2006 transportation tomorrow survey regional...

45
datamanagementgroup DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL SUMMARY BY WARDS

Upload: others

Post on 20-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEYREGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL

SUMMARY BY WARDS

Page 2: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEYREGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL

SUMMARY BY WARDS

Prepared for theTransportation Information Steering Committee

by the

Data Management GroupDepartment of Civil Engineering

University of TorontoJuly 2009

Page 3: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

i

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) was conducted on behalf of 21 local, regional, provincial and transit operating agencies in the Greater Toronto and surrounding areas. The members of the TTS Survey Techni-cal Committee are represented by the following agencies:

City of Barrie GO Transit City of Brantford Ministry of Transportation Ontario City of Guelph Regional Municipality of Durham City of Hamilton Regional Municipality of Halton City of Kawartha Lakes Regional Municipality of Niagara City of Peterborough Regional Municipality of Peel City of Toronto Regional Municipality of Waterloo County of Dufferin Regional Municipality of York County of Peterborough Toronto Transit Commission County of Simcoe Town of Orangeville County of Wellington

This report was prepared for the Transportation Information Steering Committee (TISC) by the Data Management Group (DMG) at the Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto. The Steering Committee, formerly known as the Toronto Area Transportation Planning Data Collection Steering Committee (TATPDCSC), which also conducted the 1986, 1991, 1996 and 2001 TTS, is represented by the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Cities of Toronto and Hamilton, Regional Municipalities of Durham, Halton, Peel and York, GO Transit and the Toronto Transit Commission. The contributions of the above supporting agencies to the production of this report and to the ongoing work of the DMG are gratefully acknowledged.

Page 4: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

ii

FURTHER INFORMATION

The Transportation Tomorrow Surveys (TTS) are parts of an ongoing data collection program by the Transportation Information Steering Committee (TISC). The survey data (2006, 2001, 1996, 1991 and 1986) are currently under the care of the Data Management Group. This group is responsible for maintaining the TTS databases and making available appropriate travel information for any urban transportation study in the area. Requests for information from the TTS, or enquiries related to the contents of this report, should be directed to the address below.

Data Management Group Department of Civil Engineering University of Toronto 35 St. George Street Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4 Tel: (416) 978-3916 Fax: (416) 978-3941 Email: [email protected] Web: www.dmg.utoronto.ca

Page 5: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 Background ....................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of This Report ...................................................................................... 2

THE TTS DATA ................................................................................................................... 3 Design and Conduct of the Survey .................................................................... 3 Information Collected ......................................................................................... 3 Sample Expansion Methods .............................................................................. 4 Quality of the Data ............................................................................................. 4

REPORT CONTENTS ........................................................................................................ 6 Overview ............................................................................................................ 6 General Summary Tables .................................................................................. 6 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY AREA .......................................................... 8

AREA SUMMARIES ........................................................................................................... 9 Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area ................................................................. 10 Regional Municipality of Peel .......................................................................... 11 Town of Caledon .............................................................................................. 12 Ward 1 ...................................................................................................... 13 Ward 2 ...................................................................................................... 14 Ward 3 ...................................................................................................... 15 Ward 4 ...................................................................................................... 16 Ward 5 ...................................................................................................... 17 City of Brampton .............................................................................................. 18 Ward 1 ...................................................................................................... 19 Ward 2 ...................................................................................................... 20 Ward 3 ...................................................................................................... 21 Ward 4 ...................................................................................................... 22

Ward 5 ...................................................................................................... 23 Ward 6 ...................................................................................................... 24 Ward 7 ...................................................................................................... 25 Ward 8 ...................................................................................................... 26 Ward 9 ...................................................................................................... 27 Ward 10 .................................................................................................... 28 City of Mississauga .......................................................................................... 29 Ward 1 ...................................................................................................... 30 Ward 2 ...................................................................................................... 31 Ward 3 ...................................................................................................... 32 Ward 4 ...................................................................................................... 33 Ward 5 ...................................................................................................... 34 Ward 6 ...................................................................................................... 35 Ward 7 ...................................................................................................... 36 Ward 8 ...................................................................................................... 37 Ward 9 ...................................................................................................... 38 Ward 10 .................................................................................................... 39 Ward 11 .................................................................................................... 40

Page 6: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

1

BACKGROUND

The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) is the largest and most comprehensive travel survey ever conducted in Ontario or perhaps anywhere in North America. The 2006 survey is the fifth in a series of surveys conducted every five years in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA). The TTS contains detailed demographic information on all members of a surveyed household and a ledger of travel information over an entire weekday.

The first Transportation Tomorrow Survey, conducted in 1986, collected information for more than 61,700 households in the GTHA. It was the most comprehensive travel survey in the Toronto area since the 1964 Home Interview Survey for the Metropolitan Toronto (now City of Toronto) and Region Transportation Study (MTARTS).

The 1991 TTS was an update of the 1986 survey data. Approximately 22,300 households in the GTHA and 2,200 households at the fringe of the GTHA were successfully interviewed. The sur-vey captured the travel condition in the GTHA after five years of active changes, with particular emphasis on areas that experienced rapid population growth between 1986 and 1991. The 1991 survey data provided a clear measure of global trends on urban travel characteristics. One of the most significant observations was the shift of urban population and employment growth from the City of Toronto to the surrounding regions and its impact on travel demands and modal choice.

In 1996, municipalities adjacent to the GTHA were invited to participate in the TTS survey. Ten municipalities elected to be included, expanding the survey area to cover a large part of south central Ontario. The resulting survey now involved co-operation from sixteen local and regional governments, two transit operators and one provincial ministry. Based on Census information, the survey area covered 60% of Ontario’s total population. Altogether 115,200 households, or five percent of all households in the survey area, were successfully interviewed. The survey provided sample information on an estimated 13 million daily trips in the survey area.

The 2001 TTS survey covered much of the same area as the 1996 survey excluding the Regional Municipality of Waterloo whilst expanding some other counties outside of the GTHA. The survey again involved the co-operation from sixteen local and regional governments, two transit opera-tors and one provincial ministry. Altogether approximately 137,000 households were success-fully interviewed. The survey provided sample information on an estimated 14 million daily trips in the survey area.

