a-cdm implementation: burden or blessing for …...a-cdm initial phase main problems fiumicino -...
TRANSCRIPT
A-CDM Implementation: Burden or Blessing for ANSPs?
CANSO report on A-CDM
• Download it for free at: www.canso.org/publications
• Basic A-CDM processes, principles and benefits formanagers and operationalstaff
• Useful, easy to understand, relevant to all ANSPs
Presentation of our Panel
• Eugene Tuinstra (ex Eurocontrol, senior aviation consultant at To70Aviation)
• Antonio Nuzzo (A-CDM Implementation Manager / ATM Operational and Technical Expert at ENAV S.p.A)
• Phil Marques (Head of air traffic control, Dubai Air Navigation Services)
• Moderator: Bastien Bernard (DSNA, France)
•
–
–
•
–
–
–
–
•
–
•
–
–
•
•
•
–
•
•
•
•
•
DANS ACDM JOURNEY FROM 2013 TO PRESENT
To CANSO Ops Conference
10.03.2017
Prepared by: Philip Marques
Head of ATC Dubai Approach
DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
CONTENTS. . .
A-CDM 11
THE CATALYST
BEGINNERS STEPS TO A-CDM
WHERE WE ARE CURRENTLY / BENEFITS
DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
. . .
CANSO 12
THE CATALYST
DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
. . .
CANSO 13
THIS…
DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
. . .
CANSO 14
AND THIS…
DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
. . .
CANSO 15
POST MORTEM
• In 2013, Dubai experienced extreme delays due to fog. With increased traffic levels, the delays reached a point where the airport experienced gridlock.
• No one was speaking to each other which resulted in chaos at:
• Towers• Approach• ACC• Airline ACC’s• Ground handling
• Various inquisitions were held, and one of the key actions that came out was that the stakeholders (Dubai Airports, dans, Emirates ACC, Emirates / Fly Dubai Airlines) needed a communication forum when things like this would happen.
• The airport was planning an 80 day closure of one of it’s 2 runways during the summer of 2014 (Called the NRR – Northern Runway Rehabilitation)
DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
. . .
CANSO 16
BEGINNER’S STEPS
DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
. . .
CANSO 17
KEY STEPS TO KICK OFF A-CDM FOR DUBAI
1. One common forum where all stakeholders meet regularly which opens up communication at a management level. For DXB the first step was the seasonal Runway Scheduling Committee set up for capacity issues.
2. Conference Calls held by ATC twice a day.3. NRR had its own subgroup where a “play book” was prepared and
agreed to by all stakeholders on how a runway blockage at DXB would be handled.
4. All stakeholders further agreed to an APF (Airfield Performance Forum) to be held monthly.
5. Further forums were still needed to address things that happen (in our case, disruptions) that feed back into a main forum (APF).
6. A “Disruption and Resilience Workgroup” (DRWG) was formed and chaired by dans. It meets every 2 months and each disruption that happened over the last 2 months is reviewed and any lessons learned captured. The DRWG then reports to the APF if any issues require escalation.
DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
. . .
CANSO 18
WHERE WE ARE CURRENTLY / BENEFITS
DUBAI AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES
. . .
CANSO 19
WHERE WE ARE NOW, BENEFITS
1. With the results and benefits seen from the DRWG, in 2017 the DRWG has gone national and is now a subgroup of a National Committee. Stakeholders now attending have more then doubled.
2. Despite all this we still have our daily conference calls, and are now finally ready to capture requirements for a common picture tool (A CDM tool) that all stakeholders will use.
3. Airport company setting up an AOCC which all stakeholders will have a place at.
4. No more gridlock with increased capacity.
5. LVO movements doubled with the introduction of dual runway procedures.
6. Much calmer workforces / stakeholder trust / combined disruption training for our respective management teams.
7. Only cost so far has been the manpower, and a monthly conference call fee.
THANK YOU
A-CDM – ENAV ApproachAntonio Nuzzo
A-CDM Implementation ManagerAirport Operations Dept. - ENAV S.p.A.
Madrid, 10-03-2017
enav.it
A-CDM in ItalyRoma Fiumicino: Full A-CDM on 03 March 2014
Venezia Tessera: Full A-CDM on 20 January 2015
Milano Malpensa: Full A-CDM on 07 October 2014
Milano Linate: Full A-CDM on 3 May 2016
Napoli Capodichino: Operations planned end 2017
Bergamo Orio al Serio: Operations planned 2018
22
Data Exchange
Common Data Exchange Protocol between ENAV and all Airport Operators
A-CDM Operational Procedure
• Common Set of Operational procedures tailored to specific AirportOperational needs
A-CDM Implementation Approach
23
A-CDM Architecture 1/2
24
Centralized Architecturte
Pros:All technical expertise in one site
Cons:Complex architecture. Initially not always easy
to identify fault sources.
A-CDM Architecture 2/2
25
A-CDM HMI 1/2
26
TSATTOBT
De-icing
A-CDM HMI 2/2
27
A-CDM Initial Phase
Main problems
Fiumicino - Complex airport
Unstable PDS (Pre-Departure Sequence) - Too many updates
A-CDM data not integrated in ATC operational system
WIP on RWY25 during first A-CDM Trials
Malpensa – Taxi time update due to RWYs rotation
Venice – First Single RWY Ops
Linate - General Aviation
Enablers
Automatic ARDT Procedure for aircraft release from Airport Operator to
ENAV already in place when A/C is fully ready
TOBT cancelled if A/C not ARDT within TOBT+5’ AZA123AZA123
28
A-CDM Benefits Taxi Time
Example of a typical Winter week of operations for FCO Pre and Post A-CDM
pre A-CDM
A-CDM
29
FCO
Since the start of Local A-CDM Trial (January 2013)
average 3 minutes less taxi time per flight
MXP
Since the start of Local A-CDM Trial (January 2014)
• average 0.5 minutes less taxi time per flight
VCE
Since the start of Local A-CDM Trial (June 2014)
• average 0.5 minutes less taxi time per flight
LIN
Since the start of Local A-CDM Trial (July 2015)
• average 0.5 minutes less taxi time per flight
A-CDM Benefits Taxi Time
30
Operational BenefitsNew start up procedure
In FCO pilots monitor ATC frequency for Start Up clearance, no need to call.
ATCO calls pilot for Start Up according TSAT (-5’/+5’) after ARDT
Less workload
No need for REA
After the reception of ARDT, A-CDM platform triggers a new DPI message to NMOC
acting as an automatic REA message
Better CTOT allocation process
Sending accurate TTOTs NMOC ‘adapt’ CTOTs according TTOTs provided by the
airport
Estimated Landing Time
Accurate estimated landing time provided to AO and Handling Agents
Information sharing Information sharing among all airport partners provide benefits to all (at moment not
fully quantified)
31
A-CDM –Key Success Factors Strong commitment from Top Management
All Airport Stakeholders part of the process
Right communication with different Airlines actors
Maximum transparency on processes
Frequent Meetings between partners to identify problems and find shared/balancedsolutions
Information sharing and coordination among all A-CDM Airports
Incremental Stepwise approach
32
A-CDM next STEPS
Italian
A-CDM HTF
Improved
Data Analysis Improved A-CDM
support in airport
contingencies
New Procedure
to manage
double FPs
33
