a review of lesser known funding sources and funding strategies for work-related assistive...

52
A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Upload: dinah-bradford

Post on 23-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding

Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology

November 19, 2014

1

Page 2: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

2

Today’s Presenters

James R. Sheldon, Jr., Supervising Attorney

National Assistive Technology Advocacy Project

Neighborhood Legal Services, Buffalo, NY

[email protected] * 716-847-0650 ext. 262

Ronald M. Hager, Senior Staff Attorney

National Disability Rights Network

Washington, D.C.

[email protected] * 202-253-5252

Page 3: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

CEUs

The RESNA Catalyst Project offers CEUs for this webinar session. The RESNA Catalyst Project is an approved

authorized provider for CEU credits by the International Association for Continuing Education and Training (IACET).

You can receive 0.1 CEUs for a sixty to ninety minute webinar. There is a $16 fee to receive credits for each

webinar.

To learn more about CEUs or to apply for CEUs from an archived webinar, contact Paul Galonsky,

[email protected].

3

Page 4: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Funding of AT to Support Work Webinar Series

• Today’s session is Part 5 of the 6 part webinar series.

• December 10, 2014 (Session 6) - Using Traditional Medicaid and Medicaid Waivers to Fund Assistive Technology to Support Work

All sessions 2:00 to 3:15 p.m. Eastern & sessions will be archived at http://www.resnaprojects.org/statewide/webedarchive.html

4

Page 5: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Services of the NationalAT Advocacy Project

A Technical Assistance and Training Project• Call or email speakers for technical assistance• Any topic covered in the webinars• Any issue related to funding of AT• We can assist you in thinking through funding issues and

appeals

Additional materials available on most topics• Contact us for copies and/or links.

5

Page 6: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Purpose of Webinar Series

Barriers to Funding AT to Support Work• It can be expensive.• Individuals and service providers may not be familiar

with funding sources and funding criteria.

Will discuss funding sources, funding criteria:• Most common funders – Medicaid, special education,

vocational rehabilitation• Less common funding sources• Special rules within programs that support funding for

work, education, training.6

Page 7: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Format for Today’s Session• Walk through power point (on screen, received via email)• Participants can post questions in question or chat box.• Will attempt to address questions during presentation.• Follow up questions can be emailed to presenters.• Contact presenters for more resources on any of the

content.• Additional resources-This ppt and additional documents

will be posted at http://www.resnaprojects.org/statewide/webedarchive.html

7

Page 8: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Purpose of this Session

Look at Non-Traditional Ways to Fund AT to

Support Work, Such As:• Special ways to create eligibility for traditional funding

source like Medicaid or Medicare.• Variety of non-traditional funding sources, like equipment

loan funds and the crime victims program.• Funding strategies, like use of IRS approved flexible

spending accounts.

8

Page 9: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Will Funding Source or Strategy be Available in Your State?

• For most part, answer is yes.

• Many of the programs, like Crime Victims Fund, are subject to some state options.

• Some programs, like Alternative Financing Programs (equipment loan funds) do not exist in every state.

9

Page 10: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Hypothetical

10

Page 11: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

The Case of Mario

Mario is 17 years old and a high school senior.

• He has cerebral palsy, uses a 7-year old power wheelchair for all mobility, and relies on accessible transportation to go to school.

• He will turn 18 in February 2015.

• He will graduate from high school in June 2015.

• He plans to go to college and study to become an English teacher at the high school or college level.

11

Page 12: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Mario’s Current Education

Mainstreamed with some special education services:

• Physical therapy, occupational therapy

• Use of standing frame in physical therapy (allows medical benefits of standing program)

• Laptop with adapted keyboard, voice dictation software

12

Page 13: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Mario’s SSI and Medicaid

SSI• Currently, SSI benefits - $104.50 per month (Mom works and

earns $2,800 gross monthly, $33,600 per year).

