34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj -...
TRANSCRIPT
Index
601601
Abbreviations, 595–596Accelerated Life Testing (ALT), 500Access dimension in quality, 102Accuracy in measurement systems analysis,
306–307Active listening, 149–150Actual Factor Value in full factorial designs,
407Advanced process control (APC), 564–565Aesthetics dimension in quality, 101After-tax profits
calculating, 23–24in long term variation costs, 34in tightened specifications costs, 33
AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group) scale,265
Alarm and recording strategy, 563Algorithm to Solve an Inventive Problem (ARIZ),
217–218Aliasing in fractional factorial design, 413–416Alkaline battery failures, 498AlliedSignal Corporation, 5–6ALT (Accelerated Life Testing), 500Alternative approaches to robust design, 438–443Alternative hypotheses, 344–346. See also
Hypothesis testingAltshuller, Genrich, 19–20, 214–215. See also
TRIZ (Theory of Inventive ProblemSolving) tool
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)for mean comparisons
from more than two samples, 370, 374one-way, 375–380
for measurement system studies, 315for mixture experiments, 457–458for regression analysis, 387
Analytical data analysis, 343Analytical Physics activity, 489Analyze Factorial Design option, 401–403Analyze phase in DMAIC, 8Analyzing survey results, 179–181Anderson-Darling statistic, 345–346ANOVA. See Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)APC (Advanced process control), 564–565Apparent or Conventional Solution level in TRIZ,
215ARIZ (Algorithm to Solve an Inventive Problem),
217–218As-Is/Can-Be Process Maps, 243–244Assume equal variances option, 360, 369Assumptions in Process Capability Analysis,
336Attribute data
in DFMEA, 260Process Capability Analysis for, 339–340in statistics, 275–276
Attribute Sigma Calculator, 339–340Augmented simplex centroid design, 456
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 601
Automation evolutionary pattern in TRIZ,216–217
Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) scale,265
Average moving range, 335Average performance in robust design, 430,
434–436Axial points
in mixture designs, 450–451, 453in response surface designs, 424–428
Bardeen, John, 14Barrentine, Larry B., 310Baseline, 28–30Basic statistics, 275–278Bathtub curves, 494–495
constant failure rates in, 496–498decreasing failure rates in, 495–496distributions for, 507–508increasing failure rates in, 498–499, 510for PDF, 506
Benefits received in product value, 99Berry, Leonard L., 102Best distribution fit
with Crystal Ball, 525, 527–529with Minitab, 523–527
Best products, 274–275BetaMax format vs. VHS, 4Bias in measurement systems, 306–307Big block process maps, 238–239Blackbelt projects, 42–43Blackbelts
in schedule development, 70, 73selecting, 74
Borror, C. M., 439Bossidy, Larry, 5Box-Behnken designs
in response surface design, 426in robust design, 439
Boxplots, 287–292Brattain, Walter, 14Broadcast programming, 14Bullet-point interview objectives, 136–137Burn-in, 496Business case for DFSS, 11
dynamic markets, 15–18product life cycle, 11–15role of DFSS, 18–20
Business plansdeveloping, 75–77Executive Summary section in, 78financial plan, 79Management and Organization section in,
79Marketing Plan and Competitive Analysis
section in, 78Operating Plan section in, 78–79reviewing, 75
Cameras, evolution of, 217Can-Be Process Maps, 243–244Cannibalization, product, 103, 105Categorical data, 275–276Cause and Effects (C&E) Matrix, 247
developing, 248–257link from Process Variables Maps, 241, 243vs. QFD3, 247–248working with, 253
CDF (Cumulative Distribution Function), 506CDOC (Concept, Design, Optimize, and
Capability) implementation, 8–9Censoring in reliability tests, 509Center-cutting approach, 274–275Center point runs, 420Centering data
for multiple regression analysis, 391in Process Capability Analysis, 327–328
Central Composite Designsin response surface designs, 424–426in robust design, 439
Centroid designsaugmented, 454, 456with axial points, 453constraints in, 463–464for three components, 447–448
Chart defects tables, 294Charters, project, 42–46Chi Square statistical analysis, 276Closed-ended questions, 141Coded Factor Value in full factorial designs,
407Coefficients
correlation, 383–384for Crystal Ball, 481in regression analysis, 384–385for three-response optimization, 476
602 Index
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 602
Collection weaknesses in Process Variables Maps,241
Commercialization delay costs, 25–26Commercialization pipeline, 48Common cause variation, 271–272Communication dimension in quality, 102Comparisons
meansto medians, 297–298more than two samples, 370–374one-way ANOVA, 375–380paired, 363–367t-tests for, 360–363to target values, 348–354two samples, 355–363
mediansKruskal-Wallis test, 380–381Mann-Whitney test, 363–364to means, 297–298Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, 354–355
standard deviation, 298more than two samples, 370–374two samples, 355–359
variancesthree variances, 373–375two variances, 360–361
Competence dimension in quality, 102Competitor analysis
in Market Perceived Quality Profile, 122in market segmentation, 89–90
Competitors category for interview questions, 142Components
in mixture designs, 449–450of variation plots, 316
Composite desirability for Response Optimizer,472–473
Concept, Design, Optimize, and Capability(CDOC) implementation, 8–9
Concept Development, 129advantages, 131, 133applications, 131–132process, 129–131
Concept Development tools, 133Concept phase
in Design for Reliability, 487in FMEA, 504
Concept Generation phase in Ideation process,185, 188
Concept Selection Matrixin Pugh concept selection, 190–192rankings in, 192–194
Confidence intervalsfor difference between means, 369–370for means, 367–369for standard deviation, 369
Confirming products, 538–545Conformance dimension in quality, 101Confounding in fractional factorial design,
413–416Constant failure rates in bathtub curve,
496–498Constraints in mixture experiments, 459–462Continuous data in statistics, 275–276Contour plots
for mixture experiments, 459–460for product scale-up, 554in response surface designs, 420, 423for three-response optimization, 475–476
Contradiction Matrix, 217–222, 225Contradictions, technical. See TRIZ (Theory of
Inventive Problem Solving) toolControl charts
creating, 285–287, 289of cycles between failures, 492, 494
Control plans, 555–556advanced process control in, 564alarm and recording strategy in, 563final documentation package, 568–569input variable shifts in, 557, 559–561out-of-control conditions in, 556–558link from Process Variables Maps, 241–242sampling plans for, 564standard operating procedures in, 568summary, 565–568time series analysis for, 557, 561–563
