a genetic diversity study of antifungal lactobacillus

27
Accepted Manuscript A genetic diversity study of antifungal Lactobacillus plantarum isolates An-Ran Dong, Van Thi Thuy Ho, Raquel Lo, Nidhi Bansal, Mark S. Turner PII: S0956-7135(16)30389-9 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.07.026 Reference: JFCO 5152 To appear in: Food Control Received Date: 10 May 2016 Revised Date: 15 July 2016 Accepted Date: 20 July 2016 Please cite this article as: Dong A.-R., Thuy Ho V.T., Lo R., Bansal N. & Turner M.S., A genetic diversity study of antifungal Lactobacillus plantarum isolates, Food Control (2016), doi: 10.1016/ j.foodcont.2016.07.026. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. brought to you by CORE View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk provided by University of Queensland eSpace

Upload: others

Post on 31-Oct-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Accepted Manuscript

A genetic diversity study of antifungal Lactobacillus plantarum isolates

An-Ran Dong, Van Thi Thuy Ho, Raquel Lo, Nidhi Bansal, Mark S. Turner

PII: S0956-7135(16)30389-9

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.07.026

Reference: JFCO 5152

To appear in: Food Control

Received Date: 10 May 2016

Revised Date: 15 July 2016

Accepted Date: 20 July 2016

Please cite this article as: Dong A.-R., Thuy Ho V.T., Lo R., Bansal N. & Turner M.S., A geneticdiversity study of antifungal Lactobacillus plantarum isolates, Food Control (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.07.026.

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service toour customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergocopyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Pleasenote that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and alllegal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

brought to you by COREView metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk

provided by University of Queensland eSpace

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

A genetic diversity study of antifungal Lactobacillus plantarum isolates. 1

2

An-Ran Donga, Van Thi Thuy Hoa, Raquel Loa, Nidhi Bansala and Mark S. Turnera, b* 3

4

aSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; 5

bQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, 6

Brisbane, Australia. 7

8

9

*Corresponding author: 10

Mark S. Turner, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, 11

Brisbane, Australia Tel: +61-7 33651171, Fax: +61-7 33651177, E-mail. 12

[email protected] 13

14

Running head: DNA typing of antifungal Lactobacillus plantarum. 15

Key words: Lactobacillus plantarum, typing, antifungal, Penicillium commune, MLVA 16

17

18

19

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT1

Abstract 20

Lactobacillus plantarum is a lactic acid bacterium commonly found on fruits and vegetables 21

and also used in a variety of food fermentations. Strains from this species are also regularly 22

reported as having antifungal or probiotic activity. Genotyping methods can be used to 23

differentiate strains of the same species thus determining if strains are related or not. 24

However for L. plantarum, the currently used methods have limitations including DNA band 25

profile interpretation difficulty and cost. In this study, a new genotyping method based on 26

multi-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) analysis was developed and 27

compared to a previously reported randomly amplified polymorphic DNA-PCR (RAPD-28

PCR) method for L. plantarum. With a selection of 13 antifungal strains of L. plantarum 29

isolated from heterogeneous sources (cheese, silage, sauerkraut, vegetables and a probiotic 30

product), RAPD-PCR revealed 9 different profiles resulting in a Hunter-Gaston 31

discrimination index (D-value) of 0.94. The new MLVA method which compares the lengths 32

of 4 repetitive regions within LPXTG motif-containing surface protein genes differentiated 33

the 13 L. plantarum strains into 10 different subtypes leading to a D-value of 0.95. 34

Interestingly 11 additional L. plantarum isolates obtained in a previous study during a screen 35

for antifungal activity against the common cheese spoilage mould Penicillium commune all 36

possessed the same RAPD-PCR and MLVA profile as each other and the commercial 37

probiotic strain L. plantarum 299v. This study demonstrates that the new MLVA method can 38

be used to simply and inexpensively differentiate L. plantarum strains and provide 39

information regarding strain relatedness and thus potential insight into strain properties. 40

41

42

43

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT2

1. Introduction 44

Lactobacillus spp. are members of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) group, are commonly found 45

in the environment and raw foods and have generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status. 46

They are key components in a variety of fermentations whereby their production of organic 47

acids and other antimicrobial compounds enhance the quality and safety of foods (Reis, 48

Paula, Casarotti, & Penna, 2012). Lactobacillus plantarum is one species of particular 49

interest as it is used in dairy, vegetable and meat fermentations, in the conversion of grass to 50

silage and some strains are marketed as a commercial probiotics with health promoting 51

properties (de Vries, Vaughan, Kleerebezem, & de Vos, 2006). In studies where large LAB 52

collections were screened for antifungal activity, L. plantarum was frequently isolated 53

(Cheong et al., 2014; Crowley, Mahony, & van Sinderen, 2013a; Magnusson, Strom, Roos, 54

Sjogren, & Schnurer, 2003). Antifungal activity of L. plantarum strains has been shown to 55

be due to organic acids, phenyllactic acid, cyclic dipeptides and fatty acids (Crowley, 56