• In February 2015, at age 18, will get full SSI check of $733 as Mom’s income will no longer count.

• As SSI beneficiary automatically eligible for Medicaid in his state.

• Parents are divorced and Dad pays no child support.

13

Page 14: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

AT Needed by Mario

• A ramp at the home, to come and go in his wheelchair

• Accessible van transportation, to attend college (until he gets a modified van)

• A modified van, with hydraulic lift, hand controls, etc.

• A power standing wheelchair, to replace old wheelchair, allow him to benefit from standing therapy throughout the day, to do work-related activities best done in standing position.

• A new laptop, with modified keyboard, voice input software

14

Page 15: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Additional ATNeeded by Mario

• A speech generating device (SGD)– We know Medicaid programs can fund dedicated devices, often

costing more than $6,000.– Mario would like to get an iPad to function as an SGD. Medicaid

programs reluctant to fund the tablet devices because they have uses not related to a disability.

• A smart phone, other hand held device– Assuming Mario also has a learning disability, with short-term

memory problems.– Using built in features and apps, can set up reminders, record

videos for job-related tasks.

15

Page 16: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Creative Ways to Fund

AT While Retaining

SSI and Medicaid

16

Page 17: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

The Flexible Spending Account

Authorized by section 125 of Internal Revenue Code• If employer offers FSA, money set aside can be used to pay

for many medical costs not covered by insurance or Medicaid.

• This money will not count as taxable income, not count in determining Social Security and Medicare (i.e., FICA) contributions, and not count as income in the SSI program.

• Tax benefit will be based on taxes and FICA avoided. E.g., if $1,000 set aside and combined tax and FICA rate would be 20 percent, savings would be $200.

17

Page 18: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Using FSA to Partially Fund AT, Keep SSI and Medicaid

Mario is 17 and receives $104.50 in SSI.• Household consists of Mario and his mother.• As an SSI beneficiary, Mario qualifies for Medicaid.• Mom earns $2,800 gross per month - $33,600 per year.

Mom gets offered a promotion.• Will pay $3,050 per month gross - $36,660 per year.• With this pay rate, Mario will lose SSI and Medicaid.• What can mom do?

18

Page 19: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Using FSA to Fund Ramp,Retaining SSI and Medicaid

Mario’s mom sets aside $200 per month in Flexible

Spending Account to purchase $2,400 ramp.• Assuming a combined tax + FICA rate of 15 percent,

$360 of ramp costs funded through tax savings.• Mario retains SSI at $79.50 per month (more than $950

per year) and keeps Medicaid.• With ramp, Mario will have a better way to leave home

for travel to college after graduation.• By time extra $2,400 starts counting against SSI, Mario

will be 18 and Mom’s earnings will no longer count.

19

Page 20: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Creative Alimony Settlement to Pay for AT, Retain SSI & Medicaid

The Case of Christina, Age 42:

• Power wheelchair user, receives $721 SSI and Medicaid.

• Attends college and is looking for a way to fund a van for post-college transportation to work.

• Not a candidate for Plan for Achieving Self Support (PASS) because no source of income other than SSI to put in PASS.

Settling a divorce with working spouse.

• Expected to get $920 per month alimony.

• SSI will count $900 of alimony as unearned income. She will lose SSI and Medicaid.

• What can she do?

20

Page 21: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

In Lieu of Alimony Christina’s Ex-Husband will Pay Directly:

• $10,800 van down payment and $450 van loan payment.

• $100 cable TV bill and $50 cell phone bill.

• Payments not for food or shelter, so not counted as income for SSI. Continues to get SSI of $721 plus Medicaid.

• State VR agency will pay for van modifications.

