2014 environmental performance index - summary for policymakers

4
2014 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDEX Summary for Policymakers Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, Yale University Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia University In collaboration with World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland With support from The Samuel Family Foundation, Toronto, Canada www.epi.yale.edu

Upload: yaleepi

Post on 30-Mar-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

The Environmental Performance Index is a biennial ranking of how well countries perform on high-priority environmental issues. The 2014 EPI Summary for Policymakers provides an overview of the key findings and results.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2014 Environmental Performance Index - Summary for Policymakers

2014 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDEX

Summary for PolicymakersYale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, Yale UniversityCenter for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia University

In collaboration withWorld Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland

With support fromThe Samuel Family Foundation, Toronto, Canada

www.epi.yale.edu

Page 2: 2014 Environmental Performance Index - Summary for Policymakers
Page 3: 2014 Environmental Performance Index - Summary for Policymakers

REGIONAL RANKINGS & TRENDS

Global ScorecardThe world lags on some environmental issues, while demonstrating progress in others. A ‘global scorecard’ provides first-time insight as to the world’s collective impacts on the major environmental issues of our time. Complete methods, data, and results are available online at www.epi.yale.edu.

KEY FINDINGSOverall, results are high in Access to Drinking Water, Child Mortality, and Access to Sanitation. Poorer results are found in Air Quality, Fisheries, and Wastewater Treatment. While in most areas, trends suggest improvement, some primary issues like air quality and fisheries show distressing decline over the last decade.

Figure 1. Global indicators for most of the policy issues assessed by the EPI demonstrate improvement over time. Footnote: Wastewater Treatment only has one data point and no available time series. Similarly, relevant global indicators were not possible for the Climate and Energy or Forest indicators, which already represent 10-year trends.

2000 201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001

Scor

e

100

75

50

25

Child Mortality

Access to Drinking Water

Access to Sanitation

Agricultural Subsidies

Terrestrial Protected Areas

Pesticide Regulation

Critical Habitat Protection

Fish Stocks

Wastewater Treatment

Air Quality (PM2.5 Exceedance)

Marine Protected Areas

Air Quality (Average PM2.5 Exceedance)

Coastal Shelf Fishing Pressure

Household Air Quality

A much wider array of tools for filling key measurement gaps is available now, compared to the 1980s and 1990s when environmental indicators first entered the international spotlight. New technologies such as remote sensing and institutions in the form of third-party organizations have emerged, and the EPI makes use of these cutting-edge innovations. Forestry measures, for example, can now make use of satellite data to generate metrics that are far more comparable and comprehensive than what emerged from previous modeling efforts and national reports. New data using over 650,000 satellite images reveal the true global extent of forest loss and gain over the last decade.

OTHER CONCLUSIONS

Despite all the media attention it gets, air quality measurement capabilities are weak and poorly coordinated with management. International policy targets are largely absent, and the world has observed policy stagnation and alarming air pollution crises in a growing number of cities. With the expansion of industry and fossil fuels-based transportation sectors in the developing world, the number of people breathing unsafe air has risen by 606 million since 2000. It now totals 1.78 billion people.

1.78 billion people breathe unsafe air today

01.

02.

03.

04.

The EPI contributes to the post-2015 development agenda.

The 2014 EPI results are released at an opportune time to inform the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Guided by discussions with water experts contributing to the development of the SDGs, the 2014 EPI introduces a new indicator on wastewater treatment. This indicator shows that overall, countries are performing poorly with respect to wastewater treatment, which is a major driver of ecosystem water quality.

Cities offer opportunities and challenges when it comes to environmental sustainability.

Some elements of sustainability, such as wastewater treatment, benefit from denser urban populations. Others, including air pollution, are harder to address under crowded conditions. Singapore, for example, is a highly dense, urbanized nation that ranks in the Top 10 of the 2014 EPI. The city-state’s high performance on Wastewater Treatment, Access to Drinking Water, and Improved Sanitation speaks to the potential of urban infrastructure to secure some elements of environmental health. In fact, Singapore’s wastewater treatment system actually enables it to recycle a high proportion of its water resources.

For some priority indicators, measurement capabilities remain distressingly weak.

The sustainability of agricultural practices and freshwater resource management, for example, have virtually no reliable metrics by which to identify priority needs, set policy targets, or evaluate national performance. Other key areas lacking adequate measurement include exposure to toxic chemicals, solid waste management, recycling, and wetlands protection. Issue areas that are fundamentally ecological and systems-oriented tend to be measured least effectively. Failing to manage such systems poses increasing risks, and the need to step up to the measurement challenge is dire.

The world needs better measurement and indicator systems.

To meet the growing demand for environmental performance indicators, the world will need to build on existing strengths and invest in innovative approaches. The EPI team remains committed to working with interested partners, as it already has with air quality and water resources, to develop new measurement and indicator systems. Such innovation will require tighter partnership between governments, corporations, scientists, and civil society. The EPI documents the tangible benefits that arise where such efforts are pursued and the shameful damage that manifests where they are not.

