26095695 starbucks case study

Upload: saowalak-phutthana

Post on 05-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    1/39

    1.0 INTRODUCTION

    Name : Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ: SBUX)Headquarters : Seattle, Washington, U.S.

    Employees : 176,000 in 2008

    Revenue for 2008 : US$10.383 billion

    CEO : Howard Schultz (Founder of Starbucks coffeehouse)

    Starbucks Corporation is an international coffeehouse chain based in Seattle,

    Washington, United States. Starbucks is the largest coffeehouse company in the

    world, with 16,120 stores in 49 countries, including around 11,000 in the United

    States, followed by nearly 1,000 in Canada and more than 800 in Japan.

    Starbucks sells drip brewed coffee, espresso-based hot drinks, other hot and

    cold drinks, snacks, and items such as mugs and coffee beans. Through the

    Starbucks Entertainment division and Hear Music brand, the company also

    markets books, music, and film. Many of the company's products are seasonal or

    specific to the locality of the store. Starbucks-brand ice cream and coffee are

    also offered at grocery stores. Starbucks Italian style coffee, espresso

    beverages, teas, pastries and confections had made Starbucks one of the

    greatest retailing stories of recent history and worlds biggest specialty coffee

    chain. In 2003, Starbucks made the fortune 500.

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle,_Washingtonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washingtonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_dollarhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_coffeehouse_chainshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washingtonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffeehousehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drip_brewhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espressohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hear_Musichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_creamhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle,_Washingtonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washingtonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_dollarhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_coffeehouse_chainshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washingtonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffeehousehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drip_brewhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espressohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hear_Musichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_cream
  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    2/39

    1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE COMPANY

    1.1.1 Era before Howard Schultz

    In 1971, three academics, English Teacher Jerry Baldwin, History Teacher Zel

    Siegel and writer Gordon Bowker opened Starbucks Coffee, Tea and Spice in

    Touristy Pikes Place Market in Seattle. The three were inspired by entrepreneur

    Alfred Peet (whom they knew personally) to sell high-quality coffee beans and

    equipment. The store did not offer fresh brewed coffee by the cup, but tasting

    samples were sometimes available. Siegel will wore a grocers apron, scooped

    out beans for customers while the other two kept their day jobs but came by at

    lunch or after work to help out. The store was an immediate success, with sales

    exceeding expectations, partly because of interest stirred by the favorable article

    in Seattle Times. Starbucks ordered its coffee-bean from Alfred Peet but later on

    the three partners bought their own used roaster setting up roasting operations in

    a nearby ramshackle building and developed their own blends and flavors. By the

    year 1980s the company had four Starbucks Stores in Seattle area and had been

    profitable every year. Later on, Siegel left the company and Jerry Baldwin took

    over day-to-day management of the company. Gordon Bowker remained as an

    owner but devoted most of his time in his Design Firm. In 1981, Howard Schultz,

    the vice president of U.S operations for Swedish Maker of stylish kitchen

    equipment and coffeemakers decided to pay Starbucks a visit. He was curious

    about why Starbucks was selling so many of his company products. He was

    impressed with the company management and the quality products the make.

    Schultz asked Baldwin whether there was any way he could fit into Starbucks

    and it took long time to decide his request. He tried many times till one day he

    was given a job of heading marketing and overseeing the retail stores.

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Peethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Peet
  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    3/39

    1.1.2 Era with Howard Schultz

    Howard Schultz spent most of his working hours in the four stores learning the

    retail aspects of the company business; Schultz was overflowing with ideas for

    the company. His biggest inspiration and vision for Starbucks future came during

    1983 when the company sent him for an international house wares show to

    Milan, Italy. There he spotted an espresso bar and went to take a coffee. He was

    impressed with the coffeehouse services and decided to stay at Milan for a week

    to explore all coffee bars and learned as much as he could about the Italian

    passion for coffee drinks. He made a decision to serve fresh brewed coffee,

    espressos, and cappuccinos in its stores and try to create an American version of

    Italian coffee bar culture. He shared his idea with Baldwin and it took nearly a

    year to convince Jerry Baldwin to let him test an espresso bar. In April 1984, the

    first espresso bar was opened and it was a successful too. Yet Baldwin felt

    something is wrong. After Schultz failed to convince Baldwin for the expansion of

    business, he left Starbucks in 1985. Schultz started the Il Giornale coffee bar

    chain in 1985 and the coffeehouse was very successful. In 1987 Starbucks

    owner Jerry Baldwin and Bowker decide to sell the whole Starbucks chain to

    Schultz's Il Giornale, which rebranded the Il Giornale outlets as Starbucks and

    quickly began to expand. Starbucks opened its first locations outside Seattle at

    Waterfront Station in Vancouver, British Columbia, and Chicago, Illinois, that

    same year. At the time of its initial public offering on the stock market in 1992,

    Starbucks had grown to 165 outlets.In 2009 The Company plans to open a net of

    900 new stores outside of the United States.

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 3

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterfront_Station_(Vancouver)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vancouverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicagohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinoishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_public_offeringhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterfront_Station_(Vancouver)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vancouverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicagohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinoishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_public_offering
  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    4/39

    2.0 STARBUCKS VISION, OBJECTIVES AND MISSION

    2.1 Vision Statement

    Starbucks vision statement is;

    To establish Starbucks as the most recognized and respected brand in

    the world and become a national company with values and guiding

    principles that employee could be proud of

    The vision statement clearly describes the dream or the future of the company

    that is to be the worlds most well known coffeehouse and also to be the most

    appreciated and positively graded brand by all levels of people around the world.

