8_vainikka
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
1/25
Cofiring in large scale CFB - Experience gained from
experiments with the worlds largest biofuel fired CFB ofAlholmens Kraft, Finland
Pasi Vainikka, VTT Processes, Finland
2nd World Conference and Technology Exhibition on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
2/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
2
VTT PROCESSES
FP5 Project partnersMaximum biomass use and efficiency in large-scale co-firing (BIOMAX)
VTT Processes, Finland Alholmens Kraft, Finland Kvaerner Power, Finland
CIRCE Foundation, Spain Elsam Engineering, Denmark Abo AkademiUniversity, Finland
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
3/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
3
VTT PROCESSES
Contents Alholmens Kraft CHP plant general features
The experiment matrix
Fuel properties Emissions of SO2 and SO2autoreductions achieved
Emissions of NO
Deposition measurements
Composition of deposits
Means to avoid chlorine deposition
Protective elements
Protective elements from fuel blending
Source:
Kvaerner Power Oy
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
4/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
4
VTT PROCESSES
The boiler
Annual proportion of fuels:
Peat 50%
Wood fuels 25% (LR, Bark)
Coal 25%
2.5 years of successful
operation in open electricity
market
Operates with anything from
100% coal to 100% biofuel Combusts the fuels in any given
combination while staying within
the emission limits
Consumes a truck load of peat
in 7 minutes
30,000 truck deliveries annually
Furnace measures 8.5m by
24m and is 40m in height
550MWth194kg/s, 165bar, 545C
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
5/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
5
VTT PROCESSES
The Process
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
6/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
6
VTT PROCESSES
The experiment matrix
X--32501816
X--32501815
X--28254714
---26254913
-48-4210-12
-60-40--11
--90-10-10
--100---9
--37--638---39-617
---3324436
--2525-505
---4456-4
--24-50263
----5952
----43571
LimeWood
chips
Logging
residueBarkCoalPeat
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
7/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
7
VTT PROCESSES
Fuel properties
9.68.1-10.29.222.510.9LHV
19.621.121.927.020.5HHV
HEATING VALUE (MJ/kg)
0.0040.0140.0100.0100.020Cl
0.0140.060.040.30.15S
34.441.040.28.233.3O
1.50.40.721.5N
5.86.05.64.55.2H
55.050.051.073.053.1C
ULTIMATE ANALYSIS OF DRY SOLIDS (wt-%)
3.32.52.5126.8Ash (wt-%, D.S.)
41.740-5248-521241.8Total moisture
WCLRBarkCoalPeatFUELS
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
8/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
8
VTT PROCESSES
Sources of contributing elements
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
100%L
R
50%
LR+5
0%Bark
40%
LR+4
0%Bark
+20%Pe
at
20%
LR+4
0%Bark
+40%Pe
at
10%
LR+4
0%Bark
+50%Pe
at
15%LR
+25%
Bark
+45%
Peat
+15%Co
al
30%
LR+3
5%Pe
at+3
5%Coal
100%Co
al
wt-%
Ca*0.5 K Zn*10 P Na Al Si*0.5
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
9/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
9
VTT PROCESSES
Sources of contributing elements
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
0.20
100%
LR
50%
LR+5
0%Bark
40%
LR+4
0%Bark
+20%P
eat
20%
LR+4
0%Bark
+40%P
eat
10%
LR+4
0%Bark
+50%P
eat
15%LR
+25%
Bark
+45%
Peat
+15%C
oal
30%
LR+3
5%Pe
at+3
5%Coal
wt-%
0
1
2
3
4
S/Clatomicratio
S Cl S/Cl atomic ratio
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
10/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
10
VTT PROCESSES
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
lr100
lr90/c1
0
wc6
0/b4
0
wc4
8/b4
2/c10
p63/lr3
7
p54/b2
3/lr2
3
p61/b3
9
p43/b3
3/c2
3
c56/b4
4
p95/
c5
p49/b2
6/c25
p26/c5
0/lr2
4
p57/
c43c1
00
p
47/b28
/c25
+L
c
50/b32
/p18
+L
c50/b
32/p18
+L+FA
SO
2emission
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Sulphu
rcontent(wt-%)
Sulphur content
SO2 emission
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
11/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
11
VTT PROCESSES
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Share of biomass in fuel blend (% )
SO2reduction
S02 reduction
SO2 reduction withlimestone feeding
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
12/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
12
VTT PROCESSES
Sources of contributing elements:
TGA test
75
80
85
90
95
100
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Temperature (C)
Weight-%(%)
~20% fall
Logging residue chips, ashed in 500 C
Courtesy of Markku Orjala
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
13/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
13
VTT PROCESSES
Sources of contributing elements:
TGA test
75
80
85
90
95
100
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Temperature (C)
Weight-%(%)
Peat, ashed in 500 C
Courtesy of Markku Orjala
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
14/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
14
VTT PROCESSES
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
lr100
lr90/c10
wc4
8/b4
2/c1
0
wc6
0/b4
