acr technology base: containment library/20031214.pdf · acr technology base: containment by andrew...
TRANSCRIPT
ACR Technology Base:Containment
by Andrew White, Director, Reactor Safety
Presented to US Nuclear Regulatory CommissionOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
September 26, 2002
Pg 2
Introduction
� The containment of a CANDU reactor is designed tomitigate the consequences of an accident
� During an accident the containment building could besubjected to a harsh environment of hot vapor, fissionproducts from failed fuel, and hydrogen released fromoxidation reactions
� Research is performed to ensure that we understand:� The time dependent nature of the environment� The behavior of fission products� Any threats posed by released hydrogen (primarily a concern
for severe accidents)
Pg 3
Containment Performance
� R&D focused on determining behavior of effluent fromthe reactor coolant system in containment
� Experimental:� Large-scale gas mixing facility� Used to study mixing, buoyancy-induced flows, stratification,
condensation, effects of containment partitions� Data used to validate GOTHIC
� Modeling:� GOTHIC, with addition of CANDU-specific models for
hydrogen behavior, used to model containmentthermalhydraulics and hydrogen transport
Pg 4
Large Scale Gas Mixing Facility
• Volume: 1000 m3
(35000 ft3)
• Atmosphere: air,steam and helium
• Internal partitionssimulate sub-compartments
Pg 5
Example of a Gas-Mixing Experiment
GMBT137
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Time (s)
Hel
ium
Con
cent
ratio
n (v
ol%
)
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
Blow er on
Side view
I I
BT injection
C8
C7
C6
C9
C10C11
Helium injection 8.32 g/sbottom inlet
A1 & C6
A3 & C8
A2 & C7
A3
A2
A1
A4
A5
Ceiling I-beams
Plan view
C
A
A4
C9A5
• Steam injectedand formed astratified layer
• Helium injected,breaks throughstratified layer after~200 seconds, andrises
• After 1200seconds, blowerscreate uniform mix
Pg 6
Fission Product Behavior
� In the event of a LOCA, fission products from failed fuelare discharged from the break
� Fission products that remain in the vapor phase aremore subject to release from containment than thosethat partition to water
� Iodine has been a focus because of its relativeabundance, high biological activity and gaseous forms
Pg 7
Iodine Behavior in Containment
� Primary concern is the time dependent concentrationof gaseous iodine
� Released from fuel into containment mainly as CsI,which dissolves as non-volatile iodide in water
� Under the oxidizing and high radiation environmentfollowing an accident, non-volatile iodide would reactand become volatile and partition into the gas phase
Pg 8
Iodine Reactions and Transport
I�, I3�, HOI, IOx�
I(con)
Iaq(ad)
Ig(ad)
I2(aq) RI(aq)
I2(g) RI(g)
Pg 9
Factors affecting Iodine Behavior
� Iodine exists in various chemical states� Post-accident containment is under irradiation and not
in chemical equilibrium� Iodine chemistry is driven by water radiolysis� Many reactions and processes are inter-dependent� Iodine behavior can not be easily scaled from
correlations based on integrated tests� Requires a correct representation of aqueous
chemistry (which can be scaled)
Pg 10
AECL Iodine Program Components
� Intermediate-scale integrated-effects tests in theRadioiodine Test Facility (RTF)
� Supporting bench-scale tests to separate and quantifyindividual effects
� Development and validation of containment iodinebehavior models, LIRIC & IMOD, for safety analysis
� International collaboration� EPRI ACEX� PHEBUS� International Standard Problem code comparison exercise
Pg 11
Radioiodine Test Facility
Pg 12
50 RTF Tests� Type of Vessel Surface
� Stainless Steel (electropolished, untreated)� Organic Coatings on carbon steel or concrete (Vinyl, Epoxy,
Polyurethane)� Inorganic Coatings (zinc primer)
� Radiation on, Radiation off� pH controlled, pH uncontrolled: range 4.5 – 10.5� Temperature
� constant throughout experiment: 25, 60, 90oC (80, 140, 190oF)� steps from 25 to 80oC (80 to 170oF)
� Condensing, Non-condensing� Organic and Inorganic Additives
Pg 13
Bench-Scale R&D Areas
� Aqueous Phase Chemistry� Inorganic Iodine Reactions� Water Radiolysis� Effects of Organic Impurities
� Sources of organic compounds dissolved in water� Radiolytic decomposition of organic impurities� Organic iodide formation & decomposition
� Aqueous-Gas Phase Partitioning of Volatile Species� Iodine – Surface Interaction
Pg 14
Model Development & ValidationLIRIC� A comprehensive mechanistic model, based on our extensive
knowledge of relevant chemical reactions and mass transport� Performs well when tested against bench-scale and RTF tests
carried out over a wide range of conditions� Due to its complexity and size, integration of LIRIC into a safety
analysis code is considered to be impracticalIMOD� Reduced reaction set based on extensive LIRIC analysis and
simulations of various RTF tests� A smaller and simpler model, but maintains many of the
capabilities of LIRIC
Pg 15
LIRIC
Gas PhaseAqueous Phase
Water radiolysis reactions (~40 rxns)
Inorganic iodine reactions (~80 rxns)
Organic reactions
