a comparative study of the effects of uv- and γ-radiation on copolymers of acrylonitrile/butadiene
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A comparative study of the effects of UV- and γ-radiation on copolymers of acrylonitrile/butadiene](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072112/575001011a28ab11488ba051/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A comparative study of the effects of UV- andg-radiation on copolymers of acrylonitrile/butadieneFrancisco Cardona,1 David JT Hill,1 Peter J Pomery1* and Andrew K Whittaker2
1Polymer Materials and Radiation Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia2Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Chemistry, University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia
Abstract: The radiolysis of nitrile rubbers with different acrylonitrile/butadiene composition and the
homopolymers, poly(butadiene) (PBD) and poly(acrylonitrile) (PAN) has been investigated and com-
pared with the photolysis of the same polymers. A signi®cantly different mechanism of degradation
was found for the two types of radiation. The results obtained by ESR, FTIR and measurements of
soluble fractions of irradiated samples, indicated that the acrylonitrile units of the nitrile rubbers are
more sensitive units to g-radiation, with the effects of irradiation increasing with the acrylonitrile
content. The reactions observed were consumption of double bonds, crosslinking, and cyclization with
the formation of conjugated double bonds. No chain-scission reactions were detected. In contrast to
g-irradiation, the effects of photolysis were centred at the butadiene units, and increases in the
acrylonitrile content resulted in a proportional decrease in the sensitivity of the copolymers.
Crosslinking and chain scission were identi®ed as the main effects of photolysis of NBR rubbers.
# 1999 Society of Chemical Industry
Keywords: nitrile rubbers; copolymers; radiolysis; photolysis
INTRODUCTIONAcrylonitrile/butadiene copolymers (NBR) are impor-
tant commercial materials displaying outstanding
resistance towards oils and aromatic solvents com-
bined with good ageing characteristics and high
abrasion resistance.1 Typical applications include use
as moulded goods of all types, rubberized cloth,
closed-cell sponge and adhesives. A signi®cant num-
ber of papers have been published on the photo-
oxidative degradation of NBR rubbers and the
homopolymers PAN and PBD.1±4 Thermal oxida-
tion,5,6 gamma radiation,7±9 X-ray radiation,10,11 and
more recently laser-induced photo-fragmentation
studies,12,13 have also been the subject of several
publications. However, the photolysis of nitrile
rubbers and homopolymers has not been investigated,
and signi®cant questions regarding the mechanism of
the g-radiolysis remain unanswered, such as the effect
of copolymer composition on the radiation sensitivity.
In this paper we have investigated and compared the
stability of PAN, PBD and NBR rubbers with different
AN/BD composition, against g and UV radiation
under vacuum. Mechanisms of degradation have been
proposed to account for the observed radical and
stable products.
EXPERIMENTALThree nitrile rubber samples, NBR-16 (Chemigom
N926), NBR-33 Chemigom N436) and NBR-46
(Chemigom N206), were obtained from the Austra-
lian Synthetic Rubber Co Ltd. The rubbers were
puri®ed by precipitation from chloroform into metha-
nol and dried for 24h in a vacuum oven at 30°C.
Samples of poly(butadiene) (PBD) and poly(acrylo-
nitrile) (PAN, 100000g molÿ1) were acquired from
Aldrich Chemical Co. The PBD sample had a
molecular weight (Mw) of 400000g molÿ1 and the
structure of the double bonds was 55% 1,4-trans, 36%
1,4-cis and 9% 1,2-vinyl, as determined by 13C NMR
spectroscopy.
The composition and microstructure of the NBR
samples were characterized using 1H and 13C NMR
spectra recorded on an AC 200-F spectrometer
operating at 50.2Hz for carbon. The results of this
analysis are given in Table 1.
Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) measure-
ments of molecular weight distributions were obtained
using a Waters Associates high performance liquid
chromatograph (HPLC) ®tted with ®ve ultrastyragel
columns of varying pore sizes (106, 105, 104, 103 and
102A). Automated signal detection was achieved using
Polymer International Polym Int 48:985±992 (1999)
* Correspondence to: Peter J Pomery, Department of Chemistry, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, AustraliaE-mail: [email protected]/grant sponsor: Australian Research CouncilContract/grant sponsor: Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering(Received 15 January 1999; accepted 27 March 1999)
# 1999 Society of Chemical Industry. Polym Int 0959±8103/99/$17.50 985
![Page 2: A comparative study of the effects of UV- and γ-radiation on copolymers of acrylonitrile/butadiene](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072112/575001011a28ab11488ba051/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
a Waters 401 differential refractometer interfaced to
an IBM-PC. Molecular weights are quoted as poly-
styrene (PSTY) equivalents.
HPLC grade THF was used as the elutant for all
nitrile rubbers. Data points were collected at 1s
intervals for a total of 60min with an eluent ¯ow rate
of 1ml minÿ1 and a column pressure of 100lbf inÿ2.
The temperature was kept at 22±23°C for all measure-
ments. Molecular weight values of 1.02�105,
1.9�103 and 9.6�104 were obtained for NBR-16,
ÿ33 and ÿ46, respectively.
Gamma irradiation was carried out at 77K (for ESR
studies) and 300K with 60Co g-rays in an AECL
Gammacell 200 unit at the University of Queensland.
The dose rate was 1.25 and 1.38kGy hÿ1 at 77K and
300K, respectively.
FTIR spectra of the nitrile rubber were obtained
using a 2000 FTIR Perkin Elmer spectrometer. The
IR spectra of the g-irradiated samples were obtained
on pressed KBr tablets. Infrared spectra of the samples
after UV irradiation were recorded from samples
prepared by casting ®lms (about 50mm thickness)
over KBr tablets from solutions (5% w/v) in chloro-
form (N,N-dimethylformamide for PAN).
For UV irradiation, the ®lms deposited on KBr
tablets were placed inside quartz tubes. The tubes
were ¯ushed with nitrogen gas for 45min, and then
sealed off. The quartz tubes were held in a metal
sample holder inside a quartz beaker and surrounded
by water, to keep the temperature constant at 298K
during the irradiation. The ®lms were exposed to UV
radiation 40cm away from an Oriel high power
mercury/xenon lamp with an output intensity of
9.1mWcmÿ2, using a ®lter which removed wave-
lengths below 250nm. After irradiation the ®lms were
left in the quartz tubes for about 6.0h at room
temperature before opening, to allow the full decay
of the radical products.
For electron spin resonance (ESR) studies, the
samples were exposed to UV radiation in vacuo and at
77K inside the cavity of the ESR spectrometer, from
an un®ltered Oriel high power (1000W) mercury/
xenon lamp. The high energy UV wavelength cut-off
was 250nm. The ESR spectra were recorded on a
Bruker ER-200D ESR spectrometer interfaced to an
IBM compatible personal computer. The spectra were
obtained in the ®rst derivative form and then doubly
integrated to obtain the area of the absorption peak.
The concentration of radicals was determined by
comparison of the area under the absorption peak with
that of a standard provided by Varian (1% pitch in a
potassium chloride matrix). The concentration of the
radicals in the standard was 3.0�1015 spins cmÿ1.
After evaluating the saturation of the ESR signal, the
spectra were recorded with a microwave power of
20mW (which represents an attenuation of 40dB),
and modulation amplitude of 2.0G. Computer simu-
lations of the spectra were obtained using the
SIMOPR software written by Garrett.14
To determine the soluble fractions after irradiation,
samples were placed in 200-mesh stainless steel
baskets and then in a Soxhlet apparatus, and extracted
with re¯uxing chloroform (for nitrile rubbers and
polybutadiene) and N,N-dimethylformamide (for
polyacrylonitrile), for more than 48h. They were then
dried under reduced pressure at room temperature for
24h and weighed. This procedure was repeated until
constant weight was obtained. The gel fraction of the
polymers was determined from the weight of the
insoluble portion.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONESR spectroscopyUV irradiation
The ESR spectra of nitrile rubbers 1,4-PBD and PAN,
UV-irradiated in vacuo at 77K and recorded at 77K,
are shown in Fig 1. The spectrum of irradiated
polybutadiene, has been attributed by Carstensen15
as being mainly due to the allyl radicals (I) formed by
chain scission of the CÐC bond midway between the
butadiene units.