The 2006 TTS covered all of the area involved in the 2001 survey plus the Regional Municipality of Waterloo, which had previously been surveyed in 1996 but not 2001, and an additional two new areas, the City of Brantford and the County of Brantford, which had not been covered in any previous surveys. The survey involved co-operation from 19 local and regional governments, two transit operators and one provincial ministry. Altogether approximately 149,000 households were successfully interviewed. The survey provides sample information on an estimated 16.5 million daily trips in the survey area. Unlike data sources such as regular traffic counts which measure the change in magnitude of travel demand, the TTS provides information on the characteristics of these changes. As a transportation time series database, the TTS enables analysis on how factors such as flexible work hour programs, relocation of manufacturing employment, increasing female participation in the labour force, and aging population influence how people travel, how often and the purpose of their trips.

In addition to providing time series travel information for the GTHA, the 2006 data is useful in identifying the dynamic and increasing socio-economic influences between the GTHA and its surrounding regions.

INTRODUCTION

Page 7: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

2

PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT

The purpose of this report is to summarize the 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey data at the local ward boundary level for the Regional Municipality of Peel. The summary is presented in tabular and graphic formats at different levels of detail, namely the entire Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, the Regional Municipality of Peel, its local municipalities and the wards that are contained in each municipality. The information presented includes socio-demographic and travel characteristics. In addition to presenting the magnitude of the trips coming into and leav-ing an area, the summary tables and figures also describe travel characteristics such as travel purpose, trip start time, travel distance and travel mode choice.

The information presented in this report is based on Version 1.0 of the 2006 TTS database. For more historical TTS data, please refer to the fourth and fifth reports of the 2006 TTS Transporta-tion Tomorrow Survey Series respectively entitled 2006, 2001 & 1996 Travel Survey Summaries and the 2006, 2001, 1996 and 1986 Travel Survey Summaries for the Greater Toronto and Ham-ilton Area and the series of 2001 TTS Ward Reports.

Page 8: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

3

DESIGN AND CONDUCT OF THE SURVEYS

The 2006 TTS, with approximately 149,000 household interviews, is one of the largest surveys ever undertaken anywhere. The 2006 survey covered a great part of south central Ontario and consisted of the Cities of Toronto (formerly Metropolitan Toronto), Hamilton (formerly the Re-gional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth), Barrie, Brantford, Guelph, Kawartha Lakes (formerly County of Victoria), Peterborough, the Regional Municipalities of Durham, Halton, Niagara, Peel, Waterloo and York, the Town of Orangeville, the County of Simcoe and partial coverage of Pe-terborough and Wellington. In order to provide continuous coverage in the area surveyed, Brant County was surveyed during the training of interview staff.

The 2006 TTS was completed over two time periods. Areas external to the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) were surveyed in the fall of 2005 and the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area was surveyed in the fall of 2006.

A random sample of households in the study area was selected from Bell Canada’s files con-taining information on residential subscribers. The Bell files contain the name, address and telephone number of households listed in the telephone directory. Households with unlisted tele-phone numbers were not included in the sample of five percent of the households in the study area. The actual sampling rate in each Forward Sortation Area (defined by the first three char-acters of the postal code) was reviewed to ensure an even distribution of samples across the study area.

An advance letter was mailed to the sample household before the actual interview took place. The purpose was to introduce the survey, outline the survey process and impress upon the household the legitimacy and importance of information that would be collected in the interview.

Interviewers telephoned each sample household to collect travel information for the preceding day and recorded the data directly on computer files using a direct data entry software package. As the information was entered, the program carried out spelling checks on street names, valida-tion checks on transit route information and checks on the consistency and completeness of the information. The sample rates were monitored daily by sample control software to ensure even

coverage of the study area during the survey period. The locations of households, places of work and school, trip origins and destinations were coded to a geographic reference system.

Geographic coding enables the survey results to be studied at aggregate levels which are both flexible and accurate.

In the Regional Municipality of Peel, approximately 18,000 households were interviewed in the 2006 survey. With the 2006 Census count of approximately 359,000 households, the survey achieved its target of a five percent sample rate.

Detailed documentation of the planning and implementation of the 2006 survey is contained in the 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey report: Design and Conduct of the Survey. The sam-pling procedure for this survey is described in the 2006 TTS working paper: Data Expansion.

INFORMATION COLLECTED

Through the years, the TTS has collected demographic and travel information. Demographic data were collected for the household and each member of the household. Travel information was usually for the weekday just prior to the day of the interview. The 2006 database may be summarized as follows:

Demographic Information

Household Characteristics• - Location of residence - Dwelling unit type - Number of persons living in the household - Number of vehicles available for personal use

Person Characteristics• - Age

THE TTS DATA

Page 9: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

4

- Gender - Employment and student status - Possession of a driver’s licence - Possession of Transit pass - Location of usual place of work - Location of usual place of school - School Name - Availability of free parking at usual place of work - Occupation Type - Whether or not person worked at home on the trip day (only asked if a person em ployed full time outside the home did not make a work trip on the survey day)

Travel Information

Nature of trip• - Start time - Purpose of trip - Origin and destination points

Means of travel• - Travel mode - Detailed transit routes including boarding and alighting stations for all GO Train and subway trips

A trip is defined as a one-way movement between two locations for a single purpose. For exam-ple, a trip may be made to work, to serve the needs of a passenger, or to return home. The sur-vey collected information on all persons of age 11 or older over a 24-hour period. To reflect travel activities on an average work day, only trips made on Monday to Friday were recorded. The survey results indicate an approximate equal coverage of trips on each of the five weekdays.

All children between the ages of 6 and 11 were assumed to be full time students.

A comprehensive description of the contents and structures of the 2006 TTS database is con-tained in the 2006 TTS report entitled Data Guide Version 1.0.

SAMPLE EXPANSION METHODS

There were approximately 112,500 households in the GTHA and 37,100 households outside of the GTHA successfully interviewed in the 2006 TTS. Based on the 2006 Census, there were 2,160,100 households in the GTHA and 711,200 households in the remaining survey area. Therefore, the target of a five percent sample was achieved for the entire survey area.

The initial sample selection and sample control process were based on Forward Sortation Areas (FSAs) - the first three characters of the postal code. Expansion factors were applied to the data at the FSA level. Within most FSAs, according to past experience, apartment buildings are under-represented in TTS. Hence, a higher sampling rate for apartments was used. Unlike the 2001 TTS, no differential expansion process was used for apartments.

Institutions such as retirement homes and reformatories were not included in the survey. As a result, the overall population count for the GTHA by TTS is 3.1% less than that reported by Census.

The sample expansion procedures are described in detail in the third report of the 2006 TTS working paper series entitled Data Expansion.

QUALITY OF THE DATA

Analysis of the 2006 survey data indicates that the quality of the data is consistent with that from the previous surveys and can be used with confidence. Peak period travel corresponds with the 2006 Cordon Count data and transit trips are comparable to the ridership data provided by transit agencies.

