2018-20192018src.ccri.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ccri_2018... · the effects of austerity...
TRANSCRIPT
1
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W | D I R E C T O R ’ S N O T E
W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
2018-2019 A Year in Review
2
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W | D I R E C T O R ’ S N O T E
3
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W | D I R E C T O R ’ S N O T E
W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
Looking back, Brexit has provided a particular and multi-faceted context for
CCRI work over the past year. Wherever we stand as individuals on the topic,
it has stimulated a renewed focus upon the policies that have shaped the
UK’s food system, rural communities and landscapes for many decades.
The CCRI, in evidence provided to Parliamentary Committees, Government
Departments and independent Commissions, in events hosted and attended,
in research reports completed and papers published, has been playing a
constructive role in scoping what comes next.
Our focus on understanding the everyday lived experience of individuals and
communities in varied social and environmental contexts has been central
to that effort. At the same time, our contribution to policy debates and
developments continues to grow beyond the UK, to include international
collaborations and initiatives with the FAO, EU and OECD and in Asia, Africa,
central Europe and the Middle East.
These developments make for a very dynamic research environment as
together, we build, share and co-develop new knowledge with our partners.
This mini-site show-cases some of our achievements in the year so that you
can see the range of work accomplished and delve into more detail wherever
you wish.
We were delighted to welcome four new colleagues to the team this year,
enabling us to conduct more research, across a broader range of topics and
in more countries than ever before. Our capabilities have grown as we add
new skills and techniques to the mix, building synergies in our research
methods between qualitative and quantitative disciplines and approaches
within contemporary social science.
As a team, we are ever more aware of the immense challenges facing society,
with a climate emergency now declared by Parliament and action set in train
on plastics and air quality, but an ever increasing inequality in incomes and
life-chances across much of the developed and developing world.
The ability to produce rigorous evidence and to present and discuss it openly
seems now more important than ever. I am thankful that many people have
confidence in the CCRI’s ability to play these roles effectively. I look forward
to reporting back to you next year about our progress.
Director’s welcome
Janet Dwyer
Professor of Rural Policy and Director of CCRI
4
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W | D I R E C T O R ’ S N O T E
5W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W | C O N T E N T S
ContentsDirector’s Note 3
Policy & Governance 6
Research & Innovation 14
About CCRI 29
Staff 30
6
Section 1: Policy & GovernanceCCRI conducts agenda-setting research to aid policy makers who work at
the interface of agricultural, social and environmental issues in the UK,
Europe and beyond.
In 2018, we extended our hard-fought reputation for excellence in policy and
governance advice on rural and urban development. We covered topics ranging
from soil science and sustainable agriculture, to the culture of food, and the
limits of the food system.
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
Brexit: a time for strategy 2018 proved CCRI is well positioned to contribute to post-Brexit thinking and policy formulation
The one thing we know for certain about the UK’s
decision to leave the EU is that it will shape food, farming,
environmental and rural policy for the next 20 years. “After
a year of central government paralysis, with everyone
worrying about the implications of the referendum result,
2018 was the year new thinking around Brexit started
to emerge,” says CCRI Director Janet Dwyer. CCRI was
consulted on current political developments – drawing
on years of specialist knowledge – and worked on new
projects focused on the ‘beyond Brexit’ agenda.
House of Lords – the Rural EconomyThe report, entitled ‘Time for a strategy for the rural
economy’, covers a broad range of topics – the rural
economy, housing, service delivery and policies
impacting upon rural areas. Janet Dwyer was interviewed
as part of the consultation process. She spoke about
the uncertainty that has been created in the farming
community by Brexit and voiced concerns regarding
the effects of austerity measures, which have had a
disproportionate effect on rural areas. Many small family
businesses struggle to expand due to insufficient support.
This is an important issue that must be addressed if
government policy is to support a more sustainable
agricultural economy.
S E C T I O N 1 | P O L I C Y & G O V E R N A N C E
Welsh Affairs Select CommitteesCCRI gave evidence to two different committees in
Wales on what Brexit might mean for Welsh rural areas
and Welsh agri-economy, Welsh rural development
and environment. Janet Dwyer was commissioned by
the Public Policy Institute for Wales for a study on the
implications of Brexit for rural Wales.
The English ContextCCRI radio interviews and other media commentary
applied our knowledge of European policy and an
understanding of the likely consequences of different
Brexit scenarios. A CCRI press release highlighted the loss
of rural development in the policy agenda. “Research
has given us understanding of both what’s been difficult
about money coming from Europe but also what’s been
good”, comments Janet.
Brexit GeographiesDamian Maye published a paper on Brexit and Agriculture
in a special issue of ‘Brexit Geographies’. The paper
reflects one of CCRI’s broad ongoing goals – to connect
research on sustainable agriculture to live debates
in the policy arena. The subject matter links to ideas
incorporated in the EU-level SUFISA project (see below).
Brexit ConferenceCCRI held five workshops in early 2018. Across all five
there was a clear call for innovation both in policy, lines
of communication and in the synergy between food and
energy as well as land, water and biodiversity.
There is an urgent need for a new generation of
entrepreneurs and knowledge exchange around different
ways of working and achieving a resilient landscape.
Diversity is also key with a need to move away from a one
size fits all approach to policy and regulation, building on
the excellent examples that exist in Gloucestershire and
elsewhere in the country. The situation is complex but
we need to value food and highlight the social value and
well-being aspects of food and how it is produced.
7W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
8
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
Sustainable agriculture, food and fisheries policyLast year saw us further improve our ability to support
future policy for more resilient agricultural systems
Agricultural production sits at the heart of major societal
concerns, spanning food security, nutrition and health;
livelihoods and development; the environment; and animal
welfare. By their nature, sustainable policies should support
primary producers, but these producers exist in a context of
multidimensional policy requirements, market uncertainties
and globalisation. Much of our work was focused on
improving, gathering and analysing knowledge and data
around these complexities in order to aid policy decisions.
Inshore fisheries and dairy farms2018 was the final year for SUFISA, an EU-level project,
spanning 11 countries and 22 regions. CCRI’s primary
role was to examine farmers’ and fishers’ perspectives on
market and regulatory pressures on inshore fisheries in
Cornwall and dairy farms in Somerset.
We also investigated the strategies used at farm-level,
as well as collectively, to manage these pressures
effectively. “We spent the early parts of 2018 finishing
case study work and then translating the UK findings
report – which was over 200 pages – into two short
policy briefs outlining the relevant headlines about our
findings,” explains Damian Maye, who coordinated CCRI’s
activities on the project.