(I)
Until now, there have been no reports of the
successful simulation of the ESR spectra of polybuta-
diene and nitrile rubbers after UV irradiation at 77K
in vacuo. In this work computer simulations were
obtained from combinations of different amounts of
the radicals identi®ed in the ESR signal, until the best
®t with the experimental spectrum was obtained. The
experimental ESR signal of 1,4-PBD and the compu-
ter simulation are shown in Fig 1. The simulation
comprises allyl radicals of type (I) (60%), allyl radicals
of type (II) (28%) and a singlet attributed to polyenyl
radicals (III) (12%). The details of the hyper®ne
coupling constants and line-widths used in the
simulation are listed in Table 2, and are consistent
with literature values.15,16
(II) (III)
The ESR spectrum of UV-irradiated PAN shown in
Fig 1 is a singlet of width 1.4mT due to polyimine
radicals (IV). The polyimide radical has previously
Table 1. Compositions, diad fractions and double bond structures (%) of NBRrubbers determined by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy
Monomer unit NBR-16 NBR-33 NBR-46
Acrylonitrile AB diad 16.5 33.0 42.0
AA diad 0.0 0.0 4.0
Total 16.5 33.0 46.0
Butadiene 1,4-trans 62.4 54.0 49.0
1,4-cis 8.6 6.0 4.5
1,2-BD 12.5 7.0 0.5
Total 83.5 67.0 54.0
986 Polym Int 48:985±992 (1999)
F Cardona et al
![Page 3: A comparative study of the effects of UV- and γ-radiation on copolymers of acrylonitrile/butadiene](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072112/575001011a28ab11488ba051/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
been observed in UV- and g-irradiated PAN.17
(IV)
The ESR spectra of UV-irradiated rubbers are
shown in Fig 1. It can be seen that with increasing
acrylonitrile content the spectra start to resemble the
spectrum of polyacrylonitrile. Furthermore, increases
in acrylonitrile content also resulted in a clear decrease
in the size of the ESR signal; that is, the amount of
radicals formed in nitrile rubbers during irradiation
decreases with the acrylonitrile content. Photo-bleach-
ing of the nitrile rubbers with light of wavelength above
590nm or 475nm for 30min did not change the shape
or the intensity of the spectra, indicating that no
radical anions were present.
The computer simulation of the ESR signal of NBR-
46 is also shown in Fig 1. The simulation was obtained
by combination of radicals (I) (25%), radicals (II)
(45%) and a singlet (30%). The singlet is due to a
combination of polyenyl radicals (III) and polyimine
radicals (IV). It is not possible to determine the rela-
tive contribution of these two radicals to the spectrum;
however, for this material containing 46mol% AN
units, the maximum proportion of radicals derived
from the AN units (ie the polyimine radicals (IV)) is
30%. It follows therefore that the BD units are more
sensitive to degradation by UV light than the AN units.
This is consistent with the qualitative observation of a
decreased yield of radicals at higher AN contents. In
addition the reduced yield of polyimine radicals may
result from the breaking up of runs of AN units in the
random copolymers.
Finally it should be noted that the relative amount of
the radical (I) due to chain scission is lower in NBR46
than PBD. It is expected therefore that the yield of
chain scission will decrease with increasing AN
content, a result which is con®med by measurements
of soluble fractions of irradiated samples, as discussed
below.
g-Irradiation
The ESR spectrum of 1,4-PBD g-irradiated in vacuo
and recorded at 77K is shown in Fig 2. The spectrum,
obtained immediately after irradiation, consists of a
broad singlet and a superimposed septet, and is similar
to previously reported spectra.18,19 The septet was
assigned to allyl radical (II), and the singlet to the
polyenyl radical (III). On warming the sample to
temperatures near 180K, which is close to the glass
transition temperature, the intensity of the spectrum
decayed to about 40% of the intensity of the spectrum
at lower temperatures.
The computer simulation of the ESR signal of 1,4-
PBD g-irradiated at 77K (Fig 2) was obtained by
combination of the allyl radical (60%) and a singlet
(40%). The line-width of the singlet was 2.3mT,
which is considerably larger than that observed above
in the UV radiolysis of PDB. This apparently indicates
a lower degree of conjugation in the polyenyl radical
formed by g-radiolysis.
