a appendix a sonet networking topologies - · pdf fileconfigured as a upsr or blsr node...

99

56015.16/10-96 Issue 3 S/DMS TransportNode Overview

A

Appendix ASONET Networking Topologies

Today’s SONET transport networks typically employ a number of different topolo-gies to satisfy important objectives for network simplicity, cost containment, band-width efficiency, and survivability. For example, an optical hubbing configurationmay be used to eliminate the need for a costly and complicated arrangement consist-ing of several back-to-back network elements. Similarly, a self-healing ring can bedeployed to assure service survivability through redundant, geographically diversepaths. This appendix defines each of the major SONET network element configura-tions and discusses their key attributes.

Point-to-Point TerminalThe point-to-point terminal configuration is the traditional “classic” transmissiontopology that terminates the entire SONET payload at each end of a fiber span orroute. Point-to-point systems are typically employed in a basic transport applicationcalling for a single system/single route solution. While not specifically designed tobe completely survivable, the reliability of a point-to-point system may be enhancedthrough a geographically diverse protection path as shown in Figure 52 below.Where diverse routing exceeds the normal reach of the transport system, one ormore regenerators or optical amplifiers can be deployed to reconstitute (or boost) theoptical signal.

S/DMS TransportNode point-to-point terminals support an extensive range of mixedelectrical and optical tributary types; refer to earlier sections of this document fordetails.

Mixed Tributaries

Point-to-PointTerminal 1+1/1:1 Protected Fiber Span

Diverse Route Protection Path

“Classic” Point-to-Point Configuration

Point-to-Point Configuration with Route Diversity

Regenerator orOptical Amplifiers

Figure 52. Point-to-Point SystemsWith and Without Route Diversity

While not specificallydesigned to be completelysurvivable, the reliabilityof a point-to-point systemmay be enhanced througha geographically diverseprotection path

100


Figure 53. 1:N Protection Channel Sharing Configuration,S/DMS TransportNode OC-48 Application Shown

Shared OC-48 Protection Channel

OC-48 Working Channel 1

OC-48 Working Channel 11 (max.)

STS-48 Protection Loops

OC-48 Protection Shelves

OC-48 Terminal Shelves forWorking Traffic

(up to 11 at each end of span)

Extra Traffic

MixedTributaries

MixedTributaries

MixedTributaries

Extra Traffic

MixedTributaries

MixedTributaries

MixedTributaries

In applications withrapidly growing trafficdemand, the 1:N protec-tion arrangement candefer, or avoid altogether,the large capital outlaysand long lead timesassociated with the deploy-ment of new fiber cable

1:N Protection Channel SharingThis is a multi-network element point-to-point configuration that conserves fiberpairs by allowing multiple systems to share a common protection channel. In appli-cations with rapidly growing traffic demand, the 1:N protection arrangement candefer, or avoid altogether, the large capital outlays and long lead times associatedwith the deployment of new fiber cable.

If a failure or degradation occurs on any working optical channel, affected traffic isautomatically rerouted over the protection channel via an inter-shelf protection loopand a dedicated protection shelf at each end of the span (see Figure 53 below). Eachworking shelf can be equipped with a full complement of mixed electrical andoptical tributary types.

If desired, the 1:N protection configuration’s protection shelves and the normally“empty” protection bandwidth may be exploited to transport unprotected extratraffic. For information on extra traffic applications, refer to Using Existing FiberInfrastructure to Support New Services on page 13.

S/DMS TransportNode OC-48 systems allow up to 11 point-to-point systems toshare a common protection channel (i.e. 1:11 protection), the highest level of protec-tion channel sharing available industry-wide. In S/DMS TransportNode OC-192applications, support for 1:N protection is a planned feature enhancement to beintroduced with a future software release.

101


Linear Add/Drop MultiplexerThe linear add/drop multiplexer (ADM) configuration provides direct access toindividual eastbound or westbound VT/STS channels at intermediate sites along afiber route—without unnecessary multiplexing/demultiplexing of pass-throughtraffic (Figure 54). It offers cost savings and improved reliability in comparison tointermediate sites equipped with complex back-to-back terminal arrangements.

Mixed Tributaries

Point-to-PointTerminal Linear Add/Drop Multiplexers

Point-to-PointTerminal

As with point-to-point terminal applications, the survivability of linear add/droproutes can be enhanced through geographically diverse protection paths. Alterna-tively, a high degree of survivability may be achieved using a hybrid linear ADM/subtending ring configuration known as a ”path protected linear ADM route.”Subtending rings are covered on the following page.

S/DMS TransportNode’s linear ADMs support mixed electrical/optical tributarytypes and flexible VT/STS time slot assignment technology. The latter enables anydesired routing of any tributary VT/STS channel to any eastbound or westbound VT/STS channel—or direct pass-through from east to west—as desired for optimumuse of fiber span capacity and tributary hardware.

