2018 fleet barometer€¦ · fieldwork period target quotas sample duration of interview cati...

2018 FLEET BAROMETERThe Netherlands

January 2018 / Survey n°1700814

Table of content

2

I FLEET PROFILE

II FINANCING

III TELEMATICS

IV PERSPECTIVES IN TERMS OF CORPORATE MOBILITY

p.14

p.43

p.49

p.59

V ROAD SAFETY p.82

PERIMETER OF THE STUDY – FOCUS EUROPE

3

METHODOLOGY

DATA COLLECTION

METHODFIELDWORK PERIOD TARGET QUOTAS SAMPLE

DURATION OF

INTERVIEW

CATI System

(Computer Assisted

Telephone Interviewing)

Fleet managers in

companies of all industries

using at least

1 corporate vehicle

Company size

& sector

3 718 interviews including

3 313 through Europe

405 out of Europe

10 minutes

on average

JAN

15

FEB

6

4

Companies with 10 to 99 employees

62 interviews

Companies with 100 to 249 / 499 / 999 employees

77 interviews

Companies with 250 / 500 / 1 000 employees and more

61 interviews

1 to 99

employees

162 interviews

More than 100

employees

138 interviews

Perimeter of the survey: companies owning at least 1 vehicle

Companies with less than 10 employees

100 interviews

5

SAMPLE FOR THE NETHERLANDS

6

Company size

& sector

This sample structure was set up in order to be roughly representative of the number of cars registered by companies for each

company size segment and activity sector as well as to allow comparisons between countries on a similar bases.

In the following slides, no additional weighting of the data are applied to company sizes or activity sectors segments.

Total

Construction 31 (31%) 20 (32%) 10 (13%) 11 (18%) 72 (24%)

Industry 11 (11%) 13 (21%) 22 (29%) 9 (15%) 55 (18%)

Services 23 (23%) 10 (16%) 8 (10%) 17 (28%) 58 (19%)

Trade 35 (35%) 19 (31%) 37 (48%) 24 (39%) 115 (38%)

TOTAL 100 (100%) 62 (100%) 77 (100%) 61 (100%) 300 (100%)

Weight of each

company size

segment

33% 21% 26% 20% 100%

NUMBER OF INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED IN THE NETHERLANDS

SAMPLE

Less than 10 employees

10 to 99 employees

100 to 249 employees



250 employees and more



FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH TR

7

PICTOGRAMS

* Fleet size: the size of the fleet has been defined according to the total number of vehicles given in question A5.

10 – 99 employees

100 to 249 / 499 / 999 employees

250 / 500 / 1000 employees

and more

Less than 10 employees

10 – 49 vehicles

50 vehicles and more

1 – 9 vehicles

Company size Fleet size*

8

MAIN RESULTS

MAIN RESULTS

Dutch managers appear to be more

mature than other European ones.

They are pushing for switch to new

energies/technologies, especially in

largest companies.

10

#1A positive trend regarding the fleet

growth potential, especially for

large and very large companies.

#2

#3

#4

A non negligible impact of the new

WLTP test for fleet policies.

CO2 emissions are taken into

account by most fleet managers

#5Greater use of telematics compared

with the European average. Major

development across medium-sized

and large fleets.

#6Improvement of driver safety and

behaviour more taken into account

in the use of telematics.

#7 A limited interest in mobility budget.

MAIN RESULTS

11

#1 – A positive trend regarding the fleet growth potential, especially for large and very large companies.

Regardless of the vehicle size or fleet segment, except for smaller companies, the proportion of companies anticipating a growth in fleet

size is greater than that of companies anticipating a decrease. Although the scores are generally lower than the European average, the

dynamism level for 2018 reaches its highest score, in particular with largest companies (with balances of +16 and +11 respectively).

#2 – Dutch managers appear to be more mature than other European ones. They are pushing for switch to new

energies/technologies, especially in largest companies.

New technology solutions like hybrid, plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles are already widespread across Dutch companies, primarily in

large and very large companies. These companies are leaders as the Netherlands rank 3rd in Europe (behind Belgium and the UK)

amongst countries that most use these new energy solutions. 58% of Dutch companies claim that they have already incorporated these

new energy sources into their vehicle fleet.

#3 – A non negligible impact of the new WLTP test on fleet policies.

