7 ghisolfi m&g - wirec2008...microsoft powerpoint - 7 ghisolfi m&g - wirec2008.ppt author: flammini...

21
Guido Ghisolfi Vice President Corporate Operations & Research Washington, March 5, 2008 BIOETHANOL BIOETHANOL How sustainable? How sustainable? How convenient? How convenient?

Upload: others

Post on 02-Feb-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Guido Ghisolfi

    Vice President Corporate Operations & Research

    Washington, March 5, 2008

    BIOETHANOLBIOETHANOLHow sustainable?How sustainable?

    How convenient?How convenient?

  • M&G Group LocationsM&G Group Locations

    BangaloreEngineeringEngineering

    HoustonHoustonNorth America North America

    Regional OfficeRegional Office

    Sharon CenterSharon CenterR&D CentreR&D Centre

    Apple GroveApple GroveResinResin

    AltamiraAltamiraResinResin

    PoçosPoços de Caldasde CaldasResinResinFiberFiber

    R&D CentreR&D Centre

    IndaiatubaIndaiatubaRecycleRecycle

    PaulPaulíínianiaPTAPTA

    CaboCaboFiberFiber

    WilmingtonWilmingtonEngineeringEngineering

    Central OfficeCentral Office

    MilanMilanGroup Head OfficeGroup Head OfficeEurope Reg. OfficeEurope Reg. Office

    VerbaniaVerbaniaResinResin

    PreformsPreforms

    Cellulose AcetateCellulose Acetate

    RivaltaRivaltaR&D CentreR&D Centre

    AnagniAnagniResinResin

    PreformsPreforms

    Pignataro M.Pignataro M.FilmFilm

    PatricaPatricaResinResin

    TortonaTortonaGroup Head OfficeGroup Head Office

    Sao PauloSao PauloSouth America South America

    Regional OfficeRegional Office

    SuapeSuapeResin Resin

    BeijingBeijingEngineeringEngineering

    ShangaiShangaiEngineeringEngineering

    MumbaiEngineeringEngineering

    USAUSAResinResin(on-stream in H1 2009)

  • Bioethanol Sustainability ConvenienceBioethanol Sustainability Convenience

    A lot has been said about bioethanol production cost, price and environmental sustainability.

    The interests involved are so large that it would be at least ingenuous to think that all statements on feasibility are moved by scientifical rather than political convictions.

    I would like to present a strategical assessment to explain why ethanol can be considered in the portfolio of large chemical companies.

  • Bioethanol Supply / DemandBioethanol Supply / Demand

    USAUSA Mandatory: 7.5 billion gallons = 22 million tons protected by 54 ¢/gallon import duty on Brazilian ethanol. Mandate has been increased in the last Energy Bill to 35 billion gallons by 2022. Capacity installed and under construction: 12 billion gallons.

    EUEU Mandatory: 5.5% by 2010 equivalent to 11 million tons. New target set on January 24 by the European Commission to 10% by 2020.Current installed capacity: 3 million tons.

    BrazilBrazil Production: 17 million tons from sugar cane.Brazil has 5 million hectares at sugar cane and can double its plantations in the near future.

  • European SustainabilityEuropean Sustainability

    The targets of 20 million tons of The targets of 20 million tons of biofuelbiofuel for 2010 and 40 million for 2010 and 40 million

    tons for 2020 are not going to be achieved without importtons for 2020 are not going to be achieved without import. In fact:

    � The European Community has published a study (http://reports.eea.europa.eu/eea_report_2006_7/en) on the arable land usable for biofuels with the following results:

    Ha Year

    12,000,000 2010

    16,000,000 202019,000,000 2030

    � With a yield of biofuel of 2 t/ha in 2010 and 3 t/ha in 2020, the land might be there.

    � Logistics and agricultural economics will prevent though the use of part of this land demanding the import of at least 30% ofthe necessary biofuel.

  • BioethanolBioethanol: A Global Strategic Assessment: A Global Strategic Assessment

    Prof. Ricardo HausmannProf. Ricardo Hausmann, Director of Harvard University’s Center for International Development, writes that (Financial Times, November 7, 2007):

    1) In some 95 countries there are more than 700 million hectares of good quality land which is not cultivated;

    2) Depending on the assumption about productivity per hectare, today’s production of 85 million b/d of oil can be completely satisfied by the biofuelsproduced on such land;

    ���� ���� ����

  • BioethanolBioethanol: A Global Strategic Assessment: A Global Strategic Assessment

    3) Even if partially used, this large potential biofuelsupply will cap the price of oil because its supply is much more elastic than the supply of oil.