    The company also focuses its vision to employee satisfactions, so that the

    employees will be happy.

    2.2 Objectives of Starbucks

    Is to Grow by making employees feel valued

    Starbucks approach the employee with good compensation and comprehensive

    benefits package. The company beliefs that sharing the companys success with

    the people who made happen will help them think and acts like an owner of the

    company.

    Is to Recognize that every dollar earned passes through employees

    handsStarbucks will always appreciate the employee as the revenue which is

    increasing every year is by the efficient and hardworking employees. This drastic

    increase in profit is not recognized without the support of the employees who

    attracts the customers to a long term relationships with the coffeehouse.

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 4

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    5/39

    Use the pays, benefits and opportunities for personal development to

    help gain employee loyalty and become difficult to imitate.

    Paying scale and fringe benefit package allowed it to attract motivated people

    with above average skills and good work habits and also to make the employee

    to be loyal with Starbucks.

    2.3 Mission Statement

    Starbucks Mission Statement is;

    Establish Starbucks as the premier purveyor of the finest coffee in the

    world while maintaining our uncompromising principles while we grow.

    The six principles are:

    1. Provide a great work environment and treat each other with

    respect and dignity.

    2. Embrace diversity as an essential component in the way we do

    business.

    3. Apply the highest standards of excellence to the purchasing,

    roasting and fresh delivery of our coffee.4. Develop enthusiastically satisfied customers all of the time

    5. Contribute positively to our communities and our environment

    6. Recognize that profitability is essential to our future success.

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 5

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    6/39

    2.3.1 Analyzing the Mission Statement Component

    Starbucks mission statement is needed to be analyzed to see the total number of

    mission component it has.

    NO COMPONENT YES/NO

    1. Customers Yes

    2. Products or services Yes

    3. Markets Yes

    4. Technology No

    5. Concern for survival, profitability and growth Yes

    6. Philosophy Yes

    7. Self-Concept Yes

    8. Concern for public image Yes

    9. Concern for employees No

    This is a good mission statement. This mission statement lacks of 2 components:

    Technology and Concern for employees. The company must evaluate whether it

    is technologically advanced and even though the companys vision is concern to

    employee, it still have to add it in mission statement.

    2.3.2 Proposed Mission Statement

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 6

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    7/39

    Establish Starbucks as the premier purveyor1 of the finest coffee in the world and

    also to be established as the most employee valued company while maintaining

    our uncompromising principles as we grow together with technological advances.

    The six principles are:

    1. Provide a great work environment and treat each other with respect

    and dignity.

    2. Embrace diversity as an essential component in the way we do

    business.

    3. Apply the highest standards of excellence to the purchasing, roasting

    and fresh delivery of our coffee.

    4. Develop enthusiastically satisfied customers all of the time

    5. Contribute positively to our communities and our environment

    6. Recognize that profitability is essential to our future success.

    3.0 SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS

    1 Purveyor means provider

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 7

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    8/39

    3.1 External analysis

    3.1.1 PEST Analysis

    PoliticalGlobalization today has changed worldwide trend of doing business. Companies

    find it difficult to survive by relying solely on domestic market. The borders

    between various countries are getting invisible. Companies are nowadays

    creating business in various countries without boundaries. Advertisements are all

    over the world for many products. Company strategists find it not an easy task to

    expand the business beyond borders. The basic need for globalization is to learn

    the different cultures of the country they plan to start business. Taking all aspects

    including tax rates, law and legislation is important in globalization.

    Economic

    People are nowadays looking for more income to continue their luxurious life.

    The number of two income households is getting increased all over the world.

    People are looking forward for products which reduce their time to be spent on.

    Improved customer service, immediate availability, trouble free operation of

    products is becoming more important. Since the world is facing crisis, people are

    looking forward for cheap and quality products. Price is becoming priority to

    customers. Increase in the inflation rates and increase in unemployment is also a

    factor for demand in lower priced products.

    Social, Cultural, Demographic and Environmental

    According to these analyses, it creates different type of consumer and

    consequently needs for different products, different services, and different

    strategies. In the view of social, employees should have benefits.

    Consequently, after retirement for the group of baby boomer, there must be an

    allocation of funds for the retiree to support there families in life long. Provide

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 8

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    9/39

    BARGAININGPOWER OFSUPPLIERS

    POTENTIAL ENTRYOF NEW

    COMPETITORS

    BARGAININGPOWER OF

    CONSUMERS

    POTENTIALDEVELOPMENT OF

    SUBSTITUTEPRODUCT

    RIVALRY AMONGCOMPETING FIRMS

    benefits such as Medicare and Medicaid retirement beneficial. Next, products are

    produced in globally must convenience and attractive to be used by any

    customers. A cultural connection is created, among customers because

    producing the products with quality flexible price for the rich and middle class

    family. People are also looking forward for free chemical products. This means

    that the product is free from chemical or additional flavor mix and it is made from

    natural products.

    Technological

    Mass communication and high technology are creating patterns of diverse

    cultures worldwide. Revolutionary technological changes and discoveries are

    having a dramatic impact on organization. Internet is the world information

    spread machines that have covered an interaction from one user to another user.

    In contrast, advertising through have brought high achievement into marketing

    strategy. For example, advertising products into facebook so that the users can

    consume on their products .Online purchasing, this option it will create less

    hassle to customer for purchasing the products which they needed.

