· 2019-12-11 · acknowledgments the staff from the host mills were instrumental in assisting...

N A T I O N A L C O U N C I L F O R A I R A N D S T R E A M I M P R O V E M E N T

LONG-TERM RECEIVING WATER STUDYDATA COMPENDIUM:

SEPTEMBER 2000 TO AUGUST 2001

TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 868

SEPTEMBER 2003

byRenee Ragsdale

Jill ThomasNCASI Northwest Aquatic Biology Facility

Anacortes, Washington

Acknowledgments

The staff from the host mills were instrumental in assisting with logistics and, at some sites, sample collection:Doug Brodhecker, Terry Becker, Jeff Hammond and Skip Missimer of P. H. Glatfelter, Spring Grove,Pennsylvania; Melody Sydow of Weyerhaeuser, Springfield, Oregon; Steve Moon and Barry Firth ofWeyerhaeuser, Federal Way, Washington; Toby Pierce-Smith, Joni Hegney and Bill Dameworth of Pope andTalbot, Halsey, Oregon; Brent Walley and Acker Smith of Georgia-Pacific, New Augusta, Mississippi. The fishsampling plan for Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, and Willamette River was designed and carried out byWestern Washington University (WWU), Bellingham, Washington, as part of a three-year research agreement.We would like to thank Dr. Leo Bodensteiner, Todd Dielman, and Jill Thomas of WWU. In particular, fishsampling on the Leaf River was done with the assistance of Dr. Fred Howell of the University of SouthernMississippi (USM); Walter (Bubba) Hubbard, David Robinson, Barry Pessoney, and Stan Crider from theMississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks; and Dr. Todd Slack with the Mississippi Museum ofNatural Science. Monthly water quality samples on the Leaf River were collected by Dr. Fred Howell of USM.Assistance from Corvallis High School students was coordinated and supervised by Betsy Berg. The boat usedfor periphyton and invertebrate sampling in Oregon was driven by Cecil Saxon. Joan Ikoma, Bill Arthurs, DanMcGarvey, and Rick Haley of the NCASI staff in Anacortes carried out all other field activities and the analysisof samples in the Northwest Aquatic Biology Facility (NABF) laboratory. Nikki Frum, Tim Peterson, andDiana Cook from the NCASI West Coast Regional Center in Corvallis, Oregon, assisted with field andanalytical activities at the WCRC. Bill Streblow and Ray Philbeck of NCASI Southern Aquatic Biology Facilityin New Bern, North Carolina, performed the effluent bioassays. We would like to thank the Scientific AdvisoryPanel for their oversight of the LTRWS: Dr. Thomas Deardorff, International Paper; Mr. Barry Firth,Weyerhaeuser Company; Dr. Wayne Landis, WWU; Dr. Wayne Minshall, Idaho State University; Mr. TiborKovacs, Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada; and Dr. John Rodgers of Clemson University. This reportwas prepared and written by Renee Ragsdale, with the assistance of Jill Thomas, both of NCASI NABF. CindyAyers assisted with document formatting and editing. Project oversight was provided by Judy Dudley, formerNCASI Senior Research Biologist, and Tim Hall, Aquatic Biology Program Manager at the NCASI NABF.

For more information about this research, contact:

Timothy J. HallAquatic Biology Program ManagerNCASIP.O. Box 1259Anacortes, WA 98221(360) [email protected]

Robert P. Fisher, Ph.D.Vice President, Biological and Chemical AssessmentNCASIP.O. Box 13318Research Triangle Park, NC 27709(919) [email protected]

For information about NCASI publications, contact:

Publications CoordinatorNCASIP.O. Box 13318Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3318(919) [email protected]

National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI). 2003. Long-term Receiving Water Study datacompendium: September 2000 to August 2001. Technical Bulletin 868. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: NationalCouncil for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.

© 2003 by the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.

National Council for Air and Stream Improvement

s e r v i n g t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l r e s e a r c h n e e d s o f t h e f o r e s t p r o d u c t s i n d u s t r y s i n c e 1 9 4 3

PRESIDENT’S NOTE

In 1998, NCASI implemented a full range of sampling and data collection as part of the Long-TermReceiving Water Studies (LTRWS) at three different receiving waters: Codorus Creek in southcentral Pennsylvania, and the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers in western Oregon. In 1999, afourth river was added, the Leaf River in south central Mississippi. The objectives of this on-going10- to 20-year study are a) to provide to the industry short-term and long-term information as towhether there are differences in aquatic communities upstream/downstream from representative pointsource effluent discharges from pulp and paper mills; and b) to determine the significance of anydifferences. The practical applications within this broad objective include creating a data base thatdemonstrates the natural temporal and spatial variability of abiotic and biotic properties of the studystreams; studying the margin of safety for effluent addition to the stream; identifying changingreceiving water conditions that might arise following possible future changes in mill processes oreffluent treatment; and providing an early indication of possible subtle effluent effects that mightnot otherwise be known. To accomplish these goals, the LTRWS created an experimental designthat included a flexible monitoring and data collection program. Because it characterizes theaquatic communities and the river waters at multiple sites along an upstream/downstream stretchof each river, as well as the mill effluent, the experimental design provides for a comprehensiverepresentation of the receiving waters.

This report is the third annual summary of the monitoring parameters for the four LTRWS rivers,covering the study year from September 2000 to August 2001. Note that in most cases thesesummaries are not the detailed data sets, but rather graphs and tables that present an overviewof the third study year data. Also included are maps, photographs, and descriptions of eachmonitoring location to illustrate the sampling plan. As demonstrated in the following pages,these summaries present a systematic picture of the extent and coverage of the data collection.

Additional reports will be issued over the course of the study. These will include the series ofannual data summaries for each water year in the study, as well as reports specifically directedat the analysis and interpretation of the LTRWS database to address effluent effects questionsidentified in the goals of the study.

Ronald A. Yeske

September 2003


a u s e r v i c e d e l a r e c h e r c h e e n v i r o n n e m e n t a l e p o u r l ’ i n d u s t r i e f o r e s t i è r e d e p u i s 1 9 4 3

MOT DU PRÉSIDENT

En 1998, NCASI a réalisé un large éventail d’échantillonnage et de collecte de données dans lecadre des études à long terme des cours d’eau récepteurs (Long-Term Receiving Water Studies,LTRWS) et ce, pour trois cours d’eau récepteurs différents: Codorus Creek dans le centre Sud de laPennsylvanie de même que les rivières McKenzie et Willamette dans l’Ouest de l’Oregon. Unequatrième rivière a été ajoutée en 1999, la rivière Leaf dans le centre Sud du Mississippi. Lesobjectifs de cette étude qui se déroule en continu sur une période de 10 à 20 ans sont 1) fournir àl’industrie des informations à court terme et à long terme sur toute différence dans les milieuxaquatiques entre l’amont et l’aval d’émissaires représentatifs de fabriques de pâtes et papiers et2) s’il y a des différences, déterminer si elles sont significatives. De ces larges objectifs découlentcertaines applications pratiques dont la création d’une base de données qui permet de démontrerla variabilité temporelle et spatiale des propriétés abiotiques et biotiques des cours d’eau à l’étude;l’étude des marges de sécurité relatives à l’ajout d’un effluent dans un cours d’eau ; l’identificationde changements des conditions des eaux réceptrices qui peuvent survenir suite à des modificationséventuelles des procédés ou du traitement des effluents des fabriques et la possibilité de fournir unepremière indication quant aux impacts subtils des effluents sur le cours d’eau, impacts qui autrementpasseraient inaperçus. Afin d’atteindre ces objectifs la LTRWS a créé un design expérimental danslequel on retrouve un programme flexible de surveillance et de collecte de données. En effectuantla caractérisation des milieux aquatiques et des rivières en différents endroits selon des tronçonsamont/aval pour chaque rivière de même que la caractérisation des effluents des fabriques, le designexpérimental procure une représentation complète des eaux réceptrices.

Ce rapport est le troisième d’une série de synthèses annuelles de surveillance des paramètres desquatre rivières à l’étude par LTRWS et couvre la période allant de septembre 2000 à août 2001.Mentionnons que dans la plupart des cas, les données détaillées ne sont pas présentées mais onmontre plutôt les graphiques et tableaux qui illustrent les résultats de la troisième année de collectede données. Les cartes, photos et descriptions de chaque site de surveillance sont également inclusesafin d’illustrer le programme d’échantillonnage. Dans les pages suivantes, le lecteur trouvera lesdonnées synthèses qui lui procureront une représentation systématique de l’étendue et du champcouvert par la collecte de données.

Des rapports additionnels seront publiés tout au long de l’étude. Ces rapports incluront des séries desynthèses annuelles pour chaque année de l’étude, de même que des analyses et des interprétations dela base de données de la LTRWS afin de répondre aux questions soulevées dans les objectifs de cetteétude quant aux impacts des effluents.

Ronald A. Yeske

Septembre 2003

LONG-TERM RECEIVING WATER STUDY DATA COMPENDIUM: SEPTEMBER 2000 TO AUGUST 2001

TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 868 SEPTEMBER 2003

ABSTRACT

The NCASI Long-Term Receiving Water Study (LTRWS), begun in 1998, is a 10- to 20-year project involving four different U.S. receiving waters: Codorus Creek in Pennsylvania; the Leaf River in Mississippi; the McKenzie River in Oregon; and the Willamette River in Oregon. The LTRWS objectives are to evaluate possible differences in the aquatic community upstream/downstream of representative point source effluent discharges from pulp and paper mills. The experimental design includes multiple sampling sites and variables for each of the receiving waters in the study. The measured components include water and effluent chemistry, characterization of the effluents with chronic bioassays, river temperature and flow, solar radiation, and detailed measurements of the periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish communities. This report is the third annual overview of the monitoring study, covering the period from September 2000 to August 2001. The monitoring at Codorus Creek during this period included four sampling dates at eight sampling sites for biotic community data, 11 sampling dates at six sites for water quality data, and two sampling dates for mill effluent. Among the aquatic community findings for Codorus Creek were four divisions of periphyton, 210 macroinvertebrate taxa (an increase of 11% over the previous year), and 41 fish taxa (a 14% increase over the previous year). This was the first full year of monitoring for the Leaf River, with two sampling dates at six sampling sites for biotic community data, 11 sampling dates along six sites for water quality data, and nine sampling dates for mill effluent. Among the aquatic community findings for the Leaf were three to four divisions of periphyton on artificial and natural substrate, 76 macroinvertebrate taxa (a 9% increase over the previous year), 29 fish taxa using boat electrofishing gear (a decrease of 6% from the second study year) and 14 fish taxa using backpack electrofishing gear. The McKenzie River data included four sampling dates at six sampling sites for biotic community data, 11 sampling dates along five sites for water quality data, and four sampling dates for mill effluent. Among the McKenzie aquatic community findings were four divisions of periphyton, 244 macroinvertebrate taxa (a 14% increase from the previous study year), eight fish taxa using boat electrofishing gear (a decrease of 50% from the previous year) and 13 fish taxa using backpack electrofishing gear. The Willamette River included four sampling dates at six sampling sites for biotic community data, 11 sampling dates along five sites for water quality data, and three sampling dates for mill effluent. Among the findings for the Willamette aquatic communities were three divisions of periphyton, 261 macroinvertebrate taxa (a 45% increase over the previous study year), 14 fish taxa using boat electrofishing gear (a 26% decrease from the second study year) and 20 fish taxa using backpack electrofishing gear. Additional reports directed at the interpretation of the data with respect to addressing effluent effects questions identified in the study objectives, will be issued over the course of the study.

KEYWORDS

data summary, long-term receiving water study


RELATED NCASI PUBLICATIONS

Technical Bulletin No. 867 (August 2003). Integration of a relative risk multi-stressor risk assessment with the NCASI long-term receiving water studies to assess effluent effects at the watershed level, Leaf River, Mississippi.

Technical Bulletin No. 856 (January 2003). Long-term receiving water study data compendium: September 1999 to August 2000.

Technical Bulletin No. 846 (May 2002). Turbidity: A literature review on the biological effects of turbidity on aquatic organisms and an assessment of turbidity in two long-term receiving water study rivers in Oregon.

Technical Bulletin No. 843 (May 2002). Long-term receiving water study data compendium: August 1998 to September 1999.

Technical Bulletin No. 842 (February 2002). Integrated long-term receiving water studies: site selection process and a description of the selected study sites.

Technical Bulletin No. 841 (February 2002). A compendium of field methods used in NCASI long-term receiving water studies.

Technical Bulletin No. 833 (September 2001). Evaluation of nutrient criteria and response variables based upon the NCASI long-term receiving water study experience.

Technical Bulletin No. 829 (July 2001). The effects of a bleached kraft mill effluent on periphyton and macroinvertebrates in streamside mesocosm studies.

Technical Bulletin No. 828 (July 2001). The effects of an unbleached kraft mill effluent on periphyton and macroinvertebrates in streamside mesocosm studies.



COMPENDIUM DES DONNEES - ETUDES A LONG TERME DES COURS D’EAURECEPTEURS : SEPTEMBRE 2000 A AOUT 2001

BULLETIN TECHNIQUE NO. 868SEPTEMBRE 2003

RESUME

L’étude à long terme des cours d’eau récepteurs (LTRWS) de NCASI est un projet qui a démarréen 1998. Cette étude s’échelonne sur une période de 10 à 20 ans et implique quatre cours d’eaurécepteurs des États-Unis: Codorus Creek, Pennsylvanie; la rivière Leaf, Mississippi; la rivièreMcKenzie, Oregon et la rivière Willamette, Oregon. Les objectifs de la LTRWS sont d’évaluer lesdifférences possibles dans le milieu aquatique entre l’amont et l’aval d’émissaires représentatifs defabriques de pâtes et papiers. Le design expérimental comprend de nombreux sites d’échantillonnageet de nombreuses variables pour chaque cours d’eau récepteur à l’étude. Parmi les composantesmesurées mentionnons la chimie de l’eau et des effluents, la caractérisation des effluents à l’aidede bioessais de toxicité chronique, la température et le débit de la rivière, la radiation solaire et desmesures détaillées du périphyton, des macroinvertébrés benthiques et des communautés de poissons.Ce rapport présente la troisième revue annuelle de l’étude de surveillance, couvrant la période deseptembre 2000 à août 2001. La surveillance réalisée à Codorus Creek pendant cette périodecomprenait quatre dates d’échantillonnage pour huit sites d’échantillonnage de la communautébiotique, 11 dates d’échantillonnage pour six sites d’échantillonnage de la qualité de l’eau et deuxdates d’échantillonnage des effluents des fabriques. Parmi les résultats obtenus à Codorus Creek,mentionnons quatre divisions de périphyton, 210 taxons de macroinvertébrés (une augmentation de11% depuis l’année précédente) et 41 taxons de poissons (une augmentation de 14% depuis l’annéeprécédente). Il s’agissait de la première année complète de surveillance pour la rivière Leaf. L’étudecomprenait deux dates d’échantillonnage pour les six sites d’échantillonnage de la communautébiotique, 11 dates d’échantillonnage pour les six sites d’échantillonnage de la qualité de l’eau etneuf dates d’échantillonnage des effluents des fabriques. Parmi les résultats obtenus à la rivièreLeaf, mentionnons trois à quatre divisions de périphyton sur un substrat artificiel et naturel, 76taxons de macroinvertébrés (une augmentation de 9% depuis l’année précédente), 29 taxons depoissons en utilisant un dispositif de pêche électrique installé sur un bateau (une diminution de6% par rapport à la seconde année de l’étude) et 14 taxons de poissons en utilisant un dispositif depêche électrique portatif. En ce qui concerne la rivière McKenzie, la surveillance a été réaliséeselon quatre dates d’échantillonnage pour six sites d’échantillonnage de la communauté biotique,11 dates d’échantillonnage pour cinq sites d’échantillonnage de la qualité de l’eau et quatre datesd’échantillonnage pour les effluents de fabriques. Parmi les résultats obtenus à la rivière McKenziementionnons quatre divisions de périphyton, 244 taxons de macroinvertébrés (une augmentation de14% depuis l’année précédente), huit taxons de poissons en utilisant un dispositif de pêche électriqueinstallé sur un bateau (une diminution de 50% depuis l’année précédente) et 13 taxons de poissonsen utilisant un dispositif de pêche électrique portatif. Pour ce qui est de la rivière Willamette, lasurveillance consistait en quatre dates d’échantillonnage pour six sites d’échantillonnage de lacommunauté biotique, 11 dates d’échantillonnage pour cinq sites d’échantillonnage de la qualitéde l’eau et trois dates d’échantillonnage des effluents de fabriques. Parmi les résultats obtenus à larivière Willamette mentionnons trois divisions de périphyton, 261 taxons de macroinvertébrés (uneaugmentation de 45% depuis l’année précédente), 14 taxons de poissons en utilisant un dispositifde pêche électrique installé sur un bateau (une diminution de 26% par rapport à la seconde année del’étude) et 20 taxons de poissons en utilisant un dispositif de pêche électrique portatif. Des rapports


additionnels seront publiés tout au long de cette étude afin d’interpréter ces données en regarddes questions reliées aux impacts des effluents qui se trouvent dans les objectifs de l’étude.

MOTS CLES

étude à long terme des cours d’eau récepteurs, sommaire des données

AUTRES PUBLICATIONS DE NCASI DANS CE DOMAINE

Bulletin technique no. 867 (août 2003). Integration of a relative risk multi-stressor risk assessmentwith the NCASI long-term receiving water studies to assess effluent effects at the watershed level,Leaf River, Mississippi.

Bulletin technique no. 856 (janvier 2003). Long-term receiving water study data compendium:September 1999 to August 2000.

Bulletin technique no. 846 (mai 2002). Turbidity: A literature review on the biological effects ofturbidity on aquatic organisms and an assessment of turbidity in two long-term receiving water studyrivers in Oregon.

Bulletin technique no. 843 (mai 2002). Long-term receiving water study data compendium: August1998 to September 1999.

Bulletin technique no. 842 (février 2002). Integrated long-term receiving water studies: siteselection process and a description of the selected study sites.

Bulletin technique no. 841 (février 2002). A compendium of field methods used in NCASI long-termreceiving water studies.

Bulletin technique no. 833 (septembre 2001). Evaluation of nutrient criteria and response variablesbased upon the NCASI long-term receiving water study experience.

Bulletin technique no. 829 (juillet 2001). The effects of a bleached kraft mill effluent on periphytonand macroinvertebrates in streamside mesocosm studies.

Bulletin technique no. 828 (juillet 2001). The effects of an unbleached kraft mill effluent onperiphyton and macroinvertebrates in streamside mesocosm studies.

CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1

2.0 APPROACH .................................................................................................................................2

2.1 Experimental Design ...........................................................................................................2

2.2 Sampling Schedule ..............................................................................................................3

2.3 Codorus Creek Sampling Area............................................................................................4

2.4 Leaf River Sampling Area.................................................................................................13

2.5 McKenzie River Sampling Area .......................................................................................21

2.6 Willamette River Sampling Area ......................................................................................28

3.0 METHODS AND RESULTS .....................................................................................................37

3.1 Water Temperature............................................................................................................37

3.2 Solar Radiation ..................................................................................................................38

3.3 Water Flow........................................................................................................................40

3.4 Water Chemistry................................................................................................................45

3.5 Effluent Chemistry ............................................................................................................66

3.6 Effluent Bioassays.............................................................................................................72

3.7 Periphyton .........................................................................................................................74

3.8 Benthic Macroinvertebrates...............................................................................................85

3.9 Fish ..................................................................................................................................118

4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................163

REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................163


TABLES

Table 2.1 Changes to the LTRWS Sampling, Analysis, or Data Handling for the Study Year 2000 to 2001......................................................................................2

Table 2.2 Water Quality Sampling Schedule, Study Year 2000 to 2001.........................................3

Table 2.3 Biological Sampling Schedule, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ...............................................3

Table 2.4 Sampling Site Descriptions for Codorus Creek, Pennsylvania ........................................5

Table 2.5 Sampling Site Descriptions for the Leaf River ..............................................................14

Table 2.6 Sampling Site Descriptions for the McKenzie River, Oregon .......................................22

Table 2.7 Sampling Site Descriptions for the Willamette River, Oregon ......................................29

Table 3.1 Codorus Creek Water Chemistry ...................................................................................46

Table 3.2 Leaf River Water Chemistry ..........................................................................................51

Table 3.3 McKenzie River Water Chemistry .................................................................................56

Table 3.4 Willamette River Water Chemistry................................................................................61

Table 3.5 Mill Effluent Analysis for the Codorus Creek Facility Located in Spring Grove, Pennsylvania.........................................................................67

Table 3.6 Mill Effluent Analysis for the Leaf River Facility Located in New Augusta, Mississippi............................................................................67

Table 3.7 Mill Effluent Analysis for the McKenzie River Facility Located in Springfield, Oregon......................................................................................68

Table 3.8 Mill Effluent Analysis for the Willamette River Facility, Located near Halsey, Oregon.........................................................................................68

Table 3.9 Effluent IC25 (% v/v) for the LTRWS Mills .................................................................72

Table 3.10 Codorus Creek Periphyton Summary, August 2000 ......................................................74

Table 3.11 Codorus Creek Periphyton Summary, June 2001 ..........................................................76

Table 3.12 Leaf River Periphyton Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001 .........................................77

Table 3.13 McKenzie River Periphyton Summary, September 2000 ..............................................80

Table 3.14 McKenzie River Periphyton Summary, July 2001........................................................81

Table 3.15 Willamette River Periphyton Summary, September 2000 .............................................82

Table 3.16 Willamette River Periphyton Summary, July 2001 .......................................................83

Table 3.17 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ...............................................................................................86

Table 3.18 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ...............................................................................................90

Table 3.19 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biomass, Study Year 2000 to 2001...........91


Table 3.20 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2001.................................................. 94

Table 3.21 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site Using Natural Woody Substrate, Study Year 2000 to 2001.......................................... 96

Table 3.22 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2001.................................................. 97

Table 3.23 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary Using Natural Woody Substrate, Study Year 2000 to 2001.......................................... 97

Table 3.24 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biomass Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................... 98

Table 3.25 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 101

Table 3.26 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 105

Table 3.27 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biomass, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ...... 106

Table 3.28 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 109

Table 3.29 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 114

Table 3.30 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biomass, Study Year 2000 to 2001..... 115

Table 3.31 Codorus Creek: East Branch Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 119

Table 3.32 Codorus Creek: Menges Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 121

Table 3.33 Codorus Creek: USGS Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 123

Table 3.34 Codorus Creek: Martin Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 125

Table 3.35 Codorus Creek: Graybill Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 127

Table 3.36 Codorus Creek: Indian Rock Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 129

Table 3.37 Codorus Creek: Arsenal Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 131

Table 3.38 Codorus Creek: Furnace Backpack Fish Data Summary for August 2000 to June 2001 ..................................................................................... 133

Table 3.39 Leaf River Boat Electrofishing Data Summary for October 2000 .............................. 138

Table 3.40 Leaf River Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for October 2000 ...................... 141


Table 3.41 McKenzie River Boat Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 .................144

Table 3.42 McKenzie River: Hendricks RM 26.5 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001 ................................................................146

Table 3.43 McKenzie River: Bellingers RM 18.5 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001 ................................................................147

Table 3.44 McKenzie River: Harvest RM 10 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................148

Table 3.45 McKenzie River: Armitage, RM 6.0 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................149

Table 3.46 Willamette River Boat Electrofishing Data Summary for Upstream Sites (Harrisburg and Cartney), September 2000 .................................................................152

Table 3.47 Willamette River Boat Electrofishing Data Summary for Downstream Sites (Sam Daws, Peoria, and Willamette Park), September 2000 .......................................153

Table 3.48 Willamette River: Whitely RM 177 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................155

Table 3.49 Willamette River: Harrisburg RM 160 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................156

Table 3.50 Willamette River: Cartney RM 156 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................157

Table 3.51 Willamette River: Intake RM 148.5 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................158

Table 3.52 Willamette River: Peoria RM 136 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001.................................................................................159

Table 3.53 Willamette River: Fisher Lane RM 132 Backpack Electrofishing Data Summary for September 2000 to June 2001 ................................................................160

FIGURES

Figure 2.1 Codorus Creek in the Area of the LTRWS ......................................................................4

Figure 2.2 East Branch, Codorus Creek ............................................................................................6

Figure 2.3 Menges, Codorus Creek ...................................................................................................7

Figure 2.4 USGS, Codorus Creek .....................................................................................................8

Figure 2.5 Martin, Codorus Creek.....................................................................................................9

Figure 2.6 Graybill, Codorus Creek ................................................................................................10

Figure 2.7 Arsenal, Codorus Creek .................................................................................................11

Figure 2.8 Furnace, Codorus Creek.................................................................................................12


Figure 2.9 The Leaf River in the Area of the LTRWS ................................................................... 13

Figure 2.10 Tallahala, Leaf River ..................................................................................................... 15

Figure 2.11 New Augusta, Leaf River .............................................................................................. 16

Figure 2.12 Downstream, Leaf River................................................................................................ 17

Figure 2.13 Bogue, Leaf River.......................................................................................................... 18

Figure 2.14 Thompson, Leaf River ................................................................................................... 19

Figure 2.15 McLain, Leaf River ....................................................................................................... 20

Figure 2.16 McKenzie River in the Area of the LTRWS ................................................................. 21

Figure 2.17 Walterville RM 20.5, McKenzie River.......................................................................... 23

Figure 2.18 Bellingers RM 18.5 and across from Bellingers Boat Launch RM 19, McKenzie River............................................................................................................. 24

Figure 2.19 Mohawk RM 14, McKenzie River ................................................................................ 25

Figure 2.20 Harvest RM 10, McKenzie River .................................................................................. 26

Figure 2.21 Armitage RM 6, McKenzie River ................................................................................. 27

Figure 2.22 Willamette River in the Area of the LTRWS ................................................................ 28

Figure 2.23 Whitely RM 176, Willamette River............................................................................... 30

Figure 2.24 Harrisburg RM 160, Willamette River .......................................................................... 31

Figure 2.25 Cartney RM 156, Willamette River............................................................................... 32

Figure 2.26 Intake RM 148, Willamette River ................................................................................ 33

Figure 2.27 Snag Boat RM 143.5, Willamette River........................................................................ 34

Figure 2.28 Willamette Park RM 134, Willamette River ................................................................. 35

Figure 2.29 Corvallis RM 128, Willamette River............................................................................. 36

Figure 3.1 McKenzie River Water Temperature, 7d Moving Mean of the Maximum and 24h Fluctuation, from September 2000 to August 2001, Measured at Springfield, Oregon................................................................................... 37

Figure 3.2 Willamette River Water Temperature, 7d Moving Mean of the Maximum and the 24h Fluctuation, from September 2000 to August 2001, Measured at Halsey, Oregon ......................................................................................... 38

Figure 3.3 Daily Solar Radiation for the Codorus Creek LTRWS Area, Measured at Spring Grove, Pennsylvania, from September 2000 to August 2001............................ 39

Figure 3.4 Daily Solar Radiation for the Willamette River LTRWS area, Measured near Halsey, Oregon, from September 2000 to August 2001........................................ 39

Figure 3.5 Codorus Creek Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001.............................. 41


Figure 3.6 Codorus Creek Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of Total River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001.................41

Figure 3.7 Leaf River Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001 .....................................42

Figure 3.8 Leaf River Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of Total River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001.................42

Figure 3.9 McKenzie River Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001............................43

Figure 3.10 McKenzie River Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of Total River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001.................43

Figure 3.11 Willamette River Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001...........................44

Figure 3.12 Willamette River Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of Total River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001.................44

Figure 3.13 Codorus Creek pH..........................................................................................................48

Figure 3.14 Codorus Creek Temperature ..........................................................................................48

Figure 3.15 Codorus Creek Color .....................................................................................................48

Figure 3.16 Codorus Creek Conductivity..........................................................................................48

Figure 3.17 Codorus Creek Turbidity ...............................................................................................49

Figure 3.18 Codorus Creek TOC.......................................................................................................49

Figure 3.19 Codorus Creek COD ......................................................................................................49

Figure 3.20 Codorus Creek Hardness................................................................................................49

Figure 3.21 Codorus Creek Total Phosphorus...................................................................................50

Figure 3.22 Codorus Creek Total Nitrogen .......................................................................................50

Figure 3.23 Codorus Creek In Vivo Chlorophyll ..............................................................................50

Figure 3.24 Leaf River Ph .................................................................................................................53

Figure 3.25 Leaf River Temperature .................................................................................................53

Figure 3.26 Leaf River Color ............................................................................................................53

Figure 3.27 Leaf River Conductivity.................................................................................................53

Figure 3.28 Leaf River Turbidity ......................................................................................................54

Figure 3.29 Leaf River TOC..............................................................................................................54

Figure 3.30 Leaf River COD .............................................................................................................54

Figure 3.31 Leaf River Hardness.......................................................................................................54

Figure 3.32 Leaf River Total Phosphorus .........................................................................................55

Figure 3.33 Leaf River Total Nitrogen..............................................................................................55

Figure 3.34 Leaf River In Vivo Chlorophyll.....................................................................................55


Figure 3.35 McKenzie River pH....................................................................................................... 58

Figure 3.36 McKenzie River Temperature ....................................................................................... 58

Figure 3.37 McKenzie River Color................................................................................................... 58

Figure 3.38 McKenzie River Conductivity....................................................................................... 59

Figure 3.39 McKenzie River Turbidity............................................................................................. 59

Figure 3.40 McKenzie River Hardness............................................................................................. 59

Figure 3.41 McKenzie River Total Phosphorus................................................................................ 60

Figure 3.42 McKenzie River Total Nitrogen .................................................................................... 60

Figure 3.43 McKenzie River In Vivo Chlorophyll ........................................................................... 60

Figure 3.44 Willamette River pH...................................................................................................... 63

Figure 3.45 Willamette River Temperature ...................................................................................... 63

Figure 3.46 Willamette River Color ................................................................................................. 63

Figure 3.47 Willamette River Conductivity...................................................................................... 64

Figure 3.48 Willamette River Turbidity ........................................................................................... 64

Figure 3.49 Willamette River Hardness............................................................................................ 64

Figure 3.50 Willamette River Total Phosphorus............................................................................... 65

Figure 3.51 Willamette River Total Nitrogen ................................................................................... 65

Figure 3.52 Willamette River In Vivo Chlorophyll .......................................................................... 65

Figure 3.53 Mill Effluent Color ........................................................................................................ 69

Figure 3.54 Mill Effluent Tannin/Lignin .......................................................................................... 69

Figure 3.55 Mill Effluent Conductivity ............................................................................................ 69

Figure 3.56 Mill Effluent Turbidity .................................................................................................. 69

Figure 3.57 Mill Effluent TSS .......................................................................................................... 70

Figure 3.58 Mill Effluent BOD......................................................................................................... 70

Figure 3.59 Mill Effluent COD......................................................................................................... 70

Figure 3.60 Mill Effluent TOC ......................................................................................................... 70

Figure 3.61 Mill Effluent Total Phosphorus ..................................................................................... 71

Figure 3.62 Mill Effluent Phytosterols ............................................................................................. 71

Figure 3.63 Mill Effluent Resin Acids.............................................................................................. 71

Figure 3.64 Spring Grove, PA, IC25s............................................................................................... 73

Figure 3.65 New Augusta, MS, IC25s .............................................................................................. 73


Figure 3.66 Springfield, OR, IC25s...................................................................................................73

Figure 3.67 Halsey, OR, IC25s .........................................................................................................73

Figure 3.68 Codorus Creek Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), August 2000...............................................75

Figure 3.69 Codorus Creek Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), June 2001 ...................................................76

Figure 3.70 Leaf River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Using Wooden Dowels (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), October 2000 .......77

Figure 3.71 Leaf River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Using Sand Periphyton (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), May 2001.............78

Figure 3.72 Leaf River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Using Hester-Dendy Plates (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), May 2001.......79

Figure 3.73 McKenzie River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), September 2000...........................80

Figure 3.74 McKenzie River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), July 2001.....................................81

Figure 3.75 Willamette River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing <1%), September 2000............................82

Figure 3.76 Willamette River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing <1%), September 2000............................83

Figure 3.77 Mean Chlorophyll a (mg/m2) LTRWS Rivers for Study Year 2000 to 2001 ................84

Figure 3.78 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Dry Weight......................................91

Figure 3.79 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Ash-Free Dry Weight ......................91

Figure 3.80 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for Codorus Creek Sampling Sites Upstream of Mill Discharge, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ...............................................................................................92

Figure 3.81 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for Codorus Creek Sampling Sites Downstream of Mill Discharge, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ...............................................................................................93

Figure 3.82 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Dry Weight Using Hester-Dendy Plates ............................................................................................98

Figure 3.83 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Ash-Free Dry Weight Using Hester-Dendy Plates ............................................................................................98

Figure 3.84 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for the Leaf River Sampling Sites Upstream of Mill Discharge Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2001 ..................................................99

Figure 3.85 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for the Leaf River Sampling Sites Downstream of Mill Discharge Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2000`...............................................100


Figure 3.86 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Dry Biomass............................... 106

Figure 3.87 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Ash-Free Dry Biomass ............... 106

Figure 3.88 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for the McKenzie River Sampling Sites Upstream of Mill Discharge, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 107

Figure 3.89 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for the McKenzie River Sampling Sites Downstream of Mill Discharge, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 108

Figure 3.90 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Dry Biomass.............................. 115

Figure 3.91 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Mean Ash-Free Dry Biomass .............. 115

Figure 3.92 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for the Willamette River Sampling Sites Upstream of Mill Discharge, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 116

Figure 3.93 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Family Distribution by Percent Dry Weight for the Willamette River Sampling Sites Downstream of Mill Discharge, Study Year 2000 to 2001............................................................................................. 117

Figure 3.94 Percent Fish Distribution for Upstream Sites (East Branch, Menges and USGS) Codorus Creek, August 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing Samples ......... 135

Figure 3.95 Percent Fish Distribution for Downstream Sites (Martin, Graybill, and Indian Rock) Codorus Creek, August 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing Samples ................................................................................................ 136

Figure 3.96 Percent Fish Distribution for Downstream Sites (Arsenal and Furnace) Codorus Creek, August 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing Samples ......... 137

Figure 3.97 Leaf River Boat Fish Distribution for October 2000................................................... 140

Figure 3.98 Leaf River Backpack Fish Distribution for October 2000........................................... 143

Figure 3.99 McKenzie River Boat Fish Distribution for September 2000 ..................................... 145

Figure 3.100 Percent Fish Distribution for Upstream Sites (Hendricks and Bellingers) McKenzie River, September 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing Samples ................................................................................................ 150

Figure 3.101 Percent Fish Distribution for Downstream Sites (Harvest and Armitage), McKenzie River, September 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing Samples ................................................................................................ 151

Figure 3.102 Willamette River Boat Fish Distribution for September 2000 .................................... 154

Figure 3.103 Percent Fish Distribution for Upstream Sites (Whitely, Harrisburg, Cartney and Intake), Willamette River September 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing.............................................................................................. 161

Figure 3.104 Percent Fish Distribution for Downstream Sites (Peoria and Fisher Lane), September 2000 to June 2001, Backpack Electrofishing Samples .............................. 162


LONG-TERM RECEIVING WATER STUDY DATA COMPENDIUM: SEPTEMBER 2000 TO AUGUST 2001

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report summarizes the data collected during the third year (2000 to 2001) of the Long-Term Receiving Water Study (LTRWS), a 10- to 20-year NCASI project. This is the third annual summary to be issued, the first was issued in May 2002, NCASI (2002a), and the second was issued in 2003, NCASI (2003). Reports addressing study objectives will continue to be issued separately.

The LTRWS involves four different U.S. receiving waters, including Codorus Creek in Pennsylvania, the Leaf River in Mississippi, and the McKenzie and Willamette rivers in Oregon. These locations represent warm and coldwater stream types, as well as streams ranging from effluent-dominated to those more typical of industry receiving waters. Mill process types represented in the LTRWS include both bleached and unbleached kraft. Studies now underway at these locations provide an opportunity to complete before/after process change comparisons for these mills as they undergo Cluster Rule or other process or effluent treatment changes in the future. A detailed description of the site selection process for the LTRWS was presented in Hall et al. (1999) and NCASI (2002b).