As in previous surveys, population was under-represented by the 2006 TTS as compared to the Census data. The under-representation in infants and elderly persons is likely to be contributed by the exclusion of collective homes such as hospitals and nursing homes from the survey. There is also an under-representation of people aged 18 to 27. This can be attributed to the timing and definition of the survey relative to the census and its effect on post-secondary school students. The growing use of cell phone in place of land lines in this age group might also be accountable for the under-representation.

Page 10: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

5

For further discussion on the validation of the 2006 data, refer to the 2006 TTS report, Data Validation.

Page 11: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

6

REPORT CONTENTS

OVERVIEW

The data in this report provides demographic characteristics and travel pattern information. The data is presented by ward and summarized for the local municipalities, the Regional Municipal-ity of Peel and for the whole GTHA. In total there are 26 wards in the Regional Municipality of Peel.

To reflect the fact that all numbers presented in this report are estimates based on expanded survey data, all numeric figures are rounded. Totals and subtotals are rounded to the nearest 100 for all data presented in this report. All percentages are rounded to the nearest integer. No information is presented for categories that have less than four observations or survey records. These categories are denoted by an asterisk (*).

Invalid survey responses are dealt with in two ways. The response is grouped under the “other” category if one is available (travel mode, for example). Otherwise, invalid responses are distrib-uted proportionately (based on the valid responses) between the available categories.

GENERAL SUMMARY TABLES

Demographic Characteristics

Demographic data are presented in two tables on the top half of the page, one summarizes the data by household and the other summarizes the data by person.

Household characteristics include:

Total number of households in the area. The data expansion procedure ensures a close • match with the censusDistribution of households by dwelling type: house, townhouse or apartment• Distribution of households by number of persons in residence at the time of the interview•

Distribution of households by number of vehicles available to the household for personal • useA series of ratios that reflect the general characteristics of households in the area:•

Persons - Total population divided by total number of households Workers - Total number of employed persons (full-time, part-time or work at home) divided by total number of households Drivers - Total number of persons in possession of a driver’s licence divided by the total number of households Vehicles - Total number of vehicles available for personal use divided by total number of households Trips/day - Total number of trips by persons of age 11 and over divided by total num- ber of Households

Personal characteristics include:

Total population in private residence in the area at the time of the interview• Population by gender• The percentage of persons in possession of a transit pass by gender• The percentage of persons in possession of a valid driver’s licence by gender• The percentage of persons who are students (full-time or part-time) by gender• Employment status by gender. Categories are full-time out side the home, part- • time outside the home, work at home (full or part-time) The percentage of persons who made a trip to work on the survey day by employment • status Median age, the age where 50 percent of the population is older and 50 percent is • younger Distribution by age cohort• Daily trips per person calculated by the number of trips made by persons aged 11 and • over divided by the number of persons aged 11 and over

Page 12: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

7

Travel Patterns

The two tables on the lower half of the page present travel pattern information in two categories: trip purpose and mode of travel. In each category, the information is summarized by trips that were made by residents of the area and by trips with a destination in the area. Trips made by residents of an area are a measure of mobility and thus all trips regardless of trip origin or desti-nation are included. The number of trips made to an area is a measure of the area’s attractive-ness and therefore includes trips made by both residents and non-residents of the area. Note that trips made by residents include trips in and out of the GTHA and that trips made to the area include only trips made by GTHA residents.

The time periods dealt with are the 24-hour period and a 3-hour morning peak period. The morn-ing peak period has been chosen to minimize the number of non-work trips that are included in the summary. In general, the composition of the morning peak is dominated by trips to work and school. Although the period chosen for the morning peak is indicated as 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., the data actually comprises trips starting at 6:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. The reason for excluding trips starting at exactly 9:00 a.m. is that respondents tend to round off the times they reported to the nearest quarter or half hour. If data for both 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. are included the actual number of morning peak period trips would be overrepresented.

Trip Purpose

For trips made by residents of an area, the home location is the link between the commuter and the area of interest. Consequently, trip purpose categories are defined as:

Home to work and work to home (home-based work, HB-W) trips• Home to school and school to home (home-based school, HB-S) trip• All other home-based (home-based discretionary, HB-D) trips• All trips where neither trip end is the home (non-home-based, N-HB)•

The magnitude of the trips made to an area gives an indication of the attraction of land use in the area. The destination purposes are defined as:

Work• School• Home bound• Other or discretionary trips such as shopping, entertainment, etc.•

Mode of Travel

The travel mode categories are:

Automobile driver• Automobile passenger• Local transit• GO Train• Walk and Bicycle• Other, which includes motorcycle, taxi, school bus and other modes•

If a trip uses more than one mode category, public transit is given preference. In cases where both GO Train and local transit were used, GO Train is the dominant classification.

In general, only walk trips to and from work or school are included.

Trips Made by Residents of an Area

In addition to the travel information by trip purpose and travel mode, the summary tables also include statistics on the percentage of internal trips and median trip lengths.

The percentage of trips made entirely within an area by residents of the same area is a measure of the degree of self-containment for the area of interest. The percentages are calculated for the 24-hour period and a 3-hour morning peak period.

Median trip lengths are calculated as the trip distance of which 50 percent of the trips are longer and 50 percent are shorter. Trip length is measured as the straight line distance between origin and destination points. Trips with origin or destination outside the GTHA are not included in the Median calculation. The figures presented are by travel modes for the 24-hour period.

Page 13: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

8

2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY AREA

CITY OFGUELPH CITY OF

TORONTOWELLINGTON

CITY OF BARRIE

SIMCOE

CITY OF ORILLIA

CITY OF KAWARTHA LAKES

CITY OF BRANTFORD

BRANT

TOWN OF ORANGEVILLE

CITY OF PETERBOROUGH

PETERBOROUGH

YORK

DURHAM

PEEL

CITY OF HAMILTON

DUFFERIN

WATERLOO

NIAGARA

HALTON

Page 14: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

9

AREA SUMMARIES

Page 15: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

10

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO GTHA

2,865,000

12,118,800

23.6%

5.6

53%

18%

4.1

23%

6%

6.3

6%

43%

30.299% 98%

19%

33%

58%

62%

13%

16%

4%

2%

14%

12%

2%

1%

9%

6%

%2 %61%36 12% 1% 6%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF GTHA

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

2,901,200

12,244,700

23.7% 48%

32%

22%

12%

20%

40%

10%

16%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%4 %31%85 14% 2% 9%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