The team undertook a major cross-national comparison
of agri-food commodity arrangements for a variety
of case studies across Europe, drafting a large,
highly detailed report for the Commission. “From a
dissemination perspective, SUFISA is one of our most
significant projects,” says Maye.
Farm and forest managementIn 2018, we completed another major EU Horizon
2020 study called PEGASUS (Public Ecosystem Goods
And Services from land management – Unlocking the
Synergies). The work focused on new ways of thinking
about farmland and forest management. The broad
aim was to stimulate a long-lasting improvement in the
provision of public goods and ecosystem services from
agricultural and forest land in the EU.
The CCRI played a significant role in developing the
evaluation framework and the approach to analysis of
the project’s 34 case studies, including four in the UK.
“It’s interesting, Europe is now moving in the direction that
the UK has been advocating for some time,” notes CCRI
Director Janet Dwyer. The project has helped move the
conversation beyond the rhetoric of neoclassical economics
and its preoccupations with market failure and government
intervention. “The reality of rural business is that policy
comes in little silos,” says Dwyer. “You may get some money
for heritage, some for environment or some for economic
S E C T I O N 1 | P O L I C Y & G O V E R N A N C E
9W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
growth and development of jobs”. Businesses must try to
juggle these different elements in a coherent way.
PEGASUS demonstrated that, if you want to deliver
environmental quality through funding rural land managers,
you need to think beyond targeting the environment alone.
Decision makers can achieve more cost-effective outcomes
for the environment by including local social, cultural and
economic factors in their policy design.
Quantitative Policy AnalysisMauro Vigani’s work for the European Commission’s Joint
Research Centre (JRC) and the UN’s Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO) demonstrated just how effective CCRI has
been in its capacity building efforts in 2018.
The CCRI has a long-standing reputation for producing
rigorous qualitative policy-relevant research. Vigani’s
supportive work for the JRC has applied quantitative skills,
ranging from estimating demand elasticities for countries
like Ethiopia and Kenya, to investigating the production,
markets and regulation of microalgae-based food and feed
products in Europe.
The JRC is regularly charged with developing policy
scenarios at the request of the Directorate-General for
Agriculture and Rural Development and the Directorate-
General for International Cooperation and Development
in the European Commission.
Similarly, the UN’s FAO also relies on third-party research
institutes for quantitative analysis. In this instance, Vigani
analysed six farm support programmes run by the Ministry
of Agriculture in Georgia. The project represents a new
high watermark for CCRI’s quantitative evaluation impact.
Culture & HeritageCCRI’s work here focuses on opportunities to integrate
rural heritage into post Brexit rural development and
agri-environment policy
Sound policy relies on reliable evidence. CCRI actively
supports policy decisions by gathering and analysing
data around key culture and heritage issues, including
generational renewal, the built environment and land
use. Making the case for rural heritage is reliant upon
demonstrating not only the challenges it faces – but also
identifying the scale of these problems and the socio-
economic value that conserving it might bring.
10
Generational Renewal in AgricultureEmpowering a new generation of young farmers is really
vital to the success of the rural economy at large. This has
been a very active area for CCRI in 2018.
An EU-funded project for the European Commission’s
Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development
to looked at the issue across all Member States.
“To some extent, all agricultural policies impact upon
generational renewal,” says John Powell. “Any measures
that impact the wider rural economy can affect the number
of young entrepreneurs and workers entering the market.”
The study involved a wide range of different activities:
analysis of EU statistical data, and interviews with EU-level
policy makers, as well as national workshops.
Seven in-depth case studies look at the impact of the
Common Agricultural Policy on farm succession and
generational renewal in very different countries and
regions. CCRI worked with partner organisations in Italy,
Austria, Belgium, Poland, Estonia and Hungary.
Through this work, we’re improving policy advice on factors
that drive farm succession. “This work will significantly
improve policy makers’ understanding of the local contexts
that affect farm succession,” Powell notes. “Our findings will
feed into the next round of EU agricultural policy.”
Natural capital and the historic environmentCurrently there is limited understanding of the role of
historic environmental assets in ecosystem services
and natural capital approaches, and the monetary and
non-monetary benefits they can provide to society.
To fill this knowledge gap, Historic England has
commissioned research to assess the benefits that the
historic environment can provide to people’s health,
wellbeing and prosperity. As part of this research, CCRI
is undertaking three projects to develop a return-on-
investment model to explore ways in which historic
environment values can be incorporated into the four
categories of ecosystem services.
As a result of this work CCRI has been able to set out
in the language of ecosystem services what public and
environmental goods and services the heritage assets
provide. The CCRI has developed a research methodology
for recording the public and environmental benefits
arising from the historic environment, and specifically
flowing from dry stone walls in the Peak District National
Park, linear features in the Lower Severn Vale and
historic buildings and their associated boundaries in
Gloucestershire, Shropshire and the Peak District.
Farmsteads and Landscapes StatementsHistoric farmsteads make a fundamental contribution to
landscape character, local distinctiveness and a sense of
place. They are also assets which, through agricultural
or new uses, can make an important contribution to the
rural economy and communities. Historic England has
led national research on this subject and has produced
guidance on the conversion and maintenance of farm
buildings. However, further work is still needed to
develop the evidence base, in the form of Farmsteads and
Landscapes Statements.
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
Historic England commissioned Jeremy Lake and CCRI
to create and publish a baseline statement for 159 of
England’s National Character Areas. The Farmsteads and
Landscapes Statements will inform decision-making
by all those involved in the conservation, reuse and
development of historic farmsteads and farm buildings.
The Farmsteads and Landscapes Statements will provide,
for the first time, an interpretation of the farmsteads and
farmed landscapes of England to inform research agendas.
Peer-to-peer farmer learningIn 2018-19, CCRI advanced its reputation for delivering
policy-relevant research on farmer learning and innovation.
Our work on EU project AgriDemo-F2F identified best
practice in providing on-farm demonstration activities, and
proposed effective ways for policy makers to support these
at local, regional and Europe national levels.
CCRI researchers have also been involved is the ‘Farmer-
led Initiatives Network (FLIN). This is just emerging as a
formalised network. It brings together NGOs, researchers
and agencies with a common interest in supporting
farmer-led initiatives in sustainable agriculture. The
motivation for the network is to share experiences and
to identify the best way to evaluate farmer-led initiatives.
