2010-2011 campus improvement plan - freeman

Upload: cfbisd

Post on 07-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    1/17

    Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    Campus Plans

    CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

    Bernice Chatman Freeman

    CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

    2010-2011

    Walter Peterson, Principal

    Vision Statement:

    Freeman Elementary School, in partnership with our families and community, will developstudents who meet or exceed the local and state standards needed to successfullytransition to middle school and to take advantage of the highest educational

    opportunities available.The student will:

    1) Achieve at the proficient or commended level on TAKS.

    2) Engage in powerful learning opportunities which use research based instructionalstrategies, maximize learning time, and incorporate technology.3) Work collaboratively and demonstrate civic responsibility.

    October 1, 2010

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    2/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    2

    CIC MEMBERS

    Name Position Years Served Signature

    Mary Michaels Kindergarten Teacher 0Brandi Burns First Grade Teacher 1

    Jenna Petty Second Grade Teacher 0

    Talitha Basom Third Grade Teacher 0

    Eddie Reed Fourth Grade Teacher 0

    Pam Spencer Fifth Grade Teacher 1

    John Lee Specials Teacher 0

    Sara Ashead Special Education Teacher 0LaDonna Conner ITS 1

    Walter Peterson Principal 2

    Carolyn Bibbs Assistant Principal 2

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    3/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    3

    PLANNING PROCESS

    Needs Assessment

    The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus,business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educationalplans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides thiswork. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievementindicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance,graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics

    (e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered.

    The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253):1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system.2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs

    populations, including students in special education.3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student.4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan.

    5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan.6. Timelines for reaching goals.7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives.8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus.9. Program for encouraging parental involvement.10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data,

    student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged thatensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity.

    Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campusgoals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment toexcellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    4/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    4

    The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

    Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievementA. TEA Recognized/Exemplary DistrictB. Recognized/Exemplary SchoolsC. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)D. Achievement GapE. Special PopulationsF. TAKS Commended Scores (all students)G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores)

    H. SATI. PSAT/NMSQTJ. Advanced PlacementK. Graduation Data

    Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffA. Out of School SuspensionsB. DAEP PlacementsC. Attendance Rate

    Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessA. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST)B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instructionC. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 paymentsD. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usageE. Overtime hoursF. Highly Qualified Teachers

    G. Teacher Classroom Attendance RateH. All Staff Attendance RateI. Teacher Turnover RateJ. Availability of Critical Technology Systems

    Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemA. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality TogetherB. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed)

    C. Staff Survey (to be developed)

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    5/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    5

    Bernice Chatman FreemanCampus Goals & Objectives

    2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA

    2011 GOALS

    All Students African American Hispanic White Special EdEconomicallyDisadvantaged

    LEP

    INDICATOR2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    Reading/English Language Arts 97 100 92 100 95 100 100 100 89 100 95 100 95 100

    Mathematics 93 100 83 100 90 100 100 100 89 100 87 100 91 100

    Writing 95 100 90 100 100 100 88 100 na 100 88 100 88 100

    Science 91 100 88 100 82 100 na 100 na 100 81 100 na 100

    Social Studies

    All Tests

    Graduation 2009

    Graduation 2010 Goal

    Participation: Reading/Language Arts 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

    Participation: Math 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

    Attendance 96.4 98 96.9 98 96.2 98 95.2 98 na na na na na na

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    6/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    6

    Bernice Chatman FreemanCampus Goals

    2010 Percentage of Commended Students

    2011 Goals

    All Students African American Hispanic WhiteINDICATOR

    Cam-

    pusState

    Diff.

    from

    state

    2011

    Goal

    Cam-

    pusState

    Diff.

    from

    state

    2011

    Goal

    Cam-

    pusState

    Diff.

    from

    state

    2011

    Goal

    Cam-

    pusState

    Diff.

    from

    state

    2011

    Goal

    Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

    50 35 + 80 39 25 + 80 25 28 - 80 42 48 - 80

    Mathematics 53 37 + 80 34 23 + 80 25 31 - 80 42 47 - 80

    Writing 45 30 + 80 30 21 + 80 20 25 - 80 25 38 - 80

    Science 55 44 + 80 19 28 - 80 55 36 + 80 na 59 80

    Social Studies

    Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged LEP

    INDICATORCam-pus

    StateDiff.

    fromstate

    2011Goal

    Cam-pus

    StateDiff.

    fromstate

    2011Goal

    Cam-pus

    StateDiff.

    fromstate

    2011Goal

    Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

    22 17 + 80 32 26 + 80 33 23 + 80

    Mathematics 22 17 + 80 25 28 - 80 38 25 + 80

    Writing na 11 80 27 22 + 80 25 20 + 80

    Science na 24 80 23 33 - 80 na 20 80

    Social Studies

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    7/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    7

    Bernice Chatman Freeman

    2010-11 Campus Focus

    District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement

    Campus Focus # 1 Criteria for Success Performance Measure100% of all students in each sub-pop will pass TAKS, TAKS-Acc, TAKS-M or