GREATER TORONTO AND HAMILTON AREA

2,160,100

%92 %36 8%

21%

16%

32%

40%

18%

35%

18%

7%

11%

2%

2,831,500

3,040,400

69%

59%

43%

32%

6%

10%

4%

2%

24%

22%

5,871,900

1%

1%

87% 54% 36% 20%

7%

9%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median13% 7% 11% 29% 25% 15%39.4

Age

2.4 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):2.7 1.3 1.7 1.4 5.7HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

T O R O N T O

Y O R K

D U R H A M

P E E L

H A L T O N

H A M I L T O N

Page 16: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

11

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL

553,200

2,252,200

24.6%

6.5

52%

19%

4.4

23%

6%

7.8

6%

44%

27.172% 73%

19%

31%

67%

69%

15%

17%

5%

3%

5%

5%

0%

1%

8%

5%

%3 %71%76 6% 2% 5%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

595,000

2,340,500

25.4% 47%

34%

22%

13%

20%

38%

11%

15%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%5 %51%36 6% 4% 8%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL

359,000

%91 %07 11%

13%

6%

27%

37%

20%

43%

24%

10%

16%

3%

548,300

570,900

68%

59%

46%

34%

6%

9%

4%

2%

26%

24%

1,119,100

0%

1%

87% 53% 39% 22%

5%

6%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median15% 8% 12% 31% 24% 11%36.3

Age

2.5 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.1 1.6 2.0 1.7 6.5HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

M I S S I S S A U G A

B R A M P T O N

C A L E D O N

Page 17: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

12

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO TOWN OF CALEDON

16,200

89,300

18.2% 43%

12%

32%

6%

7%

55%

37% 38%

19%

27%

61%

73%

11%

15%

20%

8%

*

0%

*

0%

8%

4%

%6 %41%67 0% 1% 3%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF TOWN OF CALEDON

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

27,300

120,100

22.7% 53%

32%

22%

11%

16%

39%

9%

18%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

2%1 %8%37 0% 1% 5%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

TOWN OF CALEDON

18,200

%3 %49 3%

11%

2%

34%

21%

21%

54%

23%

16%

11%

7%

26,900

27,300

73%

70%

46%

33%

5%

10%

7%

4%

23%

24%

54,200

1%

2%

87% 49% 42% 18%

1%

1%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median15% 8% 10% 29% 26% 12%39.4

Age

2.6 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.0 1.8 2.1 2.1 6.6HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

5

4

2

31

13.7 10.6 36.6 43.4

Page 18: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

13

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 1

1,200

11,600

10.6%

22.1

43%

7%

17

27%

3%

47.8

11%

71%

55.114% 12%

19%

19%

64%

71%

8%

16%

22%

10%

*

0%

*

1%

6%

2%

%8 %51%57 0% 1% 1%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 1

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

4,500

20,800

21.6% 48%

29%

23%

11%

18%

39%

10%

21%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%81 %9%17 * 1% 1%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 1

3,100

%3 %79 *

12%

3%

36%

16%

21%

53%

18%

17%

13%

11%

4,500

4,400

76%

72%

47%

31%

4%

10%

9%

5%

20%

26%

8,900

2%

3%

81% 53% 43% *

1%

1%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median11% 9% 10% 25% 32% 13%42.8

Age

2.6 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):2.9 1.6 2.1 2.3 6.7HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

HURONTARIO ST.

CHARLEST

ON SID

EROAD

AIRPORT RD.

OLDE

BASE

LIN

E RD.

WINSTON CHURCHILL BLVD.

HWY. 9

CALED

ON-EAS

T GAR

AFRAX

A TO

WNLIN

E

Page 19: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

14

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 2

2,100

11,900

17.6%

12.2

41%

9%

10.6

31%

6%

36.6

8%

61%

43.412% 10%

20%

25%

62%

72%

20%

18%

17%

7%

*

*

*

*

*

1%

%5 %41%87 1% 1% 1%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 2

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

3,600

17,700

20.5% 63%

32%

17%

7%

15%

43%

5%

18%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%11 %9%67 * * *

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 2

2,800

* %89 *

13%

*

42%

21%

21%

48%

15%

22%

9%

8%

3,900

4,000

85%

80%

38%

31%

6%

10%

16%

8%

14%

20%

7,900

*

*

89% 57% 39% *

*

*

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median7% 7% 11% 22% 37% 16%46.0

Age

2.4 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):2.8 1.5 2.3 2.2 6.2HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

AIRPORT RD.

DIXIE RD.

HURONTARIO ST.

KING S

T.

MISSISSAUGA RD.

MAYFI

ELD R

D.

WINSTON CHURCHILL BLVD.

OLDE

BASE

LINE

RD.

Page 20: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

15

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 3

1,700

7,200

24.0%

12.9

27%

9%

11

59%

15%

*

*

43%

46.521% 23%

12%

33%

36%

64%

8%

16%

53%

17%

*

*

*

*

3%

2%

%7 %51%47 * 1% 2%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 3

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

1,600

7,600

20.6% 53%

33%

24%

11%

13%

36%

11%

19%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%41 %8%27 * * 4%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 3

1,200

%6 %39 *

14%

*

42%

22%

15%

54%

22%

14%

7%

8%

1,600

1,700

76%

77%

50%

29%

9%

14%

5%

8%

25%

21%

3,300

*

*

82% 61% 40% *

3%

*

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median10% 9% 11% 22% 37% 11%43.6

Age

2.5 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):2.7 1.6 2.1 2.1 6.1HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

OLD C

HURCH RD.

AIRPORT RD.

OLDE

BASE

LINE

RD.

MOUNTAINVIEW RD.

INNIS LAKE RD.

THE

GRANGE

SR.

Page 21: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

16

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 4

1,200

12,800

9.3%

14.5

32%

5%

8.5

23%

2%

46.1

15%

75%

*10% 9%

31%

18%

70%

76%

17%

16%

9%

6%

*

0%

*

*

4%

1%

%6 %51%77 0% * 1%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 4

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

5,100

22,900

22.2% 56%

33%

20%

9%

16%

41%

8%

16%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%31 %01%67 * * 1%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 4

3,700

%3 %49 4%

11%

*

33%

20%

22%

53%

24%

18%

10%

7%

5,300

5,500

77%

71%

45%

31%

6%

11%

9%

4%

18%

20%

10,700

1%

3%

89% 50% 37% 24%

1%

1%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median13% 7% 11% 30% 26% 14%39.4

Age

2.4 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):2.9 1.6 2.2 2.1 6.3HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

THE GORE RD.

