2011 north dakota finance facts · 2011 north dakota finance facts legislator's pocket guide...

21
2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600 East Boulevard Avenue Bismarck, ND 58505 701.328.2916 www.legis.nd.gov September 2011 Published by the North Dakota Legislative Council

Upload: others

Post on 21-Sep-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

2011North DakotaFinance Facts

Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota

Budget, Performance, and statistics

North Dakota Legislative Council600 East Boulevard Avenue

Bismarck, ND 58505

701.328.2916www.legis.nd.gov

September 2011 Published by the North Dakota Legislative Council

Page 2: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

2011 North Dakota Finance Facts

Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and Statistics

This report contains key indicators and trends relating to North Dakota's economy, state budget, and the performance of its agencies and departments.

The information in the report is categorized by the following major topic areas:

Topic SectionArea Color Pages

1. Economic Statistics .................Red ........................ 1-62. State Budget ...........................Orange ..................7-143. K-12 Education .......................Green ..................15-204. Higher Education ....................Blue .....................21-245. Human Services .....................Purple .................25-286. Corrections ..............................Brown ..................29-307. Economic Development .........Gray ....................31-328. Transportation .........................Black ...................33-35

The table of contents on the following pages provides more detailed reference to specific data included in the report.

North Dakota Legislative Council

600 East Boulevard AvenueBismarck, ND 58505-0360

(701) 328-2916www.legis.nd.govSeptember 2011

Page 3: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

2011 NorTh DAkoTA FiNANCE FACTSTable of Contents

ECoNomiC STATiSTiCSTotal Population Estimates ....................................................... 1Per Capita Personal Income .................................................... 1Percentage of North Dakota Population (Children Ages 0-17) in Poverty Compared to the United States ........................... 2Percentage of North Dakota Population (All Ages) in Poverty Compared to the United States............................... 2Gross State Product ................................................................. 3Total State Foreign Exports ...................................................... 4Average Daily Oil Production and Average Price Per Barrel of Oil..................................................................... 4Employment and Unemployment ............................................. 5Average Home Sale Prices by City .......................................... 5State-Local Tax Burden Compared to United States Average .......................................................... 6

STATE BuDGET2011-13 General Fund Budget Summary ................................ 7General Fund Revenues - Beginning Balance, Ongoing Revenues, and Transfers ...................................... 72011-13 Estimated General Fund Revenues ........................... 8General Fund Revenues - Major Revenue Types ................... 9Current Tax Rates ..................................................................... 92011-13 Biennium General Fund Appropriations ................... 10History of General Fund Appropriations ................................. 102011-13 Biennium All Funds Appropriations ...........................11History of Total Appropriations .................................................11Number of State Employees .................................................. 12Funding Increases for State Employee Salary Adjustments . 12Cost of State Employee Health Insurance Premiums History................................................................ 12Assistance to Political Subdivisions ....................................... 13State Debt ............................................................................... 13Common Schools Trust Fund ................................................. 14Legacy Fund ........................................................................... 14

k-12 EDuCATioNState School Aid Appropriations - History .............................. 15State School Aid Appropriations - Detail ................................ 16State School Aid - Per Student Payments ............................. 16Student Enrollment and Number of Teachers ........................ 17American College Testing Program Scores ........................... 17National Assessment of Educational Progress ...................... 18

hiGhEr EDuCATioNHigher Education - General Fund Appropriations and Tuition and Fee Revenue ............................................ 21

North Dakota University System Fall FTE Student Enrollment ........................................................................... 21FTE Student Enrollment by Institution .................................... 21Higher Education Tuition Rates .............................................. 22Higher Education Performance Measures ............................. 23North Dakota University System Research Expenditures ....................................................................... 24

humAN SErviCESDepartment of Human Services Legislative Appropriations ..................................................................... 25Major Medicaid Costs ............................................................. 25Medical Assistance - Average Annual Medicaid Eligibles and Recipients ...................................................... 26Children's Health Insurance Program - Average Annual Recipients ............................................................... 26Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - Cases and Benefits ............................................................. 27Temporary Assistance for Needy Families - Cases and Benefits ............................................................. 27Child Support - Percentage of Current Child Support Collected ............................................................... 28Children and Family Services - Number of Children in Foster Care .................................... 28State Hospital and Developmental Center - Average Daily Census ........................................................ 28

CorrECTioNSDepartment of Corrections and Rehabilitation FTE Positions, Inmates, and General Fund Appropriations ..................................................................... 29Parole and Probation .............................................................. 29Recidivism Rates .................................................................... 30

ECoNomiC DEvELoPmENTDepartment of Commerce Legislative Appropriations ........... 31Centers of Excellence Legislative Appropriations .................. 31Private Sector Businesses ...................................................... 32Manufacturing Jobs ................................................................ 32Number of Patents .................................................................. 32

TrANSPorTATioNState Highway Funding - History ............................................ 33State Highway Funding .......................................................... 33Estimated Federal Highway Funding ..................................... 34Motor Fuels Taxes................................................................... 34Miles of Roadways in North Dakota - 2008 ............................ 34Estimated Highway Construction Costs Per Mile .................. 35North Dakota Bridge System Condition ................................. 35North Dakota Interstate System Ride Trends ........................ 35

Page 4: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

Econom

icS

tatisticsToTAL PoPuLATioN ESTimATES (Based on 2000 and 2010 Census Data)

Year Population1

AnnualPercentage

Change 2006 636,771 .22%2007 638,202 .22%2008 641,421 .50%2009 646,844 .85%2010 672,591 3.98%

1Based on July 1 population estimates, except for 2010 which is based on the U.S. Census Bureau decennial census.

Source: North Dakota State Data Center

PEr CAPiTA PErSoNAL iNComE

North Dakota's cumulative increase from 2006 through 2010 is 20.9 percent.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

610,000620,000630,000640,000650,000660,000670,000680,000690,000700,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

$37,698 $39,392 $40,166 $39,138 $40,584

$33,585$36,678

$39,874 $39,530 $40,596

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

United States North Dakota

4.5%increase

2.0%increase

2.6%decrease

3.7%increase

ToTAL PoPuLATioN ESTimATES (Based on 2000 and 2010 Census Data)

Year Population1

AnnualPercentage

Change 2006 636,771 .22%2007 638,202 .22%2008 641,421 .50%2009 646,844 .85%2010 672,591 3.98%

1Based on July 1 population estimates, except for 2010 which is based on the U.S. Census Bureau decennial census.

Source: North Dakota State Data Center

PEr CAPiTA PErSoNAL iNComE

North Dakota's cumulative increase from 2006 through 2010 is 20.9 percent.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

610,000620,000630,000640,000650,000660,000670,000680,000690,000700,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

$37,698 $39,392 $40,166 $39,138 $40,584

$33,585$36,678

$39,874 $39,530 $40,596

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

United States North Dakota

4.5%increase

2.0%increase

2.6%decrease

3.7%increase

ToTAL PoPuLATioN ESTimATES (Based on 2000 and 2010 Census Data)

Year Population1

AnnualPercentage

Change 2006 636,771 .22%2007 638,202 .22%2008 641,421 .50%2009 646,844 .85%2010 672,591 3.98%

1Based on July 1 population estimates, except for 2010 which is based on the U.S. Census Bureau decennial census.

Source: North Dakota State Data Center

PEr CAPiTA PErSoNAL iNComE

North Dakota's cumulative increase from 2006 through 2010 is 20.9 percent.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

610,000620,000630,000640,000650,000660,000670,000680,000690,000700,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

$37,698 $39,392 $40,166 $39,138 $40,584

$33,585$36,678

$39,874 $39,530 $40,596

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

United States North Dakota

4.5%increase

2.0%increase

2.6%decrease

3.7%increase

1

ECoNomiC STATiSTiCS

Page 5: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

2

PErCENTAGE oF NorTh DAkoTA PoPuLATioN (ChiLDrEN AGES 0-17) iN

PovErTY ComPArED To ThE uNiTED STATES

The poverty threshold for one person in 2009 was $10,956 and $21,756 for a family of four.

Source: North Dakota State Data Center; U.S. Census Bureau

PErCENTAGE oF NorTh DAkoTA PoPuLATioN (ALL AGES) iN PovErTY ComPArED To ThE uNiTED STATES

The poverty threshold for one person in 2009 was $10,956 and $21,756 for a family of four.

Source: North Dakota State Data Center; U.S. Census Bureau

14.5%12.4% 14.0% 14.2% 14.1%

18.5% 17.9% 18.0% 18.2% 20.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

North Dakota United States

11.6% 11.7% 11.8% 11.5% 11.7%

13.3%12.3%

13.0% 13.2% 14.3%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

North Dakota United States

PErCENTAGE oF NorTh DAkoTA PoPuLATioN (ChiLDrEN AGES 0-17) iN

PovErTY ComPArED To ThE uNiTED STATES

The poverty threshold for one person in 2009 was $10,956 and $21,756 for a family of four.

Source: North Dakota State Data Center; U.S. Census Bureau

PErCENTAGE oF NorTh DAkoTA PoPuLATioN (ALL AGES) iN PovErTY ComPArED To ThE uNiTED STATES

The poverty threshold for one person in 2009 was $10,956 and $21,756 for a family of four.

Source: North Dakota State Data Center; U.S. Census Bureau

14.5%12.4% 14.0% 14.2% 14.1%

18.5% 17.9% 18.0% 18.2% 20.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

North Dakota United States

11.6% 11.7% 11.8% 11.5% 11.7%

13.3%12.3%

13.0% 13.2% 14.3%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

North Dakota United States

Eco

nom

icS

tatis

tics GroSS STATE ProDuCT

Total Gross State Product (Amounts Shown in millions)

2010 Gross State Product by major industry

Gross State Product (Amounts Shown in millions) major industry 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Government $4,107 $4,172 $4,050 $4,504 $4,766 Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting

1,512 2,462 3,407 2,595 2,809

Manufacturing 2,580 2,615 2,834 2,510 2,706Health care and social assistance

2,220 2,352 2,556 2,718 2,975

Real estate, rental, and leasing

2,595 2,976 3,299 3,494 3,765

Wholesale trade 1,962 2,025 2,262 2,342 2,591Retail trade 1,871 1,948 1,948 1,997 2,172Finance and insurance 1,534 1,746 2,105 2,081 2,218Construction 1,128 1,171 1,317 1,366 1,398Other 6,560 7,083 7,899 8,021 9,286Total $26,069 $28,550 $31,677 $31,628 $34,686Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

9.5% increase

11.0% increase

0.2% decrease

9.7% increase

$26,069$28,550 $31,677 $31,628

$34,686

$0$5,000

$10,000$15,000$20,000$25,000$30,000$35,000$40,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Government14%

Ag/forestry/fishing/hunting

8%

Manufacturing8%

Health care/social

assistance9%

Real estate, rental,and leasing

11%

Wholesale trade7%

Retail trade6%

Finance and insurance

6%

Construction4%

Other27%

9.5% increase

11.0% increase

0.2% decrease

9.7% increase

GroSS STATE ProDuCT Total Gross State Product

(Amounts Shown in millions)

2010 Gross State Product by major industry

Gross State Product (Amounts Shown in millions) major industry 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Government $4,107 $4,172 $4,050 $4,504 $4,766 Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting

1,512 2,462 3,407 2,595 2,809

Manufacturing 2,580 2,615 2,834 2,510 2,706Health care and social assistance

2,220 2,352 2,556 2,718 2,975

Real estate, rental, and leasing

2,595 2,976 3,299 3,494 3,765

Wholesale trade 1,962 2,025 2,262 2,342 2,591Retail trade 1,871 1,948 1,948 1,997 2,172Finance and insurance 1,534 1,746 2,105 2,081 2,218Construction 1,128 1,171 1,317 1,366 1,398Other 6,560 7,083 7,899 8,021 9,286Total $26,069 $28,550 $31,677 $31,628 $34,686Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

9.5% increase

11.0% increase

0.2% decrease

9.7% increase

$26,069$28,550 $31,677 $31,628

$34,686

$0$5,000

$10,000$15,000$20,000$25,000$30,000$35,000$40,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Government14%

Ag/forestry/fishing/hunting

8%

Manufacturing8%

Health care/social

assistance9%

Real estate, rental,and leasing

11%

Wholesale trade7%

Retail trade6%

Finance and insurance

6%

Construction4%

Other27%

9.5% increase

11.0% increase

0.2% decrease

9.7% increase

GroSS STATE ProDuCT Total Gross State Product

(Amounts Shown in millions)

2010 Gross State Product by major industry

Gross State Product (Amounts Shown in millions) major industry 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Government $4,107 $4,172 $4,050 $4,504 $4,766 Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting

1,512 2,462 3,407 2,595 2,809

Manufacturing 2,580 2,615 2,834 2,510 2,706Health care and social assistance

2,220 2,352 2,556 2,718 2,975

Real estate, rental, and leasing

2,595 2,976 3,299 3,494 3,765

Wholesale trade 1,962 2,025 2,262 2,342 2,591Retail trade 1,871 1,948 1,948 1,997 2,172Finance and insurance 1,534 1,746 2,105 2,081 2,218Construction 1,128 1,171 1,317 1,366 1,398Other 6,560 7,083 7,899 8,021 9,286Total $26,069 $28,550 $31,677 $31,628 $34,686Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

9.5% increase

11.0% increase

0.2% decrease

9.7% increase

$26,069$28,550 $31,677 $31,628

$34,686

$0$5,000

$10,000$15,000$20,000$25,000$30,000$35,000$40,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Government14%

Ag/forestry/fishing/hunting

8%

Manufacturing8%

Health care/social

assistance9%

Real estate, rental,and leasing

11%

Wholesale trade7%

Retail trade6%

Finance and insurance

6%

Construction4%

Other27%

9.5% increase

11.0% increase

0.2% decrease

9.7% increase

3

Econom

icS

tatistics

Page 6: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

ToTAL STATE ForEiGN EXPorTS (Amounts Shown in millions)

major State Foreign Exports (Amounts Shown in millions) 2007 2008 2009 2010

Tractors $154 $304 $252 $169Crude oil 58 174 216 232Front-end shovel loaders 353 441 159 246Wheat (other than durum) 74 86 84 148Seeders, planters, and transplanters 53 83 83 71Corn (other than seed corn) 74 183 81 82Sunflower seeds 55 62 65 52Sunflower seed or safflower oil 48 64 54 23Dried peas 42 57 48 53Parts and attachments for derricks 36 62 32 49Other 1,100 1,256 1,119 1,411Total $2,047 $2,772 $2,193 $2,536Source: U.S. Census Bureau - Foreign Trade Statistics

AvErAGE DAiLY oiL ProDuCTioN AND AvErAGE PriCE PEr BArrEL oF oiL

Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Barrels 103,650 115,740 138,618 196,285 258,045 345,556Price $57.42 $55.39 $88.60 $59.82 $64.49 $80.93Source: Industrial Commission, Department of Mineral Resources