The scope and framework for these studies were developed based on input from a committee of industry representatives with knowledge and skills in aquatic biology and environmental issues related to mill effluent discharges. Two broad objectives were established: a) to determine whether there were detectable differences in biological monitoring parameters upstream and downstream of mill effluent discharges, and b) to determine the significance of any differences in terms of broader river ecological functioning. Specific project goals included a) addressing temporal variability over a 10- to 20-year timeline, b) addressing spatial variability along upstream/downstream river gradients, c) identifying the margin of safety for effluent addition, d) investigating possible changes in effluent effects that might arise from mill process or effluent treatments changes, e) providing an early indication of adverse effects by carrying out a study of exceptional depth and detail, and f) providing a study template for others to use. Hall and Miner (1997) reported further details of the LTRWS scope and framework as well as other study attributes which were considered to be desirable.

To address the objectives and goals of the study, the experimental design needed to be broad, incorporating multiple spatial and temporal scales, field and laboratory assays, and biotic and abiotic components. The spatial aspect included multiple upstream/downstream sampling sites to address spatial variation, and also components to address responses on different spatial scales, from instream habitat evaluations to watershed-based risk assessments. The temporal scale was incorporated through sampling schedules to address seasonal variations and long-term annual variations. Field studies included instream or streamside monitoring of abiotic (water temperature, water flow, conductivity, and solar radiation) and biotic (periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish) components. Laboratory evaluations included water chemistry and effluent chronic bioassays. A more detailed description of the experimental design is given in NCASI (2002c).

This compendium will give a brief outline of the sampling schedule and the sampling design for each river (Section 2) including a general list of sampling sites for each LTRWS river. A short description of the field methods will be provided at the start of each section of data (Section 3). Complete descriptions of the LTRWS sites and field methods are presented in NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 841 (2002c).


Technical Bulletin No. 868 2

2.0 APPROACH

2.1 Experimental Design

The experimental design for the biotic and abiotic components of the study was originally set to maximize the ability to analyze temporal variations within and between different sets of study variables. At the onset it was recognized that flexibility would be needed to accommodate any unknown factors that might occur during such a long study (e.g., changing conditions in the field necessitating changing site locations, additions; subtractions, or modifications to field or laboratory methodologies). Changes that occurred during the 2000 to 2001 study year are described in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1 Changes to the LTRWS Sampling, Analysis, or Data Handling for the Study Year 2000 to 2001

Type of Change LTRWS Component Description Addition Water Chemistry In vivo chlorophyll analysis added for all rivers starting

in June 2001

Addition Water Chemistry COD analysis added for the Leaf River and Codorus Creek

Addition Water Chemistry TOC analysis added for the Leaf River and Codorus Creek

Addition Fish Leaf River backpack electrofishing annual sampling started September 2000

Modification Water Temperature From September 1, 2000 to March 15, 2001, Vemco-Minilog-T data loggers were used to collect temperature data; after March 15, 2001, Tidbit data loggers were used to collect temperature data for the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers.

Modification Periphyton Wooden dowels chlorophyll a analysis (Leaf River, September, 2000) switched to sand periphyton analysis in May 2001

Modification Macroinvertebrates and periphyton

Starting in March 2001, macroinvertebrates and periphyton were sampled across from Bellingers Boat Launch (RM 19) instead of at Bellingers (RM 18.5) on the McKenzie River.

Modification Macroinvertebrates and periphyton

From September 2000 to August 2001, macroinvertebrates and periphyton were sampled at Walterville (RM 20.5) instead of Hendricks (RM 22.4) on the McKenzie River due to low flow conditions.



2.2 Sampling Schedule

River water quality was sampled once monthly for chemical analysis at each river, except for during the month of December (Table 2.2). Biotic elements were sampled quarterly (Table 2.3) for Codorus Creek, the McKenzie River, and the Willamette River; the Leaf River was sampled once in the fall of 2000 for all biotic elements, and once in the spring of 2001 for benthic macroinvertebrates and periphyton.

Table 2.2 Water Quality Sampling Schedule, Study Year 2000 to 2001

Month Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

Day(s) 25 23 27 a 29 26 26 30 21 18/20b 30 2 anot sampled for this month bCodorus Creek sampled June 20, all other rivers June 18

Table 2.3 Biological Sampling Schedule, Study Year 2000 to 2001

Season Codorus Creek Leaf River McKenzie River Willamette River Fall 2000 August 22-24 October 16-18 September 21-22 September 19-21

Winter 2000 November 14-16 December 7-8 December 5-7

Spring 2001 March 20-22 March 17-18a March 8-9 March 6-8

Summer 2001 June 12-13 July 12-13 July 10-12 a benthic macroinvertebrates and periphyton only



2.3 Codorus Creek Sampling Area

Codorus Creek is located in the County of York in south central Pennsylvania. The study area of the creek extends from just above Lake Marburg (created from the impoundment of one tributary of the West Branch of Codorus Creek) to its confluence with the Susquehanna River (Figure 2.1). There were eight sampling locations along this stretch of the creek (Table 2.4); six were sampled for all biotic and abiotic elements, one (East Branch) was sampled for biotic elements, and another (Indian Rock) for fish only. The East Branch and Indian Rock sampling was done as part of the Western Washington University Research Agreement fish experimental design. A detailed description of each site is available in NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 841 (2002c) and NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 842 (2002b). Figures 2.2 through 2.8 show upstream views taken at each of the quarterly seasonal sampling events for periphyton and macroinvertebrates.

Figure 2.1 Codorus Creek in the Area of the LTRWS



Table 2.4 Sampling Site Descriptions for Codorus Creek, Pennsylvania Sample Site Site Description Sampled Elements

Oil Creek Tributary sampled upstream of the confluence with Codorus Creek

All abiotic elements No biotic

East Branch Located on the West Branch above Lake Marburg Dam All biotic elements No abiotic elements

Menges Located on the West Branch below the hypolimnetic discharge from Lake Marburg and above the mill

All biotic elements All abiotic elements

USGS Located on the West Branch below the mill thermal effluent discharge


Martin Located on the West Branch below the mill process water effluent discharge


Graybill Located on the West Branch All biotic elements All abiotic elements

Indian Rock Located on the West Branch just above the confluence with the South Branch

Fish only No abiotic elements

Arsenal Located on the main stem of Codorus Creek, in the city of York


Furnace Located on the main stem just above its confluence with the Susquehanna River



Aug

ust 2

000

Nov

embe

r 200

0

Mar

ch 2

001

June

200

1

Figu

re 2

.2 E

ast B

ranc

h, C

odor

us C

reek

6 Technical Bulletin No. 868


A

ugus

t 200

0

N

ovem

ber 2

000

Mar

ch 2

001

June

200

1

Figu

re 2

.3 M

enge

s, C

odor

us C

reek



A

ugus

t 200

0

Nov

embe

r 200

0

M

arch

200

1

June

200

1

Figu

re 2

.4 U

SGS,

Cod

orus

Cre

ek



Aug

ust 2

000

N

ovem

ber 2

000

Mar

ch 2

001

Ju

ne 2

001

Figu

re 2

.5 M

artin

, Cod

orus

Cre

ek



A

ugus

t 200

0

Nov

embe

r 200

0

M

arch

200

1

June

200

1

Figu

re 2

.6 G

rayb

ill, C

odor

us C

reek



Aug

ust 2

000

N

ovem

ber 2

000

M

arch

200

1

June

200

1

Figu

re 2

.7 A

rsen

al, C

odor

us C

reek



Aug

ust 2

000

N

ovem

ber 2

000

M

arch

200

1

June

200

1

Figu

re 2

.8 F

urna

ce, C

odor

us C

reek




2.4 Leaf River Sampling Area

The Leaf River is located in SE Mississippi, flowing in a southeasterly direction from its headwaters, joining with the Chickasawhay River to form the Pascagoula River. The LTRWS is located downstream of Hattiesburg and extends 32 river miles (RM), most of which are located in Perry County. The sampling locations begin four river miles above the paper mill discharge at New Augusta and extend downstream of the mill discharge to just below McLain (Figure 2.9). Of the 12 sampling locations along this stretch of the river (Table 2.5), six were sampled for abiotic elements; the remaining six were sampled for the biotic elements. A detailed description of each site is available in NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 841 (2002c) and NCASI Technical Bulletin No 842 (2002b). Figures 2.10 through 2.15 show upstream views taken at each of the quarterly seasonal macroinvertebrate/periphyton sampling events.

Figure 2.9 The Leaf River in the Area of the LTRWS



Table 2.5 Sampling Site Descriptions for the Leaf River

Sample Site Site Description Sampled Elements

Tallahalla Creek Located on the tributary stream, upstream of its confluence with the Leaf River

Abiotic elements only

Tallahalla Located on the Leaf River upstream of the confluence with Tallahalla Creek and 4.3 RM upstream of the mill effluent discharge

Biotic elements only

Mahned Located on the Leaf River 4.7 RM upstream of the mill effluent discharge


New Augusta Located on the Leaf River 1.5 RM upstream of the mill effluent discharge


Downstream 2 sites (A and B) located approximately 2 RM downstream of the mill effluent discharge


Wingate Located 4.4 RM downstream of the mill effluent discharge


Bogue Located upstream of the town of Beaumont, 10.3 RM downstream of the mill effluent discharge


Beaumont Located in Beaumont, 12.2 RM downstream of the mill effluent discharge


Thompson Located downstream of Beaumont, 13 RM downstream of the mill


McLain Bridge Located at the highway bridge, upstream of the town of McLain, 26.8 RM downstream of the mill


McLain Located downstream of the highway bridge, 27.5 RM downstream of the mill



Oct

ober

200

0

M

ay 2

001

Figu

re 2

.10

Tal

laha

la, L

eaf R

iver



Oct

ober

200

0

M

ay 2

001

Figu

re 2

.11

New

Aug

usta

, Lea

f Riv

er



O

ctob

er 2

001

M

ay 2

001

Figu

re 2

.12

Dow

nstre

am, L

eaf R

iver



O

ctob

er 2

000

M

ay 2

001

Figu

re 2

.13

Bog

ue, L

eaf R

iver



Oct

ober

200

0

May

200

1

Figu

re 2

.14

Tho

mps

on, L

eaf R

iver



Oct

ober

200

0

M

ay 2

001

Figu

re 2

.15

McL

ain,

Lea

f Riv

er




2.5 McKenzie River Sampling Area

The McKenzie River originates in the Cascade Mountains in central Oregon and runs west into the Willamette Valley where it joins the Willamette River. The study area of the river extends approximately 20 RM, from Hendricks Bridge at the upstream end to Armitage State Park at the downstream end (Figure 2.16). There are five water quality sampling locations, five benthic macroinvertebrate sampling locations, four backpack electrofishing areas, and five boat electrofishing areas (Table 2.6). A detailed description of each site is available in NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 841 (2002c) and NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 842 (2002b). Figures 2.17 through 2.21 show upstream views taken at each of the quarterly seasonal macroinvertebrate/periphyton sampling events.

Figure 2.16 McKenzie River in the Area of the LTRWS



Table 2.6 Sampling Site Descriptions for the McKenzie River, Oregon

Sample Site Site Description Sampled Elements Hendricks RM 26-26.5 Fish only

Hendricks RM 22.4. Located 7.6 river miles above the mill effluent discharge

All abiotic elements onlya

Walterville RM 20.5. Alternate sample location when Hendricks can’t be reached due to low water

Macroinvertebrates and periphyton

Bellingers RM 18.5-19. Located approximately 3.5 river miles above the mill effluent discharge

All biotic elements

Hayden Located just above the mill effluent discharge Abiotic elements only

Mohawk RM 14. Located 1.1 river miles below the mill effluent discharge

All biotic elements

Harvest RM 10. Located approximately 4 river miles below the mill effluent discharge


Armitage/Coburg RM 6. Located 8.3 river miles below the mill effluent outfall


Mohawk River Tributary sampled upstream of the confluence with the McKenzie River


a Due to low flow conditions, macroinvertebrates and periphyton were not sampled at Hendricks (RM22.4) during the 2000 to 2001 study year


Sep

tem

ber 2

000

Dec

embe

r 200

0

M

arch

200

1

July

200

1

Figu

re 2

.17

Wal

terv

ille

RM

20.

5, M

cKen

zie

Riv

er



Sep

tem

ber 2

000

Dec

embe

r 200

0

M

arch

200

1

J

uly

2001

Figu

re 2

.18

Bel

linge

rs R

M 1

8.5

and

Acr

oss f

rom

Bel

linge

rs B

oat L

aunc

h R

M 1

9, M

cKen

zie

Riv

er



Sept

embe

r 200

0

D

ecem

ber 2

000

Mar

ch 2

001

Ju

ly 2

001

Figu

re 2

.19

Moh

awk

RM

14,

McK

enzi

e R

iver



Sept

embe

r 200

0

Dec

embe

r 200

0

Mar

ch 2

001

Ju

ly 2

001

Figu

re 2

.20

Har

vest

RM

10,

McK

enzi

e R

iver



S

epte

mbe

r 200

0

Dec

embe

r 200

0

Mar

ch 2

001

Jul

y 20

01

Figu

re 2

.21

Arm

itage

RM

6, M

cKen

zie

Riv

er




2.6 Willamette River Sampling Area

The Willamette River is located in the Willamette Valley, which runs between the Coastal Range and the Cascade Mountain Range in Western Oregon. The study area of the river extends from Harrisburg to Corvallis, a length of approximately 32 RM (Figure 2.22). There are five water quality sites, seven macroinvertebrate/periphyton sites, six boat electrofishing areas, and four backpack electrofishing areas (Table 2.7). While different sampling elements were of necessity collected from different regions of a sample site, if they came from the same general area, they have the same site name. A detailed description of the sites is available in NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 841 (2002c) and NCASI Technical Bulletin No. 842 (2002b). Figures 2.23 through 2.29 show upstream views taken at each of the quarterly/seasonal sampling events for macroinvertebrates and periphyton.

Figure 2.22 Willamette River in the Area of the LTRWS



Table 2.7 Sampling Site Descriptions for the Willamette River, Oregon

Sample Site Site Description Sampled Elements

Whitely RM 176. Located above the confluence with the McKenzie River


Harrisburg RM 160. Located below the city of Harrisburg and 14.7 river miles above the mill effluent discharge


Cartney RM 156. Located 12.7 river miles above the mill effluent discharge


Intake RM 148. Located 0.6 river miles above the mill effluent discharge


Sam Daws RM 145.5. Located 1.0 river mile below the mill effluent discharge

Fish

Snag Boat RM 143.5. Located 2.2 river miles the mill effluent discharge


Peoria Located just downstream of the city of Peoria Fish and abiotic elements

Long Tom Confluence

RM 136 Fish

Willamette RM 134 Macroinvertebrates and periphyton

Fisher Lane RM 132 Fish only

Corvallis RM 128 All biotic elements All abiotic elements

Long Tom River Tributary sampled just upstream of the confluence with the Willamette River



Sep

tem

ber 2

000

D

ecem

ber 2

000

M

arch

200

1

July

200

1

Figu

re 2

.23

Whi

tely

RM

176

, Will

amet

te R

iver



S

epte

mbe

r 200

0

Dec

embe

r 200

0

Mar

ch 2

001

Ju

ly 2

001

Figu

re 2

.24

Har

risbu

rg R

M 1

60, W

illam

ette

Riv

er



S

epte

mbe

r 200

0

Dec

embe

r 200

0

M

arch

200

1

Ju

ly 2

001

Figu

re 2

.25

Car

tney

RM

156

, Will

amet

te R

iver



S

epte

mbe

r 200

0

D

ecem

ber 2

000

M

arch

200

1

July

200

1

Figu

re 2

.26

Inta

ke R

M 1

48, W

illam

ette

Riv

er



S

epte

mbe

r 200

0

D

ecem

ber 2

000

Mar

ch 2

001

July

200

1

Figu

re 2

.27

Sna

g B

oat R

M 1

43.5

, Will

amet

te R

iver

Technical Bulletin No. 868


Se

ptem

ber 2

000

Dec

embe

r 200

0

M

arch

200

1

J

uly

2001

Figu

re 2

.28

Will

amet

te P

ark

RM

134

, Will

amet

te R

iver



Sep

tem

ber 2

000

Dec

embe

r 200

0

Mar

ch 2

001

July

200

1

Figu

re 2

.29

Cor

valli

s RM

128

, Will

amet

te R

iver




3.0 METHODS AND RESULTS

3.1 Water Temperature

In-river temperatures were recorded near the mill intake points for the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers. No temperature data were collected for Codorus Creek or the Leaf River. Between September 1, 2000 and March 15, 2001, Vemco-Minilog-T data loggers were used to collect temperature; after March 15, 2001 Tidbit data loggers were used. The 7d moving mean of the maximum temperature smoothes out some of the daily fluctuations and provides a picture of the mean temperature over a period of time. It was calculated by taking the mean of the 24h maximum for a 7d period encompassing the 3d prior and the 3d after each day. Daily fluctuations represent the difference between the minimum and maximum temperatures that occur during the 24h period from midnight to midnight. Gaps in both of the line segments (7d moving mean and 24h fluctuation) indicate data gaps due to loss of the data logger or loss of data in the electronic transfer. For the Willamette River, gaps in the 7d moving mean line segment are due to record low flows during the winter of 2000 to 2001, which caused the temperature data logger to be exposed to the air. These gaps show up as peaks on the 24h fluctuation line.

McKenzie River 2000 to 2001

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

Septem

ber-0

0

Octobe

r-00

Novem

ber-0

0

Decem

ber-0

0

Janu

ary-01

Febru

ary-01

March-0

1

April-0

1

May-01

June

-01

July-

01

Augus

t-01

Tem

pera

ture

(˚C

)

7d Moving Mean

24h Fluctuation

H2O Sampling

Biological Sampling

Figure 3.1 McKenzie River Water Temperature, 7d Moving Mean of the Maximum and 24h Fluctuation, from September 2000 to August 2001, Measured at Springfield, Oregon (LTRWS

sampling dates are indicated by symbols.)

National Council for air and Stream Improvement


Willamette River 2000 to 2001

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Septem

ber-0

0

Octobe

r-00

Novem

ber-0

0

Decem

ber-0

0

Janu

ary-01

Febru

ary-01

March-0

1

April-0

1

May-01

June

-01

July-

01

Augus

t-01

Tem

pera

ture

(˚C

)7d Moving Mean

24h Fluctuation

H2O Sampling

Biological Sampling

Figure 3.2 Willamette River Water Temperature, 7d Moving Mean of the Maximum and the 24h Fluctuation, from September 2000 to August 2001, Measured at Halsey, Oregon (LTRWS sampling

dates are indicated by symbols.)

3.2 Solar Radiation

Solar radiation measurements were made using LI-COR LI-200SA pyranometer sensors placed near the mill effluent discharge locations for Codorus Creek (Spring Grove, Pennsylvania) and the Willamette River (near Halsey, Oregon). The pyranometers were deployed for the entire sampling season and data were downloaded in conjunction with fieldwork. The sensors record the solar radiation between 400 nm and 1100 nm wavelength every 3h and report an integrated value (in W h m–2). The eight measurements per 24h were summed to give the total solar radiation per day. Gaps in the line segment indicate data gaps due to equipment failure or interference.



Codorus Creek 2000 to 2001

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

Septem

ber-0

0

Octobe

r-00

Novembe

r-00

Decem

ber-0

0

Janu

ary-01

Febru

ary-01

March-0

1

April-0

1

May-01

June

-01

July-

01

Augus

t-01

W h

/m2

(24

h su

m)

H2O Sampling

Biological Sampling

Figure 3.3 Daily Solar Radiation for the Codorus Creek LTRWS Area, Measured at Spring Grove, Pennsylvania, from September 2000 to August 2001 (LTRWS sampling dates are indicated by

symbols.)


0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

Septem

ber-0

0

Octobe

r-00

Novem

ber-0

0

Decem

ber-0

0

Janu

ary-01

Febru

ary-01

March-0

1

April-0

1

May-01

June

-01

July-

01

Augus

t-01

W h

/m2

(24

h su

m)

H2O Sampling

Biological Sampling

Figure 3.4 Daily Solar Radiation for the Willamette River LTRWS Area, Measured near Halsey, Oregon, from September 2000 to August 2001 (LTRWS sampling dates are indicated by symbols.)



3.3 Water Flow

River flow was obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) website. Reported values were daily flow in cubic feet per second (cfs) and feet above datum. The measurements for Codorus Creek were taken from USGS gauging station #01574500 at Spring Grove, Pennsylvania, located within the study area. The Leaf River measurements were recorded at USGS Gauging station #0247460 near New Augusta, Mississippi. The McKenzie River data were recorded at USGS gauging station #14162500 at Vida, Oregon, located 16 river miles (RM) upstream of the study area. The Willamette River data was recorded at USGS gauging station #14166000 at Harrisburg, Oregon, located at the most upstream point of the study area.

The McKenzie River gauging station, unlike the other three LTRWS rivers, is located outside of the LTRWS area; therefore, a modification was applied to the flow data in order to better represent flow conditions in the study area. A more detailed description of the modification is given in NCASI 2003.

Instream waste concentration was calculated as percent effluent per total river volume. The daily amount of effluent discharged from the plant in million gallons per day was converted to instream flow in cfs. The total river volume is the river flow plus the effluent discharge. The values represent the theoretical effluent concentration at the point of discharge without any consideration for jet or diffuser dynamics or mixing. Gaps in the line segments indicate loss of data due to equipment failure.




0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Septembe

r-00

Octobe

r-00

Novem

ber-0

0

Decembe

r-00

Janu

ary-01

Febru

ary-01

March-0

1

April-0

1

May-01

June

-01

July-

01

Augus

t-01

Flow

in c

ubic

feet

per

sec

ond

(cfs

) River f low (cfs)

H2O Sampling

Biological Sampling

Figure 3.5 Codorus Creek Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001 (LTRWS sampling



0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Septem

ber-0

0

Octobe

r-00

Novem

ber-0

0

Decem

ber-0

0

Janu

ary-01

Febru

ary-01

March-0

1

April-0

1

May-01

June

-01

July-

01

Augus

t-01

% E

fflue

nt

Figure 3.6 Codorus Creek Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of Total

River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001



Leaf River 2000 to 2001

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

Septem

ber-0

0

Octobe

r-00

Novem

ber-0

0

Decem

ber-0

0

Janu

ary-01

Februa

ry-01

March-0

1

April-0

1

May-01

June

-01

July-

01

Augus

t-01

Flow

in c

ubic

feet

per

sec

ond

(cfs

)River f low (cfs)

H2O Sampling

Biological Sampling

Figure 3.7 Leaf River Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001 (LTRWS sampling dates are indicated by symbols.)

Leaf River 2000 to 2001

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Septem

ber-0

0

Octobe

r-00

Novem

ber-0

0

Decem

ber-0

0

Janu

ary-01

Febru

ary-01

March-0

1

April-0

1

May-01

June

-01

July-

01

Augus

t-01

% E

fflue

nt

Figure 3.8 Leaf River Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of Total

River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001




0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Septem

ber-0

0

Octobe

r-00

Novem

ber-0

0

Decem

ber-0

0

Janu

ary-01

Febru

ary-01

March-0

1

April-0

1

May-01

June

-01

July-

01

Augus

t-01

Flow

in c

ubic

feet

per

sec

onds

(cfs

)

River f low (cfs)

H2O Sampling

Biological Sampling

Figure 3.9 McKenzie River Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001 (LTRWS sampling



0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

Septem

ber-0

0

Octobe

r-00

Novem

ber-0

0

Decem

ber-0

0

Janu

ary-01

Febru

ary-01

March-0

1

April-0

1

May-01

June

-01

July-

01

Augus

t-01

% E

fflue

nt

Figure 3.10 McKenzie River Instream Waste Concentration at point of discharge as a percent of total

river volume, from September 2000 to August 2001




0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

Septem

ber-0

0

Octobe

r-00

Novem

ber-0

0

Decem

ber-0

0

Janu

ary-01

Febru

ary-01

March-0

1

April-0

1

May-01

June

-01

July-

01

Augus

t-01

Flow

in c

ubic

feet

per

sec

ond

(cfs

) River f low (cfs)H2O SamplingBiological Sampling

Figure 3.11 Willamette River Water Flow from September 2000 to August 2001 (LTRWS sampling



0.000.050.100.150.200.250.300.350.400.450.500.550.60

Septem

ber-0

0

Octobe

r-00

Novem

ber-0

0

Decem

ber-0

0

Janu

ary-01

Febru

ary-01

March-0

1

April-0

1

May-01

June

-01

July-

01

Augus

t-01

% E

fflue

nt

Figure 3.12 Willamette River Instream Waste Concentration at Point of Discharge as a Percent of

Total River Volume, from September 2000 to August 2001



3.4 Water Chemistry

River water samples were taken monthly for analysis at each LTRWS river. All sites were sampled on the same day (except in June when sampling on Codorus Creek occurred two days after the three other rivers) and in a downstream to upstream direction. Grab samples were collected 6 inches below the surface in acid-washed bottles, and shipped cold to the Northwest Aquatic Biology Facility (NABF) in Anacortes within 24 h and processed within 48 h. Most of the water quality analysis in this report was done at NABF, the exceptions were river pH and temperature, which were recorded in the field at the time of sampling, and total phosphorus and total nitrogen which were analyzed at the NCASI West Coast Regional Center (WCRC) in Corvallis, Oregon. Analyses included, but were not limited to, pH, temperature, color, conductivity, turbidity, total organic compounds (TOC), chemical oxygen demand (COD), hardness, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, and in vivo chlorophyll. TOC analysis was added for the Leaf River and Codorus Creek during the 2000 to 2001 study year. In vivo chlorophyll analysis was added in June 2001 for all LTRWS rivers.


Tab

le 3

.1 C

odor

us C

reek

Wat

er C

hem

istry

Sta

tion

Da

tep

HT

em

p

(ºC

)C

olo

r

(Pt-

Co

un

its)

Co

nd

uct

ivity

(µ

s/cm

)T

urb

idity

(N

TU

)T

OC

(m

g/L

)C

OD

(m

g/L

) H

ard

ne

ss

(mg

/L)

To

tal

Ph

osp

ho

rus

(mg

/L)

To

tal

Nitr

og

en

(m

g/L

)M

en

ge

s9

/25

/00

7.4

13

.01

71

72

74

10

63

FQ

AF

QA

US

GS

9/2

5/0

07

.91

7.7

16

31

21

37

16

90

FQ

AF

QA

Ma

rtin

9

/25

/00

7.9

21

.51

93

10

45

11

96

82

31

FQ

AF

QA

Gra

ybill

9/2

5/0

08

.01

9.5

16

29

42

12

75

82

10

FQ

AF

QA

Fu

rna

ce9

/25

/00

8.1

18

.16

26

18

81

92

61

75

FQ

AF

QA

Oil

Cre

ek

9/2

5/0

08

.31

6.8

55

89

91

41

81

71

83

FQ

AF

QA

Me

ng

es

10

/23

/00

7.6

10

.01

01

74

68

86

1F

QA

FQ

AU

SG

S1

0/2

3/0

07

.61

3.8

16

31

91

01

41

28

9F

QA

FQ

AM

art

in

10

/23

/00

7.8

16

.41

52

11

74

92

46

41

97

FQ

AF

QA

Gra

ybill

10

/23

/00

7.9

12

.91

53

10

59

12

59

63

19

0F

QA

FQ

AF

urn

ace

10

/23

/00

7.9

12

.29

27

02

71

93

11

69

FQ

AF

QA

Oil

Cre

ek

10

/23

/00

8.1

9.9

29

98

49

19

19

19

1F

QA

FQ

A

Me

ng

es

11

/27

/00

7.6

8.3

13

17

68

11

86

40

.05

1.6

7U

SG

S1

1/2

7/0

07

.81

0.5

21

30

44

85

87

0.1

23

.00

Ma

rtin

1

1/2

7/0

07

.71

5.8

14

81

00

68

62

42

20

30

.08

2.1

6G

rayb

ill1

1/2

7/0

07

.91

2.3

10

97

72

84

93

31

61

0.0

72

.81

Fu

rna

ce1

1/2

7/0

08

.09

.27

66

20

51

72

41

54

0.1

03

.79

Oil

Cre

ek

11

/27

/00

8.0

8.3

47

47

91

02

01

21

24

0.3

45

.64

Me

ng

es

1/2

9/0

17

.10

.7N

D [

<1

0 P

t-C

o]

20

35

65

71

ND

3.6

8U

SG

S1

/29

/01

7.8

2.5

12

39

37

15

91

11

ND

4.7

7M

art

in

1/2

9/0

17

.81

1.1

12

61

11

51

02

87

32

21

0.0

34

.30

Gra

ybill

1/2

9/0

17

.97

.21

11

10

27

43

45

82

07

ND

4.3

8F

urn

ace

1/2

9/0

18

.03

.63

75

96

31

61

81

53

0.0

25

.06

Oil

Cre

ek

1/2

9/0

18

.11

.01

88

50

69

14

18

60

.07

8.0

7

Me

ng

es

2/2

6/0

17

.43

.81

32

40

87

87

0N

D4

.57

US

GS

2/2

6/0

17

.66

.61

05

13

91

81

01

20

0.1

35

.38

Ma

rtin

2

/26

/01

7.8

10

.61

09

99

01

15

71

97

0.0

54

.71

Gra

ybill

2/2

6/0

17

.81

1.0

91

84

16

45

17

80

.04

4.6

8F

urn

ace

2/2

6/0

17

.97

.34

65

68

52

02

01

44

0.0

54

.65

Oil

Cre

ek

2/2

6/0

17

.85

.01

66

76

72

01

56

0.0

85

.81

Me

ng

es

3/2

6/0

17

.34

.41

31

93

13

83

69

0.0

44

.80

US

GS

3/2

6/0

17

.87

.31

13

01

10

15

89

80

.09

4.6

9M

art

in

3/2

6/0

17

.91

1.1

76

69

48

18

39

15

40

.10

4.2

2G

rayb

ill3

/26

/01

7.8

9.7

51

58

45

20

31

14

1N

D4

.43

Fu

rna

ce3

/26

/01

7.9

7.4

36

38

76

17

71

15

0.0

34

.37

Oil

Cre

ek

3/2

6/0

17

.96

.21

54

52

61

88

13

30

.10

5.6

9

Not

e: N

D =

Non

-det

ect;

FQA

= F

aile

d qu

ality

ass

uran

ce

(Con

tinue

d on

nex

t pag

e)



Tab

le 3

.1 C

ontin

ued

Sta

tion

Dat

epH

Tem

p (º

C)

Col

or

(P

t-C

o un

its)

Con

duct

ivity

(µ

s/cm

)T

urbi

dity

(N

TU

)T

OC

(m

g/L)

CO

D

(mg/

L)

Har

dnes

s (m

g/L)

Tot

al

Pho

spho

rus

(mg/

L)

Tot

al

Nitr

ogen

(m

g/L)

In V

ivo

Chl

orop

hyll

(mg/

L)M

enge

s4/

30/0

17.

511

.712

189

78

368

0.13

4.38

US

GS

4/30

/01

7.8

15.1

1634

412

1510

108

0.08

4.95

Mar

tin

4/30

/01

7.7

19.4

127

1306

725

7724

8N

D4.

32G

rayb

ill4/

30/0

17.

817

.110

110

429

1750

227

0.03

4.64

Fur

nace

4/30

/01

8.0

16.5

2850

07

1817

143

0.03

4.74

Oil

Cre

ek4/

30/0

17.

911

.815

579

1615

1015

10.

037.

70

Men

ges

5/21

/01

7.4

11.8

1615

420

910

590.

052.

46U

SG

S5/

21/0

17.

516

.622

252

4214

1086

0.11

3.26

Mar

tin

5/21

/01

7.7

19.5

123

847

4334

5018

50.

123.

07G

rayb

ill5/

21/0

17.

817

.598

844

3612

5119

60.

123.

63F

urna

ce5/

21/0

17.

915

.760

539

2229

2415

10.

094.

38O

il C

reek

5/21

/01

7.8

14.2

4056

298

1317

152

0.44

7.38

Men

ges

6/20

/01

7.5

13.6

ND

[<10

Pt-

Co]

171

136

956

0.05

1.63

1.23

US

GS

6/20

/01

7.8

18.8

1028

119

1510

880.

113.

211.

27M

artin

6/

20/0

17.

920

.929

690

1319

1510

00.

103.

531.

49G

rayb

ill6/

20/0

17.

921

.384

839

1114

1411

70.

103.

791.

62F

urna

ce6/

20/0

18.

124

.173

1069

108

1815

50.

324.

352.

37O

il C

reek

6/20

/01

8.1

20.9

1776

233

420

181

0.76

11.7

93.

93

Men

ges

7/30

/01

7.6

12.2

1016

36

611

66N

D1.

450.

88U

SG

S7/

30/0

17.

718

.215

271

1710

1178

0.02

2.60

2.09

Mar

tin

7/30

/01

7.8

22.0

124

833

1312

5717

4N

D2.

657.

50G

rayb

ill7/

30/0

17.

921

.311

083

111

1038

183

0.03

2.99

7.46

Fur

nace

7/30

/01

8.0

20.6

6168

69

930

180

0.05

3.97

4.21

Oil

Cre

ek7/

30/0

18.

119

.235

936

2818

197

0.38

11.1

96.

98

Men

ges

8/27

/01

7.8

12.6

ND

[<10

Pt-

Co]

163

52

1159

ND

1.35

0.92

US

GS

8/27

/01

7.7

21.5

1024

317

715

75N

D2.

401.

92M

artin

8/

27/0

17.

924

.814

210

4012

4075

210

0.04

2.00

7.95

Gra

ybill

8/27

/01

8.0

23.6

141

983

1228

6721

30.

032.

178.

04F

urna

ce8/

27/0

18.

223

.384

713

1115

4718

60.

233.

553.

86O

il C

reek

8/27

/01

8.2

21.3

3189

724

1820

188

0.20

11.4

04.

33

Not

e: N

D =

Non

-det

ect



Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

9.0

9.5

Sep-0

0Oct-

00Nov

-00 Dec

-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

pHM

enge

sUS

GS

Mar

tin

Gra

ybill

Furn

ace

Oil C

reek

Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Temperature (C)

Men

ges

USG

S

Mar

tin

Gra

ybill

Furn

ace

Oil C

reek

Fi

gure

3.1

3 C

odor

us C

reek

pH

Figu

re 3

.14

Cod

orus

Cre

ek T

empe

ratu

re

Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

050100

150

200

250

Sep-0

0 Oct-00

Nov-0

0 Dec-0

0 Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Color (Pt-Co units)

Men

ges

USG

S

Mar

tin

Gra

ybill

Furn

ace

Oil C

reek

Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

020

040

060

080

010

0012

0014

0016

0018

00

Sep-0

0 Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Conductivity (us/cm)

Men

ges

USG

SM

artin

G

rayb

ill Fu

rnac

eO

il Cre

ek

Figu

re 3

.15

Cod

orus

Cre

ek C

olor

Figu

re 3

.16

Cod

orus

Cre

ek C

ondu

ctiv

ity



Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

020406080100

120

140

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1Feb

-01Mar-

01Apr-

01May

-01Ju

n-01

Jul-0

1 Aug-0

1

Turbidity (NTU)M

enge

sU

SG

S

Mar

tin

Gra

ybill

Furn

ace

Oil

Cre

ek

Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

010203040506070

Sep-0

0Oct-

00Nov

-00Dec

-00Ja

n-01

Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01

Aug-01

TOC (mg/L)

Men

ges

US

GS

Mar

tin

Gra

ybill

Furn

ace

Oil

Cre

ek

Fig

ure

3.17

Cod

orus

Cre

ek T

urbi

dity

F

igur

e 3.

