400 gbs e 1 tbs systems and fiber nonlinearities jacklyn dias reis
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
400 Gb/s & 1 Tb/s systems and fiber nonlinearities
Jacklyn D. Reis, PhD
Luis H. H. de Carvalho, BScCarolina Franciscangelis, BScVictor Parahyba, BScJúlio C. M. Diniz, MScDaniel M. Pataca, PhDFábio D. Simões, PhDNeil G. Gonzalez, PhDJúlio César R.F. de Oliveira, PhD
CPqD, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil 23-25 February 2014Day 1
![Page 2: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
1. Fiber Nonlinear Limits
2. 1 Tb/s Super Channel
3. Field Trial with Nonlinear Compensation1. 1 Tb/s super channel 138 km
2. 112 Gb/s DP-QPSK 338 km
Outline
![Page 3: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Nonlinear Limits in Optical Networking• Spectral efficiency times distance [bit/s/Hz]*km• Longer distance• Higher launch power• Higher optical channels• Linear Regime ASE• Nonlinear Regime Kerr nonlinearities
Essiambre et al, IEEE/OSA JLT’10.Nespola et al, OptEx’14.
Liu et al, IEEE SPMag’14
![Page 4: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
FIBER NONLINEARITIESPART I
![Page 5: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Simulation model• Electrical + optical components for simulation super
channels / WDM systems implemented in Matlab• DSP normalization, CD equalizer (2x), LMS (2x), blind
phase search, synchronization, EVM/SNR
![Page 6: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Maximum reach without amplification• If 7% HD FEC with 3.8x10-3 (SNR≈21.1 dB) Maximum
reach of 175 km with linear compensation only• Launch power ≈ 4 dBm (single polarization)
-21 dBm-11 dBm
-16 dBm
-6 dBm-1 dBm
+4 dBm
![Page 7: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
-1 dBmSignal+SPMSPMSPM
+19 dBm
Maximum reach without amplification
• Output optical spectrum for different input power (or transmission distance).
• Nonlinear generation from -21 (50 km-SSMF, top left) dBm up to 19 dBm (250 km, bottom right) launch power
-21 dBm-16 dBm-11 dBm-6 dBm+4 dBm+9 dBm+14 dBm
![Page 8: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Maximum reach without amplification
• Considerations on launch power and receiver sensitivity• If receiver sensitivity is lower than -33 dBm, than the input power has
to increase
• Input power is upper bounded by fiber nonlinearities (~4 dBm up to 100 km – SSMF)
• To avoid increasing the launch power to support the loss budget, amplification prior the coherent receiver may be used to enhance sensitivity
![Page 9: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Multi-carrier transmission at 50 GHz grid• Nx43 Gbaud – 64QAM at 50 GHz frequency grid after
100 km of SSMF (0.2 dB/km, 16 ps/nm/km, 1.3 W-1km-
1)
9
![Page 10: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Multi-carrier transmission at 50 GHz grid• Intra-channel SPM versus inter-channel XPM at 50 GHz• From 1 Channel to 4 Channels 3 dB penalty on launch power BER = 10-3
due to XPM
![Page 11: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1T SUPER CHANNELPART II
![Page 12: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Optical pre-filtering
• Experimental setup• WDM scenario: 3 channels, 35-GHz spacing.• Optical filtering: Nyquist optical filter, bandwidth variation.• Use of conventional DSP, without ICI or ISI compensation.
• Results analysis• Measured performance at central channel (worst scenario).• Q-Penalty in reference to “non-filtered” 224G RZ PDM-16QAM.• Best performance @ 26GHz bandwidth (ICI vs ISI trade-off).
Test Channel
VOA
2x1
Neighbors
SC
OP
E (
40
-GS
/s)
(a)
EDFA
3 dB
Wa
ve
Sh
ap
er
Mod. RZPDM-16QAM
Mod. RZPDM-16QAM
LO Off
line
DS
P
(b)
ICR
![Page 13: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Experimental Setup
Fig. 1: Experimental setup. (a) 1.12-Tb/s transmitter; (b) 224G RZ-PDM-16QAM optical eye and constellations; (c) 1.12-Tb/s spectrum in a 175-GHz flexi-grid WSS channel; (d) Recirculation loop; (e) DSP-Rx block diagram.
![Page 14: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Back-to-back characterization (per-carrier)
• Measured performance @ 1e-3 BER• 224Gb/s RZ PDM-16QAM (Reference): 26 dB (6-dB implementation penalty).• Reference after filtering: 25.5 dB (0.5-dB matched filter improvement).• 1.12-Tb/s Superchannel (5-Carriers): 26.3 dB (0.8-dB multiplexing penalty).• 1.12-Tb/s after 5 ROADMs@175-GHz: 27.4 dB (1.1-dB penalty).
• Required OSNR @ FEC Limit: 3.8e-3 BER• 1.12-Tb/s Superchannel (5-Carriers): 23.3 dB.
![Page 15: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Transmission results
Launch-Power after 700km
BER with NLC after 1000 km Transmission performance
OSNR performance (per-carrier) • Launch-Power test• Per-carrier investigation.• Optimum value: -1 dBm/carrier
• Transmission results• 700 km and 7 ROADM passes
• Using conventional DSP
• 1000 km and 10 ROADM passes
• Employing nonlinear compensation.
• OSNR performance• Without NLC
• After 700 km: 25.3 dB• Transmission penalty: 2 dB
• With NLC• After 1000 km: 23.9 dB• Transmission penalty: 0.6 dB
• Improvement of 1.4 dB in transmission penalty by employing NLC
• Transmission reach improved from 700 to 1000 km.
![Page 16: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
FIELD TRIALPART III
![Page 17: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Field Trial: GIGA Network• Campinas to Jundiaí ~138 km• Campinas to São Paulo ~330 km
![Page 18: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
1 Tb/s Super Channel: 5 x 224 Gb/s DP-16QAM
RZ+PFDAC free
6 b/s/Hz SE (175 GHz grid)ECOC’13
![Page 19: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1 Tb/s: 5 x 224 Gb/s DP-16QAM 138 km• BER Improvement at Optimal Power 3.5x
![Page 20: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
112 Gb/s: DP-QPSK 330 km• BER Improvement at Optimal Power 1.5x / 2.8x• Nonlinear tolerance 2 dB improvement w/o MLSE
![Page 21: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Conclusions
• DSP plays a major role on high-speed optical networking
• Fiber nonlinear effects limit the launch power• Shorter capacity• Shorter distance
• Digital nonlinear compensation• At least 2 dB improvement on nonlinear tolerance• Network parameters in deployed fibers• Chip implementation is yet to appear
![Page 22: 400 Gbs e 1 TBs systems and fiber nonlinearities Jacklyn Dias Reis](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062312/5561af2dd8b42ad9538b57c3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Obrigado!
www.cpqd.com.br