An Introduction to Self-Healing SONET RingsSelf-healing ring architectures (Figure 55) are the preferred solution for applicationswhere survivability is of the utmost importance. They protect against cable cuts andnode failures by providing duplicate, geographically diverse paths for each service.To assure end-to-end survivability for services traversing multiple rings, adjacentrings may be interlocked using redundant matched node inter-ring gateways. (Referto Appendix E for more information on matched nodes.)

Figure 54. Example Linear Add/Drop Route

Cost savings and improvedreliability in comparison toback-to-back terminals

Mixed Tributaries

Network ElementConfigured as a UPSR

or BLSR Node

Self-Healing SONET Ring,UPSR, Two-Fiber BLSR, or Four-Fiber BLSR

Figure 55. Ring Configuration Employed byAll Types of SONET Self-Healing Rings

Protection against cablecuts and node failuresthrough duplicate, geo-graphically diverse pathsfor each service

102


A SONET ring is generally of one of three types: a unidirectional path switched ring(UPSR), two-fiber bidirectional line switched ring (BLSR), or four-fiber BLSR.While each type of ring features fully self-healing operation, differing characteristicsmay make one architecture preferable in certain situations. For example, a two-fiberBLSR is a good choice for networks with a highly distributed “mesh” traffic pattern.

Table 7 below shows ideal applications for each SONET ring architecture, all ofwhich are supported by S/DMS TransportNode. Refer to Appendices B, C, and D foran explanation of the underlying technology associated with each ring.

Ring Architecture Best Used In How It Works

UPSR Access networks where mosttraffic terminates in a central officehub

Two-Fiber BLSR

See Appendix B

Access and interoffice networkswith a highly distributed trafficpattern

See Appendix C

Applications requiring extra-highcapacity and/or protection againstmultiple concurrent faults

See Appendix DFour-Fiber BLSR

Table 7. Ring Architecture Comparison

Subtending RingsA subtending ring is an advanced dual-ring configuration where a node’s tributaryoptics support a secondary ring (Figure 56). This arrangement offers substantialcapital savings and network simplification at a central office hub by allowing asingle network element to serve in place of multiple collocated shelves. A subtend-ing ring can employ either UPSR or BLSR technology.

Figure 56. Subtending Ring with Single Homing

Mixed Tributaries


or BLSR Node

Self-Healing SONET Ring,UPSR or BLSR

Subtending Ring withSingle Homing

Tributary Optics

Line-Side Optics

Subtending rings offersubstantial capital savingsand network simplificationat a central office hub byallowing a single networkelement to serve in place ofmultiple collocated shelves

103


Mixed Tributaries


or BLSR Node

Self-Healing SONET Ring,UPSR or BLSR

Subtending Ring withDual Homing

Tributary Optics

Line-Side Optics

Figure 57. Subtending Ring with Dual Homing

Subtending rings may be arranged for single homing (Figure 56), or for greatergeographic diversity, in a dual homing architecture where the primary and subtend-ing rings intersect at two points (Figure 57). Subtending rings may also be deployedin a hybrid linear ADM/subtending ring configuration to provide survivability forlinear ADM routes. This is referred to as a path protected linear ADM route asillustrated in Figure 58.

S/DMS TransportNode OC-3 Express network elements support subtending UPSRswith either single or dual homing today. In addition, a subtending BLSR feature isplanned for future introduction on S/DMS TransportNode OC-192 systems.

Mixed Tributaries


or BLSR Node

Figure 58. Path Protected Linear ADM RouteFormed by Interlocked Subtending and Primary Rings

Folded RingsIn a configuration known as a folded ring, service providers can implement a UPSRor BLSR even where existing fiber infrastructure does not support a true routediversity ring system. The folded ring functions in exactly the same manner as aUPSR or BLSR, but the fibers on each side of the ring share a common conduit asshown in Figure 59. This solution enables a service provider to begin the conversionprocess from a linear to a ring system today, and then easily upgrade to a routediversity ring as additional fiber routes are constructed.

104


SharedConduit


or BLSR Node

Mixed Tributaries

Figure 59. Non-Route Diverse Folded Ring

Optical HubbingOptical hubs consolidate traffic from multiple spur routes onto an optical channelextending to a remote site. The configuration eliminates the cost and complexity ofmulti-shelf arrangements that would otherwise be required to pass traffic fromseveral (usually lower rate) fibers to a single (usually higher rate) system. Theadvantages of optical hubbing apply equally to point-to-point, linear add/drop, andring systems (Figure 60).

Optical Hub inPoint-to-PointApplications

Spur Routes Spur Routes

Consolidated Traffic Consolidated Traffic

OptionalElectricalTributaries

OptionalElectricalTributaries

Optical Hub inLinear ADM and

Ring Applications

Figure 60. Network Elements Configured as Optical Hubs

S/DMS TransportNode OC-3, 12, 48, and 192 network elements all support opticaltributaries for hubbing applications. And for added flexibility, mixed electrical/optical tributary interfaces may be combined on the same shelf as desired. OC-3Express network elements offer the additional advantage of tributary-to-tributaryhairpinning for convenient local termination of traffic entering from any spur route.(This feature is planned for future introduction on OC-192 systems as well.)