When measurement is poor or not aligned with proper management, natural and human systems suffer. The EPI documents that weak measurement systems give rise to poor outcomes. For instance, marine fisheries are badly monitored, many fleets deliberately misreport catch data or fail to report, and international policy targets are ad hoc and incomplete. It is no surprise that fish stocks around the world are in stark decline.

34% of global fish stocks are collapsed

27% are overexploited

14.6% of terrestrial area protected in 2012

9.7% of marine area protected areas in 2012

Well-organized data systems and clearly established targets have led to widespread increase in protected areas, like Mount Cameroon National Park in Cameroon. Cameroon established the park in 2009 because data showed the area is home to some of the most threatened mammal species in the world. Likewise, Peru is one of the few countries to carefully analyze its territory to identify areas where critically threatened or endangered species exist, and to specifically protect these areas.

N.America Latin America and the Caribbean Sub-Saharan Africa Europe Eastern Europe and Central Asia Middle East and North Africa South Asia East Asia and the Pacific

Cana

daU

nite

d St

ates

of A

mer

ica

Chile

Ecua

dor

Cost

a Ri

caJa

mai

caVe

nezu

ela

Pana

ma

Cuba

Mex

ico

Uru

guay

Surin

ame

Dom

inic

an R

epub

licBr

azil

Trin

idad

and

Toba

goCo

lum

bia

Boliv

iaBe

lize

Nic

arag

ua A

rgen

tina

Antig

ua a

nd B

arbu

daH

ondu

ras

Gua

tem

ala

Dom

inic

aBa

ham

asBa

rbad

osPe

ruEl

Sal

vado

rPa

ragu

ayG

uyan

aG

rena

daH

aiti

Mau

ritiu

sSe

yche

lles

S. A

frica

Zim

babw

eBo

tsw

ana

Gab

onCa

pe V

erde

Nam

ibia

Cent

ral A

fr. R

ep.

Zam

bia

Equa

toria

l Gui

nea

Sene

gal

Burk

ina

Faso

Mal

awi

Cote

d’Iv

oire

Cong

oEt

hiop

iaN

iger

iaU

gand

aSw

azila

ndKe

nya

Cam

eroo

nN

iger

Tanz

ania

Gui

nea-

Biss

auRw

anda

Beni

nG

hana

Com

oros

Chad

Moz

ambi

que

Gam

bia

Ango

laD

jibou

tiG

uine

aTo

goM

aurit

ania

Mad

agas

car

Buru

ndi

Eritr

eaD

em. R

ep. C

ongo

Libe

riaSi

erra

Leo

neLe

soth

oM

ali

Som

alia

Switz

erla

ndLu

xem

bour

gCz

ech

Rep.

Ger

man

ySp

ain

Aust

riaSw

eden

Nor

way

Net

herla

nds

Uni

ted

King

dom

Den

mar

kIc

elan

dSl

oven

iaPo

rtug

alFi

nlan

dIre

land

Esto

nia

Slov

akia

Italy

Gre

ece

Fran

ceH

unga

ryPo

land

Serb

iaM

alta

Belg

ium

Cypr

usLa

tvia

Bulg

aria

Lith

uani

aM

onte

negr

oRo

man

iaBe

laru

sCr

oatia

Arm

enia

Azer

baija

nTu

rkey

Alba

nia

Russ

iaM

oldo

vaKa

zakh

stan

Mac

edon

iaU

krai

neG

eorg

iaBo

snia

& H

erze

govi

naTu

rkm

enist

anU

zbek

istan

Kyrg

yzst

anTa

jikist

anU

nite

d Ar

ab E

mira

tes

Saud

i Ara

bia

Isra

elKu

wai

tQ

atar

Egyp

tTu

nisia

Jord

anSy

riaM

oroc

coBa

hrai

nIra

nLe

bano

nAl

geria

Om

anLi

bya

Iraq

Yem

enSu

dan

Sri L

anka

Bhut

anN

epal

Paki

stan

Indi

aBa

ngla

desh

Afgh

anist

anAu

stra

liaSi

ngap

ore

New

Zea

land

Japa

nBr

unei

Dar

ussa

lam

Sout

h Ko

rea

Taiw

anTo

nga

Mal

aysia

Kirib

ati

Fiji

Thai

land

Pala

uVa

nuat

uM

ongo

liaIn

done

siaPh

ilipp

ines

Chin

aPa

pua

New

Gui

nea

Laos

Tim

or-L

este

Viet

Nam

Cam

bodi

aSo

lom

on Is

land

sM

yanm

a r

2 billion people now have access to improved drinking water and sanitation

Since 1990 more than 2 billion people have gained access to improved drinking water and proper sanitation, exceeding Millennium Development Goal (MDG) targets and improving global well-being. In Afghanistan alone, the percentage of households with access to clean drinking water went from 5 percent in 1991 to 61 percent in 2011. Ethiopia has also been able to connect more of its villages to safe drinking water through investment from the national government and international aid. These great successes resulted from a well-organized measurement system that allowed policymakers to track their performance, identify priority needs, and create mechanisms to maintain accountability.

