4 somac!adaptaons! !and!selec’on!

43
4 Soma’c adapta’ons and selec’on

Upload: others

Post on 21-Mar-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

 4  

Soma'c  adapta'ons    and  selec'on  

 Increased  capacity  of  recogni'on  without  overloading  the  genome  with  duplicates:  Combinatorial  associa'on  

of  polypep'de  chains  

Combinatorial  associa'on  of  pep'des,  TLRs  in  human  

Cell  Death  and  Differen.a.on  (2006)  13,  816–825  

The estimated numbers of mouse gene segments are: heavy chain κ light chain λ light chain V 300-1000 300 2 D 13 0 0 J 4 4 3 Combinations of gene segments: Heavy chain : 300 x 13 x 4 = 1.6 x 104

Light chain κ : 300 x 4 = 1.2 x 103

Light chain λ : 2 x 3 = 6 Combinatorial association of heavy and light chains :1.6 x 10exp4 x (1.2 x 103 + 6) = 1.9 x 10exp7 possible antibodies. (In fact the natural number of combinations is much larger due to the mechanisms of P- and N-recombination and somatic mutations.)

Combination of gene segments and of polypeptides contribute to antibody diversity

   

Alterna've  splicing  Mutually  exclusive  alterna've  splicing  

RNA  level,  not  inheritable  

Soma'c  adapta'ons  

FREPs in Biomphalaria 13 families ca 25-30 genes!! ! ! !Splice variants  

Wernert  T  et  al  2003  J  Biol.Chem  278  26319-­‐26322  

Pep'doglycan  recogni'on  proteins  (PGRPs)  are  innate  immunity  molecules  that  contain  a  conserved  pep'doglycan-­‐binding  type  2  amidase  domain.  PGRPs  are  ubiquitous  in  most  animals.  Insects  have  mul'ple  PGRP  genes  that  are  classified  into  short  (S)  and  long  (L)  transcripts  and  are  oXen  alterna'vely  spliced  into  up  to  19  different  proteins.  PGRPs  have  also  been  iden'fied  in  mollusks,  echinoderms,  and  vertebrates),  but  plants  and  some  metazoa,  including  nematodes  such  as  Caenorhabdi.s  elegans  and  crustaceans  such  as  Daphnia,  do  not  have  PGRPs.  PGRP  genes  usually  form  clusters  that  suggest  their  origin  by  gene  duplica'on.  

Schmucker et al. 2000 Cell. 2000 Jun 9;101(6):671-84, Science. 2005 Aug 18

>  30000  isoforms  of  DSCAM  molecules  

Brites  D.et  al,  Biol  Evol.  2008  Jul;25(7):1429-­‐39.    

Schema?c  representa?on  of  Daphnia  Dscam  cytoplasmic  tails  (A)  Daphnia  magna  tail  structure  and  splicing  possibili?es  result  in  4  alterna?ve  forms.    

Brites  D  et  al.  Mol  Biol  Evol  2008;25:1429-­‐1439  

©  The  Author  2008.  Published  by  Oxford  University  Press  on  behalf  of  the  Society  for  Molecular  Biology  and  Evolu'on.  All  rights  reserved.  For  permissions,  please  e-­‐mail:  [email protected]  

Brites  et  al,  2013    More  than  one  way  to  produce  protein  diversity:  duplica?on  and  limited  alterna?ve  splicing  of  an  adhesion  molecule  

gene  in  basal  arthropods.  “Evolu'on”,    submiged  

Pressure  for  DSCAM  diversity  and  oriign  of  alterna've  splicing  mechanisms  

DSCAM  in  Ixodes    No  hypervariable  forms.  Many  germ-­‐line  full  DSCAM  genes  

   Many  genes  (>55)  

 mpst  of  them  without    any  alterna've  splicing  capacity  of  the  extracellular  part    

Botryllus Fester

Fester  reconize  the  polymorphic  determinants  of  the  fuhc  product  on  the  surface  of  Botryllus  ampullae  cells  leading  to  fusion  or  rejec'on.!