MAYFI

ELD R

D.

HWY. 50

CALED

ON

-KING

TOW

NLIN

E

KING S

T.

AIRPORT RD.

HWY. 9

Page 22: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

17

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 5

9,900

45,600

21.8%

10.3

47%

15%

10.2

29%

6%

37.2

5%

46%

3839% 41%

18%

32%

64%

74%

9%

14%

16%

6%

*

0%

*

0%

11%

6%

%5 %41%57 0% 0% 5%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 5

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

12,500

51,000

24.5% 50%

33%

24%

12%

17%

38%

10%

17%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%01 %8%37 * 1% 8%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 5

7,400

%3 %29 5%

8%

2%

29%

24%

21%

59%

29%

11%

13%

4%

11,600

11,800

66%

65%

48%

35%

4%

10%

3%

1%

29%

27%

23,300

1%

1%

89% 43% 52% *

2%

2%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median20% 8% 9% 33% 21% 9%35.5

Age

2.7 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.2 1.7 2.1 2.0 6.9HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

MAYFI

ELD R

D.

ALBION-VAUG

HAN RD.

KING ST.

COLERAINE DR.

COLUMBIA

WAY

HWY. 50

Page 23: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

18

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF BRAMPTON

163,200

735,100

22.2%

7.0

43%

15%

4.8

27%

7%

7.4

8%

49%

30.955% 58%

21%

30%

63%

67%

17%

18%

6%

3%

4%

5%

*

1%

10%

6%

%3 %81%86 5% 1% 5%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

218,600

837,500

26.1% 47%

36%

22%

13%

20%

37%

11%

14%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%5 %61%46 5% 3% 7%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF BRAMPTON

125,900

%41 %87 9%

11%

5%

25%

36%

19%

45%

25%

11%

20%

3%

205,200

211,200

67%

57%

48%

35%

5%

9%

3%

1%

26%

24%

416,400

0%

1%

87% 55% 40% 31%

3%

5%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median16% 8% 12% 32% 22% 9%34.4

Age

2.4 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.3 1.7 2.0 1.7 6.7HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

53

4

6

8

10

2

9

7

1

Page 24: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

19

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 1

10,200

64,800

15.8%

5.6

32%

8%

4.3

27%

5%

5.5

13%

53%

3121% 18%

27%

34%

64%

68%

13%

18%

4%

2%

5%

5%

*

1%

14%

6%

%1 %81%76 6% 2% 6%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 1

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

20,000

81,300

24.7% 50%

37%

19%

11%

19%

37%

12%

15%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%2 %51%66 6% 3% 8%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 1

13,200

%31 %37 14%

15%

8%

30%

42%

21%

39%

18%

9%

16%

2%

18,700

20,300

71%

57%

52%

37%

6%

9%

3%

1%

22%

23%

39,000

*

1%

87% 48% 52% *

4%

6%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median14% 7% 13% 30% 27% 9%36.5

Age

2.4 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.0 1.6 1.9 1.6 6.2HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

QUEEN S

T.

KENNEDY RD.

HWY. 410

VODDEN ST.

BOVA

IRD D

R.

WILL

IAMS P

KWY.

Page 25: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

20

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 2

12,700

69,400

18.3%

8.3

32%

9%

5.7

34%

7%

9.3

10%

55%

33.926% 23%

24%

30%

58%

68%

17%

17%

7%

4%

2%

3%

*

1%

17%

7%

%4 %61%17 3% 1% 5%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 2

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

24,300

89,500

27.2% 46%

35%

22%

13%

20%

37%

11%

15%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%6 %51%66 4% 2% 8%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 2

12,500

%1 %09 8%

7%

2%

24%

26%

22%

53%

28%

15%

19%

4%

21,100

21,200

68%

62%

49%

37%

6%

10%

3%

2%

27%

25%

42,300

1%

1%

87% 52% 31% 39%

3%

4%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median16% 10% 13% 30% 26% 6%35.2

Age

2.5 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.4 1.8 2.2 1.9 7.2HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/DayKENNEDY RD.

HURONTARIO ST.

HEAR LAKE RD.

BOVAIRD D

R.

SANDAL

WOOD P

KWY.

MAYFI

ELD R

D.

MCLAUGHLIN RD.

Page 26: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

21

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 3

33,200

121,400

27.4%

5

56%

25%

3.2

22%

8%

4.5

4%

27%

28.831% 29%

18%

40%

68%

69%

17%

19%

3%

2%

8%

6%

*

0%

4%

3%

%3 %81%66 7% 1% 5%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 3

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

17,800

75,600

23.5% 49%

34%

23%

12%

22%

41%

7%

13%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%6 %51%36 6% 2% 8%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 3

13,300

%63 %35 11%

18%

10%

32%

46%

15%

36%

20%

7%

15%

2%

19,000

19,900

69%

56%

44%

29%

7%

9%

3%

2%

24%

22%

38,900

*

0%

87% 56% 36% *

3%

4%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median15% 7% 12% 30% 22% 15%37.8

Age

2.3 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):2.9 1.4 1.8 1.4 5.7HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

HWY. 410KENNEDY RD.

HURONTARIO ST.

DIXIE RD.

HWY.

407

STEEL

ES A

VE.

QUEEN S

T.

Page 27: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

22

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 4

11,600

60,500

19.2%

6

26%

7%

3.9

39%

8%

7.9

13%

62%

29.522% 15%

22%

23%

54%

63%

18%

19%

9%

4%

3%

4%

*

1%

17%

9%

%3 %81%66 5% 1% 7%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 4

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

22,100

86,300

25.6% 45%

35%

25%

15%

20%

37%

11%

13%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%4 %61%36 5% 2% 10%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 4

14,500

%62 %86 6%

16%

10%

25%

39%

18%

36%

21%

12%

20%

3%

22,400

23,600

66%

56%

46%

31%

5%

9%

2%

1%

26%

26%

46,000

1%

1%

87% 53% 39% *

3%

4%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median15% 8% 13% 29% 22% 14%35.0

Age

2.2 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.2 1.5 1.9 1.6 6.0HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

HWY. 407

MAVIS RD.

MCLAUGHLIN RD.

STEE

LES A

VE.

CHINGUACOUSY RD.

MAIN ST.

QUEEN S

T.