The ESR spectrum of PAN g-irradiated in vacuo
and recorded at 77K is shown in Fig 2. A computer
simulation of the spectrum is also included. The
hyper®ne structure of the ESR signal is associated with
the radicals resulting from hydrogen abstraction from
the methylene and methine groups, located on the
backbone of the polyacrylonitrile chain, as suggested
by other workers.20,21 Lang20 identi®ed the different
radicals which give rise to the hyper®ne structure of the
Figure 1. ESR spectra of samples after UV-radiolysis under vacuum at77K: (a) PBD; (b) PBD (simulation), (c) NBR16; (d) NBR33, (e) NBR48,(f) NBR48 (simulation) and (g) PAN.
Table 2. Hyperfine coupling constants and line-widths used in the simulationof ESR spectra
Radical aH (a) (mT) aH (b) (mT) DHpp (mT) Refs
I 1.4 0.4 (1), 1.3 (2) 1.2 15,16
II 1.5 1.67 (1), 1.3 (2) 1.4 15,16
III ± ± 1.2 15,16
IV ± ± 1.4 (UV) 21
2.3 (g)V 4.0 1.6 1.5 21, 31
VI 4.0 1.6 1.5 21, 31
VII 2.5 2.4 (H), 0.35 (N) 1.5 21, 32
VIII ± 3.3 1.5 21
Polym Int 48:985±992 (1999) 987
UV- and g-radiation of acrylonitrile/butadiene copolymers
![Page 4: A comparative study of the effects of UV- and γ-radiation on copolymers of acrylonitrile/butadiene](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072112/575001011a28ab11488ba051/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ESR spectrum of PAN irradiated at 77K, including
the presence of the radical responsible for a singlet at
the centre of the ESR spectrum. The relative propor-
tion of each radical present obtain by computer
simulation of the signal recorded at 77K and by using
spectral subtraction techniques during the annealing
experiment, are given in Table 3. Photo-bleaching
experiments con®rmed that the contribution to the
spectra from radical anions was less than 3%.
The ESR spectra of NBR-46, 33, 16, g-irradiated in
vacuo at 77K and recorded at 77K, are also shown in
Fig 2. The spectrum of NBR-16 is similar to the
spectrum of polybutadiene, and so appears to be
composed of radicals (II) and (III). With increasing
acrylonitrile content of the rubber, ®ne structure
appears in the spectra, which start to resemble that
of polyacrylonitrile. The complex nature of the
spectra, and the obvious possible contribution of a
large number of different radicals to poorly resolved
spectra, precluded computer simulation.
The G values for formation of radicals at 77K were
determined from plots of the radical concentration as a
function of dose. The values are listed in Table 4 and
plotted in Fig 3 as a function of polymer composition.
The G value is a linear function of composition, as
expected for copolymers which do not contain strongly
protective groups. As is seen from Fig 2, the spectra of
the copolymers show features assignable to both types
of monomer unit.
Infrared spectroscopyUV radiation
The effect of UV radiation on the FTIR spectra of
nitrile rubbers is shown in Fig 4. The absorption bands
due to double bonds in the main chains
ÐRÐCH=CHÐRÐ (cis and trans at 740cmÿ1 and
Figure 2. ESR spectra of samples after g-radiolysis under vacuum at 77K;(a) PBD, (b) PBD (simulation), (c) NBR16, (d) NBR33, (e) NBR48, (f) PANand (g) PAN (simulation).
Table 3. Relative proportions of free radicals in the ESR spectrum of PANg-irradiated and recorded at 77K. The values were obtained by simulation,and by subtraction of spectra at different temperatures during warming(experimental)
Relative proportion (%)
Radical Simulated Experimental
IV Singlet: polyimine 38.0 32.0
V 38.0 40.0
VI 16.0 10.0
VII 3.0 4.0
VIII 5.0 14.0
Table 4. G values for g-radiation induced events in PBD, PAN and NBRrubbers
G value PBD NBR16 NBR33 NBR46 PAN
G(R) 0.8 1.18 1.43 1.72 2.97
G(db) 32.6 39.4 43.5 48.3 ±
G(S)/G(X) 0 0 0 0 0
G(X) 3.7 5.6 4.1 9.2 0.72
Figure 3. G(radical) for copolymers of BD and AN as a function ofcomposition.