Mahony, & van Sinderen, 2013b), however the genetic basis for the production of these 57

compounds has not been characterised at present. 58

59

Genotyping or subtyping methods can provide information about the relatedness of strains 60

within a species. For L. plantarum, the most commonly used subtyping method has been 61

random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) PCR (Di Cagno et al., 2010; Johansson, 62

Quednau, Molin, & Ahrne, 1995; Rossetti & Giraffa, 2005). Other subtyping methods such 63

as amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and restriction fragment length 64

polymorphism (RFLP) have been used to characterise L. plantarum and to differentiate it 65

from closely related species (Johansson, Molin, Pettersson, Uhlen, & Ahrne, 1995; Torriani 66

et al., 2001). Two multilocus sequence typing (MLST) schemes for L. plantarum have been 67

developed (de Las Rivas, Marcobal, & Munoz, 2006; Xu et al., 2015). However MLST can 68

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT3

be costly, involving sequencing of 6-8 housekeeping gene loci for each strain. These MLST 69

methods have identified up to 73 subgroups within L. plantarum suggesting the species is 70

genetically heterogeneous and may have variation in phenotypes such as antifungal activity. 71

72

Although the above genotyping methods have provided valuable information on the L. 73

plantarum species, they have limitations including discriminatory power, difficulties in band 74

profile interpretation or cost. Multilocus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) is 75

a subtyping method which involves analysis of repetitive regions which can be identified 76

from whole genome sequences using online programs such as Tandem Repeat Finder (TRF) 77

(Benson, 1999). Repeat regions undergo rapid evolution due to slip-strand mispairing 78

leading to good discriminatory power (Keim et al., 2004). DNA fragments are amplified and 79

their lengths can be compared using capillary electrophoresis, high resolution melt analysis 80

(HRMA) or more simply with agarose gel electrophoresis. With respect to foodborne 81

bacteria, MLVA has been successfully used to differentiate strains within Lactobacillus casei 82

(Diancourt et al., 2007), Bifidobacterium longum (Matamoros, Savard, & Roy, 2011), 83

Clostridium tyrobutyricum (Nishihara et al., 2014), Geobacillus spp. (Seale et al., 2012) 84

Krilaviciute & Kuisiene, 2013), Bacillus licheniformis (Dhakal et al., 2013), Staphylococcus 85

aureus (Schouls et al., 2009), Listeria monocytogenes (Chen, Li, Saleh-Lakha, Allen, & 86

Odumeru, 2011) and Salmonella enterica (Kruy, van Cuyck, & Koeck, 2011). 87

88

In this report, a new MLVA method was developed and compared to an established RAPD-89

PCR method for genotyping L. plantarum strains from a variety of sources. Both gave 90

congruent results and showed that antifungal L. plantarum strains are genetically 91

heterogeneous. In addition, the new MLVA method proved to be more discriminatory and 92

easier to interpret than the RAPD-PCR method. 93

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT4

2. Materials and Methods 94

2.1. Bacteria, mould and their growth conditions. 95

Eleven L. plantarum isolates from a variety of sources, one commercial probiotic strain L. 96

plantarum 299v, 12 previously identified antifungal strains and 2 non-antifungal control 97

isolates Weissella soli and Lactococcus lactis (Table 1) were collected from previous research 98

(Cheong et al., 2014). All bacterial isolates were cultured using de Man Rogosa Sharpe 99

(MRS; Oxoid) media containing 1.5% agar and were incubated at 30°C for 24 h under 100

anaerobic conditions (AnaeroGen system; Oxoid). Strains were grown in MRS broth and 101

incubated at 30°C overnight under non-shaking conditions. Bacteria and mould were frozen 102

in 40% glycerol at -80°C for long-term storage. P. commune FRR 4117 was plated out on 103

malt extract agar (MEA; Difco) from a frozen stock, and incubated at room temperature 104

(~23°C) for 7 days. 105

2.2. Antifungal activity testing. 106

All L. plantarum strains were tested against Penicillium commune FRR 4117 on MEA plates 107

using a method similar to that described previously (Cheong et al., 2014). P. commune 108

spores were harvested from MEA plates using 0.2 % (w/v) peptone water (Oxoid), and the 109

concentration was adjusted to an OD600 of 0.5 (~1 × 106 mould spores/ml). The P. commune 110

spore suspension (130 µl) was added to 8 ml of soft MEA (0.7% agar) and was poured onto 111

an MRS agar base (15 ml). L. plantarum strains (5 µl) from pure frozen stocks were spotted 112

onto the fully dried P. commune-containing plates. Plates were first incubated anaerobically 113

at 30°C for 24 h to allow efficient growth of L. plantarum and then incubated aerobically at 114

room temperature (~23°C) for 3 days. Inhibition of P. commune growth was seen when the 115

mould did not grow to the edge of the bacterial colony. Non-antifungal isolates W. soli 33 and 116

L. lactis 38 (Cheong et al., 2014) were included as negative controls in the test and P. 117

commune was able to grow over their colonies. 118

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT5

2.3. RAPD-PCR amplification and gel electrophoresis. 119

The RAPD-PCR method used was adapted from that described previously (Di Cagno et al., 120