46% of Dutch fleet managers claim that the new WLTP test has or will have an impact on their fleet policy. 25% of them say that it already

has an impact in 2018. The country's scores are very much in line with the European level. Fleet managers in the largest companies claim

to have been the most affected (69% vs 62% in Europe).

MAIN RESULTS

#4 – CO2 emissions are taken into account by most fleet managers

61% of Dutch fleet managers claim to take CO2 emissions into account for their fleet policy. The rate even reaches 80% for larger

companies, in line with European scores.

68% of companies have already introduced - or consider introducing - measures to reduce CO2 emissions for mobility solutions (43%

have introduced this type of measure).

The largest companies are leaders in the subject, which is a major concern for 87% of them.

#5 – Greater use of telematics compared with the European average. Major development across medium-sized and large fleets.

With a telematics use rate of 28%, the Netherlands show better results than their European neighbours (19%), particularly for the largest

companies and fleets.

Fleet managers for the largest fleets show the most enthusiasm for this technology and 58% of them claim that they use it, making for an

increase of 7 points compared to 2017. For medium-sized fleets, the use rate has significantly increased from 27% last year to 46% this

year.

#6 – Improvement of driver safety and behaviour more taken into account in the use of telematics.

Although telematics is chiefly used to locate vehicles (71%) and optimise employees' routes (59%), Dutch fleet managers are looking to

use it more in favour of improving driver safety.

In fact, use regarding driver safety and behaviour has dramatically stepped up, with smallest (+21 and +10 respectively) and largest (+15

and +4) companies alike.

12

MAIN RESULTS

#7 – A limited interest in mobility budget.

In total, 12% of Dutch fleet managers claim to be interested in the introduction of a mobility budget in their company and only 7% show

definite interest.

This is a fairly disappointing result, although managers of the largest companies are slightly more enthusiastic with a rate of interest of

18% (11% with definite interest). With 26% of interest, managers of the largest fleets are those with best insight into the mobility budget

(16% claim to have introduced it in their company).

13

I - FLEET PROFILE

A. FLEET CHARACTERISTICS

I - FLEET PROFILE

NUMBER OF VEHICLES IN FLEET

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 499 vehicles

500 vehicles and more

Total

A5. Can you please tell me the total number of vehicles of less than 3.5 tons in your fleet?

Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

2% 3%10% 14%9% 9%

4%11%

38% 30%33% 31%

1% 1%

39%30%

62%59%

44%45%

56% 57%

99% 99%

61%70%

34% 30%

8% 12%

1 to 9 vehicles

16

FLEET GROWTH POTENTIALby company size

% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will increase or decrease

Balance 2017 Balance 2014

Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease

Balance 2015Balance 2018

+7 +8 +1 -1

+13 +11 +10 +9

-1 +5 -6 +4

+8 +8 +4 +6

+6 +12 +13 0

+12 +9 +9 +6

+16 +9 +3 +2

+16 +14 +10 +10

+11 +8 -4 -12

+17 +15 +20 +15

14%

19%

5%

13%

11%

17%

19%

21%

23%

27%

6%

6%

6%

4%

5%

4%

4%

6%

11%

9%

IncreaseDecrease

Total

A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will?


17

FLEET GROWTH POTENTIALby fleet size

Balance 2017 Balance 2014

Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease

Balance 2015Balance 2018

+7 +8 +1 -1

+13 +11 +10 +9

+3 +7 -1 +5

+8 +7 +5 +6

+14 +8 +15 -2

+12 +13 +15 +9

+11 +11 -7 -9

+27 +19 +20 +16

14%

19%

8%

13%

17%

19%

24%

35%

6%

6%

5%

5%

3%

7%

13%

9%

IncreaseDecrease

Total

% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will increase or decrease

A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will?


18

Total

Average in years

HOW LONG THE COMPANY KEEPS ITS VEHICLEby company size

19

5,7 6,1 6,1 5,4 5,2

5,7 6,2 6,3 5,4 5,0

A25. On average, how long do you keep your vehicles before being sold (new precision added for the 2018 questionnaire) or giving back to the leasing

company?


Total

Average in years

HOW LONG THE COMPANY KEEPS ITS VEHICLEby fleet size

20

5,7 5,9 4,8 6,4

5,7 6,2 5,4 4,8

A25. On average, how long do you keep your vehicles before being sold (new precision added for the 2018 questionnaire) or giving back to the leasing

company?


