SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
DRAFTAccess Compliance Survey Report Appendix J: Curb Ramps SMCCCD - Cañada College
2809 of 4366
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
Table of Contents
I. Cover & Table of Contents
i. Report Navigation and Abbreviations ii. Cost Summary
II. Survey Data - Curb Ramps
2810 of 4366
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
NAVIGATION & LEGEND
2811 of 4366
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
NAVIGATION
1. Locator Number: Correspondstoauniquedatabaserecordtiedtothespecificcurbrampwhichcanbecrossreferencedacrossthisdata-base and its corresponding GIS database.
2. Ramp Type: Identifiesthetypeofcurbramp(parallel,perpendicular,curbramprequired,etc.).3. Specific Item: Categoryofaccessiblefeatureinwhichthebarrierbelongs.4. Survey Street: Surveystreetname.5. Field Condition: Descriptionofas-builtbarrierbasedonapplicableaccessibilitycodes.6. Measurement: Existingcondition/dimensionfeaturedontherampmeasuredasthemostseverebarrierontheparticularramp.7. Proposed Solution: Descriptionofstepsnecessarytoremovebarrierand,ifapplicable,aninterimsolutionornotes.8. Cross Street: Cross/intersectingstreetname.9. Codes / Info: -PROWAG: GuidelinestoenforceFederalaccessibilitystandardsinthepublicrights-of-way. -ADAAG/ADA2010: TheFederalStandardforaccessibilityadoptedbytheDepartmentofJustice. -CBC2007/CBC2016 TheCaliforniaBuildingCodes.10. Unit Cost: Estimatedcostspecificsolutionperoneunit.(Thefinalcostofbarrierremovalmayexceedthisestimatebasedonthe
yearofmitigation,designapproachandchosenmethodofmitigation)11. Ramp Features: Featuresofcurbrampmeasuredtodetermineaccessibility.12. Measurements: Existingcondition/dimensiondeterminedforeachramp. -(in) measurementininches -(%) measurementinpercentagegrade - BOLD textindicatenon-compliantdimensions. -Normal textindicatecompliantdimensions13. Priority: Prioritynumberassignedtospecificbarrierbasedonpriorizationcriteriawhichinclude:expectedfrequencyofuseand severityofthebarrier.Measureedonascaleof0to200,with200beingthehighestpriorityand0beingtheleast.
6542 81 11103 7 129 13
2812 of 4366
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
ADA AmericanswithDisabilitiesActADAAG ADAAccessibilityGuidelinesE EastFig. FigureJOB peronejob(lumpsum)lbs. PoundsLF LinearfootMUTCD ManualonUniformTrafficControlDevicesN NorthNE NortheastNW NorthwestNWn Northwest:NorthsideNWs Northwest:SouthsidePOT PathoftravelPROW PublicRight-of-WayPROWAG PublicRight-of-WayAccesibleGuidelinesQty QuantityREF Reference;Providedinlocationswithover- lappingissue;indicatesnoadditioncost requiredformitigationS SouthSE SoutheastSF SquarefootSW SouthwestTBD TobedeterminedW West
LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS
2813 of 4366
FeATURe: ADA/CBC GUIDeLINeStreet Grade Used for reference in regards to possible exceptionsWidth of Ramp Theclearwidthofcurbrampruns(excludinganyflaredsides),blendedtransitions,and
turningspacesshallbe48inchesminimum.Slope of the Ramp Ramprunsshallhavearunningslopenotsteeperthan1:12(8.3%).X Slope of the Ramp Thecrossslopeofcurbrampsandblendedtransitionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Top Landing Length Landingsshallbeprovidedatthetopsofcurbrampsandblendedtransitions.Thelanding
clearlengthshallbe48inchesminimum.Top Landing Slope Theslopeofthelandinginalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Top Landing X Slope Theslopeofthelandinginalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Bottom Landing Length (ParallelCurbRamp)Aturningspace48inchesminimumby48inchesminimumshallbe
providedatthebottomofthecurbramp.Bottom Landing Slope (ParallelCurbRamp)Theslopeoftheturningspaceinalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)
maximum.Bottom Landing X Slope (ParallelCurbRamp)Theslopeoftheturningspaceinalldirectionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)
maximum.Left Flare Whereprovided,curbrampflaresshallnotbesteeperthan1:10(10.0%).Right Flare Whereprovided,curbrampflaresshallnotbesteeperthan1:10(10.0%).Gutter Lip Theadjacentsurfacesattransitionsatcurbrampstowalks,gutters,andstreetsshallbeat
thesamelevel.Gutter Slope Counterslopesofadjoiningguttersandroadsurfacesimmediatelyadjacenttoandwithin
24inchesofthecurbrampshallnotbesteeperthan1:20(5.0%).Gutter X Slope Thecrossslopeofcurbrampsandblendedtransitionsshallbe1:48(2.0%)maximum.Truncated Domes Curbrampsandblendedtransitionsshallhavedetectablewarnings.Dome Setback Detectablewarningsshallbelocatedsotheedgenearestthecurbis6inchesminimum
and8inchesmaximumfromthelineatthefaceofthecurbmarkingthetransitionbetweenthecurbandthegutter,streetorhighwayorflushatthetransitionforaparalellcurbrampandislandcut-through.