$2,047

$2,772

$2,193$2,536

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

2007 2008 2009 2010

$0$50$100$150$200$250$300$350

050,000

100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000

FY2006

FY2007

FY 2008

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

PriceBarrels

Average barrels produced dailyAverage price per barrel

ToTAL STATE ForEiGN EXPorTS (Amounts Shown in millions)

major State Foreign Exports (Amounts Shown in millions) 2007 2008 2009 2010

Tractors $154 $304 $252 $169Crude oil 58 174 216 232Front-end shovel loaders 353 441 159 246Wheat (other than durum) 74 86 84 148Seeders, planters, and transplanters 53 83 83 71Corn (other than seed corn) 74 183 81 82Sunflower seeds 55 62 65 52Sunflower seed or safflower oil 48 64 54 23Dried peas 42 57 48 53Parts and attachments for derricks 36 62 32 49Other 1,100 1,256 1,119 1,411Total $2,047 $2,772 $2,193 $2,536Source: U.S. Census Bureau - Foreign Trade Statistics

AvErAGE DAiLY oiL ProDuCTioN AND AvErAGE PriCE PEr BArrEL oF oiL

Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Barrels 103,650 115,740 138,618 196,285 258,045 345,556Price $57.42 $55.39 $88.60 $59.82 $64.49 $80.93Source: Industrial Commission, Department of Mineral Resources

$2,047

$2,772

$2,193$2,536

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

2007 2008 2009 2010

$0$50$100$150$200$250$300$350

050,000

100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000

FY2006

FY2007

FY 2008

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

PriceBarrels

Average barrels produced dailyAverage price per barrel

ToTAL STATE ForEiGN EXPorTS (Amounts Shown in millions)

major State Foreign Exports (Amounts Shown in millions) 2007 2008 2009 2010

Tractors $154 $304 $252 $169Crude oil 58 174 216 232Front-end shovel loaders 353 441 159 246Wheat (other than durum) 74 86 84 148Seeders, planters, and transplanters 53 83 83 71Corn (other than seed corn) 74 183 81 82Sunflower seeds 55 62 65 52Sunflower seed or safflower oil 48 64 54 23Dried peas 42 57 48 53Parts and attachments for derricks 36 62 32 49Other 1,100 1,256 1,119 1,411Total $2,047 $2,772 $2,193 $2,536Source: U.S. Census Bureau - Foreign Trade Statistics

AvErAGE DAiLY oiL ProDuCTioN AND AvErAGE PriCE PEr BArrEL oF oiL

Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Barrels 103,650 115,740 138,618 196,285 258,045 345,556Price $57.42 $55.39 $88.60 $59.82 $64.49 $80.93Source: Industrial Commission, Department of Mineral Resources

$2,047

$2,772

$2,193$2,536

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

2007 2008 2009 2010

$0$50$100$150$200$250$300$350

050,000

100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000

FY2006

FY2007

FY 2008

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

PriceBarrels

Average barrels produced dailyAverage price per barrel

ToTAL STATE ForEiGN EXPorTS (Amounts Shown in millions)

major State Foreign Exports (Amounts Shown in millions) 2007 2008 2009 2010

Tractors $154 $304 $252 $169Crude oil 58 174 216 232Front-end shovel loaders 353 441 159 246Wheat (other than durum) 74 86 84 148Seeders, planters, and transplanters 53 83 83 71Corn (other than seed corn) 74 183 81 82Sunflower seeds 55 62 65 52Sunflower seed or safflower oil 48 64 54 23Dried peas 42 57 48 53Parts and attachments for derricks 36 62 32 49Other 1,100 1,256 1,119 1,411Total $2,047 $2,772 $2,193 $2,536Source: U.S. Census Bureau - Foreign Trade Statistics

AvErAGE DAiLY oiL ProDuCTioN AND AvErAGE PriCE PEr BArrEL oF oiL

Fiscal Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Barrels 103,650 115,740 138,618 196,285 258,045 345,556Price $57.42 $55.39 $88.60 $59.82 $64.49 $80.93Source: Industrial Commission, Department of Mineral Resources

$2,047

$2,772

$2,193$2,536

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

2007 2008 2009 2010

$0$50$100$150$200$250$300$350

050,000

100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000

FY2006

FY2007

FY 2008

FY 2009

FY 2010

FY 2011

PriceBarrels

Average barrels produced dailyAverage price per barrel

4

Eco

nom

icS

tatis

tics

EmPLoYmENT AND uNEmPLoYmENT

YearEnd

Job Force Employment unemployment

unemployment rate

2005 357,667 345,840 11,827 3.3%2006 364,746 353,176 11,570 3.2%2007 366,164 355,189 10,975 3.0%2008 368,616 354,904 13,712 3.7%2009 368,417 352,996 15,421 4.2%2010 370,998 356,732 14,266 3.8%Source: U.S. Department of Labor

AvErAGE homE SALE PriCES BY CiTY (Amounts Shown in Thousands)

Source: Multiple Listing Service, North Dakota Association of Realtors

050,000

100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000400,000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Employment Unemployment

$0 $50 $100 $150 $200

WillistonWahpeton

MinotJamestown

Grand ForksFargo

DickinsonBismarck

North Dakota

2008 2009 2010

EmPLoYmENT AND uNEmPLoYmENT

YearEnd

Job Force Employment unemployment

unemployment rate

2005 357,667 345,840 11,827 3.3%2006 364,746 353,176 11,570 3.2%2007 366,164 355,189 10,975 3.0%2008 368,616 354,904 13,712 3.7%2009 368,417 352,996 15,421 4.2%2010 370,998 356,732 14,266 3.8%Source: U.S. Department of Labor

AvErAGE homE SALE PriCES BY CiTY (Amounts Shown in Thousands)

Source: Multiple Listing Service, North Dakota Association of Realtors

050,000

100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000400,000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Employment Unemployment

$0 $50 $100 $150 $200

WillistonWahpeton

MinotJamestown

Grand ForksFargo

DickinsonBismarck

North Dakota

2008 2009 2010

EmPLoYmENT AND uNEmPLoYmENT

YearEnd

Job Force Employment unemployment

unemployment rate

2005 357,667 345,840 11,827 3.3%2006 364,746 353,176 11,570 3.2%2007 366,164 355,189 10,975 3.0%2008 368,616 354,904 13,712 3.7%2009 368,417 352,996 15,421 4.2%2010 370,998 356,732 14,266 3.8%Source: U.S. Department of Labor

AvErAGE homE SALE PriCES BY CiTY (Amounts Shown in Thousands)

Source: Multiple Listing Service, North Dakota Association of Realtors

050,000

100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000400,000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Employment Unemployment

$0 $50 $100 $150 $200

WillistonWahpeton

MinotJamestown

Grand ForksFargo

DickinsonBismarck

North Dakota

2008 2009 2010

5

Econom

icS

tatistics

Page 7: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

STATE-LoCAL TAX BurDEN ComPArED To uNiTED STATES AvErAGE1

Year North Dakota united States

Average 2005 8.3% 9.6%2006 8.9% 9.7%2007 9.2% 9.8%2008 8.7% 9.9%2009 9.5%2 9.8%

1An estimate of the combined state and local tax burden imposed on residents of the state as calculated by the Tax Foundation. Taxes include property taxes, sales taxes, individual income taxes, and corporate income taxes. The percentage is calculated by dividing the estimated total amount paid by the residents in taxes by the state's per capita income.

2For 2009 North Dakota ranked 26 of the 50 states. Of all states, New Jersey ranked highest with a percentage of 12.2, and Alaska ranked lowest with a percentage of 6.3.

7.5%

8.0%

8.5%

9.0%

9.5%

10.0%

10.5%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

North Dakota U.S. Average

STATE-LoCAL TAX BurDEN ComPArED To uNiTED STATES AvErAGE1

Year North Dakota united States

Average 2005 8.3% 9.6%2006 8.9% 9.7%2007 9.2% 9.8%2008 8.7% 9.9%2009 9.5%2 9.8%

1An estimate of the combined state and local tax burden imposed on residents of the state as calculated by the Tax Foundation. Taxes include property taxes, sales taxes, individual income taxes, and corporate income taxes. The percentage is calculated by dividing the estimated total amount paid by the residents in taxes by the state's per capita income.

2For 2009 North Dakota ranked 26 of the 50 states. Of all states, New Jersey ranked highest with a percentage of 12.2, and Alaska ranked lowest with a percentage of 6.3.

7.5%

8.0%

8.5%

9.0%

9.5%

10.0%

10.5%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

North Dakota U.S. Average

6

Eco

nom

icS

tatis

tics

7

State B

udget

2011-13 GENErAL FuND BuDGET SummArY (As Approved by the 2011 Legislative Assembly)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Estimated unobligated general fund balance - July 1, 2011 $660.21

Add estimated 2011-13 general fund revenues and transfers 3,457.7Total resources available $4,117.9Less 2011-13 general fund appropriations 4,066.8

Estimated general fund balance - June 30, 2013 $51.12

1This amount reflects a transfer of $61.4 million from the June 30, 2011, general fund balance to the budget stabilization fund, $37.2 million of 2009-11 deficiency appropriations, and $20.1 millionof estimated 2009-11 unspent general fund appropriation authority.

2In addition, the budget stabilization fund is projected to have a June 30, 2013, balance of $386.4 million.

GENErAL FuND rEvENuES - BEGiNNiNG BALANCE, oNGoiNG rEvENuES,

AND TrANSFErS (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium Beginning Balance

ongoing revenues Transfers Total

2005-07 $68.0 $2,163.0 $154.7 $2,385.72007-09 $295.5 $2,520.7 $194.6 $3,010.82009-11 $361.8 $2,753.0 $489.8 $3,604.62011-13 $660.2 $2,849.6 $608.1 $4,117.9

$68.0 $295.5 $361.8 $660.2

$2,162.9$2,520.7

$2,753.0 $2,849.6$154.7$194.6

$489.7$608.1

$0$500

$1,000$1,500$2,000$2,500$3,000$3,500$4,000$4,500

2005-07Actual

2007-09Actual

2009-11Actual

2011-13Legislative

appropriation

Beginning balance Ongoing revenues Transfers

2011-13 GENErAL FuND BuDGET SummArY (As Approved by the 2011 Legislative Assembly)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Estimated unobligated general fund balance - July 1, 2011 $660.21

Add estimated 2011-13 general fund revenues and transfers 3,457.7Total resources available $4,117.9Less 2011-13 general fund appropriations 4,066.8

Estimated general fund balance - June 30, 2013 $51.12

1This amount reflects a transfer of $61.4 million from the June 30, 2011, general fund balance to the budget stabilization fund, $37.2 million of 2009-11 deficiency appropriations, and $20.1 millionof estimated 2009-11 unspent general fund appropriation authority.

2In addition, the budget stabilization fund is projected to have a June 30, 2013, balance of $386.4 million.

GENErAL FuND rEvENuES - BEGiNNiNG BALANCE, oNGoiNG rEvENuES,

AND TrANSFErS (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium Beginning Balance

ongoing revenues Transfers Total

2005-07 $68.0 $2,163.0 $154.7 $2,385.72007-09 $295.5 $2,520.7 $194.6 $3,010.82009-11 $361.8 $2,753.0 $489.8 $3,604.62011-13 $660.2 $2,849.6 $608.1 $4,117.9

$68.0 $295.5 $361.8 $660.2

$2,162.9$2,520.7

$2,753.0 $2,849.6$154.7$194.6

$489.7$608.1

$0$500

$1,000$1,500$2,000$2,500$3,000$3,500$4,000$4,500

2005-07Actual

2007-09Actual

2009-11Actual

2011-13Legislative

appropriation

Beginning balance Ongoing revenues Transfers

2011-13 GENErAL FuND BuDGET SummArY (As Approved by the 2011 Legislative Assembly)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Estimated unobligated general fund balance - July 1, 2011 $660.21

Add estimated 2011-13 general fund revenues and transfers 3,457.7Total resources available $4,117.9Less 2011-13 general fund appropriations 4,066.8

Estimated general fund balance - June 30, 2013 $51.12

1This amount reflects a transfer of $61.4 million from the June 30, 2011, general fund balance to the budget stabilization fund, $37.2 million of 2009-11 deficiency appropriations, and $20.1 millionof estimated 2009-11 unspent general fund appropriation authority.

2In addition, the budget stabilization fund is projected to have a June 30, 2013, balance of $386.4 million.

GENErAL FuND rEvENuES - BEGiNNiNG BALANCE, oNGoiNG rEvENuES,

AND TrANSFErS (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium Beginning Balance

ongoing revenues Transfers Total

2005-07 $68.0 $2,163.0 $154.7 $2,385.72007-09 $295.5 $2,520.7 $194.6 $3,010.82009-11 $361.8 $2,753.0 $489.8 $3,604.62011-13 $660.2 $2,849.6 $608.1 $4,117.9

$68.0 $295.5 $361.8 $660.2

$2,162.9$2,520.7

$2,753.0 $2,849.6$154.7$194.6

$489.7$608.1

$0$500

$1,000$1,500$2,000$2,500$3,000$3,500$4,000$4,500

2005-07Actual

2007-09Actual

2009-11Actual

2011-13Legislative

appropriation

Beginning balance Ongoing revenues Transfers

STATE BuDGET

Page 8: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

Sta

te B

udge

t

2011-13 ESTimATED GENErAL FuND rEvENuES (Amounts Shown in millions)

1Transfers and miscellaneous revenues include:

Strategic investment and improvements fund $305,000,000Property tax relief sustainability fund 295,000,000State Mill and Elevator Association 6,650,000Gas tax administration 1,485,000

Total $608,135,000

Beginningbalance$660.2316.0%

Sales and use tax

$1,382.2333.6%

Motor vehicle

excise tax $183.04

4.5%

Individual income tax

$544.6713.2%Corporate

income tax $126.24

3.1%

Oil and gas production

tax$133.83

3.2%

Oil extraction tax

$166.174.0%

Other$313.43

7.6%

Transfersand misc.1$608.1414.8%

Total - $4,117.98

2011-13 ESTimATED GENErAL FuND rEvENuES (Amounts Shown in millions)

1Transfers and miscellaneous revenues include:

Strategic investment and improvements fund $305,000,000Property tax relief sustainability fund 295,000,000State Mill and Elevator Association 6,650,000Gas tax administration 1,485,000

Total $608,135,000

Beginningbalance$660.2316.0%

Sales and use tax

$1,382.2333.6%

Motor vehicle

excise tax $183.04

4.5%

Individual income tax

$544.6713.2%Corporate

income tax $126.24

3.1%

Oil and gas production

tax$133.83

3.2%

Oil extraction tax

$166.174.0%

Other$313.43

7.6%

Transfersand misc.1$608.1414.8%

Total - $4,117.98

8

State B

udget

GENErAL FuND rEvENuES - mAJor rEvENuE TYPES (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium Sales Tax

individual income

Tax

Corporate income

Tax others Total 2005-07 $841.9 $587.6 $232.3 $501.1 $2,162.92007-09 $1,046.5 $681.7 $239.7 $552.8 $2,520.72009-11 $1,267.2 $729.2 $234.4 $522.2 $2,753.02011-13 $1,382.2 $544.7 $126.2 $796.51 $2,849.6

1This amount reflects legislative action allocating an additional $229 million of oil and gas tax collections to the general fund providing a total of $300 million per biennium.