    Advancement of the technology can cause the life cycle of the product changed

    and increased in the distributing of the products. High technology of the

    Machineries can increased the supply of the products while achieve a better

    profits for the organization.

    3.1.2 Porters five Forces

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 9

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    10/39

    The Radial Diagram above is Porters Five-force model. It helps the Companys

    strategists to evaluate the industry growth, market development and organization

    Strategy accompanied with the good intuitive judgment. The big corporation firm

    such as Starbucks needs a systematic and effective external-audit system

    because external forces among foreign countries vary so greatly. The analysis of

    the Competitive can be divided into Porters Five-Forces. The five forces are as

    follows:

    1. Potential entry of new competitors

    2. Potential development of substitute products

    3. Bargaining power of suppliers

    4. Rivalry among competing firms

    5. Bargaining power of consumer

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 10

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    11/39

    Potential entry for new competitors shows a balance between different

    firms competing in a market. It also refers whenever a new partner enter into a

    market, they may become threat for one and opportunity for other competing

    partners. As all the new entries and existing firms are competing with each other

    so the new entry will definitely make an effect on every one transacting in the

    market. Starbucks new competitor is the McDonalds McCafe. There is a great

    deal of risk of entry by potential competitors due to the low start up costs.

    McDonalds is able to add specialty coffee to their existing services to tap into the

    specialty coffee market. There is potential of $125,000 per year in revenue to be

    made by each store if they are able to successfully enter the specialty coffee

    market.

    A potential development of substitute products also develops an

    environment of competition in the market among the competing partners. As all

    firms want to compete in term of quality and substitute will lasts for longer in the

    market if the quality of the substitute will be greater than the existing alternate.

    Nowadays coffees are being canned or bottled. The option to buy bottled coffee

    is also inexpensive compared to coffee in a mug at the Starbucks store. With the

    focus on time management, canned product is the ultimate choice .

    Other factors also have a major impact on the substitutes. Collective

    bargaining power of supplier is if vendors are less in the market and the

    organizations that have to purchase from those vendors is high. The demand for

    those suppliers will be more as the firms have to purchase from that less

    suppliers. The bargaining power of supplier affects the intensity of competition in

    an industry. It is best to have a mutual agreement between the supplier and the

    buyer. Starbucks have gone through this situation when the world coffee bean

    price increased by the suppliers in 2001. Starbucks have no choice but to buy at

    expensive price from the suppliers.

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 11

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    12/39

    Later on, Starbucks decided to prepare an agreement document regarding

    to purchase coffee beans at a fixed price. There is more bargaining power for

    suppliers of technological innovations such as automated coffee machines, latte

    and espresso machines, etc because there are not as many suppliers for such

    equipment as there are for coffee beans. Starbucks may pursue a backward

    strategy to gain control or ownership of suppliers.

    The rivalry among the competing firms is the most powerful of the 5

    competitive forces. Starbucks primary competitors were restaurants, specialty

    coffee shops, doughnut shop, supermarket and all other stores selling hot and

    cold coffees. In 2003, there was 14000 specialty coffee outlets in U.S itself.

    Starbucks also faced competition from nationwide coffee manufactures that

    distributed their coffee through supermarkets pricing them cheaper compared

    with Starbucks. Anyway, Starbucks feels that their excellence services and the

    high quality of their coffee is the biggest strength of them. Other than this

    Starbucks may lower their prices or add more features in their stores and may

    also increase their advertising all around the world.

    Last but not least is the bargaining power of consumer. When customer

    are concentrated or large or buy in volume, they bargaining power represent a

    major force affecting the intensity of competition in an industry. This may arise

    when the consumers can inexpensively switch to competing brands. Customers

    did not really have bargaining power when it came to premium coffee such as

    Starbucks. The sheer scale of Starbucks business reduces the bargaining power

    of any single group of buyers.

    Porters Five Forces Table

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 12

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    13/39

    Porters

    five

    Forces

    Details Industry

    profitability

    Rivalry Among Competing Firm

    HIGH

    There is intense competition in the coffee

    market amongst established coffee shops that

    are fighting to get customers. There are local

    coffee shops offering specials to lure potential

    customers in. Restaurants are opening earlier

    and closing later to accommodate customers on

    the go. With the 85% North American

    customers taking their coffee to go,

    convenience is a major factor

    LOW

    Potential of new competitors

    HIGH

    There is a great deal of risk of entry by potential

    competitors due to the low start up costs.

    McDonalds is able to add specialty coffee to

    their existing services to tap into the specialty

    coffee market. There is potential of $125,000

    per year in revenue to be made by each store if

    they are able to successfully enter the specialty

    coffee market.

    LOW

    Potent ial development of

    substitute products HIGH

    Water is a substitute which is healthy for us and

    it is free. The option to buy bottled water is also

    inexpensive compared to coffee. With the focus

    on healthier living, water is the ultimate choice.

    LOW

    Bargaining power of suppliers

    HIGH

    There is more bargaining power for

    suppliers of technological innovations such

    as automated coffee machines, latte and

    espresso machines, etc because there are

    not as many suppliers for such equipment

    as there are for coffee beans

    LOW

    Bargaining power of consumers

    HIGH

    Customers did not really have bargaining power

    when it came to premium coffee such as

    Starbucks. The sheer scale of Starbucks

    business reduces the bargaining power of any

    single group of buyers.