988 Polym Int 48:985±992 (1999)
F Cardona et al
![Page 5: A comparative study of the effects of UV- and γ-radiation on copolymers of acrylonitrile/butadiene](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072112/575001011a28ab11488ba051/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
970cmÿ1, respectively), double bonds in 1,2-vinyl
groups ÐCH=CH2 (920cmÿ1) and nitrile groups
ÐCN (2235cmÿ1) were reduced in intensity on
irradiation, whereas a new broad band appeared at
3220cmÿ1. The new band is assigned to the stretching
vibrations of =NH and ÐNH2 groups. A small band
centred at 1375cmÿ1 appeared after about 24h
exposure in NBR-16 and NBR-33 rubbers, and is
assigned to the symmetrical deformations of the
methyl group. All these bands attained a constant
intensity after about 100h of radiation.
The changes in peak intensity with increasing dose,
measured with the 2840cmÿ1 band (due to the
stretching vibration of the methylene group), as
internal standard, are shown in Fig 5(a±d). These
plots show that the ole®nic groups in the butadiene
units undergo reaction to a greater extent than the
nitrile groups in the acrylonitrile units, and that rate of
these processes and of the formation of methyl units
decreases with increasing amounts of acrylonitrile in
the rubber. The peak due to methyl groups was not
detected in irradiated NBR-46 rubber. The high
reactivity of polybutadiene units to UV radiation is
due to the lower bond energy of the CÐH and CÐC
bonds at the allylic position,22 and the subsequent
greater stability of the allyl radicals as con®rmed by
ESR.
g-Radiation
The IR spectra of nitrile rubber samples (NBR-33),
before and after g-irradiation to different doses are
shown in Fig 6. The main effects after irradiation are
decreases in peaks due to the ole®nic groups, 1,4-cis(740cmÿ1), 1,4-trans (967cmÿ1) and 1,2-vinyl
(910cmÿ1) and nitrile groups ÐCN (2235cmÿ1).
The absorption band at 910cmÿ1 disappears at the
highest rate during exposure to g-radiation, as has been
reported previously for PBD.8 A new band appears at
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of NBR33; (a) unirradiated, (b) UV-irradiated for48h, and (c) UV-irradiated for 120h.
Figure 5. Changes in the relative absorbance of peaks in the FTIR spectra during UV-irradiation as a function of time; (a) CN groups (2250cmÿ1); (b) 1,2-vinylgroups (910cmÿ1); (c) 1,4-trans double bonds (967cmÿ1); (d) methyl groups (1375cmÿ1).
Polym Int 48:985±992 (1999) 989
UV- and g-radiation of acrylonitrile/butadiene copolymers
![Page 6: A comparative study of the effects of UV- and γ-radiation on copolymers of acrylonitrile/butadiene](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072112/575001011a28ab11488ba051/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
1640±1670cmÿ1, which has been assigned to the
formation of conjugated and cyclic structures.10 The
changes in the relative intensity of the various
absorption bands (Fig 7) were measured taking the
1450cmÿ1 band (CÐH deformation of CH2 groups)
as reference peak, as suggested by Degteva and Pak.23
No Ð(C=N)Ð groups (2185cmÿ1) were observed,
as has been reported for thermal degradation of nitrile
rubber. Infrared spectra also do not give any evidence
for isomerization of the double bonds, because the
majority of the double bonds in the original copoly-
mers are the more stable trans bonds.
The G values for consumption of double bonds G(d
b) up to 1.6MGy, obtained from the IR analysis of the
irradiated polymers, were calculated according to
O'Donnell and Sangster24 and are listed in Table 4.
