4 inventory management and risk pooling

Upload: spandana-achanta

Post on 10-Oct-2015

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

role of ngo

TRANSCRIPT

  • Inventory Management &

    Risk Pooling

  • Introduction

    General Motors in 1984:z Logistic network consisted of 20,000 supplier plants, 133

    parts plants, 31 assembly plants, and 11,000 dealers.

    z Freight transportation costs were about $4.1 billion, of which 60 percent for material shipments.

    z GM inventory was valued at $7.4 billion, of which 70 percent was WIP and the rest was finished vehicles.

    Response:-Inventory Management in Supply Chain

  • Goals of Inventory Management

    z By effectively managing inventory:z GM has reduced parts inventory and transportation costs

    by 26% annually z Xerox eliminated $700 million inventory from its supply

    chainz Wal-Mart became the largest retail company utilizing

    efficient inventory management

    Reduce Cost, Improve Service

    Inventory Levels FinancialInvestment

    OperationalNeed

  • Inventory

    z Where do we hold inventory?

    z Suppliers and manufacturers

    z warehouses and distribution centers

    z retailers

    z Types of Inventory: General classification

    z WIP

    z raw materials

    z finished goods

  • Functions of Inventory

    zTo meet anticipated demand

    zTo smooth production requirements

    zTo decouple operations

    zTo protect against stock-outs

    zTo take advantage of order cycles

    zTo help hedge against price increases

    zTo take advantage of quantity discounts

  • Factors Affecting Inventory Policy

    z Demand Characteristics: known in advance or random

    z Lead Time

    z Number of Different Products Stored in the Warehouse

    z Economies of scale offered by suppliers & transport

    companies

    z Length of Planning Horizon

    z Service level desired

  • 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300350

    Ordering (Acquisition)Costs

    Holding

    or Car

    rying C

    ostsTota

    l CostsEconomic Order Quantity

    Economic Order Quantity Model

    Assuming demand certainty

    Trade-offs between setup costs and inventory holding costs, but ignores issues such as demand uncertainty and forecasting.

  • Single Period Model Without Initial Inventory

  • Case: Swimsuit Production

    A company designs, produces, and sells summer fashion items such as swimsuits.

    The company has to commit itself six months before summer to specific production quantities for all its products

    predicting demand for each product.

    The trade-offs are clear: overestimating customer demand will result in unsold inventory while underestimatingcustomer demand will lead to inventory stockouts and loss of potential customers.

  • Demand forecast

    forecast averages about 13,100

    The marketing department uses historical data from the last five years, current economic conditions, and other factors to construct a probabilistic forecast of the demand.

    11% 11%

    28%

    22%

    18%

    10%

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000Unit sales

  • Swimsuit Costs

    z Production cost per unit (C): $80

    z Selling price per unit (S): $125

    z Salvage value per unit (V): $20

    z Fixed production cost (F): $100,000

    z Q is production quantity, D: demand

    z Profit = Revenue - Variable Cost - Fixed Cost + Salvage

  • Swimsuit Two Scenarios

    z Scenario One:z Suppose you make 12,000 jackets and demand ends up

    being 13,000 jackets.z Profit = 125(12,000) - 80(12,000) - 100,000 = $440,000

    z Scenario Two:z Suppose you make 12,000 jackets and demand ends up

    being 11,000 jackets.z Profit = 125(11,000) - 80(12,000) - 100,000 + 20(1000) =

    $ 335,000

  • Swimsuit Best Questions ?

    z Find order quantity that maximizes weighted average profit?

    zWill this quantity be less than, equal to, or greater than average demand?

  • How much to Make?

    z Marginal cost Vs. marginal profitz if extra jacket sold, profit is 125-80 = 45z if not sold, cost is 80-20 = 60

    z So we will make less than average

  • Swimsuit Expected Profit

    Expected Profit

    $0

    $100,000

    $200,000

    $300,000

    $400,000

    8000 12000 16000 20000

    Order Quantity

    P

    r

    o

    f

    i

    t

    If Quantity ordered is 12000Profit = (0.78)*12000*125+ 8000*125+ 10000*125-80*12000-100000+4000*0.11*20+2000*0.11*20= 1170000+247500 960000 -100000 + 13200= 3070700

  • Swimsuit : Important Observations

    z Tradeoff between ordering enough to meet demand and ordering too much

    z Several quantities have the same average profitz Average profit does not tell the whole storyz 9000 and 16000 units lead to about the same average

    profit, so which do we prefer?

