a3 thinking - background, process and examples

23
© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide # A3 Thinking 1

Upload: michael-mahlberg

Post on 16-Apr-2017

449 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

A3 Thinking

1

Page 2: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

• A3 is an approach to continuous improvement, problem solving, and (secondary) also reporting• Rooted in PDCA

• A3 makes cooperation between unfamiliar colleagues more efficient (reduces pointless “discussion waste”, mura)

• Continuous improvement requires (effective) problem solving• Hypothesis driven (=planning phase) to transcend trial-and-

error

2

Plan Do

CheckAct

Page 3: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

Problem perceived

1 Grasp the current

situation

2 Identify the root cause

3 Devise countermeasures and visualise the future

state

4 Create implementation

plan

5 Create follow-up plan

7 Obtain approval

8 Execute the

implementation plan

9 Execute the follow-up

plan

6 Discuss with affected parties

Targets met? 10 Establish process standard

No

Yes

Do Check Act

Plan

3

A3 PROBLEM-SOLVING PROCESSPlan Do

CheckAct

Plan Do

CheckAct

Plan Do

CheckAct

Plan Do

CheckAct

Page 4: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

7 ELEMENTS OF A3 MINDSET

1 - Logical thinking process2 - Objectivity

3 - Results & process4 - Synthesis, distillation & visualization

5 - Alignment6 - Coherency within and consistency across

7 - Systems viewpoint

4

Page 5: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

1- LOGICAL THINKING PROCESS

• PDCA is an empirical, scientific method• Discern cause from effect• Consider alternative potential avenues• Take implementation into account• Anticipate stumbling blocks• Incorporate contingencies

5

1 - Logical thinking process2 - Objectivity

3 - Results & process4 - Synthesis, distillation & visualization

5 - Alignment6 - Coherency within and consistency across

7 - Systems viewpoint

Planning with a capital P

Page 6: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

2 - OBJECTIVITY

• Different individuals have different mental representations• “right” versus “wrong” quickly disintegrates into blaming

• Focus on factual, objective, preferably quantitative (detail) data• facts over data

• Test understanding for assumptions, bias, misconceptions

6

1 - Logical thinking process2 - Objectivity

3 - Results & process4 - Synthesis, distillation & visualization

5 - Alignment6 - Coherency within and consistency across

7 - Systems viewpoint

Page 7: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

3 - RESULTS & PROCESS

• Personal development process while producing results• producing results without understanding of root cause and

investigating alternatives is unlikely to carry forward• following the process without results is equally useless;

results demonstrate understanding • Both process and results are essential for personal and

organizational development

7

1 - Logical thinking process2 - Objectivity

3 - Results & process4 - Synthesis, distillation & visualization

5 - Alignment6 - Coherency within and consistency across

7 - Systems viewpoint

Agile Manifesto...?

Page 8: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

4 - SYNTHESIS, DISTILLATION & VISUALIZATION

• Brevity forces synthesis of learning• Integrate into a coherent “picture” (preferably graphic)• Enable detail efficiently alongside narration

8

1 - Logical thinking process2 - Objectivity

3 - Results & process4 - Synthesis, distillation & visualization

5 - Alignment6 - Coherency within and consistency across

7 - Systems viewpoint

Page 9: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

5 - ALIGNMENT

• Effective implementation hinges on consensus• 3D alignment:

• horizontal (peers)• vertical (superiors & subordinates)• longitudinal (consistent in time)

9

1 - Logical thinking process2 - Objectivity

3 - Results & process4 - Synthesis, distillation & visualization

5 - Alignment6 - Coherency within and consistency across

7 - Systems viewpoint

Page 10: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

6 - COHERENCY WITHIN & CONSISTENCY ACROSS

• Within:• establish ‘flow’, every section “naturally” leads to the next

• Across:• consistent A3 reporting style streamlines communication &

creates shared understanding between departments

10

1 - Logical thinking process2 - Objectivity

3 - Results & process4 - Synthesis, distillation & visualization

5 - Alignment6 - Coherency within and consistency across

7 - Systems viewpoint

Page 11: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

7 - SYSTEMS VIEWPOINT

• Emphasize the purpose of a (any) particular course of action• Tie immediate results to broader (organisational) objectives