    LOW

    3.1.3 Competitive Profile Matrix

    Starbucks Caribou coffee Gloria Jeans coffee

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 13

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    14/39

    CRITICAL

    SUCCESS FACTOR

    WEIGHT

    (WT)

    RATING WT

    SCORE

    RATING WT

    SCORE

    RATING WT

    SCORE

    Advertising 0.10 4 0.40 4 0.40 3 0.30

    Product Quality 0.20 4 0.80 3 0.60 2 0.40

    PriceCompetitiveness

    0.05 2 0.10 3 0.15 3 0.15

    Management 0.08 3 0.24 2 0.16 3 0.24

    Financial position 0.05 3 0.15 3 0.15 2 0.10

    Customer loyalty 0.10 3 0.30 2 0.20 2 0.20

    Global expansion 0.15 4 0.60 2 0.30 2 0.30

    Employee benefits 0.10 4 0.40 2 0.20 2 0.20Customer Service 0.17 3 0.51 2 0.34 2 0.34

    TOTAL 1.00 3.50 2.50 2.23

    Starbucks shown highest score and the second highest were Caribou Coffee and

    Gloria Jeans coffee shows the lowest Score. The competitive profile matrix

    (CPM) weighs product quality. The product quality (0.20) and is the most

    important item on the list of critical success factors. Starbucks score on this

    factor as the highest in comparison to their two chief competitors, Caribou and

    Gloria and reflecting a distinctive competitive advantage in the market. Customer

    service 0.17, Employee benefits 0.10 and global expansion 0.15 replicates a high

    level of importance on the CPM. The advertising weight, 0.10, on CPM does not

    reflect a high level in ranking the critical success factors, but does release

    valuable information in comparison to their competitors on the CPM. Starbucks

    rates and scores the lowest on the price competitiveness factor.

    3.1.4 External Factor Evaluation Matrix (EFE)

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 14

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    15/39

    Weight of TWSO=0.6+0.3+0.2+0.30=1.40/0.45

    = 3.11

    Weight of TWST=0.45+0.60+0.20

    =1.25/0.452

    = 2.78

    External Evaluation Matrix comprises of 2 lists. Both are important for the

    company. Its identified as the opportunities and threats of the company. The

    factors are rated from 1 till 4, where 1 is the lowest and 4 is the highest. The

    highest weight is assigned to the most important factors or several very important

    factors. The most important factors maybe a threat or an opportunity. In this

    case, it is an opportunity.

    Strategic Management PMS 3393

    Key External Factors

    Opportunities Weigh

    t

    Rating Weighted

    Score

    Globalization makes it easy to enter

    international market

    0.15 4 0.60

    People are looking for cheap internet

    connections.

    0.10 3 0.30

    Express foods are getting famous to reduce

    time to be spent.

    0.10 2 0.20

    Demand for non-chemical and healthy

    products.

    0.10 3 0.30

    Threats

    Increase in the inflation rates creates a

    demand in lower priced products.

    0.15 3 0.45

    Many companies are pricing their products

    cheaper to impress customers.

    0.20 3 0.60

    Increase in hypermarkets and economical

    supermarkets

    0.10 2 0.20

    1.00 2.55

    15

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    16/39

    Based on the key external factors, the most critical factors are that many

    companies are pricing their products cheaper to impress customers. Increase in

    the inflation rates creates a demand in lower priced products comes along as the

    most critical threats to the company.

    Anyway, there are still opportunities to increase the growth of the

    company. It is known that the factors which carries most weight is the factor that

    most to be address. Globalization makes it easy to enter international market is a

    good opportunity for Starbucks. Since the total weighted score is 2.78 generally

    Starbucks is not so effective in addressing its CFS which exists in its current

    environment. It needs to upgrade its effectiveness.

    However, this is subject to further analysis of individual weighted score of

    opportunities (TWSO) and weighted score of threats (TWST). Based on the

    calculation, as shown in the table above, is more effective in addressing the

    Opportunities .Still, Starbucks must find the way to reduce the threats to focus on

    the future challenges.

    3.2 THE INTERNAL ANALYSIS

    3.2.1 Financial Analysis

    A) Projected Income Statement

    Fiscal Years 2003-2005

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 16

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    17/39

    Oct 22005

    % Oct 32004

    % Sept 32003

    % Diff.between

    2005and

    2004

    Diff.between

    2004and

    2003In dollar 000, except per share amounts

    Net revenue:

    Retail $5391927 $4457378 $3449624 21 29

    Specialty 977373 836869 625898 17 34

    Total net revenue $6369300 100 5294247 100 4075522 100 20 30

    Operating expenses:

    Store operating expenses 2165911

    34 1790168 34 1379574 34 21 30

    Other operating 197024 3 171648 3 141346 4 15 21

    Depreciation andamortization expenses 340169 5 289182 6 244671 6 18 18

    24

    60

    General andadministrative

    developmentIncome from equity

    venture

    357114

    76745

    6

    1

    304293

    59071

    6

    1

    244550

    36903

    6

    1

    17

    30

    Operating income

    780615 12 606587 12 420850 10 29 44

    Gain on sale ofinvestment - - - - - - - -

    Net earnings $494467 8 $388973 7 $265355 7 27 47

    Net earning per share-diluted $0.61 0 $0.49 0 $0.34 0 24 44

    Analysis summary

    The Total net revenue for the Starbucks shows steadily increased from 2003

    until 2005.The big increase from 2003 to 2004 could be due to the major

    customer demand and customer royalty for the product. Total net revenue can be

    divided into retail and specialty. Retail is meant by selling food beverage directly

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 17

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    18/39

    to customer and specialty means customer royalty. The sale for 2004-2005

    periods is less then 10% from 2003 to 2004 which is 20%.