Cooper, Robert G., 20, 51COPQ (Cost of Poor Quality), 28–30Correlation
analysis of, 381–384in Cause and Effects Matrix, 249, 253–254for control plans, 561–563in regression, 391in reliability modeling, 509for technical interaction, 201in TRIZ, 213–214
Correlation coefficient (r), 383–384
Index 603
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 603
Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ), 28–30Costs
commercialization delays, 25–26in financial value, 108–113long term variation, 33–35
financial sensitivity analysis in, 35–39sigma levels in, 35–36
not killing poor projects, 26–28process variation, 273–274tightened specifications, 32–33warranty, 512–513
Courtesy dimension in quality, 102Cover letters for surveys, 175Cp statistic
adequacy of, 337, 339in short-term process capability analysis,
321–322in sigma level, 326–328
Cpk statistic, 328–331Create Factorial Design option, 399–400Create Mixture Design option, 447–452, 461–462Credibility dimension in quality, 102Critical input variables, 430Critical output parameters, 465Critical Parameter Management
overview, 227–228scorecards in
benefits, 232–233in DFM, 546–549information on, 230–231for minimizing product variation, 230, 232overview, 228–229
Critical path, 71–72Cross correlation, 561–563Crystal Ball program
for best distribution fit, 525, 527–529for Monte Carlo simulation, 38, 115for optimal solutions, 479–485for variation optimization, 533–534
Cubic equationsin mixture experiments, 447, 457for regression analysis, 385
Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF), 506Customer dimension in quality, 102Customer environment in Design for Reliability,
490Customer interviews, 147
active listening in, 149–150
analysis of. See KJ Analysis tooldebriefing, 151etiquette in, 150–151management of, 151–152open mindedness in, 150practice for, 152preparing for, 147–148team roles in, 148
Customer Interviews toolin concept development, 133for market segmentation, 55in Marketing Plan and Competitive Analysis
section, 78Customer needs and requirements
in business case for DFSS, 19in market segmentation, 87–90optimizing variation to, 532–535in concept development, 131, 196–198in QFD, 197, 199–200reliability expectations, 491
Customer Selection Criteria characteristic, 140
Customer Selection Matrix toolin Interview Guides, 137–140in Marketing Plan and Competitive Analysis
section, 78Customer surveys, 578–579Customers category for interview questions,
142
DART (Design Assessment Reliability Testing),488, 502
Data analysis, 343confidence intervals, 367–370correlation analysis, 381–384general methods, 343–344hypothesis testing, 344–346mean comparisons
more than two samples, 370–374one-way ANOVA, 375–380paired, 363–367t-tests for, 360–363to target values, 348–354two samples, 355–363
median comparisonsKruskal-Wallis test, 380–381Mann-Whitney test, 363–364Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, 354–355
604 Index
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 604
regression analysismultiple, 390–396single input variable, 384–390
sample size calculations in, 346–348standard deviations comparisons
more than two samples, 370–374two samples, 355–359
tool summary, 381variances comparisons
three variances, 373–375two variances, 360–361
Data collection weaknesses, 241Data mining
boxplots for, 287–292dotplots for, 292–293
Death spiral, 109, 111–113Debriefing customer interviews, 151Decline stage in product life cycle, 11–12Decreasing failure rates in bathtub curves, 495–496Defects in Attribute Sigma Calculator process,
339Defects per million opportunities (DPMO),
339–340Defects per unit (DPU), 339–340Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control
(DMAIC)characteristics, 6–7overview, 7–9
Define phase in DMAIC, 7–8DeForest, Lee, 13Degrees of freedom for mean comparisons
one-way ANOVA, 378–379two-sample t-test, 363
Delay costs, 25–26Design Assessment Reliability Testing (DART),
488, 502Design FMEA (DFMEA) tool, 259–260
conducting, 260–261design controls in, 262–264failures in
causes, 262–263effects, 262modes, 261–262
in concept development, 133ratings in, 263–265Risk Priority Number in, 266–267
Design for Manufacturability (DFM) assessment,546–549
Design for Reliability (DfR), 487distribution types in, 507–508FMEA in, 502–505Hazard Function in, 494–499and Kano Model, 490–491mathematical models in, 504–506metrics for, 491–494Minitab for, 508–512reliability requirements in, 489–490reliability tests in, 499–502roadmap for, 487–489warranty costs in, 512–514
Design For Six Sigma (DFSS)defined, 3–4history, 5–7overview, 7–9process, 580–582vs. Operations Six Sigma, 6–7tools, 9
Design Maturity Testing (DMT) plan, 488, 491,502
Design of Experiment (DOE), 397fractional factorial design. See Fractional
factorial designsfull factorial designs. See Full factorial designsresponse surface designs. See Response surface
designsselecting, 426
Desirability function, 468–473Detection (DET) ratings in DFMEA, 264–265Devices under test (DUT), 500DFM (Design for Manufacturability) assessment,
546–549DFMEA. See Design FMEA (DFMEA) toolDfR. See Design for Reliability (DfR)DFSS Tools Checklist, 232–233Difference between means, 369–370Dimensions of quality, 101–103Direction of movement in QFD, 201Direction of steepest ascent, 421, 423–424Disciplined processes, 3Discovery level in TRIZ, 215Discrete data, 275–276Discrimination in measurement systems, 305–306Display Descriptive Statistics option, 297Disruptive technologies, 11–12, 14–15Distribution ID plots, 509Distribution Overview Analysis, 524
Index 605
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 605
Distributionsbathtub curve modeling, 507–508best distribution fit, 523–529F
for mean comparisons, 379for variance comparisons, 360–361
lognormalfor best distribution fit, 523for wear-out mechanisms, 508
normalfor best distribution fit, 523to estimate waste, 319–321overview, 277–278
skewed, 282t. See t-testsWeibull
for best distribution fit, 523–524for reliability, 509–510, 512in statistical tolerancing, 529–530
DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, andControl)
characteristics, 6–7overview, 7–9
DMT (Design Maturity Testing) plan, 488, 491,502
Documentationfinal documentation package, 568–569Interview Guides, 144–146QFD critical information, 228
DOE (Design of Experiment)fractional factorial design. See Fractional
factorial designsfull factorial designs. See Full factorial designsresponse surface designs. See Response surface
designsselecting, 426