18 C

odor

us C

reek

TO

C

Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

020406080100

120

Sep-0

0Oct-

00Nov

-00 Dec

-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

COD (mg/L)

Men

ges

USG

S

Mar

tin

Gra

ybill

Furn

ace

Oil C

reek

Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

050100

150

200

250

300

350

Sep-0

0Oct-

00Nov

-00 Dec

-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Hardness (mg/L)

Men

ges

USG

S

Mar

tin

Gra

ybill

Furn

ace

Oil C

reek

Fi

gure

3.1

9 C

odor

us C

reek

CO

D

Figu

re 3

.20

Cod

orus

Cre

ek H

ardn

ess



Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

Sep-0

0Oct-

00Nov

-00 Dec

-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Total Phosphorus (mg/L)M

enge

sUS

GS

Mar

tin

Gra

ybill

Furn

ace

Oil C

reek

Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.0

0

12.0

0

14.0

0

Sep-0

0 Oct-00

Nov-0

0 Dec-0

0 Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Total Nitrogen (mg/L)

Men

ges

US

GS

Mar

tin

Gra

ybill

Furn

ace

Oil

Cre

ek

Figu

re 3

.21

Cod

orus

Cre

ek T

otal

Pho

spho

rus

Fi

gure

3.2

2 C

odor

us C

reek

Tot

al N

itrog

en

Co

do

rus

Cre

ek

200

0 to

200

1

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.0

0

12.0

0

Jun-

01

Jul-0

1

Aug-0

1

In Vivo Chlorophyll (mg/L)

Men

ges

US

GS

Mar

tin

Gra

ybill

Furn

ace

Oil

Cre

ek

Fi

gure

3.2

3 C

odor

us C

reek

In V

ivo

Chl

orop

hyll



Tab

le 3

.2 L

eaf R

iver

Wat

er C

hem

istry

Sta

tion

Da

tep

HT

em

p

(ºC

)

Co

lor

(P

t-C

o

un

its)

Co

nd

uct

ivity

(µ

s/cm

)T

urb

idity

(N

TU

)T

OC

(m

g/L

)C

OD

(m

g/L

) H

ard

ne

ss

(mg

/L)

To

tal

Ph

osp

ho

rus

(m

g/L

)

To

tal

Nitr

og

en

(m

g/L

)

Ta

llah

ala

9

/25

/00

6.9

28

.23

01

98

49

20

14

FQ

AF

QA

Ma

hn

ed

9/2

5/0

07

.52

8.2

24

89

45

16

11

FQ

AF

QA

Ne

w A

ug

ust

a

9/2

5/0

07

.52

8.5

27

10

15

51

71

2F

QA

FQ

AW

ing

ate

9

/25

/00

7.7

29

.08

12

29

51

53

11

8F

QA

FQ

AB

ea

um

on

t 9

/25

/00

7.6

29

.26

52

42

61

43

51

8F

QA

FQ

AM

cL

ain

9/2

5/0

07

.82

9.1

60

23

46

15

31

19

FQ

AF

QA

Ta

llah

ala

1

0/2

3/0

07

.32

9.3

20

13

02

71

31

2F

QA

FQ

AM

ah

ne

d1

0/2

3/0

07

.22

8.0

19

91

56

14

13

FQ

AF

QA

Ne

w A

ug

ust

a

10

/23

/00

7.2

28

.01

78

93

51

21

4F

QA

FQ

AW

ing

ate

1

0/2

3/0

07

.62

8.0

51

31

64

13

31

20

FQ

AF

QA

Be

au

mo

nt

10

/23

/00

7.3

27

.55

23

04

41

32

72

1F

QA

FQ

AM

cL

ain

10

/23

/00

7.3

29

.04

93

03

61

22

72

2F

QA

FQ

A

Ta

llah

ala

1

1/2

7/0

07

.31

2.1

67

11

91

21

22

52

20

.46

1.1

9M

ah

ne

d1

1/2

7/0

07

.11

1.9

57

81

18

10

22

17

0.1

51

.19

Ne

w A

ug

ust

a

11

/27

/00

7.2

12

.05

88

51

81

11

81

80

.18

1.1

9W

ing

ate

1

1/2

7/0

07

.21

2.2

64

13

51

71

22

12

10

.22

1.2

6B

ea

um

on

t 1

1/2

7/0

07

.21

2.0

67

14

01

81

22

42

10

.27

1.3

3M

cL

ain

11

/27

/00

7.3

12

.16

51

42

18

14

33

21

0.3

11

.48

Ta

llah

ala

1

/29

/01

7.1

11

.95

91

03

17

10

22

25

0.1

50

.99

Ma

hn

ed

1/2

9/0

16

.91

1.7

55

78

19

81

81

90

.09

1.0

7N

ew

Au

gu

sta

1

/29

/01

6.9

11

.65

48

22

09

15

19

0.0

81

.02

Win

ga

te

1/2

9/0

17

.01

2.0

64

12

42

19

24

22

0.0

20

.96

Be

au

mo

nt

1/2

9/0

17

.01

1.8

64

12

02

01

22

62

20

.04

1.0

2M

cL

ain

1/2

9/0

17

.01

1.0

65

12

12

31

21

92

10

.04

0.9

7

Ta

llah

ala

2

/26

/01

7.0

17

.07

59

41

71

42

72

30

.09

1.0

7M

ah

ne

d2

/26

/01

6.9

17

.06

48

61

31

11

92

00

.05

1.0

4N

ew

Au

gu

sta

2

/26

/01

6.8

17

.57

68

61

61

32

62

00

.10

1.0

4W

ing

ate

2

/26

/01

7.0

17

.59

51

35

20

18

33

20

0.0

91

.05

Be

au

mo

nt

2/2

6/0

16

.91

7.0

10

21

21

28

19

34

19

0.0

41

.06

Mc

La

in2

/26

/01

6.7

17

.01

06

11

13

11

73

11

7N

D0

.99

Ta

llah

ala

3

/26

/01

7.0

16

.37

28

31

81

31

82

30

.14

0.7

0M

ah

ne

d3

/26

/01

7.0

16

.65

48

21

61

01

61

90

.07

0.7

9N

ew

Au

gu

sta

3

/26

/01

6.9

17

.45

38

31

41

01

52

00

.10

0.7

5W

ing

ate

3

/26

/01

7.0

16

.76

81

00

15

11

19

20

0.1

20

.74

Be

au

mo

nt

3/2

6/0

16

.91

6.4

62

10

21

71

32

02

00

.09

0.7

7M

cL

ain

3/2

6/0

16

.91

6.3

64

93

15

12

20

19

0.0

70

.72

N

ote:

ND

= N

on-d

etec

t; FQ

A =

Fai

led

qual

ity a

ssur

ance

(Con

tinue

d on

nex

t pag

e)



Tab

le 3

.2 C

ontin

ued

Sta

tion

Dat

epH

Tem

p (º

C)

Col

or

(Pt-C

o un

its)

Con

duct

ivity

(µ

s/cm

)Tu

rbid

ity

(NTU

)TO

C

(mg/

L)C

OD

(m

g/L)

H

ardn

ess

(mg/

L)

Tota

l P

hosp

horu

s (m

g/L)

Tota

l Nitr

ogen

(m

g/L)

In V

ivo

Chl

orop

hyll

(mg/

L)Ta

llaha

la

4/30

/01

7.1

23.3

8310

510

1113

250.

321.

32M

ahne

d4/

30/0

17.

223

.352

121

89

1222

0.07

1.00

New

Aug

usta

4/

30/0

17.

122

.759

107

99

2123

0.10

1.02

Win

gate

4/

30/0

17.

123

.251

164

811

4025

0.17

1.00

Bea

umon

t 4/

30/0

17.

222

.974

159

912

3723

ND

0.94

McL

ain

4/30

/01

7.2

22.4

7714

78

1320

230.

160.

92

Talla

hala

5/

21/0

17.

428

.751

103

69

1525

0.16

0.57

Mah

ned

5/21

/01

7.3

28.0

2910

211

715

180.

110.

73N

ew A

ugus

ta

5/21

/01

7.4

27.8

3810

710

715

200.

100.

72W

inga

te

5/21

/01

7.6

28.9

5618

711

1725

230.

130.

72B

eaum

ont

5/21

/01

7.5

27.9

5617

714

1323

230.

100.

70M

cLai

n5/

21/0

17.

527

.855

163

139

1722

0.06

0.60

Talla

hala

6/

18/0

16.

928

.311

392

1615

3424

0.20

0.90

4.95

Mah

ned

6/18

/01

6.9

28.2

8172

1514

3018

0.14

1.02

8.65

New

Aug

usta

6/

18/0

16.

928

.588

7813

1433

190.

160.

968.

17W

inga

te

6/18

/01

7.1

28.2

103

117

1416

4021

0.14

0.95

7.93

Bea

umon

t 6/

18/0

17.

027

.910

311

213

1838

210.

130.

959.

95M

cLai

n6/

18/0

16.

927

.910

110

115

1742

190.

120.

948.

59

Talla

hala

7/

30/0

17.

431

.658

111

811

2320

0.18

0.96

4.63

Mah

ned

7/30

/01

7.3

31.3

4281

104

2015

0.13

0.95

10.4

8N

ew A

ugus

ta

7/30

/01

7.3

31.0

4385

912

2116

0.09

0.93

9.66

Win

gate

7/

30/0

17.

331

.058

149

711

2518

0.07

0.96

12.5

3B

eaum

ont

7/30

/01

7.2

30.3

5913

510

920

150.

050.

846.

03M

cLai

n7/

30/0

17.

130

.347

121

81

1813

0.11

0.76

4.99

Talla

hala

8/

27/0

17.

026

.985

8613

928

210.

151.

043.

55M

ahne

d8/

27/0

16.

928

.053

103

94

2118

0.09

1.12

6.73

New

Aug

usta

8/

27/0

16.

927

.554

9811

624

190.

091.

067.

35W

inga

te

8/27

/01

7.2

28.0

9815

310

1233

200.

091.

099.

60B

eaum

ont

8/27

/01

6.9

28.2

9214

710

1124

170.

091.

035.

26M

cLai

n8/

27/0

16.

628

.110

517

69

729

170.

071.

024.

10

Not

e: N

D =

Non

-det

ect



Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

6.4

6.6

6.8

7.0

7.2

7.4

7.6

7.8

8.0

8.2

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

pHTa

llaha

la

Mah

ned

New

Aug

usta

Win

gate

Beau

mon

t M

cLai

n

Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1Feb-0

1 Mar-01

Apr-01 May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01

Aug-01

Temperature (ºC)

Talla

hala

M

ahne

d

New

Aug

usta

Win

gate

Beau

mon

t M

cLai

n

Figu

re 3

.24

Lea

f Riv

er p

H

Fi

gure

3.2

5 L

eaf R

iver

Tem

pera

ture

Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

020406080100

120

140

160

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Color (Pt-Co Units)

Talla

hala

M

ahne

d

New

Aug

usta

Win

gate

Beau

mon

t M

cLai

n

Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

050100

150

200

250

300

350

Sep-0

0 Oct-00

Nov-0

0 Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Conductivity (µs/cm)

Talla

hala

M

ahne

d

New

Aug

usta

Win

gate

Beau

mon

t M

cLai

n

Figu

re 3

.26

Lea

f Riv

er C

olor

Figu

re 3

.27

Lea

f Riv

er C

ondu

ctiv

ity



Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

051015202530354045 Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Turbidity (NTU)Ta

llaha

la

Mah

ned

New

Aug

usta

Win

gate

Beau

mon

t M

cLai

n

Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

0510152025 Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

TOC (mg/L)

Talla

hala

M

ahne

d

New

Aug

usta

Win

gate

Beau

mon

t M

cLai

n

Figu

re 3

.28

Lea

f Riv

er T

urbi

dity

Fi

gure

3.2

9 L

eaf R

iver

TO

C

Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

5101520253035404550 Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

COD (mg/L)

Talla

hala

M

ahne

d

New

Aug

usta

Win

gate

Beau

mon

t M

cLai

n

Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

5101520253035 Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Hardness (mg/L)

Talla

hala

M

ahne

d Ne

w A

ugus

taW

inga

te

Beau

mon

t M

cLai

n

Figu

re 3

.30

Lea

f Riv

er C

OD

Fi

gure

3.3

1 L

eaf R

iver

Har

dnes

s



Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50 Sep

-00Oct-

00Nov

-00Dec

-00Ja

n-01 Feb

-01Mar-

01Apr-

01May

-01Ju

n-01 Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Total Phosphorus (mg/L)

Talla

hala

M

ahne

d Ne

w A

ugus

taW

inga

te

Beau

mon

t M

cLai

n

Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80 Sep

-00Oct-

00Nov

-00Dec

-00Ja

n-01 Feb

-01Mar-

01Apr-

01May

-01Ju

n-01 Ju

l-01 Aug

-01


Talla

hala

M

ahne

d

New

Aug

usta

Win

gate

Beau

mon

t M

cLai

n

Figu

re 3

.32

Lea

f Riv

er T

otal

Pho

spho

rus

Fi

gure

3.3

3 L

eaf R

iver

Tot

al N

itrog

en

Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

0.00

3.00

6.00

9.00

12.0

0

15.0

0

18.0

0

Jun-0

1

Jul-0

1

Aug-0

1In Vivo Chlorophyll (mg/L)

Talla

hala

M

ahne

d

New

Aug

usta

Win

gate

Beau

mon

t M

cLai

n

Figu

re 3

.34

Lea

f Riv

er In

Viv

o C

hlor

ophy

ll



Tab

le 3

.3 M

cKen

zie

Riv

er W

ater

Che

mis

try

Sta

tion

Dat

epH

Tem

p (º

C)

Col

or

(P

t-C

o un

its)

Con

duct

ivity

(µ

s/cm

)T

urbi

dity

(N

TU

)H

ardn

ess

(mg/

L)

Tot

al

Pho

spho

rus

(mg/

L)

Tot

al

Nitr

ogen

(m

g/L)

Hen

dric

ks

9/25

/00

7.5

11.0

ND

[<10

Pt-

Co]

541

16F

QA

FQ

AH

ayde

n B

ridge

9/25

/00

7.6

10.5

ND

[<10

Pt-

Co]

531

17F

QA

FQ

AH

arve

st

9/25

/00

7.7

10.0

1065

218

FQ

AF

QA

Arm

itage

(C

obur

g)9/

25/0

07.

510

.010

643

18F

QA

FQ

AM

ohaw

k R

iver

9/25

/00

7.6

14.0

2170

425

FQ

AF

QA

Hen

dric

ks10

/23/

007.

310

.0N

D [<

10 P

t-C

o]57

217

FQ

AF

QA

Hay

den

Brid

ge10

/23/

007.

69.

011

562

17F

QA

FQ

AH

arve

st10

/23/

007.

39.

016

662

18F

QA

FQ

AA

rmita

ge (

Cob

urg)

10/2

3/00

7.5

9.0

ND

[<10

Pt-

Co]

642

18F

QA

FQ

AM

ohaw

k R

iver

10/2

3/00

7.3

9.0

3161

522

FQ

AF

QA

Hen

dric

ks11

/27/

007.

38.

0N

D [<

10 P

t-C

o]58

117

0.07

0.06

Hay

den

Brid

ge11

/27/

007.

57.

5N

D [<

10 P

t-C

o]59

118

0.07

0.04

Har

vest

11/2

7/00

7.5

8.0

1175

218

0.07

0.08

Arm

itage

(C

obur

g)11

/27/

007.

58.

010

682

190.

060.

08M

ohaw

k R

iver

11/2

7/00

7.4

7.0

4665

523

0.04

0.18

Hen

dric

ks1/

29/0

17.

36.

0N

D [<

10 P

t-C

o]58

117

ND

0.10

Hay

den

Brid

ge1/

29/0

17.

45.

0N

D [<

10 P

t-C

o]56

118

ND

0.08

Har

vest

1/29

/01

7.4

5.0

ND

[<10

Pt-

Co]

612

17N

D0.

13A

rmita

ge (

Cob

urg)

1/29

/01

7.4

5.0

1164

218

0.02

0.14

Moh

awk

Riv

er1/

29/0

17.

25.

526

525

17N

D0.

23

Hen

dric

ks2/

26/0

17.

37.

0N

D [<

10 P

t-C

o]58

118

0.06

0.10

Hay

den

Brid

ge2/

26/0

17.

26.

0N

D [<

10 P

t-C

o]62

118

0.10

0.08

Har

vest

2/26

/01

7.3

5.5

ND

[<10

Pt-

Co]

722

190.

040.

17A

rmita

ge (

Cob

urg)

2/26

/01

7.2

6.0

ND

[<10

Pt-

Co]

702

190.

060.

14M

ohaw

k R

iver

2/26

/01

7.1

6.0

1453

418

0.04

0.17

Hen

dric

ks3/

26/0

17.

48.

515

502

160.

040.

08H

ayde

n B

ridge

3/26

/01

7.4

8.5

1650

216

0.06

0.09

Har

vest

3/26

/01

7.4

9.0

1063

317

0.05

0.12

Arm

itage

(C

obur

g)3/

26/0

17.

59.

013

612

170.

050.

12M

ohaw

k R

iver

3/26

/01

7.4

9.0

2146

617

0.03

0.23

N

ote:

ND

= N

on-d

etec

t; FQ

A =

Fai

led

qual

ity a

ssur

ance

(Con

tinue

d on

nex

t pag

e)



Tab

le 3

.3 C

ontin

ued

Sta

tion

Dat

epH

Tem

p (º

C)

Col

or

(P

t-Co

units

)C

ondu

ctiv

ity

(µs/

cm)

Turb

idity

(N

TU)

Har

dnes

s (m

g/L)

Tota

l P

hosp

horu

s (m

g/L)

Tota

l N

itrog

en

(mg/

L)

In V

ivo

Chl

orop

hyll

(mg/

L)H

endr

icks

4/30

/01

7.3

9.0

ND

[<10

Pt-C

o]48

115

0.09

0.11

Hay

den

Brid

ge4/

30/0

17.

39.

0N

D [<

10 P

t-Co]

512

150.

090.

06H

arve

st4/

30/0

17.

410

.0N

D [<

10 P

t-Co]

592

160.

080.

10A

rmita

ge (C

obur

g)4/

30/0

17.

39.

0N

D [<

10 P

t-Co]

572

160.

060.

11M

ohaw

k R

iver

4/30

/01

7.2

11.0

1849

517

0.07

0.14

Hen

dric

ks5/

21/0

17.

312

.524

483

150.

070.

14H

ayde

n B

ridge

5/21

/01

7.3

13.0

1646

216

0.09

0.09

Har

vest

5/21

/01

7.3

13.0

2152

216

0.13

0.13

Arm

itage

(Cob

urg)

5/21

/01

7.3

12.5

2650

315

0.05

0.10

Moh

awk

Riv

er5/

21/0

17.

314

.033

475

170.

080.

16

Hen

dric

ks6/

18/0

17.

213

.5N

D [<

10 P

t-Co]

571

170.

070.

111.

02H

ayde

n B

ridge

6/18

/01

7.3

14.0

ND

[<10

Pt-C

o]56

118

0.05

0.06

0.29

Har

vest

6/18

/01

7.5

13.5

972

120

ND

0.09

0.27

Arm

itage

(Cob

urg)

6/18

/01

7.4

13.5

1079

219

0.04

0.12

1.00

Moh

awk

Riv

er6/

18/0

17.

215

.316

563

19N

D0.

140.

44

Hen

dric

ks7/

30/0

17.

314

.07

551

180.

080.

030.

67H

ayde

n B

ridge

7/30

/01

7.4

17.5

1356

118

0.10

0.02

0.37

Har

vest

7/30

/01

7.5

14.5

871

220

0.10

0.06

1.26

Arm

itage

(Cob

urg)

7/30

/01

7.5

15.0

971

120

0.05

0.05

2.02

Moh

awk

Riv

er7/

30/0

17.

414

.017

614

220.

110.

080.

89

Hen

dric

ks8/

27/0

17.

417

.0N

D [<

10 P

t-Co]

541

17N

D0.

220.

66H

ayde

n B

ridge

8/27

/01

7.3

16.0

ND

[<10

Pt-C

o]55

218

ND

0.07

1.50

Har

vest

8/27

/01

7.3

15.5

ND

[<10

Pt-C

o]67

219

ND

0.19

1.46

Arm

itage

(Cob

urg)

8/27

/01

7.4

16.0

ND

[<10

Pt-C

o]66

119

ND

0.20

0.98

Moh

awk

Riv

er8/

27/0

17.

320

.010

645

23N

D0.

201.

31

Not

e: N

D =

Non

-det

ect



McK

enzi

e Ri

ver

2000

to 2

001

6.8

7.0

7.2

7.4

7.6

7.8

8.0

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1Feb-0

1 Mar-01

Apr-01 May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01

Aug-01

pH

Hend

ricks

Ha

yden

Brid

geHa

rves

t A

rmita

ge (C

obur

g)M

ohaw

k Ri

ver

McK

enzi

e Ri

ver

2000

to 2

001

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Temperature (ºC)

Hend

ricks

Ha

yden

Brid

geHa

rves

t A

rmita

ge (C

obur

g)M

ohaw

k Ri

ver

F

igur

e 3.

35 M

cKen

zie

Riv

er p

H

Fig

ure

3.36

McK

enzi

e R

iver

Tem

pera

ture

McK

enzi

e Ri

ver

2000

to 2

001

051015202530354045 Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01Color (Pt-Co Units)

Hend

ricks

Ha

yden

Brid

geHa

rves

t A

rmita

ge (C

obur

g)M

ohaw

k Ri

ver

Fi

gure

3.3

7 M

cKen

zie

Riv

er C

olor



McK

enzi

e Ri

ver

2000

to 2

001

405060708090 Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Conductivity (µs/cm)He

ndric

ks

Hayd

en B

ridge

Harv

est

Arm

itage

(Cob

urg)

Moh

awk

Rive

r

McK

enzi

e Ri

ver

2000

to 2

001

0123456789

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-0

0 Dec-0

0Ja

n-01 Feb

-01Mar-

01Apr-

01May

-01Ju

n-01

Jul-0

1 Aug-01

Turbidity (NTU)

Hend

ricks

Ha

yden

Brid

geHa

rves

t A

rmita

ge (C

obur

g)M

ohaw

k Ri

ver

F

igur

e 3.

38 M

cKen

zie

Riv

er C

ondu

ctiv

ity

F

igur

e 3.

39 M

cKen

zie

Riv

er T

urbi

dity

McK

enzi

e Ri

ver

2000

to 2

001

1012141618202224262830 Sep-0

0Oct-

00Nov

-00Dec

-00

Jan-0

1Feb

-01Mar

-01Apr-

01May

-01Ju

n-01

Jul-0

1 Aug-01

Hardness (mg/L)

Hend

ricks

Ha

yden

Brid

geHa

rves

t A

rmita

ge (C

obur

g)M

ohaw

k Ri

ver

Fi

gure

3.4

0 M

cKen

zie

Riv

er H

ardn

ess



McK

enzi

e Ri

ver

2000

to 2

001

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14 Sep

-00Oct-

00Nov

-00Dec

-00Ja

n-01 Feb

-01Mar-

01Apr-

01May

-01Ju

n-01

Jul-0

1 Aug-01

Total Phosphorus (mg/L)He

ndric

ks

Hayd

en B

ridge

Harv

est

Arm

itage

(Cob

urg)

Moh

awk

Rive

r

McK

enzi

e Ri

ver

2000

to 2

001

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30 Sep

-00Oct-

00Nov

-00Dec

-00Ja

n-01 Feb

-01Mar-

01Apr-

01May

-01Ju

n-01

Jul-0

1 Aug-01


Hend

ricks

Ha

yden

Brid

geHa

rves

t A

rmita

ge (C

obur

g)M

ohaw

k Ri

ver

Figu

re 3

.41

McK

enzi

e R

iver

Tot

al P

hosp

horu

s

Figu

re 3

.42

McK

enzi

e R

iver

Tot

al N

itrog

en

McK

enzi

e Ri

ver

2000

to 2

001

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

Jun-0

1

Jul-0

1

Aug-01

In Vivo Chlorophyll (mg/L)

Hend

ricks

Ha

yden

Brid

geHa

rves

t A

rmita

ge (C

obur

g)M

ohaw

k Ri

ver

Fi

gure

3.4

3 M

cKen

zie

Riv

er In

Viv

o C

hlor

ophy

ll



Tab

le 3

.4 W

illam

ette

Riv

er W

ater

Che

mis

try

Sta

tion

Dat

epH

Tem

p (º

C)

Col

or

(Pt-

Co

units

)C

ondu

ctiv

ity

(µs/

cm)

Tur

bidi

ty

(NT

U)

Har

dnes

s (m

g/L)

Tot

al

Pho

spho

rus

(mg/

L)

Tot

al

Nitr

ogen

(m

g/L)

Har

risbu

rg9/

25/0

07.

613

.0N

D [<

10 P

t-C

o]65

318

FQ

AF

QA

Car

tney

9/

25/0

07.

513

.0N

D [

<10

Pt-

Co]

613

18F

QA

FQ

AP

eoria

9/25

/00

7.1

13.0

ND

[<

10 P

t-C

o]12

62

41F

QA

FQ

AC

orva

llis

9/25

/00

7.6

13.0

1269

319

FQ

AF

QA

Long

Tom

Riv

er9/

25/0

07.

513

.014

603

18F

QA

FQ

A

Har

risbu

rg10

/23/

007.

611

.011

692

22F

QA

FQ

AC

artn

ey

10/2

3/00

7.3

11.5

1065

319

FQ

AF

QA

Peo

ria10

/23/

007.

111

.0N

D [<

10 P

t-C

o]12

13

38F

QA

FQ

AC

orva

llis

10/2

3/00

7.3

11.0

1774

520

FQ

AF

QA

Long

Tom

Riv

er10

/23/

007.

112

.046

7719

23F

QA

FQ

A

Har

risbu

rg11

/27/

007.

59.

011

873

190.

050.

18C

artn

ey

11/2

7/00

7.4

9.0

1084

219

0.07

0.17

Peo

ria11

/27/

007.

29.

0N

D [<

10 P

t-C

o]11

73

350.

080.

13C

orva

llis

11/2

7/00

7.5

8.5

ND

[<10

Pt-

Co]

753

200.

070.

22Lo

ng T

om R

iver

11/2

7/00

7.4

6.0

5010

616

280.

160.

44

Har

risbu

rg1/

29/0

17.

45.

5N

D [

<10

Pt-

Co]

763

210.

030.

34C

artn

ey

1/29

/01

7.4

6.0

1371

320

0.02

0.38

Peo

ria1/

29/0

17.

16.

0N

D [<

10 P

t-C

o]11

72

38N

D0.

32C

orva

llis

1/29

/01

7.4

5.5

1683

422

0.04

0.44

Long

Tom

Riv

er1/

29/0

17.

45.

046

140

1846

0.03

1.84

Har

risbu

rg2/

26/0

17.

36.

510

733

21C

artn

ey

2/26

/01

7.2

6.5

ND

[<10

Pt-

Co]

733

21P

eoria

2/26

/01

7.0

7.0

ND

[<10

Pt-

Co]

110

235

Cor

valli

s2/

26/0

17.

26.

511

855

24Lo

ng T

om R

iver

2/26

/01

7.3

7.0

4813

514

46

Har

risbu

rg3/

26/0

17.

39.

019

663

200.

040.

24C

artn

ey

3/26

/01

7.3

9.0

1666

420

0.05

0.28

Peo

ria3/

26/0

17.

29.

015

111

237

0.04

0.24

Cor

valli

s3/

26/0

17.

49.

515

785

220.

050.

33Lo

ng T

om R

iver

3/26

/01

7.4

10.0

5013

016

440.

030.

74

Not

e: N

D =

Non

-det

ect;

FQA

= F

aile

d qu

ality

ass

uran

ce

(Con

tinue

d on

nex

t pag

e)



Tab

le 3

.4 C

ontin

ued

Sta

tion

Dat

epH

Tem

p (º

C)

Col

or

(Pt-C

o un

its)

Con

duct

ivity

(µ

s/cm

)Tu

rbid

ity

(NTU

)H

ardn

ess

(mg/

L)

Tota

l P

hosp

horu

s (m

g/L)

Tota

l N

itrog

en

(mg/

L)

In V

ivo

Chl

orop

hyll

(mg/

L)

Har

risbu

rg4/

30/0

17.

310

.016

604

180.

070.

22C

artn

ey

4/30

/01

7.3

11.0

1360

218

0.17

0.19

Peo

ria4/

30/0

17.

112

.013

108

234

0.07

0.17

Cor

vallis

4/30

/01

7.4

12.0

1175

221

0.09

0.26

Long

Tom

Riv

er4/

30/0

17.

411

.016

652

200.

090.

26

Har

risbu

rg5/

21/0

17.

312

.017

643

180.

060.

21C

artn

ey

5/21

/01

7.2

13.0

1754

318

0.05

0.20

Peo

ria5/

21/0

17.

113

.521

744

240.

050.

20C

orva

llis5/

21/0

17.

414

.022

594

180.

040.

20Lo

ng T

om R

iver

5/21

/01

7.3

13.0

2254

418

0.04

0.22

Har

risbu

rg6/

18/0

17.

314

.5N

D [<

10 P

t-Co]

662

200.

060.

290.

99C

artn

ey

6/18

/01

7.3

15.0

ND

[<10

Pt-C

o]67

220

0.04

0.32

1.44

Peo

ria6/

18/0

17.

012

.514

115

839

0.49

2.32

6.93

Cor

vallis

6/18

/01

7.2

15.5

1792

225

0.09

0.22

1.04

Long

Tom

Riv

er6/

18/0

17.

314

.519

732

210.

120.

290.

88

Har

risbu

rg7/

30/0

17.

516

.514

712

200.

090.

311.

75C

artn

ey

7/30

/01

7.4

16.0

ND

[<10

Pt-C

o]69

221

0.06

0.31

1.86

Peo

ria7/

30/0

17.

116

.0N

D [<

10 P

t-Co]

102

233

0.07

0.11

1.29

Cor

vallis

7/30

/01

7.4

17.0

3476

322

0.06

0.25

1.79

Long

Tom

Riv

er7/

30/0

17.

219

.049

126

1539

0.04

0.60

3.13

Har

risbu

rg8/

27/0

17.

317

.0N

D [<

10 P

t-Co]

682

22N

D0.

222.

65C

artn

ey

8/27

/01

7.3

17.5

ND

[<10

Pt-C

o]65

320

ND

0.27

2.83

Peo

ria8/

27/0

16.

917

.0N

D [<

10 P

t-Co]

942

310.

030.

071.

15C

orva

llis8/

27/0

17.

317

.0N

D [<

10 P

t-Co]

712

21N

D0.

154.

94Lo

ng T

om R

iver

8/27

/01

7.2

17.0

ND

[<10

Pt-C

o]66

220

ND

0.18

2.16

N

ote:

ND

= N

on-d

etec

t



Will

amet

te R

iver

200

0 to

200

1

6.8

6.9

7.0

7.1

7.2

7.3

7.4

7.5

7.6

7.7

7.8

Sep-0

0Oct-

00Nov

-00 Dec

-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

pH

Har

risbu

rgC

artn

ey

Peor

iaC

orva

llisLo

ng T

om R

iver

Will

amet

te R

iver

200

0 to

200

1

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

Sep-0

0 Oct-00

Nov-0

0 Dec-0

0Ja

n-01 Feb

-01Mar

-01Apr-

01May

-01Ju

n-01

Jul-0

1 Aug-0

1

Temperature (C)

Har

risbu

rgC

artn

ey

Peor

iaC

orva

llisLo

ng T

om R

iver

Figu

re 3

.44

Will

amet

te R

iver

pH

Fig

ure

3.45

Will

amet

te R

iver

Tem

pera

ture

Will

amet

te R

iver

200

0 to

200

1

010203040506070

Sep-0

0Oct-

00Nov

-00 Dec

-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Color (Pt-Co units)

Har

risbu

rg

Car

tney

Peor

ia

Cor

vallis

Long

Tom

Riv

er

Fi

gure

3.4

6 W

illam

ette

Riv

er C

olor



Will

amet

te R

iver

200

0 to

200

1

406080100

120

140

160

180

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01


Harr

isbu

rgCa

rtney

Pe

oria

Corv

allis

Long

Tom

Riv

er

Will

amet

te R

iver

200

0 to

200

1

02468101214161820

Sep-0

0Oct-

00Nov

-00 Dec

-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Turbidity (NTU)

Harr

isbu

rgCa

rtney

Pe

oria

Corv

allis

Long

Tom

Riv

er

Fi

gure

3.4

7 W

illam

ette

Riv

er C

ondu

ctiv

ity

F

igur

e 3.

48 W

illam

ette

Riv

er T

urbi

dity

Will

amet

te R

iver

200

0 to

200

1

15202530354045505560 Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01

Hardness (mg/L)

Harr

isbu

rgCa

rtney

Pe

oria

Corv

allis

Long

Tom

Riv

er

Fi

gure

3.4

9 W

illam

ette

Riv

er H

ardn

ess



Will

amet

te R

iver

200

0 to

200

1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

Sep-0

0 Oct-00

Nov-0

0 Dec-0

0Ja

n-01 Feb

-01Mar

-01Apr-

01May

-01Ju

n-01

Jul-0

1 Aug-0

1

Total Phosphorus (mg/L)

Har

risbu

rg

Car

tney

Pe

oria

Cor

vallis

Long

Tom

Riv

er

Will

amet

te R

iver

200

0 to

200

1

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

Sep-0

0Oct-

00Nov

-00 Dec

-00

Jan-0

1 Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01 Aug

-01


Har

risbu

rg

Car

tney

Peor

ia

Cor

vallis

Long

Tom

Riv

er

Figu

re 3

.50

Will

amet

te R

iver

Tot

al P

hosp

horu

s

Fig

ure

3.51

Will

amet

te R

iver

Tot

al N

itrog

en

Will

amet

te R

iver

200

0 to

200

1

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

Jun-0

1

Jul-0

1

Aug-0

1In Vivo Chlorophyll (mg/L)

Har

risbu

rg

Car

tney

Peor

ia

Cor

vallis

Long

Tom

Riv

er

Fi

gure

3.5

2 W

illam

ette

Riv

er In

Viv

o C

hlor

ophy

ll




3.5. Effluent Chemistry

Samples of effluent were taken by local mill personnel and shipped overnight on ice to the NCASI West Coast Regional Center for chemical characterization, and to NABF for general water quality analysis including but not limited to color, tannin/lignin, conductivity, turbidity, TSS, BOD, COD and TOC. The New Augusta mill collected composite samples in November and February, and grab samples from April to August 2001; the remaining mills collected grab samples. The value reported for phytosterols is the sum for four analytes: campesterol, stigmasterol, β-sitosterol and stigmatanol. The value reported for resin acids is the sum for ten analytes: pimaric acid, sandrocopimaric acid, isopimaric acid, palustric acid, dehyroacietic acid, abietic acid, neoabieteic acid, 14-chlorodehydroabietic acid, 12-chlorodehydroabeitic acid, and dichlorodehydroabietic acid. The phytosterol non-detect column and the resin acids non-detect column report how many out of the total components measured were non-detects. Tables 3.5-3.8 present the results of the analyses.


Tab

le 3

.5 M

ill E

fflu

ent A

naly

sis f

or th

e C

odor

us C

reek

Fac

ility

, Loc

ated

in S

prin

g G

rove

, Pen

nsyl

vani

a

Dat

eC

olor

(P

CU

)

Tann

in/

Lign

in

(mg/

L)

Con

duc-

tivity

(µ

s/cm

)

Turb

idity

(N

TU)

TSS

(m

g/L)

BO

D

(mg/

L)C

OD

(m

g/L)

TOC

(m

g/L)

Tota

l P

(mg/

L)

Phy

to-

ster

ols

(µg/

L)

Phy

to-

ster

ols

non-

dete

cts

Res

in

Aci

ds

(µg/

L)

Res

in

Aci

ds

non-

dete

cts

9/25

/00

463

8.6

1965

37.

05.

016

650

ND

1.2

3/4

ND

10/1

03/

5/01

296

7.8

2265

59.

06.

016

679

ND

ND

4/4

2.36

8/10

Not

e: N

D =

non

-det

ect

Tab

le 3

.6 M

ill E

fflu

ent A

naly

sis f

or th

e Le

af R

iver

Fac

ility

, Loc

ated

in N

ew A

ugus

ta, M

issi

ssip

pi

New

Aug

usta

, MS

Dat

eS

ampl

e T

ype

Col

or

(PC

U)

Tan

nin/

Li

gnin

(m

g/L)

Con

duc-

tivity

(µ

s/cm

)

Tur

bidi

ty

(NTU

)T

SS

(m

g/L)

BO

D

(mg/

L)C

OD

(m

g/L)

TOC

(m

g/L)

Tot

al P

(m

g/L)

Phy

to-

ster

ols

(µg/

L)

Phy

to-

ster

ols

non-

dete

cts

Res

in

Aci

ds

(µg/

L)

Res

in

Aci

ds n

on-

dete

cts

11/1

3/00

com

posi

te60

720

.224

902

5.0

420

128

0.03

b5.

72/

430

.34/

102/

5/01

com

posi

te86

920

.825

005

9.0

4.8

496

180

0.04

b15

.41/

476

.33/

104/

23/0

1gr

ab75

821

.311

.547

317

8N

D4/

30/0

1gr

ab84

723

.620

.348

617

70.

425/

7/01

grab

673

19.1

3080

915

.33.