2010) using the M13 primer (5'-GAGGGTGGCGGTTCT-3') for amplification. The 121

GenEluteTM Bacterial Genomic DNA Kit (Sigma) was used to extract bacterial DNA from 122

1.5 ml of overnight broth culture using the manufacturer’s instructions, with 200 µl elution 123

solution used. A 25 µl total reaction volume for each sample contained 12.5 µl of GoTaq® 124

Green 2x Master Mix (Promega), 2 µl of primer M13 (final concentration 6 µM), 9.5 µl water 125

and 1 µl of undiluted bacterial DNA template. Negative controls where water replaced the 126

template DNA were included in all runs. Thirty amplification cycles: 94°C / 60 sec, 42°C / 127

20 sec and 72°C / 2 min were carried out after an initial 94°C / 2 min denaturation. A final 128

extension step of 72 °C / 10 min was performed. The PCR products were resolved using a 129

1.5% agarose gel in TAE buffer and stained using SYBR® Safe (Invitrogen). A DNA marker 130

was included in each gel (1 kb plus ladder, Invitrogen). Gels were run at 100 V for 2 h 131

(Mini-300 unit; Major Science) and the banding profiles were captured under UV light 132

(Smart View Pro 1100 Imager System; Major Science). Groupings were identified and the 133

Hunter-Gaston discriminatory index (D-value) was determined (Hunter & Gaston, 1988). 134

2.4. MLVA development. 135

The TRF program (Benson, 1999) was used to identify the DNA repeat regions in L. 136

plantarum WCFS1 (GenBank accession: NC_004567.2). Eighty five repeat regions were 137

located and 23 loci were chosen based on having a repeat sizes ≥ 20bp and a repeat copy 138

number of ≥ 2 based on that done previously (Seale et al., 2012). Primer-BLAST 139

(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) was used to design primers flanking the 140

repeat regions (Ye et al., 2012). Two hundred bp of flanking DNA and the repeat region 141

were analysed by Primer-BLAST and 46 primers for the 23 repeat loci were obtained. Four 142

isolates (278, 291, 1299 and 299v; Table 1) were used to test the 23 sets of primers. The 143

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT6

thermal cycling conditions were: 95°C / 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C / 15 sec, 63°C 144

/ 30 sec, 72°C / 2 min followed by a final extension step of 72°C / 2 min. The PCR products 145

were resolved using a 2.5% agarose gel with conditions as described above. Four primers 146

which generated PCR products with the greatest variation in length using the 4 tested strains 147

were named variable number tandem repeat 1 (VNTR1), VNTR2, VNTR3 and VNTR4 148

(Table 2) and were used to amplify DNA from all strains. Based on different sizes of the 149

PCR products, bands were scored from 1 to 6, with 1 being the largest PCR fragment. 150

151

3. Results 152

3.1. RAPD-PCR analysis of antifungal L. plantarum isolates from a variety of sources. 153

In previous work, antifungal L. plantarum strains were identified in a screen of isolates from 154

fruits and vegetables (Cheong et al., 2014). Testing of additional food and probiotic L. 155

plantarum strains listed in Table 1 for antifungal activity against P. commune was carried out. 156

It was found that all L. plantarum isolates inhibited P. commune growth similar to that shown 157

for strains 299v, ASCC 3005 and 885 (Figure 1). To explore the genetic relatedness of 158

antifungal L. plantarum strains, a previously described RAPD-PCR genotyping method was 159

adopted (Di Cagno et al., 2010). Thirteen selected L. plantarum isolates from a variety of 160

sources including cheese, silage, sauerkraut, green beans and a commercial probiotic (Table 161

1) were analysed by RAPD-PCR with primer M13. Based on product profiles, the sizes of 162

amplified products ranged from approximately 200bp to 2,500bp, and nine main clusters (A 163

to I) were identified from 13 isolates (Figure 2). Two PCR fragments from isolates ASCC 164

276 and ASCC 281 (group A) were observed and the sizes were around 1,800bp and 350bp. 165

A similar pattern was shown in strain ASCC 2973, however the 350 bp PCR product was not 166

present, therefore it was differentiated into group B. Highly similar banding patterns were 167

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT7

observed from isolates ASCC 278, ASCC 291 and ASCC 3005 (group C). Unique banding 168

patterns divided isolates ASCC 289, ASCC 368, ASCC 1239, ASCC 1299 and ASCC 1398 169

into 5 different groups (D, E, F, G and H). The probiotic strain 299v produced the same 170

banding pattern as strain 897 (group I) obtained previously from the antifungal screening 171

study (Cheong et al., 2014). The 9 groups identified from the 13 isolates resulted in a 172

Hunter-Gaston discrimination index (D-value) of 0.94 (Table 3). 173

3.2. MLVA development and analysis of L. plantarum isolates from a variety of sources. 174

To simplify the interpretation of band profiles and to determine if a more discriminatory 175

method could be devised, a MLVA method was investigated. Eighty-five repetitive regions 176

were identified in the L. plantarum WCFS1 genome (NC_004567.2) using the TRF program. 177