11

1 - Logical thinking process2 - Objectivity

3 - Results & process4 - Synthesis, distillation & visualization

5 - Alignment6 - Coherency within and consistency across

7 - Systems viewpoint

Page 12: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

A3 Reporting

12

Page 13: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

A3 PROBLEM SOLVING & REPORTING

• Disciplined reporting that encourages disciplined problem-solving

• Thinking process is (much) more important than the resulting reports

• Report drafting is a collaborative exercise

13

Page 14: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide # 14

!!!!Background

!!!!

Current condition

!!!!Goal

!!!!

Root-cause analysis

!!!!

Countermeasures

!!!!

Effect confirmation

!!!!

Follow-up actions

Problem-solving A3 reportReport Theme Date

Plan Do

CheckAct

Page 15: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

PRACTICE PAPER PLANE A3 REPORT

15

Page 16: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide # 16

Example of the 5 Why’s method

The machine stoppedWhy?

The overload circuit trippedWhy?

The pump was seizing upWhy?

Metal shavings damaged the shaftWhy?

Shavings entered lubrication systemWhy?

!No filter on the inlet pipe!

Page 17: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide # 17

!!!!Background

!!!!

Current condition

!!!!Goal

!!!!

Root-cause analysis

!!!!

Countermeasures

!!!!

Effect confirmation

!!!!

Follow-up actions

Problem-solving A3 reportDateReport Theme

Plan Do

CheckAct

Page 18: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

!!!!Background

!!!!

Current condition

!!!!Proposal

!!!!

Analysis/evaluation of alternatives

Report Theme

!!!!

Plan details

!!!!

Unresolved issues (optional)

!!!!

Implementation schedule

18

Proposal A3 reportDate

Plan Do

CheckAct

Page 19: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide # 19

!!!!Background

!!!!

Current condition

!!!!Proposal

!!!!

Analysis/evaluation of alternatives

Report Theme

!!!!

Plan details

!!!!

Unresolved issues (optional)

!!!!

Implementation schedule

Proposal A3 reportDate

Plan Do

CheckAct

Page 20: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide #

!!!!

Plan details

!!!!Proposal

!!!!Background

!!!!

Current condition

!!!!

Analysis/evaluation of alternatives

Report Theme

!!!!

Unresolved issues (optional)

!!!!

Implementation schedule

20

Proposal A3 reportDate

Plan Do

CheckAct

Page 21: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide # 21

!!!!Background

!!!!

Current condition

Theme

!!!!

Results

!!!!

Remaining Issues/Action Items

Status review A3 reportDate

Plan Do

CheckAct

Page 22: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide # 22

!!!!Background

!!!!

Current condition

Theme

!!!!

Results

!!!!

Remaining Issues/Action Items

Status review A3 reportDate

Plan Do

CheckAct

Page 23: A3 thinking - background, process and examples

© 2013 Tom Breur / Michael Mahlberg Slide # 23

Comparison of different A3’s

Focus Problem solving Proposal writing Project status review

Thematic content or focusImprovements related to quality, cost, delivery, safety, productivity, and so on

Policies, decisions, or projects with significant investment or implementation

Summary of changes and results as an outcome of either problem solving or proposal implementation

Tenure of person conducting the work Novice but continuing throughout career Experienced personnel; managers Both novice and more experienced managers

AnalysisStrong root-cause emphasis; quantitive/analytical

Improvement based on considering current state; mix of quantitative and qualitative

Less analysis and more focus on verification of hypothesis and action items

PDCA cycleDocuments full PDCA cycle involved in making and improvement and verifying the result

Heavy focus on the Plan step, with Check and Act steps embedded in the implementation plan

Heavy focus on the Check and Act steps, including confirmation of results and follow-up to complete the learning loop

Plan Do

CheckAct

Plan Do

CheckAct

Plan Do

CheckAct