RegeneratorsA regenerator extends system reach by reconstituting the optical signal at an inter-mediate point between two service terminating locations. If necessary, multiplecascaded regenerators can be deployed to extend reach hundreds of miles (Figure61). Unlike some optical amplifier solutions, regenerators interwork with theSONET overhead section bytes for greater flexibility in operations access andimproved isolation of troubles to a specific section along a fiber route.

Optical hubs eliminate thecost and complexity ofmulti-shelf arrangementsthat would otherwise berequired to pass trafficfrom several (usuallylower rate) fibers to asingle (usually higherrate) system

Multiple cascaded regen-erators can be deployed toextend reach hundreds ofmiles

105


Mixed Tributaries

Service TerminatingNetwork Element

Cascaded Regenerators

Mixed Tributaries

Service TerminatingNetwork Element

Figure 61. Extended Reach ApplicationSupported by Cascaded Regenerators

Regenerators are generally of one of two types. A non-route diverse regeneratorsupports two bidirectional optical channels in each direction to reconstitute theoptical signal on both the working and protection fibers of a 1+1/1:1 protected point-to-point or linear system without route diversity. A diverse route regeneratorsupports the single bidirectional optical channel associated with two-fiber BLSRsand other route diversity arrangements (such as the example depicted in Figure 52.)

S/DMS TransportNode offers regenerator solutions for all of its intermediate andlong-haul product lines (i.e. OC-12/48/192/radio systems). See also optical amplifiersolutions of Section 7.

107


B

Appendix BUnderstanding OC-3 UPSRs

A unidirectional path-switched ring is a survivable, closed-loop transport architec-ture that protects against cable cuts and node failures by providing duplicate,geographically diverse paths for each service. Adjacent nodes on the ring areinterconnected using a single pair of optical fibers. UPSRs feature a unique unidirec-tional traffic flow as illustrated in Figure 62. Working traffic travels in only one

direction (e.g. clockwise) on the ring, while asecond unidirectional protection path is providedin the opposite direction (e.g. counterclockwise).

OC-3 UPSRs are typically deployed in accessnetworks where traffic from multiple carrierserving areas (CSAs) terminates at a centraloffice hub site. (BLSRs are often the preferredchoice for other types of traffic as indicated inTable 7 of Appendix A.) Because the UPSRsupports virtual ring configurations, isolatedCSAs/nodes can easily be placed on the samering with several other physically interconnectednodes. This advantage is exclusive to the UPSRarchitecture.

Services may originate and terminate on the sameUPSR or may be passed to an adjacent access orinteroffice ring for survivable transport to theservice terminating location. OC-3 UPSRssupport matched node inter-ring gateways thatassure survivable interconnection between ringsirrespective of type (UPSR or BLSR), line rate,or equipment supplier. (Refer to Appendix E formore information on matched nodes.)

UPSR OperationAll traffic is managed at the path (i.e. service) layer on an OC-3 UPSR. As eachindividual DS-1, DS-3, or STS-1 service travels in one direction around the ring, aduplicate signal passes in the opposite direction for protection (see Figure 63). Apath selector continuously monitors both the working and protection signals at eachend of the path and automatically switches to the protection signal in the event ofoptical span or node failure (or degradation).

The path selector detects path failure and signal degradation based on industry-standard parameters such as:

• Path alarm indication signal (AIS)

OC-3

OC-3

UPSR Node

Single Fiber forWorking Traffic

(Clockwise Flow)

Single Fiber for aProtection Facility(Counterclockwise Flow)

O

C-3

OC-3

Typical Service Path

TypicalServicePath

Figure 62. Simplified View of OC-3UPSR Architecture

108


• Path loss of pointer (LOP)

• Signal degrade (SD)

• Excessive path layer bit interleaved parity (BIP) errors

Once protection switching has been activated, traffic flows in a traditional bidirec-tional pattern similar to a linear add/drop topology. The S/DMS TransportNodeOC-3 Express product line supports UPSR protection switching in accord with theGR-1400 industry standard.

Support for Virtual RingsBecause intermediate nodes are essentially transparent in the UPSR protectionswitching scheme, other survivability architectures such as a two-fiber or four-fiberBLSR may incorporated within a UPSR in a hybrid arrangement known as a virtualring or “path-in-line” ring. This alternative is an excellent choice for interconnectingan isolated business campus or CSA with several remote sites that share a commonaccess network as shown in Figure 64. Virtual rings can also provide a survivable,geographically diverse path to an IEC POP.

Path protection switching in a virtual ring operates in exactly the same manner as aconventional UPSR since any intermediate BLSR nodes (or other “foreign” nodes)are completely transparent to the virtual ring. Similarly, an intermediate BLSRprotects its portion of the path using standard line layer BLSR ring protectionswitching (see Appendices C and D). Note that survivability is completely assuredwithout use of protected optics on the OC-3 links between the virtual ring and anintermediate BLSR. This advantage can yield substantial circuit pack inventorysavings and frees up shelf space for other revenue-generating services.