  • Swimsuit Expected Profit

    Expected Profit

    $0

    $100,000

    $200,000

    $300,000

    $400,000

    8000 12000 16000 20000

    Order Quantity

    P

    r

    o

    f

    i

    t

  • Case: Swimsuit Production

    z But Need to understand risk associated with certain decisions.

    z A frequency histogram provides information about potential profit for the two given production quantities, 9,000 units and 16,000 units. The possible risk and possible reward increases as we increase the production size.

  • Probability of Outcomes

    0 0 0 0 0

    0 . 8 9

    0 00

    0 . 11 0 . 11

    0 0

    0 . 2 8

    0

    0 . 2 2

    0

    0 . 2 8

    0 . 11

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

    100%

    -

    3

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -

    2

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0 0

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    3

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    5

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    6

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Profit

    P

    r

    o

    b

    a

    b

    i

    l

    i

    t

    y

    Q =9000Q =16000

  • Key Points from this Case

    z The optimal order quantity is not necessarily equal to average forecast demand

    z The optimal quantity depends on the relationship between marginal profit and marginal cost

    z As order quantity increases, average profit first increases and then decreases

    z As production quantity increases, risk increases. In other words, the probability of large gains and of large losses increases

  • Single Period Model With Initial Inventory

  • Initial Inventory

    z Suppose that one of the jacket designs is a model produced last year.

    z Some inventory is left from last yearz Assume the same demand pattern as beforez If only old inventory is sold, no setup cost

    z Question: If there are 7000 units remaining, what should the company do? What should they do if there are 10,000 remaining?

  • Initial Inventory and Profit

    0100000200000300000400000500000

    5

    0

    0

    0

    6

    0

    0

    0

    7

    0

    0

    0

    8

    0

    0

    0

    9

    0

    0

    0

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    1

    1

    0

    0

    0

    1

    2

    0

    0

    0

    1

    3

    0

    0

    0

    1

    4

    0

    0

    0

    1

    5

    0

    0

    0

    1

    6

    0

    0

    0

    Production Quantity

    P

    r

    o

    f

    i

    t

    The case motivates a powerful (s,S) inventory policy (or a min maxpolicy): s is the reorder point and S is the order-up-to-level

  • Multi-Order Opportunities under Uncertainties

  • Inventory Policies

    z Continuous review policyz in which inventory is reviewed every day and a

    decision is made about whether and how much to order.

    z Periodic review policyz in which the inventory level is reviewed at regular

    intervals and an appropriate quantity is ordered after each review.

  • Variable Demand with a Fixed ROP

    Reorderpoint, R

    Q

    LTTime

    LT

    I

    n

    v

    e

    n

    t

    o

    r

    y

    l

    e

    v

    e

    l

    0

    Result of uncertainty

  • Reorder Point with a Safety Stock

    Reorderpoint, R

    Q

    LTTime

    LT

    I

    n

    v

    e

    n

    t

    o

    r

    y

    l

    e

    v

    e

    l

    0Safety Stock

    The amount of safety stock needed is based on the degree of uncertainty in the lead time demand and desired customer service level

  • Determinants of the Reorder Point

    z The rate of demand

    z The lead time

    z Demand and/or lead time variability

    z Stockout risk (safety stock)

  • Continuous Review Policy

    zAVG = Average daily demand faced zSTD = Standard deviation of daily demand faced zL = Replenishment lead time zh = Cost of holding one unit of the product per unit timez = service level (the probability of stocking out is 1 )

    hpp+=p =shortage cost

  • Continuous Review Policy

    z The inventory position at any point in time is the actual inventory at the warehouse plus items ordered by the distributor that have not yet arrived minus items that are backordered.

    z The reorder level, R consists of two components: the average inventory during lead time, which is the product of average daily demand and the lead time; and the safety stock, which is the amount of inventory that the distributor needs to keep at the warehouse and in the pipeline to protect against deviations from average demand during lead time.

  • Continuous Review Policy Variable demand & fixed lead time

    z Average demand during lead time is exactly

    z Safety stock is

    where z is a constant, referred to as the safety factor.