How long the company keeps its vehicles

Fleet growth potential

balance +7(Balance = % which think that the total number of

vehicles of their company fleet will increase –

decrease)

2018 Fleet Barometer - The Netherlands

-1 +6 +16 +11

+8 +12 +16 +17

FLEET PROFILE – CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLEET

Average in years

5,7 5,7

6,1 6,1 5,4 5,2

6,2 6,3 5,4 5,0

B. ENERGY MIX

I - FLEET PROFILE

USE OF NEW ENERGIES OR TECHNOLOGIESby company size

At least one technology

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid

CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)

LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)

Electric Vehicle

Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen

TotalAlready implemented

44%23%

29%13%

30%9%

4%3%

3%4%

26%11%

1%1%

Proportion of companies having already implemented new energies or technologies in their fleet (in at least one of their fleet vehicles)

E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,

considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

23

Already

implemented

12%9%

7%4%

4%2%

0%1%

2%3%

5%2%

1%<1%

44%16%

27%8%

26%6%

0%2%

6%4%

19%5%

2%1%

68%28%

45%16%

45%12%

6%4%

5%4%

35%11%

1%1%

69%48%

48%27%

57%22%

11%8%

0%6%

57%30%

2%2%

USE OF NEW ENERGIES OR TECHNOLOGIES - by fleet size


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


TotalAlready implemented

24

Already

implemented

44%23%

29%13%

30%9%

4%3%

3%4%

26%11%

1%1%

21%12%

12%5%

10%3%

0%1%

4%4%

11%3%

1%1%

69%29%

44%14%

49%11%

6%4%

6%5%

34%12%

3%1%

81%53%

60%33%

63%26%

13%8%

0%5%

58%32%

0%3%



Proportion of companies having already implemented new energies or technologies in their fleet (in at least one of their fleet vehicles)

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF NEW ENERGIES OR TECHNOLOGIES - by company size


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


Already implemented

+ considered

Total

58%44%

37%29%

40%23%

8%8%

6%8%

45%26%

9%7%

25

Considered in the next 3 years

Already implemented

27%32%

13%20%

14%16%

1%5%

4%8%

18%16%

7%6%

60%37%

39%23%

34%17%

0%6%

6%7%

42%18%

10%5%

78%46%

51%31%

55%24%

12%8%

9%8%

57%27%

9%7%

82%68%

59%47%

72%40%

21%15%

7%11%

79%52%

11%11%


considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years new energies or technologies in their fleet

(in at least one of their fleet vehicles)

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF NEW ENERGIES OR TECHNOLOGIES - by fleet size

80%47%

54%30%

59%25%

13%8%

7%8%

59%26%

9%7%


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


Already implemented

+ considered

Total

58%44%

37%29%

40%23%

8%8%

6%8%

45%26%

9%7%

90%73%

66%53%

73%45%

18%17%

6%11%

79%56%

13%13%

37%33%

20%20%

21%16%

2%5%

6%8%

27%17%

8%5%

26


Already implemented


considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years new energies or technologies in their fleet

(in at least one of their fleet vehicles)


27

+

33%

40% 40%

22%24%

23%

18%

27%

22%

4%

4%

1%

4%

5%5%

14% 19%

27%

6%

3%

8%

2015 2017 2018

Already implemented

+ considered



53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years

new energies or technologies in their fleet


28

+Already implemented

+ considered

67%

88%

80%

52%

72%

54%43%

70%

62%

15% 15% 16%

8% 12%

8%

39%

56%

67%

6%5%

10%

2015 2017 2018



53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


53% 53%57%

43%40% 40%

16%24%

29%

4%7%

4%

2%

6%

1%

29% 29%

40%

3%4% 2%

2015 2017 2018


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years

new energies or technologies in their fleet

CH 51%

IT 45%

TR 41%

FR 41%

ES 39%

DE 38%

PL 36%

PT 36%

CZ 10%

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALOF NEW ENERGIES OR TECHNOLOGIES: At least one technology

% Already implemented+ considered in the next 3 years

64%

61%58%

#1 BE

#2 UK

#3 NL

44%

TOP 3

29



Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years new energies or technologies in their fleet (hybrid,

plug-in hybrid, CNG, LPG, electric vehicle or fuel cell electric / hydrogen)

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12

HYBRYD DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL


53%

51%37%

#1 UK

#2 BE

#3 NL

29%

TOP 3

30

Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years hybrid technology in their fleet