Signal Entry Point

Signal ExitPoint

Working PathProtectionPath

Signal Entry Point

SignalExitPoint

ProtectionPath

Path FailureDetected

UPSR Nodes

OC-3OC-3

OC-3 OC-3

Path Selector

Cable

Cut

Path Selector

OC-3

OC-3 OC-3

UPSR in Normal, Fault-Free State UPSR Response to a Cable Cut

UPSR Nodes

Figure 63. OC-3 UPSR Protection Switching,One Direction of Transmission Shown

A virtual ring is an excel-lent choice for intercon-necting an isolated busi-ness campus or CSA withseveral remote sites thatshare a common accessnetwork

109


Virtual UPSR

Interoffice BLSR

Isolated BusinessCampus Site

BLSR Node

UPSR Node

OC-3 OC-3

OC-12/48/192

OC-12/48/192

Virtual UPSR Span

Isolated UPSR Node

OC-3 OC-3

OC-3 OC-3

Figure 64. Virtual OC-3 UPSR Architecture

111


Bidirectional SpanConsisting of Two Fibers

Up to 16 Traffic TerminatingNetwork Elements

OC-12, 48, or 192

Rin

gpe

rim

eter measures up to 1200 km(746

miles)

Two-FiberBLSR Node

OC

-12, 48, or 192

C

Appendix CUnderstanding Two-Fiber BLSRs

As with the OC-3 UPSR discussed in Appendix B, the two-fiber bidirectional lineswitched ring is a survivable SONET transport architecture that protects againstcable cuts and node failures by providing duplicate, geographically diverse paths foreach service. With the ability to reuse bandwidth as traffic is added/dropped atvarious locations around the ring, two-fiber BLSRs are ideal for distributed “mesh”and node-to-adjacent-node traffic patterns typical of interoffice networks—andsometimes found in access networks as well.

To meet a wide range of capacity demands, S/DMS TransportNode offers two-fiberBLSRs operating at a choice of line rates: OC-12, OC-48, or OC-192, the mostcomprehensive portfolio available industry-wide. All S/DMS TransportNode two-fiber BLSRs comply with the latest GR-1230 industry standards and supportmatched node inter-ring gateways to assure survivability for services traversingmultiple interconnected rings. These gateways are fully interoperable with two-fiberBLSRs, four-fiber BLSRs, and UPSRs irrespective of line rate or equipment vendor.(Refer to Appendix E for more information on matched nodes.)

S/DMS TransportNode also offers BLSR configurations supporting extra traffic, afeature that enhances the revenue potential of existing fiber plant.

The Two-Fiber BLSR ArchitectureIn the two-fiber BLSR architecture, SONET OC-12/48/192 network elements are interconnected in a closedloop using bidirectional spans consisting of two fibers(Figure 65). Each fiber handles one direction of trans-mission similar to traditional point-to-point and linearadd/drop topologies. The perimeter of the ring canmeasure up to 1200 km (746 miles) and up to 16 trafficterminating nodes can be placed on the ring. Regenera-tors or optical amplifiers may be deployed betweennodes as needed to maintain the level of the opticalsignal.

Allocation of BandwidthExactly one half of the bandwidth available betweenadjacent nodes can be used for working traffic, with theremaining bandwidth reserved for protection. As shownin Figure 66, this bandwidth partitioning is accom-plished by mapping traffic into STS-1 channels (time

Figure 65. Simplified View ofTwo-Fiber BLSR Architecture

With the ability to reusebandwidth as traffic isadded/dropped at variouslocations around the ring,two-fiber BLSRs are idealfor distributed “mesh” andnode-to-adjacent-nodetraffic patterns typical ofinteroffice networks—andsometimes found in accessnetworks as well

112


Node B

Shared Protection Facility(automatically selected during

span or node failure)

Working Traffic

STS-1 EquivalentService Endpoint A

STS-1 EquivalentService Endpoint Z

Working STS-1 Time Slots

Protection STS-1 Time Slots

Bandwidth Pipe Model

Node A Node C

Node E Node D

LineRate

WorkingTraffic Protection

OC-12 1 through 6 7 through 12



STS-1 Time Slot Assignmentin a Two-Fiber BLSR

Figure 66. Span Bandwidth Allocation in a Two-Fiber BLSR

slots) 1 through 6 in OC-12 applications, into channels 1through 24 in OC-48 applications, or into channels 1through 96 in OC-192 applications.

Note that STS-1 time slot usage within a two-fiber BLSRdoes not impose a bandwidth penalty since any servicecan be routed from either side of the ring (Figure 67).Thus, a two-fiber BLSR node has a maximum fullyprotected traffic termination capacity of STS-12 (OC-12applications), STS-48 (OC-48 applications), or STS-192(OC-192 applications) equivalent bandwidth.

Service Delivery via a Two-Fiber BLSRA service path is provisioned on a two-fiber BLSR byselecting endpoint network elements, tributary ports, and

an STS-1 time slot linking the service entry and exit points. A service may reach itsdestination by traveling in either direction around the ring, as needed for optimumutilization of the available STS-1 channels. Intermediate nodes on the service path,if any, simply pass the service from east to west without modifying the STS-1channel assignment.

