SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

DRAFTAccess Compliance Survey Report Appendix J: Curb Ramps SMCCCD - Cañada College

2809 of 4366

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

Table of Contents

I. Cover & Table of Contents

i. Report Navigation and Abbreviations ii. Cost Summary

II. Survey Data - Curb Ramps

2810 of 4366

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

NAVIGATION & LEGEND

2811 of 4366

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

NAVIGATION

1. Locator Number: Correspondstoauniquedatabaserecordtiedtothespecificcurbrampwhichcanbecrossreferencedacrossthisdata-base and its corresponding GIS database.

2. Ramp Type: Identifiesthetypeofcurbramp(parallel,perpendicular,curbramprequired,etc.).3. Specific Item: Categoryofaccessiblefeatureinwhichthebarrierbelongs.4. Survey Street: Surveystreetname.5. Field Condition: Descriptionofas-builtbarrierbasedonapplicableaccessibilitycodes.6. Measurement: Existingcondition/dimensionfeaturedontherampmeasuredasthemostseverebarrierontheparticularramp.7. Proposed Solution: Descriptionofstepsnecessarytoremovebarrierand,ifapplicable,aninterimsolutionornotes.8. Cross Street: Cross/intersectingstreetname.9. Codes / Info: -PROWAG: GuidelinestoenforceFederalaccessibilitystandardsinthepublicrights-of-way. -ADAAG/ADA2010: TheFederalStandardforaccessibilityadoptedbytheDepartmentofJustice. -CBC2007/CBC2016 TheCaliforniaBuildingCodes.10. Unit Cost: Estimatedcostspecificsolutionperoneunit.(Thefinalcostofbarrierremovalmayexceedthisestimatebasedonthe

yearofmitigation,designapproachandchosenmethodofmitigation)11. Ramp Features: Featuresofcurbrampmeasuredtodetermineaccessibility.12. Measurements: Existingcondition/dimensiondeterminedforeachramp. -(in) measurementininches -(%) measurementinpercentagegrade - BOLD textindicatenon-compliantdimensions. -Normal textindicatecompliantdimensions13. Priority: Prioritynumberassignedtospecificbarrierbasedonpriorizationcriteriawhichinclude:expectedfrequencyofuseand severityofthebarrier.Measureedonascaleof0to200,with200beingthehighestpriorityand0beingtheleast.

6542 81 11103 7 129 13

2812 of 4366

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

ADA AmericanswithDisabilitiesActADAAG ADAAccessibilityGuidelinesE EastFig. FigureJOB peronejob(lumpsum)lbs. PoundsLF LinearfootMUTCD ManualonUniformTrafficControlDevicesN NorthNE NortheastNW NorthwestNWn Northwest:NorthsideNWs Northwest:SouthsidePOT PathoftravelPROW PublicRight-of-WayPROWAG PublicRight-of-WayAccesibleGuidelinesQty QuantityREF Reference;Providedinlocationswithover- lappingissue;indicatesnoadditioncost requiredformitigationS SouthSE SoutheastSF SquarefootSW SouthwestTBD TobedeterminedW West

LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS

2813 of 4366

FeATURe: ADA/CBC GUIDeLINeStreet Grade Used for reference in regards to possible exceptionsWidth of Ramp Theclearwidthofcurbrampruns(excludinganyflaredsides),blendedtransitions,and

turningspacesshallbe48inchesminimum.Slope of the Ramp Ramprunsshallhavearunningslopenotsteeperthan1:12(8.3%).X Slope of the Ramp Thecrossslopeofcurbrampsandblendedtransitionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Top Landing Length Landingsshallbeprovidedatthetopsofcurbrampsandblendedtransitions.Thelanding

clearlengthshallbe48inchesminimum.Top Landing Slope Theslopeofthelandinginalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Top Landing X Slope Theslopeofthelandinginalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Bottom Landing Length (ParallelCurbRamp)Aturningspace48inchesminimumby48inchesminimumshallbe