CurrENT TAX rATES North Dakota sales tax rate is 5 percent. The estimated

impact on general fund revenues of a one percentage point change in the state's 5 percent sales and use tax is approximately$340 million per biennium, or $170 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.

individual income tax rates range from 1.51 percent to 3.99 percent based on the individual taxpayer's level of federal income tax liability. The estimated impact on general fund revenues of a 10 percent change in the state individual income tax rates (e.g., the 1.51 percent rate would increase by .151 percent to 1.661 percent, or decrease by a like amount to 1.359 percent) isapproximately $53 million per biennium, or $26.5 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.

Corporate income tax rates range from 1.68 percent to 5.15 percent of taxable income. The estimated impact on general fund revenues of a 10 percent change in the state's corporate income tax rates (e.g., the 1.68 percent rate would increase by .168 percent to 1.848 percent or would decrease by a like amount to 1.512 percent) is approximately $16 million per biennium, or $8 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.

$0$200$400$600$800

$1,000$1,200$1,400

2005-07Actual

2007-09Actual

2009-11Actual

2011-13Legislative

appropriation

Sales tax Individual income tax

Corporate income tax Others

GENErAL FuND rEvENuES - mAJor rEvENuE TYPES (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium Sales Tax

individual income

Tax

Corporate income

Tax others Total 2005-07 $841.9 $587.6 $232.3 $501.1 $2,162.92007-09 $1,046.5 $681.7 $239.7 $552.8 $2,520.72009-11 $1,267.2 $729.2 $234.4 $522.2 $2,753.02011-13 $1,382.2 $544.7 $126.2 $796.51 $2,849.6

1This amount reflects legislative action allocating an additional $229 million of oil and gas tax collections to the general fund providing a total of $300 million per biennium.

CurrENT TAX rATES North Dakota sales tax rate is 5 percent. The estimated

impact on general fund revenues of a one percentage point change in the state's 5 percent sales and use tax is approximately$340 million per biennium, or $170 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.

individual income tax rates range from 1.51 percent to 3.99 percent based on the individual taxpayer's level of federal income tax liability. The estimated impact on general fund revenues of a 10 percent change in the state individual income tax rates (e.g., the 1.51 percent rate would increase by .151 percent to 1.661 percent, or decrease by a like amount to 1.359 percent) isapproximately $53 million per biennium, or $26.5 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.

Corporate income tax rates range from 1.68 percent to 5.15 percent of taxable income. The estimated impact on general fund revenues of a 10 percent change in the state's corporate income tax rates (e.g., the 1.68 percent rate would increase by .168 percent to 1.848 percent or would decrease by a like amount to 1.512 percent) is approximately $16 million per biennium, or $8 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.

$0$200$400$600$800

$1,000$1,200$1,400

2005-07Actual

2007-09Actual

2009-11Actual

2011-13Legislative

appropriation

Sales tax Individual income tax

Corporate income tax Others

CurrENT TAX rATESNorth Dakota's sales tax rate is 5 percent. The estimated

impact on general fund revenues of a one percentage point change in the state's 5 percent sales and use tax is approximately $340 million per biennium, or $170 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.

individual income tax rates range from 1.51 percent to 3.99 percent based on the individual taxpayer's level of federal income tax liability. The estimated impact on general fund revenues of a 10 percent change in the state individual income tax rates (e.g., the 1.51 percent rate would increase by .151 percent to 1.661 percent, or decrease by a like amount to 1.359 percent) is approximately $53 million per biennium, or $26.5 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.

Corporate income tax rates range from 1.68 percent to 5.15 percent of taxable income. The estimated impact on general fund revenues of a 10 percent change in the state's corporate income tax rates (e.g., the 1.68 percent rate would increase by .168 percent to 1.848 percent or would decrease by a like amount to 1.512 percent) is approximately $16 million per biennium, or $8 million per year, based on the May 2011 legislative revenue forecast.

9

Page 9: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

Sta

te B

udge

t

2011-13 BiENNium GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

hiSTorY oF GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)

$2,000.5

$2,574.3

$3,296.6

$4,066.9

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

$4,500

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

28.7%increase

28.1%increase

23.4%increase

Generalgovernment

$289.07%

Elementary & secondary education

$902.222%

Property tax relief

education$341.8

8%Highereducation

$655.816%

Othereducation

$43.71%

Humanservices$932.023%

Other health & welfare

$45.71%

regulatory$61.52%

Public safety$223.4

6%

Ag. & economic

dev.$148.9

4%

Naturalresources

$46.31%

Transportation$376.6

9%

Total - $4,066.9

2011-13 BiENNium GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

hiSTorY oF GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)

$2,000.5

$2,574.3

$3,296.6

$4,066.9

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

$4,500

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

28.7%increase

28.1%increase

23.4%increase

Generalgovernment

$289.07%

Elementary & secondary education

$902.222%

Property tax relief

education$341.8

8%Highereducation

$655.816%

Othereducation

$43.71%

Humanservices$932.023%

Other health & welfare

$45.71%

regulatory$61.52%

Public safety$223.4

6%

Ag. & economic

dev.$148.9

4%

Naturalresources

$46.31%

Transportation$376.6

9%

Total - $4,066.9

10 11

State B

udget

2011-13 BiENNium ALL FuNDS APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

hiSTorY oF ToTAL APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium General

Fund Federal Funds

Special Funds Total

2005-07 $2,000.5 $2,347.2 $1,438.0 $5,785.72007-09 $2,574.3 $2,494.7 $1,555.0 $6,624.02009-11 $3,296.6 $3,682.21 $1,960.1 $8,938.92011-13 $4,066.9 $3,298.0 $2,559.6 $9,924.5

1Amount includes $655.8 million of federal fiscal stimulus funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

General fund Federal funds Special funds

$5,785.7$6,624.0

$8,938.9$9,924.5

14.5%increase

34.9%increase

11.0%increase

Generalgovernment

$519.95%

Elementary & secondary education$1,358.4

14%

Property tax relief

education$341.8

3%

Highereducation

$764.68%

Othereducation

$165.12%

Humanservices$2,605.4

26%

Other health & welfare$308.1

3%

Regulatory$360.8

4%

Public safety$519.1

5%

Ag. & economic

dev.$367.2

4%

Naturalresources

$574.56%

Transportation$2,039.6

20%

Total - $9,924.5

2011-13 BiENNium ALL FuNDS APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

hiSTorY oF ToTAL APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium General

Fund Federal Funds

Special Funds Total

2005-07 $2,000.5 $2,347.2 $1,438.0 $5,785.72007-09 $2,574.3 $2,494.7 $1,555.0 $6,624.02009-11 $3,296.6 $3,682.21 $1,960.1 $8,938.92011-13 $4,066.9 $3,298.0 $2,559.6 $9,924.5

1Amount includes $655.8 million of federal fiscal stimulus funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

General fund Federal funds Special funds

$5,785.7$6,624.0

$8,938.9$9,924.5

14.5%increase

34.9%increase

11.0%increase

Generalgovernment

$519.95%

Elementary & secondary education$1,358.4

14%

Property tax relief

education$341.8

3%

Highereducation

$764.68%

Othereducation

$165.12%

Humanservices$2,605.4

26%

Other health & welfare$308.1

3%

Regulatory$360.8

4%

Public safety$519.1

5%

Ag. & economic

dev.$367.2

4%

Naturalresources

$574.56%

Transportation$2,039.6

20%

Total - $9,924.5

2011-13 BiENNium ALL FuNDS APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

hiSTorY oF ToTAL APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium General

Fund Federal Funds

Special Funds Total

2005-07 $2,000.5 $2,347.2 $1,438.0 $5,785.72007-09 $2,574.3 $2,494.7 $1,555.0 $6,624.02009-11 $3,296.6 $3,682.21 $1,960.1 $8,938.92011-13 $4,066.9 $3,298.0 $2,559.6 $9,924.5

1Amount includes $655.8 million of federal fiscal stimulus funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

General fund Federal funds Special funds

$5,785.7$6,624.0

$8,938.9$9,924.5

14.5%increase

34.9%increase

11.0%increase

Generalgovernment

$519.95%

Elementary & secondary education$1,358.4

14%

Property tax relief

education$341.8

3%

Highereducation

$764.68%

Othereducation

$165.12%

Humanservices$2,605.4

26%

Other health & welfare$308.1

3%

Regulatory$360.8

4%

Public safety$519.1

5%

Ag. & economic

dev.$367.2

4%

Naturalresources

$574.56%

Transportation$2,039.6

20%

Total - $9,924.5

Page 10: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

12

Sta

te B

udge

t

NumBEr oF STATE EmPLoYEES1

(Full-Time Equivalent Positions (FTE))

1These amounts do not include employees of the North Dakota University System.

FuNDiNG iNCrEASES For STATE EmPLoYEE SALArY ADJuSTmENTS

2005-07 4% on July 1, 2005, and 4% on July 1, 2006 2007-09 4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2007, and

4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2008 2009-11 5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2009, and

5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2010 2011-13 3% on July 1, 2011, and 3% on July 1, 2012

CoST oF STATE EmPLoYEE hEALTh iNSurANCE PrEmiumS hiSTorY

Biennium monthly Premium

increase From Previous Biennium

Percentage increase

2005-07 $554 $65 13.3%2007-09 $658 $104 18.8%2009-11 $826 $168 25.5%2011-13 $887 $61 7.4%

8,437.68

8,828.178,969.76 8,989.16

8,1008,2008,3008,4008,5008,6008,7008,8008,9009,0009,100

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Increase includes 132.20 FTE positions added to the Department of Human Services for state administration of child support

$554 $658

$826 $887

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

NumBEr oF STATE EmPLoYEES1

(Full-Time Equivalent Positions (FTE))

1These amounts do not include employees of the North Dakota University System.

FuNDiNG iNCrEASES For STATE EmPLoYEE SALArY ADJuSTmENTS

2005-07 4% on July 1, 2005, and 4% on July 1, 2006 2007-09 4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2007, and

4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2008 2009-11 5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2009, and

5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2010 2011-13 3% on July 1, 2011, and 3% on July 1, 2012

CoST oF STATE EmPLoYEE hEALTh iNSurANCE PrEmiumS hiSTorY

Biennium monthly Premium

increase From Previous Biennium

Percentage increase

2005-07 $554 $65 13.3%2007-09 $658 $104 18.8%2009-11 $826 $168 25.5%2011-13 $887 $61 7.4%

8,437.68

8,828.178,969.76 8,989.16

8,1008,2008,3008,4008,5008,6008,7008,8008,9009,0009,100

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Increase includes 132.20 FTE positions added to the Department of Human Services for state administration of child support

$554 $658

$826 $887

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

NumBEr oF STATE EmPLoYEES1

(Full-Time Equivalent Positions (FTE))

1These amounts do not include employees of the North Dakota University System.

FuNDiNG iNCrEASES For STATE EmPLoYEE SALArY ADJuSTmENTS

2005-07 4% on July 1, 2005, and 4% on July 1, 2006 2007-09 4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2007, and

4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2008 2009-11 5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2009, and

5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2010 2011-13 3% on July 1, 2011, and 3% on July 1, 2012

CoST oF STATE EmPLoYEE hEALTh iNSurANCE PrEmiumS hiSTorY

Biennium monthly Premium

increase From Previous Biennium

Percentage increase

2005-07 $554 $65 13.3%2007-09 $658 $104 18.8%2009-11 $826 $168 25.5%2011-13 $887 $61 7.4%

8,437.68

8,828.178,969.76 8,989.16

8,1008,2008,3008,4008,5008,6008,7008,8008,9009,0009,100

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Increase includes 132.20 FTE positions added to the Department of Human Services for state administration of child support

$554 $658

$826 $887

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

NumBEr oF STATE EmPLoYEES1

(Full-Time Equivalent Positions (FTE))

1These amounts do not include employees of the North Dakota University System.

FuNDiNG iNCrEASES For STATE EmPLoYEE SALArY ADJuSTmENTS

2005-07 4% on July 1, 2005, and 4% on July 1, 2006 2007-09 4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2007, and

4% with a $75 per month minimum on July 1, 2008 2009-11 5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2009, and

5% with a $100 per month minimum on July 1, 2010 2011-13 3% on July 1, 2011, and 3% on July 1, 2012

CoST oF STATE EmPLoYEE hEALTh iNSurANCE PrEmiumS hiSTorY

Biennium monthly Premium

increase From Previous Biennium

Percentage increase

2005-07 $554 $65 13.3%2007-09 $658 $104 18.8%2009-11 $826 $168 25.5%2011-13 $887 $61 7.4%

8,437.68

8,828.178,969.76 8,989.16

8,1008,2008,3008,4008,5008,6008,7008,8008,9009,0009,100

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Increase includes 132.20 FTE positions added to the Department of Human Services for state administration of child support

$554 $658

$826 $887

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

13

ASSiSTANCE To PoLiTiCAL SuBDiviSioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)

The following is a summary of major state appropriations and revenue allocations for direct assistance to political subdivisions:

STATE DEBT (Amounts Shown in millions)

Bonds outstanding as of June 30, 2010 (Amounts Shown in millions)

North Dakota Building Authority $84.3State Water Commission 101.9Department of Transportation 43.0Information Technology Department 2.9State Fair Association 0.8Student loan trust 14.2Housing Finance Agency 1,067.7North Dakota University System 218.7Total $1,533.5

$0$200$400$600$800

$1,000$1,200$1,400$1,600$1,800$2,000$2,200$2,400

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13School-related funding

State aid distribution fund

Motor vehicle fuel tax and registration fees

Coal, oil, and gas taxes

Other

$1,087.0$1,302.6

$1,843.8

$2,333.0

19.8%increase

41.5%increase

26.5%increase

$1,325.3 $1,351.5 $1,463.5 $1,303.1

$1,533.5

$0$200$400$600$800

$1,000$1,200$1,400$1,600

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

ASSiSTANCE To PoLiTiCAL SuBDiviSioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)

The following is a summary of major state appropriations and revenue allocations for direct assistance to political subdivisions:

STATE DEBT (Amounts Shown in millions)