    Another significant observation from the statement is the operating income. It is

    shown that from 2003 to 2005 the income is increased. It could be because of

    the performance of the company is going concern. Operating income from 2003

    to 2004 is increased by 44%.This drastic increase is because of the purchase of

    Seattle's Best Coffee and Torrefazione Italia fromAFC Enterprises, bringing the

    total number of Starbucks-operated locations worldwide to more than 6,400.

    While the shareholder is important to any company, the net earnings per share

    are equivalently important to the shareholders. As observed, the net earnings of

    share diluted of the company increased from $0.34 in 2003 to $0.49 in 2004,

    reaching $0.61 by 2005. This is because of the company performance in

    achieving target. The net earnings per share increased by 44% from 2003 to

    2004 and increased by 24% from 2004 to 2005.

    B) Projected Balance Sheet

    Fiscal years 2003-2005

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 18

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle's_Best_Coffeehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrefazione_Italiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFC_Enterpriseshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle's_Best_Coffeehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrefazione_Italiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFC_Enterprises
  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    19/39

    In millions, exceptFor per Share Items

    Oct 22005

    DifferentBetween2004and2005

    %

    Oct 32004

    DifferentBetween2004and2003

    %

    Sept 302003

    Current assets $1209334 (11) $1350895 46 $924029

    Current liability 1226996 64 746259 23 608703

    Working Capital (17662) 604636 80 335767Total assets 3514065 4 3386541 22 2776112

    Long-termdebt(includingcurrent portion) 3618 17 4353 (14) 5076

    Shareholders equity $2090634 (15) $2470211 19 $2068689

    Analysis summary

    As observed in the above table current assets increased for 2003-2004 by 46%.It

    could be because of company activations and reloads on Starbucks Cards, but

    for the year 2004-2005 is dropped by 11% because of the advertising Starbuck

    coffee

    Besides, the shareholder Equity increased due to the increases in net earning for

    the company. While the shareholder equity decreased for about 15% in

    comparison of 2004-2005. However shareholder equity increased by $2090634

    in 2005 its because of the stability net earning.

    Long term debt shown in the table dropped 14% from 2003 to 2004 previously it

    was known companys net earning increases, thus it could mean that the

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 19

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    20/39

    company has extra earnings to pay off debt. Since this is a long term debt, the

    amount is tremendously big and by reducing it by 14% within a year shown that

    the development new shops really has a big impact on the companys

    performance.

    Financial Ratio

    1. Liquidity ratios

    2005 2004

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 20

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    21/39

    Current ratio = $1209334 = $1350895$1226996 $746259

    = 0.99 x = 1.81 x

    The Current ratio is another test of a company's financial strength. It calculates

    how many dollars in assets are likely to be converted to cash within one year in

    order to pay debts that come due during the same year. Liquidity can be

    measured through current ratios and quick ratio. An acceptable current ratio

    varies by industry. The more liquid the current assets are, the smaller the current

    ratio can be without cause for concern. For most industrial companies, 1.5 is an

    acceptable current ratio and Starbucks current ratio is 0.99x for the year 2005

    compared to 1.81 x for the year 2004. This can be considered as a decline andshould be seriously concerned and still enough to cover up current liability or

    short-term debt.

    2. Leverage Ratio

    2005 2004

    Long termDebt-to-total-assets ratio

    = $3618 = $4353

    $2090634 $2470211

    = 0.0017 = 0.0018

    The Debt-to-total-assets ratio Shows the proportion of a company's assets which

    are financed through debt. If the ratio is less than one, most of the company's

    assets are financed through equity. If the ratio is greater than one, most of the

    company's assets are financed through debt.

    Companies with high ratios are said to be "highly leveraged," and could be in

    danger if creditors start to demand repayment of debt and for Starbucks, the ratio

    is very low at both years. The ratio is 0.0017 at 2005 and 0.0018 for the year

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 21

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    22/39

    2004 respectively and the ratio drop slightly. This means that most of the

    Starbucks assets are financed through equity and is safe if creditors start to

    demand repayment of debt.

    3. Activity Ratio

    2005 2004

    Fixed assets turnover = $6369300 = $5294247

    $2304731 $2035646

    = 2.76x = 2.6x

    2005 2004

    Total assets turnover = $6369300 = $5294247

    $3514065 $3386541

    = 1.81x = 1.56x

    Activity ratios show how effectively a firms assets are being managed. Activity

    analysis, together with the leverage ratios are the key factors in determining

    profitability. Fixed Asset turnover ratio is one of the measures of activity. Another

    activity measure is the Total Asset turnover ratio. Based on the above tables,

    Starbucks has a bigger asset turnover which means that the company is using its

    assets more efficiently than other competitors in the industry. Companys no-

    inventory policy has significant effects on its superiority. In both ratios , there is a

    slide increase which shows the companys efficiency on using assets has

    increased too.

    4. Profitability Ratios

    2005 2004

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 22

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    23/39

    Gross Profit Margin = $6369300-2605212 = $5294247-2191440

    $6369300 $5294247

    = 0.59 (59%) = 0.58 (58%)

    Profitability ratios measure and explain the ability of the firm to generate income.Gross profit margin has increased. This shows that the company has a greater

    margin to cover the operating expenses and yield a profit.

    2005 2004

    Net Profit Margin = $494467 = $388973

    $6369300 $5294247

    = 0.078 (7.8%) = 0.073 (7.3%)

    There is a small increase in the profit after tax. This shows that the companys

    profit has increased. Yet, the percentage of profit compared with the sales is

    small which is 7.8% from total sales is the net income of year 2005.