Up to STS-24Working Bandwidth

Up to STS-24Working Bandwidth

Up STS-48 Traffic Termination Capacity

OC-48Two-Fiber

BLSR Node

Figure 67. Two-Fiber BLSR Dual TrafficRouting, OC-48 Application Shown

113


The two-fiber BLSR architecture allows STS-1 channels to be reused as traffic isterminated at various locations around the ring—a feature that makes the architec-ture ideally suited for the distributed mesh and node-to-adjacent-node traffic patternsof interoffice networks. Reusable bandwidth also offers important synergies in ATMnetworks.

Figure 68 illustrates how bandwidth can be reused on a two-fiber BLSR throughapplication of STS-1 time slot assignment (TSA) technology. In Figure 68, serviceA-B is routed from Node A to Node B around the east side of the ring using STS-1channel 1. Because service A-B terminates at node B, STS-1 time slot 1 can bereused to transport service B-C. The same channel is reused again at Node C to

Terminating Traffic

Service B-CService A-D-C

Node A

Node C

Node D

Terminating Traffic

TerminatingTraffic

1

1

Service A-D-C

Service A-B

Service B-C

Pass-ThroughTraffic

Service A-B

Service

A-BChannel

OC-12/48/192BidirectionalFiber Pair

OC-12/48/192BidirectionalFiber Pair

OC-12/48/192Bidirectional

Fiber Pair

OC-12/48/192Bidirectional

Fiber Pair “Reused” Bandwidth(i.e. STS-1 Time Slot 1)

Node B

STS-1 Time Slot 1

ServiceB-C Channel

STS-1 Time Slot 1

1

STS-1 Time Slot 1

A-D-CChannel

Service

1

STS-1 Time Slot 1

ServiceA-D-C Channel

Two-Fiber BLSR Node

Figure 68. Reusing Bandwidth in a Two-Fiber BLSR

114


transport service A-D-C. Node D passes service A-D-C through to Node A withoutmodifying its time slot assignment. Thus, the sample two-fiber bidirectional lineswitched ring of Figure 68 is able to transport traffic having STS-3 total band-width while using only a single STS-1 channel.

Automatic Healing of Failed or Degraded Optical SpansIn the event of failure or degradation in an optical span, automatic ring protectionswitching (RPS) reroutes affected traffic away from the fault within 50 millisec-onds—preventing a service outage. Traffic is redirected by looping back STS-1 timeslots as shown in Figure 69. Logically, the normally unused protection bandwidthbridges the defective span thereby maintaining service for all terminating and pass-through traffic. When setting up the bidirectional loopback path, OC-12 systems

Node C

Node D

Rerouted Service A-B

ReroutedService A-B

Fiber Cut

Bidirectional STS-1loopback to protection

time slot

Bidirectional STS-1 loopbackto protection time slot

Node B

OC-48 BLSRNode AW

P P

W

2525

W 25 P

W 25 P

W

P

25

P

W

25

W25P

W25P

1 25

1 25

Unaffected traffic

Pass-through routing ofprotection bandwidth

Pass-through routing ofprotection bandwidth

Unaffectedtraffic

OC-48Bidirectional

Fiber Pair OC-48BidirectionalFiber Pair

OC-48Bidirectional

Fiber Pair

W PDenotes STS-1 time slots forworking traffic (1 through 24)

Denotes STS-1 time slots forprotection (25 through 48)

ReroutedService A-B

ReroutedService A-B

1 1

1

1

1 1

1

1

Figure 69. Two-Fiber BLSR Response to an Optical Span Failure,OC-48 Application Shown

115


map working STS-1 time slots 1 through 6 to protection time slots 7 through 12(respectively), OC-48 network elements map working STS-1 time slots 1 through 24to protection time slots 25 through 48, and OC-192 systems map working STS-1time slots 1 through 96 to protection time slots 97 through 192.

STS-1 time slot bridging occurs only at the nodes adjacent to the fault, with interme-diate nodes (e.g. Nodes C and D in Figure 69) simply passing through the redirectedtraffic mapped to the protection time slots. STS-1 time slot assignments for workingtraffic at intermediate nodes are unaffected by the fault.

Conditions which trigger RPS include total failure modes such as loss of signal(LOS), and also degradation in terms of excessive line layer BIP errors. Becauseprotection switching is revertive in a two-fiber BLSR, traffic automatically returnsto its normal routing—without human intervention—after a fault-free state existsfor a user-defined wait-to-restore interval.

Rerouting of Pass-Through Traffic During Node FailuresThe two-fiber BLSR architecture also fully protects all restorable traffic in the eventof a node failure anywhere along the ring. While tributaries terminating at the failednode cannot be protected, traffic passing through that node is automatically redi-rected away from the fault via time slot loopback similar to the previous span failureexample of Figure 69. In an action referred to as “squelching,” nodes adjacent to thefailure replace non-restorable traffic with a path layer alarm indication signal (AIS)to notify the far end of the interruption in service. The squelching feature employsautomatically generated squelch maps that require no manual record keeping tomaintain.