We’re looking for ways to find evidence that counts for
policy makers and shows that such models work. This will
be particularly important given the emphasis on rewarding
collaborative provision of public goods post-Brexit.
An interview with Julie Ingram“We’ve continued to develop ideas that have emerged
in academic circles relating to learning and innovation.
Our particular interest is understanding how knowledge
processes operate in Agricultural Innovation Systems, the
complex and dynamic system of producers, innovation
support and advisory systems, commercial sector, supply
chains, researchers and educationalists, and policy makers.
“This is a particularly useful area of policy-relevant research
now the UK is thinking about its future as a competitive
food producer outside of the EU’s CAP. I think we’re quite
well placed to draw on our knowledge and experience from
previous projects on this to inform policy makers.
“Working with partners (academics and practitioners)
internationally has allowed us to explore a number of case
studies and develop some innovative ideas. We really have
been quite cutting edge in the work we’ve done.
“Many EU projects are now following the multi-actor
approach which means project partners are drawn from
farmers groups and advisory services, industry, NGOs as
well as academics. The focus is very much on working
together to solve problems and co-produce innovations
that are relevant, practical and will deliver impact.
These partners can act as gatekeepers for researchers
to stakeholders in the agriculture community. So this is
a great opportunity to really understand the realities of
achieving innovation on-farm.
“Working with stakeholders also allows us to bring
together our collective knowledge and co-create
knowledge on topics that stakeholders identify as
important. Whilst this can be rewarding for all involved,
but it also has its challenges.
“The complexities of implementing co-production of
knowledge is something worth noting. We have to take
care to manage expectations and to understand that,
while for researchers the research project is a top priority,
for stakeholders it is just one of the many demands on
their time.
“As researchers, we have to be reflective and think about our
responsibility to the stakeholders, farmers and advisors we
involve in these projects. That’s quite a progressive position
that we’re starting to explore in more depth.”
11W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
S E C T I O N 1 | P O L I C Y & G O V E R N A N C E
12
Living LabsComplex problems, such as effectively managing an
ageing population or delivering sustainable mobility,
are often specific to a particular region and encompass
both rural and urban areas. Such challenges can only
be solved by taking a collaborative approach, involving
policymakers, researchers, businesses, service providers,
citizens and other stakeholders. But it can be difficult
to know what types of governance arrangements are
effective in different scenarios.
This is why we have been contributing to the EU’s
Horizon 2020 ROBUST project since 2017. ROBUST (Rural-
Urban Outlooks: Unlocking Synergies) brings together 24
partners from 11 countries to advance our understanding
of the interactions and dependencies between rural,
peri-urban and urban areas; and to identify and promote
policies, governance models and practices that foster
mutually beneficial relations. A key element of ROBUST is
exploring different governance arrangements in real-life
settings. Therefore, 11 case studies called ‘Living Labs’
have been chosen to cover diverse territorial contexts,
one of which is Gloucestershire.
Each Living Lab is a place-based form of experimental
collaboration that emphasises co-creation in a real-world
setting. The Gloucestershire collaboration partners CCRI
with Gloucestershire County Council. “It’s a bit different to
the sort of conventional way that you do research,” says
CCRI’s Damian Maye. “Normally, if we were working for the
Council, we would just go away and collect lots of data and
come back with a report. In a Living Lab scenario we deliver
co-produced innovation, working very closely together and
identifying what we each want out of the process.”
“In 2018, one of our main jobs on the project was to
develop a framework for how you do these Living Labs
– how you run them – and then to develop a toolkit of
“In a Living Lab scenario we deliver co-produced innovation,
working very closely together and identifying what we each
want out of the process.”Damian Maye
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
13
S E C T I O N 1 | P O L I C Y & G O V E R N A N C E
W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
methods that all the practice partners can then use,” says
Maye. “We also developed a monitoring and evaluation
framework to track the learning as the Lab goes through
its stages so that by the end of the project we can provide
evidence to the Commission and our peers of what this
type of ‘trans-disciplinary research’ can actually achieve.”
Beyond developing a robust methodology, work centred on
specific challenges in urban-rural governance. “To give you
a real example, there’s a food strategy for Gloucestershire
and within that we think we need to progress quite rapidly
towards a plant-based diet,” says Dan Keech. The CCRI
team is working with the Council to adapt their contracting
for local food provision of school meals. To make this
change, within ROBUST we are developing experiments
that challenge existing conventions, linking the work we
do on sustainable food strategies to inform the Council’s
thinking. “That’s going to affect the profile of agriculture in
the county and certainly the business models people might
need to think about as change happens; so you can see
how there’s a rural-urban relationship.”
Environmental land management in EnglandThe Exmoor Ambition is an initiative to design, trial
and test future approaches to environmental land
management in England.
At present, if farmers want financial support from the public
sector, they can face extraordinary levels of bureaucracy.
Consequently, some farmers have started to organise in
various ways and build capacity to win back some control.
Exmoor Hill Farmers and the National Park had previously
commissioned CCRI to survey Exmoor farmers, helping them
to develop capacity to make a difference at a local level.
Janet Dwyer then joined the steering group, developing the
initiative and contributing ideas on governance based on her
knowledge from other parts of Europe.
Dwyer also evaluated a small project called ‘Graze the
Moor’. This focuses on understanding how to regenerate
heather moorland. “We’ve realised that the traditional
prescriptions of agri-environment schemes weren’t
working; particularly in the southwest,” Dwyer says.
Landowner Christina Williams took her moorland area out
of the conventional scheme management and persuaded
Natural England to experiment with a different approach.
This involved establishing a grazing cattle herd that would
stay on the Moor in winter. “With centrally designed, top
down schemes, a simple narrative about what works can
become policy everywhere, when it was only appropriate
to one context,” Dwyer says. “This project was about
challenging that and building on valuable local knowledge.”
Future grazing managementIn Norway, rural land is facing change from second home
construction and residents who do not want to see
agricultural activities taking place on their doorstep. In
addition, some of those with hunting rights want to remove
sheep grazing entirely to offer hunters a more ‘natural’
experience. There are also wider structural problems arising
from the effect of state subsidies on sheep farmers, and
declining lamb consumption among Norwegians.
Such change has led to concern about the voice and lack
of power and influence that traditional graziers have in
the mountain and forest regions of Norway, prompting
the Norwegian government to initiate a three-year project
called FUTGRAZE.