Bonds outstanding as of June 30, 2010 (Amounts Shown in millions)

North Dakota Building Authority $84.3State Water Commission 101.9Department of Transportation 43.0Information Technology Department 2.9State Fair Association 0.8Student loan trust 14.2Housing Finance Agency 1,067.7North Dakota University System 218.7Total $1,533.5

$0$200$400$600$800

$1,000$1,200$1,400$1,600$1,800$2,000$2,200$2,400

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13School-related funding

State aid distribution fund

Motor vehicle fuel tax and registration fees

Coal, oil, and gas taxes

Other

$1,087.0$1,302.6

$1,843.8

$2,333.0

19.8%increase

41.5%increase

26.5%increase

$1,325.3 $1,351.5 $1,463.5 $1,303.1

$1,533.5

$0$200$400$600$800

$1,000$1,200$1,400$1,600

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

ASSiSTANCE To PoLiTiCAL SuBDiviSioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)

The following is a summary of major state appropriations and revenue allocations for direct assistance to political subdivisions:

STATE DEBT (Amounts Shown in millions)

Bonds outstanding as of June 30, 2010 (Amounts Shown in millions)

North Dakota Building Authority $84.3State Water Commission 101.9Department of Transportation 43.0Information Technology Department 2.9State Fair Association 0.8Student loan trust 14.2Housing Finance Agency 1,067.7North Dakota University System 218.7Total $1,533.5

$0$200$400$600$800

$1,000$1,200$1,400$1,600$1,800$2,000$2,200$2,400

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13School-related funding

State aid distribution fund

Motor vehicle fuel tax and registration fees

Coal, oil, and gas taxes

Other

$1,087.0$1,302.6

$1,843.8

$2,333.0

19.8%increase

41.5%increase

26.5%increase

$1,325.3 $1,351.5 $1,463.5 $1,303.1

$1,533.5

$0$200$400$600$800

$1,000$1,200$1,400$1,600

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

State B

udget

Page 11: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

14

Sta

te B

udge

t

The common schools trust fund is provided for in Article IX of the Constitution of North Dakota which provides that the fund is to be used to support the common schools of the state. The fund consists of income from state lands dedicated for the support of schools as well as 10 percent of oil extraction tax revenue, 45 percent of tobacco settlement money received by the state under subsection IX(c)(1) of the Master Settlement Agreement, and funds received by the state under the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act. Article IX, Section 1, of the Constitution of North Dakota provides that only the interest and income of the trust fund may be expended.

LEGACY FuNDThe legacy fund was created in 2010 when the voters

of North Dakota approved a constitutional amendment to provide that 30 percent of oil and gas production and oil extraction taxes on oil and gas produced after June 30, 2011, be transferred to the legacy fund. The principal and earnings of the legacy fund may not be spent until after June 30, 2017, and any expenditure of principal after that date requires a vote of at least two-thirds of the members elected to each house of the Legislative Assembly. Not more than 15 percent of the principal of the fund may be spent during a biennium. Interest earnings accruing after June 30, 2017, are transferred to the general fund at the end of each biennium. The June 30, 2013, balance of the fund is estimated to be $618.6 million.

CommoN SChooLS TruST FuND The common schools trust fund is provided for in Article

IX of the North Dakota Constitution which provides that the fund is to be used to support the common schools of the state. The fund consists of income from state lands dedicated for the support of schools as wells as 10 percent of oil extraction tax revenue, 45 percent of tobacco settlement money received by the state under subsection IX(c)(1) of the master settlement agreement, and funds received by the state under the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act. Section 1 of Article IX of the North Dakota Constitution provides that only the interest and income of the trust fund may be expended.

Fiscal Year Beginning Asset Balance (Excluding Land and mineral values)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

LEGACY FuND The legacy fund was created in 2010 when the voters of

North Dakota approved a constitutional amendment to provide that 30 percent of oil and gas production and oil extraction taxes on oil and gas produced after June 30, 2011, be transferred to the legacy fund. The principal and earnings of the legacy fund may not be spent until after June 30, 2017, and any expenditure of principal after that date requires a vote of at least two-thirds of the members elected to each house of the Legislative Assembly. Not more than 15 percent of the principal of the fund may be spent during a biennium. Interest earnings accruing after June 30, 2017, are transferred to the general fund at the end of each biennium. The June 30, 2013, balance of the fund is estimated to be $618.6 million.

$761.9$887.1

$908.9$846.3

$1,221.5

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

CommoN SChooLS TruST FuND

15

K-12 E

ducation

STATE SChooL AiD APProPriATioNS - hiSTorY

(Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium General

Fund

State Tuition Fund

other Special Funds Total

2005-07 $627.0 $71.6 $698.62007-09 $704.6 $76.2 $780.82009-11 $1,098.11 $86.3 $89.81,2 $1,274.22011-13 $1,223.11 $101.6 $26.22,3 $1,350.94

1The 2009 and 2011 Legislative Assemblies provided, as state school aid, $295 million and $341.8 million from the general fund for mill levy reduction grants to school districts during the 2009-11 and the 2011-13 bienniums, respectively. In addition, the 2011 Legislative Assembly provided deficiency appropriations totaling $4.4 million, of which $4.2 million was from the property tax relief sustainability fund and $211,264 was from the general fund for mill levy reduction grants during the 2009-11 biennium.

2The 2009 Legislative Assembly provided, as state school aid, $85.6 million from federal funds available through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided, as state school aid, $21.2 million from federal funds available through the federal education jobs fund program.

3The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided $5 million from the oil and gas impact fund for rapid enrollment grants during the 2011-13 biennium.

4In addition, the 2011 Legislative Assembly authorized the Department of Public Instruction to continue $9 million of estimated excess funding for state school aid from the 2009-11 biennium to the 2011-13 biennium for state school aid per student payments.

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

General fundState tuition fundGeneral fund - Mill levy reduction grantsOther special funds

$698.6 $780.8

$1,350.9$1,274.2

STATE SChooL AiD APProPriATioNS - hiSTorY

(Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium General

Fund

State Tuition Fund

other Special Funds Total

2005-07 $627.0 $71.6 $698.62007-09 $704.6 $76.2 $780.82009-11 $1,098.11 $86.3 $89.81,2 $1,274.22011-13 $1,223.11 $101.6 $26.22,3 $1,350.94

1The 2009 and 2011 Legislative Assemblies provided, as state school aid, $295 million and $341.8 million from the general fund for mill levy reduction grants to school districts during the 2009-11 and the 2011-13 bienniums, respectively. In addition, the 2011 Legislative Assembly provided deficiency appropriations totaling $4.4 million, of which $4.2 million was from the property tax relief sustainability fund and $211,264 was from the general fund for mill levy reduction grants during the 2009-11 biennium.

2The 2009 Legislative Assembly provided, as state school aid, $85.6 million from federal funds available through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided, as state school aid, $21.2 million from federal funds available through the federal education jobs fund program.

3The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided $5 million from the oil and gas impact fund for rapid enrollment grants during the 2011-13 biennium.

4In addition, the 2011 Legislative Assembly authorized the Department of Public Instruction to continue $9 million of estimated excess funding for state school aid from the 2009-11 biennium to the 2011-13 biennium for state school aid per student payments.

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

General fundState tuition fundGeneral fund - Mill levy reduction grantsOther special funds

$698.6 $780.8

$1,350.9$1,274.2

k-12 EDuCATioN

Page 12: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

16

K-1

2 E

duca

tion

STATE SChooL AiD APProPriATioNS - DETAiL

2009-11 2011-13 increase

(Decrease) State school aid $808,370,295 $918,459,478 $110,089,183Transportation aid 48,500,000 48,500,000 Special education 15,500,000 16,000,000 500,000Rapid enrollment grants

5,000,000 5,000,000

Federal education jobs fund program payments

21,242,838 21,242,838

Supplemental operations grants

16,795,584 (16,795,584)

Supplemental one-time grants

85,644,337 (85,644,337)

Mill levy reduction grants

299,444,264 341,790,000 42,345,736

Total state school aid

$1,274,254,480 $1,350,992,3161 $76,737,836

1In addition, the 2011 Legislative Assembly authorized the Department of Public Instruction to continue $9 million of estimated excess funding for state school aid from the 2009-11 biennium to the 2011-13 biennium for state school aid per student payments.

STATE SChooL AiD - PEr STuDENT PAYmENTS

$3,116

$3,233

$3,250

$3,325

$3,200

$3,779

$3,910

$3,980

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

$4,500

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

Actual paymentsLegislative

appropriation

STATE SChooL AiD APProPriATioNS - DETAiL

2009-11 2011-13 increase

(Decrease) State school aid $808,370,295 $918,459,478 $110,089,183Transportation aid 48,500,000 48,500,000 Special education 15,500,000 16,000,000 500,000Rapid enrollment grants

5,000,000 5,000,000

Federal education jobs fund program payments

21,242,838 21,242,838

Supplemental operations grants

16,795,584 (16,795,584)

Supplemental one-time grants

85,644,337 (85,644,337)

Mill levy reduction grants

299,444,264 341,790,000 42,345,736

Total state school aid

$1,274,254,480 $1,350,992,3161 $76,737,836

1In addition, the 2011 Legislative Assembly authorized the Department of Public Instruction to continue $9 million of estimated excess funding for state school aid from the 2009-11 biennium to the 2011-13 biennium for state school aid per student payments.

STATE SChooL AiD - PEr STuDENT PAYmENTS

$3,116

$3,233

$3,250

$3,325

$3,200

$3,779

$3,910

$3,980

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

$4,500

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

Actual paymentsLegislative

appropriation

17

STuDENT ENroLLmENT AND NumBEr oF TEAChErS

AmEriCAN CoLLEGE TESTiNG ProGrAm SCorES

The American College Testing (ACT) program scores are designed to predict a student's potential for success in college. Below are average composite scores out of a possible 36 for North Dakota students as well as the average scores for regional states and the nation.

1The 2011 graduating class in North Dakota was the first class required to take either the ACT or WorkKeys assessment in the 11th grade, resulting in an increase in the number of students taking the exam. The regional composite average includes only one other state that requires all students be tested, Wyoming, which has an average composite score of 20.3 in 2011.

2The regional composite is the average composite scores posted by students tested in Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming.

North Dakota Class English math reading Science Composite2007 20.8 21.5 21.9 21.6 21.62008 20.7 21.6 21.8 21.5 21.62009 20.7 21.5 21.8 21.6 21.52010 20.7 21.4 21.7 21.6 21.52011 19.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.7

21.6 21.6 21.5 21.5

20.71

21.221.1 21.1 21.0

21.1

22.3 22.4 22.3 22.4 22.41

19.5

20

20.5

21

21.5

22

22.5

23

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Comparison of Average ACT Scores

North Dakota compositeNational compositeRegional composite2

9,015 9,046 9,083 9,228 9,264

95,600 94,057 93,405 93,715 94,729

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Number of teachers Student enrollment

STuDENT ENroLLmENT AND NumBEr oF TEAChErS

AmEriCAN CoLLEGE TESTiNG ProGrAm SCorES

The American College Testing (ACT) program scores are designed to predict a student's potential for success in college. Below are average composite scores out of a possible 36 for North Dakota students as well as the average scores for regional states and the nation.

1The 2011 graduating class in North Dakota was the first class required to take either the ACT or WorkKeys assessment in the 11th grade, resulting in an increase in the number of students taking the exam. The regional composite average includes only one other state that requires all students be tested, Wyoming, which has an average composite score of 20.3 in 2011.

2The regional composite is the average composite scores posted by students tested in Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming.

North Dakota Class English math reading Science Composite2007 20.8 21.5 21.9 21.6 21.62008 20.7 21.6 21.8 21.5 21.62009 20.7 21.5 21.8 21.6 21.52010 20.7 21.4 21.7 21.6 21.52011 19.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.7

21.6 21.6 21.5 21.5

20.71

21.221.1 21.1 21.0

21.1

22.3 22.4 22.3 22.4 22.41

19.5

20

20.5

21

21.5

22

22.5

23

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Comparison of Average ACT Scores

North Dakota compositeNational compositeRegional composite2

9,015 9,046 9,083 9,228 9,264

95,600 94,057 93,405 93,715 94,729

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Number of teachers Student enrollment

K-12 E

ducation

STuDENT ENroLLmENT AND NumBEr oF TEAChErS

AmEriCAN CoLLEGE TESTiNG ProGrAm SCorES

The American College Testing (ACT) program scores are designed to predict a student's potential for success in college. Below are average composite scores out of a possible 36 for North Dakota students as well as the average scores for regional states and the nation.

1The 2011 graduating class in North Dakota was the first class required to take either the ACT or WorkKeys assessment in the 11th grade, resulting in an increase in the number of students taking the exam. The regional composite average includes only one other state that requires all students be tested, Wyoming, which has an average composite score of 20.3 in 2011.

2The regional composite is the average composite scores posted by students tested in Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming.

North Dakota Class English math reading Science Composite2007 20.8 21.5 21.9 21.6 21.62008 20.7 21.6 21.8 21.5 21.62009 20.7 21.5 21.8 21.6 21.52010 20.7 21.4 21.7 21.6 21.52011 19.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.7

21.6 21.6 21.5 21.5

20.71

21.221.1 21.1 21.0

21.1

22.3 22.4 22.3 22.4 22.41

19.5

20

20.5

21

21.5

22

22.5

23

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Comparison of Average ACT Scores

North Dakota compositeNational compositeRegional composite2

9,015 9,046 9,083 9,228 9,264

95,600 94,057 93,405 93,715 94,729

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Number of teachers Student enrollment

AmEriCAN CoLLEGE TESTiNGProGrAm SCorES

The American College Testing (ACT) program scores are designed to predict a student's potential for success in college. Below are average composite scores out of a possible 36 for North Dakota students as well as the average scores for regional states and the nation.

Page 13: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

18

NATioNAL ASSESSmENT oF EDuCATioNAL ProGrESS

The national assessment of educational progress (NAEP) is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America's students know and can do in various subject areas. Assessments are conducted periodically in mathematics, reading, science, and writing. However, because mathematics and reading are the only assessments required every two years by "No Child Left Behind" legislation, North Dakota tests science and writing in alternating years, resulting in four years between test years for science and writing.

Since NAEP assessments are administered uniformly using the same sets of test booklets across the nation, NAEP results serve as a common metric for all states.

Average NAEP Scores - Eighth Grade

1The region NAEP score is the average of the Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming posted scores.

287 287

292 293

286 286288

289

276278

280

282

274276278280282284286288290292294

2003 2005 2007 2009

mathematics

North Dakota Region Nation1

270 270

268 269

269 268 268 269

261 260 261 262

259

261

263

265

267

269

271

2003 2005 2007 2009

reading

North Dakota Region Nation1

NATioNAL ASSESSmENT oF EDuCATioNAL ProGrESS

The national assessment of educational progress (NAEP) is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America's students know and can do in various subject areas. Assessments are conducted periodically in mathematics, reading, science, and writing. However, because mathematics and reading are the only assessments required every two years by "No Child Left Behind" legislation, North Dakota tests science and writing in alternating years, resulting in four years between test years for science and writing.