Measurements of soluble fractions
g-Radiation
The values of G(X) and G(S) were determined from
measurement of the soluble fractions of polymers
which have partially gelled. Charlesby and Pinner25
showed that the soluble fraction s, of a polymer is
related to the radiation dose D in kGy, by eqn (1):
s� s1=2 � G�S�2G�X� �
9:6� 106
MwG�X�D �1�
The Charlesby±Pinner plots for the range of materials
studied is shown in Fig 8. There is a steady decrease in
the fraction of soluble polymer with doses above the
gel dose (Dg� 8.0kGy), while at higher doses a
straight line was obtained. For all of the polymers,
the intercept of the Charlesby±Pinner plot was zero;
hence the yield of main-chain scission reactions G(S)
was negligible. This conclusion is consistent with the
absence of radicals arising from chain scission in the
ESR spectra, as discussed above. The values of G(X),
obtained from the slope of the linear section of the
plots, are listed in Table 4. Previous workers have
reported values of G(X) for PBD27±30 ranging from 3.2
to 5.9, determined by measurements of soluble
fractions and swelling ratios. There is a large un-
certainty in the values of G(X) reported above, largely
due to possible errors in the value of Mw measured by
GPC. However, it appears that the values of G(X) for
PAN and PBD are lower than in the nitrile rubbers,
indicating that in the homopolymers the extent of
intramolecular crosslinking compared with inter-
molecular crosslinking may be greater than in the
copolymers.
UV-irradiation
The corresponding Charlesby±Pinner plots for the ®ve
Figure 6. FTIR spectra of NBR33; (a) unirradiated; (b) g-irradiated to1.6MGy; (c) g-irradiated to 2.4MGy.
Figure 7. Changes in the relative absorbance of peaks in the FTIR spectraduring UV irradiation as a function of dose; CN groups (2250cmÿ1);(b) 1,2-vinyl groups (910cmÿ1); (c) 1,4-trans double bonds (967cmÿ1);(d) crosslinked and cyclic structures (1375cmÿ1).
Figure 8. Charlesby–Pinner plots for g-irradiated PBD, PAN and nitrilerubbers.
990 Polym Int 48:985±992 (1999)
F Cardona et al
![Page 7: A comparative study of the effects of UV- and γ-radiation on copolymers of acrylonitrile/butadiene](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072112/575001011a28ab11488ba051/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
UV-irradiated samples are shown in Fig 9. The data
are plotted as functions of the square root of time,
rather than absorbed dose: hence absolute values of
G(X) could not be calculated from the slopes of these
plots. However, the values of the G(S)/G(X) ratio were
calculated from the intercept at zero irradiation time,
and are plotted in Fig 10. The decreasing ratio of
scission to crosslinking with increasing acrylonitrile
content suggests that chain scission occurs at the BD
units.
CONCLUSIONSThe fundamental differences between the mechanisms
of degradation of nitrile rubbers by g- and UV-
radiolysis can be brie¯y summarized as follows:
. The total yield of radical products decreases with
AN content during UV radiolysis, but increases
on g-radiolysis.. On UV radiolysis radicals derived from the PBD
dominate the ESR spectra: however, for g-radiolysis the spectra are composed of radicals
derived from both monomer units.. The ®nal yield of products mirrors the observa-
tion of radical yields, ie for UV the rate of
formation of products decreases with increasing
AN content, but increases on g-radiolysis.. On UV photolysis a signi®cant yield of chain
scission is observed, whereas for g-radiolysis no
scission occurs. The yield of chain scission on UV
radiolysis decreases with increasing AN content.
The above statements re¯ect the different mechan-
isms of deposition of energy into the polymers on
radiolysis, and the mechanism of energy transfer. On
g-radiolysis the initial processes occurring are ioniza-
tion of both BD and AN groups, followed by decay to
free radical intermediates. The radical species most
probably formed are those due to loss of H atoms,
which can escape the surrounding cage of neighbour-
ing chains. These radicals are likely to have consider-
able kinetic energy resulting from the very high energy
of the incident radiation. The highly mobile H atoms
may then abstract other H atoms, resulting in stable
polymer radicals situated at the allylic position. The
high concentration of H atoms also initiates the
formation of conjugated polyimine radicals.
On UV radiolysis the main chromophores at the
wavelengths used are the BD double bonds. The
energy absorbed directly by these groups is dissipated
by cleavage of both the allylic CÐH and CÐC bonds.