    This will cause the price of oil to be set This will cause the price of oil to be set at marginal cost of bioat marginal cost of bio--energy.energy.

    If OPEC tries to raise prices above the price of biofuel, profitability will only crowd in more biofuels.

    4) The countries which have the largest endowment of under-utilized lands are in the developing countries, especially Latin America and Africa. Bioenergy will make the needed infrastructure investments socially profitable creating a possible stepping stone into other industries.

  • LifeLife--Cycle Fossil Energy Use: Cycle Fossil Energy Use:

    Corn Grain EthanolCorn Grain Ethanol

    CornCorn

    57,2%

    3,6%1,5%

    18,3%

    17,1%

    0,0%

    2,3%

    EtOHProduction

    EtOH Transport

    Vehicle use

    Farming

    Fertilizers / Chemicals

    Farming machineryFeed transport

  • Most recent studies show positive net energy Most recent studies show positive net energy

    balance for corn ethanolbalance for corn ethanol

  • Use of renewable process fuels improves net Use of renewable process fuels improves net

    energy balance significantly for corn ethanolenergy balance significantly for corn ethanol

    -400000

    -200000

    0

    200000

    400000

    600000

    800000

    Cu

    rre

    nt

    Fu

    ture

    Cu

    rre

    nt

    Fu

    ture

    NG

    NG

    & W

    et

    NG

    & C

    HP

    1 million Btu fuel produced – Btu fossil energy input

    Gasoline Average EtOH

    New EtOH with NG

    Ne

    w E

    tOH

    wit

    h

    ga

    sif

    ica

    tio

    n o

    f b

    iom

    ass

  • Improved technology and plant design have Improved technology and plant design have

    reduced energy use and operating costs in reduced energy use and operating costs in

    corn ethanol plantscorn ethanol plants

    Data for new ethanol plants is from Mueller and Cuttica (2006)

    0

    10000

    20000

    30000

    40000

    50000

    60000

    70000

    Btu

    /Ga

    llo

    n

    Wet Mill Dry Mill

    Average 1980s Average 2005

    New NG EtOH Plant Expected at Rivalta Plant 2009

    30% reduction 50%

    reduction

    ~1/3 of energy is spent on DDGS drying

  • Large avoidance of GHG Emissions by Corn Large avoidance of GHG Emissions by Corn

    Ethanol with Use of Renewable Process FuelsEthanol with Use of Renewable Process Fuels

    -19%-21%

    -28%

    -32%

    -36%-39% -39%

    -52%

    -60%

    -50%

    -40%

    -30%

    -20%

    -10%

    0%

    10%

    Relative to gasoline in 2010

    Cu

    rren

    t A

    vera

    ge

    Futu

    re A

    vera

    ge

    NG

    NG

    & C

    HP

    NG

    & S

    yru

    p

    NG

    & W

    et

    DG

    S

    DG

    S

    Gasif

    icati

    on

    of

    Bio

    mass

  • From corn to sugar cane to cellulosic biomass, From corn to sugar cane to cellulosic biomass,

    GHG emissions avoidance are increasedGHG emissions avoidance are increased

    -19%

    -28%

    -39%

    -52%

    -76% -76%

    -85%-90%

    -80%

    -70%

    -60%

    -50%

    -40%

    -30%

    -20%

    -10%

    0%

    10%

    Cellulosic ethanol (hydrolysis of biomass)

    Corn ethanol

    Curr

    ent

    NG

    DG

    S

    Bio

    mas

    s

    Sugar

    Cane

    EtO

    H

    Sw

    itch

    gra

    ssE

    tOH

    Fore

    st R

    esi

    duel

    EtO

    H

    Sugar Cane

    GHG Emission Reductions by Ethanol Relative to Gasoline (per Energy Unit Basis)