Since NAEP assessments are administered uniformly using the same sets of test booklets across the nation, NAEP results serve as a common metric for all states.

Average NAEP Scores - Eighth Grade

1The region NAEP score is the average of the Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming posted scores.

287 287

292 293

286 286288

289

276278

280

282

274276278280282284286288290292294

2003 2005 2007 2009

mathematics

North Dakota Region Nation1

270 270

268 269

269 268 268 269

261 260 261 262

259

261

263

265

267

269

271

2003 2005 2007 2009

reading

North Dakota Region Nation1

K-1

2 E

duca

tion

NATioNAL ASSESSmENToF EDuCATioNAL ProGrESS

The national assessment of educational progress (NAEP) is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America's students know and can do in various subject areas. Assessments are conducted periodically in mathematics, reading, science, and writing. However, because mathematics and reading are the only assessments required every two years by "No Child Left Behind" legislation, North Dakota tests science and writing in alternating years, resulting in four years between test years for science and writing.

Since NAEP assessments are administered uniformly using the same sets of test booklets across the nation, NAEP results serve as a common metric for all states.

19

K-12 E

ducation

Average NAEP Scores - Fourth Grade

1The region NAEP score is the average of the Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming posted scores.

238

243245 245

239 242 244 244

234237

239 239

225

230

235

240

245

250

2003 2005 2007 2009

mathematics

North Dakota Region Nation1

222

225 226 226

223

223225 223

216 217

220 220

210212214216218220222224226228

2003 2005 2007 2009

reading

North Dakota Region Nation1

Average NAEP Scores - Fourth Grade

1The region NAEP score is the average of the Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming posted scores.

238

243245 245

239 242 244 244

234237

239 239

225

230

235

240

245

250

2003 2005 2007 2009

mathematics

North Dakota Region Nation1

222

225 226 226

223

223225 223

216 217

220 220

210212214216218220222224226228

2003 2005 2007 2009

reading

North Dakota Region Nation1

Page 14: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

20

NoTES

21

Higher E

ducation

hiGhEr EDuCATioN - GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS AND

TuiTioN AND FEE rEvENuE (Amounts Shown in millions)

NorTh DAkoTA uNivErSiTY SYSTEm FALL FTE STuDENT ENroLLmENT

FTE STuDENT ENroLLmENT BY iNSTiTuTioN

institutionFall 2009

ActualFall 2010

Actual Fall 2011 Estimate

Bismarck State College 3,160 3,208 3,304Dakota College at Bottineau 490 540 504Dickinson State University 2,187 2,068 2,089Lake Region State College 868 921 890Mayville State University 662 704 777Minot State University 2,832 3,002 3,024North Dakota State University 12,577 12,708 12,708State College of Science 2,076 2,217 2,261University of North Dakota 11,306 12,018 12,101Valley City State University 833 957 950Williston State College 573 570 585Total 37,564 38,913 39,193

35,075

36,095

37,564

38,913 39,193

33,000

34,000

35,000

36,000

37,000

38,000

39,000

40,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Estimate

$389.6

$472.0

$593.4$655.8

$491.1

$553.2

$545.1$580.5

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

General fund appropriationsTuition and student fee revenue

hiGhEr EDuCATioN - GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS AND

TuiTioN AND FEE rEvENuE (Amounts Shown in millions)

NorTh DAkoTA uNivErSiTY SYSTEm FALL FTE STuDENT ENroLLmENT

FTE STuDENT ENroLLmENT BY iNSTiTuTioN

institutionFall 2009

ActualFall 2010

Actual Fall 2011 Estimate

Bismarck State College 3,160 3,208 3,304Dakota College at Bottineau 490 540 504Dickinson State University 2,187 2,068 2,089Lake Region State College 868 921 890Mayville State University 662 704 777Minot State University 2,832 3,002 3,024North Dakota State University 12,577 12,708 12,708State College of Science 2,076 2,217 2,261University of North Dakota 11,306 12,018 12,101Valley City State University 833 957 950Williston State College 573 570 585Total 37,564 38,913 39,193

35,075

36,095

37,564

38,913 39,193

33,000

34,000

35,000

36,000

37,000

38,000

39,000

40,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Estimate

$389.6

$472.0

$593.4$655.8

$491.1

$553.2

$545.1$580.5

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

General fund appropriationsTuition and student fee revenue

hiGhEr EDuCATioN - GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS AND

TuiTioN AND FEE rEvENuE (Amounts Shown in millions)

NorTh DAkoTA uNivErSiTY SYSTEm FALL FTE STuDENT ENroLLmENT

FTE STuDENT ENroLLmENT BY iNSTiTuTioN

institutionFall 2009

ActualFall 2010

Actual Fall 2011 Estimate

Bismarck State College 3,160 3,208 3,304Dakota College at Bottineau 490 540 504Dickinson State University 2,187 2,068 2,089Lake Region State College 868 921 890Mayville State University 662 704 777Minot State University 2,832 3,002 3,024North Dakota State University 12,577 12,708 12,708State College of Science 2,076 2,217 2,261University of North Dakota 11,306 12,018 12,101Valley City State University 833 957 950Williston State College 573 570 585Total 37,564 38,913 39,193

35,075

36,095

37,564

38,913 39,193

33,000

34,000

35,000

36,000

37,000

38,000

39,000

40,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Estimate

$389.6

$472.0

$593.4$655.8

$491.1

$553.2

$545.1$580.5

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

General fund appropriationsTuition and student fee revenue

hiGhEr EDuCATioN

Page 15: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

23

Higher E

ducationhiGhEr EDuCATioN

PErFormANCE mEASurESThe following are selected higher education performance

measures as reported in the North Dakota University System Accountability Reports:

hiGhEr EDuCATioN PErFormANCE mEASurES

The following are selected higher education performance measures as reported in the North Dakota University System Accountability Reports:

Student Graduation rates1

2007 2008 2009 2010

National Average

2010 Two-year institutions 35.6% 35.1% 34.1% 44.4% 27.5%Four-year institutions 46.5% 41.2% 48.3% 50.3% 55.9%1Based on two-year institution students who entered college and graduated within three years and on four-year institution students who entered college and graduated within six years.

Freshman retention rates1

2006 2007 2008 2009

National Average

2008 Two-year institutions 67.7% 67.3% 64.0% 65.0% 52.2%Four-year institutions 70.1% 74.7% 70.2% 68.5% 74.7%1Based on the number of freshman students who enrolled in an institution and reenrolled at the same institution the following year.

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2007 2008 2009 2010

Two-year institutions Four-year institutions

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2006 2007 2008 2009

Two-year institutions Four-year institutions

hiGhEr EDuCATioN PErFormANCE mEASurES

The following are selected higher education performance measures as reported in the North Dakota University System Accountability Reports:

Student Graduation rates1

2007 2008 2009 2010

National Average

2010 Two-year institutions 35.6% 35.1% 34.1% 44.4% 27.5%Four-year institutions 46.5% 41.2% 48.3% 50.3% 55.9%1Based on two-year institution students who entered college and graduated within three years and on four-year institution students who entered college and graduated within six years.

Freshman retention rates1

2006 2007 2008 2009

National Average

2008 Two-year institutions 67.7% 67.3% 64.0% 65.0% 52.2%Four-year institutions 70.1% 74.7% 70.2% 68.5% 74.7%1Based on the number of freshman students who enrolled in an institution and reenrolled at the same institution the following year.

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2007 2008 2009 2010

Two-year institutions Four-year institutions

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2006 2007 2008 2009

Two-year institutions Four-year institutions

hiGhEr EDuCATioN PErFormANCE mEASurES

The following are selected higher education performance measures as reported in the North Dakota University System Accountability Reports:

Student Graduation rates1

2007 2008 2009 2010

National Average

2010 Two-year institutions 35.6% 35.1% 34.1% 44.4% 27.5%Four-year institutions 46.5% 41.2% 48.3% 50.3% 55.9%1Based on two-year institution students who entered college and graduated within three years and on four-year institution students who entered college and graduated within six years.

Freshman retention rates1

2006 2007 2008 2009

National Average

2008 Two-year institutions 67.7% 67.3% 64.0% 65.0% 52.2%Four-year institutions 70.1% 74.7% 70.2% 68.5% 74.7%1Based on the number of freshman students who enrolled in an institution and reenrolled at the same institution the following year.

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2007 2008 2009 2010

Two-year institutions Four-year institutions

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2006 2007 2008 2009

Two-year institutions Four-year institutions

hiGhEr EDuCATioN PErFormANCE mEASurES

The following are selected higher education performance measures as reported in the North Dakota University System Accountability Reports:

Student Graduation rates1

2007 2008 2009 2010

National Average

2010 Two-year institutions 35.6% 35.1% 34.1% 44.4% 27.5%Four-year institutions 46.5% 41.2% 48.3% 50.3% 55.9%1Based on two-year institution students who entered college and graduated within three years and on four-year institution students who entered college and graduated within six years.

Freshman retention rates1

2006 2007 2008 2009

National Average

2008 Two-year institutions 67.7% 67.3% 64.0% 65.0% 52.2%Four-year institutions 70.1% 74.7% 70.2% 68.5% 74.7%1Based on the number of freshman students who enrolled in an institution and reenrolled at the same institution the following year.

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2007 2008 2009 2010

Two-year institutions Four-year institutions

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2006 2007 2008 2009

Two-year institutions Four-year institutions

22

Hig

her E

duca

tion

hiGhEr EDuCATioN TuiTioN rATESThe following is information regarding resident student

tuition rates for various programs:

hiGhEr EDuCATioN TuiTioN rATES The following is information regarding resident student

tuition rates for various programs:

resident Student - undergraduate Programs

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Bismarck State College $3,364 $3,364 $3,364Dakota College at Bottineau $3,120 $3,120 $3,120Dickinson State University $4,160 $4,306 $4,414Lake Region State College $3,065 $3,065 $3,065Mayville State University $4,124 $4,268 $4,375Minot State University $4,325 $4,476 $4,588State College of Science $3,368 $3,368 $3,368North Dakota State University $5,448 $5,639 $6,135University of North Dakota $5,461 $5,652 $5,793Valley City State University $4,283 $4,433 $4,544Williston State College $2,618 $2,618 $2,618

resident Student - Graduate Programs

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Minot State University $5,720 $5,920 $6,068North Dakota State University $5,843 $6,048 $6,580University of North Dakota $5,874 $6,080 $6,232Valley City State University $5,698 $5,897 $6,044

resident Student - Professional Programs

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12University of North Dakota

law school $6,596 $6,826 $6,997

University of North Dakota medical school

$23,303 $24,119 $24,722

University of North Dakota physical therapy

$10,770 $11,147 $11,426

Tuition and Fees as a Percentage of median household income

2004-05 2006-07 2008-09 2010-11Doctoral institutions

North Dakota average 11.9% 13.6% 15.5% 13.6%Regional average 12.0% 13.5% 14.4% 15.4%

Four-year institutions North Dakota average 9.1% 10.4% 11.9% 10.4%Regional average 9.1% 10.2% 10.2% 10.8%

Two-year institutions North Dakota average 7.3% 8.2% 9.2% 7.7%Regional average 5.9% 6.3% 6.5% 6.7%

hiGhEr EDuCATioN TuiTioN rATES The following is information regarding resident student

tuition rates for various programs:

resident Student - undergraduate Programs

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Bismarck State College $3,364 $3,364 $3,364Dakota College at Bottineau $3,120 $3,120 $3,120Dickinson State University $4,160 $4,306 $4,414Lake Region State College $3,065 $3,065 $3,065Mayville State University $4,124 $4,268 $4,375Minot State University $4,325 $4,476 $4,588State College of Science $3,368 $3,368 $3,368North Dakota State University $5,448 $5,639 $6,135University of North Dakota $5,461 $5,652 $5,793Valley City State University $4,283 $4,433 $4,544Williston State College $2,618 $2,618 $2,618

resident Student - Graduate Programs

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Minot State University $5,720 $5,920 $6,068North Dakota State University $5,843 $6,048 $6,580University of North Dakota $5,874 $6,080 $6,232Valley City State University $5,698 $5,897 $6,044

resident Student - Professional Programs

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12University of North Dakota

law school $6,596 $6,826 $6,997

University of North Dakota medical school

$23,303 $24,119 $24,722

University of North Dakota physical therapy

$10,770 $11,147 $11,426

Tuition and Fees as a Percentage of median household income

2004-05 2006-07 2008-09 2010-11Doctoral institutions

North Dakota average 11.9% 13.6% 15.5% 13.6%Regional average 12.0% 13.5% 14.4% 15.4%

Four-year institutions North Dakota average 9.1% 10.4% 11.9% 10.4%Regional average 9.1% 10.2% 10.2% 10.8%

Two-year institutions North Dakota average 7.3% 8.2% 9.2% 7.7%Regional average 5.9% 6.3% 6.5% 6.7%

hiGhEr EDuCATioN TuiTioN rATES The following is information regarding resident student

tuition rates for various programs:

resident Student - undergraduate Programs

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Bismarck State College $3,364 $3,364 $3,364Dakota College at Bottineau $3,120 $3,120 $3,120Dickinson State University $4,160 $4,306 $4,414Lake Region State College $3,065 $3,065 $3,065Mayville State University $4,124 $4,268 $4,375Minot State University $4,325 $4,476 $4,588State College of Science $3,368 $3,368 $3,368North Dakota State University $5,448 $5,639 $6,135University of North Dakota $5,461 $5,652 $5,793Valley City State University $4,283 $4,433 $4,544Williston State College $2,618 $2,618 $2,618

resident Student - Graduate Programs

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Minot State University $5,720 $5,920 $6,068North Dakota State University $5,843 $6,048 $6,580University of North Dakota $5,874 $6,080 $6,232Valley City State University $5,698 $5,897 $6,044

resident Student - Professional Programs

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12University of North Dakota

law school $6,596 $6,826 $6,997

University of North Dakota medical school

$23,303 $24,119 $24,722

University of North Dakota physical therapy

$10,770 $11,147 $11,426

Tuition and Fees as a Percentage of median household income

2004-05 2006-07 2008-09 2010-11Doctoral institutions

North Dakota average 11.9% 13.6% 15.5% 13.6%Regional average 12.0% 13.5% 14.4% 15.4%

Four-year institutions North Dakota average 9.1% 10.4% 11.9% 10.4%Regional average 9.1% 10.2% 10.2% 10.8%