providedatthebottomofthecurbramp.Bottom Landing Slope (ParallelCurbRamp)Theslopeoftheturningspaceinalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)

maximum.Bottom Landing X Slope (ParallelCurbRamp)Theslopeoftheturningspaceinalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)

maximum.Left Flare Whereprovided,curbrampflaresshallnotbesteeperthan1:10(10.0%).Right Flare Whereprovided,curbrampflaresshallnotbesteeperthan1:10(10.0%).Gutter Lip Theadjacentsurfacesattransitionsatcurbrampstowalks,gutters,andstreetsshallbeat

thesamelevel.Gutter Slope Counterslopesofadjoiningguttersandroadsurfacesimmediatelyadjacenttoandwithin

24inchesofthecurbrampshallnotbesteeperthan1:20(5.0%).Gutter X Slope Thecrossslopeofcurbrampsandblendedtransitionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Truncated Domes Curbrampsandblendedtransitionsshallhavedetectablewarnings.Dome Setback Detectablewarningsshallbelocatedsotheedgenearestthecurbis6inchesminimum

and8inchesmaximumfromthelineatthefaceofthecurbmarkingthetransitionbetweenthecurbandthegutter,streetorhighwayorflushatthetransitionforaparalellcurbrampandislandcut-through.

Within Crosswalk Thebottomofcurbrampsshallhaveaclearspace48inchesminimumoutsideactivetrafficlanesoftheroadway

MEASUREMENT BREAKDOWN

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

2814 of 4366

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

COST SUMMARY

2815 of 4366

Cañada College Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps Cost Summary

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: Campus Cir $6,500.00

ID:

Campus Cir $6,500.00and Building 3

$6,500.00Blended Transition415

Street Names: Type:

Total Cost for Street: Lot 1 $23,500.00

ID:

Lot 1 $20,000.00and Building 9

$20,000.00Parallel421

Lot 1 $3,500.00and Lot 1

$3,500.00Blended Transition422

Total Cost for Curb Ramps: $30,000.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

2816 of 4366

September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00

SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report

SURVEY DATA

2817 of 4366

Route

34 W

Route 22 W Route53 W

Route52 W

Route

17 SW

Route

26 E

Route 41 W

Route 40 W

Route 28 W

Route

30 W

Route 18 SW

Route 25 E

Route 27 E / S

Route 65 W

Route 63 E

Rou

te 6

1 S

E

Route 13 SW

Route 59 N

Route 57 W

Route 24 S

W

Route

60

E

Route 58 S

Route 64 S

Route 16 NW

Route 21 SW

Rou

te 3

5 N

E

Route 29 S

Route 62 W / N

Route 9 N

Route 8 NE / SW

Route 12 NW

404

405

413

414

415

421422

B17

B16

B22

Lot 9

Lot 8

B19

B20

B21

Lot 10

B18

B9

B13

B8

B5B6

B2

B1Lot 5

B3

Lot 2

Lot 1

B12

Track

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

0 130 260 390 52065FeetCañada Path of Travel Routes

LegendNodes

Ramps

Curb Ramps Priority100.000000

100.000001 - 111.250000

111.250001 - 118.000000

Path of Travel Route Priority100.000000 - 111.250000

111.250001 - 122.500000

122.500001 - 132.500000

µ

2818 of 4366

Cañada College Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps CAMPUS CIR

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

Campus Cir Building 3Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Slope of flare(s) along curb at perpendicular curb rampexceed(s) 10%.

Left: 11.6% Right: 14.1%

Ramp Flare

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.2.3PROWAG

4.7.5ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

406.3ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1127B.5.3

(in) 48.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.8(%) 0.9

Left Flare 11.6(%)Right Flare 14.1(%)

0.9Top Landing Slope (%)2.1Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

0.0Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

3.3Gutter Slope (%)2.0Gutter XSlope (%)

8.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

413

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.2.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 84.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.1 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

116.5

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:At time of the survey, curb ramp, pedestrian pad, orisland is currently under construction and/or renovation.