!Sushi  -­‐repeat:  C3b/C4b-­‐binding  domain,  short  consensus  repeat  Scr    

(apolipoprotein-­‐H,  complement  system,  blood  coagula'on  system,  transglutaminases,adhesionproteins)  

“Each  individual  appears  to  express  both  the  full-­‐length  fester  gene,  plus  an  individual-­‐specific  subset  of  up  to  36  alterna'vely  spliced  variants,  encoding  proteins  with  different  extracellular  and  intracellular  coding  regions,  as  well  as  puta've  secreted  forms.”  

Immunity,  Volume  25,  Issue  1,  July  2006,  Pages  163-­‐173  

Botryllus  

Fester  reconizes  the  polymorphic  determinants  of  the  fuhc  product  on  the  surface  of  Botryllus  ampullae  cells  leading  to  fusion  or  rejec'on.!

       

 …But  apparently  there  was  s'll  room  for  further  improvement  of  individual  responses,    for  increasing  the  capacity  of  adapta'on  during  a  life'me.  

 Further  soma'c  diversifca'on  at  the  individual  level  

Leading  to  changes  inheritable  in  cell  lineages      

Soma'c  muta'ons    Soma'c  gene  conversion  

 at  the  DNA  level    

Clonal  amplifica'on  possible      

 (Implies  cell  prolifera'on)  

Zhang et al. Science. 2004 Jul 9;305(5681):251-4.

Zhang  et  al.  Science. 2004 Jul 9;305(5681):251-4. Soma'c  varia'ons  in  FREP  genes  of  Biomphalaria  

Diversity of 185/333 transcripts. Detected after LPS injection, produced by coelomocytes

David P. Terwilliger et al. Physiol. Genomics 2006;26:134-144

©2006 by American Physiological Society

Rearrangement  of  gene  (DNA)  segments  Inheritable  changes  

 Vertebrates    

 due  to  two  types  of  enzymes    AID  and  RAG  

 the  most  important  ones    and  TdT  

   

Analogies  and  homologies    in  the  soma'c  genera'on  of  immune  repertoires  of  Vertebrates:  Agnathans  and  Gnathostomes  

 “Do-­‐it  yourself”  Kit  

 

Soma'c  adapta'ons  

Two enzymes involved with the preceding somatic events: AID and RAG

AID: Activation -Induced ( Cytidine) deaminase

•  Removes the amino group from the cytidine, replace sit by a uracil that trigger a repair mechanism , hence possible mutations depending on which base is reinserted inplace of

the U

•  Involved in three separate somatic diversification processes: somatic mutation, gene conversion and class switch recombination of IgSF members of Gnathostomes

•  Could it be involved in LRR somatic modifications in agnathans? •  i.e. could a AID homolog be involved in an analogous process? Yes

•  Pancer Z et al Nature Imm. 2007 8:647-656

•  RAG 1 and 2 (Recombination activating gene)!•  The  recombina'on  ac'va'ng  gene  1  component  is  thought  to  contain  most  of  the  cataly'c  

ac'vity,  while  the  N-­‐terminal  of  the  recombina'on  ac'va'ng  gene  2  component  is  thought  to  form  a    binding  scaffold  for  the  'ght  associa'on  of  the  complex  with  DNA.    

•  •  Present in Echinoderms , expressed early during gastrulation, hardly at all in hemocytes

•  Rast J et al PNAS 2006 103: 3728-3733

APOBEC  family  phylogeny  (AID  enzyme  involved  in  soma'c  adapta'ons)    AID  a  rela'vely  recent  member  from  an  old  family  

Although  the  family  forms  part  of  a  larger  superfamily  of  deaminases  distributed  throughout  the  biological  world,    the  AID/APOBEC  family  itself  is  restricted  to  vertebrates  with  homologs  of  AID  (a  DNA  deaminase  that  triggers  an'body    gene  diversifica'on)  and  of  APOBEC2  (unknown  func'on)  iden'fiable  in  sequence  databases  from  bony  fish,  birds,    

amphibians,  and  mammals.  