The AN groups have a UV absorption spectrum which
tails off above 220nm, and so do not participate
directly in the primary degradation processes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors would like to acknowledge the Australian
Research Council and the Australian Institute of
Nuclear Science and Engineering for ®nancial support
of this work.
REFERENCES1 Rabek JF, Ranby B and Skowronski FA, Polym Deg Stab 5:173
(1983).
2 Bousquet JA and Fouassier JP, Polym Deg Stab 5:113 (1983).
3 Adam C, Lacoste J and Lemaire J, Polym Deg Stab 27:85 (1990).
4 Rabek JF and Lala D, Eur Polym J 17:7 (1981).
5 Takao D and Georges S, Macromolecules 22:25 (1989).
6 Coleman MM and Petcavich RJ, J Polym Sci Polym Chem Ed
16:821 (1978).
7 Pak NI, Degteva TG and Sedov VV, Vysokomol Soyed A 21:2099
(1979).
8 Degteva TG and Pak NI, Polym Sci USSR 29:1750 (1978).
9 Zigmunt MM, Il'cheva ZF, Shapiro BI, Degteva TG and
Slovokhotova NA, Khim Vysok E 13:416 (1979).
10 Hill DJT, O'Donnell JH, Perera MCS and Pomery PJ, J Polym
Sci Polym Chem Ed 34:2439 (1996).
11 Brennan WD, Brophy JJ and Schonhorn SB, Organic Semi-
conductors, Macmillan, New York. p 159 (1962).
12 Cardoso LG and Kawano Y, Polym Deg Stab 44:27 (1994).
13 Murthy MR and Radhakrishna S, Indian J Pure Appl Phys 21:582
(1982).
14 Garrett RW, PhD Thesis, University of Queensland (1984).
15 Carstensen P, Makromol Chem 142:131 (1971).
16 RaÊnby B and Yoshida H, J Polym Sci C 16:1333 (1967).
17 Umezu K, Shimada S, Kashiwahara H and Sohma J, Rep Progr
Polym Phys Jpn 11:475 (1968).
Figure 9. Charlesby–Pinner plots for UV-irradiated PBD, PAN and nitrilerubbers.
Figure 10. Ratio of the yields of scission to crosslinking, G(S)/G(X), as afunction of AN content in photolysed NBR rubbers.
Polym Int 48:985±992 (1999) 991
UV- and g-radiation of acrylonitrile/butadiene copolymers
![Page 8: A comparative study of the effects of UV- and γ-radiation on copolymers of acrylonitrile/butadiene](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072112/575001011a28ab11488ba051/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
18 RaÊnby B and Rabek JF, ESR Spectroscopy in Polymer Research,
Springer-Verlag, New York. p 199 (1977).
19 Murphy M and Radhakrishna S, Pramana 20:85 (1983).
20 Hill DJT, Lang AP, O'Donnell JH and Pomery PJ, Polym Degr
Stab 38:193 (1992).
21 De Paoli MA, Eur Polym J 19(9):761 (1983).
22 Fochler HS, Mooney JR, Ball LE, Boyer RD and Grasselli JG,
Spectrochim Acta Part A 41:271 (1985).
23 Degteva TG, Pak NI and Sedov VV, Polym Sci USSR 21:2318
(1978).
24 O'Donnell JH and Sangster DF, Principles of Radiation Chemistry
Arnold, London. pp 160±169 (1970).
25 Charlesby A and Pinner SH, Proc R Soc Ser A 249:367 (1959).
26 Kozlov VT, Yevseyev AG and Zubov PI, Polym Sci USSR
11:2539 (1969).
27 Witt W, J Polym Sci 41:507 (1959).
28 Jankowski B and Kroh J, J Appl Polym Sci 9:363 (1965).
29 Jankowski B and Kroh J, J Appl Polym Sci 13:1795 (1969).
30 Miller SM, Spindler MV and Vale RL, J Polym Sci A 1:2537
(1963).
31 Hasegawa S and Shimizu T, Jpn J Appl Phys 9:958 (1970).
32 Smith P, Kaba RA and Person JT, J Mag Rerson 17:20 (1975).
992 Polym Int 48:985±992 (1999)
F Cardona et al