Capacity Advantages of Two-Fiber BLSRsDue to the BLSR’s ability to reuse STS-1 channels, a BLSR may offer significantcapacity advantages over UPSRs—depending on the traffic pattern (Figure 70).Where traffic is entirely hubbed (as in most access networks), capacity equals that ofa UPSR operating at the same line rate. As traffic becomes more distributed (or

The two-fiber BLSRarchitecture also fullyprotects all restorabletraffic in the event of anode failure anywherealong the ring

A BLSR may offer signifi-cant capacity advantagesover UPSRs—dependingon the traffic pattern

Dashed lines denote traffic flow

Hub Pattern Uniform Mesh PatternNode-to-Adjacent-

Node Pattern

Figure 70. Ring Traffic Patterns

116


mesh-like) however, a BLSR provides a substantial capacity benefit that cantypically range up to 300 percent of the capacity of a UPSR with an identical opticalrate. The greatest capacity advantage occurs with the node-to-adjacent-node patternbecause this traffic model allows a very high level of channel reuse. See Figure 71for a capacity comparison of all three traffic patterns relative to a UPSR.

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Number of Nodes

0%

100%

200%

300%

400%

500%

600%

All Traffic Hubbed

Distributed Mesh TrafficPattern (typical)

Node-to-Adjacent-Node TrafficPattern

Capacity Relativeto a UPSR

(UPSR capacity)

Figure 71. BLSR Capacity Analysis

In a given ring application, the capacity required on a BLSR depends only on theaggregate eastbound or westbound traffic at the busiest node. When implementingthe same ring as a UPSR, the aggregate of all services transported by the entire ringmust be taken into account.

Synergies with ATMAsynchronous Transfer Mode has recently emerged as a preferred transport technol-ogy for a broad mix of multimedia and data services. ATM offers enhanced band-width efficiency, scalability, and service transparency for all types of data, voice,video, and multimedia applications. To date, ATM has been extensively deployed inenterprise data networks, especially WANs with large amounts of bursty traffic. Inthese environments, the statistical multiplexing capabilities of ATM network ele-ments allow efficient transport of bursty data without unacceptable under-utilizationof facilities during off peak periods.

When distributing data embedded in ATM payloads among various WAN sites, two-fiber BLSRs offer two major advantages:

• A level of survivability that meets the most demanding reliability objects for“mission critical” applications

• Efficient sharing of a common STS-3c ATM payload among multiple locations

BLSRs offer additionaladvantages for ATMnetworks

117


The latter benefit is illustrated in the example ATM network of Figure 72. As shown,a two-fiber BLSR links each site in the network. The ring’s ability to reuse band-width is employed to deliver the same STS-3c concatenated SONET payload (“STS-3c Payload A”) to each location. This traffic routing enables the ATM networkelement at each site to efficiently pack traffic into a common payload throughstatistical multiplexing. Thus, one economical STS-3c channel can replace a moreexpensive arrangement of dedicated channels linking each site with every other site.

To facilitate ATM interworking, S/DMS TransportNode two-fiber BLSRs fullysupport concatenated payloads and OC-3c/OC-12c optical tributaries.

OC-12/48/192Two-Fiber BLSR

Two-Fiber BLSR Node

STS-3cPayload A

ATM NetworkElement

STS-3cPayload A

ATM NetworkElement

STS-3cPayload A

STS-3cPayload A

ATM NetworkElement

ATM NetworkElement

Figure 72. ATM Network Interconnected by a Two-Fiber BLSR

Transporting Extra Traffic on BLSRsIf desired, the protection bandwidth on a two-fiber (or four-fiber) BLSR may beused to transport unprotected “extra traffic.” The additional capacity permits theintroduction of new revenue-enhancing services without further investment in fiberplant. For more information on extra traffic applications, refer to Using ExistingFiber Infrastructure to Support New Services on page 13.

S/DMS TransportNode OC-48 BLSRs offer flexible extra traffic features today withan equivalent OC-192 offering planned for a future software release. Extra trafficcan be terminated along with regular protected traffic using any available tributaryports on the network element. If all tributary capacity is exhausted, an additionalcollocated BLSR node may be deployed to provide additional tributary interfaces asrequired.

Extra traffic is automatically removed from the protection channels when protectionswitching occurs on the BLSR.

The additional capacitypermits the introductionof new revenue-enhancingservices without furtherinvestment in fiber plant

119


D

Appendix DUnderstanding Four-Fiber BLSRs

The four fiber-fiber bidirectional line switched ring architecture assures servicesurvivability through duplicate, geographically diverse paths similar to a two-fiberBLSR. It differs from the two-fiber configuration in that four fibers (or two bidirec-tional fiber pairs) link adjacent nodes on the ring as shown in Figure 73. The addi-tional fiber enhances the architecture in two important ways:

• A doubling in the traffic handling capacity of the ring since twice the number offibers are available

• Two protection switching modes—automatic ring protection switching andtraditional 1+1/1:1 span switching for self-healing operation during multiplefault conditions

The allocation of bandwidth in a four-fiber BLSR isidentical to point-to-point and linear add/drop topologies.One fiber pair between nodes carries working trafficexclusively while the other pair serves as a protectionfacility.