Two-year institutions North Dakota average 7.3% 8.2% 9.2% 7.7%Regional average 5.9% 6.3% 6.5% 6.7%

hiGhEr EDuCATioN TuiTioN rATES The following is information regarding resident student

tuition rates for various programs:

resident Student - undergraduate Programs

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Bismarck State College $3,364 $3,364 $3,364Dakota College at Bottineau $3,120 $3,120 $3,120Dickinson State University $4,160 $4,306 $4,414Lake Region State College $3,065 $3,065 $3,065Mayville State University $4,124 $4,268 $4,375Minot State University $4,325 $4,476 $4,588State College of Science $3,368 $3,368 $3,368North Dakota State University $5,448 $5,639 $6,135University of North Dakota $5,461 $5,652 $5,793Valley City State University $4,283 $4,433 $4,544Williston State College $2,618 $2,618 $2,618

resident Student - Graduate Programs

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Minot State University $5,720 $5,920 $6,068North Dakota State University $5,843 $6,048 $6,580University of North Dakota $5,874 $6,080 $6,232Valley City State University $5,698 $5,897 $6,044

resident Student - Professional Programs

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12University of North Dakota

law school $6,596 $6,826 $6,997

University of North Dakota medical school

$23,303 $24,119 $24,722

University of North Dakota physical therapy

$10,770 $11,147 $11,426

Tuition and Fees as a Percentage of median household income

2004-05 2006-07 2008-09 2010-11Doctoral institutions

North Dakota average 11.9% 13.6% 15.5% 13.6%Regional average 12.0% 13.5% 14.4% 15.4%

Four-year institutions North Dakota average 9.1% 10.4% 11.9% 10.4%Regional average 9.1% 10.2% 10.2% 10.8%

Two-year institutions North Dakota average 7.3% 8.2% 9.2% 7.7%Regional average 5.9% 6.3% 6.5% 6.7%

Page 16: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

25

Hum

an Services

DEPArTmENT oF humAN SErviCES LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium General

Fund Federal Funds

Special Funds Total

2005-07 $484.4 $1,098.0 $97.7 $1,680.12007-09 $593.9 $1,184.6 $106.3 $1,884.82009-11 $652.1 $1,522.6 $115.7 $2,290.42011-13 $932.0 $1,559.4 $114.0 $2,605.4

mAJor mEDiCAiD CoSTS (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Nursing facilities $343.0 $371.5 $425.9 $459.8Developmental disabilities $211.6 $274.4 $341.5 $397.0Hospitals $121.3 $153.2 $197.7 $237.9Physicians $55.9 $59.9 $99.6 $104.7Drugs $66.3 $57.7 $50.9 $50.5

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

General fund Federal fundsSpecial funds Total

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Nursing facilitiesDevelopmental disabilitiesHospitalsPhysiciansDrugs

DEPArTmENT oF humAN SErviCES LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium General

Fund Federal Funds

Special Funds Total

2005-07 $484.4 $1,098.0 $97.7 $1,680.12007-09 $593.9 $1,184.6 $106.3 $1,884.82009-11 $652.1 $1,522.6 $115.7 $2,290.42011-13 $932.0 $1,559.4 $114.0 $2,605.4

mAJor mEDiCAiD CoSTS (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Nursing facilities $343.0 $371.5 $425.9 $459.8Developmental disabilities $211.6 $274.4 $341.5 $397.0Hospitals $121.3 $153.2 $197.7 $237.9Physicians $55.9 $59.9 $99.6 $104.7Drugs $66.3 $57.7 $50.9 $50.5

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

General fund Federal fundsSpecial funds Total

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Nursing facilitiesDevelopmental disabilitiesHospitalsPhysiciansDrugs

DEPArTmENT oF humAN SErviCES LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium General

Fund Federal Funds

Special Funds Total

2005-07 $484.4 $1,098.0 $97.7 $1,680.12007-09 $593.9 $1,184.6 $106.3 $1,884.82009-11 $652.1 $1,522.6 $115.7 $2,290.42011-13 $932.0 $1,559.4 $114.0 $2,605.4

mAJor mEDiCAiD CoSTS (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Nursing facilities $343.0 $371.5 $425.9 $459.8Developmental disabilities $211.6 $274.4 $341.5 $397.0Hospitals $121.3 $153.2 $197.7 $237.9Physicians $55.9 $59.9 $99.6 $104.7Drugs $66.3 $57.7 $50.9 $50.5

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

General fund Federal fundsSpecial funds Total

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Nursing facilitiesDevelopmental disabilitiesHospitalsPhysiciansDrugs

DEPArTmENT oF humAN SErviCES LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium General

Fund Federal Funds

Special Funds Total

2005-07 $484.4 $1,098.0 $97.7 $1,680.12007-09 $593.9 $1,184.6 $106.3 $1,884.82009-11 $652.1 $1,522.6 $115.7 $2,290.42011-13 $932.0 $1,559.4 $114.0 $2,605.4

mAJor mEDiCAiD CoSTS (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions)2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Nursing facilities $343.0 $371.5 $425.9 $459.8Developmental disabilities $211.6 $274.4 $341.5 $397.0Hospitals $121.3 $153.2 $197.7 $237.9Physicians $55.9 $59.9 $99.6 $104.7Drugs $66.3 $57.7 $50.9 $50.5

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

General fund Federal fundsSpecial funds Total

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Nursing facilitiesDevelopmental disabilitiesHospitalsPhysiciansDrugs

humAN SErviCES

24

Hig

her E

duca

tion

Employer Satisfaction Survey of Employees That Are recent university System Graduates1

Survey Question 2006 2008 2010Satisfaction with qualities expected from a college graduate

4.23 4.16 4.12

Satisfaction with employee's general skills 4.11 4.13 4.08 Satisfaction with employee's specialized skills 3.87 3.88 3.87 Likeliness of hiring other graduates of the same institution

4.15 4.17 4.13

1Survey respondents used the following scale to rate their satisfaction in each area: 5 = Extremely; 4 = Very; 3 = Somewhat; 2 = Not very; 1 = Not at all.

Performance on National Examinations - Average Pass rates

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

National Average2009-10

Pharmacy technician 97.1% 96.0% 100.0% 72.0%Culinary arts 65.0% 96.0% 84.0% 87.8%National Occupational Competency Testing Institute (NOCTI) - Auto body

72.7% 70.6% 73.7% 58.1%

NOCTI - Business management

78.1% 73.5% 72.6% 81.2%

Physical therapy assistant 67.0% 50.0% 60.0% 91.9%Veterinary technician 78.6% 65.2% 89.5% 61.3%

NorTh DAkoTA uNivErSiTY SYSTEm rESEArCh EXPENDiTurES

(Amounts Shown in millions)

$159.9 $169.5$180.5

$186.2$201.1

$100

$120

$140

$160

$180

$200

$220

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Employer Satisfaction Survey of Employees That Are recent university System Graduates1

Survey Question 2006 2008 2010Satisfaction with qualities expected from a college graduate

4.23 4.16 4.12

Satisfaction with employee's general skills 4.11 4.13 4.08 Satisfaction with employee's specialized skills 3.87 3.88 3.87 Likeliness of hiring other graduates of the same institution

4.15 4.17 4.13

1Survey respondents used the following scale to rate their satisfaction in each area: 5 = Extremely; 4 = Very; 3 = Somewhat; 2 = Not very; 1 = Not at all.

Performance on National Examinations - Average Pass rates

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

National Average2009-10

Pharmacy technician 97.1% 96.0% 100.0% 72.0%Culinary arts 65.0% 96.0% 84.0% 87.8%National Occupational Competency Testing Institute (NOCTI) - Auto body

72.7% 70.6% 73.7% 58.1%

NOCTI - Business management

78.1% 73.5% 72.6% 81.2%

Physical therapy assistant 67.0% 50.0% 60.0% 91.9%Veterinary technician 78.6% 65.2% 89.5% 61.3%

NorTh DAkoTA uNivErSiTY SYSTEm rESEArCh EXPENDiTurES

(Amounts Shown in millions)

$159.9 $169.5$180.5

$186.2$201.1

$100

$120

$140

$160

$180

$200

$220

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Employer Satisfaction Survey of Employees That Are recent university System Graduates1

Survey Question 2006 2008 2010Satisfaction with qualities expected from a college graduate

4.23 4.16 4.12

Satisfaction with employee's general skills 4.11 4.13 4.08 Satisfaction with employee's specialized skills 3.87 3.88 3.87 Likeliness of hiring other graduates of the same institution

4.15 4.17 4.13

1Survey respondents used the following scale to rate their satisfaction in each area: 5 = Extremely; 4 = Very; 3 = Somewhat; 2 = Not very; 1 = Not at all.

Performance on National Examinations - Average Pass rates

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

National Average2009-10

Pharmacy technician 97.1% 96.0% 100.0% 72.0%Culinary arts 65.0% 96.0% 84.0% 87.8%National Occupational Competency Testing Institute (NOCTI) - Auto body

72.7% 70.6% 73.7% 58.1%

NOCTI - Business management

78.1% 73.5% 72.6% 81.2%

Physical therapy assistant 67.0% 50.0% 60.0% 91.9%Veterinary technician 78.6% 65.2% 89.5% 61.3%

NorTh DAkoTA uNivErSiTY SYSTEm rESEArCh EXPENDiTurES

(Amounts Shown in millions)

$159.9 $169.5$180.5

$186.2$201.1

$100

$120

$140

$160

$180

$200

$220

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Page 17: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

27

Hum

an Services

SuPPLEmENTAL NuTriTioN ASSiSTANCE ProGrAm - CASES AND BENEFiTS

Fiscal Year

Average Number of Cases

Average monthlyBenefit

2006 19,214 $198.192007 19,926 $207.712008 21,572 $222.932009 23,104 $256.852010 26,686 $291.332011 27,857 $286.02

TEmPorArY ASSiSTANCE For NEEDY FAmiLiES - CASES AND BENEFiTS

Fiscal Year

Average Number of Cases

Average monthlyBenefit

2006 2,708 $329.712007 2,560 $332.012008 2,590 $331.442009 2,440 $335.212010 2,147 $301.122011 1,925 $299.45

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit

$280

$290

$300

$310

$320

$330

$340

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit

SuPPLEmENTAL NuTriTioN ASSiSTANCE ProGrAm - CASES AND BENEFiTS

Fiscal Year

Average Number of Cases

Average monthlyBenefit

2006 19,214 $198.192007 19,926 $207.712008 21,572 $222.932009 23,104 $256.852010 26,686 $291.332011 27,857 $286.02

TEmPorArY ASSiSTANCE For NEEDY FAmiLiES - CASES AND BENEFiTS

Fiscal Year

Average Number of Cases

Average monthlyBenefit

2006 2,708 $329.712007 2,560 $332.012008 2,590 $331.442009 2,440 $335.212010 2,147 $301.122011 1,925 $299.45

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit

$280

$290

$300

$310

$320

$330

$340

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit

SuPPLEmENTAL NuTriTioN ASSiSTANCE ProGrAm - CASES AND BENEFiTS

Fiscal Year

Average Number of Cases

Average monthlyBenefit

2006 19,214 $198.192007 19,926 $207.712008 21,572 $222.932009 23,104 $256.852010 26,686 $291.332011 27,857 $286.02

TEmPorArY ASSiSTANCE For NEEDY FAmiLiES - CASES AND BENEFiTS

Fiscal Year

Average Number of Cases

Average monthlyBenefit

2006 2,708 $329.712007 2,560 $332.012008 2,590 $331.442009 2,440 $335.212010 2,147 $301.122011 1,925 $299.45

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit

$280

$290

$300

$310

$320

$330

$340

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit

SuPPLEmENTAL NuTriTioN ASSiSTANCE ProGrAm - CASES AND BENEFiTS

Fiscal Year

Average Number of Cases

Average monthlyBenefit

2006 19,214 $198.192007 19,926 $207.712008 21,572 $222.932009 23,104 $256.852010 26,686 $291.332011 27,857 $286.02

TEmPorArY ASSiSTANCE For NEEDY FAmiLiES - CASES AND BENEFiTS

Fiscal Year

Average Number of Cases

Average monthlyBenefit

2006 2,708 $329.712007 2,560 $332.012008 2,590 $331.442009 2,440 $335.212010 2,147 $301.122011 1,925 $299.45

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit

$280

$290

$300

$310

$320

$330

$340

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Average number of casesAverage monthly benefit

26

Hum

an S

ervi

ces

mEDiCAL ASSiSTANCE - AvErAGE ANNuAL mEDiCAiD ELiGiBLES AND rECiPiENTS

Fiscal Year Average Annual

Eligibles Average Annual

recipients 2006 51,879 38,8782007 49,486 38,8332008 50,798 41,4352009 54,656 42,2792010 61,200 46,0272011 63,848 46,352

ChiLDrEN'S hEALTh iNSurANCE ProGrAm - AvErAGE ANNuAL rECiPiENTS

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Eligibles Recipients

3,329

3,821 4,006

3,470 3,368

3,718

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

mEDiCAL ASSiSTANCE - AvErAGE ANNuAL mEDiCAiD ELiGiBLES AND rECiPiENTS

Fiscal Year Average Annual

Eligibles Average Annual

recipients 2006 51,879 38,8782007 49,486 38,8332008 50,798 41,4352009 54,656 42,2792010 61,200 46,0272011 63,848 46,352

ChiLDrEN'S hEALTh iNSurANCE ProGrAm - AvErAGE ANNuAL rECiPiENTS

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Eligibles Recipients

3,329

3,821 4,006

3,470 3,368

3,718

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

mEDiCAL ASSiSTANCE - AvErAGE ANNuAL mEDiCAiD ELiGiBLES AND rECiPiENTS

Fiscal Year Average Annual

Eligibles Average Annual

recipients 2006 51,879 38,8782007 49,486 38,8332008 50,798 41,4352009 54,656 42,2792010 61,200 46,0272011 63,848 46,352

ChiLDrEN'S hEALTh iNSurANCE ProGrAm - AvErAGE ANNuAL rECiPiENTS

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Eligibles Recipients

3,329

3,821 4,006

3,470 3,368

3,718

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Page 18: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

29

Corrections

DEPArTmENT oF CorrECTioNS AND rEhABiLiTATioN FTE PoSiTioNS, iNmATES,

AND GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium

General Fund Appropriation (in millions)

Average Dailyinmate

Population FTE

Positions 2005-07 $101.1 1,405 677.282007-09 $171.61 1,444 711.292009-11 $164.11 1,479 735.292011-13 $159.6 1,5812 794.293

1Includes $41 million of one-time funding for 2007-09 biennium and $19.5 million of one-time funding for 2009-11 biennium for prison expansion project.

2Estimate. 3Includes 47 new FTE positions for the Penitentiary expansion.

