academic performance report€¦ · county saginaw county clare county gratiot county bay county...
TRANSCRIPT
ACADEMICPERFORMANCEREPORTThe Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative Studies
November 2019
OUR MISSIONTo transform public education through accountability, innovation andaccess to quality education for all students.
OUR VISIONWe envision a diverse and dynamic public education marketplacethat fosters academic excellence for all children.
OUR VALUESIntegrity | Respect | Compassion | InclusivenessSocial Responsibility | Excellence | Innovation
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesTable of Contents
ACADEMY OVERVIEW
4 Demographics
5 Composite Resident District
ACADEMIC
6 Reading Achievement & Growth
8 Math Achievement & Growth
10 Michigan Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) Achievement
11 Student Growth
12 Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) Achievement
14 Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Achievement
END NOTES
15 Sources & Citations
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 3
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesDemographics
8%
9%
12%
14%
11%
31%
30%
17%
20%
14%
14%
9%
10%
11%
11%
45%
36%
42%
45%
47%
Studentsof Color
Free/ReducedLunch
SpecialEducation
EnglishLanguageLearner
Enrolled3 or MoreYears
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
2018−2019 2017−2018 2016−2017
2015−2016 2014−2015
ENROLLMENT BY SUBGROUP
Fig. D−1
154174177
207209
0
100
200
300
2014
−201
5
2015
−201
6
2016
−201
7
2017
−201
8
2018
−201
9
Stu
dent
s
TOTAL ENROLLMENT BY YEAR
Fig. D−2
13
1
1110
5
9
6
6
4
7
11
10
3
9 10
6
5
4
4
5
5
4
3
3
0
10
20
30
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Stu
dent
s
Students Enrolled 0−2 Years
Students Enrolled 3+ Years
STUDENTS PER GRADE
Fig. D−3
African American
YourSchool
American Indian
CMUAverage
Asian
StateAverage
Hawaiian
Hispanic
Multiracial
White
0.6%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
91.6%
44.9%
0.3%
3.3%
0.0%
3.3%
8.0%
40.1%
17.6%
0.6%
3.5%
0.1%
8.0%
4.2%
66.0%
RACIAL/ETHNIC BREAKDOWN
Fig. D−4
4 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesComposite Resident District
The Composite Resident District (CRD) illustrates the public school district to which students would be assigned if they were notenrolled in the Academy. Due to geographical constraints, the map may not show all districts.
!(
TuscolaCounty
Saginaw County
Clare County
Gratiot County
Bay County
Isabella CountyMidlandCounty
GladwinCounty
Arenac County
Coleman6
Bay City13
Beaverton2
Midland84
Meridian14
Freeland13
Merrill1
Bullock Creek19
Saginaw2
!(
0 5 10Miles
The MidlandAcademy of
Advanced andCreative Studies
!( SchoolStudentPopulation:
Lowest 25%25% - 50%50% - 75%Highest 25%
Student’s Resident District Number of Students Percent of Students
Midland Public Schools 84 54.5%Bullock Creek School District 19 12.3%Meridian Public Schools 14 9.1%Bay City School District 13 8.4%Freeland Community School District 13 8.4%
Coleman Community Schools 6 3.9%Beaverton Rural Schools 2 1.3%Saginaw, School District of the City of 2 1.3%Merrill Community Schools 1 0.6%
Fig. D-5
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 5
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesReading Achievement
203
* 212
214
225
218
150
200
250
300
3 4 5 6 7 8Grade
Ave
rage
Sca
led
Sco
re
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019 Achievement Targets
ALL ENROLLED STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
MAP® SPRING RESULTS − READING ACHIEVEMENT
74%
74% Students Met Target
26% Students Did Not Meet Target
2016−2017
67%
67% Students Met Target
33% Students Did Not Meet Target
2017−2018
64%
64% Students Met Target
36% Students Did Not Meet Target
2018−2019
PERCENT OF STUDENTS MEETING THE TARGET
Fig. A−1
* Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) – Federal law that prohibits student-identifiable education data from being publicly disseminated.A group of 10 or fewer students or percentage values of 5% or less is considered to contain student-identifiable data.