Beginning in 2018, FUTGRAZE investigates how the local
common land associations are adapting to environmental,
political and economic changes and why it seems that
some are more able to adapt and avoid conflict than others.
“We’ve been chosen as a partner to look at some of the
UK’s management of those spaces and look at traditional
voices,” says CCRI’s Chris Short. “They’re looking to us in a
sense because we’re more populated and we’ve got fewer
of those areas, so they tend to be under more pressure.”
CCRI’s knowledge of both legislation and local mechanisms
of self-governance and resilience in the UK will help to
shape future best practice arrangements in Norway.
S E C T I O N 1 | P O L I C Y & G O V E R N A N C E
Section 2: Research & InnovationCCRI conducts and publishes world-class research that forms the
foundations for a deeper shared understanding of rural life and leads to
actionable insights on issues relevant to rural and urban development in
the UK, Europe and beyond.
2018 saw us collect detailed evidence and grow our knowledge base in various
key areas, including sustainable agriculture, fish and food; farmer influence;
and culture and heritage.
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
We have completed nuanced analysis of sustainable
practices for building resilient agricultural systems in
complex regional dynamics
Needing to satisfy a growing world population and
demand from a wide range of industries, agriculture,
fish and food systems are under intense strain. At the
same time, these industries are facing pressure to
abandon intensive practices that harm the environment
long-term in favour of a more sustainable approach
that manages natural resources effectively, all while
contributing to equitable regional development. In
2018, we have been adding unique and valuable insights
to the UK and European knowledge base that are
helping to facilitate a sustainable food system.
Inshore fisheries and dairy farmsPrimary producers—that is agriculture, fisheries and
aquaculture—are the foundation of the food system. But
that system faces many economic, environmental and
social challenges as well as opportunities following socio-
economic and technological developments, that are not
equally distributed.
To make sense of this complex landscape, SUFISA was born.
The EU-level project spanned 11 countries and 22 regions
and ended in 2018. Its aim was to identify sustainable
practices and policies in the agricultural, fish and food
Sustainable agriculture, food and fisheries policy
14
15
S E C T I O N 2 | S U S T A I N A B L E A G R I C U L T U R E , F O O D A N D F I S H P O L I C Y
W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
sectors that support the sustainability of primary producers
in the context of complex policy requirements, market
uncertainties and globalisation.
As part of this work, we examined farmers’ and fishers’
perspectives on market and regulatory pressures on inshore
fisheries in Cornwall and dairy farms in Somerset. This
analysis was conducted using a combination of methods,
including focus groups, interviews and a survey of 200
producers (in the dairy case only) to understand the key
market and regulatory conditions, and the strategies and
arrangements that primary producers are utilising to
manage difficulties and risks.The research exposed various
conditions that influence food producers’ strategies and
performances, and provided a unique insight into differing
supply chain arrangements and mechanisms that are
allowing farmers to deal with these pressures.
At a wider EU level, the CCRI team ran a producer survey
across 22 regions of the EU, each of which involved up to
300 producers. From this, we compiled a large database
which was then subjected to a comparative cross-regional
econometric and descriptive analysis. “In order to develop a
coherent understanding of the impacts of multi-dimensional
policy requirements, market uncertainties and globalisation,
scattered knowledge must be centralised and integrated
with new insights,” says Damian Maye, who led the CCRI
contingent. “In November 2018, the team delivered a
number of very large qualitative and quantitative datasets to
the European Commission, including the massive producer
survey report, analysis of which made sense of a very broad
dataset, reporting evidence of new arrangements emerging
around contracts in commodity sectors.”
Flood ManagementCan natural land-based measures be used to reduce the
risk of flooding for communities? This is the question
LANDWISE—a Natural Environment Research Council
(NERC)-funded project that ends in 2021—seeks to answer.
LANDWISE studies measures like crop choice, tillage
practices and tree planting, that have been identified by
people who own and manage land to have the greatest
realisable potential of reducing the risk from flooding from
surface runoff, rivers and groundwater in groundwater-fed
lowland catchments. These natural methods can reduce
the amount of water that runs off the land surface, while
also improving soil structure to allow more rainwater to
infiltrate below ground.
The LANDWISE research focuses on the West Thames River
Basin area, where around 112,000 properties are at risk of
flooding if rivers burst their banks, almost 10,000 are at risk
of groundwater flooding, and many more are in danger of
surface water flooding.
CCRI’s Chris Short is co-investigator on the project, led by
Reading University: “Modelled data suggest that natural
land-based activities on lowland agriculture catchments
are useful for reducing risk in small-scale events but this
tails off for bigger events to the point that they might
actually become more problematic than beneficial,” he
says. “There are a small number of people that say that’s
wrong, but there’s no evidence – so, that’s why this project
is really interesting.”
Alongside a paper on natural flood management
highlighting the multiple social, environmental, economic
and benefits, Short’s role heavily involves community
and farmer engagement in the Upper Thames region. As
Chair of the Upper Thames Catchment Partnership, he has
encouraged a high level of farmer engagement, secured
through various projects to learn about the benefits and
drawbacks of flood mitigation measures these farmers
employ. “I think it’s a real plus for a CCRI project to be
involved in the sort of work in which farmer engagement
produces new knowledge,” he adds.
16
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
Farmer learning and innovation
CCRI investigates farmer behaviour and influence across
a range of themes
Networks that facilitate farmer-to-farmer learning accelerate
the uptake of knowledge and innovation to make the
industry more competitive in the global marketplace.
But to tackle the economic, environmental and social
challenges facing the sector and their potentially complex
interconnections requires a broader range of expertise.
Knowledge needs to be exchanged between farmers,
researchers and other stakeholders to bridge the gap
between academic findings and the farm. Knowledge
co-creation fosters innovation towards keeping agriculture
and food production competitive and sustainable, and
rural areas vibrant in the 21st century. 2018 saw us
actively encourage knowledge co-creation by deepening
understanding of the importance of farmer learning
networks and how knowledge processes operate in
agricultural innovation systems.
Risk management and resilience“Policy analysis is a longstanding specialism of CCRI,”
says CCRI’s Mauro Vigani. “But the focus on risk
management and especially resilience is a rather new
aspect of the policy debate.”
This new focus has required an equally new approach to
knowledge gathering, requiring the consideration of more
dynamic elements such a farmer behaviour around learning,
risk management and resilience. “Some members of the
Institute studied how farmers learn in the past, but perhaps
not as intensively as we’re doing now,” explains Vigani.
