2010-2011 campus improvement plan - rosemeade

8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Rosemeade

1/15

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Improvement Plan 2010-2011

Campus Plans

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

Rosemeade Elementary

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN2010-2011

M. Amy Miller, Principal

Vision Statement: Rosemeade Elementary, in partnership with our families and community, willdevelop students who meet or exceed the local and state standards needed to successfully transition

to middle school and to take advantage of the highest educational opportunities available.

October 1, 2010


2/15

Rosemeade Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

2

CIC MEMBERS

Name Position Years Served SignatureM. Amy Miller Principal 3

Jimmie Sullivan Kindergarten 7

Carrie Walden 1st Grade/Parent 1

Linda Montgomery 2nd

Grade 3

Allison Tawney Primary 1

Shanah Brown 3rd

Grade 5

Deanne Belohlavy 4th

Grade 2

Alyson Fry-Barker 5th

Grade 2Kaleena Loard Music 2

Lynette Blough Special Education 8

Venus Thomas Special Education/Parent 6

Kelly Alexander Counselor/Parent 2

Carolyn McKeefer Parent 3

Diane Filibeck Instructional Facilitator 2


3/15


3

PLANNING PROCESS

Needs Assessment

The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus,business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educationalplans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides thiswork. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievementindicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance,graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics

(e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered.

The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253):1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system.2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs

populations, including students in special education.3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student.4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan.

5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan.6. Timelines for reaching goals.7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives.8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus.9. Program for encouraging parental involvement.10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data,

student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged thatensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity.

Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campusgoals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment toexcellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.


4/15


4

Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1funds will be spent.

Title I --Targeted Assisted ( TA )Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planning

TA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase Parental InvolvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachersTS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schoolsTS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessmentsTS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services


5/15


5

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievementA. TEA Recognized/Exemplary DistrictB. Recognized/Exemplary SchoolsC. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)D. Achievement GapE. Special PopulationsF. TAKS Commended Scores (all students)G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores)

H. SATI. PSAT/NMSQTJ. Advanced PlacementK. Graduation Data

Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffA. Out of School SuspensionsB. DAEP PlacementsC. Attendance Rate

Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessA. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST)B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instructionC. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 paymentsD. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usageE. Overtime hoursF. Highly Qualified Teachers

G. Teacher Classroom Attendance RateH. All Staff Attendance RateI. Teacher Turnover RateJ. Availability of Critical Technology Systems

Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemA. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality TogetherB. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed)

C. Staff Survey (to be developed)


6/15


6

Students willdemonstratereading fluencyandcomprehensionat or above

grade level.

By the end ofthe 2010-2011school year90% or morestudents willmeet orexceed gradelevel readingexpectationsas measuredby Fountasand Pinnellassessmentsystem.

Applying criticalthinking skills

Applying knowledgeof literary elements

RESULTS

GOALShould identifywhat is desired

in terms ofperformanceafter, or as a

result of, puttingnew processes

in place orimproving

existingprocesses.

SMARTGOAL

Goal shouldbe Strategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,Results-

based, andTime-bound.

INDICATORStandards and

objectives (weak areasfor students)

MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

are improving.

TARGETSThe attainable

performance level wewould like to see.

Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be agoal worthy of commitment.

-Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline(1990)

TPRI ReadingInventory

Fountas & Pinnell

Reading Assessment(BOY, MOY, EOY)

Using the CFB

reading chart 90% ormore students willbe reading at orabove grade levelexpectation each 9weeks. Data from09-10 was 82% onlevel.

All students willscore 90% or aboveon critical thinkingobjectives asmeasured on TAKSobjective 4

BenchmarkAssessments

TAKS and TAKSreleased Data

SMART GOALS (Example)90% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Reading

Obj. 1 Basic Understanding85% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Math

Obj. 1 Numbers, Operations, and Quantitative ReasoningObj. 6 Mathematical Processes and Tools


7/15


7

Rosemeade ElementaryCampus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA

2011 GOALS

All Students African American Hispanic White Special Ed

Economically

Disadvantaged LEPINDICATOR

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

Reading/English Language Arts 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 89 100 98 100 95 100

Mathematics 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Writing 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Science 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Social Studies

All Tests

Graduation 2009

Graduation 2010 Goal

Participation: Reading/Language Arts 100 >95 100 >95 100 >95 100 >95 100 >95 100 >95 100 >95

Participation: Math 100 >95 100 >95 100 >95 100 >95 100 >95 100 >95 100 >95

Attendance 97.8 98 98.2 99 97.3 98 97.6 98 97.1 98 97.5 98 98.4 99


8/15


8


Campus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students

2011 Goals

All Students African American Hispanic White

INDICATORCam-

pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011

Goal

Cam-

pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011

Goal

Cam-

pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011

Goal

Cam-

pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011

Goal

Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

49 35 +14 54 43 25 +18 48 48 28 +20 53 51 48 +3 56

Mathematics 55 37 +18 60 14 23 -9 19 52 31 +21 57 60 47 +13 65

Writing 45 30 +15 50 n/a 21 n/a n/a 38 25 +13 43 52 38 +14 57

Science 64 44 +20 69 17 28 -11 22 58 36 +22 63 71 59 +12 76

Social Studies

Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged LEP

INDICATORCam-pus

StateDiff.

from

state

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.

from

state

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.

from

state

2011Goal

Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

11 17 -6 16 44 26 +18 49 43 23 +20 48

Mathematics 30 17 +13 35 48 28 +20 53 39 25 +14 44

Writing n/a 11 n/a n/a 29 22 +7 34 33 20 +13 38

Science n/a 24 n/a n/a 40 33 +7 45 n/a 20 n/a n/a

Social Studies


9/15


9


2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement

Campus Focus # 1 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureCampus rating of Exemplary from TEA in 2011 Increase Student

Achievement: A, B

5% increase in all subpops commended on TAKS (all areas) from 2010 Increase Student

Achievement: D, F90% of all K-5 students reading on grade level as measured by Fountas and

Pinnell

Increase Student

Achievement: D, E

Using 09 10 data, increase overall number of fitness tests passed by 3%

Student Achievement

20% increase in % achieved HFZ in push-ups


10/15


10



District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Campus Focus #2 Criteria for Success Performance Measure100% of all students participate in School Counselor program: 4 Rs, Bullyprevention and intervention, and R-Time program

Learning Environment:A, B

Improve Student Behavior


11/15


11



District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Campus Focus #3 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureMaintain 100% Highly Qualified Teacher rate for 2010 Operational

Effectiveness: F

Increase instructional resources through use of Title I funds Operational

Effectiveness: B

Operating System


12/15


12



District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school

system

Campus Focus # 4 Criteria for Success Performance Measure100 % of teachers and staff join PTA and receive Golden Apple Award Stakeholder Confidence:

A

90% + Satisfied/Very Satisfied in all areas of Parent Survey AchievingQuality Together

Stakeholder Confidence:A

Community and PTA


13/15


14/15


15/15

2010-2011 campus improvement plan - rosemeade

Documents