    This constant is associated with the service level.

    z The reorder level is

    z Economic lot size is

    LSTDz AVGL

    LSTDzAVGL +

    hAVGKQ = 2

  • Continuous Review Policy Variable demand & fixed lead time The expected level of inventory before receiving the order

    is (lowest level i.e. Safety Stock)

    The expected level of inventory immediately after receiving the order is (highest level)

    The average inventory level is the average of these two values

    LSTDzQ +

    LSTDzQ +2

    LSTDz

  • z In many situation, the lead time to the warehouse must be assumed to be normally distributed with average lead time denoted by AVGL and standard deviation denoted by STDL. In this case, the reorder point is calculated as

    where AVG * AVGL represents average demand during lead time, &

    is the standard deviation of demand during lead time. The amount of safety stock that has to be kept is equal to

    222 STDLAVGSTDAVGLzAVGLAVG ++=

    222 STDLAVGSTDAVGLz +

    222 STDLAVGSTDAVGL +

    Continuous Review Policy Variable demand & lead time

  • Periodic Review Policy

    z Inventory level is reviewed periodically at regular intervals and an appropriate quantity so as to arrive at base stock level is ordered after each review . z Since inventory levels are reviewed at a periodic interval, the fixed cost

    of placing an order is a sunk cost and hence can be ignored.

    z This level of the inventory position should be enough to protectthe warehouse against shortages until the next order arrives.

    z The next order should cover demand during a period of r + Ldays, with r being the length of review period and L being the lead time.

  • Periodic Review Policy

    z Thus, the base-stock level should include two components: average demand during an interval of r + Ldays, which is equal to

    z and the safety stock, which is calculated aswhere z is a safety factor.

    AVGLr + )(

    LrSTDz +

  • Periodic Review Policy (with SS)

  • Periodic Review Policy

    Maximum inventory level is achieved immediately after receiving an order, while the minimum level of inventory is achieved just before receiving an order. It is easy to see that the expected level of inventory after

    receiving an order is

    while the expected level of inventory before an order arrives is just the safety stock

    Hence, the average inventory level is the average of these two values

    LrSTDzAVGr ++

    LrSTDz +LrSTDzAVGr ++

    2

  • RISK POOLING

  • Risk Poolingz Consider these two systems:

    Market Two

    SupplierWarehouse One

    Warehouse Two

    Market One

    Market Two

    Supplier WarehouseMarket One

    Questions: Q1: For the same service level, which system will require more inventory?Q2: For the same total inventory level, which system will have better service?

  • What is Risk Pooling?

    The idea behind risk pooling is to redesign the supply chain, the production process, or the product to either reduce the uncertainty the firm faces or to hedge uncertainty so that the firm is in a better position to mitigate the consequence of uncertainty.

    Location pooling

    Product pooling

    Lead Time pooling

    Capacity pooling

  • Lead Time Pooling

    Store 1

    S

    u

    p

    p

    l

    i

    e

    r

    Store 100

    8-week lead time

  • Lead Time Pooling

    Store 1

    S

    u

    p

    p

    l

    i

    e

    r

    Store 100

    8-week lead time

    Retail DC

    1-week lead time

  • Capacity Pooling

    3 Links no flexibility

  • Capacity Pooling

    9 Links Total Flexibility

  • Advantages / Disadvantages Advantages Disadvantages

    Location Pooling reduce demand variabilitycreates distance between inventory and

    customers

    reduce expected inventory investment needed to achieve a target service level

    Product Pooling reduction in demand variability potentially degrades product functionalitybetter performance in terms of

    matching supply and demand

    Lead Time Pooling decrease lead time extra costs of operating distribution center

    keep inventory closer to customer additional transportation costs

    reduce inventory investment

    Capacity Pooling accommodate demand uncertainty large costs to have flexibility

  • Summary Risk Poolingz Risk-pooling strategies are most effective when demands

    are negatively correlated because then the uncertainty

    with total demand is much less than the uncertainty

    with any individual item/location

    z Risk-pooling strategies do not help reduce pipeline inventory

    z Risk-pooling strategies can be used to reduce inventory while maintaining the same service or they can be used

    to increase service while holding the same inventory

  • Example

    Decentralized system:total SS = 47.88total avg. invent. = 179

    Safety Stock SS = z STD LReorder Point R = AVGL + SSOrder Quantity Q = sqrt(2*C0*AVG/h)Order-up-to-level R + QAverage Inventory SS + Q/2

    AVG STD SS R Q Order-up-to Level AverageInventory

    Warehouse 1 39.3 13.2 25.08 65 132 197 91

    Warehouse 2 38.6 12.0 22.8 62 131 193 88CentralizedWarehouse 77.9 20.7 39.35 118 186 304 132

    Service Level:97% k=1.88Lead Time= 1 week

    Q/2+SS

  • Risk Pooling Effect of Correlationz The benefits of risk pooling depend on the

    behavior of demand from one market relative to the demand from another market.

