a primer in x-ray crystallography for redox biologists
TRANSCRIPT
A Primer in X-ray Crystallography for Redox Biologists
Mark Wilson
Karolinska Institute June 3rd, 2014
X-ray Crystallography Basics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_crystallography
Optimistic workflow for crystallography
Fourier Transform Fourier
Transform-1
Experiment Schematic
Monochromatic X-rays typically used
Common Crystallographic Terminology
Resolution: Usually measured in Ångstroms; “higher” resolution corresponds to smaller number
Unit cell: Basic building block of crystal; can generate the entire crystal by
translation (straight-line motion)
Asymmetric unit: Most fundamental unit of crystal; must be rotated/translated to make the unit cell
Space group: collection of symmetry operations that build the unit cell from the
asymmetric unit
Phase: A quantity that is required to calculate electron density maps but cannot be directly observed in the crystallographic experiment
R/Rfree: A measure of model quality; fractional disagreement between model and
data
The Unit Cell, Asymmetric Unit, and Space Group
The unit cell contains a number of molecules related by certain symmetry operators
The most fundamental part of the crystal is the irreducible structural element-asymmetric unit
The collection of symmetry operations that generate the unit cell from the asymmetric unit compose the space group
http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/101/static101.do?p=education_discussion/Looking-at-Structures/ bioassembly_tutorial.html
Symmetry operation here is the two-fold
Why Crystallographers Worry About Phases
The amplitudes, but not phases, of the structure factors are experimentally measured
http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~cowtan/fourier/magic.html
Fourier transform-1 Fourier transform
Duck |F|
Cat φ
Duck φ
Cat |F|
Problem: The phases, not the amplitudes, completely dominate the inverse transform
The data we need most are the data we cannot directly measure
Structures Are Models of Electron Density
Diffraction data (one of ~360 images) Electron density with model
Calculate density
Build model
Quantifying Model Quality: The R Value
!
R =
FO " FChkl#
FOhkl#
!
Rfree =
FO* " FC
hkl#
FO*
hkl#
Solution: Remove a set (5-10%) of reflections from the data and exclude them from refinement (“cross validation”)
Observations are sequestered in the “test” set and not included in the refinement
Problem: unjustified fit parameters can be introduced to drive R arbitrarily low (“overfitting”)
The principal statistic used to evaluate the quality of structural models
The Rfree is highly correlated with model quality and can easily detect overfitting
How to Evaluate Crystallographic Models
What is a good R factor? • Should be below 30% in all cases • Should be approx. 10x resolution limit for data Dmin <3.0 Å • For atomic resolution data (Dmin<1.2Å), should always be <20% • Rfree-R should be 5% or less
What is a good Ramachandran plot? • Should have less than 1% of residues in disallowed regions • Should have more than 90% of residues in “core” regions
What is good geometry? • Bond length RMSD should be approx. 0.01-0.02 Å • Angle RMSD should be approx. 1-2° • No chirality deviations • No close contacts (van der Waals violations) • No planarity deviations (Phe, Trp, Tyr, His, A,T,G,C,U)
Traditional X-ray Sources: Rotating Anodes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_tube
C: cathode W: window A: anode T: target
R: rotor S: stator
• Produce X-rays by bombarding a metal anode with high energy
electrons
• Produced X-rays have a fixed energy that depends on anode
metal
• Rotation increases X-ray flux by dissipating heat
Modern X-ray Sources: Synchrotrons
ESRF; Grenoble, France
Confined electron beams moving in circular orbits at nearly the speed of light produce polychromatic X-rays
Synchrotron storage rings produce bright, tunable X-rays that allow data to be collected from difficult samples
Intense X-rays require cryocooled samples to limit radiation damage
Synchrotron radiation
Future X-ray Sources: Free Electron Lasers
http://mpsd.cfel.de/images/content/e101/e57509/index_eng.html
Produce femtosecond pulses of X-rays so intense that it converts sample to plasma
Will be able to measure diffraction from single molecules, eliminating need for crystals
FEL design: A “straight” synchrotron Single particle imaging with FEL light
Photoelectron Generation and Radiation Damage
Damage to crystal by X-ray beam
http://biop.ox.ac.uk/www/garman/projects.html
Radiation damage is sample, wavelength, dose, and temperature-dependent
Photoelectron trajectory and energy
14.4 KeV 17.8 KeV
Sanishvilli et al., PNAS, 108 (5), 6127
Beam center
Redox Proteins Present Challenges for X-ray Crystallography
• Crystals illuminated with X-rays are highly reducing
environments
• Redox-active groups are typically more sensitive to
radiation damage (e.g. disulfides, cofactors, etc.)
• Metals absorb X-rays well, generate damage, and can
themselves be reduced
• Some ongoing studies on including radical quenchers in
buffers
• Minimize time, dose, temperature, wavelength(?)
• Avoid elemental absorption edges when choosing wavelength
Issues Current Solutions
Note: Neutron diffraction suffers from none of these problems
Isocyanides Are Electronically Interesting
Note: carbon atom can be both nucleophile and
electrophile
Isocyanide hydratase (ICH) converts isocyanides to N-formamides in pseudomonads and possibly other organisms
ICH is a Member of the DJ-1 Superfamily
1. ICH is an obligate dimer with a highly conserved, catalytically essential cysteine residue (Cys101)
2. Structurally similar, but functionally unrelated, to DJ-1
The Catalytic Cysteine is Oxidized in the ICH Crystal Structure
Likely a consequence of X-ray irradiation: beware of cysteine-sulfenic acids (Cys-SOH) in crystal structures
WT ICH 1.05 Å resolution
C101S ICH 1.00 Å resolution
Mutating Cys101 Causes Structural Changes
Loss of a single hydrogen bond between Ile152 and Cys101 causes a major backbone shift
Black is WT ICH, Grey is C101A ICH
ICH Samples Multiple Conformations in the Crystal
Black is WT IHC, Grey is C101A
WT ICH Difference electron density (green) shows where atoms should be
but are not present in the model
1. WT ICH natively samples a helix-shifted conformation in the crystal that is the dominant conformation for C101A ICH
2. Crystal structures are NOT “static snapshots”
Possible Mechanism for ICH
Note that carbenoid form of the isocyanide is shown here, as it is an electrophile
Summary 1. Intense modern synchrotron X-ray sources provide ample opportunity for
radiation damage
2. Redox active proteins are particularly vulnerable to radiation damage due to photoelectron reduction at metals, cysteines, and redox-active cofactors
3. Special precautions can limit, but not prevent, X-ray induced redox changes
4. The crystal structure of ICH shows evidence of photoreduction/oxidation at the active site cysteine
5. The electron density shows clear evidence of conformational polymorphism (i.e. not a static snapshot)
6. The crystal structure allows us to propose a testable mechanism for this unusual enzyme