－79－

３．Record of Discussion（R/D）

－80－

－81－

－82－

－83－

－84－

－85－

－86－

－87－

－88－

－89－

－90－

－91－

－92－

４．調査日程表

No.

Date Day Activities Place

1 July 12 Mon （Consultant: NRT–BKK） BKK 2 13 Tue BKK - KTM

Internal meeting at JICA Nepal 16:00 Meeting with Mr. Ram Prasad BHANDARI 18:00 Meeting with Ms. Miwa HIASA

KTM

3 14 Wed Review of Baseline Survey Findings Finalize Check list for Interview with Ministries/Districts 11:00 am Meeting with M&E section, NPCS Mr. Tamang 12:30 Meeting with Agriculture section / Rural Development section, NPCS (Mr. Shrestha and Mr. Bhandari) 15:00 Meeting with Education section, NPCS (Mr. Khanal)

4 15 Thu 10:30 Meeting at ADB (Mr. Parwez and Ms. Shrestha) 12:00 Meeting at M&E Section, MoLD (Mr. Shrestha) 12:45 pm Meeting with M&E Specialist of LGCDP (Dr. Shrestha)

KTM

5 16 Fri 11:00 Meeting at MoE (Mr. Bhattarai, M&E Section, Mr. Dhungel SMES Core Trainer) 12:20 Meeting at MoAC (Mr. Adhikari) 14:30 Meeting at UNDP Project Office, NPC (Dr. Pradhan)

KTM

6 17 Sat Internal discussion KTM

7 18 Sun 09:00 Travel to Sindhupalchowk District 14:00 Meeting at DEO (Mr. Dahal) 15:30 Meeting at DFO (Mr. Bamjan) 16:40 Meeting at DADO (Mr. Tiwary)

Chautara

8 19 Mon 10:00 Meeting at DDC (Mr. Khadka) 12:00 Meeting at DSCO (Mr. Shrestha) 13:20 Travel back to Kathmandu (Mr. Takeda, Kimata NRT-BKK)

KTM

9 20

Tue (Mr. Takeda, Kimata BKK- KTM) 11:00 Meeting with JS, Economic Management Division, NPCS 14:00 Meeting with Mr. Vaidhya, UNICEF 14:30- CC to CR of JICA Nepal Meeting with JICA, Ms. Ishida (Chief of SMES)

KTM

10 21 Wed 11:00 CC to Secretary of NPCS (Mr. Pandey) 14:00 Meeting with MoF (JS Mr. Regmi, US Mr. Tripathi) 15:00 Meeting with JS of Poverty Monitoring Division, NPCS (Mr. Dahal) Meeting with M&E Section Chief, MoFSC (time to be confirmed)

KTM

11 22 Thu Internal discussion 15:10 Fly to Janakpur (PM)

Janakapur

12 23 Fri 07:00 Travel to Sindhuli (Morning) 09:30 Round table meeting with LDO/DDC and other line agencies 13:00 Travel back to Janakpur 16:05 Return back to KTM

KTM

13 24 Sat Internal Meeting Preparation for the Action Plan Workshop

KTM

14 25 Sun Internal Meeting 13:00 Planning workshop @ NPCS

KTM

－93－

15 26 Mon 14:00 M/M discussion with NPCS KTM

16 27 Tue Internal Discussion 16:00- M/M discussion

KTM

17 28 Wed 12:00- M/M Discussion KTM 18 29

Thu 9:00- Report to JICA

10:30- M/M Discussion with NPCS KTM-BKK

KTM

19 30 Fri BKK-NRT

－94－

Name Position NPCS Mr. Yuba Raj Pandey Secretary, NPCS Mr. Dhruba P. Dahal JS/Chief, PMD, NPCS Mr. Puspa Lal Shakya JS, Economic Management Division, NPCS Mr. Rabi Shankar Sainju Program Director, Macro Economic Section, NPCS Mr. Rudra Singh Tamang Program Director, M&E Section, NPCS Mr. Biju Kumar Shrestha Program Director, Agriculture and Forests Section, NPCS Ms. Rudra Devi Sharma Planning Officer, Agriculture and Forests Section, NPCS Ms. Nita Pokharel Planning Officer, Agriculture and Forests Section, NPCS Mr. Narayan P. Bhandari Planning Officer, Local Development Section

Mr. Sanjaya Kumar Khanal Program Director, Education and Human Resources Section, NPCS

Mr. Tej Prasad Panthi Planning Officer (Core Trainer), NPCS Mr. Subash Dhakal Computer Officer, NPCS Mr. Radha Krishna Pradhan Program Director, Infrastructure Section, NPCS Mr. Dhruba Bandhu Aryal Under Secretary (Core Trainer), Local Development Section,

NPCS Mr. Lava K.C. Program Director, NPCS Mr. Pashupati P Bhandari Under Secretary, M&E Section, NPCS Central Level Line Agencies

Mr. Lokdarshan Regmi JS/Chief, M&E Division, MoF Mr. Janardan P. Tripathi US, M&E Division, MoF Mr. Raj Kumar Malla JS, Planning and M&E Division, MoPPW Mr. Rajiv Ghimire SDE, PME Division, MoPPW Mr. Jivan K.C. SDE, PME Division, MoPPW Mr. Bikash Kafle Engineer, PME Divison, MoPPW Mr. Gobinda P. Adhikari Section Officer, PME Division, MoPPW Mr. Diwakar Dhungel Jt. Secretary, Education Review Office, MoE (Core Trainer) Mr. Gopal Prasad Bhattarai Under Secretary, M&E Section, MoE Mr. Dhan Bahadur Shrestha Under Secretary, M&E Section, MoLD Dr. Raghu Shrestha M&E Specialist, LGCDP Mr. Ram Babu Adhikari Senior Agriculture Economist, M&E Division, MoAC Mr. Buddhi Nath Bhattarai Agriculture Economist, M&E Division, MoAC Mr. Chevan P. Guragain US/ Chief M&E Section, MoFSC

