20130822+sciens+fund+of+funds+management+holdings+ltd
DESCRIPTION
hedge fundTRANSCRIPT
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
www.fitchratings.com 22 August 2013
Fund of Hedge Fund Managers / Caymans
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd Full Rating Report
Key Rating Drivers
Solid Adaptability, Staff Turnover: Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd (Sciens)
has continued to expand and diversify its managed accounts offering, which is at the centre of
its growth strategy. Operating profitability has increased in 2012 from the 2011 low levels.
Sciens demonstrates an overall solid organisational structure and governance mechanisms,
with adequate separation of businesses and functions. The continued staffing turnover and
attrition over the past 12 months has led to the current low levels of staff relative to business
size. Hiring is in progress to support senior staff.
Sound Control Environment: Control functions consist of a dedicated risk team within a
separate affiliate and compliance officers. Solid investment risk management and compliance
monitoring are supported by solid data management, risk analytics and reporting capabilities.
Operational risk management is well embedded throughout the organisation and benefits from
automated workflows, documented procedures and system-based controls.
Disciplined Formalised Process: The investment process is well documented based on a
robust blend of fundamental and quantitative analysis. The competitive advantage of the funds
research and portfolio construction stems from deep access to underlying hedge fund data and
risk analysis capabilities.
Strong Administration Capabilities: Sciens's operations platform is robust, enabling a
controlled, fully automated implementation of workflows with a variety of service providers.
Funds of hedge funds (FoHF) investment administration is handled by Sigma Asset
Management (Guernsey) Limited (Sigma), the manager of the funds.
Leading IT Platform: A proprietary integrated technological platform, risk analytics and
centralised in-house data management capabilities are the companys key strengths. Sciens
also makes available to investors an interactive look-through application that allows them to
perform in-depth analysis of managed accounts.
Category Scores
Good Standards High Standards Highest Standards
Company
Controls
Investments
Operations
Technology
Source: Fitch
Profile
Alternative Asset Manager: Sciens Capital Management LLC (SCM) and its predecessor
firms were founded in 1988 and began alternative asset management activities in 1994. Sciens
is owned by John Rigas (71.5%). As of 30 June 2013, the group managed and advised on
about USD5.6bn of assets. Assets under management (AUM) of FoHF and managed accounts
were USD3.4bn (both in direct investments and advisory). Around forty of SCMs 100-plus
employees are dedicated to the FoHF and managed account platform (MAP).
Asset Manager Rating
Sciens Funds of Funds Management rating was converted to High Standards, Stable Outlook from M2- on 22 April 2013. The rating was affirmed on 24 June 2013.
Outlook Stable
Profile
Asset under management (end 2012)
USD5.2bn
Operating EBITA 2012 Undisclosed Date of creation 1988 Domiciliation Cayman Islands
(Sciens) UK (SCL)
Ownership John Rigas (71.5%), other Sciens affiliates (28.5%)
Total staff 100 (around 40 for Sciens FoF Management Ltd)
Investment professionals 7 (for FoHF)
Analysts
Manuel Arrive, CFA +33 1 44 29 91 77 [email protected] Alastair Sewell +44 20 3530 1147 [email protected]
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 2
AUM Breakdowns
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
FoHF Managed accounts FoHF advisory Private equity
By Asset Type
(USDm)
Source: Sciens
Asia & Middle
East
28.5%
Americas
0.2%
Europe
59.8%
Other
11.5%
By Investor Location(% of total FoHF AUM (including Advisory)
As at December 2012)
Source: Sciens
Opportunistic
19.3%
Global macro
0.5%
Managed
futures
0.7%
Relative value
19.3%
Equity
38.7%
Fund of
managed
accounts
10.7%
Alternative beta
10.7%
By Strategy (Managed Accounts)(As at December 2012)
Source: Sciens
Thematic
FofHF
10%
Multo-Strategy
90%
By Strategy (FoHF)(As at December 2012)
Source: Sciens
Company Structure
Sciens Fund of Fund Management Holdings Group at 31 March 2013
Source: Transaction documents
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd.
Cayman
Sciens Investment Management LLC
Delaware
Sciens Capital Limited England
Sigma Asset Management (Guernsey)
Limited Guernsey
Sciens FOF Consulting Group
Ltd. Cayman
Sciens Offshore Management Ltd.
Cayman
Sciens CFO I Management Ltd.