“We’re now in a very strong position in this area.”
A big step forward was made in 2018 by developing a more
refined understanding of individual and regional farm
resilience instead of relying on a single economic measure.
“We’ve taken this dataset called the Farm Business Survey,
which is a massive annual survey of about 3000 farmers in
the UK,” says CCRI’s Robert Berry. “From this, we’ve come
up with a number of indicators that we think demonstrate
how resilient the economics of each farm is, and then
mapped it out to show the difference in farmer resilience in
different regions of England and Wales.”
A CCRI team has extended farmer risk and resilience
knowledge further in the EU-funded project SURE-
Farm. SURE-Farm aims to analyse, assess and improve
the resilience and sustainability of farms and farming
systems in the EU. “Part of that is understanding how
important the farmer learning network is to farmers,
particularly when they want to make changes on their
farm,” explains CCRI’s Damian Maye. “So, it’s building
upon the theme of farmer influence to understand: what
are the kind of influences? Who influences farmers? What
are the types of knowledge networks that they use when
they’re making changes on their farms?”
17W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
S E C T I O N 2 | S U S T A I N A B L E A G R I C U L T U R E , F O O D A N D F I S H P O L I C Y
The project aims to develop a comprehensive framework
to identify the conditions that enable farming systems to
become and remain resilient to a broad range of current
and imminent stressors. It will address determinants of
resilience, potential improvements of risk management
strategies, drivers of farm demographics, and strengths
and weaknesses of the existing policy framework.
Within the wider aims of the project, the CCRI team
uses a mixed quantitative and qualitative analytical
approach to focus on farmers’ adaptive behaviour and
learning capacity, the enabling environment for farm
demographics and farm labour, and the assessment
of the capacity of the Common Agricultural Policy to
enhance resilient and sustainable agriculture.
As part of this, the team is conducting one of 11 case
studies across Europe. The case study involves co-
creating knowledge with arable farmers in the East
of England. Just like other farmers across the UK,
these farmers face considerable challenges in terms of
uncertainties surrounding Brexit, together with ongoing
pressures of responding to consumer preferences, public
perceptions of agriculture and balancing farm business
performance with environmental sustainability.
Farm and forestry managementThe EU-level PEGASUS project has taken a methodological
approach that’s emerging from ecosystem services
literature and the work of Elinor Ostrom, 2009 Nobel
Laureate in Economic Sciences
CCRI investigated initiatives that were trying to improve
the provision of public goods and ecosystem services from
agriculture and forestry. Each case study had a different
approach to unlock the synergies between economic,
social and environmental benefits for society. With case
“This is a crucial time for British agriculture and a deeper
understanding of what makes farms resilient will be important
to safeguard UK farming and food production into the future.”
Mauro Vigani
18
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
studies from all over Europe, we were able to showcase
pioneering initiatives for sustainable management of
farming and forest land that deliver public goods and
ecosystem services using the concept of a holistic and
sustainable system.
CCRI used a social-ecological systems approach as a
way of analysing how these kind of actions work at the
local level. The analysis showed clear links between the
three pillars of sustainability –the social, the economic
and the environmental – are needed to bring about
beneficial change.
The CCRI’s work aids policy makers by looking beyond
outcomes to understand the underlying processes that
work. “Understanding the social process makes all the
difference,” says CCRI Director Janet Dwyer. “Policy
can too easily go wrong when people have bright ideas
about what they need to achieve but a naive approach to
designing ‘instruments’ to achieve it, without considering
the social context.”
The way in which monetary support is offered or
regulations are applied – and the choices made about who
has the power to make decisions and tailor instruments for
local needs – makes a huge difference to a policy’s success.
This research was completed in 2018. “We held a policy
conference in Brussels followed by more discussions
with commission officials arranged by an officer
from the Directorate-General for Agriculture and
Rural Development,” says Dwyer. New draft Common
Agricultural Policy regulations propose a radical move
towards a more flexible approach to delivering public
goods and ecosystem services through land management
beyond 2020. When the Commission was looking for
ideas, our research was on hand. “The big message was: ‘if
you want this to work, you give people at a local level more
say over what happens; give farmers a stronger voice; and
encourage collective action,’” Janet says, “these features
should now all be stronger in the new CAP.
Co-producing social dataHere, the team at CCRI looked at the policy needs for
social data. With fisheries, for example, this is limited
to demographic data like gender, age, education
levels in the fisher population. “Policy makers really
want to understand fisher’s perceptions and attitudes
towards regulation and policy, or what influences
their behaviour,” explains Julie Urquhart. “The fisher
stakeholders want a better understanding of things that
directly impact them, like health and wellbeing.” Part of
that social data is cultural, so we’ve also looked at the
cultural identity of fishing communities,”
Tree pests and diseases is another area we’ve conducted
some really meaningful, innovative work. This is quite
a new area within research and policy. The social side
of the tree health area has really only come to the force
since ash dieback hit the headlines in 2012.
The team is working on a Defra project concerning
policy options that support land managers to better
deal with pests and diseases. This included workshops
and interviews with a broad range of landholders. “The
next step is to develop these policy options through a
co-production process,” says Urquhart, “getting together
with land managers to identify formats for support and a
grant system that would help them.”
Since 2012, the government put a number of tree
health projects under the health and plant biosecurity
19W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
S E C T I O N 2 | S U S T A I N A B L E A G R I C U L T U R E , F O O D A N D F I S H P O L I C Y
initiative that were a combination of science (such as
genetics) and social dimensions.
A number of projects have come on the back of that.
The biosecurity work we’ve conducted with the plant
health social scientists in Defra has developed into an
ongoing research theme. “This is quite a new area for
CCRI because I only joined 18 months ago,” Urquhart
says. “Damian Maye’s worked on biosecurity and animal
health, and I’ve worked on tree health. So, we now have
this biosecurity strand at CCRI,” she says.
Urquhart has been involved in setting up an international
work of social science and tree health researchers. “In
the summer of 2018, we published a book that’s the
first international collection of work on the human
dimensions of tree health,” she explains.
Peer-to-peer farmer learningBuilding on our long history of researching how farmers
learn from their own on-farm experiences and from other
farmers, a CCRI team has been advancing knowledge in
the EU H2020 project Agridemo-F2F. Agridemo-F2F aims to
deepen understanding of effective on-farm demonstration
activities in order to enhance farmer-to-farmer learning.