Ms. Manju Adhikari Section Officer, MoE

Mr. Subas Chandra Shiwakoti US, DTCO Sankhuwasabaha (Core Trainer)

Mr. Ramesh Aryal Section Officer, M&E Section, MoLD (National Trainer)

Mr. Ram Krishna Shrestha Senior Extension Officer, MoAC

Mr. Bishnu G. C. Deputy Director, DoE (Core Trainer)

District Level Mr. Ganesh Gyawali LDO, DDC, Sindhuli Mr. Keshav Dahal DEO, DEO, Sindhupalchowk Mr. Badri Paudel School Administration Chief, DEO, Sindhupalchowk

５．主要面談者リスト

－95－

Name Position Mr. Bharat Subedi School Supervisor, DEO, Sindhupalchowk Mr. Sukman Bamjan Asst. DFO, DFO, Sindhupalchowk Mr. Dinesh Tiwary Sr. Agriculture Development Officer (Office-in-charge), DADO,

Sindhupalchowk Mr. Lokendra Bohora Plant Protection Officer, DADO, Sindhupalchowk Mr. Deepak Pyakurel Agriculture Extension Officer, DADO, Sindhupalchowk Mr. Bhattarai Act. Horticulture Development Officer, DADO,

Sindhupalchowk Mr. Dhruba Khadka Planning, Monitoring and Administrative Officer, DDC,

Sindhupalchowk Mr. Rajendra Pyakurel Information Officer, DDC, Sindhupalchowk Ms. Geeta Kharel Assistant, Planning Section, DDC, Sindhupalchowk Mr. Chandika Shrestha Assistant, Planning Section, DDC, Sindhupalchowk Mr. Niranjan Shrestha Chief, DSCO, Sindhupalchowk Mr. Keshav Raj Subedi Planning, Monitoring and Administrative Officer, DDC,

Sindhuli Mr. Sagar K. Dhakal Program Officer, DDC, Sindhuli

Mr. Dinesh K. Shah District Facilitator, LGCDP, DDC, Sindhuli

Mr. Dip Narayan Chaudhary Sub-Engineer, WSSDO, Sindhuli

Mr. Dilli P Paudel District Project Officer, JICA/COMCAP, Sindhuli

Mr. Kapil P Aryal Account Officer, DDC, Sindhuli

Mr. Gopal S Lamichhane Agriculture Extension Officer, DADO, Sindhuli

Mr. Upendra K Singh Planning Officer, DADO, Sindhuli

Mr. Rajendra P Sah Veterinary Officer, DLSO, Sindhuli

Mr. Shree Lal Chaudhary JTA (Planning Sector), DSCO, Sindhuli

Mr. Prabhansh Mandal Sub-Engineer, DSCO, Sindhuli

Mr. Rup Narayan Jha Officiating DFO, DFO, Sindhuli

Mr. Ram P Gajurel Sub-Engineer, DRSP, Sindhuli

Ms. Chandrakala Shrestha WDO, WDO, Sindhuli

Mr. Manoj K Dhakal US, DEO, Sindhuli

Mr. Shyam Sundar Shrestha Chief, DSCO, Sindhuli (Core Trainer)

Donor Organization Mr. Shahid Parwez Project/Program Implementation Officer, ADB Ms. Rachana Shrestha Governance and Capacity Building Officer, ADB Mr. Ashok Vaidhya Programme Specialist, Planning, M&E Section, UNICEF

Dr. Hari Pradhan Program Manager, Strengthening Planning and Monitoring Capacity of NPC (UNDP Project at NPC)

－96－

６．Plan of Operation（PO）案ネパ

ール

国モニタリング評

価システム強

化プロジェクト

As o

f 28

July

201

0

作業

工程

・人

月表

（案

）

現地

国内

現地

国内

現地

国内

現地

国内

現地

国内

12

34

56

89

#11

121

23

45

68

910

1112

12

34

56

89

1011

12I

23

Nep

ali F

isca

l Yea

r総括／有償案件評価

１総括／有償案件評価

0.90

0.10

6.50

0.10

7.00

0.00

5.00

0.20

19.4

00.

40政策・プログラムレベル評価

２政策･プ

ログラムレベル評価

0.30

0.10

2.70

0.10

3.00

0.00

1.50

0.20

7.50

0.40

訓練計画管理

３訓練計画管理

1.30

0.00

6.00

0.00

6.00

0.00

4.50

0.00

17.8

00.

00セミナー講師１

４セミナー講師1

0.00

0.00

0.50

0.00

0.50

0.00

0.50

0.00

1.50

0.00

セミナー講師2

５セミナー講師2

0.00

0.00

0.50

0.00

0.50

0.00

0.50

0.00

1.50

0.00

ｾﾐﾅ

ｰ講師３

6セミナー講師3

12

34

56

0.00

0.00

0.50

0.00

0.50

0.00

0.50

0.00

1.50

0.00

◎○

(1)基本方針の検討・確定

2.50

0.20

16.7

00.

2017

.50

0.00

12.5

00.