Within Crosswalk Thebottomofcurbrampsshallhaveaclearspace48inchesminimumoutsideactivetrafficlanesoftheroadway
MEASUREMENT BREAKDOWN
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
2814 of 4366
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
COST SUMMARY
2815 of 4366
Cañada College Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps Cost Summary
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: Campus Cir $6,500.00
ID:
Campus Cir $6,500.00and Building 3
$6,500.00Blended Transition415
Street Names: Type:
Total Cost for Street: Lot 1 $23,500.00
ID:
Lot 1 $20,000.00and Building 9
$20,000.00Parallel421
Lot 1 $3,500.00and Lot 1
$3,500.00Blended Transition422
Total Cost for Curb Ramps: $30,000.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
2816 of 4366
September 2020SSA Project # 19029.00
SMCCCD Cañada College - Curb Ramps - ACS Report
SURVEY DATA
2817 of 4366
Route
34 W
Route 22 W Route53 W
Route52 W
Route
17 SW
Route
26 E
Route 41 W
Route 40 W
Route 28 W
Route
30 W
Route 18 SW
Route 25 E
Route 27 E / S
Route 65 W
Route 63 E
Rou
te 6
1 S
E
Route 13 SW
Route 59 N
Route 57 W
Route 24 S
W
Route
60
E
Route 58 S
Route 64 S
Route 16 NW
Route 21 SW
Rou
te 3
5 N
E
Route 29 S
Route 62 W / N
Route 9 N
Route 8 NE / SW
Route 12 NW
404
405
413
414
415
421422
B17
B16
B22
Lot 9
Lot 8
B19
B20
B21
Lot 10
B18
B9
B13
B8
B5B6
B2
B1Lot 5
B3
Lot 2
Lot 1
B12
Track
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
0 130 260 390 52065FeetCañada Path of Travel Routes
LegendNodes
Ramps
Curb Ramps Priority100.000000
100.000001 - 111.250000
111.250001 - 118.000000
Path of Travel Route Priority100.000000 - 111.250000
111.250001 - 122.500000
122.500001 - 132.500000
µ
2818 of 4366
Cañada College Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps CAMPUS CIR
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
Campus Cir Building 3Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Slope of flare(s) along curb at perpendicular curb rampexceed(s) 10%.
Left: 11.6% Right: 14.1%
Ramp Flare
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.2.3PROWAG
4.7.5ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
406.3ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1127B.5.3
(in) 48.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 7.8(%) 0.9
Left Flare 11.6(%)Right Flare 14.1(%)
0.9Top Landing Slope (%)2.1Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
0.0Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
3.3Gutter Slope (%)2.0Gutter XSlope (%)
8.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
413
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.2.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 84.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.1 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
116.5
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:At time of the survey, curb ramp, pedestrian pad, orisland is currently under construction and/or renovation.
Existing Curb Ramp
Ensure compliance with ADAAG 4.1.6 and CBC1134B.2.1.
Under Construction
4.1.6ADAAG
$0.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1134B.2.1
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
414
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:No
VerticalSidewalk Width: 10.0(ft)
Priority
100
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
2819 of 4366
Cañada College Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps CAMPUS CIR
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:Curb ramp, blended transition, island cut-through, islandperpendicular, or pedestrian pad surveyed for thefollowing items are in compliance with the ADA andapplicable building codes.