6 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesReading Growth
Grade 3
140
160
180
200
220
240
Fall Spring
Grade 3
Grade 3
* Grade 4
Fall Spring
Grade 4
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Fall Spring
Grade 5
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
140
160
180
200
220
240
Fall Spring
Grade 6
Grade 5
Grade 6
* Grade 7
Fall Spring
Grade 7
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Fall Spring
Grade 8
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MAP FALL−TO−SPRING RESULTS − READING GROWTH
51%
10%
10%
30%
68
2016−2017
40%
14%4%
43%
56
2017−2018
30%
13%
3%
54% 42
2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE & PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERCENTILE CATEGORIES
Fig. A−2
* Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) – Federal law that prohibits student-identifiable education data from being publicly disseminated.A group of 10 or fewer students or percentage values of 5% or less is considered to contain student-identifiable data.
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 7
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesMath Achievement
205
* 220
220
229
235
150
200
250
300
3 4 5 6 7 8Grade
Ave
rage
Sca
led
Sco
re
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019 Achievement Targets
ALL ENROLLED STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
MAP SPRING RESULTS − MATH ACHIEVEMENT
55%
55% Students Met Target
45% Students Did Not Meet Target
2016−2017
51%
51% Students Met Target
49% Students Did Not Meet Target
2017−2018
56%
56% Students Met Target
44% Students Did Not Meet Target
2018−2019
PERCENT OF STUDENTS MEETING THE TARGET
Fig. A−3
* Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) – Federal law that prohibits student-identifiable education data from being publicly disseminated.A group of 10 or fewer students or percentage values of 5% or less is considered to contain student-identifiable data.
8 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesMath Growth
Grade 3
150
175
200
225
250
Fall Spring
Grade 3
Grade 3
* Grade 4
Fall Spring
Grade 4
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Fall Spring
Grade 5
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
150
175
200
225
250
Fall Spring
Grade 6
Grade 5
Grade 6
* Grade 7
Fall Spring
Grade 7
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Fall Spring
Grade 8
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MAP FALL−TO−SPRING RESULTS − MATH GROWTH
31%
13%
4%
52% 43
2016−2017
22%
13%
6%
59%34
2017−2018
22%
9%
9%
61%39
2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE & PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERCENTILE CATEGORIES
Fig. A−4
* Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) – Federal law that prohibits student-identifiable education data from being publicly disseminated.A group of 10 or fewer students or percentage values of 5% or less is considered to contain student-identifiable data.
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 9
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesMichigan Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) Achievement
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 3 THROUGH 7 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
M−STEP ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 3 THROUGH 7 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
M−STEP MATH
Fig. A−5
10 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesStudent Growth
Not Applicable
20
40
60
80
Mea
n S
tude
nt G
row
th P
erce
ntile
MEAN STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE FOR ALL STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Not Applicable
20
40
60
80
Mea
n S
tude
nt G
row
th P
erce
ntile
MEAN STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE FOR ALL STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
MATH
Fig. A−6
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 11
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesPreliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) Achievement
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADE 8 EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADE 8 MATH
Fig. A−7
12 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesPSAT Achievement
*** ***0%
30%
60%
90%
9 10Grade
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADES 9 & 10 EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING
*** ***0%
30%
60%
90%
9 10Grade
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADES 9 & 10 MATH
Fig. A−8
* Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) – Federal law that prohibits student-identifiable education data from being publicly disseminated.A group of 10 or fewer students or percentage values of 5% or less is considered to contain student-identifiable data.
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 13
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesScholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Achievement
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADE 11 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
GRADE 11 SAT EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADE 11 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
GRADE 11 SAT MATH
Fig. A−9
14 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative StudiesSources & Citations
Fig. D-1 CEPI Public Data; Michigan Student Data System (MSDS) fall – UnauditedFig. D-2 CEPI Public DataFig. D-3 MSDS fall – Unaudited; The display of 3+ students in kindergarten and first grade is due to the enrollment date provided in the fall MSDS.Fig. D-4 MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. D-5 MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-1 NWEA’s MAP: reading – spring; MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-2 NWEA’s MAP: reading – springFig. A-3 NWEA’s MAP: math – spring; MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-4 NWEA’s MAP: math – springFig. A-5 Spring M-STEP – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-6 Spring MI-Access, M-STEP, PSAT 8, SAT – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-7 Spring PSAT 8 – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-8 Spring PSAT 9 & 10 – Student-levelFig. A-9 Spring SAT – Student-level and Public Data
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 15
THE GOVERNOR JOHN ENGLER CENTER FOR CHARTER SCHOOLSCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY | MOUNT PLEASANT, MI 48859
(989) 774-2100 | www.TheCenterForCharters.org