    2005 2004

    Return on Total Asset( ROA) = $494467 = $388973

    $3514065 $3386541

    = 0.14 (14%) = 0.12(12%)

    The ratio is considered an indicator of how effectively a company is using its

    assets to generate earnings before contractual obligations must be paid. The

    greater a company's earnings in proportion to its assets, the more effectively that

    company is said to be using its assets. Starbucks ROA ratio shows that in year

    2005 the efficiency of using assets to generate earning has increased from 12%

    to 14%.

    2005 2004

    Return on equity ( ROE) = $494467 = $388973

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 23

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    24/39

    $2090634 $2470211

    = 0.24 (24%) = 0.16 (16%)

    Return on equity measures a corporation's profitability by revealing how

    much profit a company generates with the money shareholders have

    invested. The ROE is useful for comparing the profitability of a company to that

    of other. Starbucks shows a drastic increase from 16% to 24% for the year 2005.

    This shows that the company is generating a good profit from the shareholders

    money. This will, increase the shareholders amount in future.

    EPS

    Year 2005 2004Earning per share $0.61 $0.49The earnings per share are a good measure of profitability. When compared with

    EPS of similar companies, it gives a view of the comparative earnings or

    earnings power of the firm. EPS ratio calculated for a number of years indicates

    whether or not the earning power of the company has increased. Starbucks EPS

    has increased and thus showing that the earning power has increased.

    3.2.2 Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 24

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    25/39

    Key Internal Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score

    Strengths

    1. Huge market expansion to China,

    Brazil, India and Russia

    0.21 4 0.84

    2. Provide a great work environment 0.10 4 0.40

    3. Apply the highest standards of

    excellence in services.

    0.10 3 0.30

    4. Starbucks has monopolistic

    advantages over its competitors.

    0.10 3 0.30

    5. Purchased Ethos healthy water for

    8 million and also does not use

    chemical flavor for coffee.

    0.12 4 0.48

    6. Launching the sales of

    Frappuccino in Japan and Taiwan.

    0.08 3 0.24

    Weaknesses

    1. Price of coffee is high at Starbucks 0.10 2 0.20

    2. less marketing and advertising its

    product

    0.07 2 0.14

    3. Starbucks products are not

    available at supermarket

    0.12 2 0.24

    TOTAL 1.00 3.14

    TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE FOR STRENGHT / TOTAL SCORE FOR STRENGHT

    TWSS: 0.84+0.40+0.30+0.30+0.48+0.24 /0.21+0.10+0.10+0.10+0.12+0.08

    : 2.56/0.71

    : 3.60

    TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE FOR WEAKNESS / TOTAL SCORE FOR WEAKNESS

    TWSW: 0.20+0.14+0.24 / 0.10+0.07+0.12

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 25

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    26/39

    : 0.58/0.28

    : 2.00

    Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix is a summary step in conducting an

    internal strategic-management audit. This strategy-formulation tool summarizes

    and evaluates the major strengths and weaknesses in the functional areas of

    business, and its also provides a basis for identifying and evaluating relationship

    among those area. Based on key Internal Factor, the most advantage factor is

    Starbucks' company is expanding its market to china, Brazil and Russia. These

    are very big markets and will definitely increase its growth.

    The strategic of Starbucks' services provided, quality of coffees and management

    of the company makes strength became as very important factor. It is because

    Starbucks' provide a great work environment and treat each other with respect

    and dignity. Besides of that, other than that, Starbucks Purchase Ethos healthy

    water for 8 million and also does not use chemical flavor for coffee. This is also a

    great strength to it as its coffees are free from chemical flavors and it blends and

    mix the real hazelnuts to the coffee.

    Since the total weighted score is 3.14generally Starbucks is effective in

    addressing its CFS which exists in its current environment. But still, its weakness

    is also high. 2.00 is very high, this means that Starbucks is still weak in

    identifying its weakness.

    Since Starbucks' has its own strength to increase the growth of the company,

    there is also has weaknesses. The prices of coffees sold at Starbucks are higher

    compared with other stores. This is a major strength for other competitors.

    Other than that, Starbucks does not interest in marketing its products through

    advertisings a lot. It focuses on its quality coffee which has the power to attract

    customers.

    Anyway, this is subject to further analysis of individual weighted score of

    strength (TWSS) and weighted score of weakness (TWSW). Based on the

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 26

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    27/39

    calculation, as shown in the table above, is more effective in addressing the

    Strength, still, Starbucks' must find the way to overcome weaknesses to focus on

    the future challenges.

    .

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 27

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    28/39

    3.3 TOWS Analysis

    Strategic Management PMS 3393

    STRENGTHS

    S1.Huge market expansion to China,

    Brazil, India and RussiaS2.

    Provide a great work environment

    S3.

    Apply the highest standards of

    excellence in services.S4.

    Starbucks has monopolistic advantages

    over its competitors.

    S5

    Purchased Ethos healthy water for 8

    million and also does not use chemical

    flavor for coffee.

    S6

    Launching the sales of Frappuccino in

    Japan and Taiwan

    WEAKNESSES

    W1Price of coffee is high at

    Starbucks

    W2

    less marketing

    advertising its product

    W3

    Starbucks products are

    not available at

    supermarket

    OPPORTUNITIES

    O1.

    Globalization makes it easy to enter

    international market

    O2.

    People are looking for cheap internet

    connections

    O3.