PCR primers were designed from repetitive regions which were ≥20bp in length and 178

consisted of ≥2 repeats. These 23 primer sets were used to amplify DNA from four strains 179

which produced a mix of the same (ASCC 278, ASCC 291) and different (ASCC 1299 and 180

299v) RAPD-PCR subtypes. Four of the 23 primer sets generated PCR products on all tested 181

isolates and showed variation in PCR product lengths. Interestingly all 4 genes within which 182

the VNTRs were located were found to encode repetitive LPXTG motif anchored cell surface 183

proteins. The binding sites for each set of primers along with the repeat numbers for L. 184

plantarum WCFS1 are shown in Figure 3. These four primer sets were used to amplify all 13 185

L. plantarum strains analysed using RAPD-PCR described above (Figure 4). Based on the 186

size differences of the amplified PCR products from the 4 VNTR loci, the 13 isolates could 187

be classified into 10 groups (Table 3). L. plantarum strains ASCC 276 and ASCC 281, 188

which had the same RAPD-PCR profiles, could be differentiated into two groups using 189

MLVA with the length of VNTR4 being clearly different between the two isolates (Figure 190

4D). Like RAPD-PCR, MLVA clustered group C isolates (ASCC 278, ASCC 291 and 191

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT8

ASCC 3005) and group I isolates (299v and 897) together with all the other isolates being 192

different to each other, demonstrating that the two typing methods are highly consistent. The 193

discrimination of the two isolates (ASCC 276 and ASCC 281) from RAPD-PCR group A 194

gave MLVA a slightly improved D-value of 0.95 (Table 3). 195

Eleven other antifungal L. plantarum strains (Table 1) which were isolated from the previous 196

Cheong et al (2014) study were analysed by both RAPD-PCR and MLVA. They all 197

produced identical RAPD-PCR and MLVA profiles as each other and strains 897 and 299v 198

(data not shown). 199

200

4. Discussion 201

In this study a new MLVA method was developed and validated using antifungal L. 202

plantarum strains from a variety of sources. This method was found to have greater 203

discriminatory power than the previously reported RAPD-PCR method and also allow for 204

simpler band profile interpretation. It was observed that genetically distinct strains contained 205

antifungal activity against P. commune which agrees with the knowledge that different 206

antifungal inhibitory compounds (phenyllactic acid, fatty acids and cyclic dipeptides) are 207

produced by different L. plantarum strains. The antifungal mechanism(s) of the strains in the 208

current study are not yet known, however by using genotyping techniques, strains of the same 209

subtype are predicted to produce the same antifungal compound(s). Genotyping methods are 210

also useful for distinguishing unrelated strains which may have different phenotypes leading 211

to different performance abilities in food processing situations. Therefore, the new MLVA 212

method developed here is useful in the early stages of L. plantarum strain characterisation 213

and development for subsequent food technology applications. 214

215

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT9

To date, molecular characterisation and comparison between antifungal isolates of L. 216

plantarum has been limited. However, the complete genome sequence of antifungal L. 217

plantarum 16 has been published (Crowley, Bottacini, Mahony, & van Sinderen, 2013) and 218

genome shuffling of L. plantarum IMAU10014 has been shown to improve antifungal 219

activity (Wang et al., 2013). The two genotyping methods used here were found to provide 220

good discriminatory power and congruent results with a selection of L. plantarum strains. 221

The first method involving RAPD-PCR with an M13 primer generated a high number of 222

bands and generated consistent profiles between runs and also for different DNA templates 223

from the same strain. Other RAPD-PCR primers that have been used for L. plantarum 224

including P4 and P7 (Di Cagno et al., 2010) were also tested, but only a few bands were 225

generated (data not shown). An inherent issue with RAPD-PCR is that slight modifications 226

in DNA extraction methods (Cocconcelli, Porro, Galandini, & Senini, 1995) or PCR cycling 227

conditions can lead to variations in banding profiles and it can be difficult to interpret 228

profiles, in particular where faint bands are present in one isolate and not another. Therefore, 229

a new method was developed based on DNA repeat regions in the L. plantarum genome 230

which also relies on agarose gel electrophoresis but interpretation is made simpler as only one 231

band is produced for each VNTR PCR and the size differences are clear. Gold standard 232

methods including MLST have been developed for L. plantarum (de Las Rivas et al., 2006; 233

Xu et al., 2015), but the cost of Sanger sequencing of 6-8 housekeeping gene loci per isolate 234

prohibits labs from doing this analysis routinely. With the costs of next generation 235

sequencing falling rapidly, it is likely that draft genome sequence-based typing will become 236

commonplace. 237

238

Interestingly it was found that all 4 VNTR loci were from large repetitive LPXTG-family 239

surface proteins. This was not deliberately intended, as the TRF program was used to 240

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT10

identify repeat regions in the L. plantarum genome. In similar studies in B. licheniformis and 241