A  homolog  of  RAG1-­‐RAG2  in  sea  urchins    not  detected  in  coelomocytes  but  during  embryonic  development.  Func'on???  

S  Fugmann  Semin  Immunol    2009  22:  10-­‐16  

ASSEMBLY(AND(DIVERSIFICATION(OF(GENES(ENCODING(ANTIGEN(RECEPTORS

JAWLESS(VERTEBRATES

LRRNT LRRCTLRR&modules52 3 41

LRR&modulesn7 8 96

LRR&modules52 3 41

LRR&modulesn7 8 96

LRRNT LRRCTNT CTUUU

U U

U

AID

Homology(searchExtension(by(DNA(polymerase

LRR&modules52 3 41

LRR&modulesn7 8 96

LRRNT LRRCT2 5 7 9NT CT

Copied(LRR(modules

VLR(gene(assembly

JAWED(VERTEBRATES

V D J C

V D J C

V D J C

AID

V D J C

U U

ErrorSprone(repair

Point(mutation

Somatic(hypermutation

VψV D J C

AID

VψV D J C

U U

Gene(conversion(trace

Copy(from(ψV

Gene(conversion

DNA(deletion

ClassSswitch(recombination

V D J Cγ

Replaced(exon

S

(

AID

V D J Cµ Cγ(

Sµ Sγ

UUU U

RAG1SRAG2(V(D)J(recombinationTDT  

The  Immunoglobulin  loci  in  Vertebrates  

•  Cluster  organiza'on  in  chondrichthyes(VJC  Or  VDJC  mul'ple  copies)  

•  Translocon  organiza'on  VVVVn  JJJn  C  pr  VVVVn  JJJn  C  from  Teleots(cluster  conserved  in  some  cases)  

•  Limited  rearranging  capacity  in  birds    gene  conversion  

Soma'c  gene  conversion    

A  hyperconversion  mechanism  generates  the  chicken  light  chain  preimmune  repertoire.  Reynaud  CA,  Anquez  V,  Grimal  H,  Weill  JC.Cell.  1987  Feb  13;48(3):379-­‐88  

Combinatorial  rearrangement    

EMBO  J.  1988  Aug;7(8):2409-­‐15.  Organiza'on  and  rearrangement  of  immunoglobulin  M  genes  in  the  amphibian  Xenopus.  

Schwager  J,  Grossberger  D,  Du  Pasquier  L.  

Many different processes selected during evolution can make the number of receptors much larger than the number of genes that encode them  

Population level •  Polymorphism (receptors and effectors: lectins, C’ related, AMPs, srcr, Ig, TCR, MHC

etc)

Individual level •  Peptides Combinatorial association of polypeptide chains: Ig H.L, TCR αβ γδ,

TLRs, PGRPs,… •  •  Nucleic acids •  RNA •  Alternative splicing: e.g. SRCRs,PGRPs, FREPs, DSCAM, •  (Arthropods, Mollusks, Echinoderms, Urochordates, Vertebrates) •  Post transcriptional level: 185/333 (Echinoderms) •  DNA

Somatic rearrangement: Ig, TCR,VLR (combinatorial joining) (Vertebrates) Somatic gene conversion: Ig Vertebrates.LRR Agnathans

Somatic mutations: Ig from sharks on. Mollusks? Heavy chain class switch: From shark to mammals

   Ques'ons  Is  all  this  diversity  useful?    (concentra'on  of  specific  products)    Advantages  Individualiza'on,  economy      Problems      Regula'on  of  expression,  autommunity          

Selec'on?  Understood  fro  Gnathostomes  only.  

   

 Te  MHC,  its  origin.  

Large  repertoires  of    TCR  and    An'bodies  are  useful….  but  also  dangerous  

Germ-­‐line  diversity  can  be  selected  in  the  phylogeny.    Large  diversity  generated  randomly    by  soma'c  processes  has  to  be  selected  soma'cally.  