Dotplotsdata mining using, 292–293overview, 279–281
DPMO (defects per million opportunities),339–340
DPU (defects per unit), 339–340Durability dimension in quality, 101DUT (devices under test), 500Dynamic markets, 15–18Dynamic Model, 561Dynamization evolutionary pattern in TRIZ,
216–217
Economic view of product life cycle, 17–18Edison, Thomas, 13Edison Effect, 13Emerging trends, 19Entitlement, 28–30Environmental analysis in market segmentation,
89–90Environmental stress screening (ESS)
for infant mortality failures, 496purpose, 501
Environmental variables, 241Errors
in hypothesis testing, 344measurement. See Measurement systems
analysisESS (environmental stress screening)
for infant mortality failures, 496purpose, 501
Estimated variance in robust design, 443Estimates of long-term variation, 325Estimating wastes, 319–321Etiquette in customer interviews, 150–151Evolution in TRIZ, 216–217Excel Solver tool, 475–478Executive Summary section in business
plans, 78Expectations in Kano model, 17Experimental runs, 397Experiments, design. See Design of Experiment
(DOE)Exponential distribution, 523Extreme Vertices Design, 461–462Extreme Vertices Blend Design, 463
F-Testsfor mean comparisons, 379for variance comparisons, 360–361
Factor regions for 3-component mixtures,445–446
Failure Free Testing, 501Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) tool,
259Cause and Effects Matrix for, 253Design FMEA. See Design FMEA (DFMEA)
toolin Design for Reliability, 502–505Market FMEA. See Market FMEA toolin new product development, 259–260
606 Index
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 606
for post-mortem analysis, 580, 583Process Manufacturing, 268–269Product Design, 267–268
Failure ratesin bathtub curve
constant, 496–498decreasing, 495–496increasing, 498–499, 510
in Design for Reliability, 491–494Failures in DFMEA
causes, 262–263effects, 262modes, 261–262
Fast Track projectspipeline for, 48–49in Stage-Gate systems, 62–66
Features dimension in quality, 101Final Financial Value tool, 133Final segmentation strategy, 87–90Financial metrics, 21
commercialization delay costs, 25–26killing poor project costs, 26–28long term variation costs, 33–35
financial sensitivity analysis in, 35–39sigma levels in, 35–36
poor quality costs, 28–30sigma levels, 30–31success, 22–25tightened specifications costs, 32–33
Financial plan, 79Financial results, projects linked to, 43–46Financial sensitivity analysis, 35, 113
Monte Carlo simulation in, 38–39single factor, 36–38, 116–117
Financial value, 107fixed costs in, 108–113market segmentation, 81–86project returns, 113–120project value, 107–108
First Order Dynamic Process, 561First order equations in response surface designs,
423Fitted line plot equations, 385, 387–388Fitted models for three response variables, 474Five-factor interaction effect, 412Fixed costs in financial value, 108–113Fleming, John Ambrose, 13Flowdown process in QFD, 196, 202–208
FMEA. See Design FMEA (DFMEA) tool; FailureModes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)tool; Market FMEA tool
Four-factor interaction effect, 414–416Four in one ANOVA option, 377Fractional factorial designs
available, 416confounding in, 413–416hierarchy of effects in, 416in Minitab, 416–420overview, 411–413purpose, 426
Full factorial designs, 397–398in Minitab
creating, 399–403numerical output, 406–409Pareto plots, 403–406residual plots, 409–411
purpose, 426randomization in, 398–399
Function Within Organization characteristic, 140Functional product requirements, 197, 199–200“Fuzzy front-end” of product development, 129
Gage R&R Study (Crossed) option, 313–314, 317
Galvin, Bob, 5Gaps
in Market Perceived Quality Profile, 124–125QFD process for, 195in worst case analysis, 517–518
“Garbage in, garbage out”in product commercialization, 41with statistical analysis, 303
Garvin, David, 101Gate 3 Review tool, 133Gatekeeper, 51, 53General Electric, Six Sigma at, 6Geography characteristic, 140Glossary, 585–593Goal setting in Cost of Poor Quality, 28–30Goodness-of-fit statistic, 345Goodwill of customers, 514Graphical analysis techniques, 278–279
boxplots, 287–292control charts, 285–287, 289dotplots, 279–281, 292–293histogram plots, 279, 281–282
Index 607
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 607
Graphical analysis techniques (continued )Normal Probability Plots, 283–286Run Charts, 285, 288scatterplots, 294–297summary analysis, 282–283, 299
Greenbelt projects, 42Greenbelts in schedule development
in schedule development, 70, 73selecting, 74
Growth stage in product life cycle, 11–12
Half-fraction factorial design, 413HALT (Highly Accelerated Life Testing), 489,
497, 500HASS (Highly Accelerated Stress Screening),
489, 497, 500HAST (Highly Accelerated Stress Testing),
501Hazard Function, 494–495
constant failure rates in, 496–498decreasing failure rates in, 495–496distributions for, 507–508increasing failure rates in, 498–499, 510for PDF, 506
Hierarchy Location of Person characteristic, 140Hierarchy of effects in fractional factorial design,
416High-end market pricing, 83High Factor Value in full factorial designs, 407Highly Accelerated Life Testing (HALT), 489,
497, 500Highly Accelerated Stress Screening (HASS),
489, 497, 500Highly Accelerated Stress Testing (HAST),
501Histogram plots, 279, 281–282Historical failures for bathtub curve, 507Hopper, project, 46–48Humidity variable, 241Hypothesis testing, 344–346
for correlation analysis, 383for mean comparisons
confidence intervals for, 367–369one-way ANOVA, 378paired, 366–367t-tests for, 362–363to target values, 348–350, 353–354two-sample, 355–357
for mean difference, 369for median comparisons, 363–364for regression analysis
multiple, 393single input variable, 386, 390
sample size for, 347–348for standard deviation comparisons, 355–357for variances, 360–361
I-MR control charts, 357–358Ideation process, 183
example, 186–188problem statement in, 183product concepts in, 185–186solution generation in, 184–185work area in, 183–184
Ideation tool, 78Identify, Design, Optimize, and Validate (IDOV)
implementation, 8–9Images in KJ Analysis, 154–155
defining, 155–156final selection, 160–161in Marketing Plan and Competitive Analysis
section, 78in product development, 133recording, 156–157reducing, 157–160scrubbing, 161–162titling and positioning groups, 162–166YO OH concept, 160–161
Importance parameter for Response Optimizer, 472Improve phase in DMAIC, 8Include center points in the model option, 420Increasing failure rates in bathtub curve, 498–499,
510Infant-mortality failures
in bathtub curve, 495and Customer goodwill, 514HASS for, 500