    Express foods are getting famous to

    reduce time to be spent

    O4.

    Demand for non-chemical and

    healthy products

    SO Strategies

    S1,S3,O1,O2,O3

    Do advertisements about the FREE

    internet connections and the excellent

    service they provide.

    S5,O4

    Starbucks shall increase the healthy

    products into market as the demand

    for it is high.

    WO Strategies

    W1,W2,O1,O3

    Reduce the price and Advertis

    products all over the places.

    W1,W3,O3

    Do R&D to sell product

    supermarkets without reducin

    quality with cheap price

    28

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    29/39

    3.4 Space Matrix

    Strategic Management PMS 3393

    THREATSST Strategies

    S2,S3,S4,T1,T2

    Starbucks needs to change its

    market strategy by reducing the

    price to compete with the

    competitors.

    WT Strategies

    W1,W2,T1,T2

    Create new complementary produc

    which contain good quality and low

    price to attract more customers.

    W3,T3

    Starbucks needs to analyze the wa

    to reduce the risks of selling its coffe

    products at supermarkets a

    customers are demanding for it.

    29

    T1.

    Increase in the inflation rates

    creates a demand in lower

    priced products.T2.

    Many companies are pricing

    their products cheaper to

    impress customers.

    T3.Increase in hypermarkets and

    economical supermarkets

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    30/39

    FINANCIAL STRENGTHS

    RATING

    A Starbucks asset is financed through equity and is safe if creditors

    start to demand repayment of debt. Long term debt-to-equity ratio is only 0.0017. 5

    Starbucks Return on Asset ratio shows that in year 2005, the

    efficiency of using assets to generate earning has increased from 12% to 14%. 4

    Starbucks net income increased to $494.5 million in the year 2005

    compared with $388.9 million in 2004. There is an increase of 21.3% in the

    income of Starbucks.

    4

    13

    INDUSTRY STRENGTHS

    RATING

    Starbucks Coffee Liqueur was the top selling new spirit product,grossed sales over $8million annually. 4

    Starbucks agreed to serve Starbucks Coffee in all United flights.

    3

    Starbucks Everywhere approach has increased foot traffic for all the

    stores in area. This makes customers easy to fine Starbucks all the places in

    town.

    5

    12

    ENVIRONMENTAL STABILITY

    Strategic Management PMS 3393

    +6 = best +1= worst

    30

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    31/39

    RATING

    Starbucks products prices are high compared with competing coffee

    houses. They price their products several dollars below then Starbucks price. -4

    Demand for Starbucks products to be supplied in supermarkets

    increase. But, doing that will put Starbucks business in risk as customers dont know

    the way to brew the coffee.

    -2

    Increase in world coffee bean price in 2001, forced Starbucks to

    increase its beverages and coffee sold at retail. -3

    -9

    COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES

    RATING

    Starbucks coffee and beverages are high in quality brewed by well

    trained employees.-1

    Starbucks teamed up with T-mobile WI-Fi service to provide internetaccess to all over Starbucks Coffeehouse -1

    There are 16,120 Starbucks coffeehouses worldwide and plan to open

    another 1800 stores. -2

    Starbucks is a customer oriented Coffeehouse.

    -2

    -6

    CONCLUSION

    Strategic Management PMS 3393

    -1 = best -6= worst

    31

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    32/39

    FS Average is 13/3 = 4.3

    IS Average is 12/3 = 4.0

    ES Average is -9/3 = - 3.0

    CA Average is -6/4 = - 1.5

    Directional Vector Coordinates: X- axis: 4.0 + (-1.5) = 2.5

    Y- axis: 4.3 + (-3.0) = 1.3

    SPACE MATRIX

    FS

    +6 -CONSERVATIVE AGGRESSIVE

    +5 -

    +4 -

    +3 -

    +2 -

    +1 - (2.5, 1.3)CA IS

    I I I I I I I I I I I I-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6

    -1 -

    -2 -

    -3 -

    DEFENSIVE -4 - COMPETITIVE

    -5 -

    -6 -ES

    Starbucks must pursue a strategy that is Aggressive. The strategies that include in aggressive strategies is

    backward integration, forward integration, horizontal integration, market penetration, market development,

    product development and diversification which include related and unrelated diversification.

    3.5 BCG Matrix

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 32

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    33/39

    HIGH MEDIUM LOW

    HIGH

    MEDIUM

    LOW

    SUMMARY

    The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix is enhancing a multidivisional firms

    efforts to formulate strategies. This matrix allows a multidivisional organization to

    manage its portfolio of businesses by examining the relative market share

    position and the industry growth rate each division relative to all other divisions in

    the organization. Starbucks are measured to identify the stores strategic position

    in the Boston Consulting Matrix. The BCG matrix, were included 4 divisions

    which is Question Marks, Star, Cash Cows, and Dogs. In division quadrant I,

    shows low relatives market position, high growth industry. Firms cash needs are

    high and cash generation is low.

    This division decides to strengthen on pursuing an intensive strategy. Division

    quadrant II, identifies best long-run opportunities for growth and profitability. Star

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 33

    Backward, Forward, or

    Horizontal Integration Market Penetration

    Market Development

    Product Development

    STARSII

    STARBUCKS

    Market Penetration

    Market Development Product Development

    Divestiture

    QUESTION MARKSI

    Product Development

    Diversification

    Retrenchment Divestiture

    CASH COWSIII

    Retrenchment

    Divestiture

    Liquidation

    DOGSIV

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    34/39

    division is high relative market share and high industry growth rate. In convince

    of substantial investment to maintain or strengthen their dominant positions. Next

    in quadrant III, Cash Cows with high relative market share position but compete

    in a low growth industry ,while this division will be managed to maintain strong

    position for as long as possible.

