a review and taxonomy of distortion-oriented presentation techniques y.k leung and m.d. apperley...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
219 views
TRANSCRIPT
A Review and Taxonomy of Distortion-Oriented
Presentation Techniques
Y.K Leung and M.D. Apperley
Presentation by Sean Lynch
Problem
In most computer systems, small viewing space
Problems:
locating items
interpreting items
determining relationships between items
Two techniques: distortion-oriented and non-distortion
Non-distortion Techniques
Display portion of data
Divide information space into portions
Arrange in a way for presentation
Problems with non-distortion
Inadequate context for navigating large-scale information
Solution: distortion-oriented techniques
Distortion Techniques
Allow user to examine local areas in greater detail
Fast-growing field with numerous techniques
Taxonomy and unified theory needed
Distortion(2)
Essence: local detail and global context
Polyfocal Display
Bifocal Display
Fisheye View(Furnas)
Main technique is thresholding
Fisheye View(Hollands et al.)
Used to represent subway network to compare fisheye vs. scrolling
Three tasks: route task, locate/route task, itinerary task
Generally closer to Bifocal than Furnas
Fisheye View(Mitta)
Presentation for aircraft maintenance data
Certain components were suppressed to increase focus
Information suppressing technique
Perspective Wall
Graphical Fisheye
Taxonomy
Techniques can be broken into two categories:
Piece-wise Continuous: Bifocal, Perspective Wall
Continuous: Polyfocal, Fisheye
Piece-wise can be further broken into constant or varying
Unified TheoryTreat displayed information as if on rubber sheet
Consider bifocal display:
a, b, c marked on sheet
Sheet is stretched and distorted
A Framework for unifying presentation space
M.S.T. Carpendale and Catherine Montagnese
Elastic Presentation Framework
Unified framework for distortion and non-distortion based presentation methods
Method of relating distinct methods into a single interface
Basic Geometric Concepts
Multi-Scale Presentations
Made possible by inclusion of drop-off functions
Focal regions set to a particular degree of magnification
Folding
Repositioning of foci in lens
Shear viewer-aligned vectors
Distance MetricsOn Lp metrics, can provide different drop off functions
United Framework
Framework provides method of relating distinct methods
Allows for more than one presentation in a single interface
Lens library offers a range of distortion choices.
Gaussian LensBell-shape
Advantage: gentle focal integration
Characteristics: focal magnification, good visual integration
Lens LibraryFrom left to right: Gaussian, Cosine, Hemisphere, Linear, Inverse Cosine, Manhattan
Top row is focus to distortion
Bottom row is distortion to context
Insets and Offsets
Inset is a selected sub-region that is magnified
Achieved at cost of local-context
Offset is a selected sub-region moved and magnified
Occludes other regions
Detail-In-Context Presentations and
ZoomingTypical drop-off functions use both x and y for distance function
Can use either only x or only y
EPF Library
Representation and presentation kept distinct
Lenses have precise magnification control and positioning
All lenses can be folded
Conclusions!
Presented a taxonomy and unified theory of distortion-oriented presentation techniques
Presented a unified framework for presentation spaces, with many different distortion techniques included
ANY QUESTIONs?