Geobacillus spp., TRF did not identify any VNTR regions from within surface protein genes 242

(Dhakal et al., 2013; Seale et al., 2012). The number of LPXTG anchoring domain 243

containing proteins in L. plantarum is at the high end when compared to other Firmicutes 244

(Boekhorst, de Been, Kleerebezem, & Siezen, 2005). L. plantarum WCFS1 contains 27 such 245

proteins and these types of proteins are involved in adhesion to bacterial and host cells, 246

surfaces and mucus. Proteins and domains which are repeated can provided greater binding 247

affinity or allow greater extension from the cell surface (Foster & Hook, 1998). Since these 248

proteins are extracellularly exposed, they can undergo fast evolutionary changes in response 249

to changes in the environment in which the cell exists, such as that seen in the case of S. 250

aureus protein A (Shopsin et al., 1999). One LPXTG-containing surface protein that is well 251

characterised in L. plantarum is the mannose specific adhesin Msa (Pretzer et al., 2005) and a 252

repeat region in the encoding gene was identified by the TRF program where 23 loci were 253

initially identified. Primers were designed against the repeat region in the msa gene and PCR 254

was carried out on several of our isolates. Variations in repeat length were seen, a result in 255

agreement with variations in repeat number previously identified (Gross, Snel, Boekhorst, 256

Smits, & Kleerebezem, 2010). However only half of the isolates generated a PCR product, 257

making msa unsuitable for use as a genotyping target. These results are in agreement with 258

Pretzer et al (2005) where the absence of msa in several L. plantarum allowed for the 259

discovery of its role in mannose specific cell agglutination. 260

261

Interestingly all the 12 L. plantarum strains collected in our previous work, in which a 262

collection of 897 LAB were screened for antifungal activity (Cheong et al., 2014), contained 263

identical RAPD-PCR and MLVA genotypes. These isolates were from a variety of sources 264

but the majority were isolated from vegetables from the same retail outlet. Strains shown in 265

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT11

Table 1 with numbers in the 800s were isolated from vegetables purchased from the same 266

store, while strains 170 and 377 were from different stores. It is possible that these 267

vegetables were all harvested from the same farm or farming region and then distributed to 268

different retailers, thereby explaining why they have identical genotypes. It is therefore 269

likely that they are clonal and share the same antifungal mechanism of action. Interestingly 270

they have the same genotype with the commercial probiotic strain 299v. L. plantarum 299v 271

is a well-researched probiotic strain and has shown potential in the treatment of irritable 272

bowel syndrome (Ducrotte, Sawant, & Jayanthi, 2012; Niedzielin, Kordecki, & Birkenfeld, 273

2001) and cardiovascular disease (Naruszewicz, Johansson, Zapolska-Downar, & Bukowska, 274

2002). It was shown that 299v has antifungal activity and therefore may find application in 275

food both as a probiotic and biopreservative. It is also possible that the strains identified 276

from the antifungal LAB screen (Cheong et al., 2014) have probiotic properties similar to 277

299v, but more work is needed to test this hypothesis. 278

279

In conclusion, is was demonstrated that a newly developed MLVA genotyping method can be 280

used to differentiate antifungal L. plantarum strains. Future work understanding the 281

antifungal mechanism of action and the genetic basis of this activity of different strain 282

subtype groups will be of interest. Genotyping methods thus can provide valuable 283

information to underpin the development and application of biopreservative strains to reduce 284

mould spoilage in food. 285

286

287

Acknowledgements 288

We thank Whitney Beddoes for her work in the initial stages of the project and Dairy 289

Innovation Australia Limited for the provision of strains. 290

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT12

291

292

References 293

294

Benson, G. (1999). Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic 295

Acids Res, 27(2), 573-580. 296

Boekhorst, J., de Been, M. W., Kleerebezem, M., & Siezen, R. J. (2005). Genome-wide 297

detection and analysis of cell wall-bound proteins with LPxTG-like sorting motifs. Journal of 298

Bacteriology, 187(14), 4928-4934. 299

Chen, S., Li, J., Saleh-Lakha, S., Allen, V., & Odumeru, J. (2011). Multiple-locus variable 300

number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) of Listeria monocytogenes directly in food 301

samples. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 148(1), 8-14. 302

Cheong, E. Y. L., Sandhu, A., Jayabalan, J., Kieu Le, T. T., Nhiep, N. T., My Ho, H. T., et al. 303

(2014). Isolation of lactic acid bacteria with antifungal activity against the common cheese 304

spoilage mould Penicillium commune and their potential as biopreservatives in cheese. Food 305

Control, 46, 91-97. 306

Cocconcelli, P. S., Porro, D., Galandini, S., & Senini, L. (1995). Development of RAPD 307

protocol for typing of strains of lactic acid bacteria and Enterococci. Letters in Applied 308