Cayman
Sciens Fund of Funds
Management Ltd. Cayman
Sciens Group Fund Services
Limited Guernsey
Sciens Group Risk Services Limited
England
John Rigas
Sciens FOF Offshore Holdings
Ltd.Cayman
71.5%28.5%
Ownership 100% Unless Stated Dormant and Liquidating Companies Omitted
Rating Scope
Related Criteria
Asset Manager Rating Criteria (April 2013)
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 3
Company High Standards
Key Findings
Well-established, specialist, privately owned, alternative asset manager, hedge fund investor since 1994.
Consolidator of the industry between 2008 and 2010, now focusing on organic growth (through MAP).
Low albeit improving profitability of FoHF and MAP business at current AUM levels (accelerating growth of MAP in 2013).
Structural independence of firm and its affiliates (hosting separate businesses and functions), complemented by appropriate
governance practices.
Staff turnover and attrition since 2011 allowed a reduction of personnel costs but increased key person dependency and individual
workload. Senior staff is in place with hiring being in progress to support them further.
Sciens has a concentrated client base.
Shareholding and Financial Standing
Privately owned
alternative asset manager
SCM is an independent New York-based alternative asset manager established in 1994, originally
focused on private equity. The predecessor firms of SCM, however, trace their roots back to 1988.
The founder and ultimate owner of SCM is John Rigas. He is now chairman and chief executive officer
of SCM. John Rigas has overall responsibility for the firm and its management.
As at 30 June 2013, the group managed assets in private equity, venture capital, structured finance,
real estate, aviation and FoHF for a total of USD5.6bn.
Activities segregated in
separate affiliates
The FoHF business is hosted by the dedicated affiliate, Sciens, incorporated in the Cayman Islands.
Sciens Group Fund Services Limited (SGFS) is a managed account services provider and the manager
of Sciens Group Alternative Strategies PCC Limited, a Guernsey-based managed account platform.
Both these entities were acquired from Partners Group AG (and rebranded) in April 2010.
Sciens Capital Limited (SCL) serves as investment advisor to Sigma, its affiliated offshore fund of funds
investment manager, incorporated in Guernsey. Sigma is dedicated to management, operations,
compliance with the funds policies and legal due diligence on the underlying hedge funds for the FoHF
business.
Sciens Group Risk Services Limited (SGRS) provides risk management services.
Sciens Management LLC is the dedicated private equity affiliate of the group.
Low profitability, AUM
growth in 2013
Fitch has reviewed the consolidated audited financial statements of Sciens. Fitch did not review the
financial statements of SCM and other affiliates. Based on the information provided, Fitch concluded
that the financial condition of Sciens is adequate.
The FoHF and MAP business show a low profitability and cash flow generation at current AUM levels.
However, operational profitability has increased in 2012, largely due to lower costs. In 2013, AUM
growth (driven by MAP AUM increasing from USD504m to over USD763m as at end of June), and
performance fees increasing should contribute to higher revenues.
Despite the positive momentum in AUM growth in the year to date, a major challenge for the company
is to accelerate fund raising to increase the revenue base and profitability.
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 4
Company (continued) High Standards
Experience
FoHF manager since 1994,
MAP since 2010
FoHF activities started in 2003 at Sciens and in 1994 at Atlas, a London-based FoHF advisor, acquired
by Sciens in September 2008. Through Atlas, Sciens has a 19-year track record.
After 2008, Sciens has defined and executed in a timely and appropriate manner its external
growth strategy to adapt to structural changes in the industry.
One of the key drivers of the acquisition of Atlas in 2008 was the companys technological and
operational platform. Subsequently, Sciens was appointed in April 2009 as sub-advisor of the residual
FoHF activities of Fairfield Greenwich Group, which totalled USD2.4bn at the time. In April 2010, Sciens
acquired the managed account platform of Partners Group AG.
Sciens management swiftly restructured the firm around the core Atlas legacy platform and MAP. In
Fitchs view, Sciens has demonstrated its ability to consolidate teams and platforms.
Sciens has diversified the managed accounts it offers, which, along with a focused, rationalised range
of liquid traditional FoHFs, is at the centre of its growth strategy.
Diversification of investor
base in progress
Sciens investor base consists of around 120 clients (mostly global institutions), as at June 2013. It is
diversified by region and by client type (see charts on page 2), but shows some concentration, as the
five largest clients accounted for about 75% of AUM as of 30 June 2013.