938

714

90.

553.

03/

434

.84/

105/

14/0

1gr

ab70

216

.819

.334

912

80.

765/

21/0

1gr

ab53

716

.814

.333

314

70.

666/

25/0

1gr

ab10

1732

.529

0517

33.5

8.1

500

207

23.6

1/4

92.5

3/10

8/20

/01

grab

659

18.5

2470

711

.033

412

30.

202.

23/

411

.27/

10

N

ote:

ND

= n

on-d

etec

t



Tab

le 3

.7 M

ill E

fflu

ent A

naly

sis f

or th

e M

cKen

zie

Riv

er F

acili

ty, L

ocat

ed in

Spr

ingf

ield

, Ore

gon

Dat

eC

olor

(P

CU

)

Tann

in/

Lign

in

(mg/

L)

Con

duc-

tivity

(µ

s/cm

)

Turb

idity

(N

TU)

TSS

(mg/

L)BO

D

(mg/

L)C

OD

(m

g/L)

TOC

(m

g/L)

Tota

l P

(mg/

L)

Phyt

o-st

erol

s (µ

g/L)

Phyt

o-st

erol

s no

n -de

tect

s

Res

in

Acid

s (µ

g/L)

Res

in

Acid

s no

n-de

tect

s10

/23/

0017

316

.812

4416

22.8

100

550.

4123

.00/

41.

49/

1012

/11/

0012

915

.713

3024

31.5

18.2

116

670.

7267

.90/

412

.36/

106/

11/0

117

520

.814

3621

38.5

123

570.

5567

.90/

420

.54/

108/

28/0

113

016

.317

5616

28.0

17.2

129

650.

4616

.60/

412

.26/

10

Tab

le 3

.8 M

ill E

fflu

ent A

naly

sis f

or th

e W

illam

ette

Riv

er F

acili

ty, L

ocat

ed n

ear H

alse

y, O

rego

n

Dat

eC

olor

(P

CU

)

Tann

in/

Lign

in

(mg/

L)

Con

duc-

tivity

(µ

s/cm

)

Turb

idity

(N

TU)

TSS

(mg/

L)BO

D

(mg/

L)C

OD

(m

g/L)

TOC

(m

g/L)

Tota

l P

(mg/

L)

Phy

to-

ster

ols

(µg/

L)

Phy

to-

ster

ols

non-

dete

cts

Res

in

Aci

ds

(µg/

L)

Res

in

Aci

ds

non-

dete

cts

11/1

3/00

448

20.2

2028

1219

.827

211

11.

3138

4.3

0/4

10.8

6/10

1/29

/01

512

24.7

1907

1820

.018

.334

013

10.

6047

1.6

0/4

4.2

9/10

3/19

/01

555

27.5

2060

1216

.533

815

60.

8849

4.9

0/4

14.4

5/10



Efflu

ent 2

000

to 2

001

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1Fe

b-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01

Aug-01

Color (Pt-Co Units)

Hals

ey

New

Aug

usta

Sprin

g G

rove

Sprin

gfie

ld

Efflu

ent 2

000

to 2

001

05101520253035

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1Fe

b-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1

Jul-0

1Aug

-01

Tannin/Lignin (mg/L)

Hals

ey

New

Aug

usta

Sprin

g G

rove

Sprin

gfie

ld

Figu

re 3

.53

Mill

Eff

luen

t Col

or

Fig

ure

3.54

Mill

Eff

luen

t Tan

nin/

Lign

in

Efflu

ent 2

000

to 2

001

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1Fe

b-01Mar-0

1Apr-0

1May

-01Ju

n-01

Jul-0

1Aug

-01


Hals

ey

New

Aug

usta

Sprin

g G

rove

Sprin

gfie

ld

Efflu

ent 2

000

to 2

001

051015202530

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1Feb

-01Mar-

01Apr-0

1May-0

1Ju

n-01

Jul-0

1Aug-0

1

Turbidity (NTU)

Hals

ey

New

Aug

usta

Sprin

g G

rove

Sprin

gfie

ld

Fi

gure

3.5

5 M

ill E

fflu

ent C

ondu

ctiv

ity

F

igur

e 3.

56 M

ill E

fflu

ent T

urbi

dity



Effl

ue

nt

2000

to

200

1

051015202530354045

Sep-0

0

Oct-00

Nov-0

0Dec

-00

Jan-0

1

Feb-

01Mar

-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1

Jul-0

1

Aug-0

1

TSS (mg/L)H

alse

y

New

Aug

usta

Spr

ing

Gro

ve

Spr

ingf

ield

Effl

ue

nt

2000

to

200

1

02468101214161820

Sep-0

0

Oct-00

Nov-0

0Dec

-00

Jan-0

1

Feb-

01Mar

-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1

Jul-0

1Aug

-01

BOD (mg/L)

Hal

sey

New

Aug

usta

Spr

ing

Gro

ve

Spr

ingf

ield

Figu

re 3

.57

Mill

Eff

luen

t TSS

Fi

gure

3.5

8 M

ill E

fflu

ent B

OD

Efflu

ent 2

000

to 2

001

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1Feb

-01Mar-

01Apr-

01May

-01Ju

n-01

Jul-0

1Aug

-01

COD (mg/L)

Hals

eyNe

w A

ugus

taSp

ring

Gro

veSp

ringf

ield

Efflu

ent 2

000

to 2

001

050100

150

200

250

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1Feb-0

1Mar-0

1Apr-

01May-0

1Ju

n-01

Jul-0

1Aug

-01

TOC (mg/L)

Hals

ey

New

Aug

usta

Sprin

g G

rove

Sprin

gfie

ld

Fi

gure

3.5

9 M

ill E

fflu

ent C

OD

Figu

re 3

.60

Mill

Eff

luen

t TO

C



Efflu

ent 2

000

to 2

001

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1Fe

b-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01

Aug-01

Total Phosphorus (mg/L)Ha

lsey

New

Aug

usta

Sprin

g G

rove

Sprin

gfie

ld

Efflu

ent 2

000

to 2

001

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1Feb-01Mar-0

1Apr-0

1May-0

1Ju

n-01

Jul-0

1Aug-0

1

Phytosterols (µg/L)

Hals

ey

New

Aug

usta

Sprin

g G

rove

Sprin

gfie

ld

Fig

ure

3.61

Mill

Eff

luen

t Tot

al P

hosp

horu

s

Fi

gure

3.6

2 M

ill E

fflu

ent P

hyto

ster

ols

Efflu

ent 2

000

to 2

001

0102030405060708090100

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1Fe

b-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01

Aug-01

Resin Acids (µg/L)

Hals

ey

New

Aug

usta

Sprin

g G

rove

Sprin

gfie

ld

Fi

gure

3.6

3 M

ill E

fflu

ent R

esin

Aci

ds




3.6 Effluent Bioassays

Local mill personnel took samples of effluent. Grab samples or composite samples were taken for New Augusta, the remaining mills collected grab samples. The samples were shipped overnight on ice to NABF for echinoderm and bivalve chronic assays, and to the NCASI Southern Aquatic Biology Facility in New Bern, North Carolina, for ceriodaphnia and fathead minnow chronic bioassays. Assays were performed within 7 d of sampling. The LTRWS local mill locations were Spring Grove, Pennsylvania for Codorus Creek, New Augusta, Mississippi, for the Leaf River, Springfield, Oregon for the McKenzie River, and near Halsey, Oregon, for the Willamette River.

Table 3.9 Effluent IC25 (% v/v) for the LTRWS Mills

Spring Grove, PA Date Echinoderma

(Fertilization) Bivalveb (Normal

Development) Ceriodaphnia

(Reproduction)Fathead Minnow

(Growth) 9/25/00 >70.0 39.6 >100.0 >100.0 3/5/01 >70.0 39.4 >100.0 >100.0

New Augusta, MS Date Echinoderma




(Growth) 11/13/00 34.8 13.1

2/5/01 20.4 4.4 4/23/01 4/30/01 5/7/01 7.0 7.7 >100.0 >100.0

5/14/01 5/21/01 6/25/01 7.6 4.4 80.1 >100.0 8/20/01 25.1 14.2 >100.0 >100.0

Springfield, OR Date Echinoderma




(Growth) 10/23/00 15.1 58.3 >100.0 12/11/00 >70.0 31.7 94.2 >100.0 6/11/01 >100.0 >100.0 6/11/01 >100.0 >100.0 8/28/01 >70.0 >100.0 >100.0

Halsey, OR Date Echinoderma




(Growth) 11/13/00 28.4 13.8 65.3 >100.0 1/29/01 61.1 10.3 91.4 >100.0 3/19/01 39.9 11.7 >100.0 >100.0

a Dendraster excentricus or Strongylocentrotus purpuratus b Mytilius galloprovincialis



Spring Grove, PA

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1

Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01

Aug-01

EchinodermBivalveCeriodaphniaFathead Minnow

New Augusta, MS

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Sep-0

0Oct-

00

Nov-0

0

Dec-0

0

Jan-0

1

Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01

Aug-0

1


Figure 3.64 Spring Grove, PA, IC25s Figure 3.65 New Augusta, MS, IC25s

Springfield, OR

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1

Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01

Aug-0

1


Halsey, OR

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Sep-00

Oct-00

Nov-00

Dec-00

Jan-0

1

Feb-01

Mar-01

Apr-01

May-01

Jun-0

1Ju

l-01

Aug-01


Figure 3.66 Springfield, OR, IC25s Figure 3.67 Halsey, OR, IC25s



3.7 Periphyton

Periphyton samples were taken quarterly for chlorophyll a and semi-annually for taxonomic evaluation on Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, and Willamette River. On Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, and Willamette River, sampling was done by scraping and rinsing five cobble-size (7 to 13 cm in diameter) randomly selected rocks. Detached periphyton were rinsed into a container, filtered, and the volume (total volume and filtered volume) recorded. Rock surface area was estimated using the caliper method (Dudley et al. 2001). The Leaf River was sampled in the fall for both chlorophyll a and taxonomy, and in the spring for chlorophyll a only. Fall 2000 chlorophyll a and taxonomy sampling for the Leaf River were done using an artificial substrate, wooden dowels, exposed for five weeks with three replicates per site. Spring 2001 chlorophyll a sampling on the Leaf River was done using native sand samples with one replicate per site. All samples were split, with a portion field-filtered for pigment analysis and a portion preserved with Lugol’s Iodine for taxonomic analysis when needed. Samples were analyzed for chlorophyll a within 28 d using trichromatic methods (APHA 1998). Spring 2001 Leaf River periphyton taxonomy on the Leaf River was done using scrapings from Hester-Dendy plates and native sand samples. Periphyton taxonomy was conducted by PhycoTech, Inc. (St. Joseph, Michigan).

The periphyton and benthic macroinvertebrates shared the same sampling sites, with Codorus Creek having seven sites, the Leaf River having six sites, McKenzie River having five sites, and the Willamette River having eight sampling sites. There were three missing samples for the Leaf River for the May 2001 sampling date; the Hester-Dendy plates deployed at Downstream and McLain were not recovered, and the sand periphyton sample for New Augusta could not be analyzed. There were no missing samples for Codorus Creek, the McKenzie River, and the Willamette River.

Table 3.10 Codorus Creek Periphyton Summary, August 2000

East Arsenal Menges USGS Martin Graybill FurnaceBranch No. of Diatom Taxa 20 12 15 11 8 9 4No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 11 10 11 10 8 9 8No. of Divisions 3 3 3 4 3 3 3



East Branch

Diatom9%

Chloro- phyte4%

Cyano-phyte87%

Menges

Chloro- phyte5%

Diatom7%Cyano-

phyte88%

USGS

Chloro- phyte5%

Diatom5%

Cyano-phyte90%

Martin

Diatom2%

Cyano-phyte98%

Graybill

Cyano-phyte91% Chloro-

phyte4%

Diatom5%

Arsenal

Chloro- phyte7%

Diatom12%Cyano-

phyte81%

Furnace

Diatom2%

Chloro- phyte27%

Cyano-phyte71%

Figure 3.68 Codorus Creek Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), August 2000



Table 3.11. Codorus Creek Periphyton Summary, June 2001 East Arsenal Menges USGS Martin Graybill FurnaceBranch

No. of Diatom Taxa 17 22 20 22 17 10 11No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 10 4 7 5 9 7 9No. of Divisions 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

East Branch

Diatom11%

Chloro- phyte20%

Cyano-phyte69%

Menges

Chloro- phyte14%

Diatom6%

Cyano-phyte80%

USGS

Chloro- phyte8%

Diatom56%

Cyano-phyte36%

Martin

Diatom28%

Chloro- phyte30%Cyano-

phyte42%

Graybill

Diatom10%

Chloro- phyte17%

Cyano-phyte73%

Arsenal

Diatom64%

Cyano-phyte27%

Chloro- phyte9%

Furnace

Diatom18%

Chloro- phyte18%

Cyano-phyte64%

Figure 3.69 Codorus Creek Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division

(Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), June 2001



Table 3.12 Leaf River Periphyton Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001

Date Sampling Substrate TallahalaNew

Augusta Downstream Bogue Thompson McLainOctober 2000 Wooden dowels No. of Diatom Taxa 7 6 11 4 6 7October 2000 Wooden dowels No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 14 11 14 13 7 10October 2000 Wooden dowels No. of Divisions 4 3 3 4 3 3

May 2001 Sand No. of Diatom Taxa 26 no data 15 22 13 15May 2001 Sand No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 5 no data 3 3 6 9May 2001 Sand No. of Divisions 4 no data 3 4 4 2

May 2001 Hester-Dendy Plates No. of Diatom Taxa 7 9 no data 9 7 no dataMay 2001 Hester-Dendy Plates No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 9 12 no data 9 6 no dataMay 2001 Hester-Dendy Plates No. of Divisions 3 3 no data 3 3 no data

Tallahala

Chloro- phyte13%

Diatom8%

Cyano- phyte79%

New Augusta

Chloro- phyte25%

Diatom4%

Cyano- phyte71%

Downstream

Chloro- phyte17%

Diatom7%

Cyano- phyte76%

Bogue

Diatom2%

Chloro- phyte2%

Cyano- phyte96%

Thompson

Cyano- phyte92%

Diatom5%

Chloro- phyte3%

McLain

Chloro- phyte2%

Diatom6%

Cyano- phyte92%

Figure 3.70 Leaf River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Using

Wooden Dowels (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), October 2000



Tallahala

Cyano- phyte9%

Chloro- phyte33%

Diatom58%

Downstream

Chloro- phyte20%

Diatom76%

Cyano- phyte4%

Bogue

Cyano- phyte2%

Chloro- phyte5%Diatom

93%

Thompson

Chloro- phyte67%

Diatom33%

McLain

Diatom24%

Chloro- phyte76%

Figure 3.71 Leaf River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Using Sand Periphyton (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), May 2001



Tallahala

Chloro- phyte84%

Cyano- phyte11%

Diatom5%

New Augusta

Cyano- phyte11%Chloro-

phyte80%

Diatom9%

Bogue

Cyano- phyte4%

Diatom3%

Chloro- phyte93%

Thompson

Diatom2%Chloro-

phyte98%

Figure 3.72 Leaf River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division Using Hester-Dendy Plates (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), May 2001



Table 3.13 McKenzie River Periphyton Summary, September 2000

Walterville RM20.5

Bellingers RM18.5 Mohawk RM14 Harvest RM10 Armitage RM6

No. of Diatom Taxa 12 23 21 17 19 No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 14 18 13 17 14 No. of Divisions 4 3 3 3 3

Walterville RM 20.5

Chloro-phyte1%

Cyano-phyte97%

Diatom2%

Bellingers RM 18.5

Chloro- phyte1%

Diatom8%

Cyano-phyte91%

Mohawk RM 14

Cyano-phyte81% Chloro-

phyte14%

Diatom5%

Harvest RM 10

Chloro- phyte1%

Diatom8%Cyano-

phyte91%

Armitage RM 6

Diatom5%

Cyano-phyte92%

Chloro- phyte3%

Figure 3.73 McKenzie River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), September 2000



Table 3.14 McKenzie River Periphyton Summary, July 2001 Walterville RM20.5

Bellingers RM18.5

Mohawk RM14

Harvest RM10

Armitage RM6

No. of Diatom Taxa 17 21 29 20 20 No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 7 8 7 11 7 No. of Divisions 3 3 3 3 3

Walterville RM 20.5

Diatom2%

Cyano-phyte98%

Bellingers RM 18.5

Diatom10%Cyano-

phyte86%

Chloro- phyte4%

Mohawk RM 14

Diatom29%

Chloro- phyte4%

Cyano-phyte67%

Harvest RM 10

Diatom7%

Chloro- phyte6%

Cyano-phyte87%

Armitage RM 6

Chloro- phyte32%

Diatom11%

Cyano-phyte57%

Figure 3.74 McKenzie River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing < 1%), June 2001



Table 3.15 Willamette River Periphyton Summary, September 2000

Whitely RM 176

Chloro- phyte4%

Diatom14%Cyano-

phyte82%

Harrisburg RM 160

Chloro- phyte5%

Diatom16%

Cyano- phyte79%

Cartney RM 156

Chloro- phyte6%

Diatom44%

Cyano- phyte50%

Intake RM 148

Chloro- phyte14%

Diatom23%Cyano-

phyte63%

Sam Daws RM 145.5

Chloro- phyte16%

Cyano- phyte58%

Diatom26%

Snag Boat RM 143.5

Chloro- phyte4%

Diatom27%

Cyano- phyte69%

Willamette RM 134

Cyano- phyte70%

Diatom23%

Chloro- phyte7%

Corvallis RM 128

Diatom1%

Chloro- phyte3%

Cyano- phyte96%

Figure 3.75 Willamette River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing <1%), September 2000

Whitely RM 176

Harrisburg RM160

Cartney RM156

Intake RM148

Sam Daws RM 145.5

Snag Boat Willamette Corvallis RM134 RM128RM143.5

19 No. of Diatom Taxa 18 20 26 27 2426 1214 No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 12 13 10 15 1415 123 No. of Divisions 3 3 3 3 33 3



Table 3.16 Willamette River Periphyton Summary, July 2001

Snag Boat Willamette Whitely Harrisburg Cartney Intake Sam Daws

Corvallis RM 176 RM143.5 RM134 RM 145.5RM160 RM156 RM148 RM128

No. of Diatom Taxa 16 13 14 13 19 27 24 15No. of Non-Diatom Taxa 11 7 9 9 8 11 12 11No. of Divisions 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Whitely RM 176

Chloro- phyte1%

Diatom6%Cyano-

phyte93%

Harrisburg RM 160

Chloro- phyte2%

Diatom1%Cyano-

phyte97%

Cartney RM 156

Diatom3%

Cyano- phyte97%

Intake RM 148

Chloro- phyte8%

Diatom17%Cyano-

phyte75%

Sam Daws RM 145.5

Chloro- phyte5%

Diatom19%

Cyano- phyte76%

Snag Boat RM 143.5

Chloro- phyte3%

Diatom33%Cyano-

phyte64%

Willamette Park RM 134

Chloro- phyte1%

Diatom5%Cyano-

phyte94%

Corvallis RM 128

Diatom6%

Cyano- phyte94%

Figure 3.76 Willamette River Periphyton Cell or Colony Distribution by Taxonomic Division (Excluding Divisions Contributing <1%), July 2001


Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

020406080100

120

140 Eas

t Branc

h

Menges

USGS

Martin

Graybil

l

Arsena

l

Furna

ce

Mean Chl a (mg/m2)

8/22

/200

011

/4/2

000

3/20

/200

1

06/1

2/01

Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

010203040506070

Tallah

ala

New Augusta

Downstre

am

Bogue

Thompso

n

McLain

Mean Chl a (mg/m2)

9/15

-10/

18/0

05/

17-5

/18/

01

McK

enzi

e Ri

ver

2000

to 2

001

020406080100

120

140

160

180

Hendric

ks

Belling

ers

Mohawk

Harvest

Armita

ge

Mean Chl a (mg/m2)

09/2

1/00

12/0

7/00

03/0

8/01

07/1

2/01

Will

amet

te R

iver

200

0 to

200

1

020406080100

120

140

160

180

200

Whitely

Harrisb

urg

Cartne

y

Intak

e

Snag B

oat

Willamette

Corvall

is

Mean Chl a (mg/m2)

09/1

9/00

12/0

5/00

03/0

6/01

7/10

/01

Figu

re 3

.77

Mea

n C

hlor

ophy

ll a

(mg/

m2 ) L

TRW

S R

iver

s for

Stu

dy Y

ear 2

000

to 2

001




3.8 Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Benthic macroinvertebrates were collected quarterly on Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, and Willamette River for biomass and taxonomic evaluation. All samples from Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, and Willamette River were collected using a Hess sampler with five replicates per site. Leaf River samples were collected twice during the sampling period covered in this compendium, using Hester-Dendy multi-plate samplers exposed for five weeks, with three replicates per site, and macroinvertebrate collections from natural woody debris. All data were normalized to area (1m2). Samples were preserved in 10% buffered formalin and shipped to Benthix Consulting for taxonomic evaluation. Samples were returned in 10% buffered formalin to NABF for biomass analysis.

The benthic macroinvertebrate sampling sites were the same as the periphyton sampling sites, with Codorus Creek having seven sites, the Leaf River having six sites, the McKenzie River having five sites, and the Willamette River having eight sampling sites. The Leaf River had two missing samples; the Hester-Dendy plates deployed at McLain and Downstream were not recovered for the May 2001 sampling date. There were no missing samples for Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, or Willamette River.



3.8.1 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Table 3.17 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site, Study Year 2000 to 2001

Order Family Genus Species Furn

ace

Ars

enal

Gra

ybill

Mar

tin

US

GS

Men

ges

Eas

t Bra

nch

Amphipoda Gammaridae Gammarus xColeoptera Curculionidae Lixus x

Dryopidae Helichus xDytiscidae x x

Cybister xHydroporous x

Elmidae Ancyronyx variegatusDubiraphia vittataMacronychus glabratusMicrocylloepus pusillusOptioservus x

ovalistrivittatus

Oulimnius latiusculusStenelmis x

Hydrophilidae x xBerosus x

Psephenidae Ectopria xPsephenus herricki

Ptilodactylidae Anchytarsus bicolorStratiomyidae x x

Decapoda Cambaridae x xDiptera Ceratopogonidae Ceratopogon x

cf. Bezzia xCulicoides x

Chironomidae Ablabesmyia mallochiBrillia flavifronsCardiocladius xChaetocladius xChironomus xCladotanytarsus mancus gr.

vanderwulpi gr.vanderwulpi gr. Avanderwulpi gr. B

Conchapelopia fasciata gr.Corynoneura xCricotopus x

bicinctuscf. sylvestrissp. Ctrifascia

Cricotopus/Orthocladius gr. xCryptochironomus cf. blarina

cf. sorexDiamesa xDiamesa/Sympotthastia xDicrotendipes fumidus

neomodestusnervosus

Diplocladius cultrigerDoncricotopus bicaudatusEukiefferiella claripennis gr.

coerulescens gr.devonica gr.pseudomontana gr.

Hayesomyia senataHeleniella xHelopelopia cornuticaudata

(Continued on next page)



Table 3.17 Continued


ace

Ars

enal

Gra

ybill

Mar

tin

US

GS

Men

ges

Eas

t Bra

nch

Diptera Chironomidae Heterotrissocladius marcidus gr.Hydrobaenus xLimnophyes xLopescladius xMeropelopia flavifrons

sp. Asp. B

Microtendipes pedellus gr.Nanocladius crassicornis

distinctusspiniplenus

Natarsia baltimoreussp. A of Roback

Neozavrelia xNilotanypus fimbriatusNimbocera x

sp. Asp. B

Orthocladius xashei/rivicolacarlatuslignicolamallochirivicolarivulorumsp. Asp. B

Pagastia xparticasp. A

Paracladopelma undineParakiefferiella xParalauterborniella nigrohalteraleParametriocnemus xParatanytarsus x

inopertus gr.Paratendipes cf. albimanusPhaenopsectra obediens gr.

punctipes gr.Polypedilum aviceps

cf. halteralefallaxflavumillinoense gr.scalaenum

Potthastia gaedii gr.longimana

Procladius xPseudochironomus xRheocricotopus robackiRheotanytarsus xStempellinella xStictochironomus x

poecilopterusStilocladius xSublettea coffmaniSynorthocladius semivirensTanypus x






ace

Ars

enal

Gra

ybill

Mar

tin

US

GS

Men

ges

Eas

t Bra

nch

Diptera Chironomidae Tanytarsus curticornis gr.eminulus gr.pallidicornis & aculeatus gr.sp. Dsp. Esp. Fsp. G

Thienemanniella xThienemannimyia gr. xTvetenia bavarica gr.

discoloripes gr.Zavrelimyia x

Dolichopodidae x xEmpididae Chelifera x

Clinocera xHemerodromia x

Muscidae cf. Limnophora xPsychodidae cf. Pericoma xSimuliidae Prosimulium x

Simulium xTabanidae Chrysops x

Tabanus xTipulidae Antocha x

Dicranota xLimnophila xPseudolimnophila xTipula x

Ephemeroptera Baetidae Acentrella turbidaBaetis xDiphetor x

Caenidae Caenis xEphemerellidae x x

Attenella xEphemerella subvariaSerratella x

Ephemeridae Ephemera xHeptageniidae Stenonema/Stenacron xIsonychiidae Isonychia xLeptohyphidae Tricorythodes xLeptophlebiidae Leptophlebia x

x xGastropoda Ancylidae x x

Physidae Physella xGyraulus x

Hemiptera Veliidae Rhagovelia xHirudinea Erpobdellidae Mooreobdella fervida

Helobdella xfuscastagnalis

Hydracarina x x xHydroida Hydridae Hydra xIsopoda Asellidae Caecidotea xLepidoptera Pyralidae Petrophila xMegaloptera Corydalidae Corydalus cornutus

Sialidae Sialis xOdonata Aeshnidae x x

Calopterygidae x xCoenagrionidae Argia x






ace

Ars

enal

Gra

ybill

Mar

tin

US

GS

Men

ges

Eas

t Bra

nch

Odonata Coenagrionidae Coenagrion/Enallagma xGomphidae x x

Pelecypoda Sphaeriidae x xPlecoptera x x x

Capniidae Allocapnia xChloroperlidae Suwallia xLeuctridae Leuctra xNemouridae Amphinemura x

Prostoia xPerlidae x x

Acroneuria xPerlesta x

Taeniopterygidae Taenionema atlanticumTaeniopteryx x

metequiGlossosomatidae Anagapetus x

Trichoptera Glossosoma xGoeridae Goera xHydropsychidae x x

Cheumatopsyche xDiplectrona modestaHydropsyche x

type Atype B

Hydroptilidae Hydroptila xLeucotrichia pictipesOchrontrichia x

Lepidostomatidae Lepidostoma xLeptoceridae Ceraclea x

Mystacides xOecetis x

Philopotamidae Chimarra xDolophilodes x

Psychomyiidae Psychomyia flavidaUenoidae Neophylax x

Tricladida x x x



Table 3.18 Codorus Creek Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001

Date Site Total # Taxa % EPT1

% Chironomidae

% Diptera

Total Abundance (count/site)

August 2000 Furnace 56 41.9 81.3 8.3 2852August 2000 Arsenal 71 40.2 30.4 32.4 9877August 2000 Graybill 54 21.2 39.2 40.0 5847August 2000 Martin 44 41.9 27.6 28.9 6549August 2000 USGS 54 38.0 26.0 26.4 1901August 2000 Menges 80 22.8 38.2 52.7 6983August 2000 East Branch 72 36.2 47.6 52.0 2473

November 2000 Furnace 56 8.1 76.9 78.1 5441November 2000 Arsenal 60 2.8 79.2 81.4 3901November 2000 Graybill 59 22.2 40.1 42.0 10510November 2000 Martin 60 18.2 43.4 46.9 8259November 2000 USGS 71 37.8 39.7 41.0 3780November 2000 Menges 75 44.1 31.2 45.5 6557November 2000 East Branch 76 26.7 45.6 60.8 5315

March 2001 Furnace 66 4.9 64.9 66.4 1916March 2001 Arsenal 65 0.7 88.1 90.7 2172March 2001 Graybill 81 3.8 68.4 70.0 9382March 2001 Martin 68 4.3 74.5 75.3 9478March 2001 USGS 90 15.0 76.3 77.1 5081March 2001 Menges 85 8.9 80.2 86.0 12751March 2001 East Branch 99 11.7 65.0 82.8 5655

June 2001 Furnace 43 23.5 15.0 15.2 1000June 2001 Arsenal 73 5.3 72.4 73.2 3591June 2001 Graybill 59 11.8 61.4 62.2 5082June 2001 Martin 64 10.5 45.0 47.1 11642June 2001 USGS 53 46.1 15.0 15.1 1789June 2001 Menges 73 7.9 70.9 79.3 6824June 2001 East Branch 86 25.6 57.7 65.2 6278

1 EPT = Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera taxa


Tab

le 3

.19

Cod

orus

Cre

ek B

enth

ic M

acro

inve

rtebr

ate

Bio

mas

s, St

udy

Yea

r 200

0 to

200

1(m

eans

for 5

repl

icat

es)

East

Bra

nch

Men

ges

USG

SM

artin

Gra

ybill

Arse

nal

Furn

ace

08/2

2/00

1.24

747.

4963

2.30

814.

7940

2.49

266.

5126

4.18

0911

/14/

006.

0807

19.5

226

6.08

309.

0230

11.3

351

3.70

095.

0630

03/2

0/01

6.77

218.

5260

4.46

308.

0086

8.24

882.

5035

5.65

7406

/12/

013.

8719

7.44

912.

4381

17.6

797

8.04

867.

4421

1.78

30

Mea

n D

ry W

eigh

t (g/

m2 )

East

Bra

nch

Men

ges

USG

SM

artin

Gra

ybill

Arse

nal

Furn

ace

08/2

2/00

0.65

495.

1581

1.11

143.

0500

1.55

703.

8893

2.66

0411

/14/

004.

3581

15.9

758

3.91

566.

4407

8.69

162.

2328

3.18

1903

/20/

014.

6526

6.66

262.

8435

5.94

475.

7244

1.22

583.

5167

06/1

2/01

2.37

844.

8000

1.10

589.

8077

5.95

565.

7935

0.70

91

Mea

n As

h-Fr

ee D

ry W

eigh

t (g/

m2 )

Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

0.00

00

5.00

00

10.0

000

15.0

000

20.0

000

25.0

000 Eas

t Bran

ch

Menges

USGS

Martin

Graybil

l

Arsena

l

Furnac

e

g/m2

08/2

2/00

11/1

4/00

03/2

0/01

06/1

2/01

Cod

orus

Cre

ek 2

000

to 2

001

0.00

00

2.00

00

4.00

00

6.00

00

8.00

00

10.0

000

12.0

000

14.0

000

16.0

000

18.0

000

East B

ranch

Menges

USGS

Martin

Graybill

Arsena

lFurn

ace

g/m2

08/2

2/00

11/1

4/00

03/2

0/01

06/1

2/01

Figu

re 3

.78

Cod

orus

Cre

ek B

enth

ic M

acro

inve

rtebr

ate

Figu

re 3

.79

Cod

orus

Cre

ek B

enth

ic M

acro

inve

rtebr

ate

M

ean

Dry

Wei

ght

Mea

n A

sh-F

ree

Dry

Wei

ght



East

Bra

nch

Plec

opte

ra4%

Olig

ocha

eta

4%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra6%

Hydr

acar

ina

3%

Tric

hopt

era

37%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra25

%

Chiro

nom

idae

13%

Tric

ladi

da2%

Cole

opte

ra4%

Gas

tropo

da2%

Men

ges

Tric

ladi

da1%

Chiro

nom

idae

9%

Deca

poda

1%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra8%

Isop

oda

3%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra3%

Olig

ocha

eta

4%

Cole

opte

ra1%

Am

phip

oda

8%

Tric

hopt

era

61%

USG

S

Oth

er D

ipte

ra2%

Tric

ladi

da2%

Am

phip

oda

2%Co

leop

tera

7%

Olig

ocha

eta

8%

Odo

nata

3%

Meg

alop

tera

6%

Gas

tropo

da2%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra25

%

Chiro

nom

idae

10%

Deca

poda

13%

Isop

oda

2%Hy

drac

arin

a2%

Tric

hopt

era

12%

Pele

cypo

da3%

Figu

re 3

.80

Ben

thic

Mac

roin

verte

brat

e Fa

mily

Dis

tribu

tion

by P

erce

nt D

ry W

eigh

t for

Cod

orus

Cre

ek S

ampl

ing

Site

s Ups

tream

of M

ill

Dis

char

ge, S

tudy

Yea

r 200

0 to

200

1 (r

epre

sent

s the

sum

of a

ll re

plic

ates

and

seas

onal

sam

ples

for t

he e

ntire

stud

y ye

ar fo

r all

fam

ilies

co

ntrib

utin

g >1

% o

f the

tota

l)



Mar

tinTr

icla

dida

3%C

hiro

nom

idae

6%C

oleo

pter

a13

%Tr

icho

pter

a15

%

Pel

ecyp

oda

12%

Odo

nata

22%

Meg

alop

tera

9%

Isop

oda

6%Eph

emer

opte

ra 2%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra1%

Dec

apod

a4%

Olig

ocha

eta

8%

Gra

ybill

Cole

opte

ra17

%

Tric

ladi

da2%

Am

phip

oda

1%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra4%

Deca

poda

19%

Chiro

nom

idae

10%

Tric

hopt

era

27%

Pele

cypo

da2%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra3% G

astro

poda

1%

Hydr

acar

ina

1%

Meg

alop

tera

4%

Olig

ocha

eta

9%

Arse

nal

Tric

ladi

da7%

Pele

cypo

da2%

Am

phip

oda

2%Co

leop

tera

6%

Chiro

nom

idae

11%

Olig

ocha

eta

7%Hydr

acar

ina

3% Lepi

dopt

era

2%

Isop

oda

1%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra6%

Gas

tropo

da1%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra3%

Tric

hopt

era

5%

Deca

poda

45%

Furn

ace

Oth

er D

ipte

ra2%

Chiro

nom

idae

9%

Am

phip

oda

10%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra11

% Olig

ocha

eta

13%

Pele

cypo

da2%

Cole

opte

ra13

%

Tric

ladi

da12

%

Deca

poda

20%

Gas

tropo

da1% Hi

rudi

nea

2% Odo

nata

2%

Tric

hopt

era

3%

Figu

re 3

.81

Ben

thic

Mac

roin

verte

brat

e Fa

mily

Dis

tribu

tion

by P

erce

nt D

ry W

eigh

t for

Cod

orus

Cre

ek S

ampl

ing

Site

s Dow

nstre

am o

f Mill

D

isch

arge

, Stu

dy Y

ear 2

000

to 2

001

(rep

rese

nts t

he su

m o

f all

repl

icat

es a

nd se

ason

al sa

mpl

es fo

r the

ent

ire st

udy

year

for a

ll fa

mili

es

cont

ribut

ing

>1%

of t

he to

tal)




3.8.2 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Table 3.20 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2001

Order Family Genus Species Talla

halla

New

Aug

usta

Dow

nstr

eam

Bog

ue

Thom

pson

McL

ain

Coleoptera Elmidae Ancyronyx variegatusMacronychus glabratusOrdobrevia xStenelmis x

Diptera Chironomidae Ablabesmyia xmallochi

AxarusCorynoneuraCricotopus bicinctusCricotopus/Orthocladius gr. xCricotopus xCryptochironomus cf. sorexDicrotendipes neomodestusGlyptotendipes xNanocladius crassicornis

distinctusdownesiunknown

Nilothauma xParachironomus arcuatus gr.Paratanytarsus xPentaneura xPhaenopsectra obediens gr.Polypedilum flavum

illinoense gr.scalaenum

Pseudochironomus xRheocricotopus robackiRheopelopia xRheotanytarsus xStelechomyia perpulchraStenochironomus xTanytarsus curticornis gr.

pallidicornis&aculeatus gr.sp. Dsp. E

Thienemanniella xThienemannimyia gr. x

Empididae Hemerodromia xSimuliidae Simulium x

Ephemeroptera Baetidae Baetis xCaenidae Caenis hilarisHeptageniidae Heptagenia flavescens

Stenonema exiguumintegrumtype A

unknown xIsonychiidae Isonychia xLeptohyphidae Asioplax dolani

Tricorythodes fictusGastropoda Ancylidae x xHydracarina x x xHydroida Hydridae Hydra xMegaloptera Corydalidae Corydalus cornutusOdonata Calopterygidae early instar

Coenagrionidae Argia xPelecypoda Sphaeriidae xPlecoptera Perlidae x x

Perlidae Neoperla x (Continued on next page)





halla

New

Aug

usta

Dow

nstr

eam

Bog

ue

Thom

pson

McL

ain

Plecoptera Perlidae Paragnetina xPerlesta xx x

Trichoptera Hydropsychidae Cheumatopsyche xHydropsyche xPotamyia flavax x

Hydroptilidae Hydroptila xMayatrichia xOxyethira x

Leptoceridae Ceraclea xNectopsyche xOecetis x

Philopotamidae Chimarra xPolycentropodidae Cyrnellus fraternus

Neureclipsis xNictiophylax x



Table 3.21 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site Using Natural Woody Substrate, Study Year 2000 to 2001


hala

New

Aug

usta

Dow

nstre

am

Bog

ue

Thom

spon

McL

ain

Coleoptera Elmidae x xMacronychus glabratusStenelmis x

Diptera Chironomidae Ablabesmyia mallochiCricotopus bicinctusCricotopus/Orthocladius gr. xNanocladius crassicornisPolypedilum flavumRheotanytarsus xThienemanniella xThienemannimyia gr. x

Empididae Hemerodromia xSimuliidae x x

Simulium xTabanidae Chrysops x

Ephemeroptera Baetidae x xBaetis x

intercalarisHeterocloeon xProcloeon x

rivulareCaenidae x x

Caenis hilarisHeptageniidae x x

Heptagenia xflavescens

Stenonema exiguummexicanumterminatum

Isonychiidae Isonychia siccaLeptohyphidae Asioplax dolani

Tricorythodes fictusTricorythidae Tricorythodes x

Hemiptera Naucoridae Pelocoris xHydracarina x x xMegaloptera Corydalidae Corydalus xOdonata Coenagrionidae Argia x

Gomphidae Erpetogomphus xPlecoptera Perlidae x x

Beloneuria xNeoperla xParagnetina xPerlesta x

Trichoptera Hydropsychidae x xCheumatopsyche xHydropsyche x

type Atype B

Hydroptilidae x xHydroptila xOxyethira x

Leptoceridae Ceraclea xPhilopotamidae Chimarra xPolycentropodidae Neureclipsis x

Nictiophylax x



Table 3.22 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary Using Hester-Dendy Plates, Study Year 2000 to 2001

Date Site Total # Taxa % EPT1 % Chironomidae % Diptera


October 2000 Tallahalla 37 60.2 37.4 38.4 1933 October 2000 New Augusta 39 72.3 25.0 27.2 2829 October 2000 Downstream 42 70.3 26.4 27.0 1224 October 2000 Bogue 28 53.3 27.0 44.6 1732 October 2000 Thompson 34 60.3 33.6 38.7 1546 October 2000 McLain 32 43.5 48.5 53.5 823 May 2001 Tallahalla 39 59.1 39.7 40.5 3163 May 2001 New Augusta 44 66.8 32.3 32.9 3699 May 2001 Downstream no sample May 2001 Bogue 37 44.0 54.5 55.2 3598 May 2001 Thompson 38 42.6 57.2 57.3 3972 May 2001 McLain no sample


Table 3.23 Leaf River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary Using Natural Woody Substrate, Study Year 2000 to 2001

Date Site Total # Taxa % EPT1 % Chironomidae % Diptera


October 2000 Tallahalla 14 90.3 0.0 1.6 62 October 2000 New Augusta 13 83.6 0.0 16.4 116 October 2000 Downstream 5 100.0 0.0 0.0 16 October 2000 Bogue 12 93.3 0.0 5.0 60 October 2000 Thompson 7 97.5 0.0 0.0 40 October 2000 McLain 9 63.6 0.0 9.1 11 May 2001 Tallahalla 23 78.3 18.9 18.9 143 May 2001 New Augusta 9 72.1 20.9 23.3 43 May 2001 Downstream 16 69.8 29.1 30.2 179 May 2001 Bogue 16 84.3 7.8 7.8 51 May 2001 Thompson 19 86.0 7.0 8.8 57 May 2001 McLain 12 96.4 3.6 3.6 55



Tab

le 3

.24

Lea

f Riv

er B

enth

ic M

acro

inve

rtebr

ate

Bio

mas

s Usi

ng H

este

r-D

endy

Pla

tes,

Stud

y Y

ear 2

000

to 2

001

(mea

ns fo

r 3 re

plic

ates

)

Talla

hala

New

Aug

usta

Dow

nstre

am

Bog

ueTh

omps

onM

cLai

n10

/16/

002.