Infeasible manufacturing process mode, 98Initial Financial Analysis tool, 55Inner arrays in robust design, 431–435Innovation levels in TRIZ, 215–216Inputs and input variables
in Cause and Effects Matrix, 247–248,252–253
in Crystal Ball, 481in OptQuest, 483
608 Index
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 608
for out-of-control conditions, 556–558for Process Variables Maps, 239–243for three-response optimization, 476
Instability in product development process,272–273
Instrument bias, 306Interaction effects
five-factor, 412four-factor, 414–416in full factorial designs, 403–404, 406, 408two-factor, 411, 414
Interaction plotsin full factorial designs, 404–406in robust design, 436
Intercept in regression analysis, 384–385Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
in financial plans, 79in financial sensitivity analysis, 37, 113in Monte Carlo simulation, 115as success measure, 25
Interpretation in fractional factorial design, 413Interview Guides, 135
bullet-point objectives, 136–137Customer Selection Matrix in, 137–140documenting, 144–146finalizing, 144Purpose Statements in, 135–136for questions, 139
areas to be explored, 139, 141developing, 141–143
Interviews, customer, 147active listening in, 149–150analysis of. See KJ Analysis tooldebriefing, 151etiquette in, 150–151management of, 151–152open mindedness in, 150practice for, 152preparing for, 147–148team roles in, 148
Introduction stage in product life cycle, 11–12Invention Outside Technology level in TRIZ, 215iPod, 4–5IRR (Internal Rate of Return)
in financial plans, 79in financial sensitivity analysis, 37, 113in Monte Carlo simulation, 115as success measure, 25
Jobs, Steve, 4
Kano Model, 15–16economic view of product life cycle, 17–18implications, 16–17reliability expectations in, 490–491
Kawakita, Jiro, 153Key assumptions in Process Capability Analysis,
336Key inventive principles in TRIZ, 217–220,
222Key Items area for voice translation,
168–169Key Process Input Variables (KPIVs)
in APC, 565in control plans, 555, 557, 559–561, 567in DFM, 546–547in DOE, 397in FMEA, 259in optimal solutions, 479–481in PFMEA, 269process maps for, 237for Process Variables Maps, 239–241in product scale-up, 552–553in QFD, 205
Key Process Output Variables (KPOVs)in APC, 565in control plans, 555–556, 558, 567in DFM, 547in DOE, 397for Process Variables Maps, 239, 241in product scale-up, 552
Key requirements in Market Perceived QualityProfile, 122
Killing projects, costs of not, 26–28KJ Analysis, 153
images, 154–155defining, 155–156final selection, 160–161in Marketing Plan and Competitive
Analysis section, 78in concept development, 133recording, 156–157reducing, 157–160scrubbing, 161–162titling and positioning groups, 162–166YO OH, 160–161
overview, 154
Index 609
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 609
KJ Analysis (continued )in concept confirmation, 540in concept development, 131requirement, 164
in concept development, 133conclusion, 172, 174final selection round, 170–171identifying, 172–173in Marketing Plan and Competitive
Analysis section, 78reducing, 170scrubbing, 171theme, 164, 169–170titling and positioning groups, 171voice recording, 166–167voice reduction, 166–167voice translating, 167–169
in Stage-Gate systems, 55Knowledge gaps, QFD process for, 195KPIVs. See Key Process Input Variables (KPIVs)KPOVs. See Key Process Output Variables
(KPOVs)Kruskal-Wallis Test, 380–381
“Ladder of abstraction” in customer interviews, 149Lapsed Customers, 139Launch plans
product, 573–579in Stage-Gate systems, 60–61
Law of Ideality in TRIZ, 216LCLs (Lower Control Limits) for control charts,
286–287Least squares in regression analysis, 385Level of variation in performance, 325–326Levels of innovation in TRIZ, 215–216Levene’s Test, 360–361Lidstone, John, 91Life cycles, product
in business case for DFSS, 11–15economic view of, 17–18vacuum tube example, 13–15
Life hazards in Design for Reliability, 487Linear relationships, correlation analysis for,
381–384Linearity problems in measurement systems, 318Linking
customer needs to product development,196–198
Process Variables Maps to downstream DFSStools, 241, 243
projectsto financial results, 43–46to strategy, 41–42
Listening, active, 149–150Lognormal distributions
for best distribution fit, 523for wear-out mechanisms, 508
Long-term measurement system assessments, 318Long-term process capability analysis, 322–325,
331–332Long-term reliability, 490Long term variation
costs, 33–35financial sensitivity analysis in, 35–39sigma levels in, 35–36statistical tools for, 274–275
standard deviation, 319–320Low-end market pricing, 83Low Factor Value in full factorial designs, 407Lower Control Limits (LCLs) for control charts,
286–287Lower Specification Limit (LSL) values
in Cp, 327in Cpk, 328, 330–331in long-term process capability analysis,
322–324in measurement system error, 305in short-term process capability analysis,
321–322in sigma levels, 30–32
Maclennan, Janice, 91Main effects plots, 434–437Management and Organization section in
business plans, 79Mann-Whitney test, 363–364Manufacturing processes in QFD
identifying, 205in Stage-Gate systems, 58–59
MapsProcess Variables Maps, 237–238
big block process maps, 238–239input variables for, 239–243output variables for, 239
product positioning, 127–128value chain, 103–106
610 Index
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 610
Market analysis in Stage-Gate systems, 55Market FMEA tool, 96, 259
developing, 96–98in Marketing Plan and Competitive Analysis
section, 78results, 98in Stage-Gate systems, 55
Market opportunities, 91Market FMEA, 96–98SWOT analysis. See SWOT Analysis tool
Market Perceived Quality Profile tool, 105,121–123
competitive position and market share analysisin, 122
gap in, 124–125key requirements in, 122in Marketing Plan and Competitive Analysis
section, 78output interpretation in, 124–126price and quality sensitivity in, 122in production scale-up, 540
Market segmentation, 81customer interviews for, 55financial value of, 81–86ratings by, 93–95strategy for, 86–90value chain mapping in, 105–106
Market Segmentation tool, 78Market share analysis, 122Marketing Plan and Competitive Analysis section
in business plans, 78Mathematical models in reliability, 504–506Maturity stage in product life cycle, 11–12Mean Cycles Between Failure (MCBF), 492, 494Mean shift variation, 336Mean square of residuals (MS) error, 385Mean Squared Deviation (MSD), 430Mean squares for mean comparisons, 378Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), 492, 494Means
comparingto medians, 297–298more than two samples, 370–374one-way ANOVA, 375–380paired, 363–367t-tests for, 360–363to target values, 348–354two samples, 355–363