    TAKS-Alt on each academic assessment

    B, C, D, E, F

    80% or more of our students will achieve at Commended level on their

    TAKS test

    B, C, D, E, F

    Receive a campus rating of Exemplary from TEA A

    100% of staff will be highly qualified A, E

    Improve student achievement

    100% of staff will receive their ESL and G/T certification A, C, D, E

    Maintain a 0% teacher turnover rate A, E, G

    Campus Focus #2 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureIncrease student fitness tests passed (by 3%) for all students GImprove overall number of

    fitness tests passed from

    previous year

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    8/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    8

    Bernice Chatman Freeman

    2010-11 Campus Focus

    District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

    Campus Focus #3 Criteria for Success Performance Measure100% of the classrooms will implement Character Education traits; R-Time,Achiever McBeaver, Bully Prevention, TNN, classroom guidance counseling

    ADecrease the number of officereferrals for the year

    Campus Focus #4 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureIncrease attendance rate by .5% B, CIncrease attendance and

    decrease number of students

    who are students

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    9/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    9

    Bernice Chatman Freeman

    2010-11 Campus Focus

    District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness

    Campus Focus #5 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureReduce monthly energy consumption by 2%. A, F

    Implement a recycling program in 100% of the classrooms. F

    Continue to improve GreenTeam effort to conserve

    energy

    Campus Focus #6 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureDecrease amount of overtime hours of paraprofessional employees by 10% F

    C, F

    Develop Budget Committee toaddress campus spending

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    10/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    10

    Bernice Chatman Freeman

    2010-11 Campus Focus

    District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school

    system

    Campus Focus #7 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureIncrease PTA membership by 10% B, C, D, E, F, G

    Increase the number of business partners with the school by 3 businesses B, C, D, E, F, G

    Increase the number of parents at nine week award programs by 5 parentseach nine weeks

    B, C, D, E, F, G

    Improve and increase

    community involvement

    Increase attendance at Coffee Talk meetings with parents by 2% B, C, D, E, F, G

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    11/17

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    12/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    12

    Math SolveStory Problems

    usingunderstanding,strategies andcommunication.

    LA improve storycomprehensionwhen reading.

    100% ofstudents willbe able to1) retell andcomprehendstories2) solve a

    math wordproblem bydrawing andexplainingtheirstrategy.

    Draw a model of thestory problem

    Explain the strategy

    used to solve the mathproblem.

    Determine the problemand solution in a story

    Use graphicorganizers to retell astory and showthe problem/solution to

    RESULTSGOAL

    KindergartenStudents shouldidentify what isdesired in termsof performanceafter, or as a

    result of, putting

    new processesin place orimprovingexisting

    processes.

    SMARTGOAL

    Goal shouldbe Strategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,Results-

    based, and

    Time-bound.

    INDICATORStandards and

    objectives (weak areas

    for students)

    MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

    are improving.

    TARGETSThe attainable

    performance level wewould like to see.

    WordProblems

    Text book &teacherassess.

    ReadersResponseJournals

    Story Maps

    100% = show theirthinking by usingnumerals &

    100% - explainthe strategyused

    100% - tellthecharactersand setting

    100% - tell theproblem & solution

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    13/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    13

    First Gradestudents will

    improveacademic

    achievement inmath.

    100% ofstudents willpass thedistrict end of

    the yearexam inmath. Inaddition,100% ofstudents willachievecommended

    performance

    - Concepts of money

    - Equations

    RESULTSGOAL

    Should identifywhat is desired

    in terms ofperformanceafter, or as a

    result of, puttingnew processesin place orimprovingexisting

    processes.

    SMARTGOAL

    Goal shouldbe Strategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,Results-

    based, andTime-bound.

    INDICATORStandards and

    objectives (weak areasfor students)

    MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are now

    and whether theyare improving.

    TARGETSThe attainable

    performance level we

    would like to see.

    Math Journals

    Unit Assessment

    100% will achievecommended erformances.

    100% of students will

    pass the district end ofthe year exam in math.

    Tutoring

    Calendar Math

    - Fractions andprobability

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    14/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    14

    Students willuse literacythinkingstrategies inmath andreading. The

    students willimprove theirwriting in mathand reading asa result oflearning thestrategies.

    100% ofallstudentswill usestrategiesto bettertheirwriting inreadingand math.

    ConnectionsReadingTEK 110.4.10 (D), 9(A)MathTEK 111.14 (12)

    VisualizationReadingTEK 110.4. 9(E)MathTEK111.14.12 (A) (B)(C) (D)(E)TEK 111.14.13 (A) (B)

    QuestionsReadingTEK 110.4.12(A)MathTEK 111.14.12 (A) (B)(C) (D)(E)TEK 111.14.13 (A) (B)

    Determining

    ImportanceReadingTEK 110.4.9(F)MathTEK 111.14.12 (A) (B)(C) (D)(E)111.14.13 (A) (B)

    RESULTSGOAL

    Should identify

    what is desiredin terms of

    performanceafter, or as a

    result of, puttingnew processes

    in place orimprovingexisting

    processes.