1566

2.91

761.

7929

1.92

172.

3622

1.44

7203

/17/

014.

2775

8.59

40no

dat

a6.

2711

9.27

79no

dat

a

Mea

n D

ry W

eigh

t (g/

m2 )

Talla

hala

New

Aug

usta

Dow

nstre

am

Bog

ueTh

omps

onM

cLai

n10

/16/

001.

2494

1.80

261.

0225

1.03

930.

6183

1.14

5703

/17/

013.

2393

7.31

31no

dat

a5.

0390

8.11

35no

dat

a

Mea

n A

sh-F

ree

Dry

Wei

ght (

g/m

2 )

Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

0.00

001.

0000

2.00

003.

0000

4.00

005.

0000

6.00

007.

0000

8.00

009.

0000

10.0

000 Ta

llaha

laNew

Augus

taDow

nstre

am

Bogue

Thom

pson

McLain

g/m2

10/1

6/00

03/1

7/01

Leaf

Riv

er 2

000

to 2

001

0.00

00

1.00

00

2.00

00

3.00

00

4.00

00

5.00

00

6.00

00

7.00

00

8.00

00

9.00

00

Talla

halaNew

Augus

taDow

nstre

am

Bogue

Thomps

on

McLain

g/m2

10/1

6/00

03/1

7/01

Figu

re 3

.82

Lea

f Riv

er B

enth

ic M

acro

inve

rtebr

ate

F

igur

e 3.

83 L

eaf R

iver

Ben

thic

Mac

roin

verte

brat

e

Mea

n D

ry W

eigh

t Usi

ng H

este

r-D

endy

Pla

tes

M

ean

Ash

-Fre

e D

ry W

eigh

t Usi

ng H

este

r-D

endy

Pla

tes



Talla

hala

Tric

hopt

era

55%

Chiro

nom

idae

6%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra22

%

Hydr

acar

ina

4%

Cole

opte

ra2%

Olig

ocha

eta

2%

Gas

tropo

da2%

Plec

opte

ra5%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra3%

New

Aug

usta

Ephe

mer

opte

ra30

%

Gas

tropo

da2%

Meg

alop

tera

18%

Tric

hopt

era

43%

Plec

opte

ra1%

Hydr

acar

ina

1%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra2%

Chiro

nom

idae

3%

Figu

re 3

.84

Ben

thic

Mac

roin

verte

brat

e Fa

mily

Dis

tribu

tion

by P

erce

nt D

ry W

eigh

t for

the

Leaf

Riv

er S

ampl

ing

Site

s Ups

tream

of M

ill

Dis

char

ge U

sing

Hes

ter-

Den

dy P

late

s, St

udy

Yea

r 200

0 to

200

1 (r

epre

sent

s the

sum

of a

ll re

plic

ates

and

seas

onal

sam

ples

for t

he e

ntire

stud

y ye

ar

for a

ll fa

mili

es c

ontri

butin

g >1

% o

f the

tota

l)



Dow

nstre

am

Oth

er D

ipte

ra3%

Olig

ocha

eta

7%Pe

lecy

poda

1%

Plec

opte

ra3%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra38

%Tr

icho

pter

a19

%

Odo

nata

7%

Gas

tropo

da5%

Meg

alop

tera

9%

Hydr

acar

ina

1%

Chiro

nom

idae

6%

Bog

ue

Gas

tropo

da2%

Chiro

nom

idae

5%

Meg

alop

tera

3%

Pele

cypo

da1%

Plec

opte

ra2%

Olig

ocha

eta

2%

Hydr

acar

ina

2%

Tric

hopt

era

63%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra15

%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra3%

Cole

opte

ra1%

Thom

pson

Meg

alop

tera

1%

Gas

tropo

da2%

Chiro

nom

idae

4%O

ther

Dip

tera

2%Ep

hem

erop

tera

15%

Olig

ocha

eta

2%Hydr

acar

ina

2%

Plec

opte

ra1%

Tric

hopt

era

71%

McL

ain

Chiro

nom

idae

9%

Gas

tropo

da11

%

Olig

ocha

eta

12%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra28

%

Hydr

acar

ina

7% Meg

alop

tera

15%

Tric

hopt

era

12%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra7%

Figu

re 3

.85

Ben

thic

Mac

roin

verte

brat

e Fa

mily

Dis

tribu

tion

by P

erce

nt D

ry W

eigh

t for

the

Leaf

Riv

er S

ampl

ing

Site

s Dow

nstre

am o

f Mill

D

isch

arge

Usi

ng H

este

r-D

endy

Pla

tes,

Stud

y Y

ear 2

000

to 2

001

(rep

rese

nts t

he su

m o

f all

repl

icat

es a

nd se

ason

al sa

mpl

es fo

r the

ent

ire st

udy

year

fo

r all

fam

ilies

con

tribu

ting

>1%

of t

he to

tal)




3.8.3 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Table 3.25 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site, Study Year 2000 to 2001

Order Family Genus Species Arm

itage

R

M 6

Har

vest

R

M 1

0

Moh

awk

RM

14

Bel

linge

rs

RM

18.

5

Wal

terv

ille

RM

20.

5

Amphipoda Gammaridae x xGammarus x

Coleoptera Dytiscidae x xHydrovatus xOreodytes x

Elmidae x xAmpumixis disparCleptelmis xGonielmis xHeterlimnius xMacronychus glabratusNarpus xOptioservus xRhizelmis nigraRhizelmis xStenelmis xZaitzevia x

Diptera x x xCeratopogonidae x x

cf. Bezzia xCulicoides xProbezzia x

Chironomidae Ablabesmyia mallochiBrillia flavifronsCardiocladius xChironomus xCladotanytarsus vanderwulpi gr. A

vanderwulpi gr. Bvanderwulpi gr. C

Conchapelopia fasciata gr.Corynoneura xCricotopus x

bicinctusnostocicolasp. Bsp. Ctrifascia

Cricotopus/Orthocladius gr. xCryptochironomus cf. sorexDemichryptochironomus xDiamesa xDicrotendipes fumidusEukiefferiella brehmi gr.

claripennis gr.coerulescens gr.devonica gr.gracei gr.pseudomontana gr.

Euryhapsis xHeleniella xHeterotrissocladius marcidus gr.Krenosmittia xLimnophyes xLopescladius xMicropsectra x

sp. Asp. B

Microtendipes pedellus gr. (Continued on next page)





itage

R

M 6

Har

vest

R

M 1

0

Moh

awk

RM

14

Bel

linge

rs

RM

18.

5

Wal

terv

ille

RM

20.

5

Diptera Chironomidae Monodiamesa xNanocladius crassicornis

distinctusrectinervis

Nilotanypus fimbriatusNimbocera sp. AOrthocladius x

asheiashei/rivicolacarlatuscurtisetaluteipesmallochirivicolarivulorumsaxosussp. Asp. Bsp. C

Pagastia xparticasp. A

Paracladopelma undinewinnelli

Parakiefferiella xParametriocnemus xParatanytarsus x

tenellulus gr.Pentaneura xPhaenopsectra obediens gr.

punctipes gr.Polypedilum aviceps

laetumfallaxflavumillinoense gr.scalaenumtritum

Potthastia gaedii gr.longimana

Procladius xRheocricotopus eminellobus

robackiRheopelopia x

perdaRheotanytarsus xRobackia demeijereiSmittia xStempellina xStempellinella xSublettea coffmaniSymposiocladius lignicolaSympotthastia xSynorthocladius semivirensTanytarsus curticornis gr.

gregarius & lugens gr.pallidicornis&aculeatus gr.sp. D


discoloripes gr. (Continued on next page)





itage

R

M 6

Har

vest

R

M 1

0

Moh

awk

RM

14

Bel

linge

rs

RM

18.

5

Wal

terv

ille

RM

20.

5

Diptera Empididae x xChelifera xHemerodromia xTrichoclinocera x

Muscidae x xSimuliidae x x

Prosimulium xSimulium x

Tabanidae Chrysops xTanyderidae x x

Protanyderus xTipulidae x x

Antocha xCryptolabis xDicranota xHesperoconopa xHexatoma x

Ephemeroptera Baetidae x xAcentrella xBaetis xDiphetor hageniHeterocloeon xProcloeon x

Ephemerellidae x xAttenella margaritaCaudatella xDrunella x

doddsitype A

Epeorus xEphemerella x

aurivilliinermis

Eurylophella xSerratella levis

tibialisTimpanoga hecuba

Heptageniidae x xEpeorus (Iron) xHeptagenia xLeucrocuta xRithrogena xStenonema x

Leptophlebiidae x xLeptophlebia xParaleptophebia x

bicornutasp. B

Tricorythodes xGastropoda x x x

Ancylidae x xHydrobiidae x x

Amnicola xPhysidae Physella xPlanorbidae x x

Gyraulus xVorticifex effusa

Pleuroceridae Juga xhemphilliplicifera

Hemiptera Corixidae Sigara xHydracarina x x x






itage

R

M 6

Har

vest

R

M 1

0

Moh

awk

RM

14

Bel

linge

rs

RM

18.

5

Wal

terv

ille

RM

20.

5

Hydroida Hydridae Hydra xLepidoptera Pyralidae Petrophila xOdonata Gomphidae x xOligochaeta x x xPelecypoda Sphaeriidae x xPlecoptera x x x

Capniidae x xChloroperlidae x x

Neaviperla forcipataSuwallia xSweltsa x

Leuctridae x xDespaxia augusta

Nemouridae x xMalenka xZapada xZapada cinctipes

Perlidae x xCalineuria californicaClaassenia sabulosaHesperoperla pacifica

Perlodidae x xCascadoperla tricturaCultus xIsogenoides xIsoperla type A

type Btype C

Osobenus yakimaePerlinodes aureusSkwala x

curvataPteronarcyidae Pteronarcys x

californicaTrichoptera x x x

Brachycentridae x xAmiocentrus aspilusBrachycentrus x

occidentalisMicrasema x

Glossosomatidae x xGlossosoma x

Hydropsychidae x xArctopsyche grandisCheumatopsyche xHydropsyche x

Hydroptilidae Hydroptila xLepidostomatidae Lepidostoma xLeptoceridae Ceraclea x

Mystacides alafimbriataLeptoceridae Oecetis xLimnephilidae x x

Asynarchus xgilvipes

Philopotamidae Chimarra xPsychomyiidae psychomyia flavidaRhyacophilidae Rhyacophila x

arnauditype Atype Btype C

Tricladida x x x



Table 3.26 McKenzie River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001


% Chironomidae

% Diptera


September 2000 Armitage RM6 62 33.6 41.5 41.8 3188September 2000 Harvest RM10 98 27.9 58.2 58.6 15965September 2000 Mohawk RM14 62 13.6 53.9 56.0 2360September 2000 Bellingers RM18.5 77 39.7 41.9 50.9 3649September 2000 Walterville RM20.5 96 44.7 39.6 41.5 5891

December 2000 Armitage RM6 58 68.8 19.1 20.3 2062December 2000 Harvest RM10 65 53.8 42.2 42.5 10154December 2000 Mohawk RM14 54 20.2 22.5 28.0 4328December 2000 Bellingers RM18.5 57 47.5 35.0 46.8 4160December 2000 Walterville RM20.5 66 72.9 16.5 21.1 4319

March 2001 Armitage RM6 67 26.6 67.8 68.6 8103March 2001 Harvest RM10 79 52.0 41.6 42.2 13541March 2001 Mohawk RM14 67 16.8 51.5 54.8 9987March 2001 Bellingers RM18.5 81 41.3 46.4 51.6 6871March 2001 Walterville RM20.5 74 39.4 38.7 42.5 5210

July 2001 Armitage RM6 92 6.4 69.9 69.6 10306July 2001 Harvest RM10 92 14.7 59.6 61.9 14642July 2001 Mohawk RM14 75 2.8 16.8 18.1 19138July 2001 Bellingers RM18.5 94 14.5 67.6 69.9 11852July 2001 Walterville RM20.5 95 19.2 49.2 52.5 11346 1 EPT = Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera taxa


Tab

le 3

.27

McK

enzi

e R

iver

Ben

thic

Mac

roin

verte

brat

e B

iom

ass,

Stud

y Y

ear 2

000

to 2

001(

mea

ns fo

r 5 re

plic

ates

)

Wal

terv

ille

RM

20.

5Be

llinge

rs

RM

18.

5M

ohaw

k R

M 1

4H

arve

st

RM

10

Arm

itage

R

M 6

9/21

/200

02.

8184

1.77

981.

9879

4.22

671.

3835

12/7

/200

04.

9300

3.19

333.

0749

8.80

563.

4505

3/8/

2001

8.27

517.

8749

4.88

5311

.168

14.

8612

7/12

/200

14.

4214

5.49

848.

2512

8.68

446.

2756

Mea

n D

ry W

eigh

t (g/

m2 )

Wal

terv

ille

RM

20.

5Be

llinge

rs

RM

18.

5M

ohaw

k R

M 1

4H

arve

st

RM

10

Arm

itage

R

M 6

9/21

/200

01.

1860

0.90

631.

1470

2.31

400.

6502

12/7

/200

02.

1547

1.51

231.

6205

5.31

071.

6719

3/8/

2001

6.41

185.

1028

2.72

308.

3900

3.18

957/

12/2

001

2.79

263.

7337

3.11

495.

5419

2.82

56

Mea

n As

h Fr

ee D

ry W

eigh

t (g/

m2 )

McK

enzi

e Ri

ver

2000

-200

1

0.00

00

2.00

00

4.00

00

6.00

00

8.00

00

10.0

000

12.0

000

Waltervi

lle R

M 20.5 Bell

ingers

RM 18

.5Moh

awk RM 14

Harves

t RM 10

Armita

ge R

M 6

g/m2

9/21

/200

0

12/7

/200

0

3/8/

2001

7/12

/200

1

McK

en

zie

Riv

er

2000

-200

1

0.00

00

1.00

00

2.00

00

3.00

00

4.00

00

5.00

00

6.00

00

7.00

00

8.00

00

9.00

00

Walte

rville

RM 20

.5Bell

inger

s RM

18.5

Mohawk R

M 14

Harve

st RM 10

Armita

ge R

M 6

g/m2

9/21

/200

0

12/7

/200

0

3/8/

2001

7/12

/200

1

F

igur

e 3.

86 M

cKen

zie

Riv

er B

enth

ic M

acro

inve

rtebr

ate

M

ean

Dry

Bio

mas

s

Fi

gure

3.8

7 M

cKen

zie

Riv

er B

enth

ic M

acro

inve

rtebr

ate

Mea

n A

sh- F

ree

Dry

Bio

mas

s



Wal

terv

ille

RM

20.5

Gas

tropo

da11

%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra11

%

Tric

ladi

da2%

Cole

opte

ra4%

Chiro

nom

idae

7%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra4%

Hydr

acar

ina

5%O

ligoc

haet

a6%

Tric

hopt

era

20%

Plec

opte

ra30

%

Bel

linge

rs R

M18

.5

Gas

tropo

da1%

Hydr

acar

ina

3%O

ligoc

haet

a5%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra5%

Chiro

nom

idae

9%

Cole

opte

ra4%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra15

%

Plec

opte

ra25

%

Tric

hopt

era

32%

Figu

re 3

.88

Ben

thic

Mac

roin

verte

brat

e Fa

mily

Dis

tribu

tion

by P

erce

nt D

ry W

eigh

t for

the

McK

enzi

e R

iver

Sam

plin

g Si

tes U

pstre

am o

f Mill

D

isch

arge

, Stu

dy Y

ear 2

000

to 2

001

(rep

rese

nts t

he su

m o

f all

repl

icat

es a

nd se

ason

al sa

mpl

es fo

r the

ent

ire st

udy

year

for a

ll fa

mili

es

cont

ribut

ing

>1%

of t

he to

tal)



Moh

awk

RM

14Ch

irono

mid

ae6%

Tric

ladi

da4% Tr

icho

pter

a33

%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra4%

Hydr

oida

19%G

astro

poda

16%

Cole

opte

ra6%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra3%

Plec

opte

ra4% O

ligoc

haet

a5%

Hydr

acar

ina

1%

Har

vest

RM

10

Plec

opte

ra13

%

Chiro

nom

idae

10%

Hydr

acar

ina

2%O

ligoc

haet

a10

%

Hydr

oida

1%Gas

tropo

da3%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra2%

Cole

opte

ra3%

Tric

ladi

da1%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra18

%

Tric

hopt

era

36%

Arm

itage

RM

6Co

leop

tera

5%

Olig

ocha

eta

17%

Chiro

nom

idae

13%

Tric

ladi

da2%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra3%

Tric

hopt

era

20%

Plec

opte

ra13

%Ep

hem

erop

tera

16% G

astro

poda

5%Hy

droi

da3%

Hydr

acar

ina

3%

Figu

re 3

.89

Ben

thic

Mac

roin

verte

brat

e Fa

mily

Dis

tribu

tion

by P

erce

nt D

ry W

eigh

t for

the

McK

enzi

e R

iver

Sam

plin

g Si

tes D

owns

tream

of M

ill

Dis

char

ge, S

tudy

Yea

r 200

0 to

200

1 (r

epre

sent

s the

sum

of a

ll re

plic

ates

and

seas

onal

sam

ples

for t

he e

ntire

stud

y ye

ar fo

r all

fam

ilies

co

ntrib

utin

g >1

% o

f the

tota

l)




3.8.4 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Table 3.28 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa List by Sampling Site, Study Year 2000 to 2001

Order Family Genus Species Cor

valli

s R

M12

8W

illam

ette

R

M13

4Sn

ag B

oat

RM

143.

5Sa

m D

aws

RM

145.

5In

take

R

M14

8C

artn

ey

RM

156

Har

risbu

rg

RM

160

Whi

tely

R

M17

6

Amphipoda Gammaridae x xGammarus x

Coleoptera x x xDytiscidae x x

Oreodytes xElmidae x x

Cleptelmis xDubiraphia xGonielmis xNarpus xOptioservus xOrdobrevia x

nubriferaRhizelmis nigraStenelmis xZaitzevia x

Haliplidae x xBrychius xHalipus x

Hydrophilidae x xHydrobius x

Diptera x x xCeratopogonidae x x

Culicoides xChironomidae Ablabesmyia x

mallochirhamphe gr.

Brillia flavifronsCardiocladius xChironomus xCladotanytarsus x

mancus gr.vanderwulpi gr. Avanderwulpi gr. B

Conchapelopia xfasciata gr.

Corynoneura xCricotopus x

bicinctuscf. sylvestrissp. Bsp. Ctrifascia

Cricotopus/Orthocladius gr. xCryptochironomus x

cf. sorexDemichryptochironomus xDiamesa xDicrotendipes x

fumidusneomodestus

Doncricotopus bicaudatusEndochironomus xEukiefferiella x

brehmi gr.claripennis gr.coerulescens gr.devonica gr.






valli

s R

M12

8W

illam

ette

R

M13

4Sn

ag B

oat

RM

143.

5Sa

m D

aws

RM

145.

5In

take

R

M14

8C

artn

ey

RM

156

Har

risbu

rg

RM

160

Whi

tely

R

M17

6

Diptera Chironomidae Eukiefferiella pseudomontana gr.Euryhapsis xHeleniella xHeterotrissocladius marcidus gr.Limnophyes xMicropsectra x

sp. Asp. B

Microtendipes xpedellus gr.

Monodiamesa xNanocladius x

crassicornisdistinctusrectinervis

Nilotanypus fimbriatusNilothauma xNimbocera x

sp. Asp. B

Orthocladius xasheiashei/rivicolacarlatusluteipesmallochirivicolarivulorumsp. Asp. Bsp. C

Pagastia particasp. A

Parachironomus xcf. tenuicaudatus

Paracladopelma undineParakiefferiella xParametriocnemus xParatanytarsus x

tenellulus gr.Pentaneura xPhaenopsectra x

obediens gr.punctipes gr.

Polypedilum xavicepsfallaxflavumillinoense gr.laetumscalaenumtritum

Potthastia xgaedii gr.longimana

Procladius xPseudochironomus xPseudosmittia xRheocricotopus eminellobus

robackiRheotanytarsus xRobackia x

demeijerei (Continued on next page)





valli

s R

M12

8W

illam

ette

R

M13

4Sn

ag B

oat

RM

143.

5Sa

m D

aws

RM

145.

5In

take

R

M14

8C

artn

ey

RM

156

Har

risbu

rg

RM

160

Whi

tely

R

M17

6

Diptera Chironomidae Stempellinella xStilocladius xStictochironomus xSublettea x

coffmaniSynorthocladius x

semivirensTanytarsus x

curticornis gr.eminulus gr.gregarius & lugens gr.pallidicornis&aculeatus gr.sp. Dsp. J


discoloripes gr.Xenochironomus xenolabis

Dolichopodidae x xEmpididae Chelifera x

Hemerodromia xEphydridae x xLimoniidae Erioptera xSimuliidae x x

Prosimulium xSimulium x

Tabanidae x xTanyderidae Protanyderus xTipulidae x x

Antocha xEphemeroptera Ameletidae Ameletus velox

Baetidae x xAcentrella x

insignificansturbida

Baetis xtricaudatus

Diphetor hageniProcloeon x

Caenidae Caenis xlatipennis

Ephemerellidae x xAttenella x

margaritaCaudatella heterocaudataEphemerella aurivilli

inermisinfrequens

Eurylophella xlodi

Serratella xlevis

Heptageniidae x xEpeorus albertaeNixe x

criddleiRithrogena x

hageniStenonema x

terminatum (Continued on next page)





valli

s R

M12

8W

illam

ette

R

M13

4Sn

ag B

oat

RM

143.

5Sa

m D

aws

RM

145.

5In

take

R

M14

8C

artn

ey

RM

156

Har

risbu

rg

RM

160

Whi

tely

R

M17

6

Ephemeroptera Leptophlebiidae Asioplax xedmundsi

Paraleptophebia xbicornutavaciva

Tricorythodes xminutus

Potamanthidae Anthopotamus xGastropoda x x x

Ancylidae x xHydrobiidae x x

Amnicola xPhysidae Physella xPlanorbidae x x

Gyraulus xVorticifex effusa

Pleuroceridae Juga xhemphilliplicifera

Hemiptera Corixidae x xHirudinea x x x

Glossiphoniidae Deserobdella xpicta

Hydracarina x x xHydroida Hydridae Hydra xIsopoda Asellidae x x

Caecidotea xLepidoptera Pyralidae x x

Petrophila xOdonata Coenagrionidae x x

Gomphidae x xOphiogomphus x

Oligochaeta x x xPelecypoda x x x

Sphaeriidae x xPlecoptera x x x

Capniidae x xChloroperlidae x x

Neaviperla forcipataSuwallia x

Leuctridae Despaxia augustaPerlidae x x

Calineuria californicaClaassenia x

sabulosaPerlodidae x x

Isogenoides xIsoperla type A

type CSkwala x

Taeniopterygidae Taenionema xTaeniopteryx nivalis

Trichoptera x x xBrachycentridae Amiocentrus aspilus

Brachycentrus xoccidentalis

Glossosomatidae Glossosoma xProtoptila x

Goeridae Goera archaonHydropsychidae x x

Cheumatopsyche xHydropsyche x






valli

s R

M12

8W

illam

ette

R

M13

4Sn

ag B

oat

RM

143.

5Sa

m D

aws

RM

145.

5In

take

R

M14

8C

artn

ey

RM

156

Har

risbu

rg

RM

160

Whi

tely

R

M17

6

Trichoptera Hydroptillidae x xHydroptila xLeucotrichia pictipes

Lepidostomatidae Lepidostoma xLeptoceridae x x

Ceraclea xMystacides x

alafimbriataLimnephilidae x x

Dicosmoecus gilvipesMolannidae x xPolycentropodidae Polycentropus xPsychomyiidae Psychomyia x

flavidaRhyacophilidae Rhyacophila type B

type CTricladida x x x



Table 3.29 Willamette River Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Summary, Study Year 2000 to 2001


% Chironomidae

% Diptera


September 2000 Corvallis RM128 71 1.9 66.9 67.7 2536September 2000 Willamette RM134 72 15.6 76.2 76.4 4734September 2000 Snag Boat RM143.5 46 7.6 55.1 55.3 2440September 2000 Sam Daws RM 145.5 64 4.5 89.9 90.2 3053September 2000 Intake RM148 65 6.2 65.3 65.5 3836September 2000 Cartney RM156 51 5.0 83.0 83.0 4153September 2000 Harrisburg RM160 60 6.0 92.7 92.7 6375September 2000 Whitely RM176 55 2.8 67.3 67.5 2575

December 2000 Corvallis RM128 53 11.8 33.7 35.2 1461December 2000 Willamette RM134 60 13.6 71.1 72.3 1174December 2000 Snag Boat RM143.5 40 9.8 51.6 52.1 407December 2000 Sam Daws RM 145.5 61 21.8 66.8 68.6 1638December 2000 Intake RM148 61 35.3 38.8 40.8 1357December 2000 Cartney RM156 60 20.2 49.5 49.8 1694December 2000 Harrisburg RM160 59 17.6 75.8 77.1 2882December 2000 Whitely RM176 56 25.9 25.4 30.2 1112

March 2001 Corvallis RM128 64 6.2 63.1 63.9 2427March 2001 Willamette RM134 69 23.7 68.9 70.2 3083March 2001 Snag Boat RM143.5 55 12.3 77.3 78.4 1960March 2001 Sam Daws RM 145.5 75 14.4 68.2 69.1 4245March 2001 Intake RM148 74 24.6 69.6 70.5 7565March 2001 Cartney RM156 68 41.0 50.4 51.1 4429March 2001 Harrisburg RM160 68 38.7 53.9 54.6 5817March 2001 Whitely RM176 66 7.8 81.5 82.4 4242

July 2001 Corvallis RM128 68 20.1 48.0 48.8 4917July 2001 Willamette RM134 93 20.3 63.7 63.9 7700July 2001 Snag Boat RM143.5 62 16.4 56.5 56.6 5831July 2001 Sam Daws RM 145.5 82 14.8 67.3 67.5 10940July 2001 Intake RM148 80 34.0 46.2 46.8 7073July 2001 Cartney RM156 78 20.7 60.4 60.5 7304July 2001 Harrisburg RM160 83 41.0 39.2 39.2 4209July 2001 Whitely RM176 82 15.9 51.7 52.2 9425 1 EPT = Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera taxa


Tab

le 3

.30

Will

amet

te R

iver

Ben

thic

Mac

roin

verte

brat

e B

iom

ass,

Stud

y Y

ear 2

000

to 2

001(

mea

ns fo

r 5 re

plic

ates

)

Cor

vallis

R

M12

8W

illam

ette

R

M13

4Sn

ag B

oat

RM

143.

5Sa

m D

aws

RM

145.

5In

take

R

M14

8C

artn

ey

RM

156

Har

risbu

rg

RM

160

Whi

tely

R

M17

69/

19/2

000

13.2

049

5.43

261.

3070

1.61

441.

9528

2.43

161.

5526

1.46

6312

/5/2

000

30.5

023

5.14

121.

3479

3.51

533.

1919

2.66

191.

9574

2.69

473/

6/20

018.

2444

7.65

331.

9533

4.43

478.

1558

5.11

587.

0991

2.98

077/

10/2

001

7.05

336.

7116

2.97

915.

7593

7.10

703.

9621

5.81

6310

.250

9

Mea

n D

ry W

eigh

t (g/

m2 )

Cor

vallis

R

M12

8W

illam

ette

R

M13

4S

nag

Boa

t R

M14

3.5

Sam

Daw

s R

M14

5.5

Inta

ke

RM

148

Car

tney

R

M15

6H

arris

burg

R

M16

0W

hite

ly

RM

176

9/19

/200

05.

3430

2.08

650.

8226

1.04

560.

9119

1.50

560.

9516

0.72

8412

/5/2

000

6.48

950.

7916

0.75

371.

5563

1.60

671.

0077

1.03

300.

9000

3/6/

2001

2.38

163.

2479

0.89

402.

8251

6.05

843.

3563

5.31

141.

5870

7/10

/200

12.

4065

3.55

281.

0740

2.96

214.

6593

2.12

582.

7074

7.01

56

Mea

n A

sh F

ree

Dry

Wei

ght (

g/m

2 )

Will

amet

te R

iver

200

0 to

200

1

0.00

00

2.00

00

4.00

00

6.00

00

8.00

00

10.0

000

12.0

000

14.0

000

Corvall

is RM12

8Willa

mette R

M134

Snag Boa

t RM14

3.5

Sam D

aws R

M145.5 Int

ake R

M148

Cartne

y RM156

Harrisb

urg R

M160 White

ly RM17

6

g/m2

9/19

/200

0

12/5

/200

0

3/6/

2001

7/10

/200

1

Will

amet

te R

iver

200

0 to

200

1

0.00

00

1.00

00

2.00

00

3.00

00

4.00

00

5.00

00

6.00

00

7.00

00

8.00

00

Corvallis

RM12

8

Willamett

e RM13

4

Snag B

oat R

M143.5

Sam D

aws R

M145.5 Int

ake R

M148Cartn

ey R

M156

Harrisbu

rg RM16

0White

ly RM176

g/m2

9/19

/200

0

12/5

/200

0

3/6/

2001

7/10

/200

1

Fi

gure

3.9

0 W

illam

ette

Riv

er B

enth

ic M

acro

inve

rtebr

ate

Fig

ure

3.91

Will

amet

te R

iver

Ben

thic

Mac

roin

verte

brat

e

M

ean

Dry

Bio

mas

s

Mea

n A

sh-F

ree

Dry

Bio

mas

s



Whi

tely

RM

176

Ephe

mer

opte

ra6%

Gas

tropo

da7%

Pele

cypo

da3%

Plec

opte

ra1%

Tric

ladi

da5%

Cole

opte

ra4%

Am

phip

oda

4%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra3%

Hiru

dine

a2%

Hydr

oida

1%Hy

drac

arin

a4%

Lepi

dopt

era

4%

Olig

ocha

eta

12%

Tric

hopt

era

35%

Chiro

nom

idae

10%

Har

risbu

rg R

M16

0

Am

phip

oda

2%

Cole

opte

ra4%

Tric

ladi

da0%

Plec

opte

ra15

%Tr

icho

pter

a19

%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra20

%

Chiro

nom

idae

13%

Olig

ocha

eta

8%Le

pido

pter

a2%

Hydr

acar

ina

3%

Hiru

dine

a1%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra2%

Hydr

oida

2%

Gas

tropo

da8%

Car

tney

RM

156

Olig

ocha

eta

11%Hi

rudi

nea

1%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra2%

Plec

opte

ra10

%

Pele

cypo

da1%

Gas

tropo

da2%

Hydr

oida

3% Hydr

acar

ina

4%Le

pido

pter

a3%

Odo

nata

1%

Cole

opte

ra6%

Am

phip

oda

5%

Tric

hopt

era

17%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra20

%

Chiro

nom

idae

14%

Inta

ke R

M14

8

Olig

ocha

eta

13%

Pele

cypo

da3%

Am

phip

oda

3%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra2%

Plec

opte

ra15

%

Cole

opte

ra4%

Chiro

nom

idae

12%

Tric

ladi

da2%

Hydr

oida

1%

Hydr

acar

ina

3%

Gas

tropo

da1%

Tric

hopt

era

24%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra18

%

Figu

re 3

.92

Ben

thic

Mac

roin

verte

brat

e Fa

mily

Dis

tribu

tion

by P

erce

nt D

ry W

eigh

t for

the

Will

amet

te R

iver

Sam

plin

g Si

tes U

pstre

am o

f Mill

D

isch

arge

, Stu

dy Y

ear 2

000

to 2

001

(rep

rese

nts t

he su

m o

f all

repl

icat

es a

nd se

ason

al sa

mpl

es fo

r the

ent

ire st

udy

year

for a

ll fa

mili

es

cont

ribut

ing

>1%

of t

he to

tal)



Sam

Daw

s R

M14

5.5

Am

phip

oda

5%

Pele

cypo

da2%

Gas

tropo

da7%

Hiru

dine

a1%

Hydr

oida

3%

Hydr

acar

ina

4%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra3%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra13

%

Cole

opte

ra5%

Chiro

nom

idae

19%

Olig

ocha

eta

18%

Plec

opte

ra10

%Tr

icho

pter

a8%

Snag

Boa

t RM

143.