The four-fiber BLSR architecture is a planned futurefeature enhancement for S/DMS TransportNode OC-192systems. This survivability option incorporates advancedring capabilities such as matched node inter-ring gateways(Appendix E) and extra traffic.

Capacity Advantages ofFour-Fiber BLSRsAs in a two-fiber BLSR, a node on a four-fiber BLSRmay terminate traffic fed from either side of the ring. Witha fiber pair in each direction entirely dedicated to workingtraffic, an individual node on a four-fiber BLSR has twicethe traffic terminating capacity of a two-fiber BLSR nodeoperating at the same line rate. For example, at the OC-192 rate, a four-fiber BLSR node terminates the equiva-

lent of up to STS-384 fully protected tributary traffic. In a two-fiber configuration,fully protected tributary traffic is limited to a maximum equivalent bandwidth ofSTS-192. (This comparison assumes a sufficient number of tributary ports as inS/DMS TransportNode OC-192 systems.)

Similarly, the maximum levels of pass-through traffic and unprotected extra trafficterminations are doubled in a four-fiber BLSR. Refer to Table 8 for a concise listingof the maximum capacities offered by OC-192 two-fiber and four-fiber BLSRs.

Double the capacity of atwo-fiber BLSR plusprotection against multipleconcurrent faults

Bidirectional FiberPair for Working Traffic

Four-FiberBLSR Node

Bidirectional FiberPair for Protection

Figure 73. Simplified View ofFour-Fiber BLSR Architecture

120


BLSR TypeMax. Tributary Capacity for

Fully Protected TrafficMax. Pass-Through Traffic

on Working Time Slots

Two Fiber STS-192

Four Fiber

STS-96

Max. Extra TrafficTerminations

STS-192

STS-384 STS-192 STS-384

Table 8. OC-192 Two-Fiber/Four-Fiber BLSR Node Capacity Comparison

Span Protection SwitchingFour-fiber BLSR 1+1/1:1 span protection switching bypasses unidirectional orbidirectional faults that affect only the working fiber pair. Examples include adefective splice, faulty connector, and optical transmitter/receiver problems. A cablecut also affects only the working fiber pair in applications where geographicallydiverse routes link adjacent nodes. Because span protection switching operatesindependently on each link, service is maintained in the presence of several concur-rent working path faults. Thus, in a representative dual fault scenario (Figure 74),

Node A

Node C

Node B

Working Fiber PairBypassed

Protection FibersActivated

Working Fiber PairBypassed

Protection FibersActivated

Protection FibersUnused

Protection FibersUnused

Working Fiber Pair

Working Fiber Pair

Optics ModuleFault

Splice Failure

Node D

Four-FiberBLSR Node

LocallyTerminating

Traffic

LocallyTerminating

Traffic

LocallyTerminatingTraffic

LocallyTerminating

Traffic

Figure 74. Four-Fiber BLSR Span Switching Example

Because span protectionswitching operates inde-pendently on each link,service is maintained inthe presence of severalconcurrent working pathfaults

121


span protection switching can be activated between Nodes A and B to address anoptics module failure—while at the same time—the protection fibers betweenNodes C and D are in use to bypass a defective splice.

Four-Fiber BLSR Ring Protection SwitchingIf a fault affects both the working and protection fibers (e.g. a node failure or a cablecut in a span without route diversity) automatic ring protection switching redirectstraffic in a manner similar to a two-fiber BLSR. However, instead of looping backtime slots within the same fiber pair as in a two-fiber BLSR, the four-fiber architec-ture loops back traffic from the working fiber pair to the protection fiber pair (Figure75). Other aspects of four-fiber BLSR ring protection switching are similar to theoperation of a two-fiber BLSR (see Appendix C for details).

Figure 75. Four-Fiber BLSR Ring Protection Switching Example

Node A

Node C

Node B

Redirected Traffic onProtection Fibers

Working Fiber Pair

Working Fiber Pair

Node D

Four-FiberBLSR Node

Bidirectional Loopbackto Protection Fibers

Bidirectional Loopbackto Protection Fibers

Fiber Cut

Working Fiber Pair




LocallyTerminating

Traffic

LocallyTerminating

Traffic


If a fault affects both theworking and protectionfibers, automatic ringprotection switchingredirects traffic in amanner similar to atwo-fiber BLSR

123


E

Appendix EUnderstanding Matched Nodes

While the route diversity provided by ring topologies fully protects all workingtraffic passing from node to node along a ring, service paths must be protected on anend-to-end basis. This means survivable ring interconnections are required as trafficpasses from an access ring through one or more interoffice rings, and then to anotheraccess ring serving the service termination point. The SONET matched node con-figuration (Figure 76) has been expressly designed to provide these survivableconnections between adjacent rings.