PAroLE AND ProBATioN

Calendar Year Females males Total2006 1,242 3,385 4,6272007 1,355 3,603 4,9582008 1,331 3,641 4,9722009 1,239 3,583 4,8222010 1,250 3,767 5,017

$0$20$40$60$80$100$120$140$160$180$200

0200400600800

1,0001,2001,4001,6001,800

2005-07 Actual

2007-09 Actual

2009-11 Actual

2011-13Legislative

appropriation

FTE positionsInmatesGeneral fund appropriation

FTE positions, inmates

01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Males FemalesCalendar Year

4,627 4,958 4,972 4,822 5,017

DEPArTmENT oF CorrECTioNS AND rEhABiLiTATioN FTE PoSiTioNS, iNmATES,

AND GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium

General Fund Appropriation (in millions)

Average Dailyinmate

Population FTE

Positions 2005-07 $101.1 1,405 677.282007-09 $171.61 1,444 711.292009-11 $164.11 1,479 735.292011-13 $159.6 1,5812 794.293

1Includes $41 million of one-time funding for 2007-09 biennium and $19.5 million of one-time funding for 2009-11 biennium for prison expansion project.

2Estimate. 3Includes 47 new FTE positions for the Penitentiary expansion.

PAroLE AND ProBATioN

Calendar Year Females males Total2006 1,242 3,385 4,6272007 1,355 3,603 4,9582008 1,331 3,641 4,9722009 1,239 3,583 4,8222010 1,250 3,767 5,017

$0$20$40$60$80$100$120$140$160$180$200

0200400600800

1,0001,2001,4001,6001,800

2005-07 Actual

2007-09 Actual

2009-11 Actual

2011-13Legislative

appropriation

FTE positionsInmatesGeneral fund appropriation

FTE positions, inmates

01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Males FemalesCalendar Year

4,627 4,958 4,972 4,822 5,017

DEPArTmENT oF CorrECTioNS AND rEhABiLiTATioN FTE PoSiTioNS, iNmATES,

AND GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium

General Fund Appropriation (in millions)

Average Dailyinmate

Population FTE

Positions 2005-07 $101.1 1,405 677.282007-09 $171.61 1,444 711.292009-11 $164.11 1,479 735.292011-13 $159.6 1,5812 794.293

1Includes $41 million of one-time funding for 2007-09 biennium and $19.5 million of one-time funding for 2009-11 biennium for prison expansion project.

2Estimate. 3Includes 47 new FTE positions for the Penitentiary expansion.

PAroLE AND ProBATioN

Calendar Year Females males Total2006 1,242 3,385 4,6272007 1,355 3,603 4,9582008 1,331 3,641 4,9722009 1,239 3,583 4,8222010 1,250 3,767 5,017

$0$20$40$60$80$100$120$140$160$180$200

0200400600800

1,0001,2001,4001,6001,800

2005-07 Actual

2007-09 Actual

2009-11 Actual

2011-13Legislative

appropriation

FTE positionsInmatesGeneral fund appropriation

FTE positions, inmates

01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Males FemalesCalendar Year

4,627 4,958 4,972 4,822 5,017

DEPArTmENT oF CorrECTioNS AND rEhABiLiTATioN FTE PoSiTioNS, iNmATES,

AND GENErAL FuND APProPriATioNS (Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium

General Fund Appropriation (in millions)

Average Dailyinmate

Population FTE

Positions 2005-07 $101.1 1,405 677.282007-09 $171.61 1,444 711.292009-11 $164.11 1,479 735.292011-13 $159.6 1,5812 794.293

1Includes $41 million of one-time funding for 2007-09 biennium and $19.5 million of one-time funding for 2009-11 biennium for prison expansion project.

2Estimate. 3Includes 47 new FTE positions for the Penitentiary expansion.

PAroLE AND ProBATioN

Calendar Year Females males Total2006 1,242 3,385 4,6272007 1,355 3,603 4,9582008 1,331 3,641 4,9722009 1,239 3,583 4,8222010 1,250 3,767 5,017

$0$20$40$60$80$100$120$140$160$180$200

0200400600800

1,0001,2001,4001,6001,800

2005-07 Actual

2007-09 Actual

2009-11 Actual

2011-13Legislative

appropriation

FTE positionsInmatesGeneral fund appropriation

FTE positions, inmates

01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Males FemalesCalendar Year

4,627 4,958 4,972 4,822 5,017

CorrECTioNS

28

ChiLD SuPPorT - PErCENTAGE oF CurrENT ChiLD SuPPorT CoLLECTED

ChiLDrEN AND FAmiLY SErviCES - NumBEr oF ChiLDrEN iN FoSTEr CArE

STATE hoSPiTAL AND DEvELoPmENTAL CENTEr - AvErAGE DAiLY CENSuS

73.4%

74.2%

75.9%

75.0%74.2%

72%73%73%74%74%75%75%76%76%77%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Federal fiscal year

968 869760 768 768 736

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

266 266 272 262 247

131 126 123 120 108

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

State Hospital Developmental Center

ChiLD SuPPorT - PErCENTAGE oF CurrENT ChiLD SuPPorT CoLLECTED

ChiLDrEN AND FAmiLY SErviCES - NumBEr oF ChiLDrEN iN FoSTEr CArE

STATE hoSPiTAL AND DEvELoPmENTAL CENTEr - AvErAGE DAiLY CENSuS

73.4%

74.2%

75.9%

75.0%74.2%

72%73%73%74%74%75%75%76%76%77%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Federal fiscal year

968 869760 768 768 736

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

266 266 272 262 247

131 126 123 120 108

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

State Hospital Developmental Center

ChiLD SuPPorT - PErCENTAGE oF CurrENT ChiLD SuPPorT CoLLECTED

ChiLDrEN AND FAmiLY SErviCES - NumBEr oF ChiLDrEN iN FoSTEr CArE

STATE hoSPiTAL AND DEvELoPmENTAL CENTEr - AvErAGE DAiLY CENSuS

73.4%

74.2%

75.9%

75.0%74.2%

72%73%73%74%74%75%75%76%76%77%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Federal fiscal year

968 869760 768 768 736

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

266 266 272 262 247

131 126 123 120 108

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

State Hospital Developmental Center

Hum

an S

ervi

ces

Page 19: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

31

Econom

icD

evelopment

DEPArTmENT oF CommErCE LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

NoTE: The general fund appropriation for the 2009-11 and 2011-13 bienniums do not include funding for centers of excellence (shown separately below). The appropriation for the 2009-11 biennium includes $13.42 million of one-time funding, including child care provider assistance, an energy research center, and economic development grants.

CENTErS oF EXCELLENCE LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium General Fund Special Funds Total 2003-05 $2,300,000 $2,850,000 $5,150,0002005-07 $21,300,000 $21,300,0002007-09 $20,000,000 $20,000,0002009-11 $20,000,0001 $20,000,0001

2011-13 $12,000,0002 $12,000,0002

1The 2009 Legislative Assembly appropriated $15 million from the general fund and provided a contingent general fund appropriation of $5 million.

2The 2011 Legislative Assembly appropriated $12 million from the general fund for a limited deployment-cooperative airspace project grant ($4 million), centers of research excellence grants ($5 million), and base realignment grants ($3 million).

$19.2$28.6

$43.5

$29.8

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

$0

$10

$20

$30

2003-05 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13General fund appropriationsContingent general fund appropriationsSpecial fund appropriations

$5.2

$21.3 $20.0 $20.0

$12.0

DEPArTmENT oF CommErCE LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

NoTE: The general fund appropriation for the 2009-11 and 2011-13 bienniums do not include funding for centers of excellence (shown separately below). The appropriation for the 2009-11 biennium includes $13.42 million of one-time funding, including child care provider assistance, an energy research center, and economic development grants.

CENTErS oF EXCELLENCE LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium General Fund Special Funds Total 2003-05 $2,300,000 $2,850,000 $5,150,0002005-07 $21,300,000 $21,300,0002007-09 $20,000,000 $20,000,0002009-11 $20,000,0001 $20,000,0001

2011-13 $12,000,0002 $12,000,0002

1The 2009 Legislative Assembly appropriated $15 million from the general fund and provided a contingent general fund appropriation of $5 million.

2The 2011 Legislative Assembly appropriated $12 million from the general fund for a limited deployment-cooperative airspace project grant ($4 million), centers of research excellence grants ($5 million), and base realignment grants ($3 million).

$19.2$28.6

$43.5

$29.8

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

$0

$10

$20

$30

2003-05 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13General fund appropriationsContingent general fund appropriationsSpecial fund appropriations

$5.2

$21.3 $20.0 $20.0

$12.0

DEPArTmENT oF CommErCE LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

NoTE: The general fund appropriation for the 2009-11 and 2011-13 bienniums do not include funding for centers of excellence (shown separately below). The appropriation for the 2009-11 biennium includes $13.42 million of one-time funding, including child care provider assistance, an energy research center, and economic development grants.

CENTErS oF EXCELLENCE LEGiSLATivE APProPriATioNS

(Amounts Shown in millions)

Biennium General Fund Special Funds Total 2003-05 $2,300,000 $2,850,000 $5,150,0002005-07 $21,300,000 $21,300,0002007-09 $20,000,000 $20,000,0002009-11 $20,000,0001 $20,000,0001

2011-13 $12,000,0002 $12,000,0002

1The 2009 Legislative Assembly appropriated $15 million from the general fund and provided a contingent general fund appropriation of $5 million.

2The 2011 Legislative Assembly appropriated $12 million from the general fund for a limited deployment-cooperative airspace project grant ($4 million), centers of research excellence grants ($5 million), and base realignment grants ($3 million).

$19.2$28.6

$43.5

$29.8

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

$0

$10

$20

$30

2003-05 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13General fund appropriationsContingent general fund appropriationsSpecial fund appropriations

$5.2

$21.3 $20.0 $20.0

$12.0

ECoNomiC DEvELoPmENT

30

Cor

rect

ions

21.7% 25.4%21.2%

22.8%

20.8%

12.1% 13.4%14.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

2006 2007 2008 2009

Males Females

rECiDiviSm rATES

Calendar Year

malesreleased

returned for a New

Crime

returned for a

Technical violation

Total returned

Total Percentage returned

rates 2006 814 43 134 177 21.7%2007 769 46 149 195 25.4%2008 811 34 138 172 21.2%2009 758 31 142 173 22.8%

Calendar Year

Females released

returned for a New

Crime

returned for a

Technical violation

Total returned

Total Percentage returned

rates 2006 173 9 27 36 20.8%2007 141 4 13 17 12.1%2008 142 0 19 19 13.4%2009 140 3 17 20 14.3%

Calendar Year

Total released

returned for a New

Crime

returned for a

Technical violation

Total returned

Total Percentage returned

rates 2006 987 52 161 213 21.6%2007 910 50 162 212 23.3%2008 953 34 157 191 20.0%2009 898 34 159 193 21.5%

NoTE: The numbers shown for inmates returning to prison reflect the number of inmates released during the calendar year who returned to prison for a new crime or technical violation within 12 months of release. Source: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

21.7% 25.4%21.2%

22.8%

20.8%

12.1% 13.4%14.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

2006 2007 2008 2009

Males Females

rECiDiviSm rATES

Calendar Year

malesreleased

returned for a New

Crime

returned for a

Technical violation

Total returned

Total Percentage returned

rates 2006 814 43 134 177 21.7%2007 769 46 149 195 25.4%2008 811 34 138 172 21.2%2009 758 31 142 173 22.8%

Calendar Year

Females released

returned for a New

Crime

returned for a

Technical violation

Total returned

Total Percentage returned

rates 2006 173 9 27 36 20.8%2007 141 4 13 17 12.1%2008 142 0 19 19 13.4%2009 140 3 17 20 14.3%

Calendar Year

Total released

returned for a New

Crime

returned for a

Technical violation

Total returned

Total Percentage returned

rates 2006 987 52 161 213 21.6%2007 910 50 162 212 23.3%2008 953 34 157 191 20.0%2009 898 34 159 193 21.5%

NoTE: The numbers shown for inmates returning to prison reflect the number of inmates released during the calendar year who returned to prison for a new crime or technical violation within 12 months of release. Source: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

21.7% 25.4%21.2%

22.8%

20.8%

12.1% 13.4%14.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

2006 2007 2008 2009

Males Females

rECiDiviSm rATES

Calendar Year

malesreleased

returned for a New

Crime

returned for a

Technical violation

Total returned

Total Percentage returned

rates 2006 814 43 134 177 21.7%2007 769 46 149 195 25.4%2008 811 34 138 172 21.2%2009 758 31 142 173 22.8%

Calendar Year

Females released

returned for a New

Crime

returned for a

Technical violation

Total returned

Total Percentage returned

rates 2006 173 9 27 36 20.8%2007 141 4 13 17 12.1%2008 142 0 19 19 13.4%2009 140 3 17 20 14.3%

Calendar Year

Total released

returned for a New

Crime

returned for a

Technical violation

Total returned

Total Percentage returned

rates 2006 987 52 161 213 21.6%2007 910 50 162 212 23.3%2008 953 34 157 191 20.0%2009 898 34 159 193 21.5%

NoTE: The numbers shown for inmates returning to prison reflect the number of inmates released during the calendar year who returned to prison for a new crime or technical violation within 12 months of release. Source: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

21.7% 25.4%21.2%

22.8%

20.8%

12.1% 13.4%14.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

2006 2007 2008 2009

Males Females

rECiDiviSm rATES

Calendar Year

malesreleased

returned for a New

Crime

returned for a

Technical violation

Total returned

Total Percentage returned

rates 2006 814 43 134 177 21.7%2007 769 46 149 195 25.4%2008 811 34 138 172 21.2%2009 758 31 142 173 22.8%

Calendar Year

Females released

returned for a New

Crime

returned for a

Technical violation

Total returned

Total Percentage returned

rates 2006 173 9 27 36 20.8%2007 141 4 13 17 12.1%2008 142 0 19 19 13.4%2009 140 3 17 20 14.3%

Calendar Year

Total released

returned for a New

Crime

returned for a

Technical violation

Total returned

Total Percentage returned

rates 2006 987 52 161 213 21.6%2007 910 50 162 212 23.3%2008 953 34 157 191 20.0%2009 898 34 159 193 21.5%

NoTE: The numbers shown for inmates returning to prison reflect the number of inmates released during the calendar year who returned to prison for a new crime or technical violation within 12 months of release. Source: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Page 20: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

33

Transportation

STATE hiGhWAY FuNDiNG - hiSTorY (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions) 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Federal funding $496.0 $481.6 $779.61 $681.0State highway funding $226.8 $241.8 $274.8 $492.92

Other state funding $110.3 $127.5 $102.4 $105.11Includes $176.1 million of federal fiscal stimulus funds. 2Includes a $228.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fundfor state highway projects in areas affected by oil and gas development.