5

Oth

er D

ipte

ra2%

Tric

hopt

era

5%

Pele

cypo

da2%

Hydr

acar

ina

6%

Hydr

oida

1%

Gas

tropo

da5%

Cole

opte

ra7%

Am

phip

oda

6%

Tric

ladi

da3%

Plec

opte

ra3%

Olig

ocha

eta

8%

Hem

ipte

ra2%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra36

%

Chiro

nom

idae

14%

Will

amet

te P

ark

RM

134

Am

phip

oda

3%

Tric

ladi

da1%

Tric

hopt

era

13%

Oth

er D

ipte

ra3%

Hydr

oida

1%Hi

rudi

nea

2%

Plec

opte

ra4%

Pele

cypo

da7%

Lepi

dopt

era

1%O

ligoc

haet

a5%

Hydr

acar

ina

2%

Gas

tropo

da25

%

Cole

opte

ra3%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra11

%

Chiro

nom

idae

17%

Cor

valli

s R

M12

8

Am

phip

oda

4% Chiro

nom

idae

2%

Tric

hopt

era

2%

Tric

ladi

da1%

Ephe

mer

opte

ra6%

Olig

ocha

eta

7%

Gas

tropo

da77

%

Figu

re 3

.93

Ben

thic

Mac

roin

verte

brat

e Fa

mily

Dis

tribu

tion

by P

erce

nt D

ry W

eigh

t for

the

Will

amet

te R

iver

Sam

plin

g Si

tes D

owns

tream

of M

ill

Dis

char

ge, S

tudy

Yea

r 200

0 to

200

1 (r

epre

sent

s the

sum

of a

ll re

plic

ates

and

seas

onal

sam

ples

for t

he e

ntire

stud

y ye

ar fo

r all

fam

ilies

co

ntrib

utin

g >1

% o

f the

tota

l)




3.9 Fish

Fish on Codorus Creek, McKenzie River, and Willamette River were sampled under a three-year research agreement with Western Washington University (WWU), Bellingham, Washington, starting in the fall of 1998. The experimental design provided by WWU examined different fish habitats along the LTRWS area for fish communities. Sampling was done using electrofishing techniques on a quarterly basis. All fish sampling was done by WWU personnel, along with one or more NCASI personnel. When time and conditions allowed, fish were identified, measured, and weighed on site, then returned to the river. Otherwise, they were frozen and transported back to WWU for later examination.

Codorus Creek, a wadeable stream, had a design that called for backpack electrofishing at each of the established NCASI macroinvertebrate and periphyton sites, along with one added site, Indian Rock Dam, for a total of eight fish sampling sites. Shocking was done in three runs of approximately 600 s each. The data were not normalized to shock time. There were three missing samples for the November 2000 sampling date: East Branch, USGS, and Furnace.

The Leaf River, a wide, unregulated river, had a design that sampled for fish annually during the fall, the historically low flow season. The experimental design called for boat electroshocking at six sites, two upstream, and four downstream of the mill effluent discharge. Boat electrofishing was done as one continuous run for approximately 30 min. at each site. Boat electrofishing on the Leaf River was conducted with assistance from the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks. Backpack electrofishing was initiated on the Leaf River in October 2000, and was carried out at five of the six designated sites, each with one run of approximately 10 min. The data were not normalized to shock time. Due to low flow conditions, Tallahala, the most upstream site, was not sampled. All fish were identified, measured, and weighed on site, then returned to the river.

For the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers, both large fast moving rivers, the design focused on boat electrofishing at different areas within the LTRWS area at or near NCASI macroinvertebrate and periphyton sites. The McKenzie River had five sampling sites, and the Willamette had six sampling sites for boat electrofishing. Boat electrofishing was carried out as two runs of approximately 250 m each. Due to sampling permit issues that took effect in January 2001, boat electrofishing data is available only for the September 2000 sampling date. Boat electrofishing at Intake (RM 148.5) on the Willamette River, and Bellingers (RM 18.5) on the McKenzie River was not carried out during the 2000 to 2001 study year. Supplemental near-shore backpack electrofishing was included at sites where the bank was accessible. Backpack electrofishing was carried out at four sites on the McKenzie River and six sites on the Willamette River as three runs of approximately 600 s at each site. Backpack electrofishing data are available only for the September 2000, December 2000 and July 2001 sampling dates; data for the March 2000 sampling date were lost. There were four missing samples for the December 2000 sampling date: Harvest and Armitage on the McKenzie River, and Whitely and Willamette Park on the Willamette River. Data were also lost for the June 2001 sampling of Cartney on the Willamette River. Data in this compendium were not normalized for time or distance.


3.9.

1.

Cod

orus

Cre

ek F

ish

Tab

le 3

.31

Cod

orus

Cre

ek: E

ast B

ranc

h B

ackp

ack

Fish

Dat

a Su

mm

ary

for A

ugus

t 200

0 to

June

200

1 E

AS

T B

RA

NC

HS

ampl

ing

Dat

e/#

of ru

ns =

3

Run

s3

Run

s2

Run

s

Count

% of Total

Mean Total Length (mm)

Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suc

kers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Whi

te s

ucke

rC

atos

tom

us c

omm

erso

ni45

21.0

366

.02

3.19

1313

.27

95.3

89.

3425

17.1

210

6.56

17.6

3N

orth

ern

hogs

ucke

rH

ypen

teliu

m n

igric

ans

20.

9340

.00

0.50

0.00

32.

0569

.00

4.13

Sun

fish

(Cen

trar

chid

ae):

Roc

k ba

ssA

mbl

oplit

es ru

pest

ris0.

000.

000.

00Le

pom

isLe

pom

is0.

000.

000.

00R

edbr

east

sun

fish

Lepo

mis

aur

itus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Gre

en s

unfis

hLe

pom

is c

yane

llus

20.

9387

.00

12.8

90.

000.

00P

umpk

inse

edLe

pom

is g

ibbo

sus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Blu

egill

Lepo

mis

mac

roch

irus

0.00

0.00

10.

6871

.00

6.95

Red

ear s

unfis

hLe

pom

is m

icro

loph

us0.

000.

000.

00S

mal

lmou

th b

ass

Mic

ropt

erus

dol

omie

ui0.

000.

000.

00La

rgem

outh

bas

sM

icro

pter

us s

alm

oide

s0.

000.

000.

00

Scu

lpin

s (C

ottid

ae):

Slim

y sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s co

gnat

us0.

000.

000.

00R

iffle

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

gulo

sus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Car

ps &

min

now

s (C

ypri

nida

e):

Cen

tral s

tone

rolle

rC

ampo

stom

a an

omal

um0.

001

1.02

75.0

04.

292

1.37

86.0

09.

68R

osys

ide

dace

Clin

osto

mus

fund

uloi

des

0.00

1111

.22

50.2

71.

484

2.74

92.7

58.

85S

atin

fin s

hine

rC

yprin

ella

ana

lost

anus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Spo

tfin

shin

erC

yprin

ella

spi

lopt

erus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Com

mon

car

pC

yprin

us c

arpi

o Li

nnae

us0.

000.

000.

00C

utlip

s m

inno

wE

xogl

ossu

m m

axill

ingu

a8

3.74

71.1

33.

851

1.02

110.

0016

.98

32.

0565

.00

3.86

Com

mon

shi

ner

Luxi

lus

corn

utus

177.

9485

.12

6.11

1414

.29

88.1

47.

344

2.74

88.5

010

.07

Gol

den

shin

erN

otem

igon

us c

ryso

leuc

as0.

000.

000.

00S

potta

il sh

iner

Not

ropi

s hu

dson

ius

0.00

44.

0853

.00

1.13

0.00

Sw

allo

wta

il sh

iner

Not

ropi

s pr

ocne

2411

.21

53.1

31.

4715

15.3

163

.73

3.53

0.00

Blu

ntno

se m

inno

wP

imep

hale

s no

tatu

s0.

000.

001

0.68

84.0

07.

15D

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

0.00

0.00

0.00

Bla

ckno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

atra

tulu

s50

23.3

652

.38

1.46

2121

.43

46.4

31.

1816

10.9

653

.87

1.65

Long

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys c

atar

acta

e12

5.61

66.2

53.

365

5.10

66.4

03.

4412

8.22

60.5

82.

51C

reek

chu

bS

emot

ilus

atro

mac

ulat

us40

18.6

972

.48

4.64

44.

0870

.25

4.04

128.

2288

.91

8.81

Fallf

ish

Sem

otilu

s co

rpor

alis

20.

9310

2.50

12.1

00.

001

0.68

150.

0044

.00

Cyp

rinid

0.00

0.00

1610

.96

67.6

04.

24

08/2

2/00

03/2

4/01

06/0

9/01

(C

ontin

ued

on n

ext p

age)



Tab

le 3

.31

Con

tinue

d E

AS

T B

RA

NC

H-c

ontin

ued Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

2 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Bul

lhea

d ca

tfish

es (I

ctal

urid

ae):

Yello

w b

ullh

ead

Am

eiur

us n

atal

is0.

000.

000.

00M

argi

ned

mad

tom

Not

urus

insi

gnis

0.00

33.

0611

7.33

14.8

70.

00

Topm

inno

ws

& K

illifi

shes

(Fun

dulid

ae):

Ban

ded

killif

ish

Fund

ulus

dia

phan

us0.

000.

000.

00

Perc

hes

& d

arte

rs (P

erci

dae)

:G

reen

side

dar

ter

Eth

eost

oma

blen

nioi

des

0.00

0.00

0.00

Tess

ella

ted

darte

rE

theo

stom

a ol

mst

edi

125.

6150

.17

1.11

66.

1252

.33

1.58

74.

7956

.43

1.72

Ban

ded

darte

rE

theo

stom

a zo

nale

0.00

0.00

10.

6861

.00

2.20

Shi

eld

darte

rP

erci

na p

elta

ta0.

000.

000.

00D

arte

r0.

000.

000.

00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):R

ainb

ow tr

out

Onc

orhy

nchu

s m

ykis

s0.

000.

004

2.74

296.

5027

6.25

Bro

wn

trout

Sal

mo

trutta

0.

000.

006

4.11

238.

1716

6.67

Fish

:U

nide

ntifi

ed

0.00

0.00

2819

.18

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

214

9814

6

08/2

2/00

03/2

4/01

06/0

9/01



Tab

le 3

.32

Cod

orus

Cre

ek: M

enge

s Bac

kpac

k Fi

sh D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Aug

ust 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001

MEN

GES

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

1 R

un3

Run

s

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

0.00

Whi

te s

ucke

rC

atos

tom

us c

omm

erso

ni14

24.5

645

.79

1.03

28.

0029

0.50

284.

000.

0027

46.5

526

5.19

256.

83N

orth

ern

hogs

ucke

rH

ypen

teliu

m n

igric

ans

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Sunf

ish

(Cen

trar

chid

ae):

Roc

k ba

ssA

mbl

oplit

es ru

pest

ris0.

000.

000.

000.

00Le

pom

isLe

pom

is0.

000.

000.

000.

00R

edbr

east

sun

fish

Lepo

mis

aur

itus

0.00

0.00

1168

.75

83.6

410

.64

0.00

Gre

en s

unfis

hLe

pom

is c

yane

llus

3663

.16

43.1

71.

880.

000.

0010

17.2

474

.70

13.3

2Pu

mpk

inse

edLe

pom

is g

ibbo

sus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Blue

gill

Lepo

mis

mac

roch

irus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Red

ear s

unfis

hLe

pom

is m

icro

loph

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00Sm

allm

outh

bas

sM

icro

pter

us d

olom

ieui

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Larg

emou

th b

ass

Mic

ropt

erus

sal

moi

des

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):Sl

imy

scul

pin

Cot

tus

cogn

atus

0.00

0.00

0.00

11.

7210

9.00

19.3

6R

iffle

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

gulo

sus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Car

ps &

min

now

s (C

yprin

idae

):C

entra

l sto

nero

ller

Cam

post

oma

anom

alum

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Ros

ysid

e da

ceC

linos

tom

us fu

ndul

oide

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00Sa

tinfin

shi

ner

Cyp

rinel

la a

nalo

stan

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00Sp

otfin

shi

ner

Cyp

rinel

la s

pilo

pter

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00C

omm

on c

arp

Cyp

rinus

car

pio

Linn

aeus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cut

lips

min

now

Exo

glos

sum

max

illing

ua0.

000.

000.

000.

00C

omm

on s

hine

rLu

xilu

s co

rnut

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00G

olde

n sh

iner

Not

emig

onus

cry

sole

ucas

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Spot

tail

shin

erN

otro

pis

huds

oniu

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00Sw

allo

wta

il sh

iner

Not

ropi

s pr

ocne

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Blun

tnos

e m

inno

wP

imep

hale

s no

tatu

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00D

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Blac

knos

e da

ceR

hini

chth

ys a

tratu

lus

35.

2640

.33

0.61

0.00

0.00

11.

7249

.00

1.16

Long

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys c

atar

acta

e2

3.51

65.5

03.

880.

000.

000.

00C

reek

chu

bS

emot

ilus

atro

mac

ulat

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00Fa

llfis

hS

emot

ilus

corp

oral

is0.

000.

000.

000.

00C

yprin

id0.

000.

000.

000.

00

08/2

2/00

11/1

7/00

03/1

1/01

06/0

9/01

(C

ontin

ued

on n

ext p

age)



Tab

le 3

.32

Con

tinue

d M

ENG

ES-c

ontin

ued

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

1 R

un3

Run

s

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Bul

lhea

d ca

tfish

es (I

ctal

urid

ae):

Yello

w b

ullh

ead

Am

eiur

us n

atal

is0.

000.

000.

000.

00M

argi

ned

mad

tom

Not

urus

insi

gnis

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Topm

inno

ws

& K

illifi

shes

(Fun

dulid

ae):

Band

ed k

illifis

hFu

ndul

us d

iaph

anus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Perc

hes

& d

arte

rs (P

erci

dae)

:G

reen

side

dar

ter

Eth

eost

oma

blen

nioi

des

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Tess

ella

ted

darte

rE

theo

stom

a ol

mst

edi

23.

5149

.00

1.79

0.00

0.00

0.00

Band

ed d

arte

rE

theo

stom

a zo

nale

0.00

0.00

16.

2554

.00

-0.

00Sh

ield

dar

ter

Per

cina

pel

tata

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Dar

ter

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):R

ainb

ow tr

out

Onc

orhy

nchu

s m

ykis

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00Br

own

trout

Sal

mo

trutta

0.

0023

92.0

019

1.30

82.7

44

25.0

019

3.00

76.0

019

.032

.76

249.

6817

9.47

Fish

:U

nide

ntifi

ed0.

000.

000.

000.

00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

5725

1658

08/2

2/00

11/1

7/00

03/1

1/01

06/0

9/01



Tab

le 3

.33

Cod

orus

Cre

ek: U

SGS

Bac

kpac

k Fi

sh D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Aug

ust 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001

US

GS

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

2 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Whi

te s

ucke

rC

atos

tom

us c

omm

erso

ni1

1.22

61.0

01.

660.

002

4.88

208.

5010

7.50

Nor

ther

n ho

gsuc

ker

Hyp

ente

lium

nig

rican

s0.

001

0.75

79.0

04.

820.

00

Sunf

ish

(Cen

trar

chid

ae):

Roc

k ba

ssA

mbl

oplit

es ru

pest

ris0.

000.

000.

00Le

pom

isLe

pom

is0.

000.

000.

00R

edbr

east

sun

fish

Lepo

mis

aur

itus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Gre

en s

unfis

hLe

pom

is c

yane

llus

0.00

10.

7512

3.00

39.0

11

2.44

140.

0064

.00

Pum

pkin

seed

Lepo

mis

gib

bosu

s0.

000.

004

9.76

81.0

010

.80

Blu

egill

Lepo

mis

mac

roch

irus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Red

ear s

unfis

hLe

pom

is m

icro

loph

us0.

000.

000.

00S

mal

lmou

th b

ass

Mic

ropt

erus

dol

omie

ui0.

000.

000.

00La

rgem

outh

bas

sM

icro

pter

us s

alm

oide

s2

2.44

61.0

02.

940.

001

2.44

-1.

46

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):S

limy

scul

pin

Cot

tus

cogn

atus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Riff

le s

culp

inC

ottu

s gu

losu

s0.

000.

000.

00

Car

ps &

min

now

s (C

yprin

idae

):C

entra

l sto

nero

ller

Cam

post

oma

anom

alum

0.00

0.00

12.

4473

.00

3.68

Ros

ysid

e da

ceC

linos

tom

us fu

ndul

oide

s3

3.66

53.3

31.

670.

000.

00S

atin

fin s

hine

rC

yprin

ella

ana

lost

anus

0.00

53.

7667

.20

3.22

0.00

Spo

tfin

shin

erC

yprin

ella

spi

lopt

erus

0.00

10.

7548

.00

0.78

37.

3271

.67

3.95

Com

mon

car

pC

yprin

us c

arpi

o Li

nnae

us0.

000.

001

2.44

640.

00-

Cut

lips

min

now

Exo

glos

sum

max

illing

ua0.

000.

000.

00C

omm

on s

hine

rLu

xilu

s co

rnut

us0.

000.

000.

00G

olde

n sh

iner

Not

emig

onus

cry

sole

ucas

0.00

0.00

0.00

Spo

ttail

shin

erN

otro

pis

huds

oniu

s49

59.7

658

.20

2.03

86.

0248

.13

0.90

0.00

Sw

allo

wta

il sh

iner

Not

ropi

s pr

ocne

11.

2240

.00

0.40

100

75.1

949

.68

0.98

0.00

Blu

ntno

se m

inno

wP

imep

hale

s no

tatu

s0.

000.

002

4.88

81.0

05.

81D

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

0.00

0.00

0.00

Bla

ckno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

atra

tulu

s0.

000.

000.

00Lo

ngno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

cat

arac

tae

44.

8872

.25

5.23

0.00

37.

3274

.00

4.73

Cre

ek c

hub

Sem

otilu

s at

rom

acul

atus

0.00

10.

7512

4.00

78.7

21

2.44

117.

0022

.55

Fallf

ish

Sem

otilu

s co

rpor

alis

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cyp

rinid

0.00

96.

7742

.67

0.50

21.0

51.2

259

.57

1.99

08/2

2/00

03/2

4/01

06/0

9/01

(C

ontin

ued

on n

ext p

age)



Tab

le 3

.33

Con

tinue

d U

SG

S-co

ntin

ued

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

2 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Bul

lhea

d ca

tfish

es (I

ctal

urid

ae):

Yello

w b

ullh

ead

Am

eiur

us n

atal

is0.

000.

000.

00M

argi

ned

mad

tom

Not

urus

insi

gnis

0.00

0.00

0.00

Topm

inno

ws

& K

illifi

shes

(Fun

dulid

ae):

Ban

ded

killi

fish

Fund

ulus

dia

phan

us0.

000.

000.

00

Perc

hes

& d

arte

rs (P

erci

dae)

:G

reen

side

dar

ter

Eth

eost

oma

blen

nioi

des

0.00

0.00

0.00

Tess

ella

ted

darte

rE

theo

stom

a ol

mst

edi

2226

.83

56.0

91.

927

5.26

58.4

32.

551.

02.

4459

.00

2.03

Ban

ded

darte

rE

theo

stom

a zo

nale

0.00

0.00

0.00

Shi

eld

darte

rP

erci

na p

elta

ta0.

000.

000.

00D

arte

r0.

000.

000.

00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):R

ainb

ow tr

out

Onc

orhy

nchu

s m

ykis

s0.

000.

000.

00B

row

n tro

utS

alm

o tru

tta

0.00

0.00

0.00

Fish

:U

nide

ntifi

ed0.

000.

000.

00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

8213

341

08/2

2/00

03/2

4/01

06/0

9/01



Tab

le 3

.34

Cod

orus

Cre

ek: M

artin

Bac

kpac

k Fi

sh D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Aug

ust 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001

MAR

TIN

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Whi

te s

ucke

rC

atos

tom

us c

omm

erso

ni0.

003

17.6

528

0.67

245.

335

4.67

78.8

04.

885

12.8

219

3.80

198.

55N

orth

ern

hogs

ucke

rH

ypen

teliu

m n

igric

ans

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Sunf

ish

(Cen

trar

chid

ae):

Roc

k ba

ssA

mbl

oplit

es ru

pest

ris0.

000.

000.

000.

00Le

pom

isLe

pom

is0.

000.

000.

000.

00R

edbr

east

sun

fish

Lepo

mis

aur

itus

0.00

0.00

43.

7410

4.25

37.6

90.

00G

reen

sun

fish

Lepo

mis

cya

nellu

s0.

000.

007

6.54

120.

0043

.38

410

.26

115.

0037

.56

Pum

pkin

seed

Lepo

mis

gib

bosu

s0.

000.

002

1.87

67.0

05.

890.

00Bl

uegi

llLe

pom

is m

acro

chiru

s0.

000.

000.

001

2.56

59.0

03.

84R

edea

r sun

fish

Lepo

mis

mic

rolo

phus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Smal

lmou

th b

ass

Mic

ropt

erus

dol

omie

ui0.

000.

000.

000.

00La

rgem

outh

bas

sM

icro

pter

us s

alm

oide

s0.

000.

001

0.93

64.0

03.

924

10.2

626

0.50

362.

25

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):Sl

imy

scul

pin

Cot

tus

cogn

atus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Riff

le s

culp

inC

ottu

s gu

losu

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00

Car

ps &

min

now

s (C

yprin

idae

):C

entra

l sto

nero

ller

Cam

post

oma

anom

alum

419

.05

103.

2512

.75

0.00

32.

8012

1.00

22.4

92

5.13

97.0

010

.96

Ros

ysid

e da

ceC

linos

tom

us fu

ndul

oide

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00Sa

tinfin

shi

ner

Cyp

rinel

la a

nalo

stan

us0.

000.

0039

36.4

568

.31

3.82

0.00

Spot

fin s

hine

rC

yprin

ella

spi

lopt

erus

0.00

0.00

2523

.36

67.7

63.

715

12.8

275

.00

5.50

Com

mon

car

pC

yprin

us c

arpi

o Li

nnae

us0.

000.

000.

003

7.69

536.

3324

68.6

3C

utlip

s m

inno

wE

xogl

ossu

m m

axilli

ngua

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Com

mon

shi

ner

Luxi

lus

corn

utus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Gol

den

shin

erN

otem

igon

us c

ryso

leuc

as0.

000.

000.

000.

00Sp

otta

il sh

iner

Not

ropi

s hu

dson

ius

14.

7694

.00

7.07

211

.76

91.5

05.

756

5.61

91.1

78.

9310

25.6

498

.30

10.3

3Sw

allo

wta

il sh

iner

Not

ropi

s pr

ocne

0.00

0.00

32.

8062

.67

2.86

0.00

Blun

tnos

e m

inno

wP

imep

hale

s no

tatu

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00D

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Blac

knos

e da

ceR

hini

chth

ys a

tratu

lus

419

.05

50.0

01.

328

47.0

652

.88

-9

8.41

62.3

32.

821

2.56

40.0

00.

62Lo

ngno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

cat

arac

tae

733

.33

75.5

75.

432

11.7

671

.00

-2

1.87

68.0

03.

401

2.56

81.0

06.

62C

reek

chu

bSe

mot

ilus

atro

mac

ulat

us1

4.76

56.0

01.

910.

000.

001

2.56

75.0

04.

73Fa

llfis

hSe

mot

ilus

corp

oral

is0.

000.

000.

000.

00C

yprin

id0.

000.

001

0.93

38.0

00.

410.

00

08/2

2/00

11/1

7/00

03/2

4/01

06/0

9/01

(C

ontin

ued

on n

ext p

age)



Tab

le 3

.34

Con

tinue

d M

ARTI

N-c

ontin

ued

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Bul

lhea

d ca

tfish

es (I

ctal

urid

ae):

Yel

low

bul

lhea

dA

mei

urus

nat

alis

419

.05

59.0

02.

731

5.88

173.

0065

.00

0.00

2.0

5.13

220.

0014

7.50

Mar

gine

d m

adto

mN

otur

us in

sign

is0.

000.

000.

000.

00

Topm

inno

ws

& K

illifi

shes

(Fun

dulid

ae):

Band

ed k

illifis

hFu

ndul

us d

iaph

anus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Perc

hes

& d

arte

rs (P

erci

dae)

:G

reen

side

dar

ter

Eth

eost

oma

blen

nioi

des

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Tess

ella

ted

darte

rE

theo

stom

a ol

mst

edi

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Band

ed d

arte

rE

theo

stom

a zo

nale

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Shi

eld

darte

rP

erci

na p

elta

ta0.

000.

000.

000.

00D

arte

r0.

000.

000.

000.

00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):R

ainb

ow tr

out

Onc

orhy

nchu

s m

ykis

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00Br

own

trout

Sal

mo

trutta

0.

001

5.88

250.

0012

8.00

0.00

0.00

Fish

:U

nide

ntifi

ed0.

000.

000.

000.

00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

2117

107

39

08/2

2/00

11/1

7/00

03/2

4/01

06/0

9/01



Tab

le 3

.35

Cod

orus

Cre

ek: G

rayb

ill B

ackp

ack

Fish

Dat

a Su

mm

ary

for A

ugus

t 200

0 to

June

200

1 G

RAY

BILL

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

2 R

uns

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Whi

te s

ucke

rC

atos

tom

us c

omm

erso

ni0.

009

23.0

832

6.11

381.

223

4.62

79.0

010

.64

412

.12

323.

0039

2.50

Nor

ther

n ho

gsuc

ker

Hyp

ente

lium

nig

rican

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00

Sunf

ish

(Cen

trar

chid

ae):

Roc

k ba

ssA

mbl

oplit

es ru

pest

ris0.

000.

000.

000.

00Le

pom

isLe

pom

is0.

000.

000.

000.

00R

edbr

east

sun

fish

Lepo

mis

aur

itus

0.00

512

.82

104.

8023

.24

913

.85

112.

8935

.38

618

.18

149.

6782

.17

Gre

en s

unfis

hLe

pom

is c

yane

llus

0.00

1128

.21

102.

0023

.29

57.

6910

4.00

25.5

114

42.4

210

6.43

29.3

6P

umpk

inse

edLe

pom

is g

ibbo

sus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Blue

gill

Lepo

mis

mac

roch

irus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Red

ear s

unfis

hLe

pom

is m

icro

loph

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00S

mal

lmou

th b

ass

Mic

ropt

erus

dol

omie

ui0.

000.

000.

000.

00La

rgem

outh

bas

sM

icro

pter

us s

alm

oide

s1

7.14

80.0

06.

830.

000.

000.

00

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):Sl

imy

scul

pin

Cot

tus

cogn

atus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Riff

le s

culp

inC

ottu

s gu

losu

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00

Car

ps &

min

now

s (C

yprin

idae

):C

entra

l sto

nero

ller

Cam

post

oma

anom

alum

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Ros

ysid

e da

ceC

linos

tom

us fu

ndul

oide

s0.

000.

004

6.15

67.2

53.

370.

00Sa

tinfin

shi

ner

Cyp

rinel

la a

nalo

stan

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00Sp

otfin

shi

ner

Cyp

rinel

la s

pilo

pter

us4

28.5

758

.25

2.38

0.00

1523

.08

64.7

32.

733

9.09

83.0

07.

66C

omm

on c

arp

Cyp

rinus

car

pio

Linn

aeus

0.00

0.00

0.00

26.

06C

utlip

s m

inno

wE

xogl

ossu

m m

axilli

ngua

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

503.

0020

14.5

0C

omm

on s

hine

rLu

xilu

s co

rnut

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00G

olde

n sh

iner

Not

emig

onus

cry

sole

ucas

0.00

12.

5612

6.00

18.0

01

1.54

112.

0016

.61

13.

0317

6.00

53.0

0Sp

otta

il sh

iner

Not

ropi

s hu

dson

ius

0.00

12.

5695

.00

6.39

1320

.00

88.1

57.

771

3.03

74.0

03.

91Sw

allo

wta

il sh

iner

Not

ropi

s pr

ocne

0.00

0.00

46.

1553

.50

1.58

0.00

Blun

tnos

e m

inno

wP

imep

hale

s no

tatu

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00D

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Bla

ckno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

atra

tulu

s3

21.4

360

.67

2.34

25.

1361

.00

2.15

11.

5455

.00

2.20

0.00

Long

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys c

atar

acta

e2

14.2

992

.00

9.15

12.

5689

.00

7.00

0.00

0.00

Cre

ek c

hub

Sem

otilu

s at

rom

acul

atus

0.00

25.

1398

.50

13.1

51

1.54

150.

0037

.74

26.

0683

.00

8.46

Fallf

ish

Sem

otilu

s co

rpor

alis

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cyp

rinid

0.00

0.00

812

.31

30.3

80.

240.

00

08/2

2/00

11/1

8/00

03/2

5/01

06/1

0/01

(C

ontin

ued

on n

ext p

age)



Tab

le 3

.35

Con

tinue

d G

RA

YBIL

L-co

ntin

ued

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

2 R

uns

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Bul

lhea

d ca

tfish

es (I

ctal

urid

ae):

Yello

w b

ullh

ead

Am

eiur

us n

atal

is2

14.2

964

.50

3.11

615

.38

188.

0012

9.80

0.00

0.00

Mar

gine

d m

adto

mN

otur

us in

sign

is0.

000.

000.

000.

00

Topm

inno

ws

& K

illifi

shes

(Fun

dulid

ae):

Band

ed k

illifis

hFu

ndul

us d

iaph

anus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Perc

hes

& d

arte

rs (P

erci

dae)

:G

reen

side

dar

ter

Eth

eost

oma

blen

nioi

des

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Tess

ella

ted

darte

rE

theo

stom

a ol

mst

edi

214

.29

59.0

02.

491

2.56

72.0

04.

001

1.54

57.0

02.

380.

00B

ande

d da

rter

Eth

eost

oma

zona

le0.

000.

000.

000.

00S

hiel

d da

rter

Per

cina

pel

tata

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Dar

ter

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):R

ainb

ow tr

out

Onc

orhy

nchu

s m

ykis

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00Br

own

trout

Sal

mo

trutta

0.

000.

000.

000.

00

Fish

:U

nide

ntifi

ed0.

000.

000.

000.

00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

1439

6533

08/2

2/00

11/1

8/00

03/2

5/01

06/1

0/01



Tab

le 3

.36

Cod

orus

Cre

ek: I

ndia

n R

ock

Bac

kpac

k Fi

sh D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Aug

ust 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001

IND

IAN

RO

CK

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

1 R

un2

Run

s2

Run

s

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Whi

te s

ucke

rC

atos

tom

us c

omm

erso

ni2

3.23

56.5

2.32

0.00

0.00

46.

6716

2.75

149.

13N

orth

ern

hogs

ucke

rH

ypen

teliu

m n

igric

ans

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Sunf

ish

(Cen

trar

chid

ae):

Roc

k ba

ssA

mbl

oplit

es ru

pest

ris2

3.23

101.

5021

.34

0.00

0.00

58.

3316

6.20

116.

26Le

pom

isLe

pom

is0.

000.

000.

002

3.33

43.5

01.

51R

edbr

east

sun

fish

Lepo

mis

aur

itus

11.

6165

.00

4.61

758

.33

127.

2938

.14

33.

5772

.33

10.5

10.

00G

reen

sun

fish

Lepo

mis

cya

nellu

s3

4.84

105.

6724

.77

325

.00

108.

3320

.33

11.

1913

1.00

41.9

02

3.33

121.

0043

.00

Pum

pkin

seed

Lepo

mis

gib

bosu

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00Bl

uegi

llLe

pom

is m

acro

chiru

s1

1.61

31.0

00.

540.

000.

001

1.67

72.0

07.

89R

edea

r sun

fish

Lepo

mis

mic

rolo

phus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Sm

allm

outh

bas

sM

icro

pter

us d

olom

ieui

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Larg

emou

th b

ass

Mic

ropt

erus

sal

moi

des

11.

6159

.00

2.78

0.00

0.00

0.00

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):Sl

imy

scul

pin

Cot

tus

cogn

atus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Riff

le s

culp

inC

ottu

s gu

losu

s0.

000.

002

2.38

59.5

01.

440.

00

Car

ps &

min

now

s (C

yprin

idae

):C

entra

l sto

nero

ller

Cam

post

oma

anom

alum

34.

8472

.33

5.08

0.00

0.00

0.00

Ros

ysid

e da

ceC

linos

tom

us fu

ndul

oide

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00Sa

tinfin

shi

ner

Cyp

rinel

la a

nalo

stan

us0.

000.

001

1.19

61.0

01.

640.

00S

potfi

n sh

iner

Cyp

rinel

la s

pilo

pter

us3

4.84

70.6

73.

030.

0035

41.6

763

.69

2.14

11.

67-

4.73

Com

mon

car

pC

yprin

us c

arpi

o Li

nnae

us0.

000.

000.

001

1.67

541.

0024

12.0

0C

utlip

s m

inno

wEx

oglo

ssum

max

illing

ua0.

000.

000.

000.

00C

omm

on s

hine

rLu

xilu

s co

rnut

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00G

olde

n sh

iner

Not

emig

onus

cry

sole

ucas

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Spo

ttail

shin

erN

otro

pis

huds

oniu

s12

19.3

549

.58

1.05

0.00

2327

.38

56.0

91.

644

6.67

68.5

03.

32S

wal

low

tail

shin

erN

otro

pis

proc

ne9

14.5

250

.56

1.19

0.00

1315

.48

59.8

52.

090.

00B

lunt

nose

min

now

Pim

epha

les

nota

tus

0.00

0.00

0.00

23.

3377

.50

6.60

Dac

eR

hini

chth

ys1

1.61

45.0

00.

830.

000.

000.

00B

lack

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys a

tratu

lus

23.

2344

.50

0.93

0.00

0.00

0.00

Long

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys c

atar

acta

e6

9.68

63.1

73.

240.

000.

000.

00C

reek

chu

bS

emot

ilus

atro

mac

ulat

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00Fa

llfis

hS

emot

ilus

corp

oral

is0.

000.

000.

000.

00C

yprin

id5

8.06

--

0.00

0.00

13.0

21.6

749

.23

1.15

08/2

3/00

11/1

8/00

03/2

5/01

06/1

0/01

(C

ontin

ued

on n

ext p

age)



Tab

le 3

.36

Con

tinue

d IN

DIA

N R

OC

K-co

ntin

ued

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

1 R

un2

Run

s2

Run

s

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Bul

lhea

d ca

tfish

es (I

ctal

urid

ae):

Yel

low

bul

lhea

dA

mei

urus

nat

alis

11.

6110

3.00

14.0

02

16.6

723

2.50

177.

500.

001.

01.

6720

3.00

120.

00M

argi

ned

mad

tom

Not

urus

insi

gnis

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Topm

inno

ws

& K

illifi

shes

(Fun

dulid

ae):

Ban

ded

killif

ish

Fund

ulus

dia

phan

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00

Perc

hes

& d

arte

rs (P

erci

dae)

:G

reen

side

dar

ter

Eth

eost

oma

blen

nioi

des

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Tess

ella

ted

darte

rE

theo

stom

a ol

mst

edi

1016

.13

52.0

01.

540.

005

5.95

50.2

01.

5724

.040

.00

54.0

41.

69B

ande

d da

rter

Eth

eost

oma

zona

le0.

000.

000.

000.

00S

hiel

d da

rter

Per

cina

pel

tata

0.00

0.00

11.

1978

.00

5.04

0.00

Dar

ter

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):R

ainb

ow tr

out

Onc

orhy

nchu

s m

ykis

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00B

row

n tro

utS

alm

o tru

tta

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Fish

:U

nide

ntifi

ed0.

000.

000.

000.

00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

6212

8460

08/2

3/00

11/1

8/00

03/2

5/01

06/1

0/01



Tab

le 3

.37

Cod

orus

Cre

ek: A

rsen

al B

ackp

ack

Fish

Dat

a Su

mm

ary

for A

ugus

t 200

0 to

June

200

1 A

RSE

NA

LS

ampl

ing

Dat

e/#

of ru

ns =

3

Run

s1

Run

3 R

uns

3 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Whi

te s

ucke

rC

atos

tom

us c

omm

erso

ni1

1.30

754.

