20121119+post+trial+interview+juror+sachter

Upload: rightawrong

Post on 04-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 20121119+Post+Trial+Interview+Juror+Sachter

    1/3

    VENUSINVESTIGATIONS______________________________________________________________________________________

    Venus Lovetere Private Investigator

    NV State P.I. Lic # 1015 CA P.I. Lic #15988Web Site - http://www.venusinvestigations.com Email: [email protected]

    (702) 361- (877) 473-4036 Toll Free (702) 778-6910 Fax

    CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT

    AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES

    CLIENT: Colorado Springs Fellowship Church REPORT DATE: November 19, 2012

    RE: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

    v. FROM: Venus Lovetere

    DAVID A BANK, Venus Investigations

    DEMETRIUS K HARPER, aka Ken Harper,

    GARY L WALKER,

    CLINTON A STEWART, MEMO: colorado.Juror Sachter,R

    aka C. Alfred Stewart,

    DAVID A ZIRPOLO and,

    KENDRICK BARNES, Defendants

    CO. FEDERAL CRIMINAL CASE #: 1:09-cr-00266-CMA

    CRIME: Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, Consp to commit;

    INVESTIGATION: Interview JurorRandy Sachter Page 1 of 3

    ASSIGNMENT:

    On Monday, October 22, 2012, I was retained by Client to locate and interview 12 Jurors, 2 alternate Jurors

    and the Bailiff (US Marshal) in the above captioned case.

    The documents received from the Client listed the names of 12 Jurors, 3 alternate Jurors and the Bailiff. The

    Client included these persons first and last names, city and state of their last known residence, and their last

    known occupation. Also included on some were telephone numbers & addresses that were mostly unverified.

    Information Provided: RANDY SACHTER

    Lives in Netherland, CO

    Teacher (unknown where)

    LOCATE INVESTIGATION:

    I initiated a located investigation. Information returned many possibilities that included numerous telephone

    numbers (unverified), address history, and personal identifying information.

    I perused through the results of the searches and proceeded by selecting the name(s) most probable of being

    the SUBJECT from the information provided by the Client.

    After which I commenced telephoning the various phone numbers ascertained. This is a result of my

    investigation.

  • 8/13/2019 20121119+Post+Trial+Interview+Juror+Sachter

    2/3

    NV State P.I. Lic # 1015 CA P.I. Lic #15988Web Site - http://www.venusinvestigations.com Email: [email protected]

    (702) 361- (877) 473-4036 Toll Free (702) 778-6910 Fax

    Report Date: November 19, 2012 Page 3 of 3

    CLIENT: Colorado Springs Fellowship Church MEMO: colorado.Juror Sachter,R

    INTERVIEW OF RANDY BETH SACHTER:

    On Saturday, November 17, 2012 at approximately 4 pm, Investigator, Venus Lovetere spoke withMs. Randy

    Beth Sachtertelephonically at a Colorado telephone number, (303) 258-7905. I made her aware, who I wasand why I was calling. Ms. Sachter stated that she was an alternate juror in the above captioned case and

    therefore did not deliberate..

    I attempted to interview Ms. Sachter regarding her thoughts on the case to no avail. Ms. Sachter was

    unwilling to speak about the case. However, she had additional comments as to why she would not speak with

    me. They are:

    - She was uncomfortable talking about the case. She used the term uncomfortable at least 3 times.

    - Was told that they (the Jurors) did not have to talk to anyone on the defense side and that if anyone

    tried calling them they (the Jurors) could contact the Prosecutor/Attorney.

    Note: She asked if this statementwas true. My reply to her was that she/the Jurors could

    talk to anyone they wanted to after the trial ended. And that I dont know what was told to her, but

    that they (the Jurors) could contact the Prosecutor if they wanted, that itsup to them.

    - She heard the entire case but since all Jurors were present to deliberate, she was dismissed and

    therefore did not participate in the verdict.

    - During the trial she did not discuss the case with any of the Jurors.

    - She inquired as to my role in this case, what sideI represented.

    I explained that I did not represent any sidedirectly, but that I was hired by people whomare friendly with the defense and asked me to speak with the Jurors to ascertain the process on how

    they reached their decision.

    When asked if anyone told her (the Jurors) that she couldnt talk to anyone about the case,

    she stated in a round-about way that she was told that(as a group) but was she was more-so

    evasive with her response then she was willing to help.

    When asked who told her (the Jurors) that they couldnt speak to anyone. She did not name a

    person, but responded by saying that she was very uncomfortable talking about the case.

    I explained that she would not be in trouble if she talked with me, since the case was over,

    plus it had been over 1 year since the trial ended. That she didnt have to talk to me (of course) but

    she could if she wanted to. I attempted to learn why she was so uncomfortable, to no avail.

    At this time I elected not to continue and thanked her for her time.

    Terminated.

  • 8/13/2019 20121119+Post+Trial+Interview+Juror+Sachter

    3/3

    NV State P.I. Lic # 1015 CA P.I. Lic #15988Web Site - http://www.venusinvestigations.com Email: [email protected]

    (702) 361- (877) 473-4036 Toll Free (702) 778-6910 Fax

    Report Date: November 19, 2012 Page 3 of 3

    CLIENT: Colorado Springs Fellowship Church MEMO: colorado.Juror Sachter,R

    INVESTIGATORs NOTES:

    - She confirmed her name to be Randy (unsure of spelling) Beth Sachter

    - She is female, approximately 60 years old.

    - She work/ed at Nederland Middle School in Nederland, CO.- She resides in Nederland, CO.

    - She was very disturbed that she was contacted about the case.