2008. justices, 5-4, reject corporate spending limit washington — overruling two important...

14
U nion B acked D em ocrats C orporation B acked R epublicans 2008

Upload: ilene-eaton

Post on 12-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,

Union Backed Democrats

Corporation Backed Republicans

2008

Page 2: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,

Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit

WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations, a bitterly divided Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the government may not ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections.

“…The ruling represented a sharp doctrinal shift, and it will have major political and practical consequences. Specialists in campaign finance law said they expected the decision to reshape the way elections were conducted. Though the decision does not directly address them, its logic also applies to the labor unions that are often at political odds with big business.”

Citizens United RulingJanuary 2010

Page 3: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,
Page 4: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,

Of the 11.9% overall figureHere is the breakdown Private vs. Public

Page 5: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,
Page 6: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,

AFTER Citizens United Ruling

Page 7: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,

Union Backed Democrats

Corporation Backed Republicans

2008

Page 8: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,

Union Backed Democrats

Corporation Backed Republicans

2010

Citizens United Ruling – Unlimited Spending on Elections

Page 9: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,

Union Backed Democrats

Corporation Backed Republicans

*2012

Citizens United Ruling – Unlimited Spending on Elections

* projected

Page 10: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,

Union Backed Democrats

Corporation Backed Republicans

*2014

Citizens United Ruling – Unlimited Spending on Elections

* projected

Page 11: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,

Union Backed Democrats

Corporation Backed Republicans

*2016

Citizens United Ruling – Unlimited Spending on Elections

* projected

Page 12: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,

Union Backed Democrats

Corporation Backed Republicans

*2018

Citizens United Ruling – Unlimited Spending on Elections

* projected

Page 13: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,

Citizens United Ruling – Unlimited Spending on Elections

Corporations have more money than Unions do• Once you have full control, you can make new rules

• Election laws• Make it harder to register new voters

• Reverse current standing laws• Minimum wage• Safety laws• Anything dealing with workers rights

WISCONSIN, OHIO, INDIANA, NEW JERSEY, MAINE, SOUTH CAROLINA

This is a hostile takeover by Corporate backed Republicans

All workers are under attack!

The only voice all working people have is that of the Democrats.

The only people backing Democrats predominantly are unions.

Get rid of unions, thus take out Democrats and what do you have? FULL CONTROL

Page 14: 2008. Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit WASHINGTON — Overruling two important precedents about the First Amendment rights of corporations,

March 23rd 2011AUGUSTA — Gov. Paul LePage has ordered the removal of a 36-foot mural depicting Maine's labor history from the lobby of the Department of Labor.

Maine Governor