CH 36%

FR 30%

ES 30%

IT 22%

PT 22%

PL 19%

DE 16%

TR 15%

CZ 3%

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12



PLUG-IN HYBRID DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL


46%

43%40%

#1 UK

#2 BE

#3 NL

23%

TOP 3

31

Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years plug-in hybrid technology in their fleet

CH 25%

FR 22%

PT 20%

ES 16%

DE 15%

IT 14%

PL 14%

TR 13%

CZ 1%

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12



CNG / COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL


19%

18%11%

#1 BE

#2 IT

#3 UK

8%

TOP 3

32

Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years CNG (compressed natural gas) technology in their fleet

ES 10%

TR 9%

NL 8%

CH 7%

DE 7%

CZ 3%

PT 3%

PL 3%

FR 2%

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12



LPG / LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL


19%

17%16%

#1 TR

#2 PL

#3 IT

8%

TOP 3

33

Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) technology in their fleet

UK 14%

ES 11%

BE 8%

DE 7%

NL 6%

CH 6%

PT 4%

CZ 3%

FR 1%

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12



ELECTRIC VEHICLE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL


45%

42%37%

#1 NL

#2 UK

#3 BE

26%

TOP 3

34

Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years electric vehicle technology in their fleet

CH 34%

DE 28%

FR 26%

ES 25%

PT 23%

IT 15%

TR 15%

PL 11%

CZ 3%

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12



FUEL CELL ELECTRIC / HYDROGEN DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL


22%

10%9%

#1 UK

#2 ES

#3 NL

7%

TOP 3

35

Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years fuel cell electric / hydrogen technology in their fleet

CH 8%

BE 8%

TR 8%

PT 5%

PL 5%

IT 4%

DE 4%

FR 3%

CZ < 1%

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12



IMPACT OF THE WLTP TESTby company size

Already or

expected

% Yes, already

% Yes, already

Already or

expected

Total

NL17. Today, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions are determined with a new, more realistic test cycle: the WLTP-test. Has, or will the new higher and more

realistic fuel consumption levels and related CO2 emissions impact on your fleet policy? Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

36

25% 12% 13% 34% 46%

18% 11% 11% 20% 31%

44% 36% 36% 46% 62%

46% 33% 44% 48% 69%

Proportion of companies having already or expecting to be impacted in the next 3 years by the new WLTP test

IMPACT OF THE WLTP TESTby fleet size

Already or

expected

% Yes, already

% Yes, already

Already or

expected

Total

NL17. Today, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions are determined with a new, more realistic test cycle: the WLTP-test. Has, or will the new higher and more

realistic fuel consumption levels and related CO2 emissions impact on your fleet policy? Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

37

25% 14% 26% 52%

18% 11% 19% 35%

44% 35% 47% 67%

46% 36% 46% 76%

Proportion of companies having already or expecting to be impacted in the next 3 years by the new WLTP test

ACTIONS TAKEN TO REDUCE CO2 EMISSIONS LINKED TO MOBILITY - by company size

NL18. Does your company take action to further reduce your CO2 emissions linked to mobility?


38

Already or

considered

% Yes, already

Total

68% 63% 60% 65% 87%

43% 36% 34% 42% 67%

Proportion of companies having already or considering to take action in the next 3 years to further reduce CO2 emissions linked to mobility

ACTIONS TAKEN TO REDUCE CO2 EMISSIONS LINKED TO MOBILITY - by fleet size

Already or

considered

% Yes, already

NL18. Does your company take action to further reduce your CO2 emissions linked to mobility?


39

Total

68% 60% 67% 89%

43% 33% 47% 68%

Proportion of companies having already or considering to take action in the next 3 years to further reduce CO2 emissions linked to mobility

Total

EMISSIONS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THE CAR POLICY by company size

40

NOx (nitrogen oxyde)

Fine particles

CO2 (Carbon dioxyde)

Other polluting emissions

None of these

15%

18%

25%

26%

61%

59%

0%

6%

33%

30%

9%

14%

17%

25%

53%

49%

0%

6%

43%

39%

15%

16%

28%

25%

45%

49%

0%

8%

47%

38%

13%

20%

25%

29%

68%

66%

0%

6%

25%

23%

29%

26%

33%

27%

80%

75%

0%

5%

16%

16%

NL19. Which of the following emissions do you take into account in your company car policy? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible

Basis: companies with corporate vehicles, without “don’t know”

Proportion of companies taking into account the following pollutant emission in their fleet policy

EMISSIONS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THE CAR POLICY by fleet size

41

Total

NOx (nitrogen oxyde)

Fine particles

CO2 (Carbon dioxyde)

Other polluting emissions

None of these

15%

18%

25%

26%

61%

59%

0%

6%

33%

30%

12%

15%

20%

25%

53%

51%

0%

7%

42%

37%

18%

20%

32%

27%

57%

60%

0%

8%

36%

27%

21%

25%

28%

28%

85%

81%

0%

4%

9%

13%

NL19. Which of the following emissions do you take into account in your company car policy? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible

Basis: companies with corporate vehicles, without “don’t know”

Proportion of companies taking into account the following pollutant emission in their fleet policy

422018 Fleet Barometer – The Netherlands

FLEET PROFILE – ENERGY MIX

Development potential of new energies/technologies

Already implemented

+ considered

Electric Vehicle

Plug-in Hybrid

Hybrid

45%

40%

37%

26%

23%

29%

64%

61% 58%

#1 BE

#2 UK#3 NL

TOP 3At least one

technology

CO2 taken into account in

the car policy

61% 80%

Impact of the WLTP test

46% 44%

Already or expected in the next 3 years

33%

44%

48%

69%

#3

#3

#1

II - FINANCING

INTENTION TO DEVELOP OPERATING LEASINGby company size

Yes

% Yes, certainly

% Yes, certainly

Yes

Total

B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet?


44

12% 1% 6% 22% 21%

9% 5% 6% 11% 15%

23% 18% 19% 25% 31%

20% 4% 15% 32% 36%

Proportion of companies having the intention to develop operational leasing

INTENTION TO DEVELOP OPERATING LEASINGby company size

Yes

% Yes, certainly

% Yes, certainly

Yes

Total



45

12% 1% 6% 22% 21%

9% 5% 6% 11% 15%

23% 18% 19% 25% 31%

20% 4% 15% 32% 36%(18%) (8%) (14%) (26%) (30%)

(9%) (5%) (4%) (14%) (16%)

(24%) (21%) (22%) (26%) (31%)

(9%) (6%) (7%) (10%) (17%)

(Reminder of 2017 results)


INTENTION TO DEVELOP OPERATING LEASINGby fleet size

Yes

% Yes, certainly

% Yes, certainly

Yes



46

Total

12% 3% 19% 27%

9% 5% 9% 20%

23% 18% 22% 36%

20% 9% 27% 42%


INTENTION TO DEVELOP OPERATING LEASINGby fleet size

Yes

% Yes, certainly

% Yes, certainly

Yes



47

Total

12% 3% 19% 27%

9% 5% 9% 20%

23% 18% 22% 36%

20% 9% 27% 42%(18%) (8%) (21%) (34%)

(9%) (3%) (10%) (20%)

(24%) (20%) (29%) (33%)

(9%) (5%) (12%) (18%)



FINANCING METHOD

Intention to develop Operating leasing (in the next three years)


Total

20% 4% 15% 32% 36%

23% 18% 19% 25% 31%

III - TELEMATICS

USE OF TELEMATICSby company size

Total

50

E23. Have you implemented Telematics within your fleet? Telematics enables transmission of data to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle

location... from vehicles on the move. Data is transmitted by means of an original or after sales equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not

include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones.


28% 7% 24% 38% 56%

19% 8% 17% 26% 30%

Proportion of companies having implemented telematics in their fleet

19% 8% 17% 26% 30%

USE OF TELEMATICSby company size

Total

51





(20%) (9%) (19%) (25%) (33%)

28% 7% 24% 38% 56%(30%) (12%) (36%) (36%) (43%)



USE OF TELEMATICSby fleet size

Total

52





28% 10% 46% 58%

19% 10% 27% 37%


19% 10% 27% 37%

USE OF TELEMATICSby fleet size

Total

53





(20%) (12%) (26%) (37%)

28% 10% 46% 58%(30%) (20%) (27%) (51%)



Total

PURPOSES FOR USING TELEMATICSby company size

54

Improve drivers safety

Improve drivers behaviours

Locate vehicles

Optimize journeys

Reduce fleet costs

Other: 26% 14% 35%

14% 13% 16%

44%

60%

45%

55%

71%

74%

59%

61%

45%

59%

48%

61%

48%

59%

72%

75%

59%

63%

52%

58%

44%

62%

44%

56%

65%

67%

59%

59%

44%

64%

Small basis

Very low

basis (<20)