4049

.20

0.80

◎○

(2)基本方針の見直し

◎○

(3)最終報告書のとりまとめ

成果

1: 成果重視型

M&E

ガイドラインの普及に基づき、

NPC

Sの成果重視型

M&E

報告書の作成能力が強化される。

成果

2: N

PCが策定した成果重視型

M&E

ガイドラインに従って、パートナー省の

M&E

メカニズムが

改良

され

る。

成果

3: パ

イロット郡からパートナー省、

NPC

Sへの

M&E

結果の報告体制が強化される。

成果

4: M

&E結果を計画策定プロセスに反映するための

NPC

S内関係部局間及び

NPC

S－関係省庁間の調整メカニズムが強化される。

○

国 内 作 業 現 地 作 業

○○○

◎○

○○

○○

◎◎○

○

◎◎○

○

◎○

○

◎○

○

◎○

○

◎○

○

◎○

○

◎○

○

◎○

○

◎○

○

◎

第3年次

第4年次

合計

50.0

0

◎○

○

2-2

NPC

Sとパートナー省の行政官からなるセクター

調整タスクフォースを設置する。

○

◎○

○

○

2011

/12年

度20

12/1

3年度

2013

/14年

度第

2年

次第

3年

次

NPC

Sとパートナー省の行政官からなる

NPC

S調整タスクフォースを設置する。

1-2ナショナルレベルのM&E計画を作成する。

2010

/11

第1年次

第2年次

77

7

第4年

次

1-5成果重視型

M&E

の実施手法を策定する。

1-6ﾊﾟｲﾛｯﾄ郡

におけるパートナー省の

P1プロジェク

ト/プ

ログラムの

M&E

の進捗をモニタリングする。

第１年次

NPC

Sの能力をレビューする。

1-1

1-4

NPC

S行政官に対し、

M&E

結果分析に関する研

修を実施する。

1-3

2-1パートナー省の

M&E

能力、計画策定へのフィー

ドバック能力をレビューする。

1-7パートナー省から提出された

M&E

報告書を分析

する

1-8

M&E

報告書を毎年及び

4ヵ月毎に作成する。

2-6

M&E

実施手続をパイロット郡に指導する。

2-7パ

イロット郡

のプロジェクト／プログラムの

M&E

の進捗をモニタリングする。

2-4省行政官に対し、

M&E

研修を実施する。

2-5プロジェクト／プログラムM&Eの指標、報告書

式、手続きを修正／設定する。

◎○

○

◎○

◎○

○○

DD

Cとセクター郡事務所の

M&E

関連行政官から

なる郡調整タスクフォースを設置する。

M&E結果を踏まえた計画レビュー会合を開催す

る。

3-5

M&E

結果を計画レビュー会合で情報共有する。

パイロット郡における

M&E

、計画策定へのフィー

ドバック能力をレビューする。

3-1

2-8

3-4パイロット郡において、

M&E

実施手続に基づい

てプロジェクト／プログラムをモニタリングし、そ

3-3パイロット郡の行政官に対しM&E研修を実施す

る。

3-2

◎○

○

◎○

○ ○

◎○

○

◎○

○

◎○

◎○

○

4-2

M&E

結果を国家中期計画に反映するための

M&E

局と経済調整局の調整手続きを策定する。

4-3関係者間で成果･経

験共有セミナーを開催す

る。

4-1プロジェクト／

プログラムの

M&E結果を承認プロ

セスに反映するためのM&E局とセクター局の調

整手続きを策定する。

4-4

M&E

の実践からの経験・教訓に基づき政策決定

者への認識・理解を強化するための政策フォー

ラムを開催する。

2-3省

・セクター

M&E

計画を作成する。

2068

/69

2069

/70

2070

/71

2067

/68

－97－

Stre

ngth

enin

g M

onito

ring

and

Eval

uatio

n Sy

stem

in N

epal

Pro

ject

Pha

se 2

Tent

ativ

e Pl

an o

f Ope

ratio

n (P

O)