    Finally, in quadrant IV Dogs have low relative market share position

    and compete in a slow or no market growth industry. This divisional are weak

    into internal and external position and often liquidated, divested or trimmed down

    the retrenchment. Retrenchment can be best strategy to pursue because many

    dogs bounced back, after strenuous asset and cost reduction, to become viable,

    profitable divisions. In contrast, the highest scored is 3.5, and it determinant that

    relative share position is HIGH.

    Besides that, Starbucks Income Statements shows the Net Revenue

    were consecutively increased between the years 2003 until 2005. The revenues

    on the year 2003 is $4075,000, while $2191,000 in year 2004, $6369,000 in year

    2005. Moreover, the industry sales growth rate between year 2004 and 2005is

    56.3%.It determinant HIGH position of industry sales growth rate. In conclusion,

    Starbucks were identified in STAR division. This division represents the

    Starbucks long-run opportunities for the growth and profitability. While, this

    division is in high relative market share and industry growth rate and

    subsequently they received substantial investment. The divisions are forward,

    backward, and horizontal integration, market penetration, market development

    and product development are will be considered.

    4.0 MAJOR ISSUES

    4.1 Corporate Level

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 34

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    35/39

    Starbucks coffees price much expensive than other market competitor

    product, it is because Starbucks purchased only high quality coffee

    beans, This will increase the quality of the product as well as the price of

    the product. As Starbucks have many competitors, this will be an

    advantage of the competitors. People are also nowadays looking forward

    for cheap products. Even though Starbucks has its own customer who

    spends their money to get the quality coffee, it still has to look for the other

    people who are running to the next store.

    4.2 Functional Level

    Starbucks have poor marketing strategy on advertising. They prefer to

    build the brand by promoting the drinks cup-by-cup with customers. In this

    way, the advertisement ends until they drink the coffee, while some

    groups of people willing to support the advertisement for timing just to

    taste the drink for free. The chances to attract valuable customers are very

    low. Therefore, it also affects gross profit of Starbucks, the study does not

    show drastic increased between year 2004 and 2005. The percentages ofthe profit increased from 58% in year 2004 to 59% in year 2005. This

    would because of lack of marketing strategy in advertising. The company

    spent total of $87.7 million on advertising in fiscal 2005, up from $49.6

    million in fiscal 2003. It show Starbucks does not emphasize on funding

    the money into advertisement.

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 35

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    36/39

    Starbucks does not emphasize in distributing their products to

    supermarkets. They are very concern on quality of the coffee; if the

    coffees were packaged into plastic bags the mixing of the beans will not

    be as accurate. It will cause the taste of the coffee will be different and the

    coffee beans would not be fresh as grinded beans. In addition, the

    organization did not show a proper guideline to mix the coffee to

    customer. Therefore, the packaging coffee in supermarket did not have

    same taste as coffee which mixed in the Starbucks. Customers

    satisfaction on the coffee will badly affect and as well as demand of the

    Starbucks coffee.

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 36

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    37/39

    5.0 RECOMMENDATION

    5.1 CORPORATE LEVEL

    Reduce their price by producing a new product of coffee using cheaper beans ormay come out with special discounts promotions to increase the sales.

    Starbucks coffee is worlds preeminent global brand. Starbucks should decrease

    price of the coffee to face competition from nationwide coffee manufactures.

    They also can do promotion or promote packages of coffee set to impress

    customers, such as McDonald promoting their product. If the challenge was met

    successfully, in all likelihood companys best years lay on the strategic road

    ahead.

    5.2 BUSINESS LEVEL

    Large companies like Starbucks can effectively pursue Focus-Based Strategy in

    conjunction with differentiation or cost leadership based strategy. Being a lower

    cost store will increase the difference between Starbucks and other stores. At

    present, Starbucks competitors are attempting to specialize in the coffee

    business, therefore Starbucks must pursue focus strategy to increase its

    strength.

    5.3 FUNCTIONAL LEVEL

    Advertisement can develop through internet that services convinced for users to

    access, give the brochures, do road shows, so that public come to know more

    about Starbucks details. Market penetration and market development will help to

    increase the sales and reduce the weakness in Starbucks. Distribute packaging

    of Starbucks instant coffee will definitely increase the sales as it is a demand

    from customers.

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 37

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    38/39

    Introducing accurate mixing level of the coffee in a tea bag style will increase the

    sales at supermarkets. Packing it together with the guidelines on mixing coffee

    beans and sugars with milk to result same taste of coffee will never reduce the

    quality of the coffee. Providing proper steps to customer will make a better quality

    of coffee indeed.

    .

    Strategic Management PMS 3393 38

  • 8/2/2019 26095695 Starbucks Case Study

    39/39

    6.0 CONCLUSION

    Starbucks success is achieved through a few factors.

    Outstanding Quality of the coffee brewed

    Excellent service provided at the stores

    Fast growth of new stores all around the world

    These factors not only have increased the sales but also the reputation among

    the coffee lovers. Starbucks encounters aggressive competition in all areas of its

    business activity. The market for each of their business segments are

    characterized by vigorous competition among major corporations with long

    established positions and a large number of new and rapidly growing firms.Anyway, as Starbucks have a good financial capacity with good strategies; it can

    overcome all the competitors to shine high as the first class coffee purveyor.