2.3 million sq. km. of forest lost

0.8 million sq. km. of forest gained

Page 4: 2014 Environmental Performance Index - Summary for Policymakers

Rank Country Score 10-yr.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.

10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22.23.24.25.26.27.28.29.30.31.32.33.34.35.36.37.38.39.40.41.42.43.44.45.46.47.48.49.50.51.52.53.54.55.56.57.58.59.

SwitzerlandLuxembourgAustraliaSingaporeCzech RepublicGermanySpainAustriaSwedenNorwayNetherlandsUnited KingdomDenmarkIcelandSloveniaNew ZealandPortugalFinlandIrelandEstoniaSlovakiaItalyGreeceCanadaUnited Arab EmiratesJapanFranceHungaryChilePolandSerbiaBelarusUnited States of AmericaMaltaSaudi ArabiaBelgiumBrunei DarussalamCyprusIsraelLatviaBulgariaKuwaitSouth KoreaQatarCroatiaTaiwanTongaArmeniaLithuaniaEgyptMalaysiaTunisiaEcuadorCosta RicaJamaicaMauritiusVenezuelaPanamaKiribati

87.6783.2982.4081.7881.4780.4779.7978.3278.0978.0477.7577.3576.9276.5076.4376.4175.8075.7274.6774.6674.4574.3673.2873.1472.9172.3571.0570.2869.9369.5369.1367.6967.5267.4266.6666.6166.4966.2365.7864.0564.0163.9463.7963.0362.2362.1861.6861.6761.2661.1159.3158.9958.5458.5358.2658.0957.8056.8455.82

Rank Country Score 10-yr.60.61.62.63.64.65.66.67.68.69.70.71.72.73.74.75.76.77.78.79.80.81.82.83.84.85.86.87.88.89.90.91.92.93.94.95.96.97.98.99.

100.101.102.103.104.105.106.107.108.109.110.111.112.113.114.115.116.117.118.

JordanSeychellesMontenegroAzerbaijanCubaMexicoTurkeyAlbaniaSyriaSri LankaUruguaySurinameSouth AfricaRussiaMoldovaDominican RepublicFijiBrazilThailandTrinidad and TobagoPalauMoroccoBahrainIranKazakhstanColombiaRomaniaBoliviaBelizeMacedoniaNicaraguaLebanonAlgeriaArgentinaZimbabweUkraineAntigua and BarbudaHondurasGuatemalaOmanBotswanaGeorgiaDominicaBhutanGabonBahamasVanuatuBosnia and HerzegovinaBarbadosTurkmenistanPeruMongoliaIndonesiaCape VerdePhilippinesEl SalvadorNamibiaUzbekistanChina

55.7855.5655.5255.4755.0755.0354.9154.7354.5053.8853.6153.5753.5153.4553.3653.2453.0852.9752.8352.2851.9651.8951.8351.0851.0750.7750.5250.4850.4650.4150.3250.1550.0849.5549.5449.0148.8948.8748.0647.7547.6047.2347.0846.8646.6046.5845.8845.7945.5045.0745.0544.6744.3644.0744.0243.7943.7143.2343.00

Rank Country Score 10-yr.119.120. 121.122.123.124.125.126.127.128.129.130.131.132.133.134.135.136.137.138.139.140.141.142.143.144.145.146.147.148.149.150.151.152.153.154.155.156.157.158.159.160.161.162.163.164.165.166.167.168.169.170.171.172.173.174.175.176.177.178.

Central African RepublicLibyaZambiaPapua New GuineaEquatorial GuineaSenegalKyrgyzstanBurkina FasoLaosMalawiCote d'IvoireCongoEthiopiaTimor-LesteParaguayNigeriaUgandaViet NamGuyanaSwazilandNepalKenyaCameroonNigerTanzaniaGuinea-BissauCambodiaRwandaGrenadaPakistanIraqBeninGhanaSolomon IslandsComorosTajikistanIndiaChadYemenMozambiqueGambiaAngolaDjiboutiGuineaTogoMyanmarMauritaniaMadagascarBurundiEritreaBangladeshDem. Rep. CongoSudanLiberiaSierra LeoneAfghanistanLesothoHaitiMaliSomalia

42.9442.7241.7241.0941.0640.8340.6340.5240.3740.0639.7239.4439.4339.4139.2539.2039.1838.1738.0737.3537.0036.9936.6836.2836.1935.9835.4435.4135.2434.5833.3932.4232.0731.6331.3931.3431.2331.0230.1629.9729.3028.6928.5228.0327.9127.4427.1926.7025.7825.7625.6125.0124.6423.9521.7421.5720.8119.0118.4315.47

Top 10 Trend Performers Country Improvement in PerformanceLowest 10 Trend Performers Country Decline in Performance

2014 EPI RANKINGS