See Disability, Divorce, SSI, and Medicaid: Using Creative Alimony, Child Support and Property Settlements to Maximize SSI, Ensure Medicaid Eligibility, and Create Funding for Assistive Technology, www.nls.org/files/Disability%20Law%20Hotlines/National%20AT%20Advocacy/DisabilityDivorce.pdf

21

Page 22: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Medicare Savings Plans

Using SSI Budgeting to

Establish Eligibility

Leveraging Funding for Part B

Premiums, AT, and Part D Extra Help

22

Page 23: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Medicare Savings Programs –Paying for Part B Premiums, Co-Pays

The Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries (QMB)• Countable income up to $973 per month ($1,311 for a couple).*• $7,160 countable assets for individual. Some states allow more in

assets. New York eliminated its asset test in 2008.• Pays for Part B premium, deductibles and copayments

Selected Low-Income Beneficiaries (SLMB)• Countable income up to $1,167 per month ($1,573 for a couple).• Same asset test.• Pays for Part B premium only

*2014 figures. 2015 figures available first quarter of year.

23

Page 24: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Medicare Savings Programs

Qualified Individual (QI-1)• Countable income up to $1,313 per month ($1,770 for a couple).• Same asset test• Pays for Part B premium only

All SSI exclusion rules applied in determining

countable income, including:• $20 general income exclusion• Additional $65 plus half of remaining earned income• Impairment related work expenses, blind work expenses• 50 percent of remainder excluded

24

Page 25: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Medicare Savings Programs – Did You Know?

• MSP will pay for any Part B late enrollment penalties.

• If eligible for QMB ($973 countable income or less), it can pay 20 percent co-pay on expensive wheelchair.

Saving Money in Medicare Part D Prescription Program• MSP is considered a Medicaid program, making person

“dually eligible” for Medicaid and Medicare.• Dually eligible individual automatically qualifies for full

Part D low-income subsidy program.

25

Page 26: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Medicare Savings Programs – Work, AT Funding and Part D

The Case of Larry, Age 35• Injured in car accident 2 years ago• Settled lawsuit and used settlement money to pay off

mortgage, modify home for wheelchair use.• Approximately $9,500 remains from settlement.• Gets $650 Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI)• Lost SSI because of resources above $2,000• Just qualified for Medicare, will enroll in Parts B and D• Starting job as part time dispatcher, 3 days per week, 5

hours per day, $10 per hour (paid $300 every 2 weeks).

26

Page 27: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Work Incentives Apply to Larry’s QMB Eligibility

Step 1: $650.00 SSDI

- 20.00 General income exclusion

$630.00 Countable unearned income

Step 2: $ 648.00 Gross monthly wages ($300 x 2.16 weeks)

- 65.00 Earned income exclusion

$ 583.00

- 291.50 Additional 50% exclusion

$ 291.50 Countable earned income

+ 630.00 Countable unearned income

$ 921.50 Total countable income

(below $973 QMB limit)

27

Page 28: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Larry’s QMB Eligibility – Managing His Assets

Larry’s $9,500 is $2,340 above asset limit.• He spends about $2,500 on new doors and rugs

for his home and better clothing for work.

• With assets now at $7,000, he qualifies for QMB.

• The Medicaid agency will pay his $104.90 Part B premium each month.

28

Page 29: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Larry’s QMB Eligibility –Leads to Full Part D Extra Help

Larry gets full low-income subsidy because he is

“dually eligible” for Medicaid and Medicare.• QMB and all MSPs are considered a Medicaid benefit.• As dually eligible, he pays little or no monthly premium,

modest co-pays for drugs, and has no contributions in the “donut hole.”

Larry could earn about $650 per month more and still

qualify for QI-1 to pay the Part B premium only.

29

Page 30: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

QMB Can Pay MedicareCo-Pay on Power Wheelchair

Larry will obtain an $8,000 power wheelchair:

• Medicare Part B will pay 80 percent of an approved rate or $6,400 (if $8,000 represents the approved rate).

• Local Medicaid agency, through QMB, will pay the $1,600 copayment.