No results

displayed

Very low

basis (<20)

No results

displayed

E25. For which reasons do you use telematics within your company? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible

Basis: companies which has implemented telematics


55

+



Locate vehicles

Optimize journeys

Reduce fleet costs

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

36%

15%

41%

31%

77%

64%

59%

59%

36%

28%

56%

49%

52%

46%

80%

72%

60%

54%

57%

46%

Small basis




56

+



Locate vehicles

Optimize journeys

Reduce fleet costs

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

46%

31%

46%

42%

68%

55%

59%

56%

48%

51%

61%

54%

57%

53%

71%

66%

61%

54%

61%

60%



PURPOSES FOR USING TELEMATICSby fleet size

57

Total



Locate vehicles

Optimize journeys

Reduce fleet costs

Other: 26% 19% 31%

14% 11% 17%

44%

60%

45%

55%

71%

74%

59%

61%

45%

59%

44%

57%

56%

56%

75%

77%

63%

61%

47%

58%

50%

64%

42%

58%

69%

71%

53%

59%

53%

63%

Very low basis

(<20)

No results

displayed



TELEMATICS

Use of telematics

Purposes for using telematics


Total

19%

28% 7% 24% 38% 56%

8% 17% 26% 30%

Locate vehicles

71% 74%

Optimize journeys

59% 61%

IV - PERSPECTIVE IN TERMS OF CORPORATE MOBILITY

USE OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVES by company size

TotalAlready using

60

Already using

14%

18%

22%

23%

13%

15%

1%

8%

12%

13%

4%

8%

5%

13%

23%

22%

8%

15%

22%

24%

30%

26%

19%

17%

34%

34%

30%

38%

26%

24%

At least one of the following

alternatives

Car sharing

Ride sharing

Mobility budget or card

34% 14% 29% 48% 56%

37% 21% 35% 43% 57%

Proportion of companies already using the following mobility alternatives

MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives? Already using, Considered in the next 3 years, Not interested



alternatives

Car sharing

Ride sharing


USE OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVESby fleet size

TotalAlready using

61

Already using

14%

18%

22%

23%

13%

15%

4%

11%

15%

16%

5%

11%

20%

27%

33%

30%

24%

19%

34%

31%

31%

35%

23%

23%

34% 19% 50% 58%

37% 27% 47% 54%

Proportion of companies already using the following mobility alternatives



DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVESby company size

Already using

+ considered

Total

18%

23%

26%

28%

19%

22%

62


Already using

2%

12%

12%

15%

6%

13%

6%

16%

26%

25%

11%

20%

27%

28%

32%

31%

26%

25%

46%

44%

39%

46%

38%

35%


alternatives

Car sharing

Ride sharing


40% 16% 35% 53% 69%

44% 27% 41% 51% 67%



Proportion of companies already using or considering to use in the next 3 years the following mobility alternatives

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVESby fleet size

Already using

+ considered

Total

63


Already using


alternatives

Car sharing

Ride sharing


18%

23%

26%

28%

19%

22%

5%

14%

16%

19%

7%

16%

24%

30%

37%

34%

26%

24%

48%

43%

39%

44%

42%

37%

40% 22% 56% 73%

44% 33% 53% 67%





64

+

Already implemented

+ considered

4%

8%

17%

26%

8%

9%


alternatives

Car sharing

Ride sharing


2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

13%

13%

19%

21%

15%

16%


Already using

32%

34%

23%

33%





65

+

36%

42%

36%

39%

31%

30%


alternatives

Car sharing

Ride sharing


2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

Already implemented

+ considered

35%

34%

38%

37%

30%

30%


Already using

60%

65%

58%

59%




DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVESCar sharing

% Already using+ considered in the next 3 years

47%

35%34%

#1 TR

#2 CZ

#3 UK

23%

FR 29%

PL 28%

BE 27%

CH 24%

PT 22%

ES 19%

NL 18%

IT 14%

DE 7%

TOP 3

66

MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives?


#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12


DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVESRide sharing

% Already using+ considered in the next 3 years

48%

42%39%

#1 UK

#2 CZ

#3 TR

28%

BE 31%

CH 29%

PL 28%

FR 27%

NL 26%

ES 22%

PT 19%

IT 18%

DE 13%

TOP 3

67

MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives?