As o

f 28

July

201

0

Nep

ali F

isca

l Yea

rJa

pane

se F

isca

l Yea

rW

este

rn C

ar e

nder

12

34

56

89

##

121

23

45

68

9#

##

12

34

56

89

##

#I

23

45

68

Out

put 1

: N

PCS

capa

city

of f

orm

ulat

ing

resu

lt-ba

sed

M&E

repo

rt is

enh

ance

d ba

sed

on th

e ex

tens

ion

of R

esul

t-bas

ed M

&E G

uide

lines

Out

put2

: M&E

mec

hani

sm o

f Par

tner

Min

istri

es a

ccor

ding

to R

esul

t-bas

ed M

&E G

uide

lines

pre

pare

d by

NPC

is im

prov

ed

Out

put 3

: Rep

ortin

g an

d fe

edba

ck o

f M&E

resu

lts fr

om P

ilot D

istri

cts

to P

artn

er M

inis

tries

, and

NPC

S, a

re e

nhan

ced

Out

put 4

: Coo

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nism

s am

ong

divi

sion

s of

NPC

S an

d be

twee

n N

PCS

and

Partn

er M

inis

tries

are

enh

ance

d fo

r ref

lect

ing

M&E

resu

lts to

pla

nnin

g pr

oces

s

4-2

Form

ulat

e op

erat

iona

l pro

cedu

re to

coo

rdin

ate

betw

een

MED

and

EM

D fo

r ref

lect

ing

M&E

resu

lt to

revi

ew o

f nat

iona

l per

iodi

c pl

an

4-3

Org

aniz

e se

nsiti

zatio

n w

orks

hop

with

rele

vant

stak

ehol

ders

for s

harin

g M

&E re

sults

4-4

Org

aniz

e po

licy

foru

m fo

r enh

anci

ng a

war

enes

s an

dun

ders

tand

ing

of d

ecis

ion

mak

ers

base

d on

less

ons

lear

ned

from

M&E

pra

ctic

es

4-1

Form

ulat

e op

erat

iona

l pro

cedu

re to

coo

rdin

ate

betw

een

MED

and

Sec

tora

l Div

isio

ns fo

r ref

lect

ing

Dis

trict

Coo

rdin

atio

n TF

Dis

trict

Coo

rdin

atio

n TF

DD

Cs,

Line

Age

ncie

sD

DC

s,Li

ne A

genc

ies

Dis

trict

Coo

rdin

atio

n TF

DD

C, L

ine

Agen

cy

Dis

trict

Coo

rdin

atio

n TF

Task

forc

e Le

ader

s

Task

forc

e Le

ader

s

Sect

or C

oord

inat

ion

TFs

Sect

or C

oord

inat

ion

TFs

Sect

or C

oord

inat

ion

TFs

Sect

or C

oord

inat

ion

TFs

Sect

or C

oord

inat

ion

TFs

Sect

or C

oord

inat

ion

TFs

Sect

or C

oord

inat

ion

TFs

MED

and

Sec

tora

lD

ivis

ions

of N

PCS

NPC

S C

oord

inat

ion

TF

JS o

f MED

and

Sect

oral

Div

isio

nsJS

of M

ED a

ndSe

ctor

al D

ivis

ions

Task

forc

e Le

ader

Dis

trict

TF

Lead

ers

Sect

or T

F Le

ader

sSe

ctor

Coo

rdin

atio

n TF

s

Task

forc

e Le

ader

s

Task

forc

e Le

ader

s

Sect

or C

oord

inat

ion

TFs

3-5

Shar

e th

e M

&E re

sults

at r

evie

w m

eetin

g at

Pilo

tD

istri

cts

Rev

iew

of c

apac

ity o

f M&E

and

its

feed

back

to th

epl

anni

ng p

roce

ss in

Pilo

t Dis

trict

s

Task

forc

e Le

ader

s

Task

forc

e Le

ader

s

Task

forc

e Le

ader

s

3-1

3-4

Mon

itor P

roje

ct/P

rogr

am a

nd re

port

its re

sult

acco

rdin

gto

the

M&E

pro

cedu

re in

Pilo

t Dis

trict

s

Dis

trict

TF

Lead

ers

3-2

Esta

blis

h D

istri

ct C

oord

inat

ion

Com

mitt

ee c

onsi

st o

fof

ficer

s/st

aff m

embe

rs o

f DID

and

Par

tner

Lin

e

3-3

Con

duct

M&E

trai

ning

to s

taff

of P

ilot D

istri

cts

Task

forc

e Le

ader

NPC

S C

oord

inat

ion

Task

forc

e (T

F)N

PCS

Coo

rdin

atio

nTa

skfo

rce

Task

forc

e Le

ader

2-7

Org

aniz

e pl

anni

ng re

view

mee

ting

base

d on

the

M&E

resu

lt

Dis

trict

TF

Lead

ers

2-6

Mon

itor p

rogr

ess

of p

roje

cts/

prog

ram

s’ M

&E o

f Pilo

tD

istri

cts

Task

forc

e Le

ader

NPC

S C

oord

inat

ion

TF

NPC

S C

oord

inat

ion

TF

MED

and

Sec

tora

lD

ivis

ions

of N

PCS

Task

forc

e Le

ader

JS o

f MED

and

Sect

oral

Div

isio

ns

Task

forc

e Le

ader

s

MED

and

Sec

tora

lD

ivis

ions

of N

PCS

2-3

Con

duct

M&E

trai

ning

/WS

to P

artn

er M

inis

tries

'of

ficer

s

2-4

Rev

ise/

Set u

p in

dica

tor,

form

ant,

and

proc

edur

e fo

rpr

ojec

t/pro

gram

M&E

2-5

Inst

ruct

/Con

sult

M&E

pro

cedu

re to

Pilo

t Dis

trict

s

1-7

Prep

are

M&E

repo

rts a

nnua

lly/tr

imes

ter

1-8

Impr

ove

Res

ult-b

ased

M&E

Gui

delin

es b

ased

on

prac

tices

2-1

Rev

iew

of c

apac

ity o

f M&E

and

its

feed

back

to th

epl

anni

ng p

roce

ss in

Par

tner

Min

istri

es

1-4

Form

ulat

e op

erat

iona

l pro

cedu

re o

f Res

ult-b

ased

M&E

1-5

Mon

itor p

rogr

ess

of P

1 Pr

ojec

ts/P

rogr

ams’

M&E

of

Partn

er M

inis

tries

in P

ilot D

istri

cts

1-6

Anal

yze

M&E

repo

rts s

ubm

itted

by

Partn

er M

inis

tries

Rev

iew

of r

ole/

func

tion

of N

PCS

and

its c

apac

ity1-

1

1-3

Con

duct

trai

ning

/WS

of M

&E re

sults

ana

lysi

s to

NPC

S's

offic

ers

1-2

Esta

blis

h N

PCS

Coo

rdin

atio

n Ta

skfo

rce

cons

ist o

fdi

visi

on o

ffice

rs o

f NPC

S

2067

/68

77

7

2068

/69

2069

/70

2070

/71

2010

/11

Plan

ned

Activ

ities

Pers

on in

Cha

rge

Rem

arks

2011

2012

2013

Org

aniz

atio

n(C

entra

l)O

rgan

izat

ion

(Loc

al)