30

Page 31: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Alternative and Little Know

Programs for Funding AT

31

Page 32: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Alternative Financing Programs(AFPs) - A Source of Loans for AT

An AFP can make a loan available by:

• A revolving loan fund

• A loan guarantee

• An interest buy down

32

Page 33: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Most Common Items Purchased with Loan Funds

• Vehicles modifications• Computers, costs for computer access• Mobility equipment, such as wheelchairs, scooters• Equipment for daily living, like environmental control

devices• Hearing aids, vision aids• Home modifications

See http://resnaprojects.org/allcontacts/allafpcontacts.html

for AFP information in 40 States.

33

Page 34: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

AFPs - Advocacy Tips

The AFP loan: Excellent way to cover out-of-pocket costs related to AT purchase:• Amounts that exceed the payment limitations of private

insurance• Medicare Part B 20 percent co-payment• Share-of-cost requirement charged by a state VR

agency • AT-related costs exceeding amount available under

SSI’s Plan for Achieving Self Support (PASS)• Amounts not otherwise covered by charity payments• Pending an appeal

34

Page 35: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Federal Adoption Assistance Program

Help for parents who adopt “Child with Special Needs”• Includes cash assistance and other special services

Assistance through Automatic Medicaid:• If “child with special needs” criteria met and “adoption

assistance agreement” in effect (i.e., a federal adoption)• At state option, if child receives state or local adoption

assistance

35

Page 36: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Federal Adoption Assistance Program

Additional Payments for AT, at State Option:• Covered through Minnesota’s adoption program:

– Specialized communications equipment– Ramps– Accessible shower, elevated bathtubs and toilets– Blinking lights and tactile alarms as alternate warning

systems– Lowered kitchen work surfaces– Disability-related modifications to a vehicle

36

Page 37: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)

Requirements for the VA as a funding source• Generally, all veterans who enlisted after 1980 must

have served 24 continuous months. Certain exceptions may apply.

• Must be enrolled in VA healthcare system.• Injury must be service connected, not due to willful

misconduct.• Applicant must be unable to pay the cost of services.

37

Page 38: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Assistive Technology and the VA

• Funding for electronic equipment has been approved for

people who are blind or visually impaired.

• Funding has also been approved for the veteran engaged in/served through– Vocational rehabilitation services

– Employment services

– Independent living services

38

Page 39: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Funding AT to Support Work through the VA

Look to link the need to one of the provisions that allow for

funding of specialty equipment, such as:

• the references for people who are blind or visually impaired,

• those involved in vocational rehabilitation, employment services, or independent living services as referenced above).

The VA has history of funding tablet devices to support

employment efforts of veterans with cognitive problems.

39

Page 40: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Independent Living Services

Background•The Rehabilitation Services Administration provides funding to establish a State Independent Living Council (SILC) and Centers for Independent Living (CILs).

•Funding passes through the State VR agency to the SILC and the CILs.

•CILs are required to provide "core IL services" to individuals with significant disabilities - information and referral, IL skills training, peer counseling, and individual and systems advocacy.

•The CIL may provide "as appropriate, a combination of any other independent living services." 29 USC 796f-4(5).

40

Page 41: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Non-Core IL Services Categories that Could Fund AT Include:

• Adaptive housing services, including home modifications

• Needed prostheses and other appliances or devices

• Rehabilitation technology services

• Accessible transportation services; and

• “[A]ny other services" to improve ability to function, continue functioning, or move toward functioning independently.

41

Page 42: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Can IL Services be Used to Fund the iPod Touch or iPad Mini?

• The best answer is a qualified “maybe.”

• Considerable discretion is provided to CILs to decide how to best allocate the limited dollars available for these non-core services.

• Given modest $200-$250 price tag one might be able to convince the CIL that this independence-producing investment that can make a remarkable difference in the person’s employability.

42

Page 43: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

The Crime Victims Compensation Fund

• Operated by each state through a federal grant, is authorized by the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (VOCA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 10601.

