2015 hon. robert d. drain united states bankruptcy court, southern district of new york professor...

16
2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather Lennox Jones Day Teri Stratton Piper Jaffray & Co. Un-Till Death Do Us Part? Fontainebleau Miami Beach

Upload: edgar-mathews

Post on 18-Jan-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

U.S. Constitution Statute Case law Sources of Secured Creditors’ Rights 3

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

2015

• Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York

• Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School

• Heather LennoxJones Day

• Teri StrattonPiper Jaffray & Co.

Un-Till Death Do Us Part?

FontainebleauMiami Beach

Page 2: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

• The Absolute Priority Rule is the central organizing principle of the Bankruptcy Code– A fully secured senior creditor is entitled to

be paid in full– Or are they?

Assessing the Rights of Secured Creditors in Chapter 11

2

Page 3: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

• U.S. Constitution• Statute• Case law

Sources of Secured Creditors’ Rights

3

Page 4: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

Adequate Protection• Which is the correct baseline when a

secured creditor requests adequate protection at the outset of a case:– The value of the collateral in Chapter 11– The value of the collateral in a

nonbankruptcy foreclosure sale (ABI Bankruptcy Commission)

4

Page 5: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

Adequate Protection Example• Senior Lender is owed $100 and has security

interest in all assets, if Senior Lender exercised rights under nonbankruptcy law at the time of filing, Senior Lender would receive $50

• Debtor’s assets include a Treasury bill for $50• By the end of Chapter 11, Debtor will end up

being worth $60 or $140, with equal probability

Does putting the Treasury bill in an escrow account provide adequate protection?5

Page 6: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

Reorganization Value• Section 552(b) of the Bankruptcy Code

contains a limitation on secured creditors’ liens on proceeds, products, offspring or profits of collateral “based on the equities of the case”

• What happens when the Debtor’s reorganization value is improved by use of some of the secured creditors’ collateral, as well as some assets which are not collateral?

6

Page 7: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

Reorganization Value Example• Senior Lender has security interest in all of Debtor’s

assets except one piece of intellectual property– IP is useful but not critical, used in business and licensed to others

• Debtor files for BK amidst unfair publicity and threats of increased government regulation– Substantial chance firm would be liquidated

• CRO spends aggressively on clever advertising and adroit lobbying– Strategy is successful and Debtor is able to reorganize

To what extent is the Secured Lender entitled to the increase in value attributable to the advertising and lobbying campaign?7

Page 8: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

Measuring the Cramdown Interest Rate• Debtor proposes a plan of reorganization in

which it proposes to pay Senior Lender the amount of its secured claim over five years

• Debtor could choose to use exit financing to pay Senior Lender in cash

• If Debtor proposes to give Senior Lender a note instead, must it bear the same interest rate as the exit financing and accrue interest at a contract rate of 10%?

8

Page 9: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

• Under § 1129(b)(2)(A), the secured creditor is entitled to the value of its claim

• Holder of secured claim must receive deferred cash payments totaling at least the allowed amount of such claim, of a value, as of the effective date of the plan, of at least the value of such holder’s interest in the estate’s interest in such property

• Interest rate of exit financing is the best approximation of market

9

Measuring the Cramdown Interest Rate

Page 10: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

• However, the “market rate” includes profits and not just risk– Can attempt to disaggregate profits from

risk on a case by case basis– Can use risk free rate plus an adjustment

for risk

10

Measuring the Cramdown Interest Rate

Page 11: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

Intercorporate Guarantees• Case law suggests that a secured

creditor has a claim for full amount of guarantee against the guarantor despite any recovery from borrower

• Another argument is that a secured creditor only has a claim for the amount of the deficiency against the guarantor

11

Page 12: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

Intercorporate Guarantees Example• Parent Debtor owns Subsidiary• Bank lends $100 to Subsidiary and takes security

interest in all assets• Bank also gets unsecured guarantee from Parent

Debtor• Subsidiary defaults and Bank forecloses on its assets,

realizing $50• Parent Debtor files for BK, owes other

general creditors $200 and has assets of $100

12

Page 13: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

Intercorporate Guarantees and Postpetition Interest• Debtor has three subsidiaries: A, B, and C• Bank makes a $30 loan to Debtor and each subsidiary

guarantees and grants Bank security interest in all assets

• Entire corporate group files bankruptcy– A has assets of $20– B has assets of $10– C has assets of $5

Creditor is oversecured on a consolidated basis, but undersecured on an entity basis: entitled to postpetition interest?13

Page 14: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

Calculating Postpetition Interest• At what point in a Bankruptcy

proceeding do you value collateral to determine whether a secured creditor is oversecured– At time of filing– At point of collateral increase

14

Page 15: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

Make-Whole Payments• Courts have refused to enforce

make-whole provisions on grounds they are not clear enough in the bankruptcy context to support payment– Become due upon pre-payment of the loan– Bankruptcy accelerates the payment,

no longer making it a pre-payment

15

Page 16: 2015 Hon. Robert D. Drain United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York Professor Douglas G. Baird University of Chicago Law School Heather

• In the case that the make-whole provision is clear, should it be allowed?– Interest charged to a borrower is to compensate

for the cost of finding a new borrower• Make-whole is akin to liquidated damages, allowed in

non-bankruptcy law– Make-whole compensates for the loss of an

above market loan• Claims based on unmatured interest are not ordinarily allowed

16

Make-Whole Payments