NPC

S C

oord

inat

ion

TF

NPC

S C

oord

inat

ion

TF

NPC

S C

oord

inat

ion

TF

NPC

S C

oord

inat

ion

TF

Task

forc

e Le

ader

Task

forc

e Le

ader

Task

forc

e Le

ader

Task

forc

e Le

ader

DD

C, L

ine

Agen

cy

DD

C, L

ine

Agen

cy

2-2

Esta

blis

h Se

ctor

Coo

rdin

atio

n Ta

skfo

rce

cons

ist o

fN

PCS

and

Partn

er M

inis

tries

Task

forc

e Le

ader

sSe

ctor

Coo

rdin

atio

n TF

s

2011

/12

2012

/13

2013

/14

2014

/15

2014

7

－98－

7

ND

AC▲

▲▲

▲▲

MD

AC▲

▲▲

▲▲

(Bim

onth

ly)

MD

AC▲

▲▲

▲

(Trim

este

r)

56

2067

/68

2011

71

23

4

Cha

itra

Bais

hakh

Jest

haAs

had

Man

sir

Pous

hM

agh

Farg

un

56

Farg

unC

haitr

aBa

isha

khJe

stha

2068

/69

Nep

ali F

Y

Wes

tern

Cal

enda

r12

1

Pous

hM

agh

23

48

910

1112

Asha

dSr

awan

Bhad

raAs

hoKa

rtic

－99－

７．ワークショップ結果

THE PROJECT on STRENGTHENING MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM in NEPAL (SMES) Phase 2

Participatory Workshop on SMES Phase 2 1 Background

Nepal is standing in political and social transition period with the dream of entering the New Nepal. Good Governance including strengthening M&E is one of the prioritized issues for the Government of Nepal (GoN).

GoN has committed to strengthen the M&E system to enhance their governance and to improve their socio-economic growth by effective and efficient use of the development resources. In order to support the GoN efforts, JICA has provided the technical assistance “the Strengthening the Monitoring and Evaluation System in Nepal (SMES) Project”. The counterpart agency of the SMES Project is National Planning Commission Secretariat (NPCS) with the key line ministries as partner ministries.

Through the SMES Project the key M&E human resources, core trainers and national trainers were trained and the monitoring reporting formats and the M&T training modules were updated and produced. However, further capacity development would be needed in order to institutionalize the more effective M&E system and to make the GoN agencies take action. The improvement in the monitoring system at the district level is also given high priority, for smooth promotion of the GoN decentralization and devaluation policy,

To cope with these challenges, the GoN requested JICA to conduct the SMES Phase 2 for providing further technical assistance to develop capacity in M&E.

JICA is conducting the preparatory survey for SMES Phase 2. Participatory Workshop will be conducted with concerned persons as one of the activities of the survey.

2 Objective

The objectives of the Participatory Workshop are:

(1) to provide a platform to discuss M&E issues for the government officers in Planning and M&E field;

(2) to review the achievement of improvement of M&E through the efforts of GoN, SMES Phase 1 and the other project supported by development partners; and

(3) to prepare and agree on the action plan to develop the individual and institutional M&E capacity to i) conduct project, program and policy evaluation and ii) to use the M&E results effectively.

3 Expected participants (The total number is around 20.)

Core Trainer and National Trainer of SMES Phase 1 Government officers in Planning and M&E Section/Division

4 Schedule and Venue (Tentative)

Date: 25 July 2010 Venue: Meeting Room at NPCS

－100－

Biju

Kum

ar S

hres

tha

SMES

Cor

e Tr

aine

r/ P

rogr

am D

irect

or o

f N

PCS

July

25,

201

0

Par

tici

pato

ry W

orks

hop

Stre

ngth

enin

g M

onit

orin

g &

Ev

alua

tion

Sys

tem

in N

epal

P

hase

2

－101－

Obj

ectiv

es a

nd S

trat

egie

s

SM

ES P

roje

ct a

imed

to

stre

ngth

en t

he

M&

E sy

stem

in N

epal

thr

ough

the

thr

ee

spec

ific

str

ateg

ies:

To

str

engt

hen

the

M&

E hu

man

res

ourc

es o

f N

PCS

and

the

key

min

istr

ies

To

mak

e M

&E

proc

ess/

outp

uts

mor

e ef

ficie

nt b

y up

datin

g M

&E

form

ats,

man

uals

and

gui

delin

es

To im

prov

e th

e aw

aren

ess

and

supp

ort

of t

he

polic

y m

aker

s an

d th

e pl

anni

ng o

ffic

ers

and

to

stre

ngth

en t

he li

nkag

e be

twee

n th

em a

nd M

&E

－102－

Goa

ls a

nd O

utpu

tsRe

sults

of M

&E

are

refle

cted

in t

he p

roce

ssof

pol

icy

form

ulat

ion,

pro

ject

pla

nnin

g an

d im

plem

enta

tion

M&

E ca

pabi

litie

s ar

e st

reng

then

ed

Per

son

nel

Trai

ned

M&

ETo

ols

Imp

rove

d

Man

agem

ent

Su

pp

ort

Im

pro

ved

－103－

Targ

et G

roup

Targ

etar

eaB

ased

in K

athm

andu

, the

Pro

ject

will

cov

er th

e na

tion

wid

e ar

ea o

f Nep

al a

s its

targ

et a

rea

(SM

ES P

ilot D

istr

icts

: Par

bat,

Mor

ang

and

Jum

la

Ind

irec

t ta

rget

gro

up

Offi

cial

s of

the

cent

ral a

nd th

e di

stric

t go

vern

men

t age

ncie

s, w

ho w

ill b

e tr

aine

d by

the

offic

ials

trai

ned

by th

e Pr

ojec

t

Dir

ect

targ

etg

rou

pO

ffici

als

of th

e M

&E

units

of t

he

rele

vant

gov

ernm

ent a

genc

ies

at th

e ce

ntra

l and

the

loca

l lev

els

Par

tner

gro

up

Offi

cial

s of

PM

D, N

PCJC

C M

embe

rs

－104－

Capa

city

Dev

elop

men

t in

M&

E Le

ads

to…

.B

ette

r Res

ourc

e A

lloca

tion

and

Impr

oved

Acc

ount

abili

ty a

nd T

rans

pare

ncy

Effic

ient

and

Pr

actic

al M

&E

Tool

s/Pr

oces

s

Tim

ely

and

Qua

lity

Out

puts

of M

&E

Out

puts

of M

&E

Ref

lect

ed to

Po

licy

and

Proj

ect F

orm

ulat

ion

and

Impl

emen

tatio

n

M&

E H

uman

R

esou

rces

D

evel

oped

Link

age

with

Pl

anne

rs a

nd

Dec

isio

n M

aker

s

－105－

Less

ons

Lear

nt

Co

mm

itmen

t –

Polit

ical

Lea

ders

Co

-ord

inat

ion

–Ce

ntra

l Eco

nom

ic

Agen

cies

Ev

alua

tion

Soci

ety

M

ando

tory

Sys

tem

–Le

sson

Lea

rnin

g

Eval

uatio

n Ac

t

－106－

Prog

ress

rev

iew

of

Prob

lem

s to

hav

e be

en s

olve

d in

M&

E

Wha

t w

ere

mai

n is

sues

?

Cor

e pr

oble

m:

M&

E R

esul

ts a

re n

ot r

efle

cted

pr

oper

ly t

o pl

anni

ng p

roce

ss,

impr

ovin

g im

plem

enta

tion

, and

ac

coun

tabi

lity.

－107－

Prog

ress

rev

iew

of

Prob

lem

s to

hav

e be

en s

olve

d in

M&

EW

hat

wer

e m

ain

caus

es o

f co

re

prob

lem

?

1. L

uck

of H

uman

Res

ourc

es in

M&

E2.

Ine

ffic

ient

, unc

lear

M&

E Sy

stem

, P

roce

ss, a

nd T

ools

3. L

uck

of li

nkag

e be

twee

n M

&E

offi

cers

an

d P

lann

ers

/Dec

isio

n M

aker

s4.

Luc

k of

aw

aren

ess

of M

&E

impo

rtan

ce

－108－

Cons

eque

nces

of

the

Prob

lem

In

crea

sed

risk

of f

orm

ulat

ing

unre

alis

tic

proj

ects

;

Serio

us c

onse

quen

ces

and

gaps

in p

olic

y fo

rmul

atio

n an

d im

plem

enta

tion;

Lo

w L

evel

of

inst

itutio

naliz

atio

n of

info

rmat

ion;

In

com

plet

ion

of d

evel

opm

ent

proj

ect

in

stip

ulat

ed p

erio

d;

N

ot t

o m

aint

ain

an a

ppro

pria

te s

tand

ard

of

proj

ects

; an

d

Lack

of

inco

rpor

atio

n of

exp

erie

nces

gai

ned

from

com

plet

ed p

roje

cts

in t

he f

orm

ulat

ion

proc

ess

of n

ew p

roje

cts

－109－

Prog

ress

rev

iew

of

Prob

lem

s to

hav

e be

en s

olve

d in

M&

E

1. H

uman

Res

ourc

es in

M&

E

－110－

Prog

ress

rev

iew

of

Prob

lem

s to

hav

e be

en s

olve

d in

M&

E

2. M

&E

Syst

em, T

ools

, and

Pro

cess

－111－

Prog

ress

rev

iew

of

Prob

lem

s to

hav

e be

en s

olve

d in

M&

E

3. L

inka

ge b

etw

een

M&

E of

fice

rs a

nd

Pla

nner

s /D

ecis

ion

Mak

ers

－112－

Prog

ress

rev

iew

of

Prob

lem

s to

hav

e be

en s

olve

d in

M&

E

Wha

t ar

e co

ntin

uous

issu

es t

o be

ta

ckle

d ? in

Nex

t se

ssio

n

－113－

Dev

elop

men

t Re

sults

Pra

ctic

es in

Nep

al

Leve

l P

lann

ing

Bud

geti

ng

Mon

itor

ing

Res

ults

Nat

iona

l PR

SPLo

g fr

ame

base

dM

TEF

PMAS

PRSP

pr

ogre

ss r

epor

ts

Sect

oral

Busi

ness

pla

nAs

sec

tora

l PRS

MTE

FPM

ASSe

ctor

al

mat

rices

Proj

ect

Log

fram

eM

anda

tory

Perf

orm

ance

ba

sed

budg

etPe

rfor

man

ce

indi

cato

rs

Loca

l D

PPs

D-M

TEF

DPM

AS

－114－

Alig

nmen

t Mod

el

Sect

oral

con

trib

utio

n to

pov

erty

redu

ctio

n

Goa

ls,

Targ

ets

+ In

dica

tors

Peri

odic

Pla

n

Sect

or C

hapt

ers

+ M

IS In

dica

tors

Com

mon

Indi

cato

rs

Sect

oral

M

aste

r Pla

ns,

Sect

oral

Po

licie

s, e

tc.