• Authorizes federal financial assistance to states (up to 40 percent reimbursement for approved expenditures) for the purposes of

– compensating and assisting crime victims,

– funding training and technical assistance, and

– serving victims of federal crimes.

See links for federal crime victims site, http://ojp.gov/ovc/ and to state

crime victims sites, http://www.nacvcb.org/index.asp?sid=6.43

Page 44: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Crime Victims Compensation - Compensable Crimes

States must include crimes whose victims suffer death

or physical injury as result of:• Terrorism• Driving while intoxicated• Domestic violence• Intentional or attempted defacement of any religious real

property because of: – its religious character;

– or the race, color or ethnic characteristics of any individual associated with the religious property.

44

Page 45: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Crime Victims – Compensable Expenses

Mandated expenses• States must award compensation for a list of expenses

when they are attributable to a physical injury resulting from a compensable crime:– Eyeglasses, other corrective lenses, dental services,

prosthetic or other devices (no definition of "prosthetic and other devices" appears in the law or guidelines)

– Mental health counseling and care

– Lost wages

– Funeral expenses

45

Page 46: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Crime Victims – Compensable Expenses

Optional Allowable Expenses:• May offer compensation for other types of expenses as

authorized by state law, regulation, or established policy.• These include "[n]ecessary building modification and

equipment to accommodate physical disabilities resulting from a compensable crime." VOCA Guidelines, part IV.B.2.(b)(ii). (No definition for terms.)

• Compensation program is the payor of last resort "with regard to federal or federally financed programs."

46

Page 47: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Crime Victims Compensation – Funding for Mario’s AT?

Assume his injury is due to violent crime.• The standing wheelchair and speech generating devices fit

most durable medical equipment definitions and should fit mandated “prosthetic or other devices” category.

• Look to see if state has adopted optional category for “building modification” (should include ramps) or “equipment to accommodate disability” (could cover modified van, smart phone/hand held devices).

• Look for dollar limits on equipment in your state policies.

• Remember, under payor of last resort criteria, may have to look to Medicaid/other funders first.

47

Page 48: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Worker’s Compensation

• Employees injured on the job receive reimbursement for lost wages and medical care, without the need to show employer fault or negligence.

• In return employees generally lose their right to sue the employer for damages, subject to certain exceptions that may vary from state to state.

See “Worker’s Compensation and AT,” from Did You Know

series, with citations to court decisions awarding AT.

http://www.nls.org/Disability/NationalAssistiveTechnologyProject/

DidYouKnow/WorkersComp.

48

Page 49: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Worker’s Compensation –Examples of AT Awarded

Louisiana• Laird v. Highpoint Southwest Services (therapeutic mattress,

therapeutic shoes, and a shower massage device).

• Cottonham v. Rockwood Ins. Co of Rockwood (emergency telephone device, and ramp and hand controls for his van, for rehabilitation and safety).

Missouri• Hall v. Fru Con Const. Corp. (held that if “artificial devices”

included wheelchairs, it logically follows that home modifications needed to make a home wheelchair accessible were also covered).

49

Page 50: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Worker’s Compensation –

Examples of AT AwardedCompare two cases regarding modified vehicles:North Dakota

• Meyer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau (not responsible for purchasing a van, but was responsible for the adaptive equipment and the increased cost associated with the price of a van compared to the price of an average vehicle of the same year)

Arizona

• Terry Grantham Co. v. Industrial Com’n of Arizona (held that in claimant’s case, a specially equipped van was not merely a form of transportation, but was “other apparatus” needed to restore any mobility)

50

Page 51: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

51

Page 52: A Review of Lesser Known Funding Sources and Funding Strategies for Work-Related Assistive Technology November 19, 2014 1

Thank you!

Please use your chat box to ask questions

James R. Sheldon, Jr., Supervising Attorney

[email protected] * 716-847-0650 ext. 262

Ronald M. Hager, Senior Staff Attorney

National Disability Rights Network

[email protected] * 202-253-5252

52