  • WarehouseMarket 1

    Market 2

    D1+D2: (, 2)

    Calculating demand variability of centralized system

    Warehouse 1

    Warehouse 2

    Market 1

    Market 2

    D1: (1, 12)D2: (2, 22)

    2 = 12 + 22 + 212, where -1 12 = 12 + 22 + 212,

    where -1 1

    : correlation coefficient of D1, D2

    1+ 2 1+ 2

    Conclusions: 1. Stdev of aggregated demand is

    less than the sum of stdev of individual demands

    2. If demands are independent ornegatively correlated, the std of aggregated demand is much less

    Conclusions: 1. Stdev of aggregated demand is

    less than the sum of stdev of individual demands

    2. If demands are independent ornegatively correlated, the std of aggregated demand is much less

    1. If D1, D2 positively correlated, > 02. If D1, D2 are independent, = 03. If D1, D2 negatively correlated, < 0

    = 1 + 2 = ??

    1+2

    10-1

    22

    21 +

    P.C.N.C. Ind.As (safety) stock is based on standard deviation

    Square Root Law:Square Root Law: stock for combined demands usually less than the combined stocks

  • Risk Pooling Effect of Coefficient of Variationz The higher the C.V. of demand observed in one

    market, the greater the benefit from risk pooling

    z COV= Standard deviation/Avg. demand

  • DecentralizedCentralized

    Facility/Labor cost

    Outbound transportation cost(from warehouses to retailers)

    Responsiveness to customers(lead time)

    Inbound transportation cost(from factories to warehouses)

    Safety Stock

    Centralized vs. Decentralized

    Overhead Costs

    Service Level

  • Echelon Inventory System

    Supplier

    Warehouse

    Retailers

    Warehouse echelon

    inventoryWarehouse echelon lead

    time

  • Managing Inventory in the Supply Chainz How should the reorder point associated with the warehouse

    echelon inventory position be calculated? The reorder point is

    where Le = echelon lead time, defined as the lead time between the retailers and the warehouse plus the lead time between the warehouse and its supplier

    AVG = average demand across all retailers (i.e., the average of the aggregate demand)

    STD = standard deviation of (aggregate) demand across all retailers

    ee LSTDzAVGLs +=

  • THANKYOU

    Inventory Management & Risk PoolingIntroductionGoals of Inventory Management InventoryFunctions of InventoryFactors Affecting Inventory PolicySingle Period Model Without Initial InventoryCase: Swimsuit ProductionDemand forecastSwimsuit CostsSwimsuit Two ScenariosSwimsuit Best Questions ?How much to Make?Swimsuit Expected ProfitSwimsuit : Important ObservationsSwimsuit Expected ProfitCase: Swimsuit ProductionProbability of OutcomesKey Points from this CaseSingle Period Model With Initial InventoryInitial InventoryInitial Inventory and ProfitMulti-Order Opportunities under UncertaintiesInventory PoliciesVariable Demand with a Fixed ROPReorder Point with a Safety StockDeterminants of the Reorder PointContinuous Review PolicyContinuous Review PolicyContinuous Review Policy Variable demand & fixed lead timeContinuous Review Policy Variable demand & fixed lead timeContinuous Review Policy Variable demand & lead timePeriodic Review PolicyPeriodic Review PolicyPeriodic Review Policy (with SS)Periodic Review PolicyRISK POOLINGRisk PoolingWhat is Risk Pooling?Lead Time PoolingLead Time PoolingCapacity Pooling Capacity Pooling Advantages / Disadvantages Summary Risk PoolingRisk Pooling Effect of Correlation Risk Pooling Effect of Coefficient of VariationEchelon Inventory SystemManaging Inventory in the Supply ChainTHANKYOU