Microbiology, 21(6), 376-379. 309

Crowley, S., Bottacini, F., Mahony, J., & van Sinderen, D. (2013). Complete genome 310

sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum strain 16, a broad-spectrum antifungal-producing lactic 311

acid bacterium. Genome Announc, 1(4), e00533. 312

Crowley, S., Mahony, J., & van Sinderen, D. (2013a). Broad-spectrum antifungal producing 313

lactic acid bacteria and their application in fruit models. Folia Microbiologica, 58(4), 291-314

299. 315

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT13

Crowley, S., Mahony, J., & van Sinderen, D. (2013b). Current perspectives on antifungal 316

lactic acid bacteria as natural bio-preservatives. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 33(2), 317

93-109. 318

de Las Rivas, B., Marcobal, A., & Munoz, R. (2006). Development of a multilocus sequence 319

typing method for analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Microbiology, 152(1), 85-93. 320

de Vries, M. C., Vaughan, E. E., Kleerebezem, M., & de Vos, W. M. (2006). Lactobacillus 321

plantarum: survival, functional and potential probiotic properties in the human intestinal 322

tract. International Dairy Journal, 16(9), 1018-1028. 323

Dhakal, R., Chauhan, K., Seale, R. B., Deeth, H. C., Pillidge, C. J., Powell, I. B., et al. 324

(2013). Genotyping of dairy Bacillus licheniformis isolates by high resolution melt analysis 325

of multiple variable number tandem repeat loci. Food Microbiology, 34(2), 344-351. 326

Di Cagno, R., Minervini, G., Sgarbi, E., Lazzi, C., Bernini, V., Neviani, E., et al. (2010). 327

Comparison of phenotypic (Biolog System) and genotypic (random amplified polymorphic 328

DNA-polymerase chain reaction, RAPD-PCR, and amplified fragment length polymorphism, 329

AFLP) methods for typing Lactobacillus plantarum isolates from raw vegetables and fruits. 330

International Journal of Food Microbiology, 143(3), 246-253. 331

Diancourt, L., Passet, V., Chervaux, C., Garault, P., Smokvina, T., & Brisse, S. (2007). 332

Multilocus sequence typing of Lactobacillus casei reveals a clonal population structure with 333

low levels of homologous recombination. Appl Environ Microbiol, 73(20), 6601-6611. 334

Ducrotte, P., Sawant, P., & Jayanthi, V. (2012). Clinical trial: Lactobacillus plantarum 299v 335

(DSM 9843) improves symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol, 336

18(30), 4012-4018. 337

Foster, T. J., & Hook, M. (1998). Surface protein adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus. Trends 338

Microbiol, 6(12), 484-488. 339

Gross, G., Snel, J., Boekhorst, J., Smits, M. A., & Kleerebezem, M. (2010). Biodiversity of 340

mannose-specific adhesion in Lactobacillus plantarum revisited: strain-specific domain 341

composition of the mannose-adhesin. Benef Microbes, 1(1), 61-66. 342

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT14

Hunter, P. R., & Gaston, M. A. (1988). Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of 343

typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol, 26(11), 344

2465-2466. 345

Johansson, M. L., Molin, G., Pettersson, B., Uhlen, M., & Ahrne, S. (1995). Characterization 346

and species recognition of Lactobacillus plantarum strains by restriction-fragment-length-347

polymorphism (RFLP) of the 16s ribosomal RNA gene. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 348

79(5), 536-541. 349

Johansson, M. L., Quednau, M., Molin, G., & Ahrne, S. (1995). Randomly amplified 350

polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for rapid typing of Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Letters in 351

Applied Microbiology, 21(3), 155-159. 352

Keim, P., Van Ert, M. N., Pearson, T., Vogler, A. J., Huynh, L. Y., & Wagner, D. M. (2004). 353

Anthrax molecular epidemiology and forensics: using the appropriate marker for different 354

evolutionary scales. Infection Genetics and Evolution, 4(3), 205-213. 355

Kruy, S. L., van Cuyck, H., & Koeck, J. L. (2011). Multilocus variable number tandem repeat 356

analysis for Salmonella enterica subspecies. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and 357

Infectious Diseases, 30(4), 465-473. 358

Magnusson, J., Strom, K., Roos, S., Sjogren, J., & Schnurer, J. (2003). Broad and complex 359

antifungal activity among environmental isolates of lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol 360

Lett, 219(1), 129-135. 361

Matamoros, S., Savard, P., & Roy, D. (2011). Genotyping of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. 362

longum strains by multilocus variable number of tandem repeat analysis. Journal of 363

Microbiological Methods, 87(3), 378-380. 364

Naruszewicz, M., Johansson, M. L., Zapolska-Downar, D., & Bukowska, H. (2002). Effect of 365

Lactobacillus plantarum 299v on cardiovascular disease risk factors in smokers. American 366

Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 76(6), 1249-1255. 367

Niedzielin, K., Kordecki, H., & Birkenfeld, B. (2001). A controlled, double-blind, 368

randomized study on the efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v in patients with irritable 369

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT15

bowel syndrome. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 13(10), 1143-370

1147. 371

Nishihara, M., Takahashi, H., Sudo, T., Kyoi, D., Kawahara, T., Ikeuchi, Y., et al. (2014). 372