The largest FoHF client represents about 30% of FoHF AUM. The MAP has 38 institutional investors as
at June 2013. The largest MAP investor represents 40% of AUM.
Sciens has gained three and 26 new clients for FoHF (including advisory) and MAP, in the year to June
2013.
Governance and Independence
Appropriate company
supervision
SGFS is regulated by the Guernsey Financial Service Commission (GFSC) in Guernsey and by the
Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in the US. SCL is regulated by the Financial
Conduct Authority (FCA), the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) and the CFTC. Sigma is
regulated by the GFSC, the SEC and the CFTC.
None of the FCA, the SEC or the CFTC has inspected the relevant FoHF companies of the group
which fall under their jurisdiction. The GFSC visited the MAP while it was owned by Partners Group in
2009. No major issues were raised.
There is no independent board director on the board of Sciens, SCL or SGFS. Sigma has two
independent directors. There are also two independent directors on the board of SGAS and on each of
Sigmas ongoing funds.
Deloitte (Cayman) is the auditor of Sciens. KPMG Channel Islands Ltd is the appointed auditor for the
MAP. Deloitte LLP (Guernsey) is the auditor for Sigma and its funds.
Well formalised intra-
group relationships
Intra-group service level agreements govern the relationship between the Sciens affiliates which have
outsourced certain functions to other affiliates of the Sciens group. SCL provides management, legal,
marketing and investor relations support to SGFS. SGRS provides risk management services to SGFS
and Sigma. Most FoHF operations are delegated to Sigma.
In general, the FoHF business and the MAP are segregated to prevent FoHF business from obtaining
detailed information about the portfolio construction of the underlying managed accounts unless
specific mandates allow this. A separate risk management affiliate SGRS is in charge of monitoring the
FoHF and MAP investment activities, thereby reinforcing the independence of the risk management
function.
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 5
Company (continued) High Standards
Sound investment vehicle
governance
Funds are domiciled in the Cayman Islands or Guernsey. Some funds are listed on the Channel
Islands and Irish stock exchanges. The majority of Sigma FoHF has two independent board
members. Board meetings are generally held every six months at a minimum.
The MAP consists of Guernsey-based protected cell company structures. MAP assets are held by
the various custodian and sub-custodians. The MAP is separated from trading advisors for all
governance and controls issues.
Staffing
Clear organisational
structure, staff turnover
Sciens has a good organisational structure, with an adequate separation of businesses and
functions, often through separate companies.
Sciens has experienced staffing turnover and attrition since 2011, which has led to the current low
levels of staff relative to business size. In Fitchs view, this tends to increase key person dependency
and individual workload, particularly for MAP personnel, legal and FoHF portfolio management.
High calibre, renewed
senior staff
Stavros Siokos, who joined in 2011 is based in London and heads the FoHF and MAP business. He
provides leadership for the whole platform, thereby reducing the historic reliance on John Rigas, who
retains an overall responsibility for the firm and its management. Notable new hires are Alex Allen,
who joined in 2011 as senior portfolio manager (PM), and in 2012, Tim Wilkinson who is responsible
for global business development and distribution.
In 2012-13, the head of MAP and the head of MAP operations left. The head of MAP operations was
replaced by a former holder of that position who rejoined the company and Stavros Siokos has taken
over as head of MAP. Sciens is in the process of adding junior to medium level staff to support the
senior staff in place.
Good alignment of
interest
Sciens employees have a market competitive base salary and a discretionary bonus, which is not
directly linked to fund performance for PMs. A bonus is paid in three tranches per year. Employees
may invest in the FoHF products, subject to the approval of the CEO and compliance officers. A long-
term incentive plan for senior managers has recently been implemented.
Funds typically have a 10% Performance fee, no hurdle rate with high water mark.
Structure Diagram
a Share their roles with other teams in the chart
b Including 4 external third party marketers
Source: Transaction documents
John Rigas Chairman Group CEO
Christopher Meyering General Counsel
Legal, Compliance Support (3)
a
Dr. Stavros Siokos, Ph.DCEO
Tim WilkinsonPresident
Accounting, Treasury, Tax & IT
(4)
Sciens Group Risk Services (SGRS)
(5)
Sciens Managed Account Platform
(Map) Dr. Stavros Siokos,
Ph.D.
Sciens Investment Services
Tim Wilkinson (9)b
Sciens Fund of Hedge Funds John
Rigas - CIO
Sciens Advisory Solutions
Roberto Botero (2)
Map Legal (3)Map
Operations (4)
Operations & Due Diligence
(8)
Investment Research, Data (8)
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 6
Controls High Standards
Key Findings
Risks are actively overseen by management, investment committee and risk committee.