confidence intervals for, 367–369for control charts, 287difference between, 369–370for normal distributions, 277–278
Measure phase in DMAIC, 8Measurement System Assessment, 253Measurement systems analysis, 303
accuracy in, 306–307discrimination in, 305–306errors in, 303–305long-term, 318precision in, 307–308in Process Capability Analysis, 337, 339samples in, 311studies in, 312–318variation quantification in, 309–311
Mediansin boxplots, 290comparing
Kruskal-Wallis test, 380–381Mann-Whitney test, 363–364to means, 297–298Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, 354–355
confidence intervals for, 367for normal distributions, 278
Metricsfinancial. See Financial metricsfor reliability, 491–494
Mid-range market pricing, 83Milestones, 70–71Minitab program, 278
best distribution fit, 523–527boxplots, 287–292confidence intervals
means, 367–369standard deviation, 369
control charts, 285–287, 289control plans, 561–562correlation analysis, 383–384descriptive statistics, 298–300dotplots, 279–281, 292–293fractional factorial design, 414–420full factorial designs
creating, 399–403numerical output, 406–409Pareto plots, 403–406residual plots, 409–411
histogram plots, 279, 281–282
Index 611
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 611
Minitab program (continued )hypothesis tests, 346long-term process capability analysis, 322–324mean comparisons
one-way ANOVA, 378–380paired, 364–367sample size, 356to target values, 349–350two-sample, 360–363
measurement system studies, 312–318medians
comparing, 363–364testing, 354–355
mixture designsanalyzing, 451–454creating, 447–451
multiple response optimization process,466–473, 475
Normal Probability Plots, 283–286out-of-control conditions, 556Process Capability Analysis, 333–337product scale-up, 553–554regression analysis
multiple, 391–396single variable, 385
reliability, 508–512robust design, 434, 439, 441–443Run Charts, 285, 288sample size, 347–348scatterplots, 294–297standard deviation
comparisons, 356confidence intervals, 369
variance comparisonsthree variances, 373–375two variances, 360–361
Mistake proofing opportunities, 568Mixture experiments, 445
constraints in, 459–462mixture designs, 447
analyzing, 451–454choosing, 462–464in Minitab, 447–451
mixture equations, 445–447response surface study for, 454–462
Monitoring inputs and outputs for out-of-controlconditions, 556–558
Monte Carlo Risk Analysis tool, 133
Monte Carlo simulation, 113, 117–120for best distribution fit, 524in financial sensitivity analysis, 38–39in optimal solutions, 477–485in statistical tolerancing, 529–532, 535
Montgomery, D. C., 439Mood’s median test, 380Motorola, Six Sigma at, 5–6MS (mean square of residuals) error, 385MSD (Mean Squared Deviation), 430MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures), 492, 494Multi-State Picking Method, 157–158, 166Multiple regression analysis, 390–396Multiple response optimization process, 466
Minitab for, 475reduced model for, 466–467Response Optimizer for, 467–468
composite desirability for, 472–473desirability function, 468–472setup for, 468, 470
Multivalued responses in customer interviews,150
Murphy’s Analysis, 580Myers, R. H., 439Mystery shoppers, 579
Net Present Value (NPV)in commercialization delay costs, 26in Cost of Poor Quality, 29–30in financial plans, 79in financial sensitivity analysis, 36–38, 113in long term variation costs, 34–35in Monte Carlo simulation, 38, 115in pipeline management, 46–48as success measure, 24–25in tightened specifications costs, 32–33
New product concept finalized stage, 55–57New product design stage, 58–59Nominal gap values, 517–518Non-normal data, statistical analysis tools for,
277Non-Value-Added step, 244Non-Value-Added but Necessary step, 244Nonparametric median tests, 354Normal distributions
for best distribution fit, 523overview, 277–278for waste estimates, 319–321
612 Index
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 612
Normal probability plotscreating, 283–286in hypothesis testing, 345
Normalityin mean comparisons, 351, 370–372in standard deviation comparisons, 357, 359,
370–372statistical analysis tools for, 277
NPV. See Net Present Value (NPV)Null hypotheses, 344–346. See also Hypothesis
testingNumerical descriptive statistics, 297–300
Objectives section in Interview Guides, 145–146Observer role for customer interviews, 148Occur (OCC) ratings in DFMEA, 2641-sample t-tests, 351–3541-sample Wilcoxon tests, 354–355One-sided 2-sample t-tests, 362One-sided significance tests, 350One-way ANOVA
for mean comparisons, 375–380for regression analysis, 387
Open-ended questions, 141Open mindedness in customer interviews, 150Operating Plan section in business plans, 78–79Operations Six Sigma, 6–7Operator bias, 306Operator-sample interaction, 316, 318Opportunities, 91
Market FMEA, 96–98in Stage-Gate systems, 53–55SWOT analysis. See SWOT Analysis tool
Optimal solutions, 465–466in control plans, 565Monte Carlo simulation in, 477–485multiple response optimization process,
466–473three-response optimization, 473–478
Optimize phasein Design for Reliability, 488in FMEA, 504
Optimizing variation, 532–535OptQuest program
for variation optimization, 533–534for variation requirements, 480–484
Out-of-control conditions, 556–558Outer arrays in robust design, 431–435
Outputs and output variablesin Cause and Effects Matrix, 247–251in Market Perceived Quality Profile,
124–126for out-of-control conditions, 556–558for Process Variables Maps, 239
Overlay Contour Plots, 554
P/T ratio (Precision to Tolerance Ratio), 309–310p-values
for correlation analysis, 383–384in hypothesis tests, 345–346for means
one-way ANOVA, 378paired comparisons, 366testing, 354two-sample t-test, 363
for medians, 355for regression analysis, 386–387
multiple, 393–395single input variable, 390
in response surface designs, 420Paired mean comparisons, 363–367Parameter management. See Critical Parameter
ManagementPareto analysis for TRIZ, 222Pareto plots
for dotplots, 292, 294in fractional factorial design, 418in full factorial designs, 403–406in robust design, 436, 438
Partnering relationships, 87–88Patent analysis in TRIZ, 216Path of steepest ascent, 421, 423–424PDF (Probability Density Function), 504–506Perceived Quality dimension, 101Percent Repeatability and Reproducibility (% R&R)
value, 310–311, 313–314, 316–317Performance
Process Capability Analysis for, 325–326in quality, 101in robust design, 429–431, 434–436
PFMEA (Process FMEA), 259–260, 268–269Photography, camera evolution in, 217Physical reactions in customer interviews, 148PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) control
calculations, 564Pipeline management, 46–50
Index 613