 

•  Autoimmunity  control:  rela'vely  well  understood  in  vertebrates                    Central  dele'on  (thymus,  AIRE)(Bone  marrow)  

                 Peripheral  inhibi'on  (regulatory  T  cells)    

•  Sites  and  means  of  selec'on  (MHC,    stroma  of  lymphoid  organs).    

•  Lymphocyte  (+Lymphoid  organs)  =  good  adapta'on  to  the  necessity  of  selec'on.    

•  One  cell/one  “an'gen”  receptor.  If  one  cell  is  “autoimmune”  there  is  just  this  one  cell  to  eliminate.  

•  Once  selected  the  lymphocyte  is  an  efficient  effector,  prolifera'ng  fast,  filling  par'ally  the  genera'on  gap  with  pathogens.  

•  Darwinian  varia'on  selec'on  inside  the  body!    

ORIGIN  OF  LYMPHOCYTES?  Build  up  of  the  vertebrate  adap've  system  plan    

   

Class  I  and  Class  II  pathways  of  presenta'on  Class  I    internal,  self,  viruses  via  LMP  TAP  ClassII    external  via  lyzosomes  

MHC  

The  two  basic  pathways  of  an'gen  presenta'on:  ClassI  and  ClassII  MHC  mediated  

Agnathan  ?  Boehm’s  group  report  AAI  mee'ng,  2010:  FoxN1,  VLRA  in  situ    

Courtesy  John  Horton  

Bajoghli  et  al.  2010  Nature,  in  press  

Selec'ng  and  maintaining  a  diverse  T-­‐cell  repertoire  Ananda W. Goldrath and Michael J. Bevan 402, 6-13  

MHC Class I molecule

Peptide binding region

Ig sf C1 domain

Ig sf C1 domain

A model for the origin of MHC class I and class II

Flajnik et al

Other models suggest that Class II came first

Kaufman et al

Fundamental  Immunology  2008  

MHC  architectures    across  Vertebrates  

ABC?  PROTEASOME  

C’3   Bf   TNFSF  X   Y   Z  

12p13   6p23.1   19p13.1-­‐.3   1q21-­‐25   9q33-­‐34  

RXRB  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  COL11A2  

RING3(BRD2)  LMP2  LMP7  MECL1*  TAP  

NOTCH4  PBX2  TNX  CYP21  C4  

MHCclassI  RAGE  TNFSF-­‐3  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  TAPBP  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  

-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  CACNA1A4  COL5A3  BRD4  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  NOTCH3  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  CYP2  C3  

FcRN+  

Basigin  TNFSF-­‐7,9  VAV1  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  C5aR+  

RXRG  CACNA1A6  COL11A1  BRDT  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  NOTCH2  PBX1  TNR  

-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  CD1  PO  

TNFSF-­‐4,6,18  VAV3  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  

RXRA  CACNA1B  COL5A1  BRD3  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  LMPZ  ABC2?  NOTCH1  PBX3  HXB  

-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  C5  

-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  

TNFSF8,15  VAV2  

TAPBP-­‐LIKE  Toll  4  

-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  α2M  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  

CD4,  LAG3  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  TAPBP-­‐R  C3aR  

NK  comp    

Duplica'on,  Pre-­‐jawless  fish  >520  mya  

Duplica'on,  Pre-­‐jawed  fish  >440  mya  

Igsf  C1  

Flajnik et al Fundamental Iimmunology, 5th ed in press!

Amphioxus data suggest that human chromosome 9q34 paralogue has retained many ancestral MHC linked genes(Abi-Rached et al, Nature Genetics 2002)!!

The  Proto-­‐MHC  of  Placozoans,  a  Region  Specialized  in  Cellular  Stress  and  Ubiqui?na?on/Proteasome  Pathways    Jaanus  Suurväli,  Luc  Jouneau,  Dominique  Thépot,  Simona  Grusea,  Pierre  Pontaro|,  Louis  Du  Pasquier,  Sirje  Rüütel  Boudinot  and  Pierre  Boudinot    

J  Immunol  2014;  193:2891-­‐2901  

TCR  gene  organiza'on  in  fish  and  human