Control functions consist of a dedicated investment risk team within a separate affiliate, SGRS and compliance officers.
Sciens has a demonstrated ability to oversee and control a large number of service providers.
System-based controls and automated workflows contribute to embedding risk management in the processes.
Underlying hedge fund and portfolio surveillance is well framed through numerous formal risk triggers.
Risk and statistical analysis and reporting, supported by solid data management and risk analytics with central IT platform.
High quality investment risk reporting packs.
Overall Risk Control Framework
Enterprise-wide risk
oversight by management
The investment committee (IC) reviews market and liquidity risks of the portfolios. A risk committee has
been put in place to review the risk books and raise specific concerns to the IC on a monthly basis.
Sigma, which is the entity in charge of FoHF investment administration, has an operational risk
committee, with the minutes reviewed by the Sigma board. The MAP does not have a risk committee.
SGRS, the dedicated risk management affiliate of five focuses on risk and statistical analysis. Its main
duties are to screen and monitor hedge fund managers as well as to monitor, measure and report
portfolio risks. This function is also responsible for data management, including the consolidation and
clean-up of hedge fund and portfolio data, monitoring risk triggers and exposures and other quantitative
modelling.
Sciens has a chief compliance officer reporting to John Rigas. Sciens does not have an internal audit
function, providing a third line of defence.
Embedded, system-based
operational risk control
The good automated workflows and interfaces with third parties contribute to mitigating operational risk.
FoHF order management is automated between SCL and Sigma. Instructions are then sent by Sigma
using Scienss core system to the fund administrator and/or custodian as appropriate. The MAP
benefits from direct feeds from prime brokers and counterparties, thereby avoiding reliance on trading
advisors.
Sciens has set up comprehensive risk controls parameters in its systems. For instance, the company
tracks daily several thousand risk limits, soft limits and warning limits. Risk tools automatically write the
error status into an SQL error log database.
Procedures are documented, up to date and centralised. Escalation procedures are effective with a
rapid notification to the Board facilitated by the small size of the company.
Sciens encountered just one material error, which was almost fully compensated by the third parties
involved. Sciens expects to recover the full amount shortly.
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 7
Controls (continued) High Standards
Strong third party
oversight
FoHF administration is conducted independently by a number of administrators and custodians. The
main administrators Kleinwort Benson Fund Services (since 1994). The main custodians have been
ABN AMRO Guernsey since 2002 and UBP, Geneva since 2010. Service level agreements are in
place with FoHF service providers and the performance of these is monitored by Sigma through key
indicators and annual on-site reviews.
SEI Investments Global Funds Services Limited and SS&C Technologies Inc provide sub-
administrators services to SGFS (NAV determinations, trade reconciliations and reporting). All newly
launched cells are now sub-administered by SEI.
In July 2013, Sciens replaced HSBC Securities Services (Guernsey) Limited with ABN AMRO
(Guernsey) Limited for the custody, transfer agency and registrar functions for the MAP, following
HSBCs decision to discontinue these services in Guernsey.
Sciens follows a rigorous on-boarding procedure to select trading advisors for the MAP and the
relationship is formalised in an Service Level Agreement. Prime brokerage terms are agreed on cell
by cell basis. MAP service providers produce a monthly report to SGFS, which has been tailored by
SGFS. The reporting is then discussed during a bi-monthly oversight call with the service provider.
Control Framework
Source: Sciens, Fitch
Board Meeting
Sigma and SGFS - at least quarterly. SCL - as required SCL Board consists of J Rigas, C Meyering, S Siokos Sigma Board consists of J Rigas, C Meyering, J Sebire, M de Haaff and R Adair (last two independent) SGFS Board consists of S Siokos, S Bougourd and C Marley Oversight of reputation and business risks, assessment of control environment
Sciens Risk Committee
Meets as required Consists of A Allen, S Siokos, Risk Managers\ Review of investment risks at fund and manager level
Sigma Operational Risk Committee
Monthly Consists of relevant Sigma, SCL and SGRS staff Discusses all operational, legal and investment risk issues of Sigma's funds
Investment Committee
Weekly Consists of J Rigas, A Allen, S Siokos, F Mehregani and R Botero Review of portfolio investment and liquidity risk, approval of new funds (FoHF) and Trading Advisers (MAP)
Fund Boards (Sigma and MAP)
Sigma funds - at least six monthly; MAP at least quarterly Sigma funds generally have two independent directors; MAP has two independent directors
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 8
Controls (continued) High Standards
Compliance and Controls
Key controls well
embedded
FoHF pre- and post-trade compliance checks, including fair allocation rules, are automated in Scienss
proprietary front office system where all limits are coded. Exposure versus regulatory, legal or internal
limits are monitored as part of proprietary quantitative risk report on a monthly and quarterly basis for
FoHF.