Existing Curb Ramp

Ensure compliance with ADAAG 4.1.6 and CBC1134B.2.1.

Under Construction

4.1.6ADAAG

$0.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1134B.2.1

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

414

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:No

VerticalSidewalk Width: 10.0(ft)

Priority

100

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

2819 of 4366

Cañada College Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps CAMPUS CIR

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.

Compliant Curb Ramp

Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.

Blended Transition

$0.00Unit Cost

1.0Bottom Landing Slope (%)2.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

900.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

No X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

415

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

No

Vertical

Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.7 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 20.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Building 3andCampus Cir $6,500.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Campus Cir $6,500.00

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

2820 of 4366

Cañada College Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps LOT 1

Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements

Lot 1 Building 9Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed

TBD

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Clear width of ramp run is less than 48". (ADAAGrequires 36" min)

45.0"

Ramp Width

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.5.1PROWAG

4.7.3ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.2

(in) 45.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 3.7(%) 1.8

Left Flare 10.5(%)Right Flare 0.3(%)

1.9Top Landing Slope (%)3.6Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

0.0Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

2.8Gutter Slope (%)2.0Gutter XSlope (%)

6.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

404

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.2

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 77.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.7 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: (ft)

Priority

111.25

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Cross slope of an existing perpendicular curb rampexceeds 1:48 (2%).

2.5%

Ramp Slope

Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Perpendicular

R304.5.3PROWAG

4.8.6ADAAG

$6500.00Unit Cost

405.3ADA-2010

CBC 2007 1133B.5.3.1

(in) 48.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.1(%) 2.5

Left Flare 7.1(%)Right Flare 14.7(%)

0.6Top Landing Slope (%)2.5Top Landing X Slope (%)

48.0Top Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

0.5Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

5.0Gutter Slope (%)0.3Gutter XSlope (%)

6.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

405

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.5.7

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 73.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.6 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 12.0(ft)

Priority

116

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

2821 of 4366

Cañada College Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps LOT 1

X Slope of the Ramp / Pad

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Running slope of existing parallel curb ramp, where therun is less than 15' in length, is less than 5% or more than8.3%.

Right: 9.8%

Ramp Slope

Demolish existing and provide new parallel curb rampincluding detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Parallel

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.2ADAAG

$7000.00Unit Cost

CBC 2007 1127B.5.3

LEFT RIGHT(in) 72.0 72.0Width of Ramp / Pad

(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 4.1 9.8(%) 0.1 1.2

5.6 9.4Top Landing Slope (%)1.2 0.9Top Landing X Slope (%)

0.3Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.3Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

60.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

0.0Gutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

2.4Gutter Slope (%)1.5Gutter XSlope (%)

6.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

421

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.1

No

Vertical

Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 79.0 76.0

Street Grade (Left / Right) 8.0 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

118

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Building 9andLot 1 $20,000.00

• Proposed Solution:

• As-Built Description:

• As-isMeasurement:

Cross slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.

2.4%

Ramp Landing

Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.

Blended Transition

R304.3.2PROWAG

4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG

$3500.00Unit Cost

0.2Bottom Landing Slope (%)2.4Bottom Landing X Slope (%)

60.0Bottom Landing Length (in)

Within Crosswalk YES

N/AGutter Lip

Dome Setback

(in)

6.0(in)

(y/n)

Truncated Domes YES(y/n)

No

1 X-walk

Stop/Yield Control:

Crosswalks Served:

422

Tee Intersection:

Vertical Curb:

CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2

No

Vertical

Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.2 N/A(%)

Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)

Priority

100

Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Lot 1andLot 1 $3,500.00

Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Lot 1 $23,500.00

$30,000.00Grand Total for Curb Ramps:

September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029

2822 of 4366