  • WTP GHG results show that oil sands WTP GHG results show that oil sands

    operations are carbonoperations are carbon--intensiveintensive

    0

    100000

    200000

    300000

    400000

    WT

    P G

    HG

    s E

    mis

    sio

    ns

    , G

    ram

    s/b

    bl

    Con

    v. C

    rude

    Gas

    olin

    e

    OS

    Gas

    olin

    e: m

    inin

    g, N

    G

    OS

    Gas

    olin

    e: m

    inin

    g, c

    oal

    OS

    Gas

    olin

    e: m

    inin

    g, n

    ucle

    ar

    OS

    Gas

    olin

    e: in

    -situ

    , NG

    OS

    Gas

    olin

    e: in

    -situ

    , coa

    l

    OS

    Gas

    olin

    e: in

    -situ

    , nuc

    lear

    OS

    Gas

    olin

    e: m

    inin

    g, N

    G

    OS

    Gas

    olin

    e: m

    inin

    g, c

    oal

    OS

    Gas

    olin

    e: m

    inin

    g, n

    ucle

    ar

    OS

    Gas

    olin

    e: in

    -situ

    , NG

    OS

    Gas

    olin

    e: in

    -situ

    , coa

    l

    OS

    Gas

    olin

    e: in

    -situ

    , nuc

    lear

    Low HLow H22 Use for UpgradeUse for Upgrade High HHigh H22 Use for UpgradeUse for Upgrade

  • BioethanolBioethanol: Second Generation: Second Generation

    It is clear that the target is:

    � A cellulosic ethanolcellulosic ethanol competitive with fossil fuels…

    � …produced by a relatively cheap biomassrelatively cheap biomass…

    � …which can be intensively grownintensively grown…

    � …on less available landless available land…

    � …using less waterless water and less fertilizersless fertilizers!

  • LignoLigno--Cellulosic Ethanol: Cellulosic Ethanol:

    EU and Italian OverviewEU and Italian Overview

    68

    49

    39

    4 4 2

    0,0

    10,0

    20,0

    30,0

    40,0

    50,0

    60,0

    70,0

    80,0

    Wheat

    Straw

    Corn

    Stover

    Barley

    Straw

    Oat Straw Rye Straw Rice Straw

    MM

    T/Y

    + 4 + 4 MhaMha Set aside landSet aside land

    Agricultural Waste Potential Agricultural Waste Potential -- EUEU

    Source: FAO (1999) – data limited to western EU (A, B, L, DK, FI, F, DE, GR, I, NL, P, E, S, UK)

  • LignoLigno--Cellulosic Ethanol: Cellulosic Ethanol:

    EU and Italian OverviewEU and Italian Overview

    41%

    14%8%

    10%

    27%

    Corn StoverCorn Stover

    France

    OthersGermany

    Spain

    Italy

    19%

    19%

    27%

    15%

    7%

    13%

    Others

    France

    Spain

    Denmark

    UK

    Germany

    Barley StrawBarley Straw

    Agricultural Waste Potential Agricultural Waste Potential -- EUEU

    Wheat StrawWheat Straw

    Others

    France

    Spain

    Italy

    UK

    Germany

    38%

    13%20%

    5%

    8%

    16%

  • LignoLigno--Cellulosic Ethanol: Cellulosic Ethanol:

    EU and Italian OverviewEU and Italian Overview

    5,4

    13

    1,10,2 0

    0,9

    0,0

    2,0

    4,0

    6,0

    8,0

    10,0

    12,0

    14,0

    Wheat

    Straw

    Corn

    Stover

    Barley

    Straw

    Oat Straw Rye Straw Rice Straw

    MM

    T/Y

    Agricultural Waste Potential Agricultural Waste Potential -- ItalyItaly

    Source: FAO (1999)

  • BioethanolBioethanol: Second Generation: Second Generation

    M&G believes that the objective is at reach.

    A biomass that yields 60 dry tons/ha vs. 12 for corn

    with only 50 unitN2/ha vs. 170 for corn and no irrigation requirement vs. 3500 m3/ha of corn

    M&G has launched the PRO.E.SA. project to achieve this goal within 2012.

  • BioethanolBioethanol: Conclusions: Conclusions

    � M&G has the only corn based 200 kt ethanol plant under construction in Italy with start-up expected for Q3 2009.

    � M&G has started a € 120 million R&D program to identify the optimal biomass and the most competitive hydrolysis process for second generation EtOH.

    � M&G expects to have a proven 20,000 t/y semi-industrial plant by 2011

    and

    � Convert the corn ethanol to cellulosic by 2012reducing the necessary hectares to supply the plant from 65,000 to

  • Thank you!Thank you!