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 613
Plansbusiness
developing, 75–77Executive Summary section in, 78financial plan, 79Management and Organization section in, 79Marketing Plan and Competitive Analysis
section in, 78Operating Plan section in, 78–79reviewing, 75
control, 555–556advanced process control in, 564alarm and recording strategy in, 563final documentation package, 568–569input variable shifts in, 557, 559–561out-of-control conditions in, 556–558for Process Variables Maps, 241–242sampling plans for, 564standard operating procedures in, 568summary, 565–568time series analysis for, 557, 561–563
Pooled standard deviationfor mean comparisons, 362in Process Capability Analysis, 336
Portfolio scorecards, 48, 50Position in Value Chain characteristic, 140Positioning
in KJ Analysisimage groups, 162–166requirements, 171
product, 121maps, 127–128Market Perceived Quality Profile,
121–126Post-mortem analysis, 579–583Power of hypothesis tests, 344Pp statistic, 331–332Ppk statistic, 331–332Practical data analysis, 343Precision in measurement systems analysis,
307–308Precision to Tolerance Ratio (P/T ratio), 309–310Predictive process control approach, 562Price
in financial sensitivity analysis, 38in Market Perceived Quality Profile, 122in segmentation, 81–86
Probability Density Function (PDF), 504–506
Probing in customer interviews, 149–150Problem statement in Ideation process, 183Process, 3
in QFD, 205sigma levels of, 30–31
Process Capability Analysis, 319for attribute data, 339–340capability index interpretations in, 332–333Cause and Effects Matrix for, 253Cpk statistic for, 328–331importance of, 340–341long-term, 322–325, 331–332measurement system adequacy in, 337, 339Minitab tools for, 333–337normal distribution curves for waste estimates,
319–321short-term, 321–322for Six Sigma performance, 325–326
Process Control Plans, 253Process Design FMEA, 259Process design in Stage-Gate systems, 58, 60Process Design Package, 549–554Process FMEA (PFMEA), 259–260, 268–269Process Hazards Analysis reviews, 551Process maps, 237
As-Is/Can-Be Process Maps, 243–244final thoughts, 245Process Variables Maps. See Process Variables
MapsProcess optimization in control plans, 565Process stability in product development,
272–273Process variables in mixture designs, 450Process Variables Maps, 237–238
big block process maps, 238–239input variables for, 239–243output variables for, 239
Product cannibalization, 103, 105Product Design FMEA, 267–268Product Development
in Design for Reliability, 488in FMEA, 504linking customer needs to, 196–198measurement error impact in, 304–305in product life cycle, 11–12risk, 4–5
Product development cycle time, 195–197Product Positioning Maps tool, 78
614 Index
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 614
Product scale-up, 537Design for Manufacturability assessment,
546–549Process Design Package, 549–554product confirmation in, 538–545
Product value, 99quality in, 100–103tools for, 105value chain mapping in, 103–106value concept, 99–100
Products, 3confirming, 538–545developing. See Developmentin Ideation process, 185–186life cycle
in business case for DFSS, 11–15economic view of, 17–18vacuum tube example, 13–15
positioning, 121maps, 127–128Market Perceived Quality Profile, 121–126
in QFD, 197, 199–201in Stage-Gate systems, 55, 60–61variation in. See Variation
Profit, after-taxcalculating, 23–24in long term variation costs, 34in tightened specifications costs, 33
Project Construction phase, 552Project cycle time, 195–197Project Detailed Engineering and Procurement
phase, 552Project management, 67
customer interviews, 151–152roadmaps, 67–69schedules
developing, 69–73managing, 73–74overview, 74
Project Plans, 549, 551Project returns
financial sensitivity analysis, 113, 116–117Monte Carlo simulation, 113, 117–120
Project Scope Definition phase, 551Project value, 107–108Projects
charter, 42–46death spiral, 109, 111–113
hopper, 46–48killing, 26–28launch plans, 573–579linking
to financial results, 43–46to strategy, 41–42
loser, 41post-mortem analysis, 579–583risk
development, 4–5quantifying, 25
Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controlcalculations, 564
Pugh, Stuart, 190Pugh Concept Selection tool, 189
in concept development, 133example, 194in FMEA, 504follow-up, 194in Marketing Plan and Competitive Analysis
section, 78process, 190–194in Stage-Gate systems, 55
Purpose Statements in Interview Guides, 135–136,145
QFD (Quality Function Deployment) process, 195
critical information documentation, 228
in DFM, 546executing, 197–202flowdown in, 202–208parameters from. See Critical Parameter
Managementroof, 213–214summary, 211–212across value chain, 205, 209–211value of, 195–198
QFD1 toolin concept development, 133in Operating Plan section, 78overview, 202–203in Stage-Gate systems, 55
QFD1.5 toolin concept development, 133in Operating Plan section, 78overview, 203–204
Index 615
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 615
QFD2 toolin Operating Plan section, 79overview, 204–206
QFD2.5 toolin Operating Plan section, 79overview, 205, 207
QFD3 toolvs. Cause and Effects Matrix, 247–248, 253in Operating Plan section, 79overview, 205, 208for Process Variables Maps, 241
Quadratic equations, 385, 389–390Quadratic model output, 456Quality
dimensions of, 101–103in Market Perceived Quality Profile, 122in product value, 100–103for services, 102–103
Quality Function Deployment. See QFD (QualityFunction Deployment) process
Quality system failures in bathtub curve, 495Quantifying
measurement system variation, 309–311performance in robust design, 429–431
Questions for Interview Guides, 139areas to be explored, 139, 141developing, 141–143
R Chart by Operator graphs, 316R-Sq value, 387RACI (Resource, Accountable, Consulted, and
Informed) approach, 71Randomization in full factorial designs,
398–399Ranges for normal distributions, 278Rankings
in Concept Selection Matrix, 192–194in QFD, 197
competing products, 197functional product requirements, 200
Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests, 354–355Ratings
in Cause and Effects Matrix, 249, 255in DFMEA, 263–265by market segment, 93–95
Reaction plans, 568Recording
in control plans, 563
KJ images, 156–157voices, 166–167
Reduced models, 466–467Reducing
in KJ Analysisimages, 157–160requirements, 170voices, 164, 166–167
Reduction targets, variation, 274Regression analysis, 276
multiple, 390–396single input variable, 384–390
Regulatory category for interview selection, 142Relationship between variables
regression analysis for, 276multiple, 390–396single input variable, 384–390
scatterplots for, 294–297Relationship characteristic, 140Relative Importance Surveys, 175