The execution of the FoHF investment decisions is undertaken by Sigma, which has the latitude to veto
any of SCLs recommendations. Sigma reviews recommendations for consistency with strategy, clarity,
liquidity impact, holding restrictions, the funds prospectus and due diligence, independently of Sciens
IC.
Pre-trade compliance controls versus risk limits for the MAP are performed by the trading advisor. Post
trade compliance is monitored by Scienss risk function as part of their daily processes. 500 metrics are
calculated and monitored on a daily basis for the MAP.
Investment Risk Management
Advanced quantitative
market risk management
FoHF portfolio market risk is assessed quantitatively, based on the net asset value (NAV) of the
underlying funds. Risk indicators, such as volatility, beta, risk contribution and value at risk (VAR), are
calculated and monitored by the risk team using proprietary analytics. Sensitivity analysis and other
quantitative analyses are carried out and reported periodically.
Invested funds are closely monitored using formal risk triggers to identify material changes in AUM,
style drift and abnormal fund performance, including performance against historical returns and versus
peer funds, as represented by strategy indices. Alongside the return-based analysis, Scienss analysts
also consolidate information gathered on the underlying funds via monthly risk reports adapted to each
strategy.
All risk indicators are summarised in a risk book. This document is produced by the data and risk team
systematically for each portfolio on a monthly basis and is made available to relevant PMs. It is formally
reviewed by the risk committee and the IC.
Market risk management of MAP is based on position-based VAR, sensitivities market parameters.
Stress test and scenario analysis are also conducted. Margin requirements, capital and risk
concentrations, exposure by asset class and sectors are also closely monitored. In total, more than 500
metrics are calculated and monitored on a daily basis.
Good control of liquidity
risk
The liquidity of underlying hedge funds is monitored monthly and reported to the IC on an aggregated
basis to ensure it is consistent with liquidity offered to investors, given redemption forecasts.
Simulations are conducted to estimate the cost of a rapid liquidation and the fraction of the portfolio
which could be liquidated within a certain timeframe.
The proprietary MAP generally offers daily, weekly or monthly liquidity, depending on the manager, and
daily NAV.
Counterparty Risk Management
Appropriate counterparty
risk management
Trading advisors of the MAP have to deal with counterparties that have been agreed by Sciens.
Sciens monitors counterparties daily through rating changes, CDS spreads and equity returns (where
possible). Counterparty exposure is monitored around agreed limits. Over-the-counter (OTC) credit
exposure is calculated based on the current market value and risk-based add-on. Margin requirements
and excess cash are monitored daily. Some of the MAP excess cash is unitised into a money market
cell managed by JPMorgan.
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 9
Investments Highest Standards
Key Findings
Small team of seven investment professionals and two operational due diligence analysts.
Deep access to underlying hedge fund data and risk analysis capabilities.
Standard research process, based on a blend of quantitative and qualitative analysis, well formalised and effectively implemented.
Well documented hedge fund operational due diligence is conducted in an independent manner by Sigma.
Most decisions are taken at the five-person IC.
Portfolio construction is a risk-based, research-driven process, aiming at building more concentrated portfolios (by source of
uncorrelated alpha) but more diversified (by risk factors).
Investment Resources
Small investment team
John Rigas is the chief investment officer and has 26 years experience in the finance industry.
Alex Allen, with 15 years industry experience, is the head of research for Sciens FoHF. He is
supported by two research analysts in London. A senior PM left and the former head of research
retired in 2012. The small size of the investment team increases reliance on key persons such as
John Rigas and Alex Allen, in Fitchs opinion.
IC consists of the most senior investment professionals of the firm: J. Rigas, S. Siokos, A. Allen, F.
Mehregani and R. Botero.
The head of research is responsible for the execution of asset allocations and manager selection,
while overseeing the risk management of portfolios. He has sufficient leeway in portfolio construction
but investment decisions are made on the basis of allocation and selection decisions reached by the
IC.