“The simple idea is that farmers themselves are at the
centre of their own innovation systems,” says Julie Ingram.
The CCRI team developed a demonstrator interview schedule.
The interview is designed to identify the characteristics of a
good farm demonstration, so best practice can be replicated
elsewhere. “I think we’re quite well placed to be able to give
them knowledge and experience from the projects that we’ve
worked on,” says Ingram. “So, we really have been quite
cutting edge in the work we’ve done.”
Farm-to-farm NetworksSocial media in an urban context is well studied. 2018
was the year we really started to establish some in-depth
understanding of social media use in rural contexts. CCRI
produced a paper on farm-to-farm networks on Twitter. We’ve
observed small face-to-face networks of this type. This year, we
were able to establish the types of networks that have evolved
over social media. “Part of our success stemmed simply
from having the awareness and relevant tools to analyse this
phenomenon,” explains Matt Reed. “A lot of social media
analysis is quantitative, based on big datasets; this work was
principally qualitative analysis of a specialised network. That’s
quite different from a lot of social science in this area.”
“The work challenges perceptions that these rural
groups aren’t sufficiently networked to use digital media.”
Dr Matt Reed
20
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
This work has very clear policy implications. “The work
challenges perceptions that these rural groups aren’t
sufficiently networked to use digital media,” says Reed.
“From some of the surveys we’ve conducted, we know
that’s emphatically no longer the case in many instances.”
Soil threats in EuropeAlthough there is a large body of knowledge available
on soil threats in Europe, this knowledge is fragmented
and incomplete, in particular regarding the complexity
and functioning of soil systems and their interaction
with human activities. This is why the EU-funded project
RECARE was conceived: to save our soil.
RECARE, which ended in 2018, aimed to do this by
developing effective prevention, remediation and
restoration measures using an innovative trans-
disciplinary approach, actively integrating and advancing
the knowledge of farmers and land managers with those
of scientists and other stakeholders in 17 case studies,
covering a range of soil threats in different biophysical
and socio-economic environments across Europe.
An important element of RECARE was dissemination and
communication. Alongside running the RECARE final
policy conference, a CCRI team worked on dissemination
throughout the project, ensuring that project results were
disseminated to a variety of stakeholders at the right time
and in the appropriate formats to stimulate renewed care
for European soils. “The response from partners across
Europe and the Commission has been really positive,”
comments CCRI’s Nick Lewis.
Already RECARE has reached those who directly manage
the land and soil, enabling and encouraging them in
sustainable soil management techniques. The hope is
that RECARE results can influence the design of future
European policies on soil protection too.
“The response from partners across Europe
and the Commission has been really positive.”
Nick Lewis
21
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W | D I R E C T O R ’ S N O T E
W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
22
Culture & Heritage
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
CCRI’s work on culture and heritage doesn’t just provide
a foundation for sound policy decisions, it’s pushing
research boundaries.
Capturing social and cultural data related to changing
rural and agricultural contexts is challenging. In 2018,
CCRI built on its wealth of experience in this area to
develop and apply a range of innovative approaches to
cultural and heritage data. These include frameworks
that allow policy makers to consider broader social value
that is generally missed when employing traditional
economic frameworks.
Social valuePaul Courtney has continued to cement CCRI’s
reputation as a centre of excellence in social value.
Many definitions of ‘social value’ don’t conceptualise
it properly. “That’s one task I’ve been working on,”
Courtney says. “I conceptualised social value for the
3rd sectors; taking the idea of a research framework for
psycho-social changes and making it more meaningful
by looking at the different paradigms it draws on.” These
paradigms include, among others, social innovation,
a participatory deliberative democracy and localism.
To capture the psycho-social changes that happens to
people’s lives Courtney has been using a methodology
called ‘Social Return on Investment’ (see below).
That work included an evaluation of the ‘Going the Extra
Mile’ programme – an employment programme designed
to bring socially disadvantaged, isolated or hard to reach
groups closer to employment training or education. The
programme, which is funded by the National Lottery and
the EU, involves 70 organisations known collectively as
the Gloucestershire Gateway Trust.
In collaboration with fellow University of Gloucestershire
colleague Colin Baker, the CCRI produced an interim
evaluation report. The report includes measurement
of distance travelled in these psycho-social changes.
The work helped the Gloucestershire Gateway Trust
to win another £2.7 million to extend the programme
for another two years (until the end of 2021). The work
is important for the county and, in turn, CCRI’s role
monitoring and evaluating the project from start to finish
has been important for the University.
CCRI also evaluated the Bristol City Council’s physical
health programme using this suite of social value tools,
including SROI. “We’re capturing the physical health
benefits but also the psycho-social benefits alongside
from participating in the programme,” Courtney notes.
The Council understood the wider value created by the
programmes. They’re aware of the indirect benefits – for
example, participants can meet like-minded people,
they’re less isolated, they join in with community more
and so on. “We’ve provided a framework for measuring
those benefits,” Courtney says.
CCRI provides each project with a bespoke social value
framework, but the basic underlying framework is
“Our work helped the Gloucestershire Gateway Trust
to win another £2.7 million”Paul Courtney
23W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
S E C T I O N 2 | S U S T A I N A B L E A G R I C U L T U R E , F O O D A N D F I S H P O L I C Y
transferable between projects and even sectors: that’s
vital. The team published a paper on the methodology in
a journal called Research for all, an up and coming open
access journal.
The team is also working with Natural England to develop
indicators for environmental stewardship schemes. We
work with farm level indicators but we’re also developing
a robust, validated set of indicators for individual farmers.
Organisations like Defra and Natural England can then
use these indicators in conjunction with environmental
and economic indicators.
This comes back to the fact that social indicators are
difficult to capture, measure and value. Policy decisions
are made on the basis of environmental and economic
considerations, while important social factors are left
out. Much of our current efforts focus on bringing social
considerations further into the mainstream. The broader
goal is to support more informed policy decision making.
Social Return on InvestmentSocial Return on Investment (SROI) allows you to capture,
measure and financially value social change. CCRI has
developed an accessible toolkit, so third sector organisations
can capture and measure their own social value.
“SROI was initially developed so small organisations like
NGOs could better measure the impact of their work,” says
John Powell. “We’ve taken that model and developed it in
several significant ways.”
Historic England funded 10 projects on methodologies for
valuing cultural heritage. CCRI won three: one on dry-
stone wall in the peak district; another investigating linear
features in the Seven Vales; and a third on built structures.