Multilocus variable-number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) for Clostridium 373

tyrobutyricum strains isolated from cheese production environment. International Journal of 374

Food Microbiology, 190, 61-65. 375

Pretzer, G., Snel, J., Molenaar, D., Wiersma, A., Bron, P. A., Lambert, J., et al. (2005). 376

Biodiversity-based identification and functional characterization of the mannose-specific 377

adhesin of Lactobacillus plantarum. Journal of Bacteriology, 187(17), 6128-6136. 378

Reis, J. A., Paula, A. T., Casarotti, S. N., & Penna, A. L. B. (2012). Lactic acid bacteria 379

antimicrobial compounds: Characteristics and applications. Food Engineering Reviews, 4(2), 380

124-140. 381

Rossetti, L., & Giraffa, G. (2005). Rapid identification of dairy lactic acid bacteria by M13-382

generated, RAPD-PCR fingerprint databases. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 63(2), 383

135-144. 384

Schouls, L. M., Spalburg, E. C., van Luit, M., Huijsdens, X. W., Pluister, G. N., van Santen-385

Verheuvel, M. G., et al. (2009). Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis of 386

Staphylococcus aureus: comparison with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and spa-typing. 387

PLoS One, 4(4), e5082. 388

Seale, R. B., Dhakal, R., Chauhan, K., Craven, H. M., Deeth, H. C., Pillidge, C. J., et al. 389

(2012). Genotyping of present-day and historical Geobacillus species isolates from milk 390

powders by high-resolution melt analysis of multiple variable-number tandem-repeat loci. 391

Appl Environ Microbiol, 78(19), 7090-7097. 392

Shopsin, B., Gomez, M., Montgomery, S. O., Smith, D. H., Waddington, M., Dodge, D. E., et 393

al. (1999). Evaluation of protein A gene polymorphic region DNA sequencing for typing of 394

Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol, 37(11), 3556-3563. 395

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT16

Torriani, S., Clementi, F., Vancanneyt, M., Hoste, B., Dellaglio, F., & Kersters, K. (2001). 396

Differentiation of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. pentosus and L. paraplantarum species by 397

RAPD-PCR and AFLP. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 24(4), 554-560. 398

Wang, H. K., Sun, Y., Chen, C., Sun, Z., Zhou, Y. C., Shen, F. D., et al. (2013). Genome 399

shuffling of Lactobacillus plantarum for improving antifungal activity. Food Control, 32(2), 400

341-347. 401

Xu, H., Liu, W., Zhang, W., Yu, J., Song, Y., Menhe, B., et al. (2015). Use of multilocus 402

sequence typing to infer genetic diversity and population structure of Lactobacillus 403

plantarum isolates from different sources. Bmc Microbiology, 15(1), 241. 404

Ye, J., Coulouris, G., Zaretskaya, I., Cutcutache, I., Rozen, S., & Madden, T. (2012). Primer-405

BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC 406

Bioinformatics, 13, 134. 407

408

409

410

Figure legends. 411

Figure 1. Antifungal activity assay of L. plantarum strains 299v, ASCC 3005 and 885 and 412

negative control LAB W. soli 33 and L. lactis 38 against P. commune. 413

414

Figure 2. RAPD-PCR analysis of selected L. plantarum strains using the M13 primer. The 415

groups are indicated above the strain name with a single capital letter. M is the DNA marker 416

and NC is the no template negative control PCR. 417

418

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT17

Figure 3. Selected VNTR regions from four LPXTG motif-containing surface protein 419

encoding genes from L. plantarum WCFS1. Primer binding sites are shown as arrow heads 420

and repeat numbers from strain WCFS1 are shown. The numbered ruler refers to nucleotides. 421

422

Figure 4. MLVA of selected L. plantarum strains. Agarose gels show VNTR1 (A), VNTR2 423

(B), VNTR3 (C) and VNTR4 (D) PCR products. M is the DNA marker and NC is the no 424

template negative control PCR. Scores for each band are based on migration, with the lowest 425

number corresponding to the largest sized PCR product. Equivalent sized PCR products are 426

assigned the same number. 427

428

429

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT18

Table 1. Details of bacteria used in this study

Strain Origin Source

L. plantarum 299v human intestine (commercial probiotic)

IBS Support product (Ethical Nutrients)