Research analysts are responsible for manager due diligence and making recommendations to the
IC. As head of research, the PM is well involved in the research process, beyond his typical role of
sourcing and managing relationships with managers. Operational due diligence is the responsibility of
two people one in Sigma and one in New York with support from the legal/risk teams and from
third-parties where specific expertise is required.
Very good access to
information
Superior access to quality fund data and markets feeds the proprietary research process and allows
advanced quantitative risk analysis and reporting in FoHF.
The MAP set up enables access to position-level information, provided from prime brokers and
custodians in T+1.
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 10
Investments (continued) Highest Standards
Investment Discipline
Disciplined, flexible
investment process
Sciens implements a standard, iterative investment process, combining top-down tactical allocations
with bottom-up manager selection, as described in the diagram below. The process emphasises the
maximisation of manager selection alpha (through more concentrated portfolios by number of
managers) and the maximisation of downside protection (through more diversified and uncorrelated
sources of risks/returns).
Decisions are taken at the weekly IC meetings. The responsibilities of the IC are to set guideline limits
for strategic and tactical asset allocations, to provide final approval for manager-recommended lists
and to continuously review portfolio risk exposures.
Operational and legal due diligence, conducted both for the fund of funds and the MAP, covers all key
risks and is documented in an appropriate manner. The process includes the review of a compulsory
operational risk questionnaire, as well as a number of other requested documents and an on-site
review.
There are currently more than 100 funds approved for FoHF investments, including 34 funds from 31
managers approved on the MAP.
The trading advisors used on the MAP are subject to a comprehensive due diligence review conducted
by Scienss risk, legal, operations and business development teams, prior to the appointment to the
platform. The selection is documented in an on-boarding procedure report.
Investment Process
Source: Sciens, Fitch
Asset Allocation
Investment Committee Oversight
Determine Strategic outlook
Consider Managers for Final due Diligence or Approval
Review Monthly Portfolio Allocation
Analyze Monthly Risk Reports
Review Recent
Performance
Fundamental Hedge Fund Monitoring
Regular Manager Contact
Formal Evaluation
Watch List Procedure
Annual operational Due Diligence
Quantitative Portfolio Risk
Monitoring
Identification of Unexpected or Undesirations or Sensitivity to Risk Factors
Stress Testing Marginal VAR
of Each Manager
Quantitative Risk Oversight Liquidity MonitoringManager Approval/ Selection
Marco-Economic Outlook/Scenarios Strategy Review & Ranking Recommends
Portfolio Construction
Risk/Return Expectations Portfolio Construction
Parameters
Due Dilligen Preliminary Approval Separate Operational Due Dilligence Monitoring Initial review
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 11
Operations High Standards
Key Findings
Scalable, flexible, global operations platform both for the MAP and FoHF.
Straight through processing and effective control points exist between Sciens and service providers for the MAP and FoHF.
Recognised in-house risk reporting capabilities support investor communication and client services.
High quality of administrative processes and connectivity with external service providers both for MAP and FoHF.
Focused operations and legal team for the MAP.
Operational Procedures
Small operations teams
Most FoHF operations are delegated to Sigma, including cash management, relationship management
with underlying fund registrars, reconciliations and currency hedging. In this regard, Sigma appears
well equipped, with four full time staff with access to SIMS and a cash management system, IT2.
Three operations staff are in charge of MAP operations (relationship with trading advisors and sub-
administrators, payment execution, distribution of documentation.) and three are in charge of legal
(fund structuring, negotiation of legal documentation).
Road tested FoHF
administration capabilities
A good level of STP between SCL and Sigma supports the fund administration workflows. SCL
automatically submits recommendations to Sigma, which instructs administrators and/or custodians.
Once due-diligence status, cash and overall consistency have been checked, an instruction is
forwarded by Sigma using SIMS to the fund administrator and/or custodian as appropriate.
All residual cash positions are either placed on deposit with the custodian or in money market funds by
Sigma, which monitors and forecasts cash levels for up to three months, via the IT2 application.
Currency management is the responsibility of Sigma, which prepares instructions on each valuation
date. All active funds are systematically hedged against their base currency.
Strong MAP operating
workflows
The MAP operating model is described in the diagram below. SGFS is the official manager and
administrator for each cell, but most administration activities are outsourced to third parties through
agreements.