580.

004

5.00

58.5

02.

444

13.7

935

6.50

528.

75N

orth

ern

hogs

ucke

rH

ypen

teliu

m n

igric

ans

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Sunf

ish

(Cen

trar

chid

ae):

Roc

k ba

ssA

mbl

oplit

es ru

pest

ris21

27.2

710

5.52

43.3

42

20.0

010

6.50

41.4

020

25.0

070

.85

19.1

27

24.1

414

5.33

54.9

2Le

pom

isLe

pom

is0.

000.

000.

000.

00R

edbr

east

sun

fish

Lepo

mis

aur

itus

1620

.78

123.

3150

.94

550

.00

117.

2033

.60

1215

.00

52.3

36.

746

20.6

912

1.50

46.0

0G

reen

sun

fish

Lepo

mis

cya

nellu

s3

3.90

59.0

08.

620.

001

1.25

110.

0023

.82

0.00

Pum

pkin

seed

Lepo

mis

gib

bosu

s1

1.30

73.0

07.

652

20.0

012

4.00

39.0

00.

001

3.45

130.

0051

.00

Blu

egill

Lepo

mis

mac

roch

irus

56.

4943

.20

2.09

0.00

0.00

413

.79

49.0

02.

16R

edea

r sun

fish

Lepo

mis

mic

rolo

phus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Smal

lmou

th b

ass

Mic

ropt

erus

dol

omie

ui1

1.30

60.0

03.

161

10.0

094

.00

9.00

0.00

13.

4520

9.00

100.

00La

rgem

outh

bas

sM

icro

pter

us s

alm

oide

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):Sl

imy

scul

pin

Cot

tus

cogn

atus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Riff

le s

culp

inC

ottu

s gu

losu

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00

Car

ps &

min

now

s (C

yprin

idae

):C

entra

l sto

nero

ller

Cam

post

oma

anom

alum

0.00

0.00

0.00

13.

4555

.00

1.45

Ros

ysid

e da

ceC

linos

tom

us fu

ndul

oide

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00Sa

tinfin

shi

ner

Cyp

rinel

la a

nalo

stan

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00S

potfi

n sh

iner

Cyp

rinel

la s

pilo

pter

us0.

000.

000.

001

3.45

62.0

02.

12C

omm

on c

arp

Cyp

rinus

car

pio

Linn

aeus

0.00

0.00

0.00

13.

4568

0.00

-C

utlip

s m

inno

wEx

oglo

ssum

max

illing

ua0.

000.

000.

000.

00C

omm

on s

hine

rLu

xilu

s co

rnut

us0.

000.

000.

000.

00G

olde

n sh

iner

Not

emig

onus

cry

sole

ucas

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Spot

tail

shin

erN

otro

pis

huds

oniu

s0.

000.

005

6.25

49.0

01.

080.

00Sw

allo

wta

il sh

iner

Not

ropi

s pr

ocne

1620

.78

37.8

10.

490.

0019

23.7

543

.89

0.76

0.00

Blu

ntno

se m

inno

wP

imep

hale

s no

tatu

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00D

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Bla

ckno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

atra

tulu

s0.

000.

002

2.50

35.0

00.

360.

00Lo

ngno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

cat

arac

tae

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cre

ek c

hub

Sem

otilu

s at

rom

acul

atus

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Fallf

ish

Sem

otilu

s co

rpor

alis

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cyp

rinid

22.

60-

-0.

0014

17.5

031

.21

0.24

2.0

6.90

--

08/2

3/00

11/1

8/00

03/2

5/01

06/1

0/01

(C

ontin

ued

on n

ext p

age)



Tab

le 3

.37

Con

tinue

d A

RSE

NA

L-co

ntin

ued

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

1 R

un3

Run

s3

Run

s

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Bul

lhea

d ca

tfish

es (I

ctal

urid

ae):

Yello

w b

ullh

ead

Am

eiur

us n

atal

is1

1.30

265.

00-

0.00

0.00

0.00

Mar

gine

d m

adto

mN

otur

us in

sign

is0.

000.

000.

000.

00

Topm

inno

ws

& K

illifi

shes

(Fun

dulid

ae):

Band

ed k

illifis

hFu

ndul

us d

iaph

anus

0.00

0.00

22.

5053

.00

1.33

0.00

Perc

hes

& d

arte

rs (P

erci

dae)

:G

reen

side

dar

ter

Eth

eost

oma

blen

nioi

des

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Tess

ella

ted

darte

rE

theo

stom

a ol

mst

edi

79.

0946

.43

1.07

0.00

11.

2552

.00

1.66

1.0

3.45

57.0

01.

72B

ande

d da

rter

Eth

eost

oma

zona

le3

3.90

39.0

00.

630.

000.

000.

00Sh

ield

dar

ter

Per

cina

pel

tata

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Dar

ter

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):R

ainb

ow tr

out

Onc

orhy

nchu

s m

ykis

s0.

000.

000.

000.

00Br

own

trout

Sal

mo

trutta

0.

000.

000.

000.

00

Fish

:U

nide

ntifi

ed0.

000.

000.

000.

00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

7710

8029

08/2

3/00

11/1

8/00

03/2

5/01

06/1

0/01



Tab

le 3

.38

Cod

orus

Cre

ek: F

urna

ce B

ackp

ack

Fish

Dat

a Su

mm

ary

for A

ugus

t 200

0 to

June

200

1 FU

RN

AC

ES

ampl

ing

Dat

e/#

of ru

ns =

3

Run

s1

Run

3 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Whi

te s

ucke

rC

atos

tom

us c

omm

erso

ni0.

001

0.55

99.0

011

.08

0.00

Nor

ther

n ho

gsuc

ker

Hyp

ente

lium

nig

rican

s0.

000.

000.

00

Sunf

ish

(Cen

trar

chid

ae):

Roc

k ba

ssA

mbl

oplit

es ru

pest

ris0.

000.

002

2.70

121.

5044

.50

Lepo

mis

Lepo

mis

0.00

0.00

0.00

Red

brea

st s

unfis

hLe

pom

is a

uritu

s0.

001

0.55

114.

0027

.45

0.00

Gre

en s

unfis

hLe

pom

is c

yane

llus

2019

.05

86.5

013

.63

73.

8395

.14

18.4

711

14.8

610

8.36

30.9

8P

umpk

inse

edLe

pom

is g

ibbo

sus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Blu

egill

Lepo

mis

mac

roch

irus

0.00

0.00

34.

0567

.33

8.56

Red

ear s

unfis

hLe

pom

is m

icro

loph

us0.

004

2.19

52.2

51.

040.

00S

mal

lmou

th b

ass

Mic

ropt

erus

dol

omie

ui0.

000.

001

1.35

239.

0020

0.00

Larg

emou

th b

ass

Mic

ropt

erus

sal

moi

des

0.00

0.00

0.00

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):S

limy

scul

pin

Cot

tus

cogn

atus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Riff

le s

culp

inC

ottu

s gu

losu

s1

0.95

61.0

01.

620.

000.

00

Car

ps &

min

now

s (C

yprin

idae

):C

entra

l sto

nero

ller

Cam

post

oma

anom

alum

21.

9090

.50

10.8

12

1.09

81.0

06.

380.

00R

osys

ide

dace

Clin

osto

mus

fund

uloi

des

0.00

0.00

0.00

Sat

infin

shi

ner

Cyp

rinel

la a

nalo

stan

us0.

001

0.55

71.0

02.

390.

00S

potfi

n sh

iner

Cyp

rinel

la s

pilo

pter

us0.

0014

7.65

61.7

12.

091

1.35

75.0

05.

06C

omm

on c

arp

Cyp

rinus

car

pio

Linn

aeus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Cut

lips

min

now

Exo

glos

sum

max

illin

gua

0.00

0.00

0.00

Com

mon

shi

ner

Luxi

lus

corn

utus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Gol

den

shin

erN

otem

igon

us c

ryso

leuc

as0.

000.

000.

00S

potta

il sh

iner

Not

ropi

s hu

dson

ius

2422

.86

44.7

10.

8064

34.9

745

.66

0.73

0.00

Sw

allo

wta

il sh

iner

Not

ropi

s pr

ocne

0.00

8043

.72

47.5

40.

910.

00B

lunt

nose

min

now

Pim

epha

les

nota

tus

0.00

0.00

22.

7071

.50

3.96

Dac

eR

hini

chth

ys0.

000.

000.

00B

lack

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys a

tratu

lus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Long

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys c

atar

acta

e1

0.95

58.0

01.

980.

002

2.70

68.0

03.

62C

reek

chu

bS

emot

ilus

atro

mac

ulat

us0.

000.

000.

00Fa

llfis

hS

emot

ilus

corp

oral

is0.

000.

000.

00C

yprin

id0.

004

2.19

36.7

50.

3325

.033

.78

42.8

80.

89

08/2

3/00

03/2

5/01

06/1

0/01

(C

ontin

ued

on n

ext p

age)



Tab

le 3

.38

Con

tinue

d FU

RN

AC

E-c

ontin

ued

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

1 R

un3

Run

s

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Bul

lhea

d ca

tfish

es (I

ctal

urid

ae):

Yello

w b

ullh

ead

Am

eiur

us n

atal

is0.

000.

000.

00M

argi

ned

mad

tom

Not

urus

insi

gnis

0.00

0.00

0.00

Topm

inno

ws

& K

illifi

shes

(Fun

dulid

ae):

Ban

ded

killi

fish

Fund

ulus

dia

phan

us0.

000.

000.

00

Perc

hes

& d

arte

rs (P

erci

dae)

:G

reen

side

dar

ter

Eth

eost

oma

blen

nioi

des

1110

.48

67.2

73.

971

0.55

62.0

02.

608.

010

.81

74.5

04.

81Te

ssel

late

d da

rter

Eth

eost

oma

olm

sted

i34

32.3

850

.38

1.46

42.

1954

.50

1.96

9.0

12.1

653

.89

1.57

Ban

ded

darte

rE

theo

stom

a zo

nale

1110

.48

51.0

01.

730.

009.

012

.16

58.5

63.

71S

hiel

d da

rter

Per

cina

pel

tata

10.

9574

.00

3.98

0.00

0.00

Dar

ter

0.00

0.00

1.0

1.35

49.0

00.

53

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):R

ainb

ow tr

out

Onc

orhy

nchu

s m

ykis

s0.

000.

000.

00B

row

n tro

utS

alm

o tru

tta

0.00

0.00

0.00

Fish

:U

nide

ntifi

ed0.

000.

000.

00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

105

183

74

08/2

3/00

03/2

5/01

06/1

0/01



East

Bra

nch

Fish

Sum

mar

y 8/

00 to

6/0

1M

ean

No.

of I

ndivi

dual

s =

153

Mea

n N

o. o

f Spe

cies

= 1

4

0510152025

Bande

d dart

er

Blackn

ose d

ace Bluegil

l

Bluntno

se m

innow

Brown t

rout

Centra

l ston

eroller

Common s

hiner

Creek c

hub

Cutlips

minn

ow Cyprin

id Fallfis

h Fish

Green s

unfis

h

Long

nose

dace

Margine

d mad

tom

Northe

rn ho

gsuc

ker

Rainbo

w trout

Rosys

ide da

ce

Spotta

il shin

er

Swallow

tail shin

er

Tesse

llated

darter

White su

cker

Percent of Total

Aug

ust

2000

Mar

ch20

01Ju

ne20

01

Men

ges

Fish

Sum

mar

y 8/

00 to

6/0

1M

ean

No.

of I

ndivi

dual

s =

39M

ean

No.

of S

peci

es =

4

0102030405060708090100

Bande

d dart

er

Blackn

ose d

ace Brow

n trout

Green su

nfish

Long

nose

dace

Redbreas

t sun

fish

Slimy s

culpi

n

Tesse

llated

darte

rWhite

suck

er

Percent of Total

Aug

ust

2000

Nove

mbe

r20

00M

arch

2001

June

200

1

USG

S Fi

sh S

umm

ary

8/00

to 6

/01

Mea

n N

o. o

f Ind

ividu

als

= 85

Mea

n N

o. o

f Spe

cies

= 9

01020304050607080

Bluntno

se m

innow

Centra

l ston

eroller

Common c

arpCree

k chu

b Cyprin

id

Green s

unfis

h

Large

mouth ba

ss

Long

nose

dace

Northe

rn ho

gsuc

ker

Pumpk

insee

d

Rosys

ide da

ce

Satinfi

n shin

er

Spotfin

shiner

Spotta

il shin

er

Swallow

tail shin

er

Tesse

llated

darter

White su

cker

Percent of Total

Aug

ust

2000

Mar

ch20

01

June

2001

Figu

re 3

.94

Per

cent

Fis

h D

istri

butio

n fo

r Ups

tream

Site

s (Ea

st B

ranc

h, M

enge

s and

USG

S) C

odor

us C

reek

, Aug

ust 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001,

Bac

kpac

k El

ectro

fishi

ng S

ampl

es



Mar

tin F

ish

Sum

mar

y 8/

00 to

6/0

1M

ean

No.

of I

ndivi

dual

s =

46M

ean

No.

of S

peci

es =

9

05101520253035404550

Blackn

ose d

ace Bluegil

l

Brown t

rout

Central

stone

roller

Common carp

Creek c

hub

Cyprin

id

Green su

nfish

Large

mouth ba

ss

Long

nose

dace

Pumpk

inseed

Redbreas

t sun

fish

Satinfin

shine

r

Spotfin

shine

r

Spotta

il shin

er

Swallow

tail shine

r

White su

cker

Yellow

bullh

ead

Percent of Total

Aug

ust

2000

Nove

mbe

r20

00M

arch

2001

June

200

1

Gra

ybill

Fis

h Su

mm

ary

8/00

to 6

/01

Mea

n N

o. o

f Ind

ividu

als

= 38

Mea

n N

o. O

f Spe

cies

= 9

051015202530354045

Blackn

ose d

ace

Common c

arpCree

k chu

b Cyprin

id

Golden

shine

r

Green s

unfis

h

Large

mouth ba

ss

Long

nose

dace

Redbre

ast s

unfish

Rosys

ide da

ce

Spotfin

shiner

Spotta

il shin

er

Swallow

tail shin

er

Tesse

llated

darter

White su

cker

Yellow

bullhe

ad

Percent of Total

Aug

ust

2000

Nove

mbe

r20

00M

arch

2001

June

200

1

Indi

an R

ock

Fish

Sum

mar

y 8/

00 to

6/0

1M

ean

No.

of I

ndivi

dual

s =

55M

ean

No.

of S

peci

es =

10

010203040506070

Blackn

ose d

ace Bluegil

l

Bluntno

se m

innow

Centra

l ston

eroller

Common c

arp Cyprin

id Dace

Green s

unfis

h

Large

mouth ba

ss Lepo

mis

Long

nose

dace

Redbre

ast s

unfish

Riffle s

culpi

nRoc

k bas

s

Satinfi

n shin

er

Shield da

rter

Spotfin

shiner

Spotta

il shin

er

Swallow

tail shin

er

Tesse

llated

darter

White su

cker

Yellow

bullhe

ad

Percent of Total

Aug

ust

2000

Nove

mbe

r20

00M

arch

2001

June

200

1

Figu

re 3

.95

Per

cent

Fis

h D

istri

butio

n fo

r Dow

nstre

am S

ites (

Mar

tin, G

rayb

ill, a

nd In

dian

Roc

k) C

odor

us C

reek

, Aug

ust 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001,

B

ackp

ack

Elec

trofis

hing

Sam

ples



Arse

nal F

ish

Sum

mar

y 8/

00 to

6/0

1M

ean

No.

of I

ndivi

dual

s =

49M

ean

No.

of S

peci

es =

9

0102030405060

Bande

d dart

er

Bande

d killif

ish

Blackn

ose d

ace Bluegil

l

Centra

l ston

erolle

r

Common

carp Cyp

rinid

Green s

unfis

h

Pumpk

insee

d

Redbre

ast s

unfis

hRoc

k bas

s

Smallmou

th ba

ss

Spotfin

shine

r

Spotta

il shin

er

Swallow

tail s

hiner

Tess

ellate

d dart

er

White s

ucke

r

Yellow

bullh

ead

Percent of Total

Aug

ust

2000

Nove

mbe

r20

00M

arch

2001

June

200

1

Furn

ace

Fish

Sum

mar

y 8/

00 to

6/0

1M

ean

No.

of I

ndivi

dual

s =

121

Mea

n N

o. o

f Spe

cies

= 1

1

05101520253035404550

Bande

d dart

er Bluegil

l

Bluntno

se m

innow

Centra

l ston

eroller Cyprin

id Darter

Green s

unfis

h

Greens

ide da

rter

Long

nose

dace

Redbre

ast s

unfish

Redea

r sun

fish

Riffle s

culpi

nRoc

k bas

s

Satinfi

n shin

er

Shield da

rter

Smallmou

th ba

ss

Spotfin

shiner

Spotta

il shin

er

Swallow

tail shin

er

Tesse

llated

darter

White su

cker

Percent of Total

Aug

ust

2000

Mar

ch20

01Ju

ne20

01

Figu

re 3

.96

Per

cent

Fis

h D

istri

butio

n fo

r Dow

nstre

am S

ites (

Ars

enal

and

Fur

nace

) Cod

orus

Cre

ek, A

ugus

t 200

0 to

June

200

1, B

ackp

ack

Elec

trofis

hing

Sam

ples




3.9.2 Leaf River Fish

Table 3.39 Leaf River Boat Electrofishing Data Summary for October 2000 LEAF RIVER

Sampling Date/# of runs = 1 Run 1 Run 1 Run

Cou

nt

% o

f Tot

al

Mea

n To

tal

Leng

th (m

m)

Mea

n W

eigh

t (g

)

Cou

nt

% o

f Tot

al

Mea

n To

tal

Leng

th (m

m)

Mea

n W

eigh

t (g

)

Cou

nt

% o

f Tot

al

Mea

n To

tal

Leng

th (m

m)

Mea

n W

eigh

t (g

)

Bowfin (Amiidae):Bowfin Amia calva 1 0.71 642.00 2676.00 0.00 0.00

Freshwater eel (Anguillidae):American eel Anguilla rostrata 0.00 1 0.56 590.00 230.00 0.00

Suckers (Catostomidae):Quillback carpsucker Carpiodes cyprinus 18 12.77 417.17 863.78 11 6.18 389.46 723.64 9 14.29 355.33 618.89Highfin carpsucker Carpiodes velifer 3 2.13 274.00 302.67 7 3.93 279.57 309.14 3 4.76 209.67 128.67Blue sucker Cycleptus elongatus 0.00 0.00 1 1.59 454.00 2678.00Northern hogsucker Hypentelium nigricans 1 0.71 323.00 350.00 0.00 0.00Smallmouth buffalo Ictiobus bubalus 0.00 0.00 1 1.59 622.00 4173.00Blacktail redhorse Moxostoma poecilurum 5 3.55 339.40 416.80 11 6.18 313.00 340.00 12 19.05 256.42 179.33

Sunfishes (Centrarchidae):Shadow bass Ambloplites ariommus 0.00 2 1.12 131.50 59.00 2 3.17 177..50 109.00Warmouth sunfish Lepomis gulosus 0.00 1 0.56 170.00 90.00 0.00Bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus 4 2.84 144.00 46.50 14 7.87 160.07 93.29 2 3.17 163.50 75.00Longear sunfish Lepomis megalotis 27 19.15 102.56 22.52 42 23.60 102.10 23.29 8 12.70 117.00 34.50Redear sunfish Lepomis microlophus 2 1.42 197.00 128.00 6 3.37 214.50 211.33 0.00Spotted sunfish Lepomis puntatus 0.00 1 0.56 82.00 10.00 0.00Spotted bass Micropterus punctulatus 18 12.77 189.11 84.11 20 11.24 183.60 86.60 10 15.87 223.50 135.40Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides 0.00 0.00 0.00

Herrings (Clupeidae):Skipjack herring Alosa chrysochloris 6 4.26 143.83 22.00 5 2.81 140.40 23.20 0.00Gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum 0.00 0.00 0.00

Carps & minnows (Cyprinidae):Blacktail shiner Cyprinella venustus 3 2.13 59.33 1.33 12 6.74 68.42 - 3 4.76 57.00 -Emerald shiner Notropis atherinoides 1 0.71 84.00 2.00 1 0.56 82.00 2.00 0.00

Mooneyes (Hiodontidae):Mooneye Hiodon tergisus 0.00 1 0.56 230.00 104.00 0.00

Bullhead catfishes (Ictaluridae):Blue catfish Ictalarus furcatus 0.00 1 0.56 718.00 4173.00 0.00Channel catfish Ictalarus punctatus 6 4.26 348.00 331.33 10 5.62 345.90 311.80 4 6.35 329.75 376.50Flathead catfish Pylodictis olivaris 0.00 0.00 4 6.35 379.50 615.50

Gars (Lepisosteidae):Spotted gar Lepisosteus oculatus 8 5.67 486.63 364.75 8 4.49 491.38 377.00 0.00Longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus 1 0.71 460.00 180.00 1 0.56 405.00 128.00 0.00

Mullets (Mugilidae): Striped mullet Mugil cephalus 36 25.53 400.56 851.94 19 10.67 407.21 838.16 3 4.76 365.33 558.67

Perches & darters (Percidae):Blackbanded darter Percina nigrofasciata 0.00 2 1.12 64.50 2.00 1 1.59 72.00 2.00

Drums (Sciaenidae):Freshwater drum Aplodinotus grunniens 1 0.71 545.00 2540.00 2 1.12 444.00 1249.00 0.00

n (Total Individuals) 141 178 63

NEW AUGUSTA (RM 1.7) BOGUE (RM 10.3)10/17/200010/16/2000

DOWNSTREAM (RM 2.0)10/16/2000




Table 3.39 Continued LEAF RIVER

Sampling Date/# of runs = 1 Run 1 Run

Cou

nt

% o

f Tot

al

Mea

n To

tal

Leng

th (m

m)

Mea

n W

eigh

t (g

)

Cou

nt

% o

f Tot

al

Mea

n To

tal

Leng

th (m

m)

Mea

n W

eigh

t (g

)

Bowfin (Amiidae):Bowfin Amia calva 0.00 0.00

Freshwater eel (Anguillidae):American eel Anguilla rostrata 0.00 0.00

Suckers (Catostomidae):Quillback carpsucker Carpiodes cyprinus 17 16.50 382.47 742.47 34 23.29 315.24 383.65Highfin carpsucker Carpiodes velifer 2 1.94 275.50 306.00 14 9.59 220.86 147.86Blue sucker Cycleptus elongatus 0.00 0.00Northern hogsucker Hypentelium nigricans 2 1.94 240.50 149.00 0.00Smallmouth buffalo Ictiobus bubalus 0.00 0.00Blacktail redhorse Moxostoma poecilurum 20 19.42 256.57 287.60 5 3.42 284.20 259.20

Sunfishes (Centrarchidae):Shadow bass Ambloplites ariommus 1 0.97 96.00 14.00 2 1.37 120.50 34.00Warmouth sunfish Lepomis gulosus 0.00 0.00Bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus 1 0.97 182.00 120.00 2 1.37 91.00 14.00Longear sunfish Lepomis megalotis 11 10.68 98.09 18.73 18 12.33 100.89 22.28Redear sunfish Lepomis microlophus 0.00 0.00Spotted sunfish Lepomis puntatus 0.00 0.00Spotted bass Micropterus punctulatus 6 5.83 214.83 136.33 5 3.42 184.80 84.40Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides 0.00 2 1.37 253.00 197.00

Herrings (Clupeidae):Skipjack herring Alosa chrysochloris 0.00 0.00Gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum 0.00 11 7.53 288.73 251.09

Carps & minnows (Cyprinidae):Blacktail shiner Cyprinella venustus 3 2.91 53.33 33 22.60 45.48 -Emerald shiner Notropis atherinoides 0.00 0.00

Mooneyes (Hiodontidae):Mooneye Hiodon tergisus 0.00 0.00

Bullhead catfishes (Ictaluridae):Blue catfish Ictalarus furcatus 0.00 0.00Channel catfish Ictalarus punctatus 24 23.30 323.33 310.33 8 5.48 300.50 178.25Flathead catfish Pylodictis olivaris 0.00 0.00

Gars (Lepisosteidae):Spotted gar Lepisosteus oculatus 0.00 5 3.42 525.40 464.40Longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus 0.00 0.00

Mullets (Mugilidae): Striped mullet Mugil cephalus 16 15.53 350.69 636.50 7 4.79 346.00 520.43

Perches & darters (Percidae):Blackbanded darter Percina nigrofasciata 0.00 0.00

Drums (Sciaenidae):Freshwater drum Aplodinotus grunniens 0.00 0.00

n (Total Individuals) 103 146

THOMPSON (RM 13.0)10/17/2000

MCLAIN (RM 27.5)10/17/2000


Leaf

Riv

er B

oat F

ish

Oct

ober

200

0

051015202530American eel

Blackbanded darterBlacktail redhorse

Blacktail shinerBlue catfishBlue sucker

Bluegill sunfishBowfin

Channel catfishEmerald shiner

Flathead catfishFreshwater drum

Gizzard shadHighfin carpsucker

Largemouth bassLongear sunfish

Longnose garMooneye

Northern hogsuckerQuillback carpsucker

Redear sunfishShadow bass

Skipjack herringSmallmouth buffalo

Spotted bassSpotted gar

Spotted sunfishStriped mullet

Warmouth sunfish

Percent of Total

New

Aug

usta

Dow

nstre

am

Bogu

e

Thom

pson

McL

ain

Figu

re 3

.97

Lea

f Riv

er B

oat F

ish

Dis

tribu

tion

for O

ctob

er 2

000



Tab

le 3

.40

Lea

f Riv

er B

ackp

ack

Elec

trofis

hing

Dat

a Su

mm

ary

for O

ctob

er 2

000

LE

AF

RIV

ER

S

am

plin

g D

ate

/# o

f ru

ns

=

1 R

un

1 R

un

1 R

un

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Bo

wfi

n (

Am

iidae

):B

ow

finA

mia

ca

lva

0.0

00

.00

0.0

0

Su

cker

s (C

ato

sto

mid

ae):

Hig

hfin

car

psu

cker

Ca

rpio

de

s ve

life

r0

.00

0.0

05

3.1

64

9.8

01

.57

Su

nfi

shes

(C

entr

arch

idae

):L

on

gea

r su

nfis

hL

ep

om

is m

eg

alo

tis1

87

.83

57.8

23

.87

14

7.1

84

9.8

62.

70

42.

53

46

.50

3.3

9S

po

tted

ba

ssM

icro

pte

rus

pu

nct

ula

tus

1

0.4

31

12

.00

12

.35

10

.51

131

.00

18

.50

10.

63

148

.00

28.1

4

Car

ps

& m

inn

ow

s (C

ypri

nid

ae):

Bla

ckta

il sh

ine

rC

ypri

ne

lla v

en

ust

us

130

56.5

237

.11

0.5

21

01

51

.79

37

.24

0.5

781

51

.27

37

.21

0.5

0L

on

gno

se s

hin

er

No

tro

pis

lon

gir

ost

ris3

113

.48

37.9

30

.51

14

7.1

84

1.2

90.

63

261

6.4

64

0.2

30

.51

We

ed s

hin

er

No

tro

pis

te

xan

us

20

.87

59.5

01

.42

42

.05

66

.75

2.2

00.

00

Mim

ic s

hin

er

No

tro

pis

vo

luce

llus

22

9.5

741

.36

0.5

44

72

4.1

04

1.1

30.

52

85.

06

36

.88

0.3

7B

ullh

ea

d m

inn

owP

ima

ph

ale

s vi

gila

x2

310

.00

48.7

41

.03

0.0

033

20

.89

32

.03

0.3

1

To

pm

inn

ow

s &

Kill

ifis

hes

(F

un

du

lidae

):B

lack

spo

tte

d t

opm

inno

wF

un

du

lus

oliv

ace

us

0.0

04

2.0

54

2.7

50.

75

0.0

0

Bu

llhea

d c

atfi

shes

(Ic

talu

rid

ae):

Cha

nn

el c

atf

ish

Icta

laru

s p

un

cta

tus

20

.87

98.0

01

1.5

20

.00

0.0

0

Per

ches

& d

arte

rs (

Per

cid

ae):

Bla

ckb

and

ed

da

rte

rP

erc

ina

nig

rofa

scia

ta1

0.4

371

.00

2.2

30

.00

0.0

0

Liv

ebea

rers

(P

oec

iliid

ae):

Mo

squ

itofis

hG

am

bu

sia

aff

inis

0.0

09

4.6

22

5.7

80.

22

0.0

0

So

les

(So

leid

ae):

Hog

choc

ker

Tri

ne

cte

s m

acu

latu

s0

.00

10

.51

62

.00

4.1

50.

00

n (

Tot

al I

nd

ivid

uals

)23

01

95

15

8

NE

W A

UG

US

TA

(R

M 1

.7)

B

OG

UE

(R

M 1

0.3

)D

OW

NS

TR

EA

M (

RM

2.0

)1

0/1

6/2

00

01

0/1

6/2

00

01

0/1

7/2

00

0

(C

ontin

ued

on n

ext p

age)



Tab

le 3

.40

Con

tinue

d L

EA

F R

IVE

R

Sa

mp

ling

Da

te/#

of

run

s =

1

Ru

n1

Ru

n

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Bo

wfi

n (

Am

iid

ae)

:B

ow

finA

mia

ca

lva

0.0

00

.00

Su

cke

rs (

Ca

tos

tom

idae

):H

igh

fin c

arp

suck

er

Ca

rpio

de

s ve

life

r2

1.2

22

9.5

00

.34

0.0

0

Su

nfi

she

s (C

entr

arch

idae

):L

on

ge

ar

sun

fish

Le

po

mis

me

ga

lotis

53

.05

30

.20

0.4

31

0.6

26

0.0

02

.98

Sp

ott

ed

ba

ssM

icro

pte

rus

pu

nct

ula

tus

0

.00

0.0

0

Ca

rps

& m

inn

ow

s (

Cyp

rin

ida

e):

Bla

ckta

il sh

ine

rC

ypri

ne

lla v

en

ust

us

73

44

.51

31

.71

0.3

01

23

76

.40

35

.80

0.4

2L

on

gn

ose

sh

ine

rN

otr

op

is lo

ng

iro

stri

s5

53

3.5

44

5.1

00

.93

27

16

.77

34

.00

0.3

7W

ee

d s

hin

er

No

tro

pis

te

xan

us

10

.61

66

.00

2.0

50

.00

Mim

ic s

hin

er

No

tro

pis

vo

luce

llus

31

.83

45

.33

0.8

22

1.2

44

2.0

00

.60

Bu

llhe

ad

min

no

wP

ima

ph

ale

s vi

gila

x2

1.2

25

4.5

01

.48

0.0

0

To

pm

inn

ow

s &

Kil

lifis

hes

(F

un

du

lid

ae

):B

lack

spo

tte

d t

op

min

no

wF

un

du

lus

oliv

ace

us

0.0

00

.00

Bu

llh

ead

cat

fish

es

(Ic

talu

rid

ae)

:C

ha

nn

el c

atf

ish

Icta

laru

s p

un

cta

tus

10

.61

52

.00

1.1

00

.00

Pe

rch

es

& d

art

ers

(P

erc

idae

):B

lack

ba

nd

ed

da

rte

rP

erc

ina

nig

rofa

scia

ta0

.00

0.0

0

Liv

ebe

arer

s (

Po

eci

liid

ae):

Mo

squ

itofis

hG

am

bu

sia

aff

inis

22

13

.41

24

.50

0.1

76

3.7

33

0.0

00

.30

So

les

(S

ole

ida

e):

Ho

gch

ock

er

Tri

ne

cte

s m

acu

latu

s0

.00

21

.24

48

.50

2.0

5

n (

To

tal I

nd

ivid

ua

ls)

16

41

61

TH

OM

PS

ON

(R

M 1

3.0

)M

CL

AIN

(R

M 2

7.5

)1

0/1

7/2

00

01

0/1

7/2

00

0



Leaf

Riv

er B

ackp

ack

Fish

Oct

ober

200

0

0102030405060708090

Blackb

ande

d dart

er

Blacks

potted

topm

innow

Blackta

il shin

er

Bullhe

ad m

innow

Channe

l catf

ish

Highfin ca

rpsuc

ker

Hogchoc

ker

Long

ear s

unfis

h

Long

nose

shine

r

Mimic

shine

r

Mosqu

itofis

h

Spotte

d bas

s

Weed sh

iner

Percent of TotalNe

w A

ugus

ta

Dow

nstre

am

Bogu

e

Thom

pson

McL

ain

Figu

re 3

.98

Lea

f Riv

er B

ackp

ack

Fish

Dis

tribu

tion

for O

ctob

er 2

000



3.9.

3 M

cKen

zie

Riv

er F

ish

Tab

le 3

.41

McK

enzi

e R

iver

Boa

t Ele

ctro

fishi

ng D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Sep

tem

ber 2

000

MC

KEN

ZIE

RIV

ERSa

mpl

ing

Dat

e =

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Larg

esca

le s

ucke

rC

asto

mus

mac

roch

eilu

s2

4.17

296.

5065

0.45

48.

8944

4.25

1021

.48

1126

.19

498.

5513

69.7

58

20.0

049

0.75

1286

.68

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):To

rren

t scu

lpin

Cot

tus

rhot

heus

24.

1750

.75

16.7

50.

000.

000.

00

Car

ps a

nd M

inno

ws

(Cyp

rinid

ae):

Nor

ther

n pi

ke m

inno

wP

tych

oche

ilus

oreg

onen

sis

714

.58

195.

2323

4.64

12.

2237

5.00

420.

007

16.6

732

6.57

337.

863

7.50

303.

0024

0.67

Red

side

shi

ner

Ric

hard

soni

us b

alte

atus

0.00

0.00

0.00

12.

5080

.00

6.00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):C

utth

roat

trou

tO

ncor

hync

hus

clar

ki5

10.4

223

1.60

176.

5038

84.4

425

1.53

153.

2916

38.1

027

4.44

189.

5619

47.5

029

0.00

232.

63R

ainb

ow tr

out,

wild

Onc

orhy

nchu

s m

ykis

s8

16.6

734

.14

18.1

31

2.22

200.

0072

.00

37.

1433

3.67

350.

677

17.5

09.

228.

00C

hino

ok s

alm

onO

ncor

hync

hus

tsha

wyt

scha

2450

.00

123.

2917

.33

0.00

511

.90

138.

6026

.00

0.00

Mou

ntai

n w

hite

fish

Pro

sopi

um w

illiam

soni

0.00

12.

2225

8.00

152.

000.

002

5.00

266.

0018

7.50

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

4845

4240

ARM

ITAG

E (R

M 6

)09

/20/

00H

END

RIC

KS (R

M 2

6.5)

MO

HAW

K (R

M 1

3.7)

HAR

VEST

(RM

10)

09/2

0/00

09/1

9/00

09/2

0/00



McK

enzi

e Ri

ver

Boat

Fis

h Se

ptem

ber

2000

0102030405060708090

Chinoo

k salm

onCutt

hroat

trout

Large

scale

suck

er

Mounta

in whit

efish

Northern

pike m

innow

Rainbo

w trout,

wild

Redsid

e shin

er

Torrent

sculp

in

Percent of TotalHe

ndric

ks

Moh

awk

Harv

est

Arm

itage

Figu

re 3

.99

McK

enzi

e R

iver

Boa

t Fis

h D

istri

butio

n fo

r Sep

tem

ber 2

000



Tab

le 3

.42

McK

enzi

e R

iver

: Hen

dric

ks R

M 2

6.5

Bac

kpac

k El

ectro

fishi

ng D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Sep

tem

ber 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001

HE

ND

RIC

KS

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

2 R

uns

3 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):P

rickl

y sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s as

per

0.00

0.00

12.

4414

7.00

47.5

4M

ottle

d sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s ba

irdi

22.

7041

.50

1.28

14.

3556

.00

2.47

0.00

Pai

ute

scul

pin

Cot

tus

beld

ingi

0.00

0.00

24.

8867

.50

3.94

Sho

rthea

d sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s co

nfus

us3

4.05

70.0

04.

610.

000.

00R

iffle

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

gulo

sus

1317

.57

60.1

53.

240.

