6. protocol standardization for iot

11
6. Protocol Standardization for IoT 1 6. Protocol Standardization for IoT

Upload: derica

Post on 23-Feb-2016

73 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

6. Protocol Standardization for IoT. 6.1 Web of Things vs. Internet of Things. TCP/IP HTML and HTTP The difference between the Internet and the World Wide Web The Internet is the term used to identify the massive interconnection of computer networks around the world. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 6. Protocol Standardization for  IoT

6. Protocol Standardization for IoT 1

6. Protocol Standardiza-tion for IoT

Page 2: 6. Protocol Standardization for  IoT

6. Protocol Standardization for IoT 2

TCP/IP HTML and HTTP The difference between the Internet and the World Wide

Web• The Internet is the term used to identify the massive interconnection

of computer networks around the world.• It refers to the physical connection of the paths between two or more

computers.

6.1 Web of Things vs. Internet of Things

Page 3: 6. Protocol Standardization for  IoT

6. Protocol Standardization for IoT 3

The World Wide Web is the general name for accessing the In-ternet via HTTP, thus www.anything.something.

The Internet is the large container, and the web is a part within the container.

The key to make the Internet of Things (IoT) takes off is the Web of Things (WoT) – the killer applications’ platform or base of the IoT.

The WoT is the next logical step in this IoT evolution toward global networks of sensors and actuators, enabling new appli-cations and providing new opportunities.

World Wide Web

EmailFTP

ChatP2P

IM

Go-pher

Tel-net

The Internet

Page 4: 6. Protocol Standardization for  IoT

6. Protocol Standardization for IoT 4

The WoT explores the layer on top of connectivity with things and addresses issues such as fast prototyping, data integration, and interaction with objects.

The WoT is a version where things become seamlessly inte-grated into the web.

There are also many other WoT applications around the world. Some of the WoT applications are listed here.• Arduino• Japan Geiger Map• Nanode• The National Weather Study Project• AgSphere

Page 5: 6. Protocol Standardization for  IoT

6. Protocol Standardization for IoT 5

6.1.1 Two Pillars of the Web The application server became the foundation that helped

build widely spreading web-based applications. An application server acts as a set of components accessible

to the software developer through an API defined by the middleware itself.

The application server is based on the three-tiered (Fig. 6.2) or multi-tiered software architecture.

As the two pillars for web applications and the Internet revo-lution, the protocols (HTML)/HTTP/URL and the software will continue to be the two pillars of play an important role in building WoT applications.

Page 6: 6. Protocol Standardization for  IoT

6. Protocol Standardization for IoT 6

The current status of IoT standardization• Fragmented architectures, no coherent unifying concepts, solutions exist

only for application silos.• No holistic approach to implement the IoT has yet been proposed.• Many island solutions do exist (RFID, sensor nets, etc.)• Little cross-sector reuse of technology and exchange of knowledge.

The key objectives of the IoT-A consortium are as follows:• Create the architectural foundations of an interoperable Internet of

Things as a key dimension of the larger future Internet.• Architectural reference model together with an initial set of key building

blocks:• Not reinventing the wheel but federating already existing technologies• Demonstrating the applicability in a set of use cases• Removing the barriers of deployment and wide-scale acceptance of the IoT by

establishing a strongly involved stakeholder group• Federating heterogeneous IoT technologies into an interoperable IoT fabric

Working groups of IoT standards (Fig. 6.6) The emergency application space for smart objects require

scalable and interoperable communication mechanisms that support future innovation as the application space grows.

6.2 IoT Protocol Standardization Efforts

Page 7: 6. Protocol Standardization for  IoT

6. Protocol Standardization for IoT 7

A smart object is defined by IPSO (Internet Protocol Smart Object) as• An intelligent (RFID) tag• A Sensor• An actuator• An embedded device• Any combination of the above features to form a more complex entity

Page 8: 6. Protocol Standardization for  IoT

6. Protocol Standardization for IoT 8

6.2.1 M2M and WSN Protocol A broad horizontal standard is a key requirement for the

M2M industry to move from its current state of applications existing in isolated silos based on vertical market or underly-ing technology to a truly interconnected IoT.

There are a number of standardization bodies in the field of WSNs.• IEEE the physical and MAC layers• IETF layers or above

Page 9: 6. Protocol Standardization for  IoT

6. Protocol Standardization for IoT 9

6.2.2 SCADA and RFID Protocols The Object Linking and Embedding for Process Control

(OPC) Foundation is an industry consortium that creates and maintains standards for open connectivity of industrial au-tomation devices and systems

The OPC standards specify the communication of industrial process data, alarms and events, historical data and batch process data between sensors, instruments, controllers, software systems, and notification devices.

Page 10: 6. Protocol Standardization for  IoT

6. Protocol Standardization for IoT 10

The smart cards with contactless interfaces (RFID is a sub-set) are becoming increasingly popular for payment and ticketing applications.

The standard for contactless smart card communications is ISO/IEC 14443.

Page 11: 6. Protocol Standardization for  IoT

6. Protocol Standardization for IoT 11

6.2.3 Issues with IoT Standardization Standardization is like a double-edged sword: critical to

market development, but it may threaten innovation and in-hibit change when standards are accepted by the market.

The following two issues for the IoT standardization in par-ticular and the ICT standardization in general may never have answers:• ICT standardization is a highly decentralized activity. How can the indi-

vidual activities of the network of extremely heterogeneous standards-setting bodies be coordinated?

• It will become essential to allow all interested shake-holders to partici-pate in the standardization process toward the IoT and to voice their re-spective requirements and concerns. How can this be achieved>