#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12


PROPORTION OF COMPANIES READY TO GIVE UP ALL OR PART OF THEIR COMPANY CARS FOR ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS - by company size

TotalYes certainly

MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives?


68

Yes certainly


alternatives

Car sharing

Ride sharing


5%

2%

5%

2%

5%

2%

0%

1%

4%

1%

0%

1%

5%

2%

5%

2%

5%

1%

6%

2%

6%

2%

5%

1%

10%

4%

7%

4%

11%

3%

10% 4% 11% 8% 20%

4% 3% 4% 3% 8%

PROPORTION OF COMPANIES READY TO GIVE UP ALL OR PART OF THEIR COMPANY CARS FOR ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS - by fleet size

TotalYes certainly

69

Yes certainly




alternatives

Car sharing

Ride sharing


5%

2%

5%

2%

5%

2%

2%

1%

4%

2%

2%

1%

6%

2%

9%

3%

7%

1%

10%

5%

5%

3%

10%

3%

10% 6% 11% 18%

4% 3% 4% 7%


YES

Total

70

Yes probably

Yes certainly



7%

6%

9%

6%

8%

6%


alternatives

Car sharing

Ride sharing


0%

3%

7%

3%

1%

3%

5%

3%

6%

5%

5%

4%

8%

7%

9%

7%

14%

7%

18%

13%

16%

11%

15%

10%

17% 7% 13% 19% 33%

12% 7% 9% 13% 22%

PROPORTION OF COMPANIES READY TO GIVE UP ALL OR PART OF THEIR COMPANY CARS FOR ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS - by fleet size

YES

Total

71

Yes probably

Yes certainly



7%

6%

9%

6%

8%

6%


alternatives

Car sharing

Ride sharing


2%

4%

7%

4%

2%

4%

9%

5%

14%

6%

11%

5%

16%

14%

11%

12%

19%

12%

17% 8% 21% 34%

12% 8% 11% 23%


72



+

YES

2%

3%

7%

13%

2%

3%


alternatives

Car sharing

Ride sharing


2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

3%

3%

4%

5%

3%

4%

Yes probably

Yes certainly

9%

15%

7%

9%


73



+

12%

16%

12%

14%

14%

14%

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

YESYes probably

Yes certainly

25%

27%At least one of the following

alternatives

Car sharing

Ride sharing


10%

9%

9%

10%

8%

9%

17%

18%

INTEREST IN MOBILITY BUDGETby company size

NL8. With a mobility budget, you give employees the choice and financial responsibility of the mobility forms you provide. Are you interested in

mobility budget?


74

Yes

% Yes, certrainly

Already in place in the company:

Total

12% 4% 13% 18% 18%

7% 3% 6% 10% 11%

5% 0% 2% 8% 15%

INTEREST IN MOBILITY BUDGET by fleet size

Yes

75

% Yes, certrainly


NL8. With a mobility budget, you give employees the choice and financial responsibility of the mobility forms you provide. Are you interested in

mobility budget?


Total

12% 6% 16% 26%

7% 4% 10% 15%

5% 1% 6% 16%

ROLE OF A MOBILITY BUDGETby company size

NL9. Which role takes a mobility budget in your working conditions?

Basis: companies interested in mobility budget

76

Only usable for mobility costs

Only usable for a lease

vehicle

We have a cafeteria model

None

26%

21%

13%

19%

Total

Other:

25%

15%

15%

20%

25%

25%

15%

15%

Small basis Small basis

15% 20% 10%

Very low

basis (<20)

No results

displayed

Very low

basis (<20)

No results

displayed

INTEREST IN MOBILITY PLATFORMby company size

NL12. With a mobility platform you have insight into all the costs related to the mobility of your employees. Are you interested in such a platform?


77

Yes

% Yes, certrainly


Total

13% 3% 15% 17% 25%

6% 3% 2% 6% 16%

6% 0% 2% 9% 16%

INTEREST IN MOBILITY PLATFORMby fleet size

Yes

78

% Yes, certrainly

NL12. With a mobility platform you have insight into all the costs related to the mobility of your employees. Are you interested in such a platform?