    SMARTGOAL

    Goal should

    be Strategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,Results-

    based, andTime-bound.

    INDICATORStandards and

    objectives (weak areas

    MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

    are improving.

    TARGETSThe attainable

    performance level wewould like to see.

    Prediction/InferrencesReadingTEK 110.4.9(F)

    MathTEK 111.14(a)2

    Fountas and

    Pinnel

    Fountas andPinnel OpenEnded WritingTest

    UniversalScreening

    Problem SolvingAssessment

    All students will

    achieve a LevelM on Fountasand Pinnel

    Students willachieve 88-100% on theOE Test.

    All students willachieve 90% orhigher

    Students willreceive a 90%or higher.

    Students willreceive a 90%or higher.

    INDICATOR MEASURETargets

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    15/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    15

    SMARTGOAL

    100% of ThirdGradestudents willpass both the

    Reading andthe MathTAKS.

    Studentscomprehend avariety of textsdrawing onuseful strategiesas needed.

    The studentapplies Grade 3mathematics to

    solve problemsconnected toeverydayexperiences andactivities in andoutside ofschool.

    Studentsunderstand, makeinferences anddraw conclusionsabout the variedstructural patterns

    and features ofliterary nonfictionand respond byproviding evidencefrom text tosupport theirunderstanding.

    Open ended testing andups check (determining

    importance, prediction,synthesizing)

    end of unitassessments

    Story problems

    Interactive notebooks

    Released TAKS

    Open ended testing andups check (schema,connections, visualizing)

    end of unitassessments

    Story problems

    Interactive notebooks

    Released TAKS

    Open ended testing andups check (inferring,questioning)

    end of unit

    assessments Story problems

    Interactive notebooks

    Released TAKS

    100% of students

    will achieve 85%or higher on thepost test at theend of the year.

    100% of studentswill achieve 85%or higher on thepost test at theend of the year.

    100% of studentswill achieve 85%or higher on thepost test at theend of the year.

    Improvestudentsreadingcomprehension

    skills andapplying it tomathematicalproblemsolving.

    ResultsGoal

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    16/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    16

    Students in 4thgrade shouldhave a deeperunderstanding ofmathematicalconceptsresulting in a

    strongerconfidence whensolving morecomplexmathematicalproblems.

    By theend of theschoolyear 2011,91% ofthestudentsin the 4thGrade willbe atProficientorAdvancedlevels onthe state

    mathassessment test(TAKS).

    Objective 1

    4.1A, 4.3A, 4.4D,4.5A/B

    Objective 24.6 B/C

    Objective 44.11A/B

    Objective 64.14 B/C 4.16 A

    RESULTSGOAL

    Should identify

    what is desiredin terms of

    performanceafter, or as a

    result of, puttingnew processes

    in place orimprovingexisting

    processes.

    SMARTGOAL

    Goal should

    be Strategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,Results-

    based, andTime-bound.

    INDICATORStandards and

    objectives (weak areasfor students)

    MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

    are improving.

    TARGETSThe attainable

    performance level wewould like to see.

    Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be agoal worthy of commitment.

    -Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline(1990)

    End of Unit Test,

    Math Notebooks,Origo/Navigator/Riverdeep/ TeacherAssmt.

    End of Unit Test,Math Notebooks,Origo/Navigator/Riverdeep/ TeacherAssmt.

    End of Unit Test,Math Notebooks,Riverdeep/Origo/Navigator, TeacherAssmt.

    Increase

    TAKSscores from82% to 92%.

    IncreaseTAKSscores from82% to 92%.

    IncreaseTAKSscores from81% to 92%

    Increase

    TAKSscores from76% to 92%

    End of Unit Test,

    Math Notebooks,Riverdeep/ Origo/Navigator, TeacherAssmt.

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Freeman

    17/17

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    17

    5th gradestudents willimprove theirunderstandingof EarthSciences.

    By the endof the schoolyear, 100%of 5

    thgrade

    students willmasterObjective 4(EarthSciences)

    on theScienceTAKS test.

    .Objective 478% in 2009

    Objective 484% in 2010

    RESULTSGOAL

    Should identify

    what is desiredin terms of

    performanceafter, or as a

    result of, puttingnew processes

    in place orimprovingexisting

    processes.

    SMARTGOAL

    Goal should

    be Strategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,Results-

    based, andTime-bound.

    INDICATORStandards and

    objectives (weak areasfor students)

    MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

    are improving.

    TARGETSThe attainable

    performance level wewould like to see.

    ScienceUnit Tests

    ScienceBenchmarks/MAP

    Science TAKSRelease Tests

    IncreaseObjective 4

    from 84% in2010 to 100%in 2011.