analyzing, 179–181in concept development, 131, 133designing and conducting, 175–178in Marketing Plan and Competitive Analysis
section, 78in production scale-up, 540for requirements identification, 181
Relative value, 100Reliability, 101–102. See also Design for
Reliability (DfR)Reliability Monitoring Program, 489Reliability Verification activity, 489Repeatability (Rpt) in measurement systems
analysis, 307–308, 315Replacement of Human evolutionary pattern in
TRIZ, 216–217Reproducibility (Rpd) in measurement systems
analysis, 307–308, 315Requirements
KJ Analysis, 164in concept development, 133conclusion, 172, 174final selection round, 170–171identifying, 172–173in Marketing Plan and Competitive
Analysis section, 78reducing, 170scrubbing, 171
616 Index
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 616
themes, 164, 169–170titling and positioning groups, 171voice recording, 166–167voice reduction, 166–167voice translating, 167–169
in QFD, 197, 199–201Relative Importance Surveys for, 181
Requirements Management system. See CriticalParameter Management
Residual plotsin fractional factorial design, 418–419in full factorial designs, 409–411for mean comparisons, 377for mixture experiments, 452, 455, 457for regression analysis
multiple, 394–395single input variable, 387–388, 390
in response surface designs, 420, 422Residuals checks for mean comparisons, 379–380Resource, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed
(RACI) approach, 71Resource assignment in schedule development, 71Response Optimizer option, 467–468
composite desirability for, 472–473desirability function, 468–472setup for, 468, 470
Response surface designs, 420–422axial points in, 424–428for mixture experiments, 454–462path of steepest ascent in, 421, 423–424purpose, 426in robust design, 439–443
Response variables in full factorial designs, 397Responsiveness dimension in quality, 102Rewards and recognition, 582Risk
development, 4BetaMax vs. VHS, 4iPod, 4–5minimizing, 5
quantifying, 25Risk Priority Number (RPN), 266–267Roadmap for Reliability, 487–489Roadmaps, project, 67–69Robust design, 429
alternative approaches to, 438–443example, 434–438quantifying performance in, 429–431
response surface techniques in, 439–443Taguchi approach to, 431–434variation analysis in, 436–438
Robust tests, 354Roof, QFD, 213–214Root Sum of Squares (RSS) analysis, 517,
519–521RPN (Risk Priority Number), 266–267Run Charts, 285, 288Runs, experimental, 397
S-curves, spending, 27Sales volume after launch, 573–579Sample statistics, 277Samples and sample size
for control plans, 564in data analysis, 346–348in mean comparisons, 349–350, 355–359for measurement system studies, 311in standard deviation comparisons, 355–359
Scatterplots, 294–297for correlation analysis, 381–382for regression analysis, 387–388
Schedulesdeveloping, 69–70
critical paths in, 71–72milestones in, 70–71resource assigning in, 71task definitions in, 70
managing, 73–74Scorecards
in Critical Parameter Managementbenefits, 232–233in DFM, 546–549information on, 230–231for minimizing product variation, 230,
232overview, 228–229
portfolio, 48, 50Scoring guidelines in Stage-Gate systems, 53Screening failures in bathtub curve, 495Screening studies in fractional factorial design,
418Scribe role for customer interviews, 148Scrubbing
KJ Analysis images, 161–162KJ Analysis requirements, 171
Security dimension in quality, 102
Index 617
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 617
Segmentation, market, 81customer interviews for, 55financial value of, 81–86ratings by, 93–95strategy for, 86–90value chain mapping in, 105–106
Serviceability dimension in quality, 101Services
defined, 3quality characteristics for, 102–103
Severity (SEV) ratings in DFMEA, 264Shifts in long-term process variation, 322–325Shockley, William, 14Short-term process capability analysis, 321–322Short-term variation standard deviation,
319–320Siadat, Barry, 6Sigma levels
Cp index in, 326–328in long term variation costs, 35–36of processes, 30–31
Sigma shift in long-term process variation,322–325
Significance levels in hypothesis tests, 348Significance tests, 348–349Simple histogram option, 279, 281Simple Set of Numbers option, 312Simplex centroid designs
augmented, 454, 456with axial points, 453constraints in, 463–464for three components, 447–448
Simplex Design Plot option, 450, 462Single factor financial sensitivity, 36–38,
116–117Single input variable, regression analysis for,
384–390Skewed distributions, 282Slope coefficients, 384–385Small Invention Inside Paradigm invention level
in TRIZ, 215Smith, Bill, 5Solution generation in Ideation process, 184–185Solver tool, 475–478SOPs (standard operating procedures) in control
plans, 568Sorting Cause and Effects Matrix input variables,
253, 257
Special cause variationin Process Capability Analysis, 336in product development, 271–272
Special cubic equations, 447, 457Specifications, tightened, 32–33Spending S-curves, 27SS (sum of squares), 378, 385, 387SST (Step-Stress Testing), 500–502Stability
in data comparisons, 350–351, 357–358, 370,373–374
in product development process, 272–273Stability of object composition in TRIZ example,
225Stage-Gate systems, 20, 51
in business plans, 75–76managing, 62–66market analysis and product definition in, 55monitoring points for, 46new product concept finalized in, 55–57new product design and supporting
manufacturing process in, 58–59opportunity assessment in, 53–55product launch plan in, 60–61structure in, 51–53validate product and process design in, 58, 60
Standard deviationscomparing, 298
more than two samples, 370–374two samples, 355–359
confidence intervals for, 369for control charts, 287in hypothesis tests, 348long-term and short-term, 319–320for normal distributions, 277–278in OptQuest, 483–484pooled, 336, 362in Process Capability Analysis, 335–336in stability, 350–351in tolerance analysis, 521–522
Standard operating procedures (SOPs) in controlplans, 568
Standard order in mixture designs, 450Star points, 424–428Start-up, product, 537Statistical analysis tools, 271, 275–276
graphical analysis techniques. See Graphicalanalysis techniques
618 Index
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 618
measurement systems analysis. SeeMeasurement systems analysis
for non-normal data, 277for normality, 277numerical descriptive statistics, 297–300sample statistics for, 277selecting, 276–277for variation, 271–275
Statistical Process Control techniques, 269Statistical tolerancing, 515
analysis, 521best distribution fit
with Crystal Ball, 525, 527–529with Minitab, 523–527