Total

13% 8% 16% 26%

6% 4% 4% 16%

6% 1% 9% 16%

ADVANTAGES EXPECTED FROM A MOBILITY PLATFORMby company size

NL7bis. At what level do you expect to gain the most profit with a mobility platform? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible

Basis: companies interested in mobility platform or already in place in company

79

Corporate Social

Responsibility

Optimisation of mobility costs

Reduce administrative work

Employee satisfaction

Total

Other:

55%

55%

38%

31%

Small basis Small basis

3% 5% 4%

55%

55%

35%

35%

52%

48%

40%

24%

ADVANTAGES EXPECTED FROM A MOBILITY PLATFORMby fleet size

80

NL7bis. At what level do you expect to gain the most profit with a mobility platform? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible

Basis: companies interested in mobility platform or already in place in company

Total

Other:

Corporate Social Responsibility

Optimisation of mobility costs

Reduce administrative work

Employee satisfaction

55%

55%

38%

31%

50%

54%

42%

31%

3% 8%

Small basis

PERSPECTIVE IN TERMS OF CORPORATE MOBILITY

Development potential of mobility alternatives

Ride sharing

Car sharing

26% 32% 39%

18% 27% 46%

19% 26% 38%Mobility budget

Already using

+ considered


#10

#8

Already in place

+ certainly interested

+ probably interested

V- ROAD SAFETY

POLICY ON THE USE OF MOBILE PHONES IN THE CARby company size

83

Already or

considered in

the next 3 years

% Yes, already

% Yes, already

Already or

considered in

the next 3 years

% Yes,

already

Already or

considered in

the next 3 years

Make or receive

phone calls

The use of apps

except for navigation

The use of

navigation apps

Total

61% 53% 55% 69% 72%

55% 52% 47% 62% 59%

30% 19% 34% 32% 41%

22% 18% 26% 21% 25%

42% 35% 44% 42% 54%

33% 30% 35% 36% 33%

Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%% of companies having or considering to have in the next 3 years a policy on the use of mobile phones in the car

with regards to the following topics (NL15)

POLICY ON THE USE OF MOBILE PHONES IN THE CARby fleet size

84

Already or

considered in

the next 3 years

% Yes, already

% Yes, already

Already or

considered in

the next 3 years

% Yes,

already

Already or

considered in

the next 3 years

Make or receive

phone calls

The use of apps

except for navigation

The use of

navigation apps

Total

61% 54% 74% 66%

55% 51% 67% 52%

30% 22% 37% 44%

22% 17% 30% 24%

42% 35% 50% 55%

33% 29% 41% 35%

Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%% of companies having or considering to have in the next 3 years a policy on the use of mobile phones in the car

with regards to the following topics (NL15)

ACTIONS TAKEN IN ORDER TO INCREASE ROAD SAFETYby company size

85

Already or

considered in

the next 3 years

% Yes, already

% Yes, already

Already or

considered in

the next 3 years

E-learning

Real world driving

style analysis

% Yes,

already

Already or

considered in

the next 3 years

Smartphone blocking

Total

14% 5% 13% 13% 30%

6% 2% 3% 5% 16%

16% 3% 19% 18% 31%

9% 3% 8% 12% 16%

21% 17% 18% 19% 34%

8% 8% 6% 9% 7%

NL16. In order to increase road safety, does your company set up the following actions?


ACTIONS TAKEN IN ORDER TO INCREASE ROAD SAFETYby fleet size

86

Already or

considered in

the next 3 years

% Yes, already

% Yes, already

Already or

considered in

the next 3 years

E-learning

Real world driving

style analysis

% Yes,

already

Already or

considered in

the next 3 years

Smartphone blocking

NL16. In order to increase road safety, does your company set up the following actions?


Total

14% 6% 17% 31%

6% 1% 7% 18%

16% 7% 20% 37%

9% 4% 13% 18%

21% 18% 23% 27%

8% 7% 13% 5%

ROAD SAFETY

Policy on the use of mobile Phones in the car


Total

61% 53% 55% 69% 72%

30% 19% 34% 32% 41%

42% 35% 44% 42% 54%

Make or receive phone

calls

The use of apps except

for navigation

The use of navigation

apps

Actions taken in order to increase road safety

E-learning

14%

Real world driving style

analysis

16%

Smartphone blocking

21%30% 31% 34%

Already or considered

in the next 3 years

Already or considered

in the next 3 years

88

T H A N K Y O U

88

2018 fleet barometer€¦ · fieldwork period target quotas sample duration of interview cati...

Documents