0
p54/b2
3/lr2
3
p63/lr3
7
c56/b4
4
p61/b3
9
p43/b3
3/c2
3
p26/c5
0/lr2
4
p47/b2
8/c25
+L
p47/b2
8/c25
c50/b3
2/p1
8+L
c50/b32
/p18
+L+FA
p95/
c5
p57/
c43c1
00
N
Oxemission
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Nitrogencontent(w
t-%)
Nitrogen content
NOx emission
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
15/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
15
VTT PROCESSES
MP2:flue gas 510-550C
probe 350C
MP1:flue gas 700-750C
probe 540C
Deposit probe locations
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
16/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
16
VTT PROCESSES
Radial variation in composition and temperature
NOTE THE
TEMPERATURE
INCREASE ON THE
EDGE OF DEPOSIT
Courtesy of Pasi Makkonen
CourtesyofMarttiAho
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
Wind 50 angle Lee
wt-%
Na2O K2O Cl
Wt-%
N2O
ClK2O
Wind 50 Lee
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
17/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
17
VTT PROCESSES
Boundary conditions: Temperature
10CrMo910
R2
= 0.79
X20CrMoV121
R 2 = 0.88
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
350 370 390 410 430 450 470 490 510 530 550
STEAM TEMPERATURE, C
ESTIMATEDLIFETIM
E,a
'
10C rMo910 X20CrMoV121 SS2338 Esshete 1250 AC 66 Predicted
CORROSION DET ECT ION LIMIT
Courtesy of Pasi Makkonen
Dr Salmenoja:~450C is a threshold temperaturefor chlorine induced corrosion
supports findings of Dr Makkonen
This corresponds to400-415C steam temperature
On average, ~415C is reached after 1st superheater in TLS>500C CFB/BFB
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
18/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
18
VTT PROCESSES
Composition in 50
angle 350
C probe
0
5
10
15
20
Na2O Al2O3 SiO2 SO3 Cl K2O CaO
Wt-%ind
eposits
Biom ass Biom ass + 10% Coal Biom ass + 55% Coal
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
19/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
19
VTT PROCESSES
Means to avoid chlorine corrosion: Sulphur
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
S/Cl atomic ratio
HCl-conversion,
%
100%load
45%load
100%loadwith limestonefeeding
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
S/Cl effectiveatomic ratio
HCl-conversion,
%
100%load
45%load
100%loadwithlimestonefeeding
Sulphation of alkali chlorides:
2KCl + SO2+ O2+ H2O K2SO4+ 2HCl Gas phaseeffect!
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
20/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
20
VTT PROCESSES
Means to avoid chlorine deposition: Aluminosilicates
Kaolin, Al2O32SiO2,was fed to the bed (BFB) Dosing: 25, 50 and 80wt-% of the ash flow
Fuel 20% AGW + 80% Bark
0
15
30
45
60
75
No additive 0.25 x Ash flow 0.5 x Ash flow 0.8 x Ash flow
HCl-conversion, %
Cl in deposits x 10, wt-%
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
21/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
21
VTT PROCESSES
Means to avoid chlorine corrosion: Coal minerals
Alumininosilicatescan also react with alkalis liberating HCl:
Al2Si2O72H2O Al2O32SiO2Al2O32SiO2+ 2KCl + H2O K2O Al2O3 2SiO2+ 2HCl
The most abundant mineral iskaolinite(above) andillite(or range of aluminosilicates)
The key issue is whether there is alkali metalbound alreadyin the aluminosilicate
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
22/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
22
VTT PROCESSES
The objective
Fe K Cl
Fe K Cl
Fe Na K
O Al Si
S CaCl
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
23/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
23
VTT PROCESSES
Heat transfersurface
Lack ofprotecting
compounds
Low ashcontent
RIS
KYCOMPOUND
SALKALICHLORIDES
Cl releasescorrosion
BARK/FOREST RESIDUE
CASE 1. BARK/FOREST RESIDUE
24
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
24/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
24
VTT PROCESSES
CASE 2. PROTECTING POWER OF COAL
FOREST RESIDUE COAL
Co-combustion
PROTE
CTING REACTIO
NSALKALI
SILICATES,
SULPHATES
ALKALICHLORIDES
RISKY C
OMPOUNS
SULPHUR DIOXIDE,Al-SILICATES
PROTECTIVES
25
-
8/13/2019 8_Vainikka
25/25
VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
25
VTT PROCESSES
Conclusions
In CFB conditions high SO2autoreduction can be achieved by cofiringbiomass with peat and/or coal due to high Ca content of wood fuels
In CFB conditions peat/wood/coal cofiring produces less NOx than pure
coal or wood fuel firing Chlorine bearing deposit formation can be avoided by appropriate fuel
blending. Protective elements can be supplied in the boiler in peatand/or coal ash
As a result of fuel blending, change in the composition of fuel ash can
dramatically change ash melting behaviour S/Cl atomic ratio in fuel is not an appropriate parameter in describing
corrosion propensity of fuel blends in biomass cofiring. Instead,estimation for this ratio in gas phase could be used as a guideline
With higher shares of peat and especially coal, the effect of aluminium
silicates should also be assessed The amount of nitrous oxide, N2O, increases steeply when coal is
blended to the biomass blend. This could be an issue if there will beemission limits for this compound in the future