Prog

ram

/ Pr

ojec

tsM

DG

sPR

SP /

Peri

odic

Pla

nSe

ctor

Pla

ns/

Stra

tegi

es

－115－

16

AD

B T

A 4

765

MfD

R -I

Hel

p m

ains

trea

m M

fDR

in N

PC

, MLD

&

MP

PW

G

uide

lines

/res

ult

mat

rixes

PM

AS/M

&E/

Perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs

Inte

r-m

inis

teria

l roa

d se

ctor

pla

n

H

elp

Jhap

a, D

ang

and

Jum

la D

DC

s op

erat

iona

lize

MfD

R-

Stre

ngth

enin

g D

IDC

-D

PMAS

/M&

E/Pe

rfor

man

ce in

dica

tors

-H

ouse

hold

sur

vey

in o

ne d

istr

ict

re-g

over

nanc

e se

rvic

es/b

enef

its

－116－

17

TA

476

5 P

roje

ct O

bjec

tive

s co

ntd.

C

apac

ity

build

ing

-Tr

aini

ng (

exte

rnal

/dom

estic

)-

Info

rmat

ion

netw

orki

ng a

nd e

quip

men

ts

R

ETA -An

othe

r AD

B TA

hel

ping

to

asse

ss a

nd c

arry

out

M

fDR

at D

hanu

sha

Dis

tric

t D

evel

opm

ent

Co

mm

ittee

, Min

istr

y of

Edu

catio

n an

d Sp

orts

an

d D

epar

tmen

t of

Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Se

wer

age,

MPP

W

－117－

Lear

ning

St

rong

Lea

ders

hip,

pol

itica

l com

mitm

ent

and

min

dset

sup

port

ing

orga

niza

tiona

l ob

ject

ive

In

stitu

tiona

l mem

ory

and

rete

ntio

n of

st

aff

Li

nkin

g m

onito

ring

with

ince

ntiv

es (

both

in

divi

dual

and

org

aniz

atio

n) a

nd

acco

unta

bilit

y st

ruct

ures

Av

aila

bilit

y of

Bas

elin

e da

ta f

or

indi

cato

rs

－118－

Lear

ning

Con

td.

Co

ntin

uous

mon

itorin

g an

d su

ppor

t fr

om h

ighe

r au

thor

ities

Cont

inui

ty o

f M

TEF

Co

ntin

uous

han

ds-o

n su

ppor

t pa

rtic

ular

ly in

the

dis

tric

ts

Incr

ease

d m

otiv

atio

n at

ag

ency

/per

sona

l lev

el

－119－

20

Hap

py D

elib

erat

ions

Tha

nk Y

ou

－120－

Modality 

Ensure implementation transparency  Improved M&E related guidelines etc in an integrated way with practical level improvements 

(uniform to all) 

Points discussed to consider while formulating II Phase: 

M&E project should come under SWAp modality  M&E system needs to be diagnosed to find out the real gap 

What sort of interface between the planning and M&E functions well 

How to make the tools… developed operational  Can we refine tools at the sectoral level  We need to focus HR development as like in the first phase  M&E tools should be developed on sectoral b asis  Focus on RB M&E Guidelines  Evaluation system (as like in Vietnam), third party evaluation system needs to be introduced 

Design of the project needs to be flexible so that during the implementation we can switch over to some activities to some other felt important 

Logistics support should also be included  Is not the scale of the project too small, if it will be considering only the Sindhuli corridor. How the linkage will be developed at the NPC level with this level of intervention? 

－121－

Priority needs to be given to those areas felt necessary and /or left during the implementation of Phase I 

Gaps/needs/issues of the sectoral ministries needs to be addressed (Database, M&E tools, etc.) 

Skill needs to be developed in the area of policy analysis  Difference between the monitoring to be done by Ministry, Department and District needs to be delineated (district – implementation; ministry – policy; deparment – program ). How can we link the district level monitoring to the higher level? 

Focus on accountability might strengthen M&E system  Clear linkage has not been established in our design, therefore, the project needs to focus on establishing clear linkages among activities, outputs and so on so that clear indicators can be set out for monitoring. (Health, Education have good indicators; but agriculture is vauge). 

More investment is necessary for database management  To address the above problems, sectoral MIS might be helpful 

Capacity building system needs to be continuous  Orientation is necessary on Pink Book (still we find some inconsistencies and unclear) 

Present reporting is quantitative (eg. 67 % refers for what qualitative value: necessity …… number of teachers received training) 

－122－

Such kind of project needs to be internalized in our own system. Should be need based, not supply based. 

Maximum utilization of resources. More funds needs to be spend for program and not for consultancies. 

Flexibility should be there for the targeted areas.  Instead of giving high money for consultant, project itself can do the need assessment. 

Develop implementation modality of all the existing systems/tools 

Operationalization of RB M&E guidelines even at the ministry level might be a challenge 

How to ensure good flow of information between ministry and the districts  

Reflection of M&E results after analysis (at the ministry level and NPCS) – necessary to improve the performance 

Discussion will be continued to discuss with NPCS and line ministries while formulating the II phase. 

NPC – RB M&E guidelines. Most of the issues raised in this workshop will be solved after the implementation of the guidelines for ex. Indicators, linkages among offices 

Capacity building support  IT system support (DPMAS‐already finished, PMAS, PPIS) rigorous training might be necessary 

－123－

Need to internalize these systems – MfDR: running, UNDP: still running, Australian: thinking to support, JICA is planning) ‐  

－124－

THE PROJECT on STRENGTHENING MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM in NEPAL (SMES) Phase 2

Participatory Workshop on SMES Phase 2 1 Background

Nepal is standing in political and social transition period with the dream of entering the New Nepal. Good Governance including strengthening M&E is one of the prioritized issues for the Government of Nepal (GoN).