Page 28: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

23

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 5

8,600

53,200

16.2%

6.8

34%

9%

4.6

19%

4%

7.5

17%

60%

32.415% 12%

31%

27%

73%

68%

14%

19%

2%

2%

2%

5%

*

1%

9%

5%

%3 %81%96 6% 1% 4%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 5

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

19,500

75,400

25.8% 43%

35%

21%

13%

22%

36%

14%

16%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%4 %71%66 5% 2% 5%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 5

11,200

%9 %08 11%

12%

4%

24%

35%

20%

48%

26%

11%

18%

2%

17,100

19,000

68%

58%

50%

36%

6%

9%

1%

1%

25%

25%

36,100

0%

1%

87% 49% 40% 59%

4%

6%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median17% 8% 11% 33% 21% 9%34.5

Age

2.5 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.2 1.7 2.0 1.7 6.7HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

MAIN ST.

QUEEN S

T.

CHINGUACOUSY RD.

WILL

IAM

S PK

WY.ROYAL ORCHARD DR.

MCLAUGHLIN RD.

BOVA

IRD D

R.

Page 29: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

24

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 6

13,300

64,800

20.6%

9.7

29%

9%

7

36%

8%

10.9

12%

64%

35.723% 17%

22%

19%

58%

68%

17%

17%

7%

3%

4%

4%

*

1%

14%

7%

%2 %71%17 4% 2% 5%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 6

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

27,300

97,600

28.0% 48%

39%

19%

12%

20%

34%

13%

15%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%3 %61%76 4% 3% 6%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 6

14,000

%1 %49 6%

3%

1%

21%

28%

19%

58%

34%

11%

23%

3%

25,400

25,900

63%

58%

49%

40%

3%

8%

2%

1%

26%

23%

51,300

*

0%

89% 62% 40% *

3%

5%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median22% 8% 10% 39% 16% 5%30.8

Age

2.4 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.7 1.9 2.2 1.9 7.0HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

HWY.

407

QUEEN S

T.

WINSTON CHURCHILL BLVD.

BOVA

IRD

DR.

MAYFI

ELD R

D.

MCLAUGHLIN RD.

CHINGUACOUSY RD.MISSISSAUGA RD.

Page 30: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

25

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 7

12,200

64,000

19.1%

5.9

36%

14%

3.3

32%

6%

5.8

10%

58%

30.116% 14%

22%

22%

56%

66%

20%

19%

9%

3%

3%

4%

*

1%

12%

6%

%2 %81%86 5% 2% 5%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 7

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

22,700

87,800

25.9% 48%

34%

22%

13%

20%

38%

11%

15%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%3 %81%46 5% 3% 7%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 7

11,800

%3 %78 10%

7%

2%

28%

36%

22%

43%

27%

14%

16%

5%

18,900

19,400

71%

62%

48%

41%

6%

10%

3%

2%

28%

24%

38,300

*

1%

87% 57% 40% *

3%

6%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median12% 8% 14% 29% 28% 8%36.3

Age

2.6 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.3 1.8 2.1 1.9 7.5HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

WILL

IAMS P

KWY.

QUEEN ST.

AIRPORT RD.

BRAMALEA RD.

DIXIE RD.

BOVA

IRD D

R.

HWY. 410

Page 31: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

26

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 8

31,200

109,900

28.4%

4.7

56%

24%

3.8

20%

6%

7

4%

31%

26.832% 31%

20%

38%

68%

68%

16%

18%

4%

2%

4%

5%

*

1%

8%

6%

%2 %81%66 7% 1% 7%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 8

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

20,500

82,400

24.9% 49%

34%

19%

11%

21%

39%

11%

16%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%2 %51%26 8% 2% 11%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 8

13,600

%13 %95 10%

15%

9%

33%

47%

19%

35%

22%

7%

10%

2%

19,300

19,300

68%

57%

46%

35%

7%

9%

3%

2%

26%

19%

38,600

*

*

87% 54% 44% *

4%

5%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median13% 7% 11% 30% 24% 14%38.8

Age

2.5 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):2.8 1.4 1.8 1.5 6.1HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

BRAMALEA RD.

TOBRAM RD.

AIRPORT RD.

HWY. 4

07STEELE

S AVE.

DIXIE RD.

QUEEN S

T.HWY. 10

Page 32: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

27

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 9

14,100

60,600

23.2%

7.8

15%

5%

5.1

48%

12%

7.3

10%

54%

31.632% 24%

27%

30%

45%

62%

26%

22%

13%

4%

4%

5%

*

1%

12%

7%

%2 %12%66 5% 1% 6%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 9

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

20,400

75,000

27.2% 43%

36%

25%

15%

21%

36%

11%

13%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%3 %22%06 5% 2% 8%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 9

10,400

%5 %78 8%

5%

2%

16%

33%

17%

50%

32%

12%

31%

2%

20,600

19,700

61%

53%

45%

34%

5%

7%

3%

2%

30%

26%

40,300

*

1%

86% 54% 42% 33%

3%

4%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median20% 9% 12% 35% 18% 6%31.5

Age

2.3 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.9 1.9 2.2 1.8 7.2HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

TOBRAM RD.

COUNTRYS

IDE

DR.

MAYFI

ELD R

D.

BRAMALEA RD.

BOVA

IRD D

R.

DIXIE RD.

HEART LAKE RD.

Page 33: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

28

CASTLEMORE RD.

HWY. 4

07

STEELE

S AVE.

HWY. 50

BOVAIRD D

R.

MAYFIELD

RD.

THE GORE RD.

AIRPORT RD.

TOBRAM RD.

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 10

16,100

66,800

24.1%

10.4

64%

23%

8.7

12%

3%

12

10%

56%

3116% 14%

14%

18%

75%

70%

13%

17%

6%

6%

3%

4%

*

1%

4%

2%

%7 %81%76 4% 2% 2%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 10

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

24,000

86,600

27.7% 49%

39%

25%

16%

17%

32%

8%

14%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%31 %51%36 4% 3% 2%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 10

11,500

%4 %29 4%

4%

*

16%

27%

17%

52%

30%

16%

33%

5%

22,800

22,900

63%

56%

47%

34%

5%

8%

3%

1%

28%

27%

45,700

*

0%

90% 63% 41% *

3%

5%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median18% 9% 12% 35% 19% 6%31.9

Age

2.3 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):4.0 2.0 2.4 2.0 7.5HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

Page 34: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

29

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA

373,700

1,427,800

26.2%

5.9

56%

21%

4.0

20%

6%

7.9

6%

41%

25.065% 67%

18%

31%

69%

69%

15%

16%

4%

3%

5%

6%

0%

1%

8%

5%

%3 %71%66 7% 3% 5%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

349,100

1,383,000

25.2% 46%

33%

23%

13%

21%

39%

11%

14%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%4 %51%16 7% 5% 8%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA

214,900

%42 %36 14%

14%

7%

28%

39%

21%

41%

23%

9%

14%

3%

316,200

332,300

69%

59%

46%

34%

6%

10%

4%

2%

26%

25%

648,600

1%

1%

88% 53% 38% 19%

6%

7%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median14% 8% 12% 30% 25% 11%37.5

Age

2.5 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.0 1.5 1.9 1.6 6.4HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

3

1

7

4

2

9

5

6

8

11

10

Page 35: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

30

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 1

24,800

105,500

23.5%

5.9

46%

16%

3.9

30%

7%

6.5

4%

37%

18.630% 29%

21%

39%

60%

68%

19%

18%

7%

3%

7%

5%

0%

2%

7%

5%

%2 %61%96 5% 4% 5%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 1

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

21,200

94,000

22.6% 50%

31%

20%

10%

19%

43%

11%

16%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%3 %41%26 6% 7% 7%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 1

17,400

%63 %65 8%

29%

11%

36%

45%

15%

36%

14%

7%

6%

2%

19,700

21,500

75%

65%

47%

34%

6%

8%

4%

3%

21%

20%

41,100

1%

1%

87% 50% 36% 25%

7%

8%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median10% 7% 9% 26% 29% 18%43.9

Age

2.6 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):2.4 1.2 1.6 1.5 5.4HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

DIXIE RD.

LAKE

SHORE

RD.

DUNDAS S

T.

CAWTHRA RD.

HURONTARIO ST.

Page 36: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

31

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 2

23,400

94,000

24.9%

6.1

48%

16%

4.7

25%

7%

5.3

6%

46%

25.233% 28%

21%

31%

68%

71%

11%

15%

10%

4%

3%

3%

1%

3%

8%

5%

%2 %61%96 3% 4% 5%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 2

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

23,600

105,900

22.3% 47%

28%

20%

10%

23%

44%

9%

17%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%3 %31%46 4% 7% 8%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 2

16,000

%61 %86 16%

17%

6%

35%

37%

22%

43%

17%

12%

10%

2%

21,600

22,100

71%

67%

43%

31%

6%

10%

5%

4%

24%

21%

43,700

0%

2%

88% 52% 38% 19%

6%

8%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median12% 8% 11% 25% 28% 16%42.6

Age

2.8 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):2.7 1.4 1.9 1.7 6.6HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

MISSISSAUGA RD.

LAKE

SHORE

RD.

WINSTON CHURCHILL BLVD.

Q.E.W

.

ERIN MILLS PKWY.

Page 37: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

32

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 3

25,600

108,600

23.5%

5.3

38%

14%

3.6

33%

8%

11.4

8%

49%

18.131% 26%

21%

30%

57%

65%

20%

17%

7%

3%

5%

8%

*

1%

11%

7%

%2 %71%56 10% 1% 6%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 3

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

31,800

124,200

25.6% 46%

33%

22%

13%

21%

39%

12%

15%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%3 %71%95 10% 2% 9%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 3

21,000

%73 %15 12%

18%

11%

28%

45%

21%

34%

22%

8%

12%

2%

29,500

30,900

70%

59%

43%

32%

6%

10%

3%

2%

24%

23%

60,400

1%

1%

89% 56% 37% 18%

5%

7%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median13% 7% 12% 27% 26% 14%39.2

Age

2.4 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):2.9 1.4 1.8 1.5 5.9HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

DUNDAS S

T.

DIXIE RD.CAWTHRA RD.

BURNHAM

THORPE

RD.

EGLIN

TON A

VE.

Page 38: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

33

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 4

20,500

125,100

16.4%

5.2

63%

16%

3.6

7%

1%

6

7%

42%

21.311% 18%

22%

41%

76%

66%

10%

18%

1%

1%

8%

10%

*

1%

5%

3%

%3 %71%46 10% 2% 4%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 4

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

30,400

121,500

25.0% 48%

34%

21%

13%

20%

39%

10%

14%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%4 %51%06 11% 4% 6%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 4

21,700

%54 %04 15%

18%

11%

29%

46%

21%

36%

21%

6%

12%

1%

29,500

32,300

70%

57%

45%

33%

5%

10%

4%

1%

24%

23%

61,800

0%

1%

86% 55% 36% *

7%

10%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median13% 6% 12% 31% 24% 14%36.9

Age

2.3 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):2.8 1.4 1.8 1.4 5.6HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day DUNDAS

ST.

CAWTHRA RD.

BURNHAM

THORPE

RD.

HURONTARIO ST.

EGLIN

TON A

VE.

MAVIS RD.

HWY.

403

Page 39: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

34

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 5

129,000

315,400

40.9%

5.1

81%

48%

3.8

6%

3%

7.6

2%

20%

22.844% 38%

11%

29%

79%

76%

12%

14%

1%

1%

5%

6%

0%

0%

3%

3%

%2 %71%46 9% 1% 7%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 5

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

38,700

146,800

26.4% 46%

37%

23%

15%

20%

36%

10%

13%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%3 %61%95 9% 2% 10%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 5

22,100

%71 %86 15%

10%

8%

22%

43%

23%

35%

25%

10%

20%

3%

36,200

37,800

65%

53%

46%

34%

6%

10%

3%

1%

27%

25%

74,000

0%

1%

88% 56% 53% *

5%

6%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median15% 8% 14% 31% 23% 10%35.3

Age

2.3 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.4 1.7 2.0 1.6 6.7HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

HWY. 401

DIXIE RD.

HWY. 403

DERRY RD.HW

Y. 427

HURONTARIO ST.

MAVIS RD.

Page 40: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

35

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 6

25,000

119,100

21.0%

5.5

29%

10%

3.7

36%

8%

8.4

10%

55%

25.133% 25%

25%

27%

56%

64%

20%

18%

5%

2%

3%

6%

*

1%

16%

9%

%2 %71%56 6% 2% 7%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 6

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

38,500

151,700

25.4% 43%

34%

26%

15%

21%

38%

10%

13%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%3 %51%16 6% 4% 10%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 6

20,600

%8 %28 10%

7%

5%

21%

33%

23%

48%

28%

11%

21%

3%

35,000

36,400

67%

57%

45%

34%

6%

10%

3%

1%

29%

27%

71,500

1%

1%

87% 55% 38% 22%

6%

8%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median15% 8% 14% 29% 25% 9%36.3

Age

2.5 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.5 1.8 2.2 1.8 7.4HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

MAVIS RD.

DUNDAS S

T.