STATE hiGhWAY FuNDiNG (Amounts Shown in millions)

2009-11Statutory Funding

2011-13Statutory Funding

Additional Funding for oil-

impactedAreas

Additional Funding

forNon-oil-impacted

Areas State highway fund $274.81,2 $264.31,3 $228.64

Counties 82.11 90.81 $30.05

Cities 49.71 51.61 18.05

Townships 10.31 11.11 12.05

Public transportation fund

5.71 6.21

County and township road projects

142.04

Total $422.6 $424.0 $370.6 $60.01Funding provided from the highway tax distribution fund. 2Includes a $4.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fund for Devils Lake area highway projects and $30.5 million of motor vehicle excise taxes deposited in the highway fund.

3Includes $5.9 million from the general fund for Devils Lake area highway projects. Does not include $120 million of borrowing authority for emergency relief projects.

4The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided for a $370.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fund for roadway projects in areas affected by oil and gas development.

5The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided for $60 million of transportation funding distributions during the 2009-11 biennium ($35 million) and 2011-13 biennium ($25 million) to counties, cities, and townships in counties that received less than $500,000 of oil and gas production tax allocations during the preceding state fiscal year.

$0$100$200$300$400$500$600$700$800$900

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Federal fundingState highway fundingOther state funding

STATE hiGhWAY FuNDiNG - hiSTorY (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions) 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Federal funding $496.0 $481.6 $779.61 $681.0State highway funding $226.8 $241.8 $274.8 $492.92

Other state funding $110.3 $127.5 $102.4 $105.11Includes $176.1 million of federal fiscal stimulus funds. 2Includes a $228.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fundfor state highway projects in areas affected by oil and gas development.

STATE hiGhWAY FuNDiNG (Amounts Shown in millions)

2009-11Statutory Funding

2011-13Statutory Funding

Additional Funding for oil-

impactedAreas

Additional Funding

forNon-oil-impacted

Areas State highway fund $274.81,2 $264.31,3 $228.64

Counties 82.11 90.81 $30.05

Cities 49.71 51.61 18.05

Townships 10.31 11.11 12.05

Public transportation fund

5.71 6.21

County and township road projects

142.04

Total $422.6 $424.0 $370.6 $60.01Funding provided from the highway tax distribution fund. 2Includes a $4.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fund for Devils Lake area highway projects and $30.5 million of motor vehicle excise taxes deposited in the highway fund.

3Includes $5.9 million from the general fund for Devils Lake area highway projects. Does not include $120 million of borrowing authority for emergency relief projects.

4The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided for a $370.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fund for roadway projects in areas affected by oil and gas development.

5The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided for $60 million of transportation funding distributions during the 2009-11 biennium ($35 million) and 2011-13 biennium ($25 million) to counties, cities, and townships in counties that received less than $500,000 of oil and gas production tax allocations during the preceding state fiscal year.

$0$100$200$300$400$500$600$700$800$900

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Federal fundingState highway fundingOther state funding

STATE hiGhWAY FuNDiNG - hiSTorY (Amounts Shown in millions)

(Amounts Shown in millions) 2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Federal funding $496.0 $481.6 $779.61 $681.0State highway funding $226.8 $241.8 $274.8 $492.92

Other state funding $110.3 $127.5 $102.4 $105.11Includes $176.1 million of federal fiscal stimulus funds. 2Includes a $228.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fundfor state highway projects in areas affected by oil and gas development.

STATE hiGhWAY FuNDiNG (Amounts Shown in millions)

2009-11Statutory Funding

2011-13Statutory Funding

Additional Funding for oil-

impactedAreas

Additional Funding

forNon-oil-impacted

Areas State highway fund $274.81,2 $264.31,3 $228.64

Counties 82.11 90.81 $30.05

Cities 49.71 51.61 18.05

Townships 10.31 11.11 12.05

Public transportation fund

5.71 6.21

County and township road projects

142.04

Total $422.6 $424.0 $370.6 $60.01Funding provided from the highway tax distribution fund. 2Includes a $4.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fund for Devils Lake area highway projects and $30.5 million of motor vehicle excise taxes deposited in the highway fund.

3Includes $5.9 million from the general fund for Devils Lake area highway projects. Does not include $120 million of borrowing authority for emergency relief projects.

4The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided for a $370.6 million transfer from the general fund to the highway fund for roadway projects in areas affected by oil and gas development.

5The 2011 Legislative Assembly provided for $60 million of transportation funding distributions during the 2009-11 biennium ($35 million) and 2011-13 biennium ($25 million) to counties, cities, and townships in counties that received less than $500,000 of oil and gas production tax allocations during the preceding state fiscal year.

$0$100$200$300$400$500$600$700$800$900

2005-07 2007-09 2009-11 2011-13

Federal fundingState highway fundingOther state funding

TrANSPorTATioN

32

Eco

nom

icD

evel

opm

ent

PrivATE SECTor BuSiNESSES

Source: Job Service North Dakota, Labor Market Information Center - Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages Unit - July 2011

mANuFACTuriNG JoBS

Source: Job Service North Dakota, Labor Market Information Center - Current Employment Statistics - July 2011

NumBEr oF PATENTS

Source: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - July 2011

25,056

24,732

25,12725,074

25,741

24,20024,40024,60024,80025,00025,20025,40025,60025,80026,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

26,000 26,100 26,400

23,600

22,700

20,000

21,000

22,000

23,000

24,000

25,000

26,000

27,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

66

82

63

82

107

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

PrivATE SECTor BuSiNESSES

Source: Job Service North Dakota, Labor Market Information Center - Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages Unit - July 2011

mANuFACTuriNG JoBS

Source: Job Service North Dakota, Labor Market Information Center - Current Employment Statistics - July 2011

NumBEr oF PATENTS

Source: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - July 2011

25,056

24,732

25,12725,074

25,741

24,20024,40024,60024,80025,00025,20025,40025,60025,80026,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

26,000 26,100 26,400

23,600

22,700

20,000

21,000

22,000

23,000

24,000

25,000

26,000

27,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

66

82

63

82

107

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

PrivATE SECTor BuSiNESSES

Source: Job Service North Dakota, Labor Market Information Center - Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages Unit - July 2011

mANuFACTuriNG JoBS

Source: Job Service North Dakota, Labor Market Information Center - Current Employment Statistics - July 2011

NumBEr oF PATENTS

Source: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - July 2011

25,056

24,732

25,12725,074

25,741

24,20024,40024,60024,80025,00025,20025,40025,60025,80026,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

26,000 26,100 26,400

23,600

22,700

20,000

21,000

22,000

23,000

24,000

25,000

26,000

27,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

66

82

63

82

107

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Page 21: 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts · 2011 North Dakota Finance Facts Legislator's Pocket Guide to North Dakota Budget, Performance, and statistics North Dakota Legislative Council 600

Transportation

ESTimATED hiGhWAY CoNSTruCTioN CoSTS PEr miLE

2004 2008 2010Interstate concrete paving (two lanes in one direction)

$1,300,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000

Two-lane road reconstruction (includes grading and asphalt surfacing)

$675,000 $985,000 $1,275,000

Asphalt surface reconstruction (includes subgrade repair and resurfacing)

$450,000 $780,000 $760,000

Three-inch asphalt overlay $150,000 $350,000 $300,000Interstate seal coat $21,000 $31,000 $50,000Noninterstate seal coat $16,000 $28,000 $35,000

NorTh DAkoTA BriDGE SYSTEm CoNDiTioN

Structurally Deficient1 or Functionally obsolete2 Bridges

State urban County Total2006

Bridges 1,709 84 3,242 5,035Percentage deficient 5% 18% 30% 22%

2008 Bridges 1,714 104 3,160 4,978Percentage deficient 4% 12% 27% 19%

2010 Bridges 1,714 107 3,065 4,886Percentage deficient 5% 11% 27% 19%

1Structurally deficient bridge means that the deck, the superstructure, or the substructure has a condition that warrants attention.

2A functionally obsolete bridge has some part of the bridge that does not meet a design standard, such as vertical clearance or deck width.

NorTh DAkoTA iNTErSTATE SYSTEm riDE TrENDS

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

2006 2007 2008 2009

Excellent/Good Fair/Poor

miles

ESTimATED hiGhWAY CoNSTruCTioN CoSTS PEr miLE

2004 2008 2010Interstate concrete paving (two lanes in one direction)

$1,300,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000

Two-lane road reconstruction (includes grading and asphalt surfacing)

$675,000 $985,000 $1,275,000

Asphalt surface reconstruction (includes subgrade repair and resurfacing)

$450,000 $780,000 $760,000

Three-inch asphalt overlay $150,000 $350,000 $300,000Interstate seal coat $21,000 $31,000 $50,000Noninterstate seal coat $16,000 $28,000 $35,000

NorTh DAkoTA BriDGE SYSTEm CoNDiTioN

Structurally Deficient1 or Functionally obsolete2 Bridges

State urban County Total2006

Bridges 1,709 84 3,242 5,035Percentage deficient 5% 18% 30% 22%

2008 Bridges 1,714 104 3,160 4,978Percentage deficient 4% 12% 27% 19%

2010 Bridges 1,714 107 3,065 4,886Percentage deficient 5% 11% 27% 19%

1Structurally deficient bridge means that the deck, the superstructure, or the substructure has a condition that warrants attention.

2A functionally obsolete bridge has some part of the bridge that does not meet a design standard, such as vertical clearance or deck width.

NorTh DAkoTA iNTErSTATE SYSTEm riDE TrENDS

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

2006 2007 2008 2009

Excellent/Good Fair/Poor

miles

ESTimATED hiGhWAY CoNSTruCTioN CoSTS PEr miLE

2004 2008 2010Interstate concrete paving (two lanes in one direction)

$1,300,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000

Two-lane road reconstruction (includes grading and asphalt surfacing)

$675,000 $985,000 $1,275,000

Asphalt surface reconstruction (includes subgrade repair and resurfacing)

$450,000 $780,000 $760,000

Three-inch asphalt overlay $150,000 $350,000 $300,000Interstate seal coat $21,000 $31,000 $50,000Noninterstate seal coat $16,000 $28,000 $35,000

NorTh DAkoTA BriDGE SYSTEm CoNDiTioN

Structurally Deficient1 or Functionally obsolete2 Bridges

State urban County Total2006

Bridges 1,709 84 3,242 5,035Percentage deficient 5% 18% 30% 22%

2008 Bridges 1,714 104 3,160 4,978Percentage deficient 4% 12% 27% 19%

2010 Bridges 1,714 107 3,065 4,886Percentage deficient 5% 11% 27% 19%

1Structurally deficient bridge means that the deck, the superstructure, or the substructure has a condition that warrants attention.

2A functionally obsolete bridge has some part of the bridge that does not meet a design standard, such as vertical clearance or deck width.

NorTh DAkoTA iNTErSTATE SYSTEm riDE TrENDS

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

2006 2007 2008 2009

Excellent/Good Fair/Poor

miles

35

Tran

spor

tatio

n

ESTimATED FEDErAL hiGhWAY FuNDiNG1

(Amounts Shown in millions) 2007-09

Biennium 2009-11

Biennium2011-13

BienniumFederal Highway Administration funding

$453.7 $500.9 $569.5

Emergency relief funds 2.5 33.7 56.2Federal rail funds 8.6 2.3 6.1National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

5.6 10.0 11.4

Federal transit funds 11.2 12.8 13.7Funding for Devils Lake area projects 0 43.8 0

Federal fiscal stimulus funding - Highway infrastructure

0 170.1 19.33

Federal fiscal stimulus funding - Transit programs

0 6.02 4.83

Total $481.6 $779.6 $681.01Federal funding received for highway construction projects requires matching funds provided by the state. Interstate highway projects are funded 90 percent with federal funds and 10 percent with state funds, and most other state highway projects are funded with 80 percent federal funds and 20 percent state funds.

2Does not include $5,041,000 of federal fiscal stimulus funding distributed directly to transit programs in metropolitan planning areas.

3Includes $10 million of unspent federal fiscal stimulus funding originally appropriated by the 2009 Legislative Assembly.

moTor FuELS TAXES Both gasoline and special fuels (diesel) are taxed in

North Dakota at a rate of 23 cents per gallon. A one-cent increase in the gas tax is estimated to generate an additional $3.6 million per year or $7.2 million for a biennium. A one-cent increase in the special fuels tax is estimated to generate an additional $2.0 million per year or $4.0 million per biennium. The federal tax rate per gallon is 18.4 cents for gasoline and 24.4 cents for diesel fuel.

miLES oF roADWAYS iN NorTh DAkoTA - 2008

State highway system 7,385County roads 18,835Other rural roads 56,753City streets 3,871

Total 86,844

moTor FuELS TAXESBoth gasoline and special fuels (diesel) are taxed in North

Dakota at a rate of 23 cents per gallon. A one-cent increase in the gas tax is estimated to generate an additional $3.6 million per year or $7.2 million for a biennium. A one-cent increase in the special fuels tax is estimated to generate an additional $2 million per year or $4 million per biennium. The federal tax rate per gallon is 18.4 cents for gasoline and 24.4 cents for diesel fuel.

ESTimATED FEDErAL hiGhWAY FuNDiNG1

(Amounts Shown in millions) 2007-09

Biennium 2009-11

Biennium2011-13

BienniumFederal Highway Administration funding

$453.7 $500.9 $569.5

Emergency relief funds 2.5 33.7 56.2Federal rail funds 8.6 2.3 6.1National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

5.6 10.0 11.4

Federal transit funds 11.2 12.8 13.7Funding for Devils Lake area projects 0 43.8 0

Federal fiscal stimulus funding - Highway infrastructure

0 170.1 19.33

Federal fiscal stimulus funding - Transit programs

0 6.02 4.83

Total $481.6 $779.6 $681.01Federal funding received for highway construction projects requires matching funds provided by the state. Interstate highway projects are funded 90 percent with federal funds and 10 percent with state funds, and most other state highway projects are funded with 80 percent federal funds and 20 percent state funds.

2Does not include $5,041,000 of federal fiscal stimulus funding distributed directly to transit programs in metropolitan planning areas.

3Includes $10 million of unspent federal fiscal stimulus funding originally appropriated by the 2009 Legislative Assembly.

moTor FuELS TAXES Both gasoline and special fuels (diesel) are taxed in

North Dakota at a rate of 23 cents per gallon. A one-cent increase in the gas tax is estimated to generate an additional $3.6 million per year or $7.2 million for a biennium. A one-cent increase in the special fuels tax is estimated to generate an additional $2.0 million per year or $4.0 million per biennium. The federal tax rate per gallon is 18.4 cents for gasoline and 24.4 cents for diesel fuel.

miLES oF roADWAYS iN NorTh DAkoTA - 2008

State highway system 7,385County roads 18,835Other rural roads 56,753City streets 3,871

Total 86,844

34