GoN has committed to strengthen the M&E system to enhance their governance and to improve their socio-economic growth by effective and efficient use of the development resources. In order to support the GoN efforts, JICA has provided the technical assistance “the Strengthening the Monitoring and Evaluation System in Nepal (SMES) Project”. The counterpart agency of the SMES Project is National Planning Commission Secretariat (NPCS) with the key line ministries as partner ministries.

Through the SMES Project the key M&E human resources, core trainers and national trainers were trained and the monitoring reporting formats and the M&T training modules were updated and produced. However, further capacity development would be needed in order to institutionalize the more effective M&E system and to make the GoN agencies take action. The improvement in the monitoring system at the district level is also given high priority, for smooth promotion of the GoN decentralization and devaluation policy,

To cope with these challenges, the GoN requested JICA to conduct the SMES Phase 2 for providing further technical assistance to develop capacity in M&E.

JICA is conducting the Detailed Planning Survey for SMES Phase 2. Participatory Workshop will be conducted with concerned persons as one of the activities of the Survey.

2 Objective

The objectives of the Participatory Workshop are:

(1) to provide a platform to discuss M&E issues for the government officers and other concerned persons in planning and M&E field in the district;

(2) to discuss improvement area related to M&E in the district; and (3) to prepare the action plan to develop the individual and institutional M&E capacity

to i) implement project, ii) monitor project, and iii) use the M&E results effectively.

3 Expected participants (The total number is around 25.)

LDO, Planning Officers, Social Development Officers, and other officers related to planning and M&E at DDC

Planning Officers and Officers in charge of M&E of line agencies Other concerned persons in charge of planning and/or M&E

4 Schedule and Venue (Tentative)

Date: 23 July 2010 Time: to be considered Venue: Meeting Room at DDC (tentative)

－125－

Polic

ies

/ G

uid

elin

es

/Form

ats

Org

aniz

atio

n S

tructu

re /

Fin

ancia

l / H

um

anR

eso

urc

es

Pra

ctices

of

M&E

Utiliz

atio

n o

f M

&E

Resu

lts

Oth

er

Unst

able

indi

cat

ors

to b

em

onitore

dLac

k of

eff

ective

ness

of

the m

onitoring

mechan

ism

Inad

equ

acy

in im

pact

asse

ssm

ent

Monitoring

bein

gdo

ne f

or

the s

ake o

fm

onitoring

Difficulty

in f

ield

monitoring

due t

oge

ogr

aphic

alN

o d

irective

s fr

om

DW

SS

rega

rdin

g filli

ng

of

the

form

ats;

ask

ing

only

for

sendi

ng

progr

ess

repo

rt

Ineff

ective

M&E b

eac

ause

of

hav

ing

monitoring

from

the im

plem

enta

tion u

nit

Eye

witness

typ

e o

f m

onitoring,

not

base

d on s

om

e indi

cat

ors

Sugg

est

ions

from

monitoring

are n

ot

impl

em

ente

d

Less

motiva

tion f

or

monitoring

as t

he

probl

em

s ra

ised

are n

ot

addr

ess

ed

Repo

rtin

g fo

rms

are v

ery

com

plex

for

impl

em

enta

tion

Lac

k of

prope

r kn

ow

ledg

e o

n m

onitoring

Monitoring

is n

ot

condu

cte

d at

diff

ere

nt

leve

l of

impl

em

enta

tion

Fin

dings

of

the

monitoring

are n

ot

disc

uss

ed

and

utiliz

ed

in f

urt

her

Monitoring

should

be

on-go

ing

activi

ty

Com

mitte

e led

by D

DC

exi

sts

with T

oR

, bu

t th

ispr

ocess

is

not

eff

ective

Lac

k of

qual

ifie

d a

nd

cap

able

sta

ff o

nm

onitoring;

thus

hav

ing

poor

monitoring

Monitoring

is n

ot

tied

up

with

obj

ective

/qu

antita

tive

/qu

alitat

ive

Pro

blem

s re

port

ed

to t

he c

ente

r ar

enot

addr

ess

ed

Not

syst

em

led,

but

indi

vidu

al b

ased

gove

rnan

ce

Not

cle

ar o

n m

onitoring

and

eva

luat

ion

repo

rt w

riting

Mis

mat

ch o

f im

plem

enta

tion

tim

ing

and

monitoring

tim

ing

Futu

re p

lan s

hould

be b

ased

on M

&E

Monitoring

agency

isnot

functional

Difficult t

o m

anag

e t

he t

ime o

f th

e p

ers

on

resp

onsi

ble f

or

monitoring

No f

eedb

ack

is p

rovi

ded

from

the a

uth

orities

on t

he r

esu

lt o

fm

onitoring

and

repo

rtin

gLac

k of

reso

urc

es

Monitoring

is n

ot

eff

ective

; no

monitoring

culture

Lac

k of

staf

fR

evi

ew

is

just

in q

uan

tity

Lac

k of

trai

nin

g to

monitoring

staf

fN

o e

valu

atio

nN

o v

ehic

le f

or

field

vis

itN

o b

udg

et

as p

er

the n

eeds

No s

epa

rate

budg

et

for

M&E

M&E R

ela

ted

Pro

blem

s - O

utp

ut

of Sin

dhuli

Work

shop