Our team used an SROI model to place values on these
features. For dry-stone walls, for example, we looked at
the cost of maintenance, provision, restoration, etc., over a
50-year time period. We also consider the benefits from an
ecosystem services perspective, i.e., what are the benefits
of dry-stone walls? What are the benefits of sheltered
habitat? Considering these questions purely from a
cultural heritage perspective is very progressive.
“In one sense it’s not new: this idea of using proxies to
measure values and non-market goods has been around
for a while,” Powell notes. “But, the actual model for
doing it is new.”
24
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
In Europe, interest is growing in using social value and
SROI to capture psycho-social outcomes alongside
economic or medical outcomes has big international
potential. There’s growing appetite for social indicators
and more meaningful ways to capture social value.
CCRI is in a really strong position thanks to a long track
record in this area. “The next stage is for us to develop the
indicators and test them through a pilot survey and then
get enough cases in the sample,” says Courtney. “If we can
get 400 cases, we can validate the indicators, which would
put us in a really strong position.”
Generational renewal2018 saw the arrival of a major framework contract from
the European Commission. The goal is to evaluate the
impact of the European agri-policy on ‘balanced territorial
development’ – one of the three strategic objectives of the
current CAP. We’re conducting evaluations over six years
in partnership with two other consultancies; one based in
Belgium, one in Austria.
The first project started in June 2018 and ended in July
2019. “That project is evaluating the impact of the CAP on
generational renewal, focused mostly on farming but also
looking beyond farming to rural areas more generally,” says
Janet Dwyer, CCRI Director. “So, how do you encourage
young people to stay in rural areas? How do you create the
conditions that they can live and work by?”
These projects are an interesting prospect for CCRI. “We have
to deliver a service contract where we’re working very closely
with the policy makers,” Dwyer explains. “So, any criticisms of
policy decisions must be based on robust evidence.”
Social indicators for environment schemesWe worked on a UK-based project for Defra and Natural
England which started in October to develop social
indicators for agri-environment schemes. The indicators
are designed to help monitor and evaluate the schemes.
Normally, Natural England focus on monitoring
the environmental impacts of a scheme. They now
recognise that some environmental impacts may take a
long time to reveal themselves and that farmers’ level of
engagement with a scheme can be a good indicator of
environmental outcomes.
Building on CCRI research undertaken over the last
decade, we are developing a set of indicators that can
be used to identify the quality of engagement a farmer
has with their agreement and also the social outcomes
that result from the agreement. Social outcomes
could include, for example, increased social networks,
increased confidence as a result of gaining new skills and
knowledge, or increased stress due to demands on time.
All these factors could have an influence on how farmers’
engage with any future agri-environmental work.
The work of a joint Natural England/CCRI PhD
studentship undertaken by George Cusworth ‘Exploring
the long-term social and land management impacts on
participants of the Entry Level Stewardship Scheme’ has
helped to inform this project.
25
S E C T I O N 2 | S U S T A I N A B L E A G R I C U L T U R E , F O O D A N D F I S H P O L I C Y
W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
Place and cultureCCRI continues to develop its cultural research of local
distinctiveness with external partners. Building on
work reported on in previous reviews, our collaboration
with Otto-Friedrich University in Germany in the
two UNESCO World Heritage Cities of Bath (UK) and
Bamberg (Germany) has critically examined eco-
technical potentials of urban horticulture. These include
green space protection, water resource management
or the potential of urban food production to improve
household nutrition.
Such perspectives, often linked to the rapid
urbanisation experienced in global cities, are driven by
the need to make city food systems more sustainable
in the light of climate and economic challenges ahead.
But they can also overlook distinctive social details and
long-established cultural traditions and knowledge
about food in smaller cities, where the rural-urban
divide is often blurred.
A better understanding of crucial social-cultural contexts
may help avoid standardised approaches to urban
sustainability and play a key role in multi-stakeholder
decision-making concerning future land use planning.
Working with the School of Fine Art at the University of
the West of England (UWE), we have analysed a mixture
of lived and archival impressions of the severe floods
in the Somerset Levels and Moors in the consecutive
winters of 2012 and 2013/14.
Contrasting the responses to the flood emergency
and the unwelcome consequences of the water, with
small details of living through and with the flood water,
revealed unexpected subjective feelings and experiences
that have had little attention in climatological or
policy-facing literature or news reporting from the area
since that time. Again, we discern an eco-technical
dominance, driven, of course, by the desire to avoid
future inundation, but over-shadowing the multitude of
different perspectives about what should happen in the
area in the future.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) hold immense
potential for gathering, managing, and analysing
geospatial data in rural contexts.
Led by Dr Rob Berry, CCRI’s research activities are at the
forefront of applied, open-source GIS for rural research. GIS
techniques can be used to map processes and networks
across rural areas. Through these maps, researchers
can construct narratives that integrate qualitative and
quantitative data, text, maps and multimedia to tell
‘stories’ of particular aspects of rural regions.
Technology
Assessing the heritage value of linear landscape with GISThis project is aimed at developing a GIS-based
methodology for identifying and calculating the public and
environmental benefits (goods and services) arising from
the historic environment, and specifically flowing from linear
features in the Lower Severn Vale area of Gloucestershire.
The methodology builds on existing techniques for valuing
the benefits of market and non-market goods and services
and a recently completed CCRI project on dry stone walls
in the Peak District National Park. The method essentially
brings together valuation approaches with ecosystem
services and GIS analysis. The outputs are monetary values
for ‘benefit streams’ generated over time by the ‘capital
stock’ made up of the existing systems of boundaries and
linear features in the Lower Severn Vale.
Natural Flood Management with GISHere, we developed and evaluated a Google Earth
virtual globe tour for communicating spatial data and
engaging stakeholders in the early stages of a Natural
Flood Management (NFM) planning scenario. The project
centred on a rural UK river catchment that suffered
significant flooding in 2007.
With a range of diverse stakeholder interests to consider,
early engagement and the development of trust before
decision-making is essential for the long-term success of
such catchment-wide projects. A local catchment group
was consulted to identify key information requirements,
and from this a virtual globe tour was created.
The process involved specialist skills and expert leadership,
but the end result was accessible to a range of audiences.
User evaluation indicated that the virtual globe tour was
easy to navigate, and can be used to stimulate interest and
engage stakeholders. The Google Earth tour was developed
by CCRI MRES student Kate Smith, under the supervision of
Robert Berry (CCRI) and Lucy Clarke (Geography).