000.

00R

etic

ulat

e sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s pe

rple

xus

1418

.92

55.2

92.

325

21.7

453

.00

1.82

1946

.34

56.0

52.

57To

rrent

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

rhot

heus

2635

.14

52.8

13.

4215

65.2

254

.57

3.04

1536

.59

73.8

06.

56S

culp

in

34.

0529

.67

0.25

0.00

24.

8852

.00

2.05

Car

ps a

nd M

inno

ws

(Cyp

rinid

ae):

Long

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys c

atar

acta

e0.

000.

000.

00S

peck

led

dace

Rhi

nich

thys

osc

ulus

912

.16

63.1

13.

300.

000.

00R

edsi

de s

hine

rR

icha

rdso

nius

bal

teat

us0.

001

4.35

77.0

04.

080.

00

Lam

prey

(Pet

rom

yzon

tidae

):W

este

rn b

rook

lam

prey

Lam

petra

rich

ards

oni

45.

4168

.25

0.91

14.

3511

2.00

2.45

24.

8810

8.00

2.39

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):C

utth

roat

trou

tO

ncor

hync

hus

clar

ki0.

000.

000.

00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

7423

41

09/2

3/00

12/1

0/00

06/2

2/01



Tab

le 3

.43

McK

enzi

e R

iver

: Bel

linge

rs R

M 1

8.5

Bac

kpac

k El

ectro

fishi

ng D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Sep

tem

ber 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001

BE

LLIN

GE

RS

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

3 R

uns

2 R

uns

2 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Scu

lpin

s (C

ottid

ae):

Pric

kly

scul

pin

Cot

tus

aspe

r0.

000.

000.

00M

ottle

d sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s ba

irdi

0.00

0.00

0.00

Pai

ute

scul

pin

Cot

tus

beld

ingi

0.00

0.00

0.00

Sho

rthea

d sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s co

nfus

us0.

000.

000.

00R

iffle

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

gulo

sus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Ret

icul

ate

scul

pin

Cot

tus

perp

lexu

s59

76.6

255

.41

2.60

2354

.76

58.0

92.

9029

85.2

955

.93

2.94

Tor

rent

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

rhot

heus

1114

.29

45.0

91.

5412

28.5

745

.67

2.37

38.

8274

.00

6.42

Scu

lpin

0.

007

16.6

735

.00

0.34

12.

9459

.00

2.84

Car

ps a

nd M

inno

ws

(Cyp

rini

dae)

:Lo

ngno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

cat

arac

tae

0.00

0.00

0.00

Spe

ckle

d da

ceR

hini

chth

ys o

scul

us1

1.30

40.0

00.

630.

001

2.94

58.0

02.

14R

edsi

de s

hine

rR

icha

rdso

nius

bal

teat

us3

3.90

94.3

38.

990.

000.

00

Lam

prey

(Pet

rom

yzon

tidae

):W

este

rn b

rook

lam

prey

Lam

petra

rich

ards

oni

33.

9081

.00

1.06

0.00

0.00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):C

utth

roat

trou

tO

ncor

hync

hus

clar

ki0.

000.

000.

00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

7742

34

09/2

3/00

12/1

0/00

06/2

2/01



Tab

le 3

.44

McK

enzi

e R

iver

: Har

vest

RM

10

Bac

kpac

k El

ectro

fishi

ng D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Sep

tem

ber 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001

HA

RV

ES

TS

ampl

ing

Dat

e/#

of ru

ns =

09

/23/

003

Run

s06

/22/

013

Run

s

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Scu

lpin

s (C

ottid

ae):

Pric

kly

scul

pin

Cot

tus

aspe

r0.

000.

00M

ottle

d sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s ba

irdi

0.00

0.00

Pai

ute

scul

pin

Cot

tus

beld

ingi

6119

.55

49.3

91.

7321

26.2

561

.29

3.50

Sho

rthea

d sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s co

nfus

us1

0.32

55.0

01.

790.

00R

iffle

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

gulo

sus

134.

1770

.77

4.69

0.00

Ret

icul

ate

scul

pin

Cot

tus

perp

lexu

s19

6.09

58.5

33.

1530

37.5

057

.67

3.24

Tor

rent

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

rhot

heus

3511

.22

46.5

62.

2516

20.0

071

.75

7.16

Scu

lpin

88

28.2

130

.50

0.34

810

.00

48.3

81.

93

Car

ps a

nd M

inno

ws

(Cyp

rini

dae)

:Lo

ngno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

cat

arac

tae

10.

3263

.00

2.85

0.00

Spe

ckle

d da

ceR

hini

chth

ys o

scul

us92

29.4

958

.55

2.57

56.

2560

.00

2.73

Red

side

shi

ner

Ric

hard

soni

us b

alte

atus

10.

3284

.00

5.51

0.00

Lam

prey

(Pet

rom

yzon

tidae

):W

este

rn b

rook

lam

prey

Lam

petra

rich

ards

oni

0.00

0.00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):C

utth

roat

trou

tO

ncor

hync

hus

clar

ki1

0.32

72.0

03.

730.

00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

312

80



Tab

le 3

.45

McK

enzi

e R

iver

: Arm

itage

, RM

6.0

Bac

kpac

k El

ectro

fishi

ng D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Sep

tem

ber 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001

AR

MIT

AG

ES

ampl

ing

Dat

e/#

of ru

ns =

09

/22/

003

Run

s06

/23/

012

Run

s

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):P

rickl

y sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s as

per

0.00

0.00

Mot

tled

scul

pin

Cot

tus

baird

i0.

000.

00P

aiut

e sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s be

ldin

gi14

13.8

646

.71

1.76

4751

.09

50.0

22.

80S

horth

ead

scul

pin

Cot

tus

conf

usus

87.

9254

.50

2.17

11.

0947

.00

1.42

Riff

le s

culp

inC

ottu

s gu

losu

s0.

000.

00R

etic

ulat

e sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s pe

rple

xus

87.

9259

.25

3.38

0.00

Torre

nt s

culp

inC

ottu

s rh

othe

us39

38.6

152

.95

2.73

2122

.83

70.9

56.

04S

culp

in

0.00

1314

.13

45.8

51.

36

Car

ps a

nd M

inno

ws

(Cyp

rinid

ae):

Long

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys c

atar

acta

e22

21.7

847

.95

1.40

55.

4368

.20

3.94

Spe

ckle

d da

ceR

hini

chth

ys o

scul

us10

9.90

54.2

01.

965

5.43

63.4

03.

34R

edsi

de s

hine

rR

icha

rdso

nius

bal

teat

us0.

000.

00

Lam

prey

(Pet

rom

yzon

tidae

):W

este

rn b

rook

lam

prey

Lam

petra

rich

ards

oni

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):0.

000.

00C

utth

roat

trou

tO

ncor

hync

hus

clar

ki0.

000.

00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

101

92



Hen

dric

ks B

ackp

ack

Fish

Sum

mar

y 9/

00 to

6/0

1M

ean

No.

of I

ndivi

dual

s =

46M

ean

No.

of S

peci

es =

6

010203040506070

Mottled

sculp

in

Paiute

sculp

in

Prickly

sculp

in

Redsid

e shin

er

Reticu

late s

culpi

n

Riffle s

culpi

n Sculpi

n

Shorth

ead s

culpi

n

Speck

led da

ce

Torre

nt sc

ulpin

Wes

tern b

rook

lampr

ey

Percent of Total

Sept

embe

r20

00De

cem

ber

2000

June

200

1

Bel

linge

rs B

ackp

ack

Fish

Sum

mar

y 9/

00 to

6/0

1M

ean

No.

of I

ndivi

dual

s =

51M

ean

No.

of S

peci

es =

4

020406080100

Redsid

e shine

rReti

culat

e scu

lpin

Sculpin Spe

ckled d

ace To

rrent

sculp

in

Western br

ook l

ampre

y

Percent of Total

Seot

embe

r20

00De

cem

ber

2000

June

200

1

Figu

re 3

.100

Per

cent

Fis

h D

istri

butio

n fo

r Ups

tream

Site

s (H

endr

icks

and

Bel

linge

rs) M

cKen

zie

Riv

er, S

epte

mbe

r 200

0 to

June

200

1, B

ackp

ack

Elec

trofis

hing

Sam

ples



Har

vest

Bac

kpac

k Fi

sh S

umm

ary

9/00

to 6

/01

Mea

n N

o. o

f Ind

ividu

als

= 19

6M

ean

No.

of S

peci

es =

8

0510152025303540

Cutthroat

trout

Long

nose

dace

Paiute

sculp

in

Redside s

hiner

Reticula

te sc

ulpin

Riffle sc

ulpin Sculpin

Shorth

ead sc

ulpin

Speck

led da

ce

Torren

t scu

lpin

Percent of Total

Sept

embe

r20

00

June

200

1

Arm

itage

Bac

kpac

k Fi

sh S

umm

ary

9/00

to 6

/01

Mea

n N

o. o

f Ind

ividu

als

= 97

Mea

n N

o. o

f Spe

cies

= 6

0102030405060

Long

nose

dace Paiu

te sc

ulpin

Reticula

te sc

ulpin

Sculpin

Shorth

ead sc

ulpin

Speck

led da

ce Torren

t scu

lpin

Percent of Total

Sept

embe

r20

00

June

200

1

Figu

re 3

.101

Per

cent

Fis

h D

istri

butio

n fo

r Dow

nstre

am S

ites (

Har

vest

and

Arm

itage

), M

cKen

zie

Riv

er, S

epte

mbe

r 200

0 to

June

200

1, B

ackp

ack

Elec

trofis

hing

Sam

ples



3.9.

4 W

illam

ette

Riv

er F

ish

Tab

le 3

.46

Will

amet

te R

iver

Boa

t Ele

ctro

fishi

ng D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Ups

tream

Site

s (H

arris

burg

and

Car

tney

), Se

ptem

ber 2

000

WIL

LAM

ETT

E R

IVE

RS

ampl

ing

Dat

e =

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Larg

esca

le s

ucke

rC

asto

mus

mac

roch

eilu

s12

54.5

545

4.17

1004

.94

1436

.84

472.

6412

15.1

9M

ount

ain

suck

erC

asto

mus

pla

tyrh

ynch

us0.

001

2.63

300.

0023

4.00

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):P

rickl

y sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s as

per

0.00

0.00

Pai

ute

scul

pin

Cot

tus

beld

ingi

0.00

12.

6359

.00

1.83

Torr

ent s

culp

inC

ottu

s rh

othe

us0.

001

2.63

79.0

06.

00

Car

ps a

nd M

inno

ws

(Cyp

rinid

ae):

Chi

selm

outh

Acr

oche

ilus

alut

aceu

s0.

000.

00C

omm

on c

arp

Cyp

rinus

car

pio

0.00

0.00

Pea

mou

thM

yloc

heilu

s ca

urin

us0.

000.

00N

orth

ern

pike

min

now

Pty

choc

heilu

s or

egon

ensi

s4

18.1

827

4.25

201.

255

13.1

624

6.80

286.

80R

edsi

de s

hine

rR

icha

rdso

nius

bal

teat

us0.

003

7.89

109.

3311

.00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):C

utth

roat

trou

tO

ncor

hync

hus

clar

ki1

4.55

112.

0012

.00

37.

8927

8.67

219.

67R

ainb

ow tr

out,

wild

Onc

orhy

nchu

s m

ykis

s0.

000.

00C

hino

ok s

alm

onO

ncor

hync

hus

tsha

wyt

scha

29.

0914

1.00

31.0

02

5.26

178.

0052

.00

Mou

ntai

n w

hite

fish

Pro

sopi

um w

illia

mso

ni3

13.6

413

7.33

22.0

08

21.0

515

1.13

30.0

0

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

2238

HA

RR

ISB

UR

G (R

M 1

60)

CA

RTN

EY

(RM

156

)09

/21/

0009

/21/

00



Tab

le 3

.47

Will

amet

te R

iver

Boa

t Ele

ctro

fishi

ng D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Dow

nstre

am S

ites (

Sam

Daw

s, Pe

oria

, and

Will

amet

te P

ark)

, Se

ptem

ber 2

000

WIL

LAM

ETT

E R

IVE

RS

ampl

ing

Dat

e =

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Larg

esca

le s

ucke

rC

asto

mus

mac

roch

eilu

s21

36.8

446

2.43

1117

.86

1010

.31

385.

9084

3.46

1866

.67

425.

0090

0.00

Mou

ntai

n su

cker

Cas

tom

us p

laty

rhyn

chus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):P

rickl

y sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s as

per

0.00

11.

0312

5.00

24.0

00.

00P

aiut

e sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s be

ldin

gi0.

000.

000.

00To

rren

t scu

lpin

Cot

tus

rhot

heus

11.

7510

2.00

16.0

00.

000.

00

Car

ps a

nd M

inno

ws

(Cyp

rinid

ae):

Chi

selm

outh

Acr

oche

ilus

alut

aceu

s0.

0014

14.4

314

2.71

28.7

60.

00C

omm

on c

arp

Cyp

rinus

car

pio

11.

7547

0.00

1418

.80

0.00

0.00

Pea

mou

thM

yloc

heilu

s ca

urin

us0.

001

1.03

127.

0019

.00

0.00

Nor

ther

n pi

ke m

inno

wP

tych

oche

ilus

oreg

onen

sis

11.

7522

3.00

96.0

06

6.19

137.

0024

.83

13.

7019

3.00

71.0

0R

edsi

de s

hine

rR

icha

rdso

nius

bal

teat

us13

22.8

110

6.54

11.3

857

58.7

610

0.14

8.78

0.00

Trou

t and

Sal

mon

(Sal

mon

idae

):C

utth

roat

trou

tO

ncor

hync

hus

clar

ki4

7.02

232.

5014

9.25

11.

0325

5.00

180.

000.

00R

ainb

ow tr

out,

wild

Onc

orhy

nchu

s m

ykis

s1

1.75

295.

0024

8.00

0.00

0.00

Chi

nook

sal

mon

Onc

orhy

nchu

s ts

haw

ytsc

ha4

7.02

138.

0025

.75

0.00

27.

4114

1.00

28.0

0M

ount

ain

whi

tefis

hP

roso

pium

will

iam

soni

1119

.30

148.

0930

.18

77.

2214

5.00

27.0

06

22.2

215

8.00

37.0

0

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

5797

27

SA

M D

AW

S (R

M 1

45)

PE

OR

IA (R

M 1

36)

WIL

LAM

ETT

E P

AR

K (R

M 1

34)

09/1

9/00

09/1

9/00

09/1

9/00



Will

amet

te R

iver

Boa

t Fis

h Se

ptem

ber

2000

010203040506070

Chinoo

k salm

on

Chiselm

outh

Common

carp

Cutthro

at tro

ut

Large

scale

suck

er

Mounta

in suck

er

Mounta

in whit

efish

Northern

pike m

innow

Paiute

sculp

inPea

mouth

Prickly

sculpi

n

Rainbo

w trout,

wild

Redsid

e shin

er

Torrent

sculp

in

Percent of TotalHa

rris

burg

Cartn

ey

Sam

Daw

s

Peor

ia

Willa

met

te P

ark

Figu

re 3

.102

Will

amet

te R

iver

Boa

t Fis

h D

istri

butio

n fo

r Sep

tem

ber 2

000



Tab

le 3

.48

Will

amet

te R

iver

: Whi

tely

RM

177

Bac

kpac

k El

ectro

fishi

ng D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Sep

tem

ber 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001

WH

ITE

LYS

ampl

ing

Dat

e/#

of ru

ns =

09

/22/

003

Run

s06

/23/

013

Run

s

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Larg

esca

le s

ucke

rC

asto

mus

mac

roch

eilu

s9

4.05

70.6

73.

550.

00

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):P

rickl

y sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s as

per

0.00

0.00

Mot

tled

scul

pin

Cot

tus

baird

i0.

000.

00P

aiut

e sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s be

ldin

gi0.

002

1.09

68.5

05.

25S

limy

scul

pin

Cot

tus

cong

natu

s0.

000.

00R

iffle

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

gulo

sus

4018

.02

54.0

82.

360.

00R

etic

ulat

e sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s pe

rple

xus

83.

6043

.38

1.11

158

85.8

762

.94

3.52

Torre

nt s

culp

inC

ottu

s rh

othe

us8

3.60

81.1

37.

2423

12.5

086

.78

9.73

Scu

lpin

0.

000.

00

Car

ps a

nd M

inno

ws

(Cyp

rinid

ae):

Chi

selm

outh

Acr

oche

ilus

alut

aceu

s0.

000.

00P

eam

outh

Myl

oche

ilus

caur

inus

0.00

0.00

Nor

ther

n pi

ke m

inno

wP

tych

oche

ilus

oreg

onen

sis

0.00

0.00

Bla

ckno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

atra

tulu

s0.

000.

00Lo

ngno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

cat

arac

tae

0.00

0.00

Leop

ard

dace

Rhi

nich

thys

falc

atus

0.00

0.00

Spe

ckle

d da

ceR

hini

chth

ys o

scul

us15

569

.82

39.0

30.

751

0.54

43.0

00.

88D

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

0.00

0.00

Red

side

shi

ner

Ric

hard

soni

us b

alte

atus

20.

9040

.00

0.52

0.00

Cyp

rinid

0.00

0.00

Lam

prey

(Pet

rom

yzon

tidae

):W

este

rn b

rook

lam

prey

Lam

petra

rich

ards

oni

0.00

0.00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

222

184



Tab

le 3

.49

Will

amet

te R

iver

: Har

risbu

rg R

M 1

60 B

ackp

ack

Elec

trofis

hing

Dat

a Su

mm

ary

for S

epte

mbe

r 200

0 to

June

200

1 H

AR

RIS

BU

RG

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

09/2

1/00

3 R

uns

12/0

9/00

2 R

uns

06/2

1/01

2 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Larg

esca

le s

ucke

rC

asto

mus

mac

roch

eilu

s1

0.81

75.0

03.

146

6.00

66.8

02.

560.

00

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):Pr

ickl

y sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s as

per

0.00

22.

0096

.00

11.2

52

2.22

120.

5010

3.00

Mot

tled

scul

pin

Cot

tus

baird

i15

12.2

054

.73

2.15

0.00

0.00

Paiu

te s

culp

inC

ottu

s be

ldin

gi3

2.44

59.3

33.

330.

003

3.33

66.0

055

.33

Shor

thea

d sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s co

nfus

us0.

000.

000.

00R

iffle

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

gulo

sus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Ret

icul

ate

scul

pin

Cot

tus

perp

lexu

s19

15.4

558

.11

2.53

3232

.00

56.0

32.

4757

63.3

361

.14

50.5

6To

rrent

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

rhot

heus

97.

3258

.44

3.86

2222

.00

57.3

52.

5020

22.2

273

.05

60.0

5Sc

ulpi

n 0.

0027

27.0

065

.67

3.11

0.00

Car

ps a

nd M

inno

ws

(Cyp

rinid

ae):

Chi

selm

outh

Acr

oche

ilus

alut

aceu

s0.

002

2.00

42.5

01.

070.

00Pe

amou

thM

yloc

heilu

s ca

urin

us0.

000.

000.

00N

orth

ern

pike

min

now

Pty

choc

heilu

s or

egon

ensi

s0.

000.

001

1.11

99.0

084

.00

Blac

knos

e da

ceR

hini

chth

ys a

tratu

lus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Long

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys c

atar

acta

e23

18.7

051

.00

1.27

22.

0054

.50

1.69

33.

3348

.33

41.6

7Le

opar

d da

ceR

hini

chth

ys fa

lcat

us2

1.63

58.0

01.

600.

000.

00Sp

eckl

ed d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

osc

ulus

4032

.52

51.1

01.

602

2.00

48.5

01.

312

2.22

57.0

049

.00

Dac

eR

hini

chth

ys8

6.50

37.8

00.

405

5.00

55.0

02.

150.

00R

edsi

de s

hine

rR

icha

rdso

nius

bal

teat

us3

2.44

88.6

76.

520.

001

1.11

96.0

077

.00

Cyp

rinid

0.00

0.00

0.00

Lam

prey

(Pet

rom

yzon

tidae

):W

este

rn b

rook

lam

prey

Lam

petra

rich

ards

oni

0.00

0.00

11.

1112

7.00

-

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

123

100

90



Tab

le 3

.50

Will

amet

te R

iver

: Car

tney

RM

156

Bac

kpac

k El

ectro

fishi

ng D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Sep

tem

ber 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001

CA

RT

NE

YS

ampl

ing

Dat

e/#

of r

uns

=

09/2

1/0

03

Run

s12

/09/

002

Ru

ns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Su

cker

s (C

ato

sto

mid

ae):

Larg

esc

ale

suck

erC

asto

mus

mac

roch

eilu

s43

27.

3957

.53

1.29

66.

3868

.12

3.3

3

Scu

lpin

s (C

ott

idae

):P

rickl

y sc

ulp

inC

ottu

s as

per

0.0

00.

00M

ottle

d sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s ba

irdi

181

1.46

50.5

01.

690.

00P

aiut

e sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s be

ldin

gi0

.00

33.

1957

.67

2.7

3S

limy

scul

pin

Cot

tus

cong

nat

us

0.0

00.

00R

iffle

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

gulo

sus

117

.01

49.5

51.

570.

00R

etic

ula

te s

culp

inC

ottu

s pe

rple

xus

0.0

08

8.51

58.6

32

.82

Tor

rent

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

rho

the

us21

13.

3847

.62

1.33

6771

.28

55.4

62

.46

Scu

lpin

0

.00

44.

2651

.75

1.6

1

Car

ps

and

Min

no

ws

(Cyp

rin

idae

):C

hise

lmou

thA

croc

heilu

s al

utac

eus

0.0

00.

00P

eam

outh

Myl

oche

ilus

caur

inu

s0

.00

0.00

Nor

ther

n pi

ke m

inn

owP

tych

oche

ilus

ore

gone

nsis

0.0

00.

00B

lack

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys a

trat

ulus

0.0

00.

00Lo

ngn

ose

dace

Rhi

nich

thys

ca

tara

ctae

0.0

00.

00Le

opa

rd d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

falc

atus

31

.91

33.6

70.

330.

00S

peck

led

dace

Rhi

nich

thys

osc

ulu

s60

38.

2238

.25

0.59

55.

3237

.80

0.5

2D

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

0.0

01

1.06

41.0

00

.59

Red

side

shi

ner

Ric

har

dso

niu

s ba

ltea

tus

0.0

00.

00C

yprin

id1

0.6

4-

0.45

0.00

Lam

pre

y (P

etro

myz

on

tid

ae):

Wes

tern

bro

ok la

mp

rey

Lam

petr

a ric

hard

son

i0

.00

0.00

n (T

ota

l Ind

ivid

ual

s)15

794



Tab

le 3

.51

Will

amet

te R

iver

: Int

ake

RM

148

.5 B

ackp

ack

Elec

trofis

hing

Dat

a Su

mm

ary

for S

epte

mbe

r 200

0 to

June

200

1 IN

TAK

ES

ampl

ing

Dat

e/#

of ru

ns =

09

/21/

003

Run

s12

/09/

002

Run

s06

/21/

013

Run

s

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suc

kers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Larg

esca

le s

ucke

rC

asto

mus

mac

roch

eilu

s10

7.09

54.5

01.

587

10.0

066

.67

3.05

22.

2569

.50

-

Scu

lpin

s (C

ottid

ae):

Pric

kly

scul

pin

Cot

tus

aspe

r0.

007

10.0

056

.86

2.00

88.

9980

.00

6.12

Mot

tled

scul

pin

Cot

tus

baird

i14

9.93

51.9

31.

510.

000.

00P

aiut

e sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s be

ldin

gi0.

001

1.43

75.0

06.

592

2.25

72.5

0-

Slim

y sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s co

ngna

tus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Riff

le s

culp

inC

ottu

s gu

losu

s0.

000.

000.

00R

etic

ulat

e sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s pe

rple

xus

0.00

34.

2949

.33

1.58

1011

.24

57.2

02.

89To

rren

t scu

lpin

Cot

tus

rhot

heus

64.

2651

.67

1.75

1622

.86

58.5

82.

3912

13.4

880

.82

9.75

Scu

lpin

0.

0012

17.1

451

.43

1.78

1921

.35

40.5

01.

25

Car

ps a

nd M

inno

ws

(Cyp

rini

dae)

:C

hise

lmou

thA

croc

heilu

s al

utac

eus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Pea

mou

thM

yloc

heilu

s ca

urin

us0.

000.

000.

00N

orth

ern

pike

min

now

Pty

choc

heilu

s or

egon

ensi

s0.

001

1.43

48.0

00.

930.

00B

lack

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys a

tratu

lus

0.00

0.00

11.

1249

.00

1.10

Long

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys c

atar

acta

e0.

002

2.86

68.0

03.

0011

12.3

655

.18

1.60

Leop

ard

dace

Rhi

nich

thys

falc

atus

64.

2635

.50

0.41

0.00

1213

.48

52.9

2-

Spe

ckle

d da

ceR

hini

chth

ys o

scul

us74

52.4

841

.21

0.68

68.

5742

.33

0.86

1112

.36

54.1

82.

29D

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

0.00

1521

.43

50.5

00.

921

1.12

45.0

00.

97R

edsi

de s

hine

rR

icha

rdso

nius

bal

teat

us31

21.9

929

.25

-0.

000.

00C

yprin

id0.

000.

000.

00

Lam

prey

(Pet

rom

yzon

tidae

):W

este

rn b

rook

lam

prey

Lam

petra

rich

ards

oni

0.00

0.00

0.00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

141

7089



Tab

le 3

.52

Will

amet

te R

iver

: Peo

ria R

M 1

36 B

ackp

ack

Elec

trofis

hing

Dat

a Su

mm

ary

for S

epte

mbe

r 200

0 to

June

200

1 P

EOR

IASa

mpl

ing

Dat

e/#

of ru

ns =

09

/21/

003

Run

s12

/11/

002

Run

s06

/21/

013

Run

s

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Larg

esca

le s

ucke

rC

asto

mus

mac

roch

eilu

s15

15.6

346

.36

0.86

2120

.00

48.4

31.

150.

00

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):P

rickl

y sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s as

per

0.00

0.00

0.00

Mot

tled

scul

pin

Cot

tus

baird

i7

7.29

48.7

11.

170.

001

9.09

64.0

03.

50P

aiut

e sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s be

ldin

gi0.

001

0.95

59.0

01.

990.

00S

limy

scul

pin

Cot

tus

cong

natu

s0.

000.

000.

00R

iffle

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

gulo

sus

1313

.54

44.0

00.

950.

000.

00R

etic

ulat

e sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s pe

rple

xus

33.

1347

.67

1.38

2120

.00

46.0

41.

324

36.3

653

.50

2.06

Torr

ent s

culp

inC

ottu

s rh

othe

us16

16.6

753

.00

1.93

2120

.00

56.0

02.

316

54.5

573

.00

5.90

Scu

lpin

0.

004

3.81

47.0

01.

430.

00

Car

ps a

nd M

inno

ws

(Cyp

rinid

ae):

Chi

selm

outh

Acr

oche

ilus

alut

aceu

s0.

000.

000.

00P

eam

outh

Myl

oche

ilus

caur

inus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Nor

ther

n pi

ke m

inno

wP

tych

oche

ilus

oreg

onen

sis

0.00

0.00

0.00

Bla

ckno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

atra

tulu

s0.

000.

000.

00Lo

ngno

se d

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

cat

arac

tae

0.00

10.

9552

.00

1.32

0.00

Leop

ard

dace

Rhi

nich

thys

falc

atus

0.00

0.00

0.00

Spe

ckle

d da

ceR

hini

chth

ys o

scul

us34

35.4

234

.53

0.34

2120

.00

38.5

70.

730.

00D

ace

Rhi

nich

thys

0.00

1413

.33

33.9

30.

340.

00R

edsi

de s

hine

rR

icha

rdso

nius

bal

teat

us0.

000.

000.

00C

yprin

id8

8.33

32.5

00.

260.

000.

00

Lam

prey

(Pet

rom

yzon

tidae

):W

este

rn b

rook

lam

prey

Lam

petra

rich

ards

oni

0.00

10.

9513

3.00

4.56

0.00

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

9610

511



Tab

le 3

.53

Will

amet

te R

iver

: Fis

her L

ane

RM

132

Bac

kpac

k El

ectro

fishi

ng D

ata

Sum

mar

y fo

r Sep

tem

ber 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001

FISH

ER L

ANE

Sam

plin

g D

ate/

# of

runs

=

09/2

1/00

3 R

uns

06/2

1/01

3 R

uns

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Count

% of Total


Mean Weight (g)

Suck

ers

(Cat

osto

mid

ae):

Larg

esca

le s

ucke

rC

asto

mus

mac

roch

eilu

s13

10.9

251

.23

1.09

12.

9485

.00

-

Scul

pins

(Cot

tidae

):Pr

ickl

y sc

ulpi

nC

ottu

s as

per

0.00

0.00

Mot

tled

scul

pin

Cot

tus

baird

i28

23.5

343

.88

1.17

0.00

Paiu

te s

culp

inC

ottu

s be

ldin

gi0.

000.

00Sl

imy

scul

pin

Cot

tus

cong

natu

s0.

000.

00R

iffle

scu

lpin

Cot

tus

gulo

sus

0.00

0.00

Ret

icul

ate

scul

pin

Cot

tus

perp

lexu

s0.

0019

55.8

862

.05

-To

rren

t scu

lpin

Cot

tus

rhot

heus

119.

2450

.60

1.91

514

.71

79.2

0-

Scul

pin

0.00

12.

9425

.00

-

Car

ps a

nd M

inno

ws

(Cyp

rinid

ae):

Chi

selm

outh

Acro

chei

lus

alut

aceu

s0.

000.

00Pe

amou

thM

yloc

heilu

s ca

urin

us0.

002

5.88

89.5

0-

Nor

ther

n pi

ke m

inno

wPt

ycho

chei

lus

oreg

onen

sis

0.00

0.00

Blac

knos

e da

ceR

hini

chth

ys a

tratu

lus

0.00

0.00

Long

nose

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys c

atar

acta

e0.

000.

00Le

opar

d da

ceR

hini

chth

ys fa

lcat

us9

7.56

35.0

00.

351

2.94

54.0

0-

Spec

kled

dac

eR

hini

chth

ys o

scul

us29

24.3

737

.71

0.51

0.00

Dac

eR

hini

chth

ys0.

000.

00R

edsi

de s

hine

rR

icha

rdso

nius

bal

teat

us26

21.8

539

.50

0.63

38.

8290

.00

-C

yprin

id0.

000.

00

Lam

prey

(Pet

rom

yzon

tidae

):W

este

rn b

rook

lam

prey

Lam

petra

rich

ards

oni

32.

5211

1.00

2.27

25.

8810

5.00

-

n (T

otal

Indi

vidu

als)

119

34



Whi

tely

Bac

kpac

k Fi

sh S

umm

ary

9/00

to 6

/01

Mea

n N

o. o

f Ind

ividu

als

= 20

3M

ean

No.

of S

peci

es =

5

0102030405060708090100

Larges

cale

suck

er Paiute

sculpi

nRed

side s

hiner

Reticu

late s

culpi

n Riffle s

culpin

Speck

led da

ceTo

rrent

sculpi

n

Percent of Total

Sept

embe

r20

00

June

200

1

Har

risbu

rg B

ackp

ack

Fish

Sum

mar

y 9/

00 to

6/0

1M

ean

No.

of I

ndivi

dual

s =1

05M

ean

No.

of S

peci

es =

10

010203040506070

Chiselm

outh Dace

Large

scale

suck

er

Leop

ard da

ce

Long

nose

dace

Mottled

sculp

in

Northe

rn pik

e minn

ow

Paiute

sculp

in

Prickly

sculpi

n

Redsid

e shin

er

Reticu

late s

culpi

n Sculpin

Slimy s

culpi

n

Speck

led da

ce

Torren

t scu

lpin

Western

brook

lamprey

Pecent of Total

Sept

embe

r20

00

Dece

mbe

r20

00

June

200

1

Car

tney

Bac

kpac

k Fi

sh S

umm

ary

9/00

to 6

/01

Mea

n N

o. o

f Ind

ividu

als

= 12

6M

ean

No.

of S

peci

es =

7

01020304050607080

Dace

Large

scale

suck

er

Leop

ard da

ce

Mottled

sculp

in

Paiute

sculp

in

Reticu

late s

culpi

nRiffl

e scu

lpin Scu

lpin

Speck

led da

ce

Torren

t scu

lpin

Percent of Total

Sept

embe

r20

00

Dece

mbe

r20

00

Inta

ke B

ackp

ack

Fish

Sum

mar

y 9/

00 to

6/0

1M

ean

No.

of I

ndivi

dual

s =

100

Mea

n N

o. o

f Spe

cies

= 9

0102030405060

Blackn

ose d

ace Dace

Large

scale su

cker

Leop

ard dac

e

Long

nose

dace

Mottled

sculpin

Northern

pike m

innow

Paiute

sculp

in

Prickly

sculp

in

Redside s

hiner

Reticula

te sc

ulpin Sculpin

Speck

led da

ce

Torren

t scu

lpin

Percent of Total

Sept

embe

r20

00De

cem

ber

2000

June

200

1

Figu

re 3

.103

Per

cent

Fis

h D

istri

butio

n fo

r Ups

tream

Site

s (W

hite

ly, H

arris

burg

, Car

tney

and

Inta

ke),

Will

amet

te R

iver

Se

ptem

ber 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001,

Bac

kpac

k El

ectro

fishi

ng



Peor

ia B

ackp

ack

Fish

Sum

mar

y 9/

00 to

6/0

1M

ean

No.

of I

ndivi

dual

s =

212

Mea

n N

o. o

f Spe

cies

= 6

0102030405060 Cyprin

idDace

Large

scale su

cker

Long

nose

dace

Mottled

sculpin

Paiute

sculp

in

Reticula

te sc

ulpin

Riffle sc

ulpin Sculpin

Speck

led da

ce

Torren

t scu

lpin

Western

brook

lampre

y

Percent of Total

Sept

embe

r20

00

Dece

mbe

r20

00

June

200

1

Fish

er L

ane

Bac

kpac

k Fi

sh S

umm

ary

9/00

to 6

/01

Mea

n N

o. o

f Ind

ividu

als

= 77

Mea

n N

o. o

f Spe

cies

= 8

0102030405060

Large

scale su

cker

Leop

ard dac

e

Mottled

sculpin Peamou

th

Redside s

hiner

Reticula

te sc

ulpin

Sculpin

Speck

led da

ce

Torren

t scu

lpin

Western

brook

lampre

y

Percent of Total

Sept

embe

r20

00

June

200

1

Fi

gure

3.1

04 P

erce

nt F

ish

Dis

tribu

tion

for D

owns

tream

Site

s (Pe

oria

and

Fis

her L

ane)

, Sep

tem

ber 2

000

to Ju

ne 2

001,

Bac

kpac

k El

ectro

fishi

ng

Sam

ples




4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

This compendium characterizes the depth and extent of data collected in the LTRWS and provides a summary of monitoring parameters for the 2000 to 2001 study year. Additional reports will be issued for each study year over the course of the LTRWS. These data represent in part the information that will be utilized in addressing the overall study objective of fully assessing the potential for mill effluent effects on the aquatic community in effluent receiving waters.

REFERENCES

American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation (APHA). 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. Washington, DC.

Dudley, J.L., Arthurs, W., and Hall, T.J. 2001. A comparison of methods used to estimate river rock surface areas. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 16:2, 257-261.

Hall, T.J., Dudley, J.L., Fisher, R.P., and Borton, D.L. 1999. Integrated long-term receiving water studies: site selection and a description of the selected study sites. In Proceedings, TAPPI 1999 International Environmental Conference, Volume 1, pp 47-70.

Hall, T.J., and Miner, R.A. 1997. Integrated long-term receiving water study methodology development. Water Science and Technology 35:315-320.

National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI). 2002a. Long-term receiving water study data compendium: August 1998 to September 1999. Technical Bulletin No. 843. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.

______. 2002b. Integrated long-term receiving water studies: site selection process and a description of the selected study sites. Technical Bulletin No. 842. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.

______. 2002c. A compendium of field methods used in NCASI long-term receiving water studies. Technical Bulletin No. 841. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.

______. 2003. Long-term receiving water study data compendium: September 1999 to August 2000. Technical Bulletin (856). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.


· 2019-12-11 · acknowledgments the staff from the host mills were instrumental in assisting...

Documents