Trading advisors are responsible for trade confirmation. Sub-administrators are responsible for trade
reconciliation and NAV calculation. The operations team and sub-administrators instruct cash
movements using restricted templates and dual sign-off.
Communication and Client Servicing
Standard, transparent
reporting
Investor relations are managed by two dedicated client services staff located in New York and London.
Monthly and quarterly investor reports are generated automatically from SIMS, which is also used as a
customer relationship management (CRM) tool. Monthly factsheet reports are sent out to investors
between the 15th and 20th day of the following month. Scienss investor website is available to FoHF
and MAP clients.
MAP investors have the ability to perform in-depth analysis of all cells, portfolio of client holdings in
individual cells within MAP and portfolio simulation using SMART Sciens Managed Account Risk
Technologies. Bespoke risk analysis is also available upon request.
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 12
Sciens MAP Operating Model
Source: Fitch Sciens
Investors
Cell/Account
ABN Amro (Custodian bank)
Sciens (SGFS, MAP Operator)
Trading Advisor(Underlying HF
Investment Firm)
Market Counterparties
SEI, SS&C (Fund Sub-Administrator)
Prime Broker (Cell-Specific)
Client Invests in One or Several Funds/Accounts in the Platform
Reporting (via SMART Portal)
Fund Grants a Sub-Management Agreement to
MAC Operator
Fund Assets are Deposited at
Custodian Bank
Reconciliation and Controls Reports on
Matching and Positions Updates
MAP Grants a Trading Advisory Agreement (TAA)
Execution on Behalf of Sciens
HF Firm Sends Trade Details to
Administrator
Trade Reconciliation
Reports on Positions
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 13
Technology High Standards
Key Findings
SIMS Scienss proprietary web-based tool integrates all critical fund research, portfolio risk management and front-office
operations on the same platform.
SMART is an interactive look-through engine allowing investors to perform in-depth portfolio analysis.
Numerous automated interfaces exist between SCL, Sigma and its service providers.
Centralised SQL database is fed by market data, hedge fund prices, portfolio valuations and cash flows.
RiskMetrics is complemented by various add-ons and SIMS for MAP risk analysis.
IT Resources
In-house small IT team Scienss in-house team consists of two IT professionals in charge of system maintenance and
development. Data management and data integrity is the responsibility of the risk team.
Systems
State of the art,
proprietary IT platform
SIMS is a proprietary integrated web-based application, customised to Scienss needs in the areas of
research, portfolio management and front office operational management. Risk analytics and portfolio
management tools are all centralised in SIMS.
As an enterprise-wide solution, SIMS supports MAP risk analysis functionalities, workflow management,
underlying fund monitoring, portfolio management, reporting and risk control. Sciens uses RiskMetrics as
an enterprise-wide risk analytics. Salesforce is the main CRM system.
SMART is an interactive look-through engine allowing investors to perform in-depth analysis of all cells on
MAP, portfolio of client holdings in individual cells within MAP and portfolio simulation.
Superior data
centralisation and system
interface
Data is centralised on a SQL database, which is fed by market data (automatically for Bloomberg, HFR,
Morningstar), hedge fund prices (semi-automatically), portfolio valuations and cash flows (through STP).
It consolidates the groups portfolio positions, NAVs and other information (due-diligence questionnaires,
call reports and e-mail copies, for example) on hedge funds. Data collection, analysis and reporting are
therefore facilitated by the central database.
RiskMetrics, which is complemented by various add-ons, is also linked with SIMS.
Sciens benefits from a full integration, due to a centralised infrastructure and an enterprise-wide, front-
to-back office system.
IT Security
Effective disaster
recovery plan
Sciens has comprehensive, tested disaster recovery and business continuity plans, with daily back-up
procedures and alternative emergency sites.
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 14
IT Map
Source: Sciens, Fitch
Risk Metrics
Risk Engine
SIMS
Core Front to Back System
Central Database
Bloomberg, HFR, Morningstar
Market Data
Administrator/ Prime Broker System
Portfolio Data
SMART
Client Interface
Proprietary System
Vendor Solution
-
Fund & Asset Manager Rating Group
Sciens Fund of Funds Management Holdings Ltd
August 2013 15
The ratings above were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been compensated for the provision of the ratings.
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.
Copyright 2013 by Fitch, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. One State Street Plaza, NY, NY 10004.Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings, Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitchs factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third-party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitchs ratings should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided as is without any representation or warranty of any kind. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion is based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at anytime for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.