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
26
27W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
S E C T I O N 2 | S U S T A I N A B L E A G R I C U L T U R E , F O O D A N D F I S H P O L I C Y
Education & Communication
CCRI fosters a vibrant research culture that includes a
range of training and intellectual exchange
In 2018, we broadened the Institute’s capacity as an
EU-level dissemination partner and developed a range
of higher education courses and modules. On the
dissemination side, we’ve repeatedly demonstrated our
ability to develop Dissemination and Communication plans
for EU Horizon 2020 Framework projects, which ensure that
the outputs of projects have a significant impact both on
the ground and at policy level. Our course development
work includes Rob Berry’s efforts to meet demand for GIS
modules and courses, and a cutting-edge collaboration
with the Royal Agriculture University in Cirencester.
Soil science communicationCCRI completed work on the RECARE soil protection
and remediation project in 2018. The success of this
and previous dissemination activities means we’re
establishing a strong reputation in the field for facilitating
knowledge exchange and managing dissemination
packages. We developed an effective communications
strategy for the project, including a website and social
media presence. This work involves translating the
science emerging from the project into a language that
it understood by the end users, such as the farmers and
policy makers. Beyond those established competencies,
we took on responsibility for organising and presenting
the final conference in Brussels.
Led by Jane Mills, CCRI is now managing dissemination
activities for another EU Horizon 2020 project called
SoilCare. “We recently published a paper on the use of
Twitter for science communication,” Mills says. “Our
research is interested in the various approaches to
dissemination people take and how it really impacts
audiences.” Analysis of the SoilCare project Twitter
account identified UK farmers’ increasing use of Twitter
and how active they are in using this medium to share
knowledge and information between themselves.
Postgraduate GIS moduleGIS is a framework for gathering, managing, and analysing
data. For years, archaeology students have been requesting
more GIS. At Masters level we now offer a postgraduate
Geographic Information System (GIS) module. Students
from applied Archaeology and Landscape Architecture have
taken that module. We’ve now developed another four
modules, creating a new course: ‘Conservation GIS’.
The Conservation GIS course gives students a
Postgraduate Certificate qualification, opening the
opportunity to progress on to study for a Postgraduate
Diploma or a full Masters. Archaeologists and people
researching wildlife conservation can be the first in
the world to take a course completely focused on
conservation GIS. “It’s all Open Source and won’t involve
any proprietary software,” notes Berry.
28
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
Mixed Methods GISCCRI has taken on a PhD student specialising in Mixed
Methods GIS. “That’s qualitative GIS,” explains Berry,
“so we combine qualitative data in a GIS framework
to help better represent people’s knowledge of their
surroundings. So, how do you take an interview transcript
or audio-visuals into GIS? And how do you map that to
show people’s emotional experiences of the landscape:
it’s quite cutting edge.”
Royal Agriculture University curriculum developmentA number of staff at the CCRI are collaborating with
the Royal Agriculture University in Cirencester to
launch a new suite of postgraduate and undergraduate
courses in sustainable, Brexit-proof agri-food futures in
September 2019.
These aim to develop people with appropriate leadership
skills to be creative and transform all areas of agricultural
practice: rural leadership, entrepreneurship and
sustainable land management.
The course will use blended learning, with a suite of
novel online resources and teaching approaches. The
first courses were launched at Masters level, and are
recruiting well. The undergraduate ones will follow later,
but we’ve been involved in development and thinking
about new ways of doing things.
Undergraduate programmes include one in food,
environment and society, the other in business
management. Our contribution is to help develop new
teaching tools and modules which draw on our research
skills and knowledge.
29W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
About CCRI
The CCRI is one of the largest social science centres in the UK, working at the interface of agriculture, society and the environment on issues relevant to rural and urban development, in the UK, Europe and further afield.
Working with colleagues and partners in the natural
as well as social sciences the CCRI has placed itself at
the centre of a nexus of knowledge and innovation
embracing soil science, sustainable agriculture, through
to the culture of food, and the limits of the food system,
community capacity and culture.
Our principal research interests are manifested in a
rigorous, dynamic and inclusive approach to deepening
our shared understanding of rural life. As we prepare for
the technological and environmental challenges before
us, we look to work with those engaged in policy, in
agriculture, in food and environmental management as
well as rural communities.
In addition to extensive research in the rural arena, our
recent research has also considered the role of cities
in the future of agricultural food production and has
highlighted changes in the conceptualisation of the rural-
urban continuum.
Emerging technologies such as renewable energies and
universal broadband access are reshaping rural areas;
our research is at the forefront of these topics. We have
woven novel approaches to management, notably through
common and participatory approaches, into our on-going
commitment to investigating our shared resources.
The CCRI has benefited from considerable research
investments from the EU through the Horizon 2020
programme, UK national agencies and departments,
as well as third sector bodies and other change agents.
Through our dedicated team of researchers and
professionals, we are always looking to further our insights
into rural challenges and changes which affect us all.
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W | A B O U T C C R I
30
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W
Staff
Dr Robert BerryResearch Fellow
Dr Jasmine BlackResearch Assistant
Dr Dilshaad BundhooResearch Assistant
Dr Hannah ChiswellResearch Fellow
Paul CourtneyProfessor of Social Economy
Janet DwyerProfessor of Rural Policy and Director of the CCRI
Dr Peter GaskellSenior Research Fellow
Dr Julie IngramReader in Agri-environmental Systems
Dr Dan KeechSenior Research Fellow
Nick LewisResearcher
Damian MayeProfessor of Agri-Food Studies
Dr Nenia MichaSenior Research Fellow
Jane MillsReader in Agri-environmental Behaviours
Dr John PowellSenior Research Fellow
Dr Matt ReedReader in Food Citizenship
Chris ShortReader in Environmental Governance
Isabel FieldenProject Support Officer
Carol MarkeyAdministrator
Chris RayfieldBusiness Manager
Dr Julie UrquhartSenior Research Fellow
Dr Mauro ViganiSenior Research Fellow
Amr KhafagyResearch Assistant
Katarina KubinakovaResearcher
31
C C R I 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 A Y E A R I N R E V I E W | D I R E C T O R ’ S N O T E
W W W . C C R I . A C . U K
Countryside and Community Research Institute
University of Gloucestershire
Francis Close Hall campus
Swindon Road, Cheltenham
Gloucestershire
GL50 4AZ, UK
Telephone: +44 (0) 1242 714122
E-mail: [email protected]