HWY. 4

03

EGLIN

TON A

VE.

BRIT

ANNIA

RD.

Page 41: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

36

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 7

23,100

116,800

19.7%

5.9

40%

12%

4.1

28%

7%

6.7

7%

50%

21.522% 20%

24%

32%

61%

64%

14%

17%

4%

2%

6%

8%

*

2%

14%

7%

%2 %61%36 10% 3% 6%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 7

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

33,100

135,700

24.4% 51%

35%

21%

13%

18%

39%

10%

13%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%3 %31%95 10% 6% 9%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 7

25,500

%94 %34 8%

19%

13%

35%

48%

18%

29%

17%

8%

11%

2%

33,700

35,800

69%

57%

44%

34%

5%

10%

4%

1%

23%

22%

69,500

1%

1%

88% 52% 35% *

7%

10%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median13% 6% 12% 30% 24% 15%38.6

Age

2.2 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):2.7 1.3 1.7 1.4 5.3HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

Q.E.W

.

CAWTHRA RD.

HURONTARIO ST.

BURNHAM

THORPE

RD.

DUNDAS S

T.

MAVIS RD.

Page 42: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

37

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 8

30,200

144,400

20.9%

6.2

42%

12%

4

30%

9%

7.7

7%

44%

28.126% 27%

21%

35%

65%

67%

16%

18%

5%

3%

5%

5%

*

1%

8%

5%

%4 %61%76 4% 3% 5%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 8

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

35,800

149,300

24.0% 46%

30%

25%

14%

20%

41%

9%

15%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%7 %41%16 5% 6% 8%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 8

21,200

%51 %76 18%

13%

6%

28%

32%

21%

47%

25%

11%

14%

4%

32,000

32,700

71%

63%

43%

33%

6%

11%

5%

2%

26%

25%

64,700

1%

1%

88% 50% 38% 28%

6%

7%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median12% 9% 14% 25% 30% 11%39.8

Age

2.6 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.0 1.6 2.0 1.8 7.0HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

Q.E.W

.

ERIN MILLS PKWY.

DUNDAS S

T.

HWY. 4

03

HWY. 403

MISSISSAUGA RD.

NINTH LINE

EGLI

NTON A

VE.

Page 43: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

38

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 9

34,200

138,900

24.6%

6.8

45%

16%

3.6

27%

7%

9.3

7%

43%

30.432% 32%

22%

35%

65%

69%

17%

17%

3%

2%

3%

4%

*

1%

11%

7%

%2 %71%86 5% 2% 6%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 9

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

37,900

141,500

26.8% 42%

31%

24%

14%

22%

39%

13%

16%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%3 %61%36 5% 4% 9%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 9

19,200

%41 %16 25%

12%

4%

25%

36%

22%

48%

25%

9%

15%

3%

29,100

30,700

68%

62%

50%

36%

6%

11%

3%

2%

31%

29%

59,800

1%

1%

87% 49% 29% 25%

5%

6%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median14% 10% 14% 30% 25% 7%36.6

Age

2.8 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.1 1.7 2.0 1.7 7.4HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

EGLIN

TON A

VE.

ERIN MILLS PKWY.

BRIT

ANNIA

RD.

WINSTON CHURCHILL BLVD.

HWY. 401

MISSISSAUGA RD.

DERRY

RD.

NINTH LINE

Page 44: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

39

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 10

10,100

62,600

16.1%

8.3

13%

3%

4.8

42%

7%

10.7

17%

74%

32.118% 13%

28%

16%

51%

64%

21%

18%

7%

5%

2%

3%

*

3%

19%

8%

%4 %71%86 3% 3% 5%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 10

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

30,600

108,400

28.3% 44%

34%

23%

14%

21%

37%

12%

14%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%6 %51%36 4% 6% 6%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 10

14,600

* %29 8%

3%

*

20%

28%

25%

59%

33%

10%

19%

2%

24,700

26,600

68%

59%

51%

36%

4%

9%

3%

1%

27%

28%

51,300

0%

1%

88% 52% 36% 25%

6%

7%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median19% 9% 12% 37% 19% 5%33.7

Age

2.6 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.5 1.9 2.2 1.9 7.4HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

TENTH LINE

NINTH LINE

EGLIN

TON A

VE.

WINSTON CHURCHILL BLVD.

DERRY

RD.

BRITANNIA

RD.

Page 45: 2006 TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY REGIONAL …dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/travel_summaries_by... · University of Toronto July 2009. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow

datamanagementgroupDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERINGUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

LEGEND2006 TTS

* is used to denote categories that have less than four observations or survey records

40

% of 24 hr.

Mode of Travel

Mode of TravelTRIPS TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 11

27,900

97,200

28.7%

6.5

51%

20%

4.9

23%

7%

9.1

6%

46%

27.730% 22%

20%

27%

68%

71%

15%

15%

10%

5%

3%

4%

*

1%

5%

4%

%5 %61%07 4% 2% 4%

TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 11

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

Median TripLength (km)

Percentage of trips made within district: 6-9 a.m. =

% of 24 hr. Work School Home Other

27,200

103,900

26.2% 45%

34%

22%

13%

22%

39%

10%

14%

Time Period Trips6 - 9 a.m.

24 hours

HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB

Trip Purpose Category

Destination Purpose

24 hours =

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

%8 %51%56 4% 3% 5%

AutoDriver

AutoPassng.

LocalTransit

GOTrain

Walk& Cycle Other

TRAVEL PATTERNS

StudentFulltime

Parttime F/T P/T

On survey day: Made work trip

TransitPass

Work at Home

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 11

15,500

%5 %08 14%

11%

2%

23%

32%

19%

53%

27%

11%

19%

2%

25,300

25,500

67%

59%

47%

33%

4%

9%

5%

2%

26%

26%

50,800

0%

1%

87% 56% 47% *

4%

5%

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS:

Dwelling Type

Household Size(persons)

No. of AvailableVehicles

House ApartmentTownhouse

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5+

4+

TOTAL POPULATION:

PopulationMale

Female

LicencedDrivers

Employment Status

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

0-10 65+46-6426-4516-2511-15Median18% 8% 11% 33% 21% 9%34.8

Age

2.5 Daily trips/Person (age 11+):3.3 1.7 2.1 1.8 6.7HouseholdAverages

Persons Workers Drivers Vehicles Trips/Day

QUEEN ST.

HWY. 401

MAVIS RD.

BRITANNIA

RD.

EGLINGTO

N AVE.

DERRY

RD.

ERIN MILLS PKWY.

MISSISSAUGA RD.