Compliant Curb Ramp
Provide routine inspection and maintenance to maintainaccessible access route.
Blended Transition
$0.00Unit Cost
1.0Bottom Landing Slope (%)2.0Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
900.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
No X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
415
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
No
Vertical
Street Grade (Left / Right) 1.7 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 20.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Building 3andCampus Cir $6,500.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Campus Cir $6,500.00
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
2820 of 4366
Cañada College Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps LOT 1
Codes / Mitigation InfoExisting Access Barrierand Proposed SolutionRamp TypeID # Measurements
Lot 1 Building 9Cross StreetSurvey StreetYear Completed
TBD
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Clear width of ramp run is less than 48". (ADAAGrequires 36" min)
45.0"
Ramp Width
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.5.1PROWAG
4.7.3ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.2
(in) 45.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 3.7(%) 1.8
Left Flare 10.5(%)Right Flare 0.3(%)
1.9Top Landing Slope (%)3.6Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
0.0Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
2.8Gutter Slope (%)2.0Gutter XSlope (%)
6.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
404
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.2
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 77.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.7 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: (ft)
Priority
111.25
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Cross slope of an existing perpendicular curb rampexceeds 1:48 (2%).
2.5%
Ramp Slope
Demolish existing and provide new, perpendicular curbramp, including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Perpendicular
R304.5.3PROWAG
4.8.6ADAAG
$6500.00Unit Cost
405.3ADA-2010
CBC 2007 1133B.5.3.1
(in) 48.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 6.1(%) 2.5
Left Flare 7.1(%)Right Flare 14.7(%)
0.6Top Landing Slope (%)2.5Top Landing X Slope (%)
48.0Top Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
0.5Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
5.0Gutter Slope (%)0.3Gutter XSlope (%)
6.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
405
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.5.7
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 73.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 0.6 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 12.0(ft)
Priority
116
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
2821 of 4366
Cañada College Access Compliance Survey Report - Curb Ramps LOT 1
X Slope of the Ramp / Pad
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Running slope of existing parallel curb ramp, where therun is less than 15' in length, is less than 5% or more than8.3%.
Right: 9.8%
Ramp Slope
Demolish existing and provide new parallel curb rampincluding detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Parallel
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.2ADAAG
$7000.00Unit Cost
CBC 2007 1127B.5.3
LEFT RIGHT(in) 72.0 72.0Width of Ramp / Pad
(%)Slope of the Ramp / Pad 4.1 9.8(%) 0.1 1.2
5.6 9.4Top Landing Slope (%)1.2 0.9Top Landing X Slope (%)
0.3Bottom Landing Slope (%)0.3Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
60.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
0.0Gutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
2.4Gutter Slope (%)1.5Gutter XSlope (%)
6.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
421
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.1
No
Vertical
Length of Ramp / Pad (in) 79.0 76.0
Street Grade (Left / Right) 8.0 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
118
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Building 9andLot 1 $20,000.00
• Proposed Solution:
• As-Built Description:
• As-isMeasurement:
Cross slope at bottom landing of existing blendedtransition exceeds 2%.
2.4%
Ramp Landing
Demolish existing and provide new, blended transition,including detectable warning surfaces, and top andbottom landings as required.
Blended Transition
R304.3.2PROWAG
4.8.4; 4.8.6ADAAG
$3500.00Unit Cost
0.2Bottom Landing Slope (%)2.4Bottom Landing X Slope (%)
60.0Bottom Landing Length (in)
Within Crosswalk YES
N/AGutter Lip
Dome Setback
(in)
6.0(in)
(y/n)
Truncated Domes YES(y/n)
No
1 X-walk
Stop/Yield Control:
Crosswalks Served:
422
Tee Intersection:
Vertical Curb:
CBC 2016 11B-406.3.2
No
Vertical
Street Grade (Left / Right) 2.2 N/A(%)
Sidewalk Width: 5.0(ft)
Priority
100
Total Costs for Curb Ramps at : Lot 1andLot 1 $3,500.00
Total Costs for Curb Ramps along : Lot 1 $23,500.00
$30,000.00Grand Total for Curb Ramps:
September 2020 Prepared by Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Project # 19029
2822 of 4366