Vendor/RateIndependent

UPSR or BLSR

Primary Inter-Ring Gateways

Secondary Inter-Ring Gateways

Vendor-IndependentUPSR or BLSR node

To/FromAdjacent

Ring

To/FromAdjacent

Ring

Survivable Service Interconnection Between Rings

Vendor/Rate IndependentUPSR or BLSR

MatchedNodes

To/FromAdjacentRing

To/FromAdjacentRing

SONET Tributaries

SONET Tributaries

Vendor-IndependentUPSR or BLSR node

Figure 76. Inter-Ring Service Transport UsingSurvivable Matched Node Gateways

Matched node gateways are completely vendor/technology independent, allowingseamless interworking between rings of different types without regard to line rate orequipment supplier. Thus, matched node inter-ring gateways can provide survivableinterconnections between (for example) an OC-3 UPSR from one equipmentsupplier and an OC-192 four-fiber BLSR from a different supplier.

S/DMS TransportNode offers matched node solutions meeting the GR-1230 industrystandard.

The SONET matched nodeconfiguration has beenexpressly designed toprovide survivableconnections betweenadjacent rings

124


D&C SS

Drop & ContinueRouting for

Outbound Signal

Service Selector switchesto secondary input if

primary link fails

STS-1,OC-3, OC/

STS-12

D&C SS


Secondary Inter-Ring Gateways

Inter-Ring Service “A” Inter-Ring Service “A”

Inter-Ring Service “A”

Inter-RingService “A”

Vendor-IndependentBLSR Node

Vendor-Independent BLSR

Fiber Span

Vendor-Independent BLSR

Fiber Span

Failed

Vendor-IndependentBLSR Node

Vendor-IndependentBLSR Nodes

D&C = Drop & Continue RoutingSS = Service Selector

Figure 77. Duplicate Inter-Ring Service Paths Provided byMatched Node Gateways, BLSR Example Shown

UPSR matched node configurations employ standard UPSR path selection tech-niques plus drop-and-continue routing as shown in Figure 78. From the point ofview of an adjacent ring, this arrangement functions in exactly the same manner asBLSR matched node inter-ring gateways.

A network element provisioned as a primary gateway for one inter-ring service maybe provisioned as a secondary gateway (or neither) for another inter-ring service—as needed for most efficient use of the ring’s available bandwidth. Also, a primarygateway on one ring may feed either a primary or secondary gateway on an adjacentring as desired.

Redundant service paths

Survivable Service Interconnections Between RingsTo assure survivability for services traversing multiple interconnected rings, thematched node configuration provides redundant (i.e. duplicate) routing across inter-ring boundaries as illustrated in the BLSR example of Figure 77. In the outbounddirection, drop-and-continue routing is employed within a primary gateway networkelement to simultaneously pass an exiting signal to both the neighboring ring and aremote node configured as a secondary inter-ring gateway. For the opposite directionof transmission, the primary inter-ring gateway incorporates a service selector thatchooses either the primary or secondary input from the adjacent ring.

125


Figure 78. UPSR Matched Node Configuration

Adjacent rings are physically interconnected via SONET links (e.g. STS-1, OC-3, orOC/STS-12 facilities) that serve as “conduits” for various inter-ring services (e.g.VT-1.5/DS-1 or STS-1/DS-3 traffic). Routing and selection of inter-ring traffic isalways performed at the service layer on both BLSRs and UPSRs.

The service selector or path selector in a BLSR/UPSR matched node configurationswitches from the primary input signal to the secondary input based on standardperformance parameters such as line and/or path alarm indication signal (AIS). Inthe case of S/DMS TransportNode BLSR systems, both line layer and path layeranalysis are provided to protect inter-ring services against an extended range of faultconditions compared to other BLSRs that support line analysis only. Path analysisalso allows use of SONET systems on the inter-ring link, permitting (for example)wide separation between interconnecting gateways as illustrated in Figure 79.

For many types of failure situations, end-to-end service is maintained through acombination of ring protection switching and duplicate inter-ring gateways. In theevent of a primary gateway failure for instance, ring protection switching bypassesthe faulty node and inter-ring services pass through the secondary gateway to theadjacent ring.

Path analysis on matchednode connectionsenhances fault detectionand application flexibility

PS

D&CPS

D&C

Primary Inter-Ring Gateway

Secondary Inter-Ring Gateway

Primary Inter-Ring Link

Secondary Inter-Ring Link

Drop & ContinueRouting

Path SelectorFiber Span

Fiber Span

UPSR Node

UPSR Node

PS = Path SelectorD&C = Drop & Continue Routing

To path selector at servicetermination point

From serviceorigination point

To path selector at servicetermination point

From serviceorigination point

Fiber Span

126


Figure 79. Interconnecting Remote Secondary GatewaysUsing a Linear SONET System

Secondary Inter-RingGateway (Ring 2)

STS-1s

STS-1s

STS-1s


Ring 1,UPSR or BLSR

Ring 2

Linear System

CollocatedShelves

Ring 2,UPSR or BLSR

Secondary Inter-RingGateway (Ring 1)

a appendix a sonet networking topologies - · pdf fileconfigured as a upsr or blsr node...

Documents