L. plantarum ASCC 276 (NCDO1752; ATCC14917)

pickled cabbage (sauerkraut) DIALa

L. plantarum ASCC 278 cheddar cheese in Australia DIAL L. plantarum ASCC 281 (NCDO343 ATCC10241)

pickled cabbage (sauerkraut) DIAL

L. plantarum ASCC 289 (ATCC14431) grass silage DIAL L. plantarum ASCC 291 (NCDO704) dairy starter DIAL L. plantarum ASCC 368 cheddar cheese in Australia DIAL L. plantarum ASCC 1239 UK Leicester cheese DIAL L. plantarum ASCC 1299 French Reblochon cheese DIAL L. plantarum ASCC 1398 Dutch Maasdam cheese DIAL L. plantarum ASCC 2973 Austrian Cottage cheese DIAL L. plantarum ASCC 3005 (NCIB6376; ATCC8014)

maize silage DIAL

L. plantarum 170 stevia (sweet leaf) (Cheong et al., 2014) L. plantarum 377 baby endive (Cheong et al., 2014) L. plantarum 845 parsnips (Cheong et al., 2014) L. plantarum 871 red capsicum (Cheong et al., 2014) L. plantarum 880 asian vegetables (Cheong et al., 2014) L. plantarum 883 spinach (Cheong et al., 2014) L. plantarum 884 cos lettuce (Cheong et al., 2014) L. plantarum 885 broccoli (Cheong et al., 2014) L. plantarum 891 cos lettuce (Cheong et al., 2014) L. plantarum 892 broccoli (Cheong et al., 2014) L. plantarum 895 spinach (Cheong et al., 2014) L. plantarum 897 green beans (Cheong et al., 2014) Weissella soli 33 mixed salad (Cheong et al., 2014) Lactococcus lactis 38 baby spinach (Cheong et al., 2014) Penicillium commune FRR 4117 spoiled processed cheese CSIRO, North Ryde, Sydney

a DIAL: Dairy Innovation Australia Limited. Enquiries regarding these strains should be directed to

Chr. Hansen Pty Ltd, Bayswater, Victoria, Australia.

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

19

Table 2. Details of VNTR regions analysed in L. plantarum

VNTR locus

Locus tag of gene in WCFS1

Repeating sequences Copy number in WCFS1

Gene product Primers D-value

VNTR 1 lp_2588 AACCAGGAGTTACTGAACCGGAAAAACCTGGGACTACCGAACCCGAGA

8.5 LPXTG anchor cell wall protein with collagen binding domain (Pfam05737)

5’-CCAGACGTTCCCGAAAATCC-3’ 5’-GCTGTTCTGGTGAGACGGTA-3’

0.79

VNTR 2 lp_2958 TGGTCAGAACTAGAGTCCACAGCGCTTGAACTTTCCGAACTAGAG

7.3 WapA cell surface protein with LPXTG anchor and collagen binding domain (Pfam05737)

5’-CTCGAGCTTTCAGAACCGGA-3’ 5’-AAGTCGTTAACGGTGGGAGC-3’

0.59

VNTR 3 lp_3001 GGTTTAGTCGTGTTGCTACCATTTTCATCC

3.2 LPXTG anchor cell wall protein 5’-CCGTGGTGCTAGTTTCATGC-3’ 5’-TAAACCCGACGAAAACGGCA-3’

0.73

VNTR 4 lp_3059 TTGACCCGGTTCTTCCGGTTGACTCGGTTGCTCGGG

5.6 AapA cell surface protein with LPXTG anchor and mucus binding domain (Pfam06458)

5’-GCAGTTCCCCTGGTTTTTCG-3’ 5’-GCCGATCAGGTTGTAGTGGT-3’

0.79

430

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT20

Table 3. Clusters identified by RAPD-PCR and VNTR with D-values

Isolate RAPD-PCR type VNTR Score and type ASCC 276 A 3-1-3-2 = A ASCC 281 A 3-1-3-4 = A' ASCC 2973 B 5-1-3-4 = B ASCC 278 C 4-3-1-3 = C ASCC 291 C 4-3-1-3 = C ASCC 3005 C 4-3-1-3 = C ASCC 289 D 1-2-2-2 = D ASCC 368 E 3-1-2-4 = E ASCC 1239 F 3-1-4-2 = F ASCC 1299 G 2-2-2-4 = G ASCC 1398 H 6-1-2-3 = H

299v I 4-1-2-1 = I 897 I 4-1-2-1 = I

D-value 0.94 0.95 431

432

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure 1.

299v

ASCC 3005 38

33

885

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure 2.

ASC

C 2

973

M NC ASC

C 2

76

ASC

C 2

81

ASC

C 2

78

ASC

C 2

91

ASC

C 3

005

ASC

C 2

89

ASC

C 3

68

ASC

C 1

239

ASC

C 1

299

ASC

C 1

398

299v

897

M

A B C D E F G H I

12,000

bp

5,000

2,0001,650

1,000850

650

400

300

200

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure 3.

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure 4.

bpAVNTR1

BVNTR2

CVNTR3

DVNTR4

ASC

C 3

005

ASC

C 2

973

ASC

C 1

398

ASC

C 1

299

ASC

C 1

239

ASC

C 3

68

ASC

C 2

91

ASC

C 2

89A

SCC

281

ASC

C 2

78

ASC

C 2

76

M 299v

897

NCM

MANUSCRIP

T

ACCEPTED

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights

• A new MLVA method for typing Lactobacillus plantarum strains was developed

• MLVA targeted repetitive regions within 4 genes encoding LPXTG surface proteins

• MLVA was more discriminatory than a previously reported RAPD-PCR method

• Antifungal L. plantarum strains are genetically heterogeneous