
The code specifies when to instruct an independent mental capacity advocate
IMCA
• They should can be instructed for– Care reviews– Adult protection cases
• They must be instructed and then consulted when– Serious medical treatment is being
proposed• Ventilation, major surgery, chemotherapy, etc.
– When accommodation for > 28 days in hospital or 8/52 in a care home is being considered
Lasting power of attorney A person can appoint a named
person “the donee” with the authority to make decisions on their behalf if they lost capacity
It applies to Property and affairs Personal welfare Health care Social affairs
Lasting power of attorney• It includes all decisions except those
about withdrawal of life saving treatment unless explicitly authorised in the agreement
• Property and affairs lasting power of attorney can start before the person looses capacity
• Clinicians treating people without capacity must follow the decision of the “donee” unless they are thought not to be acting in the persons best interest
Lasting power of attorney The limits of the power granted are
specified Decisions about life sustaining
treatment must be specified A signed statement from the attorney
and a certificate completed by an independent third party are required
The court of protection can appoint a deputy for someone who already lacks capacity
Advanced decisions
Can be drawn up by anybody to specify treatments they would not want if they lost capacity
They cannot demand treatments As long as they were drawn up when
person still had capacity and are specific enough to cover the person’s current predicament they must be respected
They can be reversed if the person regains capacity
Advanced decisions
They can be made verbally Decisions that refuse life
sustaining treatment have to be written, signed and witnessed to be valid
Court of Protection
Adjudicates on the following for people who lack capacity Financial matters Health Welfare decisions
Legal protection
Section 5 of the act protects from legal liability those providing Health and personal care
For people without capacity provided they had “reasonable belief” that the person lacked capacity and their actions were in the persons best interest
Documentation is key Does not protect those who have been
negligent or who have gone against the wishes of an attorney or deputy acting within the scope of their power
Assessment of capacity
Stage 1 Person must have an impairment of or
disturbance in the functioning of the brain or mind resulting in an inability to retain, use or weigh information relevant to a decision.
Stage 2 Can only be assessed in relation to a
particular decision Must be reassessed for each decision People are entitled to make unwise
decisions
Best interests
When deciding on best interests consider Intervention likely to lead to best clinical
outcome Plus Put yourself in the person position and ask
what they would have wanted if they still had capacity
Views of relatives or others who know the person well might be crucial to decision making
The least restrictive option should be used
Use of restraint
Restraint is use or threat of force to make someone do something they are resisting
Is also the restriction of a person’s freedom of movement, whether they are resisting or not
Restraint must reasonably be believed to be necessary to prevent harm
Must be proportional to the likelihood and seriousness of the harm
Relationship to mental health act Mental health act is only relevant
when treating a mental disorder Patients detained under the mental
health act who refuse physical health treatments need to have their capacity assessed
Incapacity should not be assumed in those with mental illness
Relationship to mental health act The mental capacity act cannot be
used to give care involving loss of liberty
Treatments that are prohibited in advanced decisions or treatments that are not consented to by an attorney can still be given under the mental health act if they are to treat a mental disorder