48/96 review what wflsd learned?
DESCRIPTION
48/96 Review What WFLSD Learned?. Statistics Fire Chief Dennis Johnson Operational Issues Deputy Chief Bud Backer Union Perspective President Bob Whipple Employee/Family Impacts Lt. Greg Ahearn. 48/96 Review What WFLSD Learned?. History (Prior to Implementation) – - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Statistics Fire Chief Dennis JohnsonOperational Issues
Deputy Chief Bud BackerUnion Perspective
President Bob WhippleEmployee/Family Impacts
Lt. Greg Ahearn
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?History (Prior to Implementation) –
Required Union Vote (83% in favor)Reviewed info from Jan-Sept 2005.Members had worked 128-48 hr shifts.Members had worked 59–72 hr shifts.Had 10392 hrs experience in 2005.One reported accident.
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Sick Leave UtilizationSick Leave Utilization
2005 2006 Variance%
Change
January 459 344 115 25%
February 240 177 63 26%
March 359 184 176 49%
April 144 169 -25 -17%
May 337 167 170 51%
June 284 241 43 15%
July 315 392 -78 -25%
August 264 332 -68 -26%
September 144 338 -194 -135%
TOTALS 2544 2342 202 8%
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Sick Leave UtilizationSick Leave Utilization
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Jan March May July Sept
20052006
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Sick Leave UtilizationSick Leave Utilization
1.Three long term sick leaves beginning in 2005 and carrying into 2006 (Prior to 48/96)
2.One extensive family illness beginning in June, 2006
3.No such events in first nine months of 2005
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Sick Leave UtilizationSick Leave Utilization
2005 2006 Variance % Change
January 459 200 259 56%
February 240 177 63 26%
March 359 184 176 49%
April 144 169 -25 -17%
May 337 167 170 51%
June 284 126 158 56%
July 315 152 163 52%
August 264 212 52 20%
September 144 104 40 28%
TOTALS 2544 1490 1055 41%
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Sick Leave UtilizationSick Leave Utilization
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Jan March May July Sept
20052006
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Shift TradesShift Trades 1. 151 Shift trades in 2005, totaling
3341 hrs.
2. 71 Shift trades in 2006, totaling 1383 hrs.
3. 53% reduction in shift trades.
4. 59% reduction in trade hours.
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Shift TradesShift Trades
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Jan March May July Sept
20052006
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Shift TradesShift Trades
3341
1383
2005
2006
Hours TradedHours Traded
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Total Overtime HoursTotal Overtime Hours
7449 7181
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Overtime Hours
2005
2006
268 hour reduction equals 3.6% decrease
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Overtime Hours by ShiftOvertime Hours by Shift
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
A Shift B Shift C Shift
2005
2006
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Overtime Hours VariablesOvertime Hours Variables
1. Three long term leaves followed us into 2006 prior to the start of 48/96.
2. Overtime coverage of these long term leaves were almost 1700 hours.
3. One long term family leave issue accounts for almost 500 hours of overtime.
4. No similar long term leaves in Jan-Sept 2005.
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
AdjustedAdjustedTotal Overtime HoursTotal Overtime Hours
7449
5003
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Overtime Hours
2005
2006
2446 hour reduction equals 32.8% decrease
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
AdjustedAdjustedOvertime Hours by ShiftOvertime Hours by Shift
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
A Shift B Shift C Shift
2005
2006
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Training ComplianceTraining Compliance
87.5494.74
98.0591.79
97.1697.43
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr.
2005
2006
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Training ComplianceTraining Compliance
94.694.1897.68 94.8991.5594.23
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Kirkland Redmond Woodinville
2005
2006
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Exposure to 72 hour ShiftsExposure to 72 hour Shifts
59 Shifts4248 hours
49 Shifts3528 hours
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
20052006
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Commute MileageCommute Mileage
1. Average one-way commute – 29.6 miles/person.
2. Twenty personnel assigned per shift.
3. Minimum staffing of fifteen personnel on shift.
4. Graph indicates miles traveled based on staffing variables of 15-20 personnel on shift.
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Annual Mileage TraveledAnnual Mileage Traveled
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
20 19 18 17 16 15
ModifiedDetroit
48/96
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Firefighter FatigueFirefighter Fatigue
1. Continue to find methods/funding to measure fatigue.
2. Personnel surveys report less potential than “Modified Detroit.”
3. Personnel intuition and general response valid.
4. Ability to adapt to longer shift schedule probable 48 hour shifts as a “norm” versus occasional.
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Health/Wellness ProgramHealth/Wellness Program
Doug Bahr writes:
“For those FF's who only work out on shift, there are the same amount of shifts per month.”
“Many of our FF's consistently come in off duty to work out. This probably occurs more frequently because they are more refreshed during the 4 day and they don't have "station burnout" caused by the feeling they are always at the fire station.
48/96 Review48/96 ReviewWhat WFLSD Learned?What WFLSD Learned?
Health/Wellness ProgramHealth/Wellness Program
Doug Bahr writes:
“I believe that in general our FF's are in better condition than in previous years.”
“In general, I do not think the 48/96 has had a detrimental effect on our program and through the support of our Administration with annual Medicals, we are more aware of our own health issues.”