Monte Carlo Simulation in, 529–532, 535optimizing variation in, 532–535Root Sum of Squares analysis, 517,
519–521variation levels in, 522worst case analysis, 516–518
Steady State Model, 561Steady-state portion of bathtub curve, 507Steepest ascent, 421, 423–424Step-Stress Testing (SST), 500–502Straight line equations, 385, 387Strategy
linking projects to, 41–42for market segmentation, 86–90
Stress conditionsin Design Maturity Testing, 488in Step Stress tests, 500
Structured methodology, 3, 20Subgroup analysis, 335–336Substantial Invention Inside Technology level in
TRIZ, 215Substitutes in product life cycle, 17–18Success measures
after-tax profit, 23–24Internal Rate of Return, 25money, 22–23Net Present Value, 24–25
Successes in post-mortem analysis, 582Sum of squares (SS), 378, 385, 387Supply-demand system in product life cycle,
17–18Supporting manufacturing process in Stage-Gate
systems, 58–59“Surprised and delighted” attribute, 16
Surveys. See Relative Importance SurveysSurvival Function for reliability, 510SWOT Analysis tool, 91
in Marketing Plan and Competitive Analysissection, 78
opportunities and threats, 92ratings by market segment, 93–95results of, 95–96in Stage-Gate systems, 55strengths and weaknesses, 92–93
System evolution in TRIZ, 216–217
t-testsfor mean comparisons
one-sample, 351–354paired, 365–367two-sample, 356, 360–363
Taguchi, Genichi, 431, 434Taguchi approach to robust design, 431–434“Taken for granted” attribute, 15–16Tangibles dimension in quality, 102Tape recorders in customer interviews, 148Target ranges in QFD, 202Target values, comparing means to, 348–354Tasks in schedule development, 70Team roles in customer interviews, 148Teaming relationships in market segmentation,
87–88Technical contradictions
description, 214TRIZ for. See TRIZ (Theory of Inventive
Problem Solving) toolTechnical interactions in QFD, 201Technical support, 578Technical system evolution in TRIZ, 216–217Technology
in Customer Selection Matrix, 140in market segmentation, 89–90
Technology category for interview questions, 142Technology Platform Projects, 48Terminology, glossary for, 585–593Test for Equal Variances option, 374–375Testimonials, 579Tests, hypothesis. See Hypothesis testing“The more the better” attribute, 16Theme
for Requirements KJ, 169–170for voice reduction, 164, 166
Index 619
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 619
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. See TRIZ(Theory of Inventive Problem Solving)tool
Three-response optimization, 473–478Tightened specifications, 32–33Time Lagged Cross Correlation, 561Time series analysis, 557, 561–563Titling
KJ Analysis image groups, 162–166KJ Analysis requirements, 171
Tolerance, statistical. See Statistical tolerancingTotal Sum of Squares value
for mean comparisons, 378in Process Capability Analysis, 336
Trace plots, 459–460Trade-off analyses, 214Training, product, 578Transactional customers, 87–88Transforming Properties principle in TRIZ, 225Transistors, 14–15Transitioning from Macro to Micro Level using
Energy Fields evolutionary pattern inTRIZ, 216–217
Translating voices, 167–169TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) tool,
214–215in business case for DFSS, 19–20Contradiction Matrix in, 217–222, 225example, 223–225final thoughts, 225key inventive principles in, 217–220, 222Law of Ideality in, 216levels of innovation in, 215–216for QFD, 201technical system evolution in, 216–217
Two-factor interaction effects, 411, 4142-level Fractional Factorial Design, 416–417,
4262-sample t-tests, 356, 360–363Two-sided confidence intervals, 367Type I errors, 344, 346Type II errors, 344Type of Customer characteristic, 140
UCL (Upper Control Limits) for control charts,286–287
Uncontrolled variables for Process VariablesMaps, 241
Unit variable cost projections, 107, 109Units in Attribute Sigma Calculator process, 339Unstable product development processes,
272–273Upper Control Limits (UCL) for control charts,
286–287Upper Specification Limit (USL) values
in Cp, 327in Cpk, 328, 330–331in long-term process capability analysis,
322–324in measurement system error, 305in short-term process capability analysis,
321–322in sigma levels, 30–32
Vacuum tubes, 13–15Validating product in Stage-Gate systems, 58, 60Value, product, 99
quality in, 100–103tools for, 105value chain mapping in, 103–106value concept, 99–100
Value-Added step for As-Is Process Maps, 244Value Chain Mapping tool, 78Value chains
mapping, 103–106QFDs across, 205, 209–211
Value Proposition Identification tool, 78Variable cost projections, 107, 109Variable relationships
regression analysis for, 276multiple, 390–396single input variable, 384–390
scatterplots for, 294–297Variables
in Cause and Effects Matrix, 247–253descriptive statistics for, 298–299for out-of-control conditions, 556–558Process Variables Maps, 237–238
big block process maps, 238–239input variables, 239–243output variables, 239
VariancesANOVA. See Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)comparing
three variances, 373–375two variances, 360–361
620 Index
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 620
in mixture experiments, 457–458in robust design, 443
Variationmeasurement. See Measurement systems
analysisoptimization, 532–535in OptQuest, 480–484, 533–534performance, 325–326, 430–431in product development, 271–275in robust design, 430–431, 436–438scorecards for, 230, 232in statistical tolerancing, 522worst case, 519
VCRs, BetaMax vs. VHS, 4Verification phase
in Design for Reliability, 489in FMEA, 504
Vertex points in mixture designs, 450VHS format vs. BetaMax, 4Voice of the Customer (VOC)
in Design for Reliability, 489–490in post-mortem analysis, 580in product confirmation, 540for variation, 274
Voices in KJ Analysis, 154recording, 166–167reducing, 164, 166–167theme for, 164, 166translating, 167–169
Volume in financial sensitivity analysis, 38Volume of Use characteristic, 140
Warranty costs, 512–514Waste estimates, 319–321Wear-out area in bathtub curve, 498–499, 507Weibull distribution
for best distribution fit, 523–524for reliability, 509–510, 512in statistical tolerancing, 529–530
Weibull power law, 494–495Weibull shape factor, 533–534Weight parameter for desirability function, 471–472Welch, Jack, 6White, T. K., 310Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests, 354–355Within Group Sum of Squares value, 336Work area in Ideation process, 183–184Worst case analysis, 516–518Worst case gap values, 517–518Worst case variation, 519“Wow” factor, 16
Xbar Chart by Operator graph, 318Xbar values for control charts, 286–287
YO OH, 160–161
Zero Failure Testing, 501
Index 621
34205 99 601-624 idx r4 mj.ps 10/4/06 5:44 PM Page 621