SurfacesDry, wet, submerged(SS, Al, paints,Polymers)
Dissolution
Radiolytic decomposition
Organic iodide behavior
Mass transfer
All volatile species(I2, RI, H2, O2, CO2) Ads Des
Condensate flow
Des
Ads
Pg 16
IMOD
Aqueous Phase Gas Phase
SurfacesDry, wet, submerged(SS, Al, paints,Polymers)
Mass transfer
Volatile Iodines(I2, HVRI, LVRI) Ads Des
Condensate Flow
Des
Ads
NONVOLI(aq) I2(aq)I2(aq) HVRI(aq), LVRI(aq)HVRI(aq), LVRI(aq) NONVOLI(aq)
Dissolution Radiolytic decompositionAcid-Base Equilibria
Total 16 reactions
Pg 17
IMOD Simulation of an RTF Test(organic addition in a stainless steel vessel)
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
9.5
10
10.5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Time (h)
pH
Experimental Data
IMOD-2.0
Slow MIBK Addition Fast (5X) MIBK AdditionpH
ControlpH
ControlpH
Control
Pg 18
IMOD Simulation of an RTF Test(organic addition in a stainless steel vessel)
0.E+00
1.E-06
2.E-06
3.E-06
4.E-06
5.E-06
6.E-06
7.E-06
8.E-06
9.E-06
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (h)
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
ol/d
m3 )
Experimental DataIMOD-2.0
Total Aqueous Iodine
Pg 19
IMOD Simulation of an RTF Test(organic addition in a stainless steel vessel)
0
1E-10
2E-10
3E-10
4E-10
5E-10
6E-10
7E-10
8E-10
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (h)
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
ol/d
m3 )
Experimental DataIMOD-2.0
Total Gaseous Iodine
Pg 20
International Collaboration� EPRI ACE (Advanced Containment Experiments) & ACEX
� RTF tests, critical review of the current understanding of iodinechemistry and model developmental work were performed insupport of ACE & ACEX (extension) projects
� PHEBUS-FP� RTF & Bench Scale experiments investigating LWR severe accident
phenomena� International Standard Problem (ISP) 41 and 41F Phase 1 & 2
� Iodine code comparison exercises endorsed by NEA (NuclearEnergy Agency) CSNI (Committee on the Safety of NuclearInstallations)
� AECL has lead the very successful exercises� AECL’s iodine codes, LIRIC and IMOD are participating
Pg 21
AECL Iodine Program Status
� We have a good understanding of iodine behavior incontainment
� Models have been developed and shown to predictiodine behavior well
Pg 22
Hydrogen Behavior In ContainmentSources of Hydrogen� Short-term: reactions between hot fuel and RCS
components and steam� Long-term: water/steam radiolysis and metal
corrosion in containmentAreas of Investigation� Transition from deflagration to detonation (DDT)� Effects of deflagration and standing flames on
containment structures� Development and evaluation of Passive Auto-catalytic
Recombiners
Pg 23
Results of Hydrogen R&D
� Acquired fundamental understanding of key combustionphenomena:� the mechanisms for flame acceleration and transition to detonation� the dynamics of flame jet ignition� the mechanisms and dynamics of standing flames� the mechanisms and dynamics of vented combustion
� Developed computer models for implementation in GOTHICto predict gas distribution and combustion pressure
� Program based on a variety of facilities
Pg 24
Containment Test Facility (CTF)
• 6-m3 (200 ft3)sphere and a 10- m3
(350 ft3) cylinder
• pressures up to10MPa (1500 psi)
• temperatures up to150oC (300oF)
• vessels may beinter-connected by 30cm (12 in) and 50 cm(20 in) diameter ducts
Pg 25
Diffusion Flame Facility (DFF)
• silo: 5 m (16 ft) indiameter and 8 m (26 ft)high
• Tests with H2 / steamjet flames (up to 15 cm(6 in) diameter) in air /steam atmosphere (upto 30% steam byvolume)
Pg 26
Large Scale Vented Combustion Facility
• rectangular enclosurewith an internal volume of120 m3 (4200 ft3)
• electrically trace-heatedand insulated to maintaintemperatures in excess of100oC (212oF)
•can be subdivided into 2or 3 compartments
Pg 27
Combustion Codes
GOTHIC� Used to calculate hydrogen distribution inside
containment and the combustion pressure in the eventof an ignition
DDTINDEX� Used to calculate a set of criteria for assessing the
possibility of supersonic flames via flame accelerationand subsequent transition to detonation
Pg 28
• Hydrogendistribution incontainmentduring a largeLOCA (headerbreak)
GOTHIC Example
Pg 29
DDTINDEX Outputs
Pg 30
Passive Autocatalytic Recombiners
• recombine hydrogen withoxygen in a controlledfashion
• based on AECL’s wet-proofed catalyst technologydeveloped for heavy waterproduction
• have been qualified withtests in the large-scalevented combustion facility
Pg 31
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
mixing fans onat 70 minutes
Test #: RQT006
mixing fans offat 10.5 minutes
Initial Conditions: 1.4% H2, 100% R.H., T=14oC, P=98.4 kPa
G1: Inlet G2: Outlet G3: Floor G4: Top Corner G4: Front
Hyd
roge
n C
once
ntra
tion
(vol
%)
Time (min)
AECL PAR - Self-Start Test
Pg 32
Summary
� Research programs into areas relevant to containmentare mature and widely-recognized
� Models and computer programs have been developedand validated for CANDU safety, licensing and design
� Only work required to support ACR is minoranticipatory R&D (e.g., qualification of passiverecombiners for ACR conditions)
Pg 33